US2214962A - Method of mothproofing materials - Google Patents
Method of mothproofing materials Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US2214962A US2214962A US108472A US10847236A US2214962A US 2214962 A US2214962 A US 2214962A US 108472 A US108472 A US 108472A US 10847236 A US10847236 A US 10847236A US 2214962 A US2214962 A US 2214962A
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- materials
- bath
- antimony
- moths
- treated
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
- A01N—PRESERVATION OF BODIES OF HUMANS OR ANIMALS OR PLANTS OR PARTS THEREOF; BIOCIDES, e.g. AS DISINFECTANTS, AS PESTICIDES OR AS HERBICIDES; PEST REPELLANTS OR ATTRACTANTS; PLANT GROWTH REGULATORS
- A01N59/00—Biocides, pest repellants or attractants, or plant growth regulators containing elements or inorganic compounds
- A01N59/16—Heavy metals; Compounds thereof
- A01N59/22—Arsenic
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10S—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10S428/00—Stock material or miscellaneous articles
- Y10S428/907—Resistant against plant or animal attack
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10T—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
- Y10T442/00—Fabric [woven, knitted, or nonwoven textile or cloth, etc.]
- Y10T442/20—Coated or impregnated woven, knit, or nonwoven fabric which is not [a] associated with another preformed layer or fiber layer or, [b] with respect to woven and knit, characterized, respectively, by a particular or differential weave or knit, wherein the coating or impregnation is neither a foamed material nor a free metal or alloy layer
- Y10T442/2525—Coating or impregnation functions biologically [e.g., insect repellent, antiseptic, insecticide, bactericide, etc.]
- Y10T442/2541—Insect repellent
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10T—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
- Y10T442/00—Fabric [woven, knitted, or nonwoven textile or cloth, etc.]
- Y10T442/20—Coated or impregnated woven, knit, or nonwoven fabric which is not [a] associated with another preformed layer or fiber layer or, [b] with respect to woven and knit, characterized, respectively, by a particular or differential weave or knit, wherein the coating or impregnation is neither a foamed material nor a free metal or alloy layer
- Y10T442/2762—Coated or impregnated natural fiber fabric [e.g., cotton, wool, silk, linen, etc.]
Definitions
- This invention relates to the treatment of fabrics and other materials made wholly or in part from animal fibers to render the same resistant to moths.
- Mothproofing materials which are used for application to fabrics and other materials made wholly or in part from animal fibers are usually applied either as a bath or as a spray. Such materials must be effective in relatively small 10 concentrations so that they may be used at reasonable cost; and they should be fatal to moths eventually and must prevent mothseating the material sufiiciently to damage it; they must be of such a character as to do no injury to the fiber to which the mothproofing material is applied either by rendering it harsh or stiff or by weakening it 'or by discoloring it; they should be as permanent as possible in their effects; there must be no tendency to crystallize on the fabric and any dust which may be carried off must not be irritating.
- the standing bath method of immersion comprises passing a continuous web or a plurality of 5 webs of fabric through the same bath.
- the standing bath method of immersion hasbeenunsatisfactory becauseit has been impossible to control properly the composition of the bath.
- Con,- centration of the bath has been determined by its 58 specific gravity or its acidity. .
- the different solubili 5 ties of the ingredients individually and collectively is a factor which complicates control of the bath.
- the ingredients of the mixture may be present in solution in any one of several differ- 1o ent relative proportions.
- no satisfactory method has been known for testing the bath during operations to provide information where- 4 by such a bath may be satisfactorily controlled so as to obtain at all times a treated material 15 having satisfactory moth resistance or for determining the percentage of active moth resisting ingredients absorbed by'the fabric.
- the present invention is based upon the discovery that the effectiveness 20 of a fluoride and a silico-fiuoride are greatly increased when used in combination with antimony.
- the fabrics treated are not only inedible but provide an environment which greatly reduces the normal propagation of the moths.
- 26 when an antimony salt is used in conjunction with a fluoride or a silico-fiuoride the difficulties of control above mentioned are encountered and the bath possesses the relatively high acidity characteristic of the fluoride or silico-fluoride 30 bath.
- Moths will not stay on the surface of materials treated in accordance with the invention if they can avoid it. In fact, it has been observed that moths build a web or net over such treated material, apparently with the purpose of avoiding contact with it. The invention effectively prevents substantial injury to the treated materials.
- the treatment bath has low acidity and its composition can be accurately controlled and 2, treated material obtained at all times having a known desired moth resistance. 1
- a method of treating fabrics or other materials, which are wholly or in part of animal origin, to render the same resistant to moths which comprises applying to said material an aqueous solution containing the complex fluoride of sodium and antimony, said compound containing all the active moth resisting materials used in said solution.
- a method of treating fabrics or other materials, which are wholly or in part of animal origin, to render the same resistant to moths which comprises applying to said material an aqueous solution containing the complex compound antimony fluoride ammonium sulphate, said compound containing all the active moth resisting materials used in said solution.
- a method of treating fabrics or other materials, which are wholly or in part of animal origin, to render the same resistant to moths which comprises applying to said material an aqueous solution containing the complex compound ammonium fluoantimonate, said compound containing all the active moth resisting materials used in said solution.
Landscapes
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Agronomy & Crop Science (AREA)
- Inorganic Chemistry (AREA)
- Pest Control & Pesticides (AREA)
- Plant Pathology (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Dentistry (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
- Zoology (AREA)
- Environmental Sciences (AREA)
- Chemical Or Physical Treatment Of Fibers (AREA)
- Treatments For Attaching Organic Compounds To Fibrous Goods (AREA)
Description
Patented Sept. 17, 1940 PATENT OFFICE 2,214,962 METHOD 'OF MOTHPROOFING MATERIALS Daniel H. Jones, Collingswood, N. J., assignor to J. Harold Boss, Melrose, Mass., as trustee No Drawing.
Application October 30, 1936,
Serial No. 108,472 I Claims.
This invention relates to the treatment of fabrics and other materials made wholly or in part from animal fibers to render the same resistant to moths.
6 Mothproofing materials which are used for application to fabrics and other materials made wholly or in part from animal fibers are usually applied either as a bath or as a spray. Such materials must be effective in relatively small 10 concentrations so that they may be used at reasonable cost; and they should be fatal to moths eventually and must prevent mothseating the material sufiiciently to damage it; they must be of such a character as to do no injury to the fiber to which the mothproofing material is applied either by rendering it harsh or stiff or by weakening it 'or by discoloring it; they should be as permanent as possible in their effects; there must be no tendency to crystallize on the fabric and any dust which may be carried off must not be irritating.
It has been common practice prior to the present invention to immerse the materials to be mothproofed in a dilute water solution of a mixture of two or more chemical substances, which when present in proper portion, on the treated material impart thereto resistance to moths. These substances, however, in solution, do not possess suflicient afiinity for the material to be treated so as to render them practical for use alone in the immersion method. It is necessary, therefore, to use in combination with these substances, another chemical substance, such as aluminum sulfate, which possesses a high affinity for the material to be treated and which increases the affinity of the other substances for the material to be treated. For example, as illustrative of a common practice prior to the present invention, a dilute solution has been used containing "0 suitable proportions of sodium or potassium fluoride and a fluosilicate together with a mordant,
such as aluminum sulfate.
The standing bath method of immersion comprises passing a continuous web or a plurality of 5 webs of fabric through the same bath. Prior to the present invention the standing bath method of immersion hasbeenunsatisfactory becauseit has been impossible to control properly the composition of the bath. Thus, as the material is passed 50 through the bath the various ingredients thereof are removed by the material being treated at difierent rates. Consequently, the relative proportions of the ingredients are changed. Con,- centration of the bath has been determined by its 58 specific gravity or its acidity. .These methods do not provide the necessary information so that the composition of the bath may be satisfactorily adjusted, during operations, by the addition of one or more of the original ingredients thereto. The reason for this is that: the different solubili 5 ties of the ingredients individually and collectively is a factor which complicates control of the bath. Thus, with a given specific gravity or acidity the ingredients of the mixture may be present in solution in any one of several differ- 1o ent relative proportions. In fact. no satisfactory method has been known for testing the bath during operations to provide information where- 4 by such a bath may be satisfactorily controlled so as to obtain at all times a treated material 15 having satisfactory moth resistance or for determining the percentage of active moth resisting ingredients absorbed by'the fabric.
In its broadest aspect, the present invention is based upon the discovery that the effectiveness 20 of a fluoride and a silico-fiuoride are greatly increased when used in combination with antimony. The fabrics treated are not only inedible but provide an environment which greatly reduces the normal propagation of the moths. However, 26 when an antimony salt is used in conjunction with a fluoride or a silico-fiuoride, the difficulties of control above mentioned are encountered and the bath possesses the relatively high acidity characteristic of the fluoride or silico-fluoride 30 bath. -It has been discovered, however, that a chemical substance in which the antimony, and an alkali metal and fluoride, or silicon and fluorine, such as a fluosilicate, are chemically united not only imparts as great elfectiveness as a mix- 35 ture of an antimony salt and a fluoride or silicofluoride but is less detrimental to fabrics. A solution containing such a chemical substance can be employed in many instances without the use of aluminum sulfate, or other mordants. Fur- 40 thermore, such a solution can be controlled so that a treated material can be obtained at all times which possesses uniform satisfactory moth resistance. The presence of the antimony in chemical union makes possible an accurate determination of the moth resistance of the treated material by chemical determination of the antimony content. The relatively high solubility of the substances used in the practice of the invention makes possible the use of a bath of higher concentration than has theretofore been possible in commercial practice.
In accordance with the invention fabrics or other materials which are wholly or in part of animal origin are rendered resistant to moths by applying to the material either by spraying the material with or immersing it in an aqueous solution of a substance in which antimony and either fluorine, or fluorine and silicon, such as a fluosilicate, together with an alkali metal are chemically united. By alkali metal it is intended to include not only sodium and potassium but also the rare earth and the alkaline earth metals and also alkaline substances, such as NHa. For example, an aqueous solution of a complex fluoride of sodium and antimony (NaESbFa or (NaF)2.SbF3) or the complex salt of antimony fluoride ammonium sulfate (SbF3.(NI-I4)2SO4) or ammonium fluo-antimonate ((NH4F)2.SbFa) may be used. If desired, a wetting agent or penetrant and a mordant also may be used in any manner and for the purposes well known to those skilled in the art. After application of the solution, the treated material is dried in well known manner.
Moths will not stay on the surface of materials treated in accordance with the invention if they can avoid it. In fact, it has been observed that moths build a web or net over such treated material, apparently with the purpose of avoiding contact with it. The invention effectively prevents substantial injury to the treated materials. The treatment bath has low acidity and its composition can be accurately controlled and 2, treated material obtained at all times having a known desired moth resistance. 1
I claim:
1. A method'of treating fabrics or other materials, which are wholly or in part of animal origin, to render the same resistant to moths,
which comprises applying to said material an aqueous solution containing a complex salt, said complex salt containing antimony and fluorine and including all the active moth resisting materials used in said solution.
2. A method of treating fabrics or other materials, which are wholly or in part of animal origin, to render the same resistant to moths,
which comprisesuipplying to said material an aqueous solution containing a complex salt, said complex salt containing antimony, fluorine and an inorganic akaline radical and including all the active moth resisting materials used in said solution.
3. A method of treating fabrics or other materials, which are wholly or in part of animal origin, to render the same resistant to moths, which comprises applying to said material an aqueous solution containing the complex fluoride of sodium and antimony, said compound containing all the active moth resisting materials used in said solution. 1
4. A method of treating fabrics or other materials, which are wholly or in part of animal origin, to render the same resistant to moths, which comprises applying to said material an aqueous solution containing the complex compound antimony fluoride ammonium sulphate, said compound containing all the active moth resisting materials used in said solution.
5. A method of treating fabrics or other materials, which are wholly or in part of animal origin, to render the same resistant to moths, which comprises applying to said material an aqueous solution containing the complex compound ammonium fluoantimonate, said compound containing all the active moth resisting materials used in said solution.
DANIEL H. JONES.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US108472A US2214962A (en) | 1936-10-30 | 1936-10-30 | Method of mothproofing materials |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US108472A US2214962A (en) | 1936-10-30 | 1936-10-30 | Method of mothproofing materials |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| US2214962A true US2214962A (en) | 1940-09-17 |
Family
ID=22322421
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| US108472A Expired - Lifetime US2214962A (en) | 1936-10-30 | 1936-10-30 | Method of mothproofing materials |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US2214962A (en) |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US6015570A (en) * | 1993-12-23 | 2000-01-18 | Tucci Associates, Inc. | Slow-release insect-repellent compositions and uses |
-
1936
- 1936-10-30 US US108472A patent/US2214962A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US6015570A (en) * | 1993-12-23 | 2000-01-18 | Tucci Associates, Inc. | Slow-release insect-repellent compositions and uses |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| ATE167240T1 (en) | METHOD FOR CLEANING ALUMINUM CONTAINERS | |
| DE2054067A1 (en) | Dilutable concentrates for the treatment of metal surfaces | |
| DE1177000B (en) | Photographic material with layers containing wetting agents | |
| US2214962A (en) | Method of mothproofing materials | |
| SE8303507D0 (en) | CONCENTRATED FABRIC SOFTENING COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR MAKING SAME | |
| US1935911A (en) | Material for cleaning and preparing metal for paint | |
| DE2417791C2 (en) | Flux for hot-dip galvanizing -tinning and -verbleiuhg | |
| JPS57156411A (en) | Hair-treating agent | |
| US2473004A (en) | Galvanizing flux | |
| US2851386A (en) | Method for coating zinc and zinc alloy sheets | |
| US2614918A (en) | Method of setting fruit and composition therefor | |
| KR900003471B1 (en) | Aqueous solution of alkali metal compositions and adding method | |
| DE2704255A1 (en) | PROCESS AND MEANS FOR PREPARING WORKPIECES FOR COLD FORMING | |
| US1634791A (en) | Mothproofing composition | |
| US2152160A (en) | Aqueous wood preserving liquid | |
| US1634790A (en) | Art of mothproofing | |
| DE2852756A1 (en) | FLUX FOR DRY GALVANIZATION | |
| US2547510A (en) | Composition and process for electrolytic cleaning of metals | |
| GB759143A (en) | Improvements relating to detergent compositions | |
| GB1287940A (en) | ||
| AT246560B (en) | Developing bath | |
| Naismith et al. | The effect of inorganic electrolytes on the denaturation of arachin with urea and guanidinium salts | |
| DE2334291A1 (en) | LOW SMOKING GALVANIZING FLUX | |
| US2879195A (en) | Flux | |
| DE903654C (en) | Process for increasing the durability of oxidizable photographic processing baths |