[go: up one dir, main page]

US2391623A - Bladed rotor - Google Patents

Bladed rotor Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US2391623A
US2391623A US549038A US54903844A US2391623A US 2391623 A US2391623 A US 2391623A US 549038 A US549038 A US 549038A US 54903844 A US54903844 A US 54903844A US 2391623 A US2391623 A US 2391623A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
blades
shrouds
shroud
support
rotor
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US549038A
Inventor
Heppner Fritz Albert Max
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Armstrong Siddeley Motors Ltd
Original Assignee
Armstrong Siddeley Motors Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Armstrong Siddeley Motors Ltd filed Critical Armstrong Siddeley Motors Ltd
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US2391623A publication Critical patent/US2391623A/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F01MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; ENGINE PLANTS IN GENERAL; STEAM ENGINES
    • F01DNON-POSITIVE DISPLACEMENT MACHINES OR ENGINES, e.g. STEAM TURBINES
    • F01D5/00Blades; Blade-carrying members; Heating, heat-insulating, cooling or antivibration means on the blades or the members
    • F01D5/02Blade-carrying members, e.g. rotors
    • F01D5/022Blade-carrying members, e.g. rotors with concentric rows of axial blades
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F01MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; ENGINE PLANTS IN GENERAL; STEAM ENGINES
    • F01DNON-POSITIVE DISPLACEMENT MACHINES OR ENGINES, e.g. STEAM TURBINES
    • F01D5/00Blades; Blade-carrying members; Heating, heat-insulating, cooling or antivibration means on the blades or the members
    • F01D5/12Blades
    • F01D5/14Form or construction
    • F01D5/16Form or construction for counteracting blade vibration
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F01MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; ENGINE PLANTS IN GENERAL; STEAM ENGINES
    • F01DNON-POSITIVE DISPLACEMENT MACHINES OR ENGINES, e.g. STEAM TURBINES
    • F01D5/00Blades; Blade-carrying members; Heating, heat-insulating, cooling or antivibration means on the blades or the members
    • F01D5/12Blades
    • F01D5/22Blade-to-blade connections, e.g. for damping vibrations
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F01MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; ENGINE PLANTS IN GENERAL; STEAM ENGINES
    • F01DNON-POSITIVE DISPLACEMENT MACHINES OR ENGINES, e.g. STEAM TURBINES
    • F01D5/00Blades; Blade-carrying members; Heating, heat-insulating, cooling or antivibration means on the blades or the members
    • F01D5/30Fixing blades to rotors; Blade roots ; Blade spacers

Definitions

  • This invention relates to a rotor having a pcripheral row of blades, the latter carrying at their outer ends shrouds which form a ring and are interlocked against relative radial and lateral movement-for example, as disclosed in the specification of my co-pending U. S. Patent Application Serial No. 549,039 filed August 11, 1944.
  • My main object is to reduce the maximum deflection in a shroud due to centrifugal action.
  • Figure 1 is a fragmentary, part-sectional, elevational view of a compound turbine rotor having shrouds according to the invention, only two shrouds with thei associated blades being shown (and in elevation) whilst the portion of the rotor itself is shown as a section on the line II of Figure 2;
  • Figure 2 is an elevational view of one of the shrouds, with its associated blades, taken from the right of Figure 1, the portion of the rotor itself being in cross-section;
  • Figure 3 is a fragmentary plan of two shrouds when separated
  • Figure 4 is a fragmentary perspective view of one of the shrouds, indicating a preferred form of interlock such as that disclosed in the specification aforesaid;
  • FIG. 5 is a diagram hereinafter described.
  • the shrouds are offset in a circumferential direction relatively to the associated blades so as to reduce the maximum deflection in a shroud, due to centrifugal action, to a value lower than if the shrouds were centrally placed with respect to the associated blades.
  • each blade is connected to its associated shroud approximately mid-way between the centre of the shroud and one end, or preferably slightly nearer the said one end.
  • I2 indicates a rotor in which are secured the roots ll! of compressor blades H (the cross-section of which is indicated by the chain lines IS) in the manner disclosed in the specification aforesaid, and I! are relativelythin, flat shrouds carrying externally turbine blades l8, the cross-section of which is indicated by the chain lines l9.
  • One end of a shroud has machined in it transverse slots 2
  • the mating edge of the adjacent shroud has complementary projections 23 formed thereon, all as disclosed in the specification aforesaid. In this way, when the shrouds are brought together in the form of a ring, they are interlocked against radial or lat- I eral movement.
  • the centres of gravity of different sections of a blade taken along the length of a blade, all lie substantially on a radial line such as that marked 25, this applying both to a compressor blade and to an associated turbine blade, such radial line passing centrally through the blade root.
  • a radial line such as that marked 25
  • it passes not through the centre of the shroud but to one side of the centre, and for preference, and as shown, it intersects the shroud at a distance which is approximately 0.22 of the length of the shroud from one edge of the shroud.
  • the equal and opposite loads (Pl) on the ends may be determined by the statical equilibrium of the beam for any fixed position of the point of support.
  • the bending moment diagram (due to centrifugal forces) may then be constructed and the deflections calculated, as shown for a typical case in the small diagrams.
  • the bending moment has two maximum values, one at the point of support X (at a distance a from one end) and one between the point of support and the end furthest away, and the distance between the two maximum bending moment points is /;L, where L is the length of the beam.
  • the former bending moment vanishes if the point of support is at one end, and the latter if it is exactly in the centre.
  • the variation of the two'for different positions of support is shown in the main diagram, marked Z.
  • the bending moments are represented by a dimensionless factor 0 by dividing by the total load and the length of the beam.
  • the small diagram of a typical deflection curve shows the deflection h, between the point of support and the point furthest away from it, in a direction perpendicular to the beam.
  • This dimension is important in the case considered because the distorted shroud must move past an undistorted one (in the adjacent row of blades, which are stationary), and this distance must be added to the centrifugal expansion of the rotating compressor blade to give the minimum clearance.
  • the main graph, marked "deflection h shows the variation of this deflection, represented again by a dimensionless factor. according to the position of the support.
  • the bending moment diagram Z shows that for a beam of uniform section the stresses are least when the point of support is 0.15 of the distance along the beam. This stress occurs at two places, and any change of position of the support would cause one of them to increase, although the other would decrease. 7
  • the minimum value of the deflection is seen to occur when the point of support is 0.22 of the distance along the beam. Thus according to whether stress of deflection is most critical, the optimum point of support will lie somewhere between these two values.
  • shroud is stiffened up by the integral inner and outer blades the sections of which, at the shrouds, are inclined to one another, and this reduces the effective length of the beam and would, in point of fact, modify the shape of the curves shown.
  • a rotor having a peripheral row of blades
  • said blades carrying at their outer ends shrouds.
  • a rotor having a peripheral row of blades, said blades carrying at their outer ends shrouds which form a ring and are interlocked against relative radial and lateral movement, an outer row of blades carried externally by said shrouds, th blades of each shroud being arranged so that the lines through the centres of gravity of different sections of the blades are coincident, the shrouds being offset in a circumferential direction relatively to the associated blades so as to reduce the maximum deflection in a shroud due to centrifugal action to a value lower than if the shrouds were central with respect to the associated blades.
  • a rotor having aperipheral row of blades, the latter being fast at their outer ends with shrouds which form a ring and are interlocked against relative radial and lateral movement, an outer row of blades which are individually fast with the shrouds and respectively aligned with the blades of the inner row, the shrouds being oflset in a circumferential direction relatively to both the associated blades such that the line through the centres of gravity of different sections of each blade is approximately mid-way between the centre of the shroud and one end.
  • a rotor for an intemal-combustion turbine plant having a peripheral row of compressor' blades, the latter carrying at their outer ends shrouds which form a ring and are interlocked against relative radial and lateral movement, a row of turbine blades carried externally by the shrouds, the shrouds being oflset in a circumferential direction relatively to the associated compressor blades such that the line through the centres of gravity of different sections of each compressor blade is at a distance from one end of the shroud which is between 0.2 and 0.25 of the circumferential length of the shroud.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Structures Of Non-Positive Displacement Pumps (AREA)
  • Turbine Rotor Nozzle Sealing (AREA)

Description

Dec. 25, 1945. F. A. M. HEPPNER 2,391,623
BLADED ROTOR Filed Aug. 11, 194-4 2 Sheets-Sheet l Patented Dec. 25, 1945 BLADED ROTOR Fritz Albert Max Heppner, land, assignor to Arms Limited, Coventry,
Leamington Spa, Enstrong Siddeley Motors England Application August 11, 1944, Serial No. 549,038 In Great Britain December 8, 1943 4 Claims.
This invention relates to a rotor having a pcripheral row of blades, the latter carrying at their outer ends shrouds which form a ring and are interlocked against relative radial and lateral movement-for example, as disclosed in the specification of my co-pending U. S. Patent Application Serial No. 549,039 filed August 11, 1944.
My main object is to reduce the maximum deflection in a shroud due to centrifugal action.
In the accompanying sheets of drawings:
Figure 1 is a fragmentary, part-sectional, elevational view of a compound turbine rotor having shrouds according to the invention, only two shrouds with thei associated blades being shown (and in elevation) whilst the portion of the rotor itself is shown as a section on the line II of Figure 2;
Figure 2 is an elevational view of one of the shrouds, with its associated blades, taken from the right of Figure 1, the portion of the rotor itself being in cross-section;
Figure 3 is a fragmentary plan of two shrouds when separated, and Figure 4 is a fragmentary perspective view of one of the shrouds, indicating a preferred form of interlock such as that disclosed in the specification aforesaid; and
Figure 5 is a diagram hereinafter described.
According to the invention the shrouds are offset in a circumferential direction relatively to the associated blades so as to reduce the maximum deflection in a shroud, due to centrifugal action, to a value lower than if the shrouds were centrally placed with respect to the associated blades. Preferably, each blade is connected to its associated shroud approximately mid-way between the centre of the shroud and one end, or preferably slightly nearer the said one end.
In this way, with a certain construction I can reduce the maximum deflection from three thousandths of an inch to one thousandth of an inch. This is an important consideration if the bladed roto forms part of an internal combustion turbine plant in which, for example, the running clearance is only approximately 30 thousandths of an inch.
In the construction shown, I2 indicates a rotor in which are secured the roots ll! of compressor blades H (the cross-section of which is indicated by the chain lines IS) in the manner disclosed in the specification aforesaid, and I! are relativelythin, flat shrouds carrying externally turbine blades l8, the cross-section of which is indicated by the chain lines l9.
One end of a shroud has machined in it transverse slots 2|, 22 of which one. 2|, is narrower than and imposed upon the other. The mating edge of the adjacent shroud has complementary projections 23 formed thereon, all as disclosed in the specification aforesaid. In this way, when the shrouds are brought together in the form of a ring, they are interlocked against radial or lat- I eral movement.
It is found that the centres of gravity of different sections of a blade, taken along the length of a blade, all lie substantially on a radial line such as that marked 25, this applying both to a compressor blade and to an associated turbine blade, such radial line passing centrally through the blade root. According to the invention it passes not through the centre of the shroud but to one side of the centre, and for preference, and as shown, it intersects the shroud at a distance which is approximately 0.22 of the length of the shroud from one edge of the shroud.
The reason for this will be apparent from a consideration of Figure 5. in which the problem considered is that of a uniformly-loaded beam of uniform section supported at an arbitrary point X where the load P is applied. There is also a load Pl at each end of the beam, and a symmetry condition (that the beam shall be identical in loading and deflection to a similar one on either side) necessitates the loads Pl at the two ends being equal and opposite, and the deflections, of the two ends from the point X where the load P is applied, equal. The support and the two ends are assumed to apply no bending moment to the beam. It is required to find the best position of the point of support in order to minimise either or both the stress and the deflection.
The equal and opposite loads (Pl) on the ends may be determined by the statical equilibrium of the beam for any fixed position of the point of support. The bending moment diagram (due to centrifugal forces) may then be constructed and the deflections calculated, as shown for a typical case in the small diagrams. Normally, the bending moment has two maximum values, one at the point of support X (at a distance a from one end) and one between the point of support and the end furthest away, and the distance between the two maximum bending moment points is /;L, where L is the length of the beam. The former bending moment vanishes if the point of support is at one end, and the latter if it is exactly in the centre. The variation of the two'for different positions of support is shown in the main diagram, marked Z. In this diagram the bending moments are represented by a dimensionless factor 0 by dividing by the total load and the length of the beam.
The small diagram of a typical deflection curve shows the deflection h, between the point of support and the point furthest away from it, in a direction perpendicular to the beam. This dimension is important in the case considered because the distorted shroud must move past an undistorted one (in the adjacent row of blades, which are stationary), and this distance must be added to the centrifugal expansion of the rotating compressor blade to give the minimum clearance. The main graph, marked "deflection h, shows the variation of this deflection, represented again by a dimensionless factor. according to the position of the support.
The bending moment diagram Z shows that for a beam of uniform section the stresses are least when the point of support is 0.15 of the distance along the beam. This stress occurs at two places, and any change of position of the support would cause one of them to increase, although the other would decrease. 7
The minimum value of the deflection is seen to occur when the point of support is 0.22 of the distance along the beam. Thus according to whether stress of deflection is most critical, the optimum point of support will lie somewhere between these two values.
It should be understood that the shroud is stiffened up by the integral inner and outer blades the sections of which, at the shrouds, are inclined to one another, and this reduces the effective length of the beam and would, in point of fact, modify the shape of the curves shown.
What I claim as my invention and desire to secure by Letters Patent of the United States is;
1. A rotor having a peripheral row of blades,
said blades carrying at their outer ends shrouds.
which form a ring and are interlocked against relative radial and lateral movement, an outer row of blades carried externally by said shrouds, the shrouds being offset in a circumferential direction relatively to the associated blades of the inner row so as to reduce the maximum deflectioninashroudduetocentrirugalactiontoa value lower than if the shrouds were central with respect to the associated blades of the inner row.
2. A rotor having a peripheral row of blades, said blades carrying at their outer ends shrouds which form a ring and are interlocked against relative radial and lateral movement, an outer row of blades carried externally by said shrouds, th blades of each shroud being arranged so that the lines through the centres of gravity of different sections of the blades are coincident, the shrouds being offset in a circumferential direction relatively to the associated blades so as to reduce the maximum deflection in a shroud due to centrifugal action to a value lower than if the shrouds were central with respect to the associated blades.
3. A rotor having aperipheral row of blades, the latter being fast at their outer ends with shrouds which form a ring and are interlocked against relative radial and lateral movement, an outer row of blades which are individually fast with the shrouds and respectively aligned with the blades of the inner row, the shrouds being oflset in a circumferential direction relatively to both the associated blades such that the line through the centres of gravity of different sections of each blade is approximately mid-way between the centre of the shroud and one end.
4. A rotor for an intemal-combustion turbine plant having a peripheral row of compressor' blades, the latter carrying at their outer ends shrouds which form a ring and are interlocked against relative radial and lateral movement, a row of turbine blades carried externally by the shrouds, the shrouds being oflset in a circumferential direction relatively to the associated compressor blades such that the line through the centres of gravity of different sections of each compressor blade is at a distance from one end of the shroud which is between 0.2 and 0.25 of the circumferential length of the shroud.
FRITZ ALBERT MAX HEPPNER.
US549038A 1943-12-08 1944-08-11 Bladed rotor Expired - Lifetime US2391623A (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB2391623X 1943-12-08

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US2391623A true US2391623A (en) 1945-12-25

Family

ID=10905564

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US549037A Expired - Lifetime US2398140A (en) 1943-12-08 1944-08-11 Bladed rotor
US549038A Expired - Lifetime US2391623A (en) 1943-12-08 1944-08-11 Bladed rotor

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US549037A Expired - Lifetime US2398140A (en) 1943-12-08 1944-08-11 Bladed rotor

Country Status (2)

Country Link
US (2) US2398140A (en)
FR (1) FR946829A (en)

Cited By (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2644298A (en) * 1953-07-07 Propulsive thrust augmenter
US2800298A (en) * 1951-04-19 1957-07-23 Schellens True Corp Turbine wheel
US2999631A (en) * 1958-09-05 1961-09-12 Gen Electric Dual airfoil
US3002675A (en) * 1957-11-07 1961-10-03 Power Jets Res & Dev Ltd Blade elements for turbo machines
US3795462A (en) * 1971-08-09 1974-03-05 Westinghouse Electric Corp Vibration dampening for long twisted turbine blades
US3871791A (en) * 1972-03-09 1975-03-18 Rolls Royce 1971 Ltd Blade for fluid flow machines
US3986792A (en) * 1975-03-03 1976-10-19 Westinghouse Electric Corporation Vibration dampening device disposed on a shroud member for a twisted turbine blade
US4798519A (en) * 1987-08-24 1989-01-17 United Technologies Corporation Compressor part span shroud
US4840539A (en) * 1987-03-12 1989-06-20 Alsthom Moving blading for steam turbines
US4878811A (en) * 1988-11-14 1989-11-07 United Technologies Corporation Axial compressor blade assembly
US20080145227A1 (en) * 2006-12-19 2008-06-19 Mark Stefan Maier Methods and apparatus for load transfer in rotor assemblies
US20130051990A1 (en) * 2011-08-29 2013-02-28 Leonard Paul Palmisano Bushing to repair circumferential flanged ring
ITMI20120527A1 (en) * 2012-03-30 2013-10-01 Franco Tosi Meccanica S P A ROTORIAL STAGE OF AXIAL TURBINE WITH ADAPTIVE ADJUSTMENT TO DYNAMIC STRESS
US10006296B2 (en) * 2012-05-31 2018-06-26 General Electric Technology Gmbh Shroud for pre-twisted airfoils

Families Citing this family (25)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2510734A (en) * 1946-04-06 1950-06-06 United Aircraft Corp Turbine or compressor rotor
US2494658A (en) * 1946-05-10 1950-01-17 United Aircraft Corp Blade mounting
US2552118A (en) * 1947-03-27 1951-05-08 Buffalo Turbine Corp Blower
US2668413A (en) * 1948-03-15 1954-02-09 James V Giliberty Gas turbine power plant with duplexed blading
US2646209A (en) * 1948-05-21 1953-07-21 Galliot Jules Andre Norbert Turbine driven multistage compressor
US2840299A (en) * 1952-09-22 1958-06-24 Thompson Prod Inc Axial flow compressor rotor
GB751740A (en) * 1953-10-02 1956-07-04 English Electric Co Ltd Improvements in and relating to the fixing of rotor blades of axial flow turbines and compressors
US2801789A (en) * 1954-11-30 1957-08-06 Power Jets Res & Dev Ltd Blading for gas turbine engines
GB805418A (en) * 1955-10-05 1958-12-03 Power Jets Res & Dev Ltd Jet propulsion plant
DE1009438B (en) * 1955-11-23 1957-05-29 Power Jets Res & Dev Ltd Method and device for carrying out the method for operating a jet engine
US2942843A (en) * 1956-06-15 1960-06-28 Westinghouse Electric Corp Blade vibration damping structure
US2955799A (en) * 1957-02-11 1960-10-11 United Aircraft Corp Blade damping means
US2971745A (en) * 1958-03-21 1961-02-14 Gen Electric Fabricated blade and bucket rotor assembly
DE1131949B (en) * 1958-09-05 1962-06-20 Gen Electric Runner for a two-circuit turbo jet engine
US3070284A (en) * 1960-10-07 1962-12-25 Gen Electric Turbo-fan rotor
GB938189A (en) * 1960-10-29 1963-10-02 Ruston & Hornsby Ltd Improvements in the construction of turbine and compressor blade elements
US3104093A (en) * 1961-04-11 1963-09-17 United Aircraft Corp Blade damping device
DE1159965B (en) * 1961-08-10 1963-12-27 Bbc Brown Boveri & Cie Device for vibration damping on a turbine or compressor blade ring
JPS49120901U (en) * 1973-02-15 1974-10-16
US3923420A (en) * 1973-04-30 1975-12-02 Gen Electric Blade platform with friction damping interlock
US4135857A (en) * 1977-06-09 1979-01-23 United Technologies Corporation Reduced drag airfoil platforms
GB2032535A (en) * 1978-07-25 1980-05-08 Rolls Royce Overlapping cantilevers
FR2643940B1 (en) * 1989-03-01 1991-05-17 Snecma MOBILE VANE OF TURBOMACHINE WITH MOMENT OF COMPENSATED FOOT
US5271718A (en) * 1992-08-11 1993-12-21 General Electric Company Lightweight platform blade
FR2856105B1 (en) * 2003-06-16 2007-05-25 Snecma Moteurs IMPROVING THE RETENTION CAPACITY OF A DISSYMMETRIC HAMMER ATTACHED BLADE USING PLATFORM STIFFENERS

Cited By (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2644298A (en) * 1953-07-07 Propulsive thrust augmenter
US2800298A (en) * 1951-04-19 1957-07-23 Schellens True Corp Turbine wheel
US3002675A (en) * 1957-11-07 1961-10-03 Power Jets Res & Dev Ltd Blade elements for turbo machines
US2999631A (en) * 1958-09-05 1961-09-12 Gen Electric Dual airfoil
US3795462A (en) * 1971-08-09 1974-03-05 Westinghouse Electric Corp Vibration dampening for long twisted turbine blades
US3871791A (en) * 1972-03-09 1975-03-18 Rolls Royce 1971 Ltd Blade for fluid flow machines
US3986792A (en) * 1975-03-03 1976-10-19 Westinghouse Electric Corporation Vibration dampening device disposed on a shroud member for a twisted turbine blade
US4840539A (en) * 1987-03-12 1989-06-20 Alsthom Moving blading for steam turbines
US4798519A (en) * 1987-08-24 1989-01-17 United Technologies Corporation Compressor part span shroud
US4878811A (en) * 1988-11-14 1989-11-07 United Technologies Corporation Axial compressor blade assembly
US20080145227A1 (en) * 2006-12-19 2008-06-19 Mark Stefan Maier Methods and apparatus for load transfer in rotor assemblies
US20130051990A1 (en) * 2011-08-29 2013-02-28 Leonard Paul Palmisano Bushing to repair circumferential flanged ring
ITMI20120527A1 (en) * 2012-03-30 2013-10-01 Franco Tosi Meccanica S P A ROTORIAL STAGE OF AXIAL TURBINE WITH ADAPTIVE ADJUSTMENT TO DYNAMIC STRESS
US10006296B2 (en) * 2012-05-31 2018-06-26 General Electric Technology Gmbh Shroud for pre-twisted airfoils

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US2398140A (en) 1946-04-09
FR946829A (en) 1949-06-15

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US2391623A (en) Bladed rotor
US1362074A (en) Turbine
US2427614A (en) Rotor for multistage turbomachines
US3377050A (en) Shrouded rotor blades
US2980395A (en) Rotor with pivoted blades for compressors and turbines
EP0747573B1 (en) Gas turbine rotor with remote support rings
US3666376A (en) Turbine blade damper
US2479057A (en) Turbine rotor
US2654565A (en) Construction of rotors for compressors and like machines
US2669383A (en) Rotor blade
US2869820A (en) Rotors for axial flow compressors or turbines
US2277484A (en) Turbine blade construction
US2722373A (en) Compressor casing and stator assembly
US2861823A (en) Bladed rotors for compressors, turbines and the like
US3249293A (en) Ring-drum rotor
US2660400A (en) Blade for turbines or compressors
US4861229A (en) Ceramic-matrix composite nozzle assembly for a turbine engine
US4468148A (en) Means for reducing stress or fretting in clamped assemblies
US2543355A (en) Stator for axial compressors
US3741681A (en) Hollow turbine rotor assembly
EP4095359B1 (en) Strut reinforcing structure for a turbine exhaust case
US2729422A (en) Shaped article of ceramic material
US2575237A (en) Multistage bladed rotor
US3400912A (en) High performance pinned root rotor
US2415033A (en) Centrifugal fan