US8176181B2 - Layer-2 management entity messaging framework in a network - Google Patents
Layer-2 management entity messaging framework in a network Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US8176181B2 US8176181B2 US12/027,216 US2721608A US8176181B2 US 8176181 B2 US8176181 B2 US 8176181B2 US 2721608 A US2721608 A US 2721608A US 8176181 B2 US8176181 B2 US 8176181B2
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- nodes
- l2me
- wave
- response
- node
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Fee Related, expires
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L12/00—Data switching networks
- H04L12/02—Details
- H04L12/12—Arrangements for remote connection or disconnection of substations or of equipment thereof
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L12/00—Data switching networks
- H04L12/28—Data switching networks characterised by path configuration, e.g. LAN [Local Area Networks] or WAN [Wide Area Networks]
- H04L12/40—Bus networks
- H04L12/403—Bus networks with centralised control, e.g. polling
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L9/00—Cryptographic mechanisms or cryptographic arrangements for secret or secure communications; Network security protocols
- H04L9/40—Network security protocols
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
- H04W74/00—Wireless channel access
- H04W74/04—Scheduled access
- H04W74/06—Scheduled access using polling
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L12/00—Data switching networks
- H04L12/28—Data switching networks characterised by path configuration, e.g. LAN [Local Area Networks] or WAN [Wide Area Networks]
- H04L12/2801—Broadband local area networks
Definitions
- the disclosed method and apparatus relate to communication protocols for a shared medium, and more specifically, it relates to a Layer 2 messaging framework and architecture.
- home networks now typically include multiple types of subscriber equipment configured to deliver subscriber services through the home network.
- the subscriber services include the delivering of multimedia, such as streaming audio and video, through the home network to the subscriber equipment where it is presented to a user.
- multimedia such as streaming audio and video
- the increase in the number of services and devices increases the complexity of the coordination between the network nodes as each node may be produced by a different manufacturer at different times.
- Some home networking technologies have emerged in an attempt to facilitate simple home network solutions and take advantage of existing network infrastructure that may be present in a number of homes.
- HPNA Home Phone Network Alliance
- HPNA-enabled devices utilize a different frequency spectrum than the spectrum used by faxes and phones.
- the Homeplug® Power Alliance utilizes the existing electrical power wiring in a home to create a home network.
- all Homeplug®-enabled devices that are plugged into a wall outlet connected to a common electrical circuit may be wired together in a home network.
- One issue with Homeplug® is that the network bandwidth is susceptible to significant reduction due to large variations of the home electrical wiring and reactive loads in the outlets.
- bandwidth intensive application such as a high-throughput download
- This outcome may be unacceptable when the other application requires a high quality of service.
- a communications method comprises the steps of (1) performing at least one Layer 2 transaction comprising a plurality of wave cycles, each Layer 2 transaction includes performing a first wave cycle, (2) concatenating the received first responses from each of the one or more nodes, and (3) performing a second wave cycle.
- the first wave cycle includes broadcasting a first request from a network coordinator to a plurality of nodes connected to a coordinated network, and receiving a first response from one or more of the nodes indicating that the nodes have opted to participate in a next subsequent wave cycle.
- the second wave cycle includes transmitting a subsequent request from the network coordinator to each of the one or more nodes based upon the concatenated first responses.
- a system comprises a physical interface connected to a shared medium and an L2ME connected to the physical interface.
- the physical interface is configured to transmit and receive signals through the shared medium.
- the L2ME is configured to manage a plurality of transactions with at least one node connected to the shared medium and includes a lower module and an upper module.
- the lower module of the L2ME is configured to perform a plurality of wave cycles, and the upper module is configured to facilitate the plurality of transactions using the plurality of wave cycles performed by the lower module.
- FIG. 1 illustrates a network architecture according to one embodiment.
- FIG. 2 is a diagram showing two L2ME wave cycles in accordance with the embodiment of FIG. 1 .
- FIG. 3 illustrates a block diagram of an L2ME frame in accordance with the embodiment of FIG. 1 .
- FIG. 4 is a block diagram of a Layer 2 Management Entity transaction protocol in accordance with one embodiment.
- One system 100 as disclosed herein and shown in FIG. 1 and described in more detail below, comprises a physical layer 112 , such as a Multimedia over Coax Alliance (MoCA) PHY Layer, connected to a coordinated network 102 .
- Physical layer 112 is configured to transmit and receive signals through the coordinated network 102 .
- the system further includes an L2ME 116 connected to the physical interface 112 and configured to manage a plurality of transactions with at least one node 104 , 108 , 110 connected to the coordinated network 102 .
- MoCA Multimedia over Coax Alliance
- the L2ME 116 includes a lower module 118 , such as an L2ME wave layer, configured to perform a plurality of wave cycles, and an upper module 120 , such as an L2ME transaction layer, configured to facilitate the plurality of transactions using the plurality of wave cycles performed by the lower module 118 .
- a lower module 118 such as an L2ME wave layer
- an upper module 120 such as an L2ME transaction layer
- One communication method comprises performing at least one Layer 2 transaction comprising a plurality of wave cycles 214 , 216 .
- Each Layer 2 transaction includes performing a first wave cycle 214 , concatenating the received first responses from each of the one or more nodes 202 , 204 , 208 , 210 , 212 , and performing a second wave cycle 216 .
- the first wave cycle 214 comprises broadcasting a first request from a network coordinator 206 to a plurality of nodes 202 , 204 , 208 , 210 , 212 connected to a coordinated network, and receiving a first response from one or more of the nodes 202 , 204 , 208 , 210 , 212 indicating that the nodes have opted to participate in a next subsequent wave cycle.
- the second wave cycle 216 includes transmitting a subsequent request from the network coordinator 206 to each of the one or more nodes 202 , 204 , 208 , 210 , 212 based upon the concatenated first responses.
- the second wave cycle 216 further includes receiving a subsequent response from each participating node 202 , 204 , 208 , 210 , 212 .
- the step of performing at least one Layer 2 transaction is performed in response to receiving an initial request by the network coordinator 206 from an entry node.
- the first response receiving step comprises receiving the first response from a first sub-set of the plurality of nodes 202 , 204 , 208 , 210 , 212 that have opted to participate in the next wave cycle, the method further comprises the step of receiving a second response from a second sub-set of nodes.
- the second response indicates that the second sub-set of nodes has opted not to participate in the next wave cycle.
- the communication method includes performing a third wave cycle.
- the third wave cycle includes the network coordinator 206 transmitting a unicast message to at least one of the one or more nodes 202 , 204 , 208 , 210 , 212 from which a response was not received by the network coordinator 206 during the first wave cycle 214 .
- the third wave cycle further includes receiving a response to the unicast message from the at least one of the one or more nodes, 202 , 204 , 208 , 210 , 212 .
- the embodiments relate in general to a system, method and architecture to support a low-level messaging framework in a network. Some embodiments facilitate Layer 2 Management Entity (L2ME) messaging to enable low-cost and high-speed management of resources within the network in order to secure the capability to distribute multimedia data (such as video/audio, games, images, and other interactive services) within existing in-home networks.
- L2ME Layer 2 Management Entity
- the embodiments facilitate making home networking devices simple so that they are easy to use and are cost-effective.
- home networks should be simple to configure so home users do not have to deal with complex configuration menus or require advanced knowledge of computer networks.
- the embodiments also resolve configuration and cost issues through the implementation of a low-level digital transport framework that does not require high amounts of computing power.
- This low-level framework may be thought of as an extension to the Media Access Control (MAC) sub-layer or the physical (PHY) network layer and is referred to as a “Layer 2 messaging framework.”
- Layer 2 messaging may be implemented in a variety of networks where a spectrum is shared and negotiated due to the introduction or removal of nodes, as well as the evolution of network signaling capacity.
- the network is a coordinated network having a Network Coordinator (NC) that coordinates the communication between the several devices connected to the network. Coordination is achieved by the NC allocating time-slots to network devices during which these devices may transmit or receive MAC messages, probes and data.
- the network devices connected to the coordinated network may include managed and unmanaged devices. Examples of such networks include coaxial networks in accordance with the Multimedia over Coax Alliance (MoCA) standard, wired networks on “twisted-pair” wire, or wireless home networks.
- MoCA Multimedia over Coax Alliance
- Embodiments are described as being implemented with eight or 16 nodes within the network. However, other embodiments may incorporate extensions to enable any number of nodes within a variety of networks. Additionally, embodiments may include systems, methods, and devices that include Layer 2 messaging architecture and protocols to support end-user applications and vendor-specific
- Layer 2 Management Entity architecture and messaging protocol for a digital network.
- Some embodiments support application layer-triggered transactions, such as but not limited to, a Universal Plug and Play Quality of Service, and IEEE Stream Reservation Protocol (SRP).
- Layer 2 messaging protocols may enable capabilities such as parameterized Quality of Service (pQoS) or Full Mesh Rate transactions within the network.
- pQoS parameterized Quality of Service
- pQoS Full Mesh Rate transactions
- FIG. 1 illustrates a coordinated mesh network architecture 100 with multiple network nodes 104 , 106 , 108 , 110 connected to a network 102 .
- Network node 106 is the NC node and is shown to be configured with PHY layer 112 , MAC sub-layer 114 , and an L2ME 116 . Note that any network node may have multiple physical interfaces and may implement upper-layer functionality (e.g., TCP/IP, UDP, or the like).
- Network node 104 is an Entry node (EN).
- EN Entry node
- Each of nodes 104 , 108 , and 110 may also be configured with an L2ME 116 .
- L2ME 116 provides Layer 2 interfaces and management services through which Layer 2 management functions can be invoked. Based on end-user application initiated transactions, L2ME 116 is responsible for executing and managing all L2ME transactions, such as parameterized Quality of Service and Full Mesh Rate, between network nodes 104 , 106 , 108 , and 110 .
- L2ME 116 includes two sub-layers: an upper Transaction Protocol sub-layer 120 and a lower Wave Protocol sub-layer 118 .
- the L2ME Wave Protocol sub-layer 118 is a high-reliability message mechanism in L2ME 116 configured with its own messaging protocol.
- the L2ME Wave Protocol enables a network node to participate in robust, network-wide, low-latency generic transactions and enables NC node 106 to manage the flow of low-cost audio/video bridging devices, such as devices in accordance with the IEEE 802.1Qat/D0.8 draft standard (July, 2007), across a home network with multiple Layer 2 Quality of Service segments.
- the L2ME Wave Protocol provides reliable transport service for L2ME Transaction Protocol by generating multiple Wave Cycles.
- a Wave Cycle starts when NC node 106 broadcasts a particular payload, such as a Request, to all nodes 104 , 108 , 110 connected to the network 102 .
- the NC node 106 first classifies all the nodes in the WAVE_NODEMASK field, described in greater detail below, into three categories before initiating the Wave Cycle.
- the first category of nodes (“Category 1 nodes”) includes network nodes that have yet to be specified in the CYCLE_NODEMASK field of a Request L2ME Frame issued by the NC node 106 .
- the second category of nodes (“Category 2 nodes”) includes network nodes that have been identified in the CYCLE_NODEMASK field in a Request L2ME Frame issued by NC node 106 , but from which NC node 106 has yet to receive a Response.
- the third category of network nodes (“Category 3 nodes”) includes the network nodes from which NC node 106 has received a Response L2ME Frame.
- NC node 106 constructs the CYCLE NODEMASK in accordance with the following guidelines. First, if there are three or more Category 1 nodes, then NC node 106 sets a corresponding number of bits to “1” in the CYCLE_NODEMASK. However, if there are three or more Category 1 nodes, the number of bits set by NC node 106 in the CYCLE_NODEMASK may be less than the total number of Category 1 nodes, but not less than three bits.
- NC node 106 may set three, four, or five bits to “1” in the CYCLE_NODEMASK. Second, if there are three or more Category 2 nodes, NC node 106 sets three or more of the bits in the CYCLE_NODEMASK to “1”, which correspond to the Category 2 nodes. Third, if there are no Category 1 nodes, or if all of the bits corresponding to Category 1 nodes have already been set to “1” in the CYCLE_NODEMASK, then NC node 106 sets the bits corresponding to Category 2 nodes in the CYCLE_NODEMASK to “1”.
- NC node 106 may set as many bits to “1” in the CYCLE_NODEMASK as NC node 106 may receive a Response from without disrupting network services.
- NC node 106 initiates the Wave Cycle by broadcasting an L2ME message that includes the CYCLE_NODEMASK.
- a Wave Cycle is completed when either NC node 106 receives a corresponding payload, such as a Response, from some or all of the client nodes 104 , 108 , 110 , or the NC node's timer expires. For example, NC node 106 transmits a message and then starts its timer. If the timer of NC node 106 reaches T21 (e.g., 20 milliseconds) before receiving a responsive message from some or all of the network nodes identified in the CYCLE_NODEMASK, then the Wave Cycle is completed even though NC node 106 has not received a responsive message.
- T21 e.g. 20 milliseconds
- T21 is the maximum allowable time interval between the transmission of a Request L2ME Frame by NC node 106 and the transmission of a corresponding Response L2ME Frame by the requested node.
- An L2ME Wave Cycle is successfully completed when each of the nodes identified in the WAVE_NODEMASK field of the payload have responded. Put another way, a Wave Cycle is successful if all of the network nodes 104 , 108 , 110 are classified as Category 3 nodes before the timer of NC node 106 reaches T21.
- a Wave Cycle is unsuccessful, or fails, if NC node 106 does not receive a Response L2ME Frame from a Category 2 node that had its corresponding bit set to “1” in the CYCLE_NODEMASK transmitted by NC node 106 . If the Wave Cycle fails, then NC node 106 repeats the Wave Cycle by sending a multicast message to only those nodes from which NC node 106 did not receive a Response L2ME Frame. Note that in one embodiment multicast messages are treated the same as broadcast messages with respect to repeating the Wave Cycle by sending a multicast message to the nodes that do not respond. NC node 106 will complete the scheduled Wave Cycles before creating a new Wave Cycle for any node from which a Response was not received.
- FIG. 2 is an example of an L2ME wave diagram 200 showing two Wave Cycles 214 , 216 .
- This bitmask indicates that NC node 206 expects to receive a payload containing a WAVE_ACK from client nodes 202 , 204 , 208 , and 210 .
- FIG. 1 illustrates an L2ME wave diagram 200 showing two Wave Cycles 214 , 216 .
- NC node 206 only receives a Response L2ME Frame from nodes 202 , 204 , and 208 .
- the Response L2ME Frame from node 210 is either lost or not received before the NC node 206 timer expires. The expiration of the timer in NC node 206 completes the first Wave Cycle 214 , but does not finish the transaction.
- NC node 206 Since NC node 206 has not received a Response L2ME Frame from node 210 , NC node 206 sends another Request L2ME Frame to node 210 , thereby initiating a second Wave Cycle 216 .
- the Request sent to node 210 is also sent to node 212 and includes the NODE_BITMASK 110000 requesting nodes 210 and 212 to send a WAVE_ACK to NC node 206 .
- the Response L2ME Frames from nodes 210 and 212 are subsequently received by the NC node 206 , thereby completing Wave Cycle 216 .
- the L2ME Transaction Protocol is an upper sub-layer protocol in the L2ME that uses multiple L2ME Waves to achieve network-wide transactions.
- An EN may be any network node, including the NC node, which initiates an L2ME transaction based on an end-user application.
- the requested results are returned to the EN by the NC node.
- the L2ME transaction is completed when the other nodes, such as client nodes, provide their final responses. In some embodiments, only one L2ME transaction is carried out or pending at any given time within the network. For a failed L2ME Wave, the resultant NC node action depends on the specific L2ME transaction type and the Wave number.
- FIG. 3 illustrates one example of a MAC frame 300 in accordance with one embodiment.
- MAC frame 300 includes a MAC header 302 , a MAC payload 304 , and a MAC payload cyclic redundancy check (CRC) 310 .
- L2ME frames are embedded within the MAC payload 304 and include an L2ME header 306 , and an L2ME payload 308 .
- the Submit L2ME messages carry application-initiated requests from an EN to the NC node where an L2ME Wave transaction may be initiated.
- An EN is usually responsible for managing the various stages of a transaction while the NC node is responsible for broadcasting the Request, gathering the Response of each client node, and providing the transaction results to the EN that transmitted the Submit message.
- Table 1 below illustrates one example of a Submit L2ME Frame format, which includes a Submit L2ME Frame header and payload.
- L2ME Message Format Field Length Usage Submit L2ME Header HDR_FMT 8 bits 0x8 ENTRY_NODE_ID 8 bits The ID of the node sending this message.
- the Submit L2ME Frame header includes an 8-bit ENTRY_TXN_ID field.
- the ENTRY_TXN_ID field is the Entry Node's transaction ID, which starts at “1” and is incremented each time a Submit message is sent to the NC node.
- the composition and length of the L2ME_PAYLOAD field depends on the specific VENDOR_ID, TRANS_TYPE, and TRANS_SUBTYPE fields.
- the VENDOR_ID is a 16-bit field in the Submit and Request L2ME messages that indicates a vendor-specific use of various fields of the messages. For example, the assigned VENDOR_ID range for Entropic Communications is 0x0010 to 0x001F, and the values 0x0000 to 0x000F are assigned to MoCA.
- the length of the L2ME_PAYLOAD field may be shorter or equal to L_SUB_MAX. Also note that Submit and Request messages associated with a given L2ME transaction may have an identical set of VENDOR_ID, TRANS_TYPE, and TRANS_SUBTYPE fields.
- Request L2ME Frame messages are broadcast to all nodes by the NC node during a transaction Wave.
- the NC node will broadcast a Request L2ME Frame message as a consequence of the Submit message.
- no Submit message is transmitted, and the NC node initiates the transaction by issuing the Request L2ME Frame message on its own behalf. For example, when the NC node initiates a management transaction, a Submit L2ME Frame is not needed, and the transaction begins with the Request L2ME Frame.
- Each client node receiving a Request L2ME Frame message is expected to respond to the NC node with results of the operation as requested by the NC node in the payload.
- Table 2 shows the Request L2ME Frame message header and payload format, which is similar to the Submit L2ME Frame format where the MAC header is not shown.
- L2ME Transaction Payload L2ME_PAYLOAD 0-N One of four different payload types described below. bytes
- the ENTRY_NODE_ID is copied from the initiating SUBMIT message. If the Request message results from an L2ME transaction without an EN, such as an NC management transaction, then the ENTRY_NODE_TXN_ID has no meaning and the field value is reset to “0”.
- the WAVE_NODEMASK value is identical to the Submit message if this is the first L2ME Wave. In the last L2ME Wave in the transaction, the value of this field contains the set of nodes that are to be part of the last Wave. Otherwise, the WAVE_NODEMASK value corresponds to the set of nodes that provided a Response in the IN_NEXT_WAVE bit of the previous Request.
- the bit corresponding to each node is set if the node is instructed by the NC node to provide a Response upon receiving the Request message.
- the Request message includes the WAVE_STATUS field, which indicates if the previous Wave Cycle failed or completed successfully. Note that the allowed values in the WAVE_STATUS field are 0, 1, 2 and 4, and if the RESP_FAIL and/or NC_CANCEL_FAIL bits are set, this is the last L2ME Wave of the transaction and any following Wave may contain the L2ME_PAYLOAD field of the failed transaction.
- the payload of the Response frame for the L2ME Waves (except for Wave 0 ) is typically formed by concatenating the Responses from the nodes in the previous wave.
- the concatenation is formed as follows: when a Response L2ME Frame arrives at the NC node from a given node, its payload is appended onto the end of a Response queue at the NC node. Then, the length of the payload is written into a data structure, called a directory, and the node's ID is transmitted.
- the NC node When the NC node is ready to send the next Request L2ME Frame, it places the length of the directory into a DIR_LEN field, copies the directory into the beginning of the payload and then copies the Response queue into the remainder of the payload.
- the DIR_LEN field indicates the length of a directory in the payload portion of the Request L2ME Frame message.
- L2ME_PAYLOAD fields There are four different types of L2ME_PAYLOAD fields that are used in a Request L2ME Frame message, which are as follows:
- L2ME Frame Concatenated Payload Format Field Length Usage Request
- L2ME Frame Concatenated Payload Format Field Length Usage Request
- the Response L2ME Frame format is shown in Table 4 below.
- Response L2ME Frames are sent unicast from each L2ME transaction capable node to the NC node at the end of each L2ME Wave.
- the NC node may be configured to simultaneously receive multiple (e.g., three or more) Responses from the requested nodes.
- the Response L2ME message includes a RESP_STATUS field, which indicates the response status of a node that was requested to respond in the next or final Wave Cycle.
- the RESP_STATUS field allows an EN to cancel a transaction it initiated by sending a Submit message to the NC node, but timed out waiting for the Response message.
- an L2ME enabled network node receives any L2ME transaction messages with an unrecognized VENDOR_ID, TRANS_TYPE, or TRANS_SUBTYPE field value, the node may set the RESP_STATUS field to “0” in the Response Frame and the NC node may preclude this node from future Waves in the transaction.
- the EN and any node that sets the IN_FINAL_WAVE bit in any Response may be included in the WAVE_NODEMASK of the final Wave.
- L2ME transactions may be initiated in multiple ways, although usually only one L2ME transaction may be carried out at any given time within a network.
- an L2ME transaction may be initiated by an EN, which may be any node connected to the network.
- the EN may be a MoCA network node connected to a computer.
- the computer may be attached to the Internet and running an application that communicates by way of a higher layer protocol interface.
- the computer may use the EN as a proxy to monitor the entire MoCA network through L2ME messaging in response to application-generated operations within the computer.
- FIG. 4 illustrates a block diagram of one example of an L2ME transaction 400 initiated by EN 402 .
- EN 402 Upon receiving a request from an upper-level application, EN 402 generates and transmits a Submit L2ME message to NC node 404 .
- NC node 404 receives the Submit message and initiates a first L2ME Wave, L2ME Wave 0 , by broadcasting a Request message with a similar header to the Submit message received from EN 402 .
- the Request message is broadcast to each of the L2ME capable nodes 406 , 408 , 410 specified by the WAVE_NODEMASK parameter contained in the payload. If this Request is sent to a node which is not L2ME capable, the node would simply ignore this message.
- the Request L2ME Frame message is also sent to EN 402 for reasons now described.
- EN 402 verifies the transaction by comparing the appropriate field in the Request header with values it used in the Submit header. If the values match, the transaction will be processed. However, there may be some instances when the L2ME transaction in the network is not the most recent transaction requested by EN 402 . This situation arises when the Submit message transmitted by EN 402 was either corrupted, not received, or not granted by the NC node 404 . If the initiated transaction is not the most recently requested L2ME transaction, EN 402 may cancel the transaction by setting the DO_ENTRY_CANCEL bit to “1” in the Response. Upon receiving a Response from EN 402 with the DO_ENTRY_CANCEL bit set to “1”, the NC node does not issue more L2ME Waves in this transaction, but may immediately initiate another L2ME transaction.
- the requested L2ME transaction-capable nodes send a Response message to NC node 404 with a payload indicating whether or not they are opting to participate in the next Wave(s) of this transaction.
- a node may opt not to participate in future Waves if, for example, the transaction is a parameterized QoS transaction to create a new pQoS flow and the node cannot support the pQoS flow.
- a node may opt to participate in the network transaction by setting the IN_NEXT_WAVE bit to “1” and may opt to not participate by setting the IN_NEXT_WAVE bit to “0”.
- NC node 404 In the following L2ME Waves, NC node 404 typically generates the Request L2ME Frame payload by concatenating all Responses from the previous Wave as described above. The NC node 404 then sends this Request message to the client nodes that requested participation in the current Wave. Note that for some transaction embodiments, the NC node may produce a distinct, non-concatenated Request message payload from the received Response payloads. The transaction continues until the NC node reaches the maximum number of Waves specified in the Submit L2ME message. Upon reaching the maximum number of Waves in the transaction, NC node 404 issues the final Wave, which comprises a Request L2ME Frame message to the EN 402 .
- NC node 404 may request only EN 402 to provide a Response to its Request message after all other client nodes have responded. This Response, which completes the L2ME Wave in various transactions, ensures that the L2ME transaction has been fully completed before EN 402 notifies its application that the operation has completed. In other L2ME transactions, the transaction is not completed until NC node 404 sends a Request to multiple nodes, including EN 402 , and receives a Response from each of the nodes.
- an entire L2ME transaction may result in an error. This situation arises if, for example, (1) an L2ME Wave Cycle fails; (2) the number of executed L2ME Waves in a given transaction is less than the expected total number of L2ME Waves as indicated in the TXN_LAST_WAVE_NUM field in the initiating Submit L2ME message; and (3) the L2ME transaction was initiated by an EN.
- NC node 404 issues a new L2ME Wave called a transaction-failed Wave. This Wave announces the termination of the transaction due to the failure of the previous L2ME Wave.
- the transaction-failed Wave is initiated by NC node 404 sending a Request L2ME Frame header, as defined in Table 2 above, with the WAVE_STATUS field set to “4” and the WAVE_NODEMASK having the bit corresponding to EN 402 set to “1”. Additionally, the Request L2ME Frame is a zero-length payload as described above. Upon receipt of this Request, EN 402 sends a Response L2ME Frame as shown in Table 4 above.
- NC node 404 may autonomously initiate an L2ME transaction to inform the client nodes in the network which other nodes are L2ME transaction-capable.
- These NC node initiated transactions are usually conducted in a single Wave and are designed to achieve network maintenance by providing interoperability with legacy or other compatible nodes.
- L2ME Wave operations initiated by the NC node usually have the following characteristics:
- the WAVE_NODEMASK field indicates the set of client nodes that are recognized by the NC node as an L2ME transaction-enabled node. If the node is recognized by the NC node, then it responds using a zero-length Response message to complete the transaction using the Response L2ME Frame format in accordance with Table 5 below.
- L2ME-Enabled Frame Format Field Length Description Response
- L2ME Header HDR_FMT 8 bits
- RESP_STATUS 8 bits Ignored by receiving node RESERVED 8 bits
- Type III WAVE_SEQ_N 8 bits Copied from initiating Request RESERVED 32 bits
- the present disclosed method and apparatus may be embodied in the form of computer-implemented processes and apparatus for practicing those processes.
- the present disclosed method and apparatus may also be embodied in the form of computer program code embodied in tangible media, such as floppy diskettes, read only memories (ROMs), CD-ROMs, hard drives, “ZIPTM” high density disk drives, DVD-ROMs, flash memory drives, or any other computer-readable storage medium, wherein, when the computer program code is loaded into and executed by a computer, the computer becomes an apparatus for practicing the disclosed method and apparatus.
- the present disclosed method and apparatus may also be embodied in the form of computer program code, for example, whether stored in a storage medium, loaded into and/or executed by a computer, or transmitted over some transmission medium, such as over the electrical wiring or cabling, through fiber optics, or via electromagnetic radiation, wherein, when the computer program code is loaded into and executed by a computer, the computer becomes an apparatus for practicing the disclosed method and apparatus.
- computer program code segments configure the processor to create specific logic circuits.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- Signal Processing (AREA)
- Computer Security & Cryptography (AREA)
- Mobile Radio Communication Systems (AREA)
- Data Exchanges In Wide-Area Networks (AREA)
- Small-Scale Networks (AREA)
- Computer And Data Communications (AREA)
Abstract
Description
| TABLE 1 |
| Submit L2ME Message Format |
| Field | Length | Usage |
| Submit L2ME Header |
| HDR_FMT | 8 bits | 0x8 |
| ENTRY_NODE_ID | 8 bits | The ID of the node sending this message. |
| ENTRY_INDEX | 8 bits | An Entry node provided value; MAY be used by Entry node |
| to track responses to this Submit message | ||
| RESERVED | 8 bits | 0x0; Type III |
| VENDOR_ID | 16 bits | |
| TRANS_TYPE | 8 bits | Type of L2ME transaction defined for VENDOR_ID=0; All |
| other values are reserved | ||
| If VENDOR_ID=0 |
| 0x1=pQoS transactions | ||
| 0x2=FMR |
| The use of this field for other values of VENDOR_ID is | ||
| vendor specific | ||
| TRANS_SUBTYPE | 8 bits | Subtype of L2ME transaction defined for a VENDOR_ID |
| and TRANS_TYPE; all values are reserved except for | ||
| If VENDOR_ID=0 |
| If TRANS_TYPE=0x1 |
| 0x1=CREATE | ||
| 0x2=UPDATE | ||
| 0x3=DELETE | ||
| 0x4=LIST | ||
| 0x5=QUERY | ||
| 0x6=MAINTENANCE |
| If TRANS_TYPE=2 |
| 0x1=FMR transaction |
| The use of this field for other values of VENDOR_ID is | ||
| vendor specific | ||
| WAVE0_NODEMASK | 32 bits | Nodemask specifying nodes that are part of the |
| 0 | ||
| RESERVED | 32 bits | 0x0; Type III |
| RESERVED | 8 bits | 0x0; Type III |
| MSG_PRIORITY | 8 bits | Allowed values: 0xFF where 0xFF is the highest priority; |
| NC node MAY process received Submit messages based on | ||
| MSG_PRIORITY field value | ||
| TXN_LAST_WAVE_NUM | 8 bits | Allowed values 0x00-0x04; value=the [total number of |
| Waves −1] in an error free transaction | ||
| RESERVED | 8 bits | 0x0; Type III |
| L2ME Transaction Payload |
| L2ME_PAYLOAD | 0-N | L2ME payload is L2ME Wave and transaction specific |
| bytes | ||
| TABLE 2 |
| Request L2ME Frame Message Format |
| Field | Length | Usage |
| Request L2ME Transaction Header |
| HDR_FMT | 8 bits | 0x9 |
| ENTRY_NODE_ID | 8 bits | The ID of the Entry node that requested the transaction; |
| 0xFF=no Entry node | ||
| ENTRY_INDEX | 8 bits | Copied from initiating Submit; 0=no Entry node |
| WAVE_SEQ_N | 8 bits | An NC counter, which is held constant for all the L2ME |
| Wave Cycles in an L2ME Wave, and is incremented when | ||
| a new L2ME Wave starts; | ||
| VENDOR_ID | 16 bits | Copied from initiating Submit or NC node specified if |
| ENTRY_NODE_ID=0xFF | ||
| TRANS_TYPE | 8 bits | Copied from initiating Submit or NC node specified if |
| ENTRY_NODE_ID=0xFF | ||
| TRANS_SUBTYPE | 8 bits | Copied from initiating Submit or NC node specified if |
| ENTRY_NODE_ID=0xFF | ||
| WAVE_NODEMASK | 32 bits | If TXN_WAVE_N=0 |
| If there is an Entry node, copied from initiating | ||
| Submit field WAVE0_NODEMASK |
| CYCLE_NODEMASK | 32 bits | The subset of WAVE_NODEMASK where the NC node |
| is to receive a Response in this Wave Cycle; | ||
| WAVE_STATUS | 8 bits | Bits 7:3 reserved Type III |
| Bit 2: RESP_FAIL − 1 if response was not received from | ||
| the requested node in previous Wave. This indicates to all | ||
| nodes that this is the last L2ME Wave due to transaction | ||
| failure; otherwise = 0 | ||
| Bit 1: reserved Type III | ||
| Bit 0: FINAL_SUCCESS − 1 if the NC node declare this | ||
| Wave as the last Wave with no errors; otherwise = 0 | ||
| DIR_LEN | 8 bits | 0x10 - If L2ME_PAYLOAD field has payload type |
| “concatenated”; otherwise 0x0 | ||
| TXN_SEQ_N | 8 bits | A transaction sequence number, which is held constant for |
| all the L2ME Waves in an L2ME transaction, and is | ||
| incremented by the NC node when by a new L2ME | ||
| transaction starts | ||
| TXN_WAVE_N | 8 bits | Wave number within the L2ME transaction, starting with |
| 0 for initial Wave, and incremented by 1 for each | ||
| subsequent Wave. |
| L2ME Transaction Payload |
| L2ME_PAYLOAD | 0-N | One of four different payload types described below. |
| bytes | ||
-
- 1. The first type of L2ME_PAYLOAD is identical to the payload of the Submit message if it is the first L2ME Wave of a given transaction. The length of this L2ME_PAYLOAD field may be less than or equal to L_SUB_MAX, which is the maximum number of bytes in the concatenated Submit L2ME Frame payload.
- 2. The second type of Request L2ME Frame payload is sent as a report from the NC node to the participating client nodes starting from the second through the final Wave of the transaction as shown in Table 3 below. The L2ME_PAYLOAD field comprises a 16-entry directory with a 2 byte entry from each node, and a RESP_DATA field, which is a concatenation of the variable-length Response L2ME Frame from each of the participating L2ME nodes that provided a Response in the previous Wave. This directory enables the receiving node to decode the L2ME Responses from all the nodes.
| TABLE 3 |
| Request “Concatenated” L2ME Frame Payload Format |
| Field | Length | Usage |
| Request L2ME Frame Concatenated Payload |
| For (i=0; i<N; i++) { | N=DIR_LEN | |
| DIR_NODE_ID | 8 bits | Node ID that sent Response i or 0xFF if |
| directory entry i and subsequent directory | ||
| entries are unused | ||
| DIR_RESP_INFO | 8 bits | Values [0...(L_RESP_MAX)] indicate the |
| length of the payload in the Response from | ||
| DIR_NODE_ID in units of 4 byte | ||
| words. The following values have special | ||
| meanings and indicate zero length: | ||
| UNRECOGNIZED=0xFF - the node's | ||
| Response header indicated it couldn't | ||
| interpret the previous Request | ||
| OVERFLOW=0xFE - the node's | ||
| Response could not be included given | ||
| L_REQ_MAX. |
| } |
| RESP_DATA | 0-N | An integral number of variable length |
| words | Response payloads, parsable by traversing | |
| lengths interpreted from the directory. | ||
-
- 3. The third type of L2ME_PAYLOAD is in the case of a failed L2ME transaction where the RESP_FAIL bit or NC_FAIL bit is set to “1”. The NC node may transmit a zero-length payload in the Request message of the final L2ME Wave.
- 4. The fourth type of L2ME_PAYLOAD is used to support some specific L2ME transactions such as parameterized Quality of Service. In these cases, the DIR_LEN in the Request L2ME Frame header is not used, and the NC node process the Responses of all the nodes to produce a custom Request Frame payload. The format of the L2ME_PAYLOAD field is defined in the specific L2ME transaction. Note that Request Frames with no payload consist of a 64 bit Type III reserved field.
| TABLE 4 |
| Response L2ME Frame Format |
| Field | Length | Usage |
| Response L2ME Transaction Header |
| HDR_FMT | 8 bits | 0xA |
| RESP_STATUS | 8 bit | Bits 7:4 - reserved Type III |
| Bit 3: DO_ENTRY_CANCEL=1 iff the | ||
| Entry node requires during |
||
| the NC node not to issue further Waves | ||
| in the transaction | ||
| Bit 2: IN_NEXT_WAVE=1 iff the node | ||
| will be included in WAVE_NODEMASK | ||
| in the next Wave | ||
| Bit 1: reserved Type III | ||
| Bit 0: INTERPRETED=1 if the node fully | ||
| recognized the Request message | ||
| RESERVED | 8 bits | Type III |
| WAVE_SEQ_N | 8 bits | Copied from initiating Request |
| RESERVED | 32 bits | Type III |
| L2ME Transaction Response Payload (Optional) |
| L2ME_PAYLOAD | 0-N | The length is less than or equal to |
| words | L_RESP_MAX; no payload in the | |
| Response if this is the final Wave of | ||
| the transaction; divisible evenly by 4 | ||
-
- 1. In order to bound the Wave duration, the NC node should include at least three nodes in the CYCLE_NODEMASK field;
- 2. If the NC node does not receive the expected Response from the requested node within NC_TIMEOUT, the NC node assumes that the Response is no longer outstanding;
- 3. The NC node may not request a node to re-transmit its response before all the other nodes have been asked to first send their Responses; and
- 4. Any node that fails to provide a Response, when requested, within T21 of the second Request causes an L2ME Wave failure.
| TABLE 5 |
| Response L2ME-Enabled Frame Format |
| Field | Length | Description | |
| Response L2ME Header |
| HDR_FMT | 8 bits | ||
| RESP_STATUS | 8 bits | Ignored by receiving node | |
| RESERVED | 8 bits | Type III | |
| WAVE_SEQ_N | 8 bits | Copied from initiating Request | |
| RESERVED | 32 bits | Type III |
| Response L2ME Payload |
| RESERVED | 32 |
0; Type III | |
Claims (25)
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US12/027,216 US8176181B2 (en) | 2007-02-06 | 2008-02-06 | Layer-2 management entity messaging framework in a network |
Applications Claiming Priority (8)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US90020607P | 2007-02-06 | 2007-02-06 | |
| US90156407P | 2007-02-14 | 2007-02-14 | |
| US90156307P | 2007-02-14 | 2007-02-14 | |
| US92763607P | 2007-05-04 | 2007-05-04 | |
| US92761307P | 2007-05-04 | 2007-05-04 | |
| US92776607P | 2007-05-04 | 2007-05-04 | |
| US93131407P | 2007-05-21 | 2007-05-21 | |
| US12/027,216 US8176181B2 (en) | 2007-02-06 | 2008-02-06 | Layer-2 management entity messaging framework in a network |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| US20080189431A1 US20080189431A1 (en) | 2008-08-07 |
| US8176181B2 true US8176181B2 (en) | 2012-05-08 |
Family
ID=39433961
Family Applications (4)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| US12/027,202 Active US9838213B2 (en) | 2007-02-06 | 2008-02-06 | Parameterized quality of service architecture in a network |
| US12/027,216 Expired - Fee Related US8176181B2 (en) | 2007-02-06 | 2008-02-06 | Layer-2 management entity messaging framework in a network |
| US12/027,228 Active 2029-06-29 US8352569B2 (en) | 2007-02-06 | 2008-02-06 | Full mesh rates transaction in a network |
| US15/832,390 Active 2028-03-07 US10432422B2 (en) | 2007-02-06 | 2017-12-05 | Parameterized quality of service architecture in a network |
Family Applications Before (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| US12/027,202 Active US9838213B2 (en) | 2007-02-06 | 2008-02-06 | Parameterized quality of service architecture in a network |
Family Applications After (2)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| US12/027,228 Active 2029-06-29 US8352569B2 (en) | 2007-02-06 | 2008-02-06 | Full mesh rates transaction in a network |
| US15/832,390 Active 2028-03-07 US10432422B2 (en) | 2007-02-06 | 2017-12-05 | Parameterized quality of service architecture in a network |
Country Status (5)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (4) | US9838213B2 (en) |
| EP (3) | EP2119126A2 (en) |
| JP (2) | JP5266258B2 (en) |
| KR (1) | KR101457241B1 (en) |
| WO (3) | WO2008098083A2 (en) |
Cited By (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20030066082A1 (en) * | 2000-08-30 | 2003-04-03 | Avi Kliger | Home network system and method |
| US20080037589A1 (en) * | 2000-08-30 | 2008-02-14 | Avi Kliger | Home network system and method |
| US20080178229A1 (en) * | 2000-08-30 | 2008-07-24 | Broadcom Corporation | Home network system and method |
| US20110080850A1 (en) * | 2009-10-07 | 2011-04-07 | Broadcom Corporation | Systems and methods for providing service ("srv") node selection |
Families Citing this family (59)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US7697522B2 (en) * | 2006-11-20 | 2010-04-13 | Broadcom Corporation | Systems and methods for aggregation of packets for transmission through a communications network |
| US7742495B2 (en) | 2006-11-20 | 2010-06-22 | Broadcom Corporation | System and method for retransmitting packets over a network of communication channels |
| US7782850B2 (en) | 2006-11-20 | 2010-08-24 | Broadcom Corporation | MAC to PHY interface apparatus and methods for transmission of packets through a communications network |
| US8090043B2 (en) | 2006-11-20 | 2012-01-03 | Broadcom Corporation | Apparatus and methods for compensating for signal imbalance in a receiver |
| US9838213B2 (en) | 2007-02-06 | 2017-12-05 | Entropic Communications, Llc | Parameterized quality of service architecture in a network |
| US8665902B2 (en) * | 2007-03-12 | 2014-03-04 | Broadcom Corporation | Method and system for reducing transceiver power via a variable symbol rate |
| US8391354B2 (en) * | 2007-05-14 | 2013-03-05 | Broadcom Corporation | Method and system for transforming uncompressed video traffic to network-aware ethernet traffic with A/V bridging capabilities and A/V bridging extensions |
| US8345553B2 (en) | 2007-05-31 | 2013-01-01 | Broadcom Corporation | Apparatus and methods for reduction of transmission delay in a communication network |
| IL183904A (en) * | 2007-06-13 | 2014-06-30 | Vladimir Yanover | Method and device for bandwitdth allocation in a wireless communication system |
| US7876759B2 (en) * | 2007-07-11 | 2011-01-25 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Quality of service with control flow packet filtering |
| US20090165070A1 (en) * | 2007-12-19 | 2009-06-25 | Broadcom Corporation | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROVIDING A MoCA COMPATABILITY STRATEGY |
| US8619603B2 (en) * | 2009-06-04 | 2013-12-31 | Broadcom Corporation | Method and system for end-to-end management of energy efficient networking protocols |
| US8750116B2 (en) * | 2008-04-15 | 2014-06-10 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Methods and apparatus for communicating and/or using load information in support of decentralized traffic scheduling decisions |
| US8098770B2 (en) * | 2008-05-06 | 2012-01-17 | Broadcom Corporation | Unbiased signal-to-noise ratio estimation for receiver having channel estimation error |
| US9112717B2 (en) | 2008-07-31 | 2015-08-18 | Broadcom Corporation | Systems and methods for providing a MoCA power management strategy |
| US8175101B2 (en) * | 2008-08-15 | 2012-05-08 | Raytheon Company | Multicasting in a network using neighbor information |
| US8520524B2 (en) * | 2008-11-10 | 2013-08-27 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Methods and apparatus for making transmitter and/or receiver communications decisions |
| US8693336B2 (en) * | 2008-11-10 | 2014-04-08 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Communications decision methods and apparatus |
| US8238227B2 (en) | 2008-12-22 | 2012-08-07 | Broadcom Corporation | Systems and methods for providing a MoCA improved performance for short burst packets |
| US8254413B2 (en) | 2008-12-22 | 2012-08-28 | Broadcom Corporation | Systems and methods for physical layer (“PHY”) concatenation in a multimedia over coax alliance network |
| US8213309B2 (en) | 2008-12-22 | 2012-07-03 | Broadcom Corporation | Systems and methods for reducing latency and reservation request overhead in a communications network |
| ES2399598T3 (en) * | 2009-01-16 | 2013-04-02 | Entropic Communications Inc. | Relay admission mechanism in a shared network managed with quality of service |
| US8340125B2 (en) * | 2009-01-16 | 2012-12-25 | Entropic Communications, Inc. | Method and apparatus for block acknowledgement in a communication network |
| CN102282803B (en) * | 2009-01-19 | 2014-09-24 | 熵敏通讯股份有限公司 | Method and apparatus for layer 2 discovery in a managed shared network |
| US9148477B2 (en) * | 2009-01-29 | 2015-09-29 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Methods and apparatus for communicating in a wireless system |
| US8416685B2 (en) * | 2009-02-20 | 2013-04-09 | Entropic Communications, Inc. | Flexible reservation request and scheduling mechanisms in a managed shared network with quality of service |
| US8553547B2 (en) | 2009-03-30 | 2013-10-08 | Broadcom Corporation | Systems and methods for retransmitting packets over a network of communication channels |
| US20100254278A1 (en) | 2009-04-07 | 2010-10-07 | Broadcom Corporation | Assessment in an information network |
| US20100265955A1 (en) * | 2009-04-17 | 2010-10-21 | Park Sung I | Cross layer routing (xrp) protocol |
| US8730798B2 (en) | 2009-05-05 | 2014-05-20 | Broadcom Corporation | Transmitter channel throughput in an information network |
| US8867355B2 (en) | 2009-07-14 | 2014-10-21 | Broadcom Corporation | MoCA multicast handling |
| KR20120099412A (en) * | 2009-10-01 | 2012-09-10 | 엔트로픽 커뮤니케이션즈, 인크. | System and method for a managed network with quality-of-service |
| WO2011066507A1 (en) * | 2009-11-30 | 2011-06-03 | Entropic Communications, Inc. | Method and apparatus for communicating unicast pqos dfid information |
| US8611327B2 (en) | 2010-02-22 | 2013-12-17 | Broadcom Corporation | Method and apparatus for policing a QoS flow in a MoCA 2.0 network |
| US8514860B2 (en) | 2010-02-23 | 2013-08-20 | Broadcom Corporation | Systems and methods for implementing a high throughput mode for a MoCA device |
| US9294297B2 (en) | 2010-06-24 | 2016-03-22 | Entropic Communications, LLC. | Node-based quality-of-service management |
| TWI467961B (en) * | 2010-10-04 | 2015-01-01 | Broadcom Corp | Systems and methods for providing service("srv") node selection |
| US9444876B2 (en) * | 2010-11-08 | 2016-09-13 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Content distribution system |
| US8863249B2 (en) | 2010-12-30 | 2014-10-14 | Broadcom Corporation | Push button configuration of multimedia over coax alliance (MoCA) devices |
| US8849910B2 (en) | 2011-06-03 | 2014-09-30 | Oracle International Corporation | System and method for using quality of service with workload management in an application server environment |
| EP2772020B1 (en) | 2011-10-25 | 2020-06-10 | Fourth Wall Media, Inc. | Network bandwidth regulation using traffic scheduling |
| CN103139843B (en) * | 2011-11-30 | 2018-07-31 | 中兴通讯股份有限公司 | A kind of priority extension queue implementing method and system |
| US9191461B2 (en) * | 2012-02-21 | 2015-11-17 | Entropic Communications, Inc. | Software upgrade using layer-2 management entity messaging |
| US9548920B2 (en) * | 2012-10-15 | 2017-01-17 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | System and method for efficient use of flow table space in a network environment |
| JP5950021B2 (en) | 2013-03-12 | 2016-07-13 | 日本電気株式会社 | Control device, communication system, synchronization method and program |
| US9609086B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2017-03-28 | International Business Machines Corporation | Virtual machine mobility using OpenFlow |
| US9104643B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2015-08-11 | International Business Machines Corporation | OpenFlow controller master-slave initialization protocol |
| US9118984B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2015-08-25 | International Business Machines Corporation | Control plane for integrated switch wavelength division multiplexing |
| US9407560B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2016-08-02 | International Business Machines Corporation | Software defined network-based load balancing for physical and virtual networks |
| US9444748B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2016-09-13 | International Business Machines Corporation | Scalable flow and congestion control with OpenFlow |
| US9769074B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2017-09-19 | International Business Machines Corporation | Network per-flow rate limiting |
| US9596192B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2017-03-14 | International Business Machines Corporation | Reliable link layer for control links between network controllers and switches |
| US9614765B2 (en) | 2014-08-26 | 2017-04-04 | Lenovo Enterprise Solutions (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. | Quantized congestion notification (QCN) proxy function in data center bridging capabilities exchange (DCBX) protocol |
| US11294864B2 (en) * | 2015-05-19 | 2022-04-05 | Vmware, Inc. | Distributed transactions with redo-only write-ahead log |
| DK3427441T3 (en) * | 2016-03-09 | 2021-06-28 | Ericsson Telefon Ab L M | Traffic availability in a cellular communication network |
| WO2019204311A1 (en) | 2018-04-17 | 2019-10-24 | Intel Corporation | Technologies for out-of-order network packet management and selective data flow splitting |
| US11012723B2 (en) * | 2019-01-02 | 2021-05-18 | Tencent America LLC | Service descriptions for multimedia streaming |
| CN113825168A (en) * | 2020-06-19 | 2021-12-21 | 北京三星通信技术研究有限公司 | A method and device for supporting data transmission |
| US20230147159A1 (en) * | 2021-11-11 | 2023-05-11 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Time gaps for segment-based uplink transmissions in non-terrestrial networks |
Citations (17)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EP0971509A1 (en) | 1998-07-06 | 2000-01-12 | Sony International (Europe) GmbH | Bandwidth reservation |
| WO2000072626A1 (en) | 1999-05-21 | 2000-11-30 | Ensemble Communications, Inc. | Method and apparatus for bandwidth allocation |
| WO2001082550A2 (en) | 2000-04-25 | 2001-11-01 | Inari, Inc. | Multi-channel power line exchange protocol |
| US20020029271A1 (en) | 1998-07-06 | 2002-03-07 | Andreas Schwager | Method to control a network device in a network comprising several devices |
| US20020035442A1 (en) | 2000-01-18 | 2002-03-21 | Bulent Dervisoglu | Hierarchical test circuit structure for chips with multiple circuit blocks |
| US20020080816A1 (en) | 2000-12-22 | 2002-06-27 | Brian Spinar | Method and system for adaptively obtaining bandwidth allocation requests |
| EP1225785A1 (en) | 2000-10-27 | 2002-07-24 | Alcatel | Access control unit |
| US20030005130A1 (en) | 2001-06-29 | 2003-01-02 | Cheng Doreen Yining | Audio-video management in UPnP |
| US20030072264A1 (en) | 2001-06-01 | 2003-04-17 | Fujitsu Networks | System and method for resizing the physical link bandwidth based on utilization thereof |
| US6717913B1 (en) | 1999-02-23 | 2004-04-06 | Alcatel | Multi-service network switch with modem pool management |
| GB2406481A (en) | 2003-05-28 | 2005-03-30 | Artimi Ltd | Ultra wideband communication networks and node architecture |
| US20050152370A1 (en) * | 2003-10-06 | 2005-07-14 | Meehan Thomas J. | Protocol for messaging between a centralized broadband remote aggregation server and other devices |
| US20050254503A1 (en) * | 2004-05-13 | 2005-11-17 | Claseman George R | Static address reservation protocol in a data network |
| EP1601144A1 (en) | 2004-05-25 | 2005-11-30 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Method for communication between coordinator-based wireless networks |
| US20060280197A1 (en) | 2005-06-14 | 2006-12-14 | Stone Christopher J | Method and apparatus for transmitting and receiving data over a shared access carrier network |
| US20070058646A1 (en) * | 2005-08-25 | 2007-03-15 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Device and method for forwarding multicast traffic in a hybrid device |
| US20070168486A1 (en) * | 2005-06-09 | 2007-07-19 | Whirlpool Corporation | Software architecture system and method for operating an appliance exposing key press functionality to a network |
Family Cites Families (49)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US6272127B1 (en) * | 1997-11-10 | 2001-08-07 | Ehron Warpspeed Services, Inc. | Network for providing switched broadband multipoint/multimedia intercommunication |
| JP3490286B2 (en) | 1998-03-13 | 2004-01-26 | 株式会社東芝 | Router device and frame transfer method |
| US6856627B2 (en) * | 1999-01-15 | 2005-02-15 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Method for routing information over a network |
| CN100536419C (en) * | 1999-02-23 | 2009-09-02 | 阿尔卡塔尔互联网运行公司 | Switch and method of emulating multiple routers within a single switch therein |
| US6570867B1 (en) * | 1999-04-09 | 2003-05-27 | Nortel Networks Limited | Routes and paths management |
| JP2001053925A (en) | 1999-08-10 | 2001-02-23 | Matsushita Graphic Communication Systems Inc | Communication controller and serial bus managing device |
| US6252755B1 (en) * | 1999-08-11 | 2001-06-26 | Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | Apparatus and method for implementing a home network using customer-premises power lines |
| US6510219B1 (en) * | 1999-09-30 | 2003-01-21 | Nortel Networks Limited | Alternate network fallback for IP telephony |
| US6747968B1 (en) * | 2000-01-14 | 2004-06-08 | Nokia Ip Inc. | Methods and systems for weighted PCF polling lists for WLAN QoS support |
| US6888831B1 (en) | 2000-09-28 | 2005-05-03 | Western Digital Ventures, Inc. | Distributed resource reservation system for establishing a path through a multi-dimensional computer network to support isochronous data |
| WO2002032051A2 (en) | 2000-10-12 | 2002-04-18 | Signafor, Inc. | Advanced switching mechanism for providing high-speed communications with high quality of service |
| JP2002171257A (en) * | 2000-11-29 | 2002-06-14 | Sony Corp | Wireless transmission device and wireless transmission method |
| US20020122429A1 (en) * | 2001-03-05 | 2002-09-05 | Griggs Theodore Leon | Mechanism and method for user selection of dynamic quality of service in telephony |
| US20020159411A1 (en) | 2001-03-23 | 2002-10-31 | Manish Airy | Method and system for scheduling the transmission of wireless data |
| US7194009B2 (en) * | 2001-04-14 | 2007-03-20 | John Wai Tsang Eng | Full-service broadband cable modem system |
| JP2002359662A (en) * | 2001-05-31 | 2002-12-13 | Toshiba Corp | Wireless communication device and host interface switching method thereof |
| US6987753B2 (en) | 2001-10-09 | 2006-01-17 | Alcatel Canada Inc | Apparatus and method for dynamic bandwidth allocation with minimum bandwidth guarantee |
| US7181485B1 (en) | 2001-11-26 | 2007-02-20 | Integrated Device Technology, Inc. | Variably delayable transmission of packets between independently clocked source, intermediate, and destination circuits while maintaining orderly and timely processing in one or both of the intermediate and destination circuits |
| US7305623B2 (en) * | 2001-12-03 | 2007-12-04 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Method and apparatus for managing and representing elements in a network |
| JP2003204333A (en) * | 2002-01-09 | 2003-07-18 | Toshiba Corp | Wireless communication method and wireless communication device |
| US6876636B2 (en) | 2002-07-09 | 2005-04-05 | Qualcomm Inc. | Method and system for a multicast service initiation in a communication system |
| CN100426733C (en) * | 2003-01-16 | 2008-10-15 | 华为技术有限公司 | System for realizing resource distribution in network communication and its method |
| US7417950B2 (en) * | 2003-02-03 | 2008-08-26 | Ciena Corporation | Method and apparatus for performing data flow ingress/egress admission control in a provider network |
| CN100350779C (en) * | 2003-06-20 | 2007-11-21 | 株式会社Ntt都科摩 | Network system, control apparatus, router device, access point and mobile terminal |
| US7460543B2 (en) * | 2003-08-13 | 2008-12-02 | Panasonic Corporation | Method and system for scheduling traffic in a wireless network |
| TWI261996B (en) * | 2003-08-18 | 2006-09-11 | Nokia Corp | Apparatus, and associated method, for selecting quality of service-related information in a radio communication system |
| EP1656771A1 (en) * | 2003-08-21 | 2006-05-17 | NTT DoCoMo INC. | Resource reservation in a wireless network with distributed medium access control |
| US7756958B2 (en) | 2003-09-20 | 2010-07-13 | International Business Machines Corporation | Intelligent discovery of network information from multiple information gathering agents |
| US7590099B2 (en) | 2003-09-25 | 2009-09-15 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Managing traffic in communications system having dissimilar CDMA channels |
| US7904578B1 (en) * | 2003-10-30 | 2011-03-08 | At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. | Bandwidth and topology management device for home networks |
| US8406235B2 (en) | 2003-11-26 | 2013-03-26 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Quality of service scheduler for a wireless network |
| JP4713499B2 (en) | 2004-01-08 | 2011-06-29 | エスケーテレコム株式会社 | Mobile communication system and handover method for packet data service in a mobile communication network in which asynchronous and synchronous networks coexist |
| ES2329146T3 (en) | 2004-02-06 | 2009-11-23 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR A DISTRIBUTED BOOKING PROTOCOL FOR ACCESS CONTROL TO THE MEDIA OF ULTRA WIDE BAND. |
| JP4542359B2 (en) * | 2004-03-30 | 2010-09-15 | 株式会社クラウド・スコープ・テクノロジーズ | Network monitoring apparatus, monitoring method, and monitoring system |
| EP1748600A4 (en) * | 2004-04-28 | 2013-03-06 | Jiaxun Feihong Electric Co Ltd | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR COMMUNICATIONS OF AN IP TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORK AND THEIR APPLICATION |
| US8248932B2 (en) | 2004-05-26 | 2012-08-21 | West Lane Data Llc | Method and apparatus for fairly sharing excess bandwidth and packet dropping amongst subscribers of a data network |
| US7957266B2 (en) * | 2004-05-28 | 2011-06-07 | Alcatel-Lucent Usa Inc. | Efficient and robust routing independent of traffic pattern variability |
| JP2006080847A (en) * | 2004-09-09 | 2006-03-23 | Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd | Method for adjusting medium reservation according to medium error condition |
| JP2006100952A (en) | 2004-09-28 | 2006-04-13 | Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd | Communication device |
| US7516390B2 (en) | 2005-01-10 | 2009-04-07 | Broadcom Corporation | LDPC (Low Density Parity Check) coding and interleaving implemented in MIMO communication systems |
| EP1708426A1 (en) * | 2005-04-01 | 2006-10-04 | BRITISH TELECOMMUNICATIONS public limited company | Resource reservation in network routing |
| US7924732B2 (en) * | 2005-04-19 | 2011-04-12 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Quality of service in IT infrastructures |
| EP1739993A1 (en) | 2005-07-01 | 2007-01-03 | Siemens S.p.A. | Method for controlling the access to a TDMA wireless channel from nodes of a network of either linear or tree topology |
| JP4760169B2 (en) * | 2005-07-05 | 2011-08-31 | ソニー株式会社 | Wireless communication apparatus, computer program, wireless communication method, and wireless communication system |
| US7599302B2 (en) * | 2005-07-19 | 2009-10-06 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Dynamic enforcement of MPLS-TE inter-domain policy and QoS |
| US8181262B2 (en) * | 2005-07-20 | 2012-05-15 | Verimatrix, Inc. | Network user authentication system and method |
| US20070223669A1 (en) * | 2006-03-21 | 2007-09-27 | Bowers Mark T | Method and apparatus for alternatively switching between phone service lines |
| US7724765B2 (en) * | 2006-12-07 | 2010-05-25 | Motorola, Inc. | Method and apparatus for providing quality of service over a contention access period of a wireless personal area network |
| US9838213B2 (en) | 2007-02-06 | 2017-12-05 | Entropic Communications, Llc | Parameterized quality of service architecture in a network |
-
2008
- 2008-02-06 US US12/027,202 patent/US9838213B2/en active Active
- 2008-02-06 WO PCT/US2008/053222 patent/WO2008098083A2/en not_active Ceased
- 2008-02-06 US US12/027,216 patent/US8176181B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2008-02-06 WO PCT/US2008/053202 patent/WO2008098066A2/en not_active Ceased
- 2008-02-06 EP EP08729196A patent/EP2119126A2/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2008-02-06 EP EP08729186A patent/EP2115945B1/en not_active Not-in-force
- 2008-02-06 EP EP08729205A patent/EP2115954A2/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2008-02-06 WO PCT/US2008/053212 patent/WO2008098075A2/en not_active Ceased
- 2008-02-06 JP JP2009549219A patent/JP5266258B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2008-02-06 JP JP2009549223A patent/JP5168699B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2008-02-06 US US12/027,228 patent/US8352569B2/en active Active
- 2008-02-06 KR KR1020097017142A patent/KR101457241B1/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2017
- 2017-12-05 US US15/832,390 patent/US10432422B2/en active Active
Patent Citations (20)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EP0971509A1 (en) | 1998-07-06 | 2000-01-12 | Sony International (Europe) GmbH | Bandwidth reservation |
| US20020029271A1 (en) | 1998-07-06 | 2002-03-07 | Andreas Schwager | Method to control a network device in a network comprising several devices |
| US6717913B1 (en) | 1999-02-23 | 2004-04-06 | Alcatel | Multi-service network switch with modem pool management |
| WO2000072626A1 (en) | 1999-05-21 | 2000-11-30 | Ensemble Communications, Inc. | Method and apparatus for bandwidth allocation |
| CN1356012A (en) | 1999-05-21 | 2002-06-26 | 通信集合公司 | Bandwidth allocation method and device |
| US20020035442A1 (en) | 2000-01-18 | 2002-03-21 | Bulent Dervisoglu | Hierarchical test circuit structure for chips with multiple circuit blocks |
| WO2001082550A2 (en) | 2000-04-25 | 2001-11-01 | Inari, Inc. | Multi-channel power line exchange protocol |
| EP1225785A1 (en) | 2000-10-27 | 2002-07-24 | Alcatel | Access control unit |
| US20020080816A1 (en) | 2000-12-22 | 2002-06-27 | Brian Spinar | Method and system for adaptively obtaining bandwidth allocation requests |
| US20030072264A1 (en) | 2001-06-01 | 2003-04-17 | Fujitsu Networks | System and method for resizing the physical link bandwidth based on utilization thereof |
| WO2003003658A1 (en) | 2001-06-29 | 2003-01-09 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | AUDIO-VIDEO MANAGEMENT IN UPnP |
| US20030005130A1 (en) | 2001-06-29 | 2003-01-02 | Cheng Doreen Yining | Audio-video management in UPnP |
| CN1520659A (en) | 2001-06-29 | 2004-08-11 | �ʼҷ����ֵ�������˾ | Audio Video Management within UPnP |
| GB2406481A (en) | 2003-05-28 | 2005-03-30 | Artimi Ltd | Ultra wideband communication networks and node architecture |
| US20050152370A1 (en) * | 2003-10-06 | 2005-07-14 | Meehan Thomas J. | Protocol for messaging between a centralized broadband remote aggregation server and other devices |
| US20050254503A1 (en) * | 2004-05-13 | 2005-11-17 | Claseman George R | Static address reservation protocol in a data network |
| EP1601144A1 (en) | 2004-05-25 | 2005-11-30 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Method for communication between coordinator-based wireless networks |
| US20070168486A1 (en) * | 2005-06-09 | 2007-07-19 | Whirlpool Corporation | Software architecture system and method for operating an appliance exposing key press functionality to a network |
| US20060280197A1 (en) | 2005-06-14 | 2006-12-14 | Stone Christopher J | Method and apparatus for transmitting and receiving data over a shared access carrier network |
| US20070058646A1 (en) * | 2005-08-25 | 2007-03-15 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Device and method for forwarding multicast traffic in a hybrid device |
Non-Patent Citations (7)
| Title |
|---|
| Communication "First Office Action" issued Jun. 23, 2011 in counterpart CN Application No. 200880007820.6. |
| Hwang, Won-Joo et al. "HomeMAC: QoS-based MAC Protocol for the Home Network", Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Computers and Communications (ISCC '02). |
| IEEE revision with Corrections, Clarifications & Enhancements, P802.11-REVma/D9.0 Oct. 2006, pp. 319-320. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Dec. 15, 2008 from International Application No. PCT/US2008/053202. |
| Official Action issued May 25, 2011 in counterpart CN Application No. 200880007920.9. |
| PCT/US2008/053212 International Search Report (Filed Jun. 2, 2008). EP Search Authority. |
| PCT/US2008/053222 International Search Report (Filed Jun. 2, 2008). EP Search Authority. |
Cited By (12)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20030066082A1 (en) * | 2000-08-30 | 2003-04-03 | Avi Kliger | Home network system and method |
| US20080037589A1 (en) * | 2000-08-30 | 2008-02-14 | Avi Kliger | Home network system and method |
| US20080178229A1 (en) * | 2000-08-30 | 2008-07-24 | Broadcom Corporation | Home network system and method |
| US20080271094A1 (en) * | 2000-08-30 | 2008-10-30 | Broadcom Corporation | Home network system and method |
| US8724485B2 (en) | 2000-08-30 | 2014-05-13 | Broadcom Corporation | Home network system and method |
| US8755289B2 (en) | 2000-08-30 | 2014-06-17 | Broadcom Corporation | Home network system and method |
| US8761200B2 (en) | 2000-08-30 | 2014-06-24 | Broadcom Corporation | Home network system and method |
| US9094226B2 (en) | 2000-08-30 | 2015-07-28 | Broadcom Corporation | Home network system and method |
| US9160555B2 (en) | 2000-08-30 | 2015-10-13 | Broadcom Corporation | Home network system and method |
| US9184984B2 (en) | 2000-08-30 | 2015-11-10 | Broadcom Corporation | Network module |
| US20110080850A1 (en) * | 2009-10-07 | 2011-04-07 | Broadcom Corporation | Systems and methods for providing service ("srv") node selection |
| US8942250B2 (en) * | 2009-10-07 | 2015-01-27 | Broadcom Corporation | Systems and methods for providing service (“SRV”) node selection |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| KR101457241B1 (en) | 2014-10-31 |
| JP5168699B2 (en) | 2013-03-21 |
| EP2115945A2 (en) | 2009-11-11 |
| EP2115945B1 (en) | 2012-11-14 |
| US20180109396A1 (en) | 2018-04-19 |
| WO2008098083A2 (en) | 2008-08-14 |
| EP2115954A2 (en) | 2009-11-11 |
| US8352569B2 (en) | 2013-01-08 |
| WO2008098075A2 (en) | 2008-08-14 |
| US20080192752A1 (en) | 2008-08-14 |
| WO2008098075A3 (en) | 2008-10-02 |
| JP2010518756A (en) | 2010-05-27 |
| US10432422B2 (en) | 2019-10-01 |
| WO2008098066A3 (en) | 2009-03-05 |
| EP2119126A2 (en) | 2009-11-18 |
| WO2008098066A2 (en) | 2008-08-14 |
| US20080209004A1 (en) | 2008-08-28 |
| WO2008098083A3 (en) | 2008-10-02 |
| JP2010518753A (en) | 2010-05-27 |
| US20080189431A1 (en) | 2008-08-07 |
| US9838213B2 (en) | 2017-12-05 |
| JP5266258B2 (en) | 2013-08-21 |
| KR20090101384A (en) | 2009-09-25 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US8176181B2 (en) | Layer-2 management entity messaging framework in a network | |
| US12438825B2 (en) | Parameterized quality of service in a network | |
| US9853865B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for layer 2 discovery in a managed shared network | |
| EP2387838B1 (en) | Retransmission admission mechanism in a managed shared network with quality of service | |
| CN101632268A (en) | Parameterized quality of service architecture in the network | |
| CN103259713A (en) | Message exchange system and method | |
| CN102905318B (en) | Method, network server and access network (AN) for downlink bandwidth allocation in network | |
| KR20140025386A (en) | Method and apparatus for quality-of-service(qos) management | |
| HK1165148A (en) | Retransmission admission mechanism in a managed shared network with quality of service |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| AS | Assignment |
Owner name: ENTROPIC COMMUNICATIONS, INC., CALIFORNIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:HYSLOP, BRADLEY THOMAS;HARE, ROBERT L., JR.;SINGH, INDERJIT;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:020939/0227;SIGNING DATES FROM 20080417 TO 20080418 Owner name: ENTROPIC COMMUNICATIONS, INC., CALIFORNIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:HYSLOP, BRADLEY THOMAS;HARE, ROBERT L., JR.;SINGH, INDERJIT;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20080417 TO 20080418;REEL/FRAME:020939/0227 |
|
| FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
| STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
| AS | Assignment |
Owner name: ENTROPIC COMMUNICATIONS, INC., CALIFORNIA Free format text: MERGER AND CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNORS:EXCALIBUR ACQUISITION CORPORATION;ENTROPIC COMMUNICATIONS, INC.;ENTROPIC COMMUNICATIONS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:035706/0267 Effective date: 20150430 |
|
| AS | Assignment |
Owner name: ENTROPIC COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, CALIFORNIA Free format text: MERGER AND CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNORS:ENTROPIC COMMUNICATIONS, INC.;EXCALIBUR SUBSIDIARY, LLC;ENTROPIC COMMUNICATIONS, LLC;REEL/FRAME:035717/0628 Effective date: 20150430 |
|
| FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
| AS | Assignment |
Owner name: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT, IL Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNORS:MAXLINEAR, INC.;ENTROPIC COMMUNICATIONS, LLC (F/K/A ENTROPIC COMMUNICATIONS, INC.);EXAR CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:042453/0001 Effective date: 20170512 Owner name: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT, ILLINOIS Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNORS:MAXLINEAR, INC.;ENTROPIC COMMUNICATIONS, LLC (F/K/A ENTROPIC COMMUNICATIONS, INC.);EXAR CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:042453/0001 Effective date: 20170512 |
|
| FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: MAINTENANCE FEE REMINDER MAILED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: REM.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
| LAPS | Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees |
Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED FOR FAILURE TO PAY MAINTENANCE FEES (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: EXP.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
| STCH | Information on status: patent discontinuation |
Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362 |
|
| AS | Assignment |
Owner name: MUFG UNION BANK, N.A., CALIFORNIA Free format text: SUCCESSION OF AGENCY (REEL 042453 / FRAME 0001);ASSIGNOR:JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.;REEL/FRAME:053115/0842 Effective date: 20200701 |
|
| FP | Lapsed due to failure to pay maintenance fee |
Effective date: 20200508 |
|
| AS | Assignment |
Owner name: MAXLINEAR COMMUNICATIONS LLC, CALIFORNIA Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:ENTROPIC COMMUNICATONS LLC;REEL/FRAME:055776/0482 Effective date: 20180213 |
|
| AS | Assignment |
Owner name: MAXLINEAR COMMUNICATIONS LLC, CALIFORNIA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:MUFG UNION BANK, N.A.;REEL/FRAME:055779/0001 Effective date: 20210331 Owner name: MAXLINEAR, INC., CALIFORNIA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:MUFG UNION BANK, N.A.;REEL/FRAME:055779/0001 Effective date: 20210331 |
|
| AS | Assignment |
Owner name: ENTROPIC COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, NEW YORK Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:MAXLINEAR COMMUNICATIONS LLC;REEL/FRAME:055899/0291 Effective date: 20210331 |
|
| AS | Assignment |
Owner name: MAXLINEAR, INC., CALIFORNIA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:MUFG UNION BANK, N.A.;REEL/FRAME:056656/0204 Effective date: 20210623 Owner name: EXAR CORPORATION, CALIFORNIA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:MUFG UNION BANK, N.A.;REEL/FRAME:056656/0204 Effective date: 20210623 Owner name: MAXLINEAR COMMUNICATIONS LLC, CALIFORNIA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:MUFG UNION BANK, N.A.;REEL/FRAME:056656/0204 Effective date: 20210623 Owner name: MAXLINEAR, INC., CALIFORNIA Free format text: RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:MUFG UNION BANK, N.A.;REEL/FRAME:056656/0204 Effective date: 20210623 Owner name: EXAR CORPORATION, CALIFORNIA Free format text: RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:MUFG UNION BANK, N.A.;REEL/FRAME:056656/0204 Effective date: 20210623 Owner name: MAXLINEAR COMMUNICATIONS LLC, CALIFORNIA Free format text: RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:MUFG UNION BANK, N.A.;REEL/FRAME:056656/0204 Effective date: 20210623 |