WO1988001392A2 - Ranging and processing satellite system for mobile surveillance and data link - Google Patents
Ranging and processing satellite system for mobile surveillance and data link Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO1988001392A2 WO1988001392A2 PCT/US1987/002059 US8702059W WO8801392A2 WO 1988001392 A2 WO1988001392 A2 WO 1988001392A2 US 8702059 W US8702059 W US 8702059W WO 8801392 A2 WO8801392 A2 WO 8801392A2
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- satellite
- satellites
- mobile units
- mobile
- control facilities
- Prior art date
Links
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 46
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 11
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 10
- 230000001174 ascending effect Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 abstract description 5
- 238000001228 spectrum Methods 0.000 abstract description 3
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 8
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 7
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000000977 initiatory effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000001360 synchronised effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012937 correction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000002452 interceptive effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000008929 regeneration Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000011069 regeneration method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000003595 spectral effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000002699 waste material Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000712 assembly Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000000429 assembly Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- VJYFKVYYMZPMAB-UHFFFAOYSA-N ethoprophos Chemical compound CCCSP(=O)(OCC)SCCC VJYFKVYYMZPMAB-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000011835 investigation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000006386 memory function Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000737 periodic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012163 sequencing technique Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01S—RADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
- G01S13/00—Systems using the reflection or reradiation of radio waves, e.g. radar systems; Analogous systems using reflection or reradiation of waves whose nature or wavelength is irrelevant or unspecified
- G01S13/87—Combinations of radar systems, e.g. primary radar and secondary radar
- G01S13/878—Combination of several spaced transmitters or receivers of known location for determining the position of a transponder or a reflector
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01S—RADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
- G01S13/00—Systems using the reflection or reradiation of radio waves, e.g. radar systems; Analogous systems using reflection or reradiation of waves whose nature or wavelength is irrelevant or unspecified
- G01S13/74—Systems using reradiation of radio waves, e.g. secondary radar systems; Analogous systems
- G01S13/76—Systems using reradiation of radio waves, e.g. secondary radar systems; Analogous systems wherein pulse-type signals are transmitted
- G01S13/78—Systems using reradiation of radio waves, e.g. secondary radar systems; Analogous systems wherein pulse-type signals are transmitted discriminating between different kinds of targets, e.g. IFF-radar, i.e. identification of friend or foe
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01S—RADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
- G01S7/00—Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00
- G01S7/003—Transmission of data between radar, sonar or lidar systems and remote stations
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04B—TRANSMISSION
- H04B7/00—Radio transmission systems, i.e. using radiation field
- H04B7/14—Relay systems
- H04B7/15—Active relay systems
- H04B7/185—Space-based or airborne stations; Stations for satellite systems
- H04B7/1853—Satellite systems for providing telephony service to a mobile station, i.e. mobile satellite service
- H04B7/18545—Arrangements for managing station mobility, i.e. for station registration or localisation
- H04B7/18547—Arrangements for managing station mobility, i.e. for station registration or localisation for geolocalisation of a station
- H04B7/18554—Arrangements for managing station mobility, i.e. for station registration or localisation for geolocalisation of a station using the position provided by an existing geolocalisation system
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a satellite surveillance and data link system. More particularly, it relates to a system for determining the range from a satellite to a plurality of mobile units, for storing uploaded commands to poll mobile units until the poll is scheduled to be transmitted, and for acquiring mobile units that request entry into the system, all through satellite on-board computing capability.
- Satellites have been in successful operation for ship-to-shore communications for several years through a service provided by the international consortium, INMARSAT. Recently, the aviation community has rapidly begun to renew its interest for the use . of satellites for air traffic control, airline operational control and public correspondence.
- Still another object of the invention is a satellite system including the use of cross-link communications between the satellites to provide for on-board satellite position determination and for on-board acquisition of mobile units into the system.
- Yet another object of the invention is a system in which the on-board processing involves not only signal regeneration and beam switching capability, but also digital data processing of messages, for storage of poll commands, generation of polls to mobile units according to a schedule, storage of replies to polls, and formatting of messages.
- a ranging and processing satellite system for data communication and surveillance of mobile units from multiple control facilities including at least two satellites adapted for polling individual mobile units requested by one or more of the control facilities and for receiving replies from the mobile units including the mobile units' altitude, such as an aircraft's barometric altitude.
- a cross-link communication path is provided between the satellites.
- the satellites include processing apparatus to compute the ranges between the mobile unit and each of the satellites using the replies from the mobile units; the satellites further include apparatus for transmitting the computer ranges to at least one control facility, and for computing the mobile unit's position for acquisition.
- the control facilities employ TDMA (time division multiple access) or FDMA (frequency division multiple access) multiplexed channels as uplinks to the satellites.
- Fig. 1 is a schematic illustration of the RAPSAT external data flow
- Fig. 2 is a diagram of the overall RAPSAT system architecture employing two geostationary satellites as an example
- Fig. 3a illustrates an upload of poll commands from ten control facilities to a RAPSAT satellite
- Fig. 3b illustrates the geographical coverage area of a pair of control facilities
- FIG. 4a illustrates a prior art polling sequence
- Fig. 4b illustrates the polling sequence disclosed herein;
- Fig. 5 illustrates the multiple access system of the present invention
- Fig. 6 is an illustrative diagram of the RAPSAT on-board processing top-level data flow
- Fig. 7 is an illustrative block diagram of the RAPSAT forward link.
- Fig. 8 is an illustrative block diagram of the RAPSAT return link.
- the ranging and processing satellite system has been designed to provide multiple access for both mobile unit users and their control facilities (such as those operated by air traffic control, marine traffic regulation, and commercial transportation companies).
- the ground control facilities obtain access to the satellite via terrestrial links to large central earth stations.
- the on-board processing of the present invention makes it readily possible for a number of control facilities to gain access to the satellite directly from their premises via TDMA or FDMA channel uplinks as illustrated in Fig. 1.
- a RAPSAT satellite 10 includes an on-board processor which provides the logic and memory functions to be described hereinafter.
- Satellite access for multiple mobile units is accomplished through a polling scheme that is Initiated at the satellite 10 under the control of on-board processing, based on poll commands from the control facilities.
- the replies from the mobile units 12 to the polling commands (or polls) from the satellite 10 are processed on-board the satellite 10; such processing includes two-way range determination to the mobile unit.
- the resulting data is transmitted via a time-division multiplexed (TDM) down-link broadcast to control facilities 16.
- TDM time-division multiplexed
- Fig. 2 is an overall diagram of the RAPSAT system architecture employing, as an example, two geostationary satellites 18 and 20, each handling one-half of the mobile units 22 and 24.
- the two satellites 18 and 20 are used for the purposes of sharing the processing load and for mobile unit position determination. Position determination is accomplished by range-range measurements and transmitted altitude information included in a mobile unit's reply to a poll addressed to that unit.
- Each of the satellites 18 and 20 individually polls those mobile units that are under the control of the control facilities 26 and 28 having access to that satellite.
- the replies to the polls are received by both satellites for position determination.
- the satellite 20 transmits a poll to a mobile unit 24, with a reply being received both by the polling satellite 20 and the receive-only satellite 18.
- the receive-only satellite 18 transmits to satellite 20 by communications path 30 a message containing the time satellite 18 received the reply to the poll originated by satellite 20; this information is processed by the satellite 20 and eventually is transmitted to the ground control facilities 28.
- Satellites 18 and 20 simultaneously use the same frequency spectrum; thus, a two-fold frequency reuse is employed for spectral efficiency. This is accomplished by spot beam technology. Furthermore, the coverage of each satellite is partitioned into two areas for the purpose of filling the garbling guard times that must be placed between individual polls from the satellite when operating in a multi-satellite ranging mode. Garbling refers to an interfering overlap of replies at a received satellite. See B.D. Elrod, "Aircraft Interrogation Scheduling with ASTRO-DABS", Mitre Technical Report, MTR-6368, March 30, 1973. The filling of the garbling guard time — made readily possible by on-board processing — gives RAPSAT almost twice the capacity of previously proposed discrete address polling type satellite systems. See B.D.
- the RAPSAT system disclosed herein is designed such that a number of control facilities such as 26 and 28 can each directly access a satellite from earth stations located on their premises. Mobile units such as 22 and 24 achieve access for data link service and surveillance service by replying to periodic polls addressed to them from the satellites 18 and 20. Such polls have been previously uploaded by the control facilities 26 or 28 and stored on-board the satellite in a computer. The methods of access will now be described in conjunction with Figs. 3, 4, and 5.
- TDMA TDMA channel upload of poll commands from ten control facilities to one of the satellites 18 or 20 of Fig. 2.
- the control facility uploads in Fig. 3a are labeled as the five pairs (Al, A2) , (Bl, B2), (Cl, C2) , (Dl, D2), and (El, E2) .
- Each control facility is assigned a geographical area of responsibility and loads its poll commands into the uplink channel during its assigned time slot. Since ten control facilities are assumed in this example, ten time slots are allocated each frame. If frame duration is assumed to be four seconds, then each time slot is approximately 0.4 seconds. Each satellite's coverage area is divided in half. Thus, RAPSAT, as illustrated in this example, consists of our major coverage sub-areas, or two quadrants per satellite. Each member of a pair of control facilities (for example, El, E2) is assigned a geographical coverage area within a different quadrant, as illustrated in Fig. 3b. The geographical areas are sufficiently separated that poll replies from each area can be readily separated by spot beam receive antennas on the satellite. The order of the uplink poll command loading time sequence is synchronized to the order of polling of the area covered by each control facility in a pair as will be shown hereinbelow.
- the multiple access of mobile units is designed to account for the guard time that should be inserted between polls to prevent garbling of replies when the poll replies are to be received by more than one satellite. If the polls are to be received by only one satellite, then garbling can be precluded by polling the mobile units in ascending order of range from the satellite, and by using a guard time between polls if a reply burst from a mobile unit is of greater duration than the next poll burst transmitted from the satellite.
- B.D. Elrod in the 1973 report referred to above has shown that garbling can also be precluded when replies are to be received by more than one satellite if the guard time satisfies the following inequality:
- Trl burst duration of reply to first poll and ? t2 burst duration of the next poll transmission.
- Elrod divided the coverage area of the polling satellite into solid hexagonal cells of three-dimension diameter cT .
- these cells will be called range ordering cells (ROC) or range ordering subvolum.es to emphasize that they are different from the common frequency reuse cells used in mobile telephone systems.
- ROC range ordering cells
- T guard time
- the forward link can be fully utilized if mobile units are alternately polled as illustrated in Fig. 4b.
- mobile units from a pair of control facilities are alternately polled by the on-board processor which has the poll commands stored in its memory. For example, referring to Fig. 5, a mooile unit under Control Facility (El) is polled, the next poll is for a mobile unit under Control Facility ( ⁇ 2), then a mobile unit under Control Facility (El) and so on.
- each control facility pair occupies the two uplink time slots occurring prior to the alternating polling of their respective coverage areas. That is, control facilities (Al) and (A2) start their uplink slots every four seconds and complete them just prior to the alternating polling of their coverage areas. This allows the controlling authority on the ground the maximum amount of time (about three seconds for this example) to prepare and send an advisory or request data link message during the next poll.
- On-board processing allows the range from satellite to mobile unit to be determined ar the satellite.
- the on-board processor records the time the poll is transmitted.
- the time when the reply to the poll is received is also determined to derive range to the mobile unit as is done in conventional radar systems. That is, the total round trip time is an indication of range from the mobile unit to the satellite.
- Aircraft geocentric altitude can be estimated from the sum of transmitted baroaltimeter-derived altitude with proper corrections applied to it and the local earth radius.
- the system of the present invention derives a cooperative position determination by this method for the surveillance function. Referring again to Fig. 2, a reply to a satellite's poll is received at both satellites 18 and 20. The time the mobile unit 24 transmitted the reply can be calculated at the polling satellite 20 to be
- T time when mobile units replies to poll
- T_ __C_L time when polling satellite initiates poll to mobile unit
- R, range to second satellite
- T , time when mobile unit's reply is received at second satellite.
- the second satellite 18 transmits its poll-received time (T , ) to the polling satellite 20 via the cross ⁇ link 30.
- the clocks on both satellites are synchronized; therefore, the polling satellite uses the above equations to calculate the range between the second satellite and the mobile unit.
- the two ranges and received altitude (in the case of an aircraft) become part of the mobile unit's down-link message to the control facility and are used on-board the satellite to compute position for acquisition of mobile units entering the system. Garbling between replies to polls initiated by both satellites is precluded by directional receive antennas on the satellites.
- the acquisition of mobile units according to the present invention can also be accomplished by on-board processing. Periodically, for example, every two seconds, a broadcast message is transmitted by the satellite for the purpose of requesting acquisition. Those mobile units seeking acquisition will reply. Based on a mobile unit's reply (including altitude for the case of an aircraft), the polling satellite can calculate the mobile unit's position as described above, and, thus, identify the ROC where the mobile unit is located. During the next sweep of this ROC, the mobile unit is polled. This reply is then processed as any other reply. The efficiency of this method is decreased by the absence of garbling protection. However, if the acquisition reply message length is kept at a minimum (e.g., identification, range code and abbreviated position information from the mobile unit navigation system) then the probability of garbling is minimized.
- a minimum e.g., identification, range code and abbreviated position information from the mobile unit navigation system
- RAPSAT Concept according to the present invention centers around the use of large scale on-board processing.
- the operational on-board processing features of RAPSAT are:
- Fig. 6 is a top-level data flow chart of RAPSAT on-board processing.
- the processing is divided into forward processing and return processing.
- the forward front end processing block 40 (a) scans a poll request buffer for decoded poll request messages from the control facilities, (b) checks the messages for completeness and consistency, and (c) controls the message flow to the poll-initiate processing block 42 to ensure that the poll request messages from a control facility reach the poll-initiate processing block 42 in time for the scan of the control facility's coverage area.
- the poll-initiate processing block 42 (a) interprets the poll request messages from the control facilities, (b) formats them into poll messages to the mobile units, (c) controls the scanning of the coverage area of each control facility by controlling the switching to the corresponding spot beam,
- a return front end processing block 46 scans the poll reply buffer for decoded replies from mobile units, associates replies with their receive times, checks replies for completeness and consistency, and controls the reply flow to the return correlation processing block 44. It detects and counters external interfering signals in the return link by identifying and evaluating the interference, initiating an alert message to satellite ground control for action, attempting to reject the interference through signal processing and, if necessary, closing the beam through which the interference is present. It also similarly processes buffered decoded reply data received from the other satellite.
- the return correlation processing block 44 (a) correlates a reply message to the corresponding poll intiation message, (b) pairs the poll intiation time and poll receive times at its satellite and at the other satellite for range determination, (c) performs the two-way ranging computation for each satellite,
- the forward functions (ground to mobile unit) of the satellite receive and process the poll request messages from the control facilities and initiate the polls.
- the return functions receive and process the replies from the mobile units, correlate them with the poll initiations, determine range to the mobile unit, and generate the TDM down ⁇ link to the control facilities.
- Fig. 7 is an exemplary top-level block diagram of the satellite forward functions.
- the receiver 50 includes an up-link antenna assembly, low-noise front end, down converter and demodulator.
- a decoder 52 digitizes and formats the demodulated poll request messages to make them suitable for digital processing.
- a buffer 54 stores the digitized poll request messages until they are accessed by a forward processing block 56 as described above for Fig. 6.
- An encoder 58 transforms the poll bit streams into a waveform that is suitable for modulating the carrier.
- a transmitter 60 contains a modulator, up converter, power amplifier and spot beam antenna assembly. Since only one poll is transmitted at a time, the power amplifier can be operated at full power capability without generating intermodulation products, a significant advantage that is often stated for TDMA.
- Fig. 8 is a top-level block diagram of the satellite return functions.
- Receivers 62 and 64 representing multiple parallel receivers, consist of spot beam receive antenna assemblies, low noise front ends, down converters and demodulators. This figure illustrates parallel receivers in a functional sense. A common receiver can also be used with appropriate beam switching. However, the parallel approach would allow a less complicated operation since the poll- transmit and reply-receive functions would not have to be synchronized for receive beam switching.
- the data decoders 66 and 68 digitize, apply forward error correction, and format the demodulated replies into a format suitable for digital processing.
- the demodulated replies are also rerouted to reply timing blocks 70 and 72 where the reply arrival time is determined based upon the satellite time reference.
- a return link buffer 74 stores the digitized reply messages and arrival time until they are accessed by the return processing block 76.
- a cross-link buffer 78 stores the digitized reply messages received from the other satellite until accessed by the return processing block 76 which has been described above in conjunction with Fig. 6.
- a down-link includes a down-link transmitter 80 and provides a TMD stream of processed replies. Each control facility processes those replies that are of interest to it. This provides a backup capability in the event a control facility has an outage. In that case, another control facility(ies) would be assigned the failed control facility's TDMA uplink slot and would receive the corresponding replies on the TDM down-link.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Radar, Positioning & Navigation (AREA)
- Remote Sensing (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Radio Relay Systems (AREA)
- Mobile Radio Communication Systems (AREA)
Abstract
A satellite system including at least two satellites having on-board processing capability so that data messages may be exchanged and the position of mobile units may be determined with direct access from multiple ground control facilities. The satellites transmit data and poll individual mobile units upon command by one or more of the control facilities and receive replies from the mobile units including the mobile units' altitude and other data of interest to the control facility. At least two satellites communicate with one another by means of a cross-link communication path. Computer processing apparatus is included on the satellites to compute the ranges between the mobile units and each of the satellites from the replies received from the mobile units, and to store and process messages. The position information and messages are transmitted to at least one of the control facilities. It is preferred that the control facilities employ TDMA or FDMA protocols in the uplinks to the satellites. The on-board processing makes it readily possible for a number of control facilities to gain access to the satellites directly rather than through a central earth station, and to increase the capacity of a discrete address polling system for a given allocation of radio frequency spectrum. A discrete address polling system is one where each mobile unit is polled on an individual basis by only responding to polls that contain its identification.
Description
-! -
RANGING AND PROCESSING SATELLITE SYSTEM FOR MOBILE SURVEILLANCE AND DATA LINK
Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a satellite surveillance and data link system. More particularly, it relates to a system for determining the range from a satellite to a plurality of mobile units, for storing uploaded commands to poll mobile units until the poll is scheduled to be transmitted, and for acquiring mobile units that request entry into the system, all through satellite on-board computing capability.
Background of the Invention
There is currently high-level commercial and government interest in the application of communication satellite technology to mobile units (e.g., aircraft, ships, and trucks). This technology has the advantage of almost unlimited coverage as compared to the restrictions of terrestrial line-of-sight limited communications and it eliminates the need for many ground-based facilities. There is also unused radio spectrum reserved for mobile-satellite communications. Satellites have been in successful operation for ship-to-shore communications for several years through a service provided by the international consortium, INMARSAT. Recently, the aviation community has rapidly begun to renew its interest for the use. of satellites for air traffic control, airline operational control and public correspondence.
In known polling system methods using satellites for cooperative position determination of mobile units, the satellite acts only as a repeater for ground- initiated polls, replies from the mobile unit, and data messages. United States Patent No. 4,359,733 discloses a concept called GEOSTAR that utilizes satellites as repeaters in which ground-based computers calculate ranges to mobile units.
Other known proposed systems also use the satellite solely as a repeater of the uplinked data from the ground, and rely upon centralized earth stations and terrestrial links for interconnection to control facilities such as air traffic control centers. On-board processing is a major theme of NASA's Advanced Communication Technology Satellite (ACTS) program and advanced military satellites. See M. Kachnor, "Switchboards in the Sky," Microwave and RF, June 1986, and M.E. Thimlar et al. , "Future Space-Based computer Processors," Aerospace America, March 1984.
It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide a ranging and processing satellite system for cooperative mobile unit surveillance and data link service and in which the satellites have on-board processing capability.
It is another object of the present invention to provide such a satellite system which can be directly accessed from multiple ground control facilities.
Yet another object of the invention is such a satellite-based system which is more efficient than previously known discrete-address, cooperative- surveillance satellite systems.
Still another object of the invention is a satellite system including the use of cross-link communications between the satellites to provide for on-board satellite position determination and for on-board acquisition of mobile units into the system.
Yet another object of the invention is a system in which the on-board processing involves not only signal regeneration and beam switching capability, but also digital data processing of messages, for storage of poll commands, generation of polls to mobile units according to a schedule, storage of replies to polls, and formatting of messages.
Summary of the Invention
These and other objects of the invention are achieved by means of a ranging and processing satellite system (RAPSAT) for data communication and surveillance of mobile units from multiple control facilities including at least two satellites adapted for polling individual mobile units requested by one or more of the control facilities and for receiving replies from the mobile units including the mobile units' altitude, such as an aircraft's barometric altitude. A cross-link
communication path is provided between the satellites. The satellites include processing apparatus to compute the ranges between the mobile unit and each of the satellites using the replies from the mobile units; the satellites further include apparatus for transmitting the computer ranges to at least one control facility, and for computing the mobile unit's position for acquisition. It is preferred that the control facilities employ TDMA (time division multiple access) or FDMA (frequency division multiple access) multiplexed channels as uplinks to the satellites.
Brief Description of the Drawing
The invention disclosed herein may be understood better with reference to the drawings of which:
Fig. 1 is a schematic illustration of the RAPSAT external data flow;
Fig. 2 is a diagram of the overall RAPSAT system architecture employing two geostationary satellites as an example;
Fig. 3a illustrates an upload of poll commands from ten control facilities to a RAPSAT satellite;
Fig. 3b illustrates the geographical coverage area of a pair of control facilities;
Fig. 4a illustrates a prior art polling sequence;
Fig. 4b illustrates the polling sequence disclosed herein;
Fig. 5 illustrates the multiple access system of the present invention;
Fig. 6 is an illustrative diagram of the RAPSAT on-board processing top-level data flow;
Fig. 7 is an illustrative block diagram of the RAPSAT forward link; and
Fig. 8 is an illustrative block diagram of the RAPSAT return link.
Description of the Preferred Embodiment
The ranging and processing satellite system (RAPSAT) has been designed to provide multiple access for both mobile unit users and their control facilities (such as those operated by air traffic control, marine traffic regulation, and commercial transportation companies). As discussed above, in proposed mobile satellite systems, the ground control facilities obtain access to the satellite via terrestrial links to large central earth stations. However, the on-board processing of the present invention makes it readily possible for a number of control facilities to gain access to the satellite directly from their premises via TDMA or FDMA channel uplinks as illustrated in
Fig. 1. A RAPSAT satellite 10 includes an on-board processor which provides the logic and memory functions to be described hereinafter. Satellite access for multiple mobile units is accomplished through a polling scheme that is Initiated at the satellite 10 under the control of on-board processing, based on poll commands from the control facilities. The replies from the mobile units 12 to the polling commands (or polls) from the satellite 10 are processed on-board the satellite 10; such processing includes two-way range determination to the mobile unit. The resulting data is transmitted via a time-division multiplexed (TDM) down-link broadcast to control facilities 16. Each of the control facilities 16 picks off the data corresponding to those mobile units under its control.
Fig. 2 is an overall diagram of the RAPSAT system architecture employing, as an example, two geostationary satellites 18 and 20, each handling one-half of the mobile units 22 and 24. The two satellites 18 and 20 are used for the purposes of sharing the processing load and for mobile unit position determination. Position determination is accomplished by range-range measurements and transmitted altitude information included in a mobile unit's reply to a poll addressed to that unit. Each of the satellites 18 and 20 individually polls those mobile units that are under the control of the control facilities 26 and 28 having access to that satellite. The replies to the polls are received by both
satellites for position determination. In the example illustrated in Fig. 2, the satellite 20 transmits a poll to a mobile unit 24, with a reply being received both by the polling satellite 20 and the receive-only satellite 18. The receive-only satellite 18 transmits to satellite 20 by communications path 30 a message containing the time satellite 18 received the reply to the poll originated by satellite 20; this information is processed by the satellite 20 and eventually is transmitted to the ground control facilities 28.
Satellites 18 and 20 simultaneously use the same frequency spectrum; thus, a two-fold frequency reuse is employed for spectral efficiency. This is accomplished by spot beam technology. Furthermore, the coverage of each satellite is partitioned into two areas for the purpose of filling the garbling guard times that must be placed between individual polls from the satellite when operating in a multi-satellite ranging mode. Garbling refers to an interfering overlap of replies at a received satellite. See B.D. Elrod, "Aircraft Interrogation Scheduling with ASTRO-DABS", Mitre Technical Report, MTR-6368, March 30, 1973. The filling of the garbling guard time — made readily possible by on-board processing — gives RAPSAT almost twice the capacity of previously proposed discrete address polling type satellite systems. See B.D. Elrod, A. Weinburg, L.P. Sinha, "Investigation of Selected Satellite-Aided ATC Systems Concepts Employing the NAVSTAR Global Positioning System," Mitre Technical Repor , MTR-7688, January 1978.
The RAPSAT system disclosed herein is designed such that a number of control facilities such as 26 and 28 can each directly access a satellite from earth stations located on their premises. Mobile units such as 22 and 24 achieve access for data link service and surveillance service by replying to periodic polls addressed to them from the satellites 18 and 20. Such polls have been previously uploaded by the control facilities 26 or 28 and stored on-board the satellite in a computer. The methods of access will now be described in conjunction with Figs. 3, 4, and 5. Mmultiple access by the ground-based control facilities to the RAPSAT satellite can be accomplished either by TDMA or FDMA channels or other suitable means. It is believed that TDMA is superior for RAPSAT since the time division poll command uploads can be synchronized with the forward link polling sequence as will be discussed below. Fig. 3a illustrates a TDMA channel upload of poll commands from ten control facilities to one of the satellites 18 or 20 of Fig. 2. The control facility uploads in Fig. 3a are labeled as the five pairs (Al, A2) , (Bl, B2), (Cl, C2) , (Dl, D2), and (El, E2) . Each control facility is assigned a geographical area of responsibility and loads its poll commands into the uplink channel during its assigned time slot. Since ten control facilities are assumed in this example, ten time slots are allocated each frame. If frame duration is assumed to be four seconds, then each time slot is approximately 0.4 seconds. Each satellite's coverage area is divided in half. Thus, RAPSAT, as illustrated in this example, consists of
our major coverage sub-areas, or two quadrants per satellite. Each member of a pair of control facilities (for example, El, E2) is assigned a geographical coverage area within a different quadrant, as illustrated in Fig. 3b. The geographical areas are sufficiently separated that poll replies from each area can be readily separated by spot beam receive antennas on the satellite. The order of the uplink poll command loading time sequence is synchronized to the order of polling of the area covered by each control facility in a pair as will be shown hereinbelow.
The multiple access of mobile units is designed to account for the guard time that should be inserted between polls to prevent garbling of replies when the poll replies are to be received by more than one satellite. If the polls are to be received by only one satellite, then garbling can be precluded by polling the mobile units in ascending order of range from the satellite, and by using a guard time between polls if a reply burst from a mobile unit is of greater duration than the next poll burst transmitted from the satellite. B.D. Elrod in the 1973 report referred to above has shown that garbling can also be precluded when replies are to be received by more than one satellite if the guard time satisfies the following inequality:
Tg> D/c + Trl - T,
where
guard time between polls,
D distance between the two mobile units, c speed of light,
Trl burst duration of reply to first poll, and ?t2 burst duration of the next poll transmission.
To readily implement such a scheme, Elrod divided the coverage area of the polling satellite into solid hexagonal cells of three-dimension diameter cT . Here, these cells will be called range ordering cells (ROC) or range ordering subvolum.es to emphasize that they are different from the common frequency reuse cells used in mobile telephone systems. To preclude garbling, mobile units located in each ROC are polled in ascending order of range, with guard time T between polls. This polling sequence is illustrated in Fig. 4a. As can be seen, the guard time T is wasted since it is unused.
With on-board processing, it is readily possible to fill the garbling guard time using the same frequency by polling another mobile unit located in an ROC that is out of the coverage of the receive spot beam antenna that covers the ROC of the first mobile unit. Thus, the forward link can be fully utilized if mobile units are alternately polled as illustrated in Fig. 4b. In the present invention, mobile units from a pair of
control facilities are alternately polled by the on-board processor which has the poll commands stored in its memory. For example, referring to Fig. 5, a mooile unit under Control Facility (El) is polled, the next poll is for a mobile unit under Control Facility (Ξ2), then a mobile unit under Control Facility (El) and so on. It is noted that each control facility pair occupies the two uplink time slots occurring prior to the alternating polling of their respective coverage areas. That is, control facilities (Al) and (A2) start their uplink slots every four seconds and complete them just prior to the alternating polling of their coverage areas. This allows the controlling authority on the ground the maximum amount of time (about three seconds for this example) to prepare and send an advisory or request data link message during the next poll.
On-board processing allows the range from satellite to mobile unit to be determined ar the satellite. When a mobile unit is polled, the on-board processor records the time the poll is transmitted. The time when the reply to the poll is received is also determined to derive range to the mobile unit as is done in conventional radar systems. That is, the total round trip time is an indication of range from the mobile unit to the satellite.
To determine a mobile unit's position, it is sufficient to determine its range to two widely separated satellites and to know its geocentric
altitude. The intersection of the resulting three spherical surfaces defines the mobile unit's position. Aircraft geocentric altitude can be estimated from the sum of transmitted baroaltimeter-derived altitude with proper corrections applied to it and the local earth radius. The system of the present invention derives a cooperative position determination by this method for the surveillance function. Referring again to Fig. 2, a reply to a satellite's poll is received at both satellites 18 and 20. The time the mobile unit 24 transmitted the reply can be calculated at the polling satellite 20 to be
m = (Txa + Tr_)/2
where
T = time when mobile units replies to poll,
T_ __C_L = time when polling satellite initiates poll to mobile unit, and
ra„ = time when mobile unit's rep*-rly - is received at the polling satellite.
The range (in units of time) between the second satellite and the mobile unit is then
Rb » Trb " Tm
where
R, = range to second satellite, and
T , = time when mobile unit's reply is received at second satellite.
The second satellite 18 transmits its poll-received time (T , ) to the polling satellite 20 via the cross¬ link 30. The clocks on both satellites are synchronized; therefore, the polling satellite uses the above equations to calculate the range between the second satellite and the mobile unit. The two ranges and received altitude (in the case of an aircraft) become part of the mobile unit's down-link message to the control facility and are used on-board the satellite to compute position for acquisition of mobile units entering the system. Garbling between replies to polls initiated by both satellites is precluded by directional receive antennas on the satellites.
The acquisition of mobile units according to the present invention can also be accomplished by on-board processing. Periodically, for example, every two seconds, a broadcast message is transmitted by the satellite for the purpose of requesting acquisition. Those mobile units seeking acquisition will reply. Based on a mobile unit's reply (including altitude for the case of an aircraft), the polling satellite can calculate the mobile unit's position as described
above, and, thus, identify the ROC where the mobile unit is located. During the next sweep of this ROC, the mobile unit is polled. This reply is then processed as any other reply. The efficiency of this method is decreased by the absence of garbling protection. However, if the acquisition reply message length is kept at a minimum (e.g., identification, range code and abbreviated position information from the mobile unit navigation system) then the probability of garbling is minimized.
The RAPSAT concept according to the present invention centers around the use of large scale on-board processing. The operational on-board processing features of RAPSAT are:
o Storage of Poll Commands on Board the
Satellite to Facilitate Optimal Poll Sequencing
o Control Facility Multiple Access
o Range Ordered Polling with No Waste of Garbling Guard Times
o Two- ay Ranging on Mobiles
o Determination of Position of Mobiles
o Acquisition of Mobiles Entering the System
o Beam Switching
o Data Message Regeneration
A top-level description of the functions within the satellite to provide these features will not be presented. It is to be understood that this description is only one of a number of ways of implementation. Fig. 6 is a top-level data flow chart of RAPSAT on-board processing. The processing is divided into forward processing and return processing. The forward front end processing block 40 (a) scans a poll request buffer for decoded poll request messages from the control facilities, (b) checks the messages for completeness and consistency, and (c) controls the message flow to the poll-initiate processing block 42 to ensure that the poll request messages from a control facility reach the poll-initiate processing block 42 in time for the scan of the control facility's coverage area. The poll-initiate processing block 42 (a) interprets the poll request messages from the control facilities, (b) formats them into poll messages to the mobile units, (c) controls the scanning of the coverage area of each control facility by controlling the switching to the corresponding spot beam,
(d) properly assigns the order of the polls as directed by the stored control facility poll commands, and
(e) interleaves the polls of each control facility pair, It interfaces with the cross-link channel to alert the other satellite that a poll has been
initiated and it transfers the poll initiation alert and poll initiation time to the return correlation processing block 44. A return front end processing block 46 scans the poll reply buffer for decoded replies from mobile units, associates replies with their receive times, checks replies for completeness and consistency, and controls the reply flow to the return correlation processing block 44. It detects and counters external interfering signals in the return link by identifying and evaluating the interference, initiating an alert message to satellite ground control for action, attempting to reject the interference through signal processing and, if necessary, closing the beam through which the interference is present. It also similarly processes buffered decoded reply data received from the other satellite.
The return correlation processing block 44 (a) correlates a reply message to the corresponding poll intiation message, (b) pairs the poll intiation time and poll receive times at its satellite and at the other satellite for range determination, (c) performs the two-way ranging computation for each satellite,
(d) formats each reply message for the down-link,
(e) performs the acquisition function, and (f) formats and controls the down-link TDM stream of reply messages
The forward functions (ground to mobile unit) of the satellite receive and process the poll request messages from the control facilities and initiate the
polls. The return functions (mobile unit to ground) receive and process the replies from the mobile units, correlate them with the poll initiations, determine range to the mobile unit, and generate the TDM down¬ link to the control facilities.
Fig. 7 is an exemplary top-level block diagram of the satellite forward functions. The receiver 50 includes an up-link antenna assembly, low-noise front end, down converter and demodulator. A decoder 52 digitizes and formats the demodulated poll request messages to make them suitable for digital processing. A buffer 54 stores the digitized poll request messages until they are accessed by a forward processing block 56 as described above for Fig. 6. An encoder 58 transforms the poll bit streams into a waveform that is suitable for modulating the carrier. A transmitter 60 contains a modulator, up converter, power amplifier and spot beam antenna assembly. Since only one poll is transmitted at a time, the power amplifier can be operated at full power capability without generating intermodulation products, a significant advantage that is often stated for TDMA.
Fig. 8 is a top-level block diagram of the satellite return functions. Receivers 62 and 64, representing multiple parallel receivers, consist of spot beam receive antenna assemblies, low noise front ends, down converters and demodulators. This figure illustrates parallel receivers in a functional sense.
A common receiver can also be used with appropriate beam switching. However, the parallel approach would allow a less complicated operation since the poll- transmit and reply-receive functions would not have to be synchronized for receive beam switching. The data decoders 66 and 68 digitize, apply forward error correction, and format the demodulated replies into a format suitable for digital processing. The demodulated replies are also rerouted to reply timing blocks 70 and 72 where the reply arrival time is determined based upon the satellite time reference. A return link buffer 74 stores the digitized reply messages and arrival time until they are accessed by the return processing block 76. A cross-link buffer 78 stores the digitized reply messages received from the other satellite until accessed by the return processing block 76 which has been described above in conjunction with Fig. 6. A down-link includes a down-link transmitter 80 and provides a TMD stream of processed replies. Each control facility processes those replies that are of interest to it. This provides a backup capability in the event a control facility has an outage. In that case, another control facility(ies) would be assigned the failed control facility's TDMA uplink slot and would receive the corresponding replies on the TDM down-link.
It is thus seen that the objects of this invention have been achieved in that there has been disclosed a ranging and processing satellite system for the data
link and surveillance service of mobile units from multiple control facilities. The present invention allows direct multiple access from numerous control facilities. On-board interleaving of polling messages eliminates the waste of garbling guard time which leads to high spectral efficiency. The present system also permits on-board satellite acquisition of mobile units entering the system. It is recognized that modifications and variations of the present invention will occur to those skilled in the art and it is intended that all such modifications and variations be included within the scope of the appended claims.
What is claimed is:
Claims
1. A ranging and processing satellite system for data link with and cooperative surveillance of mobile units from multiple control facilities comprising: at least two satellites including means for polling individual mobile units requested by one or more of the control facilities and for receiving replies for the mobile units, such replies including information about the mobile units' positions; means operable in connection with the means for polling and for receiving replies, for precluding the garbling between replies to polls initiated by the at least two satellites; a cross-link communication path between the at least two satellites to exchange mobile ranging data; processing means on the satellite to store poll commands, initiate polls according to an optimal sequence, store messages between mobile units and control facilities, and to compute the ranges between the mobile unit and each of the satellites from the replies from the mobile units; and means for transmitting the computer ranges to at least one of the control facilities.
2. The system of claim 1 wherein the means for precluding garbling includes each satellite having a directional receive antenna for receiving replies from mobile units.
3. The system of claim 1 or claim 2 wherein a first one of the satellite further includes (a) means for polling a mobile unit, recording the time the poll is transmitted, Txa, and the time the rep cly•*- is received,
T , and (b) the processing means is adapted to compute a first range from the elapsed time; wherein a second satellite includes means for receiving the reply from the mobile unit, such reply being received at a time T , , and means for transmitting this time T , to the first satellite; and the first procesing means on the first satellite computes the range to the mobile unit in units of time between the second satellite and the mobile unit, being
Rb * Trb " [(Txa + ra 2)]"
4. The system of claim 3 wherein the computed ranges and data messages from the mobile units are transmitted to the control facilities by the satellites using time division multiplex techniques.
5. The system of claim 1 wherein the multiple control facilities employ TDMA or FDMA multiplexing to directly upload poll commands and data messages to the satellite data processor.
6. The system of claim 1 wherein the mobile units are polled in ascending order of range.
7. The system of claim 1 wherein the coverage volume of the satellites is divided into range-ordered subvolumes and mobile units located in separate ordered subvolumes are alternately polled.
8. The system of claim 1 wherein one of the satellites acquires mobile units entering the system by on-board position determination through the range determinations and altitude received from the mobile units when required for position determination.
Priority Applications (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DK211788A DK211788A (en) | 1986-08-20 | 1988-04-19 | SATELLITE MONITORING SYSTEM |
KR1019880700437A KR880701891A (en) | 1986-08-20 | 1988-04-20 | Scoped and processed satellite system for movement monitoring and data linking |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US89819686A | 1986-08-20 | 1986-08-20 | |
US898,196 | 1986-08-20 |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO1988001392A2 true WO1988001392A2 (en) | 1988-02-25 |
WO1988001392A3 WO1988001392A3 (en) | 1988-03-10 |
Family
ID=25409084
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US1987/002059 WO1988001392A2 (en) | 1986-08-20 | 1987-08-20 | Ranging and processing satellite system for mobile surveillance and data link |
Country Status (4)
Country | Link |
---|---|
KR (1) | KR880701891A (en) |
AU (1) | AU7915987A (en) |
DK (1) | DK211788A (en) |
WO (1) | WO1988001392A2 (en) |
Cited By (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP0310939A3 (en) * | 1987-09-30 | 1990-04-04 | Nec Corporation | Satellite-based vehicle communication/position determination system |
WO1998014795A1 (en) * | 1996-09-30 | 1998-04-09 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Position determination using one low-earth orbit satellite |
WO1998014796A3 (en) * | 1996-09-30 | 1998-06-18 | Qualcomm Inc | Passive position determination using two low-earth orbit satellites |
GB2320992A (en) * | 1997-01-03 | 1998-07-08 | Motorola Inc | Communicating between aircraft and flight control centre using satellites |
WO1998028634A3 (en) * | 1996-12-04 | 1998-08-27 | Olivetti Res Ltd | Detection system for determining positional and other information about objects |
US6137441A (en) * | 1998-09-09 | 2000-10-24 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Accurate range and range rate determination in a satellite communications system |
US6298238B1 (en) | 1998-09-09 | 2001-10-02 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Fast user terminal position determination in a satellite communications system |
US6369754B1 (en) | 1999-04-02 | 2002-04-09 | Qualcomm Inc. | Fine positioning of a user terminal in a satellite communication system |
Families Citing this family (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
KR100425246B1 (en) * | 2001-05-04 | 2004-03-30 | 이지로보틱스 주식회사 | Remote-control robots system |
Family Cites Families (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE1591517B1 (en) * | 1967-07-21 | 1971-08-05 | Siemens Ag | Radio location method by measuring the transit time to vehicles with transponders via earth satellites |
US3665464A (en) * | 1969-05-01 | 1972-05-23 | Goodyear Aerospace Corp | Method and apparatus for high speed vehicle position acquisition |
US3750166A (en) * | 1971-06-11 | 1973-07-31 | J Dearth | Pilot data system |
US4359733A (en) * | 1980-09-23 | 1982-11-16 | Neill Gerard K O | Satellite-based vehicle position determining system |
-
1987
- 1987-08-20 WO PCT/US1987/002059 patent/WO1988001392A2/en unknown
- 1987-08-20 AU AU79159/87A patent/AU7915987A/en not_active Abandoned
-
1988
- 1988-04-19 DK DK211788A patent/DK211788A/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 1988-04-20 KR KR1019880700437A patent/KR880701891A/en not_active Withdrawn
Cited By (13)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP0310939A3 (en) * | 1987-09-30 | 1990-04-04 | Nec Corporation | Satellite-based vehicle communication/position determination system |
US6107959A (en) * | 1996-09-30 | 2000-08-22 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Positioning determination using one low-Earth orbit satellite |
WO1998014795A1 (en) * | 1996-09-30 | 1998-04-09 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Position determination using one low-earth orbit satellite |
WO1998014796A3 (en) * | 1996-09-30 | 1998-06-18 | Qualcomm Inc | Passive position determination using two low-earth orbit satellites |
EP1199579A1 (en) * | 1996-09-30 | 2002-04-24 | QUALCOMM Incorporated | Passive position determination using two low-earth orbit satellites |
US6078284A (en) * | 1996-09-30 | 2000-06-20 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Passive position determination using two low-earth orbit satellites |
WO1998028634A3 (en) * | 1996-12-04 | 1998-08-27 | Olivetti Res Ltd | Detection system for determining positional and other information about objects |
GB2320992A (en) * | 1997-01-03 | 1998-07-08 | Motorola Inc | Communicating between aircraft and flight control centre using satellites |
GB2320992B (en) * | 1997-01-03 | 2001-11-21 | Motorola Inc | Global aviation communication system |
FR2758224A1 (en) * | 1997-01-03 | 1998-07-10 | Motorola Inc | GLOBAL AVIATION TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM |
US6137441A (en) * | 1998-09-09 | 2000-10-24 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Accurate range and range rate determination in a satellite communications system |
US6298238B1 (en) | 1998-09-09 | 2001-10-02 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Fast user terminal position determination in a satellite communications system |
US6369754B1 (en) | 1999-04-02 | 2002-04-09 | Qualcomm Inc. | Fine positioning of a user terminal in a satellite communication system |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
AU7915987A (en) | 1988-03-08 |
DK211788A (en) | 1988-05-11 |
WO1988001392A3 (en) | 1988-03-10 |
DK211788D0 (en) | 1988-04-19 |
KR880701891A (en) | 1988-11-05 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US5006855A (en) | Ranging and processing system for mobile surveillance and data link | |
US5666648A (en) | Polar relay system for satellite communication | |
CA2023611C (en) | Telemetry, tracking and control for satellite cellular communication systems | |
CN110474971B (en) | Wide-area low-power-consumption Internet of things communication system and transmission method thereof | |
AU709958B2 (en) | Wireless packet data distributed communications system | |
Maral et al. | Low earth orbit satellite systems for communications | |
US7590083B2 (en) | Wireless packet data distributed communications system | |
CN1327636C (en) | Satellite communications system and method using multiple simultaneous data rates | |
CA2468350A1 (en) | Satellite system for vessel identification | |
WO1995021388A1 (en) | Air traffic surveillance and communication system | |
US6975600B1 (en) | Multimode transmission system using TDMA | |
EP0632605B1 (en) | Burst signal transmission from an earth station to an orbiting satellite with a short guard time | |
WO1988001392A2 (en) | Ranging and processing satellite system for mobile surveillance and data link | |
CN115021794B (en) | Satellite mixed networking communication method and system of very high frequency data exchange system | |
US11316582B1 (en) | Prospective uplink grant for satellite communications | |
CN100359824C (en) | Method and apparatus for minimizing the number of channels used for paging | |
Braff | Ranging and processing mobile-satellite | |
Smith III | The orbit/spectrum resource and the technology of satellite telecommunications: an overview | |
CA2289514A1 (en) | System and method for sector-based routing | |
Zillig et al. | Demand access service for TDRSS users | |
Schertler | Acts experiments program | |
SUNDARARAMAN et al. | ISRO SATELLITE MISSION SUPPORT FACILITIES: SCOPE AND FUTURE PLANS | |
Schneider | The Western Union Telegraph Company's satellite switched TDMA advanced westar system | |
Attwood et al. | Baseband-processed SS-TDMA communication system architecture and design concepts | |
AU689858C (en) | Air traffic surveillance and communication system |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AK | Designated states |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): AU BR DK FI JP KR SE SU |
|
AL | Designated countries for regional patents |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE FR GB IT LU NL SE |
|
AK | Designated states |
Kind code of ref document: A3 Designated state(s): AU BR DK FI JP KR SE SU |
|
AL | Designated countries for regional patents |
Kind code of ref document: A3 Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE FR GB IT LU NL SE |