[go: up one dir, main page]

US20160145994A1 - Evaluation Method and Evaluation Device for Water Breakthrough Risk of Production Wells in Aquifer Drive Gas Reservoirs - Google Patents

Evaluation Method and Evaluation Device for Water Breakthrough Risk of Production Wells in Aquifer Drive Gas Reservoirs Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20160145994A1
US20160145994A1 US14/946,174 US201514946174A US2016145994A1 US 20160145994 A1 US20160145994 A1 US 20160145994A1 US 201514946174 A US201514946174 A US 201514946174A US 2016145994 A1 US2016145994 A1 US 2016145994A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
evaluation
gas
aquifers
water breakthrough
gas wells
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US14/946,174
Inventor
Yong Li
Baozhu LI
Jing Xia
Hui Peng
Jing Zhang
Yuwei JIAO
Manqi JIANG
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Petrochina Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Petrochina Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Petrochina Co Ltd filed Critical Petrochina Co Ltd
Assigned to PETROCHINA COMPANY LIMITED reassignment PETROCHINA COMPANY LIMITED ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: JIANG, MANQI, JIAO, YUWEI, LI, BAOZHU, LI, YONG, PENG, HUI, XIA, JING, ZHANG, JING
Publication of US20160145994A1 publication Critical patent/US20160145994A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
    • G06Q10/063Operations research, analysis or management
    • G06Q10/0635Risk analysis of enterprise or organisation activities
    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E21EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; MINING
    • E21BEARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
    • E21B47/00Survey of boreholes or wells
    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E21EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; MINING
    • E21BEARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
    • E21B44/00Automatic control systems specially adapted for drilling operations, i.e. self-operating systems which function to carry out or modify a drilling operation without intervention of a human operator, e.g. computer-controlled drilling systems; Systems specially adapted for monitoring a plurality of drilling variables or conditions
    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E21EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; MINING
    • E21BEARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
    • E21B41/00Equipment or details not covered by groups E21B15/00 - E21B40/00
    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E21EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; MINING
    • E21BEARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
    • E21B49/00Testing the nature of borehole walls; Formation testing; Methods or apparatus for obtaining samples of soil or well fluids, specially adapted to earth drilling or wells
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q50/00Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
    • G06Q50/06Energy or water supply
    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E21EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; MINING
    • E21BEARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
    • E21B2200/00Special features related to earth drilling for obtaining oil, gas or water
    • E21B2200/22Fuzzy logic, artificial intelligence, neural networks or the like

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to the technical field of natural gas development, in particular to an evaluation method and an evaluation device for water breakthrough risk of production wells in gas reservoirs with aquifer.
  • water breakthrough time prediction method adopts a water coning breakthrough time calculation formula to predict specific water breakthrough time of a gas well, but because actual gas reservoir has high heterogeneity and the production plan is continuously adjusted, use of these methods to perform evaluation of water invasion of the gas reservoirs may result in great difference with the actual situation.
  • the present invention is aimed to provide an evaluation method and an evaluation device for water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers, so as to make the obtained water breakthrough risk evaluation result be more consistent with the actual production characteristics.
  • the present invention provides an evaluation method for water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers, comprising:
  • the evaluation factors that influence water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers include the following features of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifer:
  • structure and sedimentary facies features including structure and trap feature, fracture feature, fracture development condition, rock type and sedimentary facies;
  • reservoir features including interlayer feature, reservoir type, sand body connectivity and reservoir heterogeneity
  • drilling information including drilling quality, cementing quality and distance between a perforation and the edge-bottom water
  • production performance and monitoring data including gas production profile testing result, saturation logging result and pressure transient well test evaluation result;
  • dynamic evaluation and prediction result including production rate and pressure variation features, production rate transient analysis result, controllable reserves per well, water coning critical production rate and water breakthrough time prediction result.
  • the acquiring weight vectors of the evaluation factors based on an analytic hierarchy process specifically comprises:
  • m ij represents the weight of an evaluation factor i to an evaluation factor j
  • the fuzzy relationship matrix between the water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers is:
  • R [ R
  • u p ] [ r 11 r 12 ... r 1 ⁇ ⁇ m r 21 r 22 ... r 2 ⁇ ⁇ m ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ r p ⁇ ⁇ 1 r p ⁇ ⁇ 2 ... r pm ] p , m
  • the element r pm in row p column m represents a degree of membership of water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers as for the feature vector from the aspect of the evaluation factor u p .
  • the synthesizing the fuzzy relationship matrix and the weight vectors according to a weighted average fuzzy synthesis operator specifically comprises:
  • b 1 , a i , r ij represent a degree of membership belonging to the jth level, a weight of the ith evaluation factor, and a degree of membership that the ith evaluation factor belongs to the jth level, respectively.
  • the present invention also provides an evaluation device for water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers, comprising:
  • an evaluation factor building module for building evaluation factors that influence water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers
  • a weight vector acquisition module for acquiring weight vectors of the evaluation factors based on an analytic hierarchy process
  • a fuzzy matrix building module for building a fuzzy relationship matrix between the water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers and its evaluation factors
  • a matrix and vector synthesizing module for synthesizing the fuzzy relationship matrix and the weight vectors according to a weighted average fuzzy synthesis operator, to acquire a comprehensive evaluation result of water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers.
  • the evaluation factors that influence water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers include the following features of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers:
  • structure and sedimentary facies features including structure and trap feature, fracture feature, fracture development condition, rock type and sedimentary facies;
  • reservoir features including interlayer feature, reservoir type, sand body connectivity and reservoir heterogeneity
  • drilling information including drilling quality, cementing quality and distance between perforations and the edge-bottom water
  • production performance and monitoring data including gas production profile testing results, saturation logging results and pressure transient well testing analysis results;
  • dynamic evaluation and prediction result including production rate and pressure variation features, production rate transient analysis results, reserves controlled by a well, critical water coning production rate and the predicted water breakthrough time.
  • the acquiring weight vectors of the evaluation factors based on an analytic hierarchy process specifically comprises:
  • m ij represents the weight of the evaluation factor i to the evaluation factor j
  • the fuzzy relationship matrix between the water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers and its evaluation factors is:
  • R [ R
  • u p ] [ r 11 r 12 ... r 1 ⁇ ⁇ m r 21 r 22 ... r 2 ⁇ ⁇ m ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ r p ⁇ ⁇ 1 r p ⁇ ⁇ 2 ... r pm ] p , m
  • the element r pm in row p column m represents a degree of membership of water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers as for the feature vector from the aspect of the evaluation factor u p .
  • the synthesizing the fuzzy relationship matrix and the weight vectors according to a weighted average fuzzy synthesis operator specifically comprises:
  • b i , a i , r ij represent a degree of membership belonging to the jth level, a weight of the ith evaluation factor, and a degree of membership that the ith evaluation factor belongs to the jth level, respectively.
  • a quantitative evaluation is performed on water breakthrough risk in the manner of combining an analytic hierarchy process and a fuzzy synthetic evaluation method.
  • the analytic hierarchy process is a systematic research method through which evaluation and judgment are made in accordance with decomposition, comparison, judgment and comprehensive thinking method, it is more reasonable for the present invention to adopt the analytic hierarchy process to determine weight coefficients of the evaluation factors for water breakthrough risk of the gas wells, which is more adaptive to the objective fact and easy to be calculated quantitatively, thereby improving accuracy of the result of subsequent fuzzy comprehensive evaluation, and being able to obtain an evaluation result that is more consistent with the case of actual water breakthrough situation of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers.
  • FIG. 1 is a flowchart of an evaluation method for water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention
  • FIG. 2 a is a schematic of a curve of contrast relationship between actual production rate of a well A in the evaluation method for water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers in accordance with the embodiment of the present invention and a water coning critical production rate calculated based on Chaperon method;
  • FIG. 2 b is a schematic of a curve of contrast relationship between actual production rate of a well B in the evaluation method for water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers in accordance with the embodiment of the present invention and a water coning critical production rate calculated based on Chaperon method;
  • FIG. 2 c is a schematic of a curve of contrast relationship between actual production rate of a well C in the evaluation method for water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers in accordance with the embodiment of the present invention and a water coning critical production rate calculated based on Chaperon method;
  • FIG. 2 d is a schematic of a curve of contrast relationship between actual production rate of a well D in the evaluation method for water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers in accordance with the embodiment of the present invention and a water coning critical production rate calculated based on Chaperon method.
  • an evaluation method for water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers comprises the following steps:
  • step S 101 building evaluation factors that influence water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers.
  • the evaluation factors that influence water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers are as shown in Table 1:
  • evaluation can be performed on water coning critical production rate per well by selecting an evaluation method suitable for evaluating water coning critical production rate of gas reservoir, and a contrast curve of actual daily gas production rate per well and water coning critical production rate is drawn, so that water invasion or water breakthrough of the gas well can be recognized according to relationship between gas well production rate and water coning critical production rate.
  • FIGS. 2 a to 2 d provide four curves of contrast relationships between four possible actual production rate of the gas well A, B, C, D and water coning critical production rate calculated based on Chaperon method. From the aspect of relationship between gas well production rate and water coning critical production rate, four wells in FIGS.
  • 2 a to 2 d are sequenced as D, C, B, A in accordance with possible water breakthrough levels, that is, water breakthrough occurs most easily in the well D, because the production rate of D is higher than the water coning critical production rate of D all the time, water cone is very easily formed or it causes edge water tongue advance. Water breakthrough occurs latest in the well A, because production rate of A is lower than the water coning critical production rate of A all the time, and water cone is not formed.
  • it is also possible to judge water invasion stage of gas wells by using a Blasingame production rate transient analysis type curve, a flowing material balance curve and the like, and the wells are categorized, and water breakthrough time of the gas wells can be preliminarily evaluated.
  • Step S 102 acquiring weight vectors of the evaluation factors based on an analytic hierarchy process. Specifically:
  • m ij represents the weight of an evaluation factor i to an evaluation factor j
  • the construction method is to fill upper triangular items of the sample matrices randomly with scales and their reciprocals, numerical values of the principal diagonal are always 1, and corresponding transposition position items are reciprocals of the above corresponding position random numbers. Then consistency index values of the random sample matrices are calculated, the CI values are averaged to obtain an average random consistency index RI value.
  • Step S 03 building a fuzzy relationship matrix between the water breakthrough risks of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers and its evaluation factors.
  • R [ R
  • u p ] [ r 11 r 12 ... r 1 ⁇ ⁇ m r 21 r 22 ... r 2 ⁇ ⁇ m ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ r p ⁇ ⁇ 1 r p ⁇ ⁇ 2 ... r pm ] p , m
  • the element r pm in row p column m represents a degree of membership of water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers as for the feature vector from the aspect of the evaluation factor u p .
  • Step S 104 combining the fuzzy relationship matrix and the weight vectors according to a weighted average fuzzy synthesis operator, to acquire a comprehensive evaluation results of water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers. Specifically:
  • b i , a i , r ij represent a degree of membership belonging to the jth level, a weight of the ith evaluation factor, and a degree of membership that the ith evaluation factor belongs to the jth level, respectively.
  • a comprehensive evaluation result of water breakthrough risk of each individual well can be obtained in accordance with the above evaluation method. Furthermore, if there is a need, the obtained comprehensive evaluation results of water breakthrough risk of the multiple individual wells can be graded and ranked, for example, the multiple individual wells are ranked in terms of level and position according to the comprehensive evaluation results of water breakthrough risk by using a method of seeking a grade of membership by the weighted average.
  • the evaluation method in accordance with the embodiment of the present invention has been applied successfully in gas fields of Tarim oilfield, PetroChina, which has a high prediction accuracy.
  • production rate of the gas wells are optimized and adjusted, on the basis of stable overall production rate of the gas fields, early water breakthrough in gas wells can be avoided to prevent the production rate decrease severely and improve the gas recovery, thereby greatly improving development effect of the gas fields.
  • the practical application result shows that, the evaluation method in accordance with the embodiment of the present invention is at least applicable to evaluation of water breakthrough risk of domestic large-scale gas reservoirs with edge-bottom aquifer.
  • a quantitative evaluation is performed on water breakthrough risk in the manner of combining an analytic hierarchy process and a fuzzy synthetic evaluation method.
  • the analytic hierarchy process is a systematic research method through which evaluation and judgment are made in accordance with decomposition, comparison and judgment and comprehensive thinking method, it is more reasonable for the embodiment of the present invention to adopt the analytic hierarchy process to determine weight coefficients of the evaluation factors for water breakthrough risk of the gas well, which is more adaptive to the objective fact and is easy to express quantitatively, thereby improving accuracy of the result of subsequent fuzzy comprehensive evaluation.
  • the evaluation device for water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers in accordance with the embodiment of the present invention comprises an evaluation factor building module, a weight vector acquisition module, a fussy matrix building module and a matrix and vector synthesizing module, wherein:
  • the evaluation factor building module is used for building evaluation factors that influence water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers. Specific evaluation factors can be seen in the step S 101 of the above method of the embodiment.
  • the weight vector acquisition module is used for acquiring weight vectors of the evaluation factors based on an analytic hierarchy process. Specific content can be seen in the step S 102 of the above method of the embodiment.
  • the fuzzy matrix building module is used for building a fuzzy relationship matrix between the water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers and its evaluation factors. Specific content can be seen in the step S 103 of the above method of the embodiment.
  • the matrix and vector synthesizing module is used for synthesizing the fuzzy relationship matrix and the weight vectors according to a weighted average fuzzy synthesis operator, to acquire a comprehensive evaluation result of water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers. Specific content can be seen in the step S 104 of the above method of the embodiment.
  • a quantitative evaluation is performed on water breakthrough risk in the manner of combining an analytic hierarchy process and a fuzzy synthetic evaluation method.
  • the analytic hierarchy process is a systematic research method through which evaluation and judgment are made in accordance with decomposition, comparison and judgment and comprehensive thinking method, it is more reasonable for the embodiment of the present invention to adopt the analytic hierarchy process to determine weight coefficients of the evaluation factors for water breakthrough risk of the gas well, which is more adaptive to the objective fact and is easy to express quantitatively, thereby improving accuracy of the result of subsequent fuzzy comprehensive evaluation.
  • Various illustrative logic modules or units described in the embodiment of the present invention can achieve or operate the described functions through the design of a universal processor, a digital signal processor, an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC), a field-programmable gate array or other programmable logic devices, a discrete gate or transistor logic, a discrete hardware component or any combination of the above.
  • the universal processor may be a microprocessor, and alternatively, the universal processor may be any traditional processor, controller, microcontroller or state machine.
  • the processor also can be implemented by combination of computing devices, such as a digital signal processor and a microprocessor, a plurality of microprocessors, one or more microprocessors united with one digital signal processor core, or any other similar configuration.
  • the steps of the method or algorithm described in the embodiment of the present invention can be directly inserted into hardware, a software module executed by the processor, or combination thereof
  • the software module can be stored in an RAM memory, a flash memory, an ROM memory, an EPROM memory, an EEPROM memory, a resistor, a disk, a removable disk, CD-ROM or storage medium in any other forms in the technical field.
  • a storage medium can be connected to the processor, so that the processor can read information from the storage medium and can write and store information into the storage medium.
  • the storage medium also can be integrated into the processor.
  • the processor and the storage medium can be disposed in the ASIC, and the ASIC can be disposed in a user terminal.
  • the processor and the storage medium can be disposed in different components in the user terminal.
  • the above functions described in the embodiment of the present invention can be realized by hardware, software, firmware or any combination thereof If the functions are realized in software, then the functions can be stored in a computer-readable medium, or can be transmitted to the computer-readable medium in the form of one or more instructs or codes.
  • the computer-readable medium includes a computer storage medium and a communication medium that facilitates transfer of computer program from one place to other places.
  • the storage medium can be any available media that can be accessed by a general or special computer.
  • Such computer-readable media can include but is not limited to RAM, ROM, EEPROM, CD-ROM or other optical disk storage, magnetic disc storage or other magnetic storage device, or any other medium that can be used for carrying or storing program codes in the form of instructs or data structure and other forms that can be read by a general or special computer or a general or special processor.
  • any connection can be suitably defined as computer-readable medium, for example, if software is transferred from a website, a server or other remote resources by a coaxial cable, an optical fiber cable, a twisted pair, a digital user line (DSL) or in a wireless manner such as infrared, wireless or microwave or the like, and can also be included in the defined computer-readable medium.
  • DSL digital user line
  • the described disk and disc include a compressed disc, a laser disc, an optical disc, a DVD, a floppy disc and a blue-ray disc, wherein the disc generally copies data with magnetism, while disk generally copies data optically with laser.
  • the above-described combination also can be included in the computer-readable medium.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mining & Mineral Resources (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Geology (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Geochemistry & Mineralogy (AREA)
  • General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Fluid Mechanics (AREA)
  • Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Geophysics (AREA)
  • Educational Administration (AREA)
  • Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
  • Development Economics (AREA)
  • Operations Research (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Public Health (AREA)
  • Water Supply & Treatment (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Primary Health Care (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
  • Filling Or Discharging Of Gas Storage Vessels (AREA)
  • Physical Or Chemical Processes And Apparatus (AREA)

Abstract

The present invention provides an evaluation method and an evaluation device for water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers, the method comprising the following steps: building evaluation factors that influence water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers; acquiring weight vectors of the evaluation factors based on an analytic hierarchy process; building a fuzzy relationship matrix between the water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers and its evaluation factors; and synthesizing the fuzzy relationship matrix and the weight vectors according to a weighted average fuzzy synthesis operator, to acquire a comprehensive evaluation result of water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers. The present invention improves the accuracy of the evaluation result of water breakthrough risk of the gas wells, and is able to obtain an evaluation result that is more consistent with the case of actual water breakthrough of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers.

Description

  • This application claims the benefit of co-pending Chinese patent application 201410670301.5, filed 20 Nov. 2014, which is hereby incorporated herein as though fully set forth.
  • TECHNICAL FIELD
  • The present invention relates to the technical field of natural gas development, in particular to an evaluation method and an evaluation device for water breakthrough risk of production wells in gas reservoirs with aquifer.
  • DESCRIPTION OF THE RELATED ART
  • As for development of gas reservoirs with strong edge-bottom aquifer drive, once water breakthrough occurs in gas wells, a lot of trouble may be brought to gas field surface engineering, and meanwhile productivity of the gas wells may be decreased greatly, causing the gas wells to be shut down due to too low production rate in early period, thereby greatly influencing gas reservoirs recovery and development performance. Therefore, how to identify aquifer influx of gas wells are urgent in order to guide the well production rate optimization and improve gas field performance.
  • At present, main study about evaluation of water breakthrough risk of gas reservoirs focuses on prediction of water breakthrough time based on the simplified conceptual models and identification of water invasion type. Wherein, water breakthrough time prediction method adopts a water coning breakthrough time calculation formula to predict specific water breakthrough time of a gas well, but because actual gas reservoir has high heterogeneity and the production plan is continuously adjusted, use of these methods to perform evaluation of water invasion of the gas reservoirs may result in great difference with the actual situation. There are also literatures involved the material balance method and the water invasion indication curve method, but application of these methods is also limited, because these methods need too much static pressure data and good prediction can be gotten only when a certain degree of recovery is achieved, but actually, there are few testing points of static pressure and the degree of recovery of many wells when water breakthrough occurs is very low as a result, at present it is difficult to quantitatively evaluate the water breakthrough risk, which can objectively reflect the actual situation, by using existing technology.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention is aimed to provide an evaluation method and an evaluation device for water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers, so as to make the obtained water breakthrough risk evaluation result be more consistent with the actual production characteristics.
  • To achieve the above purpose, on one hand, the present invention provides an evaluation method for water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers, comprising:
  • building evaluation factors that influence water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifer;
  • acquiring weight vectors of the evaluation factors based on an analytic hierarchy process;
  • building a fuzzy relationship matrix between the water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifer and its evaluation factors;
  • synthesizing the fuzzy relationship matrix and the weight vectors according to a weighted average fuzzy composite operator, to acquire a comprehensive evaluation result of water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers.
  • In the evaluation method for evaluating water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers, according to the present invention, the evaluation factors that influence water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers include the following features of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifer:
  • structure and sedimentary facies features, including structure and trap feature, fracture feature, fracture development condition, rock type and sedimentary facies;
  • reservoir features, including interlayer feature, reservoir type, sand body connectivity and reservoir heterogeneity;
  • drilling information, including drilling quality, cementing quality and distance between a perforation and the edge-bottom water;
  • production performance and monitoring data, including gas production profile testing result, saturation logging result and pressure transient well test evaluation result;
  • dynamic evaluation and prediction result, including production rate and pressure variation features, production rate transient analysis result, controllable reserves per well, water coning critical production rate and water breakthrough time prediction result.
  • In the evaluation method for water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers according to the present invention, the acquiring weight vectors of the evaluation factors based on an analytic hierarchy process specifically comprises:
  • performing pairwise comparison among the evaluation factors under the same hierarchy to obtain a quantized judgment matrix M;
  • M = ( m 11 m 12 m 1 j m 21 m 22 m 2 j m i 1 m i 2 m ij )
  • wherein, mij represents the weight of an evaluation factor i to an evaluation factor j;
  • calculating the largest eigenvalue λmax of the judgment matrix M and corresponding feature vector, the feature vector being weight coefficient distribution of the evaluation factors under the same hierarchy;
  • performing consistency verification on the feature vector;
  • if the feature vector goes through the consistency verification, calculating a product Qi of each row of elements of the judgment matrix M, wherein
  • Q i = j = 1 n m ij ;
  • calculating a n-th root
  • ω _ i = Q i n
  • of Qi to acquire a vector ω=[ω 1 ω 2 . . . ω n], performing a normalization process to the vector to obtain the weight vector of the evaluation factors.
  • In the evaluation method for evaluating water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers according to the present invention, the fuzzy relationship matrix between the water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers. And its evaluation factors is:
  • R = [ R | u 1 R | u 2 R | u p ] = [ r 11 r 12 r 1 m r 21 r 22 r 2 m r p 1 r p 2 r pm ] p , m
  • wherein, in the fuzzy relationship matrix R, the element rpm in row p column m represents a degree of membership of water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers as for the feature vector from the aspect of the evaluation factor up.
  • In the evaluation method for evaluating water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers according to the present invention, the synthesizing the fuzzy relationship matrix and the weight vectors according to a weighted average fuzzy synthesis operator specifically comprises:
  • according to the formula
  • b i = i = 1 p ( a i · r ij ) = min ( 1 , i = 1 p a i · r ij ) , j = 1 , 2 , , m ,
  • synthesizing the fuzzy relationship matrix and the weight vectors;
  • wherein, b1, ai, rij represent a degree of membership belonging to the jth level, a weight of the ith evaluation factor, and a degree of membership that the ith evaluation factor belongs to the jth level, respectively.
  • On the other hand, the present invention also provides an evaluation device for water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers, comprising:
  • an evaluation factor building module for building evaluation factors that influence water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers;
  • a weight vector acquisition module for acquiring weight vectors of the evaluation factors based on an analytic hierarchy process;
  • a fuzzy matrix building module for building a fuzzy relationship matrix between the water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers and its evaluation factors;
  • a matrix and vector synthesizing module for synthesizing the fuzzy relationship matrix and the weight vectors according to a weighted average fuzzy synthesis operator, to acquire a comprehensive evaluation result of water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers.
  • In the evaluation device for evaluating water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers according to the present invention, the evaluation factors that influence water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers include the following features of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers:
  • structure and sedimentary facies features, including structure and trap feature, fracture feature, fracture development condition, rock type and sedimentary facies;
  • reservoir features, including interlayer feature, reservoir type, sand body connectivity and reservoir heterogeneity;
  • drilling information, including drilling quality, cementing quality and distance between perforations and the edge-bottom water;
  • production performance and monitoring data, including gas production profile testing results, saturation logging results and pressure transient well testing analysis results;
  • dynamic evaluation and prediction result, including production rate and pressure variation features, production rate transient analysis results, reserves controlled by a well, critical water coning production rate and the predicted water breakthrough time.
  • In the evaluation device for water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers according to the present invention, the acquiring weight vectors of the evaluation factors based on an analytic hierarchy process specifically comprises:
  • performing pairwise comparison among the evaluation factors under the same hierarchy to obtain a quantized judgment matrix M;
  • M = ( m 11 m 12 m 1 j m 21 m 22 m 2 j m i 1 m i 2 m ij )
  • wherein, mij represents the weight of the evaluation factor i to the evaluation factor j;
  • calculating the largest eigenvalue λmax of the judgment matrix M and corresponding feature vector, the feature vector being weight coefficient distribution of the evaluation factors under the same hierarchy;
  • performing consistency verification on the feature vector;
  • if the eigenvector goes through the consistency verification, calculating a product Qi of each row of elements of the judgment matrix M, wherein
  • Q i = j = 1 n m ij ;
  • calculating a n-th root
  • ω _ i = Q i n
  • of Qi to acquire a vector ω=[ω 1 ω 2 . . . ω n], performing a normalization process to the vector to obtain the weight vector of the evaluation factors.
  • In the evaluation device for evaluating water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers according to the present invention, the fuzzy relationship matrix between the water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers and its evaluation factors is:
  • R = [ R | u 1 R | u 2 R | u p ] = [ r 11 r 12 r 1 m r 21 r 22 r 2 m r p 1 r p 2 r pm ] p , m
  • wherein, in the fuzzy relationship matrix R, the element rpm in row p column m represents a degree of membership of water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers as for the feature vector from the aspect of the evaluation factor up.
  • In the evaluation device for evaluating water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers according to the present invention, the synthesizing the fuzzy relationship matrix and the weight vectors according to a weighted average fuzzy synthesis operator specifically comprises:
  • according to the formula
  • b i = i = 1 p ( a i · r ij ) = min ( 1 , i = 1 p a i · r ij ) , j = 1 , 2 , , m ,
  • synthesizing the fuzzy relationship matrix and the weight vectors;
  • wherein, bi, ai, rij represent a degree of membership belonging to the jth level, a weight of the ith evaluation factor, and a degree of membership that the ith evaluation factor belongs to the jth level, respectively.
  • In the present invention, a quantitative evaluation is performed on water breakthrough risk in the manner of combining an analytic hierarchy process and a fuzzy synthetic evaluation method. Because the analytic hierarchy process is a systematic research method through which evaluation and judgment are made in accordance with decomposition, comparison, judgment and comprehensive thinking method, it is more reasonable for the present invention to adopt the analytic hierarchy process to determine weight coefficients of the evaluation factors for water breakthrough risk of the gas wells, which is more adaptive to the objective fact and easy to be calculated quantitatively, thereby improving accuracy of the result of subsequent fuzzy comprehensive evaluation, and being able to obtain an evaluation result that is more consistent with the case of actual water breakthrough situation of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • The accompanied drawings described herein are used for providing further understanding to the present invention, which constitute a part of the present application but do not constitute any definition to the present invention. In the drawings:
  • FIG. 1 is a flowchart of an evaluation method for water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;
  • FIG. 2a is a schematic of a curve of contrast relationship between actual production rate of a well A in the evaluation method for water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers in accordance with the embodiment of the present invention and a water coning critical production rate calculated based on Chaperon method;
  • FIG. 2b is a schematic of a curve of contrast relationship between actual production rate of a well B in the evaluation method for water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers in accordance with the embodiment of the present invention and a water coning critical production rate calculated based on Chaperon method;
  • FIG. 2c is a schematic of a curve of contrast relationship between actual production rate of a well C in the evaluation method for water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers in accordance with the embodiment of the present invention and a water coning critical production rate calculated based on Chaperon method;
  • FIG. 2d is a schematic of a curve of contrast relationship between actual production rate of a well D in the evaluation method for water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers in accordance with the embodiment of the present invention and a water coning critical production rate calculated based on Chaperon method.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • Hereinafter, the present invention is further described in details in combination with the embodiment and the accompanied drawings, in order to describe purpose, technical solution and advantages of the present invention is clearer. Here the schematic embodiment of the present invention and its description are to explain the present invention, but are not to define the present invention.
  • Hereinafter the specific embodiment of the present invention is further described in detail in combination with the accompanied drawings.
  • As shown in FIG. 1, an evaluation method for water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention comprises the following steps:
  • step S101: building evaluation factors that influence water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers. In the embodiment of the present invention, the evaluation factors that influence water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers are as shown in Table 1:
  • TABLE 1
    Two-hierarchy evaluation factors of water breakthrough risk
    1st-hierarchy evaluation factors 2nd-hierarchy evaluation factors
    A Structure and sedimentary a1 structure and trap feature
    facies features a2 fracture feature
    a3 fracture development condition
    a4 rock type and sedimentary facies
    B Reservoir feature b1 interlayer feature
    b2 reservoir type
    b3 sand body connectivity
    b4 reservoir heterogeneity
    C Drilling and completion c1 drilling quality
    information c2 cementing quality
    c3 distance between a perforation and the edge-bottom
    water
    D production performance and d1 gas production profile testing result
    monitoring data d2 saturation logging result
    d3 transient well testing analysis result
    E Dynamic evaluation and e1 production rate and pressure variation features
    prediction result e2 production rate transient analysis
    e3 reserve controlled by single well
    e4 water coning critical production rate
    e5 water breakthrough time prediction result
  • wherein, water invasion actually has great influence on production performance of the gas well, the gas well is not subjected to any pressure support when no water invasion occurs, the production performance of the gas well is shown as features of closed gas reservoir. At the initial stage of water invasion, the gas well is supported with water body energy, pressure may decline more slowly in the case of stable production rate than the case that no water invasion occurs. In the middle and later periods of water invasion, especially when edge-bottom water rushes into around the gas wells, gas flow is obviously resisted, gas production pressure difference in the case of same production rate increase obviously. Production characteristics of water invasion at different stages are summarized as shown in Table 2. Table 2 only exemplarily describes recognition of water invasion by production performance changes in the case of consistent production rate or stable flowing pressure, and similar analysis can be performed in the mode on the actual production data of the gas well, and pressure complex production performance changes.
  • TABLE 2
    Diagnose of water invasion by production performance data of the gas well
    serial
    number type production performance features
    1 Non-water consistent production rate, pressure declining tendency is in
    invasion type consistency
    stable pressure, production rate declining tendency is in
    consistency
    2 Initial stage of consistent production rate, pressure declines more slowly
    water invasion type than the previous stage
    stable pressure, production rate declines more slowly than
    the previous stage
    3 Middle and consistent production rate, pressure declines faster than the
    later periods of previous stage
    water invasion type stable pressure, production rate declines faster than the
    previous stage
  • Furthermore, in the embodiment of the present invention, evaluation can be performed on water coning critical production rate per well by selecting an evaluation method suitable for evaluating water coning critical production rate of gas reservoir, and a contrast curve of actual daily gas production rate per well and water coning critical production rate is drawn, so that water invasion or water breakthrough of the gas well can be recognized according to relationship between gas well production rate and water coning critical production rate. FIGS. 2a to 2d provide four curves of contrast relationships between four possible actual production rate of the gas well A, B, C, D and water coning critical production rate calculated based on Chaperon method. From the aspect of relationship between gas well production rate and water coning critical production rate, four wells in FIGS. 2a to 2d are sequenced as D, C, B, A in accordance with possible water breakthrough levels, that is, water breakthrough occurs most easily in the well D, because the production rate of D is higher than the water coning critical production rate of D all the time, water cone is very easily formed or it causes edge water tongue advance. Water breakthrough occurs latest in the well A, because production rate of A is lower than the water coning critical production rate of A all the time, and water cone is not formed. Certainly, it is also possible to judge water invasion stage of gas wells by using a Blasingame production rate transient analysis type curve, a flowing material balance curve and the like, and the wells are categorized, and water breakthrough time of the gas wells can be preliminarily evaluated.
  • Step S102: acquiring weight vectors of the evaluation factors based on an analytic hierarchy process. Specifically:
  • firstly, performing pairwise comparison among the evaluation factors under the same hierarchy to obtain a quantized judgment matrix M;
  • M = ( m 11 m 12 m 1 j m 21 m 22 m 2 j m i 1 m i 2 m ij )
  • wherein, mij represents the weight of an evaluation factor i to an evaluation factor j;
  • then, calculating the largest eigenvalue λmax of the judgment matrix M and corresponding feature vector, the feature vector being weight coefficient distribution of the evaluation factors under the same hierarchy, which represents importance ranking of the evaluation factors under the same hierarchy;
  • secondly, performing consistency verification on the feature vector; in order to judge whether the feature factor is valid, it is necessary to perform consistency verification on the judgment matrix M and to calculate a consistency index
  • CI = λ max - n n - 1
  • of the deviation, in which 500 sample matrices are constructed by a random method, the construction method is to fill upper triangular items of the sample matrices randomly with scales and their reciprocals, numerical values of the principal diagonal are always 1, and corresponding transposition position items are reciprocals of the above corresponding position random numbers. Then consistency index values of the random sample matrices are calculated, the CI values are averaged to obtain an average random consistency index RI value. When random consistency ratio is
  • CR = CI RI < 0.10 ,
  • it is regarded that a result of the analytic hierarchy process has a satisfactory consistency, that is, distribution of weight coefficients is reasonable; otherwise, element values of the judgment matrix M are reset, and values of the weight coefficients are re-distributed.
  • Thirdly, if the feature vector goes through the consistency verification, calculating a product Qi of each row of elements of the judgment matrix M, wherein
  • Q i = j = 1 n m ij ;
  • finally, calculating a n-th root
  • ω _ i = Q i n
  • of Qi to acquire a vector ω=[ω 1,ω 2 . . . ω n], performing a normalization process to the vector to obtain the weight vector of the evaluation factors.
  • Step S03: building a fuzzy relationship matrix between the water breakthrough risks of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers and its evaluation factors.
  • R = [ R | u 1 R | u 2 R | u p ] = [ r 11 r 12 r 1 m r 21 r 22 r 2 m r p 1 r p 2 r pm ] p , m
  • wherein, in the fuzzy relationship matrix R, the element rpm in row p column m represents a degree of membership of water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers as for the feature vector from the aspect of the evaluation factor up.
  • Step S104: combining the fuzzy relationship matrix and the weight vectors according to a weighted average fuzzy synthesis operator, to acquire a comprehensive evaluation results of water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers. Specifically:
  • For a maxi-min algorithm commonly used in fuzzy comprehensive evaluation, when there are many evaluation factors, weights distributed to each evaluation factor are often very small, such that in fuzzy composite operation, much information is lost, which often causes the results to be difficult to distinguish and results in unreasonable (that is, model inefficiency) case. Therefore, focusing on the above problem, here weighted average type of fuzzy composite operators are adopted to reduce information loss, the calculation formula is:
  • b i = i = 1 p ( a i · r ij ) = min ( 1 , i = 1 p a i · r ij ) , j = 1 , 2 , , m
  • wherein, bi, ai, rij represent a degree of membership belonging to the jth level, a weight of the ith evaluation factor, and a degree of membership that the ith evaluation factor belongs to the jth level, respectively.
  • When there are multiple individual wells, a comprehensive evaluation result of water breakthrough risk of each individual well can be obtained in accordance with the above evaluation method. Furthermore, if there is a need, the obtained comprehensive evaluation results of water breakthrough risk of the multiple individual wells can be graded and ranked, for example, the multiple individual wells are ranked in terms of level and position according to the comprehensive evaluation results of water breakthrough risk by using a method of seeking a grade of membership by the weighted average.
  • Furthermore, the evaluation method in accordance with the embodiment of the present invention has been applied successfully in gas fields of Tarim oilfield, PetroChina, which has a high prediction accuracy. Through comprehensive evaluation of water breakthrough risk of the gas fields, production rate of the gas wells are optimized and adjusted, on the basis of stable overall production rate of the gas fields, early water breakthrough in gas wells can be avoided to prevent the production rate decrease severely and improve the gas recovery, thereby greatly improving development effect of the gas fields. In addition, the practical application result shows that, the evaluation method in accordance with the embodiment of the present invention is at least applicable to evaluation of water breakthrough risk of domestic large-scale gas reservoirs with edge-bottom aquifer.
  • In the embodiment of the present invention, a quantitative evaluation is performed on water breakthrough risk in the manner of combining an analytic hierarchy process and a fuzzy synthetic evaluation method. Because the analytic hierarchy process is a systematic research method through which evaluation and judgment are made in accordance with decomposition, comparison and judgment and comprehensive thinking method, it is more reasonable for the embodiment of the present invention to adopt the analytic hierarchy process to determine weight coefficients of the evaluation factors for water breakthrough risk of the gas well, which is more adaptive to the objective fact and is easy to express quantitatively, thereby improving accuracy of the result of subsequent fuzzy comprehensive evaluation.
  • Correspondingly to the above evaluation method for water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers, the evaluation device for water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers in accordance with the embodiment of the present invention comprises an evaluation factor building module, a weight vector acquisition module, a fussy matrix building module and a matrix and vector synthesizing module, wherein:
  • the evaluation factor building module is used for building evaluation factors that influence water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers. Specific evaluation factors can be seen in the step S101 of the above method of the embodiment.
  • The weight vector acquisition module is used for acquiring weight vectors of the evaluation factors based on an analytic hierarchy process. Specific content can be seen in the step S102 of the above method of the embodiment.
  • The fuzzy matrix building module is used for building a fuzzy relationship matrix between the water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers and its evaluation factors. Specific content can be seen in the step S103 of the above method of the embodiment.
  • The matrix and vector synthesizing module is used for synthesizing the fuzzy relationship matrix and the weight vectors according to a weighted average fuzzy synthesis operator, to acquire a comprehensive evaluation result of water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers. Specific content can be seen in the step S104 of the above method of the embodiment.
  • In the embodiment of the present invention, a quantitative evaluation is performed on water breakthrough risk in the manner of combining an analytic hierarchy process and a fuzzy synthetic evaluation method. Because the analytic hierarchy process is a systematic research method through which evaluation and judgment are made in accordance with decomposition, comparison and judgment and comprehensive thinking method, it is more reasonable for the embodiment of the present invention to adopt the analytic hierarchy process to determine weight coefficients of the evaluation factors for water breakthrough risk of the gas well, which is more adaptive to the objective fact and is easy to express quantitatively, thereby improving accuracy of the result of subsequent fuzzy comprehensive evaluation.
  • Persons skilled in the art also know that, the illustrative logic modules, units and steps listed in the embodiment of the present invention can be implemented by hardware, software or combination of the two. Implementation by hardware or software depends on specific application and design requirement of the whole system. For each specific application, persons skilled in the art can use various methods to realize the functions, but such implementation shall not be understood as going beyond the scope claimed by the embodiment of the present invention.
  • Various illustrative logic modules or units described in the embodiment of the present invention can achieve or operate the described functions through the design of a universal processor, a digital signal processor, an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC), a field-programmable gate array or other programmable logic devices, a discrete gate or transistor logic, a discrete hardware component or any combination of the above. The universal processor may be a microprocessor, and alternatively, the universal processor may be any traditional processor, controller, microcontroller or state machine. The processor also can be implemented by combination of computing devices, such as a digital signal processor and a microprocessor, a plurality of microprocessors, one or more microprocessors united with one digital signal processor core, or any other similar configuration.
  • The steps of the method or algorithm described in the embodiment of the present invention can be directly inserted into hardware, a software module executed by the processor, or combination thereof The software module can be stored in an RAM memory, a flash memory, an ROM memory, an EPROM memory, an EEPROM memory, a resistor, a disk, a removable disk, CD-ROM or storage medium in any other forms in the technical field. Illustratively, a storage medium can be connected to the processor, so that the processor can read information from the storage medium and can write and store information into the storage medium. Alternatively, the storage medium also can be integrated into the processor. The processor and the storage medium can be disposed in the ASIC, and the ASIC can be disposed in a user terminal. Alternatively, the processor and the storage medium can be disposed in different components in the user terminal.
  • In one or more illustrative designs, the above functions described in the embodiment of the present invention can be realized by hardware, software, firmware or any combination thereof If the functions are realized in software, then the functions can be stored in a computer-readable medium, or can be transmitted to the computer-readable medium in the form of one or more instructs or codes. The computer-readable medium includes a computer storage medium and a communication medium that facilitates transfer of computer program from one place to other places. The storage medium can be any available media that can be accessed by a general or special computer. For example, such computer-readable media can include but is not limited to RAM, ROM, EEPROM, CD-ROM or other optical disk storage, magnetic disc storage or other magnetic storage device, or any other medium that can be used for carrying or storing program codes in the form of instructs or data structure and other forms that can be read by a general or special computer or a general or special processor. Furthermore, any connection can be suitably defined as computer-readable medium, for example, if software is transferred from a website, a server or other remote resources by a coaxial cable, an optical fiber cable, a twisted pair, a digital user line (DSL) or in a wireless manner such as infrared, wireless or microwave or the like, and can also be included in the defined computer-readable medium. The described disk and disc include a compressed disc, a laser disc, an optical disc, a DVD, a floppy disc and a blue-ray disc, wherein the disc generally copies data with magnetism, while disk generally copies data optically with laser. The above-described combination also can be included in the computer-readable medium.
  • The above specific embodiment further describes in detail the object, the technical solution and beneficial effect of the present invention. It shall be understood that, the above description is merely a specific embodiment of the present invention, but not for limiting the protection scope of the invention. Any modification, equivalent replacement, improvement and the like within the spirit and principle of the present invention shall be included within the protection scope of the present invention.

Claims (10)

1. An evaluation method for water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers, comprising:
building evaluation factors that influence water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers;
acquiring weight vectors of the evaluation factors based on an analytic hierarchy process;
building a fuzzy relationship matrix between the water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers and its evaluation factors; and
synthesizing the fuzzy relationship matrix and the weight vectors according to a weighted average fuzzy synthesis operator, to acquire a comprehensive evaluation result of water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers.
2. The evaluation method for evaluating water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers according to claim 1, characterized in that, the evaluation factors that influence water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers include the following features of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers:
structure and sedimentary facies features, including structure and trap feature, fracture feature, fracture development condition and rock type and sedimentary facies;
reservoir features, including interlayer feature, reservoir type, sand body connectivity and reservoir heterogeneity;
drilling and completion information, including drilling quality, cementing quality and distance between a perforation and the edge-bottom water;
production performance and monitoring data, including gas production profile testing result, saturation logging result and transient well testing analysis result; and
dynamic evaluation and prediction result, including production rate and pressure variation characteristics, production rate transient analysis result, reserve controlled by a single well, water coning critical production rate and water breakthrough time prediction result.
3. The evaluation method for water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers according to claim 1, characterized in that, the acquiring weight vectors of the evaluation factors based on an analytic hierarchy process specifically comprises:
performing pairwise comparison among the evaluation factors under the same hierarchy to obtain a quantized judgment matrix M;
M = ( m 11 m 12 m 1 j m 21 m 22 m 2 j m i 1 m i 2 m ij )
wherein, mij represents the weight of an evaluation factor i to an evaluation factor j;
calculating the largest eigenvalue λmax of the judgment matrix M and corresponding feature vector, the feature vector being weight coefficient distribution of the evaluation factors under the same hierarchy;
performing consistency verification on the feature vector;
if the feature vector goes through the consistency verification, calculating a product Qi of each row of elements of the judgment matrix M, wherein
Q i = j = 1 n m ij ;
calculating a n-th root
ω _ i = Q i n
of Qi to acquire a vector ω=[ω 1 ω 2 . . . ω n], performing a normalization process to the vector to obtain the weight vector of the evaluation factors.
4. The evaluation method for evaluating water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers according to claim 1, characterized in that, the fuzzy relationship matrix between the water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers and its evaluation factors is:
R = [ R | u 1 R | u 1 R | u p ] = [ r 11 r 12 r 1 m r 21 r 22 r 2 m r p 1 r p 2 r pm ] p , m
wherein, in the fuzzy relationship matrix, the element rpm in row p column m represents a degree of membership of water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers as for the feature vector from the aspect of the evaluation factor up.
5. The evaluation method for evaluating water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers. according to claim 1, characterized in that, the synthesizing the fuzzy relationship matrix and the weight vectors according to a weighted average fuzzy synthesis operator specifically comprises:
according to the formula
b i = i = 1 p ( a i · r ij ) = min ( 1 , i = 1 p a i · r ij ) , j = 1 , 2 , , m ,
synthesizing the fuzzy relationship matrix and the weight vectors;
wherein, bi, ai, rij represent a degree of membership belonging to the jth level, a weight of the ith evaluation factor, and a degree of membership that the ith evaluation factor belongs to the jth level, respectively.
6. An evaluation device for water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers, comprising:
an evaluation factor building module for building evaluation factors that influence water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers;
a weight vector acquisition module for acquiring weight vectors of the evaluation factors based on an analytic hierarchy process;
a fuzzy matrix building module for building a fuzzy relationship matrix between the water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers and its evaluation factors;
a matrix and vector synthesizing module for synthesizing the fuzzy relationship matrix and the weight vectors according to a weighted average fuzzy synthesis operator, to acquire a comprehensive evaluation result of water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers.
7. The evaluation device for evaluating water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers according to claim 6, characterized in that, the evaluation factors that influence water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers include the following features of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers:
structure and sedimentary facies features, including structure and trap feature, fracture feature, fracture development condition and rock type and sedimentary facies;
reservoir features, including interlayer feature, reservoir type, sand body connectivity and reservoir heterogeneity;
drilling and completion information, including drilling quality, cementing quality and distance between a perforation and the edge-bottom water;
production performance and monitoring data, including gas production profile testing result, saturation logging result and transient well testing analysis result;
dynamic evaluation and prediction result, including production rate and pressure variation characteristics, production rate transient analysis result, reserve controlled by a single well, water coning critical production rate and water breakthrough time prediction result.
8. The evaluation device for water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers according to claim 6, characterized in that, the acquiring weight vectors of the evaluation factors based on an analytic hierarchy process specifically comprises:
performing pairwise comparison among the evaluation factors under the same hierarchy to obtain a quantized judgment matrix M;
M = ( m 11 m 12 m 1 j m 21 m 22 m 2 j m i 1 m i 2 m ij )
wherein, mij represents the weight of an evaluation factor i to an evaluation factor j;
calculating the largest eigenvalue λmax of the judgment matrix M and corresponding feature vector, the feature vector being weight coefficient distribution of the evaluation factors under the same hierarchy;
performing consistency verification on the feature vector;
if the feature vector goes through the consistency verification, calculating a product Qi of each row of elements of the judgment matrix M, wherein
Q i = j = 1 n m ij ;
calculating a n-th root
ω _ i = Q i n
of Qi to acquire a vector ω=[ω 1 ω 2 . . . ω n], performing a normalization process to the vector to obtain the weight vector of the evaluation factors.
9. The evaluation device for evaluating water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers according to claim 6, characterized in that, the fuzzy relationship matrix between the water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers and its evaluation factors is:
R = [ R | u 1 R | u 1 R | u p ] = [ r 11 r 12 r 1 m r 21 r 22 r 2 m r p 1 r p 2 r pm ] p , m
wherein, in the fuzzy relationship matrix R, the element rpm in row p column m represents a degree of membership of water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers as for the feature vector from the aspect of the evaluation factor up.
10. The evaluation device for evaluating water breakthrough risk of gas wells in gas reservoirs with aquifers according to claim 6, characterized in that, the synthesizing the fuzzy relationship matrix and the weight vectors according to a weighted average fuzzy synthesis operator specifically comprises:
according to the formula
b i = i = 1 p ( a i · r ij ) = min ( 1 , i = 1 p a i · r ij ) , j = 1 , 2 , , m ,
synthesizing the fuzzy relationship matrix and the weight vectors;
wherein, bi, ai, rij represent a degree of membership belonging to the jth level, a weight of the ith evaluation factor, and a degree of membership that the ith evaluation factor belongs to the jth level, respectively.
US14/946,174 2014-11-20 2015-11-19 Evaluation Method and Evaluation Device for Water Breakthrough Risk of Production Wells in Aquifer Drive Gas Reservoirs Abandoned US20160145994A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201410670301.5A CN104376420A (en) 2014-11-20 2014-11-20 Water breakthrough risk assessment method and assessment device for gas wells in water-bearing gas reservoirs
CN201410670301.5 2014-11-20

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20160145994A1 true US20160145994A1 (en) 2016-05-26

Family

ID=52555315

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US14/946,174 Abandoned US20160145994A1 (en) 2014-11-20 2015-11-19 Evaluation Method and Evaluation Device for Water Breakthrough Risk of Production Wells in Aquifer Drive Gas Reservoirs

Country Status (3)

Country Link
US (1) US20160145994A1 (en)
CN (1) CN104376420A (en)
GB (1) GB2535581B (en)

Cited By (91)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2535581A (en) * 2014-11-20 2016-08-24 Petrochina Co Ltd Evaluation method and evaluation device for water breakthrough risk of production wells in aquifer drive gas reservoirs
CN106056307A (en) * 2016-06-14 2016-10-26 中国电力科学研究院 Electric power replacement technology comprehensive benefit assessment method based on comprehensive weighting method
CN106875104A (en) * 2017-01-21 2017-06-20 西安交通大学 A kind of cold-strip steel quality overall evaluation method
CN107038516A (en) * 2016-10-20 2017-08-11 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Complex Fault Block Oil Reservoir water flooding effectiveness quantitative evaluation method is oozed in one kind
CN107842359A (en) * 2016-09-19 2018-03-27 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Individual well recoverable reserves evaluation method and device
CN108009716A (en) * 2017-11-28 2018-05-08 西南石油大学 A kind of horizontal well volume fracturing influential effect factor mutiple-stage model method
CN108182510A (en) * 2017-12-11 2018-06-19 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 Production potential evaluation method and device
CN108960553A (en) * 2017-05-27 2018-12-07 中国石油化工股份有限公司 A kind of visualizing monitor method of drillng operation information and risk
CN109102180A (en) * 2018-07-30 2018-12-28 北京大学 The comprehensive parameters evaluation method of the double dessert evaluations of tight sandstone reservoir
CN109359871A (en) * 2018-10-19 2019-02-19 中国海洋石油集团有限公司 Reliability evaluation method of casing for oil and gas wells
CN109409724A (en) * 2018-10-19 2019-03-01 中国海洋石油集团有限公司 Deepwater drilling blowout out of control risk evaluating method
CN109470839A (en) * 2018-11-22 2019-03-15 山东科技大学 Physical test device and method for simulating deep fault formation, fault activation and fault water inrush
CN109899051A (en) * 2017-12-07 2019-06-18 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 Evaluation standard determination method, device and storage medium for oil well equipment
CN109933745A (en) * 2019-01-29 2019-06-25 西南石油大学 An intelligent judgment method for hydrate drilling and production risk based on fuzzy judgment
CN110020403A (en) * 2017-11-23 2019-07-16 中国电力科学研究院有限公司 A kind of power distribution automation equipment test synthesis evaluation method and system
CN110070258A (en) * 2019-03-06 2019-07-30 中南大学 A kind of coke oven heating-combustion process performance estimating method
CN110163442A (en) * 2019-05-27 2019-08-23 华北理工大学 A kind of gas well plug-ging prediction technique based on integrated study
CN110163486A (en) * 2019-03-19 2019-08-23 广州中国科学院计算机网络信息中心 A kind of project risk different degree appraisal procedure and system
CN110222973A (en) * 2019-05-31 2019-09-10 国网安徽省电力有限公司经济技术研究院 A kind of integrated energy system evaluation method and system based on optimal weights combination
CN110619467A (en) * 2019-09-17 2019-12-27 电子科技大学 Power equipment state evaluation method based on alarm big data information
CN110727986A (en) * 2019-10-15 2020-01-24 成都亮紫智能科技有限公司 BIM and weighted gray cloud clustering model-based ancient building maintenance model acquisition method
CN110738398A (en) * 2019-09-19 2020-01-31 中山大学 A trial risk analysis method based on the overall utility of fuzzy numbers
CN111008734A (en) * 2019-11-26 2020-04-14 华南理工大学 Flood hazard zoning and research methods for spatiotemporal evolution
CN111062500A (en) * 2019-12-05 2020-04-24 国网电力科学研究院武汉南瑞有限责任公司 A Power Equipment Evaluation Method Based on Discrete Fuzzy Numbers and AHP
CN111105156A (en) * 2019-12-19 2020-05-05 南通大学 A roadside safety risk assessment method based on evidence-based reasoning
CN111339679A (en) * 2020-03-13 2020-06-26 武汉材料保护研究所有限公司 Fuzzy recognition model establishment method for predicting LDPE (Low-Density polyethylene) aging grade in natural environment
CN111401683A (en) * 2020-02-11 2020-07-10 苏州科技大学 Method and device for measuring tradition of ancient villages
CN111594160A (en) * 2020-06-24 2020-08-28 陕西延长石油(集团)有限责任公司 Optimization method for gas field pressurization and stable production scheme
CN111666684A (en) * 2020-06-05 2020-09-15 中国石化销售股份有限公司华南分公司 Circumferential weld risk estimation method and device for conveying pipeline and readable storage medium
CN111833968A (en) * 2020-07-09 2020-10-27 福建师范大学 Black rice wine brewing process evaluation method and equipment based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method
CN112270355A (en) * 2020-10-28 2021-01-26 长沙理工大学 Active safety prediction method based on big data technology and SAE-GRU
CN112381364A (en) * 2020-10-30 2021-02-19 浪潮云信息技术股份公司 Comprehensive evaluation method for food quality spot check
CN112377146A (en) * 2020-12-07 2021-02-19 西南石油大学 Device and method for simulating formation water seepage water invasion well cementation cement slurry
CN112412443A (en) * 2020-11-12 2021-02-26 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 Ultra-low permeability reservoir polymer microsphere adaptability quantitative evaluation method
CN112446588A (en) * 2020-11-04 2021-03-05 厦门华润燃气有限公司 Urban buried steel gas pipeline risk evaluation system
CN112561319A (en) * 2020-12-14 2021-03-26 清华大学 Comprehensive evaluation method for energy system of data center
CN112613750A (en) * 2020-12-25 2021-04-06 中建三局绿色产业投资有限公司 Sedimentation risk assessment method for deep sewage conveying tunnel
CN112709547A (en) * 2019-10-24 2021-04-27 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Method for judging water plugging time of water producing gas well
CN112884320A (en) * 2021-02-18 2021-06-01 中铁建华南建设有限公司 Foundation pit risk assessment method, device, equipment and medium based on entropy model
CN112966783A (en) * 2021-04-12 2021-06-15 中国矿业大学 Method for identifying constant ion characteristics of mine water and distinguishing water source
CN113065758A (en) * 2021-03-29 2021-07-02 中国地质科学院 Method and system for determining earthquake resistance of community at earthquake disaster moment
CN113112124A (en) * 2021-03-22 2021-07-13 西安理工大学 Risk evaluation method for check dam system
CN113222347A (en) * 2021-04-16 2021-08-06 南京君缘科爆工程技术有限公司 Open blasting safety risk grey system evaluation method
CN113236203A (en) * 2021-07-09 2021-08-10 西南石油大学 Water invasion dynamic production allocation method for carbonate rock with water-gas reservoir
CN113361066A (en) * 2021-04-16 2021-09-07 中国海洋石油集团有限公司 Accumulated liquid and accumulated liquid degree identification method
CN113469522A (en) * 2021-06-30 2021-10-01 国网综合能源服务集团有限公司 Comprehensive energy Internet of things evaluation method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium
CN113537655A (en) * 2020-04-13 2021-10-22 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 Method and device for determining the restart potential of gas wells
CN113554258A (en) * 2020-04-24 2021-10-26 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Method for evaluating full-process green development effect of high-water-content oil field
CN113592265A (en) * 2021-07-19 2021-11-02 杭州领见数字农业科技有限公司 Plot risk assessment method and device based on analytic hierarchy process
CN113657767A (en) * 2021-08-18 2021-11-16 广东汇通信息科技股份有限公司 Urban arterial road tunnel-passing risk assessment method based on traffic data and fuzzy algorithm
CN113822511A (en) * 2020-11-16 2021-12-21 全球能源互联网研究院有限公司 A multi-level power quality assessment method and device based on fuzzy cluster analysis
CN113822503A (en) * 2020-06-18 2021-12-21 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Safety evaluation method, device and electronic equipment for underground facilities of gas storage
CN113931621A (en) * 2020-07-14 2022-01-14 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 Method and device for determining gas well accumulated liquid information and storage medium
CN113934975A (en) * 2021-10-22 2022-01-14 安徽理工大学 Identification method of mine water inrush source based on exponential whitening function and grey theory
CN114047547A (en) * 2021-11-25 2022-02-15 中国石油大学(华东) Quantitative evaluation method for sealing capacity of gypsum-rock cover layer
CN114066119A (en) * 2020-08-06 2022-02-18 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Method, device, electronic equipment and storage medium for evaluating the suitability of water injection oil wells
CN114118872A (en) * 2021-12-09 2022-03-01 公安部交通管理科学研究所 Emergency management efficiency evaluation method for public security traffic command center
CN114154864A (en) * 2021-12-06 2022-03-08 国网湖南省电力有限公司 Quality assessment method and processor for electric microclimate monitoring data
CN114186787A (en) * 2021-11-05 2022-03-15 中国市政工程华北设计研究总院有限公司 Urban black and odorous water body remediation model evaluation method based on multi-level fuzzy analysis
CN114548758A (en) * 2022-02-22 2022-05-27 东莞理工学院 Comprehensive evaluation method for excessive carbon dioxide emission in cement industry
CN114594526A (en) * 2020-12-03 2022-06-07 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Quantitative evaluation method for inter-well plane connectivity of river facies sand body
CN114638053A (en) * 2022-03-22 2022-06-17 中国人民解放军国防科技大学 Active guiding capability assessment method, device, equipment and medium for magnetic-levitation train
WO2022133889A1 (en) * 2020-12-24 2022-06-30 华能国际电力股份有限公司 Power plant equipment quality data processing method and apparatus based on equipment supervision
CN114997714A (en) * 2022-06-27 2022-09-02 公安部道路交通安全研究中心 Risk identification method and system for electric bicycle rider and computer equipment
CN115187105A (en) * 2022-07-20 2022-10-14 深圳市城市公共安全技术研究院有限公司 Dynamic risk assessment system for multi-source data engineering
CN115217467A (en) * 2021-03-31 2022-10-21 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 Method and device for determining breakthrough time of bottom water of multi-medium bottom water gas reservoir horizontal well
CN115239148A (en) * 2022-07-26 2022-10-25 中海石油(中国)有限公司深圳分公司 Logging card-encountering risk assessment method and device, electronic equipment and readable medium
CN115479540A (en) * 2022-09-14 2022-12-16 西南交通大学 A method and system for evaluating the magnitude of karst water inrush disasters based on laser scanning
CN115879654A (en) * 2023-03-03 2023-03-31 山东科技大学 Method for predicting stability and evaluating reliability of underground roadway
CN116070907A (en) * 2023-01-05 2023-05-05 山东省地质矿产勘查开发局八〇一水文地质工程地质大队(山东省地矿工程勘察院) Karst collapse susceptibility assessment method and system based on analytic hierarchy process
CN116205495A (en) * 2023-03-24 2023-06-02 北京赛目科技股份有限公司 Method and device for predicting risk of industrial supply chain, storage medium and electronic equipment
CN116227913A (en) * 2022-12-14 2023-06-06 中电建路桥集团有限公司 System and method for evaluating cracking risk of large-span bridge structure based on AHP-entropy weight method
CN116596378A (en) * 2023-05-17 2023-08-15 安徽建筑大学 Low-grade rural road pavement maintenance management decision-making method, equipment and storage medium
CN116733461A (en) * 2023-07-05 2023-09-12 西南石油大学 Device and method for analyzing critical yield sensitivity of heterogeneous gas cap-bottom water reservoir
CN116821656A (en) * 2023-06-27 2023-09-29 中国煤炭地质总局勘查研究总院 Mine water inrush source identification method, device and storable medium
CN117035566A (en) * 2023-10-10 2023-11-10 民航成都电子技术有限责任公司 Flight area operation evaluation method, device, equipment and storage medium
CN117217502A (en) * 2023-11-09 2023-12-12 国网山西省电力公司晋中供电公司 A method, device, medium and equipment for evaluating factors affecting power grid dispatching
CN117231211A (en) * 2023-11-02 2023-12-15 大庆油田有限责任公司 A method for identifying the direction of water inflow from horizontal wells using comprehensive discriminant parameter method
CN117474328A (en) * 2023-10-31 2024-01-30 青岛理工大学 Rock foundation pit risk assessment method
CN117473774A (en) * 2023-11-15 2024-01-30 山东大学 A method for evaluating mud transportation performance of mud-water shield tunneling
CN117763941A (en) * 2023-11-14 2024-03-26 江苏省特种设备安全监督检验研究院 A method for gas storage well life assessment based on machine learning
CN117892926A (en) * 2024-03-15 2024-04-16 中国石油大学(华东) A method and system for evaluating the fracturing potential of chemical flooding oil wells
CN117973943A (en) * 2024-03-05 2024-05-03 长江大学 Method, device, medium and equipment for evaluating gas well bubble discharge and production effect
CN118552044A (en) * 2024-07-26 2024-08-27 北京理工大学 Power station external damage scene risk assessment method based on analytic hierarchy process
CN118709351A (en) * 2024-05-22 2024-09-27 西南交通大学 A method and system for optimizing ventilation scheme of long-distance water pipeline
CN118728334A (en) * 2023-03-29 2024-10-01 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 A method and device for differential water control and production allocation of gas wells in edge water gas reservoirs
CN118886744A (en) * 2024-07-10 2024-11-01 四川省地质环境调查研究中心 A method and system for shallow natural gas genesis analysis and risk assessment
CN119416147A (en) * 2024-10-15 2025-02-11 深圳供电局有限公司 Cable insulation status detection method based on live harmonic fluctuations
CN119801501A (en) * 2023-10-09 2025-04-11 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 Water invasion early warning method, system, equipment and medium for fractured low-porosity sandstone gas reservoirs
WO2025148234A1 (en) * 2024-01-09 2025-07-17 中煤科工西安研究院(集团)有限公司 Intelligent discrimination method and apparatus for mine water inrush source, device, and storage medium
US12371981B2 (en) * 2021-07-13 2025-07-29 Southwest Petroleum University Prediction method for constant production decline of water-producing gas well in highly heterogeneous reservoir

Families Citing this family (35)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN104794361B (en) * 2015-05-05 2018-01-16 中国石油大学(华东) A kind of water-drive pool development effectiveness integrated evaluating method
CN105003256A (en) * 2015-07-20 2015-10-28 西安石油大学 Method for selecting wells or layers for acidifying oil-water wells on basis of improved entropy weight processes
CN106557640A (en) * 2015-09-21 2017-04-05 核工业北京地质研究院 A kind of method for evaluating Superimposed Basins interlevel oxidation type U metallogeny favorab1e sandbadies
CN105443120A (en) * 2015-10-26 2016-03-30 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Method for early stage characteristic analysis of marine facies equipping gas field edge water invasion
CN105718720A (en) * 2016-01-15 2016-06-29 西南石油大学 Complex gas reservoir reserve quality classification comprehensive evaluation method
CN106295210B (en) * 2016-08-16 2018-10-23 中国石油化工股份有限公司 A kind of quantitative evaluation method and system for carrying out reserves blank tape Exploration Potential
CN106780105A (en) * 2016-11-18 2017-05-31 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 A method and device for determining a lifting mode
CN106640063A (en) * 2016-12-09 2017-05-10 中石化石油工程技术服务有限公司 Monitoring method for overflowing in well cementation construction
CN106703776B (en) * 2016-12-23 2020-04-21 西南石油大学 Fracturing parameter optimization method
CN109296358B (en) * 2017-07-25 2022-03-01 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 Wellbore Quality Evaluation Method for Cementing
CN109424362B (en) * 2017-08-29 2021-10-29 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Method and system for calculating single-well control crude oil reserve of bottom water reservoir
CN107816339A (en) * 2017-09-11 2018-03-20 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 Water injection development method and device
CN109961375B (en) * 2017-12-22 2021-06-01 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 Sand production risk assessment method and device for oil and gas wells
CN108595875A (en) * 2018-05-08 2018-09-28 中国石油天然气集团有限公司 A kind of method, apparatus and system of determining side water gas condensate reservoir water breakthrough time
CN110924941B (en) * 2018-09-17 2022-08-30 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 Method and device for determining radius of water cone of side water reservoir
CN111173495B (en) * 2018-10-23 2023-09-26 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Fracture-cavity type oil reservoir fracture-cavity unit communication condition evaluation method
CN111105114B (en) * 2018-10-26 2022-08-05 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 Method and device for evaluating development effect of water-gas reservoir and computer equipment
CN109636243A (en) * 2019-01-03 2019-04-16 深圳壹账通智能科技有限公司 Model fault detection method, device, computer equipment and storage medium
CN110852615A (en) * 2019-11-11 2020-02-28 黑龙江省电工仪器仪表工程技术研究中心有限公司 Comprehensive reliability evaluation model for intelligent electric energy meter in typical environment
CN110956388B (en) * 2019-11-28 2023-04-07 中国石油大学(华东) Method for generating yield increasing scheme of offshore oil and gas reservoir
CN111768075B (en) * 2020-05-26 2023-08-22 中国矿业大学(北京) Risk assessment method, equipment and medium for persons involved in mine flooding
CN112324429B (en) * 2020-08-12 2023-08-22 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 Method for Determining Reasonable Production Pressure Difference of Gas Reservoir with Water
CN112115413B (en) * 2020-09-07 2023-11-24 广西天懿智汇建设投资有限公司 Termite quantity monitoring method based on iteration method
CN113158403B (en) * 2020-12-28 2024-02-20 成都国铁电气设备有限公司 Method for evaluating smoothness of rigid contact wires of subway based on kneeded
CN112417713A (en) * 2021-01-24 2021-02-26 成都创源油气技术开发有限公司 Evaluation method of fuzzy optimization model of gas storage based on analytic hierarchy process
CN115142839B (en) * 2021-03-31 2025-01-28 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 Method and device for determining bottom water breakthrough time in vertical wells of triple-medium bottom water gas reservoirs
CN113268704B (en) * 2021-04-27 2023-08-04 国网福建省电力有限公司 Data center site selection method and system based on fuzzy analytic hierarchy process
CN113779881B (en) * 2021-09-10 2024-11-22 中国石油大学(北京) Method, device and equipment for predicting the productivity of tight water-containing gas reservoirs
CN114280244B (en) * 2021-12-27 2025-03-18 清华大学合肥公共安全研究院 A method and system for comprehensive evaluation of environmental adaptability of combustible gas monitor
CN114329313A (en) * 2021-12-31 2022-04-12 中国矿业大学 Multi-level evaluation method for closing coal mine water resource utilization selected area
CN114723283A (en) * 2022-04-07 2022-07-08 中山大学 Ecological bearing capacity remote sensing evaluation method and device for urban group
CN116484236B (en) * 2023-03-27 2025-05-27 西南石油大学 A method for evaluating heterogeneity of fractured horizontal wells in unconventional reservoirs
CN118115317B (en) * 2024-04-30 2024-08-09 深圳大学 Method for evaluating safety toughness of existing tunnel structure under adjacent construction disturbance effect
CN118691094B (en) * 2024-08-26 2024-11-08 中煤科工西安研究院(集团)有限公司 A method and system for dynamic risk assessment of roof water in mine working face
CN120598356A (en) * 2025-06-05 2025-09-05 中电建铁路建设投资集团有限公司 A method for assessing gas leakage risk in rail transit tunnels

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6101444A (en) * 1998-08-21 2000-08-08 Stoner; Michael S. Numerical control unit for wellbore drilling
US6386297B1 (en) * 1999-02-24 2002-05-14 Baker Hughes Incorporated Method and apparatus for determining potential abrasivity in a wellbore
US6662140B2 (en) * 2001-06-12 2003-12-09 Rolls-Royce Canada Limited Fuzzy logic estimator for minimizing signal measurement inaccuracy effects in a signal processing system
US8374974B2 (en) * 2003-01-06 2013-02-12 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Neural network training data selection using memory reduced cluster analysis for field model development
US20130096835A1 (en) * 2011-10-14 2013-04-18 Precision Energy Services, Inc. Clustering Process for Analyzing Pressure Gradient Data

Family Cites Families (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20040215551A1 (en) * 2001-11-28 2004-10-28 Eder Jeff S. Value and risk management system for multi-enterprise organization
US7512543B2 (en) * 2002-05-29 2009-03-31 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Tools for decision-making in reservoir risk management
CN103091234B (en) * 2011-11-03 2015-08-05 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 A Method for Evaluating Corrosion of Cement Sheath of Gas Well Cementing in Sour Gas Reservoirs
CN104156617B (en) * 2014-08-24 2017-06-23 西南石油大学 For the six stage modeling methods that multilayer sandstone reservoirs gas-bearing formation attribute classification is characterized
CN104376420A (en) * 2014-11-20 2015-02-25 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 Water breakthrough risk assessment method and assessment device for gas wells in water-bearing gas reservoirs

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6101444A (en) * 1998-08-21 2000-08-08 Stoner; Michael S. Numerical control unit for wellbore drilling
US6386297B1 (en) * 1999-02-24 2002-05-14 Baker Hughes Incorporated Method and apparatus for determining potential abrasivity in a wellbore
US6662140B2 (en) * 2001-06-12 2003-12-09 Rolls-Royce Canada Limited Fuzzy logic estimator for minimizing signal measurement inaccuracy effects in a signal processing system
US8374974B2 (en) * 2003-01-06 2013-02-12 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Neural network training data selection using memory reduced cluster analysis for field model development
US20130096835A1 (en) * 2011-10-14 2013-04-18 Precision Energy Services, Inc. Clustering Process for Analyzing Pressure Gradient Data

Cited By (92)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2535581B (en) * 2014-11-20 2017-10-11 Petrochina Co Ltd Evaluation method and evaluation device for water breakthrough risk of production wells in aquifer drive gas reservoirs
GB2535581A (en) * 2014-11-20 2016-08-24 Petrochina Co Ltd Evaluation method and evaluation device for water breakthrough risk of production wells in aquifer drive gas reservoirs
CN106056307A (en) * 2016-06-14 2016-10-26 中国电力科学研究院 Electric power replacement technology comprehensive benefit assessment method based on comprehensive weighting method
CN107842359A (en) * 2016-09-19 2018-03-27 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Individual well recoverable reserves evaluation method and device
CN107038516A (en) * 2016-10-20 2017-08-11 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Complex Fault Block Oil Reservoir water flooding effectiveness quantitative evaluation method is oozed in one kind
CN106875104A (en) * 2017-01-21 2017-06-20 西安交通大学 A kind of cold-strip steel quality overall evaluation method
CN108960553A (en) * 2017-05-27 2018-12-07 中国石油化工股份有限公司 A kind of visualizing monitor method of drillng operation information and risk
CN110020403A (en) * 2017-11-23 2019-07-16 中国电力科学研究院有限公司 A kind of power distribution automation equipment test synthesis evaluation method and system
CN108009716A (en) * 2017-11-28 2018-05-08 西南石油大学 A kind of horizontal well volume fracturing influential effect factor mutiple-stage model method
CN109899051A (en) * 2017-12-07 2019-06-18 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 Evaluation standard determination method, device and storage medium for oil well equipment
CN108182510A (en) * 2017-12-11 2018-06-19 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 Production potential evaluation method and device
CN109102180A (en) * 2018-07-30 2018-12-28 北京大学 The comprehensive parameters evaluation method of the double dessert evaluations of tight sandstone reservoir
CN109359871A (en) * 2018-10-19 2019-02-19 中国海洋石油集团有限公司 Reliability evaluation method of casing for oil and gas wells
CN109409724A (en) * 2018-10-19 2019-03-01 中国海洋石油集团有限公司 Deepwater drilling blowout out of control risk evaluating method
CN109470839A (en) * 2018-11-22 2019-03-15 山东科技大学 Physical test device and method for simulating deep fault formation, fault activation and fault water inrush
CN109933745A (en) * 2019-01-29 2019-06-25 西南石油大学 An intelligent judgment method for hydrate drilling and production risk based on fuzzy judgment
CN110070258A (en) * 2019-03-06 2019-07-30 中南大学 A kind of coke oven heating-combustion process performance estimating method
CN110163486A (en) * 2019-03-19 2019-08-23 广州中国科学院计算机网络信息中心 A kind of project risk different degree appraisal procedure and system
CN110163442A (en) * 2019-05-27 2019-08-23 华北理工大学 A kind of gas well plug-ging prediction technique based on integrated study
CN110222973A (en) * 2019-05-31 2019-09-10 国网安徽省电力有限公司经济技术研究院 A kind of integrated energy system evaluation method and system based on optimal weights combination
CN110619467A (en) * 2019-09-17 2019-12-27 电子科技大学 Power equipment state evaluation method based on alarm big data information
CN110738398A (en) * 2019-09-19 2020-01-31 中山大学 A trial risk analysis method based on the overall utility of fuzzy numbers
CN110727986A (en) * 2019-10-15 2020-01-24 成都亮紫智能科技有限公司 BIM and weighted gray cloud clustering model-based ancient building maintenance model acquisition method
CN112709547A (en) * 2019-10-24 2021-04-27 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Method for judging water plugging time of water producing gas well
CN111008734A (en) * 2019-11-26 2020-04-14 华南理工大学 Flood hazard zoning and research methods for spatiotemporal evolution
CN111062500A (en) * 2019-12-05 2020-04-24 国网电力科学研究院武汉南瑞有限责任公司 A Power Equipment Evaluation Method Based on Discrete Fuzzy Numbers and AHP
CN111105156A (en) * 2019-12-19 2020-05-05 南通大学 A roadside safety risk assessment method based on evidence-based reasoning
CN111401683A (en) * 2020-02-11 2020-07-10 苏州科技大学 Method and device for measuring tradition of ancient villages
CN111339679A (en) * 2020-03-13 2020-06-26 武汉材料保护研究所有限公司 Fuzzy recognition model establishment method for predicting LDPE (Low-Density polyethylene) aging grade in natural environment
CN113537655A (en) * 2020-04-13 2021-10-22 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 Method and device for determining the restart potential of gas wells
CN113554258A (en) * 2020-04-24 2021-10-26 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Method for evaluating full-process green development effect of high-water-content oil field
CN111666684A (en) * 2020-06-05 2020-09-15 中国石化销售股份有限公司华南分公司 Circumferential weld risk estimation method and device for conveying pipeline and readable storage medium
CN113822503A (en) * 2020-06-18 2021-12-21 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Safety evaluation method, device and electronic equipment for underground facilities of gas storage
CN111594160A (en) * 2020-06-24 2020-08-28 陕西延长石油(集团)有限责任公司 Optimization method for gas field pressurization and stable production scheme
CN111833968A (en) * 2020-07-09 2020-10-27 福建师范大学 Black rice wine brewing process evaluation method and equipment based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method
CN113931621A (en) * 2020-07-14 2022-01-14 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 Method and device for determining gas well accumulated liquid information and storage medium
CN114066119A (en) * 2020-08-06 2022-02-18 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Method, device, electronic equipment and storage medium for evaluating the suitability of water injection oil wells
CN112270355A (en) * 2020-10-28 2021-01-26 长沙理工大学 Active safety prediction method based on big data technology and SAE-GRU
CN112381364A (en) * 2020-10-30 2021-02-19 浪潮云信息技术股份公司 Comprehensive evaluation method for food quality spot check
CN112446588A (en) * 2020-11-04 2021-03-05 厦门华润燃气有限公司 Urban buried steel gas pipeline risk evaluation system
CN112412443A (en) * 2020-11-12 2021-02-26 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 Ultra-low permeability reservoir polymer microsphere adaptability quantitative evaluation method
CN113822511A (en) * 2020-11-16 2021-12-21 全球能源互联网研究院有限公司 A multi-level power quality assessment method and device based on fuzzy cluster analysis
CN114594526A (en) * 2020-12-03 2022-06-07 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Quantitative evaluation method for inter-well plane connectivity of river facies sand body
CN112377146A (en) * 2020-12-07 2021-02-19 西南石油大学 Device and method for simulating formation water seepage water invasion well cementation cement slurry
CN112561319A (en) * 2020-12-14 2021-03-26 清华大学 Comprehensive evaluation method for energy system of data center
WO2022133889A1 (en) * 2020-12-24 2022-06-30 华能国际电力股份有限公司 Power plant equipment quality data processing method and apparatus based on equipment supervision
CN112613750A (en) * 2020-12-25 2021-04-06 中建三局绿色产业投资有限公司 Sedimentation risk assessment method for deep sewage conveying tunnel
CN112884320A (en) * 2021-02-18 2021-06-01 中铁建华南建设有限公司 Foundation pit risk assessment method, device, equipment and medium based on entropy model
CN113112124A (en) * 2021-03-22 2021-07-13 西安理工大学 Risk evaluation method for check dam system
CN113065758A (en) * 2021-03-29 2021-07-02 中国地质科学院 Method and system for determining earthquake resistance of community at earthquake disaster moment
CN115217467A (en) * 2021-03-31 2022-10-21 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 Method and device for determining breakthrough time of bottom water of multi-medium bottom water gas reservoir horizontal well
CN112966783A (en) * 2021-04-12 2021-06-15 中国矿业大学 Method for identifying constant ion characteristics of mine water and distinguishing water source
CN113361066A (en) * 2021-04-16 2021-09-07 中国海洋石油集团有限公司 Accumulated liquid and accumulated liquid degree identification method
CN113222347A (en) * 2021-04-16 2021-08-06 南京君缘科爆工程技术有限公司 Open blasting safety risk grey system evaluation method
CN113469522A (en) * 2021-06-30 2021-10-01 国网综合能源服务集团有限公司 Comprehensive energy Internet of things evaluation method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium
CN113236203A (en) * 2021-07-09 2021-08-10 西南石油大学 Water invasion dynamic production allocation method for carbonate rock with water-gas reservoir
US12371981B2 (en) * 2021-07-13 2025-07-29 Southwest Petroleum University Prediction method for constant production decline of water-producing gas well in highly heterogeneous reservoir
CN113592265A (en) * 2021-07-19 2021-11-02 杭州领见数字农业科技有限公司 Plot risk assessment method and device based on analytic hierarchy process
CN113657767A (en) * 2021-08-18 2021-11-16 广东汇通信息科技股份有限公司 Urban arterial road tunnel-passing risk assessment method based on traffic data and fuzzy algorithm
CN113934975A (en) * 2021-10-22 2022-01-14 安徽理工大学 Identification method of mine water inrush source based on exponential whitening function and grey theory
CN114186787A (en) * 2021-11-05 2022-03-15 中国市政工程华北设计研究总院有限公司 Urban black and odorous water body remediation model evaluation method based on multi-level fuzzy analysis
CN114047547A (en) * 2021-11-25 2022-02-15 中国石油大学(华东) Quantitative evaluation method for sealing capacity of gypsum-rock cover layer
CN114154864A (en) * 2021-12-06 2022-03-08 国网湖南省电力有限公司 Quality assessment method and processor for electric microclimate monitoring data
CN114118872A (en) * 2021-12-09 2022-03-01 公安部交通管理科学研究所 Emergency management efficiency evaluation method for public security traffic command center
CN114548758A (en) * 2022-02-22 2022-05-27 东莞理工学院 Comprehensive evaluation method for excessive carbon dioxide emission in cement industry
CN114638053A (en) * 2022-03-22 2022-06-17 中国人民解放军国防科技大学 Active guiding capability assessment method, device, equipment and medium for magnetic-levitation train
CN114997714A (en) * 2022-06-27 2022-09-02 公安部道路交通安全研究中心 Risk identification method and system for electric bicycle rider and computer equipment
CN115187105A (en) * 2022-07-20 2022-10-14 深圳市城市公共安全技术研究院有限公司 Dynamic risk assessment system for multi-source data engineering
CN115239148A (en) * 2022-07-26 2022-10-25 中海石油(中国)有限公司深圳分公司 Logging card-encountering risk assessment method and device, electronic equipment and readable medium
CN115479540A (en) * 2022-09-14 2022-12-16 西南交通大学 A method and system for evaluating the magnitude of karst water inrush disasters based on laser scanning
CN116227913A (en) * 2022-12-14 2023-06-06 中电建路桥集团有限公司 System and method for evaluating cracking risk of large-span bridge structure based on AHP-entropy weight method
CN116070907A (en) * 2023-01-05 2023-05-05 山东省地质矿产勘查开发局八〇一水文地质工程地质大队(山东省地矿工程勘察院) Karst collapse susceptibility assessment method and system based on analytic hierarchy process
CN115879654A (en) * 2023-03-03 2023-03-31 山东科技大学 Method for predicting stability and evaluating reliability of underground roadway
CN116205495A (en) * 2023-03-24 2023-06-02 北京赛目科技股份有限公司 Method and device for predicting risk of industrial supply chain, storage medium and electronic equipment
CN118728334A (en) * 2023-03-29 2024-10-01 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 A method and device for differential water control and production allocation of gas wells in edge water gas reservoirs
CN116596378A (en) * 2023-05-17 2023-08-15 安徽建筑大学 Low-grade rural road pavement maintenance management decision-making method, equipment and storage medium
CN116821656A (en) * 2023-06-27 2023-09-29 中国煤炭地质总局勘查研究总院 Mine water inrush source identification method, device and storable medium
CN116733461A (en) * 2023-07-05 2023-09-12 西南石油大学 Device and method for analyzing critical yield sensitivity of heterogeneous gas cap-bottom water reservoir
CN119801501A (en) * 2023-10-09 2025-04-11 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 Water invasion early warning method, system, equipment and medium for fractured low-porosity sandstone gas reservoirs
CN117035566A (en) * 2023-10-10 2023-11-10 民航成都电子技术有限责任公司 Flight area operation evaluation method, device, equipment and storage medium
CN117474328A (en) * 2023-10-31 2024-01-30 青岛理工大学 Rock foundation pit risk assessment method
CN117231211A (en) * 2023-11-02 2023-12-15 大庆油田有限责任公司 A method for identifying the direction of water inflow from horizontal wells using comprehensive discriminant parameter method
CN117217502A (en) * 2023-11-09 2023-12-12 国网山西省电力公司晋中供电公司 A method, device, medium and equipment for evaluating factors affecting power grid dispatching
CN117763941A (en) * 2023-11-14 2024-03-26 江苏省特种设备安全监督检验研究院 A method for gas storage well life assessment based on machine learning
CN117473774A (en) * 2023-11-15 2024-01-30 山东大学 A method for evaluating mud transportation performance of mud-water shield tunneling
WO2025148234A1 (en) * 2024-01-09 2025-07-17 中煤科工西安研究院(集团)有限公司 Intelligent discrimination method and apparatus for mine water inrush source, device, and storage medium
CN117973943A (en) * 2024-03-05 2024-05-03 长江大学 Method, device, medium and equipment for evaluating gas well bubble discharge and production effect
CN117892926A (en) * 2024-03-15 2024-04-16 中国石油大学(华东) A method and system for evaluating the fracturing potential of chemical flooding oil wells
CN118709351A (en) * 2024-05-22 2024-09-27 西南交通大学 A method and system for optimizing ventilation scheme of long-distance water pipeline
CN118886744A (en) * 2024-07-10 2024-11-01 四川省地质环境调查研究中心 A method and system for shallow natural gas genesis analysis and risk assessment
CN118552044A (en) * 2024-07-26 2024-08-27 北京理工大学 Power station external damage scene risk assessment method based on analytic hierarchy process
CN119416147A (en) * 2024-10-15 2025-02-11 深圳供电局有限公司 Cable insulation status detection method based on live harmonic fluctuations

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN104376420A (en) 2015-02-25
GB2535581B (en) 2017-10-11
GB2535581A (en) 2016-08-24
GB201520368D0 (en) 2016-01-06

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20160145994A1 (en) Evaluation Method and Evaluation Device for Water Breakthrough Risk of Production Wells in Aquifer Drive Gas Reservoirs
CN105626009B (en) A Quantitative Evaluation Method for Oil Replacement Effect of Single Well Water Injection in Fracture-vuggy Carbonate Reservoirs
CN104794361B (en) A kind of water-drive pool development effectiveness integrated evaluating method
CN113874598A (en) Automated production optimization techniques for intelligent well completion using real-time nodal analysis
CN111985610B (en) A system and method for predicting the pumping efficiency of a pumping well based on time series data
Shahsavari et al. Optimum selection of sand control method using a combination of MCDM and DOE techniques
CN110472363B (en) Surrounding rock deformation grade prediction method and system suitable for high-speed railway tunnel
CN104453875B (en) Shale gas reservoir identification method based on self-organizing competitive neural network
US20230222397A1 (en) Method for automated ensemble machine learning using hyperparameter optimization
CN112116130B (en) Short-term scheduling rule extraction method based on variable structure deep learning framework
CN111914478A (en) A comprehensive geological borehole logging lithology identification method
CN110956388B (en) Method for generating yield increasing scheme of offshore oil and gas reservoir
CN113825889A (en) Automated Production Optimization Techniques for Smart Completions Using Real-Time Node Analysis
CN105760673A (en) Fluvial facies reservoir earthquake sensitive parameter template analysis method
CN104915555A (en) Dam break grading early-warning index extraction method for homogeneous earth dam
CN103376468A (en) Reservoir parameter quantitative characterization method based on neural network function approximation algorithm
Song et al. Potential for vertical heterogeneity prediction in reservoir basing on machine learning methods
CN117172386A (en) Advantageous reservoir classification, identification and prediction methods, systems, electronic equipment, and media
CN101620034B (en) Accelerated life test optimization design method based on proportional hazards-proportional odds model
EP3850187B1 (en) Method and system for reactively defining valve settings
CN119228185A (en) A geothermal resource evaluation method, device and equipment based on machine learning
CN119132460A (en) A method for identifying igneous fluids based on CXDF algorithm
CN106779275A (en) Field output Dominated Factors weight analysis method
US20230140905A1 (en) Systems and methods for completion optimization for waterflood assets
Aulia et al. A new history matching sensitivity analysis framework with random forests and Plackett-Burman design

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: PETROCHINA COMPANY LIMITED, CHINA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:LI, YONG;LI, BAOZHU;XIA, JING;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:037148/0145

Effective date: 20151119

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION