[go: up one dir, main page]

US20060043002A1 - Method for downhole sulfur removal and recovery - Google Patents

Method for downhole sulfur removal and recovery Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20060043002A1
US20060043002A1 US11/207,566 US20756605A US2006043002A1 US 20060043002 A1 US20060043002 A1 US 20060043002A1 US 20756605 A US20756605 A US 20756605A US 2006043002 A1 US2006043002 A1 US 2006043002A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
sulfur
solvent
accordance
gas
recovery
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US11/207,566
Inventor
Bryan Petrinec
David Seeger
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
CrystaTech Inc
Original Assignee
CrystaTech Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by CrystaTech Inc filed Critical CrystaTech Inc
Priority to US11/207,566 priority Critical patent/US20060043002A1/en
Assigned to CRYSTATECH, INC. reassignment CRYSTATECH, INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: PETRINEC, BRYAN, SEEGER, DAVID M.
Publication of US20060043002A1 publication Critical patent/US20060043002A1/en
Priority to US12/316,668 priority patent/US20090136414A1/en
Priority to US13/066,339 priority patent/US20110262345A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C01INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C01BNON-METALLIC ELEMENTS; COMPOUNDS THEREOF; METALLOIDS OR COMPOUNDS THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASS C01C
    • C01B17/00Sulfur; Compounds thereof
    • C01B17/02Preparation of sulfur; Purification
    • C01B17/027Recovery of sulfur from material containing elemental sulfur, e.g. luxmasses or sulfur containing ores; Purification of the recovered sulfur
    • C01B17/033Recovery of sulfur from material containing elemental sulfur, e.g. luxmasses or sulfur containing ores; Purification of the recovered sulfur using a liquid extractant
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10LFUELS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; NATURAL GAS; SYNTHETIC NATURAL GAS OBTAINED BY PROCESSES NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES C10G OR C10K; LIQUIFIED PETROLEUM GAS; USE OF ADDITIVES TO FUELS OR FIRES; FIRE-LIGHTERS
    • C10L3/00Gaseous fuels; Natural gas; Synthetic natural gas obtained by processes not covered by subclass C10G, C10K; Liquefied petroleum gas
    • C10L3/06Natural gas; Synthetic natural gas obtained by processes not covered by C10G, C10K3/02 or C10K3/04
    • C10L3/10Working-up natural gas or synthetic natural gas

Definitions

  • This invention relates generally to production of natural gas from subterranean wells, and more specifically relates to the removal and recovery of sulfur which may be present when natural gas is produced from sour and other gas wells.
  • the sulfur sought to be removed from the gas producing well is dissolved in a high boiling point, relatively pure and low cost non-aqueous solvent, the solvent further being more environmentally friendly than those used in the prior art.
  • the solvent used in the invention require in its use mixing with a carrier oil.
  • the sulfur is removed from the solvent by lowering the temperature of the solution to precipitate the solvent, with the sulfur then being separated and used as a relatively pure product.
  • the regenerated solution, then lower in sulfur concentration, is injected back down the well hole to dissolve additional sulfur and may then be reutilized in subsequent cycles of the process.
  • FIGURE is a schematic block diagram of a system for well head sulfur removal operating in accordance with the present invention.
  • a sulfur solvent which has a high solubility for elemental sulfur and a low vapor pressure, thereby reducing the chemical consumption costs.
  • the non-aqueous solvent is selected from the group consisting of diphenyl ethers, dibenzyl ethers, terphenyls and alkylated terphenyls, diphenylethanes and alkylated diphenylethanes, and mixtures thereof.
  • the selected member or members should have a boiling point above 290° C. (at one atmosphere).
  • the solvent consists of one or more diphenyl ethers.
  • the solvent is injected downhole at a typical pressure in the range of atmospheric to 4,000 psi.
  • No mixing of the solvent with a carrier oil is needed.
  • relatively high pressures in the range of 2000 to 4000 psi are used.
  • the solvent is heat stable at well over 260° F. and will readily dissolve any elemental sulfur deposits.
  • the sulfur laden solvent is transported with the gas to the wellhead where it is separated from the gas in a high pressure gas liquid separator.
  • the solvent and any associated water is flashed and separated prior to regeneration and crystallization.
  • the sulfur is crystallized and separated from the solvent and the regenerated solvent is reinjected into the well. Any vaporization losses are made up by using a solvent make up system.
  • Wellhead gas 12 is taken from a well at an underground subterranean formation and includes the gas which is usually (but not necessarily) sour along with the solvent which has been previously injected and may contain residual quantities of dissolved sulfur.
  • the extracted gas and solvent are provided to a high pressure gas-liquid separator 14 .
  • the product gas is taken at 16 for its intended ultimate use.
  • the solvent and dissolved sulfur proceeds from separator 14 via line 18 to a flash tank separator 20 .
  • the gas component is flashed there and exits at 22 where it can be recompressed or flared. Sour water is taken as one separated product at line 24 .
  • the solvent containing the dissolved sulfur proceeds via line 26 to a loop 28 which includes a recirculation pump 30 and a heat exchanger 32 .
  • the cooled solution enters a crystalizer tank 34 where the sulfur is crystallized and the solvent then returned via line 36 to a surge tank 38 heated with a steam line 40 .
  • the solvent proceeds from surge tank 38 via line 41 to the main injection pump 42 and then downhole at 44 .
  • a chemical make up storage tank is provided at 46 which via a metering pump 48 provides make up solvent to tank 38 by line 50 .
  • the sulfur (slurry) taken from crystalizer tank 34 proceeds via line 52 and a filter feedpump 54 which pumps the sulfur slurry to a pressure filter 56 .
  • Sulfur cake 60 is separated at that point and removed via 58 as relatively high purity sulfur.
  • a solvent recovery system with clean solvent tank 62 provides clean wash solvent and wash water by line 64 to the pressure filter. Dirty wash solvent and wash water proceeds from the filter to tank 62 via line 66 . Oily water blow down is taken at line 68 from the solvent tank and discarded or further treated for purification.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
  • Geology (AREA)
  • Inorganic Chemistry (AREA)
  • General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Treating Waste Gases (AREA)
  • Gas Separation By Absorption (AREA)
  • Physical Water Treatments (AREA)

Abstract

Sulfur sought to be removed from deposits formed at a subterranean gas producing well are dissolved in a high boiling point relatively pure and low cost non-aqueous solvent. The dissolved sulfur is then removed from the solvent by lowering the temperature of the solution to precipitate the sulfur which is then separated and recovered as a relatively pure product. After additional processing the regenerated solvent is injected back down the well hole to dissolve additional sulfur and reutilized in successive cycles of the process.

Description

    RELATED APPLICATION
  • This application claims priority from U.S. Provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/604,510 filed Aug. 26, 2004.
  • FIELD OF INVENTION
  • This invention relates generally to production of natural gas from subterranean wells, and more specifically relates to the removal and recovery of sulfur which may be present when natural gas is produced from sour and other gas wells.
  • BACKGROUND OF INVENTION
  • When natural gas is produced from gas wells and particularly from sour gas wells, solid sulfur or sulfur vapor is often generated if the gas is quite hot and accumulates or condenses on the well tubing itself and over time builds up thus reducing the gas flow or even plugging the well. This accumulated sulfur must be removed. One solution used in the past is application at the well of a sulfur scavenger composition which dissolves the sulfur, with the scavenger solution containing the sulfur then being discarded. This solution while it can be perfectly effective, is also both economically wasteful and environmentally detrimental.
  • In U.S. Pat. No. 4,322,307 to Roland Kettner a process is disclosed for treating a sour gas well in which an alkyl naphthalene base sulfur solvent is mixed with an oil carrier and circulated into the well and then recovered from the well mixed with the produced gas. After further processing the sulfur is crystallized from the solvent under suitable cooling conditions and the solvent recovered for re-use. The sulfur from the separation is described in the patent as being delivered to a suitable sulfur disposal facility. The aforementioned carrier oil which is mixed with the solvent is needed so that a sufficient density differential can be achieved in order to readily accommodate separation of the solvent from entrained water contained in the production fluid. The cited patent also contains a discussion of additional prior art processes and methodology that have been used in the past for removal of the sulfur by means of various solvents and the like.
  • The process of the U.S. Pat. No. 4,322,307 patent while potentially useful is based on a solvent with a vapor pressure that is high enough to cause losses to the gas phase, when compared to the solvents used in the present invention. The U.S. Pat. No. 4,322,307 solvent used is less economical and less environmentally friendly than the solvents of the present invention due to the higher vapor losses of the solvents used in that patent.
  • SUMMARY OF INVENTION
  • Now in accordance with the present invention the sulfur sought to be removed from the gas producing well is dissolved in a high boiling point, relatively pure and low cost non-aqueous solvent, the solvent further being more environmentally friendly than those used in the prior art. Neither does the solvent used in the invention require in its use mixing with a carrier oil. The sulfur is removed from the solvent by lowering the temperature of the solution to precipitate the solvent, with the sulfur then being separated and used as a relatively pure product. The regenerated solution, then lower in sulfur concentration, is injected back down the well hole to dissolve additional sulfur and may then be reutilized in subsequent cycles of the process.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
  • The invention is diagrammatically illustrated, by way of example, in the drawing appended hereto, in which:
  • The FIGURE is a schematic block diagram of a system for well head sulfur removal operating in accordance with the present invention.
  • DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
  • In accordance with the present invention a sulfur solvent is utilized which has a high solubility for elemental sulfur and a low vapor pressure, thereby reducing the chemical consumption costs. The non-aqueous solvent is selected from the group consisting of diphenyl ethers, dibenzyl ethers, terphenyls and alkylated terphenyls, diphenylethanes and alkylated diphenylethanes, and mixtures thereof. Preferably the selected member or members should have a boiling point above 290° C. (at one atmosphere). Preferably further, the solvent consists of one or more diphenyl ethers. The solvent is injected downhole at a typical pressure in the range of atmospheric to 4,000 psi. No mixing of the solvent with a carrier oil is needed. Preferably, relatively high pressures in the range of 2000 to 4000 psi are used. The solvent is heat stable at well over 260° F. and will readily dissolve any elemental sulfur deposits. The sulfur laden solvent is transported with the gas to the wellhead where it is separated from the gas in a high pressure gas liquid separator. The solvent and any associated water is flashed and separated prior to regeneration and crystallization. The sulfur is crystallized and separated from the solvent and the regenerated solvent is reinjected into the well. Any vaporization losses are made up by using a solvent make up system.
  • Referring to the appended schematic FIGURE, a system 10 in accordance with the present invention is shown. Wellhead gas 12 is taken from a well at an underground subterranean formation and includes the gas which is usually (but not necessarily) sour along with the solvent which has been previously injected and may contain residual quantities of dissolved sulfur. The extracted gas and solvent are provided to a high pressure gas-liquid separator 14. The product gas is taken at 16 for its intended ultimate use. The solvent and dissolved sulfur proceeds from separator 14 via line 18 to a flash tank separator 20. The gas component is flashed there and exits at 22 where it can be recompressed or flared. Sour water is taken as one separated product at line 24. The solvent containing the dissolved sulfur proceeds via line 26 to a loop 28 which includes a recirculation pump 30 and a heat exchanger 32. The cooled solution enters a crystalizer tank 34 where the sulfur is crystallized and the solvent then returned via line 36 to a surge tank 38 heated with a steam line 40. The solvent proceeds from surge tank 38 via line 41 to the main injection pump 42 and then downhole at 44. A chemical make up storage tank is provided at 46 which via a metering pump 48 provides make up solvent to tank 38 by line 50.
  • The sulfur (slurry) taken from crystalizer tank 34 proceeds via line 52 and a filter feedpump 54 which pumps the sulfur slurry to a pressure filter 56. Sulfur cake 60 is separated at that point and removed via 58 as relatively high purity sulfur. A solvent recovery system with clean solvent tank 62 provides clean wash solvent and wash water by line 64 to the pressure filter. Dirty wash solvent and wash water proceeds from the filter to tank 62 via line 66. Oily water blow down is taken at line 68 from the solvent tank and discarded or further treated for purification.
  • It should be noted that the sulfur crystallization process per se described herein is used with suitable solvents in the processes disclosed in several patents to David W. DeBerry et al., such as U.S. Pat. No. 6,416,729. The formation of large sulfur crystals by means of the present invention provides sulfur that is up to 99 percent pure and leaves the filter with only 2 to 5 percent water. In consequence the sulfur product is relatively dry and is of sufficient purity that it can be used in agricultural applications, blended into Claus sulfur (if available) or sent to a land fill as non-hazardous waste.
  • While the present invention has been set forth in terms of specific embodiments thereof, the instant disclosure is such that numerous variations upon the invention are now enabled to those skilled in the art, which variations yet reside within the scope of the present teaching. Accordingly, the invention is to be broadly construed and limited only by the scope and spirit of the claims now appended hereto.

Claims (6)

1. A method for removal and recovery of sulfur which may be present when natural gas is produced from sour and other gas wells, comprising:
dissolving the sulfur in a high boiling point, relatively pure and low cost non-aqueous solvent selected from one or more members of the group consisting of diphenyl ethers, dibenzyl ethers, terphenyls and alkylated terphenyls, diphenylethanes and alkylated diphenylethanes, and mixtures thereof; removing the sulfur from the solvent by lowering the temperature of the solvent to precipitate the sulfur; and
separating the precipitated sulfur as a relatively pure product.
2. A method in accordance with claim 1, wherein the said solvent has a boiling point of above 290° C. at one atmosphere.
3. A method in accordance with claim 1, wherein the said solvent, following the separation of sulfur therefrom is recirculated to the said wells to dissolve additional sulfur for said removal and recovery.
4. A method in accordance with claim 2, wherein the solvent consists of one or more diphenyl ethers.
5. A method in accordance with claim 4, wherein the said solvent for dissolving the sulfur is injected into a said well at pressures from atmospheric to about 4,000 psi.
6. A method in accordance with claim 5, wherein said pressure is in the range of 2,000 to 4,000 psi.
US11/207,566 2004-08-26 2005-08-19 Method for downhole sulfur removal and recovery Abandoned US20060043002A1 (en)

Priority Applications (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/207,566 US20060043002A1 (en) 2004-08-26 2005-08-19 Method for downhole sulfur removal and recovery
US12/316,668 US20090136414A1 (en) 2004-08-26 2008-12-15 Method for downhole sulfur removal and recovery
US13/066,339 US20110262345A1 (en) 2004-08-26 2011-04-12 Method for downhole sulfur removal and recovery

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US60451004P 2004-08-26 2004-08-26
US11/207,566 US20060043002A1 (en) 2004-08-26 2005-08-19 Method for downhole sulfur removal and recovery

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/316,668 Continuation-In-Part US20090136414A1 (en) 2004-08-26 2008-12-15 Method for downhole sulfur removal and recovery

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20060043002A1 true US20060043002A1 (en) 2006-03-02

Family

ID=36000603

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/207,566 Abandoned US20060043002A1 (en) 2004-08-26 2005-08-19 Method for downhole sulfur removal and recovery

Country Status (3)

Country Link
US (1) US20060043002A1 (en)
CA (1) CA2578937A1 (en)
WO (1) WO2006026417A2 (en)

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20090136414A1 (en) * 2004-08-26 2009-05-28 Petrinec Bryan J Method for downhole sulfur removal and recovery
US20100150817A1 (en) * 2006-08-10 2010-06-17 Abry Raymond G F Method for generating micronized sulphur
WO2010071616A1 (en) * 2008-12-15 2010-06-24 Crystatech, Inc. Method for downhole sulfur removal and recovery
US8444887B2 (en) 2010-07-22 2013-05-21 Conocophillips Company Methods and systems for conversion of molten sulfur to powder sulfur

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4322307A (en) * 1979-10-15 1982-03-30 Mobil Oil Corporation Process for alleviating sulfur deposition in sour gas wells
US5738834A (en) * 1996-09-09 1998-04-14 Gas Research Institute System for removal of hydrogen sulfide from a gas stream
US6416729B1 (en) * 1999-02-17 2002-07-09 Crystatech, Inc. Process for removing hydrogen sulfide from gas streams which include or are supplemented with sulfur dioxide
US20030057136A1 (en) * 2001-08-22 2003-03-27 Mcintush Kenneth E. Process for recovering sulfur while sponging light hydrocarbons from hydrodesulfurization hydrogen recycle streams

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4248717A (en) * 1979-05-29 1981-02-03 Standard Oil Company (Indiana) Method for removing elemental sulfur from high temperature, high pressure wells and flow lines

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4322307A (en) * 1979-10-15 1982-03-30 Mobil Oil Corporation Process for alleviating sulfur deposition in sour gas wells
US5738834A (en) * 1996-09-09 1998-04-14 Gas Research Institute System for removal of hydrogen sulfide from a gas stream
US6416729B1 (en) * 1999-02-17 2002-07-09 Crystatech, Inc. Process for removing hydrogen sulfide from gas streams which include or are supplemented with sulfur dioxide
US20030057136A1 (en) * 2001-08-22 2003-03-27 Mcintush Kenneth E. Process for recovering sulfur while sponging light hydrocarbons from hydrodesulfurization hydrogen recycle streams

Cited By (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20090136414A1 (en) * 2004-08-26 2009-05-28 Petrinec Bryan J Method for downhole sulfur removal and recovery
US20100150817A1 (en) * 2006-08-10 2010-06-17 Abry Raymond G F Method for generating micronized sulphur
WO2008041132A3 (en) * 2006-08-10 2011-03-03 Abry Raymond G F Method for generating micronized sulphur
US8431106B2 (en) * 2006-08-10 2013-04-30 CCR, Technologies, Ltd. Method for generating micronized sulphur
US20130230448A1 (en) * 2006-08-10 2013-09-05 Raymond G.F. Abry Method of Generating Micronized Sulphur
US9517935B2 (en) * 2006-08-10 2016-12-13 Ccr Technologies, Ltd. Method of generating micronized sulphur
WO2010071616A1 (en) * 2008-12-15 2010-06-24 Crystatech, Inc. Method for downhole sulfur removal and recovery
US8444887B2 (en) 2010-07-22 2013-05-21 Conocophillips Company Methods and systems for conversion of molten sulfur to powder sulfur
US8851794B2 (en) 2010-07-22 2014-10-07 Conocophillips Company Methods and systems for sulfur disposal

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CA2578937A1 (en) 2006-03-09
WO2006026417A3 (en) 2006-10-12
WO2006026417A2 (en) 2006-03-09

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP1261410B1 (en) Process for recovering processing liquids
US9090813B2 (en) Process for hydrate inhibitor regeneration
EP0914189B1 (en) Process for recovering processing liquids
US8652304B2 (en) Process for separating solids from valuable or harmful liquids by vaporisation
US9205370B2 (en) Process for recovery of processing liquids
CA2776627C (en) Method for hydrocarbon removal and recovery from drill cuttings
CN104284881B (en) Reclaim single or mixing amine solvent system and method
US4033410A (en) Monoethanolamine process for sulfur removal from circulating oil used in sour gas wells
US20110262345A1 (en) Method for downhole sulfur removal and recovery
US20060043002A1 (en) Method for downhole sulfur removal and recovery
US3437451A (en) Selective precipitation of potassium chloride from brine using organoamines
US4322307A (en) Process for alleviating sulfur deposition in sour gas wells
CN106659963B (en) Process for recovering process liquids from streams containing alkaline earth metal salts
RU2175882C2 (en) Method of treating hydrocarbon gas for transportation
US3826811A (en) Sulphur removal from natural gas
BR112014020401B1 (en) PROCESS FOR THE REMOVAL OF SALTS FROM A PROCESSING LIQUID
KR100486679B1 (en) Recovery of Processed Liquid
WO2010071616A1 (en) Method for downhole sulfur removal and recovery
RU2761705C1 (en) Method for removing carbon dioxide from natural gas
KR20140019434A (en) Method and apparatus for removing mercury from waste water from hydrocarbon well stream
CA2258785C (en) Process for recovering processing liquids
OA20755A (en) Method for regenerating an aqueous solution of MEG containing salts with purge treatment.
US2954217A (en) Iodine extraction from underground waters
Matsumoto et al. Recovery of borax from stripping solution by adding alcohol

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: CRYSTATECH, INC., TEXAS

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:SEEGER, DAVID M.;PETRINEC, BRYAN;REEL/FRAME:017096/0170

Effective date: 20051004

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION