[go: up one dir, main page]

US3277948A - Radiant burner utilizing flame quenching phenomena - Google Patents

Radiant burner utilizing flame quenching phenomena Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US3277948A
US3277948A US55077A US5507760A US3277948A US 3277948 A US3277948 A US 3277948A US 55077 A US55077 A US 55077A US 5507760 A US5507760 A US 5507760A US 3277948 A US3277948 A US 3277948A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
flame
quenching
burner
radiant
burning
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US55077A
Inventor
Willie H Best
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
THERMAL ENGINEERING Corp
Original Assignee
THERMAL ENGINEERING CORP
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by THERMAL ENGINEERING CORP filed Critical THERMAL ENGINEERING CORP
Priority to US55077A priority Critical patent/US3277948A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US3277948A publication Critical patent/US3277948A/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F23COMBUSTION APPARATUS; COMBUSTION PROCESSES
    • F23DBURNERS
    • F23D14/00Burners for combustion of a gas, e.g. of a gas stored under pressure as a liquid
    • F23D14/12Radiant burners
    • F23D14/14Radiant burners using screens or perforated plates
    • F23D14/145Radiant burners using screens or perforated plates combustion being stabilised at a screen or a perforated plate

Definitions

  • the primary object of the present invention is to provide a radiant burner constructed of ceramic material or other suitable refractory material capable of becoming incandescent when heated to a predetermined high temperature whereby radiant heat rays will emit from the incandescent surface of the burner.
  • the primary feature of the present invention is its construction with openings in the form of relatively narrow and elongated slots in which the width of the slot is such that a flame will be quenched before it will pass through the slots. This results in a burner which is incapable of backflashing, that is, incapable of permitting passage of flame from the burning surface of the burner to the rear surface thereof from which the combustible mixture originates.
  • Another advantage of this arrangement is the fact that the velocity of the combustible mixture may be materially lowered since it is not necessary that the velocity of the combustible mixture be greater than the flame propagation rate of the combustible mixture as is necessary in conventional burners in order to prevent backflashing.
  • Another primary object of the present invention is to provide a radiant burner having relatively narrow slotlike openings as defined in the preceding paragraph together with a structure in which the outer edge portions of the side walls of the slot are recessed by either bevelling or providing a stepped wall structure for increasing the cross sectional area of the slot at the burning surface thereof, thereby further reducing the velocity of the combustible mixture and, in fact, substantially decreasing the velocity to Zero movement or only very small movement whereby the combustion of the combustible mixture will take place within the confines generally of the trough formed by the recesses for producing more effective flame impingement upon the burning surface of the ceramic plate from which the burner is constructed.
  • a very important feature of the recessed construction or the troughlike construction results from the orientation of the flame within the trough so that flame agitation is reduced to an absolute minimum by any air flow over the burning surface of the burner, thereby further increasing the efficiency of flame impingement upon the burning surface and further increasing the temperature of the burning surface of the burner.
  • Another very important result from the construction of the recessed side walls of the slot-like openings is an increase in the effective area of the burning surface of the radiant burner. Inasmuch as the efficiency of the burner is dependent in part upon the burning surface area or incandescent area of the radiant burner, the increase in the surface area will, of course, increase the efficiency of the radiant burner.
  • the most important feature of the increase in the width of the slot or channel at the discharge end thereof is the provision of a width such that will not quench the flame whereas the parallel side walls of the slot or channel inwardly of the recess edges will quench the flame since the width of the slot or channel is less than the critical quenching distance for the material from which the radiant burner is constructed.
  • FIGURE 1 is a plan view of a radiant burner constructed in accordance with the present invention.
  • FIGURE 2 is a detailed sectional view taken substantially upon a plane passing along section line 22 of FIGURE 1 illustrating the details of construction of the burner;
  • FIGURE 3 is an enlarged fragmentary sectional view illustrating the orientation of the flame in the troughs or valleys formed by the recessed edges of the slots or channels;
  • FIGURE 4 is a detailed sectional view similar to FIGURE 3 but illustrating a slightly different form of recessed edge for the slots;
  • FIGURE 5 is a detailed sectional view similar to FIGURES 3 and 4 but illustrating still another modified form of the invention
  • FIGURE 6 is a detailed view illustrating the burner structure and forming a basis for certain mathematical computations
  • FIGURE 7 is a graph illustrating the increase in radiation efliciency dependent upon the angle of divergence of the slot wall
  • FIGURE 8 is a graph illustrating the relationship of the radiation area and the R distance vs. the angle of divergence
  • FIGURE 9 is a graph illustrating the radiation area vs. the angle of divergence.
  • FIGURE 10 is a pair of graphs illustrating comparatively the radiant heat distribution from a flat burning surface on a burner and a burning surface having the divergent recessed edges in the side walls of the slots.
  • the numeral 10 generally relates to the radiant burner of the present invention which includes an exterior frame 12 which forms means for guiding the combustible mixture to the rear surface 14 of the radiant burner.
  • the radiant burner also is provided with a burning surface 16 and is constructed from a plate of ceramic material 18.
  • the plate of ceramic material 18 may be of one-piece construction or it may be constructed from a plurality of individual strips.
  • the slots 20 are arranged in any of several diflerent patterns in the ceramic plate.
  • the burner may be separated by a transverse solid member 21 or they may be staggered in relation to each other or extend completely across the burning face depending upon the size of the burner and other physical factors. If the burner is constructed of a plurality of relatively thin plates, the ends of said plates or strips are provided with enlargements to provide for spacing between the strips thus defining the slots similar to slots 20. As illustrated, the slots 20 are quite narrow and are provided with parallel side walls. Adjacent the burning surface 16, the side walls of the slots 20 are recessed by providing a bevel 22 thereon which defines an apex 24 generally in the center of the area of the ceramic plates between adjacent slots 20. The recess formed by the bevels 22 form troughs or valleys 26 for receiving the flame during combustion thereof whereby the flame is disposed substantially within the confines of the troughs or valleys 26 for specificpurposes set forth hereinafter.
  • FIGURE 4 illustrates a similar type of structure in which the ceramic plate is designated by numeral 28, the slots designated by numeral 30 and in this instance, the
  • recess at the outer edge or burning surface of the side Walls of the slot are provided by a square cut recess 32 formed in the side walls of the slot 30 which effectively increases the width of the slot and forms troughs or valleys 34 for receiving the flame whereby the flame will impinge against the side walls of the recess 32.
  • FIGURE 5 illustrates an arrangement in which the ceramic plate is designated by numeral 36 and the slots designated by numeral 38.
  • the recess is formed in the side walls of the slots 38 by providing two square cut recesses 40 and 42 therein as illustrated in FIGURE 5 thus defining an increase in the Width of the slot 38 and further defining a valley 44 in which the flame is disposed for more effective impingement upon the burning surface of the radiant burner.
  • the slot or channey for passage of the combustible mixture is relatively narrow and has a width less than that critical width which will enable passage of flame.
  • the width of the slots is such that flame will be quenched thus preventing backflash of the flame from the burning surface to the rear surface of the burner.
  • the quenching distance of a flame can be measured quite accurately and reproducibly.
  • the object of recent experimental investigations has been to make such measurements on hydrocarbon flames, the chemical kinetics of which are relatively well understood, in the hope that the resultant correlated data would be useful in the development of a theory that could be applied to the design of radiant burners.
  • No completely adequate theory of flame behavior in terms of chemical kinetics and transport properties of gas molecules has yet been developed; however, measurements of quenching distance provides an experimental approach to the study of flame structure.
  • quenching is a very important aspect in the mechanism of flame anchoring which is of utmost importance in the operation of a radiant burner.
  • the spreading of a flame may be considered to be the result of the perpetuation of a chain reaction by the diffusion of chain initiators. This means that initiation of the oxidation reaction in successive elements of combustible gas is accomplished by the diffusion of chain initiators into each element.
  • the number of chain initiators, their chemical and physical nature, and the velocity and direction of diffusion are determined by internal structure of the flame front.
  • the flame structure consists of the gradients of temperature, pressure, and chemical species which exist in the flame as a result of the effect of the chemical oxidation reaction on the environment. If the structure of the flame is changed, either by the use of a different combustible mixture or by changes in the conditions of the environment, the rate of flame propagation ought to reflect these changes.
  • the flame front is considered as a region of high temperature thermal equilibrium including a number of chain carriers.
  • the chain carriers diffuse ahead of the burning zone and initiate the oxidation reaction. Chain branching is negligible, and chain carriers are destroyed by collision with the surface. The extent of the oxidation reaction is limited by the destruction of chain carriers. This principle was used to formulate the approximate equation for the pressure limit of flammability in tubes of different diameters.
  • the quenching distance is proportional to the pressure to the minus 0.91 power for stoichiometric propane-air flame, and that the exponent numerically decreases with decreasing propane concentration in air. It has been further shown that the average ratio of quenching distances measured by flashback through plane parallel plates to quenching diameters for cylindrical ducts is approximately 0.70 for lean propane-air mixtures, while for all propane mixtures, the averages was 0.62. This work indicates that the experimental critical diameters for propagation in the tube multiplied by 0.70 would be equivalent to the quenching distance measured by flash-back through parallel plates if both are governed by the same process.
  • dead space A detailed description of the method employed for the measurement of dead space has been published elsewhere and the values of dead space as just defined have been obtained from many mixtures with air of ethylene, carbon monoxide and propane burning at various pressures between cm. of mercury and atmospheric pressure upon burners of several diameters.
  • dead space Unlike the burning velocity itself, dead space cannot be regarded as a physical constant of any one explosive mixture, and besides being dependent upon temperature and pressure, it is conditioned also by such factors as burner size and shape, the material of construction of the burner and to a lesser extent, flame area. It has not been shown thus far the degree, if any, that dead space effects the operation of a radiant burner. However, if this phenomena does occur it is evident that anything that could decrease this space would result in a higher surface temperature of the radiant burner. With proper quenching techniques the distance known as dead space between the burner surface and the flame front can be reduced to zero or to a negligible distance.
  • Quenching is probably governed to a great extent by heat conduction from the flame to the cold surface; however, the destruction of chain carriers on the surface appears to be an important part of the quenching process.
  • the present interpretation shows that the destruction of chain carriers on a surface could provide a termination step in the oxidation chain reaction which could be sufliciently important to suppress flame propagation. In that case, the process of flame propagation would also be effected by the surface. Further experimental work appears to be needed to establish the effect of the nature of the surface of quenching, limits of flammability, and flame propagation.
  • a burner has been constructed by your applicant utilizing the phenomena of quenching as the only method of preventing rearwardly extending combustion, into the plenum. It has been determined that gas air velocities in a burner utilizing quenching can be as low as approximately 2 to 3 feet per second whereas the flame propogation can be as high as 9 to 12 feet per second and yet rearwardly extending combustion or backflashing will not occur because of the phenomena of flame quenching.
  • FIGURE 6 it is apparent that a channel is established that has an increasing cross sectional width near the surface of the burner.
  • the purpose of increasing the width gap is to provide a gap width such that the flame will not quench, that is the width exceeds the critical quenching distance for the material and other factors mentioned in the preceding discussion.
  • the critical quenching distance At some position between point (a) and point (b) the critical quenching distance will not be exceeded because of the converging nature of the channel, resulting in anchoring of the flame to the surrounding walls.
  • the flame cannot recede in a rearwardly direction beyond point (a) because the slot width at point (a) is less than the critical quenching distance therefore, trapping the flame in the given channel.
  • the divergent channels serve the two-fold purpose of controlling the quenching criticalities as well as controlling velocities of the gas air mixture which are certainly critical in this region of the burner.
  • the gas air mixture velocity at point (a) exceeds the rate of propagation of the flame then it is evident that this velocity can be reduced to a point less than the rate of propagation of the flame at point (b). Therefore, with the same type of construction or the same geometry involved critical factors relative to radiant burners are controlled, resulting in the flame being firmly anchored to the channel, increasing the surface temperature to a great degree.
  • the critical gap width at point (b) can exceed the critical quenching distance which in this case may be of the order of magnitude of .040 inch, however, the gap width at point (a) is less than the critical quenching distance thereby anchoring the flame in the channel between point (a) and (b).
  • the flame can be entirely stable and generally embedded in the channels when the burner is located in an area where air current exists.
  • Flame quenching can also be accomplished utilizing a surface geometry shown in FIGURE 4 and FIGURE 5. Utilizing configuration of FIGURES 4 and 5 the flame is quenched in the open channel above the cross section labeled C. It is evident from the foregoing discussion that the flame can be quenched utilizing a configuration shown as in FIGURES 4 and 5, but with reference to the engineering principles involved certain other critera must exist in order that maximum efficiency be attained with respect to the operation of a radiant burner. It is a well known fact that radiation is a function of the emitting surface temperature to the 4th power but is also a function of the surface area. For maximum efliciency, the ideal situation would be to quench the flame and also expose maximum surface area for radiation emitting purposes.
  • FIG- URE 6 of a mathematical solution has been derived to determine the critical dimensions that will expose the greatest surface area to emit unobstructed radiation.
  • FIGURE 6 and the accompanying derivation and curve is self-explanatory and points out the fact that for maximum unobstructed radiation area, a certan angle of divergence of the plates must exist.
  • FIGURE 7 is a curve A of Predicted Radiation Efliciency vs. Angle of Divergence and imposed upon this curve is curve B of Radiation Efiiciency Actual vs. Angle of Divergence. It is readily seen that the maximum efficiency is attained at a given angle, however, the efficiency does not vary to a great extent in a given region of the curve.
  • FIGURE 9 is a curve of Radiation Area vs. Angle of Divergence and illustrates how the effective radiating area drops off after a certain critical angle is exceeded.
  • the flame front is securely anchored to the surface of the radiant burner and the surface temperature has been increased considerably.
  • Increasing the surface temperature plays a significant role in the radiation efficiency but it appears that it has also increased the catalytic effect on the combustion process.
  • the increase in catalytic effect on the combustion process can probably be attributed to the increase in the surface temperature.
  • the increase in surface temperature has resulted in the emissivity of the radiating surface being also increased. By increasing the emissivity of the surface, the total radiation emitted can be further increased.
  • FIGURE 9 8 illustrates the increase in unobstructed radiation area by the mehod of divergence.
  • the radiation area in inches square of a flat burner was approximately 2.82 and by diverging the openings at an angle beta of approximately 54 the radiation area was increased to approximately 4.82 square inches.
  • the ray of maximum concentration travels the longest distance and as the rays flux concentration diminish, the distance the ray has to travel is also decreased resulting in a more even heat pattern distribution.
  • the heat pattern distribution can be of importance when this type burner is utilized in space heating.
  • the area immediately beneath the center of the burner is usually much hotter than the area a few feet away from the center.
  • this hot spot to some extent is eliminated and it is easier to accomplish a more uniform heat pattern across the area to be heated.
  • the velocity of the combustible mixture is controlled and the geometry discussed previously not only serves as a control for back flashing but in certain instances, the velocity is also controlled for assuring proper flame anchorage to the burning surface.
  • Various thicknesses of burner plate may be employed and by balancing the thickness of the plate, the width or size of the openings and the velocity of the gases, a highly eflicient radiant burner is produced. A very important factor is the actual increase of exposure area for radiation and also, the flame contact area with the burning surface is increased by the divergent surfaces at the burning surface of the burner.
  • a unitary plate-shaped member of refractory ceramic material adapted for use in forming a radiant burner said member being provided with a plurality of substantially parallely aligned slot-shaped passages extending through substantially the shortest distance from the rear surface of said member to the burning surface thereof, adjacent passages in said substantially parallel alignment thereof being spaced from each other by wall thicknesses not exceeding .075 inch, the burning surface of said member being provided with grooves having sides defined by outwardly sloped side walls of said slot-like passages at said burning surface, the slope of said side walls being such that radiation emitted perpendicular to said slope is free to pass away from the burning surface of said member without obstruction, said slope further being great enough to provide a size for said grooves sufficiently large to allow the base of a flame to rest substantially therein but sufliciently small in combination with the length of the slope to allow said flame to impinge upon and wipe at least the outermost extremities of said outwardly sloped side walls during the process of flame combustion, said passages in the section thereof connected with said groove

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Gas Burners (AREA)

Description

W. H. BEST Oct. 11, 1966 RADIANT BURNER UTILIZING FLAME QUENCHING PHENOMENA Filed Sept. 9. 1960 5 Sheets-Sheet 1 Fig! Willie H. Besf Fly. 2
INVENTOR.
W. H. BEST Oct. 11, 1966 RADIANT BURNER UTILIZING FLAME QUENCHING PHENOMENA Filed Sept. 9. 1960 5 Sheets-Sheet 2 m m eT 8-H. A Hw H M 5 i M m W w m b lv or a M i w 4 2 c m fi E l D h wfi v W. H. BEST RADIANT BURNER UTILIZING FLAME QUENCHING PHENOMENA Filed Sept. 9. 1960 5 Shea us-Sheet 5 Fig.8
444546 414449 505/ 57!: .ws'r efl use 60 Amour fi INGLE fi BY 24mm WWW w m w 6 M H B E M V g H m 9 e 9 u m 0 .l i E W F M M K H nwuw uuiwwfi $5 3% 3533* 2 2 m 0.. D 6 H D 2 c B United States Patent 3,277,948 RADIANT BURNER UTILIZING FLAME QUENCHING PHENOMENA Wiilie H. Best, Columbia, S.C., assignor, by mesne assignments, to Thermal Engineering Corporation, Co-
lumbia, 5.11., a corporation of South Carolina Filed Sept. 9, 1960, Ser. No. 55,077 1 Claim. (Cl. 158116) The present invention generally relates to radiant burners and this application is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 847,480, filed October 20, 1959, for radiant burner, now abandoned.
The primary object of the present invention is to provide a radiant burner constructed of ceramic material or other suitable refractory material capable of becoming incandescent when heated to a predetermined high temperature whereby radiant heat rays will emit from the incandescent surface of the burner. The primary feature of the present invention is its construction with openings in the form of relatively narrow and elongated slots in which the width of the slot is such that a flame will be quenched before it will pass through the slots. This results in a burner which is incapable of backflashing, that is, incapable of permitting passage of flame from the burning surface of the burner to the rear surface thereof from which the combustible mixture originates. Another advantage of this arrangement is the fact that the velocity of the combustible mixture may be materially lowered since it is not necessary that the velocity of the combustible mixture be greater than the flame propagation rate of the combustible mixture as is necessary in conventional burners in order to prevent backflashing.
Another primary object of the present invention is to provide a radiant burner having relatively narrow slotlike openings as defined in the preceding paragraph together with a structure in which the outer edge portions of the side walls of the slot are recessed by either bevelling or providing a stepped wall structure for increasing the cross sectional area of the slot at the burning surface thereof, thereby further reducing the velocity of the combustible mixture and, in fact, substantially decreasing the velocity to Zero movement or only very small movement whereby the combustion of the combustible mixture will take place within the confines generally of the trough formed by the recesses for producing more effective flame impingement upon the burning surface of the ceramic plate from which the burner is constructed. A very important feature of the recessed construction or the troughlike construction results from the orientation of the flame within the trough so that flame agitation is reduced to an absolute minimum by any air flow over the burning surface of the burner, thereby further increasing the efficiency of flame impingement upon the burning surface and further increasing the temperature of the burning surface of the burner. Another very important result from the construction of the recessed side walls of the slot-like openings is an increase in the effective area of the burning surface of the radiant burner. Inasmuch as the efficiency of the burner is dependent in part upon the burning surface area or incandescent area of the radiant burner, the increase in the surface area will, of course, increase the efficiency of the radiant burner.
The most important feature of the increase in the width of the slot or channel at the discharge end thereof is the provision of a width such that will not quench the flame whereas the parallel side walls of the slot or channel inwardly of the recess edges will quench the flame since the width of the slot or channel is less than the critical quenching distance for the material from which the radiant burner is constructed.
3,2719% Patented Get. Ill, 1966 ice These together with other objects and advantages which will become subsequently apparent reside in the details of construction and operation as more fully hereinafter described and claimed, reference being had to the accompanying drawings forming a part hereof, wherein like numerals refer to like parts throughout, and in which:
FIGURE 1 is a plan view of a radiant burner constructed in accordance with the present invention;
FIGURE 2 is a detailed sectional view taken substantially upon a plane passing along section line 22 of FIGURE 1 illustrating the details of construction of the burner;
FIGURE 3 is an enlarged fragmentary sectional view illustrating the orientation of the flame in the troughs or valleys formed by the recessed edges of the slots or channels;
FIGURE 4 is a detailed sectional view similar to FIGURE 3 but illustrating a slightly different form of recessed edge for the slots;
FIGURE 5 is a detailed sectional view similar to FIGURES 3 and 4 but illustrating still another modified form of the invention;
FIGURE 6 is a detailed view illustrating the burner structure and forming a basis for certain mathematical computations;
FIGURE 7 is a graph illustrating the increase in radiation efliciency dependent upon the angle of divergence of the slot wall;
FIGURE 8 is a graph illustrating the relationship of the radiation area and the R distance vs. the angle of divergence;
FIGURE 9 is a graph illustrating the radiation area vs. the angle of divergence; and
FIGURE 10 is a pair of graphs illustrating comparatively the radiant heat distribution from a flat burning surface on a burner and a burning surface having the divergent recessed edges in the side walls of the slots.
Referring now specifically to the drawings, the numeral 10 generally relates to the radiant burner of the present invention which includes an exterior frame 12 which forms means for guiding the combustible mixture to the rear surface 14 of the radiant burner. The radiant burner also is provided with a burning surface 16 and is constructed from a plate of ceramic material 18. The plate of ceramic material 18 may be of one-piece construction or it may be constructed from a plurality of individual strips. When the plate 18 is of one-piece construction, there is provided a plurality of slots 20 therethrough which communicate the rear face 14 with the burning surface 16. The slots 20 are arranged in any of several diflerent patterns in the ceramic plate. They may be separated by a transverse solid member 21 or they may be staggered in relation to each other or extend completely across the burning face depending upon the size of the burner and other physical factors. If the burner is constructed of a plurality of relatively thin plates, the ends of said plates or strips are provided with enlargements to provide for spacing between the strips thus defining the slots similar to slots 20. As illustrated, the slots 20 are quite narrow and are provided with parallel side walls. Adjacent the burning surface 16, the side walls of the slots 20 are recessed by providing a bevel 22 thereon which defines an apex 24 generally in the center of the area of the ceramic plates between adjacent slots 20. The recess formed by the bevels 22 form troughs or valleys 26 for receiving the flame during combustion thereof whereby the flame is disposed substantially within the confines of the troughs or valleys 26 for specificpurposes set forth hereinafter.
FIGURE 4 illustrates a similar type of structure in which the ceramic plate is designated by numeral 28, the slots designated by numeral 30 and in this instance, the
recess at the outer edge or burning surface of the side Walls of the slot are provided by a square cut recess 32 formed in the side walls of the slot 30 which effectively increases the width of the slot and forms troughs or valleys 34 for receiving the flame whereby the flame will impinge against the side walls of the recess 32.
FIGURE 5 illustrates an arrangement in which the ceramic plate is designated by numeral 36 and the slots designated by numeral 38. In this form of the invention, the recess is formed in the side walls of the slots 38 by providing two square cut recesses 40 and 42 therein as illustrated in FIGURE 5 thus defining an increase in the Width of the slot 38 and further defining a valley 44 in which the flame is disposed for more effective impingement upon the burning surface of the radiant burner.
In each of the forms of the invention, the slot or channey for passage of the combustible mixture is relatively narrow and has a width less than that critical width which will enable passage of flame. Thus, the width of the slots is such that flame will be quenched thus preventing backflash of the flame from the burning surface to the rear surface of the burner. While the flame quenching phenomena of a slot is not clearly understood, recent investigations of the engineering principles involved in connection with a radiant burner has resulted in some fundamental principles that were not heretofore fully accounted for. Investigation has shown the quenching distance of a flame, that is the gap between the flame and relatively cold surfaces is a very important aspect of the operation of a radiant burner such as that previously described.
The quenching distance of a flame can be measured quite accurately and reproducibly. The object of recent experimental investigations has been to make such measurements on hydrocarbon flames, the chemical kinetics of which are relatively well understood, in the hope that the resultant correlated data would be useful in the development of a theory that could be applied to the design of radiant burners. No completely adequate theory of flame behavior in terms of chemical kinetics and transport properties of gas molecules has yet been developed; however, measurements of quenching distance provides an experimental approach to the study of flame structure. Furthermore, from the practical point of view, quenching is a very important aspect in the mechanism of flame anchoring which is of utmost importance in the operation of a radiant burner.
The mechanism by which quenching occurs is not well understood even qualitatively. Before the importance of free radicals and atoms in flames was fully appreciated, it was accepted that quenching was entirely governed by heat conduction from the flame to the cold surface, chemical reactions being able to proceed only in those regions of the gas where the temperature was greater than a vaguely defined ignition temperature. Now, in the light of present knowledge of chain reactions, it appears possible that the diffusion of chain carriers to the wall may play a significant role in quenching.
Four methods of measuring quenching distance have been proposed: (a) Observation of a gap between a stable flame and the cold burner rim, (b) the determination of the minimum tube diameter or distance between plane parallel plates through which flask-back can occur, (c) the determination of the minimum distance between plane parallel plates by which a flame will propagate from a spark of minimum ignition energy, and (d) the determina tion of the ratio of the burning velocity to the critical velocity gradient for flash-back.
The plan of this experimentation has been to make an accurate study of the effect of all convenient variables upon which hydrocarbon flame quenching depends. Among these variables are the gas-air pressure, gas concentration, fraction of stoichiometric, the slot width, and the separating plate width.
Method (b) above, has been used to measure quenching distances, using plane parallel plates with variable separation and variable plate width, because this appeared to be the most convenient method for obtaining accurate measurements. The investigations have been conducted with the use of plane parallel plates made from a ceramic material; however, investigations could easily be made involving other material.
The fact that the quenching effect of one type surface of a material is not different from any other type of surface does not permit any conclusion as to the importance of diffusion in quenching, since it is conceivable that one type of surface can be equally useful in promoting free radical recombinations, under the conditions in the vicinity of a flame. One proposed mechanism of flame propagation is based on the diffusion of atoms and free radicals ahead of the flame front. The approximate equation for flame velocity derived on this basis has been found to be consistent with measured flame velocities for a number of systems including hydrocarbons in air. Because of the success of this equation and the prediction of burning velocities, an extension of the mechanism to the quenching process appeared to have some merit.
The spreading of a flame may be considered to be the result of the perpetuation of a chain reaction by the diffusion of chain initiators. This means that initiation of the oxidation reaction in successive elements of combustible gas is accomplished by the diffusion of chain initiators into each element. The number of chain initiators, their chemical and physical nature, and the velocity and direction of diffusion are determined by internal structure of the flame front. The flame structure consists of the gradients of temperature, pressure, and chemical species which exist in the flame as a result of the effect of the chemical oxidation reaction on the environment. If the structure of the flame is changed, either by the use of a different combustible mixture or by changes in the conditions of the environment, the rate of flame propagation ought to reflect these changes.
In order to apply the diffusion principle of flame propagation to the process of flame quenching, it is assured that the most important effect of a surface near a propagating flame is the destruction of the chain carriers on the surface. Then, when a propagating flame approaches the entrance of a narrow duct, the first effect of the surface occurs in some thin cross-section ahead of the flame front. If the number of molecules that react in this thin cross-section is suflicient to support the flame, it will pass into the ducts; otherwise, it will be extinguished.
The flame front is considered as a region of high temperature thermal equilibrium including a number of chain carriers. The chain carriers diffuse ahead of the burning zone and initiate the oxidation reaction. Chain branching is negligible, and chain carriers are destroyed by collision with the surface. The extent of the oxidation reaction is limited by the destruction of chain carriers. This principle was used to formulate the approximate equation for the pressure limit of flammability in tubes of different diameters.
In prior investigations it was found that the quenching distance is proportional to the pressure to the minus 0.91 power for stoichiometric propane-air flame, and that the exponent numerically decreases with decreasing propane concentration in air. It has been further shown that the average ratio of quenching distances measured by flashback through plane parallel plates to quenching diameters for cylindrical ducts is approximately 0.70 for lean propane-air mixtures, while for all propane mixtures, the averages was 0.62. This work indicates that the experimental critical diameters for propagation in the tube multiplied by 0.70 would be equivalent to the quenching distance measured by flash-back through parallel plates if both are governed by the same process.
In order to compare the values for quenching distances found in prior investigations, the effect of the geometry of the quenching surface must be considered. In recent investigations a series of thin parallel plates formed the geometry of the surface. The quenching distances determined by this method will not necessarily correlate data obtained by other methods. In the series plate method the flame is quenched on either surface of the plate whereas in other investigations only one surface of the plate was exposed to the flame. It seems the heat sinking properties of the plate will certainly be effected by exposing each surface of the plate to the flame as compared to the one surface being exposed in prior investigations.
The quenching distances determined, during recent investigations utilizing a series of plates, were less than those determined in prior investigations where only one surface of the plate was exposed to the flame. A typical quenching distance determined utilizing sixteen parallel plates, thickness of which was .060 inch, gas pressure 14 inches of water, fraction of stoichiometric equal to one utilizing C H for the fuel, was .035 inch.
Reference has been made from time to time to the fact that the base of the inner cone of an aerated flame does not have immediate contact with the burner head, but it is separated from the rim by a small but finite distance known as the dead space, although this phenomena appears to have received little attention previously, it is felt that it is of some importance in the design of a radiant burner. More recently during the course of a comprehensive study of a burner flame, the dead space has been investigated systematically and measurements have been made covering a wide margin of experimental conditions. As a result, the true significance of the phenomena has been clearly revealed, thus not only is dead space an important factor in any measure of burning velocity by the dynamic method, but also it is one of the principal factors governing flame stability, the realization of which has enabled the mechanism of flash-back to be understood more clearly. A detailed description of the method employed for the measurement of dead space has been published elsewhere and the values of dead space as just defined have been obtained from many mixtures with air of ethylene, carbon monoxide and propane burning at various pressures between cm. of mercury and atmospheric pressure upon burners of several diameters.
Unlike the burning velocity itself, dead space cannot be regarded as a physical constant of any one explosive mixture, and besides being dependent upon temperature and pressure, it is conditioned also by such factors as burner size and shape, the material of construction of the burner and to a lesser extent, flame area. It has not been shown thus far the degree, if any, that dead space effects the operation of a radiant burner. However, if this phenomena does occur it is evident that anything that could decrease this space would result in a higher surface temperature of the radiant burner. With proper quenching techniques the distance known as dead space between the burner surface and the flame front can be reduced to zero or to a negligible distance.
In recent investigations many experiments have been conducted utilizing a varying cross sectional area at the face of the burner surface. The purpose of this investigation was to determine what effect would occur in the process of the surface combustion. The experiments were carried out on a burner surface, the geometry of which allowed the critical quenching distance to be exceeded at the surface of the burner. The flame was immediately quenched a short distance from the surface of the burner by a geometry resulting from divergence of each ceramic plate. By utilizing this method of flame quenching, superiod anchoring to the surface of the burner was the net result.
Quenching is probably governed to a great extent by heat conduction from the flame to the cold surface; however, the destruction of chain carriers on the surface appears to be an important part of the quenching process. The present interpretation shows that the destruction of chain carriers on a surface could provide a termination step in the oxidation chain reaction which could be sufliciently important to suppress flame propagation. In that case, the process of flame propagation would also be effected by the surface. Further experimental work appears to be needed to establish the effect of the nature of the surface of quenching, limits of flammability, and flame propagation.
Although, equations have been developed describing the phenomena of flame quenching the complete process by which a flame is quenched is not fully understood. It is certainly apparent that more mathematical methods will have to be developed which are capable of simultaneously handling the chemical kinetics, diflusion and heat transfer in a rigorous fashion, considering at least two dimensions, if the quenching of a flame is to be completely understood. However, without completely understanding the phenomena of flame quenching, the end results of this phenomena can be applied quite accurately in the construction of radiant burners because it is certainly apparent that a close relationship between the flame properties of burning velocity, concentration limits of flammability, and quenching distance does exist.
A burner has been constructed by your applicant utilizing the phenomena of quenching as the only method of preventing rearwardly extending combustion, into the plenum. It has been determined that gas air velocities in a burner utilizing quenching can be as low as approximately 2 to 3 feet per second whereas the flame propogation can be as high as 9 to 12 feet per second and yet rearwardly extending combustion or backflashing will not occur because of the phenomena of flame quenching.
Referring specifically now to FIGURE 6 it is apparent that a channel is established that has an increasing cross sectional width near the surface of the burner. The purpose of increasing the width gap is to provide a gap width such that the flame will not quench, that is the width exceeds the critical quenching distance for the material and other factors mentioned in the preceding discussion. At some position between point (a) and point (b) the critical quenching distance will not be exceeded because of the converging nature of the channel, resulting in anchoring of the flame to the surrounding walls. The flame cannot recede in a rearwardly direction beyond point (a) because the slot width at point (a) is less than the critical quenching distance therefore, trapping the flame in the given channel. It is of importance to note that the divergent channels serve the two-fold purpose of controlling the quenching criticalities as well as controlling velocities of the gas air mixture which are certainly critical in this region of the burner. In other words if the gas air mixture velocity at point (a) exceeds the rate of propagation of the flame then it is evident that this velocity can be reduced to a point less than the rate of propagation of the flame at point (b). Therefore, with the same type of construction or the same geometry involved critical factors relative to radiant burners are controlled, resulting in the flame being firmly anchored to the channel, increasing the surface temperature to a great degree.
It has been shown in investigations with reference to the theories involved on a radiant burner that it is more likely that the phenomena of quenching is more critical that the gas air velocity in comparison to the rate of flame propagation. It has been shown that a burner utilizing the phenomena of flame quenching should have a gap width not to exceed an order of magnitude of approximately .040 inch. The critical gap width of which varies somewhat with the thickness of the plate, but a plate thickness not exceeding .075 inch can tolerate a gap width of approximately .040 inch and still quench the flame. It has further been shown that as the plate width is increased the critical gap distance can also be increased. It is felt that the length of the thin slot also to some extent determines the critical width, however, the dimension of length is very nearly negligible as compared to the width of the slot.
If a channel is formed by a ceramic plate such as shown in FIGURE 6 it is evident the critical gap width at point (b) can exceed the critical quenching distance which in this case may be of the order of magnitude of .040 inch, however, the gap width at point (a) is less than the critical quenching distance thereby anchoring the flame in the channel between point (a) and (b). By quenching the flame in this manner a distance that exists between the flame front and the burner surface known as dead space can be virtually eliminated. Also it is evident the flame can be entirely stable and generally embedded in the channels when the burner is located in an area where air current exists.
Flame quenching can also be accomplished utilizing a surface geometry shown in FIGURE 4 and FIGURE 5. Utilizing configuration of FIGURES 4 and 5 the flame is quenched in the open channel above the cross section labeled C. It is evident from the foregoing discussion that the flame can be quenched utilizing a configuration shown as in FIGURES 4 and 5, but with reference to the engineering principles involved certain other critera must exist in order that maximum efficiency be attained with respect to the operation of a radiant burner. It is a well known fact that radiation is a function of the emitting surface temperature to the 4th power but is also a function of the surface area. For maximum efliciency, the ideal situation would be to quench the flame and also expose maximum surface area for radiation emitting purposes. With reference to FIG- URE 6 of a mathematical solution has been derived to determine the critical dimensions that will expose the greatest surface area to emit unobstructed radiation. FIGURE 6 and the accompanying derivation and curve is self-explanatory and points out the fact that for maximum unobstructed radiation area, a certan angle of divergence of the plates must exist.
FIGURE 7 is a curve A of Predicted Radiation Efliciency vs. Angle of Divergence and imposed upon this curve is curve B of Radiation Efiiciency Actual vs. Angle of Divergence. It is readily seen that the maximum efficiency is attained at a given angle, however, the efficiency does not vary to a great extent in a given region of the curve. FIGURE 9 is a curve of Radiation Area vs. Angle of Divergence and illustrates how the effective radiating area drops off after a certain critical angle is exceeded.
Because of the phenomena of quenching, the flame front is securely anchored to the surface of the radiant burner and the surface temperature has been increased considerably. Increasing the surface temperature plays a significant role in the radiation efficiency but it appears that it has also increased the catalytic effect on the combustion process. The increase in catalytic effect on the combustion process can probably be attributed to the increase in the surface temperature. The increase in surface temperature has resulted in the emissivity of the radiating surface being also increased. By increasing the emissivity of the surface, the total radiation emitted can be further increased.
By utilizing a geometry which has been described and shown in FIGURE 6 certain critical factors are controlled in a manner which results in the eflicient operation of a radiant burner.
(A) Because of the natural divergence angle of gas exiting small apertures it is a fundamentally sound principle to allow the ceramic surface to follow closely the pattern of gas flow for maximum flame impingement. It has been found that this gas pattern is different in thin slots than it is in round apertures. Regardless of benefits obtained from flame quenching or if the gas velocities were greater than or less than the flame propagation it would be fundamentally sound to closely follow the pattern formed by the exiting gases to expose greater flame area to the surface. (See curve.)
(B) By following a geometry as shown in FIGURE 6, the maximum unobstructed radiation area is exposed if the proper divergence angle is selected. FIGURE 9 8 illustrates the increase in unobstructed radiation area by the mehod of divergence. In a typical example the radiation area in inches square of a flat burner was approximately 2.82 and by diverging the openings at an angle beta of approximately 54 the radiation area was increased to approximately 4.82 square inches.
(C) By utilizing the geometry as previously described the phenomena of flame quenching is definitely controlled. If in a particular application the gas-air velocities were the controlling factor, then the same geometry the gas-air velocities could be reduced to a point less than flame propagation before they exited the burner, again attributing to superior flame impingement and flame stability. The most important aspect is the control of the phenomena of flame quenching; without proper control of this phenomena, rearwardly extending combustion could result. The proposed geometry also serves the purpose of increasing the coefficient of forced convection heat transfer. This can be attributed to the turbulence of the gas.
(D) Because of the increase in surface temperature the emissivity of the radiating surface has also been increased contributing to an increase in radiant efficiency.
(E) By embedding the flame in the channels as described the flame stability is far superior to the flame of a burner utilizing a flat surface.
(F) By utilizing this geometry the pattern of heat distribution is far superior to that of conventional burners. (Please refer to FIGURE 10.) It is common knowledge that a radiant ray of maximum flux concentration leaves normal to a surface. If a burner was suspended horizontally the ray of maximum concentration would leave normal to the surface and would be represented by ray A of FIGURE 10 (note FIGURE 10 is a diagrammatical representation but the rays are drawn to an approximate scale). As the angle is changed from the normal flux concentration represented by c, d, d is decreased and the resulting heat distribution of a burner utilizing a fiat surface would be similar to the pattern in the drawing of FIGURE 10. With a design utilizing the divergent section, the ray of maximum concentration travels the longest distance and as the rays flux concentration diminish, the distance the ray has to travel is also decreased resulting in a more even heat pattern distribution. The heat pattern distribution can be of importance when this type burner is utilized in space heating. In operation of the conventional flat surface burner, the area immediately beneath the center of the burner is usually much hotter than the area a few feet away from the center. However, by using the geometry of divergence, this hot spot to some extent is eliminated and it is easier to accomplish a more uniform heat pattern across the area to be heated. It should be pointed out that if the rays need to be concentrated that concentration could be accomplished with the use of a reflector and that if the principle of quenching was to be utilized without the added benefit of divergence then a geometry similar to FIGURES 4 or 5 could be used.
From the above discussion, it is apparent that many factors attributing to the increase in radiation efiiciency can be influenced by the geometry described in this patent application. There is no question to the theories involved because a burner utilizing these principles has been reduced to practice and many rigorous investigations involvingthe above theories have been conducted.
From an examination of FIGURE 6 it is apparent that the following relations exist:
(1) Cosine B= cos B Z 2 cos B Tangent B- W (5) h=%xtan B In order for ray R to clear point b and be normal to surface the following relation exists:
( Sine E= sin E But from Equation 5 h= /zx tan B and Equation 9E=90-B nxmma It is obvious that R must satisfy Equations 10 and 12 if it is to meet the stated conditions.
It is further obvious that for any value of x+y that only one angle will satisfy the Equation 13.
In certain instances, the velocity of the combustible mixture is controlled and the geometry discussed previously not only serves as a control for back flashing but in certain instances, the velocity is also controlled for assuring proper flame anchorage to the burning surface. Various thicknesses of burner plate may be employed and by balancing the thickness of the plate, the width or size of the openings and the velocity of the gases, a highly eflicient radiant burner is produced. A very important factor is the actual increase of exposure area for radiation and also, the flame contact area with the burning surface is increased by the divergent surfaces at the burning surface of the burner.
The foregoing is considered as illustrative only of the principles of the invention. Further, since numerous modifications and changes will readily occur to those skilled in the art, it is not desired to limit the invention to the exact construction and operation shown and described, and accordingly all suitable modifications and equivalents may be resorted to, falling within the scope of the invention as claimed.
What is claimed as new is as follows:
A unitary plate-shaped member of refractory ceramic material adapted for use in forming a radiant burner, said member being provided with a plurality of substantially parallely aligned slot-shaped passages extending through substantially the shortest distance from the rear surface of said member to the burning surface thereof, adjacent passages in said substantially parallel alignment thereof being spaced from each other by wall thicknesses not exceeding .075 inch, the burning surface of said member being provided with grooves having sides defined by outwardly sloped side walls of said slot-like passages at said burning surface, the slope of said side walls being such that radiation emitted perpendicular to said slope is free to pass away from the burning surface of said member without obstruction, said slope further being great enough to provide a size for said grooves sufficiently large to allow the base of a flame to rest substantially therein but sufliciently small in combination with the length of the slope to allow said flame to impinge upon and wipe at least the outermost extremities of said outwardly sloped side walls during the process of flame combustion, said passages in the section thereof connected with said grooves and through which combustible gas is fed to said grooves provided with substantially parallel side walls of planar character spaced at a quenching distance from each other and with end walls spaced so far from each other as to render negligible any effect on quenching by said end walls, said parallel side walls spaced at a quenching distance from each other being such as to account for the major length of said passages, said major length of said passages being greatly in excess of the quenching distance spacing of said parallel side walls, the spacing of said side Walls in said quenching section being suflicient to permit combustible gas to pass through said passages but small enough to quench a flame tending to retrogress therein when combustible gas is fed through said passages to said grooves at a rate lower than the flame propagation rate of said combustible gas, said flame quenching distance being under no circumstances in excess of 0.04 inch, and the outermost extremity of the side walls of the grooves at the burning surface of said member being further apart than the dimension of said flame quenching distance and being spaced apart in excess of 0.04 inch, said grooves and said flame quenching section serving in combination to anchor the base of a flame within said grooves and cause said flame to wipe the outermost extremities of the sloped side walls of said grooves during combustion, thereby to cause the outermost extremities of said side Walls to become incandescent and the grooved burning surface of said member to emit radiation from a surf-ace area in excess of the planar cross-sectional area of said grooved burning surface.
References Cited by the Examiner UNITED STATES PATENTS 1,113,171 10/1914 Creelman 15899 1,215,229 2/1917 Willson 158-112 1,308,364 7/1919 Lucke 158-99 1,313,196 8/1919 Lucke 158-99 1,896,286 2/1933 Burns et a1. 158116 2,515,845 7/1950 Van den Bussche 158116 X 2,618,322 11/1952 Conta 15827.4
FOREIGN PATENTS 558,007 6/1957 Belgium. 624,438 1/1936 Germany.
8,480 1911 Great Britain.
FREDERICK L. MATTESON, JR., Primary Examiner.
JAMES W. WESTHAVER, PERCY L. PATRICK,
Examiners.
H. B. RAMEY, Assistant Examiner.
US55077A 1960-09-09 1960-09-09 Radiant burner utilizing flame quenching phenomena Expired - Lifetime US3277948A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US55077A US3277948A (en) 1960-09-09 1960-09-09 Radiant burner utilizing flame quenching phenomena

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US55077A US3277948A (en) 1960-09-09 1960-09-09 Radiant burner utilizing flame quenching phenomena

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US3277948A true US3277948A (en) 1966-10-11

Family

ID=21995428

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US55077A Expired - Lifetime US3277948A (en) 1960-09-09 1960-09-09 Radiant burner utilizing flame quenching phenomena

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US3277948A (en)

Cited By (31)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3359965A (en) * 1965-10-23 1967-12-26 Milligan William Cecil Radiant heaters
US3492986A (en) * 1966-04-18 1970-02-03 Maurice Partiot Directional beamed radiant heaters
JPS4962510A (en) * 1972-06-08 1974-06-18
US4292024A (en) * 1979-12-18 1981-09-29 Sid Richardson Carbon & Gasoline Company Method of and apparatus for burning wet lean gas
US4546553A (en) * 1978-06-16 1985-10-15 Best Willie H Radiant wall oven and process of drying coated objects
US5049065A (en) * 1988-12-23 1991-09-17 Valor Limited Construction of ceramic plaque burners
WO1992017737A1 (en) * 1991-03-28 1992-10-15 Kurt Krieger Burner grid for radiant burner
WO1994011675A1 (en) * 1992-11-12 1994-05-26 British Gas Plc Fuel fired burners
US5525056A (en) * 1992-08-18 1996-06-11 British Gas Plc Fuel fired burners
US5568692A (en) * 1994-11-09 1996-10-29 Durr Industries, Inc. Paint drying oven with radiant energy floor
US5658139A (en) * 1990-11-16 1997-08-19 American Gas Association Low NOX burner
US5685708A (en) * 1994-06-16 1997-11-11 British Gas Plc Fuel fired burners
US20060003279A1 (en) * 2004-06-23 2006-01-05 Best Willie H Radiant burner
US20060035182A1 (en) * 2004-08-13 2006-02-16 Hesse David J Detonation safety in microchannels
US20080072890A1 (en) * 2006-09-26 2008-03-27 Best Willie H Cooking apparatus with concave emitter
US20080124666A1 (en) * 2006-10-24 2008-05-29 Frank Stocker Porous burner as well as a method for operating a porous burner
US20090007452A1 (en) * 2004-02-12 2009-01-08 Kuk Rae Cho Drying unit Using far Infrared Rays, Drying Apparatus Using the Unit and Waveguide for the Apparatus
US20090202688A1 (en) * 2006-09-26 2009-08-13 Best Willie H Methods and apparatus for generating infrared radiation from convective products of Combustion
US20110155118A1 (en) * 2009-06-29 2011-06-30 Mallik Ahmed Single cavity radiant cooking apparatus
US8227728B2 (en) 2006-11-10 2012-07-24 Char-Broil, Llc Radiant tube broiler
US20120301837A1 (en) * 2011-05-27 2012-11-29 Kazuyuki Akagi Plate type burner
US8841232B1 (en) 2013-12-13 2014-09-23 Lucian Borduz Advanced ceramic catalyst
US9510604B2 (en) 2013-06-17 2016-12-06 W.C. Bradley Co. Outdoor cooker and smoker, and fuel combustor therefor
US9668613B2 (en) 2013-06-17 2017-06-06 W.C. Bradley Co. High efficiency apparatus and method for cooking, heating and drying
US9709281B2 (en) 2014-03-31 2017-07-18 W.C. Bradley Co. High efficiency side burner and outdoor cooker
US10004241B2 (en) 2012-11-15 2018-06-26 W.C. Bradley Co. Electric roaster and smoker
US20180320895A1 (en) * 2015-11-03 2018-11-08 Eco-Burner Products Ltd. Improvements in or relating to a burner module and an integrated gas burner
US10426176B2 (en) 2015-03-25 2019-10-01 W.C. Bradley Co. Vertical electric cooker and smoker and smoke box
WO2020081595A1 (en) * 2018-10-16 2020-04-23 Best Willie H Incinerating container for broiling
US11435143B2 (en) * 2016-04-29 2022-09-06 Clearsign Technologies Corporation Burner system with discrete transverse flame stabilizers
US12359804B2 (en) 2016-04-29 2025-07-15 Clearsign Technologies Corporation Burner system with discrete transverse flame stabilizers

Citations (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
BE558007A (en) *
GB191108480A (en) * 1911-04-05 1912-03-21 James Keith Improvements in or relating to Burners for Gas Fired Furnaces and the like.
US1113171A (en) * 1913-01-08 1914-10-06 Gas And Oil Comb Company Apparatus for burning explosive gaseous mixtures.
US1215229A (en) * 1916-09-23 1917-02-06 Samuel Tully Willson Fluid-fuel burner.
US1308364A (en) * 1919-07-01 Apparatus for burning explosive gaseous mixtures
US1313196A (en) * 1919-08-12 lucre
US1896286A (en) * 1929-01-23 1933-02-07 Burns Bruce Burner plate
DE624438C (en) * 1931-04-29 1936-01-21 Koppers Gmbh Heinrich Stone jet burner for compressed gas operation
US2515845A (en) * 1946-06-25 1950-07-18 Shell Dev Flame pocket fluid fuel burner
US2618322A (en) * 1949-03-19 1952-11-18 Air Reduction Flashback-proof gas burner

Patent Citations (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
BE558007A (en) *
US1308364A (en) * 1919-07-01 Apparatus for burning explosive gaseous mixtures
US1313196A (en) * 1919-08-12 lucre
GB191108480A (en) * 1911-04-05 1912-03-21 James Keith Improvements in or relating to Burners for Gas Fired Furnaces and the like.
US1113171A (en) * 1913-01-08 1914-10-06 Gas And Oil Comb Company Apparatus for burning explosive gaseous mixtures.
US1215229A (en) * 1916-09-23 1917-02-06 Samuel Tully Willson Fluid-fuel burner.
US1896286A (en) * 1929-01-23 1933-02-07 Burns Bruce Burner plate
DE624438C (en) * 1931-04-29 1936-01-21 Koppers Gmbh Heinrich Stone jet burner for compressed gas operation
US2515845A (en) * 1946-06-25 1950-07-18 Shell Dev Flame pocket fluid fuel burner
US2618322A (en) * 1949-03-19 1952-11-18 Air Reduction Flashback-proof gas burner

Cited By (44)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3359965A (en) * 1965-10-23 1967-12-26 Milligan William Cecil Radiant heaters
US3492986A (en) * 1966-04-18 1970-02-03 Maurice Partiot Directional beamed radiant heaters
JPS4962510A (en) * 1972-06-08 1974-06-18
US4546553A (en) * 1978-06-16 1985-10-15 Best Willie H Radiant wall oven and process of drying coated objects
US4292024A (en) * 1979-12-18 1981-09-29 Sid Richardson Carbon & Gasoline Company Method of and apparatus for burning wet lean gas
US5049065A (en) * 1988-12-23 1991-09-17 Valor Limited Construction of ceramic plaque burners
US5658139A (en) * 1990-11-16 1997-08-19 American Gas Association Low NOX burner
WO1992017737A1 (en) * 1991-03-28 1992-10-15 Kurt Krieger Burner grid for radiant burner
US5525056A (en) * 1992-08-18 1996-06-11 British Gas Plc Fuel fired burners
WO1994011675A1 (en) * 1992-11-12 1994-05-26 British Gas Plc Fuel fired burners
GB2272508B (en) * 1992-11-12 1995-10-18 British Gas Plc Fuel fired burners
AU672456B2 (en) * 1992-11-12 1996-10-03 Bg Plc Fuel fired burners
JP2783915B2 (en) 1992-11-12 1998-08-06 ビージー ピーエルシー Fuel burner
US5685708A (en) * 1994-06-16 1997-11-11 British Gas Plc Fuel fired burners
US5568692A (en) * 1994-11-09 1996-10-29 Durr Industries, Inc. Paint drying oven with radiant energy floor
US20090007452A1 (en) * 2004-02-12 2009-01-08 Kuk Rae Cho Drying unit Using far Infrared Rays, Drying Apparatus Using the Unit and Waveguide for the Apparatus
US7726967B2 (en) 2004-06-23 2010-06-01 Char-Broil, Llc Radiant burner
US20060003279A1 (en) * 2004-06-23 2006-01-05 Best Willie H Radiant burner
US20060021517A1 (en) * 2004-06-23 2006-02-02 Best Willie H Infrared emitting apparatus
US7853129B2 (en) 2004-06-23 2010-12-14 Char-Broil, Llc Infrared emitting apparatus
US20060035182A1 (en) * 2004-08-13 2006-02-16 Hesse David J Detonation safety in microchannels
US8517717B2 (en) * 2004-08-13 2013-08-27 Velocys, Inc. Detonation safety in microchannels
US8770181B2 (en) 2006-09-26 2014-07-08 Char-Broil, Llc Methods and apparatus for generating infrared radiation from convective products of combustion
US20090202688A1 (en) * 2006-09-26 2009-08-13 Best Willie H Methods and apparatus for generating infrared radiation from convective products of Combustion
US8074634B2 (en) 2006-09-26 2011-12-13 Char-Broil, Llc Cooking apparatus with concave emitter
US20080072890A1 (en) * 2006-09-26 2008-03-27 Best Willie H Cooking apparatus with concave emitter
US20080124666A1 (en) * 2006-10-24 2008-05-29 Frank Stocker Porous burner as well as a method for operating a porous burner
US8227728B2 (en) 2006-11-10 2012-07-24 Char-Broil, Llc Radiant tube broiler
US8890037B2 (en) 2006-11-10 2014-11-18 Char-Broil, Llc Radiant tube broiler
US20110155118A1 (en) * 2009-06-29 2011-06-30 Mallik Ahmed Single cavity radiant cooking apparatus
US8776775B2 (en) 2009-06-29 2014-07-15 W.C. Bradley Co. Single cavity radiant cooking apparatus
US20120301837A1 (en) * 2011-05-27 2012-11-29 Kazuyuki Akagi Plate type burner
US10004241B2 (en) 2012-11-15 2018-06-26 W.C. Bradley Co. Electric roaster and smoker
US9510604B2 (en) 2013-06-17 2016-12-06 W.C. Bradley Co. Outdoor cooker and smoker, and fuel combustor therefor
US9668613B2 (en) 2013-06-17 2017-06-06 W.C. Bradley Co. High efficiency apparatus and method for cooking, heating and drying
US10485245B2 (en) 2013-06-17 2019-11-26 W.C. Bradley Co. Outdoor cooker and smoker, and fuel combustor therefor
US8841232B1 (en) 2013-12-13 2014-09-23 Lucian Borduz Advanced ceramic catalyst
US9709281B2 (en) 2014-03-31 2017-07-18 W.C. Bradley Co. High efficiency side burner and outdoor cooker
US10426176B2 (en) 2015-03-25 2019-10-01 W.C. Bradley Co. Vertical electric cooker and smoker and smoke box
US20180320895A1 (en) * 2015-11-03 2018-11-08 Eco-Burner Products Ltd. Improvements in or relating to a burner module and an integrated gas burner
US11435143B2 (en) * 2016-04-29 2022-09-06 Clearsign Technologies Corporation Burner system with discrete transverse flame stabilizers
US12359804B2 (en) 2016-04-29 2025-07-15 Clearsign Technologies Corporation Burner system with discrete transverse flame stabilizers
WO2020081595A1 (en) * 2018-10-16 2020-04-23 Best Willie H Incinerating container for broiling
US10823429B2 (en) 2018-10-16 2020-11-03 Willie H. Best Incinerating container for broiling

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US3277948A (en) Radiant burner utilizing flame quenching phenomena
Ferguson et al. Stand-off distances on a flat flame burner
Maruta et al. Experimental study on methane-air premixed flame extinction at small stretch rates in microgravity
EP0378272B1 (en) High efficiency linear burner assembly
Dupont et al. The reduction of NOx formation in natural gas burner flames
US3245458A (en) Radiant gas burner
US3561902A (en) Radiant burner
US5649821A (en) Gas burner with an improved diffuser
US3951584A (en) Self-stabilizing burner
US3258058A (en) Radiant gas burners
US2439038A (en) Overhead gas-fired radiator and reflector
US3574507A (en) Air/fuel mixing and flame-stabilizing device for fluid fuel burners
US4202661A (en) Jet implement radiation furnace, method and apparatus
US3302689A (en) Catalytically active radiant tile
US3504994A (en) Burner for use with fluid fuels
US3558252A (en) Radiating element
US3501098A (en) Gas burner for rotary dryer drum
US4825846A (en) Ribbon-type, gas-fired burner head
EP3336427B1 (en) Gas burner
US3212557A (en) Apparatus for generating a hot gaseous blast
GB1263611A (en) Gas burner
US3492986A (en) Directional beamed radiant heaters
US3288198A (en) Bunsen burner for gas appliances, more particular for gas water heaters
McVEY Observation of the Effect of Streamwise Vorticity on the Spreadind of Flames in High Speed Flow
US3322180A (en) Burner apparatus