US20030062064A1 - Method of removing PECVD residues of fluorinated plasma using in-situ H2 plasma - Google Patents
Method of removing PECVD residues of fluorinated plasma using in-situ H2 plasma Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20030062064A1 US20030062064A1 US09/965,077 US96507701A US2003062064A1 US 20030062064 A1 US20030062064 A1 US 20030062064A1 US 96507701 A US96507701 A US 96507701A US 2003062064 A1 US2003062064 A1 US 2003062064A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- plasma
- chamber
- fluorinated
- residues
- situ
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C23—COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
- C23C—COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL BY DIFFUSION INTO THE SURFACE, BY CHEMICAL CONVERSION OR SUBSTITUTION; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL
- C23C16/00—Chemical coating by decomposition of gaseous compounds, without leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating, i.e. chemical vapour deposition [CVD] processes
- C23C16/44—Chemical coating by decomposition of gaseous compounds, without leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating, i.e. chemical vapour deposition [CVD] processes characterised by the method of coating
- C23C16/4401—Means for minimising impurities, e.g. dust, moisture or residual gas, in the reaction chamber
- C23C16/4405—Cleaning of reactor or parts inside the reactor by using reactive gases
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10S—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10S438/00—Semiconductor device manufacturing: process
- Y10S438/905—Cleaning of reaction chamber
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a method of removing plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) residues from a reaction chamber during a process of forming semiconductors or integrated circuits. These residues result from fluorinated discharges used to remove unwanted film deposition from PECVD chamber walls when preparing semiconductor or integrated circuits.
- PECVD plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition
- the photolithography steps include coating a wafer with a photoresist wherein an ultraviolet photosensitive organic material is utilized.
- the photoresist is exposed through a mask, after which the resist is developed.
- the exposed photoresist is etched thereby leaving given exposed areas on the surface of the wafer.
- additional processing steps such as deposition, implantation or etching may be employed on the exposed areas.
- U.S. Pat. No. 5,882,489 disclose processes for cleaning and stripping photoresist from surfaces of semiconductor wafers.
- the process entails ashing the organic resist from a device, rinsing the device in water, and sputtering the rinsed device to remove residual contaminants.
- the stripping step is a dry etching process such as a microwave downstream process, a RIE process, or sequential or simultaneous microwave downstream and RIE process, wherein the rinsing step is performed with deionized (DI) water, and the sputtering step is performed with argon.
- DI deionized
- sputtering step is performed with argon.
- the process is especially useful for etching via holes when the holes penetrate a conductive layer and create insoluble, inorganic contaminants such as AlF 3 .
- the second substrate being formed of a material which reacts with activated oxygen to form a stable oxygen-containing compound such that material etched from the second substrate reduces activated oxygen in the gas plasma;
- U.S. Pat. No. 5,017,403 disclose the use of plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) to form dielectric films.
- PECVD plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition
- a low pressure and low power Cl 2 /HCl process for sub-micron metal etching is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,976,986. The method entails:
- One object of the present invention is to provide an improved method for removing PECVD chamber residues resulting from fluorinated plasma cleaning during a process for forming semiconductors or integrated circuits.
- Another object of the present invention is to provide a method for removing PECVD chamber residues of AlF 3 or derivatives thereof that alter plasma chemistry and adversely impacts film deposition properties.
- a further object of the present invention is to provide a method for removing PECVD chamber residues resulting from fluorinated plasma cleaning; namely, AlF 3 or its derivatives, by utilizing in-situ H 2 plasma or mixtures containing H 2 , and thereby avoiding wet chemical cleaning which requires disassembling the chamber, cleaning the chamber parts in wet chemical baths, and incurring considerable chamber downtime during the wet chemical cleaning procedure.
- a further object yet still of the present invention is to provide a method for removing PECVD chamber residues resulting from fluorinated plasma cleaning by using in-situ H 2 plasma to restore chamber performance without opening the chamber, and thereby increasing tool availability and freeing maintenance resources.
- the invention process of using H 2 plasma to etch AlF 3 accumulated in the reaction chamber and to improve control over film properties is accomplished after a fluorinated plasma clean by:
- FIG. 1 is a graph showing film thickness U % versus number of wafers processed, and reflects drifting film properties in a PECVD chamber between wet cleans (denoted WC).
- FIG. 2 depicts a reaction chamber after one or more fluorinated plasma cleans and shows AlF 3 build-up on the powered electrode.
- FIG. 3A is a graph generally showing SiON film thickness versus rf power (DARC is a specific SiON application), consistent with the accumulation of AlF 3 on a shower head to affect power coupling into plasma.
- DARC is a specific SiON application
- FIG. 3B is a graph generally depicting SiON optical constants refractive index (n) and extinction coefficient (k) versus rf power, which is the primary knob for adjusting plasma density. The changes that are induced by reducing power are consistent with the film drift problem.
- FIG. 4A is a graph depicting change in SiON film thickness by location across a wafer after processing several thousand wafers and represents the impact of non-uniform AlF 3 build-up (concentrated in center), and provides some indication as to why the U % drifts.
- FIG. 4B is a graph showing the change in optical properties, n and k, by location across a wafer after processing several thousand wafers due to non-uniform AlF 3 build-up (concentrated in the center), where there is diminished plasma density in the center of the chamber.
- FIG. 5A is a graph comparing the number of wafers processed between wet cleans (performed as necessary to control SiON film thickness U %) for processes with and without in-situ H 2 plasma.
- FIG. 5B is a graph showing drift in SiON thickness U %. The rate of drift is greatly reduced after introducing H 2 plasma to remove AlF 3 residues.
- FIG. 6 is a graph generally showing the influence of rf power on H-atom concentration in a plasma as predicted by actinometry for a mixture of 99% H 2 and 1% Ar.
- FIG. 7 is a graph generally showing the effect of pressure on H-atom concentration in a plasma as predicted by actinometry for a mixture of 99% H 2 and 1% Ar.
- a fluorine containing discharge (here as a mixture of CF 4 +N 2 O) is introduced periodically into the chamber to remove excess deposition material (e.g., SiO 2 or Si 3 N 4 ) in order to maintain consistent film properties from wafer to wafer.
- the fluorinated discharge leaves a light residue in the chamber that accumulates over successive treatments.
- the build-up in the chamber was identified as AlF 3 , by EDX (energy dispersive x-ray analysis).
- the build-up of AlF 3 on the powered electrode may be seen in the parallel plate plasma reactor diagram of FIG. 2.
- the AlF 3 is a dielectric that inhibits the coupling of rf power into the plasma, resulting in reduced plasma density.
- An evenly distributed AlF 3 build-up affects the plasma chemistry which ultimately determines the properties of the film deposited.
- FIGS. 3A and 3B show the impact of plasma density on film properties as rf power directly modulates plasma density (i.e., higher rf power implies higher plasma density). Because the transfer of energy is affected uniformly across the chamber, film properties are impacted in a roughly uniform manner.
- the fluorinated discharge that produces the AlF 3 residue may not be perfectly uniform.
- An uneven distribution of AlF 3 (or other derivatives from fluorinated plasma cleaning) on the showerhead causes an uneven transfer of power into the plasma, thereby leading to uneven plasma density across the chamber.
- plasma density plays a prominent role in the reaction chemistry, varying the plasma density locally can yield locally different film properties, as may be seen from FIGS. 4A and 4B, which shows respectively, a change in thickness versus location on a wafer and a change in n and k versus location on a wafer during the AlF 3 build-up.
- FIG. 4A and 4B shows respectively, a change in thickness versus location on a wafer and a change in n and k versus location on a wafer during the AlF 3 build-up.
- the thickness versus position represents film properties over several thousand wafers due to non-uniform AlF 3 build-up (concentrated in the center), and thereby provides some indication as to why the U % drifts.
- FIG. 4B there is also shown the change in n and k versus position over several thousand wafers due to non-uniform AlF 3 build-up (concentrated in the center) where there is diminished plasma density in the center of the chamber.
- PECVD chambers are typically performed to remove AlF 3 residue and restore (i.e., control) film properties.
- Wet cleans temporarily remove a chamber from operation and require maintenance resources for disassembling the chamber, initiating the wet chemical clean, and eventually reassembling the chamber.
- frequent chamber wet cleans can easily impact overall manufacturing productivity by reducing chamber availability and consuming maintenance resources.
- the invention process uses in-situ H 2 plasma to reduce or remove fluorinated discharge residues, namely AlF 3 , in a less invasive manner.
- the invention process of removing this build-up from fluorinated plasma cleaning by using in-situ H 2 plasma eliminates or reduces the need for wet chemical cleaning, thereby improving chamber availability and freeing maintenance resources.
- the improvement realized by employing in-situ H 2 plasma is illustrated in FIG. 5A which compares the number of wafers processed between SiON thickness U % failures with and without H 2 plasma cleaning.
- FIG. 5B shows SiON thickness U % over time and reflects a significant reduction in U % drift rate after beginning H 2 plasma treatments.
- the invention process is the first to utilize H 2 plasma etching of AlF 3 to control chamber conditions in order to enhance control over PECVD processes and the properties of the deposited film.
- the invention process is the first in-situ chemical process for removal of fluorinated discharge residues.
- the H 2 plasma process has distinct advantages over the wet clean process typically used in terms of chamber productivity and use of maintenance resources.
- the H-atom concentration in the plasma may be determined by the following formula: Intensity of H Intensity of Ar ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ [ H atom ]
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Materials Engineering (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Metallurgy (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Drying Of Semiconductors (AREA)
- Cleaning Or Drying Semiconductors (AREA)
Abstract
In a method of affecting cleaning or chamber process control to remove residues of fluorinated discharges from internal PECVD chamber hardware during manufacture of a semiconductor or integrated circuit, the improvement of removing the fluorinated discharges without opening the chamber and without causing chamber downtime, comprising:
a) maximizing H-atom concentration in a gas mix of a plasma containing H2 through the use of high rf power and low pressure to obtain an in-situ H2 plasma; and
b) subjecting a reactor chamber containing build-up residues from previous chamber treatment with a fluorinated plasma, with the in-situ H2 plasma from step a) without opening the chamber and without shutting down the chamber to remove the build-up residues of the fluorinated plasma.
Description
- The present invention relates to a method of removing plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) residues from a reaction chamber during a process of forming semiconductors or integrated circuits. These residues result from fluorinated discharges used to remove unwanted film deposition from PECVD chamber walls when preparing semiconductor or integrated circuits.
- It is known that manufacturing semiconductor devices on a wafer entails a number of steps, inclusive of photolithography and etching, thin film deposition, and the use of ion implantation steps alternately performed in order to develop or build-up the semiconductor device or wafer. Typically, the photolithography steps include coating a wafer with a photoresist wherein an ultraviolet photosensitive organic material is utilized. The photoresist is exposed through a mask, after which the resist is developed. Next, the exposed photoresist is etched thereby leaving given exposed areas on the surface of the wafer. Following the foregoing steps, additional processing steps such as deposition, implantation or etching may be employed on the exposed areas.
- In deposition processes, particularly in PECVD processes, it is necessary to periodically remove or clean deposition material from the chamber or reactor hardware. A fluorine-based plasma discharge is commonly used to remove dielectric material such as silicon dioxide (SiO 2), silicon nitride (Si3N4), and silicon oxynitrides (SiON). During such fluorinated plasma cleaning, AlF3 (which is a by-product of the cleaning) grows on exposed internal PECVD chamber hardware by reaction of various fluorine species with the aluminum or aluminum based chamber parts. This accumulation of AlF3 on the chamber hardware alters the ensuing plasma chemistry and adversely impacts film deposition properties. In essence, the slow accumulation of AlF3 causes drifting film properties and process control problems. (Refer to publication by B. Smith, et al, J. Electrochem. Soc. accepted for Nov 2001.)
- Eventually, the AlF 3 must be removed in order to maintain film properties within some process window. Wet chemical cleaning is commonly used to restore PECVD chamber performance (since AlF3 is water soluble). However, wet cleaning unfortunately involves removing the PECVD chamber from operation, disassembling the chamber, and cleaning the chamber parts in a wet chemical bath. This wet chemical cleaning unfortunately creates considerable chamber downtime during the wet cleaning procedure.
- In the past, H 2 plasma etching of AlF3 films on wafers has been demonstrated by S. G. Pearton, et al, Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Aoc., Volume 282 (1993), p. 131. Pearton et al used H2 plasma to remove AlF3 etch-stop layers in GaAs-based wafer processing.
- U.S. Pat. No. 5,882,489 disclose processes for cleaning and stripping photoresist from surfaces of semiconductor wafers. The process entails ashing the organic resist from a device, rinsing the device in water, and sputtering the rinsed device to remove residual contaminants. The stripping step is a dry etching process such as a microwave downstream process, a RIE process, or sequential or simultaneous microwave downstream and RIE process, wherein the rinsing step is performed with deionized (DI) water, and the sputtering step is performed with argon. The process is especially useful for etching via holes when the holes penetrate a conductive layer and create insoluble, inorganic contaminants such as AlF 3.
- A method for etch rate enhancement by background oxygen control in a soft etch system is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,143,144. This sputter etch cleaning process to remove or sputter off particles from the substrate surface within the processing chamber is accomplished by:
- positioning a first substrate to be processed within a processing chamber, the first substrate including a material layer containing oxygen;
- introducing a process gas into the chamber;
- inductively coupling electrical energy to the process gas in the chamber to form an ionized gas plasma in the chamber;
- positioning a second material substrate proximate the first substrate in the processing chamber;
- biasing the first and second substrates with RF electrical energy so that the plasma etches the first substrate material layer and the second substrate, the material etched from the first substrate material layer producing activated oxygen in the gas plasma;
- the second substrate being formed of a material which reacts with activated oxygen to form a stable oxygen-containing compound such that material etched from the second substrate reduces activated oxygen in the gas plasma;
- whereby residual oxygen in the processing chamber is reduced to maintain an etch rate for subsequent sputter etching processes.
- U.S. Pat. No. 5,017,403 disclose the use of plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) to form dielectric films. The process entails:
- (a) providing a substrate in a chamber;
- (b) flowing a reactant gas in the chamber;
- (c) generating a plasma between the electrodes by R.F. power to dissociate the gas and deposit a predetermined planarization layer of carbonaceous material on the substrate; while maintaining the substrate at a relatively low temperature wherein the layer is soft as deposited and is then hardened by thermal or plasma treatment.
- A low pressure and low power Cl 2/HCl process for sub-micron metal etching is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,976,986. The method entails:
- placing aluminum metallization coated on at least one surface with a barrier layer in an etch chamber;
- creating a transformer coupled plasma from Cl 2, HCl, and an inert gas within the etch chamber, without a magnetic field, using separately powered electrodes positioned above and below aluminum metallizations wherein each of the electrodes are powered by less than 350 Watts, and wherein the pressure in the etch chamber is less than 15 milliTorr;
- etching the aluminum metallizations with ions and radicals formed in the plasma; and adjusting a concentration of the Cl 2 in the plasma during the creating and etching steps between a first higher concentration during etching of the aluminum metallization and a second lower concentration during etching of the barrier layer.
- The addition of hydrogen to plasma is used to reduce corrosion during the etching of aluminum layers.
- In the art of PECVD processing where fluorinated plasma discharges are utilized, there is a need to remove unwanted residues from PECVD chamber hardware without wet cleaning the chamber (i.e., disassembling the chamber and cleaning the chamber parts in a wet chemical bath), which results in considerable chamber downtime.
- One object of the present invention is to provide an improved method for removing PECVD chamber residues resulting from fluorinated plasma cleaning during a process for forming semiconductors or integrated circuits.
- Another object of the present invention is to provide a method for removing PECVD chamber residues of AlF 3 or derivatives thereof that alter plasma chemistry and adversely impacts film deposition properties.
- A further object of the present invention is to provide a method for removing PECVD chamber residues resulting from fluorinated plasma cleaning; namely, AlF 3 or its derivatives, by utilizing in-situ H2 plasma or mixtures containing H2, and thereby avoiding wet chemical cleaning which requires disassembling the chamber, cleaning the chamber parts in wet chemical baths, and incurring considerable chamber downtime during the wet chemical cleaning procedure.
- A further object yet still of the present invention is to provide a method for removing PECVD chamber residues resulting from fluorinated plasma cleaning by using in-situ H 2 plasma to restore chamber performance without opening the chamber, and thereby increasing tool availability and freeing maintenance resources.
- In general, the invention process of using H 2 plasma to etch AlF3 accumulated in the reaction chamber and to improve control over film properties is accomplished after a fluorinated plasma clean by:
- subjecting the reaction chamber to a mixture of He/H 2 at a flow rate of 1,000/200 sccm (standard cubic centimeters per minute), at about 750W rf, at about 0.8 Torr for about 5 seconds to strike the plasma, and then cleaning the chamber by subjecting it to H2 at about 500 sccm for 5-60 seconds, at about 500W rf, at about 0.5 Torr.
- FIG. 1 is a graph showing film thickness U % versus number of wafers processed, and reflects drifting film properties in a PECVD chamber between wet cleans (denoted WC).
- FIG. 2 depicts a reaction chamber after one or more fluorinated plasma cleans and shows AlF 3 build-up on the powered electrode.
- FIG. 3A is a graph generally showing SiON film thickness versus rf power (DARC is a specific SiON application), consistent with the accumulation of AlF 3 on a shower head to affect power coupling into plasma.
- FIG. 3B is a graph generally depicting SiON optical constants refractive index (n) and extinction coefficient (k) versus rf power, which is the primary knob for adjusting plasma density. The changes that are induced by reducing power are consistent with the film drift problem.
- FIG. 4A is a graph depicting change in SiON film thickness by location across a wafer after processing several thousand wafers and represents the impact of non-uniform AlF 3 build-up (concentrated in center), and provides some indication as to why the U % drifts.
- FIG. 4B is a graph showing the change in optical properties, n and k, by location across a wafer after processing several thousand wafers due to non-uniform AlF 3 build-up (concentrated in the center), where there is diminished plasma density in the center of the chamber.
- FIG. 5A is a graph comparing the number of wafers processed between wet cleans (performed as necessary to control SiON film thickness U %) for processes with and without in-situ H 2 plasma.
- FIG. 5B is a graph showing drift in SiON thickness U %. The rate of drift is greatly reduced after introducing H 2 plasma to remove AlF3 residues.
- FIG. 6 is a graph generally showing the influence of rf power on H-atom concentration in a plasma as predicted by actinometry for a mixture of 99% H 2 and 1% Ar.
- FIG. 7 is a graph generally showing the effect of pressure on H-atom concentration in a plasma as predicted by actinometry for a mixture of 99% H 2 and 1% Ar.
- In PECVD processing, a fluorine containing discharge (here as a mixture of CF 4+N2O) is introduced periodically into the chamber to remove excess deposition material (e.g., SiO2 or Si3N4) in order to maintain consistent film properties from wafer to wafer. The fluorinated discharge leaves a light residue in the chamber that accumulates over successive treatments. The build-up in the chamber was identified as AlF3, by EDX (energy dispersive x-ray analysis).
- Accumulation of fluorine discharge residue gradually affects film deposition properties. An example of said drifting film properties in a PECVD chamber is shown in the graph of FIG. 1 which shows SiON film thickness uniformity (U %) versus the number of wafers processed. In general, all film properties including film thickness, thickness U %, n, k, and stress are subject to gradual drift depending on the sensitivity of the particular process and process parameter. Wet cleans (denoted WC in FIG. 1) are invasive procedures typically used to remove chamber residue and restore film properties. After the wet clean (WC), the SiON film thickness profile is relatively flat. With use, the profile becomes center thin and U % increases. U % is governed by the formula:
- where s is the standard deviation of film thickness measured at nine sites on a wafer and {overscore (x)} is the mean of the film thickness measured at the same nine sites.
- The build-up of AlF 3 on the powered electrode (typically the showerhead in commercial reactors) may be seen in the parallel plate plasma reactor diagram of FIG. 2. The AlF3 is a dielectric that inhibits the coupling of rf power into the plasma, resulting in reduced plasma density. An evenly distributed AlF3 build-up affects the plasma chemistry which ultimately determines the properties of the film deposited. FIGS. 3A and 3B show the impact of plasma density on film properties as rf power directly modulates plasma density (i.e., higher rf power implies higher plasma density). Because the transfer of energy is affected uniformly across the chamber, film properties are impacted in a roughly uniform manner.
- In practice the fluorinated discharge that produces the AlF 3 residue may not be perfectly uniform. An uneven distribution of AlF3 (or other derivatives from fluorinated plasma cleaning) on the showerhead causes an uneven transfer of power into the plasma, thereby leading to uneven plasma density across the chamber. Since plasma density plays a prominent role in the reaction chemistry, varying the plasma density locally can yield locally different film properties, as may be seen from FIGS. 4A and 4B, which shows respectively, a change in thickness versus location on a wafer and a change in n and k versus location on a wafer during the AlF3 build-up. In FIG. 4A, the thickness versus position represents film properties over several thousand wafers due to non-uniform AlF3 build-up (concentrated in the center), and thereby provides some indication as to why the U % drifts. In FIG. 4B, there is also shown the change in n and k versus position over several thousand wafers due to non-uniform AlF3 build-up (concentrated in the center) where there is diminished plasma density in the center of the chamber.
- This phenomenon is the same for oxide and nitride films, but to a slightly lesser degree.
- Wet cleaning PECVD chambers is typically performed to remove AlF 3 residue and restore (i.e., control) film properties. Wet cleans temporarily remove a chamber from operation and require maintenance resources for disassembling the chamber, initiating the wet chemical clean, and eventually reassembling the chamber. In large scale semiconductor manufacturing where a large number of PECVD chambers are employed, frequent chamber wet cleans can easily impact overall manufacturing productivity by reducing chamber availability and consuming maintenance resources. The invention process uses in-situ H2 plasma to reduce or remove fluorinated discharge residues, namely AlF3, in a less invasive manner. In essence, the invention process of removing this build-up from fluorinated plasma cleaning by using in-situ H2 plasma eliminates or reduces the need for wet chemical cleaning, thereby improving chamber availability and freeing maintenance resources. The improvement realized by employing in-situ H2 plasma is illustrated in FIG. 5A which compares the number of wafers processed between SiON thickness U % failures with and without H2 plasma cleaning. FIG. 5B shows SiON thickness U % over time and reflects a significant reduction in U % drift rate after beginning H2 plasma treatments. The invention process is the first to utilize H2 plasma etching of AlF3 to control chamber conditions in order to enhance control over PECVD processes and the properties of the deposited film. The invention process is the first in-situ chemical process for removal of fluorinated discharge residues. As such, the H2 plasma process has distinct advantages over the wet clean process typically used in terms of chamber productivity and use of maintenance resources.
- While the preferred embodiment of the invention applies the H 2 plasma cleaning in-situ, it should be noted that an ex-situ process would also suffice.
- Hydrogen atoms generated in H 2 plasma are responsible for removal of AlF3 by reduction reaction. Consequently, it is desirable to maximize the H-atom concentration (denoted [H]) for efficient removal of AlF3 residues. From FIG. 6, it can be seen that the high rf power is conducive to high hydrogen atom concentration. The use of optical emission spectroscopy (OES) and actinometry, a related technique, is utilized to identify process conditions that maximize H-atom concentration in the plasma based on the relative emission from excited H and Ar atoms.
- Referring to FIG. 7, it may also be seen that low pressure is also conducive to high [H]. Therefore, it is clear from FIGS. 6 and 7 that the combination of low pressure and high power are together conducive to high [H]. In general, the H-atom concentration in the plasma may be determined by the following formula:
- By use of H 2 plasma to etch AlF3 on the faceplate of the chamber, improved control over film properties was obtained. This in-situ procedure effectively eliminates the need for wet cleans and increases tool availability. Restoration of chamber performance by removing AlF3 removes AlF3 growth on the chamber wall that alters PECVD chamber performance, and the invention process for removing the AlF3 is superior to removal by wet chemical or mechanical means, as these means require considerable chamber downtime. Further, the in-situ H2 plasma removes AlF3 without opening the chamber, thereby increasing tool availability and freeing maintenance resources.
- While the invention has been described in terms of its preferred embodiments, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the invention may be practiced with modifications within the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
Claims (6)
1. In a method of affecting cleaning or chamber process control to remove residues of fluorinated discharges from chamber walls from PECVD during manufacture of a semiconductor or integrated circuit, the improvement of removing said fluorinated discharge residues without opening said chamber and without causing chamber downtime, comprising:
a) maximizing H-atom concentration in a gas mix of a plasma containing H2 through the use of high rf power and low pressure to obtain an in-situ H2 plasma; and
b) subjecting a reactor chamber, containing build-up residues from previous chamber treatment with a fluorinated plasma, with the in-situ H2 plasma from step a) without opening said chamber and without shutting down said chamber to remove said build-up residues of said fluorinated plasma.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein said fluorinated discharge residue is AlF3.
3. The method of claim 1 wherein said plasma contains a mixture of H2 and Ar.
4. The method of claim 1 wherein said fluorinated plasma is a mixture of CF4+N2O.
5. The method of claim 1 wherein said gas mix of said plasma is a mixture of He/H2.
6. The method of claim 1 wherein said gas is comprised only of H2-7. The process of claim 4-6 wherein said mixture of He/H2 is first administered at a flow rate and ratio of about 1,000/200 sccm at an rf power of about 750W and a pressure of about 0.8 Torr, and then administered so that the H2 or Ar/H2 flow rate is about 500 sccm at an rf power of about 500W at about 0.5 Torr.
Priority Applications (3)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US09/965,077 US20030062064A1 (en) | 2001-09-28 | 2001-09-28 | Method of removing PECVD residues of fluorinated plasma using in-situ H2 plasma |
| DE10245314A DE10245314A1 (en) | 2001-09-28 | 2002-09-27 | Procedure for removing PECVD residues from fluorinated plasma using in-situ H¶2¶ plasma |
| US10/786,996 US7150796B2 (en) | 2001-09-28 | 2004-02-25 | Method of removing PECVD residues of fluorinated plasma using in-situ H2 plasma |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US09/965,077 US20030062064A1 (en) | 2001-09-28 | 2001-09-28 | Method of removing PECVD residues of fluorinated plasma using in-situ H2 plasma |
Related Child Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| US10/786,996 Division US7150796B2 (en) | 2001-09-28 | 2004-02-25 | Method of removing PECVD residues of fluorinated plasma using in-situ H2 plasma |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| US20030062064A1 true US20030062064A1 (en) | 2003-04-03 |
Family
ID=25509406
Family Applications (2)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| US09/965,077 Abandoned US20030062064A1 (en) | 2001-09-28 | 2001-09-28 | Method of removing PECVD residues of fluorinated plasma using in-situ H2 plasma |
| US10/786,996 Expired - Fee Related US7150796B2 (en) | 2001-09-28 | 2004-02-25 | Method of removing PECVD residues of fluorinated plasma using in-situ H2 plasma |
Family Applications After (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| US10/786,996 Expired - Fee Related US7150796B2 (en) | 2001-09-28 | 2004-02-25 | Method of removing PECVD residues of fluorinated plasma using in-situ H2 plasma |
Country Status (2)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (2) | US20030062064A1 (en) |
| DE (1) | DE10245314A1 (en) |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20050193949A1 (en) * | 2004-02-18 | 2005-09-08 | Atmel Nantes Sa | Method for manufacturing integrated circuits and corresponding device |
Families Citing this family (9)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP3657942B2 (en) * | 2003-01-16 | 2005-06-08 | 沖電気工業株式会社 | Method for cleaning semiconductor manufacturing apparatus and method for manufacturing semiconductor device |
| US8231736B2 (en) * | 2007-08-27 | 2012-07-31 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Wet clean process for recovery of anodized chamber parts |
| US8802545B2 (en) | 2011-03-14 | 2014-08-12 | Plasma-Therm Llc | Method and apparatus for plasma dicing a semi-conductor wafer |
| US8691702B2 (en) | 2011-03-14 | 2014-04-08 | Plasma-Therm Llc | Method and apparatus for plasma dicing a semi-conductor wafer |
| JP6388886B2 (en) | 2013-03-06 | 2018-09-12 | プラズマ − サーム、エルエルシー | Method for plasma dicing a semiconductor wafer |
| CN110735181A (en) | 2013-08-09 | 2020-01-31 | 应用材料公司 | Method and apparatus for pre-cleaning substrate surface prior to epitaxial growth |
| CN105355546A (en) * | 2014-08-19 | 2016-02-24 | 北大方正集团有限公司 | Gallium nitride device electrode structure manufacture method and gallium nitride device |
| JP6469854B2 (en) * | 2015-11-09 | 2019-02-13 | 古河電気工業株式会社 | Semiconductor chip manufacturing method and mask-integrated surface protection tape used therefor |
| US10002745B2 (en) * | 2016-05-03 | 2018-06-19 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Plasma treatment process for in-situ chamber cleaning efficiency enhancement in plasma processing chamber |
Family Cites Families (13)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US5017403A (en) | 1989-04-13 | 1991-05-21 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Process for forming planarized films |
| US5207836A (en) | 1989-08-25 | 1993-05-04 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Cleaning process for removal of deposits from the susceptor of a chemical vapor deposition apparatus |
| US5611210A (en) | 1993-03-05 | 1997-03-18 | Ikon Corporation | Fluoroiodocarbon blends as CFC and halon replacements |
| CH687986A5 (en) | 1993-05-03 | 1997-04-15 | Balzers Hochvakuum | Plasma treatment equipment and method for its operation. |
| US5486235A (en) | 1993-08-09 | 1996-01-23 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Plasma dry cleaning of semiconductor processing chambers |
| US5882489A (en) | 1996-04-26 | 1999-03-16 | Ulvac Technologies, Inc. | Processes for cleaning and stripping photoresist from surfaces of semiconductor wafers |
| US5976986A (en) | 1996-08-06 | 1999-11-02 | International Business Machines Corp. | Low pressure and low power C12 /HC1 process for sub-micron metal etching |
| US5788778A (en) | 1996-09-16 | 1998-08-04 | Applied Komatsu Technology, Inc. | Deposition chamber cleaning technique using a high power remote excitation source |
| US5935340A (en) * | 1996-11-13 | 1999-08-10 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Method and apparatus for gettering fluorine from chamber material surfaces |
| US6223755B1 (en) | 1998-04-23 | 2001-05-01 | Sandia Corporation | Method and apparatus for monitoring plasma processing operations |
| US6259105B1 (en) | 1999-05-10 | 2001-07-10 | Axcelis Technologies, Inc. | System and method for cleaning silicon-coated surfaces in an ion implanter |
| US6143144A (en) | 1999-07-30 | 2000-11-07 | Tokyo Electronlimited | Method for etch rate enhancement by background oxygen control in a soft etch system |
| US6350697B1 (en) | 1999-12-22 | 2002-02-26 | Lam Research Corporation | Method of cleaning and conditioning plasma reaction chamber |
-
2001
- 2001-09-28 US US09/965,077 patent/US20030062064A1/en not_active Abandoned
-
2002
- 2002-09-27 DE DE10245314A patent/DE10245314A1/en not_active Ceased
-
2004
- 2004-02-25 US US10/786,996 patent/US7150796B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20050193949A1 (en) * | 2004-02-18 | 2005-09-08 | Atmel Nantes Sa | Method for manufacturing integrated circuits and corresponding device |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| US20040221869A1 (en) | 2004-11-11 |
| US7150796B2 (en) | 2006-12-19 |
| DE10245314A1 (en) | 2003-05-28 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US6322714B1 (en) | Process for etching silicon-containing material on substrates | |
| US6069092A (en) | Dry etching method and semiconductor device fabrication method | |
| US6296780B1 (en) | System and method for etching organic anti-reflective coating from a substrate | |
| US6187688B1 (en) | Pattern formation method | |
| EP0976151A1 (en) | Methods and apparatus for removing photoresist mask defects-in a plasma reactor | |
| JPH0982687A (en) | Method for manufacturing semiconductor device | |
| US6475918B1 (en) | Plasma treatment apparatus and plasma treatment method | |
| KR100272122B1 (en) | Metal line making metod using dry etching and reaction products removing method | |
| KR20040102337A (en) | Method for removal of residue from a substrate | |
| US7150796B2 (en) | Method of removing PECVD residues of fluorinated plasma using in-situ H2 plasma | |
| KR100595090B1 (en) | Improved Etching Method Using Photoresist Mask | |
| EP0779651A2 (en) | Method and apparatus for plasma processing | |
| US6410451B2 (en) | Techniques for improving etching in a plasma processing chamber | |
| US20050009356A1 (en) | Method of manufacturing semiconductor device and method of cleaning plasma etching apparatus used therefor | |
| EP2065923A2 (en) | Methods for adjusting critical dimension uniformity in an etch process | |
| US6649532B1 (en) | Methods for etching an organic anti-reflective coating | |
| JPH08124902A (en) | Plasma processing device | |
| JP3172340B2 (en) | Plasma processing equipment | |
| KR100519675B1 (en) | Etching method capable of obtaining high photoresist selectivity with using inductively coupled plasma apparatus. | |
| JP2004031970A (en) | Method for manufacturing semiconductor device | |
| US6528341B1 (en) | Method of forming a sion antireflection film which is noncontaminating with respect to deep-uv photoresists | |
| US20250118556A1 (en) | Method for forming deposition film | |
| JP3696442B2 (en) | Dry etching method and apparatus | |
| JPH0855838A (en) | Cleaning method for microfabrication equipment | |
| JP2002367958A (en) | Dry etching method and method for manufacturing semiconductor device using the dry etching method |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |
|
| AS | Assignment |
Owner name: INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES RICHMOND, LP, VIRGINIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:SMITH, BRADLEY C.;JAMES, DAVID;REEL/FRAME:018161/0261 Effective date: 20060823 |