US20130256123A1

US20130256123A1 - Electrocatalyst for electrochemical conversion of carbon dioxide

Info

Publication number: US20130256123A1
Application number: US13/437,766
Authority: US
Inventors: Saleem Ur Rahman; Syed Mohammed Javaid Zaidi; Shakeel Ahmed; Sk Safdar Hossain
Original assignee: King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals; King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology KACST
Current assignee: King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals; King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology KACST
Priority date: 2012-04-02
Filing date: 2012-04-02
Publication date: 2013-10-03
Also published as: US20140336037A1; US9109293B2

Abstract

An electrocatalyst for the electrochemical conversion of carbon dioxide to hydrocarbons is provided. The electrocatalyst for the electrochemical conversion of carbon dioxide includes copper material supported on carbon nanotubes. The copper material may be pure copper, copper and ruthenium, copper and iron, or copper and palladium supported on the carbon nanotubes. The electrocatalyst is prepared by dissolving copper nitrate trihydrate in deionized water to form a salt solution. Carbon nanotubes are then added to the salt solution to form a suspension, which is then heated. A urea solution is added to the suspension to form the electrocatalyst in solution. The electrocatalyst is then removed from the solution. In addition to dissolving the copper nitrate trihydrate in the deionized water, either iron nitrate monohydrate, ruthenium chloride or palladium chloride may also be dissolved in the deionized water to form the salt solution.

Description

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to electrochemical catalysts, and particularly to an electrocatalyst for the electrochemical conversion of carbon dioxide to hydrocarbons, such as methanol and methane.
2. Description of the Related Art
Over the past several decades, various electrode materials have been researched for the reduction of carbon dioxide (CO₂) into different products, most notably formic acid, carbon monoxide (CO), methane and methanol. Conventional metals used in the research were provided in the form of high purity foils, plates, rotating discs, wires, beds of particles, tubes and mesh. These are all macroscopic materials. Thus, when compared to microscopic or nanoscopic materials, they all have relatively low surface areas and low conductivity electrical supports.
It would be desirable to provide an electrocatalytic material formed on nanostructures, thus greatly increasing available reactive surface area and conductivity. Given the destructive nature of carbon dioxide as a greenhouse gas, increasing the efficiency of electrocatalysts to form benign hydrocarbons, such as methanol, is obviously quite important. Further, it would be desirable to not only increase the overall efficiency of the catalytic process, but also provide an electrocatalyst that operates under relatively low temperatures and in the range of atmospheric pressure.
Thus, an electrocatalyst for the electrochemical conversion of carbon dioxide solving the aforementioned problems is desired.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The electrocatalyst for the electrochemical conversion of carbon dioxide includes a copper material supported on carbon nanotubes. The copper material may be pure copper, such that the pure copper forms 20 wt % of the electrocatalyst; or copper and ruthenium supported on the carbon nanotubes such that the copper forms 20 wt % of the electrocatalyst and the ruthenium forms 20 wt % of the electrocatalyst; or copper and iron supported on the carbon nanotubes such that the copper forms 20 wt % of the electrocatalyst and the iron forms 20 wt % of the electrocatalyst; or copper and palladium supported on the carbon nanotubes such that the copper forms 20 wt % of the electrocatalyst and the palladium forms 20 wt % of the electrocatalyst. The metal supported on carbon nanotubes is prepared using homogenous deposition-precipitation with urea.
The electrocatalyst is prepared by first dissolving copper nitrate trihydrate (Cu(NO₃)₂3H₂O) in deionized water to form a salt solution. Carbon nanotubes are then added to the salt solution to form a suspension, which is then heated. A urea solution is added to the suspension to form the electrocatalyst in solution. The electrocatalyst is then removed from the solution. In addition to dissolving the copper nitrate trihydrate (Cu(NO₃)₂3H₂O) in the deionized water, either iron nitrate monohydrate (Fe(NO₃)₂H₂O), ruthenium chloride (RuCl₃), or palladium chloride (PdCl₂) may also be dissolved in the deionized water to form the salt solution.
These and other features of the present invention will become readily apparent upon further review of the following specification.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

The electrocatalyst for the electrochemical conversion of carbon dioxide to hydrocarbons, such as methanol and methane, includes a copper material supported on carbon nanotubes. The copper material may be pure copper, such that the pure copper forms 20 wt % of the electrocatalyst; or copper and ruthenium supported on the carbon nanotubes such that the copper forms 20 wt % of the electrocatalyst and the ruthenium forms 20 wt % of the electrocatalyst; or copper and iron supported on the carbon nanotubes such that the copper forms 20 wt % of the electrocatalyst and the iron forms 20 wt % of the electrocatalyst; or copper and palladium supported on the carbon nanotubes such that the copper forms 20 wt % of the electrocatalyst and the iron forms 20 wt % of the electrocatalyst.
The electrocatalyst is prepared by first dissolving copper nitrate trihydrate (Cu(NO₃)₂3H₂O) in deionized water to form a salt solution. Using exemplary quantities, the copper nitrate trihydrate is dissolved in about 220 mL of the deionized water and then stirred for about thirty minutes. Using the exemplary volume of deionized water given above, about one gram of carbon nanotubes (preferably single wall carbon nanotubes) are then added to the salt solution to form a suspension, which is then sonicated for about one hour and heated to a temperature of about 90° C. with stirring.
A urea solution is added to the suspension to form the electrocatalyst in solution. Using the exemplary quantities given above, about 30 mL of an about 0.42 M aqueous urea solution may be added to the suspension (about 6 g of urea are added to the solution). Preferably, the urea solution is added to the suspension in a drop-wise fashion. The urea solution and suspension are then maintained at a temperature of about 90° C. for about eight hours, with stirring.
The electrocatalyst is then removed from the solution, preferably by first cooling the solution to room temperature, centrifuging the solution to separate out the electrocatalyst, and then washing and drying the catalyst at a temperature of about 110° C. overnight. The electrocatalyst may then be calcined at a temperature of about 450° C. for about four hours in an argon gas flow. Following calcination, the electrocatalyst is reduced at a rate of about 100 mL/min at a temperature of about 450° C. for about four hours in a gas flow of about 10% hydrogen in argon. The result is a solid powder having a particle size in the range of 3-60 nm.
In addition to dissolving the copper nitrate trihydrate (Cu(NO₃)₂3H₂O) in the deionized water, either iron nitrate monohydrate (Fe(NO₃)₂H₂O), ruthenium chloride (RuCl₃), or palladium chloride (PdCl₂) may also be dissolved in the deionized water to form the salt solution. The carbon nanotubes preferably have diameters of about 3-60 nm, and may be prepared by a conventional deposition-precipitation method.
In the following, each catalyst was tested in an electrochemical reactor system operated in phase mode. The electrochemical system was similar to a fuel cell test station. Humidified carbon dioxide was fed on the cathode side and 0.5M NaHCO₃was used as an analyte on the anode side. Each electrocatalyst sample was dissolved in a solvent and painted or coated on one side of a solid polymer electrolyte (SPE) membrane, viz., a proton conducting Nafion® 117 membrane (manufactured by E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company of Delaware), with 60% Pt—Ru deposited on Vulcan® carbon (manufactured by Vulcan Engineering Ltd. of the United Kingdom) being used as an anode catalyst. Permeation of sodium bicarbonate solution through the membrane provided the alkalinity required for the reduction reaction to occur. Feeding CO₂in the gas phase greatly reduced the mass transfer resistance.
For the first electrocatalyst sample, using pure copper forming 20 wt % of the electrocatalyst, using the experimental reactor described above, at lower voltages (−0.5 V), no hydrocarbon was produced. Maximum faradaic efficiency for methanol was achieved at −1.5 V. Maximum faradaic efficiency for methane was achieved at −2.5 V. The overall results are given below in Table 1:

TABLE 1

Results of reduction of CO₂over 20% Cu/CNT

		Faradaic	Faradaic	Faradaic	Faradaic
		Efficiency	Efficiency	Efficiency	Efficiency
Potential	Current	for	for	for	for carbon
vs. SCE/V	density	hydrogen	methanol	methane	monoxide

−0.5	0.40	0	0	0	0
−1.5	5.20	8.03	3.90	4.20	0
−2.5	14.40	68.76	1.45	6.60	9.43
−3.5	40.48	77.83	0.80	1.40	18.17

For the second electrocatalyst sample, using copper and ruthenium supported on the carbon nanotubes such that the copper forms 20 wt % of the electrocatalyst and the ruthenium forms 20 wt % of the electrocatalyst, using the experimental reactor described above, at lower voltages (−0.5 V), no hydrocarbon apart from methanol was produced. Maximum faradaic efficiency (15.5%) for methanol was achieved at −1.5 V. The overall results are given below in Table 2:

TABLE 2

Results of reduction of CO₂over 20% Cu - 20% Ru/CNT

		Faradaic	Faradaic	Faradaic
		Efficiency	Efficiency	Efficiency
Potential	Current	for	for	for carbon
vs. SCE/V	density	hydrogen	methanol	monoxide

−0.5	0.32	0	0	0
−1.5	8.40	8.00	15.50	0
−2.5	30.40	68.80	6.20	9.43
−3.5	75.20	77.80	1.30	18.17

For the third electrocatalyst sample, using copper and iron supported on the carbon nanotubes such that the copper forms 20 wt % of the electrocatalyst and the iron forms 20 wt % of the electrocatalyst, using the experimental reactor described above, no hydrocarbon was detected in the working potential range. Instead, carbon monoxide was detected. The overall results are given below in Table 3:

TABLE 3

Results of reduction of CO₂over 20% Cu - 20% Fe/CNT

		Faradaic	Faradaic
		Efficiency	Efficiency
Potential	Current	for	for carbon
vs. SCE/V	density	hydrogen	monoxide

−0.5	1.2	0	0
−1.5	14.1	13.6	0
−2.5	38.2	68.4	9.4
−3.5	78.8	89.8	8.3

For the fourth electrocatalyst sample, using copper and palladium supported on the carbon nanotubes such that the copper forms 20 wt % of the electrocatalyst and the palladium forms 20 wt % of the electrocatalyst, using the experimental reactor described above, no hydrocarbon apart from formic acid was detected in the working potential range. At lower voltages (−0.5 V), no product was produced. Maximum faradaic efficiency (21.3%) of formic acid was achieved at −1.5 V. The overall results are given below in Table 4:

TABLE 4

Results of reduction of CO₂over 20% Cu - 20% Pd/CNT

		Faradaic	Faradaic	Faradaic
		Efficiency	Efficiency	Efficiency
Potential	Current	for	for formic	for carbon
vs. SCE/V	density	hydrogen	acid	monoxide

−0.5	0.42	0	0	0
−1.5	7.6	8.0	9.5	0
−2.5	28.5	68.8	21.3	10.3
−3.5	54.2	73.8	18.2	9.8

It is to be understood that the present invention is not limited to the embodiments described above, but encompasses any and all embodiments within the scope of the following claims.

Claims

We claim:

1. An electrocatalyst for electrochemical conversion of carbon dioxide, comprising a copper catalyst material supported on carbon nanotubes.

2. The electrocatalyst as recited in claim 1, wherein the copper catalyst material comprises pure copper, the pure copper forming 20 wt % of the electrocatalyst, the balance being the carbon nanotubes.

3. The electrocatalyst as recited in claim 1, wherein the copper catalyst material comprises copper and ruthenium, the copper forming 20 wt % of the electrocatalyst, the ruthenium forming 20 wt % of the electrocatalyst, the balance being the carbon nanotubes.

4. The electrocatalyst as recited in claim 1, wherein the copper catalyst material comprises copper and iron, the copper forming 20 wt % of the electrocatalyst, the iron forming 20 wt % of the electrocatalyst, the balance being the carbon nanotubes.

5. The electrocatalyst as recited in claim 1, wherein the copper catalyst material comprises copper and palladium, the copper forming 20 wt % of the electrocatalyst, the palladium forming 20 wt % of the electrocatalyst, the balance being the carbon nanotubes.

6. The electrocatalyst according to claim 1, wherein the electrocatalyst is a dry powder having particles in a size range of 3 nm to 60 nm.

7. An electrode for electrochemical conversion of carbon dioxide, comprising a solid polymer electrolyte membrane having an electrocatalyst disposed on one side thereof, the electrocatalyst being nanoparticles of a catalyst having at least one metal supported on carbon nanotubes, the at least one metal being selected from the group consisting of pure copper, a mixture of copper and ruthenium, a mixture of copper and iron, and a mixture of copper and palladium.

8. A method of making an electrocatalyst for electrochemical conversion of carbon dioxide, comprising the steps of:

dissolving copper nitrate trihydrate in deionized water to form a salt solution;

adding carbon nanotubes to the salt solution to form a suspension;

heating the suspension;

adding a urea solution to the suspension to form an electrocatalyst in solution, the electrocatalyst comprising copper material supported on the carbon nanotubes; and

removing the electrocatalyst from the solution.

9. The method of making an electrocatalyst as recited in claim 8, further comprising the step of sonicating the suspension for about one hour.

10. The method of making an electrocatalyst as recited in claim 10, wherein the step of heating the suspension comprises heating the suspension to a temperature of about 90° C. with stirring.

11. The method of making an electrocatalyst as recited in claim 8, further comprising the step of maintaining the mixture of the urea solution and the suspension at a temperature of about 90° C. for about eight hours.

12. The method of making an electrocatalyst as recited in claim 8, wherein the step of removing the electrocatalyst from the solution comprises the steps of:

cooling the solution to room temperature; and

centrifuging the solution to separate the electrocatalyst out of the solution.

13. The method of making an electrocatalyst as recited in claim 12, wherein the step of removing the electrocatalyst from the solution further comprises the steps of washing and drying the electrocatalyst at a temperature of about 110° C.

14. The method of making an electrocatalyst as recited in claim 13, wherein the step of removing the electrocatalyst from the solution further comprises the steps of calcining the washed and dried electrocatalyst at a temperature of about 450° C. for about four hours in an argon gas flow.

15. The method of making an electrocatalyst as recited in claim 14, further comprising the step of reducing the calcined electrocatalyst at a rate of about 100 mL/min at a temperature of about 450° C. for about four hours in a gas flow of about 10% hydrogen in argon.

16. The method of making an electrocatalyst for electrochemical conversion of carbon dioxide as recited in claim 8, further comprising the step of dissolving iron nitrate monohydrate in the deionized water to form the salt solution.

17. The method of making an electrocatalyst for electrochemical conversion of carbon dioxide as recited in claim 8, further comprising the step of dissolving ruthenium chloride in the deionized water to form the salt solution.

18. The method of making an electrocatalyst for electrochemical conversion of carbon dioxide as recited in claim 8, further comprising the step of dissolving palladium chloride in the deionized water to form the salt solution.