US20060194023A1 - Algae resistant shingle - Google Patents
Algae resistant shingle Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20060194023A1 US20060194023A1 US11/066,644 US6664405A US2006194023A1 US 20060194023 A1 US20060194023 A1 US 20060194023A1 US 6664405 A US6664405 A US 6664405A US 2006194023 A1 US2006194023 A1 US 2006194023A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- roofing material
- metallic particles
- asphalt coating
- algae
- granules
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
- 241000195493 Cryptophyta Species 0.000 title claims abstract description 72
- 239000013528 metallic particle Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 146
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 100
- 239000010426 asphalt Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 91
- 239000011248 coating agent Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 85
- 238000000576 coating method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 85
- 239000008187 granular material Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 57
- 239000000758 substrate Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 19
- 230000012010 growth Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 11
- 239000002344 surface layer Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 11
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 claims description 40
- RYGMFSIKBFXOCR-UHFFFAOYSA-N Copper Chemical compound [Cu] RYGMFSIKBFXOCR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 39
- 229910052802 copper Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 33
- 239000010949 copper Substances 0.000 claims description 33
- 230000002401 inhibitory effect Effects 0.000 claims description 30
- 229910000881 Cu alloy Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 4
- 244000005700 microbiome Species 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000002028 premature Effects 0.000 abstract description 2
- 230000002459 sustained effect Effects 0.000 abstract 1
- 241000233866 Fungi Species 0.000 description 9
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 7
- 239000012530 fluid Substances 0.000 description 7
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 description 7
- 229910052751 metal Inorganic materials 0.000 description 7
- 238000002386 leaching Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 4
- 229920005372 Plexiglas® Polymers 0.000 description 3
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000002845 discoloration Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000002538 fungal effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 3
- 235000019738 Limestone Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 239000000919 ceramic Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000007613 environmental effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000009616 inductively coupled plasma Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000006028 limestone Substances 0.000 description 2
- 125000006850 spacer group Chemical group 0.000 description 2
- 239000004575 stone Substances 0.000 description 2
- VVQNEPGJFQJSBK-UHFFFAOYSA-N Methyl methacrylate Chemical compound COC(=O)C(C)=C VVQNEPGJFQJSBK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- HCHKCACWOHOZIP-UHFFFAOYSA-N Zinc Chemical compound [Zn] HCHKCACWOHOZIP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000002353 algacidal effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000005791 algae growth Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000003619 algicide Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000007853 buffer solution Substances 0.000 description 1
- 125000000484 butyl group Chemical group [H]C([*])([H])C([H])([H])C([H])([H])C([H])([H])[H] 0.000 description 1
- 239000007931 coated granule Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000003086 colorant Substances 0.000 description 1
- 150000001875 compounds Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005260 corrosion Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007797 corrosion Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000779 depleting effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000011152 fibreglass Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000000855 fungicidal effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000417 fungicide Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229910001092 metal group alloy Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000007769 metal material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 150000001455 metallic ions Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 150000002739 metals Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 238000002310 reflectometry Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000565 sealant Substances 0.000 description 1
- BHZOKUMUHVTPBX-UHFFFAOYSA-M sodium acetic acid acetate Chemical compound [Na+].CC(O)=O.CC([O-])=O BHZOKUMUHVTPBX-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 1
- 238000010998 test method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000011701 zinc Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052725 zinc Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 150000003752 zinc compounds Chemical class 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E04—BUILDING
- E04D—ROOF COVERINGS; SKY-LIGHTS; GUTTERS; ROOF-WORKING TOOLS
- E04D1/00—Roof covering by making use of tiles, slates, shingles, or other small roofing elements
- E04D1/26—Strip-shaped roofing elements simulating a repetitive pattern, e.g. appearing as a row of shingles
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E04—BUILDING
- E04D—ROOF COVERINGS; SKY-LIGHTS; GUTTERS; ROOF-WORKING TOOLS
- E04D13/00—Special arrangements or devices in connection with roof coverings; Protection against birds; Roof drainage ; Sky-lights
- E04D13/002—Provisions for preventing vegetational growth, e.g. fungi, algae or moss
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E04—BUILDING
- E04D—ROOF COVERINGS; SKY-LIGHTS; GUTTERS; ROOF-WORKING TOOLS
- E04D1/00—Roof covering by making use of tiles, slates, shingles, or other small roofing elements
- E04D2001/005—Roof covering by making use of tiles, slates, shingles, or other small roofing elements the roofing elements having a granulated surface
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10T—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
- Y10T428/00—Stock material or miscellaneous articles
- Y10T428/24—Structurally defined web or sheet [e.g., overall dimension, etc.]
- Y10T428/24355—Continuous and nonuniform or irregular surface on layer or component [e.g., roofing, etc.]
- Y10T428/24372—Particulate matter
Definitions
- This invention relates to roofing materials. More particularly, the invention pertains to asphalt roofing shingles having an application of metallic particles applied to the asphalt base material to provide algae resistance to the roofing shingle.
- Asphalt-based roofing materials such as roofing shingles, are installed on the roofs of buildings to provide protection from the elements.
- the roofing material is constructed of a substrate, an asphalt coating on the substrate, and a surface layer of granules embedded in the asphalt coating.
- algae, fungus, and other types of microorganisms often grow on the exposed surfaces of the roofing material.
- This algae and fungus growth is particularly prevalent in the southeastern Gulf Coast area of the United States, and has recently become increasingly prevalent in the northern and midwest regions of the United States.
- This algae and/or fungal growth leads to a discoloring of the exposed roofing material surfaces.
- the discoloration begins as dark spots of algae/fungus that develop into dark streaks and eventually cover a majority of the roof.
- the discoloration generally occurs over a period of years. For example, in southeastern regions of the United States, the discoloration generally becomes visible during the second or third year after the roofing shingles have been applied. This discoloring is particularly noticeable and unsightly on white or light-colored roofing materials, which are often used in warm and humid climates because of their aesthetic and sun reflectivity properties.
- metallic granules on the surface of the roofing material.
- the metallic granules are generally either composed primarily of or coated with a coating containing copper and/or other metals such as zinc.
- the copper and zinc compounds leach out from the roofing material and act as algaecides and/or fungicides to inhibit the growth of the algae and/or fungus.
- the metallic materials and compounds used to provide the algae and/or fungal resistance are generally very expensive and can often undesirably increase the cost of the roofing material. Additionally, the metallic granules on the roofing material are often not aesthetically pleasing because they are highly reflective and appear shiny on the surface of the roofing material. Hence, there is a need for an improved, less expensive algae resistant roofing material.
- the above objects as well as other objects not specifically enumerated are achieved by asphalt roofing shingles having an application of metallic particles applied to the asphalt base material to provide algae resistance to the roofing shingle.
- the algae resistant asphalt-based roofing material includes at least a portion that is normally exposed when the roofing material is installed on a roof.
- the exposed portion of the roofing material is comprised of a substrate coated with an asphalt coating.
- the asphalt coating includes an upper surface that is positioned above the substrate when the roofing material is installed on the roof. A surface layer of granules is adhered to the asphalt coating.
- An application of metallic particles having a component that inhibits the growth of algae is applied to the upper surface of the asphalt coating.
- the metallic particles are applied such that greater than fifty percent of the metallic particles are covered by the asphalt coating or by the granules, or by both the asphalt coating and the granules.
- the metallic particles are preferably applied to the roofing material at a rate that provides the algae inhibiting component of the metallic particles in an amount within the range of from about 0.05 pounds per square to about 0.29 pounds per square of roofing material.
- the algae inhibiting component of the metallic particles is copper or a copper alloy.
- greater than ninety percent of the metallic particles applied to the asphalt coating have a particle geometry having an aspect ratio of less than or equal to 1.5.
- elongated copper-containing particles are applied to the upper surface of the asphalt coating.
- the copper-containing particles preferably have an aspect ratio within the range of from about 1.5 to about 200.
- a surface layer of granules is also adhered to the asphalt coating.
- FIG. 1 is a perspective view of the roofing shingle of the present invention.
- FIG. 2 is a cross-sectional view of the shingle portion of the roofing shingle taken along Line 2 - 2 in FIG. 1 .
- FIG. 3 is an enlarged cross-sectional view of a portion of the roofing shingle cross-section shown in FIG. 2 .
- FIG. 4 is a schematic view of an alternate embodiment of the present invention using chopped copper wire.
- FIG. 1 shows an algae resistant roofing shingle according to the present invention.
- the illustrated roofing shingle indicated generally at 10 , is in large measure conventional in the art and is intended merely to illustrate one environment in which this invention may be used.
- the scope of this invention is not intended to be limited for use with the specific structure for the roofing shingle 10 illustrated in FIG. 1 or with roofing shingles in general.
- this invention may be used in any desired environment for the purposes described below.
- any other roofing material such as roll roofing and commercial roofing, may also be formed according to the present invention.
- the roofing shingle 10 includes a headlap region 12 and a prime region 14 .
- the headlap region 12 of the shingle 10 is the portion of the shingle 10 that is covered by adjacent shingles when the shingle 10 is installed upon a roof.
- the prime region 14 of the shingle 10 is the portion of the shingle 10 that remains exposed when the shingle 10 is installed upon a roof.
- the prime region 14 is the portion of the shingle 10 where growth of fungus, algae, or other such microorganisms may occur.
- the shingle 10 may have any suitable dimensions.
- the shingle 10 may also be divided between the headlap region 12 and the prime region 14 in any suitable proportion. For example, a typical residential roofing shingle 10 is approximately three feet wide by one foot high, with the height dimension being equally divided between the headlap region 12 (six inches) and the prime region 14 (six inches).
- FIGS. 2 and 3 illustrate the composition of the shingle 10 of the present invention.
- the shingle 10 consists of a substrate material 20 that is coated with a coating material, indicated generally at 22 .
- An application of metallic particles 30 is applied to the coating material 22 .
- a surface layer of granules 32 is preferably applied over the metallic particles 30 and the coating material 22 .
- the substrate 20 can be any suitable material for receiving the asphalt coating 22 , such as fiberglass mat or organic felt material.
- the substrate material 20 is preferably coated with an asphalt coating, indicated generally at 22 . It will be appreciated that any suitable coating material other than asphalt may be used as well.
- the asphalt coating 22 includes an upper region 24 and a lower region 26 .
- the upper region 24 includes an upper surface 28 .
- the upper region 24 and upper surface 28 are positioned above the substrate 20 when the roofing material is installed on a roof.
- the lower region 26 is positioned below the substrate 20 when the roofing material is installed on a roof.
- An application of metallic particles 30 is applied to the upper surface 28 of the asphalt coating 22 .
- the metallic particles 30 are applied to provide the algae and/or fungal resistance to the shingle 10 .
- the metallic particles 30 may be formed from any suitable metal or metal alloy that provides an algae/fungus inhibiting component.
- the algae/fungus inhibiting component of the metallic particles 30 provides the appropriate algaecidal and/or fungicidal properties desired for the algae resistant shingle 10 .
- the algae inhibiting component of the metallic particles 30 consists essentially of copper or a copper alloy.
- the metallic particles 30 can be applied by any suitable mechanism, such as a vibratory feeder.
- a surface layer of granules 32 is applied to the top surface 28 of the asphalt coating 22 .
- the granules 32 can be any suitable material typically used in roofing material construction, such as limestone, ceramic coated limestone, or other stone or ceramic coated stone material.
- the granules 32 can be applied in any suitable manner to the top surface 28 of the asphalt coating 22 .
- the granules 32 may be applied in a single application.
- the granules may also be applied in a series of applications, such as blend drops and background granules, as is common practice when multiple colors of granules 32 are applied to the roofing shingle 10 .
- the metallic particles 30 are preferably pre-applied to the upper surface 28 of the asphalt coating 22 .
- the term “pre-applied”, as used herein, refers to the application of the metallic particles 30 to the asphalt coating 22 prior to the final application of the surface layer of granules 32 . It is preferable that the metallic particles 30 be applied directly to the upper surface 28 of the asphalt coating 22 prior to the application of any granules 32 . It will be appreciated, however, that it is also possible to apply the metallic particles 30 in conjunction with one or more of a series of granule 32 applications, provided that the metallic particles 30 are applied prior to the final application of the surface granules 32 .
- roofing shingle 10 must contain a suitable amount of metallic particles 30 to provide algae resistance as the shingle 10 erodes over time when it is installed on a roof.
- roofing shingles 10 may be manufactured to different specifications regarding the duration of protection desired.
- the desired duration of the algae resistance of the roofing shingle 10 of the present invention is preferably at least ten years, and preferably longer. It will be appreciated, however, that the roofing shingle 10 may have any suitable desired wear duration. Accordingly, it will also be appreciated that the composition of the shingle 10 may be adapted accordingly to obtain the desired duration of algae resistance.
- the amount of metallic particles 30 contained on the roofing shingle 10 contributes significantly to the overall cost of the roofing shingle 10 .
- a particular advantage of the present invention is that the amount of metallic particles 30 required on the roofing shingle 10 is minimized while still achieving the desired duration of algae resistance for the roofing shingle 10 .
- the metallic particles 30 provide algae/fungus protection because metallic ions from the algae inhibiting component of the metallic particles 30 are leached, or drawn out, from the roofing shingle 10 over time.
- the leach rate of the algae inhibiting component from the metallic particles 30 can be measured by the parts per million (ppm) of the algae inhibiting component present in a sample of moisture taken from a roofing shingle 10 installed on a roof. For purposes of this patent, this leach rate measurement is determined using a “dew test”.
- the dew test can be carried out in either a natural weathering environment or a simulated weathering environment. In a natural weathering environment, the dew test analyzes the concentration of the algae-inhibiting component of the metallic particles 30 dissolved in dew formed on the roofing shingles 10 during natural weathering.
- a trough is typically installed below the lower edge of a north-facing deck covered with the roofing material, which has a minimum runoff path of 4 feet and a pitch angle of 22 degrees.
- dew forms on the roofing material and runs off into the trough.
- the dew samples are collected in the morning hours (i.e. generally between 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 a.m.) before the dew evaporates from the roofing shingles 10 .
- the dew samples are collected from roofing shingles 10 that have been naturally weathered for a minimum of 6 months, and at least 10 collections of dew samples are collected and analyzed to determine the average algae inhibiting component concentration in the dew runoff.
- the dew runoff is preferably analyzed by inductively-coupled plasma analysis.
- the dew test used for purposes of this patent may also be carried out in a laboratory under simulated environmental conditions. Where simulated conditions are used, a sample is cut from a roofing shingle 10 .
- the dimensions of the roofing shingle sample are preferably approximately two inches by six inches.
- the shingle sample is placed face-up on a Plexiglas® plate. Thin strips of butyl tape sealant are placed around the edges of the sample, and six 3.2 millimeter spacers are placed at the corners and in the middle of each long dimension.
- a second Plexiglas® sheet fitted with flow ports located 1.375 inches from the opposite narrow edges of the sample is placed on top of the sample. The second Plexiglass sheet is pressed to the spacers and the two plates are then clamped together.
- the sample is thus enclosed in a watertight compartment which permits fluid to enter at one end, then allows a thin sheet-like flow of the fluid across the surface of the sample, and directs the fluid out the other end.
- This fluid flow simulates the natural weathering environment described above.
- These sample holders are hung vertically at room temperature and flow lines are connected to the inlet and outlet ports of the prepared sample. Fluid is pumped through the holders at a target rate of 19.4 milliliter per day, which corresponds to 0.30 milliliter per square centimeter per day.
- the fluid used is preferably a 0.1 N sodium acetate acetic acid pH 6.0 buffer solution.
- This fluid simulates the dew runoff that is collected by the natural environment dew test described above.
- the simulated dew runoff is collected periodically and analyzed for its concentration of the algae inhibiting component of the roofing shingles 10 .
- the simulated dew runoff is also preferably analyzed by inductively-coupled plasma analysis.
- the leach rate of the algae inhibiting component from the metallic particles 30 on the roofing shingle 10 must be sufficient to provide the shingle 10 with algae resistant characteristics without prematurely depleting the metallic particles 30 from the shingle 10 .
- the leach rate of the algae inhibiting component of the metallic particles 30 for the ten year algae-resistant roofing shingle 10 of the present invention is preferably within the range of from about 0.3 parts per million to about 1.0 parts per million as measured in dew runoff collected from the natural weathering environment.
- the leach rate measured from the simulated test may differ from the natural runoff due to the relative moisture content and environmental conditions, such as acidity, etc. It will also be appreciated that the leach rate can be any other suitable rate or range of rates as well. It will also be appreciated that the leach rate may be proportionally adjusted depending upon the desired duration of the algae resistance of the roofing shingle 10 .
- the leach rate of the metallic particles 30 can be affected by a number of design features of the roofing shingle 10 .
- One such factor is the percent of metallic particles 30 covered by the asphalt coating 22 and/or surface granules 32 .
- the metallic particles 30 are preferably applied such that a portion of the metallic particles 30 are covered by the asphalt coating 22 or by the granules 32 , and a portion is left exposed.
- the covering of the metallic particles 30 by the asphalt coating 22 and/or the granules 32 maximizes the useful life of the metallic particles 30 .
- the covering of the metallic particles 30 also prevents loss of the metallic particles 30 that may be caused by exposure to the elements, such as rain or hail.
- the covering of the metallic particles 30 helps lessen the undesirable effects of the metallic particles 30 on the aesthetics of the roofing shingle 10 .
- the term “covered by the asphalt coating”, as used herein, refers to any particle that is positioned below the top surface 28 of the asphalt coating 22 and encapsulated within the asphalt coating 22 .
- the term “covered by the asphalt coating” may also refer to metallic particles 30 that are covered partially by the asphalt coating 22 and partially by a granule or granules 32 applied over the metallic particles 30 .
- the term “covered by the Applicants coating” may also refer generally to metallic particles 30 that are not visible on the top surface 28 of the asphalt coating 22 .
- greater than fifty percent of the metallic particles 30 are covered by the asphalt coating 22 , the granules 32 , or by both the asphalt coating 22 and the granules 32 . In another embodiment, it is preferable that greater than seventy percent of the metallic particles 30 are covered by the asphalt coating 22 , the granules 32 , or by both the asphalt coating 22 and the granules 32 . In yet another embodiment, it is preferable that greater than ninety percent of the metallic particles 30 are covered by the asphalt coating 22 , the granules 32 , or by both the asphalt coating 22 and the granules 32 .
- the percentage of metallic particles 30 covered by the asphalt coating 22 or the granules 32 affects the leach rate of the metallic particles 30 from the roofing shingle 10 .
- the leach rate affects the overall algae resistance of the roofing shingle 10 .
- the covered metallic particles 30 are preserved within the asphalt coating 22 and/or under the granules 32 until micro-cracks form in the asphalt coating 22 as the asphalt coating 22 degrades over time or until the granules 32 erode from the surface of the shingle 10 .
- the asphalt coating 22 degrades and/or the surface granules 32 erode the metallic particles 30 are exposed and the metal is leached from the roofing shingle 10 .
- the invention provides a particular advantage in that the asphalt coating 22 and/or granules 32 protects the metallic particles 30 from premature leaching. Subsequently, this reduces the amount of metallic particles 30 required to achieve the desired algae resistance of the roofing shingle 10 over a long period of time.
- a common measure of particle geometry is aspect ratio.
- the aspect ratio of a metallic particle 30 is the ratio of the length of the longest dimension of the metallic particle 30 to the shortest dimension of the metallic particle 30 . Where the aspect ratio of a specified percentage of the individual metallic particles 30 is low, the surface area of the individual metallic particles 30 is minimized, and the corresponding leach rate of the metallic particles 30 is low. This slows down the leach rate, thereby extending the effective life of the metallic particle 30 with respect to leaching of the metal. Also, this allows for a reduced amount (by weight) of the metallic particles 30 to be used on the roofing shingle 10 .
- greater than ninety percent of the metallic particles 30 have an aspect ratio of less than or equal to about 1.5, and more preferably greater than ninety percent of the metallic particles 30 have an aspect ratio of less than or equal to 1.3.
- An example of a metallic particle 30 having the preferred aspect ratio is copper shot, which is a small, bead-like copper particle that is nearly spherical in shape, i.e. having an aspect ratio of approximately one. It will be appreciated, however, that the metallic particles 30 may have any suitable particle geometry that provides a sufficient leach rate to support the reduced application of the metallic particles 30 to the roofing shingle 10 .
- the particle size of the metallic particles 30 may also contribute to the reduced amount (by weight) of metallic particles 30 required on the roofing shingle 10 . To maintain a sufficient leach rate to control algae growth while minimizing the amount of metallic particles 30 applied, it is desirable to increase the surface area of the metallic particles 30 . A smaller particle size increases the overall surface area of the metallic particles 30 , which subsequently increases the metal leach rate of the metallic particles 30 .
- the size of the largest dimension of the individual metallic particles 30 is within the range of from about 0.05 mm to about 1.0 mm, and is more preferably within the range of from about 0.1 mm to about 0.5 mm.
- particle size may be proportionally adjusted to any other suitable size or range of sizes depending upon the desired duration of algae resistance for the roofing shingle 10 . It will also be appreciated that particle size may be proportionally adjusted to any other suitable size or range of sizes depending upon the metal consumption rate through leaching or corrosion in the natural environment of the algae inhibiting component of the metallic particles 30 .
- the reduced size of the metallic particles 30 provides a number of advantages.
- the reduced size of the metallic particles 30 relative to conventional metal-leaching particles, allows the metallic particles 30 to be easily covered by the asphalt coating 22 , which is usually heated or otherwise softened during the manufacturing process. Additionally, those metallic particles 30 that are not covered by the asphalt coating 22 may also be more easily embedded between the asphalt coating 22 and the surface granules 32 or covered by the surface granules 32 applied over the metallic particles 30 .
- the covering of the metallic particles 30 impacts the leach rate of the roofing shingle 10 , as discussed above.
- the reduced size of the metallic particles 30 also provides an aesthetic advantage in that the particles 30 that are not covered by the asphalt coating 30 are less visible when the roofing shingle 10 is applied on a roof. In fact, particles of a size in these ranges are substantially visually undetectable from the ground when the shingles are applied to a roof.
- the improvements of the present invention permit a reduced amount of metallic particles 30 to be applied to the roofing shingle 10 while achieving superior algae resistance on the roofing shingle 10 .
- the metallic particles 30 are preferably applied to the roofing material at a rate that provides the algae inhibiting component of the metallic particles 30 in an amount within the range of from about 0.05 pounds per square to about 0.29 pounds per square of roofing shingles 10 , and is more preferably within the range of from about 0.10 to about 0.20 pounds per square.
- the term “square” is well recognized in the art and refers to the amount of roofing shingles 10 necessary to cover one hundred square feet of roof surface. It will be appreciated that the amount of metallic particles 30 required per square may be proportionally adjusted to any other suitable amount depending upon the algae inhibiting component used and/or the desired duration of algae resistance for the roofing shingle 10 .
- the reduced amount of metallic particles 30 required per square provides a particular advantage in that it results in a significant manufacturing cost savings.
- the manufacturing costs attributable to conventional metal-leaching particles, such as metallic chips, flakes, or coated granules are approximately $1.00 to $1.50 per square
- the cost per square of the metallic particles 30 of the roofing shingles 10 of the present invention is approximately $0.50 or less.
- the metallic particles are in the form of elongated copper-containing particles 40 , such as recycled copper wire.
- the copper functions as the algae inhibiting component of the elongated particles 40 .
- other elongated metallic particles having any other suitable algae inhibiting component may also be used, such as elongated particles formed from a copper alloy or any other suitable metal.
- the elongated copper-containing particles 40 function in substantially the same manner as the metallic particles 30 described above, and are also preferably pre-applied to the asphalt coating 22 of the roofing shingle 10 .
- the elongated copper-containing particles may also be applied within a series of granule 32 applications, as discussed above.
- the elongated copper-containing particles 40 are preferably applied such that greater than fifty percent of the elongated copper-containing particles are covered by the asphalt coating 22 or the granules 32 , or by both the asphalt coating 22 and the granules 32 of the roofing shingle 10 .
- the leach rate of the elongated copper-containing particles is preferably the same as discussed above, i.e. preferably within the range of from about 0.3 parts per million to about 1.0 parts per million of copper (the algae inhibiting component).
- the preferred amount of elongated copper-containing particles 40 applied per square of roofing material provides within the range of from about 0.05 to about 0.29 pounds of copper per square, and is more preferably within the range of from about 0.10 to about 0.20 pounds of copper per square of roofing material.
- the elongated copper-containing particles 40 may have any suitable aspect ratio.
- the aspect ratio of the copper-containing particles is within the range of from about 1.5 to about 200, and more preferably within the range of from about 10 to about 50.
- the elongated copper-containing particles preferably have a substantially circular cross-section, although it will be appreciated that the copper-containing particles may have any other suitable cross-sectional shape as well.
- the diameter of the cross-section of the elongated copper-containing particles is preferably within the range of from about 0.050 mm to about 1.5 mm.
- a particular advantage of using the elongated copper-containing particles is the availability of the material and the subsequent cost savings associated therewith.
- copper wire which is readily available in scrap or recycled form, may be used to form the elongated copper-containing particles 40 . Subsequently, the use of the recycled copper wire may even further reduce the manufacturing costs of the algae resistant roofing shingle 10 discussed above.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Architecture (AREA)
- Civil Engineering (AREA)
- Structural Engineering (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Biotechnology (AREA)
- Roof Covering Using Slabs Or Stiff Sheets (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- This invention relates to roofing materials. More particularly, the invention pertains to asphalt roofing shingles having an application of metallic particles applied to the asphalt base material to provide algae resistance to the roofing shingle.
- Asphalt-based roofing materials, such as roofing shingles, are installed on the roofs of buildings to provide protection from the elements. Typically, the roofing material is constructed of a substrate, an asphalt coating on the substrate, and a surface layer of granules embedded in the asphalt coating.
- In certain climates, particularly warm climates with high humidity, algae, fungus, and other types of microorganisms often grow on the exposed surfaces of the roofing material. This algae and fungus growth is particularly prevalent in the southeastern Gulf Coast area of the United States, and has recently become increasingly prevalent in the northern and midwest regions of the United States. This algae and/or fungal growth leads to a discoloring of the exposed roofing material surfaces. The discoloration begins as dark spots of algae/fungus that develop into dark streaks and eventually cover a majority of the roof. The discoloration generally occurs over a period of years. For example, in southeastern regions of the United States, the discoloration generally becomes visible during the second or third year after the roofing shingles have been applied. This discoloring is particularly noticeable and unsightly on white or light-colored roofing materials, which are often used in warm and humid climates because of their aesthetic and sun reflectivity properties.
- To combat algae and/or fungus growth, it is generally known to include metallic granules on the surface of the roofing material. The metallic granules are generally either composed primarily of or coated with a coating containing copper and/or other metals such as zinc. When wetted by rain or otherwise, the copper and zinc compounds leach out from the roofing material and act as algaecides and/or fungicides to inhibit the growth of the algae and/or fungus.
- The metallic materials and compounds used to provide the algae and/or fungal resistance are generally very expensive and can often undesirably increase the cost of the roofing material. Additionally, the metallic granules on the roofing material are often not aesthetically pleasing because they are highly reflective and appear shiny on the surface of the roofing material. Hence, there is a need for an improved, less expensive algae resistant roofing material.
- The above objects as well as other objects not specifically enumerated are achieved by asphalt roofing shingles having an application of metallic particles applied to the asphalt base material to provide algae resistance to the roofing shingle. The algae resistant asphalt-based roofing material includes at least a portion that is normally exposed when the roofing material is installed on a roof. The exposed portion of the roofing material is comprised of a substrate coated with an asphalt coating. The asphalt coating includes an upper surface that is positioned above the substrate when the roofing material is installed on the roof. A surface layer of granules is adhered to the asphalt coating. An application of metallic particles having a component that inhibits the growth of algae is applied to the upper surface of the asphalt coating. The metallic particles are applied such that greater than fifty percent of the metallic particles are covered by the asphalt coating or by the granules, or by both the asphalt coating and the granules. The metallic particles are preferably applied to the roofing material at a rate that provides the algae inhibiting component of the metallic particles in an amount within the range of from about 0.05 pounds per square to about 0.29 pounds per square of roofing material. In a preferred embodiment, the algae inhibiting component of the metallic particles is copper or a copper alloy. Preferably, greater than ninety percent of the metallic particles applied to the asphalt coating have a particle geometry having an aspect ratio of less than or equal to 1.5.
- In another embodiment of the invention, elongated copper-containing particles are applied to the upper surface of the asphalt coating. The copper-containing particles preferably have an aspect ratio within the range of from about 1.5 to about 200. A surface layer of granules is also adhered to the asphalt coating.
- Various objects and advantages of this invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments, when read in light of the accompanying drawings.
-
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of the roofing shingle of the present invention. -
FIG. 2 is a cross-sectional view of the shingle portion of the roofing shingle taken along Line 2-2 inFIG. 1 . -
FIG. 3 is an enlarged cross-sectional view of a portion of the roofing shingle cross-section shown inFIG. 2 . -
FIG. 4 is a schematic view of an alternate embodiment of the present invention using chopped copper wire. - Referring now to the drawings,
FIG. 1 shows an algae resistant roofing shingle according to the present invention. The illustrated roofing shingle, indicated generally at 10, is in large measure conventional in the art and is intended merely to illustrate one environment in which this invention may be used. Thus, the scope of this invention is not intended to be limited for use with the specific structure for theroofing shingle 10 illustrated inFIG. 1 or with roofing shingles in general. On the contrary, as will become apparent below, this invention may be used in any desired environment for the purposes described below. For example, it will be appreciated that any other roofing material, such as roll roofing and commercial roofing, may also be formed according to the present invention. - The
roofing shingle 10 includes aheadlap region 12 and aprime region 14. Theheadlap region 12 of theshingle 10 is the portion of theshingle 10 that is covered by adjacent shingles when theshingle 10 is installed upon a roof. Theprime region 14 of theshingle 10 is the portion of theshingle 10 that remains exposed when theshingle 10 is installed upon a roof. Theprime region 14 is the portion of theshingle 10 where growth of fungus, algae, or other such microorganisms may occur. Theshingle 10 may have any suitable dimensions. Theshingle 10 may also be divided between theheadlap region 12 and theprime region 14 in any suitable proportion. For example, a typicalresidential roofing shingle 10 is approximately three feet wide by one foot high, with the height dimension being equally divided between the headlap region 12 (six inches) and the prime region 14 (six inches). -
FIGS. 2 and 3 illustrate the composition of theshingle 10 of the present invention. Generally, theshingle 10 consists of asubstrate material 20 that is coated with a coating material, indicated generally at 22. An application ofmetallic particles 30 is applied to thecoating material 22. A surface layer ofgranules 32 is preferably applied over themetallic particles 30 and thecoating material 22. - The
substrate 20 can be any suitable material for receiving theasphalt coating 22, such as fiberglass mat or organic felt material. Thesubstrate material 20 is preferably coated with an asphalt coating, indicated generally at 22. It will be appreciated that any suitable coating material other than asphalt may be used as well. Theasphalt coating 22 includes anupper region 24 and alower region 26. Theupper region 24 includes anupper surface 28. Theupper region 24 andupper surface 28 are positioned above thesubstrate 20 when the roofing material is installed on a roof. Thelower region 26 is positioned below thesubstrate 20 when the roofing material is installed on a roof. - An application of
metallic particles 30 is applied to theupper surface 28 of theasphalt coating 22. Themetallic particles 30 are applied to provide the algae and/or fungal resistance to theshingle 10. Themetallic particles 30 may be formed from any suitable metal or metal alloy that provides an algae/fungus inhibiting component. The algae/fungus inhibiting component of themetallic particles 30 provides the appropriate algaecidal and/or fungicidal properties desired for the algaeresistant shingle 10. Preferably, the algae inhibiting component of themetallic particles 30 consists essentially of copper or a copper alloy. Themetallic particles 30 can be applied by any suitable mechanism, such as a vibratory feeder. - A surface layer of
granules 32 is applied to thetop surface 28 of theasphalt coating 22. Thegranules 32 can be any suitable material typically used in roofing material construction, such as limestone, ceramic coated limestone, or other stone or ceramic coated stone material. Thegranules 32 can be applied in any suitable manner to thetop surface 28 of theasphalt coating 22. For example, thegranules 32 may be applied in a single application. The granules may also be applied in a series of applications, such as blend drops and background granules, as is common practice when multiple colors ofgranules 32 are applied to theroofing shingle 10. - The
metallic particles 30 are preferably pre-applied to theupper surface 28 of theasphalt coating 22. The term “pre-applied”, as used herein, refers to the application of themetallic particles 30 to theasphalt coating 22 prior to the final application of the surface layer ofgranules 32. It is preferable that themetallic particles 30 be applied directly to theupper surface 28 of theasphalt coating 22 prior to the application of anygranules 32. It will be appreciated, however, that it is also possible to apply themetallic particles 30 in conjunction with one or more of a series ofgranule 32 applications, provided that themetallic particles 30 are applied prior to the final application of thesurface granules 32. - The
roofing shingle 10 must contain a suitable amount ofmetallic particles 30 to provide algae resistance as theshingle 10 erodes over time when it is installed on a roof.Roofing shingles 10 may be manufactured to different specifications regarding the duration of protection desired. The desired duration of the algae resistance of theroofing shingle 10 of the present invention is preferably at least ten years, and preferably longer. It will be appreciated, however, that theroofing shingle 10 may have any suitable desired wear duration. Accordingly, it will also be appreciated that the composition of theshingle 10 may be adapted accordingly to obtain the desired duration of algae resistance. - The amount of
metallic particles 30 contained on theroofing shingle 10 contributes significantly to the overall cost of theroofing shingle 10. A particular advantage of the present invention is that the amount ofmetallic particles 30 required on theroofing shingle 10 is minimized while still achieving the desired duration of algae resistance for theroofing shingle 10. - The
metallic particles 30 provide algae/fungus protection because metallic ions from the algae inhibiting component of themetallic particles 30 are leached, or drawn out, from theroofing shingle 10 over time. The leach rate of the algae inhibiting component from themetallic particles 30 can be measured by the parts per million (ppm) of the algae inhibiting component present in a sample of moisture taken from aroofing shingle 10 installed on a roof. For purposes of this patent, this leach rate measurement is determined using a “dew test”. The dew test can be carried out in either a natural weathering environment or a simulated weathering environment. In a natural weathering environment, the dew test analyzes the concentration of the algae-inhibiting component of themetallic particles 30 dissolved in dew formed on theroofing shingles 10 during natural weathering. To collect dew samples for the analysis, a trough is typically installed below the lower edge of a north-facing deck covered with the roofing material, which has a minimum runoff path of 4 feet and a pitch angle of 22 degrees. When weather permits, dew forms on the roofing material and runs off into the trough. The dew samples are collected in the morning hours (i.e. generally between 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 a.m.) before the dew evaporates from theroofing shingles 10. The dew samples are collected fromroofing shingles 10 that have been naturally weathered for a minimum of 6 months, and at least 10 collections of dew samples are collected and analyzed to determine the average algae inhibiting component concentration in the dew runoff. The dew runoff is preferably analyzed by inductively-coupled plasma analysis. - The dew test used for purposes of this patent may also be carried out in a laboratory under simulated environmental conditions. Where simulated conditions are used, a sample is cut from a
roofing shingle 10. The dimensions of the roofing shingle sample are preferably approximately two inches by six inches. The shingle sample is placed face-up on a Plexiglas® plate. Thin strips of butyl tape sealant are placed around the edges of the sample, and six 3.2 millimeter spacers are placed at the corners and in the middle of each long dimension. A second Plexiglas® sheet fitted with flow ports located 1.375 inches from the opposite narrow edges of the sample is placed on top of the sample. The second Plexiglass sheet is pressed to the spacers and the two plates are then clamped together. The sample is thus enclosed in a watertight compartment which permits fluid to enter at one end, then allows a thin sheet-like flow of the fluid across the surface of the sample, and directs the fluid out the other end. This fluid flow simulates the natural weathering environment described above. These sample holders are hung vertically at room temperature and flow lines are connected to the inlet and outlet ports of the prepared sample. Fluid is pumped through the holders at a target rate of 19.4 milliliter per day, which corresponds to 0.30 milliliter per square centimeter per day. The fluid used is preferably a 0.1 N sodium acetate acetic acid pH 6.0 buffer solution. This fluid simulates the dew runoff that is collected by the natural environment dew test described above. The simulated dew runoff is collected periodically and analyzed for its concentration of the algae inhibiting component of theroofing shingles 10. The simulated dew runoff is also preferably analyzed by inductively-coupled plasma analysis. - The leach rate of the algae inhibiting component from the
metallic particles 30 on theroofing shingle 10, as determined by the above dew test method, must be sufficient to provide theshingle 10 with algae resistant characteristics without prematurely depleting themetallic particles 30 from theshingle 10. The leach rate of the algae inhibiting component of themetallic particles 30 for the ten year algae-resistant roofing shingle 10 of the present invention is preferably within the range of from about 0.3 parts per million to about 1.0 parts per million as measured in dew runoff collected from the natural weathering environment. One skilled in the art appreciates that the leach rate measured from the simulated test may differ from the natural runoff due to the relative moisture content and environmental conditions, such as acidity, etc. It will also be appreciated that the leach rate can be any other suitable rate or range of rates as well. It will also be appreciated that the leach rate may be proportionally adjusted depending upon the desired duration of the algae resistance of theroofing shingle 10. - The leach rate of the
metallic particles 30 can be affected by a number of design features of theroofing shingle 10. One such factor is the percent ofmetallic particles 30 covered by theasphalt coating 22 and/orsurface granules 32. Themetallic particles 30 are preferably applied such that a portion of themetallic particles 30 are covered by theasphalt coating 22 or by thegranules 32, and a portion is left exposed. The covering of themetallic particles 30 by theasphalt coating 22 and/or thegranules 32 maximizes the useful life of themetallic particles 30. The covering of themetallic particles 30 also prevents loss of themetallic particles 30 that may be caused by exposure to the elements, such as rain or hail. Additionally, the covering of themetallic particles 30 helps lessen the undesirable effects of themetallic particles 30 on the aesthetics of theroofing shingle 10. The term “covered by the asphalt coating”, as used herein, refers to any particle that is positioned below thetop surface 28 of theasphalt coating 22 and encapsulated within theasphalt coating 22. The term “covered by the asphalt coating” may also refer tometallic particles 30 that are covered partially by theasphalt coating 22 and partially by a granule orgranules 32 applied over themetallic particles 30. Finally, the term “covered by the Applicants coating” may also refer generally tometallic particles 30 that are not visible on thetop surface 28 of theasphalt coating 22. In the preferred embodiment, greater than fifty percent of themetallic particles 30 are covered by theasphalt coating 22, thegranules 32, or by both theasphalt coating 22 and thegranules 32. In another embodiment, it is preferable that greater than seventy percent of themetallic particles 30 are covered by theasphalt coating 22, thegranules 32, or by both theasphalt coating 22 and thegranules 32. In yet another embodiment, it is preferable that greater than ninety percent of themetallic particles 30 are covered by theasphalt coating 22, thegranules 32, or by both theasphalt coating 22 and thegranules 32. - The percentage of
metallic particles 30 covered by theasphalt coating 22 or thegranules 32 affects the leach rate of themetallic particles 30 from theroofing shingle 10. As discussed above, the leach rate affects the overall algae resistance of theroofing shingle 10. The coveredmetallic particles 30 are preserved within theasphalt coating 22 and/or under thegranules 32 until micro-cracks form in theasphalt coating 22 as theasphalt coating 22 degrades over time or until thegranules 32 erode from the surface of theshingle 10. As theasphalt coating 22 degrades and/or thesurface granules 32 erode, themetallic particles 30 are exposed and the metal is leached from theroofing shingle 10. By covering at least a certain percentage of themetallic particles 30, the invention provides a particular advantage in that theasphalt coating 22 and/orgranules 32 protects themetallic particles 30 from premature leaching. Subsequently, this reduces the amount ofmetallic particles 30 required to achieve the desired algae resistance of theroofing shingle 10 over a long period of time. - Another factor affecting the leach rate and the amount of
metallic particles 30 required is the particle geometry of themetallic particles 30. A common measure of particle geometry is aspect ratio. The aspect ratio of ametallic particle 30 is the ratio of the length of the longest dimension of themetallic particle 30 to the shortest dimension of themetallic particle 30. Where the aspect ratio of a specified percentage of the individualmetallic particles 30 is low, the surface area of the individualmetallic particles 30 is minimized, and the corresponding leach rate of themetallic particles 30 is low. This slows down the leach rate, thereby extending the effective life of themetallic particle 30 with respect to leaching of the metal. Also, this allows for a reduced amount (by weight) of themetallic particles 30 to be used on theroofing shingle 10. In the preferred embodiment, greater than ninety percent of themetallic particles 30 have an aspect ratio of less than or equal to about 1.5, and more preferably greater than ninety percent of themetallic particles 30 have an aspect ratio of less than or equal to 1.3. An example of ametallic particle 30 having the preferred aspect ratio is copper shot, which is a small, bead-like copper particle that is nearly spherical in shape, i.e. having an aspect ratio of approximately one. It will be appreciated, however, that themetallic particles 30 may have any suitable particle geometry that provides a sufficient leach rate to support the reduced application of themetallic particles 30 to theroofing shingle 10. - The particle size of the
metallic particles 30 may also contribute to the reduced amount (by weight) ofmetallic particles 30 required on theroofing shingle 10. To maintain a sufficient leach rate to control algae growth while minimizing the amount ofmetallic particles 30 applied, it is desirable to increase the surface area of themetallic particles 30. A smaller particle size increases the overall surface area of themetallic particles 30, which subsequently increases the metal leach rate of themetallic particles 30. Preferably, the size of the largest dimension of the individualmetallic particles 30 is within the range of from about 0.05 mm to about 1.0 mm, and is more preferably within the range of from about 0.1 mm to about 0.5 mm. It will be appreciated, however, that the particle size may be proportionally adjusted to any other suitable size or range of sizes depending upon the desired duration of algae resistance for theroofing shingle 10. It will also be appreciated that particle size may be proportionally adjusted to any other suitable size or range of sizes depending upon the metal consumption rate through leaching or corrosion in the natural environment of the algae inhibiting component of themetallic particles 30. - The reduced size of the
metallic particles 30 provides a number of advantages. The reduced size of themetallic particles 30, relative to conventional metal-leaching particles, allows themetallic particles 30 to be easily covered by theasphalt coating 22, which is usually heated or otherwise softened during the manufacturing process. Additionally, thosemetallic particles 30 that are not covered by theasphalt coating 22 may also be more easily embedded between theasphalt coating 22 and thesurface granules 32 or covered by thesurface granules 32 applied over themetallic particles 30. The covering of themetallic particles 30 impacts the leach rate of theroofing shingle 10, as discussed above. The reduced size of themetallic particles 30 also provides an aesthetic advantage in that theparticles 30 that are not covered by theasphalt coating 30 are less visible when theroofing shingle 10 is applied on a roof. In fact, particles of a size in these ranges are substantially visually undetectable from the ground when the shingles are applied to a roof. - As discussed above, the improvements of the present invention permit a reduced amount of
metallic particles 30 to be applied to theroofing shingle 10 while achieving superior algae resistance on theroofing shingle 10. For the ten year algaeresistant shingle 10 discussed above, themetallic particles 30 are preferably applied to the roofing material at a rate that provides the algae inhibiting component of themetallic particles 30 in an amount within the range of from about 0.05 pounds per square to about 0.29 pounds per square ofroofing shingles 10, and is more preferably within the range of from about 0.10 to about 0.20 pounds per square. The term “square” is well recognized in the art and refers to the amount ofroofing shingles 10 necessary to cover one hundred square feet of roof surface. It will be appreciated that the amount ofmetallic particles 30 required per square may be proportionally adjusted to any other suitable amount depending upon the algae inhibiting component used and/or the desired duration of algae resistance for theroofing shingle 10. - The reduced amount of
metallic particles 30 required per square provides a particular advantage in that it results in a significant manufacturing cost savings. For example, whereas the manufacturing costs attributable to conventional metal-leaching particles, such as metallic chips, flakes, or coated granules, are approximately $1.00 to $1.50 per square, the cost per square of themetallic particles 30 of theroofing shingles 10 of the present invention is approximately $0.50 or less. - In an alternate embodiment of the invention, as shown in
FIG. 4 , the metallic particles are in the form of elongated copper-containingparticles 40, such as recycled copper wire. The copper functions as the algae inhibiting component of theelongated particles 40. It will be appreciated that other elongated metallic particles having any other suitable algae inhibiting component may also be used, such as elongated particles formed from a copper alloy or any other suitable metal. The elongated copper-containingparticles 40 function in substantially the same manner as themetallic particles 30 described above, and are also preferably pre-applied to theasphalt coating 22 of theroofing shingle 10. The elongated copper-containing particles may also be applied within a series ofgranule 32 applications, as discussed above. - The elongated copper-containing
particles 40 are preferably applied such that greater than fifty percent of the elongated copper-containing particles are covered by theasphalt coating 22 or thegranules 32, or by both theasphalt coating 22 and thegranules 32 of theroofing shingle 10. As such, the leach rate of the elongated copper-containing particles is preferably the same as discussed above, i.e. preferably within the range of from about 0.3 parts per million to about 1.0 parts per million of copper (the algae inhibiting component). Similarly, the preferred amount of elongated copper-containingparticles 40 applied per square of roofing material provides within the range of from about 0.05 to about 0.29 pounds of copper per square, and is more preferably within the range of from about 0.10 to about 0.20 pounds of copper per square of roofing material. - The elongated copper-containing
particles 40 may have any suitable aspect ratio. Preferably, the aspect ratio of the copper-containing particles is within the range of from about 1.5 to about 200, and more preferably within the range of from about 10 to about 50. The elongated copper-containing particles preferably have a substantially circular cross-section, although it will be appreciated that the copper-containing particles may have any other suitable cross-sectional shape as well. The diameter of the cross-section of the elongated copper-containing particles is preferably within the range of from about 0.050 mm to about 1.5 mm. - A particular advantage of using the elongated copper-containing particles is the availability of the material and the subsequent cost savings associated therewith. As mentioned above, copper wire, which is readily available in scrap or recycled form, may be used to form the elongated copper-containing
particles 40. Subsequently, the use of the recycled copper wire may even further reduce the manufacturing costs of the algaeresistant roofing shingle 10 discussed above. - The principle and mode of operation of this invention have been described in its preferred embodiments. However, it should be noted that this invention can be practiced otherwise than as specifically illustrated and described without departing from its scope.
Claims (35)
Priority Applications (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US11/066,644 US20060194023A1 (en) | 2005-02-25 | 2005-02-25 | Algae resistant shingle |
| US11/493,748 US20070020436A1 (en) | 2005-02-25 | 2006-07-26 | Roofing shingle containing algae inhibiting metallic particles |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US11/066,644 US20060194023A1 (en) | 2005-02-25 | 2005-02-25 | Algae resistant shingle |
Related Child Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| US11/493,748 Continuation-In-Part US20070020436A1 (en) | 2005-02-25 | 2006-07-26 | Roofing shingle containing algae inhibiting metallic particles |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| US20060194023A1 true US20060194023A1 (en) | 2006-08-31 |
Family
ID=36932243
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| US11/066,644 Abandoned US20060194023A1 (en) | 2005-02-25 | 2005-02-25 | Algae resistant shingle |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US20060194023A1 (en) |
Cited By (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20100126663A1 (en) * | 2008-11-26 | 2010-05-27 | Certain Teed Corporation | Method of forming a roofing product including a ceramic base material and recycled roofing material |
| US20110104440A1 (en) * | 2009-11-03 | 2011-05-05 | Certainteed Corporation | Laminated roofing product including recycled roofing material and method of forming the same |
| US20120005977A1 (en) * | 2005-08-30 | 2012-01-12 | Certainteed Corporation | Shingle Layer or Shingle Having Thick Appearance |
| US9259860B2 (en) | 2009-11-03 | 2016-02-16 | Certainteed Corporation | Roofing product including recycled roofing material |
| US10822749B2 (en) | 2017-12-01 | 2020-11-03 | Saint-Gobain Adfors Canada, Ltd. | Reinforcing fabric |
| US20220154470A1 (en) * | 2020-11-17 | 2022-05-19 | Certainteed Llc | Algaecidal roofing granules, roofing products including them, and methods for making them |
Citations (25)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US2133966A (en) * | 1937-08-18 | 1938-10-25 | Westinghouse Electric & Mfg Co | Method and apparatus for controlling refrigerating machines |
| US3494727A (en) * | 1967-11-17 | 1970-02-10 | Stanley L Rapaport | Microbe resistant roof |
| US3507676A (en) * | 1966-12-15 | 1970-04-21 | Minnesota Mining & Mfg | Zinc containing algicidal surfacing,method,and granules |
| US3528842A (en) * | 1966-07-22 | 1970-09-15 | Minnesota Mining & Mfg | Copper compound-containing algicidal surfacing and process |
| US3866682A (en) * | 1972-10-12 | 1975-02-18 | Mobil Oil Corp | Process for controlling water and gas coning |
| US3884706A (en) * | 1972-10-25 | 1975-05-20 | Gaf Corp | Algicidal roofing granules |
| US3888683A (en) * | 1972-10-25 | 1975-06-10 | Gaf Corp | Novel algicidal post treated roofing granules |
| US3888684A (en) * | 1972-10-25 | 1975-06-10 | Gaf Corp | Algicidal roofing granules |
| US3888176A (en) * | 1972-10-25 | 1975-06-10 | Gaf Corp | Algicidal post treated roofing granules |
| US3894877A (en) * | 1972-10-25 | 1975-07-15 | Gaf Corp | Roofing granules with enhanced algicidal post treatment |
| US3998644A (en) * | 1973-05-07 | 1976-12-21 | Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company | Alkali metal silicate-zinc hydroxychloride coating composition |
| US4088810A (en) * | 1973-05-07 | 1978-05-09 | Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company | Alkali metal silicate-zinc hydroxychloride coating composition |
| US4092441A (en) * | 1973-08-30 | 1978-05-30 | Gaf Corporation | Roofing granule treatment by coating with a metallic algicide |
| US4936898A (en) * | 1986-04-09 | 1990-06-26 | Nielsen James W | Atomized elemental moss killer |
| US5147686A (en) * | 1988-03-17 | 1992-09-15 | Ishihara Sangyo Kaisha, Ltd. | Method of making titanium oxide powder having antimicrobial metal supported thereon |
| US5356664A (en) * | 1992-09-15 | 1994-10-18 | Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company | Method of inhibiting algae growth on asphalt shingles |
| US5411803A (en) * | 1992-09-15 | 1995-05-02 | Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company | Granular materials having an improved ceramic coating, methods of preparing same, and composite sheets including same |
| US5573810A (en) * | 1994-09-21 | 1996-11-12 | Owens-Corning Fiberglas Technology Inc. | Method of applying microorganism resistant granules to a continuously moving strip of asphalt coated material |
| US6214466B1 (en) * | 1999-07-28 | 2001-04-10 | Isp Investments Inc. | Algae-resistant roofing granules |
| US20020098110A1 (en) * | 2000-11-30 | 2002-07-25 | Graham William David | Exterior panels containing algae-inhibiting properties |
| US20030037698A1 (en) * | 2000-06-08 | 2003-02-27 | Elk Corporation Of Dallas | Surface covering building materials resistant to microbial growth staining |
| US6548145B2 (en) * | 2001-05-10 | 2003-04-15 | Isp Investments Inc. | Roofing granules with a decorative metallic appearance |
| US20030091795A1 (en) * | 2000-06-08 | 2003-05-15 | Matti Kiik | Metal flake-surfaced roofing materials |
| US20040110639A1 (en) * | 2002-11-27 | 2004-06-10 | Isp Investments Inc. | Roofing granules |
| US6838152B2 (en) * | 2003-01-21 | 2005-01-04 | Isp Investments Inc. | Low pigments costs algae-retardant roofing granule products containing metallic copper |
-
2005
- 2005-02-25 US US11/066,644 patent/US20060194023A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (27)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US2133966A (en) * | 1937-08-18 | 1938-10-25 | Westinghouse Electric & Mfg Co | Method and apparatus for controlling refrigerating machines |
| US3528842A (en) * | 1966-07-22 | 1970-09-15 | Minnesota Mining & Mfg | Copper compound-containing algicidal surfacing and process |
| US3507676A (en) * | 1966-12-15 | 1970-04-21 | Minnesota Mining & Mfg | Zinc containing algicidal surfacing,method,and granules |
| US3494727A (en) * | 1967-11-17 | 1970-02-10 | Stanley L Rapaport | Microbe resistant roof |
| US3866682A (en) * | 1972-10-12 | 1975-02-18 | Mobil Oil Corp | Process for controlling water and gas coning |
| US3884706A (en) * | 1972-10-25 | 1975-05-20 | Gaf Corp | Algicidal roofing granules |
| US3888683A (en) * | 1972-10-25 | 1975-06-10 | Gaf Corp | Novel algicidal post treated roofing granules |
| US3888684A (en) * | 1972-10-25 | 1975-06-10 | Gaf Corp | Algicidal roofing granules |
| US3888176A (en) * | 1972-10-25 | 1975-06-10 | Gaf Corp | Algicidal post treated roofing granules |
| US3894877A (en) * | 1972-10-25 | 1975-07-15 | Gaf Corp | Roofing granules with enhanced algicidal post treatment |
| US3998644A (en) * | 1973-05-07 | 1976-12-21 | Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company | Alkali metal silicate-zinc hydroxychloride coating composition |
| US4088810A (en) * | 1973-05-07 | 1978-05-09 | Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company | Alkali metal silicate-zinc hydroxychloride coating composition |
| US4092441A (en) * | 1973-08-30 | 1978-05-30 | Gaf Corporation | Roofing granule treatment by coating with a metallic algicide |
| US4936898A (en) * | 1986-04-09 | 1990-06-26 | Nielsen James W | Atomized elemental moss killer |
| US5147686A (en) * | 1988-03-17 | 1992-09-15 | Ishihara Sangyo Kaisha, Ltd. | Method of making titanium oxide powder having antimicrobial metal supported thereon |
| US5356664A (en) * | 1992-09-15 | 1994-10-18 | Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company | Method of inhibiting algae growth on asphalt shingles |
| US5411803A (en) * | 1992-09-15 | 1995-05-02 | Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company | Granular materials having an improved ceramic coating, methods of preparing same, and composite sheets including same |
| US5573810A (en) * | 1994-09-21 | 1996-11-12 | Owens-Corning Fiberglas Technology Inc. | Method of applying microorganism resistant granules to a continuously moving strip of asphalt coated material |
| US6214466B1 (en) * | 1999-07-28 | 2001-04-10 | Isp Investments Inc. | Algae-resistant roofing granules |
| US20030091795A1 (en) * | 2000-06-08 | 2003-05-15 | Matti Kiik | Metal flake-surfaced roofing materials |
| US20030037698A1 (en) * | 2000-06-08 | 2003-02-27 | Elk Corporation Of Dallas | Surface covering building materials resistant to microbial growth staining |
| US6585813B2 (en) * | 2000-06-08 | 2003-07-01 | Elk Premium Building Products, Inc. | Surface covering building materials resistant to microbial growth staining |
| US20020098110A1 (en) * | 2000-11-30 | 2002-07-25 | Graham William David | Exterior panels containing algae-inhibiting properties |
| US6548145B2 (en) * | 2001-05-10 | 2003-04-15 | Isp Investments Inc. | Roofing granules with a decorative metallic appearance |
| US6607781B2 (en) * | 2001-05-10 | 2003-08-19 | Isp Investments Inc. | Roofing granules with a decorative metallic appearance |
| US20040110639A1 (en) * | 2002-11-27 | 2004-06-10 | Isp Investments Inc. | Roofing granules |
| US6838152B2 (en) * | 2003-01-21 | 2005-01-04 | Isp Investments Inc. | Low pigments costs algae-retardant roofing granule products containing metallic copper |
Cited By (12)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20120005977A1 (en) * | 2005-08-30 | 2012-01-12 | Certainteed Corporation | Shingle Layer or Shingle Having Thick Appearance |
| US8302358B2 (en) * | 2005-08-30 | 2012-11-06 | Certainteed Corporation | Shingle layer or shingle having thick appearance |
| US20100126663A1 (en) * | 2008-11-26 | 2010-05-27 | Certain Teed Corporation | Method of forming a roofing product including a ceramic base material and recycled roofing material |
| US20100129667A1 (en) * | 2008-11-26 | 2010-05-27 | Certainteed Corporation | Roofing product including a ceramic base material and recycled roofing material |
| US8168032B2 (en) * | 2008-11-26 | 2012-05-01 | Certainteed Corporation | Method of forming a roofing product including a ceramic base material and recycled roofing material |
| US8663418B2 (en) | 2008-11-26 | 2014-03-04 | Certainteed Corporation | Method of forming a roofing product including a ceramic base material and recycled roofing material |
| US9677277B2 (en) | 2008-11-26 | 2017-06-13 | Certainteed Corporation | Roofing product including a ceramic base material and recycled roofing material |
| US20110104440A1 (en) * | 2009-11-03 | 2011-05-05 | Certainteed Corporation | Laminated roofing product including recycled roofing material and method of forming the same |
| US9259860B2 (en) | 2009-11-03 | 2016-02-16 | Certainteed Corporation | Roofing product including recycled roofing material |
| US9290944B2 (en) | 2009-11-03 | 2016-03-22 | Certainteed Corporation | Laminated roofing product including recycled roofing material and method of forming the same |
| US10822749B2 (en) | 2017-12-01 | 2020-11-03 | Saint-Gobain Adfors Canada, Ltd. | Reinforcing fabric |
| US20220154470A1 (en) * | 2020-11-17 | 2022-05-19 | Certainteed Llc | Algaecidal roofing granules, roofing products including them, and methods for making them |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US20070020436A1 (en) | Roofing shingle containing algae inhibiting metallic particles | |
| US6585813B2 (en) | Surface covering building materials resistant to microbial growth staining | |
| US6214466B1 (en) | Algae-resistant roofing granules | |
| Wallinder et al. | Effects of exposure direction and inclination on the runoff rates of zinc and copper roofs | |
| US3507676A (en) | Zinc containing algicidal surfacing,method,and granules | |
| US20030091795A1 (en) | Metal flake-surfaced roofing materials | |
| Ganguly et al. | Performance of building roofs on energy efficiency–a review | |
| US9103124B2 (en) | Shingle inserts and method for eliminating and preventing growth of algae, moss, or lichens on a roof | |
| US20060194023A1 (en) | Algae resistant shingle | |
| US20020098110A1 (en) | Exterior panels containing algae-inhibiting properties | |
| Berdahl et al. | Three-year weathering tests on asphalt shingles: Solar reflectance | |
| Quintana et al. | Study of the composition and morphology of initial stages of corrosion products formed on Zn plates exposed to the atmosphere of southeast Mexico | |
| Edwards et al. | Soil leachate responses during 10 years of induced whole-watershed acidification | |
| Santamouris | Appropriate materials for the urban environment | |
| CA2791532C (en) | Shingle inserts and method for eliminating and preventing growth of algae, moss, or lichens on a roof | |
| US20120324807A1 (en) | Shingle Inserts And Method For Eliminating and Preventing Growth of Algae, Moss, or Lichens on a Roof | |
| CA2487212C (en) | Algae-resistant roofing material and methods | |
| Sonneveld et al. | New developments of energy-saving greenhouses with a high light transmittance | |
| US20220064954A1 (en) | Microbial growth and dust retardant roofing shingles | |
| Bullard et al. | Atmospheric corrosion of steel and coated steel in coastal environments | |
| Jacobs et al. | How advances in algae-resistant roofing address the growing roof algae problem | |
| CN113898270A (en) | Dampproofing termite-proof structure of timber door and window | |
| Künniger et al. | Release of Conventional and Nano-Sized Biocides from Coated Wooden Façades during Weathering: Consequences for Functionality and Aquatic Environment | |
| JPH11124960A (en) | Roof and sacrificially corroding member for roof | |
| CA2448498A1 (en) | Roofing shingle with headlap seal and improved coverage |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| AS | Assignment |
Owner name: OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS TECHNOLOGY, INC., ILLINOIS Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:TENG, YIHSIEN H.;REEL/FRAME:016529/0379 Effective date: 20050404 |
|
| AS | Assignment |
Owner name: OWENS CORNING INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL, LLC, OHIO Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLASS TECHNOLOGY, INC.;REEL/FRAME:019795/0433 Effective date: 20070803 Owner name: OWENS CORNING INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL, LLC,OHIO Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLASS TECHNOLOGY, INC.;REEL/FRAME:019795/0433 Effective date: 20070803 Owner name: OWENS CORNING INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL, LLC, OHIO Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS TECHNOLOGY, INC.;REEL/FRAME:019795/0433 Effective date: 20070803 |
|
| STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |