US20020175486A1 - Agricultural tractor with draft compensating suspension - Google Patents
Agricultural tractor with draft compensating suspension Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20020175486A1 US20020175486A1 US09/803,602 US80360201A US2002175486A1 US 20020175486 A1 US20020175486 A1 US 20020175486A1 US 80360201 A US80360201 A US 80360201A US 2002175486 A1 US2002175486 A1 US 2002175486A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- draft
- suspension
- compensation
- instantaneous center
- load
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 239000000725 suspension Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 120
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000006835 compression Effects 0.000 abstract description 15
- 238000007906 compression Methods 0.000 abstract description 15
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000005096 rolling process Methods 0.000 description 4
- 239000002689 soil Substances 0.000 description 4
- 230000001133 acceleration Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000003068 static effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000012530 fluid Substances 0.000 description 2
- 210000001364 upper extremity Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 229910000831 Steel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 230000000712 assembly Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000000429 assembly Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001788 irregular Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000000630 rising effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000011435 rock Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000010959 steel Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000002699 waste material Substances 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B60—VEHICLES IN GENERAL
- B60G—VEHICLE SUSPENSION ARRANGEMENTS
- B60G3/00—Resilient suspensions for a single wheel
- B60G3/18—Resilient suspensions for a single wheel with two or more pivoted arms, e.g. parallelogram
- B60G3/20—Resilient suspensions for a single wheel with two or more pivoted arms, e.g. parallelogram all arms being rigid
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B60—VEHICLES IN GENERAL
- B60G—VEHICLE SUSPENSION ARRANGEMENTS
- B60G2200/00—Indexing codes relating to suspension types
- B60G2200/10—Independent suspensions
- B60G2200/14—Independent suspensions with lateral arms
- B60G2200/144—Independent suspensions with lateral arms with two lateral arms forming a parallelogram
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B60—VEHICLES IN GENERAL
- B60G—VEHICLE SUSPENSION ARRANGEMENTS
- B60G2300/00—Indexing codes relating to the type of vehicle
- B60G2300/08—Agricultural vehicles
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B60—VEHICLES IN GENERAL
- B60G—VEHICLE SUSPENSION ARRANGEMENTS
- B60G2300/00—Indexing codes relating to the type of vehicle
- B60G2300/08—Agricultural vehicles
- B60G2300/082—Tractors
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10S—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10S180/00—Motor vehicles
- Y10S180/90—Argicultural-type tractors
Definitions
- the present invention relates to an agricultural tractor having a rear suspension and in particular a draft compensating rear suspension in which the suspension is designed to reduce or minimize the effect of draft loads on the tractor attitude by minimizing compression or extension of the rear suspension.
- An agricultural tractor is intended primarily for off-road usage and is designed primarily to supply power to agricultural implements.
- An agricultural tractor propels itself and provides a draft force in the direction of travel to enable an attached, soil engaging, implement to perform its intended function.
- an agricultural tractor may provide mechanical, hydraulic and/or electrical power to the implement.
- Agricultural tractors must be designed with sufficient normal force, i.e. a down force, acting on the drive wheels to produce the needed draft force.
- Agricultural tractors differ from cargo carrying vehicles, such as pickup trucks and semi-truck tractors, in that trucks are not designed to produce a continuous draft load. A truck only needs to produce a draft load during periods of acceleration and deceleration and relies on the weight of the cargo to produce the normal force on the drive wheels.
- One way to overcome the problem of suspension compression is to provide a system that compensates for the draft load by extending the suspension. This is accomplished by adding hydraulic fluid to the system to return the suspension to a center position, whereby suspension travel in each direction is still available. However, this significantly increases the spring rate of the suspension under a draft load, resulting in a harsher ride. Furthermore, adding and removing fluid to a circuit with an accumulator results in a large energy waste.
- Another solution is to provide a rigid beam axle mounted to the chassis through the suspension and mount the hitch to the unsuspended beam axle. This avoids reacting of the draft load through the suspension. However, the implement will not receive the benefit of the suspension and will follow the motion of the axle.
- the present invention relates to an agricultural tractor having a rear suspension with draft compensating geometry to control the compression of the rear suspension in response to a draft load.
- the draft load is applied to the chassis by a ground engaging implement.
- the tractive load and torque at the rear wheels are reacted through the side view instantaneous center of the rear suspension.
- the placement of the instantaneous center affects the chassis reaction to the wheel load and torque. Locating the suspension instantaneous center on a line of 100% draft-compensation will eliminate the motion of the suspension due to the draft load.
- the suspension will compress under a draft load, whereas if the instantaneous center is located above the 100% draft-compensation line, the suspension will extend under a draft load.
- the distance between the instantaneous center and the 100% draft compensation line will determine the amount of compression or extension of the suspension.
- An expected response to the draft load is to compress the suspension. In a tractor without a suspension, the draft load typically compresses the rear tires.
- the draft compensating suspension geometry can be used to eliminate or reduce the amount of suspension travel used to react to the draft load. As a result, the suspension will have travel available to react to irregular terrain profiles, which provides the operator with better ride and control. It also permits the suspension to be less stiff to terrain inputs.
- a draft compensating suspension also reduces the interaction between the suspension and the hitch draft control system.
- a draft compensating geometry eliminates the need for complex control systems to control suspension height and vehicle attitude.
- FIG. 1 is a side view of the agricultural tractor of the present invention having a draft compensation rear suspension.
- FIG. 2 is a rear view of the left side of the rear suspension.
- FIG. 3 is a perspective view of the left side rear suspension without the outboard final drive housing.
- FIG. 4 is side view of the left side chassis illustrating the connection of the control arms to the tractor frame.
- FIG. 5 is a side view free body diagram of the dynamic loads acting on the tractor.
- FIG. 6 is a side view schematic representing the suspension system.
- FIGS. 7 and 8 are side schematics of tractors illustrating two different degrees of draft compensation.
- FIG. 1 An agricultural tractor 10 according to the present invention is shown in FIG. 1.
- the tractor 10 includes a frame 12 , front wheels and tires 14 , rear wheels and tires 16 and a cab 18 forming an operator station.
- a front hood 22 covers an engine 24 .
- the frame 12 includes a pair of channel members 28 between which a transmission 26 is housed. Only one of the channels is shown in FIG. 1.
- a rear drive differential case 30 is attached to the rear ends 32 of the steel channels 28 and thus forms a part of the tractor frame structure.
- the term “frame structure” is used broadly to mean both separate frame elements such as the channels 28 and other structural members mounted thereto such as the differential case and transmission, etc. Some tractors may be designed without separate frame members and form a frame structure entirely of drive train components such as the engine, transmission, front and rear drive differential cases, etc.
- the differential case 30 houses a rear differential drive that is driven by the transmission 26 .
- the rear differential has left and right outputs 34 to drive the left and right rear wheels 16 .
- a three-point hitch 36 is mounted to the rear of the differential case 30 .
- the three-point hitch includes a pair of lower draft links 38 and an upper link 40 .
- Lift links 42 are attached to the draft links 38 and extend upperly therefrom.
- the lift arms and the rock shaft of a conventional three point hitch are not shown.
- a drawbar 44 extends rearwardly from the differential case 30 .
- a PTO housing 46 with a PTO shaft 48 is also mounted to the differential case 30 .
- the rear wheels 16 are mounted to outboard final drives 50 , only the left side final drive 50 is shown in FIG. 2.
- the left and right sides of the rear axle and suspension are substantially identical.
- the final drive 50 is attached to the frame 12 by upper and lower suspension control arms 52 , 54 .
- the upper control arm 52 is generally V-shaped, having a front leg 56 and a rear leg 58 .
- the two legs are joined together at an outboard apex 60 that forms a ball joint 61 having a ball stud 62 that is coupled to the housing of the final drive 50 at the top of the housing.
- the inboard ends of the legs 56 , 58 are joined to the frame 12 by ball joints 64 and 66 respectively.
- the ball joints 64 , 66 include ball studs 68 and 70 , respectively, shown in FIG. 4.
- the lower control arm 54 is similarly to the upper control arm 52 , having a front leg 72 and a rear leg 74 joined together at an outboard apex 76 .
- the apex 76 forms a ball joint 78 having a ball stud 79 for attachment to the final drive housing at the bottom of the housing.
- the legs 72 , 74 of the lower control arm are joined to the frame 12 by ball joints 90 , 92 having ball studs 94 , 96 .
- the ball joints at the inboard and outboard ends of the control arms 52 , 54 enable the outboard final drive housing 50 to move up and down relative to the frame 12 , as shown by the double arrow 98 in FIG. 2.
- One or both of the ball joints at the inner end of each control arm can be replaced with pivot pins.
- FIG. 1 Vertical loads are transmitted between the differential case 30 and the outboard final drive housing 50 by front and rear hydraulic cylinders 100 , shown only schematically by a phantom line.
- the hydraulic cylinders extend between front mounting brackets 102 on the frame 12 and a stud (not shown) on the front of the final drive housing.
- the rear hydraulic cylinder 100 extends between rear mounting brackets 104 on the differential case and a rear stud 106 on the final drive housing.
- the hydraulic cylinders 100 are part of a hydraulic circuit that includes a pressure accumulator in a known manner to provide the suspension system with a hydro-pneumatic spring system. Other spring devices can be used in place of the hydraulic cylinders such as metal springs, air bags, etc.
- a drive shaft 110 shown schematically by a phantom line connects the left output 34 from the differential to the final drive 50 .
- the ball joints 64 , 66 that attach the upper control arm 52 to the frame 12 define an upper control arm pivot axis 84 .
- the lower ball joints assemblies 90 , 92 define a lower control arm pivot axis 86 .
- the axes 84 , 86 converge toward one another, forward of the rear wheels 16 at the side view instantaneous center of the rear suspension. The location of the side view instantaneous center is a critical factor in designing the suspension geometry so that it provides the desired degree of draft compensation as described below.
- W f 1 L ⁇ ( Wc ⁇ ⁇ cos ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ - D A ⁇ h a - Wa x ⁇ h g - R dbx ⁇ h db - R dbz ⁇ d db - Wh ⁇ ⁇ sin ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ) 2 )
- the load on the rear axle can be found by summing moments about the point Of.
- D A ⁇ h a + Wa x ⁇ h g + R dbx ⁇ h db + R dbz ⁇ ( d db + L ) - W r ⁇ L + Wh ⁇ ⁇ sin ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ + Wb ⁇ ⁇ cos ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ 0 3 )
- W r 1 L ⁇ ( Wb ⁇ ⁇ cos ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ + D A ⁇ h a + R dbx ⁇ h db + R dbz ⁇ ( d db + L ) + Wh ⁇ ⁇ sin ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ + Wa x ⁇ h g ) 4 )
- any suspension is equivalent to a trailing arm, the pitch control performance can be quantified by analyzing the free body diagram of the suspension shown in FIG. 6.
- points A f and A r are the virtual pivot points of the front and rear suspensions on the vehicle body. Since the arm is rigidly attached to the axle (resisting axle wind up), it has the ability to transmit a vertical force to the sprung mass which can be designed to counteract draft loads that compress the rear suspension.
- W fs and W rs are the static loads on the front and rear axles and suspensions respectively.
- ⁇ W f and ⁇ W r are the dynamic changes in front and rear suspension loads respectively.
- r f and r r are the rolling radii of the front and rear tires respectively.
- k r is the rear suspension spring rate.
- ⁇ r is the rear suspension deflection (positive jounce).
- ⁇ is the fraction of the total tractive force developed on the front tires.
- F x is the total tractive force developed by the tractor.
- ⁇ f equals the front suspension deflection (positive jounce).
- R db is the drawbar pull
- ⁇ is the angle of the drawbar pull with respect to the vehicle horizontal axis.
- the equation 27 defines a line 80 shown in FIG. 7 that extends from the center of the rear tire patch upward and forward. If the side view instantaneous center of the rear suspension, A r , is located on this line, the suspension geometry will produce a 100% compensation of the draft forces, resulting in no rear suspension compression or extension when the tractor produces a draft force. As a result, the line 80 is referred to as the “100% draft compensation line”.
- the side view instantaneous center of the rear suspension is the point of intersection 82 of the pivot axis 84 of the upper control arm and the pivot axis 86 of the lower control arm.
- the instantaneous center 82 is located above the line 80 . This is the lift zone where the draft force will produce an extension of the rear suspension.
- the instantaneous center 82 is located below the 100% draft compensation line and is in the compression zone. A draft force will result in compression of the rear suspension. The further the instantaneous center 82 is from the 100% draft compensation line, the greater the effect of the draft load on the suspension system.
- the line 80 defined by the equation 27 above provides draft compensation for only the horizontal component of the draft force.
- the angle ⁇ of the draft force to horizontal is assumed to be zero. If the draft force is not horizontal, equation 27 would be different and the slope of the line 80 would be different. Since the suspension instantaneous center is fixed on the tractor, the percentage of draft compensation varies as a function of the angled ⁇ . The exact amount of draft compensation will vary depending on the particular implement and angle of the draft force produced by the implement. Accordingly, the amount of draft compensation is usually expressed as a range.
- the suspension geometry could be designed with the instantaneous center above the line of 100% draft compensation to produce a suspension extension to counter a vertical draft component to control the vehicle attitude. This can be expressed as a draft compensation value that is greater than 100%.
- equation 22 would resolve differently for the slope of the 100% draft compensation line since the dimensions r r and r f are the rolling radii of the tires.
- the desired percentage of draft compensation produced by the suspension geometry will vary depending upon the tractor design, the total amount of tire motion available through the suspension system, the suspension spring rate and the load leveling system. Where greater suspension travel is available, a lower amount of draft compensation may be needed to still have sufficient suspension travel to traverse an uneven terrain. Where a relatively large amount of suspension travel is available, a suspension geometry providing 30% draft compensation may be adequate.
- the tractor 10 above has draft compensation between 40-60%. However, where the suspension travel is smaller, draft compensation between 60-80% may be required to insure adequate suspension travel remains for traversing a rough terrain.
- the draft compensating suspension of the present invention on an agricultural tractor enables the implement hitch to be mounted on the suspended frame of the tractor and avoid the negative consequences of the draft load reacting through the suspension to either compress or extend the suspension.
- the suspension allows the implement to be suspended as well, providing greater control over the implement operation.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Vehicle Body Suspensions (AREA)
- Lifting Devices For Agricultural Implements (AREA)
- Agricultural Machines (AREA)
Abstract
An agricultural tractor having a rear suspension with draft compensating geometry to control the compression or extension of the rear suspension in response to a draft load. The draft compensating suspension enables the tractor hitch to be mounted on the suspended frame or chassis of the tractor rather than mounting the hitch to a non-suspended beam axle or locking out the suspension during draft work. The draft load is applied to the chassis by a ground engaging implement. The tractive load and torque at the rear wheels are reacted through the side view instantaneous center of the rear suspension. The placement of the instantaneous center will determine the suspension reaction to the wheel load and torque. Locating the suspension instantaneous center on a line of 100% draft-compensation will eliminate the motion of the suspension due to the draft load. If the instantaneous center is located below the 100% draft-compensation line, the suspension will compress under a draft load. If the instantaneous center is located above the 100% draft-compensation line, the suspension will extend under a draft load. The distance between the instantaneous center and the 100% draft compensation line will determine the amount of compression or extension of the suspension.
Description
- 1. Field of the Invention
- The present invention relates to an agricultural tractor having a rear suspension and in particular a draft compensating rear suspension in which the suspension is designed to reduce or minimize the effect of draft loads on the tractor attitude by minimizing compression or extension of the rear suspension.
- 2. Description of the Related Art
- An agricultural tractor is intended primarily for off-road usage and is designed primarily to supply power to agricultural implements. An agricultural tractor propels itself and provides a draft force in the direction of travel to enable an attached, soil engaging, implement to perform its intended function. Furthermore, an agricultural tractor may provide mechanical, hydraulic and/or electrical power to the implement. Agricultural tractors must be designed with sufficient normal force, i.e. a down force, acting on the drive wheels to produce the needed draft force. Agricultural tractors differ from cargo carrying vehicles, such as pickup trucks and semi-truck tractors, in that trucks are not designed to produce a continuous draft load. A truck only needs to produce a draft load during periods of acceleration and deceleration and relies on the weight of the cargo to produce the normal force on the drive wheels.
- There is a continuous desire to increase the productivity of agricultural tractors. Productivity can be increased by tractor designs that maintain tire-soil contact force when traversing uneven terrain, both during field operations and during road transport. To maintain tire-soil contact force on an uneven terrain, it is necessary to provide a suspension system to allow the tires to follow the terrain. When a suspension is added to an agricultural tractor, between the chassis and the wheels, with the hitch on the suspended chassis, an undesirable interaction occurs between the suspension and draft load. The draft load reaction through the suspension tends to force the rear suspension into jounce, i.e. the suspension compresses, causing the wheels to move upward relative to the suspended chassis. As the suspension compresses, the pulled implement, such as a plow, runs deeper, increasing the draft load. The higher the draft load, the more the rear suspension compresses until it is fully compressed. Once fully compressed, the suspension no longer provides a benefit. If the suspension is only partially compressed, it will still reduce the amount of suspension travel available to maintain tire-soil contact force and to improve the tractor ride. Suspension compression also affects the clearance under the vehicle, the height of the drawbar and hitch above the ground plane, and the attitude of the tractor.
- The interaction between the suspension and draft load can interfere with the proper operation of hitch controls. When the hitch control senses the need to reduce the depth of the implement in the ground, the suspension compresses, instead of raising the implement. The reverse is true if the hitch control senses the need to lower the implement.
- One way to overcome the problem of suspension compression is to provide a system that compensates for the draft load by extending the suspension. This is accomplished by adding hydraulic fluid to the system to return the suspension to a center position, whereby suspension travel in each direction is still available. However, this significantly increases the spring rate of the suspension under a draft load, resulting in a harsher ride. Furthermore, adding and removing fluid to a circuit with an accumulator results in a large energy waste.
- Another solution is to provide a rigid beam axle mounted to the chassis through the suspension and mount the hitch to the unsuspended beam axle. This avoids reacting of the draft load through the suspension. However, the implement will not receive the benefit of the suspension and will follow the motion of the axle.
- Yet another alternative is to provide a means to lock out the suspension when performing draft work. This eliminates all benefits of the suspension.
- All of the above solutions to the interaction of the suspension to the draft load reduce the effectiveness and benefit of the rear suspension.
- The present invention relates to an agricultural tractor having a rear suspension with draft compensating geometry to control the compression of the rear suspension in response to a draft load. The draft load is applied to the chassis by a ground engaging implement. The tractive load and torque at the rear wheels are reacted through the side view instantaneous center of the rear suspension. The placement of the instantaneous center affects the chassis reaction to the wheel load and torque. Locating the suspension instantaneous center on a line of 100% draft-compensation will eliminate the motion of the suspension due to the draft load. If the instantaneous center is located below the 100% draft-compensation line, the suspension will compress under a draft load, whereas if the instantaneous center is located above the 100% draft-compensation line, the suspension will extend under a draft load. The distance between the instantaneous center and the 100% draft compensation line will determine the amount of compression or extension of the suspension. An expected response to the draft load is to compress the suspension. In a tractor without a suspension, the draft load typically compresses the rear tires. By properly locating the instantaneous center of the suspension, an opposing force is created to counteract, completely or partially, the suspension compression.
- The draft compensating suspension geometry can be used to eliminate or reduce the amount of suspension travel used to react to the draft load. As a result, the suspension will have travel available to react to irregular terrain profiles, which provides the operator with better ride and control. It also permits the suspension to be less stiff to terrain inputs. A draft compensating suspension also reduces the interaction between the suspension and the hitch draft control system. A draft compensating geometry eliminates the need for complex control systems to control suspension height and vehicle attitude.
- FIG. 1 is a side view of the agricultural tractor of the present invention having a draft compensation rear suspension.
- FIG. 2 is a rear view of the left side of the rear suspension.
- FIG. 3 is a perspective view of the left side rear suspension without the outboard final drive housing.
- FIG. 4 is side view of the left side chassis illustrating the connection of the control arms to the tractor frame.
- FIG. 5 is a side view free body diagram of the dynamic loads acting on the tractor.
- FIG. 6 is a side view schematic representing the suspension system.
- FIGS. 7 and 8 are side schematics of tractors illustrating two different degrees of draft compensation.
- An agricultural tractor 10 according to the present invention is shown in FIG. 1. The tractor 10 includes a
frame 12, front wheels andtires 14, rear wheels andtires 16 and acab 18 forming an operator station. Afront hood 22 covers anengine 24. - The
frame 12 includes a pair ofchannel members 28 between which atransmission 26 is housed. Only one of the channels is shown in FIG. 1. A rear drivedifferential case 30 is attached to the rear ends 32 of thesteel channels 28 and thus forms a part of the tractor frame structure. The term “frame structure” is used broadly to mean both separate frame elements such as thechannels 28 and other structural members mounted thereto such as the differential case and transmission, etc. Some tractors may be designed without separate frame members and form a frame structure entirely of drive train components such as the engine, transmission, front and rear drive differential cases, etc. Thedifferential case 30 houses a rear differential drive that is driven by thetransmission 26. The rear differential has left andright outputs 34 to drive the left and rightrear wheels 16. - A three-
point hitch 36 is mounted to the rear of thedifferential case 30. The three-point hitch includes a pair oflower draft links 38 and anupper link 40. Lift links 42 are attached to the draft links 38 and extend upperly therefrom. The lift arms and the rock shaft of a conventional three point hitch are not shown. In addition to the three-point hitch, adrawbar 44 extends rearwardly from thedifferential case 30. APTO housing 46 with a PTO shaft 48 is also mounted to thedifferential case 30. - The
rear wheels 16 are mounted to outboardfinal drives 50, only the left sidefinal drive 50 is shown in FIG. 2. The left and right sides of the rear axle and suspension are substantially identical. Thefinal drive 50 is attached to theframe 12 by upper and lower 52, 54. Thesuspension control arms upper control arm 52 is generally V-shaped, having afront leg 56 and arear leg 58. The two legs are joined together at anoutboard apex 60 that forms a ball joint 61 having aball stud 62 that is coupled to the housing of thefinal drive 50 at the top of the housing. The inboard ends of the 56, 58 are joined to thelegs frame 12 by 64 and 66 respectively. The ball joints 64, 66 includeball joints 68 and 70, respectively, shown in FIG. 4.ball studs - The
lower control arm 54 is similarly to theupper control arm 52, having afront leg 72 and arear leg 74 joined together at anoutboard apex 76. The apex 76 forms a ball joint 78 having aball stud 79 for attachment to the final drive housing at the bottom of the housing. The 72, 74 of the lower control arm are joined to thelegs frame 12 by 90, 92 havingball joints 94, 96. The ball joints at the inboard and outboard ends of theball studs 52, 54 enable the outboardcontrol arms final drive housing 50 to move up and down relative to theframe 12, as shown by thedouble arrow 98 in FIG. 2. One or both of the ball joints at the inner end of each control arm can be replaced with pivot pins. - Vertical loads are transmitted between the
differential case 30 and the outboardfinal drive housing 50 by front and rear hydraulic cylinders 100, shown only schematically by a phantom line. The hydraulic cylinders extend between front mountingbrackets 102 on theframe 12 and a stud (not shown) on the front of the final drive housing. The rear hydraulic cylinder 100 extends between rear mountingbrackets 104 on the differential case and arear stud 106 on the final drive housing. The hydraulic cylinders 100 are part of a hydraulic circuit that includes a pressure accumulator in a known manner to provide the suspension system with a hydro-pneumatic spring system. Other spring devices can be used in place of the hydraulic cylinders such as metal springs, air bags, etc. - Since the
final drive 50 is attached to the upper and lower control arms through ball joints, it is possible to rotate thefinal drive 50 about a generally upright axis passing through the ball joints 61 and 78. To prevent this rotation, a fixedlength link 108 extends between thedifferential case 30 to the outboardfinal drive housing 50, rearward of thelower control arm 54. - A
drive shaft 110 shown schematically by a phantom line connects theleft output 34 from the differential to thefinal drive 50. - With reference to FIG. 4, the ball joints 64, 66 that attach the
upper control arm 52 to theframe 12 define an upper controlarm pivot axis 84. Likewise, the lower 90, 92 define a lower controlball joints assemblies arm pivot axis 86. The 84, 86 converge toward one another, forward of theaxes rear wheels 16 at the side view instantaneous center of the rear suspension. The location of the side view instantaneous center is a critical factor in designing the suspension geometry so that it provides the desired degree of draft compensation as described below. - The various loads on a tractor are shown in reference to the free body diagram in FIG. 5. The forces shown in FIG. 5 are as follows:
DA Aerodynamic drag Rxƒ Rolling resistance of the front tires Rxr Rolling resistance of the rear tires Fxƒ Longitudinal force at the front tires (traction) Fxr Longitudinal force at the rear tires (traction) Wƒ Load on the front wheel Wr Load on the rear wheel W Total Vehicle weight ax Longitudinal acceleration Rdbx Longitudinal drawbar load Rdbz Vertical drawbar load θ Angle of slope -
-
-
-
-
-
- Since any suspension is equivalent to a trailing arm, the pitch control performance can be quantified by analyzing the free body diagram of the suspension shown in FIG. 6. In FIG. 6, points A f and Ar are the virtual pivot points of the front and rear suspensions on the vehicle body. Since the arm is rigidly attached to the axle (resisting axle wind up), it has the ability to transmit a vertical force to the sprung mass which can be designed to counteract draft loads that compress the rear suspension.
- The sum of the moments about A f or Ar must be zero when the system is in equilibrium. Note that the rear load is characterized as a static component, Wrs, plus a dynamic component, ΔWr, rising from longitudinal load transfer. For simplicity, axle weights are neglected. Counter-clockwise torque's are positive.
- ΣM Ar =W r d r −W rs d r —ΔW r d r −F xr(e r −r r)=0 9)
- ΣM Af =−W f d f +W fs d f +ΔW f d f −F xf(e f −r f)=0 10)
- Where:
- W fs and Wrs are the static loads on the front and rear axles and suspensions respectively.
- ΔW f and ΔWr are the dynamic changes in front and rear suspension loads respectively.
-
- Where:
- k r is the rear suspension spring rate.
- δ r is the rear suspension deflection (positive jounce).
-
-
-
-
- Where:
- ξ is the fraction of the total tractive force developed on the front tires.
- F x is the total tractive force developed by the tractor.
-
-
- Where:
- k f equals the front suspension spring rate
- δ f equals the front suspension deflection (positive jounce).
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Since:
- R dbx =R db cos β
- R dbz =R db sin β
- Where:
- R db is the drawbar pull
- β is the angle of the drawbar pull with respect to the vehicle horizontal axis.
-
-
- The equation 27 defines a
line 80 shown in FIG. 7 that extends from the center of the rear tire patch upward and forward. If the side view instantaneous center of the rear suspension, Ar, is located on this line, the suspension geometry will produce a 100% compensation of the draft forces, resulting in no rear suspension compression or extension when the tractor produces a draft force. As a result, theline 80 is referred to as the “100% draft compensation line”. - The side view instantaneous center of the rear suspension is the point of
intersection 82 of thepivot axis 84 of the upper control arm and thepivot axis 86 of the lower control arm. In FIG. 7, theinstantaneous center 82 is located above theline 80. This is the lift zone where the draft force will produce an extension of the rear suspension. In FIG. 8, theinstantaneous center 82 is located below the 100% draft compensation line and is in the compression zone. A draft force will result in compression of the rear suspension. The further theinstantaneous center 82 is from the 100% draft compensation line, the greater the effect of the draft load on the suspension system. -
- If the location of the instantaneous center produces, for example, 60% draft compensation, then 60% of the draft load is compensated by an opposing force that counteracts compression or extension of the suspension. The remaining 40% of the draft force will result in suspension compression and can be partially or totally reacted by the suspension load leveling system, depending on the leveling system design. Some compression is desired as it is the expected response of a tractor to a draft load, resulting from tire compression in non-suspended tractors. Load leveling will increase the suspension spring rate, but not nearly as much as would be required if the load leveling system reacted to the entire draft force. With a draft compensating suspension geometry, a less complex load leveling system is needed and requires less power to operate. Load leveling suspension systems are generally known.
- The
line 80 defined by the equation 27 above provides draft compensation for only the horizontal component of the draft force. In deriving equation 27, the angle β of the draft force to horizontal is assumed to be zero. If the draft force is not horizontal, equation 27 would be different and the slope of theline 80 would be different. Since the suspension instantaneous center is fixed on the tractor, the percentage of draft compensation varies as a function of the angled β. The exact amount of draft compensation will vary depending on the particular implement and angle of the draft force produced by the implement. Accordingly, the amount of draft compensation is usually expressed as a range. - If the suspension did not have a load leveling system, the suspension geometry could be designed with the instantaneous center above the line of 100% draft compensation to produce a suspension extension to counter a vertical draft component to control the vehicle attitude. This can be expressed as a draft compensation value that is greater than 100%.
- The equation 27 above results from
equation 22 where rr and rf=0 in the case of an outboard planetary final drive. For a tractor having an inboard final drive,equation 22 would resolve differently for the slope of the 100% draft compensation line since the dimensions rr and rf are the rolling radii of the tires. - The desired percentage of draft compensation produced by the suspension geometry will vary depending upon the tractor design, the total amount of tire motion available through the suspension system, the suspension spring rate and the load leveling system. Where greater suspension travel is available, a lower amount of draft compensation may be needed to still have sufficient suspension travel to traverse an uneven terrain. Where a relatively large amount of suspension travel is available, a suspension geometry providing 30% draft compensation may be adequate. The tractor 10 above has draft compensation between 40-60%. However, where the suspension travel is smaller, draft compensation between 60-80% may be required to insure adequate suspension travel remains for traversing a rough terrain.
- The draft compensating suspension of the present invention on an agricultural tractor enables the implement hitch to be mounted on the suspended frame of the tractor and avoid the negative consequences of the draft load reacting through the suspension to either compress or extend the suspension. The suspension allows the implement to be suspended as well, providing greater control over the implement operation.
- The invention should not be limited to the above-described embodiment, but should be limited solely by the claims that follow.
Claims (8)
1. An agricultural tractor comprising:
a frame;
front and rear wheels and tires;
an implement hitch mounted to the frame;
the rear wheels and tires being coupled to the frame through a suspension system wherein the rear wheels and tires are able to move up and down relative to the frame, the rear suspension having a side view instantaneous center located to produce at least 30% draft compensation for draft forces acting on the frame through the implement hitch to reduce the effect of a draft force on the suspension system.
2. The agricultural tractor as defined by claim 1 wherein the side view instantaneous center located to produce 40-60% draft compensation.
3. The agricultural tractor as defined by claim 1 wherein the side view instantaneous center located to produce 60-80% draft compensation.
4. The agricultural tractor as defined by claim 1 wherein 100% draft compensation is defined by the equation
5. An agricultural tractor comprising:
a frame structure;
front and rear wheels and tires;
an implement hitch mounted to the frame structure;
the rear wheels and tires being coupled to the frame structure through a suspension system wherein the rear wheels and tires are able to move up and down relative to the frame structure.
6. The agricultural tractor as defined by claim 5 further comprising a rear wheel outboard planetary drive movable together with the rear wheel relative to the frame.
7. The agricultural tractor as defined by claim 5 wherein:
the frame structure includes a rear drive differential case having left and right outputs;
the suspension includes, on each side, upper and lower control arms pivotally mounted to the frame structure and extending outwardly therefrom to distal ends;
outboard final drive housing at the distal ends of the control arms to which the rear wheels are attached.
8. The agricultural tractor as defined by claim 7 wherein the upper and lower control arms pivot about upper and lower control arm pivot axes which converge toward one another forward of the rear wheels at a side view instantaneous center of the rear suspension.
Priority Applications (6)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US09/803,602 US6491129B1 (en) | 2001-03-09 | 2001-03-09 | Agricultural tractor with draft compensating suspension |
| EP02722176A EP1370430B1 (en) | 2001-03-09 | 2002-03-05 | Agricultural tractor with draft compensating suspension |
| DE60233476T DE60233476D1 (en) | 2001-03-09 | 2002-03-05 | AGRICULTURAL TRACTOR WITH SUSPENSION FOR COMPENSATING THE POWER LIFT INFLUENCES |
| PCT/EP2002/002359 WO2002072370A1 (en) | 2001-03-09 | 2002-03-05 | Agricultural tractor with draft compensating suspension |
| BR0207973-9A BR0207973A (en) | 2001-03-09 | 2002-03-05 | Farm Tractor |
| ARP020100822A AR032964A1 (en) | 2001-03-09 | 2002-03-07 | AGRICULTURAL TRACTOR WITH SHOT COMPENSATOR SUSPENSION |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US09/803,602 US6491129B1 (en) | 2001-03-09 | 2001-03-09 | Agricultural tractor with draft compensating suspension |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| US20020175486A1 true US20020175486A1 (en) | 2002-11-28 |
| US6491129B1 US6491129B1 (en) | 2002-12-10 |
Family
ID=25186973
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| US09/803,602 Expired - Lifetime US6491129B1 (en) | 2001-03-09 | 2001-03-09 | Agricultural tractor with draft compensating suspension |
Country Status (6)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US6491129B1 (en) |
| EP (1) | EP1370430B1 (en) |
| AR (1) | AR032964A1 (en) |
| BR (1) | BR0207973A (en) |
| DE (1) | DE60233476D1 (en) |
| WO (1) | WO2002072370A1 (en) |
Cited By (8)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EP1600311A1 (en) * | 2004-05-26 | 2005-11-30 | AGCO GmbH | Tractor with front suspension |
| US20060027988A1 (en) * | 2004-08-05 | 2006-02-09 | Cnh America Llc | Suspension with torsion-resisting cylinder |
| US20060027411A1 (en) * | 2004-08-05 | 2006-02-09 | Cnh America Llc | Steerable rear tractor suspension |
| US20060027992A1 (en) * | 2004-08-05 | 2006-02-09 | Cnh America Llc | Tractor suspension with tensioned drive shaft |
| US20060027414A1 (en) * | 2004-08-05 | 2006-02-09 | Cnh America Llc | Tractor rear suspension |
| US20100109275A1 (en) * | 2008-10-30 | 2010-05-06 | Silvano Sandri | Independent Rear Suspension for an Agricultural Vehicle |
| US8700270B2 (en) | 2011-07-11 | 2014-04-15 | Cnh America Llc | System and method for determining drawbar force magnitude and direction |
| US10549796B2 (en) * | 2015-07-30 | 2020-02-04 | Zf Friedrichshafen Ag | Cab support arrangement for a utility vehicle |
Families Citing this family (8)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GB2379429A (en) * | 2001-09-08 | 2003-03-12 | New Holland Uk Ltd | Tractor with lockable suspension |
| US6830110B2 (en) * | 2003-01-16 | 2004-12-14 | Deere & Company | Three-point hitch having flotation |
| US7559403B2 (en) | 2006-04-05 | 2009-07-14 | Schmitz Geoffrey W | Modular, central frame, offset, dual control arm independent suspension and suspension retrofit |
| DE102007062457A1 (en) * | 2007-12-22 | 2009-06-25 | Deere & Company, Moline | Gear arrangement of an agricultural or industrial utility vehicle |
| US8517394B2 (en) | 2011-08-01 | 2013-08-27 | Cnh America Llc | Adjustable suspension system for a work vehicle |
| GB201323179D0 (en) * | 2013-12-31 | 2014-02-12 | Agco Sa | Rear link isolator |
| CN103738136B (en) * | 2014-01-27 | 2017-02-15 | 徐州重型机械有限公司 | Independent suspension system and crane with same |
| CN107182326B (en) * | 2017-07-14 | 2023-08-08 | 无锡福阪农机科技有限公司 | Suspension transmission mechanism of tractor power agricultural implement |
Family Cites Families (16)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DE1178720B (en) * | 1960-12-22 | 1964-09-24 | Ford Werke Ag | Single wheel suspension for the rear wheel of a motor vehicle, driven by a double universal joint shaft, with a handlebar extending essentially transversely to the direction of travel |
| FR2153221B1 (en) * | 1971-09-23 | 1976-09-17 | Jamer Jacques | |
| US4124079A (en) * | 1976-09-30 | 1978-11-07 | Crow Harold J | Driven implement connected to rockable motor of a vehicle |
| JPS5695712A (en) * | 1979-12-28 | 1981-08-03 | Kubota Ltd | Front wheel suspension system of tractor |
| US4355697A (en) * | 1980-09-02 | 1982-10-26 | Deere & Company | Vehicular steering and suspension system |
| GB2095967B (en) * | 1981-03-23 | 1985-01-03 | Taylor Engineering Development | Pick-up hitch mounting arrangement |
| DE3300335C2 (en) * | 1983-01-07 | 1986-12-04 | Daimler-Benz Ag, 7000 Stuttgart | Self-propelled utility vehicle, in particular agricultural utility vehicle |
| CA1287147C (en) * | 1985-10-24 | 1991-07-30 | Hiromu Fujimoto | Tractor equipped with working implements |
| DE3834693A1 (en) | 1987-12-17 | 1989-06-29 | Zahnradfabrik Friedrichshafen | Tractor with a steerable rigid axle for agricultural or building use |
| DE3901757A1 (en) | 1988-01-29 | 1989-08-10 | Zahnradfabrik Friedrichshafen | Suspension of a rigid axle of a tractor |
| DE3937938A1 (en) | 1988-11-25 | 1990-05-31 | Zahnradfabrik Friedrichshafen | Steerable rigid axle for tractor - uses secure method of joining axle to chassis |
| JP2517677B2 (en) * | 1989-09-12 | 1996-07-24 | 日産自動車株式会社 | Vehicle suspension system |
| US5538264A (en) | 1990-07-28 | 1996-07-23 | Jcb Landpower Limited | Agricultural plowing vehicle with self-leveling suspension |
| US5820150A (en) * | 1993-04-14 | 1998-10-13 | Oshkosh Truck Corporation | Independent suspensions for lowering height of vehicle frame |
| IT1287898B1 (en) * | 1996-05-14 | 1998-08-26 | Carraro Spa | SPRING AND VARIABILITY SYSTEM OF A DIFFERENTIAL BRIDGE |
| KR20000031741A (en) * | 1998-11-10 | 2000-06-05 | 권문구 | Method for automatically controlling horizontal positioning of tractors and apparatus thereof |
-
2001
- 2001-03-09 US US09/803,602 patent/US6491129B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
2002
- 2002-03-05 WO PCT/EP2002/002359 patent/WO2002072370A1/en not_active Ceased
- 2002-03-05 DE DE60233476T patent/DE60233476D1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2002-03-05 EP EP02722176A patent/EP1370430B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2002-03-05 BR BR0207973-9A patent/BR0207973A/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2002-03-07 AR ARP020100822A patent/AR032964A1/en unknown
Cited By (13)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EP1600311A1 (en) * | 2004-05-26 | 2005-11-30 | AGCO GmbH | Tractor with front suspension |
| US20060027988A1 (en) * | 2004-08-05 | 2006-02-09 | Cnh America Llc | Suspension with torsion-resisting cylinder |
| US20060027411A1 (en) * | 2004-08-05 | 2006-02-09 | Cnh America Llc | Steerable rear tractor suspension |
| US20060027992A1 (en) * | 2004-08-05 | 2006-02-09 | Cnh America Llc | Tractor suspension with tensioned drive shaft |
| US20060027414A1 (en) * | 2004-08-05 | 2006-02-09 | Cnh America Llc | Tractor rear suspension |
| US7204340B2 (en) | 2004-08-05 | 2007-04-17 | Cnh America Llc | Tractor rear suspension |
| US7207575B2 (en) | 2004-08-05 | 2007-04-24 | Cnh America Llc | Suspension with torsion-resisting cylinder |
| US7264079B2 (en) | 2004-08-05 | 2007-09-04 | Cnh America Llc | Steerable rear tractor suspension |
| US7284633B2 (en) | 2004-08-05 | 2007-10-23 | Cnh America Llc | Tractor suspension with tensioned drive shaft |
| US20100109275A1 (en) * | 2008-10-30 | 2010-05-06 | Silvano Sandri | Independent Rear Suspension for an Agricultural Vehicle |
| US8220812B2 (en) | 2008-10-30 | 2012-07-17 | Cnh America Llc | Independent rear suspension for an agricultural vehicle |
| US8700270B2 (en) | 2011-07-11 | 2014-04-15 | Cnh America Llc | System and method for determining drawbar force magnitude and direction |
| US10549796B2 (en) * | 2015-07-30 | 2020-02-04 | Zf Friedrichshafen Ag | Cab support arrangement for a utility vehicle |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| AR032964A1 (en) | 2003-12-03 |
| US6491129B1 (en) | 2002-12-10 |
| EP1370430B1 (en) | 2009-08-26 |
| BR0207973A (en) | 2004-06-15 |
| WO2002072370A1 (en) | 2002-09-19 |
| DE60233476D1 (en) | 2009-10-08 |
| EP1370430A1 (en) | 2003-12-17 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US6491129B1 (en) | Agricultural tractor with draft compensating suspension | |
| EP3708467B1 (en) | Assembly having a skid plate module | |
| US9359021B2 (en) | Configuration of a two-track tractor | |
| CA1230356A (en) | Vehicle suspension system | |
| US5538264A (en) | Agricultural plowing vehicle with self-leveling suspension | |
| US8146939B2 (en) | Roll-stabilizing fifth wheel apparatus | |
| US4057121A (en) | Modular rear axle suspension and drive arrangement for trucks | |
| EP0928251B1 (en) | Suspension system for a load carrying machine | |
| US4418932A (en) | Front axle suspension system for a vehicle chassis | |
| EP1309461B1 (en) | Arrangement for wheel suspension | |
| EP0494286B1 (en) | Vehicle | |
| EP1153772B1 (en) | Load carrying machine | |
| US5074580A (en) | Torsion bar suspension assembly for an articulated vehicle | |
| US4149606A (en) | Wheel tractor suspension system | |
| AU2014202860B2 (en) | Rear suspension for swather tractor | |
| RU231010U1 (en) | Wheeled tractor | |
| US9415651B2 (en) | Rear suspension for swather tractor | |
| US4201273A (en) | Vehicle axle suspension system | |
| EP2428373A1 (en) | Axle arrangement | |
| JPS638544Y2 (en) | ||
| GB2104854A (en) | Light weight off-road vehicle | |
| WO2001060646A1 (en) | Front suspension system for a wheeled vehicle |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| AS | Assignment |
Owner name: DEERE & COMPANY, ILLINOIS Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:YOUNG, DONALD EUGENE;BURK, RONNIE FRANKLIN;REEL/FRAME:011613/0570 Effective date: 20010308 |
|
| STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
| FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
| FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
| FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 12 |