[go: up one dir, main page]

WO2000058805A2 - Procede, appareil et systeme de calcul et de comparaison de couts d'energie - Google Patents

Procede, appareil et systeme de calcul et de comparaison de couts d'energie Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2000058805A2
WO2000058805A2 PCT/US2000/005516 US0005516W WO0058805A2 WO 2000058805 A2 WO2000058805 A2 WO 2000058805A2 US 0005516 W US0005516 W US 0005516W WO 0058805 A2 WO0058805 A2 WO 0058805A2
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
user
energy
information
supplier
suppliers
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2000/005516
Other languages
English (en)
Other versions
WO2000058805A3 (fr
Inventor
Andrew B. Blake
Martin Flusberg
Robert E. Frieden
Gennady Gorbovitsky
Nelson A. Rooker
Original Assignee
Nexus Energy Software, Inc.
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Nexus Energy Software, Inc. filed Critical Nexus Energy Software, Inc.
Priority to AU37187/00A priority Critical patent/AU3718700A/en
Publication of WO2000058805A2 publication Critical patent/WO2000058805A2/fr
Publication of WO2000058805A3 publication Critical patent/WO2000058805A3/fr

Links

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00—Commerce
    • G06Q30/06—Buying, selling or leasing transactions
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F2219/00—Indexing scheme relating to application aspects of data processing equipment or methods
    • G06F2219/10—Environmental application, e.g. waste reduction, pollution control, compliance with environmental legislation

Definitions

  • the invention relates generally to a method, apparatus and system for calculating and comparing energy costs. More particularly, the method and system provides users with a way to compare various energy suppliers based on a comparative cost and environmental analysis.
  • the actual utility company 10 may still be under regulation, the actual energy commodity, such as electricity or gas, has become deregulated.
  • the utility company 10 which once provided, e.g. the electricity or gas, may not be able to actually sell the product, e.g. electricity or gas.
  • the selling of the commodity, such as electricity and gas, in deregulated states is now handled by energy suppliers 30.
  • suppliers will be non-regulated companies selling, but not distributing, the electric and gas commodity in specific states 32, 34.
  • Each supplier may have a variety of products 36, 38 to offer an energy consumer such as an individual, family or business.
  • supplier may vary in usage on a state by state basis but as used herein, the term will refer to any non-regulated entity which engages in the selling of utility services and commodities.
  • a certain supplier 14 may actually be an affiliate of a utility 10 which distributes the energy commodity.
  • supplyier will refer to both independent and affiliated energy suppliers, so long as the supplier is involved in the sale of the energy commodity
  • the electric industry can typically be broken down into four basic components: (1) generation, e.g. the power plants that create the electricity that is transported to homes and facilities; (2) transmission, e.g. the wires and associated facilities that transport the electricity (at high voltage levels) from power plants to distribution substations; (3) distribution, e.g. the wires and associated facilities that transport the electricity from distribution substations to customers' facilities and homes; and (4) customer services, which covers services such as metering and billing.
  • generation e.g. the power plants that create the electricity that is transported to homes and facilities
  • transmission e.g. the wires and associated facilities that transport the electricity (at high voltage levels) from power plants to distribution substations
  • distribution e.g. the wires and associated facilities that transport the electricity from distribution substations to customers' facilities and homes
  • customer services which covers services such as metering and billing.
  • these components were bundled and provided as monopoly services by electric companies, at prices fully regulated by the state.
  • Standard Offer Service is a transition generation service that will be available to customers of record of each Distribution Company.
  • Default Service is the generation service that is provided by Distribution Companies to those customers who are not receiving either competitive generation or Standard Offer Service.
  • Rate-related deregulation terminology may vary from state to state.
  • the utilities' "offer” for electricity is called the "standard offer”; which is essentially the same as their generation charge.
  • the utility offers a "shopping credit", which is their generation charge.
  • a customer that is connected to a Distribution Company's system will receive electric service, regardless of the option under which the customer is receiving generation service.
  • the price that the customer pays for generation service is dependent on the type of service the customer is receiving which is, in turn, determined by the supplier the customer has selected to provide the service or electric commodity.
  • Residential rates may also broken into a variety of classes. Virtually all utilities have low income rates with varying qualification levels. Many also have special rates for customers who use the utility's fuel for heating. In the case of gas, the default rate usually assumes gas heat, and the special rate applies to non-gas heat. These special classes will also usually come in regular and low income flavors. Thus, in the current state of deregulation, the energy consumer is faced with a startling array of supplier choices as well as complicated systems of service pricings. Accordingly, it would be desirable to have a means to aid consumers and businesses in comparing their now many energy choices and suppliers so that they can make an informed decision when choosing a supplier.
  • the present invention is directed to a method, apparatus and system for comparing energy costs and environmental savings of a plurality of energy suppliers' products.
  • the invention obtains user enter information relating to the user's location and estimated energy consumption. This information may be inputted by the user or provided directly by the user's current energy supplier.
  • the location and energy consumption information is received and processed to select available energy suppliers depending on the user's location.
  • An energy offer is calculated for each available energy supplier products based on the user's estimated or actual past energy consumption.
  • a selection of energy suppliers and the suppliers respective offers by product is displayed for the user.
  • the user is provided with the option of preparing a cost analysis of energy suppliers' products the user selects.
  • a comparative cost analysis of the selected energy suppliers's products selected by the user is displayed for the user.
  • the user may register for a selected utility through the system.
  • the system provides cost estimates while accounting for varying rate structures and tiers of each supplier's energy product.
  • the cost information may be provided in terms of a generation rate charged by the selected energy product and in terms of a total monthly cost which includes the distribution rate charged by the local utility distribution company.
  • the user may view information comparing the cost savings of selecting a new energy supplier relative to the costs of maintaining the standard utility-provided energy service.
  • FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a typical energy utility and supplier hierarchy.
  • FIG. 2 illustrates an exemplary computer system and network for use with the teachings of the present invention.
  • FIG. 3 is an exemplary display screen for entering location and energy usage information.
  • FIG. 4 is an exemplary code routine for use with the teachings of the present invention.
  • FIG. 5 illustrates an exemplary display screen showing various energy suppliers and their respective energy offers.
  • FIG. 6 illustrates an exemplary display screen showing a comparative cost analysis of the selected suppliers.
  • FIG. 7 illustrates an exemplary display screen showing the detailed offer selection and information screen.
  • FIG. 8 illustrates an exemplary display screen showing environmental savings and impact information.
  • FIG. 9 illustrates an exemplary display screen showing an exemplary sign-up screen for a selected energy supplier.
  • the method, apparatus and system of the present invention may be implemented on a local, remote, networked and/or distributed system as will now be described by reference to FIG. 2.
  • a remote user may access the method, apparatus and system of the present invention on a stand-alone or a remote computer 64, network or the Internet 66.
  • the term "internet” generally refers to any collection of distinct networks working together to appear as a single network to a remote user.
  • the term "Internet” refers to the so-called world wide “network of networks” that are connected to each other using the Internet protocol (IP) and other similar protocols.
  • IP Internet protocol
  • the Internet provides file transfer, remote log in, electronic mail, news and other services.
  • the remote user may connect via the remote computer 64 to the Internet 66 in a variety of manners known in the art.
  • a common method of making such a connection involves allowing the remote computer 64 to communicate with an Internet Service Provider ("ISP") 68 over telephone lines using a modem or a higher speed device called a cable-modem which may be provided from a local cable company.
  • ISP Internet Service Provider
  • the remote user then accesses services available on the Internet 66 through centralized communication facilities.
  • the user may also be "hard-wired" to the Internet through a computer 70 which is connected via a Local Area Network (LAN) 72 using any number of connections such as a TI, T3 and ISDN line 74.
  • LAN Local Area Network
  • Resources that may be addressed over the Internet 66 include Hypertext Markup Language (“HTML”), Dynamic HTML (“DHTML”), Java, Javascript and Visual Basic script (“VBscript”) files.
  • HTML Hypertext Markup Language
  • DHTML Dynamic HTML
  • Java Javascript
  • VBscript Visual Basic script
  • the present invention is not limited to development in the languages listed herein and any language or development tool may be used herein to define the various components of a World Wide Web page which may incorporate the teachings of the present invention.
  • World Wide Web pages often include text and graphics as well as "links" which allow a viewer of the page to address other resources on the Internet including other HTML pages.
  • These pages may also communicate with databases, as is known in the art. For example, database query commands from these pages may be in Structured Query Language (SQL) or Active-X calls from the pages.
  • SQL Structured Query Language
  • Active-X calls from the pages.
  • the exemplary computers and networks shown of FIG. 2 are for descriptive purposes only. Although the description may refer to terms commonly used in describing particular public networks such as the Internet, the description and concepts equally apply to other public and private computer networks, including systems having architectures dissimilar to that shown in FIG. 2. For example and without limitation thereto, the system of the present invention can find application in public as well as private networks.
  • FIGS. 3 to 8 are exemplary screens provided to a user in the present invention to obtain user information from users of the system.
  • the screens shown may be displayed in a standard personal computer application format, in a browser format and/or other similar interface.
  • the system prompts the user to enter some personal information such as location and estimates on the user's energy usage. Using this information, the system provides the user with a selection of energy suppliers in that user's area.
  • the user may be given comparative cost information so that a detailed economic cost analysis can be viewed for competing energy suppliers. These values may be give as a relative cost in relation to the Standard Offer available in the user's geographical location.
  • the user may then make a selection as to an energy supplier based on the cost information given. Registration with the selected energy supplier may be accomplished through the system.
  • the present invention may contain many discrete steps. Each of these steps may be manifested to a remote user as a single web page which presents the user with options to move to another web page or to cause some appropriate action to occur as described herein. It will be appreciated by a person of ordinary skill in the art that the method described may be presented to a remote user in other formats without departing from the spirit of the invention described herein. A more detailed discussion of the system now follows, wherein exemplary display screens, equations, algorithms and code are provided.
  • the user is prompted to enter or provide some basic user location information, such as a zip code 104 in a selection screen 100.
  • some basic user location information such as a zip code 104 in a selection screen 100.
  • the two letter state abbreviation, county name and/or city name of the user may be provided.
  • the user also may provide some energy usage information in input areas 108, 112, such as a cost from the user's monthly electricity bill or an estimated cost per month.
  • the user may be prompted to enter the actual kilowatt hours used per month which may be derived from an actual utility bill the user has received.
  • the monthly and yearly value provided and referenced herein should not be construed to limit the scope of the invention in any way.
  • time periods have merely been selected for convenience and clarity and it is contemplated that any predetermined time frame, such as, for example, hourly, quarterly, bi-weekly or yearly time periods may be used.
  • the user may also enter actual energy figures or energy estimates from one to twelve monthly estimates of energy usage. It is contemplated, that more or less data points may be used, such as energy estimates on an hourly basis, but ideally the user will provide at least one month, and preferably 6 to 12 months of estimates. If the utility and energy supplier do not have summer and winter rates, then the usage amounts actually entered are averaged to create an average month. If either the utility or energy supplier have different winter and summer months, then the correct rate is applied to each month.
  • the estimated usage for the missing months is calculated based upon the average monthly usage during that time period for which data is available.
  • the estimated usage for the missing time frame may be determined using factors which impact the actual usage such as weather and other seasonal-based factors, and information on what appliances and devices the user has in the home, obtained either by asking such questions or using regional defaults.
  • the user's energy consumption information may be entirely replaced or supplemented by information received from the user's current energy provider/supplier.
  • the system herein may be electronically linked to information which may reside on a database at the user's current energy supplier's location. This information may be downloaded or retrieved to provide the appropriate inputs to the system. Once this information has been provided to the system, either by the system itself of through the user input, the user may then select to see comparative supplier product offerings, for example, by selecting the "Find Offers" button 116 or other similar prompt.
  • selecting the 'Find Offers" button 116 will display for the user a table 120 similar to the one illustrated in FIG 4.
  • An exemplary embodiment of the display is in tabular form which includes columns designated with headings such as "Supplier/Offer" 122;
  • the minimum term will be expressed in number of months, but may be in weeks, quarters or years.
  • additional information may be provided in the display such as whether the supplier is environmentally “friendly” or “green” 128 and other additional comments 130 such as sources of power, for example, wind or water.
  • the present invention may access a database of rates of utilities and energy suppliers in the target state.
  • the user's utility is identified either by use of location identifying database, such as a state, county and/or zip code database, or simply by asking the user to select their utility from a list of utilities in their state.
  • the list of utilities may be provided to the user in a simple list, pull-down menu or similar selection screen as is known in the art.
  • the present invention employs a rates database which has been created for each utility in the target, deregulated states.
  • the rates database covers all the rate types and structures identified above and is available from public sources. For a given utility, there could be more than one rate structure, reflecting, for example, consumers with different types of heating fuels.
  • the rates database is update yearly to reflect any rate changes or modifications.
  • a rates database has also been created for each energy product offered by each energy supplier licensed to offer service in the state. This part of the database is complied from private sources, and could be updated as frequently as weekly.
  • a supplier may have multiple products, and may offer a particular product in one, a few, or all of the utility service territories in the state, or perhaps in a specific city or town. Rates may vary in different geographic areas.
  • the method, apparatus and system of the present invention identifies whether a particular product is available for a user, based on that user's location and utility. It then selects the correct rate for each available product. The correct rate could also be based on other user characteristics, such as fuel type.
  • UDC rates can be broken into a Customer charge (or fixed monthly), Distribution charge (per kiloWatt-hour "kWh” or therm) and a Generation charge (per kWh or therm) for each rate class.
  • the distribution component is called a delivery charge and the generation charge is called a gas charge.
  • the distribution and generation components of the charge may be tiered. Typically, there may be up to 2 tiers and 3 rates per both the distribution and generation components.
  • UDC's may have a summer and winter rate schedule, where any or all of the above rate components can vary by season.
  • summer is the months of May-October and winter is the months of November- April, but this convention may vary among different UDC's.
  • suppliers have rate components such as a fixed monthly rate and a Generation charge per unit.
  • the fixed monthly rate is basically equivalent to a customer charge. Similar to the generation charge for UDC, the supplier generation rate component can be tiered.
  • a supplier may offer a fixed monthly generation charge for a fixed amount of energy. Special discounts and offers may also apply as discussed in more detail later herein.
  • the present invention utilizes a number of algorithms to calculate, for example, the estimated monthly costs and cost savings associated with specific suppliers. As shown below, the calculations are shown as to compare the costs of electricity suppliers, but the basic structure of the equations and algorithms support the comparison of other types of energy suppliers as well, such as gas.
  • the system accepts the following inputs: 1. The approximate energy usage of the consumer; 2. The distribution rate structure of the consumer's (electric or gas) utility; 3. The generation rate offered by the utility if the consumer were not to select an alternative supplier; and 4. The generation rate of the various suppliers that are available for that consumer.
  • the outputs of the system are as follows: 1 An estimate of the monthly generation cost of the supplier options; 2. An estimate of the monthly generation cost were the consumer to decide to stay with the utility; 3. The monthly savings (or added cost) of selecting a particular energy supplier; 4. The first year savings (or added cost) of selecting a particular energy supplier, taking into account any special offers or rebated made by the energy supplier for that product (e.g. first or 12 th month free) of by a government entity (e.g. some energy products that rely on renewable energy may be eligible for a rebate in some states); 5. The total monthly energy cost, including both the cost of generation and the utility's cost of distribution; and 6.
  • the total energy cost for the first 12 months including both the cost of generation and the utility's cost of distribution.
  • their total cost is the sum of their utility cost (which now excludes the generation portion) and their supplier cost.
  • the system accepts the following five basic rate elements or variations: 1. A variable rate per unit of energy consumed; 2. A fixed rate per month plus variable rate per unit of energy consumed; 3. A tiered rate which varies depending upon the level of energy used in the month. For example, the rate might be x cents per kilowatt hour up to a kilowatt hours per month, and then y cents per kilowatt hours for levels above that.
  • the algorithm supports up to 3 tiers per rate but may be configured to accept more than three tiers as industry practices change.
  • a tiered rate structure can include a fixed component as part of the entire rate structure; 4. A fixed amount per month, covering (up to) a fixed amount of energy delivered; 5.
  • Selecting "Find Offers" 116 from the selection screen shown in FIG. 3 results in a number of calculations performed using the equations and algorithms provided below, wherein a Usage for a Year (Usage yr ), Average Monthly Usage (Usage avg ), Average Variable Distribution Rate (AVDR), Average Generation Rate (AVGR) and Average Monthly Generation Cost (AMGC) values are computed.
  • Fuel-Units customary measurements of the fuel (.e.g. "gallons" for fuel oil).
  • Equation 1 calculates a yearly energy usage as a sum of the monthly energy usage. The calculation is in the appropriate units of the fuel (e.g. Therms for natural gas). Equation 2 divides the result from equation 1 by 12 to give an average monthly energy usage. Equation 3: Average Variable Distribution Rate (AVDR)
  • AVDR ⁇ _TM- H 2 ⁇ er-l N (DistRate mon, tier *
  • Fuel-Units customary measurements of the fuel (.e.g. "gallons" for fuel oil).
  • tier DistRate Tier ( 1 to N; where "N" is the number of tiers in the utility distribution rate schedule)
  • DistTop t Highest level of Distribution rate tier level "t" (in Fuel-Units)
  • Equation 3 may be developed as follows:
  • AVDR ( (DistRate mon, tierl * Usage m on, tierl) + (DistRate m0 n, t ⁇ er2 * Usage mon, t ⁇ er2)
  • Equation 3 calculates the Average Variable Distribution Rate (AVDR).
  • the AVDR is a double-summation divided by the yearly energy usage. The inner sum of the double summation adds up the contributions by rate tier while the outer summation adds these results over the 12 months of a year.
  • Equation 3 A shows that AVDR is the ratio of Expense to Usage.
  • expense is in dollars, allocated to Variable Distribution and Usage is in Energy Units customary for the fuel (e.; kWh for electricity). Since usage varies with weather over the year, and rates may also have seasonal variation, the expense is expanded in equation 3B by showing the expense as monthly amounts that must be summed up before the ratio is taken.
  • Equation 3C shows that Expense in any month is composed of the product of the Usage in that month and the Rate in that month (the rate is the rate attributable to Variable Distribution). Substituting this expanded Expense term into equation 3B gives equation 3D. Typically, there are multiple rates, each for a different level of usage.
  • tiers where the first rate tier is applied to the first usage up to a limit, the second tier rate is applied to usage above the first limit and below the second limit, etc.
  • a 2-tier electric rate may charge $0.10 per kWh for the first 1000 kWh in a month, and S0.08 for each kWh over 1000 in a month.
  • Equation 3E This multiple-tier rate calculation is shown in equation 3E as usage in each tier is multiplied by the rate for the tier. This is done month-by-month and summed. As before, the expense sum is divided by the year's Usage. Equation 3F shows the same calculation as equation 3E, but as a double-sum by month of a sum by tier.
  • the Usage within a tier is the excess of the Usage in the month over the Bottom level of the tier. This is expressed in equation 3G. But if the Usage for the month could be below the bottom level of a tier and equation 3G might yield a negative result. This is cured in the more sophisticated equation 3H which uses the "Max" function to ensure that the Usage in a tier cannot be less than zero.
  • the usage calculated in equation 3H might be larger than the full range of the tier.
  • This excessive usage figure is cured in equation 31 which uses the "Min" function to ensure that the Usage within a tier does not exceed the range between the Top and Bottom of the tier.
  • Fuel-Units customary measurements of the fuel (.e.g. "gallons" for fuel oil).
  • tier GenRate Tier ( 1 to N; where "N" is the number of tiers in the utility
  • GenTop t Highest level of Generation rate tier level "t" (in Fuel-Units) (GenTopn
  • Equation 4 is built in the same manner as described above with relation to equation 3.
  • Equation 4 differs only in that it makes explicit that there may be different rates and tiers for
  • Equation 5 Average Monthly Distribution Cost (AMDC)
  • Equation 6 Average Monthly Generation Cost (AMGC)
  • AVGC gfr + AVGR * Usage Av g
  • gfc fixed generation charge
  • gfa amount of energy delivered for the fixed charge
  • Equations 5 and 6 apply the average rates to average usage to compute average monthly costs, taking into account fixed cost components.
  • Equation 6 A is a variation of Equation 6 where an energy product has a fixed cost for a fixed amount of fuel, rather than a fixed cost plus a variable rate.
  • the generation charge can be generated by the following code shown in FIG. 5. As shown in FIG. 5, the generation charge is developed by first sending a query to determine which supplier offers the user's location information, e.g. in this case, zipcode, is eligible for. From this, an early charge is generated, based on factors such as 12 months of costs, applicable rebates, free months and special offers. Most of this information may drawn from two database tables which, in this exemplary embodiment, are called Eoffers and RateRange.
  • the generation charge can be structured in one of four ways, e.g. Fixed (X charge for Y kWh), Tiered (X charge for first tier of Y kWh, Z charge for second tier of Y kWh, etc.), Indexed (X charge for Y kWh, then Z charge for anything above Y kWh) or "piggy back" (additional kWh rate that sits on a regular fixed rate).
  • Fixed X charge for Y kWh
  • Tiered X charge for first tier of Y kWh
  • Z charge for second tier of Y kWh etc.
  • Indexed X charge for Y kWh, then Z charge for anything above Y kWh
  • "piggy back" additional kWh rate that sits on a regular fixed rate
  • Equation 9 takes into account fixed cost components (dfc and gfc) if any, as well as the matching fixed fuel amounts associated with these (dfa and fga) if any. If there is no fixed component, then these terms are set to zero and the equation will still calculate properly.
  • Equation 7 Determining Average Seasonal or Monthly Usage When User Provides Cost Rather Than Usage Estimate
  • DistTier DistRate Tier ( 1 to N; where "N” is the number of tiers in the utility distribution rate schedule) These tier amounts are net of any fuel included in the fixed portion of charge (dfa) if any.
  • gtC on fixed generation charge of current generation supplying utility in the given month (if any)
  • glSmon fixed energy amount delivered for the fixed generation charge by the current generating supplier in the given month (if any)
  • tCmon fixed distribution charge of local utility in the given month (if any)
  • dfa on fixed energy amount delivered for the fixed distribution charge in the given month (if any)
  • Equation 7 needs to be solved for the Usage m o n term, but this is quite not practical in closed form because of the non-linearity (discontinuities) introduced by the price tiers. This is not a problem for a computer as it can use one of many algorithms to find a Usage figure which will result in the UserEstimate of cost.
  • the methods can use the equation in a forward manner to test various Usage values to see if they generate the desired UserEstimate (or a value that is close enough). This trial-and-error process can be as simple as a count from zero upward until the desired UserEstimate is matched or more sophisticated search algorithms, such as a binary search.
  • the monthly energy usage amounts are combined to form a yearly estimated Usage, and then an average monthly usage.
  • seasonal information is used to improve the average. For example, in the simplest case, if the user gives one winter and one summer month, these can be used 6 times each. However, if the user gives 1 winter and 2 summer months, they would not be given equal weight, but the two summer values would be averaged to arrive at a summer value and the single winter value would be used to represent the entire winter. These would then be expanded into 6 summer and 6 winter months to arrive at a yearly Usage.
  • the usage is calculated as (100-5)/.11 or 863 kWh. If the rate is a tiered rate, the calculation is as follows. For a rate of $5 plus 8 cents for the first 500 kWh and 10 cents thereafter, plus 3 cents per kWh for generation, the calculation must first determine if the amount entered by the user could have been reached with usage at or below the first tier. If the user enters both of the summer and winter cost estimates and the user's utility does offer different summer and winter rates, the calculation noted above is made separately for each time period, and then averaged.
  • the summer and winter rates are averaged, and then applied against the cost estimate as above.
  • the user may elect to select a energy supplier simply based on the information provided or the user may select to see a more detailed cost analysis of certain providers.
  • Certain providers may be "checked-off ' or selected, such as shown in the "Inc.” or "Include” column 132.
  • the system will default to having all suppliers included in the cost analysis.
  • the user may then select the cost analysis by clicking the "cost analysis" 134 button or other similar prompt.
  • the user may also have the option of seeing a detailed comparison 136 information of certain suppliers as discussed in more detail later herein.
  • the user is displayed a table similar to the one shown in FIG. 6.
  • the table lists the suppliers' products by "Supplier/Offer Name” 152; "Monthly Generation/Supplier Charge” 154; Monthly Total Electric Bill” 156; "Estimated Monthly Savings” 158; "1 st year Generation/Supplier Charge” 160; l sl Year Total Electric Bill” 162 and “1 st year Savings” 164, all of which may be appropriately abbreviated as shown in FIG. 6.
  • the monthly savings and 1 st year savings information are based on a reference value of the Standard Offer as discussed earlier herein.
  • the term "savings” as used herein may either in the form of an actual savings to the user or a cost to the consumer based on a reference value, which is typically the cost of staying with the standard UDC or standard offer.
  • a reference value typically the cost of staying with the standard UDC or standard offer.
  • the Southern California Edison Standard Offer 166 for a month is $13.55 (reference numeral 168) while Commonwealth Energy Corporation's (CEC) 170 monthly charge is $12.90 (reference numeral 172) and Green Mountain Energy Resources Wind of the Future's (GMER) 174 charge is $24.93 (reference numeral 176).
  • CEC 170 offers a monthly savings of $.65 (reference numeral 178) and GMER 174 offers a monthly savings of negative $11.36 (reference numeral 180), as indicated by the number in parentheses.
  • the monthly and yearly cost savings may be calculated by the following equations.
  • Equation 8 Monthly Cost Savings (MS)
  • MSsj (AVGCu - AVGCsj )
  • MSsj Monthly savings for supplier "s", offer "j"
  • AVGCu average monthly generation cost for the local utility
  • Equations 7 and 8 determine monthly and annual savings of selecting a particular energy supply option over the "default" or “standard” utility service, building off the earlier equations.
  • the annual savings take into account any special discounts or rebates.
  • the system may be configured to provide cost savings information based on a user selected comparison of competing suppliers rather than based on the Standard Offer.
  • the user is displayed a screen similar to the screen 190 shown in FIG. 7.
  • the selected suppliers are shown in a scroll down type window or menu 192.
  • the user may select from the window to see more detailed information on the desire supplier. For example, as shown, the "PG&E Energy Service Corporation" is selected and the user is provided information such as the "Rate” 194, "Sources” 196 and “Minimum Term” 198 required by the supplier. Any additional information may be supplied such as whether the supplier has a switching fee and whether any product bundling is available.
  • the user may undertake to view more detailed information on any number of suppliers the user desires.
  • environmental savings information in a further screen 200, as shown in FIG. 8 may be provided to the user such as the savings related to changing a supplier and implementing energy savings measures and actual environmental savings, such as the amount of emission types reduced.
  • Equation 10 provides a way to estimate an average marginal rate for the purposes of calculating the impact of energy savings measures.
  • energy savings measures may include any activity, device or task which results in energy savings to the user.
  • an energy savings measure may be something as simple as lowering the thermostat a few degrees to something more involved like replacing all lighting in a house with energy efficient bulbs.
  • the marginal rate calculations ignore the fixed component of the rate structure and take into account the tier levels. This is accomplished in effect by determining what the average variable rate would be if the usage was 10% lower in each time period.
  • Equation 11 Combined Savings Of Changing Supplier and Implementing Energy Savings Measures (ACSM)
  • ACSM ACS + ⁇ f ⁇ m MSRfj * Sav m )
  • MSR fj the marginal savings rate associated with fuel "f ' for supplier "j"
  • Equation 11 provides a way to calculate the combined effect of selecting a particular energy supply option and performing some energy savings actions.
  • Equation 12 Environmental Savings (ES)
  • Emission types include CO2, N0 2 and SO x
  • Equation 12 provides a way to calculate the environmental impact of selecting a particular energy supply option and performing some energy savings actions.
  • an exemplary display screen 200 is shown wherein the user may view information, such as calculated in equation 12.
  • the user may be provided with information related to the amount of emission types 202 saved as well as actual economic savings 204 by selecting a specific supplier.
  • the user may also have the option of selecting additional energy savings measures 206 such as "Lower the thermostat setting" and "Replace your refrigerator” and their impact on both cost and emissions.
  • the user may optionally elect to sign-up for a certain supplier product or service type through the system.
  • the user will use considerations such as cost and environmental impact with which to select an energy supplier product.
  • the user through a button, prompt or other similar means may be provided with the choice to sign-up on the system. If this option is chosen by the user, the user will be provided with a display 210 as shown in FIG. 9.
  • the user may enter personal information such as name, address, phone and current utility 212 which may then be transmitted or provided to the selected supplier in order to properly register the user for the desired service.
  • the present invention as shown and described herein is well adapted to be utilized on a personal computer on which the present invention may be implemented locally or accessed remotely.
  • the term computer or computer system refers to a machine having a central processing unit (CPU), which may be provided, for example, as a conventional microprocessor, a random access memory (RAM) for temporary storage of information, and a read only memory (ROM) for permanent storage of information.
  • Computer system also includes a display , and an audio system. Each of the aforementioned components are coupled to a bus. Operation of computer system is generally controlled and coordinated by operating system software. The operating system controls allocation of system resources and performs tasks such as processing, scheduling, memory management, networking, and I/O services, among things.
  • an operating system resident in system memory and executed by CPU coordinates the operation of the other elements of computer system.
  • Data and software may be provided to and extracted from computer system via removable storage media such as a diskette, tape and CD ROM .
  • data values generated may be stored on storage media. The data values may then be retrieved from the media by CPU and utilized by CPU to perform the processing steps described herein. Alternatively, CPU may simply store such data values in ROM.
  • User input to computer system may be provided by a number of devices. For example, a keyboard and a mouse are coupled to bus by a controller.
  • Computer system may also include a communications adapter which allows the system to be interconnected to a local area network (LAN) or a wide area network (WAN), through an adapter, bus or network card
  • LAN local area network
  • WAN wide area network
  • data and computer program software can be transferred to and from computer system via the adapter, bus and network.
  • aspects of this invention pertain to specific "methods” and "method functions" implementable on computer systems.
  • computer code defining these functions can be delivered to a computer in many forms; including, but not limited to: (a) information permanently stored on non-writable storage media (e.g., read only memory devices within a computer or CD-ROM disks readable by a computer I/O attachment); (b) information alterably stored on writable storage media (e.g., floppy disks and hard drives); or (c) information conveyed to a computer through communication media such as telephone networks. It should be understood, therefore, that such media, when carrying such information, represent alternate embodiments of the present invention.

Landscapes

  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Accounting & Taxation (AREA)
  • Finance (AREA)
  • Development Economics (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

La présente invention est un procédé, un appareil et un système de comparaison des coûts d'énergie des offres de produits de divers fournisseurs d'énergie. Le système obtient des informations utilisateurs relatives à l'emplacement et la consommation en énergie estimée de l'utilisateur. Ces informations sont ensuite traitées pour sélectionner les produits disponibles du fournisseur d'énergie en fonction de la situation géographique de l'utilisateur. Les informations d'offre et de coût d'énergie pour chacun des produits offerts par les divers fournisseurs d'énergie sont fournies et affichées à l'utilisateur sur la base de sa consommation estimée. L'utilisateur a la possibilité de visualiser des informations plus détaillées sur chaque produit du fournisseur individuellement, une analyse comparative de coûts et également des informations d'impact sur l'environnement et d'économie. L'utilisateur peut également s'engager par contrat avec un fournisseur d'énergie choisi par l'intermédiaire du système.
PCT/US2000/005516 1999-03-31 2000-03-02 Procede, appareil et systeme de calcul et de comparaison de couts d'energie WO2000058805A2 (fr)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU37187/00A AU3718700A (en) 1999-03-31 2000-03-02 Method, apparatus and system for calculating and comparing energyy costs

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US28377699A 1999-03-31 1999-03-31
US09/283,776 1999-03-31

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2000058805A2 true WO2000058805A2 (fr) 2000-10-05
WO2000058805A3 WO2000058805A3 (fr) 2007-05-24

Family

ID=23087502

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2000/005516 WO2000058805A2 (fr) 1999-03-31 2000-03-02 Procede, appareil et systeme de calcul et de comparaison de couts d'energie

Country Status (2)

Country Link
AU (1) AU3718700A (fr)
WO (1) WO2000058805A2 (fr)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20150310461A1 (en) * 2014-04-25 2015-10-29 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Operating method and apparatus of smart system for power consumption optimization

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6598029B1 (en) 1997-02-24 2003-07-22 Geophonic Networks, Inc. Bidding for energy supply with request for service

Family Cites Families (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5655085A (en) * 1992-08-17 1997-08-05 The Ryan Evalulife Systems, Inc. Computer system for automated comparing of universal life insurance policies based on selectable criteria
US6047274A (en) * 1997-02-24 2000-04-04 Geophonic Networks, Inc. Bidding for energy supply
US6009402A (en) * 1997-07-28 1999-12-28 Whitworth; Brian L. System and method for predicting, comparing and presenting the cost of self insurance versus insurance and for creating bond financing when advantageous
US6070156A (en) * 1997-09-26 2000-05-30 Gilbarco Inc. Providing transaction estimates in a fueling and retail system
US6078850A (en) * 1998-03-03 2000-06-20 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for fuel management and for preventing fuel spillage

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20150310461A1 (en) * 2014-04-25 2015-10-29 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Operating method and apparatus of smart system for power consumption optimization

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU3718700A (en) 2000-10-16
WO2000058805A3 (fr) 2007-05-24

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Roche et al. Design of a solar energy centre for providing lighting and income-generating activities for off-grid rural communities in Kenya
EP1660917B1 (fr) Procede et systeme destines a predire une production d'energie solaire
Johnson et al. Peak shifting and cross-class subsidization: The impacts of solar PV on changes in electricity costs
JP5175798B2 (ja) 発電設備管理システム
US7949555B2 (en) Tariff generation, invoicing and contract management
Siddiqui et al. Distributed generation with heat recovery and storage
US20110047048A1 (en) Integrated solar agent business model
Hanser et al. The practicality of distributed PV-battery systems to reduce household grid reliance
Stadler et al. Optimal planning and operation of smart grids with electric vehicle interconnection
JP5801980B2 (ja) 試算装置及び試算方法
McLaren et al. Impact of rate design alternatives on residential solar customer bills: increased fixed charges, minimum bills and demand-based rates
Anderson et al. REopt Lite user manual
AU2001267953A1 (en) Tariff generation, invoicing and contract management
Hledik et al. Distribution system pricing with distributed energy resources
KR20140098369A (ko) 변동비 반영시장의 시간대별 계통한계가격을 이용한 실시간 요금제 운영 장치 및 방법
US20020019740A1 (en) Electric power marketing method and electric power marketing system
Haji et al. Feed-in tariff structure development for photovoltaic electricity and the associated benefits for the Kingdom of Bahrain
US20090099915A1 (en) Systems and methods for standardized billing for at-premise renewable power systems
WO2000058805A2 (fr) Procede, appareil et systeme de calcul et de comparaison de couts d'energie
Rubio et al. CERTS customer adoption model
JP2004126946A (ja) 太陽電池モジュールのレイアウト設計装置およびレイアウト設計方法
Heid et al. Equilibrium effects in complementary markets: Electric vehicle adoption and electricity pricing
Kondziella et al. Towards positive energy districts: assessing the contribution of virtual power plants and energy communities
CN113240288A (zh) 一种电力方案选择方法、装置及电子设备
Jovel-Zelaya et al. Effects of an hourly tariff on the electricity power sector—the Honduran model

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AU GB

DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)