US20180069573A1 - Incremental error detection and correction for memories - Google Patents
Incremental error detection and correction for memories Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20180069573A1 US20180069573A1 US15/810,304 US201715810304A US2018069573A1 US 20180069573 A1 US20180069573 A1 US 20180069573A1 US 201715810304 A US201715810304 A US 201715810304A US 2018069573 A1 US2018069573 A1 US 2018069573A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- new
- calculating
- incorrect
- numbers
- error detecting
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H03—ELECTRONIC CIRCUITRY
- H03M—CODING; DECODING; CODE CONVERSION IN GENERAL
- H03M13/00—Coding, decoding or code conversion, for error detection or error correction; Coding theory basic assumptions; Coding bounds; Error probability evaluation methods; Channel models; Simulation or testing of codes
- H03M13/61—Aspects and characteristics of methods and arrangements for error correction or error detection, not provided for otherwise
- H03M13/611—Specific encoding aspects, e.g. encoding by means of decoding
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H03—ELECTRONIC CIRCUITRY
- H03M—CODING; DECODING; CODE CONVERSION IN GENERAL
- H03M13/00—Coding, decoding or code conversion, for error detection or error correction; Coding theory basic assumptions; Coding bounds; Error probability evaluation methods; Channel models; Simulation or testing of codes
- H03M13/29—Coding, decoding or code conversion, for error detection or error correction; Coding theory basic assumptions; Coding bounds; Error probability evaluation methods; Channel models; Simulation or testing of codes combining two or more codes or code structures, e.g. product codes, generalised product codes, concatenated codes, inner and outer codes
- H03M13/2906—Coding, decoding or code conversion, for error detection or error correction; Coding theory basic assumptions; Coding bounds; Error probability evaluation methods; Channel models; Simulation or testing of codes combining two or more codes or code structures, e.g. product codes, generalised product codes, concatenated codes, inner and outer codes using block codes
- H03M13/2909—Product codes
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G11—INFORMATION STORAGE
- G11C—STATIC STORES
- G11C29/00—Checking stores for correct operation ; Subsequent repair; Testing stores during standby or offline operation
- G11C29/04—Detection or location of defective memory elements, e.g. cell constructio details, timing of test signals
- G11C2029/0411—Online error correction
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H03—ELECTRONIC CIRCUITRY
- H03M—CODING; DECODING; CODE CONVERSION IN GENERAL
- H03M13/00—Coding, decoding or code conversion, for error detection or error correction; Coding theory basic assumptions; Coding bounds; Error probability evaluation methods; Channel models; Simulation or testing of codes
- H03M13/03—Error detection or forward error correction by redundancy in data representation, i.e. code words containing more digits than the source words
- H03M13/05—Error detection or forward error correction by redundancy in data representation, i.e. code words containing more digits than the source words using block codes, i.e. a predetermined number of check bits joined to a predetermined number of information bits
- H03M13/11—Error detection or forward error correction by redundancy in data representation, i.e. code words containing more digits than the source words using block codes, i.e. a predetermined number of check bits joined to a predetermined number of information bits using multiple parity bits
- H03M13/1102—Codes on graphs and decoding on graphs, e.g. low-density parity check [LDPC] codes
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H03—ELECTRONIC CIRCUITRY
- H03M—CODING; DECODING; CODE CONVERSION IN GENERAL
- H03M13/00—Coding, decoding or code conversion, for error detection or error correction; Coding theory basic assumptions; Coding bounds; Error probability evaluation methods; Channel models; Simulation or testing of codes
- H03M13/03—Error detection or forward error correction by redundancy in data representation, i.e. code words containing more digits than the source words
- H03M13/05—Error detection or forward error correction by redundancy in data representation, i.e. code words containing more digits than the source words using block codes, i.e. a predetermined number of check bits joined to a predetermined number of information bits
- H03M13/13—Linear codes
- H03M13/15—Cyclic codes, i.e. cyclic shifts of codewords produce other codewords, e.g. codes defined by a generator polynomial, Bose-Chaudhuri-Hocquenghem [BCH] codes
- H03M13/151—Cyclic codes, i.e. cyclic shifts of codewords produce other codewords, e.g. codes defined by a generator polynomial, Bose-Chaudhuri-Hocquenghem [BCH] codes using error location or error correction polynomials
- H03M13/1515—Reed-Solomon codes
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H03—ELECTRONIC CIRCUITRY
- H03M—CODING; DECODING; CODE CONVERSION IN GENERAL
- H03M13/00—Coding, decoding or code conversion, for error detection or error correction; Coding theory basic assumptions; Coding bounds; Error probability evaluation methods; Channel models; Simulation or testing of codes
- H03M13/03—Error detection or forward error correction by redundancy in data representation, i.e. code words containing more digits than the source words
- H03M13/05—Error detection or forward error correction by redundancy in data representation, i.e. code words containing more digits than the source words using block codes, i.e. a predetermined number of check bits joined to a predetermined number of information bits
- H03M13/13—Linear codes
- H03M13/19—Single error correction without using particular properties of the cyclic codes, e.g. Hamming codes, extended or generalised Hamming codes
Definitions
- Embodiments of the present invention relate to the structure and operation of memory arrays, and more particularly to memory arrays in which data is stored in blocks utilizing error detection and correction.
- Modern electric memory devices such as flash memory devices erase data bits in parallel.
- the memory device portion in which the update data is to be stored is first erased and then the entire block is then written (with the updated bits or bytes) to the erased memory device portion.
- error detecting and error correcting bits are appended to the block. This approach requires that the unchanging data from the prior block is known.
- New cross point memory arrays are being utilized to store data in applications that were previously served by flash memory devices. As with flash memory devices, error detecting and error correcting techniques are being used to improve yield. Because, since cross point memory arrays can be erased on a byte-wise or even a bit-wise basis (as opposed to the bulk erase requirements of flash memory devices), and because each time a memory cell is written its ability to be written again degrades (a property called endurance), it is desirable to only change those bits or bytes that have changed.
- New cross point memory arrays that use phase-change information storage elements such as those found in PCM or PRAM devices (or, in some cases, resistive change information storage elements such as those found in RRAM devices) that wear out much more slowly than charge storage information storage elements (such as floating gate devices such as those found in flash memory devices) will particularly benefit from the present invention due to the reduced load balancing that enables the same physical storage locations to be written and rewritten without relocating the sector to a different area of the memory device.
- phase-change information storage elements such as those found in PCM or PRAM devices (or, in some cases, resistive change information storage elements such as those found in RRAM devices) that wear out much more slowly than charge storage information storage elements (such as floating gate devices such as those found in flash memory devices)
- What is needed is an error correcting technique that can be made more efficient by adjusting the error correcting bits from a previous computation of the error detecting and correcting bits for a storage block rather than regenerating the error detecting and correcting bits for the entire block.
- What is needed is a cross point memory array that works with an incrementally modifiable ECC. The present invention fills this need by reversing the error correcting code (ECC) and backing out prior values and replacing them with new values without recomputing the entire ECC.
- ECC error correcting code
- FIG. 1 depicts a nine number block of data arranged in a rectangular pattern
- FIG. 2 depicts a nine number block of data arranged in a rectangular pattern with computed error detection and correction codes added;
- FIG. 3 depicts a nine number block of data arranged in a rectangular pattern with an error in the first number
- FIG. 4 illustrates a nine number block of data arranged in a rectangular pattern for which the first number is being changed.
- Modern electric memory devices such as flash memory devices erase data bits in parallel.
- the memory device portion in which the update data is to be stored is first erased and then the entire block is written (with the updated bits or bytes) to the erased memory device portion.
- error detecting and error correcting bits are appended to the block. Often, this involves reading the existing portion out of the flash memory into a buffer area, replacing bytes in the buffer area with the new update data bytes, recomputing the ECC bits (in the buffer area), and rewriting the buffer area data with ECC bits to a previously erased area of the flash memory device.
- New cross point memory arrays are being utilized to store data in applications that were previously served by flash memory devices.
- error detecting and error correcting techniques are being used in these cross point memory array devices to improve yield. Since cross point memory arrays can be erased on a byte-wise or even a bit-wise basis (as opposed to the bulk erase requirements of flash memory devices), it is desirable to only change those bits or bytes that change. This in part because even with cross point memory array devices (but, to a lesser degree), each time a memory cell is written, its ability to be rewritten degrades (a property called endurance).
- Error correcting techniques utilized with flash memory devices generate the error detecting and error correcting bits for a given block of memory. This technique can be made more efficient by adjusting the error correcting bits from a previous generation of the error detecting and correcting bits rather than regenerating the error detecting and correcting bits for the entire block.
- the FAT table (or File Allocation Table) is used, among other things, to hold the names of the files storage along with a pointer into the memory device for where the data storage for any given file begins.
- the FAT table or File Allocation Table
- the file's name is added to the FAT table with a pointer to an area of available storage where the file contents are stored.
- the name and pointer is added to a copy of a block of the FAT table in memory, new error detecting and correcting bits are determined by an error correcting algorithm for the block, and the new block (comprising the new file information and error detecting and correcting bits) is written to an erased area of the flash memory device.
- the flash memory cannot be piecewise erased—i.e., it is not possible to erase only the memory cells where the error correction bits will be stored because erasure is done a block at a time.
- the error detection and correction algorithm can be one of many possible algorithms—from simple hamming codes and multidimensional parity-check codes to Reed-Solomon codes and Turbo codes and low-density parity-check codes (LDPC).
- simple hamming codes and multidimensional parity-check codes to Reed-Solomon codes and Turbo codes and low-density parity-check codes (LDPC).
- LDPC low-density parity-check codes
- Error detecting and correcting parity numbers are then calculated by summing each column and row separately as shown in FIG. 2 .
- the present invention is an improvement to this approach. Since with a cross point memory, erasure can be done to individual storage locations, changing a particular number (say, the first number) only requires changing that number and adjusting the affected error correcting codes. For the purpose of illustration and from the above example while referring to FIG. 4 , changing the “1” to a “9” would be done in two steps.
- the advantage of the present invention is that the entire block would not have to be read out of the memory (in order to make them available for recomputing all of the error correcting values from scratch) and only the values that are changed (i.e., the new data values and the affected ECC values) would have to be written into the memory.
- the prior value (of the value being replaced) and two out of six ECC values had to be read form memory; only the new value and two out of six ECC values had to be written to memory.
- the result is greater speed (due to fewer reads and less computation time) and less wear (due to fewer writes) on the individual memory cells. Throughput and endurance are both improved.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Probability & Statistics with Applications (AREA)
- Techniques For Improving Reliability Of Storages (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- This application is a divisional application of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/803,091, filed on Jul. 19, 2015, which claims benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/026,657, filed on Jul. 20, 2014. Each of afore mentioned patent applications are incorporated herein by reference.
- Embodiments of the present invention relate to the structure and operation of memory arrays, and more particularly to memory arrays in which data is stored in blocks utilizing error detection and correction.
- Modern electric memory devices such as flash memory devices erase data bits in parallel. As a result, to update a block of memory, the memory device portion in which the update data is to be stored is first erased and then the entire block is then written (with the updated bits or bytes) to the erased memory device portion. In addition, to improve the yield and lower the cost of large capacity memory devices, error detecting and error correcting bits are appended to the block. This approach requires that the unchanging data from the prior block is known.
- New cross point memory arrays are being utilized to store data in applications that were previously served by flash memory devices. As with flash memory devices, error detecting and error correcting techniques are being used to improve yield. Because, since cross point memory arrays can be erased on a byte-wise or even a bit-wise basis (as opposed to the bulk erase requirements of flash memory devices), and because each time a memory cell is written its ability to be written again degrades (a property called endurance), it is desirable to only change those bits or bytes that have changed. New cross point memory arrays that use phase-change information storage elements such as those found in PCM or PRAM devices (or, in some cases, resistive change information storage elements such as those found in RRAM devices) that wear out much more slowly than charge storage information storage elements (such as floating gate devices such as those found in flash memory devices) will particularly benefit from the present invention due to the reduced load balancing that enables the same physical storage locations to be written and rewritten without relocating the sector to a different area of the memory device.
- What is needed is an error correcting technique that can be made more efficient by adjusting the error correcting bits from a previous computation of the error detecting and correcting bits for a storage block rather than regenerating the error detecting and correcting bits for the entire block. What is needed is a cross point memory array that works with an incrementally modifiable ECC. The present invention fills this need by reversing the error correcting code (ECC) and backing out prior values and replacing them with new values without recomputing the entire ECC.
- In the following description, various embodiments of the present invention are described with reference to the following drawings, in which:
-
FIG. 1 depicts a nine number block of data arranged in a rectangular pattern; -
FIG. 2 depicts a nine number block of data arranged in a rectangular pattern with computed error detection and correction codes added; -
FIG. 3 depicts a nine number block of data arranged in a rectangular pattern with an error in the first number; and -
FIG. 4 illustrates a nine number block of data arranged in a rectangular pattern for which the first number is being changed. - Modern electric memory devices such as flash memory devices erase data bits in parallel. As a result, to update a block of memory, the memory device portion in which the update data is to be stored is first erased and then the entire block is written (with the updated bits or bytes) to the erased memory device portion. In addition, to improve the yield and lower the cost of large capacity memory devices, error detecting and error correcting bits are appended to the block. Often, this involves reading the existing portion out of the flash memory into a buffer area, replacing bytes in the buffer area with the new update data bytes, recomputing the ECC bits (in the buffer area), and rewriting the buffer area data with ECC bits to a previously erased area of the flash memory device.
- New cross point memory arrays are being utilized to store data in applications that were previously served by flash memory devices. As with flash memory devices, error detecting and error correcting techniques are being used in these cross point memory array devices to improve yield. Since cross point memory arrays can be erased on a byte-wise or even a bit-wise basis (as opposed to the bulk erase requirements of flash memory devices), it is desirable to only change those bits or bytes that change. This in part because even with cross point memory array devices (but, to a lesser degree), each time a memory cell is written, its ability to be rewritten degrades (a property called endurance).
- Error correcting techniques utilized with flash memory devices generate the error detecting and error correcting bits for a given block of memory. This technique can be made more efficient by adjusting the error correcting bits from a previous generation of the error detecting and correcting bits rather than regenerating the error detecting and correcting bits for the entire block.
- By way of example, consider an update to the FAT table of a typical memory system. The FAT table (or File Allocation Table) is used, among other things, to hold the names of the files storage along with a pointer into the memory device for where the data storage for any given file begins. When a new file is added to the device, the file's name is added to the FAT table with a pointer to an area of available storage where the file contents are stored. With a flash memory device, the name and pointer is added to a copy of a block of the FAT table in memory, new error detecting and correcting bits are determined by an error correcting algorithm for the block, and the new block (comprising the new file information and error detecting and correcting bits) is written to an erased area of the flash memory device. This is necessitated by the fact that the flash memory cannot be piecewise erased—i.e., it is not possible to erase only the memory cells where the error correction bits will be stored because erasure is done a block at a time. While it would be possible to write the bytes being appended (i.e., those bytes being written to an area of the area of the block that has not yet been written and is still in its erased state), the ECC bits will have been written and will require erasure (i.e., the bits being changed from a ‘0’ to a ‘1’, if ‘1’ is the defined erased state).
- The error detection and correction algorithm can be one of many possible algorithms—from simple hamming codes and multidimensional parity-check codes to Reed-Solomon codes and Turbo codes and low-density parity-check codes (LDPC).
- Consider a simple nine-number data block: 123456789. With two-dimensional parity-check code, the numbers are first arranged in a rectangular pattern as shown in
FIG. 1 . - Error detecting and correcting parity numbers are then calculated by summing each column and row separately as shown in
FIG. 2 . The fifteen number sequence “1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 6 15 24 12 15 18” is the block that is stored into the memory device. If any single error occurs (say, to the first number) during writing and reading back, this error can be detected and corrected by arranging the message into its original grid (seeFIG. 3 ). With an assumption that only one error occurred, it is possible to verify that the “2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9” are correct and it is also possible to correct the error in the first number by reversing the algorithm (6−3−2=1 and 12−7−4=1). With a flash memory, the error correcting values are computed for each block written to available flash storage. - The present invention is an improvement to this approach. Since with a cross point memory, erasure can be done to individual storage locations, changing a particular number (say, the first number) only requires changing that number and adjusting the affected error correcting codes. For the purpose of illustration and from the above example while referring to
FIG. 4 , changing the “1” to a “9” would be done in two steps. - First, the targeted number would be backed out of the error detecting and correcting algorithm's resulting error detecting and correcting bytes by reversing the algorithm; in the present example, since the original error detecting and correcting codes were calculated by adding each data value (the number “1” and others), reversing out the “1” dictates that we use the opposite operation (subtraction) to back out its impact (we subtract the “1” from the 6 and from the 12 the result of which is shown in the middle matrix). Second, we bring the “9” and run the forward algorithm to add in the impact of the “9” to the error detection and correction values (5+9=14 and 11+9=20). Other more advanced error detecting and correcting algorithms such as those mentioned above, while using more complex operators, would be affected in similar fashion.
- An improvement to the exact technique as described above, would be to combine the two steps by calculating the difference between the new and old value (in the above example, the difference between the old ‘1’ value and the new ‘9’ value is the value ‘8’) and this difference value would be incorporated into the impacted error detection and correction values (in the above example, the difference value ‘8’ is added to the old error detection and correction values of ‘6’ and ‘12’ resulting in the same new error detection and correction values of ‘14’ and ‘20). More complex algorithms will be more complex in how the change will impact the error detection and correction values (more complex than the simple subtraction as outlined in the above example), but the approach is nonetheless the same as will be clear to those skilled in the art of error detection and correction algorithms.
- The advantage of the present invention is that the entire block would not have to be read out of the memory (in order to make them available for recomputing all of the error correcting values from scratch) and only the values that are changed (i.e., the new data values and the affected ECC values) would have to be written into the memory. In the above example, only the prior value (of the value being replaced) and two out of six ECC values had to be read form memory; only the new value and two out of six ECC values had to be written to memory. The result is greater speed (due to fewer reads and less computation time) and less wear (due to fewer writes) on the individual memory cells. Throughput and endurance are both improved.
- The foregoing description of an example of embodiments of the present invention; variations thereon have been presented for the purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed. Many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teaching. It is intended that the scope of the invention be limited not by this detailed description.
Claims (20)
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US15/810,304 US20180069573A1 (en) | 2014-07-20 | 2017-11-13 | Incremental error detection and correction for memories |
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US201462026657P | 2014-07-20 | 2014-07-20 | |
| US14/803,091 US9819365B2 (en) | 2014-07-20 | 2015-07-19 | Incremental error detection and correction for memories |
| US15/810,304 US20180069573A1 (en) | 2014-07-20 | 2017-11-13 | Incremental error detection and correction for memories |
Related Parent Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| US14/803,091 Division US9819365B2 (en) | 2014-07-20 | 2015-07-19 | Incremental error detection and correction for memories |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| US20180069573A1 true US20180069573A1 (en) | 2018-03-08 |
Family
ID=55074667
Family Applications (2)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| US14/803,091 Expired - Fee Related US9819365B2 (en) | 2014-07-20 | 2015-07-19 | Incremental error detection and correction for memories |
| US15/810,304 Abandoned US20180069573A1 (en) | 2014-07-20 | 2017-11-13 | Incremental error detection and correction for memories |
Family Applications Before (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| US14/803,091 Expired - Fee Related US9819365B2 (en) | 2014-07-20 | 2015-07-19 | Incremental error detection and correction for memories |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (2) | US9819365B2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TWI699776B (en) * | 2019-07-13 | 2020-07-21 | 華邦電子股份有限公司 | Memory storage apparatus and data access method |
| CN112289366B (en) * | 2019-07-25 | 2024-03-26 | 华邦电子股份有限公司 | Memory storage device and data access method |
| US11231870B1 (en) | 2020-08-11 | 2022-01-25 | Micron Technology, Inc. | Memory sub-system retirement determination |
Citations (9)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20090055682A1 (en) * | 2007-07-18 | 2009-02-26 | Panasas Inc. | Data storage systems and methods having block group error correction for repairing unrecoverable read errors |
| US8015438B2 (en) * | 2007-11-29 | 2011-09-06 | Qimonda Ag | Memory circuit |
| US20120030441A1 (en) * | 2010-07-29 | 2012-02-02 | Takahiro Yamashita | Semiconductor memory device detecting error |
| US8315092B2 (en) * | 2010-01-27 | 2012-11-20 | Fusion-Io, Inc. | Apparatus, system, and method for determining a read voltage threshold for solid-state storage media |
| US8429494B2 (en) * | 2009-08-06 | 2013-04-23 | Sony Corporation | Nonvolatile random access memory and nonvolatile memory system |
| US8661184B2 (en) * | 2010-01-27 | 2014-02-25 | Fusion-Io, Inc. | Managing non-volatile media |
| US8839046B2 (en) * | 2012-07-10 | 2014-09-16 | International Business Machines Corporation | Arranging data handling in a computer-implemented system in accordance with reliability ratings based on reverse predictive failure analysis in response to changes |
| US8892980B2 (en) * | 2010-06-15 | 2014-11-18 | Fusion-Io, Inc. | Apparatus, system, and method for providing error correction |
| US9245653B2 (en) * | 2010-03-15 | 2016-01-26 | Intelligent Intellectual Property Holdings 2 Llc | Reduced level cell mode for non-volatile memory |
Family Cites Families (10)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP3286205B2 (en) * | 1997-04-08 | 2002-05-27 | 東芝デジタルメディアエンジニアリング株式会社 | Data transmission system, error correction device, error correction method, and DVD playback device |
| JP2002007225A (en) * | 2000-06-22 | 2002-01-11 | Fujitsu Ltd | Address parity error processing method, information processing device and storage device |
| US6847760B2 (en) * | 2001-10-23 | 2005-01-25 | Georgia Tech Research Corporation | Spatially resolved equalization and forward error correction for multimode fiber links |
| US6918069B2 (en) * | 2002-04-16 | 2005-07-12 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Optimum threshold for FEC transponders |
| US7797609B2 (en) * | 2004-08-19 | 2010-09-14 | Unisys Corporation | Apparatus and method for merging data blocks with error correction code protection |
| JP4583294B2 (en) * | 2005-11-25 | 2010-11-17 | 東芝ストレージデバイス株式会社 | Error correction apparatus, error correction program, and error correction method |
| US8286059B1 (en) * | 2007-01-08 | 2012-10-09 | Marvell International Ltd. | Word-serial cyclic code encoder |
| KR20110105257A (en) * | 2010-03-18 | 2011-09-26 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Semiconductor memory device with stacked structure and error correction method |
| US9189329B1 (en) * | 2011-10-13 | 2015-11-17 | Marvell International Ltd. | Generating error correcting code (ECC) data using an ECC corresponding to an identified ECC protection level |
| US8898549B2 (en) * | 2013-02-12 | 2014-11-25 | Seagate Technology Llc | Statistical adaptive error correction for a flash memory |
-
2015
- 2015-07-19 US US14/803,091 patent/US9819365B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2017
- 2017-11-13 US US15/810,304 patent/US20180069573A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (9)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20090055682A1 (en) * | 2007-07-18 | 2009-02-26 | Panasas Inc. | Data storage systems and methods having block group error correction for repairing unrecoverable read errors |
| US8015438B2 (en) * | 2007-11-29 | 2011-09-06 | Qimonda Ag | Memory circuit |
| US8429494B2 (en) * | 2009-08-06 | 2013-04-23 | Sony Corporation | Nonvolatile random access memory and nonvolatile memory system |
| US8315092B2 (en) * | 2010-01-27 | 2012-11-20 | Fusion-Io, Inc. | Apparatus, system, and method for determining a read voltage threshold for solid-state storage media |
| US8661184B2 (en) * | 2010-01-27 | 2014-02-25 | Fusion-Io, Inc. | Managing non-volatile media |
| US9245653B2 (en) * | 2010-03-15 | 2016-01-26 | Intelligent Intellectual Property Holdings 2 Llc | Reduced level cell mode for non-volatile memory |
| US8892980B2 (en) * | 2010-06-15 | 2014-11-18 | Fusion-Io, Inc. | Apparatus, system, and method for providing error correction |
| US20120030441A1 (en) * | 2010-07-29 | 2012-02-02 | Takahiro Yamashita | Semiconductor memory device detecting error |
| US8839046B2 (en) * | 2012-07-10 | 2014-09-16 | International Business Machines Corporation | Arranging data handling in a computer-implemented system in accordance with reliability ratings based on reverse predictive failure analysis in response to changes |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| US9819365B2 (en) | 2017-11-14 |
| US20160019112A1 (en) | 2016-01-21 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN111078131B (en) | Split wafer planes using interleaved writes | |
| CN102906712B (en) | MLC self-raid flash data protection scheme | |
| TWI569273B (en) | Method for read disturbance management in non-volatile memory devices | |
| CN106095700B (en) | Method and system for replicating and using grid-level metadata in a storage system | |
| US10915394B1 (en) | Schemes for protecting data in NVM device using small storage footprint | |
| TWI574277B (en) | Error correction operations in a memory device | |
| TWI498724B (en) | Apparatus and method for protecting data from write failures in memory devices | |
| US20180321874A1 (en) | Flash management optimization for data update with small block sizes for write amplification mitigation and fault tolerance enhancement | |
| US9229813B2 (en) | Error correction with on-demand parity sectors in magnetic data storage devices | |
| US9058869B2 (en) | Applying a bias signal to memory cells to reverse a resistance shift of the memory cells | |
| CN105051700B (en) | Select redundant storage configuration based on available storage space | |
| US9239757B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for relocating data in non-volatile memory | |
| US10635527B2 (en) | Method for processing data stored in a memory device and a data storage device utilizing the same | |
| US20190205247A1 (en) | Data storage device and method for operating non-volatile memory | |
| CN110389906B (en) | Method for rearranging data in memory element, controller and system thereof | |
| CN102693760A (en) | error correction method of NAND flash memory | |
| US20180069573A1 (en) | Incremental error detection and correction for memories | |
| US9424131B2 (en) | Spatially decoupled redundancy schemes for a solid state drive (SSD) | |
| Li et al. | Stochastic analysis on RAID reliability for solid-state drives | |
| JP5335779B2 (en) | Semiconductor recording device | |
| JP7520160B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for striping a redundant array of independent disks against programming failures - Patents.com | |
| CN112530506B (en) | Reducing delay in syndrome-based quasi-cyclic decoders | |
| KR20140104829A (en) | Multi level cell nonvolatile memory system | |
| US11082062B2 (en) | Hardware implementations of a quasi-cyclic syndrome decoder | |
| CN113420341B (en) | Data protection method, data protection equipment and computer system |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| AS | Assignment |
Owner name: HGST, INC., CALIFORNIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:SHEPARD, DANIEL R.;REEL/FRAME:044187/0065 Effective date: 20151001 |
|
| STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: DOCKETED NEW CASE - READY FOR EXAMINATION |
|
| AS | Assignment |
Owner name: WESTERN DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., CALIFORNIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:HGST, INC.;REEL/FRAME:046939/0587 Effective date: 20180824 |
|
| STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED |
|
| STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: RESPONSE TO NON-FINAL OFFICE ACTION ENTERED AND FORWARDED TO EXAMINER |
|
| STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED |
|
| AS | Assignment |
Owner name: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS AGENT, ILLINOIS Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:WESTERN DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.;REEL/FRAME:052915/0566 Effective date: 20200113 |
|
| STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |
|
| AS | Assignment |
Owner name: WESTERN DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., CALIFORNIA Free format text: RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST AT REEL 052915 FRAME 0566;ASSIGNOR:JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.;REEL/FRAME:059127/0001 Effective date: 20220203 |