US20070081860A1 - Flexible arch-shaped corrugated structure - Google Patents
Flexible arch-shaped corrugated structure Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20070081860A1 US20070081860A1 US11/462,671 US46267106A US2007081860A1 US 20070081860 A1 US20070081860 A1 US 20070081860A1 US 46267106 A US46267106 A US 46267106A US 2007081860 A1 US2007081860 A1 US 2007081860A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- arch
- corrugations
- base
- chamber
- peak
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
- 238000002386 leaching Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 118
- 239000004033 plastic Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 18
- 229920003023 plastic Polymers 0.000 claims abstract description 18
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 claims description 9
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 230000009969 flowable effect Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000002689 soil Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000009933 burial Methods 0.000 claims 4
- 229920000114 Corrugated plastic Polymers 0.000 claims 2
- 238000007689 inspection Methods 0.000 abstract description 36
- 230000007704 transition Effects 0.000 description 6
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 5
- 229920001903 high density polyethylene Polymers 0.000 description 4
- 239000004700 high-density polyethylene Substances 0.000 description 4
- 230000008595 infiltration Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000001764 infiltration Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000033228 biological regulation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000000295 complement effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000002347 injection Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000007924 injection Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000009434 installation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000013011 mating Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000010865 sewage Substances 0.000 description 2
- 241000251468 Actinopterygii Species 0.000 description 1
- 239000004743 Polypropylene Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000005273 aeration Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005452 bending Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000919 ceramic Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000006835 compression Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007906 compression Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000004567 concrete Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000005520 cutting process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002349 favourable effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001746 injection moulding Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920000642 polymer Polymers 0.000 description 1
- -1 polypropylene Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 229920001155 polypropylene Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 238000007493 shaping process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000003860 storage Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229920001169 thermoplastic Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000004416 thermosoftening plastic Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000002351 wastewater Substances 0.000 description 1
- 208000016261 weight loss Diseases 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E03—WATER SUPPLY; SEWERAGE
- E03F—SEWERS; CESSPOOLS
- E03F1/00—Methods, systems, or installations for draining-off sewage or storm water
- E03F1/002—Methods, systems, or installations for draining-off sewage or storm water with disposal into the ground, e.g. via dry wells
- E03F1/003—Methods, systems, or installations for draining-off sewage or storm water with disposal into the ground, e.g. via dry wells via underground elongated vaulted elements
Definitions
- Arch-shaped corrugated structures are useful for various applications, particularly where the structure is exposed to load forces.
- a typical application is a leaching chamber that can fabricated from a thermoplastic, such as high density polyethylene (HDPE).
- the leaching chamber is typically injection molded into its shape.
- Plastic leaching chambers are typically connected together in a series or an array and buried in a leaching field for dispersing waste water, sewage effluent, or storm water into the ground.
- the buried leaching chamber must resist loads from the overhead soil and possibly vehicular traffic.
- Prior art leaching chambers are typically rigid structures. Thick sidewalls, plastic structural ribs, and other features, are generally used to increase the strength of the leaching chambers. That rigidity can cause the leaching chambers to fail prematurely. Indeed, many prior art chambers break during shipment or transport to the installation site, and during installation itself.
- Leaching chambers are generally installed in accordance with state and local laws and regulations, as well as local customs.
- those laws, regulations, and customs dictate the width of the leaching field trench, and thus limit the width of the leaching chamber, generally to either 36 inches, 24 inches, or 18 inches.
- Most leaching chambers are between about five to six feet in length to be dimensioned and light enough for an individual worker to handle.
- a flexible arch-shaped corrugated structure include a plastic structure that can be light weight and easy to handle, while at the same time having suitable strength for carrying loads.
- the plastic structure is a leaching chamber.
- Prior art plastic leaching chambers have relied on thick sidewalls and structural ribs to strength the structure.
- the ribs can place portions of the structure under tension when loaded and have been found to introduce failure points into the structure. Failures at those points tend to crack and propagate through the structure's wall to tear the structure. Based on the locations of prior art ribbing, those failures tend to occur at the sidewalls.
- Weight reductions can be realized by reducing the amount of structural ribs and decreasing the wall thickness. However, those weight-saving measures can decrease the strength of the leaching chamber.
- the need for structural ribs can be eliminated and thinner sidewalls can be used.
- the flexible structure is strong but light. The resulting structure will flex before failing. When loaded, the structure is under compression. When failure does occur, the structure will fail at the crest of the corrugations by buckling, not at the sidewalls. In addition to flexing before failing, a flexible structure is better able to cover uneven ground.
- aspects of the invention include a structure having a base with an open bottom.
- the structure can be a chamber, and more particularly an arch-shaped leaching chamber. Also included are methods of fabricating the structure, such as by injection molding.
- the structure can include a plurality of alternating corrugations running along the structure's body, with each corrugation being arch shaped about a center longitudinal axis with the bottom of the arch being at the base and the crest of the arch being perpendicular to the base.
- the corrugations can include a peak corrugation having a radius when sectioned through the center longitudinal axis, with the radius varying along the arch from the base to the crest of the arch.
- the structure can include a series of vertically-oriented arched corrugations having surfaces that convexly arch or curve upwardly as well as laterally. Having both upward and lateral arched or curved features on the corrugations can provide increased strength to the corrugations and the leaching chamber.
- the radius is larger at the base than at the peak of the arch.
- the larger corrugation portion at the bottom can provide greater strength for resisting backfill.
- the radius of the sectioned peak corrugation can be continuously variable along the arch from the base to the peak. The radius blends into the side walls of the corrugations, which can be slightly angled for strength purposes.
- the structure's corrugations can be fabricated from plastic.
- the corrugations can have a wall thickness of less than about 0.1 inches and are not connected with structural ribs.
- the wall thickness can further be relatively uniform, with the variation in thickness being less than 10%.
- the peak corrugations can include openings to facilitate the flow of a flowable medium, such as air, storm water, or sewage effluent between the inside of the structure and the outside of the structure.
- the peak corrugations can further include louvers to define the openings and to inhibit the intrusion of external material, such as soil, into the structure.
- the louvers can, in particular, be formed as protrusions on the peak corrugations.
- the louvers can include louvers with louver members that laterally extend across the laterally curving surfaces of the corrugations, resulting in laterally oriented arched louver members.
- the louvers can be formed to include a frame structure formed on the peak corrugations, the louvers being within the frame structure.
- the lateral arch of the louver members on the laterally curving surfaces of the corrugations can also have increased strength for resisting the lateral thrust of backfill and can have increased leaching surface area, in comparison to louvers that are merely straight.
- the corrugations can include valley corrugations or troughs between adjacent peak corrugations.
- Each valley corrugation can also have a plurality of formed louvers defining openings along a portion of the valley corrugations.
- a plurality of the valley corrugations can include a pair of stacking features.
- Each stacking feature can include a stacking column extending vertically downward from the valley corrugation and a stacking pocket above the valley corrugation and vertically aligned with the stacking column.
- the stacking feature can further include a rail transitioning the stacking pocket to the top of the valley corrugation.
- the structure in particular a leaching chamber
- the inspection port can be disposed at the crest of a valley corrugation.
- the ends of the structure can include end flanges that can be overlapped and locked with end flanges on adjacent leaching chambers.
- the end flanges can be generally arched shaped in a vertical orientation.
- One end flange on a chamber can include an upwardly extending post, and the opposite end flange can include a mating downwardly facing socket for providing pivotal engagement between adjacent leaching chambers.
- the side walls of the end flanges can have a curved or tapered contour to allow the end flanges to slide over each other during lateral pivoting of the leaching chambers relative to each other.
- the end flanges can have a curved contour forming a dome like structure, resulting in a post and dome locking feature.
- the mating ends of the chambers can include access or inspection ports, which can be circular in shape and function as post and dome structures disposed at the crests of the ends. That is, mated leaching chambers can articulate or rotatably pivot about the inspection port structures within a fixed range of angles. By positioning the inspection ports at the ends of the leaching chamber, a potential structural weakness at the corrugations can be removed and disposed at the end joint that can be stiffened through overlapping.
- a plurality of arch-shaped structures can be joined into a series or an array of structures.
- leaching chambers can be joined together to form a leaching field.
- a particular leaching field can include a first leaching chamber and a second leaching chamber, which may be alike.
- Each leaching chamber can have like end flanges, the end flanges including a first end flange having a first inspection port structure and a second end flange having a second inspection port structure.
- the first leaching chamber is mated with the second leaching chamber such that the first inspection port structure of the first leaching chamber overlaps the second inspection port structure of the second leaching chamber.
- the first inspection port structure and the second inspection port structure are opened to allow access to the interior of the leaching field.
- first and second leaching chambers can rotational pivot about the mated inspection port structures.
- FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a particular leaching chamber.
- FIG. 2 is a top view of the leaching chamber of FIG. 1 .
- FIG. 3 is a first end view of the leaching chamber 1 of FIG. 1 .
- FIG. 4 is a right side view of the leaching chamber 1 of FIG. 1 .
- FIG. 5 is a second end view of the leaching chamber 1 of FIG. 1 .
- FIGS. 6A-6B illustrate the interconnection of adjacent leaching chambers of FIG. 1 .
- FIG. 7 is a cross-sectional view along line A-A of FIG. 4 .
- FIG. 8 is a foreshortened cross-sectional view along line B-B of FIG. 4 .
- FIG. 9A is a load/defection curve for a commercial embodiment of the leaching chamber of FIGS. 1-8 .
- FIG. 9B is a load/defection curve for a competitor's commercially-available Quick 4 leaching chamber.
- FIG. 10 is a perspective view of a leaching chamber having inspection port ends.
- FIG. 11 is a side view of the leaching chamber 100 of FIG. 10 .
- FIG. 12 is a top view of the leaching chamber 100 of FIG. 10 .
- FIGS. 13A-13B illustrate the interconnection of adjacent leaching chambers of FIG. 10 .
- FIG. 14 is a cross-sectional diagram of nested chambers taken along line C-C in a valley corrugation of FIG. 4 .
- the flexible arch-shaped corrugated structure is a plastic leaching chamber, which has an open bottom and louvered opening side walls for dispersing effluent from inside the structure to the ground.
- Leaching chambers can also be used to disperse storm water. Similar structures can be used in other applications as well, including grain aeration and fish channels.
- the side walls may not have louvered openings, such as in culverts.
- FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a particular leaching chamber.
- the leaching chamber 1 has an open bottom and is generally arch shaped with a center axis 5 .
- the chamber has a total length TL, a width W, and a height H.
- the leaching chamber 1 includes a first end flange 10 at a first end and a second end flange 20 at a second end.
- the first and second end flanges 10 , 20 are complementary so that the first end flange 10 of one chamber can mate with the second end flange 20 of an adjacent chamber to form a serial chain of chambers for a leaching field as understood by those of ordinary skill in the art.
- the ends of the leaching chamber can include end flanges that can be overlapped and locked with end flanges on adjacent leaching chambers.
- the end flanges 10 , 20 are generally arched shaped in a vertical orientation. As shown, the end flanges 10 , 20 feature a post and dome interconnect, which is described in more detail in U.S. Design Pat. No. 403,047, issued on Dec. 22, 1998 to Gray, the teaching of which are incorporated herein by reference.
- a post structure 12 is located at the crest of the first end flange 10 and a dome structure 22 is located at the crest of the second end flange 20 .
- the second end flange 20 overlaps the first end flange 10 of adjacent chambers.
- the first end flange 10 also includes latching grooves 14 and the second end flange 20 includes a lip structure 24 .
- a base flange 30 acts as feet for the leaching chamber 1 .
- the base flange When installed, the base flange is set on the surface of a prepared trench.
- An elevated flange 32 is fabricated on the base flange 30 adjacent to the first (overlapped) end flange 10 .
- the base flange 30 adjacent to the second (overlapping) end flange 20 is received in the gap under the elevated flange 32 .
- the leaching chamber 1 also includes a plurality of alternating peak corrugations 40 and valley corrugations or troughs 50 along its length.
- the corrugations 40 , 50 include respective sidewalls 45 , 55 with opening louver features 140 having a height h for dispersing effluent or storm water from inside the chamber 1 .
- the distal louvered corrugations are connected to the respective end flanges 10 , 20 via a first end transition corrugation 15 and a second end transition corrugation (not shown).
- louver features 140 are formed onto and follow the profile of the corrugations 40 , 50 .
- the amount of material absent from the corrugation sidewalls due to the louver slots is replaced by a structural louver frame.
- prior art louvers are generally formed by simply perforating the sidewall, which introduces a structural weakness in the corrugations.
- an inspection port 60 located at the crest of a valley corrugation. When a leaching field is installed, selected inspection ports 60 can be cut out for later access. It should be understood that the number and position of access ports can be a design choice.
- FIG. 2 is a top view of the leaching chamber 1 of FIG. 1 .
- the laying length LL of the chamber is defined as the longitudinal distance between the centers of the post structure 12 and the dome structure 22 .
- This view better illustrates the first end transition corrugation 15 and the second end transition corrugation 25 .
- the corrugations do not have a fixed contour.
- This view also illustrates tabs 34 on the second end of the base flange 30 .
- the structure of the ends permits interconnected chambers to articulate or swivel a through a small angle so that a series of interconnected chambers can follow a non-linear path.
- Other swivel connectors can also be used, such as those described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,592,293 to Gray, U.S. Pat. No. 6,592,293 to Hedstrom et al. and in co-pending U.S. application Ser. No. 10/619,060 by Hedstrom et al., the teachings of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
- non-swivel connecting joints can also be employed.
- the latching grooves 14 on the first end flange 10 and the lip 24 on the second end flange 20 are used to connect end caps to terminate a series of chambers.
- FIG. 3 is a first end view of the leaching chamber 1 of FIG. 1 .
- the louvers 140 include louver members 142 a , 142 b , . . . , 142 y , 142 z . Those louver members protrude from the corrugation side wall.
- FIG. 4 is a right side view of the leaching chamber 1 of FIG. 1 . This view further illustrates the contours of the corrugations and details of the ends.
- the leaching chamber 1 includes a series of vertically-oriented arched corrugations having surfaces that convexly arch or curve upwardly as well as laterally.
- the side walls of the leaching chamber between the corrugations can include louvers for allowing the passage of liquids from the leaching chamber.
- the corrugations can also include louvers with louver members that laterally extend across the laterally curving surfaces of the corrugations, resulting in laterally oriented arched louver members.
- the corrugations can have sidewalls having flat surfaces.
- the lateral arch of the louver members on the laterally curving surfaces of the corrugations can also have increased strength for resisting the lateral thrust of backfill and can have increased leaching surface area, in comparison to louvers that are merely straight.
- FIG. 5 is a second end view of the leaching chamber 1 of FIG. 1 .
- the louvers 140 include louver members 142 a , 142 b , . . . , 142 y , 142 z . Again, those louver members protrude from the corrugation side wall.
- FIGS. 6A-6B illustrate the interconnection of adjacent leaching chambers of FIG. 1 .
- a first chamber 1 A and a second chamber 1 B interconnect by overlapping end flanges.
- the first chamber 1 A is installed in place with its first end flanges 10 A exposed.
- the second chamber 1 B is installed by placing its second end flange 20 B over the first end flange 10 A of the first chamber 1 B, with the dome structure 22 B aligned over the post structure (not shown) of the first chamber 1 A.
- the second chamber 1 B is elevated at a vertical angle. As shown in FIG.
- the interconnection is completed by tilting the second chamber 1 B down so that the second chamber base flange 30 B is received under the elevated flange 32 A of the first chamber 1 A.
- the joint particularly the gap below the elevated flange 32 A, allows for articulated movement of the connected chambers. Latches or other suitable engageable structures on the ends of the leaching chambers can be used to help hold the mated chambers together.
- leaching chambers 1 A, 1 B are shown being mated, other structures can also be mated with a leaching chamber.
- one or more angle couplers similar to those described in the above-referenced U.S. Pat. No. 6,592,293 to Hedstrom et al., can be serially attached to a leaching chamber.
- FIG. 7 is a cross-sectional view along line A-A of FIG. 4 .
- a base louver 142 a transitions into the base flange 30 and a top louver 142 z extends from the main corrugation sidewall.
- a plurality of interior louvers are shown between the base louver 142 a and the top louver 142 z.
- the louvers 140 are designed to allow flow of effluent or storm water from within the chamber and to inhibit backfill from entering the chamber.
- the first louver 142 a and the interior louvers 142 b , 142 y includes a respective lip 144 a , 144 b , 144 y along the inside of their top surfaces 146 a , 146 b , 146 y .
- the top louver surfaces 146 run parallel to the base flange 30 .
- the lips 144 extend above the top louver surface 146 by a first distance d 1 and are separated from the next louver by a second distance d 2 .
- the bottom surfaces 48 of the interior louvers 142 b , 142 y and the top louver 142 z run at an angle ⁇ 1 relative to the adjacent top louver surfaces 146 a , 146 y .
- the bottom surfaces 148 are thus separated from the prior louver top surface 146 by a third distance d 3 .
- the interior louvers have an inside height of d 4 , including the lip, and an outside height of d 5 .
- the louvers have an inside-to-outside width d 6 , which is greater than the thickness of the side wall.
- the chamber wall thickness is nominally 0.10 inches.
- d 1 is 0.030 inches
- d 2 is 0.110 inches
- d 3 is 0.152 inches
- d 4 is 0.130 inches
- d 5 is 0.083 inches
- d 6 is 0.250 inches (including the sidewall thickness) when measured perpendicular to the arch
- ⁇ 1 is 4.0 degrees.
- Other dimensions can be substituted to meet other engineering requirements.
- the louver surfaces is offset and extends from the corrugation side walls by about 0.15 inches, other approaches to the infiltration structures could be used.
- FIG. 8 is a foreshortened cross-sectional view along line B-B of FIG. 4 .
- the view shows a representative horizontal cross-section of a peak and valley corrugation.
- the particular arc of the peak corrugation 40 is continuously variable from the bottom of the corrugation to the crest.
- the peak corrugation is, in particular, a linear blended surface between the horizontal plane (at the base flange 30 ) and the vertical plane (at the crest of the chamber arch). More specifically, the arc is only measurable as a radius (but still variable) if the corrugation is sectioned perpendicular to the chamber's arch. In the illustrated view, the curve is an incidental ellipse. Also, when sectioned horizontally as shown, the thickness of the louvers is variable. If a cross-section were taken perpendicular to the chamber arch (i.e. passing through the center axis 5 ( FIG. 1 )), then the louver thickness would be equal to d 6 ( FIG. 7 ).
- the laterally curving surfaces of the corrugations has a radius that becomes smaller with an increase in elevation, starting at the bottom on a lateral plane and ending at the top on a vertical plane. That change in dimensions results in corrugations having portions that are larger at the bottom and smaller at the top. The larger corrugation portion at the bottom can provide greater strength for resisting backfill.
- the radius blends into the side walls of the corrugations, which can be slightly angled for strength purposes. Again, note that the louvers protruded from the corrugations.
- Particular chambers can have a peak corrugation profile that is similar to a successful pipe profile disclosed on U.S. Pat. No. 6,644,357 to Goddard, the teachings of which are incorporated herein by reference. Unlike a pipe, however, the chamber does not require a fixed diameter. Instead, the particular peak corrugations have an arch-shape that is larger in diameter at the base than at the crest.
- the peak corrugations 40 and the valley corrugations 50 have respective louvered opening features 140 , 150 .
- the louver features is a formed feature that follows the contour of the corrugations. This shaping of the louvers increases the amount of open area provided at the corrugations.
- the louver feature 140 includes a protruding frame 148 and center support member 149 .
- the approximate amount of sidewall material removed to form the open areas between the louvers in the peak corrugation is replaced by material in the frame 148 and center support 149 .
- the valley corrugations 50 have similar louver features 150 .
- the valley corrugations 50 have center supports 159
- outer support is provided by the sidewall itself 158 .
- the frame 148 and center supports 149 , 159 have a thickness equal to the thickness of the louvers, d 6 ( FIG. 7 ).
- the leaching chamber has a total length (TL) of 63.16 inches, a laying length (LL) of 60.00 inches, a width (W) of 34.50 inches, a height (H) of 13.00 inches, and a height to the highest louver opening (h) of 7.13 inches.
- the overall chamber weighs about 15.3 pounds.
- the peak corrugations have a 36-inch pipe profile at its base and transitions to a 24-inch pipe profile at its crest.
- a leaching chamber manufactured in accordance with the above disclosure (ARC-36 H-10) has been compared with samples of other low-weight commercially-available leaching chambers. The results between the ARC-36 H-10 embodiment and the Quick 4 chamber from Infiltrator Systems, Inc.
- FIG. 9A is a load/defection curve for the ARC-36 chamber of Table 2. The curve was plotted from actual measurement data. Note that up until the failure point A 1 at 5573 pounds, the load/deflection curve is smooth. Even after the failure point, the curve remains smooth before leveling off. This indicates that, even after buckling, the chamber remains as a integral structure.
- FIG. 9B is a load/deflection curve for the Quick 4 chamber of Table 2. Again, the curve was plotted from actual measurement data.
- the Quick 4 chamber fails at a load of 6509 pounds at point Q 1 , but there is an earlier break at about 5500 pounds at point Q 2 . After the main failure, the curve falls off sharply and reveals further breaks at least at points Q 3 , Q 4 , Q 5 , Q 6 , and Q 7 , indicating that the chamber has lost structural integrity.
- the above-disclosed leaching chamber operates well for its intended purpose, it requires a trench width of at least 36 inches. Some localities require narrower trenches, such as 24 inches or 18 inches. As narrow chambers where designed, it was found that the location of the inspection port in the body of the chamber tended to weaken the chamber. To solve that problem, the inspection port was moved from the body of the chamber to the ends.
- FIG. 10 is a perspective view of a leaching chamber having inspection port ends.
- the leaching chamber 100 has an open bottom and is generally arch shaped with a center axis 105 .
- the chamber has a total length TL′, a width W′, and a height H′.
- the leaching chamber 100 includes a first end flange 110 at a first end and a second end flange 120 at a second end.
- the first and second end flanges 110 , 120 are complementary so that the first end flange 110 of one chamber can mate with the second end flange 120 of an adjacent chamber.
- the first end flange 110 includes a first inspection port structure 112 at the crest of the arch and the second end flange 120 includes a second inspection port 122 at the crest of the arch. Access to the interior of an installed leaching field is attained by cutting out one of more inspection ports. It should be recognized that the first inspection port 112 functions as a post and the second inspection port 122 functions as a dome in a post-dome configuration. That is, when two chambers are mated, the second inspection port 122 of one chamber overlaps the first inspection port 112 of another chamber.
- the mated chambers can pivot about the mated inspection ports 112 , 122 though a fixed angular range.
- FIG. 11 is a side view of the leaching chamber 100 of FIG. 10 . Except for structural differences to accommodate the inspection ports, the chamber 100 is similar to the chamber 1 of FIGS. 1-8 .
- the laying length LL′ of the chamber is defined as the longitudinal distance between the centers of the first inspection port 112 and the second inspection port 122 .
- the inspection port structure 112 at the first end is disposed on a larger length first end flange 110 as compared to the leaching chamber of FIG. 1 . That additional span if repeated at the opposite end could introduce a weakness into the joint. To counteract that possibility, there is a peak corrugation at the second end that is intersected by the second inspection port structure 122 . That corrugation adds strength to the joint without the need for a structural rib.
- FIG. 12 is a top view of the leaching chamber 100 of FIG. 10 . Note that the first end 132 of the base flange 130 is contoured to receive a second end 134 of another base flange 130 . The received second end is held in place by tabs 116 extending from the first end flange 110 .
- FIGS. 13A-13B illustrate the interconnection of adjacent leaching chambers of FIG. 10 . Note that assembly is similar to that shown in FIGS. 6A-6B , except that the post 12 is replaced by a first (overlapped) inspection port 112 and the dome 22 is replaced by a second (overlapping) inspection port 122 . To access the interior of the chamber, the mated inspection ports 112 , 122 are cut out.
- the leaching chamber has a total length (TL′) of 67.25 inches, a laying length (LL′) of 60.00 inches, a width (W) of 22.00 inches, a height (H) of 11.623 inches. Note that the resulting 22-inch chamber is nearly as tall as the previously described 36-inch chamber, which results in a more favorable arch profile.
- the dimensions given above are approximate or nominal dimensions, which can vary due to changes in material properties or manufacturing techniques.
- the performance of the manufactured product can be enhanced by designing for even distribution of plastic throughout the part.
- the actual sidewall thickness varies by less than 10% of the maximum thickness.
- the chambers are typically shipped from a factory to a distribution center by being stacked on pallets. It is advantageous to stack many chambers on a single pallet.
- the rigidity of prior art leaching chambers can cause breakage during transport. It is not unusual for 10% of prior art chambers on a pallet to be cracked during shipment.
- the flexibility and profile of the above-disclosed chambers allows them to be more reliably transported, and in greater numbers per pallet.
- FIG. 14 is a cross-sectional diagram of nested chambers taken along line C-C in a valley corrugation of FIG. 4 .
- two chambers 1 A, 1 B are stacked, such as for shipping or storage.
- Each valley corrugation includes a pair of stacking columns 162 A, 162 B extending downward from the underside of the corrugation and a pair of stacking pockets 164 A, 164 B on the topside of the corrugation.
- the stacking columns 162 A, 162 B are tube shaped and can be longer than the distance separating the surface of the peak corrugations from the surface of the valley corrugations.
- the stacking pockets 164 A, 164 B are delimited from the corrugation surface by a rail 166 A, 166 B formed into the corrugation.
- a rail 166 A, 166 B formed into the corrugation.
- the chambers can be closely stacked.
- the stacking pockets 164 guide the columns 162 so that they are vertically aligned.
- a pallet suitably constructed to transfer the column load to the pallet, a stack of at least 60 chambers can be shipped without damage. Even if the load is not directly transferred, the only chamber that typically suffers damage is the bottom chamber, which carries the load of all chambers above it, and generally only when the plastic is exposed to sufficient heat to weaken its stacking pocket 164 .
- the flexibility of the above-disclosed chambers also reduces the risk of damage due to rough handling of individual chambers. Instead of resisting twisting and bending forces, which can break prior art chambers, the above-disclosed chambers move with the forces by flexing. While the corrugations themselves are strong, the chamber can flex around its center axis. In particular, the chamber can be easily twisted so that the opposing ends are at about 45 degrees relative to each other. Once the forces are removed, the chamber returns to its nominal shape.
- the leaching chambers are injection molded from high density polyethylene (HDPE), other manufacturing techniques can be used.
- the leaching chambers can be fabricated from another suitable polymer, such as polypropylene, or another material, such as concrete, metal, or ceramics, or combinations of materials.
Landscapes
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Hydrology & Water Resources (AREA)
- Public Health (AREA)
- Water Supply & Treatment (AREA)
- Sewage (AREA)
- Greenhouses (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/707,490, filed on Aug. 10, 2005 (Attorney Docket No. 1652.2004-000), the teachings of which are incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
- Arch-shaped corrugated structures are useful for various applications, particularly where the structure is exposed to load forces. A typical application is a leaching chamber that can fabricated from a thermoplastic, such as high density polyethylene (HDPE). The leaching chamber is typically injection molded into its shape.
- Plastic leaching chambers are typically connected together in a series or an array and buried in a leaching field for dispersing waste water, sewage effluent, or storm water into the ground. The buried leaching chamber must resist loads from the overhead soil and possibly vehicular traffic.
- Prior art leaching chambers are typically rigid structures. Thick sidewalls, plastic structural ribs, and other features, are generally used to increase the strength of the leaching chambers. That rigidity can cause the leaching chambers to fail prematurely. Indeed, many prior art chambers break during shipment or transport to the installation site, and during installation itself.
- Leaching chambers are generally installed in accordance with state and local laws and regulations, as well as local customs. In particular, those laws, regulations, and customs dictate the width of the leaching field trench, and thus limit the width of the leaching chamber, generally to either 36 inches, 24 inches, or 18 inches. Most leaching chambers are between about five to six feet in length to be dimensioned and light enough for an individual worker to handle.
- Particular embodiments of a flexible arch-shaped corrugated structure include a plastic structure that can be light weight and easy to handle, while at the same time having suitable strength for carrying loads. In a particular embodiment, the plastic structure is a leaching chamber.
- Prior art plastic leaching chambers have relied on thick sidewalls and structural ribs to strength the structure. The ribs, however, can place portions of the structure under tension when loaded and have been found to introduce failure points into the structure. Failures at those points tend to crack and propagate through the structure's wall to tear the structure. Based on the locations of prior art ribbing, those failures tend to occur at the sidewalls.
- Weight reductions can be realized by reducing the amount of structural ribs and decreasing the wall thickness. However, those weight-saving measures can decrease the strength of the leaching chamber.
- By suitably engineering the corrugations, the need for structural ribs can be eliminated and thinner sidewalls can be used. Once installed, the flexible structure is strong but light. The resulting structure will flex before failing. When loaded, the structure is under compression. When failure does occur, the structure will fail at the crest of the corrugations by buckling, not at the sidewalls. In addition to flexing before failing, a flexible structure is better able to cover uneven ground.
- Aspects of the invention include a structure having a base with an open bottom. The structure can be a chamber, and more particularly an arch-shaped leaching chamber. Also included are methods of fabricating the structure, such as by injection molding.
- The structure can include a plurality of alternating corrugations running along the structure's body, with each corrugation being arch shaped about a center longitudinal axis with the bottom of the arch being at the base and the crest of the arch being perpendicular to the base. Furthermore, the corrugations can include a peak corrugation having a radius when sectioned through the center longitudinal axis, with the radius varying along the arch from the base to the crest of the arch.
- The structure can include a series of vertically-oriented arched corrugations having surfaces that convexly arch or curve upwardly as well as laterally. Having both upward and lateral arched or curved features on the corrugations can provide increased strength to the corrugations and the leaching chamber.
- In particular embodiments, the radius is larger at the base than at the peak of the arch. The larger corrugation portion at the bottom can provide greater strength for resisting backfill. More particularly, the radius of the sectioned peak corrugation can be continuously variable along the arch from the base to the peak. The radius blends into the side walls of the corrugations, which can be slightly angled for strength purposes.
- The structure's corrugations can be fabricated from plastic. In particular, the corrugations can have a wall thickness of less than about 0.1 inches and are not connected with structural ribs. The wall thickness can further be relatively uniform, with the variation in thickness being less than 10%.
- The peak corrugations can include openings to facilitate the flow of a flowable medium, such as air, storm water, or sewage effluent between the inside of the structure and the outside of the structure. The peak corrugations can further include louvers to define the openings and to inhibit the intrusion of external material, such as soil, into the structure. The louvers can, in particular, be formed as protrusions on the peak corrugations. The louvers can include louvers with louver members that laterally extend across the laterally curving surfaces of the corrugations, resulting in laterally oriented arched louver members. In particular, the louvers can be formed to include a frame structure formed on the peak corrugations, the louvers being within the frame structure. The lateral arch of the louver members on the laterally curving surfaces of the corrugations can also have increased strength for resisting the lateral thrust of backfill and can have increased leaching surface area, in comparison to louvers that are merely straight.
- The corrugations can include valley corrugations or troughs between adjacent peak corrugations. Each valley corrugation can also have a plurality of formed louvers defining openings along a portion of the valley corrugations.
- In addition, a plurality of the valley corrugations can include a pair of stacking features. Each stacking feature can include a stacking column extending vertically downward from the valley corrugation and a stacking pocket above the valley corrugation and vertically aligned with the stacking column. The stacking feature can further include a rail transitioning the stacking pocket to the top of the valley corrugation.
- The structure (in particular a leaching chamber) can further include at least one inspection port formed in the body. In one embodiment, the inspection port can be disposed at the crest of a valley corrugation.
- The ends of the structure can include end flanges that can be overlapped and locked with end flanges on adjacent leaching chambers. The end flanges can be generally arched shaped in a vertical orientation. One end flange on a chamber can include an upwardly extending post, and the opposite end flange can include a mating downwardly facing socket for providing pivotal engagement between adjacent leaching chambers. The side walls of the end flanges can have a curved or tapered contour to allow the end flanges to slide over each other during lateral pivoting of the leaching chambers relative to each other. In some embodiments, the end flanges can have a curved contour forming a dome like structure, resulting in a post and dome locking feature.
- The mating ends of the chambers can include access or inspection ports, which can be circular in shape and function as post and dome structures disposed at the crests of the ends. That is, mated leaching chambers can articulate or rotatably pivot about the inspection port structures within a fixed range of angles. By positioning the inspection ports at the ends of the leaching chamber, a potential structural weakness at the corrugations can be removed and disposed at the end joint that can be stiffened through overlapping.
- A plurality of arch-shaped structures can be joined into a series or an array of structures. In particular, leaching chambers can be joined together to form a leaching field.
- A particular leaching field can include a first leaching chamber and a second leaching chamber, which may be alike. Each leaching chamber can have like end flanges, the end flanges including a first end flange having a first inspection port structure and a second end flange having a second inspection port structure. The first leaching chamber is mated with the second leaching chamber such that the first inspection port structure of the first leaching chamber overlaps the second inspection port structure of the second leaching chamber. At a particular joint, the first inspection port structure and the second inspection port structure are opened to allow access to the interior of the leaching field.
- In addition, the longitudinal axis of the first chamber can be at an angle relative to the longitudinal axis of the second chamber. More specifically, the first and second leaching chambers can rotational pivot about the mated inspection port structures.
- The foregoing and other objects, features, and advantages of the invention, including various novel details of construction and construction of parts, will be apparent from the following more particular drawings and description of embodiments, in which like reference characters refer to the same parts throughout the different views. The drawings are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon illustrating the principles of the invention. It will be understood that the particular details embodying the invention are shown by way of illustration only and not as a limitation of the invention. The principles and features of this invention may be employed and varied in numerous embodiments without departing from the scope of the invention.
-
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a particular leaching chamber. -
FIG. 2 is a top view of the leaching chamber ofFIG. 1 . -
FIG. 3 is a first end view of the leaching chamber 1 ofFIG. 1 . -
FIG. 4 is a right side view of the leaching chamber 1 ofFIG. 1 . -
FIG. 5 is a second end view of the leaching chamber 1 ofFIG. 1 . -
FIGS. 6A-6B illustrate the interconnection of adjacent leaching chambers ofFIG. 1 . -
FIG. 7 is a cross-sectional view along line A-A ofFIG. 4 . -
FIG. 8 is a foreshortened cross-sectional view along line B-B ofFIG. 4 . -
FIG. 9A is a load/defection curve for a commercial embodiment of the leaching chamber ofFIGS. 1-8 . -
FIG. 9B is a load/defection curve for a competitor's commercially-available Quick 4 leaching chamber. -
FIG. 10 is a perspective view of a leaching chamber having inspection port ends. -
FIG. 11 is a side view of theleaching chamber 100 ofFIG. 10 . -
FIG. 12 is a top view of theleaching chamber 100 ofFIG. 10 . -
FIGS. 13A-13B illustrate the interconnection of adjacent leaching chambers ofFIG. 10 . -
FIG. 14 is a cross-sectional diagram of nested chambers taken along line C-C in a valley corrugation ofFIG. 4 . - In a particular embodiment of the invention, the flexible arch-shaped corrugated structure is a plastic leaching chamber, which has an open bottom and louvered opening side walls for dispersing effluent from inside the structure to the ground. Leaching chambers can also be used to disperse storm water. Similar structures can be used in other applications as well, including grain aeration and fish channels. In other application, the side walls may not have louvered openings, such as in culverts.
-
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a particular leaching chamber. The leaching chamber 1 has an open bottom and is generally arch shaped with acenter axis 5. The chamber has a total length TL, a width W, and a height H. The leaching chamber 1 includes afirst end flange 10 at a first end and asecond end flange 20 at a second end. The first and 10, 20 are complementary so that thesecond end flanges first end flange 10 of one chamber can mate with thesecond end flange 20 of an adjacent chamber to form a serial chain of chambers for a leaching field as understood by those of ordinary skill in the art. - In particular, the ends of the leaching chamber can include end flanges that can be overlapped and locked with end flanges on adjacent leaching chambers. The end flanges 10, 20 are generally arched shaped in a vertical orientation. As shown, the
10, 20 feature a post and dome interconnect, which is described in more detail in U.S. Design Pat. No. 403,047, issued on Dec. 22, 1998 to Gray, the teaching of which are incorporated herein by reference. Aend flanges post structure 12 is located at the crest of thefirst end flange 10 and adome structure 22 is located at the crest of thesecond end flange 20. Thus, thesecond end flange 20 overlaps thefirst end flange 10 of adjacent chambers. Thefirst end flange 10 also includes latchinggrooves 14 and thesecond end flange 20 includes alip structure 24. - A
base flange 30 acts as feet for the leaching chamber 1. When installed, the base flange is set on the surface of a prepared trench. Anelevated flange 32 is fabricated on thebase flange 30 adjacent to the first (overlapped)end flange 10. When two like chambers are mated, thebase flange 30 adjacent to the second (overlapping)end flange 20 is received in the gap under theelevated flange 32. - The leaching chamber 1 also includes a plurality of alternating
peak corrugations 40 and valley corrugations ortroughs 50 along its length. The 40, 50 includecorrugations 45, 55 with opening louver features 140 having a height h for dispersing effluent or storm water from inside the chamber 1. The distal louvered corrugations are connected to therespective sidewalls 10, 20 via a firstrespective end flanges end transition corrugation 15 and a second end transition corrugation (not shown). - The louver features 140 are formed onto and follow the profile of the
40, 50. In particular the amount of material absent from the corrugation sidewalls due to the louver slots is replaced by a structural louver frame. In contrast, prior art louvers are generally formed by simply perforating the sidewall, which introduces a structural weakness in the corrugations.corrugations - Also shown is an
inspection port 60 located at the crest of a valley corrugation. When a leaching field is installed, selectedinspection ports 60 can be cut out for later access. It should be understood that the number and position of access ports can be a design choice. -
FIG. 2 is a top view of the leaching chamber 1 ofFIG. 1 . The laying length LL of the chamber is defined as the longitudinal distance between the centers of thepost structure 12 and thedome structure 22. This view better illustrates the firstend transition corrugation 15 and the secondend transition corrugation 25. Also note that the corrugations do not have a fixed contour. Also note that there is no external ribbing between corrugations, as is frequently used in prior art leaching chambers. Internal ribbing between corrugations is also not used. - This view also illustrates
tabs 34 on the second end of thebase flange 30. As will be illustrated below, the structure of the ends permits interconnected chambers to articulate or swivel a through a small angle so that a series of interconnected chambers can follow a non-linear path. Other swivel connectors can also be used, such as those described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,592,293 to Gray, U.S. Pat. No. 6,592,293 to Hedstrom et al. and in co-pending U.S. application Ser. No. 10/619,060 by Hedstrom et al., the teachings of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. Of course, non-swivel connecting joints can also be employed. - The latching
grooves 14 on thefirst end flange 10 and thelip 24 on thesecond end flange 20 are used to connect end caps to terminate a series of chambers. -
FIG. 3 is a first end view of the leaching chamber 1 ofFIG. 1 . In addition to illustrating the arch shape along thecenter line 5 and thepost connector structure 12, details of thepeak corrugation louvers 140 are shown. Note that thelouvers 140 include 142 a, 142 b, . . . , 142 y, 142 z. Those louver members protrude from the corrugation side wall.louver members -
FIG. 4 is a right side view of the leaching chamber 1 ofFIG. 1 . This view further illustrates the contours of the corrugations and details of the ends. - As shown, the leaching chamber 1 includes a series of vertically-oriented arched corrugations having surfaces that convexly arch or curve upwardly as well as laterally. The side walls of the leaching chamber between the corrugations can include louvers for allowing the passage of liquids from the leaching chamber. In addition, the corrugations can also include louvers with louver members that laterally extend across the laterally curving surfaces of the corrugations, resulting in laterally oriented arched louver members.
- Having both upward and lateral arched or curved features on the corrugations can provide increased strength to the corrugations and the leaching chamber. The corrugations can have sidewalls having flat surfaces. The lateral arch of the louver members on the laterally curving surfaces of the corrugations can also have increased strength for resisting the lateral thrust of backfill and can have increased leaching surface area, in comparison to louvers that are merely straight.
-
FIG. 5 is a second end view of the leaching chamber 1 ofFIG. 1 . In addition to illustrating the arch shape along thecenter line 5 and thedome connector structure 22, details of thepeak corrugation louvers 140 are shown. As shown inFIG. 3 , thelouvers 140 include 142 a, 142 b, . . . , 142 y, 142 z. Again, those louver members protrude from the corrugation side wall.louver members -
FIGS. 6A-6B illustrate the interconnection of adjacent leaching chambers ofFIG. 1 . As shown afirst chamber 1A and asecond chamber 1B interconnect by overlapping end flanges. As shown inFIG. 6A , thefirst chamber 1A is installed in place with itsfirst end flanges 10A exposed. Thesecond chamber 1B is installed by placing itssecond end flange 20B over thefirst end flange 10A of thefirst chamber 1B, with thedome structure 22B aligned over the post structure (not shown) of thefirst chamber 1A. Note that thesecond chamber 1B is elevated at a vertical angle. As shown inFIG. 6B , the interconnection is completed by tilting thesecond chamber 1B down so that the second chamber base flange 30B is received under the elevated flange 32A of thefirst chamber 1A. Note that the joint, particularly the gap below the elevated flange 32A, allows for articulated movement of the connected chambers. Latches or other suitable engageable structures on the ends of the leaching chambers can be used to help hold the mated chambers together. - Although two like leaching
1A, 1B are shown being mated, other structures can also be mated with a leaching chamber. For example, one or more angle couplers, similar to those described in the above-referenced U.S. Pat. No. 6,592,293 to Hedstrom et al., can be serially attached to a leaching chamber.chambers -
FIG. 7 is a cross-sectional view along line A-A ofFIG. 4 . This illustrates a typical peakcorrugation louver structure 140 and valley corrugation louver structure 52 ofFIG. 1 . Referring to the peakcorrugation louver structure 140, abase louver 142 a transitions into thebase flange 30 and atop louver 142 z extends from the main corrugation sidewall. Between thebase louver 142 a and thetop louver 142 z are a plurality of interior louvers, of which the two adjacent to thebase louver 142 a and thetop louver 142 z are shown. Thelouvers 140 are designed to allow flow of effluent or storm water from within the chamber and to inhibit backfill from entering the chamber. - The
first louver 142 a and the 142 b, 142 y includes ainterior louvers 144 a, 144 b, 144 y along the inside of their top surfaces 146 a, 146 b, 146 y. The top louver surfaces 146 run parallel to therespective lip base flange 30. The lips 144 extend above the top louver surface 146 by a first distance d1 and are separated from the next louver by a second distance d2. - The bottom surfaces 48 of the
142 b, 142 y and theinterior louvers top louver 142 z run at an angle Θ1 relative to the adjacent top louver surfaces 146 a, 146 y. The bottom surfaces 148 are thus separated from the prior louver top surface 146 by a third distance d3. The interior louvers have an inside height of d4, including the lip, and an outside height of d5. As shown, the louvers have an inside-to-outside width d6, which is greater than the thickness of the side wall. - In a specific embodiment, the chamber wall thickness is nominally 0.10 inches. For the louvers, d1 is 0.030 inches, d2 is 0.110 inches, d3 is 0.152 inches, d4 is 0.130 inches, d5 is 0.083 inches, d6 is 0.250 inches (including the sidewall thickness) when measured perpendicular to the arch, and Θ1 is 4.0 degrees. Other dimensions can be substituted to meet other engineering requirements. For example, although the louver surfaces is offset and extends from the corrugation side walls by about 0.15 inches, other approaches to the infiltration structures could be used.
-
FIG. 8 is a foreshortened cross-sectional view along line B-B ofFIG. 4 . The view shows a representative horizontal cross-section of a peak and valley corrugation. - The particular arc of the
peak corrugation 40 is continuously variable from the bottom of the corrugation to the crest. The peak corrugation is, in particular, a linear blended surface between the horizontal plane (at the base flange 30) and the vertical plane (at the crest of the chamber arch). More specifically, the arc is only measurable as a radius (but still variable) if the corrugation is sectioned perpendicular to the chamber's arch. In the illustrated view, the curve is an incidental ellipse. Also, when sectioned horizontally as shown, the thickness of the louvers is variable. If a cross-section were taken perpendicular to the chamber arch (i.e. passing through the center axis 5 (FIG. 1 )), then the louver thickness would be equal to d6 (FIG. 7 ). - The laterally curving surfaces of the corrugations has a radius that becomes smaller with an increase in elevation, starting at the bottom on a lateral plane and ending at the top on a vertical plane. That change in dimensions results in corrugations having portions that are larger at the bottom and smaller at the top. The larger corrugation portion at the bottom can provide greater strength for resisting backfill. The radius blends into the side walls of the corrugations, which can be slightly angled for strength purposes. Again, note that the louvers protruded from the corrugations.
- Particular chambers can have a peak corrugation profile that is similar to a successful pipe profile disclosed on U.S. Pat. No. 6,644,357 to Goddard, the teachings of which are incorporated herein by reference. Unlike a pipe, however, the chamber does not require a fixed diameter. Instead, the particular peak corrugations have an arch-shape that is larger in diameter at the base than at the crest.
- As shown in
FIG. 8 , thepeak corrugations 40 and the valley corrugations 50 have respective louvered opening features 140, 150. Note that the louver features is a formed feature that follows the contour of the corrugations. This shaping of the louvers increases the amount of open area provided at the corrugations. - At the
peak corrugation 40, thelouver feature 140 includes a protrudingframe 148 andcenter support member 149. In particular, the approximate amount of sidewall material removed to form the open areas between the louvers in the peak corrugation is replaced by material in theframe 148 andcenter support 149. The valley corrugations 50 have similar louver features 150. Although the valley corrugations 50 have center supports 159, outer support is provided by the sidewall itself 158. Also shown is abrace 157 for base of the valleylouver center support 159. In a particular embodiment, theframe 148 and center supports 149, 159 have a thickness equal to the thickness of the louvers, d6 (FIG. 7 ). - In a particular embodiment of the above-described leaching chamber 1, the leaching chamber has a total length (TL) of 63.16 inches, a laying length (LL) of 60.00 inches, a width (W) of 34.50 inches, a height (H) of 13.00 inches, and a height to the highest louver opening (h) of 7.13 inches. The overall chamber weighs about 15.3 pounds. With respect to the above-referenced U.S. Pat. No. 6,644,357, the peak corrugations have a 36-inch pipe profile at its base and transitions to a 24-inch pipe profile at its crest.
- Further dimensions are given in Table 1, below.
TABLE 1 Chamber Volume (Lay Length) 13896.4 Sq. In. Total Bottom Area 2070.00 Sq. In. Open Bottom Area 1747.32 Sq. In. Footprint Area 322.68 Sq. In. Sidewall Infiltration Surface Area 462.77 Sq. In. Chamber Volume per Linear Foot 2779.28 Cu. In. Total Bottom Area per Linear Foot 414.00 Sq. In. Open Bottom Area per Linear Foot 349.46 Sq. In. Footprint Area per Linear Foot 64.54 Sq. In. Sidewall Infiltration Surface Area per Linear Foot 92.55 Sq. In. Total Infiltration Surface 442.02 Sq. In. - A leaching chamber manufactured in accordance with the above disclosure (ARC-36 H-10) has been compared with samples of other low-weight commercially-available leaching chambers. The results between the ARC-36 H-10 embodiment and the Quick 4 chamber from Infiltrator Systems, Inc. are summarized in Table 2, below:
TABLE 2 ARC-36 H-10 Quick 4 LL × W × H 60.0 × 35.5 × 12.5 46.5 × 33.5 × 13.0 inches inches Weight (lbs) 15.3 12.5 3% Deflection 1320 lbs 254 lbs 6% Deflection 3446 lbs 1015 lbs 12% Deflection 5573 lbs 5287 lbs 25% Deflection 2573 lbs 3247 lbs Maximum Load 5573 lbs 6509 lbs Failure Point 12.0% 19.6% Sidewall Thickness 0.091-0.099 inch 0.092-0.106 inch Range
Note that the disclosed ARC-36 chamber resists loads much better than the competing products. It requires 5 times the load of the Quick 4 chamber to deflect 3% and over 3 times the load to deflect 6%.
For the ARC-36, the first failure point occurs when the crown buckles.
In the Quick 4 product, there are preliminary failures before the chamber fails. The distinctions are illustrated by load/deflection curves.
-
FIG. 9A is a load/defection curve for the ARC-36 chamber of Table 2. The curve was plotted from actual measurement data. Note that up until the failure point A1 at 5573 pounds, the load/deflection curve is smooth. Even after the failure point, the curve remains smooth before leveling off. This indicates that, even after buckling, the chamber remains as a integral structure. -
FIG. 9B is a load/deflection curve for the Quick 4 chamber of Table 2. Again, the curve was plotted from actual measurement data. The Quick 4 chamber fails at a load of 6509 pounds at point Q1, but there is an earlier break at about 5500 pounds at point Q2. After the main failure, the curve falls off sharply and reveals further breaks at least at points Q3, Q4, Q5, Q6, and Q7, indicating that the chamber has lost structural integrity. - While the above-disclosed leaching chamber operates well for its intended purpose, it requires a trench width of at least 36 inches. Some localities require narrower trenches, such as 24 inches or 18 inches. As narrow chambers where designed, it was found that the location of the inspection port in the body of the chamber tended to weaken the chamber. To solve that problem, the inspection port was moved from the body of the chamber to the ends.
-
FIG. 10 is a perspective view of a leaching chamber having inspection port ends. Like the leaching chamber 1 ofFIGS. 1-8 , theleaching chamber 100 has an open bottom and is generally arch shaped with acenter axis 105. The chamber has a total length TL′, a width W′, and a height H′. Theleaching chamber 100 includes afirst end flange 110 at a first end and asecond end flange 120 at a second end. The first and 110, 120 are complementary so that thesecond end flanges first end flange 110 of one chamber can mate with thesecond end flange 120 of an adjacent chamber. - The
first end flange 110 includes a firstinspection port structure 112 at the crest of the arch and thesecond end flange 120 includes asecond inspection port 122 at the crest of the arch. Access to the interior of an installed leaching field is attained by cutting out one of more inspection ports. It should be recognized that thefirst inspection port 112 functions as a post and thesecond inspection port 122 functions as a dome in a post-dome configuration. That is, when two chambers are mated, thesecond inspection port 122 of one chamber overlaps thefirst inspection port 112 of another chamber. - Because the inspection ports are circular structures, the mated chambers can pivot about the mated
112, 122 though a fixed angular range.inspection ports -
FIG. 11 is a side view of theleaching chamber 100 ofFIG. 10 . Except for structural differences to accommodate the inspection ports, thechamber 100 is similar to the chamber 1 ofFIGS. 1-8 . The laying length LL′ of the chamber is defined as the longitudinal distance between the centers of thefirst inspection port 112 and thesecond inspection port 122. - Note that the
inspection port structure 112 at the first end is disposed on a larger lengthfirst end flange 110 as compared to the leaching chamber ofFIG. 1 . That additional span if repeated at the opposite end could introduce a weakness into the joint. To counteract that possibility, there is a peak corrugation at the second end that is intersected by the secondinspection port structure 122. That corrugation adds strength to the joint without the need for a structural rib. -
FIG. 12 is a top view of theleaching chamber 100 ofFIG. 10 . Note that thefirst end 132 of thebase flange 130 is contoured to receive asecond end 134 of anotherbase flange 130. The received second end is held in place bytabs 116 extending from thefirst end flange 110. -
FIGS. 13A-13B illustrate the interconnection of adjacent leaching chambers ofFIG. 10 . Note that assembly is similar to that shown inFIGS. 6A-6B , except that thepost 12 is replaced by a first (overlapped)inspection port 112 and thedome 22 is replaced by a second (overlapping)inspection port 122. To access the interior of the chamber, the mated 112, 122 are cut out.inspection ports - In a particular embodiment of the above-described
leaching chamber 100, the leaching chamber has a total length (TL′) of 67.25 inches, a laying length (LL′) of 60.00 inches, a width (W) of 22.00 inches, a height (H) of 11.623 inches. Note that the resulting 22-inch chamber is nearly as tall as the previously described 36-inch chamber, which results in a more favorable arch profile. - It should be understood that the dimensions given above are approximate or nominal dimensions, which can vary due to changes in material properties or manufacturing techniques. The performance of the manufactured product can be enhanced by designing for even distribution of plastic throughout the part. In a particular embodiment, the actual sidewall thickness varies by less than 10% of the maximum thickness.
- The chambers are typically shipped from a factory to a distribution center by being stacked on pallets. It is advantageous to stack many chambers on a single pallet. The rigidity of prior art leaching chambers can cause breakage during transport. It is not unusual for 10% of prior art chambers on a pallet to be cracked during shipment. The flexibility and profile of the above-disclosed chambers allows them to be more reliably transported, and in greater numbers per pallet.
-
FIG. 14 is a cross-sectional diagram of nested chambers taken along line C-C in a valley corrugation ofFIG. 4 . As shown, two 1A, 1B are stacked, such as for shipping or storage. Each valley corrugation includes a pair of stackingchambers 162A, 162B extending downward from the underside of the corrugation and a pair of stacking pockets 164A, 164B on the topside of the corrugation. As shown, the stackingcolumns 162A, 162B are tube shaped and can be longer than the distance separating the surface of the peak corrugations from the surface of the valley corrugations. The stacking pockets 164A, 164B are delimited from the corrugation surface by acolumns rail 166A, 166B formed into the corrugation. When stacked, the bottom of the top stackingcolumn 162B rests in a respective pocket 164A of the nextlower chamber 1A, with therail 166A guiding and holding thecolumn 162B in the pocket 164A. - Because the arch shape and corrugations decrease in size away from the base, the chambers can be closely stacked. The stacking pockets 164 guide the columns 162 so that they are vertically aligned. With a pallet suitably constructed to transfer the column load to the pallet, a stack of at least 60 chambers can be shipped without damage. Even if the load is not directly transferred, the only chamber that typically suffers damage is the bottom chamber, which carries the load of all chambers above it, and generally only when the plastic is exposed to sufficient heat to weaken its stacking pocket 164.
- The flexibility of the above-disclosed chambers also reduces the risk of damage due to rough handling of individual chambers. Instead of resisting twisting and bending forces, which can break prior art chambers, the above-disclosed chambers move with the forces by flexing. While the corrugations themselves are strong, the chamber can flex around its center axis. In particular, the chamber can be easily twisted so that the opposing ends are at about 45 degrees relative to each other. Once the forces are removed, the chamber returns to its nominal shape.
- While particular embodiments of the leaching chambers are injection molded from high density polyethylene (HDPE), other manufacturing techniques can be used. In addition, the leaching chambers can be fabricated from another suitable polymer, such as polypropylene, or another material, such as concrete, metal, or ceramics, or combinations of materials.
- While this invention has been shown and described with references to particular embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and details may be made to the detailed embodiments without departing from the scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
Claims (40)
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US11/462,671 US20070081860A1 (en) | 2005-08-10 | 2006-08-04 | Flexible arch-shaped corrugated structure |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US70749005P | 2005-08-10 | 2005-08-10 | |
| US11/462,671 US20070081860A1 (en) | 2005-08-10 | 2006-08-04 | Flexible arch-shaped corrugated structure |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| US20070081860A1 true US20070081860A1 (en) | 2007-04-12 |
Family
ID=37594927
Family Applications (2)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| US11/462,678 Abandoned US20070077122A1 (en) | 2005-08-10 | 2006-08-04 | Leaching chamber having joint with access port |
| US11/462,671 Abandoned US20070081860A1 (en) | 2005-08-10 | 2006-08-04 | Flexible arch-shaped corrugated structure |
Family Applications Before (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| US11/462,678 Abandoned US20070077122A1 (en) | 2005-08-10 | 2006-08-04 | Leaching chamber having joint with access port |
Country Status (2)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (2) | US20070077122A1 (en) |
| WO (1) | WO2007021715A2 (en) |
Cited By (10)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WO2009102855A3 (en) * | 2008-02-13 | 2009-10-29 | Contech Stormwater Solutions Inc. | Plastic detention chamber for stormwater runoff and related system and methods |
| US20100078367A1 (en) * | 2008-09-30 | 2010-04-01 | Robert Ronald Orom | Field relief reservoir for septic field system |
| US20100222662A1 (en) * | 2007-12-11 | 2010-09-02 | Searete Llc, A Limited Liability Corporation Of The State Of Delaware | Systems, devices, and methods including paramagnetic oscillation, rotation, and translation of hemozoin asymmetric nanoparticles in response to dark-field or Rheinberg detection of the presence of hemozoin |
| US20100329788A1 (en) * | 2009-06-29 | 2010-12-30 | Moore Jr Roy | Corrugated leaching chamber having wide peak corrugations |
| US10544575B1 (en) * | 2018-07-03 | 2020-01-28 | Robert J. DiTullio | Water storage chamber connection system |
| US11795679B2 (en) | 2021-07-19 | 2023-10-24 | Prinsco, Inc. | Asymmetric leaching chamber for onsite wastewater management system |
| USD1036617S1 (en) | 2022-02-17 | 2024-07-23 | Prinsco, Inc. | Septic chamber end cap |
| USD1036616S1 (en) | 2022-02-17 | 2024-07-23 | Prinsco, Inc. | Septic chamber |
| USD1053304S1 (en) | 2022-02-17 | 2024-12-03 | Prinsco, Inc. | Septic chamber |
| USD1111128S1 (en) | 2024-01-23 | 2026-02-03 | Prinsce, Inc. | Septic chamber body |
Families Citing this family (15)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US8147688B2 (en) * | 2008-09-11 | 2012-04-03 | Contech Engineered Solutions LLC | Stormwater chamber detention system |
| US8672583B1 (en) | 2009-06-05 | 2014-03-18 | Stormtech Llc | Corrugated stormwater chamber having sub-corrugations |
| US9255394B2 (en) | 2009-06-05 | 2016-02-09 | Stormtech Llc | Corrugated stormwater chamber having sub-corrugations |
| US8414222B2 (en) * | 2010-06-11 | 2013-04-09 | Robert J. DiTullio | Riser assembly for water storage chambers |
| US9145769B2 (en) * | 2011-07-11 | 2015-09-29 | Michael Hall Lee | Underground mining rib support system and method |
| US9809968B1 (en) * | 2014-08-28 | 2017-11-07 | Infiltrator Water Technologies, Llc | Leaching chamber having sidewall with tenced louvers |
| US9580899B2 (en) * | 2015-06-18 | 2017-02-28 | Rotondo Environmental Solutions, Llc | Storm-pod system for collecting and utilizing storm water |
| CN105714925A (en) * | 2015-12-31 | 2016-06-29 | 武汉美华禹水环境有限公司 | Arched composite material water storage module |
| US10364563B1 (en) * | 2017-01-06 | 2019-07-30 | Thomas Florence | Runoff water management system |
| WO2018218300A1 (en) | 2017-06-02 | 2018-12-06 | Michael John Wynne | Improved liquid run-off disposal system |
| CN107268758A (en) * | 2017-08-08 | 2017-10-20 | 高红俊 | Arch rainwater-collecting chamber |
| US11377835B2 (en) * | 2018-07-27 | 2022-07-05 | Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc. | End caps for stormwater chambers and methods of making same |
| CN113453859A (en) * | 2018-12-14 | 2021-09-28 | 史东翠普有限责任公司 | Module and assembly for underground fluid management for shallow applications |
| DE102020105558A1 (en) * | 2020-03-02 | 2021-09-02 | Faserverbund Innovations UG (haftungsbeschränkt) | Resin pipe formed from a corrugated pipe |
| US12352032B2 (en) | 2022-04-15 | 2025-07-08 | Eljen Corporation | Chamber for subsoil fluid treatment |
Citations (8)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US4759661A (en) * | 1987-02-27 | 1988-07-26 | Infiltrator Systems Inc | Leaching system conduit |
| US6270287B1 (en) * | 1995-07-19 | 2001-08-07 | Psa, Inc. | Leaching chamber |
| US20020025226A1 (en) * | 2000-08-25 | 2002-02-28 | Maestro Robert M. | Stormwater dispensing chamber |
| US20020044833A1 (en) * | 2000-05-05 | 2002-04-18 | Kruger Kurt J. | Stormwater management system |
| US6375388B1 (en) * | 2000-03-17 | 2002-04-23 | Zoeller Company | Affluent distribution system capable of being horizontally offset or curved |
| US6644357B2 (en) * | 2001-11-09 | 2003-11-11 | Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc. | Corrugated pipe with improved profile stability |
| US20040042855A1 (en) * | 2002-08-27 | 2004-03-04 | Benecke Arnold G. | Coupling structure for a leaching chamber |
| US20050074288A1 (en) * | 2003-10-01 | 2005-04-07 | Moore Roy E. | Ergonomic size leaching chamber |
Family Cites Families (7)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US3645100A (en) * | 1970-01-16 | 1972-02-29 | Rotondo & Sons Inc A | Leaching chamber unit for soil absorption system |
| US4192628A (en) * | 1978-05-12 | 1980-03-11 | Gorman Edward D | Flow distributor for leaching fields |
| US4245924A (en) * | 1978-12-07 | 1981-01-20 | Hancor, Inc. | Arch conduit |
| US5441363A (en) * | 1994-04-29 | 1995-08-15 | Gray; Terrance H. | Leaching chamber |
| US5498104A (en) * | 1994-04-29 | 1996-03-12 | Gray; Terrance H. | Leaching chamber |
| USD403047S (en) * | 1997-01-16 | 1998-12-22 | Gray Terrance H | Post and dome interconnect for leaching chambers |
| US6592293B1 (en) * | 2000-09-15 | 2003-07-15 | Psa, Inc. | Adjustable angle coupler for leaching chamber systems |
-
2006
- 2006-08-04 US US11/462,678 patent/US20070077122A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2006-08-04 WO PCT/US2006/030978 patent/WO2007021715A2/en not_active Ceased
- 2006-08-04 US US11/462,671 patent/US20070081860A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (9)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US4759661A (en) * | 1987-02-27 | 1988-07-26 | Infiltrator Systems Inc | Leaching system conduit |
| US6270287B1 (en) * | 1995-07-19 | 2001-08-07 | Psa, Inc. | Leaching chamber |
| US6375388B1 (en) * | 2000-03-17 | 2002-04-23 | Zoeller Company | Affluent distribution system capable of being horizontally offset or curved |
| US20020044833A1 (en) * | 2000-05-05 | 2002-04-18 | Kruger Kurt J. | Stormwater management system |
| US20020025226A1 (en) * | 2000-08-25 | 2002-02-28 | Maestro Robert M. | Stormwater dispensing chamber |
| US6361248B1 (en) * | 2000-08-25 | 2002-03-26 | Robert M. Maestro | Stormwater dispensing chamber |
| US6644357B2 (en) * | 2001-11-09 | 2003-11-11 | Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc. | Corrugated pipe with improved profile stability |
| US20040042855A1 (en) * | 2002-08-27 | 2004-03-04 | Benecke Arnold G. | Coupling structure for a leaching chamber |
| US20050074288A1 (en) * | 2003-10-01 | 2005-04-07 | Moore Roy E. | Ergonomic size leaching chamber |
Cited By (13)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20100222662A1 (en) * | 2007-12-11 | 2010-09-02 | Searete Llc, A Limited Liability Corporation Of The State Of Delaware | Systems, devices, and methods including paramagnetic oscillation, rotation, and translation of hemozoin asymmetric nanoparticles in response to dark-field or Rheinberg detection of the presence of hemozoin |
| WO2009102855A3 (en) * | 2008-02-13 | 2009-10-29 | Contech Stormwater Solutions Inc. | Plastic detention chamber for stormwater runoff and related system and methods |
| US8491224B2 (en) | 2008-02-13 | 2013-07-23 | Contech Engineered Solutions LLC | Plastic detention chamber for stormwater runoff and related system and methods |
| AU2009214692B2 (en) * | 2008-02-13 | 2014-10-30 | Contech Engineered Solutions LLC | Plastic detention chamber for stormwater runoff and related system and methods |
| US20100078367A1 (en) * | 2008-09-30 | 2010-04-01 | Robert Ronald Orom | Field relief reservoir for septic field system |
| US20100329788A1 (en) * | 2009-06-29 | 2010-12-30 | Moore Jr Roy | Corrugated leaching chamber having wide peak corrugations |
| US10544575B1 (en) * | 2018-07-03 | 2020-01-28 | Robert J. DiTullio | Water storage chamber connection system |
| US10662635B2 (en) | 2018-07-03 | 2020-05-26 | Robert J. DiTullio | Water storage chamber connection system |
| US11795679B2 (en) | 2021-07-19 | 2023-10-24 | Prinsco, Inc. | Asymmetric leaching chamber for onsite wastewater management system |
| USD1036617S1 (en) | 2022-02-17 | 2024-07-23 | Prinsco, Inc. | Septic chamber end cap |
| USD1036616S1 (en) | 2022-02-17 | 2024-07-23 | Prinsco, Inc. | Septic chamber |
| USD1053304S1 (en) | 2022-02-17 | 2024-12-03 | Prinsco, Inc. | Septic chamber |
| USD1111128S1 (en) | 2024-01-23 | 2026-02-03 | Prinsce, Inc. | Septic chamber body |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| WO2007021715A9 (en) | 2007-05-24 |
| WO2007021715A3 (en) | 2008-08-21 |
| WO2007021715A2 (en) | 2007-02-22 |
| US20070077122A1 (en) | 2007-04-05 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US20070081860A1 (en) | Flexible arch-shaped corrugated structure | |
| US6270287B1 (en) | Leaching chamber | |
| US9885171B2 (en) | Corrugated stormwater chamber having sub-corrugations | |
| US11242677B2 (en) | Corrugated stormwater chamber having sub-corrugations | |
| EP2449179B1 (en) | Corrugated leaching chambers having pillars and wide peak corrugations | |
| US5498104A (en) | Leaching chamber | |
| US5441363A (en) | Leaching chamber | |
| US7716879B2 (en) | Window well | |
| US9016979B1 (en) | Plastic stormwater chamber made from separately molded half chambers | |
| MX2010008956A (en) | Plastic detention chamber for stormwater runoff and related system and methods. | |
| US20050106347A1 (en) | Interlocked strip structure | |
| US11795679B2 (en) | Asymmetric leaching chamber for onsite wastewater management system | |
| US20240368873A1 (en) | End caps for stormwater chambers and methods of making same | |
| US7473053B1 (en) | Arch shape cross section chamber having corrugations with flattened web segments | |
| US7419332B1 (en) | Leaching chamber with strengthened dome end | |
| US20110020065A1 (en) | Leaching chamber having pillars and wide peak corrugations | |
| US20220205232A1 (en) | Corrugated stormwater chamber having sub-corrugations | |
| US7475791B2 (en) | Toroidal tank | |
| JP3099044B2 (en) | U-shaped groove for easy connection |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| AS | Assignment |
Owner name: ADVANCED DRAINAGE SYSTEMS, INC., OHIO Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:GODDARD, JAMES B.;HELMRICH, STEPHEN R.;BIRCHLER, TERRY M.;REEL/FRAME:024920/0972 Effective date: 20061212 |
|
| AS | Assignment |
Owner name: PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, PENNSYLVANIA Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNORS:ADVANCED DRAINAGE SYSTEMS, INC.;ADS WORLDWIDE, INC.;PSA, INC.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:025039/0556 Effective date: 20100924 |
|
| AS | Assignment |
Owner name: PSA, INC., OHIO Free format text: RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION;REEL/FRAME:027544/0496 Effective date: 20120117 Owner name: HANCOR, INC., OHIO Free format text: RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION;REEL/FRAME:027544/0496 Effective date: 20120117 Owner name: ADVANCED DRAINAGE SYSTEMS, INC., OHIO Free format text: RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION;REEL/FRAME:027544/0496 Effective date: 20120117 Owner name: ISI POLYETHYLENE SOLUTIONS, LLC, CONNECTICUT Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:ADVANCED DRAINAGE SYSTEMS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:027542/0994 Effective date: 20120117 |
|
| AS | Assignment |
Owner name: GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORATION, ILLINOIS Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:ISI POLYETHYLENE SOLUTIONS, LLC;REEL/FRAME:027618/0271 Effective date: 20120127 |
|
| STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |
|
| AS | Assignment |
Owner name: ADVANCED DRAINAGE OF OHIO, INC., OHIO Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION;REEL/FRAME:030610/0221 Effective date: 20130612 Owner name: ADS WORLDWIDE, INC., OHIO Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION;REEL/FRAME:030610/0221 Effective date: 20130612 Owner name: ADS STRUCTURES, INC., OHIO Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION;REEL/FRAME:030610/0221 Effective date: 20130612 Owner name: HANCOR INTERNATIONAL, INC., OHIO Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION;REEL/FRAME:030610/0221 Effective date: 20130612 Owner name: ADVANCED DRAINAGE SYSTEMS, INC., OHIO Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION;REEL/FRAME:030610/0221 Effective date: 20130612 Owner name: SPARTAN CONCRETE, INC., OHIO Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION;REEL/FRAME:030610/0221 Effective date: 20130612 Owner name: STORMTECH LLC, OHIO Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION;REEL/FRAME:030610/0221 Effective date: 20130612 Owner name: HANCOR, INC., OHIO Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION;REEL/FRAME:030610/0221 Effective date: 20130612 Owner name: ADS VENTURES, INC., OHIO Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION;REEL/FRAME:030610/0221 Effective date: 20130612 Owner name: SEWER TAP, INC., OHIO Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION;REEL/FRAME:030610/0221 Effective date: 20130612 Owner name: PSA, INC., OHIO Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION;REEL/FRAME:030610/0221 Effective date: 20130612 Owner name: MEDIA PLUS, INC., OHIO Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION;REEL/FRAME:030610/0221 Effective date: 20130612 Owner name: ADS INTERNATIONAL, INC., OHIO Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION;REEL/FRAME:030610/0221 Effective date: 20130612 Owner name: HANCOR HOLDING CORPORATION, OHIO Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION;REEL/FRAME:030610/0221 Effective date: 20130612 |
|
| AS | Assignment |
Owner name: EZFLOW, L.P., CONNECTICUT Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:035745/0534 Effective date: 20150528 Owner name: INFILTRATOR SYSTEMS, INC., CONNECTICUT Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:035745/0534 Effective date: 20150528 Owner name: ISI POLYETHYLENE SOLUTIONS, LLC, CONNECTICUT Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:035745/0534 Effective date: 20150528 |