US8566780B2 - Object model based mapping - Google Patents
Object model based mapping Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US8566780B2 US8566780B2 US11/768,628 US76862807A US8566780B2 US 8566780 B2 US8566780 B2 US 8566780B2 US 76862807 A US76862807 A US 76862807A US 8566780 B2 US8566780 B2 US 8566780B2
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- data
- user selectable
- backend
- selectable elements
- receiving
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Fee Related, expires
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q30/00—Commerce
Definitions
- ISV independent software vendor
- niche markets comprising, for example, real estate brokers, scheduling for healthcare personnel, barcode scanning, and stock maintenance.
- Specialized software products generally offer higher productivity to organizations than more generalized software such as basic spreadsheet or database packages.
- Object model based mapping may be provided.
- First backend data may be received defining data constructs in a backend system.
- entity data may be received defining data constructs in an entity model.
- User selectable elements may then be received defining a process associating the backend data with the entity data.
- code may be produced, based on the received user selectable elements, configured to implement the process.
- FIG. 1 is a block diagram of an operating environment
- FIG. 2 is a flow chart of a method for providing object model based mapping
- FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating an object model
- FIG. 4 is a block diagram of a system including a computing device.
- CRM customer relationship management
- the backend may be, for example, a conceptual model itself, a relational database, or a set of application program interfaces (APIs). There may be no restrictions on the nature of the backend.
- Embodiments of the invention may have the following behavior to enable mapping between an entity model and a backend: i) ability to define both endpoints (e.g.
- entity model and backend ii) ability to understand the properties, predicates, and behaviors of conceptual model, and translate those into pertinent functionality to be performed on the backend; iii) ability to customize a solutions provided for a specific design/implementation of a conceptual model and a specific type/version of the backend; iv) ability to customize at both a design time and/or runtime of a solution; and v) ability to package the solutions, ship, or deploy them independent of the backends.
- mapping may include: i) data type transformation (e.g. strings to guides, integers to strings, concatenation of types, any mathematical transformation on a type, etc.); ii) backend end specification (e.g. which backend to map to, such as a structured query language (SQL) server, Microsoft customer relationship management (MSCRM) server, a SAP CRM server, a Siebel CRM server, etc.); and iii) which method to access the backend (e.g. via data access layers such as ActiveX Data Objects (e.g. Ado.Net) or Web service facades to the backend).
- data type transformation e.g. strings to guides, integers to strings, concatenation of types, any mathematical transformation on a type, etc.
- backend end specification e.g. which backend to map to, such as a structured query language (SQL) server, Microsoft customer relationship management (MSCRM) server, a SAP CRM server, a Siebel CRM server, etc.
- MSCRM Microsoft customer
- ISVs A problem faced by ISVs is that any ISV solution may not be a viable choice for customers without the ability to customize that solution. Customization may be important because any generic solution may not be what specific customers need for their specific conceptual (i.e. entity) model and their specific backends. Customers may have a different conceptual model, may interact with a different backend, may have different mapping requirements between their conceptual model and the backend, or any possible combination of these.
- FIG. 1 shows a mapping system 100 consistent with embodiments of the invention.
- system 100 may includes a backend 105 , a map 110 , and an entity model 115 .
- map 110 may include specific mapping predicates that have the ability to: i) define end points for the conceptual model to go against; and ii) define mapping/transformation logic between the two ends (e.g. entity model 115 and backend 105 ).
- backend 105 may comprise a legacy banking system using a structured query language (SQL) server.
- Entity model 115 may comprise a conceptual model corresponding to a remote personal computer configured to perform online banking for example.
- Map 110 may perform bi-directional data transforms between entity model 115 and backend 105 as described in greater detail below.
- embodiments of the invention may have the following features.
- embodiments of the invention may have the ability to understand the conceptual model's signatures (i.e. as a set of interfaces).
- embodiments of the invention may be configured to define and access backend endpoints and to schedule actions and functionality to insure correctness of the mapping.
- embodiments of the invention may be configured to supply workflow/runtime like behavior (e.g. scheduling, error handling, event raising, and event handling, etc.).
- embodiments of the invention may be configured to support programmable customization of the mapping solutions.
- FIG. 2 is a flow chart setting forth the general stages involved in a method 200 consistent with an embodiment of the invention for providing object model based mapping.
- Method 200 may be implemented using a computing device 400 as described in more detail below with respect to FIG. 4 . Ways to implement the stages of method 200 will be described in greater detail below.
- Method 200 may begin at starting block 205 and proceed to stage 210 where computing device 400 may receive backend data defining data constructs for backend system 105 .
- the backend data may specify any information regarding backend system 105 in order for map 110 to provide object model based mapping between backend 105 and entity model 115 .
- the backend data may specify which backend to map to, such as a structured query language (SQL) server, a Microsoft customer relationship management (MSCRM) server, a SAP CRM server, a Siebel CRM server, etc.). Furthermore, the backend data may specify which method to use to access backend system 105 , for example, via data access layers such as ActiveX Data Objects (e.g. Ado.Net) or Web service facades to backend system 105 .
- SQL structured query language
- MSCRM Microsoft customer relationship management
- SAP CRM SAP CRM
- Siebel CRM server Siebel CRM server
- method 200 may advance to stage 220 where computing device 400 may receive entity data defining data constructs in an entity model.
- the entity data may specify any information regarding entity model 115 in order for map 110 to provide object model based mapping between backend 105 and entity model 115 .
- the entity data may specify the desired data or the desired data format for the input and output associated with entity model 115 .
- Entity model 115 may comprise a customer's conceptual world.
- computing device 400 may receive user selectable elements defining a process associating the backend data with the entity data.
- the process may be defined by a flow chart (i.e. workflow) 305 as shown in FIG. 3 .
- computing device 400 may present a user with an interface configured to receive the user selectable elements defining the process as flow chart 305 .
- the selectable elements may comprise activities including, for example, an activity 310 .
- the activities in flow chart 305 may define map 110 .
- flow chart 305 may be translated by computing device 400 from flow chart 305 's easy-readable format for human to machine code for computer execution.
- workflows there may be two main kinds of workflows: i) sequential; and ii) and state machine.
- sequential workflows actions may be executed in some predefined order with a beginning and an end.
- Examples of sequential workflows may include installations.
- state machine workflows these workflows may not have a path, but it may be represented as a set of states and transitions between states. Examples may include a web shop: you may need approval for mailing, the user could pay via credit card or with a cheque, and each user is in one state and may go to any order depending on previous questions.
- method 200 may proceed to stage 240 where computing device 400 may produce code, based on the received user selectable elements, configured to implement the process. For example, computing device 400 may convert flow chart 305 's activities (e.g. describing map 110 ) to machine code for execution on computing device 400 . During execution, the code may perform mapping between entity model 115 and backend 105 .
- code may perform mapping between entity model 115 and backend 105 .
- Workflow instances may be created and maintained by an in-process runtime engine, for example, a runtime engine 315 .
- a runtime engine 315 There can be several workflow runtime engines within an application domain, and each instance of the runtime engine can support multiple workflow instances running concurrently.
- a workflow model When a workflow model is compiled, it can be executed inside any process including console applications, forms-based applications, Services, ASP.NET Web sites, and Web services.
- a workflow may be hosted in process, a workflow can communicate with its host application. For example, the workflow described in flow chart 305 may communicate with a host application 320 .
- An embodiment consistent with the invention may comprise a system for providing object model based mapping.
- the system may comprise a memory storage and a processing unit coupled to the memory storage.
- the processing unit may be operative to receive backend data defining data constructs in a backend system and to receive entity data defining data constructs in an entity model.
- the processing unit may be operative to receive user selectable elements defining a process associating the backend data with the entity data.
- the processing unit may be operative to produce code, based on the received user selectable elements, configured to implement the process.
- Another embodiment consistent with the invention may comprise a system for providing object model based mapping.
- the system may comprise a memory storage and a processing unit coupled to the memory storage.
- the processing unit may be operative to execute code configured to implement a process.
- the code may be produced based on received user selectable elements defining the process associating a backend data with an entity data.
- the backend data may define data constructs in a backend system and the entity data may define data constructs in an entity model.
- Yet another embodiment consistent with the invention may comprise a system for providing object model based mapping.
- the system may comprise a memory storage and a processing unit coupled to the memory storage.
- the processing unit may be operative to receive backend data defining data constructs in a backend system.
- the backend data may be configured to define the backend system and to define how to access the backend system.
- the processing unit may be operative to receive entity data defining data constructs in an entity model.
- the entity data may define the data constructs comprising one of the following: entity classes and data logical classes.
- the processing unit may be operative to receive user selectable elements defining a process associating the backend data with the entity data.
- the user selectable elements may define a flow chart of the process comprising at least one activity describing the process comprising one of the following: a sequential process and a state machines process.
- the processing unit may be operative to produce code, based on the received user selectable elements, configured to implement the process.
- FIG. 4 is a block diagram of a system including computing device 400 .
- the aforementioned memory storage and processing unit may be implemented in a computing device, such as computing device 400 of FIG. 4 . Any suitable combination of hardware, software, or firmware may be used to implement the memory storage and processing unit.
- the memory storage and processing unit may be implemented with computing device 400 or any of other computing devices 418 (e.g. backend 105 ), in combination with computing device 400 .
- the aforementioned system, device, and processors are examples and other systems, devices, and processors may comprise the aforementioned memory storage and processing unit, consistent with embodiments of the invention.
- computing device 400 may comprise an operating environment for system 100 as described above. System 100 may operate in other environments and is not limited to computing device 400 .
- a system consistent with an embodiment of the invention may include a computing device, such as computing device 400 .
- computing device 400 may include at least one processing unit 402 and a system memory 404 .
- system memory 404 may comprise, but is not limited to, volatile (e.g. random access memory (RAM)), non-volatile (e.g. read-only memory (ROM)), flash memory, or any combination.
- System memory 404 may include operating system 405 , one or more programming modules 406 , and may include a program data 407 . Operating system 405 , for example, may be suitable for controlling computing device 400 's operation.
- programming modules 406 may include, for example, mapping application 420 .
- embodiments of the invention may be practiced in conjunction with a graphics library, other operating systems, or any other application program and is not limited to any particular application or system. This basic configuration is illustrated in FIG. 4 by those components within a dashed line 408 .
- Computing device 400 may have additional features or functionality.
- computing device 400 may also include additional data storage devices (removable and/or non-removable) such as, for example, magnetic disks, optical disks, or tape.
- additional storage is illustrated in FIG. 4 by a removable storage 409 and a non-removable storage 410 .
- Computer storage media may include volatile and nonvolatile, removable and non-removable media implemented in any method or technology for storage of information, such as computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules, or other data.
- System memory 404 , removable storage 409 , and non-removable storage 410 are all computer storage media examples (i.e. memory storage).
- Computer storage media may include, but is not limited to, RAM, ROM, electrically erasable read-only memory (EEPROM), flash memory or other memory technology, CD-ROM, digital versatile disks (DVD) or other optical storage, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tape, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium which can be used to store information and which can be accessed by computing device 400 . Any such computer storage media may be part of device 400 .
- Computing device 400 may also have input device(s) 412 such as a keyboard, a mouse, a pen, a sound input device, a touch input device, etc.
- Output device(s) 414 such as a display, speakers, a printer, etc. may also be included. The aforementioned devices are examples and others may be used.
- Computing device 400 may also contain a communication connection 416 that may allow device 400 to communicate with other computing devices 418 , such as over a network in a distributed computing environment, for example, an intranet or the Internet.
- Communication connection 416 is one example of communication media.
- Communication media may typically be embodied by computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules, or other data in a modulated data signal, such as a carrier wave or other transport mechanism, and includes any information delivery media.
- modulated data signal may describe a signal that has one or more characteristics set or changed in such a manner as to encode information in the signal.
- communication media may include wired media such as a wired network or direct-wired connection, and wireless media such as acoustic, radio frequency (RF), infrared, and other wireless media.
- wireless media such as acoustic, radio frequency (RF), infrared, and other wireless media.
- RF radio frequency
- computer readable media may include both storage media and communication media.
- a number of program modules and data files may be stored in system memory 404 , including operating system 405 .
- programming modules 406 e.g. mapping application 420
- Other programming modules that may be used in accordance with embodiments of the present invention may include electronic mail and contacts applications, word processing applications, spreadsheet applications, database applications, slide presentation applications, drawing or computer-aided application programs, etc.
- program modules may include routines, programs, components, data structures, and other types of structures that may perform particular tasks or that may implement particular abstract data types.
- embodiments of the invention may be practiced with other computer system configurations, including hand-held devices, multiprocessor systems, microprocessor-based or programmable consumer electronics, minicomputers, mainframe computers, and the like.
- Embodiments of the invention may also be practiced in distributed computing environments where tasks are performed by remote processing devices that are linked through a communications network.
- program modules may be located in both local and remote memory storage devices.
- embodiments of the invention may be practiced in an electrical circuit comprising discrete electronic elements, packaged or integrated electronic chips containing logic gates, a circuit utilizing a microprocessor, or on a single chip containing electronic elements or microprocessors.
- Embodiments of the invention may also be practiced using other technologies capable of performing logical operations such as, for example, AND, OR, and NOT, including but not limited to mechanical, optical, fluidic, and quantum technologies.
- embodiments of the invention may be practiced within a general purpose computer or in any other circuits or systems.
- Embodiments of the invention may be implemented as a computer process (method), a computing system, or as an article of manufacture, such as a computer program product or computer readable media.
- the computer program product may be a computer storage media readable by a computer system and encoding a computer program of instructions for executing a computer process.
- the computer program product may also be a propagated signal on a carrier readable by a computing system and encoding a computer program of instructions for executing a computer process.
- the present invention may be embodied in hardware and/or in software (including firmware, resident software, micro-code, etc.).
- embodiments of the present invention may take the form of a computer program product on a computer-usable or computer-readable storage medium having computer-usable or computer-readable program code embodied in the medium for use by or in connection with an instruction execution system.
- a computer-usable or computer-readable medium may be any medium that can contain, store, communicate, propagate, or transport the program for use by or in connection with the instruction execution system, apparatus, or device.
- the computer-usable or computer-readable medium may be, for example but not limited to, an electronic, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor system, apparatus, device, or propagation medium. More specific computer-readable medium examples (a non-exhaustive list), the computer-readable medium may include the following: an electrical connection having one or more wires, a portable computer diskette, a random access memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM or Flash memory), an optical fiber, and a portable compact disc read-only memory (CO-ROM).
- RAM random access memory
- ROM read-only memory
- EPROM or Flash memory erasable programmable read-only memory
- CO-ROM portable compact disc read-only memory
- the computer-usable or computer-readable medium could even be paper or another suitable medium upon which the program is printed, as the program can be electronically captured, via, for instance, optical scanning of the paper or other medium, then compiled, interpreted, or otherwise processed in a suitable manner, if necessary, and then stored in a computer memory.
- Embodiments of the present invention are described above with reference to block diagrams and/or operational illustrations of methods, systems, and computer program products according to embodiments of the invention.
- the functions/acts noted in the blocks may occur out of the order as shown in any flowchart.
- two blocks shown in succession may in fact be executed substantially concurrently or the blocks may sometimes be executed in the reverse order, depending upon the functionality/acts involved.
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Accounting & Taxation (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Finance (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
- Circuits Of Receivers In General (AREA)
- User Interface Of Digital Computer (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims (20)
Priority Applications (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US11/768,628 US8566780B2 (en) | 2007-06-26 | 2007-06-26 | Object model based mapping |
| PCT/US2008/067836 WO2009002901A2 (en) | 2007-06-26 | 2008-06-23 | Object model based mapping |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US11/768,628 US8566780B2 (en) | 2007-06-26 | 2007-06-26 | Object model based mapping |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| US20090006440A1 US20090006440A1 (en) | 2009-01-01 |
| US8566780B2 true US8566780B2 (en) | 2013-10-22 |
Family
ID=40161889
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| US11/768,628 Expired - Fee Related US8566780B2 (en) | 2007-06-26 | 2007-06-26 | Object model based mapping |
Country Status (2)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US8566780B2 (en) |
| WO (1) | WO2009002901A2 (en) |
Cited By (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US8799858B2 (en) * | 2012-12-14 | 2014-08-05 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Efficient execution of human machine interface applications in a heterogeneous multiprocessor environment |
| US20160162527A1 (en) * | 2014-12-04 | 2016-06-09 | International Business Machines Corporation | Automatic discovery of code and data stores that populate a user interface element |
| US20190386737A1 (en) * | 2017-03-14 | 2019-12-19 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Coverage enhancement mode switching for wireless communications using shared radio frequency spectrum |
Families Citing this family (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US7747899B2 (en) * | 2007-06-26 | 2010-06-29 | Microsoft Corporation | Providing mapping fault processing |
| US8620956B2 (en) * | 2009-06-16 | 2013-12-31 | Microsoft Corporation | Educational entity architecture and object model |
| US8949774B2 (en) | 2011-09-06 | 2015-02-03 | Microsoft Corporation | Generated object model for test automation |
| US10346388B2 (en) | 2013-05-03 | 2019-07-09 | Sap Se | Performance and quality optimized architecture for cloud applications |
| KR101636455B1 (en) * | 2015-04-21 | 2016-07-06 | 주식회사 씨와줄기 | Apparatus and method for development of software using data oriented programming model |
Citations (42)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US5627979A (en) * | 1994-07-18 | 1997-05-06 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for providing a graphical user interface for mapping and accessing objects in data stores |
| US5692169A (en) | 1990-12-14 | 1997-11-25 | Hewlett Packard Company | Method and system for deferring exceptions generated during speculative execution |
| US5729739A (en) | 1994-04-26 | 1998-03-17 | International Business Machines Corporation | Persistent object mapping system and method with abstract schema mapper |
| US5737601A (en) | 1993-09-24 | 1998-04-07 | Oracle Corporation | Method and apparatus for peer-to-peer data replication including handling exceptional occurrences |
| US5809505A (en) * | 1996-06-14 | 1998-09-15 | Lo; Thomas | System and method for relational to object mapping |
| US5878411A (en) * | 1997-06-27 | 1999-03-02 | International Business Machines Corporation | Dependent object class and subclass mapping to relational data store |
| US5937409A (en) * | 1997-07-25 | 1999-08-10 | Oracle Corporation | Integrating relational databases in an object oriented environment |
| US5940587A (en) | 1997-12-12 | 1999-08-17 | Intel Corporation | System and method for trap address mapping for fault isolation |
| US5940839A (en) | 1997-04-04 | 1999-08-17 | Hewlett-Packard Company | Fault-tolerant system and method of managing transaction failures in hierarchies |
| US5956725A (en) | 1997-11-26 | 1999-09-21 | Interanational Business Machines Corporation | Schema mapping to a legacy table with primary and foreign key support |
| US6101502A (en) * | 1997-09-26 | 2000-08-08 | Ontos, Inc. | Object model mapping and runtime engine for employing relational database with object oriented software |
| US6233585B1 (en) | 1998-03-12 | 2001-05-15 | Crossworlds Software, Inc. | Isolation levels and compensating transactions in an information system |
| US6253369B1 (en) * | 1994-11-30 | 2001-06-26 | International Business Machines Corp. | Workflow object compiler with user interrogated information incorporated into skeleton of source code for generating executable workflow objects |
| US6363435B1 (en) | 1998-02-03 | 2002-03-26 | Microsoft Corporation | Event sourcing and filtering for transient objects in a hierarchical object model |
| US6434628B1 (en) | 1999-08-31 | 2002-08-13 | Accenture Llp | Common interface for handling exception interface name with additional prefix and suffix for handling exceptions in environment services patterns |
| US6526416B1 (en) | 1998-06-30 | 2003-02-25 | Microsoft Corporation | Compensating resource managers |
| WO2004003745A2 (en) | 2002-06-29 | 2004-01-08 | Intel Corporation | Handling faults associated with operation of guest software in the virtual-machine architecture |
| US6704862B1 (en) | 2000-03-06 | 2004-03-09 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Method and apparatus for facilitating exception handling using a conditional trap instruction |
| US6738975B1 (en) | 1998-11-18 | 2004-05-18 | Software Ag, Inc. | Extensible distributed enterprise application integration system |
| US20050021355A1 (en) * | 2003-07-22 | 2005-01-27 | Rainer Brendle | Side-effect modeling of a service-oriented business framework |
| US20050027575A1 (en) | 2003-07-30 | 2005-02-03 | International Business Machines Corporation | Customer relationship management system with compliance tracking capabilities |
| US20050097187A1 (en) | 2003-10-10 | 2005-05-05 | Oracle International Corporation | Object relational mapping layer |
| US6971051B2 (en) | 2002-01-10 | 2005-11-29 | Agilent Technologies, Inc. | System and method of recovering from soft memory errors |
| US6996566B1 (en) * | 2000-11-21 | 2006-02-07 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for an object model with embedded metadata and mapping information |
| US20060029054A1 (en) | 2004-04-29 | 2006-02-09 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for modeling and dynamically deploying services into a distributed networking architecture |
| US7020880B2 (en) | 1997-01-08 | 2006-03-28 | International Business Machines Corporation | Modular application collaborator for providing inter-operability between applications and monitoring errors to trigger execution of required compensating actions to undo interrupted transaction |
| US7047243B2 (en) | 2002-08-05 | 2006-05-16 | Microsoft Corporation | Coordinating transactional web services |
| US20060235548A1 (en) * | 2005-04-19 | 2006-10-19 | The Mathworks, Inc. | Graphical state machine based programming for a graphical user interface |
| US7127474B2 (en) * | 1994-12-07 | 2006-10-24 | Apple Computer, Inc. | Method and apparatus for mapping objects to multiple tables of a database |
| US20060277024A1 (en) | 2005-04-06 | 2006-12-07 | Matthias Kloppmann | Processing of compensation scopes in Workflow Management Systems |
| US7149730B2 (en) | 2002-05-03 | 2006-12-12 | Ward Mullins | Dynamic class inheritance and distributed caching with object relational mapping and cartesian model support in a database manipulation and mapping system |
| US20070006237A1 (en) | 2005-07-01 | 2007-01-04 | Microsoft Corporation | Using messages to extend CRM functionality |
| US7171585B2 (en) | 2003-11-26 | 2007-01-30 | International Business Machines Corporation | Diagnosing faults and errors from a data repository using directed graphs |
| US20070055692A1 (en) | 2005-09-07 | 2007-03-08 | Microsoft Corporation | Incremental approach to an object-relational solution |
| US7200530B2 (en) | 2003-03-06 | 2007-04-03 | Microsoft Corporation | Architecture for distributed computing system and automated design, deployment, and management of distributed applications |
| US20070179975A1 (en) | 2006-01-31 | 2007-08-02 | Microsoft Corporation | Report generation using metadata |
| US20070226732A1 (en) * | 2006-03-16 | 2007-09-27 | Timekeeping Systems, Inc. | Flow chart programmable data collector |
| US20070283146A1 (en) | 2006-06-06 | 2007-12-06 | Cedric Gaston Christian Neveux | Enhanced Exception Handling |
| US20080127205A1 (en) | 2006-07-31 | 2008-05-29 | Barros Alistair P | Exception handling for collaborating process models |
| US20090006908A1 (en) | 2007-06-29 | 2009-01-01 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for fault mapping of exceptions across programming models |
| US20090006441A1 (en) | 2007-06-26 | 2009-01-01 | Microsoft Corporation | Providing Mapping Fault Processing |
| US7606681B2 (en) | 2006-11-03 | 2009-10-20 | Air Products And Chemicals, Inc. | System and method for process monitoring |
Family Cites Families (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US6022944A (en) * | 1990-09-05 | 2000-02-08 | Milliken & Company | Anthraquinone and condensed anthraquinone colorants having sulfonamide linked poly(oxyalkylene) moieties and their preparation |
| JP3722380B2 (en) * | 1995-12-01 | 2005-11-30 | 矢崎総業株式会社 | Housing cover for fusible link |
| JP2004339993A (en) * | 2003-05-14 | 2004-12-02 | Toyota Motor Corp | Exhaust gas purification system for internal combustion engine |
-
2007
- 2007-06-26 US US11/768,628 patent/US8566780B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2008
- 2008-06-23 WO PCT/US2008/067836 patent/WO2009002901A2/en not_active Ceased
Patent Citations (43)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US5692169A (en) | 1990-12-14 | 1997-11-25 | Hewlett Packard Company | Method and system for deferring exceptions generated during speculative execution |
| US5737601A (en) | 1993-09-24 | 1998-04-07 | Oracle Corporation | Method and apparatus for peer-to-peer data replication including handling exceptional occurrences |
| US5729739A (en) | 1994-04-26 | 1998-03-17 | International Business Machines Corporation | Persistent object mapping system and method with abstract schema mapper |
| US5627979A (en) * | 1994-07-18 | 1997-05-06 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for providing a graphical user interface for mapping and accessing objects in data stores |
| US6253369B1 (en) * | 1994-11-30 | 2001-06-26 | International Business Machines Corp. | Workflow object compiler with user interrogated information incorporated into skeleton of source code for generating executable workflow objects |
| US7127474B2 (en) * | 1994-12-07 | 2006-10-24 | Apple Computer, Inc. | Method and apparatus for mapping objects to multiple tables of a database |
| US5809505A (en) * | 1996-06-14 | 1998-09-15 | Lo; Thomas | System and method for relational to object mapping |
| US7020880B2 (en) | 1997-01-08 | 2006-03-28 | International Business Machines Corporation | Modular application collaborator for providing inter-operability between applications and monitoring errors to trigger execution of required compensating actions to undo interrupted transaction |
| US5940839A (en) | 1997-04-04 | 1999-08-17 | Hewlett-Packard Company | Fault-tolerant system and method of managing transaction failures in hierarchies |
| US5878411A (en) * | 1997-06-27 | 1999-03-02 | International Business Machines Corporation | Dependent object class and subclass mapping to relational data store |
| US5937409A (en) * | 1997-07-25 | 1999-08-10 | Oracle Corporation | Integrating relational databases in an object oriented environment |
| US6101502A (en) * | 1997-09-26 | 2000-08-08 | Ontos, Inc. | Object model mapping and runtime engine for employing relational database with object oriented software |
| US5956725A (en) | 1997-11-26 | 1999-09-21 | Interanational Business Machines Corporation | Schema mapping to a legacy table with primary and foreign key support |
| US5940587A (en) | 1997-12-12 | 1999-08-17 | Intel Corporation | System and method for trap address mapping for fault isolation |
| US6363435B1 (en) | 1998-02-03 | 2002-03-26 | Microsoft Corporation | Event sourcing and filtering for transient objects in a hierarchical object model |
| US6233585B1 (en) | 1998-03-12 | 2001-05-15 | Crossworlds Software, Inc. | Isolation levels and compensating transactions in an information system |
| US6526416B1 (en) | 1998-06-30 | 2003-02-25 | Microsoft Corporation | Compensating resource managers |
| US6738975B1 (en) | 1998-11-18 | 2004-05-18 | Software Ag, Inc. | Extensible distributed enterprise application integration system |
| US6434628B1 (en) | 1999-08-31 | 2002-08-13 | Accenture Llp | Common interface for handling exception interface name with additional prefix and suffix for handling exceptions in environment services patterns |
| US6704862B1 (en) | 2000-03-06 | 2004-03-09 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Method and apparatus for facilitating exception handling using a conditional trap instruction |
| US6996566B1 (en) * | 2000-11-21 | 2006-02-07 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for an object model with embedded metadata and mapping information |
| US6971051B2 (en) | 2002-01-10 | 2005-11-29 | Agilent Technologies, Inc. | System and method of recovering from soft memory errors |
| US7149730B2 (en) | 2002-05-03 | 2006-12-12 | Ward Mullins | Dynamic class inheritance and distributed caching with object relational mapping and cartesian model support in a database manipulation and mapping system |
| WO2004003745A2 (en) | 2002-06-29 | 2004-01-08 | Intel Corporation | Handling faults associated with operation of guest software in the virtual-machine architecture |
| US7047243B2 (en) | 2002-08-05 | 2006-05-16 | Microsoft Corporation | Coordinating transactional web services |
| US7200530B2 (en) | 2003-03-06 | 2007-04-03 | Microsoft Corporation | Architecture for distributed computing system and automated design, deployment, and management of distributed applications |
| US20050021355A1 (en) * | 2003-07-22 | 2005-01-27 | Rainer Brendle | Side-effect modeling of a service-oriented business framework |
| US20050027575A1 (en) | 2003-07-30 | 2005-02-03 | International Business Machines Corporation | Customer relationship management system with compliance tracking capabilities |
| US20050097187A1 (en) | 2003-10-10 | 2005-05-05 | Oracle International Corporation | Object relational mapping layer |
| US7171585B2 (en) | 2003-11-26 | 2007-01-30 | International Business Machines Corporation | Diagnosing faults and errors from a data repository using directed graphs |
| US20060029054A1 (en) | 2004-04-29 | 2006-02-09 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for modeling and dynamically deploying services into a distributed networking architecture |
| US20060277024A1 (en) | 2005-04-06 | 2006-12-07 | Matthias Kloppmann | Processing of compensation scopes in Workflow Management Systems |
| US20060235548A1 (en) * | 2005-04-19 | 2006-10-19 | The Mathworks, Inc. | Graphical state machine based programming for a graphical user interface |
| US20070006237A1 (en) | 2005-07-01 | 2007-01-04 | Microsoft Corporation | Using messages to extend CRM functionality |
| US20070055692A1 (en) | 2005-09-07 | 2007-03-08 | Microsoft Corporation | Incremental approach to an object-relational solution |
| US20070179975A1 (en) | 2006-01-31 | 2007-08-02 | Microsoft Corporation | Report generation using metadata |
| US20070226732A1 (en) * | 2006-03-16 | 2007-09-27 | Timekeeping Systems, Inc. | Flow chart programmable data collector |
| US20070283146A1 (en) | 2006-06-06 | 2007-12-06 | Cedric Gaston Christian Neveux | Enhanced Exception Handling |
| US20080127205A1 (en) | 2006-07-31 | 2008-05-29 | Barros Alistair P | Exception handling for collaborating process models |
| US7606681B2 (en) | 2006-11-03 | 2009-10-20 | Air Products And Chemicals, Inc. | System and method for process monitoring |
| US20090006441A1 (en) | 2007-06-26 | 2009-01-01 | Microsoft Corporation | Providing Mapping Fault Processing |
| US7747899B2 (en) | 2007-06-26 | 2010-06-29 | Microsoft Corporation | Providing mapping fault processing |
| US20090006908A1 (en) | 2007-06-29 | 2009-01-01 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for fault mapping of exceptions across programming models |
Non-Patent Citations (11)
| Title |
|---|
| "Client-Server Object Issues," 4 pgs., 1997-2000, http://www.chimu.com/publications/objectRelational/part0007.html. |
| A. Biliris et al., "ASSET: A System for Supporting Extended Transactions," SIGMOD 94-5/94 Minneapolis, MN, 1994, pp. 44-54, http://deliver.acm.org/10.1145/200000/191848/p44-biliris.pdf?key1=191848&key2=6889097711&coll=GUIDE&dl=GUIDE&CFID=21288866&CFTOKEN=93794674. |
| Bartek Kiepuszewski et al., "FlowBack: Providing Backward Recovery for Workflow Management Systems," DSTC Technical Report, DSTC-TR-9840, 7 pgs., http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/cache/papers/cs/4522/http:zSzzSzwww.dstc.edu.auzSzDDUzSzpublicationszSztech-reportszSzTR-9840.pdf/kiepuszewski98flowback.pdf. |
| Huanqing Lu, "Implementation of an Advanced Transaction Model for an Integrated Computing Environment for Building Construction," 2002, 85 pgs., http://etd.fcla.edu/UF/UFE1000138/lu-h.pdf. |
| International Search Report dated Dec. 19, 2008 cited in Application No. PCT/US2008/067559, p. 1-10. |
| International Search Report dated Dec. 19, 2008 cited in Application No. PCT/US2008/067836, p. 1-9. |
| Jürg Gutknecht, "Active Oberon for .NET: A Case Study in Object Model Mapping," pp. 1-22, Aug. 10, 2001, http://www.es.inf.ethz.eh/-gutknechAODotNet.pdf. |
| Liu, et al. "High-order Object Model Based Software Analysis", 1997, IEEE, p. 228-231. * |
| Mark Potts et al., "Business Transactions in Workflow and Business Process Management," OASIS Business Transactions Technical Committee Workflow sub-committee, 2001, pp. 1-14, http://www.ifi.uio.no/indis/v2002/handouts/2001-07-12.BTPModelForWF2.pdf. |
| Michael Rys et al., "Intra-Transaction Parallelism in the Mapping of an Object Model to a Relational Multi-Processor System," Proceedings of the 22nd VLDB Conference Mumbai (Bombay), India, 1996, pp. 460-471, http://www.sigmod.org/vldb/conf/1996/P460.PDF. |
| U.S. Office Action dated Nov. 12, 2009 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 11/768,735, p. 1-22. |
Cited By (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US8799858B2 (en) * | 2012-12-14 | 2014-08-05 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Efficient execution of human machine interface applications in a heterogeneous multiprocessor environment |
| US20160162527A1 (en) * | 2014-12-04 | 2016-06-09 | International Business Machines Corporation | Automatic discovery of code and data stores that populate a user interface element |
| US9984105B2 (en) * | 2014-12-04 | 2018-05-29 | International Business Machines Corporation | Automatic discovery of code and data stores that populate a user interface element |
| US20190386737A1 (en) * | 2017-03-14 | 2019-12-19 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Coverage enhancement mode switching for wireless communications using shared radio frequency spectrum |
| US10833760B2 (en) * | 2017-03-14 | 2020-11-10 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Coverage enhancement mode switching for wireless communications using shared radio frequency spectrum |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| US20090006440A1 (en) | 2009-01-01 |
| WO2009002901A3 (en) | 2009-02-26 |
| WO2009002901A2 (en) | 2008-12-31 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US10782960B2 (en) | User interface that integrates plural client portals in plural user interface portions through sharing of one or more log records | |
| US8566780B2 (en) | Object model based mapping | |
| AU2005201433B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for generating user interfaces based upon automation with full flexibility | |
| US7039898B2 (en) | Computer system for performing reusable software application development from a set of declarative executable specifications | |
| US20180158003A1 (en) | Web-based visual representation of a structured data solution | |
| US9563543B2 (en) | Test framework extension for testing logic on a modeled user interface | |
| US7363578B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for mapping a data model to a user interface model | |
| US7747899B2 (en) | Providing mapping fault processing | |
| US20100235275A1 (en) | Card Processing | |
| US20130158964A1 (en) | Reusable workflows | |
| CN114201718A (en) | Dynamically configurable form instance generation method and device | |
| JP2018067286A (en) | Model validity confirmation system and method | |
| US8234570B2 (en) | Harvesting assets for packaged software application configuration | |
| US20110145735A1 (en) | Model driven content development | |
| US20120110508A1 (en) | Enterprise resource planning oriented context-aware user interface | |
| US20120284735A1 (en) | Interaction-Based Interface to a Logical Client | |
| Galster et al. | An industrial case study on variability handling in large enterprise software systems | |
| US10147063B2 (en) | Transforming project management representations into business process representations | |
| Brown | MDA redux: Practical realization of model driven architecture | |
| US11126967B2 (en) | Dynamic markup language-driven product administration system | |
| KR20080072010A (en) | Representing business transactions | |
| US20120151434A1 (en) | System And Method For Generating One Or More Plain Text Source Code Files For Any Computer Language Representing Any Graphically Represented Business Process | |
| Mohan | Managing variability in software product families: A traceability-based approach | |
| Dudev | Risk-Weighted IT Development for the Financial Industry |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| AS | Assignment |
Owner name: MICROSOFT CORPORATION, WASHINGTON Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:TOLSTYAKOV, ANDREY;SHATNAWI, MOHAMMED FADEL;HERRING, RUSSELL ALLEN, JR.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:020269/0979 Effective date: 20070622 |
|
| STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
| AS | Assignment |
Owner name: MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING, LLC, WASHINGTON Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:MICROSOFT CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:034542/0001 Effective date: 20141014 |
|
| FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
| MAFP | Maintenance fee payment |
Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 8TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1552); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
| FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: MAINTENANCE FEE REMINDER MAILED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: REM.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
| LAPS | Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees |
Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED FOR FAILURE TO PAY MAINTENANCE FEES (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: EXP.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
| STCH | Information on status: patent discontinuation |
Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362 |
|
| AS | Assignment |
Owner name: LOT NETWORK INC., ARIZONA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING, LLC;REEL/FRAME:073083/0947 Effective date: 20250630 Owner name: LOT NETWORK INC., ARIZONA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING, LLC;REEL/FRAME:073083/0947 Effective date: 20250630 |
|
| FP | Lapsed due to failure to pay maintenance fee |
Effective date: 20251022 |