[go: up one dir, main page]

US20030064196A1 - Glass substrate for information recording medium, manufacturing method thereof, and information recording medium - Google Patents

Glass substrate for information recording medium, manufacturing method thereof, and information recording medium Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20030064196A1
US20030064196A1 US10/194,787 US19478702A US2003064196A1 US 20030064196 A1 US20030064196 A1 US 20030064196A1 US 19478702 A US19478702 A US 19478702A US 2003064196 A1 US2003064196 A1 US 2003064196A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
mol
glass substrate
acid
glass
sio
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
US10/194,787
Other versions
US6547980B1 (en
Inventor
Junji Kurachi
Akihiro Koyama
Nobuyuki Yamamoto
Yasuhiro Saito
Kazuishi Mitani
Koichi Ataka
Yoshihiro Matsuno
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Hoya Corp
Original Assignee
Nippon Sheet Glass Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Nippon Sheet Glass Co Ltd filed Critical Nippon Sheet Glass Co Ltd
Priority to US10/194,787 priority Critical patent/US6547980B1/en
Publication of US20030064196A1 publication Critical patent/US20030064196A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US6547980B1 publication Critical patent/US6547980B1/en
Assigned to HOYA CORPORATION reassignment HOYA CORPORATION ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: NIPPON SHEET GLASS COMPANY, LIMITED
Assigned to HOYA CORPORATION reassignment HOYA CORPORATION ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: NIPPON SHEET GLASS COMPANY, LIMITED
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C03—GLASS; MINERAL OR SLAG WOOL
    • C03C—CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF GLASSES, GLAZES OR VITREOUS ENAMELS; SURFACE TREATMENT OF GLASS; SURFACE TREATMENT OF FIBRES OR FILAMENTS MADE FROM GLASS, MINERALS OR SLAGS; JOINING GLASS TO GLASS OR OTHER MATERIALS
    • C03C15/00—Surface treatment of glass, not in the form of fibres or filaments, by etching
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C03—GLASS; MINERAL OR SLAG WOOL
    • C03C—CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF GLASSES, GLAZES OR VITREOUS ENAMELS; SURFACE TREATMENT OF GLASS; SURFACE TREATMENT OF FIBRES OR FILAMENTS MADE FROM GLASS, MINERALS OR SLAGS; JOINING GLASS TO GLASS OR OTHER MATERIALS
    • C03C15/00—Surface treatment of glass, not in the form of fibres or filaments, by etching
    • C03C15/02—Surface treatment of glass, not in the form of fibres or filaments, by etching for making a smooth surface
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C03—GLASS; MINERAL OR SLAG WOOL
    • C03C—CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF GLASSES, GLAZES OR VITREOUS ENAMELS; SURFACE TREATMENT OF GLASS; SURFACE TREATMENT OF FIBRES OR FILAMENTS MADE FROM GLASS, MINERALS OR SLAGS; JOINING GLASS TO GLASS OR OTHER MATERIALS
    • C03C21/00—Treatment of glass, not in the form of fibres or filaments, by diffusing ions or metals in the surface
    • C03C21/001—Treatment of glass, not in the form of fibres or filaments, by diffusing ions or metals in the surface in liquid phase, e.g. molten salts, solutions
    • C03C21/002—Treatment of glass, not in the form of fibres or filaments, by diffusing ions or metals in the surface in liquid phase, e.g. molten salts, solutions to perform ion-exchange between alkali ions
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C03—GLASS; MINERAL OR SLAG WOOL
    • C03C—CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF GLASSES, GLAZES OR VITREOUS ENAMELS; SURFACE TREATMENT OF GLASS; SURFACE TREATMENT OF FIBRES OR FILAMENTS MADE FROM GLASS, MINERALS OR SLAGS; JOINING GLASS TO GLASS OR OTHER MATERIALS
    • C03C3/00—Glass compositions
    • C03C3/04—Glass compositions containing silica
    • C03C3/076—Glass compositions containing silica with 40% to 90% silica, by weight
    • C03C3/083—Glass compositions containing silica with 40% to 90% silica, by weight containing aluminium oxide or an iron compound
    • C03C3/085—Glass compositions containing silica with 40% to 90% silica, by weight containing aluminium oxide or an iron compound containing an oxide of a divalent metal
    • C03C3/087—Glass compositions containing silica with 40% to 90% silica, by weight containing aluminium oxide or an iron compound containing an oxide of a divalent metal containing calcium oxide, e.g. common sheet or container glass
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G11—INFORMATION STORAGE
    • G11B—INFORMATION STORAGE BASED ON RELATIVE MOVEMENT BETWEEN RECORD CARRIER AND TRANSDUCER
    • G11B5/00—Recording by magnetisation or demagnetisation of a record carrier; Reproducing by magnetic means; Record carriers therefor
    • G11B5/62—Record carriers characterised by the selection of the material
    • G11B5/73—Base layers, i.e. all non-magnetic layers lying under a lowermost magnetic recording layer, e.g. including any non-magnetic layer in between a first magnetic recording layer and either an underlying substrate or a soft magnetic underlayer
    • G11B5/739—Magnetic recording media substrates
    • G11B5/73911—Inorganic substrates
    • G11B5/73921—Glass or ceramic substrates
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C03—GLASS; MINERAL OR SLAG WOOL
    • C03C—CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF GLASSES, GLAZES OR VITREOUS ENAMELS; SURFACE TREATMENT OF GLASS; SURFACE TREATMENT OF FIBRES OR FILAMENTS MADE FROM GLASS, MINERALS OR SLAGS; JOINING GLASS TO GLASS OR OTHER MATERIALS
    • C03C2204/00—Glasses, glazes or enamels with special properties
    • C03C2204/08—Glass having a rough surface
    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10T—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
    • Y10T428/00—Stock material or miscellaneous articles
    • Y10T428/24—Structurally defined web or sheet [e.g., overall dimension, etc.]
    • Y10T428/24355—Continuous and nonuniform or irregular surface on layer or component [e.g., roofing, etc.]
    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10T—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
    • Y10T428/00—Stock material or miscellaneous articles
    • Y10T428/8305—Miscellaneous [e.g., treated surfaces, etc.]

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a glass substrate for an information recording medium such as a magnetic disk or the like, and more particularly to a highly acid-resistant glass substrate having an excellent level of surface smoothness.
  • aluminum substrates are used as substrates for use in information recording mediums.
  • the aluminum substrates are not suitable for use in disks for high-density recording.
  • glass substrates which have a high level of surface hardness and which can be polished to a high level of surface smoothness are used in disks for high-density recording.
  • Glass substrates for use in information recording mediums are fabricated by forming a molten material according to a float process, a rod process, and a press process, cutting the formed material to a desired substrate shape, if necessary, and thereafter polishing the substrate to adjust its thickness and surface smoothness to a predetermined range.
  • the polished substrate is strengthened by an ion exchange or the like. Consequently, fine particles of foreign matter, primarily a polishing compound, remain attached to the surface of the substrate. While those fine particles of foreign matter cannot completely be removed from the substrate by an ordinary cleaning process, they have heretofore posed no significant problems.
  • Japanese patent publication No. 46-4271 discloses a chemically strengthened glass composed of 1 to 5 weight % of MgO, 0 to 5 weight % of K 2 O, 5 to 25 weight % of Na 2 O, 5 to 25 weight % of Al 2 O 3 +ZrO 2 , and SiO 2 , the sum of which is 80% or more of the entire composition.
  • the disclosed glass is poor in acid resistance and hence cannot be treated by an acid for the removal of foreign matter therefrom.
  • Japanese laid-open patent publication No. 5-32431 discloses another chemically strengthened glass of improved acid resistance which is composed of 62 to 75 weight % of SiO 2 , 5 to 15 weight % of Al 2 O 3 , 4 to 10 weight % of Li 2 O, 4 to 12 weight % of Na 2 O, and 5.5 to 15 weight % of ZrO 2 , with the weight ratio of Na 2 O/ZrO 2 being in the range from 0.5 to 2.0 and the weight ratio of Al 2 O 3 /ZrO 2 being in the range from 0.4 to 2.5.
  • the publication fails to show a causal dependence of the acid resistance on surface irregularities.
  • the glass revealed in the publication contains a large amount of ZrO 2 , ZrO 2 tends to be separated out as fine crystals in the glass, which project on the surface after it is polished and are liable to cause an error and crash.
  • Japanese laid-open patent publication No. 62-187140 reveals still another chemically strengthened glass composed of 64 to 70 weight % of SiO 2 , 14 to 20 weight % of Al 2 O 3 , 4 to 6 weight % of Li 2 O, 7 to 10 weight % of Na 2 O, 0 to 4 weight % MgO, and 0 to 1.5 weight % of ZrO 2 .
  • the publication also fails to show a causal dependence of the acid resistance on surface irregularities.
  • Japanese laid-open patent publication No. 9-22525 discloses a process of cleaning a glass substrate pulled up out of a strengthening liquid with a solution containing an acid, in the fabrication of a glass substrate for use in a magnetic disk.
  • the disclosed process is aimed at only the removal of a chemically strengthening salt.
  • the publication is silent as to the acid resistance which the glass substrate is required to have, and does not suggest or describe the level of surface smoothness in question.
  • a glass substrate for an information recording medium having at least one surface as a recording surface, the glass substrate having an acid resistance represented by an etching rate of at most 45 nm/min. upon contact with a hydrofluoric acid having a temperature of 50° C. and a concentration of 0.1 weight %, at least the recording surface having an average surface roughness Ra smaller than 0.3 nm.
  • the components of the glass are not uniformly dissolved, but those components which are weaker on the acid are dissolved at first, and then those stronger on the acid are dissolved gradually.
  • the components which are weaker on the acid include alkali, alkaline earth group, alumina, etc., and those stronger on the acid include silica, zirconia, titania, etc.
  • the surface of the glass treated with the acid, as microscopically observed, has a porous layer of network structure mainly composed of silica, zirconia, titania, etc.
  • the etching rate of the substrate glass with an aqueous solution of 0.1 weight % of hydrofluoric acid at a temperature of 50° C., as an indication of acid resistance needs to be 45 nm/min. or less.
  • An acid liquid used in the present invention serves to dissolve a polishing compound on the glass substrate or etch the surface of the glass substrate to remove a polishing compound therefrom.
  • the acid liquid may include an inorganic acid such as hydrofluoric acid, a mixture of hydrofluoric acid and ammonium fluoride, hydrochloric acid, sulfuric acid, nitric acid, phosphoric acid, etc., or an organic acid such as sulfamic acid, formic acid, oxalic acid, citric acid, malic acid, hydroxyacetic acid, gluconic acid, etc.
  • the attached polishing compound can be removed irrespective of its type by etching the substrate surface with an acid having a high etching effect, such as hydrofluoric acid. If the concentration of the hydrofluoric acid used to remove the polishing compound were less than 0.002 weight %, then the removing ability would be insufficient, and if the concentration of the hydrofluoric acid exceeded 1 weight %, then fine defects of the glass substrate would appear on the surface. Therefore, the concentration of the hydrofluoric acid should preferably in the range from 0.002 to 1 weight %.
  • the etching rate of the substrate glass with an aqueous solution of 0.1 weight % of hydrofluoric acid at a temperature of 50° C. should preferably be 30 nm/min. or less.
  • the glass composition will hereinafter be expressed in terms of molar fractions unless otherwise specified.
  • composition of the glass substrate which meets the requirement for the etching rate of 30 nm/min. or less with the aqueous solution, of 0.1 weight % of hydrofluoric acid is preferably substantially the same as the above composition except that the difference SiO 2 ⁇ Al 2 O 3 is 58.5%, from the standpoint of glass solubility and substrate weather resistance.
  • the etching rate based on the aqueous solution of 0.1 weight % of hydrofluoric acid depends strongly on the difference SiO 2 ⁇ Al 2 O 3 as expressed by a molar fraction. If the difference SiO 2 ⁇ Al 2 O 3 were less than 56.5%, then the alkaline component would be required to be greatly reduced in order to make the etching rate equal to or less than 45 nm/min. through adjustments of other components.
  • the resultant composition would have a high dissolving temperature, and would not easily be chemically strengthened by an ion exchange.
  • the difference SiO 2 ⁇ Al 2 O 3 should preferably be 56.5% or 58.5% or higher.
  • SiO 2 is a major component of the glass. If the proportion of SiO 2 were less than 63%, then the chemical durability of the glass would be lowered. If the proportion of SiO 2 were in excess of 70%, then the viscosity would increase to the extent that it would be difficult to melt the glass. Therefore, the proportion of SiO 2 should preferably range from 63% to 70%.
  • Al 2 O 3 is a component for increasing the depth of a compressive stress layer due to an ion exchange and also increasing the water resistance of the glass. If the proportion of Al 2 O 3 were less than 4%, the above effects would not sufficiently be developed. If the proportion of Al 2 O 3 were greater than 11%, the viscosity would increase and the liquid phase temperature would increase more than the viscosity, resulting in a reduction in solubility. Therefore, the proportion of Al 2 O 3 should preferably range from 4% to 11%, and more preferably range from 6% to 11%.
  • Li 2 O is a component to be exchanged in an ion exchange and to increase the solubility. If the ratio of Li 2 O were less than 5%, the compressive stress after the ion exchange would become insufficient and the viscosity would increase to the extent that it would be difficult to melt the glass. If the ratio of Li 2 O exceeded 11%, then the weather resistance and acid resistance of the substrate would be lowered. Therefore, the proportion of Li 2 O should preferably range from 5% to 11%.
  • Na 2 O is a component to be exchanged in an ion exchange and to increase the solubility. If the ratio of Na 2 O were less than 6%, the compressive stress after the ion exchange would become insufficient and the viscosity would increase to the extent that it would be difficult to melt the glass. If the ratio of Na 2 O exceeded 14%, then the weather resistance and acid resistance of the substrate would be lowered. Therefore, the proportion of Na 2 O should preferably be equal to or less than 14%.
  • K 2 O is a component to increase the solubility. If the proportion of K 2 O exceeded 2%, then the weather resistance would be lowered, and the surface compressive stress after the ion exchange would be reduced. Therefore, the proportion of K 2 0 should preferably be equal to or less than 2%.
  • TiO 2 is a component to increase the weather resistance of the glass. If the proportion of TiO 2 exceeded 5%, then the liquid phase temperature of the glass would rise and the devitrification resistance would be lowered. Therefore, the proportion of TiO 2 should preferably be equal to or less than 5%, and more preferably be equal to or less than 3%.
  • ZrO 2 is a component to increase the weather resistance of the glass. If the proportion of ZrO 2 were in excess of 2.5%, the possibility for ZrO 2 to be separated out as fine crystals when melted would be increased. Therefore, the proportion of ZrO 2 should preferably be equal to or less than 2.5%, and more preferably be equal to or less than 2%.
  • MgO is a component to increase the solubility of the glass. If the proportion of MgO were in excess of 6%, then the liquid phase temperature of the glass would rise and the devitrification resistance would be lowered. Therefore, the proportion of MgO should preferably be equal to or less than 6%, and more preferably be equal to or less than 4.5%.
  • CaO is a component to increase the solubility and the thermal expansion coefficient of the glass. If the proportion of CaO were less than 2%, then the effect to increase the solubility and the thermal expansion coefficient of the glass would be small. If CaO existed together with either of SrO or BaO, or both of SrO and BaO, then the effect would be sufficiently produced in the proportion equal to or more than 1%. If the proportion of CaO were in excess of 7.5%, then the liquid phase temperature of the glass would tend to rise. If the proportion of CaO were in excess of 9%, then such tendency would be remarkable. Therefore, the proportion of CaO should preferably be in the range from 1 to 9%, more preferably be in the range from 2 to 7.5%.
  • SrO is a component to increase the solubility and the thermal expansion coefficient of the glass.
  • the effect of SrO to increase the thermal expansion coefficient is higher than that of CaO.
  • the proportion of SrO should preferably be equal to or less than 3%.
  • BaO is a component to increase the solubility and the thermal expansion coefficient of the glass.
  • the effect of BaO to increase the thermal expansion coefficient is higher than that of CaO and SrO.
  • the proportion of BaO should preferably be equal to or less than 2%.
  • the proportion of the sum of MgO+CaO+SrO+BaO (RO) were smaller than 2%, then the solubility would be insufficient. If the proportion of the sum would exceed 15%, then the liquid phase temperature of the glass would rise and the devitrification resistance would be lowered. Therefore, the proportion of the sum (RO) should preferably range from 2 to 15%, and more preferably range from 2 to 12%.
  • an ion exchange may be performed in a molten salt including ions of potassium, sodium, or both for imparting compressive stresses to the glass surface to increase the fracture strength.
  • An information recording medium which is fabricated using the above glass substrate has a high level of surface smoothness and is free of surface projections due to foreign matter. Therefore, the height of a magnetic head which is lifted from the surface of the information recording medium can be reduced for recording information at a high density on the information recording medium.
  • the treatment with the acid described above can be carried out anytime after a process of polishing the glass substrate to a mirror finish and immediately before the growth of a recording layer on the glass sub- strate.
  • FIG. 1 is a graph showing the relationship between etching rates with a hydrofluoric acid having a concentration of 0.1 weight % at a temperature of 50° C. and surface roughnesses after being treated with an acid and an alkali;
  • FIG. 2 is a graph showing the relationship between the difference SiO 2 ⁇ Al 2 O 3 and etching rates with a hydrofluoric acid a concentration of 0.1 weight % at a temperature of 50° C.
  • Tables 1 through 4 show details of 31 Inventive Examples and 3 Comparative Examples.
  • TABLE 1 Inventive Examples 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Composition mol % SiO 2 67.78 67.78 67.32 66.31 67.50 68.00 66.62 66.00 66.50 66.84 Al 2 O 3 7.18 7.18 7.11 7.07 8.50 9.00 8.60 8.50 9.50 9.87 Li 2 O 5.37 5.37 5.31 5.21 8.00 8.00 6.43 8.00 9.00 7.38 Na 2 O 11.04 11.04 10.93 12.27 8.54 7.54 10.85 8.54 12.00 8.56 K 2 O 0.19 0.19 0.18 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.18 MgO 2.60 3.41 1.87 2.81 2.98 2.98 2.96 2.98 0.00 2.88 CaO 3.90 5.04 7.27 4.14 4.48 4.48 4.37 4.48 3.00 4.25 SrO 0 0 0 1.98 0 0 0 0 0 BaO 1.95 0
  • the base material of the glass substrate was fabricated as follows:
  • Batches were prepared of silica, alumina, lithium carbonate, sodium carbonate, basic magnesium carbonate, calcium carbonate, potassium carbonate, strontium carbonate, barium carbonate, titania, and zirconia, which are ordinary glass materials, in order to achieve the compositions shown in above Tables.
  • the prepared batches were kept at 1550° C. for 4 hours in a platinum crucible, and then flowed onto an iron plate.
  • the glasses were kept at 550° C. for 2 hours, and thereafter gradually lowered in temperature to 450° C. in 10 hours, after which the power supply was turned off to let the glasses be cooled to room temperature, thus producing glass specimens.
  • the liquid phase temperature of each of the glass specimens was measured as follows: The glass specimen was crushed and passed through a sieve of 2380 ⁇ m. Glass particles remaining on a sieve of 1000 ⁇ m were dipped in ethanol and ultrasonically cleaned, and thereafter dried in a high-temperature tank. 25 g of the glass particles were placed to a uniform thickness in a platinum boat having a width of 12 mm, a length of 200 mm, and a depth of 10 mm, and held for 2 hours in a furnace with a temperature gradient from 930 to 1180° C. Thereafter, the glass was removed from the furnace and observed for devitrification developed therein by an optical microscope at a magnification of 40. The highest temperature at which devitrification was observed was regarded as the liquid phase temperature.
  • the thermal expansion coefficient was determined by measuring the glass specimen, which was grinded into a cylindrical shape having a diameter of 5 mm and a length of 15 mm, with a thermal expansion rate measuring device on the market.
  • the glass substrates according to all Inventive Examples had excellent solubility and moldability and were of high quality free of foreign matter and warpage because Tm ⁇ 1580° C., Tw ⁇ 1100° C., and Tl ⁇ Tw.
  • Etching rates per minute when the glass substrates were etched with a hydrofluoric acid having a concentration of 0.1 weight % at a temperature of 50° C. are shown in Tables. Each of the etching rates was measured as follows:
  • the sample substrate was then partly masked, dipped in a hydrofluoric acid having a concentration of 0.1 weight % at a temperature of 50° C. for 2.5 minutes. After the sample substrate was cleaned with water, the mask was removed, and the step between the masked area and the etched area was measured by a surface irregularity meter ( ⁇ -STEP500 manufactured by TENCORINSTRUMENT). The etching rate was calculated based on the measured step.
  • the surface roughness Ra of the glass substrate of each of the compositions, as treated under two different conditions, is shown in Tables.
  • the surface roughness Ra of each glass substrate was measured as follows:
  • a substrate prepared in the same manner as with the substrate measured for the etching rates was dipped in acid solutions at 50° C. for 2.5 minutes, and then dipped in an alkaline solution (aqueous solution of KOH with pH 11) at 50° C. for 2.5 minutes. After the substrate was cleaned in pure water and dried, it was observed in a field of 5 ⁇ m ⁇ 5 ⁇ m by a scanning probe microscope (SPM SPI3700 manufactured by SII), and an average surface roughness Ra thereof was calculated.
  • the average surface roughness Ra used herein represents a three-dimensional roughness applied to a surface based on the central line average roughness defined according to JIS B0601, and was calculated according to the following equation:
  • n the number of data points of the microscope
  • FIG. 1 is a graph showing the relationship between etching rates with a hydrofluoric acid having a concentration of 0.1 weight % at a temperature of 50° C. and surface roughnesses after cleaning, among the specimens shown in Tables.
  • ⁇ represents glass substrates treated with a hydrofluoric acid having a concentration of 0.005%
  • FIG. 2 is a graph showing the relationship between the difference SiO 2 ⁇ Al 2 O 3 and etching rates with a hydrofluoric acid a concentration of 0.1 weight % at a temperature of 50° C., among the specimens shown in Tables.
  • a review of FIG. 2 indicates that the etching rate and the difference SiO 2 ⁇ Al 2 O 3 are correlated to each other very strongly.
  • Values of the difference SiO 2 ⁇ Al 2 O 3 at the respective etching rates of 45 nm/min. and 30 nm/min. are 56.5% and 58.5%, respectively.
  • the glass substrates according to Comparative Examples have etching rates in excess of 60 nm/min. with a hydrofluoric acid having a concentration of 0.1 weight %, and surface roughnesses Ra in excess of 0.3 nm after being treated with acids. According to Comparative Examples, it is virtually impossible to remove foreign matter with an acid treatment and keep a desired level of surface smoothness after cleaning.
  • the glass substrates have etching rates equal to or less than 45 nm/min. with a hydrofluoric acid having a concentration of 0.1 weight %.
  • the glass substrates have etching rates equal to or less than 30 nm/min. with a hydrofluoric acid having a concentration of 0.1 weight %.
  • the substrate prepared in the same manner as measuring a surface roughness mentioned above was dipped in a hydrofluoric acid having a concentration of 0.005% at 50° C. for 2.5 minutes, and then dipped in an alkaline solution (aqueous solution of KOH with pH 11). It was observed in a field of 50 nm ⁇ 50 nm by a scanning probe microscope, and a number-of projections having a height of 3 nm or higher on the surface was counted. The result is shown in Tables 1 through 4. Since the substrates according to Inventive Examples 1-31 are high in acid resistance, surface irregularities are not produced by the acid and the number of such projections was at most 500.
  • the substrate prepared was dipped only in an alkaline solution (aqueous solution of KOH with pH 11) without dipping in a hydrofluoric acid.
  • a number of projections having a height of 3 nm or higher on the surface was counted in the same manner mentioned above. The number of such projections was 4100/50 ⁇ m 2 .
  • This result shows that a number of projections having a height of at least 3 nm in an arbitrary area of 50 ⁇ m ⁇ 50 ⁇ m can be at most 500 by cleaning with an acid, compared with the result in Inventive Example 10 where the glass,substrate was dipped in a hydrofluoric acid.
  • the amount of cerium attached to the surface of the substrate was measured before cleaning and after cleaning. Before cleaning it was 32 ⁇ g and after cleaning it was 0.6 ⁇ g. The removal rate of cerium by cleaning with an acid was 98%. This shows that almost the projections are caused by a polishing compound which is left on the surface of the substrate and it can efficiently be removed by cleaning with an acid.
  • a disk having an outside diameter of 65 mm, an inside diameter of 20 mm, a thickness of 0.635 mm, and a surface roughness Ra of 0.25 nm was prepared in the same manner as the samples measured for their etching rates.
  • the disk was cleaned with a hydrofluoric acid having a concentration of 0.005% at a temperature of 50° C. to remove foreign matter from the surface thereof.
  • the disk was then cleaned successively with an aqueous solution of KOH with pH 11 at a temperature of 50° C. and pure water to produce a clean smooth surface.
  • KNO 3 : NaNO 3 80:20
  • the disk thus chemically strengthened was used as a glass substrate for an information recording medium.
  • a base layer of Cr, a recording layer of Co—Cr—Ta, and a protective layer of Cc were deposited on the glass substrate by sputtering. Then, a lubricating layer was deposited on the glass substrate, thus producing an information recording medium.
  • the information recording medium thus produced was loaded in a ramp-loading-type disk drive, and continuously operated at a rotational speed of 4,500 rpm. As a result, any error and head crash which would otherwise be caused by a collision between foreign matter on the medium and the head did not occur. It was confirmed that the information recording medium was suitable for use in a magnetic disk drive having a low glide height.
  • a glass substrate for an information recording medium has an etching rate of at most 45 nm/min. upon contact with a hydrofluoric acid having a temperature of 50° C. and a concentration of 0.1 weight %. Therefore, foreign matter attached to the surface of the glass substrate can be removed by an acid treatment.
  • the recording surface of the glass substrate can have an average surface roughness Ra smaller than 0.3 nm. As a consequence, the glass substrate makes it possible to provide a high-density information recording device with a low error rate.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Geochemistry & Mineralogy (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Ceramic Engineering (AREA)
  • Inorganic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Glass Compositions (AREA)
  • Surface Treatment Of Glass (AREA)
  • Magnetic Record Carriers (AREA)
  • Manufacturing Of Magnetic Record Carriers (AREA)

Abstract

A glass substrate for an information recording medium has an acid resistance represented by an etching rate of at most 45 nm/min. upon contact with a hydrofluoric acid having a temperature of 50° C. and a concentration of 0.1 weight %. The glass substrate has a recording surface having an average surface roughness Ra smaller than 0.3 nm.

Description

    BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • 1. Field of the Invention [0001]
  • The present invention relates to a glass substrate for an information recording medium such as a magnetic disk or the like, and more particularly to a highly acid-resistant glass substrate having an excellent level of surface smoothness. [0002]
  • 2. Description of the Related Art [0003]
  • Generally, aluminum substrates are used as substrates for use in information recording mediums. However, since it is difficult for aluminum substrates to increase their surface smoothness, the aluminum substrates are not suitable for use in disks for high-density recording. Instead, glass substrates which have a high level of surface hardness and which can be polished to a high level of surface smoothness are used in disks for high-density recording. [0004]
  • Glass substrates for use in information recording mediums are fabricated by forming a molten material according to a float process, a rod process, and a press process, cutting the formed material to a desired substrate shape, if necessary, and thereafter polishing the substrate to adjust its thickness and surface smoothness to a predetermined range. If desired, the polished substrate is strengthened by an ion exchange or the like. Consequently, fine particles of foreign matter, primarily a polishing compound, remain attached to the surface of the substrate. While those fine particles of foreign matter cannot completely be removed from the substrate by an ordinary cleaning process, they have heretofore posed no significant problems. However, the present trend toward high-density information recording mediums inevitably demands a smaller gap between the information recording medium and the head for reading information from and writing information in the information recording medium. The fine particles of foreign matter need to be removed from the substrate as completely as possible because they would tend to hit the head and cause an error or crash because of the small gap between the information recording medium and the head. Though complete removal of fine particles of foreign matter from the substrate cannot easily be performed, they can efficiently be removed when they are dissolved by an acid such as sulfuric acid, hydrofluoric acid, etc., or the surface of the substrate is etched. [0005]
  • Japanese patent publication No. 46-4271 discloses a chemically strengthened glass composed of 1 to 5 weight % of MgO, 0 to 5 weight % of K[0006] 2O, 5 to 25 weight % of Na2O, 5 to 25 weight % of Al2O3+ZrO2, and SiO2, the sum of which is 80% or more of the entire composition. However, the disclosed glass is poor in acid resistance and hence cannot be treated by an acid for the removal of foreign matter therefrom.
  • Japanese laid-open patent publication No. 5-32431 discloses another chemically strengthened glass of improved acid resistance which is composed of 62 to 75 weight % of SiO[0007] 2, 5 to 15 weight % of Al2O3, 4 to 10 weight % of Li2O, 4 to 12 weight % of Na2O, and 5.5 to 15 weight % of ZrO2, with the weight ratio of Na2O/ZrO2 being in the range from 0.5 to 2.0 and the weight ratio of Al2O3/ZrO2 being in the range from 0.4 to 2.5. The publication, however, fails to show a causal dependence of the acid resistance on surface irregularities. Furthermore, since the glass revealed in the publication contains a large amount of ZrO2, ZrO2 tends to be separated out as fine crystals in the glass, which project on the surface after it is polished and are liable to cause an error and crash.
  • Japanese laid-open patent publication No. 62-187140 reveals still another chemically strengthened glass composed of 64 to 70 weight % of SiO[0008] 2, 14 to 20 weight % of Al2O3, 4 to 6 weight % of Li2O, 7 to 10 weight % of Na2O, 0 to 4 weight % MgO, and 0 to 1.5 weight % of ZrO2. However, the publication also fails to show a causal dependence of the acid resistance on surface irregularities.
  • Japanese laid-open patent publication No. 9-22525 discloses a process of cleaning a glass substrate pulled up out of a strengthening liquid with a solution containing an acid, in the fabrication of a glass substrate for use in a magnetic disk. The disclosed process is aimed at only the removal of a chemically strengthening salt. The publication is silent as to the acid resistance which the glass substrate is required to have, and does not suggest or describe the level of surface smoothness in question. [0009]
    • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide a glass substrate for an information recording medium which can easily be treated by an acid to achieve high cleanliness and high smoothness. [0010]
  • To achieve the above object, there is provided in accordance with the present invention a glass substrate for an information recording medium having at least one surface as a recording surface, the glass substrate having an acid resistance represented by an etching rate of at most 45 nm/min. upon contact with a hydrofluoric acid having a temperature of 50° C. and a concentration of 0.1 weight %, at least the recording surface having an average surface roughness Ra smaller than 0.3 nm. [0011]
  • When glass is etched by an acid, the components of the glass are not uniformly dissolved, but those components which are weaker on the acid are dissolved at first, and then those stronger on the acid are dissolved gradually. The components which are weaker on the acid include alkali, alkaline earth group, alumina, etc., and those stronger on the acid include silica, zirconia, titania, etc. The surface of the glass treated with the acid, as microscopically observed, has a porous layer of network structure mainly composed of silica, zirconia, titania, etc. When the substrate thus produced is cleaned by an alkali for the purposes of removing the porous layer and fats and oils, since the porous layer is thick and unevenly dissolved by the alkali if the substrate is low in acid resistance, pores appear on the surface, producing surface irregularities which make it impossible to achieve a level of surface smoothness that is required by the information recording medium. It has been found according to the present invention that in order to keep the surface smoothness (average surface roughness) Ra of the substrate in the range of Ra<0.3 nm when cleaned by the alkali after having been treated with the acid, the etching rate of the substrate glass with an aqueous solution of 0.1 weight % of hydrofluoric acid at a temperature of 50° C., as an indication of acid resistance, needs to be 45 nm/min. or less. [0012]
  • An acid liquid used in the present invention serves to dissolve a polishing compound on the glass substrate or etch the surface of the glass substrate to remove a polishing compound therefrom. The acid liquid may include an inorganic acid such as hydrofluoric acid, a mixture of hydrofluoric acid and ammonium fluoride, hydrochloric acid, sulfuric acid, nitric acid, phosphoric acid, etc., or an organic acid such as sulfamic acid, formic acid, oxalic acid, citric acid, malic acid, hydroxyacetic acid, gluconic acid, etc. [0013]
  • A polishing compound mainly composed of cerium oxide, which is used most generally, can be removed most efficiently when it is dissolved in an aqueous solution of sulfuric acid. If the concentration of the sulfuric acid used to remove the polishing compound were less than 0.01 weight %, then the removing ability would be insufficient, and if the concentration of the sulfuric acid exceeded 5 weight %, then fine defects of the glass substrate would appear on the surface. Therefore, the concentration of the sulfuric acid should preferably in the range from 0.01 to 5 weight %. In order to keep a desired level of surface smoothness under this condition, the etching rate of the substrate glass with an aqueous solution of 0.1 weight % of hydrofluoric acid at a temperature of 50° C. should preferably be 45 nm/min. or less. [0014]
  • Even if a polishing compound other than cerium oxide is used, the attached polishing compound can be removed irrespective of its type by etching the substrate surface with an acid having a high etching effect, such as hydrofluoric acid. If the concentration of the hydrofluoric acid used to remove the polishing compound were less than 0.002 weight %, then the removing ability would be insufficient, and if the concentration of the hydrofluoric acid exceeded 1 weight %, then fine defects of the glass substrate would appear on the surface. Therefore, the concentration of the hydrofluoric acid should preferably in the range from 0.002 to 1 weight %. In order to require the glass to have a high level of acid resistance and keep a desired level of surface smoothness, the etching rate of the substrate glass with an aqueous solution of 0.1 weight % of hydrofluoric acid at a temperature of 50° C. should preferably be 30 nm/min. or less. [0015]
  • The composition of the glass substrate which meets the requirement for the etching rate of 45 nm/min. or less with the aqueous solution of 0.1 weight % of hydrofluoric acid is preferably as follows from the standpoint of glass solubility and substrate weather resistance: In terms of molar fractions, the difference between SiO[0016] 2 and Al2O3 (SiO2−Al2O3): 56.5%, SiO2: 63-70%, Al2O3: 4-11%, Li2O: 5-11%, Na2O: 6-14%, K2O: 0-2%, TiO2: 0-5%, ZrO2: 0-2.5%, RO: 2-15% (RO=MgO+CaO+SrO+BaO, MgO: 0-6%, CaO: 1-9%, SrO: 0-3%, BaO: 0-2%), and other components: 3% or less. The glass composition will hereinafter be expressed in terms of molar fractions unless otherwise specified.
  • The composition of the glass substrate which meets the requirement for the etching rate of 30 nm/min. or less with the aqueous solution, of 0.1 weight % of hydrofluoric acid is preferably substantially the same as the above composition except that the difference SiO[0017] 2−Al2O3 is 58.5%, from the standpoint of glass solubility and substrate weather resistance.
  • From the standpoint of solubility, a glass composition similar to the above composition except that TiO[0018] 2: 0-3% and ZrO2: 0-2% is more advantageous as the devitrification temperature is lower.
  • The reasons for the limitations of the glass composition are as follows: [0019]
  • The etching rate based on the aqueous solution of 0.1 weight % of hydrofluoric acid depends strongly on the difference SiO[0020] 2−Al2O3 as expressed by a molar fraction. If the difference SiO2−Al2O3 were less than 56.5%, then the alkaline component would be required to be greatly reduced in order to make the etching rate equal to or less than 45 nm/min. through adjustments of other components. The resultant composition would have a high dissolving temperature, and would not easily be chemically strengthened by an ion exchange.
  • The same problem would arise if the etching rate were 30 nm/min. or less with the difference SiO[0021] 2−Al2O3 being 58.5% or less. Therefore, in order to make the etching rate equal to or less than 45 nm/min. or 30 nm/min., the difference SiO2−Al2O3 should preferably be 56.5% or 58.5% or higher.
  • SiO[0022] 2 is a major component of the glass. If the proportion of SiO2 were less than 63%, then the chemical durability of the glass would be lowered. If the proportion of SiO2 were in excess of 70%, then the viscosity would increase to the extent that it would be difficult to melt the glass. Therefore, the proportion of SiO2 should preferably range from 63% to 70%.
  • Al[0023] 2O3 is a component for increasing the depth of a compressive stress layer due to an ion exchange and also increasing the water resistance of the glass. If the proportion of Al2O3 were less than 4%, the above effects would not sufficiently be developed. If the proportion of Al2O3 were greater than 11%, the viscosity would increase and the liquid phase temperature would increase more than the viscosity, resulting in a reduction in solubility. Therefore, the proportion of Al2O3 should preferably range from 4% to 11%, and more preferably range from 6% to 11%.
  • Li[0024] 2O is a component to be exchanged in an ion exchange and to increase the solubility. If the ratio of Li2O were less than 5%, the compressive stress after the ion exchange would become insufficient and the viscosity would increase to the extent that it would be difficult to melt the glass. If the ratio of Li2O exceeded 11%, then the weather resistance and acid resistance of the substrate would be lowered. Therefore, the proportion of Li2O should preferably range from 5% to 11%.
  • Na[0025] 2O is a component to be exchanged in an ion exchange and to increase the solubility. If the ratio of Na2O were less than 6%, the compressive stress after the ion exchange would become insufficient and the viscosity would increase to the extent that it would be difficult to melt the glass. If the ratio of Na2O exceeded 14%, then the weather resistance and acid resistance of the substrate would be lowered. Therefore, the proportion of Na2O should preferably be equal to or less than 14%.
  • K[0026] 2O is a component to increase the solubility. If the proportion of K2O exceeded 2%, then the weather resistance would be lowered, and the surface compressive stress after the ion exchange would be reduced. Therefore, the proportion of K 20 should preferably be equal to or less than 2%.
  • TiO[0027] 2 is a component to increase the weather resistance of the glass. If the proportion of TiO2 exceeded 5%, then the liquid phase temperature of the glass would rise and the devitrification resistance would be lowered. Therefore, the proportion of TiO2 should preferably be equal to or less than 5%, and more preferably be equal to or less than 3%.
  • ZrO[0028] 2 is a component to increase the weather resistance of the glass. If the proportion of ZrO2 were in excess of 2.5%, the possibility for ZrO2 to be separated out as fine crystals when melted would be increased. Therefore, the proportion of ZrO2 should preferably be equal to or less than 2.5%, and more preferably be equal to or less than 2%.
  • MgO is a component to increase the solubility of the glass. If the proportion of MgO were in excess of 6%, then the liquid phase temperature of the glass would rise and the devitrification resistance would be lowered. Therefore, the proportion of MgO should preferably be equal to or less than 6%, and more preferably be equal to or less than 4.5%. [0029]
  • CaO is a component to increase the solubility and the thermal expansion coefficient of the glass. If the proportion of CaO were less than 2%, then the effect to increase the solubility and the thermal expansion coefficient of the glass would be small. If CaO existed together with either of SrO or BaO, or both of SrO and BaO, then the effect would be sufficiently produced in the proportion equal to or more than 1%. If the proportion of CaO were in excess of 7.5%, then the liquid phase temperature of the glass would tend to rise. If the proportion of CaO were in excess of 9%, then such tendency would be remarkable. Therefore, the proportion of CaO should preferably be in the range from 1 to 9%, more preferably be in the range from 2 to 7.5%. [0030]
  • SrO is a component to increase the solubility and the thermal expansion coefficient of the glass. The effect of SrO to increase the thermal expansion coefficient is higher than that of CaO. However, if the glass contained a large amount of SrO, then the specific gravity of the glass would increase. The proportion of SrO should preferably be equal to or less than 3%. [0031]
  • BaO is a component to increase the solubility and the thermal expansion coefficient of the glass. The effect of BaO to increase the thermal expansion coefficient is higher than that of CaO and SrO. However, if the glass contained a large amount of BaO, then the specific gravity of the glass would increase. The proportion of BaO should preferably be equal to or less than 2%. [0032]
  • If the proportion of the sum of MgO+CaO+SrO+BaO (RO) were smaller than 2%, then the solubility would be insufficient. If the proportion of the sum would exceed 15%, then the liquid phase temperature of the glass would rise and the devitrification resistance would be lowered. Therefore, the proportion of the sum (RO) should preferably range from 2 to 15%, and more preferably range from 2 to 12%. [0033]
  • In addition to the above components, other components including As[0034] 2O3, Sb2O3, SO3, SnO2, Fe2O3, CoO, Cl, F, etc., for example, may be added in a total proportion up to 3% for the purpose of cleaning the glass when melted.
  • Since the glass substrate contains lithium, an ion exchange may be performed in a molten salt including ions of potassium, sodium, or both for imparting compressive stresses to the glass surface to increase the fracture strength. [0035]
  • An information recording medium which is fabricated using the above glass substrate has a high level of surface smoothness and is free of surface projections due to foreign matter. Therefore, the height of a magnetic head which is lifted from the surface of the information recording medium can be reduced for recording information at a high density on the information recording medium. [0036]
  • The treatment with the acid described above can be carried out anytime after a process of polishing the glass substrate to a mirror finish and immediately before the growth of a recording layer on the glass sub- strate. [0037]
  • The above and other objects, features, and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent from the following description when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which preferred embodiments of the present invention are shown by way of illustrative example.[0038]
    • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1 is a graph showing the relationship between etching rates with a hydrofluoric acid having a concentration of 0.1 weight % at a temperature of 50° C. and surface roughnesses after being treated with an acid and an alkali; and [0039]
  • FIG. 2 is a graph showing the relationship between the difference SiO[0040] 2−Al2O3 and etching rates with a hydrofluoric acid a concentration of 0.1 weight % at a temperature of 50° C.
    • DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
  • Tables 1 through 4 show details of 31 Inventive Examples and 3 Comparative Examples. [0041]
    TABLE 1
    Inventive Examples
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    Composition mol % SiO2 67.78 67.78 67.32 66.31 67.50 68.00 66.62 66.00 66.50 66.84
    Al2O3 7.18 7.18 7.11 7.07 8.50 9.00 8.60 8.50 9.50 9.87
    Li2O 5.37 5.37 5.31 5.21 8.00 8.00 6.43 8.00 9.00 7.38
    Na2O 11.04 11.04 10.93 12.27 8.54 7.54 10.85 8.54 12.00 8.56
    K2O 0.19 0.19 0.18 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.18
    MgO 2.60 3.41 1.87 2.81 2.98 2.98 2.96 2.98 0.00 2.88
    CaO 3.90 5.04 7.27 4.14 4.48 4.48 4.37 4.48 3.00 4.25
    SrO 0 0 0 1.98 0 0 0 0 0 0
    BaO 1.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
    TiO2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.5 0 0
    ZrO2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
    SiO2—Al2O3 60.60 60.60 60.21 59.24 59.00 59.00 58.02 57.50 57.00 56.97
    R2O 16.60 16.60 16.48 17.65 16.54 15.54 17.46 16.54 21.06 16.12
    RO 8.45 8.45 8.94 8.93 7.46 7.46 7.33 7.46 3.00 7.13
    Melting Temperature Tm (° C.) 1516 1535 1501 1477 1563 1580 1543 1535 1530 1579
    Working Temperature Tw (° C.) 1035 1047 1029 1002 1039 1069 1050 1046 1009 1068
    Liquid Phase Temperature Tl (° C.) Unrecog- 1020 1023 Unrecog- 1004 1041 1004 1003 Unrecog- 1038
    nizable nizable nizable
    Tw − Tl (° C.) 105 or 27 6 72 or 35 28 46 43 79 or 30
    greater greater greater
    Density (g/cm3) 2.56 2.47 2.49 2.56 2.47 2.46 2.47 2.49 2.47 2.47
    Average Thermal Expansion Coefficient, 89 93 94 93 89 86 92 88 94 87
    ×10−7° C.−1, 50˜350° C.
    Etching Rate (nm/min), 50° C., 0.1% 13 12 14 18 21 21 31 32 38 42
    Hydrofluoric acid
    Surface Roughness Sulfuric acid 1% 0.26 0.26 0.27 0.27 0.28 0.26 0.27 0.26 0.28 0.29
    after cleaning Ra (nm) Hydrofluoric acid 0.26 0.26 0.27 0.27 0.28 0.27 0.34 0.36 0.48 0.59
    0.005%
    Number of Projections, Sulfuric acid 1% 15 10 13 18 15 13 17 14 14 18
    3 nm or higher, Hydrofluoric acid 18 12 14 19 13 10 19 18 50 366
    Projections/50 × 50 μm 0.005
  • [0042]
    TABLE 2
    Inventive Examples
    11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
    Composition mol % SiO2 67.51 67.22 66.62 64.84 64.84 66.84 68.84 65.42 68.42 67.51
    Al2O3 5.93 6.87 6.87 5.87 5.87 7.87 5.87 6.87 7.01 5.93
    Li2O 5.43 7.38 7.38 7.38 7.38 7.38 7.38 8.88 5.49 9.47
    Na2O 12.69 12.06 12.06 11.56 10.56 10.56 10.56 10.56 9.75 8.65
    K2O 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.00 2.00 0.18
    MgO 0.89 1.88 4.28 2.88 5.38 1.38 2.88 1.88 2.94 0.89
    CaO 7.32 4.55 2.75 7.25 5.75 1.75 4.25 6.35 4.34 7.32
    SrO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
    BaO 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0
    TiO2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
    ZrO2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
    SiO2—Al2O3 61.58 60.35 59.75 58.97 58.97 58.97 62.97 58.55 61.41 61.58
    R2O 18.29 19.43 19.43 19.11 18.11 18.11 18.11 19.43 17.24 18.29
    RO 8.21 6.43 7.03 10.13 11.13 7.13 7.13 8.23 7.28 8.21
    Melting Temperature Tm (° C.) — 1503 1532 — — 1511 1539 1491 1551 —
    Working Temperature Tw (° C.) — 1006 1012 — — 1008 1008 1002 1064 —
    Liquid Phase Temperature Tll (° C.) 1017 945 924 1006 1036 925 923 961 996 1013
    Tw − Tl (° C.) — 61 88 — — 83 85 41 68 —
    Density (g/cm3) 2.50 2.47 2.47 2.51 2.50 2.61 2.46 2.49 2.46 2.48
    Average Thermal Expansion Coefficient, 98 98 96 96 96 96 96 96 94 93
    ×10−7° C.−1, 50˜350° C.
    Etching Rate (nm/min), 50° C., 0.1% 13 16 18 26 26 33 6 23 20 8
    Hydrofluoric acid
    Surface Roughness Sulfuric acid 1% 0.28 0.28 0.29 0.27 0.29 0.29 0.27 0.28 0.25 0.29
    after cleaning Ra (nm) Hydrofluoric acid 0.005% 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.28 0.29 0.29 0.26 0.29 0.26 0.26
    Number of Projections, Sulfuric acid 1% 10 12 16 22 22 22 9 21 8 14
    3 nm or higher, Hydrofluoric acid 0.005% 12 36 43 12 16 69 35 14 132 36
    Projections/50 × 50 μm
  • [0043]
    TABLE 3
    Inventive Examples
    21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
    Composition mol % SiO2 67.82 67.84 66.84 67.18 65.52 66.84 66.84 66.84 66.84 67.84 67.51
    Al2O3 6.87 6.87 7.87 7.01 8.87 7.87 7.87 7.87 7.87 6.87 5.93
    Li2O 8.88 7.38 7.38 9.57 7.38 7.38 6.38 7.38 7.38 7.38 5.43
    Na2O 10.56 10.56 10.56 8.73 10.56 10.06 11.56 10.56 10.06 10.56 12.69
    K2O 0.00 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.00 0.68 0.18 0.18 0.68 0.18 0.18
    MgO 3.08 0.88 2.88 2.94 3.08 2.38 2.88 1.88 2.38 2.88 5.94
    CaO 2.75 6.25 4.25 4.34 4.55 3.25 4.25 5.25 3.25 4.25 2.27
    SrO 0 0 0 0 0 1.5 0 0 0 0 0
    BaO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
    TiO2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.5 0 0
    ZrO2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
    SiO2—Al2O3 60.95 60.97 58.97 60.17 56.65 58.97 58.97 58.97 58.97 60.97 61.58
    R2O 19.43 18.11 18.11 18.48 17.93 18.11 18.11 18.11 18.11 18.11 18.29
    RO 5.83 7.13 7.13 7.28 7.63 7.13 7.13 7.13 5.63 7.13 8.21
    Melting Temperature Tm (° C.) 1546 — 1540 1551 1536 1504 1531 1527 1516 1540 1540
    Working Temperature Tw (° C.) 1005 — 1024 1005 1030 1005 1037 1016 1050 1014 1043
    Liquid Phase Temperature Tl (° C.) 910 1006 990 968 995 938 982 971 923 963 971
    Tw − Tl (° C.) 95 — 34 37 35 67 55 45 127 51 72
    Density (g/cm3) 2.46 2.48 2.47 2.46 2.48 2.49 2.47 2.48 2.47 2.47 2.47
    Average Thermal Expansion Coefficient, 93 92 92 91 90 94 92 94 90 93 93
    ×10−7° C.−1, 50˜350° C.
    Etching Rate (nm/min), 50° C., 0.1% 14 13 23 13 35 20 24 22 18 12 10
    Hydrofluoric acid
    Surface Roughness Sulfuric acid 1% 0.29 0.28 0.28 0.29 0.26 0.28 0.27 0.28 0.25 0.28 0.27
    after cleaning Ra (nm) Hydrofluoric acid 0.26 0.26 0.28 0.26 0.62 0.30 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.26 0.26
    0.005%
    Number of Projections, Sulfuric acid 1% 11 10 15 16 23 14 14 15 9 11 11
    3 nm or higher, Hydrofluoric acid 54 20 9 35 189 95 10 9 18 33 27
    Projections/50 × 50 μm 0.005%
  • [0044]
    TABLE 4
    Comparative Examples
    1 2 3
    Composition mol % SiO2 65.87 66.00 64.20
    Al2O3 9.84 11.00 11.30
    Li2O 7.38 8.00 6.20
    Na2O 9.56 9.05 8.30
    K2O 0.18 0.00 2.00
    MgO 2.88 2.38 2.00
    CaO 4.25 3.57 6.00
    SrO 0 0 0
    BaO 0 0 0
    TiO 2 0 0 0
    ZrO 2 0 0 0
    SiO2—Al2O3 56.03 55.00 52.90
    R2O 17.12 17.05 16.50
    RO 7.13 5.95 8.00
    Melting Temperature Tm (° C.) 1556 1590 1579
    Working Temperature Tw (° C.) 1055 1075 1093
    Liquid Phase Temperature Tl (° C.) 1016 987 1075
    Tw − Tl (° C.) 39 88 18
    Density (g/cm3) 2.47 2.47 2.49
    Average Thermal Expansion Coefficient, 89 87 91
    ×10−7° C.−1, 50˜350° C.
    Etching Rate (nm/min), 50° C., 0.1% 57 113 174
    Hydrofluoric acid
    Surface Roughness Sulfuric acid 1% 0.41 0.49 0.58
    after cleaning Ra (nm) Hydrofluoric acid 0.26 0.26 1.1
    0.005%
    Number of Projections, Sulfuric acid 1% 26 39 70
    3 nm or higher, Hydrofluoric acid 583 835 1621
    Projections/50 × 50 μm 0.005%
  • The base material of the glass substrate was fabricated as follows: [0045]
  • Batches were prepared of silica, alumina, lithium carbonate, sodium carbonate, basic magnesium carbonate, calcium carbonate, potassium carbonate, strontium carbonate, barium carbonate, titania, and zirconia, which are ordinary glass materials, in order to achieve the compositions shown in above Tables. The prepared batches were kept at 1550° C. for 4 hours in a platinum crucible, and then flowed onto an iron plate. The glasses were kept at 550° C. for 2 hours, and thereafter gradually lowered in temperature to 450° C. in 10 hours, after which the power supply was turned off to let the glasses be cooled to room temperature, thus producing glass specimens. [0046]
  • Characteristics of the glass specimens, i.e., a melting temperature Tm (temperature of log η=2), a working temperature Tw (temperature of log η=4), a liquid phase temperature Tl, a difference Tw−Tl between the working and liquid phase temperatures, and an average thermal expansion coefficient at a temperature in the range from 50° C. to 350° C. were measured and shown in Tables 1 through 4. [0047]
  • The viscosity of each of the glass specimens in a high temperature range was measured by an automatic viscosity measuring device with a pull-up platinum ball. [0048]
  • The liquid phase temperature of each of the glass specimens was measured as follows: The glass specimen was crushed and passed through a sieve of 2380 μm. Glass particles remaining on a sieve of 1000 μm were dipped in ethanol and ultrasonically cleaned, and thereafter dried in a high-temperature tank. 25 g of the glass particles were placed to a uniform thickness in a platinum boat having a width of 12 mm, a length of 200 mm, and a depth of 10 mm, and held for 2 hours in a furnace with a temperature gradient from 930 to 1180° C. Thereafter, the glass was removed from the furnace and observed for devitrification developed therein by an optical microscope at a magnification of 40. The highest temperature at which devitrification was observed was regarded as the liquid phase temperature. [0049]
  • The thermal expansion coefficient was determined by measuring the glass specimen, which was grinded into a cylindrical shape having a diameter of 5 mm and a length of 15 mm, with a thermal expansion rate measuring device on the market. [0050]
  • The glass substrates according to all Inventive Examples had excellent solubility and moldability and were of high quality free of foreign matter and warpage because Tm<1580° C., Tw<1100° C., and Tl<Tw. [0051]
  • Etching rates per minute when the glass substrates were etched with a hydrofluoric acid having a concentration of 0.1 weight % at a temperature of 50° C. are shown in Tables. Each of the etching rates was measured as follows: [0052]
  • The glass specimen was cut into a doughnut shape having an outside diameter of 65 mm and an inside diameter of 20 mm, polished to a mirror finish (Ra=0.25 nm or less) to achieve a thickness of 0.635 mm, after which the glass specimen was cleaned with pure water, thereby producing a sample substrate. The sample substrate was then partly masked, dipped in a hydrofluoric acid having a concentration of 0.1 weight % at a temperature of 50° C. for 2.5 minutes. After the sample substrate was cleaned with water, the mask was removed, and the step between the masked area and the etched area was measured by a surface irregularity meter (α-STEP500 manufactured by TENCORINSTRUMENT). The etching rate was calculated based on the measured step. [0053]
  • The surface roughness Ra of the glass substrate of each of the compositions, as treated under two different conditions, is shown in Tables. The surface roughness Ra of each glass substrate was measured as follows: [0054]
  • A substrate prepared in the same manner as with the substrate measured for the etching rates was dipped in acid solutions at 50° C. for 2.5 minutes, and then dipped in an alkaline solution (aqueous solution of KOH with pH 11) at 50° C. for 2.5 minutes. After the substrate was cleaned in pure water and dried, it was observed in a field of 5 μm×5 μm by a scanning probe microscope (SPM SPI3700 manufactured by SII), and an average surface roughness Ra thereof was calculated. The average surface roughness Ra used herein represents a three-dimensional roughness applied to a surface based on the central line average roughness defined according to JIS B0601, and was calculated according to the following equation: [0055]
  • Ra=(1/n)i=1˜nabs (Zi−Zo)
  • where n: the number of data points of the microscope, [0056]
  • abs: absolute value, [0057]
  • Zi: the height of the ith data point, and [0058]
  • Zo: the average value of all Zi. [0059]
  • FIG. 1 is a graph showing the relationship between etching rates with a hydrofluoric acid having a concentration of 0.1 weight % at a temperature of 50° C. and surface roughnesses after cleaning, among the specimens shown in Tables. In FIG. 1, ▴ represents glass substrates treated with a hydrofluoric acid having a concentration of 0.005%, and ◯ represents glass substrates treated with a sulfuric acid having a concentration of 1%. It can be seen from FIG. 1 that the surface roughness of the cleaned glass substrate changes greatly in an etching rate range from 30 to 60 nm/min. If the glass substrates whose etching rates exceed 30 nm/min. and 45 nm/min. are treated with 0.005% of hydrofluoric acid and 1% of sulfuric acid, then the surface roughness Ra of the treated glass substrates cannot be held below a desired surface irregularity level of Ra=0.3 nm. [0060]
  • FIG. 2 is a graph showing the relationship between the difference SiO[0061] 2−Al2O3 and etching rates with a hydrofluoric acid a concentration of 0.1 weight % at a temperature of 50° C., among the specimens shown in Tables. A review of FIG. 2 indicates that the etching rate and the difference SiO2−Al2O3 are correlated to each other very strongly. Values of the difference SiO2−Al2O3 at the respective etching rates of 45 nm/min. and 30 nm/min. are 56.5% and 58.5%, respectively.
  • The glass substrates according to Comparative Examples have etching rates in excess of 60 nm/min. with a hydrofluoric acid having a concentration of 0.1 weight %, and surface roughnesses Ra in excess of 0.3 nm after being treated with acids. According to Comparative Examples, it is virtually impossible to remove foreign matter with an acid treatment and keep a desired level of surface smoothness after cleaning. [0062]
  • According to Inventive Examples 1-31, the glass substrates have etching rates equal to or less than 45 nm/min. with a hydrofluoric acid having a concentration of 0.1 weight %. The surface roughness of these glass substrates after the removal of foreign matter from their surface using 1% or less of sulfuric acid can be held to Ra=0.3 nm or less. [0063]
  • According to Inventive Examples 1-6, the glass substrates have etching rates equal to or less than 30 nm/min. with a hydrofluoric acid having a concentration of 0.1 weight %. The surface roughness of these glass substrates after the removal of foreign matter from their surface using 0.005% of hydrofluoric acid can be held to Ra=0.3 nm or less. [0064]
  • With the glass substrates according to Inventive Examples 1-31 and Comparative Examples 1-3, the substrate prepared in the same manner as measuring a surface roughness mentioned above was dipped in a hydrofluoric acid having a concentration of 0.005% at 50° C. for 2.5 minutes, and then dipped in an alkaline solution (aqueous solution of KOH with pH 11). It was observed in a field of 50 nm×50 nm by a scanning probe microscope, and a number-of projections having a height of 3 nm or higher on the surface was counted. The result is shown in Tables 1 through 4. Since the substrates according to Inventive Examples 1-31 are high in acid resistance, surface irregularities are not produced by the acid and the number of such projections was at most 500. Next, with the glass substrate according to Inventive Examples 10, the substrate prepared was dipped only in an alkaline solution (aqueous solution of KOH with pH 11) without dipping in a hydrofluoric acid. A number of projections having a height of 3 nm or higher on the surface was counted in the same manner mentioned above. The number of such projections was 4100/50 μm[0065] 2. This result shows that a number of projections having a height of at least 3 nm in an arbitrary area of 50 μm×50 μm can be at most 500 by cleaning with an acid, compared with the result in Inventive Example 10 where the glass,substrate was dipped in a hydrofluoric acid. Further, in Inventive Example 10, the amount of cerium attached to the surface of the substrate was measured before cleaning and after cleaning. Before cleaning it was 32 μg and after cleaning it was 0.6 μg. The removal rate of cerium by cleaning with an acid was 98%. This shows that almost the projections are caused by a polishing compound which is left on the surface of the substrate and it can efficiently be removed by cleaning with an acid.
  • The glass substrates according to Inventive Examples were chemically strengthened by being dipped in a mixed molten salt of KNO[0066] 3 and NaNO3 (KNO3: NaNO3=80: 20), heated to 380° C., for one hour, and then observed for the thickness of a compressive stress layer by a polarization microscope. All of the glass substrates had a compressive stress layer having a thickness of 50 μm or more, and a composition suitable for chemical strengthening.
  • An actual application of a glass substrate according to the present invention to an information recording medium will be described below. [0067]
  • A disk having an outside diameter of 65 mm, an inside diameter of 20 mm, a thickness of 0.635 mm, and a surface roughness Ra of 0.25 nm was prepared in the same manner as the samples measured for their etching rates. [0068]
  • The disk was cleaned with a hydrofluoric acid having a concentration of 0.005% at a temperature of 50° C. to remove foreign matter from the surface thereof. The disk was then cleaned successively with an aqueous solution of KOH with pH 11 at a temperature of 50° C. and pure water to produce a clean smooth surface. [0069]
  • The disk was then chemically strengthened by being dipped in a mixed molten salt of KNO[0070] 3 and NaNO3 (KNO3: NaNO3=80:20), heated to 380° C., for one hour. The disk thus chemically strengthened was used as a glass substrate for an information recording medium.
  • An information recording medium was then prepared using the glass substrate thus produced. [0071]
  • A base layer of Cr, a recording layer of Co—Cr—Ta, and a protective layer of Cc were deposited on the glass substrate by sputtering. Then, a lubricating layer was deposited on the glass substrate, thus producing an information recording medium. [0072]
  • The information recording medium thus produced was loaded in a ramp-loading-type disk drive, and continuously operated at a rotational speed of 4,500 rpm. As a result, any error and head crash which would otherwise be caused by a collision between foreign matter on the medium and the head did not occur. It was confirmed that the information recording medium was suitable for use in a magnetic disk drive having a low glide height. [0073]
  • As described above, a glass substrate for an information recording medium according to the present invention has an etching rate of at most 45 nm/min. upon contact with a hydrofluoric acid having a temperature of 50° C. and a concentration of 0.1 weight %. Therefore, foreign matter attached to the surface of the glass substrate can be removed by an acid treatment. By treating the glass substrate with an alkali in combination with the acid treatment, the recording surface of the glass substrate can have an average surface roughness Ra smaller than 0.3 nm. As a consequence, the glass substrate makes it possible to provide a high-density information recording device with a low error rate. [0074]
  • Although certain preferred embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described in detail, it should be understood that various changes and modifications may be made therein without departing from the scope of the appended claims. [0075]

Claims (15)

What is claimed is:
1. A glass substrate for an information recording medium having at least one surface as a recording surface, the glass substrate having an acid resistance represented by an etching rate of at most 45 nm/min. upon contact with a hydrofluoric acid having a temperature of 50° C. and a concentration of 0.1 weight %, at least the recording surface having an average surface roughness Ra smaller than 0.3 nm.
2. A glass substrate for an information recording medium having at least one surface as a recording surface, the glass substrate having an acid resistance represented by an etching rate of at most 30 nm/min. upon contact with a hydrofluoric acid having a temperature of 50° C. and a concentration of 0.1 weight %, at least the recording surface having an average surface roughness Ra smaller than 0.3 nm.
3. A glass substrate according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the number of projections having a height of at least 3 nm in an arbitrary area of 50 μm×50 μm in the recording surface is at most 500.
4. A glass substrate according to any one of claims 1 through 3, wherein the glass substrate contains SiO2 and Al2O3, and the difference (SiO2−Al2O3) between molar fractions of SiO2 and Al2O3 is at least 56.5 mol %.
5. A glass substrate according to claim 4, wherein the glass substrate contains SiO2 and Al2O3, and the difference (SiO2−Al2O3) between molar fractions of SiO2 and Al2O3 is at least 58.5 mol %.
6. A glass substrate according to claim 4 or 5, wherein the glass substrate contains components whose molar fractions are given as follows:
SiO2: 63-70 mol %,
Al2O3: 4-11 mol %,
Li2O: 5-11 mol %,
Na2O: 6-14 mol %,
K2O: 0-2 mol %,
MgO: 0-6 mol %,
CaO: 1-9 mol %,
SrO: 0-3 mol %,
BaO: 0-2 mol %,
TiO2: 0-5 mol %,
ZrO2: 0-2.5 mol %, and
RO: 2-15 mol %
where RO=MgO+CaO+SrO+BaO.
7. A glass substrate according to claim 4 or 5, wherein the glass substrate contains components whose molar fractions are given as follows:
SiO2: 63-70 mol %,
Al2O3: 6-11 mol %,
Li2O: 5-11 mol %,
Na2O: 6-14 mol %,
K2O: 0-2 mol %,
TiO2: 0-5 mol %,
ZrO2: 0-2.5 mol %,
RO: 2-12 mol %
where RO=MgO+CaO+SrO+BaO,
MgO: 0-4.5 mol %,
CaO: 2-7.5 mol %,
SrO: 0-3 mol %,
BaO: 0-2 mol %, and
other components: 0-3 mol %.
8. A glass substrate according to claim 4 or 5, wherein the glass substrate contains components whose molar fractions are given as follows:
SiO2: 63-70 mol %,
Al2O3: 6-11 mol %,
Li2O: 5-11 mol %,
Na2O: 6-14 mol %,
K2O: 0-2 mol %,
TiO2: 0-3 mol %,
ZrO2: 0-2 mol %,
RO: 2-12 mol %
where RO=MgO+CaO+SrO+BaO,
MgO: 0-4.5 mol %,
CaO: 2-7.5 mol %,
SrO: 0-3 mol %,
BaO: 0-2 mol %, and
other components: 0-3 mol %.
9. A glass substrate according to any one of claims 1 through 8, wherein the surface thereof is chemically strengthened by an ion exchange.
10. A glass substrate according to any one of claims 1 through 9, wherein the glass substrate is treated with an acid to remove foreign matter from the surface thereof, and then a layer produced on the surface by the acid is removed by being treated with an alkali.
11. A manufacturing method of a glass substrate for an information recording medium comprising the steps of:
melting components for a glass having an etching rate of at most 45 nm/min. upon contact with a hydrofluoric acid having a temperature of 50° C. and a concentration of 0.1 weight %;
forming said melted components to a desired substrate shape;
polishing the surface of said substrate with a polishing compound;
removing the polishing compound which remain attached to the surface of said substrate by cleaning with an acid; and
holding the surface smoothness (average surface roughness) Ra of said substrate in the range of Ra<0.3 nm by cleaning with an alkali.
12. A manufacturing method of a glass substrate for an information recording medium comprising the steps of:
melting components for a glass having an etching rate of at most 30 nm/min. upon contact with a hydrofluoric acid having a temperature of 50° C. and a concentration of 6.1 weight %;
forming said melted components to a desired substrate shape;
polishing the surface of said substrate with a polishing compound;
removing the polishing compound which remain attached to the surface of said substrate by cleaning with an acid; and
holding the surface smoothness (average surface roughness) Ra of said substrate in the range of Ra<0.3 nm by cleaning with an alkali.
13. A manufacturing method of a glass substrate for an information recording medium according to claim 11 or 12, wherein a sulfuric acid having a concentration in the range from 0.01 to 5 weight % is used for said cleaning with an acid.
14. A manufacturing method of a glass substrate for an information recording medium according to claim 11 or 12, a hydrofluoric acid having a concentration in the range from 0.002 to 1 weight % is used for said cleaning with an acid.
15. An information recording medium according to any one of claims 1 through 10, wherein a recording layer comprising a magnetic layer is disposed on the surface of said substrate.
US10/194,787 1999-05-13 2002-07-12 Glass substrate for information recording medium, manufacturing method thereof, and information recording medium Expired - Lifetime US6547980B1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10/194,787 US6547980B1 (en) 1999-05-13 2002-07-12 Glass substrate for information recording medium, manufacturing method thereof, and information recording medium

Applications Claiming Priority (6)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP13237199 1999-05-13
JP11-132371 1999-05-13
JP2000-139675 2000-05-12
US09/569,754 US6440531B1 (en) 1999-05-13 2000-05-12 Hydrofluoric acid etched substrate for information recording medium
JP2000139675A JP3959588B2 (en) 1999-05-13 2000-05-12 Glass substrate for information recording medium, method for producing glass substrate for information recording medium, and information recording medium
US10/194,787 US6547980B1 (en) 1999-05-13 2002-07-12 Glass substrate for information recording medium, manufacturing method thereof, and information recording medium

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/569,754 Division US6440531B1 (en) 1999-05-13 2000-05-12 Hydrofluoric acid etched substrate for information recording medium

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20030064196A1 true US20030064196A1 (en) 2003-04-03
US6547980B1 US6547980B1 (en) 2003-04-15

Family

ID=26466958

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/569,754 Expired - Lifetime US6440531B1 (en) 1999-05-13 2000-05-12 Hydrofluoric acid etched substrate for information recording medium
US10/194,787 Expired - Lifetime US6547980B1 (en) 1999-05-13 2002-07-12 Glass substrate for information recording medium, manufacturing method thereof, and information recording medium

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/569,754 Expired - Lifetime US6440531B1 (en) 1999-05-13 2000-05-12 Hydrofluoric acid etched substrate for information recording medium

Country Status (2)

Country Link
US (2) US6440531B1 (en)
JP (1) JP3959588B2 (en)

Cited By (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20050287304A1 (en) * 2004-06-11 2005-12-29 Fuji Electric Device Technology Co., Method of treating a substrate for electroless plating and method of increasing adhesion therebetween, and magnetic recording medium and magnetic recording device thereof
US20060228493A1 (en) * 2005-04-08 2006-10-12 Fuji Electric Device Technology Co., Ltd. Method of plating on a glass base plate and a method of manufacturing a perpendicular magnetic recording medium
US20080028793A1 (en) * 2004-08-27 2008-02-07 Showa Denko K.K. Process for Manufacturing Glass Substrate for Magnetic Recording Medium, Glass Substrate for Magnetic Recording Medium Obtained by the Process, and Magnetic Recording Medium Obtained Using the Substrate
US20080032608A1 (en) * 2004-08-27 2008-02-07 Showa Denko K.K. Process for Manufacturing Glass Substrate for Magnetic Recording Medium and Glass Substrate for Magnetic Recording Medium Obtained by the Process
US20130164521A1 (en) * 2010-08-10 2013-06-27 Jae Min Myoung Glass substrate manufacturing method and glass thereof
US9926225B2 (en) * 2011-12-30 2018-03-27 Corning Incorporated Media and methods for etching glass
EP2456727B1 (en) 2009-07-24 2021-05-26 Corsam Technologies LLC Fusion formable silica and sodium containing glasses
US11767252B2 (en) 2016-01-21 2023-09-26 AGC Inc. Chemically strengthened glass, and glass for chemical strengthening

Families Citing this family (61)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP4161509B2 (en) * 1999-04-13 2008-10-08 旭硝子株式会社 Glass for information recording medium substrate and glass substrate for information recording medium
JP4785274B2 (en) * 2001-05-29 2011-10-05 日本板硝子株式会社 Glass article and glass substrate for magnetic recording medium using the same
JP3995902B2 (en) * 2001-05-31 2007-10-24 Ｈｏｙａ株式会社 Glass substrate for information recording medium and magnetic information recording medium using the same
CN1277775C (en) * 2001-06-04 2006-10-04 日本板硝子株式会社 Method of producing transparent substrate and trasparent substrate&comma, and organic electroluminescence element having the transparent substrate
JP3953760B2 (en) * 2001-09-04 2007-08-08 日本板硝子株式会社 Micro-processing method of glass substrate, glass substrate for micro-processing, and micro-processed glass product
JP3665777B2 (en) * 2001-09-28 2005-06-29 Ｈｏｙａ株式会社 Method for manufacturing glass substrate for magnetic recording medium, and method for manufacturing magnetic recording medium
JP2003212603A (en) * 2002-01-18 2003-07-30 Nippon Sheet Glass Co Ltd Method for manufacturing glass substrate for information recording medium
US20040137828A1 (en) * 2002-07-17 2004-07-15 Hoya Corporation Glass substrate for a mask blank, method of producing a glass substrate for a mask blank, mask blank, method of producing the mask blank, transfer mask, and method of producing a transfer mask
JP4530618B2 (en) 2002-09-27 2010-08-25 コニカミノルタオプト株式会社 Glass composition and glass substrate
JP4189383B2 (en) * 2002-10-23 2008-12-03 Ｈｏｙａ株式会社 Method for manufacturing glass substrate for magnetic recording medium
JP4795614B2 (en) 2002-10-23 2011-10-19 Ｈｏｙａ株式会社 Glass substrate for information recording medium and manufacturing method thereof
AU2003280597A1 (en) * 2002-11-07 2004-06-07 Hoya Corporation Substrate for information recording medium, information recording medium and method for manufacturing same
JP4151440B2 (en) * 2003-03-17 2008-09-17 コニカミノルタオプト株式会社 Glass substrate
JP4726399B2 (en) 2003-05-29 2011-07-20 コニカミノルタオプト株式会社 Glass substrate
WO2004109860A2 (en) * 2003-06-02 2004-12-16 Infocus Corporation Board-to-board power connector for a projection device
JP4548140B2 (en) * 2005-02-15 2010-09-22 コニカミノルタオプト株式会社 Glass substrate for magnetic recording media
JP2006268904A (en) * 2005-03-22 2006-10-05 Konica Minolta Opto Inc Method for manufacturing magnetic recording medium glass substrate
US7307408B2 (en) * 2005-05-09 2007-12-11 Gregory Porcu Cable locating device
JP4794982B2 (en) * 2005-10-27 2011-10-19 古河電気工業株式会社 Manufacturing method of glass strip
US8076014B2 (en) * 2006-06-08 2011-12-13 Hoya Corporation Glass for use in substrate for information recording medium, substrate for information recording medium and information recording medium, and their manufacturing method
JP5743125B2 (en) * 2007-09-27 2015-07-01 日本電気硝子株式会社 Tempered glass and tempered glass substrate
JP5419612B2 (en) * 2008-10-23 2014-02-19 Ｈｏｙａ株式会社 Mask blank substrate manufacturing method, reflective mask blank manufacturing method, and reflective mask manufacturing method
JP4815002B2 (en) 2009-06-04 2011-11-16 株式会社オハラ Crystallized glass substrate for information recording medium and manufacturing method thereof
JP5375698B2 (en) * 2010-03-23 2013-12-25 コニカミノルタ株式会社 Manufacturing method of glass substrate
JP5720499B2 (en) 2010-10-26 2015-05-20 旭硝子株式会社 Substrate glass and glass substrate
JP5612233B1 (en) * 2010-12-24 2014-10-22 旭硝子株式会社 Glass for chemical strengthening
JP5834793B2 (en) * 2010-12-24 2015-12-24 旭硝子株式会社 Method for producing chemically strengthened glass
JP5737043B2 (en) * 2011-07-29 2015-06-17 旭硝子株式会社 Substrate glass and glass substrate
US9359251B2 (en) 2012-02-29 2016-06-07 Corning Incorporated Ion exchanged glasses via non-error function compressive stress profiles
US9139469B2 (en) 2012-07-17 2015-09-22 Corning Incorporated Ion exchangeable Li-containing glass compositions for 3-D forming
US9272945B2 (en) 2012-10-25 2016-03-01 Corning Incorporated Thermo-electric method for texturing of glass surfaces
US11352287B2 (en) 2012-11-28 2022-06-07 Vitro Flat Glass Llc High strain point glass
CN105164079A (en) * 2013-04-30 2015-12-16 康宁股份有限公司 Surface treatments for low electrostatic discharge fusion drawn glass
US11079309B2 (en) 2013-07-26 2021-08-03 Corning Incorporated Strengthened glass articles having improved survivability
PL3100986T3 (en) * 2014-01-31 2019-05-31 Nippon Sheet Glass Co Ltd Process for producing glass plate and uses of glass plate
US10118858B2 (en) 2014-02-24 2018-11-06 Corning Incorporated Strengthened glass with deep depth of compression
WO2015152316A1 (en) 2014-03-31 2015-10-08 Hoya株式会社 Magnetic disk-use glass substrate
US9670088B2 (en) 2014-05-20 2017-06-06 Corning Incorporated Scratch resistant glass and method of making
TWI852054B (en) 2014-06-19 2024-08-11 美商康寧公司 Glasses having non-frangible stress profiles
JP5900560B2 (en) * 2014-09-01 2016-04-06 旭硝子株式会社 Substrate glass and glass substrate
CN108046589A (en) 2014-10-08 2018-05-18 康宁股份有限公司 Glass and glass ceramics comprising metal oxide concentration gradient
US10150698B2 (en) 2014-10-31 2018-12-11 Corning Incorporated Strengthened glass with ultra deep depth of compression
TWI680954B (en) 2014-11-04 2020-01-01 美商康寧公司 Deep non-frangible stress profiles and methods of making
US11613103B2 (en) 2015-07-21 2023-03-28 Corning Incorporated Glass articles exhibiting improved fracture performance
US10579106B2 (en) 2015-07-21 2020-03-03 Corning Incorporated Glass articles exhibiting improved fracture performance
SG11201709624VA (en) * 2015-09-30 2017-12-28 Hoya Corp Magnetic-disk glass substrate, magnetic-disk glass substrate intermediate, and method for manufacturing magnetic-disk glass substrate
CN108139058B (en) 2015-10-22 2021-03-23 康宁股份有限公司 High transmission glass
WO2017100646A1 (en) 2015-12-11 2017-06-15 Corning Incorporated Fusion-formable glass-based articles including a metal oxide concentration gradient
US10271442B2 (en) 2016-04-08 2019-04-23 Corning Incorporated Glass-based articles including a stress profile comprising two regions, and methods of making
CN109071316B (en) 2016-04-08 2020-03-27 康宁股份有限公司 Glass-Based Articles Containing Metal Oxide Concentration Gradients
CN109715573B (en) * 2016-09-21 2022-07-12 Ａｇｃ株式会社 Chemically strengthened glass and chemically strengthened glass
JP7551312B2 (en) * 2020-03-13 2024-09-17 日本板硝子株式会社 Glass composition, glass plate and its manufacturing method, and substrate for information recording medium
CN112960904B (en) * 2021-02-09 2022-02-15 醴陵旗滨电子玻璃有限公司 Lithium-aluminosilicate glass, lithium-aluminosilicate chemically strengthened glass and preparation method and application thereof
US12054422B2 (en) 2021-06-18 2024-08-06 Corning Incorporated Colored glass articles having improved mechanical durability
US11802072B2 (en) 2021-06-18 2023-10-31 Corning Incorporated Gold containing silicate glass
US12454479B2 (en) 2021-06-18 2025-10-28 Corning Incorporated Gold containing silicate glass
US11634354B2 (en) 2021-06-18 2023-04-25 Corning Incorporated Colored glass articles having improved mechanical durability
US12378152B2 (en) 2021-06-18 2025-08-05 Corning Incorporated Colored glass articles having improved mechanical durability
CN116249679A (en) 2021-06-18 2023-06-09 康宁股份有限公司 Tinted glass articles with improved mechanical durability
EP4355702A1 (en) 2021-06-18 2024-04-24 Corning Incorporated Colored glass articles having improved mechanical durability
US12240782B2 (en) 2022-05-31 2025-03-04 Corning Incorporated Ion exchangeable yellow glass articles

Family Cites Families (15)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH0676224B2 (en) 1986-02-13 1994-09-28 旭硝子株式会社 Tempered glass manufacturing method
EP0263512B1 (en) * 1986-10-09 1994-06-01 Asahi Glass Company Ltd. Glass substrate for a magnetic disc and process for its production
JP2886872B2 (en) * 1989-01-13 1999-04-26 株式会社日立製作所 Magnetic disk substrate and magnetic disk
US5268071A (en) * 1989-04-27 1993-12-07 Nippon Sheet Glass Process of producing a magnetic disk substrate
JP2837005B2 (en) 1991-05-20 1998-12-14 ホーヤ株式会社 Glass for chemical strengthening
US5534321A (en) * 1993-05-20 1996-07-09 Corning Incorporated Disk substrate for magnetic memory devices
US5569518A (en) * 1993-07-07 1996-10-29 Ag Technology Co., Ltd. Glass substrate for a magnetic disk with roughened edges
JP3125127B2 (en) * 1994-07-21 2001-01-15 ミネベア株式会社 Surface finishing method for floating magnetic head
JP2951571B2 (en) 1995-07-04 1999-09-20 ホーヤ株式会社 Method of manufacturing glass substrate for magnetic disk and method of manufacturing magnetic disk
GB2303811B (en) * 1995-03-30 1998-10-21 Ag Technology Corp Method for producing a glass substrate for a magnetic disk
TW366331B (en) * 1996-02-02 1999-08-11 Ohara Kk A glass-ceramic substrate for a magnetic disk
JP3219705B2 (en) * 1996-11-14 2001-10-15 株式会社オハラ Glass ceramic substrate for magnetic information storage media
US6134918A (en) * 1996-12-29 2000-10-24 Hoya Corporation Method of fabricating glass substrate for magnetic disk and method of fabricating magnetic disk
US6048466A (en) * 1997-08-20 2000-04-11 Fine Glass Technology Co., Ltd. Method of cleaning glass substrate for magnetic disk or semiconductor substrate
US6383404B1 (en) * 1998-08-19 2002-05-07 Hoya Corporation Glass substrate for magnetic recording medium, magnetic recording medium, and method of manufacturing the same

Cited By (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20050287304A1 (en) * 2004-06-11 2005-12-29 Fuji Electric Device Technology Co., Method of treating a substrate for electroless plating and method of increasing adhesion therebetween, and magnetic recording medium and magnetic recording device thereof
US20080028793A1 (en) * 2004-08-27 2008-02-07 Showa Denko K.K. Process for Manufacturing Glass Substrate for Magnetic Recording Medium, Glass Substrate for Magnetic Recording Medium Obtained by the Process, and Magnetic Recording Medium Obtained Using the Substrate
US20080032608A1 (en) * 2004-08-27 2008-02-07 Showa Denko K.K. Process for Manufacturing Glass Substrate for Magnetic Recording Medium and Glass Substrate for Magnetic Recording Medium Obtained by the Process
US7700205B2 (en) * 2004-08-27 2010-04-20 Showa Denko K.K. Process for manufacturing glass substrate for magnetic recording medium, glass substrate for magnetic recording medium obtained by the process, and magnetic recording medium obtained using the substrate
US20060228493A1 (en) * 2005-04-08 2006-10-12 Fuji Electric Device Technology Co., Ltd. Method of plating on a glass base plate and a method of manufacturing a perpendicular magnetic recording medium
EP2456727B1 (en) 2009-07-24 2021-05-26 Corsam Technologies LLC Fusion formable silica and sodium containing glasses
EP2456727B2 (en) † 2009-07-24 2025-02-12 Corsam Technologies LLC Photovoltaic device comprising a fusion formable, silica and sodium containing glass
US20130164521A1 (en) * 2010-08-10 2013-06-27 Jae Min Myoung Glass substrate manufacturing method and glass thereof
US9112076B2 (en) * 2010-08-10 2015-08-18 Industry-Academic Cooperation Foundation Yonsei University Glass substrate manufacturing method and glass thereof
US20150315069A1 (en) * 2010-08-10 2015-11-05 Industry-Academic Cooperation Foundation, Yonsei University Glass substrate manufacturing method and glass thereof
US9926225B2 (en) * 2011-12-30 2018-03-27 Corning Incorporated Media and methods for etching glass
US11767252B2 (en) 2016-01-21 2023-09-26 AGC Inc. Chemically strengthened glass, and glass for chemical strengthening

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2001026460A (en) 2001-01-30
JP3959588B2 (en) 2007-08-15
US6440531B1 (en) 2002-08-27
US6547980B1 (en) 2003-04-15

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6440531B1 (en) Hydrofluoric acid etched substrate for information recording medium
JP4785274B2 (en) Glass article and glass substrate for magnetic recording medium using the same
JP3995902B2 (en) Glass substrate for information recording medium and magnetic information recording medium using the same
US8883330B2 (en) Glass for chemical strengthening, substrate for information recording media and information recording media
CN100468526C (en) Glass substrate for information recording medium and manufacturing method thereof, and information recording medium and manufacturing method thereof
CN100482606C (en) Substrate for information recording medium, and method for producing the same
US20030109202A1 (en) Substrate for information recording media and manufacturing method thereof, and information recording medium
JP4656863B2 (en) Zirconium-containing glass composition, chemically strengthened glass article, glass substrate for magnetic recording medium, and method for producing glass plate
SG180106A1 (en) Glass for substrate, and glass substrate
JP2006228431A (en) Glass substrate for magnetic disk, manufacturing method of glass substrate for magnetic disk, and magnetic disk
US6821893B2 (en) Method of manufacturing a substrate for information recording media
US7462411B2 (en) Substrate for information recording medium, information recording medium and process for producing the same
US6627565B1 (en) Crystallized glass substrate for information recording medium
JP2001143246A (en) Substrate for information recording medium and its manufacturing method as well as information recording medium and information recorder using the same
JP4218839B2 (en) Glass substrate for information recording medium and magnetic information recording medium using the same
JP2002288823A (en) Manufacturing method of substrate for information record medium
JPH10241134A (en) Glass substrate for information-recording medium and magnetic recording medium using the same
JP4507135B2 (en) Glass composition, substrate for information recording medium and information recording medium using the same
JP2004277232A (en) Glass composition and glass substrate
JP2000159544A (en) Glass composition, its production, substrate for information recording medium using the same, information recording medium and information recording apparatus
WO2013094451A1 (en) Glass substrate
JP2008308405A (en) Glass article, and glass substrate for magnetic recording medium using the same

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

AS Assignment

Owner name: HOYA CORPORATION, JAPAN

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:NIPPON SHEET GLASS COMPANY, LIMITED;REEL/FRAME:015469/0818

Effective date: 20040317

AS Assignment

Owner name: HOYA CORPORATION, JAPAN

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:NIPPON SHEET GLASS COMPANY, LIMITED;REEL/FRAME:015108/0177

Effective date: 20040701

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 4

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 8

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 12