US20040162615A1 - Material and method for engraftment of a composite biocompatible skin graft on the neodermis of artificial skin - Google Patents
Material and method for engraftment of a composite biocompatible skin graft on the neodermis of artificial skin Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20040162615A1 US20040162615A1 US10/778,760 US77876004A US2004162615A1 US 20040162615 A1 US20040162615 A1 US 20040162615A1 US 77876004 A US77876004 A US 77876004A US 2004162615 A1 US2004162615 A1 US 2004162615A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- keratinocytes
- substratum
- dermal fibroblasts
- layer
- skin
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 42
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 32
- 239000002131 composite material Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 22
- 210000002510 keratinocyte Anatomy 0.000 claims abstract description 110
- 210000002950 fibroblast Anatomy 0.000 claims abstract description 85
- 210000003491 skin Anatomy 0.000 claims abstract description 51
- 230000002500 effect on skin Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 50
- 230000001851 biosynthetic effect Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 20
- 239000012528 membrane Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 17
- 229920001296 polysiloxane Polymers 0.000 claims abstract description 12
- KIUKXJAPPMFGSW-DNGZLQJQSA-N (2S,3S,4S,5R,6R)-6-[(2S,3R,4R,5S,6R)-3-Acetamido-2-[(2S,3S,4R,5R,6R)-6-[(2R,3R,4R,5S,6R)-3-acetamido-2,5-dihydroxy-6-(hydroxymethyl)oxan-4-yl]oxy-2-carboxy-4,5-dihydroxyoxan-3-yl]oxy-5-hydroxy-6-(hydroxymethyl)oxan-4-yl]oxy-3,4,5-trihydroxyoxane-2-carboxylic acid Chemical compound CC(=O)N[C@H]1[C@H](O)O[C@H](CO)[C@@H](O)[C@@H]1O[C@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@H](O[C@H]2[C@@H]([C@@H](O[C@H]3[C@@H]([C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@H](O3)C(O)=O)O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O2)NC(C)=O)[C@@H](C(O)=O)O1 KIUKXJAPPMFGSW-DNGZLQJQSA-N 0.000 claims description 13
- 229920002674 hyaluronan Polymers 0.000 claims description 11
- 229960003160 hyaluronic acid Drugs 0.000 claims description 11
- 125000001797 benzyl group Chemical group [H]C1=C([H])C([H])=C(C([H])=C1[H])C([H])([H])* 0.000 claims description 10
- 229920002683 Glycosaminoglycan Polymers 0.000 claims description 6
- 239000000758 substrate Substances 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000010899 nucleation Methods 0.000 abstract description 26
- 230000001681 protective effect Effects 0.000 abstract description 2
- 238000011081 inoculation Methods 0.000 abstract 1
- 241000282414 Homo sapiens Species 0.000 description 37
- 208000027418 Wounds and injury Diseases 0.000 description 33
- 210000004027 cell Anatomy 0.000 description 32
- 206010052428 Wound Diseases 0.000 description 30
- 241000700159 Rattus Species 0.000 description 23
- 239000010410 layer Substances 0.000 description 19
- 210000004379 membrane Anatomy 0.000 description 13
- 241001465754 Metazoa Species 0.000 description 9
- 210000000981 epithelium Anatomy 0.000 description 8
- 239000006144 Dulbecco’s modified Eagle's medium Substances 0.000 description 6
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 6
- NWIBSHFKIJFRCO-WUDYKRTCSA-N Mytomycin Chemical compound C1N2C(C(C(C)=C(N)C3=O)=O)=C3[C@@H](COC(N)=O)[C@@]2(OC)[C@@H]2[C@H]1N2 NWIBSHFKIJFRCO-WUDYKRTCSA-N 0.000 description 5
- 238000001574 biopsy Methods 0.000 description 5
- 208000014674 injury Diseases 0.000 description 5
- 238000001356 surgical procedure Methods 0.000 description 5
- 102000003745 Hepatocyte Growth Factor Human genes 0.000 description 4
- 108090000100 Hepatocyte Growth Factor Proteins 0.000 description 4
- NOESYZHRGYRDHS-UHFFFAOYSA-N insulin Chemical compound N1C(=O)C(NC(=O)C(CCC(N)=O)NC(=O)C(CCC(O)=O)NC(=O)C(C(C)C)NC(=O)C(NC(=O)CN)C(C)CC)CSSCC(C(NC(CO)C(=O)NC(CC(C)C)C(=O)NC(CC=2C=CC(O)=CC=2)C(=O)NC(CCC(N)=O)C(=O)NC(CC(C)C)C(=O)NC(CCC(O)=O)C(=O)NC(CC(N)=O)C(=O)NC(CC=2C=CC(O)=CC=2)C(=O)NC(CSSCC(NC(=O)C(C(C)C)NC(=O)C(CC(C)C)NC(=O)C(CC=2C=CC(O)=CC=2)NC(=O)C(CC(C)C)NC(=O)C(C)NC(=O)C(CCC(O)=O)NC(=O)C(C(C)C)NC(=O)C(CC(C)C)NC(=O)C(CC=2NC=NC=2)NC(=O)C(CO)NC(=O)CNC2=O)C(=O)NCC(=O)NC(CCC(O)=O)C(=O)NC(CCCNC(N)=N)C(=O)NCC(=O)NC(CC=3C=CC=CC=3)C(=O)NC(CC=3C=CC=CC=3)C(=O)NC(CC=3C=CC(O)=CC=3)C(=O)NC(C(C)O)C(=O)N3C(CCC3)C(=O)NC(CCCCN)C(=O)NC(C)C(O)=O)C(=O)NC(CC(N)=O)C(O)=O)=O)NC(=O)C(C(C)CC)NC(=O)C(CO)NC(=O)C(C(C)O)NC(=O)C1CSSCC2NC(=O)C(CC(C)C)NC(=O)C(NC(=O)C(CCC(N)=O)NC(=O)C(CC(N)=O)NC(=O)C(NC(=O)C(N)CC=1C=CC=CC=1)C(C)C)CC1=CN=CN1 NOESYZHRGYRDHS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 230000035755 proliferation Effects 0.000 description 4
- 210000001519 tissue Anatomy 0.000 description 4
- 108010035532 Collagen Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 102000008186 Collagen Human genes 0.000 description 3
- 206010053615 Thermal burn Diseases 0.000 description 3
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 3
- 229920001436 collagen Polymers 0.000 description 3
- 230000006378 damage Effects 0.000 description 3
- 210000004207 dermis Anatomy 0.000 description 3
- 210000005175 epidermal keratinocyte Anatomy 0.000 description 3
- 210000002615 epidermis Anatomy 0.000 description 3
- 239000003102 growth factor Substances 0.000 description 3
- 208000015181 infectious disease Diseases 0.000 description 3
- 230000000977 initiatory effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 3
- 229960004857 mitomycin Drugs 0.000 description 3
- 239000002953 phosphate buffered saline Substances 0.000 description 3
- -1 polypropylene ring Polymers 0.000 description 3
- 238000002360 preparation method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 102000004169 proteins and genes Human genes 0.000 description 3
- 108090000623 proteins and genes Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 238000007390 skin biopsy Methods 0.000 description 3
- CIWBSHSKHKDKBQ-JLAZNSOCSA-N Ascorbic acid Chemical compound OC[C@H](O)[C@H]1OC(=O)C(O)=C1O CIWBSHSKHKDKBQ-JLAZNSOCSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 102000009016 Cholera Toxin Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 108010049048 Cholera Toxin Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 108010067306 Fibronectins Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 102000016359 Fibronectins Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 241000722985 Fidia Species 0.000 description 2
- 238000000729 Fisher's exact test Methods 0.000 description 2
- HTTJABKRGRZYRN-UHFFFAOYSA-N Heparin Chemical compound OC1C(NC(=O)C)C(O)OC(COS(O)(=O)=O)C1OC1C(OS(O)(=O)=O)C(O)C(OC2C(C(OS(O)(=O)=O)C(OC3C(C(O)C(O)C(O3)C(O)=O)OS(O)(=O)=O)C(CO)O2)NS(O)(=O)=O)C(C(O)=O)O1 HTTJABKRGRZYRN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 102000004877 Insulin Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 108090001061 Insulin Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 241000897276 Termes Species 0.000 description 2
- 206010052779 Transplant rejections Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 239000000427 antigen Substances 0.000 description 2
- 102000036639 antigens Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 108091007433 antigens Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 229920001222 biopolymer Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 238000003501 co-culture Methods 0.000 description 2
- 210000002808 connective tissue Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 2
- XEYBRNLFEZDVAW-ARSRFYASSA-N dinoprostone Chemical compound CCCCC[C@H](O)\C=C\[C@H]1[C@H](O)CC(=O)[C@@H]1C\C=C/CCCC(O)=O XEYBRNLFEZDVAW-ARSRFYASSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 229960002986 dinoprostone Drugs 0.000 description 2
- 108010007093 dispase Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 210000000245 forearm Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 229920000669 heparin Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 229960002897 heparin Drugs 0.000 description 2
- 229940125396 insulin Drugs 0.000 description 2
- 238000013508 migration Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000005012 migration Effects 0.000 description 2
- XEYBRNLFEZDVAW-UHFFFAOYSA-N prostaglandin E2 Natural products CCCCCC(O)C=CC1C(O)CC(=O)C1CC=CCCCC(O)=O XEYBRNLFEZDVAW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000008733 trauma Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000005406 washing Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000029663 wound healing Effects 0.000 description 2
- WCDDVEOXEIYWFB-VXORFPGASA-N (2s,3s,4r,5r,6r)-3-[(2s,3r,5s,6r)-3-acetamido-5-hydroxy-6-(hydroxymethyl)oxan-2-yl]oxy-4,5,6-trihydroxyoxane-2-carboxylic acid Chemical compound CC(=O)N[C@@H]1C[C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O[C@H]1O[C@@H]1[C@@H](C(O)=O)O[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@H]1O WCDDVEOXEIYWFB-VXORFPGASA-N 0.000 description 1
- PXGPLTODNUVGFL-BRIYLRKRSA-N (E,Z)-(1R,2R,3R,5S)-7-(3,5-Dihydroxy-2-((3S)-(3-hydroxy-1-octenyl))cyclopentyl)-5-heptenoic acid Chemical compound CCCCC[C@H](O)C=C[C@H]1[C@H](O)C[C@H](O)[C@@H]1CC=CCCCC(O)=O PXGPLTODNUVGFL-BRIYLRKRSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 208000034309 Bacterial disease carrier Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 102000010907 Cyclooxygenase 2 Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010037462 Cyclooxygenase 2 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 230000006820 DNA synthesis Effects 0.000 description 1
- 102000003972 Fibroblast growth factor 7 Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108090000385 Fibroblast growth factor 7 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 241000282412 Homo Species 0.000 description 1
- 206010061218 Inflammation Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 108010052285 Membrane Proteins Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 229930192392 Mitomycin Natural products 0.000 description 1
- 208000004221 Multiple Trauma Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 206010062575 Muscle contracture Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 206010039580 Scar Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 230000001154 acute effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000002588 alveolar type II cell Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004873 anchoring Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229960005070 ascorbic acid Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 235000010323 ascorbic acid Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000011668 ascorbic acid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 210000002469 basement membrane Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000037396 body weight Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000003636 conditioned culture medium Substances 0.000 description 1
- 208000006111 contracture Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 210000004748 cultured cell Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 238000007405 data analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004069 differentiation Effects 0.000 description 1
- LOKCTEFSRHRXRJ-UHFFFAOYSA-I dipotassium trisodium dihydrogen phosphate hydrogen phosphate dichloride Chemical compound P(=O)(O)(O)[O-].[K+].P(=O)(O)([O-])[O-].[Na+].[Na+].[Cl-].[K+].[Cl-].[Na+] LOKCTEFSRHRXRJ-UHFFFAOYSA-I 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002708 enhancing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000002919 epithelial cell Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 239000000835 fiber Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000001497 fibrovascular Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011010 flushing procedure Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000003953 foreskin Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 239000001963 growth medium Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000003306 harvesting Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229940014041 hyaluronate Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 230000001969 hypertrophic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001900 immune effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000000338 in vitro Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000001727 in vivo Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011534 incubation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004054 inflammatory process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007689 inspection Methods 0.000 description 1
- 108010002823 integra artificial skin Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 230000008611 intercellular interaction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004264 monolayer culture Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000037311 normal skin Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008520 organization Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002085 persistent effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000004033 plastic Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000036647 reaction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 231100000241 scar Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 230000037390 scarring Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000000926 separation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013376 serial cultivation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000002356 single layer Substances 0.000 description 1
- 210000004927 skin cell Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 241000894007 species Species 0.000 description 1
- 210000004085 squamous epithelial cell Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000006641 stabilisation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011105 stabilization Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010561 standard procedure Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000005127 stratified epithelium Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 239000000725 suspension Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012353 t test Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61F—FILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
- A61F2/00—Filters implantable into blood vessels; Prostheses, i.e. artificial substitutes or replacements for parts of the body; Appliances for connecting them with the body; Devices providing patency to, or preventing collapsing of, tubular structures of the body, e.g. stents
- A61F2/02—Prostheses implantable into the body
- A61F2/10—Hair or skin implants
- A61F2/105—Skin implants, e.g. artificial skin
Definitions
- This invention was made under the joint sponsorship of the Chinese University of Hong Kong of Shatin, Hong Kong SAR, and the Hospital Authority, also known as the Prince of Wales Hospital of Shatin, Hong Kong SAR.
- This invention relates to the cultivation of keratinocytes and dermal fibroblasts on a biosynthetic membrane and subsequent engraftment of this type of membrane on the neodermis of artificial skin with particular application to humans.
- This invention also relates to fabricated graft materials.
- Prompt wound coverage for protection and stabilization is essential for the treatment of burns.
- the 3T3 cell-feeder layer technique developed by Rheinwald and Green in the 1970s is the standard method for cultivation of autologous epidermal autograft or so-called cultivated epidermal autograft material (“CEA”).
- CEA cultivated epidermal autograft material
- a small piece of native skin from the patient can be cultured and expanded to 500 times or more in size within 3-4 weeks.
- the lack of dermis and the fragility of the cultured graft often result in unpredictable grafting success rates ranging from 0%-80%, as reported by Tompkins et al. (1992) and Herzog et al. (1991).
- IntegraTM a brand of artificial skin is sold by Integra LifeScience Corporation of New Jersey, USA, and has been approved by FDA for use in the USA since 1996.
- Artificial skin is a bilayer biosynthetic sheet comprising porous collagen-glycoaminoglycan integrated with a thin silicone membrane as an outer layer. The use of artificial skin such as Integra as a biocompatible acellular dermal replacement in deep and full-thickness burn wounds is well known.
- the grafted CEA does not ‘take’ on the neodermis of Integra after the silicone membrane is peeled off, it can be replaced by another CEA.
- another split thickness autograft must be harvested from a second or even a third donor site.
- LaserskinTM material is a thin and pliable biosynthetic membrane comprising a 100% benzyl esterified hyaluronic acid derivative suitable for use as a substratum in the growth of skin cells.
- the recommendation of the manufacturer is to seed human keratinocytes on Laserskin preseeded with irradiated 3T3 cells as feeder layer.
- the manufacturer's recommendation it was found that, after the initiation of the formation of keratinocyte colonies, the xenogenic 3T3 cells growing on the Laserskin were less likely to be washed away than those growing on a culture dish as in the conventional Green's method during each flushing procedure with phosphate-buffered saline.
- autologous cultured keratinocytes grown on a biocompatible substratum are engrafted on the neodermis of artificial skin covering a wound.
- Autologous keratinocytes may be cultivated on a commercially available membrane such as LaserskinTM (available from Fidia Advanced Biopolymers Ltd., Abano Terme (PD), Italy) following pre-seeding with autologous or allogenic dermal fibroblasts.
- the resultant composite material may then be applied on the neodermis of artificial skin which had been previously engrafted on the patient.
- the composite material, and specifically Composite Biocompatible Skin Graft (CBSG) material comprises autologous keratinocytes and allogenic or autologous dermal fibroblasts grown on the substratum.
- a method for fabricating the composite material includes the application of dermal fibroblasts onto the substratum as a feeder layer and then inoculating autologous keratinocytes on the resultant structure.
- a method for engraftment comprises first applying an artificial skin with a protective silicone membrane on a wound area, thereby allowing vascularization; following vascularization, removing the silicone membrane and engrafting the cultured composite material onto the vascularized artificial skin.
- Human fibroblasts used in the cultivation technique according to the invention were found to achieve a role similar to 3T3 cells in the initiation of keratinocyte colonies on Laserskin. Specifically, it was found that the seeding efficacy of human keratinocytes was increased to up to 95%. CBSG containing autologous keratinocytes and autologous dermal fibroblast or allogenic dermal fibroblasts or a combination of autologous and allogenic dermal fibroblasts according to the invention, has been successfully applied to burn patients whose wounds were previously grafted with allografts employing the engraftment techniques according to the invention.
- the purpose of this invention is to simplify burn treatment further and eventually to save lives of patients having extensive burns where little or no autologous skin grafts can be repeatedly harvested in a short period of time.
- all dead skin tissue of a patient with extensive burns can be excised within about three to seven days after injury.
- the wound can be covered with artificial skin, such as IntegraTM or any dermal equivalent thereof, and only a small quantity of harvested normal skin would be required to initiate skin culture, which may thereafter be engrafted, according to the invention, on the neodermis of the artificial skin, with resultant lower rejection and infection incidences.
- CBSG material according to the invention offers notable advantages.
- the basal proteins including the early basement membrane proteins such as collagen IV and fibronectin
- the keratinocytes are directly cultivated on the pliable Laserskin. This is believed to enhance anchorage of the cultured keratinocytes on the neodermis of Integra.
- the dermal fibroblasts in the inventive CBSG material evidently produce a number of proteins such as native collagen fibers and fibronectin which is believed to facilitate the attachment of a cultured graft.
- the cultured keratinocytes of the inventive CBSG can be grafted five to seven days sooner than can traditionally-cultured keratinocytes. This is because cultured keratinocytes of the inventive CBSG are capable of being transferred and grafted at the sub-confluent or less differentiated stage rather than at a later confluent stage. Fourth, since there is minimal need for a donor site there is less likelihood of widespread scarring related to donor site harvesting. Fifth, the cultured keratinocytes of CBSG can be handled much more easily than the conventional CEA during its application on the neodermis of the artificial skin. Fewer cultured cells are lost or damaged during the transfer and application of CBSG. This should improve the success rate of the cultured graft. Sixth, the inventive engraftment technique can result in higher demand and broader scope of clinical applications for artificial skin.
- FIG. 1A- 1 C are schematic diagrams of cross-sections of Type A, B and C embodiments of a cultured graft material according to the invention.
- FIG. 2A- 2 C are schematic diagrams of cross-sections of skin grafts illustrating the engraftment technique according to the invention.
- FIG. 1A is what is herein termed a Type A composite skin graft material.
- it is formed by cultivating autologous keratinocytes on a commercially-available biosynthetic substratum 14 of a derivative of benzyl esterified hyaluronic acid.
- dermal fibroblasts 12 On the basal side and on the upper side of the substratum 14 layers of dermal fibroblasts 12 are seeded and grown. Over the dermal fibroblasts 12 of the upper side, a layer of autologous keratinocytes 10 is grown.
- the keratinocytes 10 are harvested from the target donor patient.
- the dermal fibroblasts can be autologous or allogenic.
- FIG. 1B is a Type B composite skin graft material.
- it is formed of a cultivation of autologous keratinocytes on commercially-available biosynthetic substratum 14 .
- Over the dermal fibroblasts 12 of the upper side is a layer of autologous keratinocytes 10 .
- the dermal fibroblasts can be autologous or allogenic.
- FIG. 1C is a Type C composite skin graft material. Originally intended as a control, it is, in a specific embodiment, formed of a cultivation of autologous keratinocytes on substratum 14 . On the upper side of the substratum 14 there is merely a layer of keratinocytes 10 .
- FIG. 2A is an illustration of a first stage in an engraftment method according to the invention.
- FIG. 2A there is a wound bed 26 of a patient on Day Zero prior to the commencement of treatment.
- An artificial skin substrate 20 is applied upon the wound bed 26 .
- the artificial skin substrate 20 has a basal side and an upper side. It comprises a layer 24 of collagen-glycoaminoglycan on its basal side, thus in a position to be juxtaposed to the wound bed 26 .
- a covering membrane 22 of silicone is on the opposing upper side of the substrate 20 .
- the wound bed remains covered in order to allow vascularization of the neodermis. Referring to FIG.
- the silicone membrane 22 is removed from the vascularized neodermis of artificial skin 24 ′ in preparation for immediate further treatment.
- one of Type A, B or C composite skin graft material 28 is engrafted on the layer 24 ′.
- the material 28 comprises a substratum 34 having thereon autologous cultivated keratinocytes 30 of the donor patient, typically having thereunder on the substratum a layer of dermal fibroblasts 32 , depending on the type of graft material 28 .
- Laserskin is a biosynthetic biocompatible substratum for keratinocyte cultivation according to the invention. It is a form of thin and pliable biosynthetic membrane comprising a 100% benzyl esterified hyaluronic acid derivative. Laserskin is commercially available from Fidia Advanced Biopolymers Ltd., Abano Terme (PD), Italy. Laserskin was found to be useful to the inventors' experiments, although its preparation and application are not done according to the manufacturer's conventional instructions. There is nothing to preclude the use of compatible bioequivalents or human skin substitutes would also work in a similar fashion with the inventive CBSG.
- human keratinocytes and fibroblasts were derived from human foreskin obtained from circumcision for the human part of study.
- Rat keratinocytes and fibroblasts were obtained from Spraque Dawley rat (body weight, 400-450 gm).
- the primary cultures of human and rat keratinocytes were grown on mitomycin C-treated 3T3 feeder layer.
- the secondary and tertiary cultures of human keratinocytes were maintained in defined keratinocyte growth medium (Gibco), whereas rat keratinocytes were continuously grown on 3T3 feeder layer.
- Fibroblasts were cultivated in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS.
- Human dermal fibroblasts and 3T3 cells were grown separately on Laserskin with DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS. At sub-confluency, the 3T3 cells were treated with mitomycin-C (4 mg/ml) for 2 hours at 37° C., whereas the human fibroblasts were not treated.
- Human keratinocytes were seeded (3 ⁇ 10 4 cells/cm 2 ) on top of the Laserskin either pre-seeded with 3T3 cells or human fibroblasts. The keratinocyte suspension was instilled and concentrated on the Laserskin surface (0.5 ml/cm 2 ).
- DMEM fetal bovine serum
- insulin 4 mg/ml
- cholera toxin 6 ng/ml
- EGF 10 ng/ml
- Type A CBSG consisted of allogenic rat fibroblasts seeded onto the basal side of a Laserskin substratum. The fibroblasts were stimulated to produce collagen and other proteins by feeding the fibroblasts with DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS and 50 cm ascorbic acid. After ten days, the Laserskin substratum was turned over and the upper side was seeded with fibroblasts. The fibroblasts on both sides were then fed with DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS.
- rat keratinocytes were seeded (3 ⁇ 10 4 cells/cm 2 ) on top of the upper surface of CBSG material.
- the cells were fed with DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS, insulin (4 mg/ml), cholera toxin (6 ng/ml), EGF(10 ng/ml).
- the keratinocytes became sub-confluent and were ready for grafting after only four to six days.
- Type B CBSG materials Two further types were prepared.
- Type C CBSG keratinocytes alone were seeded on the upper side. As will be evident hereafter, all three types had a demonstrable efficacy.
- the ‘take’ rate of the CBSG materials was analyzed with the Fisher Exact Test using Stat Xact (version 2.05).
- the p values were further adjusted by the Bonferron method (i.e., multiplying the p value obtained from each test by k paired comparisons) in order to account for the so called ‘serial t test’.
- CBSG substratum provided a suitable culture template for the in vitro proliferation of keratinocytes.
- human keratinocytes showed a mean seeding efficacy of 75%.
- These human keratinocytes had a 95% seeding efficacy on Laserskin populated with human fibroblasts and a 98% on 3T3 cell-seeded Laserskin (Table 1).
- Rat keratinocytes had a seeding efficacy of 36% on plain Laserskin.
- the respective seeding efficacies of rat keratinocytes on 3T3/Laserskin and on allogenic fibroblasts/Laserskin were 91% and 88%.
- human/rat fibroblasts could achieve a role similar to that of the 3T3 cells in enhancing the seeding efficacies of keratinocytes growing on Laserskin with respective p values of 0.445 and 0.646 using the same statistical package.
- the optical transparency of the Laserskin allowed regular inspection of the grafted wound bed as it healed. Skin biopsies were taken from the center of the grafted area of the subject. It was observed that the polypropylene ring prevented the migration of epithelium from the wound edge as no epithelial cell was found in the control rat wound sutured with polypropylene ring alone up to day 21. In sixteen out of the twenty (80%) animal wounds covered with Type A CBSG, the keratinocytes formed a multi-layered epithelium that had a basal layer in contact with underlying connective tissue. The undersurface of epidermis did not show rete. Fibrovascular ingrowth of connective tissue into the Laserskin was observed.
- Type B CBSG sites Eight (40%) of the Type B CBSG sites and seven (35%) of the Type C CBSG sites showed re-epitheliazation. Histologically there was no observable epithelium in 3 (15%), 10 (50%), and 12 (55%) of the grafted CBSG sites of Types A, B and C respectively (Table 2).
- the graft take rate of Type A CBSG was found to be significantly higher than those of Types B and C CBSG in the Fisher Exact Test/Bonferron method analysis with respective p values of 0.0419 and 0.018. There was no significant difference (p>0.1) of the graft take rate between Types B and C CBSG(table 2). Infection occurred in only one (5%) animal with a Type A or C CBSG graft and in two (10%) animals with a Type B CBSG graft.
- Hyaluronic acid is a mucopolysaccharide with alternating ⁇ 1-3 glucuronidic and ⁇ 1-4 glycosaminidic bonds.
- Laserskin mainly consists of 100% benzyl esterified hyaluronic acid.
- a weak electrostatic association exists between the keratinocytes and the Laserskin. Since the volume and surface area of human keratinocytes differ from those of rat keratinocytes, there is a variation of charge density of two cell populations. Consequently they have different seeding efficacies on plain Laserskin. The species-specific difference was abolished by cultivating keratinocytes on 3T3 cell/Laserskin because 3T3 cells were the dominant factors influencing keratinocyte attachment on Laserskin.
- the seeding efficacies of human and rat keratinocytes were 75% and 36% respectively on plain Laserskin.
- the manufacturer recommends seeding the human keratinocytes on Laserskin pre-seeded with irradiated 3T3 cells.
- Good seeding efficiencies of 98% (human keratinocytes) and 91% (rat keratinocytes) were demonstrated on Laserskin with Mitomycin-treated 3T3 cells.
- Green's method keratinocytes are seeded on a 3T3 cell feeder layer which allows a rather low seeding density of 6-10 ⁇ 10 4 cells/cm 2 for the primary culture.
- a smaller seeding density of 2-5 ⁇ 10 4 cells/cm 2 is feasible for the secondary and tertiary cultures.
- the utility of cultured epidermal autograft grown on culture dish using Green's feeder layer technique is limited by the persistent 3T3 fibroblasts which sensitize the host to xenogenic antigen resulting in late graft rejection.
- the 3T3 cells were found less likely to be washed away from the Laserskin.
- allogenic fibroblasts can achieve a similar role as 3T3 cells in initiation of keratinocyte colonization on Laserskin.
- CBSG material consisting of cultured keratinocytes and dermal fibroblasts is a good human skin substitute for freshly excised full-thickness wounds which were previously grafted with allografts.
- TABLE 1 Mean Seeding Efficacies of Human and Rat Keratinocytes on Laserskin. 15 determinations were made. Seeding efficacies of human/rat keratinocytes were significantly improved by 3T3 cells/fibroblasts (p ⁇ 0.001). Human Keratinocytes Rat keratinocytes Plain Laserskin 75% 36% Laserskin with 3T3 cells 98% 91% Laserskin with human fibroblasts 95% — Laserskin with rat fibroblasts — 88%
- Fibroblasts on Fibroblasts on Keratinocytes Results both sides upper side alone Grafted epithelium observed 16 (80%) 8 (40%) 7 (35%) No epithelium observed 3 (15%) 10 (50%) 12 (55%) Infection 1 (5%) 2 (10%) 1 (5%)
- Prostaglandin E2 (PGF2) is considered to be involved in the proliferation and differentiation of keratinocytes.
- PEG2 Prostaglandin E2
- the production of PEG2 was enhanced in the co-culture of keratinocytes and fibroblasts, whereas the PEG2 production was negligible in monolayer cultures of keratinocytes or fibroblasts.
- the fibroblasts also produced two soluble heparin-binding growth factors such as keratinocyte growth factor and hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor that promote DNA synthesis and proliferation of keratinocytes.
- the histology at Day 6 showed early epithelization with a few squamous epithelial cells settling on top of the scaffolds of Integra and Laserskin. Most of the epithelium were single-layer flattened squamous cells.
- the biopsy taken on Day 14 showed a viable 2- to 4-cell-thick squamous epithelium with minimal inflammation.
- the wounds were completely epithelized within four weeks of the application of the CBSG. Biopsies taken from other wounds showed similar findings.
Landscapes
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Transplantation (AREA)
- Biomedical Technology (AREA)
- Cardiology (AREA)
- Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Dermatology (AREA)
- Heart & Thoracic Surgery (AREA)
- Vascular Medicine (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Public Health (AREA)
- Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
- Medicines Containing Material From Animals Or Micro-Organisms (AREA)
Abstract
Autologous cultured keratinocytes are grown on a biosynthetic and biocompatible substratum following pre-seeding with autologous or allogenic dermal fibroblasts. The resultant composite material may then be applied on the neodermis of artificial skin which had been previously engrafted on the patient. The composite material, and specifically Composite Biocompatible Skin Graft (CBSG) material comprises autologous keratinocytes and allogenic or autologous dermal fibroblasts grown on Laserskin. A method for cultivating the CBSG includes the application of dermal fibroblasts onto the substratum as a feeder layer and then the inoculation of autologous keratinocytes on the resultant structure. A method for engraftment comprises first applying an artificial skin with a protective silicone membrane on a wound area, thereby allowing vascularization; and following vascularization, removing the silicone membrane and engrafting the CBSG material onto the vascularized artificial skin.
Description
- This invention was made under the joint sponsorship of the Chinese University of Hong Kong of Shatin, Hong Kong SAR, and the Hospital Authority, also known as the Prince of Wales Hospital of Shatin, Hong Kong SAR.
- This invention relates to the cultivation of keratinocytes and dermal fibroblasts on a biosynthetic membrane and subsequent engraftment of this type of membrane on the neodermis of artificial skin with particular application to humans. This invention also relates to fabricated graft materials.
- Prompt wound coverage for protection and stabilization is essential for the treatment of burns. The 3T3 cell-feeder layer technique developed by Rheinwald and Green in the 1970s is the standard method for cultivation of autologous epidermal autograft or so-called cultivated epidermal autograft material (“CEA”). A small piece of native skin from the patient can be cultured and expanded to 500 times or more in size within 3-4 weeks. However, the lack of dermis and the fragility of the cultured graft often result in unpredictable grafting success rates ranging from 0%-80%, as reported by Tompkins et al. (1992) and Herzog et al. (1991).
- Alloderm™ and Integra™ are two currently popular examples of human skin substitute commercially available in the market. Integra™, a brand of artificial skin is sold by Integra LifeScience Corporation of New Jersey, USA, and has been approved by FDA for use in the USA since 1996. Artificial skin is a bilayer biosynthetic sheet comprising porous collagen-glycoaminoglycan integrated with a thin silicone membrane as an outer layer. The use of artificial skin such as Integra as a biocompatible acellular dermal replacement in deep and full-thickness burn wounds is well known.
- It has been observed that within about 14 to 21 days following the grafting of Integra, there is full vascularization of the neodermis formed in the Integra. Thereafter an ultra thin split thickness skin graft must be harvested from a donor site in order to cover the neodermis immediately after the silicone membrane is removed. Substantial research effort has been undertaken in the past to determine the possibility of reliably grafting CEA on the neodermis, since an effective combination of CEA and Integra should eliminate the second operative stage, the associated pain and scaring, as well as a need for a second donor site, which may not be available in extensively burned patients. If the grafted CEA does not ‘take’ on the neodermis of Integra after the silicone membrane is peeled off, it can be replaced by another CEA. Whereas, in the conventional application of Integra, another split thickness autograft must be harvested from a second or even a third donor site. There have been very limited initial anecdotal reports on experience with such a combination technique, such as Sheridan et al. 1999 and Pandya et al. 1998. At the 10th Congress of International Society For Burn Injuries, November 1998 in Israel, the difficulties with the conventionally cultured graft anchoring onto the neodermis of Integra were addressed. The exact reasons for such difficulties remain unknown.
- Laserskin™ material is a thin and pliable biosynthetic membrane comprising a 100% benzyl esterified hyaluronic acid derivative suitable for use as a substratum in the growth of skin cells. The recommendation of the manufacturer is to seed human keratinocytes on Laserskin preseeded with irradiated 3T3 cells as feeder layer. When following the manufacturer's recommendation, it was found that, after the initiation of the formation of keratinocyte colonies, the xenogenic 3T3 cells growing on the Laserskin were less likely to be washed away than those growing on a culture dish as in the conventional Green's method during each flushing procedure with phosphate-buffered saline. It is believed that the remaining 3T3 cells or debris might have sensitized the host to xenogenic antigen resulting in undesired late graft rejection. What is needed is a cultivation and engraftment procedure with a biocompatible, durable human skin substitute.
- The following references, not all of which are prior art for the purposes of a patent application, are hereby made of record and incorporated herein by reference for the purposes described in this text:
- 1) Rheinwald J, Green H. “Serial cultivation of strain of human epidermal keratinocytes: The formation of keratinizing colonies from single cells.” Cell 1975; 6: 331-344.
- 2) Tompkins R G, Burke J F. “Burn wound closure using permanent skin replacement material.” World J Surgery 1992; 16: 47-52.
- 3) Herzog S R, Meyer A, Woodley D, Peterson H D. “Wound coverage with cultured autologous keratinocytes: Use after burn wound excision, including biopsy follow-up.” J Trauma 1991; 28: 195-1999.
- 4) Yannas I V, Burke J F, Orgill D P, Skrabut E M. “Wound tissues can utilize a polymeric template to synthesize a functional extension of skin.” Science 1982; 215: 174-176.
- 5) Heimbach D, Letterman A, Burke J et al. “Artificial dermis for major burns. A multi-center randomized clinical trial.” Ann Surgery 1988; 208: 313-320.
- 6) Sheridan R L, Heggerty M, Tompkins R G, Burke J F. “Artificial skin in massive burns-results at ten years.” Eur J Plast Surgery 1994; 17: 91-93.
- 7) Sheridan R L, Tompkins R G. “Skin substitutes in burns.” Burns 1999; 25: 97-103.
- 8) Pandya A N, Woodward B, Parkhouse N. “The use of cultured autologous keratinocytes with Integra in the resurfacing of acute burns.” Plast Reconst Surgery 1998; 102: 825-828.
- 9) Hultman C S, Brinson G M, Silitharm S, et al. “Allogenic fibroblasts used to grow cultured epidermal autografts persist in vivo and sensitize the graft recipient for accelerated second-set rejection.” J Trauma 1996; 41: 51-60.
- 10) Lam P K, King W K, et al. “Development and evaluation of a new composite Laserskin graft” Abstracts of the 10th Congress of International Society For Burn Injuries, Nov. 1-6, 1998, Jerusalem, Israel, p. 46.
- 11) Sato T, Kirimura Y, Mori Y. “The co-culture of dermal fibroblasts with human epidermal keratinocytes induces increased prostaglandin E2 production and cyclooxygenase 2 activity in fibroblasts.” J Investigative Dermatology 1997; 109: 334-339.
- 12) Pano R J, Rubin J R, Aaronson S A, Mason R. “Keratinocytes growth factor and hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor are heparin-binding growth factors for alveolar type II cells in fibroblast-conditioned medium.” J Clin Invest 1993; 92: 969-977.
- 13) Burd D A R, Greco R M, Regauer M T, et al. “Hyaluron and wound healing: a new perspective.” Br J Plast Surgery 1991; 44: 579-584.
- 14) Feinberg R N, Beebe D C. “Hyaluronate in vasoculogenesis.” Science 1983; 220: 1177-1179.
- 15) Alman D G. Practical Statistics for Medical Research Chapman & Hall, London 1991 pp. 211, 260-261.
- 16) Harris P A, Francesco F di, Barisoni D, Leigh I M, Navsaria H A. “Use of hyaluronic acid and cultured autologous keratinocytes and fibroblasts in extensive burns.” Lancet 1999; 353: 35-36.
- 17) Myers S R, Grady J, Soranzo C, Sander R, et al. “A hyaluronic acid membrane delivery system for cultured keratinocytes: Clinical take rates in the porcine Kerato-Dermal model.” J Burn Care Rehabil 1977; 18: 214-222.
- 18) Hansbrough J F, Dore C, Hansbrough W N. “Clinical trials of living dermal tissue replacement placed beneath meshed, split-thickness skin grafts on excised burn wounds.” J Burn Care Rehabil 1992; 13: 519-529.
- According to the invention, autologous cultured keratinocytes grown on a biocompatible substratum are engrafted on the neodermis of artificial skin covering a wound. Autologous keratinocytes may be cultivated on a commercially available membrane such as Laserskin™ (available from Fidia Advanced Biopolymers Ltd., Abano Terme (PD), Italy) following pre-seeding with autologous or allogenic dermal fibroblasts. The resultant composite material may then be applied on the neodermis of artificial skin which had been previously engrafted on the patient. The composite material, and specifically Composite Biocompatible Skin Graft (CBSG) material comprises autologous keratinocytes and allogenic or autologous dermal fibroblasts grown on the substratum. A method for fabricating the composite material includes the application of dermal fibroblasts onto the substratum as a feeder layer and then inoculating autologous keratinocytes on the resultant structure. A method for engraftment comprises first applying an artificial skin with a protective silicone membrane on a wound area, thereby allowing vascularization; following vascularization, removing the silicone membrane and engrafting the cultured composite material onto the vascularized artificial skin.
- Human fibroblasts used in the cultivation technique according to the invention were found to achieve a role similar to 3T3 cells in the initiation of keratinocyte colonies on Laserskin. Specifically, it was found that the seeding efficacy of human keratinocytes was increased to up to 95%. CBSG containing autologous keratinocytes and autologous dermal fibroblast or allogenic dermal fibroblasts or a combination of autologous and allogenic dermal fibroblasts according to the invention, has been successfully applied to burn patients whose wounds were previously grafted with allografts employing the engraftment techniques according to the invention.
- The purpose of this invention is to simplify burn treatment further and eventually to save lives of patients having extensive burns where little or no autologous skin grafts can be repeatedly harvested in a short period of time. With the inventive technique, all dead skin tissue of a patient with extensive burns can be excised within about three to seven days after injury. The wound can be covered with artificial skin, such as Integra™ or any dermal equivalent thereof, and only a small quantity of harvested normal skin would be required to initiate skin culture, which may thereafter be engrafted, according to the invention, on the neodermis of the artificial skin, with resultant lower rejection and infection incidences.
- CBSG material according to the invention offers notable advantages. First, the basal proteins (including the early basement membrane proteins such as collagen IV and fibronectin) of the cultured graft are protected from dispase treatment because the keratinocytes are directly cultivated on the pliable Laserskin. This is believed to enhance anchorage of the cultured keratinocytes on the neodermis of Integra. Second, in addition to acting as a feeder layer, the dermal fibroblasts in the inventive CBSG material evidently produce a number of proteins such as native collagen fibers and fibronectin which is believed to facilitate the attachment of a cultured graft. Third, the cultured keratinocytes of the inventive CBSG can be grafted five to seven days sooner than can traditionally-cultured keratinocytes. This is because cultured keratinocytes of the inventive CBSG are capable of being transferred and grafted at the sub-confluent or less differentiated stage rather than at a later confluent stage. Fourth, since there is minimal need for a donor site there is less likelihood of widespread scarring related to donor site harvesting. Fifth, the cultured keratinocytes of CBSG can be handled much more easily than the conventional CEA during its application on the neodermis of the artificial skin. Fewer cultured cells are lost or damaged during the transfer and application of CBSG. This should improve the success rate of the cultured graft. Sixth, the inventive engraftment technique can result in higher demand and broader scope of clinical applications for artificial skin.
- The invention will be better understood by reference to the following detailed description in connection with the accompanying drawings.
- FIG. 1A- 1C are schematic diagrams of cross-sections of Type A, B and C embodiments of a cultured graft material according to the invention.
- FIG. 2A- 2C are schematic diagrams of cross-sections of skin grafts illustrating the engraftment technique according to the invention.
- FIG. 1A, is what is herein termed a Type A composite skin graft material. In a specific embodiment it is formed by cultivating autologous keratinocytes on a commercially-available
biosynthetic substratum 14 of a derivative of benzyl esterified hyaluronic acid. On the basal side and on the upper side of thesubstratum 14 layers ofdermal fibroblasts 12 are seeded and grown. Over thedermal fibroblasts 12 of the upper side, a layer ofautologous keratinocytes 10 is grown. Thekeratinocytes 10 are harvested from the target donor patient. The dermal fibroblasts can be autologous or allogenic. - FIG. 1B is a Type B composite skin graft material. In a specific embodiment it is formed of a cultivation of autologous keratinocytes on commercially-available
biosynthetic substratum 14. On the upper side of thesubstratum 14 there is a layer ofdermal fibroblasts 12. Over thedermal fibroblasts 12 of the upper side is a layer ofautologous keratinocytes 10. The dermal fibroblasts can be autologous or allogenic. - FIG. 1C is a Type C composite skin graft material. Originally intended as a control, it is, in a specific embodiment, formed of a cultivation of autologous keratinocytes on
substratum 14. On the upper side of thesubstratum 14 there is merely a layer ofkeratinocytes 10. - FIG. 2A is an illustration of a first stage in an engraftment method according to the invention. In FIG. 2A there is a
wound bed 26 of a patient on Day Zero prior to the commencement of treatment. Anartificial skin substrate 20 is applied upon thewound bed 26. Theartificial skin substrate 20 has a basal side and an upper side. It comprises alayer 24 of collagen-glycoaminoglycan on its basal side, thus in a position to be juxtaposed to thewound bed 26. A coveringmembrane 22 of silicone is on the opposing upper side of thesubstrate 20. For a period of about fourteen days to about twenty-one days, the wound bed remains covered in order to allow vascularization of the neodermis. Referring to FIG. 2B, at this point, thesilicone membrane 22 is removed from the vascularized neodermis ofartificial skin 24′ in preparation for immediate further treatment. Referring to FIG. 2C, one of Type A, B or C compositeskin graft material 28 is engrafted on thelayer 24′. In the specific embodiment, thematerial 28 comprises asubstratum 34 having thereon autologous cultivatedkeratinocytes 30 of the donor patient, typically having thereunder on the substratum a layer ofdermal fibroblasts 32, depending on the type ofgraft material 28. - The following is a detailed discussion of the materials and results of actual clinical experiments.
- Laserskin
- Laserskin is a biosynthetic biocompatible substratum for keratinocyte cultivation according to the invention. It is a form of thin and pliable biosynthetic membrane comprising a 100% benzyl esterified hyaluronic acid derivative. Laserskin is commercially available from Fidia Advanced Biopolymers Ltd., Abano Terme (PD), Italy. Laserskin was found to be useful to the inventors' experiments, although its preparation and application are not done according to the manufacturer's conventional instructions. There is nothing to preclude the use of compatible bioequivalents or human skin substitutes would also work in a similar fashion with the inventive CBSG.
- Keratinocyte and Fibroblast Culture Sources
- In the specific experiments undertaken, human keratinocytes and fibroblasts were derived from human foreskin obtained from circumcision for the human part of study. Rat keratinocytes and fibroblasts were obtained from Spraque Dawley rat (body weight, 400-450 gm). The primary cultures of human and rat keratinocytes were grown on mitomycin C-treated 3T3 feeder layer. The secondary and tertiary cultures of human keratinocytes were maintained in defined keratinocyte growth medium (Gibco), whereas rat keratinocytes were continuously grown on 3T3 feeder layer. Fibroblasts were cultivated in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS.
- Comparison of Seeding Efficacy of Human Keratinocytes on Laserskin
- Human dermal fibroblasts and 3T3 cells were grown separately on Laserskin with DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS. At sub-confluency, the 3T3 cells were treated with mitomycin-C (4 mg/ml) for 2 hours at 37° C., whereas the human fibroblasts were not treated. Human keratinocytes were seeded (3×10 4 cells/cm2) on top of the Laserskin either pre-seeded with 3T3 cells or human fibroblasts. The keratinocyte suspension was instilled and concentrated on the Laserskin surface (0.5 ml/cm2). Thirty minutes after seeding, DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS, insulin (4 mg/ml), cholera toxin (6 ng/ml), and EGF (10 ng/ml) (per Rheinwald et al. 75) were added to the culture.
- In a control run, human keratinocytes were also seeded on top of plain Laserskin (FIG. 1C). Efficacy was exhibited as hereinafter noted. After incubation at 37° C. in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO 2 for 24 hours, the non-seeded keratinocytes on the Laserskin were gently rinsed off with PBS. The cells were then counted with a hemocytometer. In order to quantify the number of fibroblasts or 3T3 cells detached together with the non-seeded keratinocytes during the washing of the Laserskin, the Laserskin without keratinocytes but seeded with equivalent number of 3T3 cells or fibroblasts were included as control.
- Comparison of Seeding Efficacy of Rat Keratinocytes on Laserskin
- The seeding of rat keratinocytes on Laserskin was performed according to a technique essentially the same as the seeding of human keratinocytes. Rat fibroblasts were used to replace the human fibroblasts.
- Preparation of CBSG Graft for Use on Full-Thickness Wounds
- Three different types of composite skin graft (CBSG) materials were compared and tested in animals, specifically laboratory rats. Type A CBSG consisted of allogenic rat fibroblasts seeded onto the basal side of a Laserskin substratum. The fibroblasts were stimulated to produce collagen and other proteins by feeding the fibroblasts with DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS and 50 cm ascorbic acid. After ten days, the Laserskin substratum was turned over and the upper side was seeded with fibroblasts. The fibroblasts on both sides were then fed with DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS. When the fibroblasts on the upper side became sub-confluent, rat keratinocytes were seeded (3×10 4 cells/cm2) on top of the upper surface of CBSG material. The cells were fed with DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS, insulin (4 mg/ml), cholera toxin (6 ng/ml), EGF(10 ng/ml). The keratinocytes became sub-confluent and were ready for grafting after only four to six days.
- Two further types of CBSG materials were prepared. In Type B CBSG materials, the fibroblasts and keratinocytes were grown only on the upper side of the substratum. In Type C CBSG, keratinocytes alone were seeded on the upper side. As will be evident hereafter, all three types had a demonstrable efficacy.
- Grafting Procedures
- Using twenty Spraque Dawley rats for the experiment, three separate full-thickness wounds, 2 cm in diameter each, were created on the dorsal area of each animal. The CBSG sheets were rinsed thoroughly with sterile PBS in a culture dish. They were lifted from the culture dish and placed directly on the wound so that the basal side of the CBSG was in contact with the wound. Non-adherent dressing was placed over the graft site. Each animal was engrafted with the three different types of CBSG materials. The migration of the epithelium from the cut wound edge was prevented by application of a polypropylene ring. The entire dressing was protected with porous thermal plastic. All grafts consisted of autologous keratinocytes and allogenic dermal fibroblasts.
- Data Analysis
- The ‘take’ rate of the CBSG materials was analyzed with the Fisher Exact Test using Stat Xact (version 2.05). In multiple comparisons, the p values were further adjusted by the Bonferron method (i.e., multiplying the p value obtained from each test by k paired comparisons) in order to account for the so called ‘serial t test’.
- Results
- Twenty-four hours after the seeding on the CBSG substratum, the non-viable and unseeded keratinocytes were carefully washed away and concentrated for counting. There were no detectable 3T3 cells or fibroblasts detached from the Laserskin during the washing procedure. The seeding efficacy of keratinocytes was calculated as:
- It is evident that the selected type of CBSG substratum provided a suitable culture template for the in vitro proliferation of keratinocytes. On a plain Laserskin substratum, human keratinocytes showed a mean seeding efficacy of 75%. These human keratinocytes had a 95% seeding efficacy on Laserskin populated with human fibroblasts and a 98% on 3T3 cell-seeded Laserskin (Table 1). Rat keratinocytes had a seeding efficacy of 36% on plain Laserskin. The respective seeding efficacies of rat keratinocytes on 3T3/Laserskin and on allogenic fibroblasts/Laserskin were 91% and 88%. The seeding efficacies of human/rat keratinocytes growing on 3T3 cell/Laserskin or on allogenic fibroblasts/Laserskin were significantly (p<0.001) better than those seeded on plain Laserskin, as noted in the Fisher Exact Testing using Stat Xact (version 2.05) statistical package.
- It is believed that human/rat fibroblasts could achieve a role similar to that of the 3T3 cells in enhancing the seeding efficacies of keratinocytes growing on Laserskin with respective p values of 0.445 and 0.646 using the same statistical package.
- The optical transparency of the Laserskin allowed regular inspection of the grafted wound bed as it healed. Skin biopsies were taken from the center of the grafted area of the subject. It was observed that the polypropylene ring prevented the migration of epithelium from the wound edge as no epithelial cell was found in the control rat wound sutured with polypropylene ring alone up to day 21. In sixteen out of the twenty (80%) animal wounds covered with Type A CBSG, the keratinocytes formed a multi-layered epithelium that had a basal layer in contact with underlying connective tissue. The undersurface of epidermis did not show rete. Fibrovascular ingrowth of connective tissue into the Laserskin was observed. Eight (40%) of the Type B CBSG sites and seven (35%) of the Type C CBSG sites showed re-epitheliazation. Histologically there was no observable epithelium in 3 (15%), 10 (50%), and 12 (55%) of the grafted CBSG sites of Types A, B and C respectively (Table 2).
- The graft take rate of Type A CBSG was found to be significantly higher than those of Types B and C CBSG in the Fisher Exact Test/Bonferron method analysis with respective p values of 0.0419 and 0.018. There was no significant difference (p>0.1) of the graft take rate between Types B and C CBSG(table 2). Infection occurred in only one (5%) animal with a Type A or C CBSG graft and in two (10%) animals with a Type B CBSG graft.
- A preliminary clinical trial of CBSG was also conducted on two human burn patients (designated CLB & CKT). Three out of the five (60%) grafted wounds in patient CLB developed stratified epithelium (Table 3). The other two grafts were lost because of the bacterial colonization at the adjacent tissues. All three skin biopsies from patient CKT showed complete epithelization with primitive rete ridge formation. There was no severe immunologic reaction to the allogenic fibroblasts in these two patients or in the animal experiments. Clinically, the CBSG grafts were durable. All grafts were histologically confirmed as a ‘take’ at two weeks, and they remained clinically intact on the recipient wound at eight weeks post-grafting. No further biopsies were taken of the patients.
- Discussion
- Problems encountered in cultivation of keratinocytes on Laserskin type material can be attributed to limited experience on this new product. Hyaluronic acid is a mucopolysaccharide with alternating β1-3 glucuronidic and β1-4 glycosaminidic bonds. Laserskin mainly consists of 100% benzyl esterified hyaluronic acid. A weak electrostatic association exists between the keratinocytes and the Laserskin. Since the volume and surface area of human keratinocytes differ from those of rat keratinocytes, there is a variation of charge density of two cell populations. Consequently they have different seeding efficacies on plain Laserskin. The species-specific difference was abolished by cultivating keratinocytes on 3T3 cell/Laserskin because 3T3 cells were the dominant factors influencing keratinocyte attachment on Laserskin.
- The seeding efficacies of human and rat keratinocytes (3×10 4 cells/cm2) were 75% and 36% respectively on plain Laserskin. The manufacturer recommends seeding the human keratinocytes on Laserskin pre-seeded with irradiated 3T3 cells. Good seeding efficiencies of 98% (human keratinocytes) and 91% (rat keratinocytes) were demonstrated on Laserskin with Mitomycin-treated 3T3 cells. In Green's method, keratinocytes are seeded on a 3T3 cell feeder layer which allows a rather low seeding density of 6-10×104 cells/cm2 for the primary culture. A smaller seeding density of 2-5×104 cells/cm2 is feasible for the secondary and tertiary cultures. The utility of cultured epidermal autograft grown on culture dish using Green's feeder layer technique is limited by the persistent 3T3 fibroblasts which sensitize the host to xenogenic antigen resulting in late graft rejection. The 3T3 cells were found less likely to be washed away from the Laserskin. However, allogenic fibroblasts can achieve a similar role as 3T3 cells in initiation of keratinocyte colonization on Laserskin.
- It is evident that the CBSG material consisting of cultured keratinocytes and dermal fibroblasts is a good human skin substitute for freshly excised full-thickness wounds which were previously grafted with allografts.
TABLE 1 Mean Seeding Efficacies of Human and Rat Keratinocytes on Laserskin. 15 determinations were made. Seeding efficacies of human/rat keratinocytes were significantly improved by 3T3 cells/fibroblasts (p < 0.001). Human Keratinocytes Rat keratinocytes Plain Laserskin 75% 36% Laserskin with 3T3 cells 98% 91% Laserskin with human fibroblasts 95% — Laserskin with rat fibroblasts — 88% -
TABLE 2 Evaluation of Composite Biocompatible Skin Graft on Animals Type A CBSG had a higher graft take rate than types B & C with respective p values of 0.0419 and 0.018. Type A(N = 20) Type B(N = 20) Keratinocytes + Keratinocytes + Type C(N = 20) Fibroblasts on Fibroblasts on Keratinocytes Results both sides upper side alone Grafted epithelium observed 16 (80%) 8 (40%) 7 (35%) No epithelium observed 3 (15%) 10 (50%) 12 (55%) Infection 1 (5%) 2 (10%) 1 (5%) -
TABLE 3 Preliminary Clinical Trials on Composite Biocompatible Skin Graft. Grafted sites Graft Histology Left hand (2) v v Patient CLB Left arm X Left forearm v Left shoulder X Patient CKT Left arm v Left forearm (2) v v - Attempts were made to graft freshly harvested epidermis onto the neodermis of Integra in animal experiments. The dermal-epidermal separation was performed with dispase. The epidermal graft was not easily ‘taken’ by the neodermis whereas thin split thickness autografts readily incorporated on the neodermis as in many clinical applications. It is believed that the presence of fibroblasts in the dermis of the thin autograft may play an essential role in the keratinocyte attachment and its proliferation on the neodermis. It was observed that, during wound healing, cell-cell interactions between epidermal keratinocytes and dermal fibroblasts contributed to the organization of epidermis. Prostaglandin E2 (PGF2) is considered to be involved in the proliferation and differentiation of keratinocytes. The production of PEG2 was enhanced in the co-culture of keratinocytes and fibroblasts, whereas the PEG2 production was negligible in monolayer cultures of keratinocytes or fibroblasts. The fibroblasts also produced two soluble heparin-binding growth factors such as keratinocyte growth factor and hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor that promote DNA synthesis and proliferation of keratinocytes.
- The combination of the inventive CBSG material including keratinocytes and dermal fibroblasts and Integra artificial skin was applied to a 28-year old man with extensive hypertrophic burn scars and neck contracture. Multiple wounds from scar excision with a total area of approximately 250 cm 2 were covered with Integra. At the same time a skin biopsy was taken for keratinocyte culture. Two weeks later, the top silicone layer of the artificial skin was removed. The neodermis of the artificial skin was then covered with the CBSG. At
Days 6 and 14 after the application of CBSG, biopsies were taken from center of one of the wounds. The histology at Day 6 showed early epithelization with a few squamous epithelial cells settling on top of the scaffolds of Integra and Laserskin. Most of the epithelium were single-layer flattened squamous cells. The biopsy taken onDay 14 showed a viable 2- to 4-cell-thick squamous epithelium with minimal inflammation. The wounds were completely epithelized within four weeks of the application of the CBSG. Biopsies taken from other wounds showed similar findings. - The invention has now been explained with reference to specific embodiments. Other embodiments will be evident to those of ordinary skill in the art. It is therefor not intended that this invention be limited, except as indicated by the appended claims.
Claims (17)
1. A method for cultivation of graftable skin comprising:
growing a layer of dermal fibroblasts upon at least an upper side of a biosynthetic substratum of a derivative of benzyl esterified hyaluronic acid; and, after said dermal fibroblast layer becomes at least sub-confluent,
growing a layer of keratinocytes over said dermal fibroblasts upon said upper side of said substratum to form a composite skin graft material, said keratinocytes being harvested from a target donor patient.
2. The method according to claim 1 wherein said dermal fibroblasts are allogenic.
3. The method according to claim 1 wherein said dermal fibroblasts are autologous.
4. A method for cultivation of graftable skin comprising:
growing a first layer of dermal fibroblasts upon a first basal side of a biosynthetic substratum of a derivative of benzyl esterified hyaluronic acid;
growing second layer of dermal fibroblasts upon a second upper side of said biosynthetic substratum; and
after said second dermal fibroblast layer becomes at least sub-confluent, growing a layer of keratinocytes over said dermal fibroblasts upon said upper side of said substratum to form a composite skin material, said keratinocytes having been harvested from a target donor patient.
5. The method according to claim 4 wherein said dermal fibroblasts are allogenic.
6. The method according to claim 4 wherein said dermal fibroblasts are autologous.
7. A method for cultivation of graftable skin comprising:
growing a layer of keratinocytes upon an upper side of a substratum of a biosynthetic substratum of a derivative of benzyl esterified hyaluronic acid to form a composite skin graft material, said keratinocytes having been harvested from a target donor patient.
8. A graftable skin material compromising a composite of:
a biosynthetic substratum of a derivative of benzyl esterified hyaluronic acid;
a layer of dermal fibroblasts upon at least an upper side of said biosynthetic substratum; and
a layer of keratinocytes over said dermal fibroblasts upon said upper side of said substratum, said keratinocytes having been harvested from a target donor patient.
9. The material according to claim 8 wherein said dermal fibroblasts are allogenic.
10. The material according to claim 8 wherein said dermal fibroblasts are autologous.
11. A graftable skin material comprising a composite of:
a biosynthetic substratum of a derivative of benzyl esterified hyaluronic acid;
a first layer of dermal fibroblasts upon a first basal side of said biosynthetic substratum;
a second layer of dermal fibroblasts upon a second upper side of said biosynthetic substratum; and
a layer of keratinocytes over said dermal fibroblasts upon said upper side of said substratum, said keratinocytes having been harvested from a target donor patient.
12. The material according to claim 11 wherein said dermal fibroblasts are allogenic.
13. The material according to claim 11 wherein said dermal fibroblasts are autologous.
14. A graftable skin material comprising:
a substratum of a biosynthetic substratum of a derivative of benzyl esterified hyaluronic acid; and
a layer of keratinocytes upon an upper side of said substratum, said keratinocytes having been harvested from a target donor patient.
15. A method for grafting a graftable skin material comprising the steps of:
applying an artificial skin substrate upon a wound bed of a recipient patient; said artificial skin substrate comprising a layer of collagen-glycoaminoglycan on a basal side to be juxtaposed to said wound bed and a covering membrane of silicone on an opposing upper side;
allowing a sufficient time to form a vascularized wound bed under said collagen-glycoaminoglycan; thereupon
removing said silicone membrane; and thereupon
applying a basal side of a sheet of cultivated skin material over said collagen-glycoaminoglycan, said cultivated skin material comprising at least a layer of keratinocytes upon an upper side of a substratum, said keratinocytes being harvested from a target donor patient.
16. The method according to claim 15 wherein said cultivated skin material further comprises a layer of dermal fibroblasts upon at least an upper side of a biosynthetic substratum and wherein said layer of keratinocytes is over said dermal fibroblasts.
17. The method according to claim 16 wherein said cultivated skin material further comprises a layer of dermal fibroblasts upon said basal side of said biosynthetic substratum.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US10/778,760 US20040162615A1 (en) | 1999-08-02 | 2004-02-12 | Material and method for engraftment of a composite biocompatible skin graft on the neodermis of artificial skin |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US09/365,677 US6733530B1 (en) | 1999-08-02 | 1999-08-02 | Material and method for engraftment of a composite biocompatible skin graft on the neodermis of artificial skin |
| US10/778,760 US20040162615A1 (en) | 1999-08-02 | 2004-02-12 | Material and method for engraftment of a composite biocompatible skin graft on the neodermis of artificial skin |
Related Parent Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| US09/365,677 Continuation US6733530B1 (en) | 1999-08-02 | 1999-08-02 | Material and method for engraftment of a composite biocompatible skin graft on the neodermis of artificial skin |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| US20040162615A1 true US20040162615A1 (en) | 2004-08-19 |
Family
ID=32230058
Family Applications (2)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| US09/365,677 Expired - Lifetime US6733530B1 (en) | 1999-08-02 | 1999-08-02 | Material and method for engraftment of a composite biocompatible skin graft on the neodermis of artificial skin |
| US10/778,760 Abandoned US20040162615A1 (en) | 1999-08-02 | 2004-02-12 | Material and method for engraftment of a composite biocompatible skin graft on the neodermis of artificial skin |
Family Applications Before (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| US09/365,677 Expired - Lifetime US6733530B1 (en) | 1999-08-02 | 1999-08-02 | Material and method for engraftment of a composite biocompatible skin graft on the neodermis of artificial skin |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (2) | US6733530B1 (en) |
Cited By (8)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WO2006125991A1 (en) * | 2005-05-26 | 2006-11-30 | Intercytex Limited | Tissue repair using allogenic dermal fibroblasts |
| US20080095748A1 (en) * | 2006-10-23 | 2008-04-24 | Alexander Kharazi | Cellular scaffold |
| US20080193507A1 (en) * | 2004-02-13 | 2008-08-14 | Paul Kemp | Wound Healing Profile |
| CN100462059C (en) * | 2005-05-25 | 2009-02-18 | 中国人民解放军第四军医大学口腔医院 | Preparation method of artificial skin for repairing skin defect |
| US20110027366A1 (en) * | 2005-03-14 | 2011-02-03 | Dfb Technology Holdings, Llc | Skin equivalent culture |
| WO2013151725A1 (en) | 2012-04-05 | 2013-10-10 | The Regents Of The University Of California | Regenerative sera cells and mesenchymal stem cells |
| US8709081B2 (en) | 2006-10-23 | 2014-04-29 | Stemedica Cell Technologies, Inc. | Cellular scaffold |
| CN107320781A (en) * | 2017-07-11 | 2017-11-07 | 广州润虹医药科技股份有限公司 | Organization engineering skin containing living cells and preparation method thereof |
Families Citing this family (13)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BR9915476A (en) * | 1998-11-19 | 2002-01-02 | Organogenesis Inc | Fabric constructs made by bioengineering and methods for their production and use |
| US6479072B1 (en) * | 1999-02-11 | 2002-11-12 | The General Hospital Corporation | Microfabricated membranes and matrices |
| US7741116B2 (en) | 2002-03-06 | 2010-06-22 | University Of Cincinnati | Surgical device for skin therapy or testing |
| US20080281421A1 (en) * | 2004-05-24 | 2008-11-13 | Frederick Cahn | Wound Closure System and Methods |
| US9259445B2 (en) * | 2006-06-07 | 2016-02-16 | Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria | Integrated implant system (IIS) biocompatible, biodegradable and bioactive, comprising a biocompatible sterile porous polymeric matrix and a gel, integrating in situ the tridimensional matrix structure |
| WO2008027984A1 (en) | 2006-08-29 | 2008-03-06 | Isolagen Technologies, Inc. | Methods for culturing minimally-passaged fibroblasts and uses thereof |
| US8097274B2 (en) * | 2006-10-27 | 2012-01-17 | National Defense Medical Center | Skin substitutes, preparation methods and uses thereof |
| EP1918365A1 (en) * | 2006-10-30 | 2008-05-07 | DKFZ Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum | Labeling of human epidermal stem cells |
| US20100303770A1 (en) * | 2006-12-28 | 2010-12-02 | John Maslowski | Methods for culturing dermal cells for treatment of skin injuries such as burns |
| US8529883B2 (en) | 2010-05-07 | 2013-09-10 | Fibrocell Technologies, Inc. | Dosage unit formulations of autologous dermal fibroblasts |
| US8765121B2 (en) | 2010-10-14 | 2014-07-01 | Fibrocell Technologies, Inc. | Treatment of vocal cords with autologous dermal fibroblast formulation |
| CN107496053A (en) * | 2017-08-11 | 2017-12-22 | 京东方科技集团股份有限公司 | Electronic skin, preparation method and driving method |
| US11193858B2 (en) | 2018-05-01 | 2021-12-07 | Community Blood Center | Tissue planing assemblies and methods |
Citations (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US5489304A (en) * | 1994-04-19 | 1996-02-06 | Brigham & Women's Hospital | Method of skin regeneration using a collagen-glycosaminoglycan matrix and cultured epithelial autograft |
| US5658331A (en) * | 1990-06-01 | 1997-08-19 | Fidia S.P.A. | Biocompatible perforated membranes, processes for their preparation, their use as a support in the in vitro growth of epithelial cells, the artificial skin obtained in this manner, and its use in skin grafts |
-
1999
- 1999-08-02 US US09/365,677 patent/US6733530B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
2004
- 2004-02-12 US US10/778,760 patent/US20040162615A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US5658331A (en) * | 1990-06-01 | 1997-08-19 | Fidia S.P.A. | Biocompatible perforated membranes, processes for their preparation, their use as a support in the in vitro growth of epithelial cells, the artificial skin obtained in this manner, and its use in skin grafts |
| US5489304A (en) * | 1994-04-19 | 1996-02-06 | Brigham & Women's Hospital | Method of skin regeneration using a collagen-glycosaminoglycan matrix and cultured epithelial autograft |
Cited By (15)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US8765169B2 (en) | 2004-02-13 | 2014-07-01 | Smith & Nephew, Inc. | Wound healing profile |
| US9526746B2 (en) | 2004-02-13 | 2016-12-27 | Smith & Nephew, Inc. | Wound healing composition |
| US20080193507A1 (en) * | 2004-02-13 | 2008-08-14 | Paul Kemp | Wound Healing Profile |
| US20080226720A1 (en) * | 2004-02-13 | 2008-09-18 | Paul Kemp | Wound Healing Composition |
| US9248153B2 (en) | 2004-02-13 | 2016-02-02 | Smith & Nephew, Inc. | Wound healing profile |
| US20110027366A1 (en) * | 2005-03-14 | 2011-02-03 | Dfb Technology Holdings, Llc | Skin equivalent culture |
| US8114670B2 (en) | 2005-03-14 | 2012-02-14 | Dfb Technology Holdings, Llc | Skin equivalent culture |
| CN100462059C (en) * | 2005-05-25 | 2009-02-18 | 中国人民解放军第四军医大学口腔医院 | Preparation method of artificial skin for repairing skin defect |
| WO2006125991A1 (en) * | 2005-05-26 | 2006-11-30 | Intercytex Limited | Tissue repair using allogenic dermal fibroblasts |
| US9271923B2 (en) | 2005-05-26 | 2016-03-01 | Intercytex Limited | Tissue repair using allogeneic dermal fibroblasts |
| US8105380B2 (en) | 2006-10-23 | 2012-01-31 | Stemedica Cell Technologies, Inc. | Cellular scaffold |
| US8709081B2 (en) | 2006-10-23 | 2014-04-29 | Stemedica Cell Technologies, Inc. | Cellular scaffold |
| US20080095748A1 (en) * | 2006-10-23 | 2008-04-24 | Alexander Kharazi | Cellular scaffold |
| WO2013151725A1 (en) | 2012-04-05 | 2013-10-10 | The Regents Of The University Of California | Regenerative sera cells and mesenchymal stem cells |
| CN107320781A (en) * | 2017-07-11 | 2017-11-07 | 广州润虹医药科技股份有限公司 | Organization engineering skin containing living cells and preparation method thereof |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| US6733530B1 (en) | 2004-05-11 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US6733530B1 (en) | Material and method for engraftment of a composite biocompatible skin graft on the neodermis of artificial skin | |
| Lam et al. | Development and evaluation of a new composite Laserskin graft | |
| Kearney | Clinical evaluation of skin substitutes | |
| Eaglstein et al. | Tissue engineering and the development of Apligraf®, a human skin equivalent | |
| Hafemann et al. | Use of a collagen/elastin-membrane for the tissue engineering of dermis | |
| US5489304A (en) | Method of skin regeneration using a collagen-glycosaminoglycan matrix and cultured epithelial autograft | |
| Compton et al. | Organized skin structure is regenerated in vivo from collagen-GAG matrices seeded with autologous keratinocytes | |
| Barrandon et al. | New techniques for the grafting of cultured human epidermal cells onto athymic animals | |
| EP1483373B1 (en) | Surgical device for skin therapy or testing | |
| US5015584A (en) | Epidermal graft system | |
| Damour et al. | A dermal substrate made of collagen-GA-chitosan for deep burn coverage: first clinical uses | |
| Fang et al. | Clinical application of cultured epithelial autografts on acellular dermal matrices in the treatment of extended burn injuries | |
| WO1980001350A1 (en) | Skin-equivalent | |
| Orgill et al. | The use of collagen‐GAG membranes in reconstructive surgery | |
| US4888291A (en) | Human epithelium originating from cell cultures | |
| WO1999043787A2 (en) | A living chimeric skin replacement | |
| CA2406282C (en) | Method for expansion of epithelial stem cells | |
| McAree et al. | The use of cultured epithelial autografts in the wound care of severely burned patients | |
| Kantrowitz et al. | Development of a percutaneous access device | |
| Lam et al. | Combination of a new composite biocampatible skin graft on the neodermis of artificial skin in an animal model | |
| Tark et al. | Skin flap prefabrication using acellular dermal matrix and cultured keratinocytes in a porcine model | |
| US20040247573A1 (en) | Dermal replacement prepared from mesenchymal cells of hair follicle | |
| Hafemann et al. | Intermingled skin grafts with in vitro cultured keratinocytes-experiments with rats | |
| Gallico III et al. | Engineering a skin replacement | |
| CN114949363A (en) | Nano zinc oxide particle loaded autologous skin fibroblast patch and preparation method and application thereof |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |