US20120046714A1 - Power efficient electrical stimulation - Google Patents
Power efficient electrical stimulation Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20120046714A1 US20120046714A1 US13/286,751 US201113286751A US2012046714A1 US 20120046714 A1 US20120046714 A1 US 20120046714A1 US 201113286751 A US201113286751 A US 201113286751A US 2012046714 A1 US2012046714 A1 US 2012046714A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- stimulus
- stimuli
- masked
- stimulation
- electrode
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
- 230000000638 stimulation Effects 0.000 title claims abstract description 20
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 23
- 230000001537 neural effect Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 12
- 230000000873 masking effect Effects 0.000 claims description 18
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000004936 stimulating effect Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000012217 deletion Methods 0.000 claims 1
- 230000037430 deletion Effects 0.000 claims 1
- 239000007943 implant Substances 0.000 description 7
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000005236 sound signal Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000007792 addition Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000000721 basilar membrane Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000003477 cochlea Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 210000000860 cochlear nerve Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 210000000883 ear external Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008447 perception Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000003672 processing method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000002699 waste material Substances 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61N—ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY
- A61N1/00—Electrotherapy; Circuits therefor
- A61N1/02—Details
- A61N1/04—Electrodes
- A61N1/05—Electrodes for implantation or insertion into the body, e.g. heart electrode
- A61N1/0526—Head electrodes
- A61N1/0541—Cochlear electrodes
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61N—ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY
- A61N1/00—Electrotherapy; Circuits therefor
- A61N1/18—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes
- A61N1/32—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes alternating or intermittent currents
- A61N1/36—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes alternating or intermittent currents for stimulation
- A61N1/36036—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes alternating or intermittent currents for stimulation of the outer, middle or inner ear
- A61N1/36038—Cochlear stimulation
Definitions
- the present invention relates to devices and methods for neural stimulation, and particularly but not exclusively to auditory prostheses.
- Wearable medical devices reliant upon stored power share a common dynamic. As the possible and desired functionality of the devices is improved, the power demands generally also increase. As a result, the life per charge or per cell is reduced, which has not only a cost impact for the user, but also increases the risk that a device will power down at an inconvenient time.
- the present invention provides, broadly, for a scheme in which masking effects are taken into account when determining which stimuli are actually delivered to a patient.
- This may be implemented in various ways.
- the set is checked against a look-up table. This table contains combinations of stimuli which have previously been clinically determined for that patent to display a masking effect.
- the second stimulus is deleted in this case.
- the present invention relates to a method of neural stimulation of the type in which successive stimuli are presented on an electrode array having one or more electrodes, said stimuli being generated by a stimulus generation device, the method including the steps of:
- the present invention provides a neural stimulator device, including a stimulus generation device for generating stimulus sets for one or more periods, said stimulus sets being intended for delivery at an electrode array for operatively presenting stimuli to neural structures,
- said device further includes processing means implementing a predetermined instruction set, said processing means analysing each stimulus set using said predetermined instruction set in order to locate factors indicative of a likely masking effect, and if it is determined that a masking effect is likely, altering said stimulus set.
- the stimulus set may include a single stimulus in which case only the variable parameters relevant to that type of stimulation need to be specified. In suitable devices, this may include the timing, waveform, frequency, current, voltage, phase, amplitude and electrode location or further factors as required.
- the instruction set in this case preferably will consider the stimuli previously delivered in determining whether a masking effect is likely.
- the stimulus set may include multiple stimuli, with variables as discussed above. If this case, in addition to or instead of previous stimulus sets, the instruction set will preferably analyse the various stimuli in relation to each other.
- the stimulus generation device may be unitary or be made of physically distinct parts.
- a cochlear implant it may include both an external speech processor and an implanted device, only the speech processor, or only an implanted device, depending upon the desired location of processing capacity.
- the instruction set may be implanted as a separate procedure, or integrated within the processor which generates the stimulus set.
- the masked stimulus is simply omitted.
- an alternative stimuli for example, on a different electrode—may be substituted.
- the next most significant sound channel may be selected as the basis for stimulation.
- the present invention arises from a recognition that masking effects can be considered as indicating a waste of stimulation power, as although the stimulus is presented to the patient, the patient does not receive any increased perception as a result of the stimulus. Accordingly, a proportion of the stimulus energy is simply wasted.
- FIG. 1 is a schematic illustration of a conventional intra-cochlear implant system
- FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating the operation of one embodiment of the inventive system.
- the present invention will be described with particular reference to a speech processor unit for a cochlear implant system. However, it will be appreciated that the present invention has application to other neural stimulation systems where the masking phenomenon may be relevant.
- the external component includes a speech processor 1 , and a microphone 2 .
- the speech processor is in this illustration constructed and arranged so that it can fit behind the outer ear 11 .
- Attached to speech processor 1 is a transmitter coil 3 which transmits the electrical signals to the implanted unit 5 via an RF link 4 .
- the implanted component 5 includes a receiver coil 6 for receiving power and data from coil 3 .
- a cable 7 extends from the implanted device 5 to the cochlea 12 and terminates in an electrode array 10 .
- the signals thus received are applied by the array 10 to the basilar membrane 8 thereby stimulating the auditory nerve.
- the operation of the device shown in FIG. 1 is described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 4,532,930.
- the RF link which is in turn powered by the speech processor 1 , provides power and data to the implanted device 6 .
- the speech processor also processes sound signals received by microphone 2 , so as to send appropriate instructions for stimulation to the implanted device 6 .
- the precise details of speech processing are not necessary for an understanding of the present invention, and are in any case well understood by those skilled in the art. Any suitable speech processing strategy could be used in conjunction with the present invention.
- FIG. 2 illustrates one implementation of the present invention, in schematic terms.
- Sound signals are detected by microphone 20 , and processed into a predetermined number of frequency channels by filter 21 .
- the output of filter 21 is a set of signal amplitudes per channel 22 .
- Processor 23 in simple terms, selects certain channels as the basis for stimulation, based on amplitude or other factors. A set of stimulation instructions for implanted receiver stimulator unit 28 is thereby produced.
- These instructions include at least the electrode or electrodes to be stimulated, and the amplitude of the stimulus to be applied.
- the process so far is conventional.
- Masking check involves comparing each successive two or more stimuli with the look-up table to determine whether they match a predetermined masking rule in look-up table 26 .
- the table below sets out a set of minimum unmasked level—that is, for one electrode n, the level which will not be masked, as a function of the stimulus levels which have been applied to the other electrodes within the previous 2m 5 .
- the electrode column lists the electrodes in an array of n max electrodes. Each entry M gives the minimum stimulus level (amplitude) to electrode n which will elicit a response immediately following a stimulus to the relevant electrodes, expressed as values between threshold (T) and maximum comfortable (c) levels. It will be appreciated that T and C levels are routinely determined during set up of a speech processor.
- the masking check output is thus the stimulation set, with masked stimuli excluded. This is then transmitted conventionally, for example via an RF link to the implanted receiver/stimulator unit, which operates conventionally.
Landscapes
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Otolaryngology (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Public Health (AREA)
- Nuclear Medicine, Radiotherapy & Molecular Imaging (AREA)
- Radiology & Medical Imaging (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Biomedical Technology (AREA)
- Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
- Cardiology (AREA)
- Heart & Thoracic Surgery (AREA)
- Prostheses (AREA)
- Electrotherapy Devices (AREA)
- Finger-Pressure Massage (AREA)
- Inorganic Insulating Materials (AREA)
- Details Of Audible-Bandwidth Transducers (AREA)
Abstract
A method and device are disclosed for neural stimulation with improved power consumption and/or effectiveness. The stimulus generator is arranged, for example via a look up table, to recognise proposed stimuli which will be masked by earlier or simultaneous stimuli. Such masked stimuli are either deleted, or replaced by another stimulus.
Description
- This application is a divisional application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/857,253 entitled “POWER EFFICIENT ELECTRICAL STIMULATION” and filed on Sep. 18, 2007, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,050,770 on Nov. 1, 2011, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/343,397, filed Feb. 21, 2003, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,272,446 on Sep. 18, 2007, which was a National Stage application of International Application PCT/AU01/01032, filed Aug. 21, 2001, and which claims the benefit of Australian Patent Application PQ 9528, filed Aug. 21, 2000, the contents of each of these applications being incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
- The present invention relates to devices and methods for neural stimulation, and particularly but not exclusively to auditory prostheses.
- Wearable medical devices reliant upon stored power share a common dynamic. As the possible and desired functionality of the devices is improved, the power demands generally also increase. As a result, the life per charge or per cell is reduced, which has not only a cost impact for the user, but also increases the risk that a device will power down at an inconvenient time.
- In the field of cochlear implants, this issue is exacerbated by the trend to a single, behind the ear unit to replace what was once a head mounted unit and a separate speech processor unit worn on the body. The available volume and weight for the power cell is accordingly reduced. Increased power demands to provide improved functionality create a need to consider the efficiency of speech processing schemes and stimulus sets in order to provide maximum battery life.
- It is an object of the present invention to provide an improved processing method and device, in order to a better balance of power consumption and performance in neural stimulation systems, particularly auditory prostheses.
- The present invention provides, broadly, for a scheme in which masking effects are taken into account when determining which stimuli are actually delivered to a patient. This may be implemented in various ways. In one approach, after a set of stimulus instructions is generated, the set is checked against a look-up table. This table contains combinations of stimuli which have previously been clinically determined for that patent to display a masking effect. The second stimulus is deleted in this case.
- In another approach, a theoretical model of masking could be used in addition to or instead of a look up table.
- According to one aspect, the present invention relates to a method of neural stimulation of the type in which successive stimuli are presented on an electrode array having one or more electrodes, said stimuli being generated by a stimulus generation device, the method including the steps of:
-
- determining a stimulus set for one or more periods;
- analysing each proposed stimulus set using a predetermined instruction set which is adopted to locate factors indicative of a likely masking effect;
- if masking effects are detected, altering said stimulus set for one or more of said periods;
- presenting the stimuli via said electrode array to a neural structure.
- According to another aspect, the present invention provides a neural stimulator device, including a stimulus generation device for generating stimulus sets for one or more periods, said stimulus sets being intended for delivery at an electrode array for operatively presenting stimuli to neural structures,
- wherein said device further includes processing means implementing a predetermined instruction set, said processing means analysing each stimulus set using said predetermined instruction set in order to locate factors indicative of a likely masking effect, and if it is determined that a masking effect is likely, altering said stimulus set.
- The stimulus set may include a single stimulus in which case only the variable parameters relevant to that type of stimulation need to be specified. In suitable devices, this may include the timing, waveform, frequency, current, voltage, phase, amplitude and electrode location or further factors as required. The instruction set in this case preferably will consider the stimuli previously delivered in determining whether a masking effect is likely.
- Alternatively, the stimulus set may include multiple stimuli, with variables as discussed above. If this case, in addition to or instead of previous stimulus sets, the instruction set will preferably analyse the various stimuli in relation to each other.
- The stimulus generation device may be unitary or be made of physically distinct parts. For example, in the case of a cochlear implant, it may include both an external speech processor and an implanted device, only the speech processor, or only an implanted device, depending upon the desired location of processing capacity. The instruction set may be implanted as a separate procedure, or integrated within the processor which generates the stimulus set.
- In a preferred form, if analysis indicates a likelihood of masking, the masked stimulus is simply omitted. However, in a system such as a cochlear implant, where stimuli are presented on multiple electrodes, an alternative stimuli—for example, on a different electrode—may be substituted. For example, the next most significant sound channel may be selected as the basis for stimulation.
- In the case of the intra-cochlear implant, it has been observed that certain stimuli, when delivered simultaneously or in close succession, do not produce a patient percept significantly different from when only the first stimulus is delivered. For example, consider a conventional, multi-electrode intra-cochlear electrode array. If a large amplitude stimulus is delivered at one electrode, and simultaneously a smaller amplitude stimulus is delivered at the next electrode, then in many cases the user will not be able to perceive whether or not the smaller stimulus was delivered—it is said to be masked by the large stimulus. Other circumstances may give rise to masking of various neural percepts. Masking phenomena have been discussed in the technical literature.
- The present invention arises from a recognition that masking effects can be considered as indicating a waste of stimulation power, as although the stimulus is presented to the patient, the patient does not receive any increased perception as a result of the stimulus. Accordingly, a proportion of the stimulus energy is simply wasted.
- An implementation of the present invention will now be described with reference to the accompanying figures, in which:
-
FIG. 1 is a schematic illustration of a conventional intra-cochlear implant system; and -
FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating the operation of one embodiment of the inventive system. - The present invention will be described with particular reference to a speech processor unit for a cochlear implant system. However, it will be appreciated that the present invention has application to other neural stimulation systems where the masking phenomenon may be relevant.
- Referring to
FIG. 1 , a typical cochlear implant device is shown. The external component, includes a speech processor 1, and amicrophone 2. The speech processor is in this illustration constructed and arranged so that it can fit behind theouter ear 11. Attached to speech processor 1 is atransmitter coil 3 which transmits the electrical signals to the implantedunit 5 via anRF link 4. - The implanted
component 5 includes areceiver coil 6 for receiving power and data fromcoil 3. Acable 7 extends from the implanteddevice 5 to thecochlea 12 and terminates in anelectrode array 10. The signals thus received are applied by thearray 10 to thebasilar membrane 8 thereby stimulating the auditory nerve. The operation of the device shown inFIG. 1 is described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 4,532,930. - Thus, the RF link, which is in turn powered by the speech processor 1, provides power and data to the implanted
device 6. The speech processor also processes sound signals received bymicrophone 2, so as to send appropriate instructions for stimulation to the implanteddevice 6. The precise details of speech processing are not necessary for an understanding of the present invention, and are in any case well understood by those skilled in the art. Any suitable speech processing strategy could be used in conjunction with the present invention. - The block diagram of
FIG. 2 illustrates one implementation of the present invention, in schematic terms. - Sound signals are detected by microphone 20, and processed into a predetermined number of frequency channels by
filter 21. The output offilter 21 is a set of signal amplitudes perchannel 22.Processor 23, in simple terms, selects certain channels as the basis for stimulation, based on amplitude or other factors. A set of stimulation instructions for implantedreceiver stimulator unit 28 is thereby produced. - These instructions include at least the electrode or electrodes to be stimulated, and the amplitude of the stimulus to be applied. The process so far is conventional.
- Masking check involves comparing each successive two or more stimuli with the look-up table to determine whether they match a predetermined masking rule in look-up table 26.
- The table below sets out a set of minimum unmasked level—that is, for one electrode n, the level which will not be masked, as a function of the stimulus levels which have been applied to the other electrodes within the previous 2m5. The electrode column lists the electrodes in an array of n max electrodes. Each entry M gives the minimum stimulus level (amplitude) to electrode n which will elicit a response immediately following a stimulus to the relevant electrodes, expressed as values between threshold (T) and maximum comfortable (c) levels. It will be appreciated that T and C levels are routinely determined during set up of a speech processor.
-
Minimum Unmasked Level Electrode 1 M1, T M1, T+1 -----------M1, c−1 M1, C 2 | | n − 1 Mn−1, T Mn−1, T+1 ------------ Mn−1, C n − 1 | | | | N max - The masking check output is thus the stimulation set, with masked stimuli excluded. This is then transmitted conventionally, for example via an RF link to the implanted receiver/stimulator unit, which operates conventionally.
- Variations and additions will be apparent to those skilled in the art with the broad scope of the present invention.
Claims (15)
1. A method of neural stimulation, of the type in which successive stimuli are presented on an electrode array having one or more electrodes, said stimuli being generated by a stimulus generation device, the method including the steps of:
determining a stimulus set for one or more periods;
analyzing each proposed stimulus set using a predetermined instruction set which is adapted to locate factors indicative of a likely masking effect;
if masking effects are detected, altering said stimulus set for one or more of said periods; and
presenting the stimuli via said electrode array to a neural structure.
2. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the predetermined instruction set is responsive to stimuli in previous periods.
3. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the predetermined instruction set is responsive to the selected electrodes defined by said stimulus set.
4. The method according to claim 1 , wherein if said predetermined instruction set determines that a stimulus will be masked, said stimulus is deleted from the stimulation set.
5. The method according to claim 1 , wherein if said predetermined instruction set determines that a stimulus will be masked, said stimulus is deleted from the stimulation set, and an alternative stimulus is added to said stimulation set.
6. The method according to claim 1 , wherein said neural stimulation is cochlear stimulation, and said stimulus generator includes an impanted component.
7. The method according to claim 6 , wherein the predetermined instruction set is responsive to a look up table of stimuli which are likely to be masked.
8. A method of electrically stimulating a recipient, comprising:
determining a stimulus set of electrical stimuli;
analyzing the stimulus set to determine if any of said stimuli are likely to be masked upon delivery of the stimulus set to the recipient; and
altering the stimulus set upon a determination that any of the stimuli are likely to be masked.
9. The method of claim 8 , wherein:
the action of altering the stimulus set corresponds to deleting one or more of the stimuli likely to be masked.
10. The method of claim 9 , further comprising:
adding at least one alternative stimuli to the stimulus set upon the deletion of one or more stimuli determined to be likely masked.
11. The method of claim 8 , further comprising:
upon a determination that a first stimuli of the stimulus is likely to be masked upon delivery, preventing the first stimuli of the stimulus from being delivered by a first electrode;
upon a determination that the first stimuli of the stimulus is likely to be masked upon delivery, delivering a new stimuli corresponding to the stimuli prevented from being delivered by a second electrode; and
after the analysis of the stimulus set, upon a lack of determination that the first stimuli of the stimulus is likely to be masked upon delivery, delivering the first stimuli of the stimulus by the first electrode.
12. The method of claim 11 , wherein:
the action of preventing the first stimuli of the stimulus from being delivered by the first electrode corresponds to deleting the first stimuli.
13. The method of claim 8 , wherein:
the action of altering the stimulus set corresponds to deleting all stimuli of the stimulus set determined to be likely masked.
14. The method of claim 8 , further comprising:
delivering said altered stimulus set to the recipient.
15. The method of claim 8 , further comprising:
adding at least one stimuli to the stimulus set upon a determination that any of the stimuli are likely to be masked.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US13/286,751 US20120046714A1 (en) | 2000-08-21 | 2011-11-01 | Power efficient electrical stimulation |
Applications Claiming Priority (6)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUPQ9528 | 2000-08-21 | ||
| AUPQ9528A AUPQ952800A0 (en) | 2000-08-21 | 2000-08-21 | Power efficient electrical stimulation |
| US10/343,397 US7272446B2 (en) | 2000-08-21 | 2001-08-21 | Power efficient electrical stimulation |
| PCT/AU2001/001032 WO2002017679A1 (en) | 2000-08-21 | 2001-08-21 | Power efficient electrical stimulation |
| US11/857,253 US8050770B2 (en) | 2000-08-21 | 2007-09-18 | Power efficient electrical stimulation |
| US13/286,751 US20120046714A1 (en) | 2000-08-21 | 2011-11-01 | Power efficient electrical stimulation |
Related Parent Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| US11/857,253 Continuation US8050770B2 (en) | 2000-08-21 | 2007-09-18 | Power efficient electrical stimulation |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| US20120046714A1 true US20120046714A1 (en) | 2012-02-23 |
Family
ID=3823583
Family Applications (3)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| US10/343,397 Expired - Fee Related US7272446B2 (en) | 2000-08-21 | 2001-08-21 | Power efficient electrical stimulation |
| US11/857,253 Expired - Fee Related US8050770B2 (en) | 2000-08-21 | 2007-09-18 | Power efficient electrical stimulation |
| US13/286,751 Abandoned US20120046714A1 (en) | 2000-08-21 | 2011-11-01 | Power efficient electrical stimulation |
Family Applications Before (2)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| US10/343,397 Expired - Fee Related US7272446B2 (en) | 2000-08-21 | 2001-08-21 | Power efficient electrical stimulation |
| US11/857,253 Expired - Fee Related US8050770B2 (en) | 2000-08-21 | 2007-09-18 | Power efficient electrical stimulation |
Country Status (8)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (3) | US7272446B2 (en) |
| EP (1) | EP1329132B1 (en) |
| JP (2) | JP5063853B2 (en) |
| AT (1) | ATE360973T1 (en) |
| AU (1) | AUPQ952800A0 (en) |
| CA (1) | CA2419321C (en) |
| DE (1) | DE60128124T2 (en) |
| WO (1) | WO2002017679A1 (en) |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WO2015136505A1 (en) * | 2014-03-13 | 2015-09-17 | Cochlear Limited | Stimulation management |
Families Citing this family (18)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US7822478B2 (en) * | 2000-08-21 | 2010-10-26 | Cochlear Limited | Compressed neural coding |
| AUPQ952800A0 (en) * | 2000-08-21 | 2000-09-14 | Cochlear Limited | Power efficient electrical stimulation |
| US9008786B2 (en) | 2000-08-21 | 2015-04-14 | Cochlear Limited | Determining stimulation signals for neural stimulation |
| US8285382B2 (en) | 2000-08-21 | 2012-10-09 | Cochlear Limited | Determining stimulation signals for neural stimulation |
| AUPR604801A0 (en) * | 2001-06-29 | 2001-07-26 | Cochlear Limited | Multi-electrode cochlear implant system with distributed electronics |
| AU2003901852A0 (en) | 2003-04-16 | 2003-05-01 | Cochlear Limited | Cochlear electrode array |
| AU2005202837B2 (en) | 2004-06-28 | 2011-05-26 | Hearworks Pty Limited | Selective resolution speech processing |
| US7421298B2 (en) | 2004-09-07 | 2008-09-02 | Cochlear Limited | Multiple channel-electrode mapping |
| US7496405B1 (en) * | 2005-03-14 | 2009-02-24 | Advanced Bionics, Llc | Sound processing and stimulation systems and methods for use with cochlear implant devices |
| US20100131032A1 (en) * | 2008-11-26 | 2010-05-27 | Med-El Elektromedizinische Geraete Gmbh | Audio Prostheses Product Selection |
| US8688222B2 (en) | 2009-02-05 | 2014-04-01 | Cochlear Limited | Stimulus timing for a stimulating medical device |
| CN102883774B (en) * | 2010-03-04 | 2015-05-13 | 弗兰霍菲尔运输应用研究公司 | Method and apparatus for generating an electrode stimulation signal in a neural auditory prosthesis |
| US8515540B2 (en) | 2011-02-24 | 2013-08-20 | Cochlear Limited | Feedthrough having a non-linear conductor |
| US9579499B2 (en) | 2012-09-17 | 2017-02-28 | Cochlear Limited | Sound processing using a masking model |
| US10509527B2 (en) | 2013-09-13 | 2019-12-17 | Box, Inc. | Systems and methods for configuring event-based automation in cloud-based collaboration platforms |
| US9937346B2 (en) | 2016-04-26 | 2018-04-10 | Cochlear Limited | Downshifting of output in a sense prosthesis |
| CN107192665B (en) * | 2017-06-05 | 2021-09-24 | 中国石油大学(华东) | Test system and method for localized corrosion of non-uniform structures coupled with multiple electrodes |
| EP4188537B1 (en) * | 2020-07-30 | 2025-09-03 | CAScination AG | System for insertion of a cochlear implant |
Citations (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US4532930A (en) * | 1983-04-11 | 1985-08-06 | Commonwealth Of Australia, Dept. Of Science & Technology | Cochlear implant system for an auditory prosthesis |
| US6751505B1 (en) * | 1999-03-03 | 2004-06-15 | Cochlear Limited | Method and apparatus for optimizing the operation of a cochlear implant prosthesis |
| US7272446B2 (en) * | 2000-08-21 | 2007-09-18 | Cochlear Limited | Power efficient electrical stimulation |
| US7822478B2 (en) * | 2000-08-21 | 2010-10-26 | Cochlear Limited | Compressed neural coding |
Family Cites Families (75)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US199470A (en) * | 1878-01-22 | Improvement in spring-motors | ||
| US119304A (en) * | 1871-09-26 | Improvement in shutter-workers | ||
| US103622A (en) * | 1870-05-31 | Isaac b | ||
| DE3070698D1 (en) * | 1979-05-28 | 1985-07-04 | Univ Melbourne | Speech processor |
| US4611596A (en) * | 1980-10-14 | 1986-09-16 | Purdue Research Foundation | Sensory prostheses |
| CA1189147A (en) * | 1980-12-12 | 1985-06-18 | James F. Patrick | Speech processors |
| US5046242A (en) * | 1982-07-27 | 1991-09-10 | Commonwealth Of Australia | Method of making feedthrough assemblies having hermetic seals between electrical feedthrough elements and ceramic carriers therefor |
| US4813417A (en) * | 1987-03-13 | 1989-03-21 | Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company | Signal processor for and an auditory prosthesis utilizing channel dominance |
| US4847617A (en) | 1987-08-14 | 1989-07-11 | Siemens-Pacesetter, Inc. | High speed digital telemetry system for implantable devices |
| US5271397A (en) | 1989-09-08 | 1993-12-21 | Cochlear Pty. Ltd. | Multi-peak speech processor |
| US5603726A (en) | 1989-09-22 | 1997-02-18 | Alfred E. Mann Foundation For Scientific Research | Multichannel cochlear implant system including wearable speech processor |
| US5274711A (en) * | 1989-11-14 | 1993-12-28 | Rutledge Janet C | Apparatus and method for modifying a speech waveform to compensate for recruitment of loudness |
| GB9211085D0 (en) * | 1992-05-23 | 1992-07-08 | Tippey Keith E | Electrical stimulation |
| US5412748A (en) * | 1992-12-04 | 1995-05-02 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Optical semiconductor module |
| US5403262A (en) * | 1993-03-09 | 1995-04-04 | Microtek Medical, Inc. | Minimum energy tinnitus masker |
| JP3600239B2 (en) | 1993-07-01 | 2004-12-15 | ザ ユニバーシティ オブ メルボルン | Cochlear implant |
| AUPM883794A0 (en) | 1994-10-17 | 1994-11-10 | University Of Melbourne, The | Multiple pulse stimulation |
| WO1996021975A1 (en) * | 1995-01-09 | 1996-07-18 | Philips Electronics N.V. | Method and apparatus for determining a masked threshold |
| CA2211844C (en) | 1995-02-27 | 2001-01-30 | Medtronic, Inc. | External patient reference sensor |
| US5786439A (en) | 1996-10-24 | 1998-07-28 | Minimed Inc. | Hydrophilic, swellable coatings for biosensors |
| US5601617A (en) | 1995-04-26 | 1997-02-11 | Advanced Bionics Corporation | Multichannel cochlear prosthesis with flexible control of stimulus waveforms |
| US5626629A (en) | 1995-05-31 | 1997-05-06 | Advanced Bionics Corporation | Programming of a speech processor for an implantable cochlear stimulator |
| KR100485053B1 (en) * | 1995-06-06 | 2005-04-27 | 옵토바이오닉스 코포레이션 | Multi-phasic microphotodiode retinal implant and adaptive imaging stimulation system |
| US5649970A (en) | 1995-08-18 | 1997-07-22 | Loeb; Gerald E. | Edge-effect electrodes for inducing spatially controlled distributions of electrical potentials in volume conductive media |
| AUPN533195A0 (en) | 1995-09-07 | 1995-10-05 | Cochlear Pty. Limited | Derived threshold and comfort level for auditory prostheses |
| AU702746B2 (en) | 1995-09-20 | 1999-03-04 | Cochlear Limited | Bioresorbable polymer use in cochlear and other implants |
| US5776179A (en) * | 1995-10-06 | 1998-07-07 | The University Of Michigan | Method for evaluating inner ear hearing loss |
| US5833714A (en) | 1996-01-18 | 1998-11-10 | Loeb; Gerald E. | Cochlear electrode array employing tantalum metal |
| US6463328B1 (en) * | 1996-02-02 | 2002-10-08 | Michael Sasha John | Adaptive brain stimulation method and system |
| US5824022A (en) * | 1996-03-07 | 1998-10-20 | Advanced Bionics Corporation | Cochlear stimulation system employing behind-the-ear speech processor with remote control |
| US5853424A (en) | 1996-03-13 | 1998-12-29 | Medtronic, Inc | Method of and apparatus for preventing tissue ingrowth in infusion catheters |
| CA2254777A1 (en) | 1996-05-16 | 1997-11-20 | Cochlear Limited | Calculating electrode frequency allocation in a cochlear implant |
| EP0959943B1 (en) * | 1996-06-20 | 2004-03-17 | Advanced Bionics Corporation | Self-adjusting cochlear implant system |
| US5909497A (en) | 1996-10-10 | 1999-06-01 | Alexandrescu; Eugene | Programmable hearing aid instrument and programming method thereof |
| US5895416A (en) * | 1997-03-12 | 1999-04-20 | Medtronic, Inc. | Method and apparatus for controlling and steering an electric field |
| ATE285162T1 (en) | 1997-04-16 | 2005-01-15 | Dsp Factory Ltd | DEVICE AND METHOD FOR PROGRAMMING A HEARING AID |
| US6354299B1 (en) | 1997-10-27 | 2002-03-12 | Neuropace, Inc. | Implantable device for patient communication |
| DE69726319T2 (en) | 1997-10-31 | 2004-08-19 | Cochlear Ltd., Lane Cove | PACKING AND COATING FOR BIOELECTRIC STIMULATION AND RECORDING ELECTRODES |
| US6643903B2 (en) * | 1997-11-13 | 2003-11-11 | Greatbatch-Sierra, Inc. | Process for manufacturing an EMI filter feedthrough terminal assembly |
| US6366863B1 (en) | 1998-01-09 | 2002-04-02 | Micro Ear Technology Inc. | Portable hearing-related analysis system |
| JP2002518912A (en) | 1998-06-08 | 2002-06-25 | コックレア リミティド | Hearing device |
| US6304787B1 (en) | 1998-08-26 | 2001-10-16 | Advanced Bionics Corporation | Cochlear electrode array having current-focusing and tissue-treating features |
| WO2000030698A1 (en) | 1998-11-20 | 2000-06-02 | University Of Connecticut | Apparatus and method for control of tissue/implant interactions |
| US6321126B1 (en) * | 1998-12-07 | 2001-11-20 | Advanced Bionics Corporation | Implantable connector |
| US6304786B1 (en) | 1999-03-29 | 2001-10-16 | Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. | Implantable lead with dissolvable coating for improved fixation and extraction |
| DE19914993C1 (en) | 1999-04-01 | 2000-07-20 | Implex Hear Tech Ag | Fully implantable hearing system with telemetric sensor testing has measurement and wireless telemetry units on implant side for transmitting processed signal to external display/evaluation unit |
| DE19915846C1 (en) * | 1999-04-08 | 2000-08-31 | Implex Hear Tech Ag | Partially implantable system for rehabilitating hearing trouble includes a cordless telemetry device to transfer data between an implantable part, an external unit and an energy supply. |
| DE69930382T2 (en) | 1999-05-21 | 2006-11-30 | Cochlear Ltd., Lane Cove | ELECTRODE MATRIX FOR COCHLEAR IMPLANT |
| AUPQ161099A0 (en) | 1999-07-13 | 1999-08-05 | Cochlear Limited | Multirate cochlear stimulation strategy and apparatus |
| ATE533532T1 (en) * | 1999-08-26 | 2011-12-15 | Med El Elektromed Geraete Gmbh | ELECTRICAL NERVE STIMULATION BASED ON CHANNEL-SPECIFIC SAMPLING SEQUENCES |
| CA2381725C (en) | 1999-09-16 | 2008-01-22 | Advanced Bionics N.V. | Cochlear implant |
| US7181297B1 (en) | 1999-09-28 | 2007-02-20 | Sound Id | System and method for delivering customized audio data |
| US7058182B2 (en) | 1999-10-06 | 2006-06-06 | Gn Resound A/S | Apparatus and methods for hearing aid performance measurement, fitting, and initialization |
| DE10015421C2 (en) | 2000-03-28 | 2002-07-04 | Implex Ag Hearing Technology I | Partially or fully implantable hearing system |
| DE10018360C2 (en) | 2000-04-13 | 2002-10-10 | Cochlear Ltd | At least partially implantable system for the rehabilitation of a hearing impairment |
| DE10018334C1 (en) | 2000-04-13 | 2002-02-28 | Implex Hear Tech Ag | At least partially implantable system for the rehabilitation of a hearing impairment |
| DE10018361C2 (en) | 2000-04-13 | 2002-10-10 | Cochlear Ltd | At least partially implantable cochlear implant system for the rehabilitation of a hearing disorder |
| AUPQ820500A0 (en) | 2000-06-19 | 2000-07-13 | Cochlear Limited | Travelling wave sound processor |
| AUPQ952700A0 (en) | 2000-08-21 | 2000-09-14 | University Of Melbourne, The | Sound-processing strategy for cochlear implants |
| US6916291B2 (en) | 2001-02-07 | 2005-07-12 | East Carolina University | Systems, methods and products for diagnostic hearing assessments distributed via the use of a computer network |
| KR100432361B1 (en) * | 2001-05-29 | 2004-05-22 | 김성열 | Lead-through type filter with improved function of shielding |
| US20030109903A1 (en) * | 2001-12-12 | 2003-06-12 | Epic Biosonics Inc. | Low profile subcutaneous enclosure |
| US6879693B2 (en) | 2002-02-26 | 2005-04-12 | Otologics, Llc. | Method and system for external assessment of hearing aids that include implanted actuators |
| US7328151B2 (en) * | 2002-03-22 | 2008-02-05 | Sound Id | Audio decoder with dynamic adjustment of signal modification |
| US7211103B2 (en) * | 2002-04-11 | 2007-05-01 | Second Sight Medical Products, Inc. | Biocompatible bonding method and electronics package suitable for implantation |
| US7184840B2 (en) | 2002-04-22 | 2007-02-27 | Medtronic, Inc. | Implantable lead with isolated contact coupling |
| WO2004026199A2 (en) | 2002-09-19 | 2004-04-01 | Advanced Bionics Corporation | Cochlear implant electrode and method of making same |
| US7035690B2 (en) * | 2002-11-15 | 2006-04-25 | Medtronic, Inc. | Human-implantable-neurostimulator user interface having multiple levels of abstraction |
| US7251530B1 (en) | 2002-12-11 | 2007-07-31 | Advanced Bionics Corporation | Optimizing pitch and other speech stimuli allocation in a cochlear implant |
| US7085605B2 (en) * | 2003-01-23 | 2006-08-01 | Epic Biosonics Inc. | Implantable medical assembly |
| US7317944B1 (en) | 2003-07-08 | 2008-01-08 | Advanced Bionics Corporation | System and method for using a multi-contact electrode to stimulate the cochlear nerve or other body tissue |
| AU2005202733A1 (en) | 2004-06-23 | 2006-01-12 | Cochlear Limited | Methods for maintaining low impedance of electrodes |
| US7519435B2 (en) | 2004-06-23 | 2009-04-14 | Cochlear Limited | Methods for maintaining low impedance of electrodes |
| US20070127745A1 (en) | 2005-12-07 | 2007-06-07 | Cochlear Limited | Prevention of static bonding between medical device components |
| US20090292161A1 (en) | 2008-03-31 | 2009-11-26 | Cochlear Limited | Multi-mode hearing prosthesis |
-
2000
- 2000-08-21 AU AUPQ9528A patent/AUPQ952800A0/en not_active Abandoned
-
2001
- 2001-08-21 DE DE60128124T patent/DE60128124T2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2001-08-21 EP EP01959971A patent/EP1329132B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2001-08-21 AT AT01959971T patent/ATE360973T1/en active
- 2001-08-21 WO PCT/AU2001/001032 patent/WO2002017679A1/en not_active Ceased
- 2001-08-21 CA CA2419321A patent/CA2419321C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2001-08-21 US US10/343,397 patent/US7272446B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2001-08-21 JP JP2002561453A patent/JP5063853B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2007
- 2007-09-18 US US11/857,253 patent/US8050770B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2010
- 2010-10-01 JP JP2010224289A patent/JP5260614B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2011
- 2011-11-01 US US13/286,751 patent/US20120046714A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US4532930A (en) * | 1983-04-11 | 1985-08-06 | Commonwealth Of Australia, Dept. Of Science & Technology | Cochlear implant system for an auditory prosthesis |
| US6751505B1 (en) * | 1999-03-03 | 2004-06-15 | Cochlear Limited | Method and apparatus for optimizing the operation of a cochlear implant prosthesis |
| US7272446B2 (en) * | 2000-08-21 | 2007-09-18 | Cochlear Limited | Power efficient electrical stimulation |
| US7822478B2 (en) * | 2000-08-21 | 2010-10-26 | Cochlear Limited | Compressed neural coding |
| US8050770B2 (en) * | 2000-08-21 | 2011-11-01 | Cochlear Limited | Power efficient electrical stimulation |
Cited By (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WO2015136505A1 (en) * | 2014-03-13 | 2015-09-17 | Cochlear Limited | Stimulation management |
| US9956406B2 (en) | 2014-03-13 | 2018-05-01 | Cochlear Limited | Stimulation management |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| US20080051853A1 (en) | 2008-02-28 |
| JP5063853B2 (en) | 2012-10-31 |
| US20030163172A1 (en) | 2003-08-28 |
| CA2419321A1 (en) | 2002-02-28 |
| ATE360973T1 (en) | 2007-05-15 |
| DE60128124D1 (en) | 2007-06-06 |
| JP5260614B2 (en) | 2013-08-14 |
| EP1329132A1 (en) | 2003-07-23 |
| US7272446B2 (en) | 2007-09-18 |
| EP1329132B1 (en) | 2007-04-25 |
| WO2002017679A1 (en) | 2002-02-28 |
| JP2011025059A (en) | 2011-02-10 |
| US8050770B2 (en) | 2011-11-01 |
| AUPQ952800A0 (en) | 2000-09-14 |
| DE60128124T2 (en) | 2007-12-27 |
| JP2004517702A (en) | 2004-06-17 |
| EP1329132A4 (en) | 2005-09-28 |
| CA2419321C (en) | 2010-06-01 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US8050770B2 (en) | Power efficient electrical stimulation | |
| US6249704B1 (en) | Low voltage stimulation to elicit stochastic response patterns that enhance the effectiveness of a cochlear implant | |
| US8565890B2 (en) | Methods and apparatus for cochlear implant signal processing | |
| US7627377B2 (en) | Cochlear implant devices | |
| EP3006080B1 (en) | Electrical nerve stimulation with broad band low frequency filter | |
| US7697992B2 (en) | Systems for selecting one or more stimulation channels | |
| US9533146B2 (en) | Systems and methods for facilitating apical electrode stimulation by an electro-acoustic stimulation system | |
| US9446236B2 (en) | Systems and methods for optimizing a compliance voltage of an auditory prosthesis | |
| US7647119B1 (en) | Distributed compression amplitude mapping for a cochlear stimulation system | |
| US9036846B2 (en) | Systems and methods for optimizing a compliance voltage of an auditory prosthesis | |
| AU2001281588B2 (en) | Power efficient electrical stimulation | |
| US9403005B2 (en) | Systems and methods for optimizing a compliance voltage of an auditory prosthesis | |
| AU2001281588A1 (en) | Power efficient electrical stimulation | |
| US20100010570A1 (en) | Auditory prosthesis | |
| US11285322B2 (en) | Channel selection systems and methods that utilize fine structure information | |
| US20210370050A1 (en) | Apical inner ear stimulation | |
| EP3492137A1 (en) | Implantable hearing aid utilizing a stimulation pulse |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |