US20220032575A1

US20220032575A1 - Liquid crystal polymer film and laminate comprising the same

Info

Publication number: US20220032575A1
Application number: US17/502,213
Authority: US
Inventors: An-Pang Tu; Chia-Hung Wu; Chien-Chun CHEN
Original assignee: Chang Chun Plastics Co Ltd
Current assignee: Chang Chun Plastics Co Ltd
Priority date: 2019-12-23
Filing date: 2021-10-15
Publication date: 2022-02-03
Also published as: TW202124678A; JP2021098832A; JP7372898B2; KR102197515B9; US20210189075A1; US12103285B2; JP2021098842A; CN113096900A; JP6804673B1; KR102197515B1; TWI697549B

Abstract

Provided are a liquid crystal polymer (LCP) film and a laminate comprising the same. The LCP film has a first surface and a second surface opposite each other, and a ratio of a ten-point mean roughness relative to a maximum height (Rz/Ry) of the first surface is from 0.30 to 0.62. By controlling Rz/Ry of at least one surface of the LCP film, the peel strength of the LCP film stacked to a metal foil can be increased, and the laminate comprising the same can still maintain the merit of low insertion loss.

Description

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/748,846, filed Jan. 22, 2020, which claims the benefit of Taiwan Patent Application No. 108147226, filed Dec. 23, 2019, each of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention

The present application relates to a polymer film for a laminate, more particularly to a liquid crystal polymer (LCP) film and a laminate comprising the same.

2. Description of the Prior Arts

The rapid development of mobile communication technology has pushed the telecom industry to actively develop the fifth generation mobile networks, abbreviated as 5G, so as to optimize the performances, such as the data transmission rate, the response time, and the system capacity, etc. of the fourth generation mobile networks (4G).
Since 5G communication technology uses high-frequency bands for signal transmission, the higher the frequency of the signal, the greater the insertion loss. In order to achieve signal transmission using high-frequency bands, it has been known that an LCP film with low dielectric properties can be chosen to match a metal foil, and they are used to produce a laminate so as to decrease dielectric loss of the signal transmission.
However, the interfacial adhesion between the LCP film and a metal foil is generally insufficient, so components on a circuit board are prone to be detached and thus subsequent lamination processes will be seriously adversely affected. Therefore, the peel strength between the LCP film and the metal foil of conventional laminates still needs improvement in order to develop a laminate that is suitable for 5G products.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

To overcome the shortcomings, the objective of the present application is to enhance the peel strength between an LCP film and a metal foil.
To achieve the aforementioned objective, one aspect of the present application provides an LCP film. The LCP film has a first surface and a second surface opposite each other, and a ratio of a ten-point mean roughness relative to a maximum height (Rz/Ry) of the first surface may be more than or equal to 0.30 and less than or equal to 0.62.
By controlling the Rz/Ry property of either surface (e.g., the first surface) of the LCP film, the adhesion of the LCP film stacked to the metal foil can be increased, thereby enhancing the peel strength between the LCP film and the metal foil. Therefore, the problem such as wire detachment during subsequent processing of a laminate can be avoided.
In accordance with the present application, in terms of the second surface of the LCP film, Rz/Ry thereof may also be more than or equal to 0.30 and less than or equal to 0.62. Herein, regardless of whether the LCP film of the present application is laminated with at least one metal foil through either or both of the first surface and the second surface, the LCP film can possess superior adhesion to the at least one metal foil, thus improving the peel strength between the LCP film and the at least one metal foil. Preferably, Rz/Ry of the first surface and/or Rz/Ry of the second surface of the LCP film of the present application may also be more than or equal to 0.36 and less than or equal to 0.61. In one of the embodiments, Rz/Ry of the first surface and Rz/Ry of the second surface of the LCP film of the present application may be the same or different. In one of the embodiments, Rz/Ry of the first surface and Rz/Ry of the second surface of the LCP film of the present application both fall within the aforementioned ranges.
In accordance with the present application, Rz of the first surface of the LCP film may be less than or equal to 2 micrometers (μm). Preferably, Rz of the first surface of the LCP film of the present application may be less than or equal to 1.5 μm; more preferably, Rz of the first surface of the LCP film of the present application may be more than or equal to 0.3 μm and less than or equal to 1.5 μm; even more preferably, Rz of the first surface of the LCP film of the present application may be more than or equal to 0.3 μm and less than or equal to 1.4 μm; still more preferably, Rz of the first surface of the LCP film of the present application may be more than or equal to 0.3 μm and less than or equal to 1.3 μm; yet still more preferably, Rz of the first surface of the LCP film of the present application may be more than or equal to 0.35 μm and less than or equal to 1.2 μm; even further preferably, Rz of the first surface of the LCP film of the present application may be more than or equal to 0.39 μm and less than or equal to 1.2 μm. In one of the embodiments, Rz of the first surface and Rz of the second surface of the LCP film of the present application may be the same or different. In one of the embodiments, Rz of the first surface and Rz of the second surface of the LCP film of the present application both fall within the aforementioned ranges.
In accordance with the present application, Ry of the first surface of the LCP film may be less than or equal to 2.2 μm. In one of the embodiments, Ry of the first surface of the LCP film of the present application may be less than or equal to 2.0 μm; preferably, Ry of the first surface of the LCP film of the present application may be more than or equal to 0.5 μm and less than or equal to 1.8 μm; more preferably, Ry of the first surface of the LCP film of the present application may be more than or equal to 0.6 μm and less than or equal to 1.6 μm. In one of the embodiments, Ry of the first surface and Ry of the second surface of the LCP film of the present application may be the same or different. In one of the embodiments, Ry of the first surface and Ry of the second surface of the LCP film of the present application both fall within the aforementioned ranges.
Preferably, arithmetic average roughness (Ra) of the first surface of the LCP film of the present application may be less than or equal to 0.09 μm. Herein, applying the LCP film to a laminate can significantly decrease the insertion loss, so that the laminate comprising the LCP film is highly suitable for high-end 5G products.
More preferably, Ra of the first surface of the LCP film of the present application may be more than or equal to 0.02 μm and less than or equal to 0.08 ion; even more preferably, Ra of the first surface may be more than or equal to 0.02 μm and less than or equal to 0.07 μm; still more preferably, Ra of the first surface may be more than or equal to 0.02 μm and less than or equal to 0.06 μm. By means of decreasing Ra of the first surface of the LCP film, the insertion loss of the laminate including the LCP film is further reduced, so that the laminate is highly suitable for high-end 5G products. In one of the embodiments, Ra of the first surface and Ra of the second surface of the LCP film of the present application may be the same or different. In one of the embodiments, Ra of the first surface and Ra of the second surface of the LCP film of the present application both fall within the aforementioned ranges.
In accordance with the present application, the LCP film may be produced by an LCP resin, which is commercially available or made from conventional raw materials. In the present application, the LCP resin is not particularly restricted. For example, aromatic or aliphatic hydroxy compounds such as hydroquinone, resorcin, 2,6-naphthalenediol, ethanediol, 1,4-butanediol, and 1,6-hexanediol; aromatic or aliphatic dicarboxylic acids such as terephthalic acid, isophthalic acid, 2,6-naphthalenedicarboxylic acid, 2-chloroterephthalic acid, and adipic acid; aromatic hydroxy carboxylic acids such as 3-hydroxybenzoic acid, 4-hydroxybenzoic acid, 6-hydroxy-2-naphthalenecarboxylic acid, and 4′-hydroxy-4-biphenylcarboxylic acid; aromatic amine compounds such as p-phenylenediamine, 4,4′-diaminobiphenyl, naphthalene-2,6-diamine, 4-aminophenol, 4-amino-3-methylphenol, and 4-aminobenzoic acid may be used as raw materials to prepare the LCP resin, and the LCP resin is then used to prepare the LCP film of the present application. In one of the embodiments of the present application, 6-hydroxy-2-naphthalenecarboxylic acid, 4-hydroxybenzoic acid, and acetyl anhydride (also called acetic anhydride) may be chosen to obtain the LCP resin, which can be used to prepare the LCP film of the present application. In one of the embodiments, the melting point of the LCP resin may be about 250° C. to 360° C.
In one of the embodiments, a person having ordinary knowledge in the art may add additives such as, but not limited to, lubricants, antioxidants, electrical insulating agents, or fillers during preparation of the LCP film of the present application based on different needs. For example, the applicable additives may be, but are not limited to, polycarbonate, polyamide, polyphenylene sulfide, polyetheretherketone, etc.
In accordance with the present application, the thickness of the LCP film is not particularly restricted. For example, the thickness of the LCP film may be more than or equal to 10 μm and less than or equal to 500 μm; preferably, the thickness of the LCP film of the present application may be more than or equal to 10 μm and less than or equal to 300 μm; more preferably, the thickness of the LCP film of the present application may be more than or equal to 15 μm and less than or equal to 250 μm; even more preferably, the thickness of the LCP film of the present application may be more than or equal to 20 μm and less than or equal to 200 μm.
To achieve the aforementioned objective, another aspect of the present application also provides a laminate, which comprises a first metal foil and the LCP film. The first metal foil is disposed over the first surface of the LCP film.
In one of the embodiments, the laminate of the present application may further comprise a second metal foil, which is disposed over the second surface of the LCP film, i.e., the LCP film of the present application is sandwiched between the first metal foil and the second metal foil. In this embodiment, when the Rz/Ry properties of both of the first surface and the second surface the LCP film are controlled at the same time, the adhesion of the LCP film stacked to the first metal foil and the adhesion of the LCP film stacked to the second metal foils are improved simultaneously, and thus the peel strength between the LCP film and the first metal foil as well as the peel strength between the LCP film and the second metal foil are enhanced.
In accordance with the present application, “stacking” is not limited to direct contact; further, it also includes indirect contact. For example, in one of the embodiments of the present application, the first metal foil and the LCP film in the laminate are stacked with each other in a direct contact manner, that is, the first metal foil is disposed on and in direct contact with the first surface of the LCP film. In another embodiment of the present application, the first metal foil and the LCP film in the laminate are stacked with each other in an indirect contact manner, that is, the first metal foil is disposed above the LCP film, and the first metal foil and the LCP film are stacked with each other in an indirect contact manner. For example, a connection layer may be disposed between the first metal foil and the LCP film based on different needs, so that the first metal foil contacts the first surface of the LCP film via the connection layer. The material of the connection layer may be adjusted according to different needs to provide corresponding functions. For example, the material of the connection layer may include nickel, cobalt, chromium, or alloys thereof to provide functions such as thermal resistance, chemical resistance, or electrical resistance. Similarly, the second metal foil and the LCP film in the laminate may also be stacked with each other in direct contact or indirect contact. In one of the embodiments of the present application, the stacking manner for the LCP film and the first metal foil and the one for the LCP film and the second metal foil may be the same or different.
In accordance with the present application, the first metal foil and/or the second metal foil may be, but are not limited to, copper foil, gold foil, silver foil, nickel foil, aluminum foil, stainless steel foil, etc. In one of the embodiments, the first metal foil and the second metal foil are made of different materials. Preferably, the first metal foil and/or the second metal foil may be copper foil, so that the copper foil and the LCP film are stacked to form a copper clad laminate (CCL). In addition, the manufacturing method of the first metal foil and/or the manufacturing method of the second metal foil are not particularly restricted, as long as the methods do not violate the objective of the present application. For example, the metal foil may be produced by, but not limited to, a roll-to-roll method or an electrodeposition method.
In accordance with the present application, the thickness of the first metal foil and/or the second metal foil is not particularly restricted and can be adjusted based on different needs by a person having ordinary knowledge in the art. For example, in one of the embodiments, the thickness of the first metal foil and/or the second metal foil may independently be more than or equal to 1 μm and less than or equal to 200 μm; preferably, the thickness of the first metal foil and/or the second metal foil may independently be more than or equal to 1 μm and less than or equal to 40 μm; more preferably, the thickness of the first metal foil and/or the second metal foil may independently be more than or equal to 1 μm and less than or equal to 20 μm; even more preferably, the thickness of the first metal foil and/or the second metal foil may independently be more than or equal to 3 μm and less than or equal to 20 μm.
In accordance with the present application, surface treatments of the first metal foil and/or the second metal foil of the present application can be conducted based on different needs by a person having ordinary knowledge in the art. For example, the surface treatments may be selected from, but not limited to, roughening treatments, acid-base treatments, thermal treatments, degreasing treatments, ultraviolet irradiation treatments, corona discharge treatments, plasma treatments, primer coating treatments, etc.
In accordance with the present application, the roughness of the first metal foil and/or the second metal foil is not particularly restricted and can be adjusted according to different needs by a person having ordinary knowledge in the art. In one of the embodiments, Rz of the first metal foil and/or Rz of the second metal foil may independently be more than or equal to 0.1 μm and less than or equal to 2.0 μm; preferably, Rz of the first metal foil and/or Rz of the second metal foil may independently be more than or equal to 0.1 μm and less than or equal to 1.5 μm. In one of the embodiments, Rz of the first metal foil and Rz of the second metal foil may be the same or different. In one of the embodiments, Rz of the first metal foil and Rz of the second metal foil both fall within the aforementioned ranges.
In one of the embodiments, a third metal foil may be additionally provided based on different needs by a person having ordinary knowledge in the art. The third metal foil may be the same or different from the first metal foil and/or the second metal foil. In one of the embodiments, Rz of the third metal foil may fall within the aforementioned ranges of Rz of the first metal foil and/or Rz of the second metal foil.
In one of the embodiments, the laminate may comprise multiple LCP films. Based on the premise of not violating the spirit of the present application, multiple LCP films of the present application and multiple metal foils, such as the aforesaid first metal foil, second metal foil, and/or third metal foil, may be stacked based on different needs to produce a laminate having the multiple LCP films and the multiple metal foils by a person having ordinary knowledge in the art.
In the specification, the terms “ten-point mean roughness (Rz)”, “maximum height (Ry)”, and “arithmetic average roughness (Ra)” are defined according to JIS B 0601:1994.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

Hereinafter, multiple preparation examples are provided to illustrate raw materials used to produce the LCP film of the present application. Multiple examples are further provided to illustrate the implementation of the LCP film and the laminate of the present application, while multiple comparative examples are provided as comparison. A person skilled in the art can easily realize the advantages and effects of the present application from the following examples and comparative examples. The descriptions proposed herein are just preferable embodiments for the purpose of illustrations only, not intended to limit the scope of the present application. Various modifications and variations could be made in order to practice or apply the present application without departing from the spirit and scope of the present application.
<LCP Resin>

Preparation Example 1: LCP Resin

A mixture of 6-hydroxy-2-naphthalenecarboxylic acid (700 g), 4-hydroxybenzoic acid (954 g), acetyl anhydride (1085 g), and sodium phosphite (1.3 g) was charged into a 3-liter autoclave and stirred for acetylation at 160° C. for about 2 hours under nitrogen atmosphere at normal pressure. Subsequently, the mixture was heated to 320° C. at a rate of 30° C. per hour, and then under this temperature condition, the pressure was reduced slowly from 760 torr to 3 torr or below, and the temperature was increased from 320° C. to 340° C. Afterwards, the stirring power and the pressure were increased, and steps of discharging polymers, drawing strands, and cutting strands into pellets were conducted to obtain an LCP resin having a melting point about 265° C. and a viscosity about 60 pascal-seconds (Pa·s) measured at 300° C. (hereinafter referred to as @300° C.).

Preparation Example 2: LCP Resin

A mixture of 6-hydroxy-2-naphthalenecarboxylic acid (440 g), 4-hydroxybenzoic acid (1145 g), acetyl anhydride (1085 g), and sodium phosphite (1.3 g) was charged into a 3-liter autoclave and stirred for acetylation at 160° C. for about 2 hours under nitrogen atmosphere at normal pressure. Subsequently, the mixture was heated to 320° C. at a rate of 30° C. per hour, and then under this temperature condition, the pressure was reduced slowly from 760 torr to 3 torr or below, and the temperature was increased from 320° C. to 340° C. Afterwards, the stirring power and the pressure were increased, and steps of discharging polymers, drawing strands, and cutting strands into pellets were conducted to obtain an LCP resin having a melting point about 305° C. and a viscosity about 40 Pa·s @300° C.

Preparation Example 3: LCP Resin

A mixture of 6-hydroxy-2-naphthalenecarboxylic acid (540 g), 4-hydroxybenzoic acid (1071 g), acetyl anhydride (1086 g), sodium phosphite (1.3 g), and 1-methylimidazole (0.3 g) was charged into a 3-liter autoclave and stirred for acetylation at 160° C. for about 2 hours under nitrogen atmosphere at normal pressure. Subsequently, the mixture was heated to 320° C. at a rate of 30° C. per hour, and then under this temperature condition, the pressure was reduced slowly from 760 torr to equal to or less than 3 torr or below, and the temperature was increased from 320° C. to 340° C. Afterwards, the stirring power and the pressure were increased, and steps of discharging polymers, drawing strands, and cutting strands into pellets were conducted to obtain an LCP resin having a melting point about 278° C. and a viscosity about 45 Pa·s @300° C.
LCP Film

Examples 1 to 13 and Comparative Examples 1 to 5: LCP Film

The LCP resin obtained from Preparation Examples 1 to 3 (PE1 to PE3) was used as raw materials to prepare LCP films of Examples 1 to 13 (E1 to E13) and Comparative Examples 1 to 5 (C1 to C5) by the methods described below.
First, the LCP resin was put into an extruder having a screw diameter of 27 millimeters (mm) (manufacturer: Leistritz, model: ZSE27) and heated to a temperature ranging from 300° C. to 320° C., and then extruded from a T-die of a width of 500 mm with a feeding speed ranging from 3.5 kilograms per hour (kg/hr) to 10 kg/hr. The LCP resin was then delivered to a space between two casting wheels having a temperature ranging from about 250° C. to 320° C. and a diameter ranging from about 35 centimeters (cm) to 45 cm, extruded with a force about 20 kilonewtons (kN) to 60 kN, and then transferred to a cooling wheel for cooling at room temperature to obtain an LCP film having a thickness of 50 μm. Herein, the casting wheels were spaced about 1 mm to 50 mm from the T-die.
The processes of Examples 1 to 13 differ from those of Comparative Examples 1 to 5 in the kind of the LCP resin, the distance from the T-die to the surfaces of the casting wheels, the feeding speed, and the extrusion temperature. The parameters of Examples 1 to 13 and Comparative Examples 1 to 5 are respectively listed in Table 1 below.

TABLE 1

parameters of LCP films of Examples 1 to 13 and
Comparative Examples 1 to 5

Parameters

Sam-		Distance from	Feeding	Extrusion
ple	LCP	T-die to casting	Speed	Temp.
No.	Resin	wheels (mm)	(kg/hr)	(° C.)

E1	PE1	20	7.5	310
E2	PE1	20	7.5	315
E3	PE1	20	7.5	320
E4	PE1	20	6.5	290
E5	PE1	20	8.5	310
E6	PE1	20	8.5	315
E7	PE1	20	8.5	320
E8	PE1	20	5.5	310
E9	PE2	20	5.5	315
E10	PE3	20	5.5	320
E11	PE1	20	6.5	310
E12	PE2	20	6.5	315
E13	PE3	20	6.5	320
C1	PE1	20	7.5	300
C2	PE1	20	8.5	290
C3	PE1	5	6.5	310
C4	PE1	5	5.5	320
C5	PE1	5	7.5	315

The above-mentioned preparation method of LCP film is only used to exemplify implementation of the present application. A person having ordinary knowledge in the art may also use conventional methods such as a laminate extension method and an inflation method to prepare an LCP film.
In one of the embodiments, after the LCP resin was extruded from the T-die, the LCP resin might be delivered with two high-temperature resistant films to a space between two casting wheels to form a three-layered laminate based on needs by a person having ordinary knowledge in the art. The two high-temperature resistant films were detached from the LCP resin at room temperature to obtain the LCP film of the present application. The high-temperature resistant film may be selected from, but not limited to, poly(tetrafluoroethene) (PTFE) film, polyimide (PI) film, and poly(ether sulfone) (PES) film.
In addition, post treatments for the obtained LCP film may be conducted based on different needs by a person having ordinary knowledge in the art. The post treatments may be, but are not limited to, polishing, ultraviolet irradiation, plasma, etc. For the plasma treatment, it may be applied with a plasma operated with a power of 1 kW under nitrogen, oxygen, or air atmosphere at a reduced or normal pressure based on different needs, but is not limited thereto.

Test Example 1: Roughness of LCP Films

In this test example, the LCP films of Examples 1 to 13 and Comparative Examples 1 to 5 were used as test samples. The surface morphology images of the test samples were each taken using a laser microscope (manufacturer: Olympus, model: LEXT OLS5000-SAF, objective lens: MPLAPON-50×LEXT) with an objective lens having a magnification power of 50×, 1× optical zoom, and a 405 nanometers (nm) wavelength of light source at a temperature of 24±3° C. and a relative humidity of 63±3%. Ra, Ry, and Rz of either surface of the test samples were measured according to JIS B 0601:1994 using an evaluation length of 4 mm and a cutoff value (λc) of 0.8 mm. The results of the test samples are listed in Table 2 below.

Examples 1A to 13A: Laminates

Laminates of Examples 1A to 13A (E1A to E13A) and Comparative Examples 1A to 5A (C1A to C5A) were produced from the LCP films of Examples 1 to 13 as well as Comparative Examples 1 to 5 and commercially available copper foils. The product descriptions of the commercially available copper foils are provided as follows:
Copper foil 1: CF-T49A-HD2, purchased from FUKUDA METAL FOIL & POWDER CO., LTD., Rz: about 1.2 μm;
Copper foil 2: CF-H9A-HD2, purchased from FUKUDA METAL FOIL & POWDER CO., LTD., Rz: about 1.0 μm;
Copper foil 3: 3EC-M2S-HTE-SP2, purchased from MITSUI MINING & SMELTING CO., LTD., Rz: about 1.1 μm; and
Copper foil 4: TQ-M7-VSP, purchased from MITSUI MINING & SMELTING CO., LTD., Rz: about 1.1 μm.
The kind of the LCP film and the kind of the copper foil used for each of the laminates of Examples 1A to 13A and Comparative Examples 1A to 5A were listed in Table 2, and each of the laminates was produced as follows.
The LCP film having a thickness about 50 μm and two identical copper foils each having a thickness about 12 μm were each first cut to size of 20 cm*20 cm. The LCP film was then sandwiched between the two copper foils to form a laminated structure. The laminated structure was subjected to a pressure of 5 kilograms per square centimeter (kg/cm²) for 60 seconds at 180° C., followed by a pressure of 20 kg/cm²for 25 minutes (min) at 300° C., and then cooled to room temperature to obtain a laminate.
Herein, the lamination method for the laminates is not particularly restricted. A person having ordinary knowledge in the art may use conventional techniques such as a wire lamination or a surface lamination to conduct the lamination process. A laminator applicable to the present application may be, but is not limited to, an intermittent hot-press machine, a roll-to-roll wheeling machine, a double belt press machine, etc. According to different needs, a person having ordinary knowledge in the art can also align the LCP film with the copper foils to form a laminated structure, which may then be processed with surface lamination comprising a heating step and a pressing step.
In another embodiment, a metal foil, such as a copper foil, on an LCP film may be formed through sputtering, electroplating, chemical plating, evaporation deposition, etc. based on different needs by a person having ordinary knowledge in the art. Or, a connection layer, such as a glue layer, a nickel layer, a cobalt layer, a chromium layer, or an alloy layer thereof, may be formed between an LCP film and a metal foil based on different needs by a person having ordinary knowledge in the art.

Test Example 2: Peel Strength of Laminates

The peel strength of the laminates was measured according to IPC-TM-650 No.: 2.4.9. The laminates of Examples 1A to 13A and Comparative Examples 1A to 5A were each cut to size of a length about 228.6 mm and a width about 3.2 mm as etched specimens. Each etched specimen was placed at a temperature of 23±2° C. and a relative humidity of 50±5% for 24 hours to reach stabilization. Subsequently, each etched specimen was adhered to a clamp of a testing machine (manufacturer: Hung Ta Instrument Co., Ltd., model: HT-9102) with a double faced adhesive tape. Each etched specimen was then peeled from the clamp with a force at a peel speed of 50.8 mm/min, and the value of the force during the peeling process was continuously recorded. Herein, the force should be controlled within a range of 15% to 85% of the bearable force of the testing machine, the peeling distance from the clamp should be at least more than 57.2 mm, and the force for the initial distance of 6.4 mm was neglected and not recorded. The results are shown in Table 2.

TABLE 2

roughness of LCP films of Examples 1 to 13 and Comparative
Examples 1 to 5, and sample number of copper foil and peel strength of
laminates of Examples 1A to 13A and Comparative Examples 1A to 5A

LCP Film

Laminate

Sample		Ra	Rz	Sample	Copper Foil	Peel Strength
No.	Rz/Ry	(μm)	(μm)	No.	No.	(kN/m)

E1	0.483	0.029	0.506	E1A	Copper Foil 1	0.68
E2	0.548	0.034	0.534	E2A	Copper Foil 1	0.60
E3	0.606	0.041	0.826	E3A	Copper Foil 1	0.58
E4	0.422	0.092	0.793	E4A	Copper Foil 1	0.70
E5	0.361	0.057	1.186	ESA	Copper Foil 2	1.44
E6	0.476	0.026	0.390	E6A	Copper Foil 2	1.38
E7	0.553	0.036	0.735	E7A	Copper Foil 2	1.30
E8	0.492	0.031	0.856	E8A	Copper Foil 3	0.53
E9	0.532	0.032	0.547	E9A	Copper Foil 3	0.48
E10	0.566	0.033	0.602	E10A	Copper Foil 3	0.45
E11	0.495	0.037	0.864	E11A	Copper Foil 4	0.83
E12	0.530	0.035	0.609	E12A	Copper Foil 4	0.85
E13	0.567	0.037	0.591	E13A	Copper Foil 4	0.78
C1	0.829	0.088	1.562	C1A	Copper Foil 1	0.56
C2	0.896	0.122	1.839	C2A	Copper Foil 1	0.53
C3	0.685	0.043	0.717	C3A	Copper Foil 1	0.52
C4	0.632	0.057	1.049	C4A	Copper Foil 1	0.50
C5	0.814	0.034	0.442	C5A	Copper Foil 2	1.18

Test Example 3: Insertion Loss of Laminates

The laminates of Examples 1A to 13A and Comparative Examples 1A to 5A were each cut to size of a length about 100 mm, a width about 140 mm, and a resistance about 50 Ohm (Ω) as strip line specimens. The insertion loss of the strip line specimens was measured under 10 GHz by a microwave network analyzer (manufacturer: Agilent Technologies, Ltd., model: 8722ES) including a probe (manufacturer: Cascade Microtech, model: ACP40-250).
The LCP films of Examples 1 to 7 as well as Comparative Examples 1 to 5 were chosen as examples to laminate with the commercially available copper foils, the laminates of Examples 1A to 7A and Comparative Examples 1A to 5A were prepared to evaluate insertion loss, and the results are listed in Table 3 below.

TABLE 3

descriptions of LCP films and copper foils used for laminates of
Examples 1A to 7A and Comparative Examples 1A to 5A and
insertion loss of the laminates

Laminate

LCP Film

Insertion

Sample		Ra	Rz	Sample	Copper Foil	Loss
No.	Rz/Ry	(μm)	(μm)	No.	No.	(dB)

E1	0.483	0.029	0.506	E1A	Copper Foil 1	−2.9
E2	0.548	0.034	0.534	E2A	Copper Foil 1	−2.9
E3	0.606	0.041	0.826	E3A	Copper Foil 1	−2.9
E4	0.422	0.092	0.793	E4A	Copper Foil 1	−3.1
E5	0.361	0.057	1.186	E5A	Copper Foil 2	−2.9
E6	0.476	0.026	0.390	E6A	Copper Foil 2	−2.8
E7	0.553	0.036	0.735	E7A	Copper Foil 2	−2.9
C1	0.829	0.088	1.562	C1A	Copper Foil 1	−3.1
C2	0.896	0.122	1.839	C2A	Copper Foil 1	−3.1
C3	0.685	0.043	0.717	C3A	Copper Foil 1	−3.0
C4	0.632	0.057	1.049	C4A	Copper Foil 1	−2.9
C5	0.814	0.034	0.442	C5A	Copper Foil 2	−2.9

Discussion on Test Results
As shown in Table 2 above, Rz/Ry of either surface of the LCP film of each of Examples 1 to 13 was controlled within the range between more than or equal to 0.30 and less than or equal to 0.62, so the laminates (Examples 1A to 13A) produced from such LCP films and various commercially available copper foils with low roughness all exhibited high peel strength. In addition, as shown in Table 3 above, take the results of Examples 1A to 7A as examples, when Rz/Ry of either surface of the LCP films was controlled within the range between more than or equal to 0.30 and less than or equal to 0.62, the insertion loss of the laminates of Examples 1A to 7A was modulated to be −3.1 dB or less.
The results of Table 2 were further analyzed. For laminates having Copper foil 1, the laminates with the LCP films of Examples 1 to 4 all exhibited higher peel strength than the ones with the LCP films of Comparative Examples 1 to 4. Similarly, for laminates having Copper foil 2, the laminates with the LCP films of Examples 5 to 7 all exhibited higher peel strength than the one with LCP film of Comparative Example 5. Clearly, the peel strength of the laminates produced from the LCP films of the present application is certainly improved, so the laminates are suitable for processing and problems of component detachment will be effectively avoided.
Furthermore, from the test results of the laminates of Examples 1A to 7A, when either surface of the LCP film has Rz/Ry of more than or equal to 0.30 and less than or equal to 0.62 as well as Ra of less than or equal to 0.09, the peel strength of the laminates (Examples 1A to 3A and 5A to 7A) having the LCP film and copper foils was enhanced, and the insertion loss of the laminates was further reduced to −2.9 dB or less. Thus, the laminates that exhibited high peel strength as well as low insertion loss were provided.
In summary, by controlling Rz/Ry of at least one surface of the LCP film that is more than or equal to 0.30 and less than or equal to 0.62, the peel strength of the LCP film stacked to metal foils can be specifically improved. In addition, by controlling Ra and Rz/Ry of at least one surface of the LCP film, the laminate having the LCP film not only has improved peel strength but also has reduced insertion loss. Therefore, the laminate of the present application is highly suitable for high-end 5G products.
Even though numerous characteristics and advantages of the present application have been set forth in the foregoing description, together with details of the structure and features of the present application, the disclosure is illustrative only. Changes may be made in the details, especially in matters of shape, size, and arrangement of parts within the principles of the present application to the full extent indicated by the broad general meaning of the terms in which the appended claims are expressed.

Claims

What is claimed is:

1. A liquid crystal polymer film, comprising a first surface and a second surface opposite each other, a ratio of a ten-point mean roughness relative to a maximum height of the first surface being more than or equal to 0.36 and less than or equal to 0.61, and the maximum height of the first surface being more than or equal to 1.1 μm and less than or equal to 2.2 μm.

2. The liquid crystal polymer film as claimed in claim 1, wherein an arithmetic average roughness of the first surface is less than or equal to 0.09 μm.

3. The liquid crystal polymer film as claimed in claim 2, wherein the arithmetic average roughness of the first surface is more than or equal to 0.02 μm and less than or equal to 0.08 μm.

4. The liquid crystal polymer film as claimed in claim 1, wherein the ten-point mean roughness of the first surface is less than or equal to 2 μm.

5. The liquid crystal polymer film as claimed in claim 4, wherein the ten-point mean roughness of the first surface is less than or equal to 1.5 μm.

6. The liquid crystal polymer film as claimed in claim 1, wherein the maximum height of the first surface is more than or equal to 1.6 μm and less than or equal to 2.2 μm.

7. The liquid crystal polymer film as claimed in claim 1, wherein a ratio of a ten-point mean roughness relative to a maximum height of the second surface is more than or equal to 0.30 and less than or equal to 0.62.

8. The liquid crystal polymer film as claimed in claim 2, wherein a ratio of a ten-point mean roughness relative to a maximum height of the second surface is more than or equal to 0.30 and less than or equal to 0.62.

9. The liquid crystal polymer film as claimed in claim 3, wherein a ratio of a ten-point mean roughness relative to a maximum height of the second surface is more than or equal to 0.30 and less than or equal to 0.62.

10. The liquid crystal polymer film as claimed in claim 4, wherein a ratio of a ten-point mean roughness relative to a maximum height of the second surface is more than or equal to 0.30 and less than or equal to 0.62.

11. The liquid crystal polymer film as claimed in claim 5, wherein a ratio of a ten-point mean roughness relative to a maximum height of the second surface is more than or equal to 0.30 and less than or equal to 0.62.

12. The liquid crystal polymer film as claimed in claim 6, wherein a ratio of a ten-point mean roughness relative to a maximum height of the second surface is more than or equal to 0.30 and less than or equal to 0.62.

13. The liquid crystal polymer film as claimed in claim 7, wherein an arithmetic average roughness of the second surface is less than or equal to 0.09 μm.

14. The liquid crystal polymer film as claimed in claim 8, wherein an arithmetic average roughness of the second surface is less than or equal to 0.09 μm.

15. The liquid crystal polymer film as claimed in claim 9, wherein an arithmetic average roughness of the second surface is less than or equal to 0.09 μm.

16. The liquid crystal polymer film as claimed in claim 10, wherein an arithmetic average roughness of the second surface is less than or equal to 0.09 μm.

17. The liquid crystal polymer film as claimed in claim 11, wherein an arithmetic average roughness of the second surface is less than or equal to 0.09 μm.

18. The liquid crystal polymer film as claimed in claim 12, wherein an arithmetic average roughness of the second surface is less than or equal to 0.09 μm.

19. A laminate, comprising a first metal foil and the liquid crystal polymer film as claimed in claim 1, the first metal foil disposed over the first surface of the liquid crystal polymer film.

20. The laminate as claimed in claim 19, wherein the laminate comprises a second metal foil, and the second metal foil is disposed over the second surface of the liquid crystal polymer film.