[go: up one dir, main page]

US20180187293A1 - Aluminum alloy plate having excellent moldability and bake hardening properties - Google Patents

Aluminum alloy plate having excellent moldability and bake hardening properties Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20180187293A1
US20180187293A1 US15/128,281 US201515128281A US2018187293A1 US 20180187293 A1 US20180187293 A1 US 20180187293A1 US 201515128281 A US201515128281 A US 201515128281A US 2018187293 A1 US2018187293 A1 US 2018187293A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
temperature
aluminum alloy
peak
exothermic
less
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US15/128,281
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Hisao Shishido
Katsushi Matsumoto
Yasuhiro Aruga
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Kobe Steel Ltd
Original Assignee
Kobe Steel Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Kobe Steel Ltd filed Critical Kobe Steel Ltd
Assigned to KABUSHIKI KAISHA KOBE SEIKO SHO (KOBE STEEL, LTD.) reassignment KABUSHIKI KAISHA KOBE SEIKO SHO (KOBE STEEL, LTD.) ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: ARUGA, YASUHIRO, MATSUMOTO, KATSUSHI, SHISHIDO, HISAO
Publication of US20180187293A1 publication Critical patent/US20180187293A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C21/00Alloys based on aluminium
    • C22C21/02Alloys based on aluminium with silicon as the next major constituent
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C21/00Alloys based on aluminium
    • C22C21/06Alloys based on aluminium with magnesium as the next major constituent
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C21/00Alloys based on aluminium
    • C22C21/06Alloys based on aluminium with magnesium as the next major constituent
    • C22C21/08Alloys based on aluminium with magnesium as the next major constituent with silicon
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22FCHANGING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF NON-FERROUS METALS AND NON-FERROUS ALLOYS
    • C22F1/00Changing the physical structure of non-ferrous metals or alloys by heat treatment or by hot or cold working
    • C22F1/04Changing the physical structure of non-ferrous metals or alloys by heat treatment or by hot or cold working of aluminium or alloys based thereon
    • C22F1/047Changing the physical structure of non-ferrous metals or alloys by heat treatment or by hot or cold working of aluminium or alloys based thereon of alloys with magnesium as the next major constituent
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22FCHANGING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF NON-FERROUS METALS AND NON-FERROUS ALLOYS
    • C22F1/00Changing the physical structure of non-ferrous metals or alloys by heat treatment or by hot or cold working
    • C22F1/04Changing the physical structure of non-ferrous metals or alloys by heat treatment or by hot or cold working of aluminium or alloys based thereon
    • C22F1/05Changing the physical structure of non-ferrous metals or alloys by heat treatment or by hot or cold working of aluminium or alloys based thereon of alloys of the Al-Si-Mg type, i.e. containing silicon and magnesium in approximately equal proportions

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to an Al—Mg—Si alloy sheet.
  • the aluminum alloy sheet referred to in the present invention means an aluminum alloy sheet that is a rolled sheet such as a hot rolled sheet or a cold rolled sheet and has been subjected to refining such as a solution heat treatment and a quenching treatment, but is not yet subjected to a press forming and a bake hardening treatment. Further, aluminum is hereinafter also referred to as Al.
  • an outer panel such as a hood, a fender, a door, a roof, or a trunk lid
  • an Al—Mg—Si-based AA or JIS 6000-series (hereinafter, also simply referred to as a 6000-series) aluminum alloy sheet as a thin and high strength aluminum alloy sheet, has been studied.
  • the 6000-series aluminum alloy sheet contains Si and Mg as essential components.
  • a 6000-series aluminum alloy with excess Si has a composition in which the Si/Mg mass ratio is 1 or greater, and has excellent age hardenability. Because of this, formability for press forming or bending into the outer panels of automobiles is secured by lowering the proof stress.
  • it has such bake hardenability (hereinafter referred to also as BH response) that it undergoes age hardening upon heating in an artificial aging (hardening) treatment performed at a relatively low temperature, such as the baking treatment of formed panels, and hence improves in proof stress, thereby ensuring the strength required as a panel.
  • an outer panel of an automobile is manufactured by applying combined formings, such as stretch forming or bending forming in press forming, to an aluminum alloy sheet.
  • combined formings such as stretch forming or bending forming in press forming
  • the shape of a formed product is made as an outer panel by press forming such as stretching, and then joining with an inner panel is executed by hem work (hemming) of a flat hem and the like of the outer panel peripheral section to be formed into a panel structural body.
  • the 6000-series aluminum alloy had an advantage of having excellent BH response, but had a problem of having aging properties at room temperature, that is, of age hardening during retention at room temperature after solution heat treatment and quenching treatment to increase the strength, thereby deteriorating formability into a panel, particularly the bendability.
  • a 6000-series aluminum alloy sheet is to be used for an automobile panel, it is placed at room temperature (standing at room temperature) for approximately 1 month after the solution heat treatment and the quenching treatment (after manufacturing) at an aluminum manufacturer until forming into a panel at an automobile manufacturer, and comes to be significantly age hardened (room-temperature aged) during that time.
  • Patent Documents 1 and 2 propose that the formation amount of Mg—Si clusters that inhibit room-temperature aging and suppress low-temperature age hardenability, in particular, Si/hole clusters (GPI), is regulated.
  • GPI Si/hole clusters
  • the T4 material after solution treatment and subsequent natural aging
  • a low-temperature heat treatment of holding at 70-150° C. for about 0.5-50 hours is performed after a solution treatment and quenching to room temperature, in order to inhibit or control the formation of the GPI.
  • Patent Document 3 proposes a 6000-series aluminum alloy sheet with excess Si which, after a refining treatment including solution and quenching treatments of this aluminum alloy sheet, gives a DSC in which an endothermic peak in the temperature range of 150-250° C. and corresponds to a dissolution of Si/hole clusters (GPI) has a minus height of 1,000 ⁇ W or less and an exothermic peak in the temperature range of 250-300° C. and corresponds to a precipitation of Mg/Si clusters (GPII) has a plus height of 2,000 ⁇ W or less.
  • GPI dissolution of Si/hole clusters
  • GPIII precipitation of Mg/Si clusters
  • This aluminum alloy sheet after having undergone room-temperature aging for at least 4 months after the refining treatment, has the properties in which a proof stress is in the range of 110-160 MPa, a difference in proof stress with the one just after the refining treatment is 15 MPa or less, an elongation is 28% or greater, and a proof stress, as measured after application of a 2% strain thereto and a subsequent low-temperature aging treatment of 150° C. ⁇ 20 minutes, is 180 MPa or greater.
  • Patent Document 4 proposes that a 6000-series aluminum alloy sheet is set to give, after a refining treatment, a DSC in which an exothermic peak in the temperature range of 100-200° C. has a height W1 of 50 ⁇ W or larger and a ratio of a height W2 of an exothermic peak in the temperature range of 200 to 300° C. to the exothermic-peak height W1, (W2/W1), is 20.0 or less, in order to obtain BH response in a bake hardening treatment performed at a low temperature for a short period.
  • the document states that the exothermic peak W1 corresponds to the precipitation of GP zones serving as nucleus formation sites of ⁇ ′′ (Mg 2 Si phase) in an artificial age hardening treatment, and that the higher the W1 peak height, the more the GP zones serving as nucleus formation sites of ⁇ ′′ in an artificial age hardening treatment have already been formed and secured in the sheet after refining. It states that as a result, the ⁇ ′′ grows rapidly in a bake hardening treatment after forming, thereby attaining an improvement in BH response.
  • the exothermic peak W2 corresponds to a precipitation peak of the ⁇ ′′ itself, and that the height of this exothermic peak W2 is made as small as possible in order to reduce the proof stress of the sheet to be formed to less than 135 MPa and to thereby ensure formability.
  • Patent Document 5 proposes that three exothermic-peak heights (three portions) in a DSC in specific temperature ranges and particularly affect BH response are selected and regulated to enhance the BH response (bake hardenability).
  • the three exothermic peaks are peak A at 230-270° C., peak B at 280-320° C. and peak C at 330-370° C.
  • the height of the peak B is regulated to 20 ⁇ W/mg or larger and the peak ratio (A/B) and the peak ratio (C/B) are regulated to 0.45 or less and 0.6 or less, respectively, thereby attaining an increase in 0.2% proof stress, through an artificial hardening treatment of 170° C. ⁇ 20 minutes after application of a 2% strain, of 100 MPa or greater.
  • Patent Document 1 JP-A-10-219382
  • Patent Document 2 JP-A-2000-273567
  • Patent Document 3 JP-A-2003-27170
  • Patent Document 4 JP-A-2005-139537
  • Patent Document 5 JP-A-2013-167004
  • Recessed portions having given depths for attaching devices or members, such as knob mount bases, lamp mount bases and license (number plate) mount bases, or for drawing wheel arches are partly provided to outer panels.
  • recessed portions protrudent portions
  • a problem common to automotive panels which partly have a recessed portion (protrudent portion) that may suffer a face strain, such as a saddle-shaped portion of a door outer panel, a vertical wall portion of a front fender, a wind corner portion of a rear fender, a character-line termination portions of a trunk lid or hood outer panel, and a root portion of a rear fender pillar.
  • a sheet in press forming which has undergone room-temperature aging after production, should have a 0.2% proof stress reduced to less than 110 MPa.
  • bake hardening hereinafter also referred to as “after BH”
  • An object thereof is to provide an aluminum alloy sheet which combines formability and bake hardenability, that is, which can have, in automotive-panel forming, a 0.2% proof stress reduced to 110 MPa or less and can have a 0.2% proof stress after BH of 170 MPa or greater.
  • the present inventors diligently made investigations and, as a result, have discovered that an aluminum alloy sheet which combines formability and bake hardenability can be obtained by adopting a specific composition and specific exothermic peaks in the DSC for an Al—Mg—Si alloy sheet, which contains Mg and Si.
  • the present invention has been thus completed.
  • the gist of the aluminum alloy sheet of the present invention which is excellent in terms of formability and bake hardenability, is an Al—Mg—Si alloy sheet containing, in terms of mass %, Mg: 0.2-1.0% and Si: 0.2-1.0% and satisfying ⁇ (Mg content)+(Si content) ⁇ 1.2%, with the remainder being Al and unavoidable impurities, in which a differential scanning thermal analysis curve of the aluminum alloy sheet has, in a temperature range of 230-330° C., only one exothermic peak (i) or only two exothermic peaks (ii) having a temperature difference between the peaks of 50° C. or less, and in which the exothermic peak (i) or the peak having a higher peak height of the exothermic peaks (ii) has a height in a range of 20-50 ⁇ W/mg.
  • the differential thermal analysis at each of measurement portions in the sheet is performed under the same conditions including a test apparatus of DSC220G, manufactured by Seiko Instruments Inc., a reference substance of aluminum, a sample container made of aluminum, temperature increase conditions of 15° C./min, an atmosphere of argon (50 mL/min), and a sample weight of 24.5-26.5 mg.
  • the differential thermal analysis profile ( ⁇ W) obtained is divided by the sample weight and thereby normalized ( ⁇ W/mg). Thereafter, in the range of 0-100° C. in the differential thermal analysis profile, a region where the differential thermal analysis profile is horizontal is taken as a reference level of 0, and the height of exothermic peak from the reference level is measured.
  • the aluminum alloy sheet excellent in terms of formability and bake hardenability may further contain one element or two or more elements selected from the group consisting of Fe: more than 0% and 0.5% or less, Mn: more than 0% and 0.3% or less, Cr: more than 0% and 0.3% or less, Zr: more than 0% and 0.1% or less, V: more than 0% and 0.1% or less, Ti: more than 0% and 0.1% or less, Cu: more than 0% and 0.5% or less, Ag: more than 0% and 0.1% or less, and Zn: more than 0% and 0.5% or less.
  • the contents of Mg and Si, which are major elements of an Al—Mg—Si alloy sheet, are regulated to be relatively low, thereby enabling a 0.2% proof stress in forming of the sheet, which has been produced and then subjected to room-temperature aging, to be reduced to 110 MPa or less. Consequently, it can have improved formability when applied to automotive panels or the like, which are particularly problematic in face strains thereof, in automotive panel structures.
  • thermal properties (structure) in the DSC of the aluminum alloy sheet are regulated.
  • an increased strength which includes a 0.2% proof stress after BH of 170 MPa or greater and an increase in 0.2% proof stress of 70 MPa or greater, which is useful as automotive panels can be ensured.
  • the regulation of thermal properties (structure) in the DSC provides a measure for ensuring the amount of precipitates which precipitate after a bake hardening treatment.
  • an aluminum alloy sheet which combines formability and bake hardenability can be provided merely with a basic composition of Al—Mg—Si alloys, without the need of newly adding any additive element or without the need of giving a large modification to ordinary production processes.
  • FIG. 1 is a view which shows DSCs of the aluminum alloy sheets of some examples in the Examples.
  • mass % has the same meaning as “wt %”.
  • Al—Mg—Si (hereinafter referred to also as 6000-series) aluminum alloy sheet (hereinafter also referred to simply as “aluminum alloy sheet”) according to the present invention is explained below.
  • the 6000-series aluminum alloy sheet targeted by the present invention is required to have various properties such as excellent formability, BH response, strength, weldability, and corrosion resistance. Consequently, such requirements are also met by means of the composition.
  • the contents of Mg and Si, which are major elements are regulated so as to be relatively low, thereby reducing a 0.2% proof stress in forming of the sheet, which has been produced and then subjected to room-temperature aging, to 110 MPa or less.
  • the formability into automotive panels or the like which are particularly problematic in face strains thereof, in automotive panel structures, can be improved. Simultaneously therewith, a 0.2% proof stress after bake hardening of 170 MPa or greater is rendered possible by means of composition.
  • the aluminum alloy sheet has a composition which contains, in terms of mass %, Mg: 0.2-1.0% and Si: 0.2-1.0% and satisfies ⁇ (Mg content)+(Si content) ⁇ 1.2%, with the remainder being Al and unavoidable impurities.
  • all the content indicated in % of the elements means that in mass %.
  • the “-” in each content means that the content is equal to or more than the lower limit value but is equal to or less than the upper limit value.
  • elements other than Mg, Si and Al basically are impurities or elements which may be contained.
  • the contents of such other elements are the contents (permissible amounts) on levels in accordance with the AA or JIS standards, etc., or are on levels below such standards.
  • other elements shown below are inevitably included in substantial amounts. Since refining performed for intentionally diminishing these elements itself leads to an increase in cost, it is necessary to accept an inclusion of some degree of amount. There are content ranges which do not defeat or lessen the object or effects of the present invention, even if included in substantial amounts.
  • examples of the other elements which may be contained in the aluminum alloy include the following elements.
  • the permissible contents thereof are within the ranges of equal to or less than the upper limits according to the AA or JIS standards or the like, and are as shown below.
  • the aluminum alloy sheet may further contain one element or two or more elements selected from the group consisting of Fe: 0.5% or less (exclusive of 0%), Mn: 0.3% or less (exclusive of 0%), Cr: 0.3% or less (exclusive of 0%), Zr: 0.1% or less (exclusive of 0%), V: 0.1% or less (exclusive of 0%), Ti: 0.1% or less (exclusive of 0%), Cu: 0.5% or less (exclusive of 0%), Ag: 0.1% or less (exclusive of 0%), and Zn: 0.5% or less (exclusive of 0%), within those ranges.
  • Si is an essential element for obtaining the strength (proof stress) required as automotive panels because it forms aging precipitates which contribute to an improvement in strength, during an artificial aging treatment such as a baking treatment, and thus exhibits an age hardenability.
  • the content of Si is too low, the amount of aging precipitates after an artificial aging treatment is too small, resulting in too small an increase in strength after baking.
  • the content of Si is too high, not only the strength of the sheet just after production but also the amount of room-temperature aging after the production are increased, resulting in too high a strength before forming. Because of this, the formability into automotive panels or the like, which are particularly problematic in face strains thereof, in automotive panel structures, is reduced. In addition, coarse crystals and precipitates are formed, resulting in a considerable decrease in bendability.
  • a preferred upper limit of the content of Si is 0.8%.
  • Mg is also an essential element for obtaining the proof stress required as panels, since it forms, together with the Si, aging precipitates which contribute to an improvement in strength, and thus exhibits an age hardenability.
  • the precipitate amount of precipitates after an artificial aging treatment is too small, resulting in too small an increase in strength after baking.
  • the content of Mg is too high, not only the strength of the sheet just after production but also the amount of room-temperature aging after the production are increased, resulting in too high a strength before forming. Because of this, the formability into automotive panels or the like, which are particularly problematic in face strains thereof, in automotive panel structures, is reduced.
  • a preferred upper limit of the content of Mg is 0.8%.
  • the difference in temperature between the peaks of the two exothermic peaks (ii) can be 50° C. or less and the one having a higher peak height can have a peak height in the range of 20-50 ⁇ W/mg. Meanwhile, in the case where there exists only one exothermic peak (i) in that temperature range, this exothermic peak (i) can have a height in the range of 20-50 ⁇ W/mg.
  • ⁇ (Mg content)+(Si content) ⁇ is as small as possible.
  • a lower limit of ⁇ (Mg content)+(Si content) ⁇ is determined by the minimum contents of these each. From this standpoint, a lower limit of ⁇ (Mg content)+(Si content) ⁇ is preferably 0.6% or higher.
  • peaks in the DSC of the aluminum alloy sheet are regulated as a measure for ensuring the amount of precipitates which precipitate after a bake hardening treatment, in order to ensure high strength as automotive panels or the like.
  • a structure is configured in which two exothermic peaks, which have conventionally been present in the temperature range of 230-330° C. apart from each other, are present so as to near to each other (with a reduced temperature difference) and to overlap each other. This makes it possible to attain a 0.2% proof stress in forming into automotive panels reduced to 110 MPa or less and to attain a 0.2% proof stress after bake hardening of 170 MPa or greater.
  • the differential scanning calorimetry curve is a heating curve from solid phase, obtained by measuring the thermal changes during melting of aluminum alloy sheet after the refining treatment of the sheet, by differential thermal analysis performed under the following conditions.
  • the differential thermal analysis at each of measurement portions in the aluminum alloy sheet is performed under the same conditions including a test apparatus of DSC220G, manufactured by Seiko Instruments Inc., a reference substance of aluminum, a sample container made of aluminum, temperature increase conditions of 15° C./min, an atmosphere of argon (50 mL/min), and a sample weight of 24.5 to 26.5 mg.
  • the differential thermal analysis profile ( ⁇ W) obtained is divided by the sample weight and thereby normalized ( ⁇ W/mg). Thereafter, in the range of 0 to 100° C. in the differential thermal analysis profile, a region where the differential thermal analysis profile is horizontal is taken as a reference level of 0, and the height of exothermic peak from the reference level is measured.
  • the structure of the aluminum alloy sheet has been specified so that the two exothermic peaks are located near to each other (with a reduced temperature difference therebetween) and to overlap each other.
  • the only one exothermic peak (i), or the exothermic peak having a larger (higher) peak height of the only two exothermic peaks (ii) has a height in the range of 20-50 ⁇ W/mg.
  • the 6000-series aluminum alloy sheet of the present invention in which the contents of Mg and Si have been regulated so as to be relatively low in order to make the sheet have, in forming after room-temperature aging, a 0.2% proof stress reduced to 110 MPa or less, considerably differs in the appearing behavior (appearing temperature) of the strengthening phase 1 ( ⁇ ′′) and strengthening phase 2 ( ⁇ ′) upon BH (artificial aging treatment), from ordinary 6000-series aluminum alloy sheets having relatively high Mg and Si contents.
  • a simulation with DSC of the appearing behavior of ⁇ ′′ and ⁇ ′ upon BH shows that in the case of, for example, ordinary 6000-series aluminum alloy sheets having relatively high Mg and Si contents, the exothermic peaks assigned to ⁇ ′′ and ⁇ ′ are present more widely apart from each other in the range of 230-330° C. More specifically, a conventional exothermic peak assigned to ⁇ ′′ is mostly present around 240-260° C., which is the lower-temperature former half of that temperature range.
  • a conventional exothermic peak assigned to ⁇ ′ is present around 310-320° C., which is the higher-temperature latter half of that temperature range, and they have existed in a state that the difference in temperature between the peaks of ⁇ ′′ and ⁇ ′ has been larger than 50° C.
  • Such state of conventional exothermic peaks is a representative example, and that appearing behavior of the exothermic peaks varies widely, as a matter of course, depending on the composition of the sheet and production conditions.
  • a DSC has three exothermic peaks (three portions) regarding BH response and they are respectively called peak A at 230-270° C., peak B at 280-320° C. and peak C at 330-370° C., as in Patent Document 5.
  • the appearing temperature of the exothermic peak assigned to ⁇ ′′ shifts from the position (temperature) around 250-260° C. of low temperature to a position (temperature) around 270-290° C. of high temperature.
  • the appearing temperature of the exothermic peak assigned to ⁇ ′ also called second or latter-half peak shifts from the position (temperature) around 300-310° C. of high temperature to a position (temperature) around 290-300° C. of low temperature.
  • the state in which the exothermic peaks assigned to ⁇ ′′ and ⁇ ′ overlap each other has been specified as above.
  • the 6000-series aluminum alloy sheet gives a DSC in which only two (only two in total) exothermic peaks, i.e., a lower-temperature-side exothermic peak assigned to ⁇ ′′ and a higher-temperature-side exothermic peak assigned to ⁇ ′, that have a difference in temperature between the peaks of 50° C. or less, preferably 30° C.
  • the exothermic peak assigned to ⁇ ′′ should be present around 270-290° C. as a lower-temperature-side first or former-half peak. It is also preferable that the exothermic peak assigned to ⁇ ′ should be present around 290-300° C. as a higher-temperature-side second or latter-half peak. Furthermore, the difference in temperature between the peaks of these exothermic peaks is 50° C.
  • the height of the exothermic peak, which has a higher peak height of these exothermic peaks is in the range of 20-50 ⁇ W/mg.
  • Examples thereof are the thick continuous line among the DSCs shown in FIG. 1 , which will be described later, and Invention Examples 0, 1, 16, 17, 19, 21, etc. shown in Table 2 in the Examples.
  • the thin continuous line among the DSCs shown in FIG. 1 which will be described later, and Invention Examples 5, 6, 12, 15, 18, 20, etc. shown in Table 2 in the Examples are the case where a lower-temperature-side exothermic peak assigned to ⁇ ′′ and a higher-temperature-side exothermic peak assigned to ⁇ ′ more overlap each other to render the difference in temperature between these peaks unrecognizable and, hence, there is only one synthesized exothermic peak in the temperature range of 230-330° C., preferably in the temperature range of 270-300° C.
  • the height of an exothermic peak which indicates the amount of artificial-aging precipitates in BH is, of course, the height of an exothermic peak which indicates the amount of artificial-aging precipitates in BH.
  • the height ( ⁇ W/mg) of the exothermic peak assigned to ⁇ ′ is regulated so as to be in the range of 20-50 ⁇ W/mg.
  • the height of this exothermic peak is regulated so as to be in the range of 20-50 ⁇ W/mg.
  • the aluminum alloy sheet according to the present invention is produced through production steps which themselves are common or known, by subjecting, after casting, an aluminum alloy slab having the 6000-series component composition to a homogenizing heat treatment, hot rolling and cold rolling to obtain a given sheet thickness, followed by a refining treatment such as a solution quenching treatment.
  • the conditions for a preliminary aging treatment after the solution and quenching treatments are regulated so as to be in a preferred range, as will be described later.
  • an aluminum alloy molten metal that has been melted and regulated so as to have a component composition within the 6000-series composition range is cast by a suitably selected ordinary melting and casting method, such as a continuous casting method or a semi-continuous casting method (DC casting method).
  • a suitably selected ordinary melting and casting method such as a continuous casting method or a semi-continuous casting method (DC casting method).
  • the average cooling rate, during the casting, from the liquidus temperature to the solidus temperature is as high (quick) as possible at 30° C./min or greater.
  • the aluminum alloy slab obtained by casting is subjected to a homogenizing heat treatment prior to hot rolling.
  • the purpose of this homogenizing heat treatment is to homogenize the structure, that is, to eliminate segregation within the grains in the structure of the slab.
  • the conditions are not particularly limited so long as the purpose is achieved therewith, and the treatment may be an ordinary one conducted once or in one stage.
  • a homogenizing heat treatment temperature is suitably selected from the range of 500° C. or more and lower than the melting point, and a homogenizing time is suitably selected from the range of 4 hours and longer.
  • the homogenizing temperature is low, the segregation within grains cannot be sufficiently eliminated, and these act as starting points for fracture, resulting in decreases in stretch flangeability and bendability.
  • cooling to room temperature may be performed so that the average cooling rate in the range of 300° C. to 500° C. is 20 to 100° C./hour, followed by reheating to 350° C. to 450° C. at an average heating rate of 20 to 100° C./hour to start hot rolling in this temperature range.
  • the hot rolling is constituted of a slab rough rolling step and a finish rolling step in accordance with the thickness of the plate to be rolled.
  • rolling mills such as a reverse type and a tandem type are suitably used.
  • the hot-rolling start temperature is preferably in the range of 350° C. to the solidus temperature, more preferably in the range of 400° C. to the solidus temperature.
  • Annealing before cold rolling is not always necessary for the hot-rolled plate. However, it may be performed in order to further improve properties such as formability by making the grains smaller and optimizing the texture.
  • the hot-rolled sheet is rolled to produce a cold-rolled sheet (including a coil) having a desired final sheet thickness.
  • the cold rolling ratio should be 60% or greater.
  • Intermediate annealing may be performed between cold-rolling passes for the same purpose as in the rough annealing.
  • a solution treatment is performed, followed by a treatment for quenching to room temperature.
  • the solution and quenching treatments may be a heating and a cooling performed on an ordinary continuous heat treatment line, and are not particularly limited. However, from the standpoint of obtaining a sufficient solid-solution amount of each element and because it is desirable that the grains should be finer as stated above, it is desirable that the treatments should be conducted under such conditions of heating at a heating rate of 5° C./sec or greater to a solution treatment temperature which is 520° C. or higher and lower than the melting temperature, and then holding for 0.1-10 seconds.
  • the average cooling rate from the solution treatment temperature to the quenching stop temperature should be 3° C./sec or greater.
  • the average rate of cooling to room temperature after the solution treatment is too low, coarse Mg 2 Si and elemental Si are yielded during the cooling, resulting in impaired formability.
  • the solid-solution amount after the solution treatment is reduced, resulting in a decrease in BH response.
  • means such as air cooling with fans or water cooling with mist or spray or by immersion, etc. and conditions therefor are selected and used for the quenching treatment.
  • the cold-rolled sheet After having thus undergone the solution treatment and the subsequent quenching treatment to be cooled to room temperature, the cold-rolled sheet is subjected to a preliminary aging treatment (reheating treatment) within 1 hour.
  • reheating treatment a preliminary aging treatment
  • the room-temperature holding period from termination of the treatment for quenching to room temperature to initiation of the preliminary ageing treatment (initiation of heating) is too long, clusters that are prone to dissolve upon room-temperature aging are yielded, making it impossible to form the exothermic peaks, as a prerequisite, specified with a DSC according to the present invention. Consequently, the shorter the room-temperature holding period, the better.
  • the solution and quenching treatments and the reheating treatment may be consecutively performed so that there is substantially no pause therebetween, and a lower limit of the period is not particularly determined.
  • the higher-temperature-side range of 80-120° C. and the lower-temperature-side range of 60-40° C. may be divided into stages, e.g., in two stages, in terms of temperature, or may be regulated so that the temperature changes continuously.
  • the temperature holding in the higher-temperature-side range may be a heat treatment in which a constant temperature within that temperature range is maintained or in which the temperature is gradually changed within that temperature range by temperature increase.
  • the temperature holding in the lower-temperature-side range may be a heat treatment in which a constant temperature within that temperature range is maintained or in which the temperature is gradually changed within that temperature range by temperature decrease.
  • the temperature may be continuously changed by temperature increase, temperature decrease (annealing), etc., so long as the temperature is held in each of the temperature ranges for the necessary holding period.
  • the temperature holding in the higher-temperature-side and in the lower-temperature-side may be a heat treatment of consecutive two stages in which the temperature is divided into stages, or may be heat treatment in which the holding temperature is kept constant within each of the specified temperature ranges or may be a continuous heat treatment in which temperature increase, temperature decrease, natural cooling, etc are suitably combined within each of the specified temperature ranges.
  • the cooling after the preliminary aging treatment may be natural cooling or rapid cooling.
  • the period of holding in the higher-temperature-side range of 80-120° C. in the former half is preferably regulated to 5-40 hours including the time period during which the sheet is held in the temperature range of 80-120° C. in the temperature increase of the sheet.
  • the period of holding in the lower-temperature-side range of 60-40° C. in the latter half is preferably regulated to 20-300 hours including the period of temperature decrease from the holding in the higher-temperature-side range or the time period during which the sheet is held in the temperature range of 60-40° C. in the cooling such as natural cooling or rapid cooling.
  • the structure according to the present invention specified with a DSC is less apt to be obtained, and no exothermic peak appears in the temperature range of 230-330° C. or, even if two exothermic peaks appear, the temperature difference between the peaks exceeds 50° C. or the specified exothermic peak height exceeds 50 ⁇ W/mg.
  • the structure according to the present invention specified with a DSC is less apt to be obtained, and no exothermic peak appears in the temperature range of 230-330° C. or the specified exothermic peak height exceeds 50 ⁇ W/mg.
  • 6000-series aluminum alloy sheets were individually produced so as to differ in the structure specified with a DSC in the present invention, by changing the conditions for a preliminary aging treatment performed after solution and quenching treatments. After a holding at room temperature for 30 days after the production of the sheets, BH response (bake hardenability), As proof stress as an index of press formability and hem workability as bendability are examined and evaluated.
  • the 6000-series aluminum alloy sheets having the compositions shown in Table 1 was produced by variously changing conditions such as the temperature and holding period in the preliminary aging treatment after the solution and quenching treatments as shown in Table 2.
  • a value of the element expressed by a blank indicates that the content is below a detection limit.
  • Specific conditions for aluminum alloy sheet production were as follows. Slabs of aluminum alloys respectively having the compositions shown in Table 1 were commonly produced through casting by the DC casting method. In this casting, the average rate of cooling from the liquidus temperature to the solidus temperature was set at 50° C./min in common with all the Examples. Subsequently, the slabs were subjected to a soaking treatment of 540° C. ⁇ 6 hours, followed by initiation of hot rough rolling at that temperature, in common with all the Examples. Thereafter, they were hot-rolled, in the succeeding finish rolling, to a thickness of 3.5 mm to obtain hot-rolled sheets, in common with all the Examples.
  • the hot-rolled aluminum alloy sheets were subjected to rough annealing of 500° C. ⁇ 1 minute and then to cold rolling at a processing rate of 70% without performing intermediate annealing during the cold-rolling passes, to obtain cold-rolled sheets having a thickness of 1.0 mm, in common with all the Examples.
  • the cold-rolled sheets were each continuously subjected to a refining treatment (T4) with continuous type heat treatment facilities while unwinding and winding each sheet, in common with all the Examples.
  • T4 refining treatment
  • a solution treatment was performed by heating at an average rate of heating to 500° C. of 10° C./sec and holding for 5 seconds after the temperature reached a target temperature of 540° C., followed by cooling to room temperature by performing water cooling at an average cooling rate of 100° C./sec.
  • a preliminary aging treatment was performed in two stages of the higher-temperature-side range and the lower-temperature-side range, using the temperatures (° C.) and holding periods (hr) shown in Table 2.
  • this two-stage preliminary aging treatment was performed by holding at the given temperature for the given period by using an oil bath, as the higher-temperature-side range, and thereafter, by holding at the given temperature for the given period by using a thermostatic oven, as the lower-temperature-side range, followed by annealing (natural cooling).
  • the period of holding in the higher-temperature-side range included the time period during which the sheet was held in the temperature range of 80-120° C. in the temperature increase of the sheet.
  • the period of holding in the lower-temperature-side range included the temperature decrease from the holding in the higher-temperature-side range or the time period during which the sheet was held in the temperature range of 60-40° C. in the cooling by natural cooling.
  • test sheets (blanks) were cut out and the DSC and properties of the test sheets were examined and evaluated. The results thereof are shown in Table 2.
  • the structure in each of ten portions of the central portion in the sheet-thickness direction in each test sheet was examined for the DSC.
  • the exothermic peaks present in the temperature range of 230-330° C. were examined. Specifically, in the cases when two exothermic peaks were present, the difference in temperature (° C.) between these exothermic peaks and the peak height ( ⁇ W/mg) of the exothermic peak having a higher peak height were determined. In the cases when only one exothermic peak was present, the height ( ⁇ W/mg) of this exothermic peak was determined.
  • the differential thermal analysis of each of the measurement portions in each test sheet was performed under the same conditions including a test apparatus of DSC220G, manufactured by Seiko Instruments Inc., a reference substance of aluminum, a sample container made of aluminum, temperature increase conditions of 15° C./min, an atmosphere of argon (50 mL/min), and a sample weight of 24.5 to 26.5 mg.
  • the differential thermal analysis profile ( ⁇ W) obtained was divided by the sample weight and thereby normalized ( ⁇ W/mg). Thereafter, in the range of 0 to 100° C. in the differential thermal analysis profile, a region where the differential thermal analysis profile was horizontal was taken as a reference level of 0, and the height of exothermic peak from the reference level was measured. The results thereof are shown in Tables 2 and 3.
  • test sheets which had been allowed to stand at room temperature for 30 days after the refining treatment were each examined for 0.2% proof stress (As proof stress) as a mechanical property through a tensile test. Furthermore, these test sheets were aged at room temperature for 30 days, subsequently subjected to an artificial age hardening treatment of 170° C. ⁇ 20 minutes (after BH), and then examined for 0.2% proof stress (proof stress after BH) through a tensile test, in common with the test sheets. The BH response of each test sheet was evaluated on the basis of the difference between these 0.2% proof stresses (increase in proof stress).
  • the surface state, such as the occurrence of rough surface, a minute crack or a large crack, of the bent part (edge bent part) of the flat hem was visually examined and visually evaluated on the basis of the following criteria. In the following criteria, ratings of 0 to 2 are on an acceptable level, and ratings of 3 and larger are unacceptable.
  • the Invention Examples each not only have a component composition within the range according to the present invention and have been produced under conditions within preferred ranges but also have undergone the refining treatment, including the preliminary aging treatment, under conditions within preferred ranges. Because of this, these Invention Examples satisfy the DSC requirements specified in the present invention, as shown in Table 2. That is, these sheets each gave a DSC which had only one or only two exothermic peaks in the temperature range of 230-330° C. and in which when only two exothermic peaks were present, then the difference in temperature between the peaks was 50° C.
  • the exothermic-peak height of one having a higher exothermic-peak height was in the range of 20-50 ⁇ W/mg. Furthermore, when only one exothermic peak was present, the height of this exothermic peak was in the range of 20-50 ⁇ W/mg.
  • the Invention Examples each show excellent BH response although the bake hardening is performed after the refining treatment and subsequent room-temperature aging and is a treatment conducted at a low temperature for a short period of time. Furthermore, as shown in Table 2, even after the refining treatment and subsequent room-temperature aging, they each have a relatively low As proof stress and hence show excellent press formability into automotive panels or the like and excellent hem workability.
  • the Invention Examples even when having undergone an automotive-baking treatment after room-temperature aging, were able to exhibit not only high BH response with a 0.2% proof stress difference of 70 MPa or greater and a 0.2% proof stress after BH of 170 MPa or greater but also press formability with an As 0.2% proof stress of 110 MPa or less and satisfactory bendability.
  • the period of holding in the lower-temperature-side range in the preliminary aging treatment is 2 hours, which is too short. Because of this, although the two exothermic peaks present in the temperature range of 230-330° C. have a difference in temperature between the peaks of 50° C. or less, the exothermic-peak height exceeds 50 ⁇ W/mg, or in the case where one exothermic peak is present in the temperature range of 230 ⁇ 330° C., this exothermic peak has a height exceeding 50 ⁇ W/mg.
  • the temperature in the higher-temperature-side range in the preliminary aging treatment is 70° C., which is too low. Because of this, although the two exothermic peaks present in the temperature range of 230-330° C. have a difference in temperature between the peaks of 50° C. or less, the higher exothermic peak has a height exceeding 50 ⁇ W/mg.
  • the temperature in the higher-temperature-side range in the preliminary aging treatment is 130° C., which is too high. Because of this, in the case where one exothermic peak is present in the temperature range of 230-330° C., this exothermic peak has a height less than 20 ⁇ W/mg.
  • Comparative Examples 22 to 30 in Table 2 have been produced under preferred conditions, including the conditions for the preliminary aging treatment. However, since they employed alloys Nos. 10 to 18 shown in Table 1, the contents of Mg and Si, which are essential elements, therein are outside the ranges according to the present invention or the content of impurity elements therein is too high. Because of this, these Comparative Examples 22 to 30 each show, in particular, a relatively too high As proof stress after 30-day room-temperature holding as compared with the Invention Examples, as shown in Table 2. They hence are poor in press formability into automotive panels or the like and in hem workability or are poor in BH response. The compositions of Comparative Examples 22 to 30 are described in detail below.
  • Comparative Example 22 is alloy 10 shown in Table 1, in which the Si content is too low.
  • Comparative Example 23 is alloy 12 shown in Table 1, in which the Mg+Si content is too high.
  • Comparative Example 24 is alloy 11 shown in Table 1, in which the Si content is too high and the Mg+Si content is too high.
  • Comparative Example 25 is alloy 13 shown in Table 1, in which the Fe content is too high.
  • Comparative Example 26 is alloy 14 shown in Table 1, in which the Mn content is too high.
  • Comparative Example 27 is alloy 15 shown in Table 1, in which the Cr and Ti contents are too high.
  • Comparative Example 28 is alloy 16 shown in Table 1, in which the Cu content is too high.
  • Comparative Example 29 is alloy 17 shown in Table 1, in which the Zn content is too high.
  • Comparative Example 30 is alloy 18 shown in Table 1, in which the Zr and V contents are too high.
  • DSCs selected from those of the Invention Examples and Comparative Examples are shown in FIG. 1 .
  • the thick continuous line indicates Invention Example 1
  • the thin continuous line indicates Invention Example 12
  • the broken line indicates Comparative Example 23.
  • a first exothermic peak of ⁇ ′′ and a second exothermic peak of ⁇ ′ overlap each other to form one synthesized peak.
  • This synthesized peak appears around 290° C. and, as shown in Table 2, has a peak height of 35.9 ⁇ W/mg, which is in the range of 20-50 ⁇ W/mg.
  • the present invention it is possible to provide 6000-series aluminum alloy sheets which combine BH response and formability after room-temperature aging.
  • the 6000-series aluminum alloy sheets are usable in applications extended to automotive panels, in particular, outer panels in which problems may arise concerning the design of beautiful curved-surface configurations, character lines, etc.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Thermal Sciences (AREA)
  • Crystallography & Structural Chemistry (AREA)
  • Body Structure For Vehicles (AREA)
  • Other Surface Treatments For Metallic Materials (AREA)
  • Shaping Metal By Deep-Drawing, Or The Like (AREA)
US15/128,281 2014-03-31 2015-03-23 Aluminum alloy plate having excellent moldability and bake hardening properties Abandoned US20180187293A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2014-074044 2014-03-31
JP2014074044A JP6190307B2 (ja) 2014-03-31 2014-03-31 成形性と焼付け塗装硬化性とに優れたアルミニウム合金板
PCT/JP2015/058795 WO2015151908A1 (ja) 2014-03-31 2015-03-23 成形性と焼付け塗装硬化性とに優れたアルミニウム合金板

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20180187293A1 true US20180187293A1 (en) 2018-07-05

Family

ID=54240235

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US15/128,281 Abandoned US20180187293A1 (en) 2014-03-31 2015-03-23 Aluminum alloy plate having excellent moldability and bake hardening properties

Country Status (7)

Country Link
US (1) US20180187293A1 (es)
JP (1) JP6190307B2 (es)
KR (1) KR101850235B1 (es)
CN (1) CN106103762B (es)
CA (1) CA2941997C (es)
MX (1) MX2016012241A (es)
WO (1) WO2015151908A1 (es)

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20180049520A1 (en) * 2015-03-27 2018-02-22 Ykk Corporation Element for Slide Fastener
US20190194779A1 (en) * 2016-08-15 2019-06-27 Hydro Aluminium Rolled Products Gmbh Aluminium alloy and aluminium alloy strip for pedestrian impact protection
US11932924B2 (en) 2019-03-13 2024-03-19 Novelis, Inc. Age-hardenable and highly formable aluminum alloys and methods of making the same
US12054810B2 (en) 2020-08-24 2024-08-06 Kobe Steel, Ltd. Al—Mg—Si-based aluminum alloy sheet excellent in formability

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CA2958723A1 (en) * 2016-02-26 2017-08-26 Uacj Corporation Aluminum alloy plate for hot forming production and method therefor
JP6277299B1 (ja) * 2017-03-15 2018-02-07 株式会社フジクラ アルミニウム合金線、これを用いた電線及びワイヤハーネス
CN111041294B9 (zh) * 2019-12-31 2021-03-12 辽宁忠旺集团有限公司 具有高长期热稳定性的6系低合金成分及其制备方法

Family Cites Families (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH10219382A (ja) 1997-02-04 1998-08-18 Nippon Steel Corp 成形加工性および塗装焼付け硬化性に優れたアルミニウム合金板およびその製造方法
JP4237326B2 (ja) 1999-03-18 2009-03-11 新日本製鐵株式会社 成形性および耐食性に優れたアルミニウム合金板の製造方法
JP3819263B2 (ja) 2001-07-10 2006-09-06 株式会社神戸製鋼所 室温時効抑制と低温時効硬化能に優れたアルミニウム合金材
JP4117243B2 (ja) * 2003-11-10 2008-07-16 株式会社神戸製鋼所 焼付け塗装硬化性に優れたアルミニウム合金板
JP4771791B2 (ja) * 2005-11-08 2011-09-14 古河スカイ株式会社 成形加工用アルミニウム合金板の製造方法
JP2008303449A (ja) * 2007-06-11 2008-12-18 Furukawa Sky Kk 成形加工用アルミニウム合金板および成形加工用アルミニウム合金板の製造方法
JP5709298B2 (ja) * 2010-08-12 2015-04-30 株式会社Uacj 塗装焼付硬化性および成形性に優れたAl−Mg−Si系アルミニウム合金板の製造方法
JP5746528B2 (ja) * 2011-03-15 2015-07-08 株式会社神戸製鋼所 焼付け塗装硬化性に優れたアルミニウム合金板
JP5985165B2 (ja) * 2011-09-13 2016-09-06 株式会社神戸製鋼所 焼付け塗装硬化性に優れたアルミニウム合金板
JP6227222B2 (ja) * 2012-02-16 2017-11-08 株式会社神戸製鋼所 焼付け塗装硬化性に優れたアルミニウム合金板
JP5820315B2 (ja) * 2012-03-08 2015-11-24 株式会社神戸製鋼所 室温時効後のヘム加工性と焼付け塗装硬化性に優れたアルミニウム合金板

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20180049520A1 (en) * 2015-03-27 2018-02-22 Ykk Corporation Element for Slide Fastener
US10786051B2 (en) * 2015-03-27 2020-09-29 Ykk Corporation Element for slide fastener
US20190194779A1 (en) * 2016-08-15 2019-06-27 Hydro Aluminium Rolled Products Gmbh Aluminium alloy and aluminium alloy strip for pedestrian impact protection
US11932924B2 (en) 2019-03-13 2024-03-19 Novelis, Inc. Age-hardenable and highly formable aluminum alloys and methods of making the same
US12247271B2 (en) 2019-03-13 2025-03-11 Novelis Inc. Age-hardenable and highly formable aluminum alloys and methods of making the same
US12054810B2 (en) 2020-08-24 2024-08-06 Kobe Steel, Ltd. Al—Mg—Si-based aluminum alloy sheet excellent in formability

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
KR20160127113A (ko) 2016-11-02
KR101850235B1 (ko) 2018-04-18
CN106103762A (zh) 2016-11-09
MX2016012241A (es) 2017-01-19
JP2015196852A (ja) 2015-11-09
WO2015151908A1 (ja) 2015-10-08
CA2941997A1 (en) 2015-10-08
CA2941997C (en) 2019-02-12
JP6190307B2 (ja) 2017-08-30
CN106103762B (zh) 2017-12-29

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP6227222B2 (ja) 焼付け塗装硬化性に優れたアルミニウム合金板
JP5059423B2 (ja) アルミニウム合金板
JP4312819B2 (ja) 成形時のリジングマーク性に優れたアルミニウム合金板
CA2941997C (en) Aluminum alloy plate having excellent moldability and bake hardening properties
CN103429772B (zh) 烤漆硬化性优异的铝合金板
US20160222492A1 (en) High strength aluminum alloy sheet
JP2009173973A (ja) 成形時のリジングマーク性に優れたアルミニウム合金板
JP4117243B2 (ja) 焼付け塗装硬化性に優れたアルミニウム合金板
JP4939091B2 (ja) 曲げ加工性に優れたアルミニウム合金板の製造方法
JP2009173972A (ja) 成形時のリジングマーク性に優れたアルミニウム合金板
JP3833574B2 (ja) 曲げ加工性とプレス成形性に優れたアルミニウム合金板
JP3740086B2 (ja) 室温時効後のヘム加工性に優れた、張出成形後にヘム加工されるアルミニウム合金板の製造方法
JP6306123B2 (ja) アルミニウム合金板及びアルミニウム合金板の製造方法
JP2017179469A (ja) アルミニウム合金板およびアルミニウム合金構造部材
JP4944474B2 (ja) 伸びフランジ性に優れたアルミニウム合金板およびその製造方法
JP6301175B2 (ja) 成形性と焼付け塗装硬化性とに優れたアルミニウム合金板
JP4694770B2 (ja) 曲げ加工性に優れたアルミニウム合金板
WO2017170835A1 (ja) アルミニウム合金板及びアルミニウム合金板の製造方法
JP7701503B2 (ja) 成形性に優れたAl-Mg-Si系アルミニウム合金板の製造方法
JP2003239032A (ja) 曲げ加工性に優れたアルミニウム合金板

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: KABUSHIKI KAISHA KOBE SEIKO SHO (KOBE STEEL, LTD.)

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:SHISHIDO, HISAO;MATSUMOTO, KATSUSHI;ARUGA, YASUHIRO;REEL/FRAME:039834/0077

Effective date: 20150701

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: FINAL REJECTION MAILED

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: RESPONSE AFTER FINAL ACTION FORWARDED TO EXAMINER

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: ADVISORY ACTION MAILED

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: DOCKETED NEW CASE - READY FOR EXAMINATION

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION