US20120329014A1 - Essay System - Google Patents
Essay System Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20120329014A1 US20120329014A1 US13/168,325 US201113168325A US2012329014A1 US 20120329014 A1 US20120329014 A1 US 20120329014A1 US 201113168325 A US201113168325 A US 201113168325A US 2012329014 A1 US2012329014 A1 US 2012329014A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- essay
- algorithm
- students
- writing
- thesis
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 20
- 230000002452 interceptive effect Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 5
- 230000001343 mnemonic effect Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- PCTMTFRHKVHKIS-BMFZQQSSSA-N (1s,3r,4e,6e,8e,10e,12e,14e,16e,18s,19r,20r,21s,25r,27r,30r,31r,33s,35r,37s,38r)-3-[(2r,3s,4s,5s,6r)-4-amino-3,5-dihydroxy-6-methyloxan-2-yl]oxy-19,25,27,30,31,33,35,37-octahydroxy-18,20,21-trimethyl-23-oxo-22,39-dioxabicyclo[33.3.1]nonatriaconta-4,6,8,10 Chemical compound C1C=C2C[C@@H](OS(O)(=O)=O)CC[C@]2(C)[C@@H]2[C@@H]1[C@@H]1CC[C@H]([C@H](C)CCCC(C)C)[C@@]1(C)CC2.O[C@H]1[C@@H](N)[C@H](O)[C@@H](C)O[C@H]1O[C@H]1/C=C/C=C/C=C/C=C/C=C/C=C/C=C/[C@H](C)[C@@H](O)[C@@H](C)[C@H](C)OC(=O)C[C@H](O)C[C@H](O)CC[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)C[C@H](O)C[C@](O)(C[C@H](O)[C@H]2C(O)=O)O[C@H]2C1 PCTMTFRHKVHKIS-BMFZQQSSSA-N 0.000 abstract description 17
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000026676 system process Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007812 deficiency Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000014759 maintenance of location Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G09—EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
- G09B—EDUCATIONAL OR DEMONSTRATION APPLIANCES; APPLIANCES FOR TEACHING, OR COMMUNICATING WITH, THE BLIND, DEAF OR MUTE; MODELS; PLANETARIA; GLOBES; MAPS; DIAGRAMS
- G09B19/00—Teaching not covered by other main groups of this subclass
Definitions
- This invention relates to an interactive computer based essay system that prompts students, step-by-step, field-by-field, to write a completed essay is disclosed.
- the system breaks down the essay-writing process into simple steps using unique processes and algorithms. It also integrates several external elements to ensure student success with writing.
- the present invention has addressed the shortcomings of previous attempts and provides a novel, innovative, interactive, and more effective system for teaching essay writing.
- the present invention achieves this goal by way of a unique essay-writing system that breaks the writing process down into various processes and algorithms.
- the present invention revolves around three key elements: 1) students; 2) writing coaches; and 3) the essay writing platform.
- the essay system follows three key steps: 1) follow the instructions based on the three key algorithms: “ABCD Algorithm”, “Advanced TEEEEC Algorithm”, and “Thesis Algorithm”; 2) Write an essay; and 3) Coach provides feedback.
- Key differentiators of the present invention from traditional systems include: 1) Multiple Mastery Model; 2) On-Demand Service; 3) Progress Tracking; and 4) Developing the Foundation for Students' Futures.
- the unique Multiple Mastery Model of learning combines two proven models of learning: Multiple Intelligence and Mastery Learning.
- the Multiple Mastery Model assumes that students should master one subject before advancing to another one, yet learn this subject in multiple ways.
- IQ Intelligent Quotient
- Students can display high interpersonal intelligence, as well as areas such as musical, linguistic, naturalistic, spatial or body/physiological intelligence, among other types.
- Mastery Learning shows that Mastery Learning increases retention and shows educational results. Rather than simply moving from one lesson to the next, Mastery Learning means focusing on one lesson or skill at a time (in this case essays) and mastering it.
- Our Multiple Mastery Model delivers Multiple Intelligence assessments and forms of learning, combined with one focused topic—writing essays.
- the online platform of the present invention serves students with on-demand with 24/7 access. Not only do students have the capability of accessing the software at all times, but they also get extremely quick turnaround for essay feedback and editing.
- the present invention provides open office hours, tutorials, demos and webinars that enable students to obtain all of the information they need with the click of a mouse.
- the present invention allows customers to know how students are performing by tracking regular progression. Students can see how they've improved over time with progress reports and updated tracking. Parents and instructors thereby have the capability to gauge and guide improvement, as well as identify critical areas of focus for the student.
- the present invention lays the groundwork for future instances and opportunities of written communication that students may encounter including college admissions essays, scholarship applications, resumes, job applications and cover letters.
- the present invention also utilizes external elements to ensure student success with writing, including: 1) the “ABCD Algorithm”; 2) the “Advanced TEEEEC Algorithm”; and the “Thesis Algorithm”.
- the “ABCD Algorithm” is broken down to mean: A: Answer the question directly; B: Brainstorm; C: Categorize; and D: Demonstrate (with examples).
- the “ABCD Algorithm” is usually a linear process, which means that Steps A-D are performed in that exact order. This is especially the case when the essay prompt asks a question in the form of “Who,” “What,” “Where,” and “When.” Sometimes, however, when questions are in the form of “Why” or “How,” the “Brainstorm” and “Categorize” steps may have to be performed before the “Answer the question directly” step.
- T Topic Sentence
- E Example #1
- E Explanation #1
- E Example #2
- E Explanation #2
- C Concluding Sentence
- the “Thesis Algorithm” uses steps A and C of the ABCD outline to form a thesis in a clear and easy manner. It combines part A and the main categories of Part C in the outline to create a thesis that can satisfy the “Thesis Test.”
- FIG. 1 illustrates a flow chart depicting the three key elements that the present invention revolves around: 1) students; 2) writing coaches; and 3) the essay writing platform.
- FIG. 2 illustrates a flow chart depicting the three key steps of the present system: 1) follow the instructions based on the three key algorithms: “ABCD Algorithm”, “Advanced TEEEEC Algorithm”, and “Thesis Algorithm”; 2) Write an essay; and 3) Coach provides feedback.
- FIG. 3 illustrates the essay system process flow for the student user.
- FIG. 4 illustrates the writing pyramid
- FIG. 5 illustrates the “ABCD Algorithm” outline process.
- FIG. 6 illustrates a meta-view of essays using the “Advanced TEEEEC Algorithm.”
- FIG. 7 illustrates the thesis algorithm
- the present invention breaks down the essay-writing system into simple steps using various processes and algorithms. It prompts students, step-by-step, field-by-field, to write a complete essay from start to finish.
- the three elements include students 1 , writing coaches 2 , and the essay writing platform 3 .
- Students sign up for the essay system to learn the proper techniques for composing an essay. After they have completed composing their essays, they submit the final products through the essay writing platform. Writing coaches are then readily available to correct the submitted essays and provide feedback.
- the three key steps include “Follow the instructions based on the three key algorithms” 4 : “ABCD Algorithm” 5 , “Advanced TEEEEC Algorithm” 6 , and “Thesis Algorithm” 7 ; “Write an essay” 8 ; and “Coach provides feedback” 9 .
- the students follow the processes and algorithms in order to write an essay.
- the students also follow the instructions based on the “ABCD Algorithm” 5 , “Advanced TEEEEC Algorithm” 6 , and “Thesis Algorithm” 7 , which will be explained in more detail thereafter.
- the platform allows for progress tracking so that customers know how students are performing with the system at all times. Parents and instructors, therefore, have the ability to gauge and guide improvement, as well as identify critical areas of focus for the student. Coaches are readily available to provide feedback.
- the essay writing system process flow for the student user is illustrated.
- the student begins at “Start” 10 , proceeds to the “Store Front” 11 , and then proceeds to “Student Log-In” 12 to log in. If the student is a “First time student” 13 , then the “Parents need to set up profile” 14 . After setting up the profile, the “Parents make payment” 15 for the essay system. Alternatively, if the student is already a registered student, then the student proceeds to “Current student log-in” 16 and then proceed directly to the “Dashboard” 17 , where they receive instructions on composing the essay and actually compose the essay. Then, the “Student submits essay” 18 and the “ES system logs incoming essays” 19 . Finally, the coaches grade the essays and the “ES system returns graded essay” 20 , which leads to the “End” 21 .
- the writing pyramid contains eight elements, including: style 22 , vocabulary 23 , grammar 24 , editing 25 , introductions and conclusions 26 , thesis statements 27 , paragraphs 28 , and brainstorming and outlining 29 .
- the first four elements can take a large quantity of time to develop, and only yield limited results.
- the last four elements can also take a large quantity of time to learn but will, however, yield a much larger improvement and better results within a smaller time frame. Therefore, the present invention focuses on the last four elements rather than the first four.
- the present invention also utilizes external elements to ensure student success with writing, including: the “ABCD Algorithm” 5 , the “Advanced TEEEEC Algorithm” 6 , and the “Thesis Algorithm” 7 .
- the “ABCD Algorithm” 5 stands for A 31 —“Answer the question directly” 30 , B 33 —“Brainstorm” 32 , C 35 —“Categorize” 34 , and D 37 —“Demonstrate (with examples)” 36 .
- the “ABCD Algorithm” 5 is usually a linear process, which means that Steps A-D are performed in that exact order.
- the primary instruction of this process is to A 31 —“Answer the question” 30 .
- Thesis statements are created after the body of the essay is completed and finalized later in the software.
- the introduction and conclusion paragraphs are then created after the thesis statement is created.
- the “Advanced TEEEEC Algorithm” 6 stands for: T: Topic Sentence 39 ; E: Example #1 40 ; E: Explanation #1 41 ; E: Example #2 42 ; E: Explanation #2 43 ; C: Concluding Sentence 44 .
- An essay typically contains five parts: Introduction 38 , Paragraph 2 45 , Paragraph 3 46 , Paragraph 4 47 , and Conclusion 48 . Each of the five parts is further broken down using the “Advanced TEEEEC Algorithm” 6 .
- the Introduction has a topic sentence 39 , two examples 40 and 42 , two explanations 41 and 43 , and a concluding sentence 44 .
- the second paragraph 45 also follows the same structure.
- the third and fourth paragraphs 46 - 47 also follow the same structure.
- the conclusion 48 also follows the same structure.
- the “Advanced TEEEEC Algorithm” 6 requires examples and an explanation of each of the examples.
- the essay writing software allows users to literally categorize or sort through their reasons after they are formed in order to create paragraphs. Subsequently, students work towards building the essay.
- the “Thesis Algorithm” 7 uses steps A 49 and C 50 of the ABCD outline 5 to form a thesis 51 in a clear and easy manner. It combines part A 49 and the main categories of Part C 50 in the outline to create a thesis 51 that can satisfy the “Thesis Test.”
- the thesis statement describes the argument, or what the student believes, suggests the evidence, and structures the argument.
- the thesis formula in the present invention includes an answer plus categories. Students combine their previous answers from the “Answer” and “Categorize” fields to create a single thesis. Universal methods apply to many types of essays but this essay system mainly provides for the three algorithms as previously discussed: ABCD 5 , TEEEEC 6 , and Thesis Formula 7 .
- interactive software is incorporated, including pop-up tool tips that are embedded in the software.
- the essay writing system also provides for step-by-step instructions and examples.
- mnemonics are utilized to aid users in remembering methods and structures.
- the essay writing system provides students with algorithms and challenges students to think first by using the ABCD outline 5 . Then, the system focuses on how to determine the content of each of the paragraphs. After each of these steps is completed, the students then work towards building the essay.
- the essay writing system features a unique Multiple Mastery Model of learning, which integrates two proven models of learning: Multiple Intelligence and Mastery Learning.
- the Multiple Mastery Model assumes that students should master one subject before advancing to another one, yet learn this subject in multiple ways. It draws from the Multiple Intelligence approach, which demonstrates that people possess different types of intelligence—IQ (Intelligence Quotient) only measures one type of intelligence. Students can display high interpersonal intelligence, as well as areas such as musical, linguistic, naturalistic, spatial, or body/physiological intelligence, among other types.
- IQ Intelligent Quotient
- Mastery Learning research shows that students should place their energies on one lesson at a time, and master it, before moving to others.
- the present invention provides students with different types of teaching and learning, while focusing exclusively on the single topic of essay writing—one of the most-critical skills needed in school and career.
- the Multiple Mastery Model offers Multiple Intelligence and various forms of learning, combined with one focused topic.
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Educational Administration (AREA)
- Educational Technology (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Electrically Operated Instructional Devices (AREA)
Abstract
An interactive computer based essay system that prompts students, step-by-step, field-by-field, to write a completed essay is disclosed. The system breaks down the essay-writing process into simple steps using unique processes and algorithms. It also integrates several external elements to ensure student success with writing. The essay system follows three key steps: 1) Follow the instructions based on the three key algorithms: “ABCD Algorithm”, “Advanced TEEEEC Algorithm”, and “Thesis Algorithm”; 2) Write an essay; and 3) Coach provides feedback. The platform allows for progress tracking so that customers know how students are performing with the system at all times. Parents and instructors, therefore, have the ability to gauge and guide improvement, as well as identify critical areas of focus for the student. Coaches are readily available to provide feedback.
Description
- This invention relates to an interactive computer based essay system that prompts students, step-by-step, field-by-field, to write a completed essay is disclosed. The system breaks down the essay-writing process into simple steps using unique processes and algorithms. It also integrates several external elements to ensure student success with writing.
- Traditionally, educators have struggled with the arduous task of teaching writing skills to students. One of the most difficult areas to teach is the writing of essays. Numerous attempts at providing computer assisted essay instruction have had mixed and limited success. Often, the methods and their lack of success discourage students from acquiring this very important skill.
- The present invention has addressed the shortcomings of previous attempts and provides a novel, innovative, interactive, and more effective system for teaching essay writing.
- Given the above deficiencies of prior art, there is a need for a more effective essay writing system that allows students to interact with writing coaches and undergo a step-by-step, field-by-field, writing system.
- Advantageously, the present invention achieves this goal by way of a unique essay-writing system that breaks the writing process down into various processes and algorithms.
- The present invention revolves around three key elements: 1) students; 2) writing coaches; and 3) the essay writing platform.
- The essay system follows three key steps: 1) Follow the instructions based on the three key algorithms: “ABCD Algorithm”, “Advanced TEEEEC Algorithm”, and “Thesis Algorithm”; 2) Write an essay; and 3) Coach provides feedback.
- Key differentiators of the present invention from traditional systems include: 1) Multiple Mastery Model; 2) On-Demand Service; 3) Progress Tracking; and 4) Developing the Foundation for Students' Futures.
- With regards to the first differentiator, the unique Multiple Mastery Model of learning combines two proven models of learning: Multiple Intelligence and Mastery Learning. The Multiple Mastery Model assumes that students should master one subject before advancing to another one, yet learn this subject in multiple ways. We draw from the Multiple Intelligence approach, which demonstrates that people possess different types of intelligence—IQ (Intelligence Quotient) only measures one type of intelligence. Students can display high interpersonal intelligence, as well as areas such as musical, linguistic, naturalistic, spatial or body/physiological intelligence, among other types. We couple this with Mastery Learning. Research shows that Mastery Learning increases retention and shows educational results. Rather than simply moving from one lesson to the next, Mastery Learning means focusing on one lesson or skill at a time (in this case essays) and mastering it. Our Multiple Mastery Model delivers Multiple Intelligence assessments and forms of learning, combined with one focused topic—writing essays.
- With regards to “On-Demand Service”, the online platform of the present invention serves students with on-demand with 24/7 access. Not only do students have the capability of accessing the software at all times, but they also get extremely quick turnaround for essay feedback and editing. The present invention provides open office hours, tutorials, demos and webinars that enable students to obtain all of the information they need with the click of a mouse.
- With regard to “Progress Tracking”, the present invention allows customers to know how students are performing by tracking regular progression. Students can see how they've improved over time with progress reports and updated tracking. Parents and instructors thereby have the capability to gauge and guide improvement, as well as identify critical areas of focus for the student.
- With regard to “Developing the Foundation for Students' Futures”, the present invention lays the groundwork for future instances and opportunities of written communication that students may encounter including college admissions essays, scholarship applications, resumes, job applications and cover letters.
- The present invention also utilizes external elements to ensure student success with writing, including: 1) the “ABCD Algorithm”; 2) the “Advanced TEEEEC Algorithm”; and the “Thesis Algorithm”.
- The “ABCD Algorithm” is broken down to mean: A: Answer the question directly; B: Brainstorm; C: Categorize; and D: Demonstrate (with examples). The “ABCD Algorithm” is usually a linear process, which means that Steps A-D are performed in that exact order. This is especially the case when the essay prompt asks a question in the form of “Who,” “What,” “Where,” and “When.” Sometimes, however, when questions are in the form of “Why” or “How,” the “Brainstorm” and “Categorize” steps may have to be performed before the “Answer the question directly” step.
- The “Advanced TEEEEC Algorithm” is broken down to mean: T: Topic Sentence; E:
Example # 1; E:Explanation # 1; E:Example # 2; E:Explanation # 2; C: Concluding Sentence. - The “Thesis Algorithm” uses steps A and C of the ABCD outline to form a thesis in a clear and easy manner. It combines part A and the main categories of Part C in the outline to create a thesis that can satisfy the “Thesis Test.”
- The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated into and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate one or more embodiments, and together with the detailed description, serve to explain the principles and implementations of the invention. In the drawings:
-
FIG. 1 illustrates a flow chart depicting the three key elements that the present invention revolves around: 1) students; 2) writing coaches; and 3) the essay writing platform. -
FIG. 2 illustrates a flow chart depicting the three key steps of the present system: 1) Follow the instructions based on the three key algorithms: “ABCD Algorithm”, “Advanced TEEEEC Algorithm”, and “Thesis Algorithm”; 2) Write an essay; and 3) Coach provides feedback. -
FIG. 3 illustrates the essay system process flow for the student user. -
FIG. 4 illustrates the writing pyramid. -
FIG. 5 illustrates the “ABCD Algorithm” outline process. -
FIG. 6 illustrates a meta-view of essays using the “Advanced TEEEEC Algorithm.” -
FIG. 7 illustrates the thesis algorithm. - Traditionally, essays were all either written by hand or composed on paper. With the invention of the computer, writers began typing their essays on word processing software. The present invention addresses the shortcomings of composing essays on paper, by hand, or even on word processing software by creating a novel process for composing essays with a computer-based structure.
- The present invention, however, breaks down the essay-writing system into simple steps using various processes and algorithms. It prompts students, step-by-step, field-by-field, to write a complete essay from start to finish.
- Referring now to
FIG. 1 , a flow chart depicting the three key elements of the present invention is illustrated. In this embodiment of the invention, the three elements includestudents 1, writingcoaches 2, and theessay writing platform 3. Students sign up for the essay system to learn the proper techniques for composing an essay. After they have completed composing their essays, they submit the final products through the essay writing platform. Writing coaches are then readily available to correct the submitted essays and provide feedback. - Referring now to
FIG. 2 , a flow chart depicting the three key steps of the present system is illustrated. In this embodiment of the invention, the three key steps include “Follow the instructions based on the three key algorithms” 4: “ABCD Algorithm” 5, “Advanced TEEEEC Algorithm” 6, and “Thesis Algorithm” 7; “Write an essay” 8; and “Coach provides feedback” 9. - Still referring to
FIG. 2 , in an embodiment, the students follow the processes and algorithms in order to write an essay. The students also follow the instructions based on the “ABCD Algorithm” 5, “Advanced TEEEEC Algorithm” 6, and “Thesis Algorithm” 7, which will be explained in more detail thereafter. The platform allows for progress tracking so that customers know how students are performing with the system at all times. Parents and instructors, therefore, have the ability to gauge and guide improvement, as well as identify critical areas of focus for the student. Coaches are readily available to provide feedback. - Referring now to
FIG. 3 , the essay writing system process flow for the student user is illustrated. The student begins at “Start” 10, proceeds to the “Store Front” 11, and then proceeds to “Student Log-In” 12 to log in. If the student is a “First time student” 13, then the “Parents need to set up profile” 14. After setting up the profile, the “Parents make payment” 15 for the essay system. Alternatively, if the student is already a registered student, then the student proceeds to “Current student log-in” 16 and then proceed directly to the “Dashboard” 17, where they receive instructions on composing the essay and actually compose the essay. Then, the “Student submits essay” 18 and the “ES system logs incoming essays” 19. Finally, the coaches grade the essays and the “ES system returns graded essay” 20, which leads to the “End” 21. - Referring now to
FIG. 4 , the writing pyramid is illustrated. The pyramid contains eight elements, including:style 22,vocabulary 23,grammar 24, editing 25, introductions andconclusions 26, thesis statements 27,paragraphs 28, and brainstorming and outlining 29. The first four elements can take a large quantity of time to develop, and only yield limited results. The last four elements can also take a large quantity of time to learn but will, however, yield a much larger improvement and better results within a smaller time frame. Therefore, the present invention focuses on the last four elements rather than the first four. - The present invention also utilizes external elements to ensure student success with writing, including: the “ABCD Algorithm” 5, the “Advanced TEEEEC Algorithm” 6, and the “Thesis Algorithm” 7.
- Referring now to
FIG. 5 , the “ABCD Algorithm” 5 outline process is illustrated. The “ABCD Algorithm” 5 stands for A 31—“Answer the question directly” 30, B 33—“Brainstorm” 32,C 35—“Categorize” 34, andD 37—“Demonstrate (with examples)” 36. The “ABCD Algorithm” 5 is usually a linear process, which means that Steps A-D are performed in that exact order. This is especially the case when the essay prompt asks a question in the form of “Who,” “What,” “Where,” and “When.” Sometimes, however, when questions are in the form of “Why” or “How,” the “Brainstorm” and “Categorize” steps may have to be performed before the “Answer the question directly” step. - Still referring to
FIG. 5 , the primary instruction of this process is to A 31—“Answer the question” 30. Thesis statements are created after the body of the essay is completed and finalized later in the software. The introduction and conclusion paragraphs are then created after the thesis statement is created. - Referring now to
FIG. 6 , a meta-view of essays using the “Advanced TEEEEC Algorithm” 6 is illustrated. The “Advanced TEEEEC Algorithm” 6 stands for: T:Topic Sentence 39; E:Example # 1 40; E:Explanation # 1 41; E:Example # 2 42; E:Explanation # 2 43; C: ConcludingSentence 44. An essay typically contains five parts:Introduction 38,Paragraph 2 45,Paragraph 3 46, Paragraph 4 47, andConclusion 48. Each of the five parts is further broken down using the “Advanced TEEEEC Algorithm” 6. Therefore, the Introduction has atopic sentence 39, two examples 40 and 42, two 41 and 43, and a concludingexplanations sentence 44. Thesecond paragraph 45 also follows the same structure. The third and fourth paragraphs 46-47 also follow the same structure. Finally, theconclusion 48 also follows the same structure. - Still referring to
FIG. 6 , the “Advanced TEEEEC Algorithm” 6 requires examples and an explanation of each of the examples. The essay writing software allows users to literally categorize or sort through their reasons after they are formed in order to create paragraphs. Subsequently, students work towards building the essay. - Referring now to
FIG. 7 , a case example of thesis statements is illustrated. The “Thesis Algorithm” 7 uses steps A 49 andC 50 of the ABCD outline 5 to form athesis 51 in a clear and easy manner. It combinespart A 49 and the main categories ofPart C 50 in the outline to create athesis 51 that can satisfy the “Thesis Test.” In an embodiment, the thesis statement describes the argument, or what the student believes, suggests the evidence, and structures the argument. - The thesis formula in the present invention includes an answer plus categories. Students combine their previous answers from the “Answer” and “Categorize” fields to create a single thesis. Universal methods apply to many types of essays but this essay system mainly provides for the three algorithms as previously discussed: ABCD 5, TEEEEC 6, and Thesis Formula 7.
- In another embodiment of the present invention, interactive software is incorporated, including pop-up tool tips that are embedded in the software. The essay writing system also provides for step-by-step instructions and examples.
- In yet another embodiment of the present invention, mnemonics are utilized to aid users in remembering methods and structures. The essay writing system provides students with algorithms and challenges students to think first by using the ABCD outline 5. Then, the system focuses on how to determine the content of each of the paragraphs. After each of these steps is completed, the students then work towards building the essay.
- In yet another embodiment of the present invention, the essay writing system features a unique Multiple Mastery Model of learning, which integrates two proven models of learning: Multiple Intelligence and Mastery Learning. The Multiple Mastery Model assumes that students should master one subject before advancing to another one, yet learn this subject in multiple ways. It draws from the Multiple Intelligence approach, which demonstrates that people possess different types of intelligence—IQ (Intelligence Quotient) only measures one type of intelligence. Students can display high interpersonal intelligence, as well as areas such as musical, linguistic, naturalistic, spatial, or body/physiological intelligence, among other types.
- In yet another embodiment of the present invention, Mastery Learning research shows that students should place their energies on one lesson at a time, and master it, before moving to others. The present invention provides students with different types of teaching and learning, while focusing exclusively on the single topic of essay writing—one of the most-critical skills needed in school and career. The Multiple Mastery Model offers Multiple Intelligence and various forms of learning, combined with one focused topic.
Claims (3)
1. A computer based system for composing an essay comprising:
a thesis formula;
outlining capability;
a paragraph writing algorithm (Advanced TEEEEC Algorithm); and
multiple mastery method.
2. The system of claim 1 , further comprising interactive software, such as pop-up tools, that are embedded into the software.
3. The system of claim 1 , further comprising the use of mnemonics to aid users in remembering methods and structures of composing an essay.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US13/168,325 US20120329014A1 (en) | 2011-06-24 | 2011-06-24 | Essay System |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US13/168,325 US20120329014A1 (en) | 2011-06-24 | 2011-06-24 | Essay System |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| US20120329014A1 true US20120329014A1 (en) | 2012-12-27 |
Family
ID=47362175
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| US13/168,325 Abandoned US20120329014A1 (en) | 2011-06-24 | 2011-06-24 | Essay System |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US20120329014A1 (en) |
Cited By (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20120196253A1 (en) * | 2011-01-31 | 2012-08-02 | Audra Duvall | Interactive communication design system |
| US20160133147A1 (en) * | 2014-11-10 | 2016-05-12 | Educational Testing Service | Generating Scores and Feedback for Writing Assessment and Instruction Using Electronic Process Logs |
| CN107615267A (en) * | 2015-05-11 | 2018-01-19 | 林迪·莱多霍夫斯基 | Methods and systems related to context-specific writing frameworks |
| US10062131B2 (en) | 2015-03-31 | 2018-08-28 | Fujitsu Limited | Assignment guidance in curation learning |
| US20190180641A1 (en) * | 2017-12-07 | 2019-06-13 | Robin Donaldson | System and Method for Draft-Contemporaneous Essay Evaluating and Interactive Editing |
| US10353720B1 (en) | 2013-10-18 | 2019-07-16 | ApplicantLab Inc. | Computer system, method, and media for preparing qualitative elements of an academic application |
-
2011
- 2011-06-24 US US13/168,325 patent/US20120329014A1/en not_active Abandoned
Cited By (8)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20120196253A1 (en) * | 2011-01-31 | 2012-08-02 | Audra Duvall | Interactive communication design system |
| US10353720B1 (en) | 2013-10-18 | 2019-07-16 | ApplicantLab Inc. | Computer system, method, and media for preparing qualitative elements of an academic application |
| US20160133147A1 (en) * | 2014-11-10 | 2016-05-12 | Educational Testing Service | Generating Scores and Feedback for Writing Assessment and Instruction Using Electronic Process Logs |
| US10262547B2 (en) * | 2014-11-10 | 2019-04-16 | Educational Testing Service | Generating scores and feedback for writing assessment and instruction using electronic process logs |
| US10062131B2 (en) | 2015-03-31 | 2018-08-28 | Fujitsu Limited | Assignment guidance in curation learning |
| CN107615267A (en) * | 2015-05-11 | 2018-01-19 | 林迪·莱多霍夫斯基 | Methods and systems related to context-specific writing frameworks |
| EP3295328A4 (en) * | 2015-05-11 | 2019-01-16 | Ledohowski, Lindy | METHODS AND SYSTEMS RELATING TO SPECIFIC WRITING STRUCTURES IN THE CONTEXT |
| US20190180641A1 (en) * | 2017-12-07 | 2019-06-13 | Robin Donaldson | System and Method for Draft-Contemporaneous Essay Evaluating and Interactive Editing |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Kholis | Elsa speak app: automatic speech recognition (ASR) for supplementing English pronunciation skills | |
| Chen et al. | Classroom discourse analyzer (CDA): A discourse analytic tool for teachers | |
| US20120329014A1 (en) | Essay System | |
| Rafi et al. | Computer-mediated diagnostic assessment of mixed-ability EFL learners’ performance on tiered tasks: Differentiating mediation on Google Meet™ | |
| Abidin et al. | Conceptualizing and integrating intercultural communicative competence in the English Language Teaching | |
| Healey | Teaching an embodied thinking process for narrative writing ‘with grammar in mind’: an analysis of writing conferences and teacher talk | |
| Feng et al. | Exploring the Development of Chinese College Students' Proficiency in English through ChatGPT: An Experimental Study | |
| Seng et al. | An evaluation of the integration of m-learning in Total Reading Approach for Children Plus (TRAC+): Enhancing literacy of early grade students in Cambodia. | |
| Lai et al. | A new frontier in AI-assisted English oral presentation assessment | |
| Bostan et al. | Ways to use artificial intelligence in education | |
| Mahmood et al. | Teaching English to aircraft maintenance students: Challenges and needs | |
| Nguyen et al. | The role of English language learning experiences in the development of TESOL preservice teachers’ identity capital | |
| Pertiwi et al. | Developing English job interview skill using artificial intelligence technology | |
| Cui | Research on the innovation in college English teaching under the background of new liberal arts | |
| Amalia et al. | Gender Divergence In English Learning Motivation At The Tenth Grade Students Of Kartikatama Senior High School Metro | |
| Bowden et al. | EMI policy in practice: Multilingual mathematics lessons in a government secondary school in rural Rwanda | |
| Wang et al. | Study on the Network-Based English Phonetics Teaching Mode for English-Major Students. | |
| Thompson | Scaffolding emergent literacy skills in pre-kindergarten through writing instruction | |
| Dewi et al. | Developing project-based-learning (PBL) speaking syllabus for flight attendant school in flipped learning network (FLN) activities | |
| Suwannatrai et al. | Instructional Methods Used in English Teaching as a Foreign Language (EFL) Classroom Practice at the University Level in Thailand | |
| Kohnke | Review of Informal digital learning of English: Research to practice | |
| Du | Learning Analytics in Action: A Mixed-Methods Study of Generative AI–ChatGPT’s Impact on L2 Academic Writing Development in English for Academic Purposes (EAP) Classrooms | |
| Chih-Yang et al. | Advancing Education through Stakeholder Engagement: An Evaluation of the Learning Butler Chatbot's Impact on Instructors, and Learners | |
| Wang | The application of “5G+ AI” information technology in college English teaching | |
| Kaharuddin et al. | Effect of Interactive and Collaborative Strategies on Indonesian EFL Learners' Oral English Proficiency Improvement |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |