US20230100659A1 - Reduction of br2 and cl2 in semiconductor processes - Google Patents
Reduction of br2 and cl2 in semiconductor processes Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20230100659A1 US20230100659A1 US18/077,087 US202218077087A US2023100659A1 US 20230100659 A1 US20230100659 A1 US 20230100659A1 US 202218077087 A US202218077087 A US 202218077087A US 2023100659 A1 US2023100659 A1 US 2023100659A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- plasma reactor
- gases
- hbr
- ghgs
- reagent
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01J—ELECTRIC DISCHARGE TUBES OR DISCHARGE LAMPS
- H01J37/00—Discharge tubes with provision for introducing objects or material to be exposed to the discharge, e.g. for the purpose of examination or processing thereof
- H01J37/32—Gas-filled discharge tubes
- H01J37/32431—Constructional details of the reactor
- H01J37/32798—Further details of plasma apparatus not provided for in groups H01J37/3244 - H01J37/32788; special provisions for cleaning or maintenance of the apparatus
- H01J37/32816—Pressure
- H01J37/32834—Exhausting
- H01J37/32844—Treating effluent gases
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01J—ELECTRIC DISCHARGE TUBES OR DISCHARGE LAMPS
- H01J37/00—Discharge tubes with provision for introducing objects or material to be exposed to the discharge, e.g. for the purpose of examination or processing thereof
- H01J37/32—Gas-filled discharge tubes
- H01J37/32009—Arrangements for generation of plasma specially adapted for examination or treatment of objects, e.g. plasma sources
- H01J37/32082—Radio frequency generated discharge
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01J—ELECTRIC DISCHARGE TUBES OR DISCHARGE LAMPS
- H01J37/00—Discharge tubes with provision for introducing objects or material to be exposed to the discharge, e.g. for the purpose of examination or processing thereof
- H01J37/32—Gas-filled discharge tubes
- H01J37/32009—Arrangements for generation of plasma specially adapted for examination or treatment of objects, e.g. plasma sources
- H01J37/32082—Radio frequency generated discharge
- H01J37/321—Radio frequency generated discharge the radio frequency energy being inductively coupled to the plasma
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01J—ELECTRIC DISCHARGE TUBES OR DISCHARGE LAMPS
- H01J37/00—Discharge tubes with provision for introducing objects or material to be exposed to the discharge, e.g. for the purpose of examination or processing thereof
- H01J37/32—Gas-filled discharge tubes
- H01J37/32431—Constructional details of the reactor
- H01J37/3244—Gas supply means
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01J—ELECTRIC DISCHARGE TUBES OR DISCHARGE LAMPS
- H01J37/00—Discharge tubes with provision for introducing objects or material to be exposed to the discharge, e.g. for the purpose of examination or processing thereof
- H01J37/32—Gas-filled discharge tubes
- H01J37/32431—Constructional details of the reactor
- H01J37/3244—Gas supply means
- H01J37/32449—Gas control, e.g. control of the gas flow
-
- H10P50/242—
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02C—CAPTURE, STORAGE, SEQUESTRATION OR DISPOSAL OF GREENHOUSE GASES [GHG]
- Y02C20/00—Capture or disposal of greenhouse gases
- Y02C20/30—Capture or disposal of greenhouse gases of perfluorocarbons [PFC], hydrofluorocarbons [HFC] or sulfur hexafluoride [SF6]
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02P—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
- Y02P70/00—Climate change mitigation technologies in the production process for final industrial or consumer products
- Y02P70/50—Manufacturing or production processes characterised by the final manufactured product
Definitions
- One or more embodiments described herein generally relate to abatement systems for semiconductor processes, and more particularly, to abatement systems for reducing Br 2 and Cl 2 in semiconductor processes.
- Process gases used by semiconductor processing facilities include many compounds that must be abated or treated before disposal, due to regulatory requirements and environmental concerns.
- etch processes among others, often use fluorinated greenhouse gases (F-GHGs) such as CF 4 , SF 6 , C 4 F 8 , and CHF 3 .
- F-GHGs fluorinated greenhouse gases
- other process gases such as HBr and Cl 2 are often used to improve selectivity and reduce oxidative damage to substrate surfaces during etch processes. Under energetic conditions, HBr is known to equilibrate with H 2 +Br 2 .
- Br 2 and Cl 2 are corrosive and toxic, causing environment concerns. Br 2 is liquid at room temperature and may accumulate in the exhaust duct under certain conditions. Additionally, Br 2 and Cl 2 are not water soluble and may not be completely abated in wet scrubbers. As HBr and Cl 2 flows increase in etch processes due to larger substrates being used in semiconductor processes, increasing Br 2 and Cl 2 emissions are problematic.
- One or more embodiments described herein relate to methods for abating process gases.
- a method for abating process gases includes performing a semiconductor etch process within a process chamber using process gases including fluorinated greenhouse gases (F-GHGs), HBr, and Cl 2 , wherein the process gases are configured to flow out of the process chamber into a plasma reactor; introducing reagent gases from a reagent gas delivery system to the plasma reactor to react with the process gases; and applying RF power to the plasma reactor; wherein a ratio of a reagent gas flow rate to a HBr flow rate is greater than 2:1.
- F-GHGs fluorinated greenhouse gases
- HBr HBr
- Cl 2 fluorinated greenhouse gases
- a method for abating process gases includes performing a semiconductor etch process within a process chamber using process gases including fluorinated greenhouse gases (F-GHGs), HBr, and Cl 2 wherein the process gases are configured to flow out of the process chamber into a plasma reactor; introducing reagent gases from a reagent gas delivery system to the plasma reactor to react with the process gases; and applying RF power to the plasma reactor; wherein a ratio of a regent gas flow rate to a Br 2 byproduct gas is greater than 8:1.
- F-GHGs fluorinated greenhouse gases
- HBr HBr
- Cl 2 reactive oxygen species
- a process system includes a process chamber; a plasma reactor located downstream of the process chamber; a reagent gas delivery apparatus located between the process chamber and the plasma reactor; a vacuum pump located downstream of the plasma reactor; a wet scrubber located downstream of the vacuum pump; an inert gas delivery apparatus located between the plasma reactor and the vacuum pump; and a controller configured to receive information from the process system, and when executed by a processor performs an operation, including: performing a semiconductor etch process within the process chamber using process gases including fluorinated greenhouse gases (F-GHGs), HBr, and Cl 2 , wherein the process gases are configured to flow out of the process chamber into the plasma reactor; introducing water vapor (H 2 O) from the reagent gas delivery system to the plasma reactor to react with the process gases; and applying RF power to the plasma reactor; wherein a ratio of a H 2 O flow rate to a HBr flow rate is greater than 2:1; and a ratio a H 2 O flow rate to a bromine (Br 2 ) by
- FIG. 1 is a schematic view of a process system according to at least one embodiment described herein;
- FIG. 2 is a flow chart of a method according to at least one embodiment described herein.
- One or more embodiments described herein relate to abatement systems for reducing Br 2 and Cl 2 in semiconductor processes.
- semiconductor etch processes are performed within process chambers.
- F-GHGs such as CF 4 , SF 6 , C 4 F 8 , and CHF 3 are often used.
- other process gases such as HBr and Cl 2 are often used to improve selectivity and reduce oxidative damage to substrate surfaces during etch processes.
- the F-GHGs, HBr, and Cl 2 gases exit the process chamber and enter a plasma reactor.
- reagent gases which include hydrogen and oxygen atoms
- reagent gases are delivered from a reagent gas delivery apparatus to the plasma reactor to mix with the process gases.
- Radio frequency (RF) power is applied to the plasma reactor, which adds energy and “excites” the gases within the plasma reactor.
- the gases within the plasma reactor get excited, the gases dissociate to the atomic level. Thereafter, the atomic elements recombine to form more stable, water soluble compounds which helps greatly reduce or eliminate the F-GHGs which often cause environmental concerns if they exit to the environment.
- HBr is energized within the process chamber and the plasma reactor, it is known to equilibrate with H 2 +Br 2 . As discussed above, Br 2 is corrosive and toxic.
- H 2 O is corrosive and toxic.
- H 2 O the addition of H 2 O in the plasma reactor quenches the Br 2 and Cl 2 emissions, as the H atoms recombine with the Br atoms and the Cl atoms to form HBr and HCl.
- HBr and HCl are readily water-soluble and removed through a wet scrubber, whereas Br 2 and Cl 2 are not effectively abated in a wet scrubber.
- the embodiments described herein provide advantages over conventional abatement systems.
- H atoms do not recombine as effectively to form HBr and HCl, often leaving high amounts of toxic Br 2 and Cl 2 , which are not abated through the wet scrubber.
- Br 2 is liquid at room temperature and may accumulate in the exhaust duct of the process system under certain conditions.
- Br 2 and Cl 2 are converted to water-soluble HBr and HCl, respectively, and the problems above are reduced or eliminated. Additionally, the F-GHGs are greatly reduced and/or eliminated.
- FIG. 1 is a schematic view of a process system 100 according to at least one embodiment described herein.
- the process system 100 includes a process chamber 102 .
- the process chamber 102 is configured to perform semiconductor etch processes to process a substrate.
- the process chamber 102 may be a plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) chamber configured to perform process material deposition or etching.
- PECVD plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition
- other chambers can also be used and modified with the embodiments described herein.
- F-GHGs such as CF 4 , SF 6 , C 4 F 8 , and CHF 3 are often used with the process chamber 102 .
- the F-GHGs gases are used to achieve the required anisotropy required in etch processes, especially for deep trench etch processes.
- other process gases such as HBr and Cl 2 are often used to improve selectivity and reduce oxidative damage to substrate surfaces during etch processes.
- the F-GHGs, HBr, and Cl 2 gases are configured to flow out of the process chamber 102 and enter a plasma reactor 106 .
- the plasma reactor 106 is located downstream of the process chamber 102 .
- RF power is applied to the plasma reactor 106 via a remote plasma source 107 .
- the plasma source 107 can be an inductively coupled plasma source and may include a solid state match network.
- the amount of RF power applied may be between about 2000 and about 4000 watts, although other amounts of RF power are also possible.
- the process system 100 also includes a reagent gas delivery apparatus 104 configured to deliver reagent gases, such as water vapor (H 2 O), H 2 , and O 2 , to the plasma reactor 106 to mix with the process gases exiting the process chamber 102 .
- reagent gas delivery apparatus 104 may be a water delivery system configured to introduce water vapor to supply hydrogen and oxygen atoms to the plasma.
- the amount of each of the process gases within the plasma reactor 106 varies, and ratios of each of the different gases within the plasma reactor 106 can vary.
- the ratio of the H 2 O vapor flow rate to the HBr chamber flow rate is greater than 2:1.
- the ratio of the H 2 O vapor flow rate to the HBr chamber flow rate is greater than 5:1.
- the ratio of the H 2 O vapor flow rate to Br 2 byproduct gas is greater than 8:1.
- the ratio of the H 2 O vapor flow rate to Br 2 byproduct gas is greater than 15:1.
- Water vapor supplied from the reagent gas delivery apparatus 104 mixes with the process gases exiting the process chamber 102 within the plasma reactor 106 .
- the plasma source 107 adds energy, which dissociates the process gases to the atomic level. Thereafter, the atomic elements recombine with the water vapor to form more stable, water soluble compounds which helps greatly reduce or eliminate the F-GHGs which often cause environmental concerns if they exit to the environment.
- HBr is energized within the process chamber and the plasma reactor, it is known to equilibrate with H 2 +Br 2 .
- Br 2 is corrosive and toxic.
- Cl 2 is corrosive and toxic.
- H 2 O in the plasma reactor 107 quenches the Br 2 and Cl 2 emissions, as the H atoms recombine with the Br atoms and the Cl atoms to form HBr and HCl.
- HBr and HCl provide an advantage over conventional abatement systems, in which H atoms do not recombine as effectively to form HBr and HCl, often leaving high amounts of toxic Br 2 and Cl 2 .
- Br 2 is liquid at room temperature and may accumulate in the exhaust duct of the process system 100 under certain conditions.
- the process system 100 includes an inert gas delivery apparatus 108 located downstream of the plasma reactor 106 .
- Inert gases can be delivered to the process system 100 via the inert gas delivery apparatus 108 .
- a vacuum pump 110 is located downstream of the inert gas delivery apparatus 108 . Therefore, the inert gas delivery apparatus 108 is located between the plasma reactor 106 and the vacuum pump 110 .
- the vacuum pump 110 may be used to pump the gases exiting the plasma reactor 106 and the inert gas delivery apparatus 108 to a wet scrubber 112 .
- the wet scrubber 112 is located downstream of the vacuum pump 110 .
- the wet scrubber 112 may be a bubble tower, packed bed tower, or scrubbing tower.
- the wet scrubber 112 acts to abate the remaining gases in the process system 100 before they exit into the environment.
- the wet scrubber 112 does not abate Br 2 and Cl 2 well, as they are not water soluble.
- the wet scrubber 112 does abate HBr and HCl well, as they are water soluble. Therefore, the embodiments described herein provide the advantage of providing a greater amount of HBr and HCl, such that they can be more easily abated by the wet scrubber 112 before exiting into the environment.
- the process system 100 is controlled by a controller 114 .
- the controller 114 is in communication with hardware contained within the entire process system 100 , which acts to control the process parameters within the process system 100 .
- the controller 114 may include a central processing unit (CPU) 114 A, memory 114 B, and support circuits (or I/O) 114 C.
- the CPU 114 A may be one of any form of computer processors that are used in industrial settings for controlling various processes and hardware and monitor the processes.
- the memory 114 B is connected to the CPU 114 A, and may be one or more of a readily available memory, such as random access memory (RAM), read only memory (ROM), floppy disk, hard disk, or any other form of digital storage, local or remote.
- RAM random access memory
- ROM read only memory
- floppy disk hard disk, or any other form of digital storage, local or remote.
- Software instructions, algorithms and data can be coded and stored within the memory 114 B for instructing the CPU 114 A.
- the support circuits 114 C are also connected to the CPU 114 A for supporting the processor in a conventional manner.
- the support circuits 114 C may include conventional cache, power supplies, clock circuits, input/output circuitry, subsystems, and the like.
- a program (or computer instructions) readable by the controller determines which tasks are performable within the process system 100 .
- the program may be software readable by the controller 114 and may include code to monitor and control, the process parameters within the process system 100 .
- FIG. 2 is a flow chart of a method 200 according to at least one embodiment described herein.
- the method 200 is performed with the devices described in FIG. 1 , but is not limited to these devices and can be performed with other similar devices.
- a semiconductor deposition process is performed within the process chamber 102 .
- the semiconductor processes can be etch processes, in which F-GHGs such as CF 4 , SF 6 , C 4 F 8 , and CHF 3 are often used.
- F-GHGs such as CF 4 , SF 6 , C 4 F 8 , and CHF 3
- other process gases such as HBr and Cl 2 are often used to improve selectivity and reduce oxidative damage to substrate surfaces during etch processes.
- reagent gases are introduced to the plasma reactor 106 from a reagent gas delivery apparatus 104 .
- the reagent gases mix with the process gases exiting the process chamber 102 .
- the reagent gas delivery apparatus 104 may be a water delivery system configured to introduce water to supply hydrogen and oxygen atoms to the plasma reactor 106 .
- the amount of each of the process gases within the plasma reactor 106 varies, and ratios of each of the different gases within the plasma reactor 106 can vary.
- the ratio of the H 2 O vapor flow rate to the HBr chamber flow rate is greater than 2:1.
- the ratio of the H 2 O vapor flow rate to the HBr chamber flow rate is greater than 5:1.
- the ratio of the H 2 O vapor flow rate to Br 2 byproduct gas is greater than 8:1.
- the ratio of the H 2 O vapor flow rate to Br 2 byproduct gas is greater than 15:1.
- Ratios of HBr and Cl 2 can also be compared with the other gases in the plasma reactor 106 .
- the ratio of the H 2 O vapor flow rate to Cl 2 byproduct gas is greater than 8:1.
- the ratio of the H 2 O vapor flow rate to Cl 2 byproduct gas is greater than 15:1.
- RF power is applied to the plasma reactor 106 .
- the RF power can be applied via a remote plasma source 107 .
- the amount of RF power applied may be about 4000 watts, although other amounts of RF power are also possible.
- inert gases are delivered to the process system 100 via the inert gas delivery apparatus 108 .
- Embodiments described by method 200 provide advantageous results compared to conventional abatement processes.
- the F-GHGs such CF 4 and SF 6
- the F-GHGs are 95% abated.
- Br 2 emissions are reduced from the process chamber 102 by about 30 to 40% compared to conventional processes and Cl 2 emissions are reduced from the process chamber 102 by about 90% compared to conventional processes. Therefore, lesser quantities of the damaging F-GHGs, Br 2 , and Cl 2 gases exit the process system 100 when performing the method 200 . Reducing these potentially harmful emissions becomes even more important as greater amounts of HBr and Cl 2 are used to etch larger substrates within the process chamber 102 during semiconductor processes.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Plasma & Fusion (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
- Treating Waste Gases (AREA)
- Drying Of Semiconductors (AREA)
- Condensed Matter Physics & Semiconductors (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
- Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
- Microelectronics & Electronic Packaging (AREA)
- Power Engineering (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- This application is a divisional application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/793,983, filed Feb. 18, 2020, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/840,345, filed Apr. 29, 2019, and U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/808,943, filed Feb. 22, 2019. All of the above applications are herein incorporated by reference in their entireties.
- One or more embodiments described herein generally relate to abatement systems for semiconductor processes, and more particularly, to abatement systems for reducing Br2 and Cl2 in semiconductor processes.
- Process gases used by semiconductor processing facilities include many compounds that must be abated or treated before disposal, due to regulatory requirements and environmental concerns. For example, etch processes, among others, often use fluorinated greenhouse gases (F-GHGs) such as CF4, SF6, C4F8, and CHF3. Along with F-GHGs, other process gases such as HBr and Cl2 are often used to improve selectivity and reduce oxidative damage to substrate surfaces during etch processes. Under energetic conditions, HBr is known to equilibrate with H2+Br2.
- Process chamber plasmas are energetic enough to result in Br2 formation. Conventional abatement systems are also energetic enough to result in Br2 formation. Br2 and Cl2 are corrosive and toxic, causing environment concerns. Br2 is liquid at room temperature and may accumulate in the exhaust duct under certain conditions. Additionally, Br2 and Cl2 are not water soluble and may not be completely abated in wet scrubbers. As HBr and Cl2 flows increase in etch processes due to larger substrates being used in semiconductor processes, increasing Br2 and Cl2 emissions are problematic.
- Accordingly, there is a need for abatement systems that reduce Br2 and Cl2 in semiconductor processes.
- One or more embodiments described herein relate to methods for abating process gases.
- In one embodiment, a method for abating process gases includes performing a semiconductor etch process within a process chamber using process gases including fluorinated greenhouse gases (F-GHGs), HBr, and Cl2, wherein the process gases are configured to flow out of the process chamber into a plasma reactor; introducing reagent gases from a reagent gas delivery system to the plasma reactor to react with the process gases; and applying RF power to the plasma reactor; wherein a ratio of a reagent gas flow rate to a HBr flow rate is greater than 2:1.
- In another embodiment, a method for abating process gases includes performing a semiconductor etch process within a process chamber using process gases including fluorinated greenhouse gases (F-GHGs), HBr, and Cl2 wherein the process gases are configured to flow out of the process chamber into a plasma reactor; introducing reagent gases from a reagent gas delivery system to the plasma reactor to react with the process gases; and applying RF power to the plasma reactor; wherein a ratio of a regent gas flow rate to a Br2 byproduct gas is greater than 8:1.
- One of more embodiments described related to systems for abating process gases.
- In one embodiment, a process system includes a process chamber; a plasma reactor located downstream of the process chamber; a reagent gas delivery apparatus located between the process chamber and the plasma reactor; a vacuum pump located downstream of the plasma reactor; a wet scrubber located downstream of the vacuum pump; an inert gas delivery apparatus located between the plasma reactor and the vacuum pump; and a controller configured to receive information from the process system, and when executed by a processor performs an operation, including: performing a semiconductor etch process within the process chamber using process gases including fluorinated greenhouse gases (F-GHGs), HBr, and Cl2, wherein the process gases are configured to flow out of the process chamber into the plasma reactor; introducing water vapor (H2O) from the reagent gas delivery system to the plasma reactor to react with the process gases; and applying RF power to the plasma reactor; wherein a ratio of a H2O flow rate to a HBr flow rate is greater than 2:1; and a ratio a H2O flow rate to a bromine (Br2) byproduct gas is greater than 15:1.
- So that the manner in which the above recited features of the present disclosure can be understood in detail, a more particular description of the disclosure, briefly summarized above, may be had by reference to embodiments, some of which are illustrated in the appended drawings. It is to be noted, however, that the appended drawings illustrate only typical embodiments of this disclosure and are therefore not to be considered limiting of its scope, for the disclosure may admit to other equally effective embodiments.
-
FIG. 1 is a schematic view of a process system according to at least one embodiment described herein; and -
FIG. 2 is a flow chart of a method according to at least one embodiment described herein. - In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth to provide a more thorough understanding of the embodiments of the present disclosure. However, it will be apparent to one of skill in the art that one or more of the embodiments of the present disclosure may be practiced without one or more of these specific details. In other instances, well-known features have not been described in order to avoid obscuring one or more of the embodiments of the present disclosure.
- One or more embodiments described herein relate to abatement systems for reducing Br2 and Cl2 in semiconductor processes. In embodiments described herein, semiconductor etch processes are performed within process chambers. During certain processes, such as etch processes, F-GHGs such as CF4, SF6, C4F8, and CHF3 are often used. Along with the F-GHGs, other process gases such as HBr and Cl2 are often used to improve selectivity and reduce oxidative damage to substrate surfaces during etch processes. Following the etch processes, the F-GHGs, HBr, and Cl2 gases exit the process chamber and enter a plasma reactor.
- In some embodiments, reagent gases, which include hydrogen and oxygen atoms, are delivered from a reagent gas delivery apparatus to the plasma reactor to mix with the process gases. Radio frequency (RF) power is applied to the plasma reactor, which adds energy and “excites” the gases within the plasma reactor. When the gases within the plasma reactor get excited, the gases dissociate to the atomic level. Thereafter, the atomic elements recombine to form more stable, water soluble compounds which helps greatly reduce or eliminate the F-GHGs which often cause environmental concerns if they exit to the environment. When HBr is energized within the process chamber and the plasma reactor, it is known to equilibrate with H2+Br2. As discussed above, Br2 is corrosive and toxic. Additionally, Cl2 is corrosive and toxic. However, the addition of H2O in the plasma reactor quenches the Br2 and Cl2 emissions, as the H atoms recombine with the Br atoms and the Cl atoms to form HBr and HCl. HBr and HCl are readily water-soluble and removed through a wet scrubber, whereas Br2 and Cl2 are not effectively abated in a wet scrubber.
- As such, the embodiments described herein provide advantages over conventional abatement systems. In conventional abatement systems, H atoms do not recombine as effectively to form HBr and HCl, often leaving high amounts of toxic Br2 and Cl2, which are not abated through the wet scrubber. Additionally, in conventional abatement systems, Br2 is liquid at room temperature and may accumulate in the exhaust duct of the process system under certain conditions. In the embodiments described herein, Br2 and Cl2 are converted to water-soluble HBr and HCl, respectively, and the problems above are reduced or eliminated. Additionally, the F-GHGs are greatly reduced and/or eliminated.
-
FIG. 1 is a schematic view of aprocess system 100 according to at least one embodiment described herein. Theprocess system 100 includes aprocess chamber 102. Theprocess chamber 102 is configured to perform semiconductor etch processes to process a substrate. In some embodiments, theprocess chamber 102 may be a plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) chamber configured to perform process material deposition or etching. However, other chambers can also be used and modified with the embodiments described herein. During the deposition processes, such as etch processes, potentially damaging F-GHGs such as CF4, SF6, C4F8, and CHF3 are often used with theprocess chamber 102. The F-GHGs gases are used to achieve the required anisotropy required in etch processes, especially for deep trench etch processes. Along with the F-GHGs, other process gases such as HBr and Cl2 are often used to improve selectivity and reduce oxidative damage to substrate surfaces during etch processes. - Following the etch processes, the F-GHGs, HBr, and Cl2 gases are configured to flow out of the
process chamber 102 and enter aplasma reactor 106. Theplasma reactor 106 is located downstream of theprocess chamber 102. RF power is applied to theplasma reactor 106 via aremote plasma source 107. Theplasma source 107 can be an inductively coupled plasma source and may include a solid state match network. In some embodiments, the amount of RF power applied may be between about 2000 and about 4000 watts, although other amounts of RF power are also possible. Theprocess system 100 also includes a reagentgas delivery apparatus 104 configured to deliver reagent gases, such as water vapor (H2O), H2, and O2, to theplasma reactor 106 to mix with the process gases exiting theprocess chamber 102. In some embodiments, the reagentgas delivery apparatus 104 may be a water delivery system configured to introduce water vapor to supply hydrogen and oxygen atoms to the plasma. - The amount of each of the process gases within the
plasma reactor 106 varies, and ratios of each of the different gases within theplasma reactor 106 can vary. In some embodiments, the ratio of the H2O vapor flow rate to the HBr chamber flow rate is greater than 2:1. In other embodiments, the ratio of the H2O vapor flow rate to the HBr chamber flow rate is greater than 5:1. In some embodiments, the ratio of the H2O vapor flow rate to Br2 byproduct gas is greater than 8:1. In other embodiments, the ratio of the H2O vapor flow rate to Br2 byproduct gas is greater than 15:1. In some embodiments, there can be higher amounts of H2O than F-GHGs gases, and vice versa. In other embodiments, there can be higher amounts of H2 and/or O2 than F-GHGs gases, and vice versa. In other embodiments, there can be substantially similar amounts of some or all of the gases within theplasma reactor 106. - Water vapor supplied from the reagent
gas delivery apparatus 104 mixes with the process gases exiting theprocess chamber 102 within theplasma reactor 106. Theplasma source 107 adds energy, which dissociates the process gases to the atomic level. Thereafter, the atomic elements recombine with the water vapor to form more stable, water soluble compounds which helps greatly reduce or eliminate the F-GHGs which often cause environmental concerns if they exit to the environment. When HBr is energized within the process chamber and the plasma reactor, it is known to equilibrate with H2+Br2. As discussed above, Br2 is corrosive and toxic. Additionally, Cl2 is corrosive and toxic. However, the addition of H2O in theplasma reactor 107 quenches the Br2 and Cl2 emissions, as the H atoms recombine with the Br atoms and the Cl atoms to form HBr and HCl. HBr and HCl provide an advantage over conventional abatement systems, in which H atoms do not recombine as effectively to form HBr and HCl, often leaving high amounts of toxic Br2 and Cl2. Additionally, in conventional abatement systems, Br2 is liquid at room temperature and may accumulate in the exhaust duct of theprocess system 100 under certain conditions. - In some embodiments, the
process system 100 includes an inertgas delivery apparatus 108 located downstream of theplasma reactor 106. Inert gases can be delivered to theprocess system 100 via the inertgas delivery apparatus 108. Furthermore, avacuum pump 110 is located downstream of the inertgas delivery apparatus 108. Therefore, the inertgas delivery apparatus 108 is located between theplasma reactor 106 and thevacuum pump 110. Thevacuum pump 110 may be used to pump the gases exiting theplasma reactor 106 and the inertgas delivery apparatus 108 to awet scrubber 112. Thewet scrubber 112 is located downstream of thevacuum pump 110. In some embodiments, thewet scrubber 112 may be a bubble tower, packed bed tower, or scrubbing tower. Any suitable wet scrubber may be used. Thewet scrubber 112 acts to abate the remaining gases in theprocess system 100 before they exit into the environment. Thewet scrubber 112 does not abate Br2 and Cl2 well, as they are not water soluble. However, thewet scrubber 112 does abate HBr and HCl well, as they are water soluble. Therefore, the embodiments described herein provide the advantage of providing a greater amount of HBr and HCl, such that they can be more easily abated by thewet scrubber 112 before exiting into the environment. - In some embodiments, the
process system 100 is controlled by acontroller 114. Thecontroller 114 is in communication with hardware contained within theentire process system 100, which acts to control the process parameters within theprocess system 100. Thecontroller 114 may include a central processing unit (CPU) 114A,memory 114B, and support circuits (or I/O) 114C. TheCPU 114A may be one of any form of computer processors that are used in industrial settings for controlling various processes and hardware and monitor the processes. Thememory 114B is connected to theCPU 114A, and may be one or more of a readily available memory, such as random access memory (RAM), read only memory (ROM), floppy disk, hard disk, or any other form of digital storage, local or remote. Software instructions, algorithms and data can be coded and stored within thememory 114B for instructing theCPU 114A. Thesupport circuits 114C are also connected to theCPU 114A for supporting the processor in a conventional manner. Thesupport circuits 114C may include conventional cache, power supplies, clock circuits, input/output circuitry, subsystems, and the like. A program (or computer instructions) readable by the controller determines which tasks are performable within theprocess system 100. The program may be software readable by thecontroller 114 and may include code to monitor and control, the process parameters within theprocess system 100. -
FIG. 2 is a flow chart of amethod 200 according to at least one embodiment described herein. In these embodiments, themethod 200 is performed with the devices described inFIG. 1 , but is not limited to these devices and can be performed with other similar devices. Inblock 202, a semiconductor deposition process is performed within theprocess chamber 102. The semiconductor processes can be etch processes, in which F-GHGs such as CF4, SF6, C4F8, and CHF3 are often used. Along with the F-GHGs, other process gases such as HBr and Cl2 are often used to improve selectivity and reduce oxidative damage to substrate surfaces during etch processes. - In
block 204, reagent gases are introduced to theplasma reactor 106 from a reagentgas delivery apparatus 104. The reagent gases mix with the process gases exiting theprocess chamber 102. In some embodiments, the reagentgas delivery apparatus 104 may be a water delivery system configured to introduce water to supply hydrogen and oxygen atoms to theplasma reactor 106. - As discussed above, the amount of each of the process gases within the
plasma reactor 106 varies, and ratios of each of the different gases within theplasma reactor 106 can vary. In some embodiments, the ratio of the H2O vapor flow rate to the HBr chamber flow rate is greater than 2:1. In other embodiments, the ratio of the H2O vapor flow rate to the HBr chamber flow rate is greater than 5:1. In some embodiments, the ratio of the H2O vapor flow rate to Br2 byproduct gas is greater than 8:1. In other embodiments, the ratio of the H2O vapor flow rate to Br2 byproduct gas is greater than 15:1. In some embodiments, there can be higher amounts of H2O than F-GHGs gases, and vice versa. In other embodiments, there can be higher amounts of H2 and/or O2 than F-GHGs gases, and vice versa. Ratios of HBr and Cl2 can also be compared with the other gases in theplasma reactor 106. For example, in some embodiments, the ratio of the H2O vapor flow rate to Cl2 byproduct gas is greater than 8:1. In other embodiments, the ratio of the H2O vapor flow rate to Cl2 byproduct gas is greater than 15:1. In other embodiments, there can be substantially similar amounts of some of all of the gases within theplasma reactor 106. - In
block 206, RF power is applied to theplasma reactor 106. The RF power can be applied via aremote plasma source 107. In some embodiments, the amount of RF power applied may be about 4000 watts, although other amounts of RF power are also possible. Inoptional block 208, inert gases are delivered to theprocess system 100 via the inertgas delivery apparatus 108. - Embodiments described by
method 200 provide advantageous results compared to conventional abatement processes. For example, after performing themethod 200, the F-GHGs, such CF4 and SF6, are 95% abated. Additionally, Br2 emissions are reduced from theprocess chamber 102 by about 30 to 40% compared to conventional processes and Cl2 emissions are reduced from theprocess chamber 102 by about 90% compared to conventional processes. Therefore, lesser quantities of the damaging F-GHGs, Br2, and Cl2 gases exit theprocess system 100 when performing themethod 200. Reducing these potentially harmful emissions becomes even more important as greater amounts of HBr and Cl2 are used to etch larger substrates within theprocess chamber 102 during semiconductor processes. - While the foregoing is directed to implementations of the present invention, other and further implementations of the invention may be devised without departing from the basic scope thereof, and the scope thereof is determined by the claims that follow.
Claims (20)
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US18/077,087 US20230100659A1 (en) | 2019-02-22 | 2022-12-07 | Reduction of br2 and cl2 in semiconductor processes |
Applications Claiming Priority (4)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US201962808943P | 2019-02-22 | 2019-02-22 | |
| US201962840345P | 2019-04-29 | 2019-04-29 | |
| US16/793,983 US11551917B2 (en) | 2019-02-22 | 2020-02-18 | Reduction of Br2 and Cl2 in semiconductor processes |
| US18/077,087 US20230100659A1 (en) | 2019-02-22 | 2022-12-07 | Reduction of br2 and cl2 in semiconductor processes |
Related Parent Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| US16/793,983 Division US11551917B2 (en) | 2019-02-22 | 2020-02-18 | Reduction of Br2 and Cl2 in semiconductor processes |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| US20230100659A1 true US20230100659A1 (en) | 2023-03-30 |
Family
ID=72142725
Family Applications (2)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| US16/793,983 Active US11551917B2 (en) | 2019-02-22 | 2020-02-18 | Reduction of Br2 and Cl2 in semiconductor processes |
| US18/077,087 Pending US20230100659A1 (en) | 2019-02-22 | 2022-12-07 | Reduction of br2 and cl2 in semiconductor processes |
Family Applications Before (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| US16/793,983 Active US11551917B2 (en) | 2019-02-22 | 2020-02-18 | Reduction of Br2 and Cl2 in semiconductor processes |
Country Status (3)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (2) | US11551917B2 (en) |
| TW (2) | TW202037407A (en) |
| WO (1) | WO2020172179A1 (en) |
Citations (22)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US5137701A (en) * | 1984-09-17 | 1992-08-11 | Mundt Randall S | Apparatus and method for eliminating unwanted materials from a gas flow line |
| US5928426A (en) * | 1996-08-08 | 1999-07-27 | Novellus Systems, Inc. | Method and apparatus for treating exhaust gases from CVD, PECVD or plasma etch reactors |
| US6187072B1 (en) * | 1995-09-25 | 2001-02-13 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Method and apparatus for reducing perfluorocompound gases from substrate processing equipment emissions |
| US6194628B1 (en) * | 1995-09-25 | 2001-02-27 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Method and apparatus for cleaning a vacuum line in a CVD system |
| US6391146B1 (en) * | 2000-04-11 | 2002-05-21 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Erosion resistant gas energizer |
| US20020066535A1 (en) * | 1995-07-10 | 2002-06-06 | William Brown | Exhaust system for treating process gas effluent |
| US6673323B1 (en) * | 2000-03-24 | 2004-01-06 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Treatment of hazardous gases in effluent |
| US6888040B1 (en) * | 1996-06-28 | 2005-05-03 | Lam Research Corporation | Method and apparatus for abatement of reaction products from a vacuum processing chamber |
| US20080081130A1 (en) * | 2006-09-29 | 2008-04-03 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Treatment of effluent in the deposition of carbon-doped silicon |
| US20090018688A1 (en) * | 2007-06-15 | 2009-01-15 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Methods and systems for designing and validating operation of abatement systems |
| US20090238972A1 (en) * | 2008-03-24 | 2009-09-24 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for using reduced purity silane to deposit silicon |
| US20100071548A1 (en) * | 2005-10-27 | 2010-03-25 | The Boc Grop Plc | Method of Treating Gas |
| US20160077508A1 (en) * | 2014-09-12 | 2016-03-17 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Controller for treatment of semiconductor processing equipment effluent |
| US20170027049A1 (en) * | 2015-07-24 | 2017-01-26 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Method and apparatus for gas abatement |
| US20170301524A1 (en) * | 2016-04-13 | 2017-10-19 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Apparatus for exhaust cooling |
| US9997325B2 (en) * | 2008-07-17 | 2018-06-12 | Verity Instruments, Inc. | Electron beam exciter for use in chemical analysis in processing systems |
| US20190338419A1 (en) * | 2018-05-04 | 2019-11-07 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Apparatus for gaseous byproduct abatement and foreline cleaning |
| US20200041211A1 (en) * | 2018-07-31 | 2020-02-06 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Apparatus with multistaged cooling |
| US20200083029A1 (en) * | 2018-09-06 | 2020-03-12 | Tokyo Electron Limited | Substrate Processing Apparatus |
| US20200191488A1 (en) * | 2018-12-13 | 2020-06-18 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Heat exchanger with multistaged cooling |
| US20230377842A1 (en) * | 2021-02-18 | 2023-11-23 | Lot Ces Co., Ltd. | Inductively coupled plasma apparatus for exhaust gas treatment and impedance matching method thereof |
| US20240128065A1 (en) * | 2021-04-06 | 2024-04-18 | Lot Ces Co., Ltd. | Semiconductor manufacturing facility and method of operating the same |
Family Cites Families (11)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US6361706B1 (en) | 1999-08-13 | 2002-03-26 | Philips Electronics North America Corp. | Method for reducing the amount of perfluorocompound gas contained in exhaust emissions from plasma processing |
| US20080102011A1 (en) | 2006-10-27 | 2008-05-01 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Treatment of effluent containing chlorine-containing gas |
| US20100258510A1 (en) | 2009-04-10 | 2010-10-14 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for treating effluent |
| US20110023908A1 (en) * | 2009-07-30 | 2011-02-03 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for process abatement with recovery and reuse of abatement effluent |
| US8747762B2 (en) | 2009-12-03 | 2014-06-10 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for treating exhaust gas in a processing system |
| US8546234B2 (en) * | 2011-06-06 | 2013-10-01 | Nanya Technology Corporation | Semiconductor process |
| US9847225B2 (en) * | 2011-11-15 | 2017-12-19 | Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd. | Semiconductor device and method of manufacturing the same |
| WO2015134197A1 (en) | 2014-03-06 | 2015-09-11 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Plasma abatement of compounds containing heavy atoms |
| US9240308B2 (en) | 2014-03-06 | 2016-01-19 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Hall effect enhanced capacitively coupled plasma source, an abatement system, and vacuum processing system |
| WO2016099760A1 (en) * | 2014-12-16 | 2016-06-23 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Plasma abatement using water vapor in conjunction with hydrogen or hydrogen containing gases |
| CN110291611B (en) | 2017-02-09 | 2022-05-17 | 应用材料公司 | Plasma abatement technique using water vapor and oxygen reagents |
-
2020
- 2020-02-18 WO PCT/US2020/018665 patent/WO2020172179A1/en not_active Ceased
- 2020-02-18 US US16/793,983 patent/US11551917B2/en active Active
- 2020-02-21 TW TW109105597A patent/TW202037407A/en unknown
- 2020-02-21 TW TW113148082A patent/TW202521212A/en unknown
-
2022
- 2022-12-07 US US18/077,087 patent/US20230100659A1/en active Pending
Patent Citations (23)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US5137701A (en) * | 1984-09-17 | 1992-08-11 | Mundt Randall S | Apparatus and method for eliminating unwanted materials from a gas flow line |
| US20020066535A1 (en) * | 1995-07-10 | 2002-06-06 | William Brown | Exhaust system for treating process gas effluent |
| US6187072B1 (en) * | 1995-09-25 | 2001-02-13 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Method and apparatus for reducing perfluorocompound gases from substrate processing equipment emissions |
| US6194628B1 (en) * | 1995-09-25 | 2001-02-27 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Method and apparatus for cleaning a vacuum line in a CVD system |
| US6888040B1 (en) * | 1996-06-28 | 2005-05-03 | Lam Research Corporation | Method and apparatus for abatement of reaction products from a vacuum processing chamber |
| US5928426A (en) * | 1996-08-08 | 1999-07-27 | Novellus Systems, Inc. | Method and apparatus for treating exhaust gases from CVD, PECVD or plasma etch reactors |
| US6673323B1 (en) * | 2000-03-24 | 2004-01-06 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Treatment of hazardous gases in effluent |
| US6391146B1 (en) * | 2000-04-11 | 2002-05-21 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Erosion resistant gas energizer |
| US20100071548A1 (en) * | 2005-10-27 | 2010-03-25 | The Boc Grop Plc | Method of Treating Gas |
| US20080081130A1 (en) * | 2006-09-29 | 2008-04-03 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Treatment of effluent in the deposition of carbon-doped silicon |
| US20090018688A1 (en) * | 2007-06-15 | 2009-01-15 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Methods and systems for designing and validating operation of abatement systems |
| US20090238972A1 (en) * | 2008-03-24 | 2009-09-24 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for using reduced purity silane to deposit silicon |
| US9997325B2 (en) * | 2008-07-17 | 2018-06-12 | Verity Instruments, Inc. | Electron beam exciter for use in chemical analysis in processing systems |
| US20160077508A1 (en) * | 2014-09-12 | 2016-03-17 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Controller for treatment of semiconductor processing equipment effluent |
| US20170027049A1 (en) * | 2015-07-24 | 2017-01-26 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Method and apparatus for gas abatement |
| US20170301524A1 (en) * | 2016-04-13 | 2017-10-19 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Apparatus for exhaust cooling |
| US20190338419A1 (en) * | 2018-05-04 | 2019-11-07 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Apparatus for gaseous byproduct abatement and foreline cleaning |
| US20200041211A1 (en) * | 2018-07-31 | 2020-02-06 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Apparatus with multistaged cooling |
| US20200083029A1 (en) * | 2018-09-06 | 2020-03-12 | Tokyo Electron Limited | Substrate Processing Apparatus |
| US11081321B2 (en) * | 2018-09-06 | 2021-08-03 | Tokyo Electron Limited | Substrate processing apparatus |
| US20200191488A1 (en) * | 2018-12-13 | 2020-06-18 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Heat exchanger with multistaged cooling |
| US20230377842A1 (en) * | 2021-02-18 | 2023-11-23 | Lot Ces Co., Ltd. | Inductively coupled plasma apparatus for exhaust gas treatment and impedance matching method thereof |
| US20240128065A1 (en) * | 2021-04-06 | 2024-04-18 | Lot Ces Co., Ltd. | Semiconductor manufacturing facility and method of operating the same |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| WO2020172179A1 (en) | 2020-08-27 |
| US20200273682A1 (en) | 2020-08-27 |
| US11551917B2 (en) | 2023-01-10 |
| TW202521212A (en) | 2025-06-01 |
| TW202037407A (en) | 2020-10-16 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| KR102510935B1 (en) | Apparatus for reducing gaseous by-products and foreline cleaning | |
| US6689252B1 (en) | Abatement of hazardous gases in effluent | |
| JP7021237B2 (en) | Plasma mitigation technology using water vapor and oxygen reactants | |
| US6673323B1 (en) | Treatment of hazardous gases in effluent | |
| CN109155233B (en) | Plasma abatement solids avoidance method using oxygen plasma cleaning cycle | |
| JP2018502451A (en) | Plasma mitigation using water vapor with hydrogen or hydrogen-containing gas | |
| KR100505065B1 (en) | Method for deposition chamber cleaning and apparatus for depositing capable of in-situ cleaning | |
| CN101410167A (en) | Method of treating a gas stream | |
| US20180221816A1 (en) | Plasma abatement of nitrous oxide from semiconductor process effluents | |
| WO2007086283A1 (en) | Apparatus for treating exhaust gas | |
| US20230100659A1 (en) | Reduction of br2 and cl2 in semiconductor processes | |
| US20160276179A1 (en) | Nitrogen oxide abatement in semiconductor fabrication | |
| KR20200080525A (en) | Plasma technology-based smart storage systems and storage methods | |
| JP2007021290A (en) | Exhaust gas treatment method and treatment apparatus | |
| US20250121321A1 (en) | System and method of abating residual effluent gases | |
| KR20260002287A (en) | plasma treatment device | |
| KR20190109210A (en) | Method for operating the hybrid scrubber while deposition process and cleaning process are interlocked | |
| JP5221842B2 (en) | Exhaust gas treatment method | |
| Suzuki et al. | High-Efficiency PFC Abatement System Utilizing Plasma Decomposition and Ca (OH) $ _ {2} $/CaO Immobilization | |
| JP2005026409A (en) | Process chamber cleaning method and substrate processing apparatus | |
| JP2006116424A (en) | Processing method of harmful component gas | |
| CN101400875B (en) | Method and apparatus for improved operation of an abatement system | |
| JP2006205121A (en) | Exhaust gas removal method and system, and electronic device manufacturing system | |
| JP2000026106A (en) | Method and apparatus for producing reactive fluorinated gas, and method and apparatus for surface treatment | |
| Suzuki et al. | High-Efficiency PFC Abatement System Utilizing High-Efficiency PFC |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: DOCKETED NEW CASE - READY FOR EXAMINATION |
|
| AS | Assignment |
Owner name: APPLIED MATERIALS, INC., CALIFORNIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:VAN GOMPEL, JOSEPH;L'HEUREUX, JAMES;REEL/FRAME:062330/0669 Effective date: 20200427 Owner name: APPLIED MATERIALS, INC., CALIFORNIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:VAN GOMPEL, JOSEPH;L'HEUREUX, JAMES;REEL/FRAME:062330/0669 Effective date: 20200427 |
|
| STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION COUNTED, NOT YET MAILED |
|
| STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED |
|
| STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: RESPONSE TO NON-FINAL OFFICE ACTION ENTERED AND FORWARDED TO EXAMINER |
|
| STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: FINAL REJECTION COUNTED, NOT YET MAILED |
|
| STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: FINAL REJECTION MAILED |