WO1999015270A1 - Compositions and methods for the remediation of chemical contamination in subsurface water bearing geological formations - Google Patents
Compositions and methods for the remediation of chemical contamination in subsurface water bearing geological formations Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO1999015270A1 WO1999015270A1 PCT/US1998/019981 US9819981W WO9915270A1 WO 1999015270 A1 WO1999015270 A1 WO 1999015270A1 US 9819981 W US9819981 W US 9819981W WO 9915270 A1 WO9915270 A1 WO 9915270A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- composition
- surface active
- active agent
- water bearing
- subsurface water
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Ceased
Links
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B09—DISPOSAL OF SOLID WASTE; RECLAMATION OF CONTAMINATED SOIL
- B09C—RECLAMATION OF CONTAMINATED SOIL
- B09C1/00—Reclamation of contaminated soil
- B09C1/02—Extraction using liquids, e.g. washing, leaching, flotation
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B09—DISPOSAL OF SOLID WASTE; RECLAMATION OF CONTAMINATED SOIL
- B09C—RECLAMATION OF CONTAMINATED SOIL
- B09C1/00—Reclamation of contaminated soil
- B09C1/002—Reclamation of contaminated soil involving in-situ ground water treatment
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F1/00—Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage
- C02F1/68—Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage by addition of specified substances, e.g. trace elements, for ameliorating potable water
- C02F1/683—Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage by addition of specified substances, e.g. trace elements, for ameliorating potable water by addition of complex-forming compounds
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10S—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10S502/00—Catalyst, solid sorbent, or support therefor: product or process of making
- Y10S502/506—Method of making inorganic composition utilizing organic compound, except formic, acetic, or oxalic acid or salt thereof
- Y10S502/512—Carboxylic acid or salt thereof other than formic, acetic, or oxalic acid
Definitions
- the present invention relates to the remediation of groundwater, e.g., water in subsurface geological formations.
- Groundwater is one of the world's greatest natural resources supplying water for vegetation, animals and humans, especially in areas where there is little or no surface precipitation.
- Groundwater exists in a variety of geological formations, such as perched water in the unsaturated zone, the water table in the saturated zone, shallow and deep aquifers and bedrock aquifers, all of which in some capacity recharge contiguous subsurface water bearing formations or surface water bodies, such as lakes, ponds, swamps, marshes, bogs, rivers, streams, brooks and springs, etc.
- Groundwater and surface water bodies may be used as sources for drinking, recreation or irrigation. Consequently, chemical contamination released into subsurface water bearing geological formations must be remediated to safeguard the environment, animals and humans.
- the remediation process will vary depending on the type, location, and amount of the chemical contamination. For example, if chemical contamination in subsurface water bearing geological formations readily dissolves or disperses into the groundwater, then many conventional remediation methods might be effective in treating chemical contamination in subsurface water bearing geological formations. However, hydrophobic or water insoluble chemical contamination released into subsurface water bearing geological formations has an affinity to bind by adsorption, adhesion or other physical phenomenon to the surface area within the primary porosity or secondary porosity of an affected water bearing formation as the chemical contamination is physically carried by groundwater.
- the chemical contamination bound to the subsurface water bearing geological formation slowly dissolves into the groundwater that flows through the area of contamination rendering the water supply nonpotable for years, if not permanently, depending on the extent of the chemical contamination.
- Chemical contamination bound to the subsurface water bearing geological formation is extremely difficult to remediate by conventional remediation methods, such as groundwater extraction, induced biodegradation, high temperature processes and oxidation processes (e.g., ozonolysis, hydrogen peroxide, uv treatment, radiation, etc.).
- Conventional remediation methods have numerous shortcomings which limit their ability to remediate chemical contamination quickly and efficiently.
- chemical contaminant or “chemical contamination” means a chemical substance which can be classified in at least one of the following categories: volatile organic compounds; semi-volatile organic compounds; acid extractable compounds; phenolic compounds; base neutral compounds; polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons; polychlorinated biphenyls; pesticides; insecticides; herbicides; metals; and radionuclides.
- free chemical contamination is defined as chemical contamination of hydrophobic or water insoluble character which is floating or undissolved in the body of groundwater contained within the affected water bearing formation and not bound to the surface area within the primary porosity or secondary porosity of the affected water bearing formation.
- primary porosity as used in this application means the void space in granular unconsolidated rock formations or granular consolidated rock formations
- secondary porosity as used in this application means the fractures in consolidated rock formations
- oxidized form of lignitic coal as used in this application means leonardite, other oxidized forms of lignitic coal, purified humic acid component of leonardite or other oxidized forms of lignitic coal, and chemically altered humic acid component of the oxidized forms of lignitic coal from processes such as biological degradation or chemical processes such as hydrolysis, esterification, transesterification, condensation, amidation, alkylation or salt formation with elements of nature or other suitable derivatives.
- an “eluting component” as used in this application means the oxidized form of lignitic coal or the surface active agent in a composition which forms a water soluble complex with the chemical contamination by adsorption, adhesion, chelation or other physical phenomenon, such as covalent binding, coordinate binding or complexation.
- electrogativity as used in this application means the positive or negative attractive force exerted by the chemical contaminant which defines its character regarding adso ⁇ tion, adhesion, chelation or other physical phenomenon, such as covalent binding or complexation.
- efficant plume is defined as the volumetric or areal extent of groundwater in the affected water bearing formation containing the dissolved complex formed between the chemical contamination and a composition of the present invention.
- concentrations sufficient to complex with a chemical contaminant or "in a concentration sufficient to complex with a chemical contaminant” means the suitable amount of an eluting component in a composition which effectively forms a complex with a chemical contaminant in a subsurface water bearing geological formation.
- the present invention provides compositions comprised of an oxidized form of lignitic coal, preferably leonardite, and at least one surface active agent for decreasing chemical contamination bound to the subsurface water bearing geological formation.
- the compositions can be applied to an affected water bearing formation by conventional methods, e.g., injection wells.
- the present invention does not require altering the molecular structure of the chemical contamination. Rather, the present invention elutes the chemical contamination from the subsurface water bearing geological formation by forming a water soluble complex with the chemical contamination.
- the groundwater containing the dissolved complex formed between the bound chemical contamination and the composition of the present invention can be removed from the treated water bearing formation by conventional methods, e.g., pumping wells or other groundwater withdrawal, filtering or purification systems.
- the compositions have an oxidized form of lignitic coal component and a surface active agent component.
- the oxidized form of lignitic coal component of the present invention has a greater capacity than the affected water bearing formation to bind with the chemical contamination, and thus, forms a water soluble complex with the chemical contamination by adsorption, adhesion, chelation or other physical phenomenon, such as covalent binding or complexation.
- the surface active agent component of the present invention possibly acts as a crown ether capable of enhancing the solubility of both the oxidized form of lignitic coal component and the oxidized form of lignitic coal component-chemical contaminant complex.
- the surface active agents of high molecular weight are more prone to this mode of action than surface active agents of low molecular weight.
- the surface active agent component appears to block the superfluous active sites of the oxidized form of lignitic coal component that hinder the binding sites which complex with the chemical contamination. It has been observed that the oxidized form of lignitic coal component elutes the chemical contamination in the absence of a surface active agent, but the activity of the oxidized form of lignitic coal component is accelerated by the presence of the surface active agent component, and hence, the rate of the process is enhanced by the presence of a suitable surface active agent component.
- the characteristics of the chemically contaminated subsurface water bearing formation e.g., chemical contamination, hydrogeology, and lithology dictate the surface active agent component, or combinations thereof, utilized in the compositions of the present invention.
- composition comprised of an oxidized form of lignitic coal, at least one cationic surface active agent and at least one nonionic surface active agent in concentrations sufficient to complex with a chemical contaminant in a subsurface water bearing geological formation, wherein the composition has a pH range of about pH 4 to about pH 7.
- a further object of this invention is to provide a composition comprised of an oxidized form of lignitic coal, at least one anionic surface active agent and at least one amphoteric surface active agent in concentrations sufficient to complex with a chemical contaminant in a subsurface water bearing geological formation, wherein the composition has a pH range of about pH 7 to about pH 10.
- Yet another object of this invention is to provide a composition comprised of an oxidized form of lignitic coal, at least one anionic surface active agent and at least one nonionic surface active agent in concentrations sufficient to complex with a chemical contaminant in a subsurface water bearing geological formation, wherein the composition has a pH range of about pH 7 to about pH 10.
- Yet another object of this invention is to provide a composition comprised of an oxidized form of lignitic coal, at least one anionic surface active agent, at least one amphoteric surface active agent and at least one nonionic surface active agent in concentrations sufficient to complex with a chemical contaminant in a subsurface water bearing geological formation, wherein the composition has a pH range of about pH 7 to about pH 10.
- Yet another object of this invention is to provide a composition comprised of an oxidized form of lignitic coal, at least one amphoteric surface active agent and at least one nonionic surface active agent in concentrations sufficient to complex with a chemical contaminant in a subsurface water bearing geological formation, wherein the composition has a pH range of about pH 4 to about pH 10.
- the reducing agent is a monovalent sulfite compound (e.g., sodium bisulfite or potassium bisulfite) or bivalent sulfite compound (e.g., magnesium sulfite or calcium sulfite), preferably a monovalent sulfite compound;
- a monovalent sulfite compound e.g., sodium bisulfite or potassium bisulfite
- bivalent sulfite compound e.g., magnesium sulfite or calcium sulfite
- a monovalent sulfite compound e.g., sodium bisulfite or potassium bisulfite
- bivalent sulfite compound e.g., magnesium sulfite or calcium sulfite
- a step (f) adding at least one surface active agent in a concentration sufficient to complex with a chemical contaminant in a subsurface water bearing geological formation.
- Yet another object of this invention is to provide a composition comprised of an oxidized form of lignitic coal in a concentration sufficient to complex with a chemical contaminant in a subsurface water bearing geological formation, wherein the composition has a pH range of about pH 4 to about pH 10.
- the reducing agent is a monovalent sulfite compound (e.g., sodium bisulfite or potassium bisulfite) or bivalent sulfite compound (e.g., magnesium sulfite or calcium sulfite), preferably a monovalent sulfite compound.
- a monovalent sulfite compound e.g., sodium bisulfite or potassium bisulfite
- bivalent sulfite compound e.g., magnesium sulfite or calcium sulfite
- Yet another object of this invention is to provide a method of decreasing chemical contamination in subsurface water bearing formations having primary and secondary porosities, comprising the steps of: (a) applying a composition into an affected subsurface water bearing geological formation to form a dissolved complex with the chemical contamination bound to the surface areas of the primary and secondary porosities of the subsurface water bearing geological formation;
- the method may further comprise the step of adjusting at least one of the following: concentration of the oxidized form of lignitic coal in a composition; concentration and type of the surface active agent in a composition; and pH of a composition in response to the monitored conditions of an area of contamination within a subsurface water bearing geological formation.
- Another object of the present invention is to decrease the free chemical contamination in a body of groundwater contained within the subsurface water bearing geological formation having primary and secondary porosities, comprising the steps of:
- the method may further comprise the step of adjusting at least one of the following: concentration of the oxidized form of lignitic coal in a composition; and pH of a composition in response to the monitored conditions of an area of contamination within a subsurface water bearing geological formation.
- Still another object of the present invention is to decrease the chemical contamination in the removed groundwater containing the dissolved complex formed between the bound or free chemical contamination and a composition of the present invention to an acceptable level prior to disposal or discharge by conventional filtration or purification methods known to those skilled in the art, e.g., activated carbon treatment, reverse osmosis, ultrafiltration, aeration, oxidation processes or biodegradation.
- conventional filtration or purification methods known to those skilled in the art, e.g., activated carbon treatment, reverse osmosis, ultrafiltration, aeration, oxidation processes or biodegradation.
- the development of a faster, cheaper and more efficient composition and method to remediate chemical contamination in subsurface water bearing geological formations is extremely desirable.
- the present invention reduces the time and expense to remediate chemical contamination in subsurface water bearing geological formations. Further, the present invention reduces the need for expensive, long term monitoring of chemically contaminated groundwater often required subsequent to the implementation of conventional remediation methods because of their shortcomings in remediating chemical contamination.
- the components of the compositions of the present invention are water soluble, biodegradable and nontoxic to humans, animals and the environment.
- the present invention relates to novel aqueous compositions, comprised of an oxidized form of lignitic coal, preferably leonardite, and at least one biodegradable synthetic anionic, cationic, amphoteric or nonionic surfactant, or naturally occurring surface active agent, or a combination thereof, that are stable at both acidic and basic pH conditions, and that have broad applications in the remediation of chemical contaminants released into subsurface water bearing geological formations.
- the present invention has been shown effective in remediating chemical contaminants which can be characterized in at least one of the following categories: volatile organic compounds; semi-volatile organic compounds; acid extractable compounds; phenolic compounds; base neutral compounds; polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons; polychlorinated biphenyls; pesticides; insecticides; herbicides; and metals.
- the present invention can also be utilized to remediate radionuclides because the properties of radionuclides are akin to heavy metals and the compositions of the present invention will not distinguish between radionuclides and heavy metals.
- Leonardite is a soft, earthy brown colored, naturally oxidized lignitic coal material occurring abundantly in many parts of the world including the United States, e.g., North Dakota, Texas and parts of Florida. It is generally found above grade in a lignitic outcropping or below grade in the overburden at depths not exceeding about twenty feet.
- leonardite contains humic acid at about 50% to about 80% (by weight) and inert substances such as clay, silicates of magnesium, aluminum, alkaline earth salts and metallic oxides.
- Preferred reducing agents are monovalent sulfite compounds (e.g., sodium bisulfite or potassium bisulfite) or bivalent sulfite compounds (e.g., magnesium sulfite or calcium sulfite).
- the most preferred reducing agents are monovalent sulfite compounds.
- leonardite particles are pretreated in a caustic solution at ambient temperature for about 24 to about 48 hours to dissolve the eluting materials.
- the pH is maintained at greater than about 10.0 during this step.
- the insoluble inert substances are then removed from the leonardite solution by conventional methods, e.g., filtration or centrifugation.
- the concentration of leonardite in the solution may be adjusted by dilution using additional hydroxylic solvent and the pH of the solution may be adjusted from about pH 4 to about pH 10 using an inorganic acid, organic acid or reducing agent.
- At least one surface active agent is added to attain a composition of the present invention, preferably after any dilution or pH adjustment is carried out.
- the humic acid component of the oxidized forms of lignitic coal may be chemically altered to modify and enhance its water solubility.
- the use of a surface active agent component in the compositions may optionally be used for enhancing the solubility of the oxidized form of lignitic coal.
- the use of at least one surface active agent in the compositions comprised of a water soluble-enhanced oxidized form of lignitic coal is the most preferred method.
- a suitable surface active agent can be cationic, anionic, amphoteric or nonionic having alkyl chains of 2 to 25 carbon atoms, and preferably 4 to 20 carbon atoms.
- the most preferred surface active agents are nonionic surfactants.
- the group of anionic surface active agents includes, but is not limited to, surfactants prepared from condensation products of formalin with sulfonic acid or salts of sulfonic acid of cyclic aromatic compounds such as naphthalene, alkylnaphthalene, alkylphenol or alkylbenzene in which the degree of condensation of formalin is 2 to 25 and preferably 5-20.
- Preferred salts are lower amines such as ammonium, monoethanolamine, diethanolamine, triethanolamine and triethylamine or alkali metals or alkaline earth metals such as potassium, sodium, magnesium and calcium.
- alkali metals e.g., sodium or potassium
- alkaline earth metals e.g., magnesium or calcium
- This group also includes, but is not limited to, surfactants prepared from formalin condensation products of lignin sulfonic acid, lignin sulfonates or sulfonates of aromatic compounds, such as naphthalene, alkyl naphthalene and their salts.
- the group of cationic surface active agents includes, but is not limited to, surfactants of quaternary salts of nitrogen substituted with alkyl chains of 2 to 20 carbon atoms, including tetra alkyl ammonium halides.
- amphoteric surface active agents includes, but is not limited to, surfactant molecules containing both an acidic and basic group substituted with ether or hydroxyl groups to enhance hydrophilicity. This group also includes, but is not limited to, naturally occurring amphoteric surfactants originating from plants such as phosphotidyl choline compounds, preferably lecithin.
- the group of nonionic surface active agents includes, but is not limited to, surfactants prepared from alkylene oxide addition products of compounds having phenolic hydroxyl groups such as phenol, cresol, nonylphenol, dinonylphenol and dodecylphenol in which the alkylene oxide is ethylene oxide and/or propylene oxide.
- This group also includes, but is not limited to, surfactants prepared from alkylene oxide addition products of the formalin condensation products of compounds having phenolic hydroxyl groups such as alkyl phenol, benzylated phenol in which a condensation degree is 2 to 25 and preferably 4 to 20.
- the alkylene oxide is preferably ethylene oxide and/or propylene oxide.
- this group includes, but is not limited to, surfactants prepared from alkylene oxide addition products of polyvalent alcohols such as glycerol, trimethylolpropane, pentaerythritol, sorbitol, sucrose, ethylene glycol, polyethylene glycol, polypropylene glycol or the esters of these polyalcohols and fatty acids having 8 to 20 carbon atoms.
- This group also includes, but is not limited to, naturally occurring nonionic surface active agents originating from microorganisms (e.g., xanthan gum, bluran and dextran), plants (e.g., agar, galaginan, phaseleran, alginates and their salts, locust bean gum, guar gum, fatsia gum, gum arabica, karaya gum, tragacanth, pectin and processed starch) and animals (e.g., gelatin and casein).
- microorganisms e.g., xanthan gum, bluran and dextran
- plants e.g., agar, galaginan, phaseleran, alginates and their salts, locust bean gum, guar gum, fatsia gum, gum arabica, karaya gum, tragacanth, pectin and processed starch
- animals e.g., gelatin and casein.
- concentrations of the oxidized form of lignitic coal, and surface active agent components in the present invention depend on certain conditions, such as the types, concentrations, electronegativities and molecular sizes of the chemical contaminants, the volume of chemical contamination, and the hydrogeology (e.g., dilution effect of groundwater, groundwater chemistry, etc.) and lithology (e.g., porosity, hydraulic conductivity, etc.) of the subsurface water bearing geological formation.
- hydrogeology e.g., dilution effect of groundwater, groundwater chemistry, etc.
- lithology e.g., porosity, hydraulic conductivity, etc.
- At least one composition comprised of an oxidized form of lignitic coal, preferably leonardite, and at least one surface active agent is prepared in accordance with the specifications in Table 1.
- the compositions can be applied to an affected water bearing formation by conventional methods, e.g., injection wells.
- a composition comprised of an oxidized form of lignitic coal and two or more surface active agents, or a multiple phase application of two or more compositions may be utlilized.
- Table 1 summarizes preferred combinations of eluting components in the compositions of the present invention based on the types and electronegativities of the chemical contaminants.
- the eluting components of the compositions of the present invention should be present in concentrations sufficient to complex with the chemical contaminants sought to be removed.
- the concentration of the oxidized form of lignitic coal ranges from about 1 % to about 40% (by weight of the total composition), preferably about 10% to about 25% (by weight of the total composition), the concentration of the surface active agent ranges from about 0.5% to about 20% (by weight of the total composition), preferably about 5% to about 15% (by weight of the total composition), and the balance of the composition is water.
- each surface active agent is preferably added in an amount so that the total weight percent of all of the surface active agents ranges from about 0.5 % to about 20% (by weight of the total composition) and preferably about 5% to about 15% (by weight of the total composition), depending upon the chemical contamination.
- the concentrations of the eluting components of the compositions can depend on factors such as the concentrations, strengths of electronegativities and molecular sizes of the chemical contaminants, the volume of chemical contamination, and the hydrogeology and lithology of the subsurface water bearing geological formation. For instance, chemical contamination exerting strong binding forces to the affected geological formation may require a composition with a greater concentration of eluting components than chemical contamination exerting weak binding forces, even though the concentrations of the strong and weak binding chemical contaminants may be similar. Likewise, chemical contamination of large molecular size may require a composition with a greater concentration of eluting components than chemical contamination of small molecular size, even though the concentrations of the large and small sized chemical contaminants may be similar.
- chemical contamination in an affected water bearing formation containing hard groundwater may require an initial composition with higher concentrations of eluting components to compensate for the effect of the minerals causing hardness (e.g., calcium, magnesium, etc.), whereas this overcompensation may be adjusted by decreasing the concentrations of eluting components of the composition as the groundwater chemistry is impacted by a composition of the present invention.
- a porous sandy geological formation may accommodate a denser composition containing a higher concentration of eluting components for faster remediation of the chemical contamination, whereas a clayey geological formation with tortuous pore space may require a dilute composition relative to the amount of chemical contamination to facilitate an eluant plume of low density.
- the conditions of the affected water bearing formation should be considered in determining the initial composition for achieving the highest level of effectiveness of the present invention and should be monitored in the field using appropriate sampling and analysis methods well known to those skilled in the art, such as gas chromatography, atomic abso ⁇ tion, etc. If necessary, adjustments in a composition can be made based on the analytical results.
- Treatment of the affected water bearing formation by the present invention can be continued until sampling and analysis shows that the chemical contamination in the area of contamination within the affected water bearing formation has decreased to an acceptable level.
- the groundwater containing the dissolved complex formed between the bound chemical contamination and the composition of the present invention may be removed from the treated water bearing formation by conventional methods such as pumping wells or other groundwater withdrawal, filtering or purification systems.
- Treatment can be followed by the application of potable water to wash excess or residual components of the composition from the remediated subsurface water bearing geological formation. This washing step of the process can be continued until sampling and analysis show that excess composition has been removed to an acceptable level.
- the application of a composition of the present invention into an affected subsurface water bearing geological formation may form a dissolved complex simultaneously with the free chemical contamination in the body of groundwater contained within the affected subsurface water bearing geological formation not bound to the surface area within the primary and secondary porosities of the affected water bearing formation as the chemical contamination is carried by groundwater.
- the groundwater containing the dissolved complex formed between the free chemical contamination and a composition of the present invention may be removed from the affected water bearing formation simultaneously with groundwater containing the dissolved complex of bound chemical contamination eluted from the affected water bearing formation described above.
- the removed groundwater containing the dissolved complex formed between the bound or free chemical contamination and the composition of the present invention may be appropriately disposed of or treated by conventional filtration or purification methods known to those skilled in the art, such as activated carbon treatment, reverse osmosis, ultrafiltration, aeration, oxidation processes (e.g., ozonolysis, hydrogen peroxide, etc.) or biodegradation, prior to disposal or discharge.
- the biodegradation of the chemical contamination in the removed groundwater containing the dissolved complex formed between the chemical contamination and a composition may be induced by applying an air or oxygen source, agitation and a microbe capable of altering the molecular structure of the chemical contamination, thus, rendering the chemical contamination innocuous.
- the oxidized form of lignitic coal in the removed groundwater may act as the nutrient source to sustain microbial activity or another nutrient (e.g., urea) may be added.
- a nutrient e.g., urea
- the present invention is illustrated in the examples, but the invention is not meant to be limited to the details described therein.
- a chemically contaminated subsurface water bearing geological formation was simulated in the laboratory using a glass column packed with clean potting soil, saturated with water of drinking quality, and contaminated with a known chemical. Two columns were utilized in each example. One column was treated with a composition, while the second column acted as a control. The top of each column simulated a conventional injection well network, upgradient from the simulated chemically contaminated subsurface water bearing formation. The stopcock at the bottom of each column simulated either a conventional monitoring well network for collecting samples or a conventional groundwater withdrawal well network for the removal of the eluant plume, downgradient from the simulated chemically contaminated subsurface water bearing formations. Two glass columns were packed loosely with potting soil to facilitate water flow.
- the tops of the columns were charged with drinking water which was allowed to flow through the columns and saturate the soil beds. An excess amount of drinking water was passed through the saturated soil beds of the columns to develop the porosity until the discharge through the stopcocks became colorless and clear of soil fines. The saturated soil beds in the columns were maintained throughout the experiment.
- the water levels in the columns were allowed to become flush with the surface of the saturated soil beds of the columns, then aliquots of known chemical contamination were loaded onto the surface of the saturated soil beds and allowed to seep into the saturated soil beds to simulate the release and seepage of chemical contamination into subsurface water bearing geological formations. Then the tops of the columns were charged with drinking water and the flow of water through the columns was maintained to physically draw the aliquots of chemical contamination downgradient through the saturated soil beds and develop simulated chemical contaminant plumes within subsurface water bearing geological formations.
- the stopcocks which controlled the flow of water through the columns, were adjusted equally to simulate the rate of groundwater flow throughout the experiment. The discharges from the stopcocks were collected in fractions for analysis. The stopcocks simulated monitoring well networks.
- the fractions simulated groundwater samples.
- the fractions were analyzed by appropriate methods (e.g., gas chromatography, atomic absorption, etc.) for the presence of chemical contamination.
- a composition comprised of leonardite and at least one surface active agent was prepared in accordance with Table 1.
- the dilution effect and chemistry of the water in the columns as well as the hydraulic conductivity of the soil beds in the columns were not considered in preparing the compositions in the examples of this application because the drinking water, potting soil and water volume within the soil beds had a negligible effect on the performance of the compositions.
- the water levels in the columns were allowed to become flush with the surface of the chemically contaminated saturated soil beds, then the top of one column was charged with a composition, while the other column acted as a control.
- the composition was allowed to flow through the chemically contaminated saturated soil bed of the column and elute the chemical contamination, forming an eluant plume.
- the eluant plume was removed and collected in fractions through the stopcock.
- the stopcock simulated a conventional groundwater withdrawal well network.
- the fractions were analyzed for the presence of the chemical contamination. Treatment was continued until analysis of the fractions showed that the chemical contamination was decreased to an acceptable level.
- the top of the column was charged with excess drinking water and allowed to flow through the treated saturate soil bed to wash excess components of the composition.
- a sample of the discharge from the stopcock was collected and analyzed to confirm the composition was removed to an acceptable level.
- the composition was not loaded onto the second column. Instead, drinking water in an amount equal to the composition used in the first column was loaded onto the second column to compare the effectiveness of the present invention against the conventional remediation method of groundwater extraction.
- the drinking water was allowed to flow through the chemically contaminated saturated soil bed of the second column and extract the chemical contamination over an equal period of time.
- the drinking water extract was collected in fractions from the stopcock and analyzed for the presence of the chemical contaminants.
- the present invention decreased the chemical contaminants from the simulated subsurface water bearing geological formation to an acceptable level in each example, whereas the conventional remediation method of groundwater extraction had a negligible impact on the concentration of chemical contamination in a subsurface water bearing geological formation.
- the trichloroethane was allowed to seep into the surface of each soil bed, wherein each column was charged with about 40 ml of water of drinking quality. The water was allowed to pass through the soil beds of columns A and B, wherein four (4) 10 ml fractions were collected from each column. The fractions from columns A and B were pooled separately and analyzed by gas chromatography ("GC") for the presence of trichloroethane leaching from each soil bed. No trichloroethane was detected in the pooled fractions from columns A or B. About 100 ml of an aqueous composition comprised of leonardite at about 10%
- Triton 150 ® a nonionic surfactant available from Rohm & Haas, Pennsylvania, at about 5% (by weight of the total composition) and water at about 85% (by weight of the total composition) was prepared.
- Triton 150 ® a nonionic surfactant available from Rohm & Haas, Pennsylvania
- the pooled fractions and fraction 4 were analyzed for the presence of trichloroethane. Likewise, four (4) 10 ml fractions were collected from column B, pooled and analyzed for the presence of trichloroethane. Trichloroethane was detected in the pooled fractions from column A but not in fraction 4 from column A. Trichloroethane was not detected in the pooled fractions from column B.
- the phenol was allowed to seep into the surface of each soil bed, wherein each column was charged with about 40 ml of water of drinking quality.
- the water was allowed to pass through the soil beds of columns A and B, wherein four (4) 10 ml fractions were collected from each column.
- the fractions from columns A and B were pooled separately and analyzed by GC for the presence of phenol leaching from each soil bed. No phenol was detected in the pooled fractions from columns A or B.
- aqueous composition comprised of leonardite at about 10% (by weight of the total composition), sodium lauryl sulfate, an anionic surfactant, at about 5% (by weight of the total composition) and water at about 85% (by weight of the total composition) was prepared.
- the column was charged with about 40 ml of the composition.
- the composition was not applied to column B.
- Column B was charged with about 40 ml of water of drinking quality. The composition was allowed to pass through the soil bed in column A and elute the chemical contaminant.
- the resulting eluant plume in column A was collected in four (4) 10 ml fractions, wherein fractions 1 through 3 were pooled. The pooled fractions and fraction 4 were analyzed for the presence of phenol. Likewise, four (4) 10 ml fractions were collected from column B, pooled and analyzed for the presence of phenol. Phenol was detected in the pooled fractions from column A but not in fraction 4 from column A. Phenol was not detected in the pooled fractions from column B.
- Column A Two glass columns, 36 cm in length and 2 cm in diameter (herein defined as “Column A” and “Column B”), were packed loosely with about 16.4 and about 16.0 gm of clean potting soil, respectively.
- the soil beds of each column were saturated with water of drinking quality and the columns charged with excess drinking water.
- the stopcocks of each column were opened wide to allow the water to pass through the soil beds of columns A and B until the discharge water became clear and colorless, wherein each stopcock was adjusted to a drip rate of about 30 drops per minute and maintained throughout the experiment.
- naphthalene a base neutral compound
- each column was charged with about 40 ml of water of drinking quality.
- the water was allowed to pass through the soil beds of columns A and B, wherein four (4) 10 ml fractions were collected from each column.
- the fractions from columns A and B were pooled separately and analyzed by GC for the presence of naphthalene leaching from each soil bed. No naphthalene was detected in the pooled fractions from columns A or B.
- aqueous composition comprised of leonardite at about 10% (by weight of the total composition), distearyldimethylammoniumchloride, a cationic surfactant, at about 5% (by weight of the total composition) and water at about 85% (by weight of the total composition) was prepared.
- the column was charged with about 40 ml of the composition.
- the composition was not applied to column B.
- Column B was charged with about 40 ml of water of drinking quality. The composition was allowed to pass through the soil bed in column A and elute the chemical contaminant.
- the resulting eluant plume in column A was collected in four (4) 10 ml fractions, wherein fractions 1 through 3 were pooled. The pooled fractions were analyzed for the presence of naphthalene. Likewise, four (4) 10 ml fractions were collected from column B, pooled and analyzed for the presence of naphthalene. Naphthalene was detected in the pooled fractions from column A but not in fraction 4 from column A. Naphthalene was not detected in the pooled fractions from column B.
- Column A and “Column B”) were packed loosely with about 16.8 and about 16.0 gm of clean potting soil, respectively.
- the soil beds of each column were saturated with water of drinking quality and the columns charged with excess drinking water.
- the stopcocks of each column were opened wide to allow the water to pass through the soil beds of columns A and B until the discharge water became clear and colorless, wherein each stopcock was adjusted to a drip rate of about 30 drops per minute and maintained throughout the experiment.
- pyrethrin an insecticide
- the pyrethrin was allowed to seep into the surface of each soil bed, wherein each column was charged with about 40 ml of water of drinking quality. The water was allowed to pass through the soil beds of columns A and B, wherein four (4) 10 ml fractions were collected from each column. The fractions from columns A and B were pooled separately and analyzed by GC for the presence of pyrethrin leaching from each soil bed. No pyrethrin was detected in the pooled fractions from columns A or B.
- aqueous composition comprised of leonardite at about 10% (by weight of the total composition), Triton 150 ® , a nonionic surfactant, at about 5% (by weight of the total composition) and water at about 85% (by weight of the total composition) was prepared.
- Triton 150 ® a nonionic surfactant
- water at about 85% (by weight of the total composition) was prepared.
- Column B was charged with about 40 ml of water of drinking quality. The composition was allowed to pass through the soil bed in column A and elute the chemical contaminant.
- the resulting eluant plume in column A was collected in four (4) 10 ml fractions, wherein fractions 1 through 3 were pooled. The pooled fractions were analyzed for the presence of pyrethrin. Likewise, four (4) 10 ml fractions were collected from column B, pooled and analyzed for the presence of pyrethrin. Pyrethrin was detected in the pooled fractions from column A but not in fraction 4 from column A. Pyrethrin was not detected in the pooled fractions from column B.
- Column A Two glass columns, 36 cm in length and 2 cm in diameter (herein defined as “Column A” and “Column B”), were packed loosely with about 16.0 and about 15.6 gm of clean potting soil, respectively.
- the soil beds of each column were saturated with water of drinking quality and the columns charged with excess drinking water.
- the stopcocks of each column were opened wide to allow the water to pass through the soil beds of columns A and B until the discharge water became clear and colorless, wherein each stopcock was adjusted to a drip rate of about 30 drops per minute and maintained throughout the experiment.
- the resulting eluant plume in column A was collected in four (4) 10 ml fractions, wherein each fraction was analyzed for the presence of silver by a 5% by weight diphenylthiocarbazone solution.
- four (4) 10 ml fractions were collected from column B and analyzed for the presence of silver. Silver was detected in fractions 1 through 3 from column A but not in fraction 4 from column A. Silver was not detected in fractions 1 through 4 from column B.
Landscapes
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
- Soil Sciences (AREA)
- Hydrology & Water Resources (AREA)
- Water Supply & Treatment (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Processing Of Solid Wastes (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (3)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| EP98949468A EP1034033A1 (en) | 1997-09-25 | 1998-09-24 | Compositions and methods for the remediation of chemical contamination in subsurface water bearing geological formations |
| AU95784/98A AU9578498A (en) | 1997-09-25 | 1998-09-24 | Compositions and methods for the remediation of chemical contamination in subsurface water bearing geological formations |
| CA002304716A CA2304716A1 (en) | 1997-09-25 | 1998-09-24 | Compositions and methods for the remediation of chemical contamination in subsurface water bearing geological formations |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US08/937,938 | 1997-09-25 | ||
| US08/937,938 US6001769A (en) | 1997-09-25 | 1997-09-25 | Compositions and methods for the remediation of chemical contamination in subsurface water bearing geological formations |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| WO1999015270A1 true WO1999015270A1 (en) | 1999-04-01 |
Family
ID=25470603
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/US1998/019981 Ceased WO1999015270A1 (en) | 1997-09-25 | 1998-09-24 | Compositions and methods for the remediation of chemical contamination in subsurface water bearing geological formations |
Country Status (5)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (2) | US6001769A (en) |
| EP (1) | EP1034033A1 (en) |
| AU (1) | AU9578498A (en) |
| CA (1) | CA2304716A1 (en) |
| WO (1) | WO1999015270A1 (en) |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN103385523A (en) * | 2013-07-15 | 2013-11-13 | 浙江蓝美农业有限公司 | Blueberry juice product on-line clarification technique and blueberry juice pectization agent |
Families Citing this family (7)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US5888395A (en) * | 1996-08-30 | 1999-03-30 | The Regents Of The University Of California | Method for enhanced longevity of in situ microbial filter used for bioremediation |
| EP1855774A4 (en) * | 2005-03-04 | 2009-10-21 | Cornell Res Foundation Inc | RESTORATION AND RECOVERY OF HEAVY METALS FROM AQUEOUS LIQUIDS |
| WO2007035672A2 (en) * | 2005-09-19 | 2007-03-29 | Terrenew, Llc | Removal of oils from solid surfaces and water with a substance having a high humate level |
| WO2007102750A1 (en) * | 2006-03-07 | 2007-09-13 | Department Of Chemistry Of The Lomonosov Moscow State University | Humic derivatives methods of preparation and use |
| US8911630B2 (en) * | 2009-01-14 | 2014-12-16 | Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, Llc | Process for treating waste water having low concentrations of metallic contaminants |
| US8784665B1 (en) * | 2011-04-12 | 2014-07-22 | Geoff McMahon | Method for reducing odor and harmful materials from sewer plant process streams |
| US20130199996A1 (en) * | 2012-02-06 | 2013-08-08 | Brian B. Looney | Ground water remediation using humate enhanced aerobic cometabolism |
Citations (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US4084382A (en) * | 1975-08-18 | 1978-04-18 | American Colloid Company | Method and composition for preventing water contaminated with industrial waste seeping through soil containing said water |
| US4699660A (en) * | 1986-02-13 | 1987-10-13 | Union Camp Corporation | Use of humates in printing inks |
Family Cites Families (15)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AU470836B2 (en) * | 1970-07-24 | 1976-04-01 | Universityof Melbourne | Removal of microorganisms and nonliving pollutant substances from water |
| US3872002A (en) * | 1973-03-29 | 1975-03-18 | Georesources Inc | Process for extracting phosphate from solutions |
| JPS5259088A (en) * | 1975-11-11 | 1977-05-16 | Japan Exlan Co Ltd | Adsorbent for treating waste fluid |
| JPS5354857A (en) * | 1976-10-28 | 1978-05-18 | Mitsubishi Rayon Co Ltd | Method of purifying waste liquid |
| CH619911A5 (en) * | 1977-03-22 | 1980-10-31 | Schlatter Ag | |
| US4591443A (en) * | 1984-11-08 | 1986-05-27 | Fmc Corporation | Method for decontaminating a permeable subterranean formation |
| US4778602A (en) * | 1986-04-28 | 1988-10-18 | Allen Iii Ralph S | Method of producing multi-functional filtering medium |
| US5169534A (en) * | 1991-08-28 | 1992-12-08 | Trw Inc. | Metal ion and organic contaminant disposal |
| US5728302A (en) * | 1992-04-09 | 1998-03-17 | Groundwater Services, Inc. | Methods for the removal of contaminants from subterranean fluids |
| US5254521A (en) * | 1992-08-03 | 1993-10-19 | University Of North Dakota Energy And Environment Research Center Foundation | Leonardite char adsorbents |
| US5454956A (en) * | 1993-04-01 | 1995-10-03 | Deluxe Corporation | Method of cleaning waste water and recovery of contaminants therefrom |
| US5443158A (en) * | 1992-10-02 | 1995-08-22 | Fording Coal Limited | Coal flotation process |
| US5286141A (en) * | 1993-02-12 | 1994-02-15 | Vigneri Ronald J | Method and system for remediation of groundwater contamination |
| US5378280A (en) * | 1993-06-07 | 1995-01-03 | Phillips Petroleum Company | Composition comprising leonardite, clay and lime and process therewith |
| US5767060A (en) * | 1996-10-30 | 1998-06-16 | Advanced Water Systems | Bonded polymer filter medium and its use |
-
1997
- 1997-09-25 US US08/937,938 patent/US6001769A/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
1998
- 1998-09-18 US US09/157,034 patent/US5997749A/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1998-09-24 CA CA002304716A patent/CA2304716A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 1998-09-24 EP EP98949468A patent/EP1034033A1/en not_active Withdrawn
- 1998-09-24 AU AU95784/98A patent/AU9578498A/en not_active Abandoned
- 1998-09-24 WO PCT/US1998/019981 patent/WO1999015270A1/en not_active Ceased
Patent Citations (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US4084382A (en) * | 1975-08-18 | 1978-04-18 | American Colloid Company | Method and composition for preventing water contaminated with industrial waste seeping through soil containing said water |
| US4699660A (en) * | 1986-02-13 | 1987-10-13 | Union Camp Corporation | Use of humates in printing inks |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN103385523A (en) * | 2013-07-15 | 2013-11-13 | 浙江蓝美农业有限公司 | Blueberry juice product on-line clarification technique and blueberry juice pectization agent |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| EP1034033A1 (en) | 2000-09-13 |
| US6001769A (en) | 1999-12-14 |
| CA2304716A1 (en) | 1999-04-01 |
| AU9578498A (en) | 1999-04-12 |
| US5997749A (en) | 1999-12-07 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Wasay et al. | Remediation of soils polluted by heavy metals using salts of organic acids and chelating agents | |
| Neilson et al. | Characterization of lead removal from contaminated soils by nontoxic soil‐washing agents | |
| Aşçı et al. | Sorption of Cd (II) onto kaolin as a soil component and desorption of Cd (II) from kaolin using rhamnolipid biosurfactant | |
| Herman et al. | Rhamnolipid (biosurfactant) effects on cell aggregation and biodegradation of residual hexadecane under saturated flow conditions | |
| Das et al. | Bacterial biosurfactants can be an ecofriendly and advanced technology for remediation of heavy metals and co-contaminated soil | |
| Kuhnt | Behavior and fate of surfactants in soil | |
| Simpanen et al. | Bioremediation of creosote contaminated soil in both laboratory and field scale: investigating the ability of methyl-β-cyclodextrin to enhance biostimulation | |
| Schneider et al. | Eichhornia crassipes as biosorbent for heavy metal ions | |
| Piccolo et al. | Efficient simultaneous removal of heavy metals and polychlorobiphenyls from a polluted industrial site by washing the soil with natural humic surfactants | |
| Singer et al. | Soils in an environmental context: an American perspective | |
| US5997749A (en) | Methods for the remediation of chemical contamination in subsurface water bearing geological structures | |
| Srivastava et al. | Cobalt in soils: sources, fate, bioavailability, plant uptake, remediation, and management | |
| Groudev et al. | Bioremediation of a soil contaminated with radioactive elements | |
| Jacobsen et al. | Degradation and mobility of linear alkylbenzene sulfonate and nonylphenol in sludge‐amended soil | |
| Fine et al. | Organic carbon leaching from effluent irrigated lysimeters as affected by residence time | |
| Han et al. | Soluble organic carbon in a biosolids‐amended Mollisol | |
| Xu et al. | Optimization of slow-release fertilizer dosage for bioremediation of oil-contaminated beach sediment in a tropical environment | |
| Mulligan | Biosurfactants for the remediation of metal contamination | |
| Bardi et al. | In situ bioremediation of a hydrocarbon polluted site with cyclodextrin as a coadjuvant to increase bioavailability | |
| Pereira et al. | Geochemical investigations of polychlorinated dibenzo‐p‐dioxins in the subsurface environment at an abandoned wood‐treatment facility | |
| Gibert | Behavior of aquifers concerning contaminants: Differential permeability and importance of the different purification processes | |
| Banks et al. | Constructed wetlands for the remediation of blast furnace slag leachates | |
| Litz et al. | The influence of surfactants applied by sewage sludge on the behaviour of atrazine and PAHs in semiarid soils | |
| Pradhan et al. | An overview of natural water contamination and sustainable attenuation techniques: challenges and opportunities | |
| Hughes et al. | The effects of leather tannery sludge on the leachates from soil columns |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| AK | Designated states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY CA CH CN CU CZ DE DK EE ES FI GB GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MD MG MK MN MW MX NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TR TT UA UG UZ VN YU ZW |
|
| AL | Designated countries for regional patents |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW SD SZ UG ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GW ML MR NE SN TD TG |
|
| 121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application | ||
| DFPE | Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101) | ||
| REG | Reference to national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: 8642 |
|
| ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 2304716 Country of ref document: CA Ref country code: CA Ref document number: 2304716 Kind code of ref document: A Format of ref document f/p: F |
|
| NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: KR |
|
| WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 95784/98 Country of ref document: AU |
|
| WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 1998949468 Country of ref document: EP |
|
| WWP | Wipo information: published in national office |
Ref document number: 1998949468 Country of ref document: EP |
|
| WWW | Wipo information: withdrawn in national office |
Ref document number: 1998949468 Country of ref document: EP |