US20160145994A1 - Evaluation Method and Evaluation Device for Water Breakthrough Risk of Production Wells in Aquifer Drive Gas Reservoirs - Google Patents
Evaluation Method and Evaluation Device for Water Breakthrough Risk of Production Wells in Aquifer Drive Gas Reservoirs Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20160145994A1 US20160145994A1 US14/946,174 US201514946174A US2016145994A1 US 20160145994 A1 US20160145994 A1 US 20160145994A1 US 201514946174 A US201514946174 A US 201514946174A US 2016145994 A1 US2016145994 A1 US 2016145994A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- evaluation
- gas
- aquifers
- water breakthrough
- gas wells
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0635—Risk analysis of enterprise or organisation activities
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B47/00—Survey of boreholes or wells
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B44/00—Automatic control systems specially adapted for drilling operations, i.e. self-operating systems which function to carry out or modify a drilling operation without intervention of a human operator, e.g. computer-controlled drilling systems; Systems specially adapted for monitoring a plurality of drilling variables or conditions
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B41/00—Equipment or details not covered by groups E21B15/00 - E21B40/00
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B49/00—Testing the nature of borehole walls; Formation testing; Methods or apparatus for obtaining samples of soil or well fluids, specially adapted to earth drilling or wells
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/06—Energy or water supply
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B2200/00—Special features related to earth drilling for obtaining oil, gas or water
- E21B2200/22—Fuzzy logic, artificial intelligence, neural networks or the like
Definitions
- the present invention relates to the technical field of natural gas development, in particular to an evaluation method and an evaluation device for water breakthrough risk of production wells in gas reservoirs with aquifer.
- water breakthrough time prediction method adopts a water coning breakthrough time calculation formula to predict specific water breakthrough time of a gas well, but because actual gas reservoir has high heterogeneity and the production plan is continuously adjusted, use of these methods to perform evaluation of water invasion of the gas reservoirs may result in great difference with the actual situation.
- the present invention is aimed to provide an evaluation method and an evaluation device for water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers, so as to make the obtained water breakthrough risk evaluation result be more consistent with the actual production characteristics.
- the present invention provides an evaluation method for water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers, comprising:
- the evaluation factors that influence water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers include the following features of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifer:
- structure and sedimentary facies features including structure and trap feature, fracture feature, fracture development condition, rock type and sedimentary facies;
- reservoir features including interlayer feature, reservoir type, sand body connectivity and reservoir heterogeneity
- drilling information including drilling quality, cementing quality and distance between a perforation and the edge-bottom water
- production performance and monitoring data including gas production profile testing result, saturation logging result and pressure transient well test evaluation result;
- dynamic evaluation and prediction result including production rate and pressure variation features, production rate transient analysis result, controllable reserves per well, water coning critical production rate and water breakthrough time prediction result.
- the acquiring weight vectors of the evaluation factors based on an analytic hierarchy process specifically comprises:
- m ij represents the weight of an evaluation factor i to an evaluation factor j
- the fuzzy relationship matrix between the water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers is:
- R [ R
- u p ] [ r 11 r 12 ... r 1 ⁇ ⁇ m r 21 r 22 ... r 2 ⁇ ⁇ m ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ r p ⁇ ⁇ 1 r p ⁇ ⁇ 2 ... r pm ] p , m
- the element r pm in row p column m represents a degree of membership of water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers as for the feature vector from the aspect of the evaluation factor u p .
- the synthesizing the fuzzy relationship matrix and the weight vectors according to a weighted average fuzzy synthesis operator specifically comprises:
- b 1 , a i , r ij represent a degree of membership belonging to the jth level, a weight of the ith evaluation factor, and a degree of membership that the ith evaluation factor belongs to the jth level, respectively.
- the present invention also provides an evaluation device for water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers, comprising:
- an evaluation factor building module for building evaluation factors that influence water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers
- a weight vector acquisition module for acquiring weight vectors of the evaluation factors based on an analytic hierarchy process
- a fuzzy matrix building module for building a fuzzy relationship matrix between the water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers and its evaluation factors
- a matrix and vector synthesizing module for synthesizing the fuzzy relationship matrix and the weight vectors according to a weighted average fuzzy synthesis operator, to acquire a comprehensive evaluation result of water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers.
- the evaluation factors that influence water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers include the following features of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers:
- structure and sedimentary facies features including structure and trap feature, fracture feature, fracture development condition, rock type and sedimentary facies;
- reservoir features including interlayer feature, reservoir type, sand body connectivity and reservoir heterogeneity
- drilling information including drilling quality, cementing quality and distance between perforations and the edge-bottom water
- production performance and monitoring data including gas production profile testing results, saturation logging results and pressure transient well testing analysis results;
- dynamic evaluation and prediction result including production rate and pressure variation features, production rate transient analysis results, reserves controlled by a well, critical water coning production rate and the predicted water breakthrough time.
- the acquiring weight vectors of the evaluation factors based on an analytic hierarchy process specifically comprises:
- m ij represents the weight of the evaluation factor i to the evaluation factor j
- the fuzzy relationship matrix between the water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers and its evaluation factors is:
- R [ R
- u p ] [ r 11 r 12 ... r 1 ⁇ ⁇ m r 21 r 22 ... r 2 ⁇ ⁇ m ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ r p ⁇ ⁇ 1 r p ⁇ ⁇ 2 ... r pm ] p , m
- the element r pm in row p column m represents a degree of membership of water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers as for the feature vector from the aspect of the evaluation factor u p .
- the synthesizing the fuzzy relationship matrix and the weight vectors according to a weighted average fuzzy synthesis operator specifically comprises:
- b i , a i , r ij represent a degree of membership belonging to the jth level, a weight of the ith evaluation factor, and a degree of membership that the ith evaluation factor belongs to the jth level, respectively.
- a quantitative evaluation is performed on water breakthrough risk in the manner of combining an analytic hierarchy process and a fuzzy synthetic evaluation method.
- the analytic hierarchy process is a systematic research method through which evaluation and judgment are made in accordance with decomposition, comparison, judgment and comprehensive thinking method, it is more reasonable for the present invention to adopt the analytic hierarchy process to determine weight coefficients of the evaluation factors for water breakthrough risk of the gas wells, which is more adaptive to the objective fact and easy to be calculated quantitatively, thereby improving accuracy of the result of subsequent fuzzy comprehensive evaluation, and being able to obtain an evaluation result that is more consistent with the case of actual water breakthrough situation of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers.
- FIG. 1 is a flowchart of an evaluation method for water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention
- FIG. 2 a is a schematic of a curve of contrast relationship between actual production rate of a well A in the evaluation method for water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers in accordance with the embodiment of the present invention and a water coning critical production rate calculated based on Chaperon method;
- FIG. 2 b is a schematic of a curve of contrast relationship between actual production rate of a well B in the evaluation method for water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers in accordance with the embodiment of the present invention and a water coning critical production rate calculated based on Chaperon method;
- FIG. 2 c is a schematic of a curve of contrast relationship between actual production rate of a well C in the evaluation method for water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers in accordance with the embodiment of the present invention and a water coning critical production rate calculated based on Chaperon method;
- FIG. 2 d is a schematic of a curve of contrast relationship between actual production rate of a well D in the evaluation method for water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers in accordance with the embodiment of the present invention and a water coning critical production rate calculated based on Chaperon method.
- an evaluation method for water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers comprises the following steps:
- step S 101 building evaluation factors that influence water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers.
- the evaluation factors that influence water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers are as shown in Table 1:
- evaluation can be performed on water coning critical production rate per well by selecting an evaluation method suitable for evaluating water coning critical production rate of gas reservoir, and a contrast curve of actual daily gas production rate per well and water coning critical production rate is drawn, so that water invasion or water breakthrough of the gas well can be recognized according to relationship between gas well production rate and water coning critical production rate.
- FIGS. 2 a to 2 d provide four curves of contrast relationships between four possible actual production rate of the gas well A, B, C, D and water coning critical production rate calculated based on Chaperon method. From the aspect of relationship between gas well production rate and water coning critical production rate, four wells in FIGS.
- 2 a to 2 d are sequenced as D, C, B, A in accordance with possible water breakthrough levels, that is, water breakthrough occurs most easily in the well D, because the production rate of D is higher than the water coning critical production rate of D all the time, water cone is very easily formed or it causes edge water tongue advance. Water breakthrough occurs latest in the well A, because production rate of A is lower than the water coning critical production rate of A all the time, and water cone is not formed.
- it is also possible to judge water invasion stage of gas wells by using a Blasingame production rate transient analysis type curve, a flowing material balance curve and the like, and the wells are categorized, and water breakthrough time of the gas wells can be preliminarily evaluated.
- Step S 102 acquiring weight vectors of the evaluation factors based on an analytic hierarchy process. Specifically:
- m ij represents the weight of an evaluation factor i to an evaluation factor j
- the construction method is to fill upper triangular items of the sample matrices randomly with scales and their reciprocals, numerical values of the principal diagonal are always 1, and corresponding transposition position items are reciprocals of the above corresponding position random numbers. Then consistency index values of the random sample matrices are calculated, the CI values are averaged to obtain an average random consistency index RI value.
- Step S 03 building a fuzzy relationship matrix between the water breakthrough risks of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers and its evaluation factors.
- R [ R
- u p ] [ r 11 r 12 ... r 1 ⁇ ⁇ m r 21 r 22 ... r 2 ⁇ ⁇ m ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ r p ⁇ ⁇ 1 r p ⁇ ⁇ 2 ... r pm ] p , m
- the element r pm in row p column m represents a degree of membership of water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers as for the feature vector from the aspect of the evaluation factor u p .
- Step S 104 combining the fuzzy relationship matrix and the weight vectors according to a weighted average fuzzy synthesis operator, to acquire a comprehensive evaluation results of water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers. Specifically:
- b i , a i , r ij represent a degree of membership belonging to the jth level, a weight of the ith evaluation factor, and a degree of membership that the ith evaluation factor belongs to the jth level, respectively.
- a comprehensive evaluation result of water breakthrough risk of each individual well can be obtained in accordance with the above evaluation method. Furthermore, if there is a need, the obtained comprehensive evaluation results of water breakthrough risk of the multiple individual wells can be graded and ranked, for example, the multiple individual wells are ranked in terms of level and position according to the comprehensive evaluation results of water breakthrough risk by using a method of seeking a grade of membership by the weighted average.
- the evaluation method in accordance with the embodiment of the present invention has been applied successfully in gas fields of Tarim oilfield, PetroChina, which has a high prediction accuracy.
- production rate of the gas wells are optimized and adjusted, on the basis of stable overall production rate of the gas fields, early water breakthrough in gas wells can be avoided to prevent the production rate decrease severely and improve the gas recovery, thereby greatly improving development effect of the gas fields.
- the practical application result shows that, the evaluation method in accordance with the embodiment of the present invention is at least applicable to evaluation of water breakthrough risk of domestic large-scale gas reservoirs with edge-bottom aquifer.
- a quantitative evaluation is performed on water breakthrough risk in the manner of combining an analytic hierarchy process and a fuzzy synthetic evaluation method.
- the analytic hierarchy process is a systematic research method through which evaluation and judgment are made in accordance with decomposition, comparison and judgment and comprehensive thinking method, it is more reasonable for the embodiment of the present invention to adopt the analytic hierarchy process to determine weight coefficients of the evaluation factors for water breakthrough risk of the gas well, which is more adaptive to the objective fact and is easy to express quantitatively, thereby improving accuracy of the result of subsequent fuzzy comprehensive evaluation.
- the evaluation device for water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers in accordance with the embodiment of the present invention comprises an evaluation factor building module, a weight vector acquisition module, a fussy matrix building module and a matrix and vector synthesizing module, wherein:
- the evaluation factor building module is used for building evaluation factors that influence water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers. Specific evaluation factors can be seen in the step S 101 of the above method of the embodiment.
- the weight vector acquisition module is used for acquiring weight vectors of the evaluation factors based on an analytic hierarchy process. Specific content can be seen in the step S 102 of the above method of the embodiment.
- the fuzzy matrix building module is used for building a fuzzy relationship matrix between the water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers and its evaluation factors. Specific content can be seen in the step S 103 of the above method of the embodiment.
- the matrix and vector synthesizing module is used for synthesizing the fuzzy relationship matrix and the weight vectors according to a weighted average fuzzy synthesis operator, to acquire a comprehensive evaluation result of water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers. Specific content can be seen in the step S 104 of the above method of the embodiment.
- a quantitative evaluation is performed on water breakthrough risk in the manner of combining an analytic hierarchy process and a fuzzy synthetic evaluation method.
- the analytic hierarchy process is a systematic research method through which evaluation and judgment are made in accordance with decomposition, comparison and judgment and comprehensive thinking method, it is more reasonable for the embodiment of the present invention to adopt the analytic hierarchy process to determine weight coefficients of the evaluation factors for water breakthrough risk of the gas well, which is more adaptive to the objective fact and is easy to express quantitatively, thereby improving accuracy of the result of subsequent fuzzy comprehensive evaluation.
- Various illustrative logic modules or units described in the embodiment of the present invention can achieve or operate the described functions through the design of a universal processor, a digital signal processor, an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC), a field-programmable gate array or other programmable logic devices, a discrete gate or transistor logic, a discrete hardware component or any combination of the above.
- the universal processor may be a microprocessor, and alternatively, the universal processor may be any traditional processor, controller, microcontroller or state machine.
- the processor also can be implemented by combination of computing devices, such as a digital signal processor and a microprocessor, a plurality of microprocessors, one or more microprocessors united with one digital signal processor core, or any other similar configuration.
- the steps of the method or algorithm described in the embodiment of the present invention can be directly inserted into hardware, a software module executed by the processor, or combination thereof
- the software module can be stored in an RAM memory, a flash memory, an ROM memory, an EPROM memory, an EEPROM memory, a resistor, a disk, a removable disk, CD-ROM or storage medium in any other forms in the technical field.
- a storage medium can be connected to the processor, so that the processor can read information from the storage medium and can write and store information into the storage medium.
- the storage medium also can be integrated into the processor.
- the processor and the storage medium can be disposed in the ASIC, and the ASIC can be disposed in a user terminal.
- the processor and the storage medium can be disposed in different components in the user terminal.
- the above functions described in the embodiment of the present invention can be realized by hardware, software, firmware or any combination thereof If the functions are realized in software, then the functions can be stored in a computer-readable medium, or can be transmitted to the computer-readable medium in the form of one or more instructs or codes.
- the computer-readable medium includes a computer storage medium and a communication medium that facilitates transfer of computer program from one place to other places.
- the storage medium can be any available media that can be accessed by a general or special computer.
- Such computer-readable media can include but is not limited to RAM, ROM, EEPROM, CD-ROM or other optical disk storage, magnetic disc storage or other magnetic storage device, or any other medium that can be used for carrying or storing program codes in the form of instructs or data structure and other forms that can be read by a general or special computer or a general or special processor.
- any connection can be suitably defined as computer-readable medium, for example, if software is transferred from a website, a server or other remote resources by a coaxial cable, an optical fiber cable, a twisted pair, a digital user line (DSL) or in a wireless manner such as infrared, wireless or microwave or the like, and can also be included in the defined computer-readable medium.
- DSL digital user line
- the described disk and disc include a compressed disc, a laser disc, an optical disc, a DVD, a floppy disc and a blue-ray disc, wherein the disc generally copies data with magnetism, while disk generally copies data optically with laser.
- the above-described combination also can be included in the computer-readable medium.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Mining & Mineral Resources (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Geology (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Geochemistry & Mineralogy (AREA)
- General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Fluid Mechanics (AREA)
- Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Geophysics (AREA)
- Educational Administration (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Public Health (AREA)
- Water Supply & Treatment (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Primary Health Care (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
- Filling Or Discharging Of Gas Storage Vessels (AREA)
- Physical Or Chemical Processes And Apparatus (AREA)
Abstract
The present invention provides an evaluation method and an evaluation device for water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers, the method comprising the following steps: building evaluation factors that influence water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers; acquiring weight vectors of the evaluation factors based on an analytic hierarchy process; building a fuzzy relationship matrix between the water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers and its evaluation factors; and synthesizing the fuzzy relationship matrix and the weight vectors according to a weighted average fuzzy synthesis operator, to acquire a comprehensive evaluation result of water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers. The present invention improves the accuracy of the evaluation result of water breakthrough risk of the gas wells, and is able to obtain an evaluation result that is more consistent with the case of actual water breakthrough of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers.
Description
- This application claims the benefit of co-pending Chinese patent application 201410670301.5, filed 20 Nov. 2014, which is hereby incorporated herein as though fully set forth.
- The present invention relates to the technical field of natural gas development, in particular to an evaluation method and an evaluation device for water breakthrough risk of production wells in gas reservoirs with aquifer.
- As for development of gas reservoirs with strong edge-bottom aquifer drive, once water breakthrough occurs in gas wells, a lot of trouble may be brought to gas field surface engineering, and meanwhile productivity of the gas wells may be decreased greatly, causing the gas wells to be shut down due to too low production rate in early period, thereby greatly influencing gas reservoirs recovery and development performance. Therefore, how to identify aquifer influx of gas wells are urgent in order to guide the well production rate optimization and improve gas field performance.
- At present, main study about evaluation of water breakthrough risk of gas reservoirs focuses on prediction of water breakthrough time based on the simplified conceptual models and identification of water invasion type. Wherein, water breakthrough time prediction method adopts a water coning breakthrough time calculation formula to predict specific water breakthrough time of a gas well, but because actual gas reservoir has high heterogeneity and the production plan is continuously adjusted, use of these methods to perform evaluation of water invasion of the gas reservoirs may result in great difference with the actual situation. There are also literatures involved the material balance method and the water invasion indication curve method, but application of these methods is also limited, because these methods need too much static pressure data and good prediction can be gotten only when a certain degree of recovery is achieved, but actually, there are few testing points of static pressure and the degree of recovery of many wells when water breakthrough occurs is very low as a result, at present it is difficult to quantitatively evaluate the water breakthrough risk, which can objectively reflect the actual situation, by using existing technology.
- The present invention is aimed to provide an evaluation method and an evaluation device for water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers, so as to make the obtained water breakthrough risk evaluation result be more consistent with the actual production characteristics.
- To achieve the above purpose, on one hand, the present invention provides an evaluation method for water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers, comprising:
- building evaluation factors that influence water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifer;
- acquiring weight vectors of the evaluation factors based on an analytic hierarchy process;
- building a fuzzy relationship matrix between the water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifer and its evaluation factors;
- synthesizing the fuzzy relationship matrix and the weight vectors according to a weighted average fuzzy composite operator, to acquire a comprehensive evaluation result of water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers.
- In the evaluation method for evaluating water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers, according to the present invention, the evaluation factors that influence water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers include the following features of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifer:
- structure and sedimentary facies features, including structure and trap feature, fracture feature, fracture development condition, rock type and sedimentary facies;
- reservoir features, including interlayer feature, reservoir type, sand body connectivity and reservoir heterogeneity;
- drilling information, including drilling quality, cementing quality and distance between a perforation and the edge-bottom water;
- production performance and monitoring data, including gas production profile testing result, saturation logging result and pressure transient well test evaluation result;
- dynamic evaluation and prediction result, including production rate and pressure variation features, production rate transient analysis result, controllable reserves per well, water coning critical production rate and water breakthrough time prediction result.
- In the evaluation method for water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers according to the present invention, the acquiring weight vectors of the evaluation factors based on an analytic hierarchy process specifically comprises:
- performing pairwise comparison among the evaluation factors under the same hierarchy to obtain a quantized judgment matrix M;
-
- wherein, mij represents the weight of an evaluation factor i to an evaluation factor j;
- calculating the largest eigenvalue λmax of the judgment matrix M and corresponding feature vector, the feature vector being weight coefficient distribution of the evaluation factors under the same hierarchy;
- performing consistency verification on the feature vector;
- if the feature vector goes through the consistency verification, calculating a product Qi of each row of elements of the judgment matrix M, wherein
-
- calculating a n-th root
-
- of Qi to acquire a vector
ω =[ω 1ω 2 . . .ω n], performing a normalization process to the vector to obtain the weight vector of the evaluation factors. - In the evaluation method for evaluating water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers according to the present invention, the fuzzy relationship matrix between the water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers. And its evaluation factors is:
-
- wherein, in the fuzzy relationship matrix R, the element rpm in row p column m represents a degree of membership of water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers as for the feature vector from the aspect of the evaluation factor up.
- In the evaluation method for evaluating water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers according to the present invention, the synthesizing the fuzzy relationship matrix and the weight vectors according to a weighted average fuzzy synthesis operator specifically comprises:
- according to the formula
-
- synthesizing the fuzzy relationship matrix and the weight vectors;
- wherein, b1, ai, rij represent a degree of membership belonging to the jth level, a weight of the ith evaluation factor, and a degree of membership that the ith evaluation factor belongs to the jth level, respectively.
- On the other hand, the present invention also provides an evaluation device for water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers, comprising:
- an evaluation factor building module for building evaluation factors that influence water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers;
- a weight vector acquisition module for acquiring weight vectors of the evaluation factors based on an analytic hierarchy process;
- a fuzzy matrix building module for building a fuzzy relationship matrix between the water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers and its evaluation factors;
- a matrix and vector synthesizing module for synthesizing the fuzzy relationship matrix and the weight vectors according to a weighted average fuzzy synthesis operator, to acquire a comprehensive evaluation result of water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers.
- In the evaluation device for evaluating water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers according to the present invention, the evaluation factors that influence water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers include the following features of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers:
- structure and sedimentary facies features, including structure and trap feature, fracture feature, fracture development condition, rock type and sedimentary facies;
- reservoir features, including interlayer feature, reservoir type, sand body connectivity and reservoir heterogeneity;
- drilling information, including drilling quality, cementing quality and distance between perforations and the edge-bottom water;
- production performance and monitoring data, including gas production profile testing results, saturation logging results and pressure transient well testing analysis results;
- dynamic evaluation and prediction result, including production rate and pressure variation features, production rate transient analysis results, reserves controlled by a well, critical water coning production rate and the predicted water breakthrough time.
- In the evaluation device for water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers according to the present invention, the acquiring weight vectors of the evaluation factors based on an analytic hierarchy process specifically comprises:
- performing pairwise comparison among the evaluation factors under the same hierarchy to obtain a quantized judgment matrix M;
-
- wherein, mij represents the weight of the evaluation factor i to the evaluation factor j;
- calculating the largest eigenvalue λmax of the judgment matrix M and corresponding feature vector, the feature vector being weight coefficient distribution of the evaluation factors under the same hierarchy;
- performing consistency verification on the feature vector;
- if the eigenvector goes through the consistency verification, calculating a product Qi of each row of elements of the judgment matrix M, wherein
-
- calculating a n-th root
-
- of Qi to acquire a vector
ω =[ω 1ω 2 . . .ω n], performing a normalization process to the vector to obtain the weight vector of the evaluation factors. - In the evaluation device for evaluating water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers according to the present invention, the fuzzy relationship matrix between the water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers and its evaluation factors is:
-
- wherein, in the fuzzy relationship matrix R, the element rpm in row p column m represents a degree of membership of water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers as for the feature vector from the aspect of the evaluation factor up.
- In the evaluation device for evaluating water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers according to the present invention, the synthesizing the fuzzy relationship matrix and the weight vectors according to a weighted average fuzzy synthesis operator specifically comprises:
- according to the formula
-
- synthesizing the fuzzy relationship matrix and the weight vectors;
- wherein, bi, ai, rij represent a degree of membership belonging to the jth level, a weight of the ith evaluation factor, and a degree of membership that the ith evaluation factor belongs to the jth level, respectively.
- In the present invention, a quantitative evaluation is performed on water breakthrough risk in the manner of combining an analytic hierarchy process and a fuzzy synthetic evaluation method. Because the analytic hierarchy process is a systematic research method through which evaluation and judgment are made in accordance with decomposition, comparison, judgment and comprehensive thinking method, it is more reasonable for the present invention to adopt the analytic hierarchy process to determine weight coefficients of the evaluation factors for water breakthrough risk of the gas wells, which is more adaptive to the objective fact and easy to be calculated quantitatively, thereby improving accuracy of the result of subsequent fuzzy comprehensive evaluation, and being able to obtain an evaluation result that is more consistent with the case of actual water breakthrough situation of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers.
- The accompanied drawings described herein are used for providing further understanding to the present invention, which constitute a part of the present application but do not constitute any definition to the present invention. In the drawings:
-
FIG. 1 is a flowchart of an evaluation method for water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention; -
FIG. 2a is a schematic of a curve of contrast relationship between actual production rate of a well A in the evaluation method for water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers in accordance with the embodiment of the present invention and a water coning critical production rate calculated based on Chaperon method; -
FIG. 2b is a schematic of a curve of contrast relationship between actual production rate of a well B in the evaluation method for water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers in accordance with the embodiment of the present invention and a water coning critical production rate calculated based on Chaperon method; -
FIG. 2c is a schematic of a curve of contrast relationship between actual production rate of a well C in the evaluation method for water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers in accordance with the embodiment of the present invention and a water coning critical production rate calculated based on Chaperon method; -
FIG. 2d is a schematic of a curve of contrast relationship between actual production rate of a well D in the evaluation method for water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers in accordance with the embodiment of the present invention and a water coning critical production rate calculated based on Chaperon method. - Hereinafter, the present invention is further described in details in combination with the embodiment and the accompanied drawings, in order to describe purpose, technical solution and advantages of the present invention is clearer. Here the schematic embodiment of the present invention and its description are to explain the present invention, but are not to define the present invention.
- Hereinafter the specific embodiment of the present invention is further described in detail in combination with the accompanied drawings.
- As shown in
FIG. 1 , an evaluation method for water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention comprises the following steps: - step S101: building evaluation factors that influence water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers. In the embodiment of the present invention, the evaluation factors that influence water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers are as shown in Table 1:
-
TABLE 1 Two-hierarchy evaluation factors of water breakthrough risk 1st-hierarchy evaluation factors 2nd-hierarchy evaluation factors A Structure and sedimentary a1 structure and trap feature facies features a2 fracture feature a3 fracture development condition a4 rock type and sedimentary facies B Reservoir feature b1 interlayer feature b2 reservoir type b3 sand body connectivity b4 reservoir heterogeneity C Drilling and completion c1 drilling quality information c2 cementing quality c3 distance between a perforation and the edge-bottom water D production performance and d1 gas production profile testing result monitoring data d2 saturation logging result d3 transient well testing analysis result E Dynamic evaluation and e1 production rate and pressure variation features prediction result e2 production rate transient analysis e3 reserve controlled by single well e4 water coning critical production rate e5 water breakthrough time prediction result - wherein, water invasion actually has great influence on production performance of the gas well, the gas well is not subjected to any pressure support when no water invasion occurs, the production performance of the gas well is shown as features of closed gas reservoir. At the initial stage of water invasion, the gas well is supported with water body energy, pressure may decline more slowly in the case of stable production rate than the case that no water invasion occurs. In the middle and later periods of water invasion, especially when edge-bottom water rushes into around the gas wells, gas flow is obviously resisted, gas production pressure difference in the case of same production rate increase obviously. Production characteristics of water invasion at different stages are summarized as shown in Table 2. Table 2 only exemplarily describes recognition of water invasion by production performance changes in the case of consistent production rate or stable flowing pressure, and similar analysis can be performed in the mode on the actual production data of the gas well, and pressure complex production performance changes.
-
TABLE 2 Diagnose of water invasion by production performance data of the gas well serial number type production performance features 1 Non-water consistent production rate, pressure declining tendency is in invasion type consistency stable pressure, production rate declining tendency is in consistency 2 Initial stage of consistent production rate, pressure declines more slowly water invasion type than the previous stage stable pressure, production rate declines more slowly than the previous stage 3 Middle and consistent production rate, pressure declines faster than the later periods of previous stage water invasion type stable pressure, production rate declines faster than the previous stage - Furthermore, in the embodiment of the present invention, evaluation can be performed on water coning critical production rate per well by selecting an evaluation method suitable for evaluating water coning critical production rate of gas reservoir, and a contrast curve of actual daily gas production rate per well and water coning critical production rate is drawn, so that water invasion or water breakthrough of the gas well can be recognized according to relationship between gas well production rate and water coning critical production rate.
FIGS. 2a to 2d provide four curves of contrast relationships between four possible actual production rate of the gas well A, B, C, D and water coning critical production rate calculated based on Chaperon method. From the aspect of relationship between gas well production rate and water coning critical production rate, four wells inFIGS. 2a to 2d are sequenced as D, C, B, A in accordance with possible water breakthrough levels, that is, water breakthrough occurs most easily in the well D, because the production rate of D is higher than the water coning critical production rate of D all the time, water cone is very easily formed or it causes edge water tongue advance. Water breakthrough occurs latest in the well A, because production rate of A is lower than the water coning critical production rate of A all the time, and water cone is not formed. Certainly, it is also possible to judge water invasion stage of gas wells by using a Blasingame production rate transient analysis type curve, a flowing material balance curve and the like, and the wells are categorized, and water breakthrough time of the gas wells can be preliminarily evaluated. - Step S102: acquiring weight vectors of the evaluation factors based on an analytic hierarchy process. Specifically:
- firstly, performing pairwise comparison among the evaluation factors under the same hierarchy to obtain a quantized judgment matrix M;
-
- wherein, mij represents the weight of an evaluation factor i to an evaluation factor j;
- then, calculating the largest eigenvalue λmax of the judgment matrix M and corresponding feature vector, the feature vector being weight coefficient distribution of the evaluation factors under the same hierarchy, which represents importance ranking of the evaluation factors under the same hierarchy;
- secondly, performing consistency verification on the feature vector; in order to judge whether the feature factor is valid, it is necessary to perform consistency verification on the judgment matrix M and to calculate a consistency index
-
- of the deviation, in which 500 sample matrices are constructed by a random method, the construction method is to fill upper triangular items of the sample matrices randomly with scales and their reciprocals, numerical values of the principal diagonal are always 1, and corresponding transposition position items are reciprocals of the above corresponding position random numbers. Then consistency index values of the random sample matrices are calculated, the CI values are averaged to obtain an average random consistency index RI value. When random consistency ratio is
-
- it is regarded that a result of the analytic hierarchy process has a satisfactory consistency, that is, distribution of weight coefficients is reasonable; otherwise, element values of the judgment matrix M are reset, and values of the weight coefficients are re-distributed.
- Thirdly, if the feature vector goes through the consistency verification, calculating a product Qi of each row of elements of the judgment matrix M, wherein
-
- finally, calculating a n-th root
-
- of Qi to acquire a vector
ω =[ω 1,ω 2 . . .ω n], performing a normalization process to the vector to obtain the weight vector of the evaluation factors. - Step S03: building a fuzzy relationship matrix between the water breakthrough risks of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers and its evaluation factors.
-
- wherein, in the fuzzy relationship matrix R, the element rpm in row p column m represents a degree of membership of water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers as for the feature vector from the aspect of the evaluation factor up.
- Step S104: combining the fuzzy relationship matrix and the weight vectors according to a weighted average fuzzy synthesis operator, to acquire a comprehensive evaluation results of water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers. Specifically:
- For a maxi-min algorithm commonly used in fuzzy comprehensive evaluation, when there are many evaluation factors, weights distributed to each evaluation factor are often very small, such that in fuzzy composite operation, much information is lost, which often causes the results to be difficult to distinguish and results in unreasonable (that is, model inefficiency) case. Therefore, focusing on the above problem, here weighted average type of fuzzy composite operators are adopted to reduce information loss, the calculation formula is:
-
- wherein, bi, ai, rij represent a degree of membership belonging to the jth level, a weight of the ith evaluation factor, and a degree of membership that the ith evaluation factor belongs to the jth level, respectively.
- When there are multiple individual wells, a comprehensive evaluation result of water breakthrough risk of each individual well can be obtained in accordance with the above evaluation method. Furthermore, if there is a need, the obtained comprehensive evaluation results of water breakthrough risk of the multiple individual wells can be graded and ranked, for example, the multiple individual wells are ranked in terms of level and position according to the comprehensive evaluation results of water breakthrough risk by using a method of seeking a grade of membership by the weighted average.
- Furthermore, the evaluation method in accordance with the embodiment of the present invention has been applied successfully in gas fields of Tarim oilfield, PetroChina, which has a high prediction accuracy. Through comprehensive evaluation of water breakthrough risk of the gas fields, production rate of the gas wells are optimized and adjusted, on the basis of stable overall production rate of the gas fields, early water breakthrough in gas wells can be avoided to prevent the production rate decrease severely and improve the gas recovery, thereby greatly improving development effect of the gas fields. In addition, the practical application result shows that, the evaluation method in accordance with the embodiment of the present invention is at least applicable to evaluation of water breakthrough risk of domestic large-scale gas reservoirs with edge-bottom aquifer.
- In the embodiment of the present invention, a quantitative evaluation is performed on water breakthrough risk in the manner of combining an analytic hierarchy process and a fuzzy synthetic evaluation method. Because the analytic hierarchy process is a systematic research method through which evaluation and judgment are made in accordance with decomposition, comparison and judgment and comprehensive thinking method, it is more reasonable for the embodiment of the present invention to adopt the analytic hierarchy process to determine weight coefficients of the evaluation factors for water breakthrough risk of the gas well, which is more adaptive to the objective fact and is easy to express quantitatively, thereby improving accuracy of the result of subsequent fuzzy comprehensive evaluation.
- Correspondingly to the above evaluation method for water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers, the evaluation device for water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers in accordance with the embodiment of the present invention comprises an evaluation factor building module, a weight vector acquisition module, a fussy matrix building module and a matrix and vector synthesizing module, wherein:
- the evaluation factor building module is used for building evaluation factors that influence water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers. Specific evaluation factors can be seen in the step S101 of the above method of the embodiment.
- The weight vector acquisition module is used for acquiring weight vectors of the evaluation factors based on an analytic hierarchy process. Specific content can be seen in the step S102 of the above method of the embodiment.
- The fuzzy matrix building module is used for building a fuzzy relationship matrix between the water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers and its evaluation factors. Specific content can be seen in the step S103 of the above method of the embodiment.
- The matrix and vector synthesizing module is used for synthesizing the fuzzy relationship matrix and the weight vectors according to a weighted average fuzzy synthesis operator, to acquire a comprehensive evaluation result of water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers. Specific content can be seen in the step S104 of the above method of the embodiment.
- In the embodiment of the present invention, a quantitative evaluation is performed on water breakthrough risk in the manner of combining an analytic hierarchy process and a fuzzy synthetic evaluation method. Because the analytic hierarchy process is a systematic research method through which evaluation and judgment are made in accordance with decomposition, comparison and judgment and comprehensive thinking method, it is more reasonable for the embodiment of the present invention to adopt the analytic hierarchy process to determine weight coefficients of the evaluation factors for water breakthrough risk of the gas well, which is more adaptive to the objective fact and is easy to express quantitatively, thereby improving accuracy of the result of subsequent fuzzy comprehensive evaluation.
- Persons skilled in the art also know that, the illustrative logic modules, units and steps listed in the embodiment of the present invention can be implemented by hardware, software or combination of the two. Implementation by hardware or software depends on specific application and design requirement of the whole system. For each specific application, persons skilled in the art can use various methods to realize the functions, but such implementation shall not be understood as going beyond the scope claimed by the embodiment of the present invention.
- Various illustrative logic modules or units described in the embodiment of the present invention can achieve or operate the described functions through the design of a universal processor, a digital signal processor, an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC), a field-programmable gate array or other programmable logic devices, a discrete gate or transistor logic, a discrete hardware component or any combination of the above. The universal processor may be a microprocessor, and alternatively, the universal processor may be any traditional processor, controller, microcontroller or state machine. The processor also can be implemented by combination of computing devices, such as a digital signal processor and a microprocessor, a plurality of microprocessors, one or more microprocessors united with one digital signal processor core, or any other similar configuration.
- The steps of the method or algorithm described in the embodiment of the present invention can be directly inserted into hardware, a software module executed by the processor, or combination thereof The software module can be stored in an RAM memory, a flash memory, an ROM memory, an EPROM memory, an EEPROM memory, a resistor, a disk, a removable disk, CD-ROM or storage medium in any other forms in the technical field. Illustratively, a storage medium can be connected to the processor, so that the processor can read information from the storage medium and can write and store information into the storage medium. Alternatively, the storage medium also can be integrated into the processor. The processor and the storage medium can be disposed in the ASIC, and the ASIC can be disposed in a user terminal. Alternatively, the processor and the storage medium can be disposed in different components in the user terminal.
- In one or more illustrative designs, the above functions described in the embodiment of the present invention can be realized by hardware, software, firmware or any combination thereof If the functions are realized in software, then the functions can be stored in a computer-readable medium, or can be transmitted to the computer-readable medium in the form of one or more instructs or codes. The computer-readable medium includes a computer storage medium and a communication medium that facilitates transfer of computer program from one place to other places. The storage medium can be any available media that can be accessed by a general or special computer. For example, such computer-readable media can include but is not limited to RAM, ROM, EEPROM, CD-ROM or other optical disk storage, magnetic disc storage or other magnetic storage device, or any other medium that can be used for carrying or storing program codes in the form of instructs or data structure and other forms that can be read by a general or special computer or a general or special processor. Furthermore, any connection can be suitably defined as computer-readable medium, for example, if software is transferred from a website, a server or other remote resources by a coaxial cable, an optical fiber cable, a twisted pair, a digital user line (DSL) or in a wireless manner such as infrared, wireless or microwave or the like, and can also be included in the defined computer-readable medium. The described disk and disc include a compressed disc, a laser disc, an optical disc, a DVD, a floppy disc and a blue-ray disc, wherein the disc generally copies data with magnetism, while disk generally copies data optically with laser. The above-described combination also can be included in the computer-readable medium.
- The above specific embodiment further describes in detail the object, the technical solution and beneficial effect of the present invention. It shall be understood that, the above description is merely a specific embodiment of the present invention, but not for limiting the protection scope of the invention. Any modification, equivalent replacement, improvement and the like within the spirit and principle of the present invention shall be included within the protection scope of the present invention.
Claims (10)
1. An evaluation method for water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers, comprising:
building evaluation factors that influence water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers;
acquiring weight vectors of the evaluation factors based on an analytic hierarchy process;
building a fuzzy relationship matrix between the water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers and its evaluation factors; and
synthesizing the fuzzy relationship matrix and the weight vectors according to a weighted average fuzzy synthesis operator, to acquire a comprehensive evaluation result of water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers.
2. The evaluation method for evaluating water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers according to claim 1 , characterized in that, the evaluation factors that influence water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers include the following features of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers:
structure and sedimentary facies features, including structure and trap feature, fracture feature, fracture development condition and rock type and sedimentary facies;
reservoir features, including interlayer feature, reservoir type, sand body connectivity and reservoir heterogeneity;
drilling and completion information, including drilling quality, cementing quality and distance between a perforation and the edge-bottom water;
production performance and monitoring data, including gas production profile testing result, saturation logging result and transient well testing analysis result; and
dynamic evaluation and prediction result, including production rate and pressure variation characteristics, production rate transient analysis result, reserve controlled by a single well, water coning critical production rate and water breakthrough time prediction result.
3. The evaluation method for water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers according to claim 1 , characterized in that, the acquiring weight vectors of the evaluation factors based on an analytic hierarchy process specifically comprises:
performing pairwise comparison among the evaluation factors under the same hierarchy to obtain a quantized judgment matrix M;
wherein, mij represents the weight of an evaluation factor i to an evaluation factor j;
calculating the largest eigenvalue λmax of the judgment matrix M and corresponding feature vector, the feature vector being weight coefficient distribution of the evaluation factors under the same hierarchy;
performing consistency verification on the feature vector;
if the feature vector goes through the consistency verification, calculating a product Qi of each row of elements of the judgment matrix M, wherein
calculating a n-th root
of Qi to acquire a vector ω =[ω 1 ω 2 . . . ω n], performing a normalization process to the vector to obtain the weight vector of the evaluation factors.
4. The evaluation method for evaluating water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers according to claim 1 , characterized in that, the fuzzy relationship matrix between the water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers and its evaluation factors is:
wherein, in the fuzzy relationship matrix, the element rpm in row p column m represents a degree of membership of water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers as for the feature vector from the aspect of the evaluation factor up.
5. The evaluation method for evaluating water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers. according to claim 1 , characterized in that, the synthesizing the fuzzy relationship matrix and the weight vectors according to a weighted average fuzzy synthesis operator specifically comprises:
according to the formula
synthesizing the fuzzy relationship matrix and the weight vectors;
wherein, bi, ai, rij represent a degree of membership belonging to the jth level, a weight of the ith evaluation factor, and a degree of membership that the ith evaluation factor belongs to the jth level, respectively.
6. An evaluation device for water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers, comprising:
an evaluation factor building module for building evaluation factors that influence water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers;
a weight vector acquisition module for acquiring weight vectors of the evaluation factors based on an analytic hierarchy process;
a fuzzy matrix building module for building a fuzzy relationship matrix between the water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers and its evaluation factors;
a matrix and vector synthesizing module for synthesizing the fuzzy relationship matrix and the weight vectors according to a weighted average fuzzy synthesis operator, to acquire a comprehensive evaluation result of water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers.
7. The evaluation device for evaluating water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers according to claim 6 , characterized in that, the evaluation factors that influence water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers include the following features of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers:
structure and sedimentary facies features, including structure and trap feature, fracture feature, fracture development condition and rock type and sedimentary facies;
reservoir features, including interlayer feature, reservoir type, sand body connectivity and reservoir heterogeneity;
drilling and completion information, including drilling quality, cementing quality and distance between a perforation and the edge-bottom water;
production performance and monitoring data, including gas production profile testing result, saturation logging result and transient well testing analysis result;
dynamic evaluation and prediction result, including production rate and pressure variation characteristics, production rate transient analysis result, reserve controlled by a single well, water coning critical production rate and water breakthrough time prediction result.
8. The evaluation device for water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers according to claim 6 , characterized in that, the acquiring weight vectors of the evaluation factors based on an analytic hierarchy process specifically comprises:
performing pairwise comparison among the evaluation factors under the same hierarchy to obtain a quantized judgment matrix M;
wherein, mij represents the weight of an evaluation factor i to an evaluation factor j;
calculating the largest eigenvalue λmax of the judgment matrix M and corresponding feature vector, the feature vector being weight coefficient distribution of the evaluation factors under the same hierarchy;
performing consistency verification on the feature vector;
if the feature vector goes through the consistency verification, calculating a product Qi of each row of elements of the judgment matrix M, wherein
calculating a n-th root
of Qi to acquire a vector ω =[ω 1 ω 2 . . . ω n], performing a normalization process to the vector to obtain the weight vector of the evaluation factors.
9. The evaluation device for evaluating water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers according to claim 6 , characterized in that, the fuzzy relationship matrix between the water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers and its evaluation factors is:
wherein, in the fuzzy relationship matrix R, the element rpm in row p column m represents a degree of membership of water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers as for the feature vector from the aspect of the evaluation factor up.
10. The evaluation device for evaluating water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers according to claim 6 , characterized in that, the synthesizing the fuzzy relationship matrix and the weight vectors according to a weighted average fuzzy synthesis operator specifically comprises:
according to the formula
synthesizing the fuzzy relationship matrix and the weight vectors;
wherein, bi, ai, rij represent a degree of membership belonging to the jth level, a weight of the ith evaluation factor, and a degree of membership that the ith evaluation factor belongs to the jth level, respectively.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201410670301.5A CN104376420A (en) | 2014-11-20 | 2014-11-20 | Water breakthrough risk assessment method and assessment device for gas wells in water-bearing gas reservoirs |
| CN201410670301.5 | 2014-11-20 |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| US20160145994A1 true US20160145994A1 (en) | 2016-05-26 |
Family
ID=52555315
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| US14/946,174 Abandoned US20160145994A1 (en) | 2014-11-20 | 2015-11-19 | Evaluation Method and Evaluation Device for Water Breakthrough Risk of Production Wells in Aquifer Drive Gas Reservoirs |
Country Status (3)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US20160145994A1 (en) |
| CN (1) | CN104376420A (en) |
| GB (1) | GB2535581B (en) |
Cited By (91)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GB2535581A (en) * | 2014-11-20 | 2016-08-24 | Petrochina Co Ltd | Evaluation method and evaluation device for water breakthrough risk of production wells in aquifer drive gas reservoirs |
| CN106056307A (en) * | 2016-06-14 | 2016-10-26 | 中国电力科学研究院 | Electric power replacement technology comprehensive benefit assessment method based on comprehensive weighting method |
| CN106875104A (en) * | 2017-01-21 | 2017-06-20 | 西安交通大学 | A kind of cold-strip steel quality overall evaluation method |
| CN107038516A (en) * | 2016-10-20 | 2017-08-11 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | Complex Fault Block Oil Reservoir water flooding effectiveness quantitative evaluation method is oozed in one kind |
| CN107842359A (en) * | 2016-09-19 | 2018-03-27 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | Individual well recoverable reserves evaluation method and device |
| CN108009716A (en) * | 2017-11-28 | 2018-05-08 | 西南石油大学 | A kind of horizontal well volume fracturing influential effect factor mutiple-stage model method |
| CN108182510A (en) * | 2017-12-11 | 2018-06-19 | 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 | Production potential evaluation method and device |
| CN108960553A (en) * | 2017-05-27 | 2018-12-07 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | A kind of visualizing monitor method of drillng operation information and risk |
| CN109102180A (en) * | 2018-07-30 | 2018-12-28 | 北京大学 | The comprehensive parameters evaluation method of the double dessert evaluations of tight sandstone reservoir |
| CN109359871A (en) * | 2018-10-19 | 2019-02-19 | 中国海洋石油集团有限公司 | Reliability evaluation method of casing for oil and gas wells |
| CN109409724A (en) * | 2018-10-19 | 2019-03-01 | 中国海洋石油集团有限公司 | Deepwater drilling blowout out of control risk evaluating method |
| CN109470839A (en) * | 2018-11-22 | 2019-03-15 | 山东科技大学 | Physical test device and method for simulating deep fault formation, fault activation and fault water inrush |
| CN109899051A (en) * | 2017-12-07 | 2019-06-18 | 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 | Evaluation standard determination method, device and storage medium for oil well equipment |
| CN109933745A (en) * | 2019-01-29 | 2019-06-25 | 西南石油大学 | An intelligent judgment method for hydrate drilling and production risk based on fuzzy judgment |
| CN110020403A (en) * | 2017-11-23 | 2019-07-16 | 中国电力科学研究院有限公司 | A kind of power distribution automation equipment test synthesis evaluation method and system |
| CN110070258A (en) * | 2019-03-06 | 2019-07-30 | 中南大学 | A kind of coke oven heating-combustion process performance estimating method |
| CN110163442A (en) * | 2019-05-27 | 2019-08-23 | 华北理工大学 | A kind of gas well plug-ging prediction technique based on integrated study |
| CN110163486A (en) * | 2019-03-19 | 2019-08-23 | 广州中国科学院计算机网络信息中心 | A kind of project risk different degree appraisal procedure and system |
| CN110222973A (en) * | 2019-05-31 | 2019-09-10 | 国网安徽省电力有限公司经济技术研究院 | A kind of integrated energy system evaluation method and system based on optimal weights combination |
| CN110619467A (en) * | 2019-09-17 | 2019-12-27 | 电子科技大学 | Power equipment state evaluation method based on alarm big data information |
| CN110727986A (en) * | 2019-10-15 | 2020-01-24 | 成都亮紫智能科技有限公司 | BIM and weighted gray cloud clustering model-based ancient building maintenance model acquisition method |
| CN110738398A (en) * | 2019-09-19 | 2020-01-31 | 中山大学 | A trial risk analysis method based on the overall utility of fuzzy numbers |
| CN111008734A (en) * | 2019-11-26 | 2020-04-14 | 华南理工大学 | Flood hazard zoning and research methods for spatiotemporal evolution |
| CN111062500A (en) * | 2019-12-05 | 2020-04-24 | 国网电力科学研究院武汉南瑞有限责任公司 | A Power Equipment Evaluation Method Based on Discrete Fuzzy Numbers and AHP |
| CN111105156A (en) * | 2019-12-19 | 2020-05-05 | 南通大学 | A roadside safety risk assessment method based on evidence-based reasoning |
| CN111339679A (en) * | 2020-03-13 | 2020-06-26 | 武汉材料保护研究所有限公司 | Fuzzy recognition model establishment method for predicting LDPE (Low-Density polyethylene) aging grade in natural environment |
| CN111401683A (en) * | 2020-02-11 | 2020-07-10 | 苏州科技大学 | Method and device for measuring tradition of ancient villages |
| CN111594160A (en) * | 2020-06-24 | 2020-08-28 | 陕西延长石油(集团)有限责任公司 | Optimization method for gas field pressurization and stable production scheme |
| CN111666684A (en) * | 2020-06-05 | 2020-09-15 | 中国石化销售股份有限公司华南分公司 | Circumferential weld risk estimation method and device for conveying pipeline and readable storage medium |
| CN111833968A (en) * | 2020-07-09 | 2020-10-27 | 福建师范大学 | Black rice wine brewing process evaluation method and equipment based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method |
| CN112270355A (en) * | 2020-10-28 | 2021-01-26 | 长沙理工大学 | Active safety prediction method based on big data technology and SAE-GRU |
| CN112381364A (en) * | 2020-10-30 | 2021-02-19 | 浪潮云信息技术股份公司 | Comprehensive evaluation method for food quality spot check |
| CN112377146A (en) * | 2020-12-07 | 2021-02-19 | 西南石油大学 | Device and method for simulating formation water seepage water invasion well cementation cement slurry |
| CN112412443A (en) * | 2020-11-12 | 2021-02-26 | 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 | Ultra-low permeability reservoir polymer microsphere adaptability quantitative evaluation method |
| CN112446588A (en) * | 2020-11-04 | 2021-03-05 | 厦门华润燃气有限公司 | Urban buried steel gas pipeline risk evaluation system |
| CN112561319A (en) * | 2020-12-14 | 2021-03-26 | 清华大学 | Comprehensive evaluation method for energy system of data center |
| CN112613750A (en) * | 2020-12-25 | 2021-04-06 | 中建三局绿色产业投资有限公司 | Sedimentation risk assessment method for deep sewage conveying tunnel |
| CN112709547A (en) * | 2019-10-24 | 2021-04-27 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | Method for judging water plugging time of water producing gas well |
| CN112884320A (en) * | 2021-02-18 | 2021-06-01 | 中铁建华南建设有限公司 | Foundation pit risk assessment method, device, equipment and medium based on entropy model |
| CN112966783A (en) * | 2021-04-12 | 2021-06-15 | 中国矿业大学 | Method for identifying constant ion characteristics of mine water and distinguishing water source |
| CN113065758A (en) * | 2021-03-29 | 2021-07-02 | 中国地质科学院 | Method and system for determining earthquake resistance of community at earthquake disaster moment |
| CN113112124A (en) * | 2021-03-22 | 2021-07-13 | 西安理工大学 | Risk evaluation method for check dam system |
| CN113222347A (en) * | 2021-04-16 | 2021-08-06 | 南京君缘科爆工程技术有限公司 | Open blasting safety risk grey system evaluation method |
| CN113236203A (en) * | 2021-07-09 | 2021-08-10 | 西南石油大学 | Water invasion dynamic production allocation method for carbonate rock with water-gas reservoir |
| CN113361066A (en) * | 2021-04-16 | 2021-09-07 | 中国海洋石油集团有限公司 | Accumulated liquid and accumulated liquid degree identification method |
| CN113469522A (en) * | 2021-06-30 | 2021-10-01 | 国网综合能源服务集团有限公司 | Comprehensive energy Internet of things evaluation method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium |
| CN113537655A (en) * | 2020-04-13 | 2021-10-22 | 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 | Method and device for determining the restart potential of gas wells |
| CN113554258A (en) * | 2020-04-24 | 2021-10-26 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | Method for evaluating full-process green development effect of high-water-content oil field |
| CN113592265A (en) * | 2021-07-19 | 2021-11-02 | 杭州领见数字农业科技有限公司 | Plot risk assessment method and device based on analytic hierarchy process |
| CN113657767A (en) * | 2021-08-18 | 2021-11-16 | 广东汇通信息科技股份有限公司 | Urban arterial road tunnel-passing risk assessment method based on traffic data and fuzzy algorithm |
| CN113822511A (en) * | 2020-11-16 | 2021-12-21 | 全球能源互联网研究院有限公司 | A multi-level power quality assessment method and device based on fuzzy cluster analysis |
| CN113822503A (en) * | 2020-06-18 | 2021-12-21 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | Safety evaluation method, device and electronic equipment for underground facilities of gas storage |
| CN113931621A (en) * | 2020-07-14 | 2022-01-14 | 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 | Method and device for determining gas well accumulated liquid information and storage medium |
| CN113934975A (en) * | 2021-10-22 | 2022-01-14 | 安徽理工大学 | Identification method of mine water inrush source based on exponential whitening function and grey theory |
| CN114047547A (en) * | 2021-11-25 | 2022-02-15 | 中国石油大学(华东) | Quantitative evaluation method for sealing capacity of gypsum-rock cover layer |
| CN114066119A (en) * | 2020-08-06 | 2022-02-18 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | Method, device, electronic equipment and storage medium for evaluating the suitability of water injection oil wells |
| CN114118872A (en) * | 2021-12-09 | 2022-03-01 | 公安部交通管理科学研究所 | Emergency management efficiency evaluation method for public security traffic command center |
| CN114154864A (en) * | 2021-12-06 | 2022-03-08 | 国网湖南省电力有限公司 | Quality assessment method and processor for electric microclimate monitoring data |
| CN114186787A (en) * | 2021-11-05 | 2022-03-15 | 中国市政工程华北设计研究总院有限公司 | Urban black and odorous water body remediation model evaluation method based on multi-level fuzzy analysis |
| CN114548758A (en) * | 2022-02-22 | 2022-05-27 | 东莞理工学院 | Comprehensive evaluation method for excessive carbon dioxide emission in cement industry |
| CN114594526A (en) * | 2020-12-03 | 2022-06-07 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | Quantitative evaluation method for inter-well plane connectivity of river facies sand body |
| CN114638053A (en) * | 2022-03-22 | 2022-06-17 | 中国人民解放军国防科技大学 | Active guiding capability assessment method, device, equipment and medium for magnetic-levitation train |
| WO2022133889A1 (en) * | 2020-12-24 | 2022-06-30 | 华能国际电力股份有限公司 | Power plant equipment quality data processing method and apparatus based on equipment supervision |
| CN114997714A (en) * | 2022-06-27 | 2022-09-02 | 公安部道路交通安全研究中心 | Risk identification method and system for electric bicycle rider and computer equipment |
| CN115187105A (en) * | 2022-07-20 | 2022-10-14 | 深圳市城市公共安全技术研究院有限公司 | Dynamic risk assessment system for multi-source data engineering |
| CN115217467A (en) * | 2021-03-31 | 2022-10-21 | 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 | Method and device for determining breakthrough time of bottom water of multi-medium bottom water gas reservoir horizontal well |
| CN115239148A (en) * | 2022-07-26 | 2022-10-25 | 中海石油(中国)有限公司深圳分公司 | Logging card-encountering risk assessment method and device, electronic equipment and readable medium |
| CN115479540A (en) * | 2022-09-14 | 2022-12-16 | 西南交通大学 | A method and system for evaluating the magnitude of karst water inrush disasters based on laser scanning |
| CN115879654A (en) * | 2023-03-03 | 2023-03-31 | 山东科技大学 | Method for predicting stability and evaluating reliability of underground roadway |
| CN116070907A (en) * | 2023-01-05 | 2023-05-05 | 山东省地质矿产勘查开发局八〇一水文地质工程地质大队(山东省地矿工程勘察院) | Karst collapse susceptibility assessment method and system based on analytic hierarchy process |
| CN116205495A (en) * | 2023-03-24 | 2023-06-02 | 北京赛目科技股份有限公司 | Method and device for predicting risk of industrial supply chain, storage medium and electronic equipment |
| CN116227913A (en) * | 2022-12-14 | 2023-06-06 | 中电建路桥集团有限公司 | System and method for evaluating cracking risk of large-span bridge structure based on AHP-entropy weight method |
| CN116596378A (en) * | 2023-05-17 | 2023-08-15 | 安徽建筑大学 | Low-grade rural road pavement maintenance management decision-making method, equipment and storage medium |
| CN116733461A (en) * | 2023-07-05 | 2023-09-12 | 西南石油大学 | Device and method for analyzing critical yield sensitivity of heterogeneous gas cap-bottom water reservoir |
| CN116821656A (en) * | 2023-06-27 | 2023-09-29 | 中国煤炭地质总局勘查研究总院 | Mine water inrush source identification method, device and storable medium |
| CN117035566A (en) * | 2023-10-10 | 2023-11-10 | 民航成都电子技术有限责任公司 | Flight area operation evaluation method, device, equipment and storage medium |
| CN117217502A (en) * | 2023-11-09 | 2023-12-12 | 国网山西省电力公司晋中供电公司 | A method, device, medium and equipment for evaluating factors affecting power grid dispatching |
| CN117231211A (en) * | 2023-11-02 | 2023-12-15 | 大庆油田有限责任公司 | A method for identifying the direction of water inflow from horizontal wells using comprehensive discriminant parameter method |
| CN117474328A (en) * | 2023-10-31 | 2024-01-30 | 青岛理工大学 | Rock foundation pit risk assessment method |
| CN117473774A (en) * | 2023-11-15 | 2024-01-30 | 山东大学 | A method for evaluating mud transportation performance of mud-water shield tunneling |
| CN117763941A (en) * | 2023-11-14 | 2024-03-26 | 江苏省特种设备安全监督检验研究院 | A method for gas storage well life assessment based on machine learning |
| CN117892926A (en) * | 2024-03-15 | 2024-04-16 | 中国石油大学(华东) | A method and system for evaluating the fracturing potential of chemical flooding oil wells |
| CN117973943A (en) * | 2024-03-05 | 2024-05-03 | 长江大学 | Method, device, medium and equipment for evaluating gas well bubble discharge and production effect |
| CN118552044A (en) * | 2024-07-26 | 2024-08-27 | 北京理工大学 | Power station external damage scene risk assessment method based on analytic hierarchy process |
| CN118709351A (en) * | 2024-05-22 | 2024-09-27 | 西南交通大学 | A method and system for optimizing ventilation scheme of long-distance water pipeline |
| CN118728334A (en) * | 2023-03-29 | 2024-10-01 | 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 | A method and device for differential water control and production allocation of gas wells in edge water gas reservoirs |
| CN118886744A (en) * | 2024-07-10 | 2024-11-01 | 四川省地质环境调查研究中心 | A method and system for shallow natural gas genesis analysis and risk assessment |
| CN119416147A (en) * | 2024-10-15 | 2025-02-11 | 深圳供电局有限公司 | Cable insulation status detection method based on live harmonic fluctuations |
| CN119801501A (en) * | 2023-10-09 | 2025-04-11 | 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 | Water invasion early warning method, system, equipment and medium for fractured low-porosity sandstone gas reservoirs |
| WO2025148234A1 (en) * | 2024-01-09 | 2025-07-17 | 中煤科工西安研究院(集团)有限公司 | Intelligent discrimination method and apparatus for mine water inrush source, device, and storage medium |
| US12371981B2 (en) * | 2021-07-13 | 2025-07-29 | Southwest Petroleum University | Prediction method for constant production decline of water-producing gas well in highly heterogeneous reservoir |
Families Citing this family (35)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN104794361B (en) * | 2015-05-05 | 2018-01-16 | 中国石油大学(华东) | A kind of water-drive pool development effectiveness integrated evaluating method |
| CN105003256A (en) * | 2015-07-20 | 2015-10-28 | 西安石油大学 | Method for selecting wells or layers for acidifying oil-water wells on basis of improved entropy weight processes |
| CN106557640A (en) * | 2015-09-21 | 2017-04-05 | 核工业北京地质研究院 | A kind of method for evaluating Superimposed Basins interlevel oxidation type U metallogeny favorab1e sandbadies |
| CN105443120A (en) * | 2015-10-26 | 2016-03-30 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | Method for early stage characteristic analysis of marine facies equipping gas field edge water invasion |
| CN105718720A (en) * | 2016-01-15 | 2016-06-29 | 西南石油大学 | Complex gas reservoir reserve quality classification comprehensive evaluation method |
| CN106295210B (en) * | 2016-08-16 | 2018-10-23 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | A kind of quantitative evaluation method and system for carrying out reserves blank tape Exploration Potential |
| CN106780105A (en) * | 2016-11-18 | 2017-05-31 | 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 | A method and device for determining a lifting mode |
| CN106640063A (en) * | 2016-12-09 | 2017-05-10 | 中石化石油工程技术服务有限公司 | Monitoring method for overflowing in well cementation construction |
| CN106703776B (en) * | 2016-12-23 | 2020-04-21 | 西南石油大学 | Fracturing parameter optimization method |
| CN109296358B (en) * | 2017-07-25 | 2022-03-01 | 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 | Wellbore Quality Evaluation Method for Cementing |
| CN109424362B (en) * | 2017-08-29 | 2021-10-29 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | Method and system for calculating single-well control crude oil reserve of bottom water reservoir |
| CN107816339A (en) * | 2017-09-11 | 2018-03-20 | 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 | Water injection development method and device |
| CN109961375B (en) * | 2017-12-22 | 2021-06-01 | 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 | Sand production risk assessment method and device for oil and gas wells |
| CN108595875A (en) * | 2018-05-08 | 2018-09-28 | 中国石油天然气集团有限公司 | A kind of method, apparatus and system of determining side water gas condensate reservoir water breakthrough time |
| CN110924941B (en) * | 2018-09-17 | 2022-08-30 | 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 | Method and device for determining radius of water cone of side water reservoir |
| CN111173495B (en) * | 2018-10-23 | 2023-09-26 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | Fracture-cavity type oil reservoir fracture-cavity unit communication condition evaluation method |
| CN111105114B (en) * | 2018-10-26 | 2022-08-05 | 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 | Method and device for evaluating development effect of water-gas reservoir and computer equipment |
| CN109636243A (en) * | 2019-01-03 | 2019-04-16 | 深圳壹账通智能科技有限公司 | Model fault detection method, device, computer equipment and storage medium |
| CN110852615A (en) * | 2019-11-11 | 2020-02-28 | 黑龙江省电工仪器仪表工程技术研究中心有限公司 | Comprehensive reliability evaluation model for intelligent electric energy meter in typical environment |
| CN110956388B (en) * | 2019-11-28 | 2023-04-07 | 中国石油大学(华东) | Method for generating yield increasing scheme of offshore oil and gas reservoir |
| CN111768075B (en) * | 2020-05-26 | 2023-08-22 | 中国矿业大学(北京) | Risk assessment method, equipment and medium for persons involved in mine flooding |
| CN112324429B (en) * | 2020-08-12 | 2023-08-22 | 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 | Method for Determining Reasonable Production Pressure Difference of Gas Reservoir with Water |
| CN112115413B (en) * | 2020-09-07 | 2023-11-24 | 广西天懿智汇建设投资有限公司 | Termite quantity monitoring method based on iteration method |
| CN113158403B (en) * | 2020-12-28 | 2024-02-20 | 成都国铁电气设备有限公司 | Method for evaluating smoothness of rigid contact wires of subway based on kneeded |
| CN112417713A (en) * | 2021-01-24 | 2021-02-26 | 成都创源油气技术开发有限公司 | Evaluation method of fuzzy optimization model of gas storage based on analytic hierarchy process |
| CN115142839B (en) * | 2021-03-31 | 2025-01-28 | 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 | Method and device for determining bottom water breakthrough time in vertical wells of triple-medium bottom water gas reservoirs |
| CN113268704B (en) * | 2021-04-27 | 2023-08-04 | 国网福建省电力有限公司 | Data center site selection method and system based on fuzzy analytic hierarchy process |
| CN113779881B (en) * | 2021-09-10 | 2024-11-22 | 中国石油大学(北京) | Method, device and equipment for predicting the productivity of tight water-containing gas reservoirs |
| CN114280244B (en) * | 2021-12-27 | 2025-03-18 | 清华大学合肥公共安全研究院 | A method and system for comprehensive evaluation of environmental adaptability of combustible gas monitor |
| CN114329313A (en) * | 2021-12-31 | 2022-04-12 | 中国矿业大学 | Multi-level evaluation method for closing coal mine water resource utilization selected area |
| CN114723283A (en) * | 2022-04-07 | 2022-07-08 | 中山大学 | Ecological bearing capacity remote sensing evaluation method and device for urban group |
| CN116484236B (en) * | 2023-03-27 | 2025-05-27 | 西南石油大学 | A method for evaluating heterogeneity of fractured horizontal wells in unconventional reservoirs |
| CN118115317B (en) * | 2024-04-30 | 2024-08-09 | 深圳大学 | Method for evaluating safety toughness of existing tunnel structure under adjacent construction disturbance effect |
| CN118691094B (en) * | 2024-08-26 | 2024-11-08 | 中煤科工西安研究院(集团)有限公司 | A method and system for dynamic risk assessment of roof water in mine working face |
| CN120598356A (en) * | 2025-06-05 | 2025-09-05 | 中电建铁路建设投资集团有限公司 | A method for assessing gas leakage risk in rail transit tunnels |
Citations (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US6101444A (en) * | 1998-08-21 | 2000-08-08 | Stoner; Michael S. | Numerical control unit for wellbore drilling |
| US6386297B1 (en) * | 1999-02-24 | 2002-05-14 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Method and apparatus for determining potential abrasivity in a wellbore |
| US6662140B2 (en) * | 2001-06-12 | 2003-12-09 | Rolls-Royce Canada Limited | Fuzzy logic estimator for minimizing signal measurement inaccuracy effects in a signal processing system |
| US8374974B2 (en) * | 2003-01-06 | 2013-02-12 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Neural network training data selection using memory reduced cluster analysis for field model development |
| US20130096835A1 (en) * | 2011-10-14 | 2013-04-18 | Precision Energy Services, Inc. | Clustering Process for Analyzing Pressure Gradient Data |
Family Cites Families (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20040215551A1 (en) * | 2001-11-28 | 2004-10-28 | Eder Jeff S. | Value and risk management system for multi-enterprise organization |
| US7512543B2 (en) * | 2002-05-29 | 2009-03-31 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Tools for decision-making in reservoir risk management |
| CN103091234B (en) * | 2011-11-03 | 2015-08-05 | 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 | A Method for Evaluating Corrosion of Cement Sheath of Gas Well Cementing in Sour Gas Reservoirs |
| CN104156617B (en) * | 2014-08-24 | 2017-06-23 | 西南石油大学 | For the six stage modeling methods that multilayer sandstone reservoirs gas-bearing formation attribute classification is characterized |
| CN104376420A (en) * | 2014-11-20 | 2015-02-25 | 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 | Water breakthrough risk assessment method and assessment device for gas wells in water-bearing gas reservoirs |
-
2014
- 2014-11-20 CN CN201410670301.5A patent/CN104376420A/en active Pending
-
2015
- 2015-11-19 GB GB1520368.0A patent/GB2535581B/en active Active
- 2015-11-19 US US14/946,174 patent/US20160145994A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US6101444A (en) * | 1998-08-21 | 2000-08-08 | Stoner; Michael S. | Numerical control unit for wellbore drilling |
| US6386297B1 (en) * | 1999-02-24 | 2002-05-14 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Method and apparatus for determining potential abrasivity in a wellbore |
| US6662140B2 (en) * | 2001-06-12 | 2003-12-09 | Rolls-Royce Canada Limited | Fuzzy logic estimator for minimizing signal measurement inaccuracy effects in a signal processing system |
| US8374974B2 (en) * | 2003-01-06 | 2013-02-12 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Neural network training data selection using memory reduced cluster analysis for field model development |
| US20130096835A1 (en) * | 2011-10-14 | 2013-04-18 | Precision Energy Services, Inc. | Clustering Process for Analyzing Pressure Gradient Data |
Cited By (92)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GB2535581B (en) * | 2014-11-20 | 2017-10-11 | Petrochina Co Ltd | Evaluation method and evaluation device for water breakthrough risk of production wells in aquifer drive gas reservoirs |
| GB2535581A (en) * | 2014-11-20 | 2016-08-24 | Petrochina Co Ltd | Evaluation method and evaluation device for water breakthrough risk of production wells in aquifer drive gas reservoirs |
| CN106056307A (en) * | 2016-06-14 | 2016-10-26 | 中国电力科学研究院 | Electric power replacement technology comprehensive benefit assessment method based on comprehensive weighting method |
| CN107842359A (en) * | 2016-09-19 | 2018-03-27 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | Individual well recoverable reserves evaluation method and device |
| CN107038516A (en) * | 2016-10-20 | 2017-08-11 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | Complex Fault Block Oil Reservoir water flooding effectiveness quantitative evaluation method is oozed in one kind |
| CN106875104A (en) * | 2017-01-21 | 2017-06-20 | 西安交通大学 | A kind of cold-strip steel quality overall evaluation method |
| CN108960553A (en) * | 2017-05-27 | 2018-12-07 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | A kind of visualizing monitor method of drillng operation information and risk |
| CN110020403A (en) * | 2017-11-23 | 2019-07-16 | 中国电力科学研究院有限公司 | A kind of power distribution automation equipment test synthesis evaluation method and system |
| CN108009716A (en) * | 2017-11-28 | 2018-05-08 | 西南石油大学 | A kind of horizontal well volume fracturing influential effect factor mutiple-stage model method |
| CN109899051A (en) * | 2017-12-07 | 2019-06-18 | 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 | Evaluation standard determination method, device and storage medium for oil well equipment |
| CN108182510A (en) * | 2017-12-11 | 2018-06-19 | 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 | Production potential evaluation method and device |
| CN109102180A (en) * | 2018-07-30 | 2018-12-28 | 北京大学 | The comprehensive parameters evaluation method of the double dessert evaluations of tight sandstone reservoir |
| CN109359871A (en) * | 2018-10-19 | 2019-02-19 | 中国海洋石油集团有限公司 | Reliability evaluation method of casing for oil and gas wells |
| CN109409724A (en) * | 2018-10-19 | 2019-03-01 | 中国海洋石油集团有限公司 | Deepwater drilling blowout out of control risk evaluating method |
| CN109470839A (en) * | 2018-11-22 | 2019-03-15 | 山东科技大学 | Physical test device and method for simulating deep fault formation, fault activation and fault water inrush |
| CN109933745A (en) * | 2019-01-29 | 2019-06-25 | 西南石油大学 | An intelligent judgment method for hydrate drilling and production risk based on fuzzy judgment |
| CN110070258A (en) * | 2019-03-06 | 2019-07-30 | 中南大学 | A kind of coke oven heating-combustion process performance estimating method |
| CN110163486A (en) * | 2019-03-19 | 2019-08-23 | 广州中国科学院计算机网络信息中心 | A kind of project risk different degree appraisal procedure and system |
| CN110163442A (en) * | 2019-05-27 | 2019-08-23 | 华北理工大学 | A kind of gas well plug-ging prediction technique based on integrated study |
| CN110222973A (en) * | 2019-05-31 | 2019-09-10 | 国网安徽省电力有限公司经济技术研究院 | A kind of integrated energy system evaluation method and system based on optimal weights combination |
| CN110619467A (en) * | 2019-09-17 | 2019-12-27 | 电子科技大学 | Power equipment state evaluation method based on alarm big data information |
| CN110738398A (en) * | 2019-09-19 | 2020-01-31 | 中山大学 | A trial risk analysis method based on the overall utility of fuzzy numbers |
| CN110727986A (en) * | 2019-10-15 | 2020-01-24 | 成都亮紫智能科技有限公司 | BIM and weighted gray cloud clustering model-based ancient building maintenance model acquisition method |
| CN112709547A (en) * | 2019-10-24 | 2021-04-27 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | Method for judging water plugging time of water producing gas well |
| CN111008734A (en) * | 2019-11-26 | 2020-04-14 | 华南理工大学 | Flood hazard zoning and research methods for spatiotemporal evolution |
| CN111062500A (en) * | 2019-12-05 | 2020-04-24 | 国网电力科学研究院武汉南瑞有限责任公司 | A Power Equipment Evaluation Method Based on Discrete Fuzzy Numbers and AHP |
| CN111105156A (en) * | 2019-12-19 | 2020-05-05 | 南通大学 | A roadside safety risk assessment method based on evidence-based reasoning |
| CN111401683A (en) * | 2020-02-11 | 2020-07-10 | 苏州科技大学 | Method and device for measuring tradition of ancient villages |
| CN111339679A (en) * | 2020-03-13 | 2020-06-26 | 武汉材料保护研究所有限公司 | Fuzzy recognition model establishment method for predicting LDPE (Low-Density polyethylene) aging grade in natural environment |
| CN113537655A (en) * | 2020-04-13 | 2021-10-22 | 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 | Method and device for determining the restart potential of gas wells |
| CN113554258A (en) * | 2020-04-24 | 2021-10-26 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | Method for evaluating full-process green development effect of high-water-content oil field |
| CN111666684A (en) * | 2020-06-05 | 2020-09-15 | 中国石化销售股份有限公司华南分公司 | Circumferential weld risk estimation method and device for conveying pipeline and readable storage medium |
| CN113822503A (en) * | 2020-06-18 | 2021-12-21 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | Safety evaluation method, device and electronic equipment for underground facilities of gas storage |
| CN111594160A (en) * | 2020-06-24 | 2020-08-28 | 陕西延长石油(集团)有限责任公司 | Optimization method for gas field pressurization and stable production scheme |
| CN111833968A (en) * | 2020-07-09 | 2020-10-27 | 福建师范大学 | Black rice wine brewing process evaluation method and equipment based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method |
| CN113931621A (en) * | 2020-07-14 | 2022-01-14 | 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 | Method and device for determining gas well accumulated liquid information and storage medium |
| CN114066119A (en) * | 2020-08-06 | 2022-02-18 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | Method, device, electronic equipment and storage medium for evaluating the suitability of water injection oil wells |
| CN112270355A (en) * | 2020-10-28 | 2021-01-26 | 长沙理工大学 | Active safety prediction method based on big data technology and SAE-GRU |
| CN112381364A (en) * | 2020-10-30 | 2021-02-19 | 浪潮云信息技术股份公司 | Comprehensive evaluation method for food quality spot check |
| CN112446588A (en) * | 2020-11-04 | 2021-03-05 | 厦门华润燃气有限公司 | Urban buried steel gas pipeline risk evaluation system |
| CN112412443A (en) * | 2020-11-12 | 2021-02-26 | 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 | Ultra-low permeability reservoir polymer microsphere adaptability quantitative evaluation method |
| CN113822511A (en) * | 2020-11-16 | 2021-12-21 | 全球能源互联网研究院有限公司 | A multi-level power quality assessment method and device based on fuzzy cluster analysis |
| CN114594526A (en) * | 2020-12-03 | 2022-06-07 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | Quantitative evaluation method for inter-well plane connectivity of river facies sand body |
| CN112377146A (en) * | 2020-12-07 | 2021-02-19 | 西南石油大学 | Device and method for simulating formation water seepage water invasion well cementation cement slurry |
| CN112561319A (en) * | 2020-12-14 | 2021-03-26 | 清华大学 | Comprehensive evaluation method for energy system of data center |
| WO2022133889A1 (en) * | 2020-12-24 | 2022-06-30 | 华能国际电力股份有限公司 | Power plant equipment quality data processing method and apparatus based on equipment supervision |
| CN112613750A (en) * | 2020-12-25 | 2021-04-06 | 中建三局绿色产业投资有限公司 | Sedimentation risk assessment method for deep sewage conveying tunnel |
| CN112884320A (en) * | 2021-02-18 | 2021-06-01 | 中铁建华南建设有限公司 | Foundation pit risk assessment method, device, equipment and medium based on entropy model |
| CN113112124A (en) * | 2021-03-22 | 2021-07-13 | 西安理工大学 | Risk evaluation method for check dam system |
| CN113065758A (en) * | 2021-03-29 | 2021-07-02 | 中国地质科学院 | Method and system for determining earthquake resistance of community at earthquake disaster moment |
| CN115217467A (en) * | 2021-03-31 | 2022-10-21 | 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 | Method and device for determining breakthrough time of bottom water of multi-medium bottom water gas reservoir horizontal well |
| CN112966783A (en) * | 2021-04-12 | 2021-06-15 | 中国矿业大学 | Method for identifying constant ion characteristics of mine water and distinguishing water source |
| CN113361066A (en) * | 2021-04-16 | 2021-09-07 | 中国海洋石油集团有限公司 | Accumulated liquid and accumulated liquid degree identification method |
| CN113222347A (en) * | 2021-04-16 | 2021-08-06 | 南京君缘科爆工程技术有限公司 | Open blasting safety risk grey system evaluation method |
| CN113469522A (en) * | 2021-06-30 | 2021-10-01 | 国网综合能源服务集团有限公司 | Comprehensive energy Internet of things evaluation method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium |
| CN113236203A (en) * | 2021-07-09 | 2021-08-10 | 西南石油大学 | Water invasion dynamic production allocation method for carbonate rock with water-gas reservoir |
| US12371981B2 (en) * | 2021-07-13 | 2025-07-29 | Southwest Petroleum University | Prediction method for constant production decline of water-producing gas well in highly heterogeneous reservoir |
| CN113592265A (en) * | 2021-07-19 | 2021-11-02 | 杭州领见数字农业科技有限公司 | Plot risk assessment method and device based on analytic hierarchy process |
| CN113657767A (en) * | 2021-08-18 | 2021-11-16 | 广东汇通信息科技股份有限公司 | Urban arterial road tunnel-passing risk assessment method based on traffic data and fuzzy algorithm |
| CN113934975A (en) * | 2021-10-22 | 2022-01-14 | 安徽理工大学 | Identification method of mine water inrush source based on exponential whitening function and grey theory |
| CN114186787A (en) * | 2021-11-05 | 2022-03-15 | 中国市政工程华北设计研究总院有限公司 | Urban black and odorous water body remediation model evaluation method based on multi-level fuzzy analysis |
| CN114047547A (en) * | 2021-11-25 | 2022-02-15 | 中国石油大学(华东) | Quantitative evaluation method for sealing capacity of gypsum-rock cover layer |
| CN114154864A (en) * | 2021-12-06 | 2022-03-08 | 国网湖南省电力有限公司 | Quality assessment method and processor for electric microclimate monitoring data |
| CN114118872A (en) * | 2021-12-09 | 2022-03-01 | 公安部交通管理科学研究所 | Emergency management efficiency evaluation method for public security traffic command center |
| CN114548758A (en) * | 2022-02-22 | 2022-05-27 | 东莞理工学院 | Comprehensive evaluation method for excessive carbon dioxide emission in cement industry |
| CN114638053A (en) * | 2022-03-22 | 2022-06-17 | 中国人民解放军国防科技大学 | Active guiding capability assessment method, device, equipment and medium for magnetic-levitation train |
| CN114997714A (en) * | 2022-06-27 | 2022-09-02 | 公安部道路交通安全研究中心 | Risk identification method and system for electric bicycle rider and computer equipment |
| CN115187105A (en) * | 2022-07-20 | 2022-10-14 | 深圳市城市公共安全技术研究院有限公司 | Dynamic risk assessment system for multi-source data engineering |
| CN115239148A (en) * | 2022-07-26 | 2022-10-25 | 中海石油(中国)有限公司深圳分公司 | Logging card-encountering risk assessment method and device, electronic equipment and readable medium |
| CN115479540A (en) * | 2022-09-14 | 2022-12-16 | 西南交通大学 | A method and system for evaluating the magnitude of karst water inrush disasters based on laser scanning |
| CN116227913A (en) * | 2022-12-14 | 2023-06-06 | 中电建路桥集团有限公司 | System and method for evaluating cracking risk of large-span bridge structure based on AHP-entropy weight method |
| CN116070907A (en) * | 2023-01-05 | 2023-05-05 | 山东省地质矿产勘查开发局八〇一水文地质工程地质大队(山东省地矿工程勘察院) | Karst collapse susceptibility assessment method and system based on analytic hierarchy process |
| CN115879654A (en) * | 2023-03-03 | 2023-03-31 | 山东科技大学 | Method for predicting stability and evaluating reliability of underground roadway |
| CN116205495A (en) * | 2023-03-24 | 2023-06-02 | 北京赛目科技股份有限公司 | Method and device for predicting risk of industrial supply chain, storage medium and electronic equipment |
| CN118728334A (en) * | 2023-03-29 | 2024-10-01 | 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 | A method and device for differential water control and production allocation of gas wells in edge water gas reservoirs |
| CN116596378A (en) * | 2023-05-17 | 2023-08-15 | 安徽建筑大学 | Low-grade rural road pavement maintenance management decision-making method, equipment and storage medium |
| CN116821656A (en) * | 2023-06-27 | 2023-09-29 | 中国煤炭地质总局勘查研究总院 | Mine water inrush source identification method, device and storable medium |
| CN116733461A (en) * | 2023-07-05 | 2023-09-12 | 西南石油大学 | Device and method for analyzing critical yield sensitivity of heterogeneous gas cap-bottom water reservoir |
| CN119801501A (en) * | 2023-10-09 | 2025-04-11 | 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 | Water invasion early warning method, system, equipment and medium for fractured low-porosity sandstone gas reservoirs |
| CN117035566A (en) * | 2023-10-10 | 2023-11-10 | 民航成都电子技术有限责任公司 | Flight area operation evaluation method, device, equipment and storage medium |
| CN117474328A (en) * | 2023-10-31 | 2024-01-30 | 青岛理工大学 | Rock foundation pit risk assessment method |
| CN117231211A (en) * | 2023-11-02 | 2023-12-15 | 大庆油田有限责任公司 | A method for identifying the direction of water inflow from horizontal wells using comprehensive discriminant parameter method |
| CN117217502A (en) * | 2023-11-09 | 2023-12-12 | 国网山西省电力公司晋中供电公司 | A method, device, medium and equipment for evaluating factors affecting power grid dispatching |
| CN117763941A (en) * | 2023-11-14 | 2024-03-26 | 江苏省特种设备安全监督检验研究院 | A method for gas storage well life assessment based on machine learning |
| CN117473774A (en) * | 2023-11-15 | 2024-01-30 | 山东大学 | A method for evaluating mud transportation performance of mud-water shield tunneling |
| WO2025148234A1 (en) * | 2024-01-09 | 2025-07-17 | 中煤科工西安研究院(集团)有限公司 | Intelligent discrimination method and apparatus for mine water inrush source, device, and storage medium |
| CN117973943A (en) * | 2024-03-05 | 2024-05-03 | 长江大学 | Method, device, medium and equipment for evaluating gas well bubble discharge and production effect |
| CN117892926A (en) * | 2024-03-15 | 2024-04-16 | 中国石油大学(华东) | A method and system for evaluating the fracturing potential of chemical flooding oil wells |
| CN118709351A (en) * | 2024-05-22 | 2024-09-27 | 西南交通大学 | A method and system for optimizing ventilation scheme of long-distance water pipeline |
| CN118886744A (en) * | 2024-07-10 | 2024-11-01 | 四川省地质环境调查研究中心 | A method and system for shallow natural gas genesis analysis and risk assessment |
| CN118552044A (en) * | 2024-07-26 | 2024-08-27 | 北京理工大学 | Power station external damage scene risk assessment method based on analytic hierarchy process |
| CN119416147A (en) * | 2024-10-15 | 2025-02-11 | 深圳供电局有限公司 | Cable insulation status detection method based on live harmonic fluctuations |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN104376420A (en) | 2015-02-25 |
| GB2535581B (en) | 2017-10-11 |
| GB2535581A (en) | 2016-08-24 |
| GB201520368D0 (en) | 2016-01-06 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US20160145994A1 (en) | Evaluation Method and Evaluation Device for Water Breakthrough Risk of Production Wells in Aquifer Drive Gas Reservoirs | |
| CN105626009B (en) | A Quantitative Evaluation Method for Oil Replacement Effect of Single Well Water Injection in Fracture-vuggy Carbonate Reservoirs | |
| CN104794361B (en) | A kind of water-drive pool development effectiveness integrated evaluating method | |
| CN113874598A (en) | Automated production optimization techniques for intelligent well completion using real-time nodal analysis | |
| CN111985610B (en) | A system and method for predicting the pumping efficiency of a pumping well based on time series data | |
| Shahsavari et al. | Optimum selection of sand control method using a combination of MCDM and DOE techniques | |
| CN110472363B (en) | Surrounding rock deformation grade prediction method and system suitable for high-speed railway tunnel | |
| CN104453875B (en) | Shale gas reservoir identification method based on self-organizing competitive neural network | |
| US20230222397A1 (en) | Method for automated ensemble machine learning using hyperparameter optimization | |
| CN112116130B (en) | Short-term scheduling rule extraction method based on variable structure deep learning framework | |
| CN111914478A (en) | A comprehensive geological borehole logging lithology identification method | |
| CN110956388B (en) | Method for generating yield increasing scheme of offshore oil and gas reservoir | |
| CN113825889A (en) | Automated Production Optimization Techniques for Smart Completions Using Real-Time Node Analysis | |
| CN105760673A (en) | Fluvial facies reservoir earthquake sensitive parameter template analysis method | |
| CN104915555A (en) | Dam break grading early-warning index extraction method for homogeneous earth dam | |
| CN103376468A (en) | Reservoir parameter quantitative characterization method based on neural network function approximation algorithm | |
| Song et al. | Potential for vertical heterogeneity prediction in reservoir basing on machine learning methods | |
| CN117172386A (en) | Advantageous reservoir classification, identification and prediction methods, systems, electronic equipment, and media | |
| CN101620034B (en) | Accelerated life test optimization design method based on proportional hazards-proportional odds model | |
| EP3850187B1 (en) | Method and system for reactively defining valve settings | |
| CN119228185A (en) | A geothermal resource evaluation method, device and equipment based on machine learning | |
| CN119132460A (en) | A method for identifying igneous fluids based on CXDF algorithm | |
| CN106779275A (en) | Field output Dominated Factors weight analysis method | |
| US20230140905A1 (en) | Systems and methods for completion optimization for waterflood assets | |
| Aulia et al. | A new history matching sensitivity analysis framework with random forests and Plackett-Burman design |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| AS | Assignment |
Owner name: PETROCHINA COMPANY LIMITED, CHINA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:LI, YONG;LI, BAOZHU;XIA, JING;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:037148/0145 Effective date: 20151119 |
|
| STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |