US20020163461A1 - Runway incursion detection and warning system - Google Patents
Runway incursion detection and warning system Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20020163461A1 US20020163461A1 US09/848,106 US84810601A US2002163461A1 US 20020163461 A1 US20020163461 A1 US 20020163461A1 US 84810601 A US84810601 A US 84810601A US 2002163461 A1 US2002163461 A1 US 2002163461A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- transceiver
- runway
- warning system
- annunciator
- incursion detection
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 25
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 6
- 230000001960 triggered effect Effects 0.000 claims description 7
- 238000001914 filtration Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 230000001755 vocal effect Effects 0.000 abstract description 2
- 239000006185 dispersion Substances 0.000 description 6
- 230000000007 visual effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 3
- 206010000369 Accident Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000009434 installation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000135 prohibitive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000005855 radiation Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G08—SIGNALLING
- G08G—TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
- G08G5/00—Traffic control systems for aircraft
- G08G5/50—Navigation or guidance aids
- G08G5/51—Navigation or guidance aids for control when on the ground, e.g. taxiing or rolling
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G08—SIGNALLING
- G08G—TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
- G08G5/00—Traffic control systems for aircraft
- G08G5/70—Arrangements for monitoring traffic-related situations or conditions
- G08G5/72—Arrangements for monitoring traffic-related situations or conditions for monitoring traffic
- G08G5/727—Arrangements for monitoring traffic-related situations or conditions for monitoring traffic from a ground station
Definitions
- This invention relates to the field of airport ground traffic control systems and more particularly to a system for determining aircraft position on an airport surface and for providing warnings of potential collisions.
- ground traffic control radars In poor visual conditions the problem becomes even worse since the ground controller is often reliant on non-visual information such as voice communications from the cockpit crew, reporting an aircraft's current position on the airport surface, or on display information from a ground traffic control radar system.
- non-visual information such as voice communications from the cockpit crew, reporting an aircraft's current position on the airport surface, or on display information from a ground traffic control radar system.
- ground traffic control radar systems Unfortunately, due to their prohibitive cost, only some of the largest airports in the United States have ground traffic control radar systems to aid the controller. The remainder of U.S. airports depend solely on the visual observations of flight controllers and on position reports from pilots. Of the airports which have ground traffic control radar, some of these systems are modern systems such as the ASDE-3 systems.
- many existing ground traffic control radars are over twenty years old, are difficult to maintain, and may provide inadequate information in poor weather because rain, snow, and fog tend to interfere with the radar signals.
- the present invention is a simple, low cost, but effective, runway incursion warning system for monitoring the critical runway/taxiway intersections of an airport and for communicating data indicative of a possible runway incursion to flight controllers or other airport personnel.
- the system uses off-the-shelf microwave radar motion detectors for detecting the approach of aircraft, ground vehicles, or people.
- a microwave radar system has important advantages over a conventional radar system. Most notably, due to the comparatively short wavelengths of microwaves, such systems are not as affected by rain, snow, or fog, as are conventional radar systems.
- microwave radar transceivers or motion detectors are located at predetermined installation sites adjacent to selected runways and/or taxiways of the airport.
- the motion detectors include a transmitter unit and a receiver unit.
- the detectors operate by transmitting microwaves in a cone shaped dispersion pattern. When an aircraft or a ground vehicle enters the dispersion pattern some of the microwaves are reflected back to the motion detector and are detected by the receiver unit.
- Commonly available motion detectors may be configured to detect motion in one direction only, thus the system of the present invention may be configured to selectively detect either incoming or outgoing traffic.
- the detectors may also be arranged in pairs to detect the direction of travel of an aircraft or vehicle.
- the detectors when the detectors detect the approach of an aircraft or ground vehicle, a signal is transmitted to an annunciator located in the tower.
- the annunciator provides a verbal warning to tower personnel of a potential runway intrusion.
- the annunciator is programable so that different voices will provide warnings depending upon, for example, where the runway intrusion is occurring.
- This feature is highly advantageous, in that by using a different voice to indicate a runway intrusion at each critical area, tower personnel will be able to immediately recognize where the intrusion has occurred without waiting to hear the complete warning.
- a further advantage of the present invention system is that it operates at low power and may utilize the existing cabling normally provided for runway lights.
- the motion detector and associated hardware are integrated with a typical runway lamp.
- FIG. 1 is a schematic illustration of the system of the present invention.
- FIG. 2 is a schematic illustration of an embodiment of the present invention where the motion detector and associated hardware are integrated with a runway light.
- FIG. 3 is a schematic illustration of a motion detector in accordance with the present invention disposed adjacent to a runway.
- FIG. 4 is a schematic illustration of two motion detectors in accordance with the present invention disposed adjacent to a runway in such a manner that the direction of travel of an aircraft or ground vehicle may be determined.
- An exemplary system embodying the present invention shown in FIG. 1 comprises a microwave radar transceiver 12 , which is commonly referred to as a motion detector, a power adapter 18 , a fuse 20 , a timing relay 22 , and a programable annunciator 24 .
- the microwave transceiver 12 includes a transmitter unit 14 and a receiver unit 16 .
- the transmitter broadcasts microwaves 25 , in a cone shaped dispersion pattern 26 , across a taxiway or runway 28 .
- a moving object such as an aircraft 30 , or a ground vehicle 32
- enters the dispersion pattern some of the microwaves are reflected back to the receiver unit which detects the reflected microwave radiation and generates a signal 34 indicative of the aircraft or ground vehicle present in the dispersion pattern.
- the microwave transceiver operates using Doppler effect principles, which are known to those skilled in the art.
- the transceiver may selectively detect either incoming or outgoing traffic. This feature is particularly important in that often it is desirable to detect only those aircraft or ground vehicles that are entering a runway or taxiway from the wrong direction.
- the ability to selectively detect only incoming or outgoing traffic is further advantageous in that often airports change the direction in which aircraft takeoff or land on a particular runway.
- airports change the direction in which aircraft takeoff or land on a particular runway.
- taxiway 38 would then become the runway “approach” taxiway and the correct direction of travel would then be towards the runway, as shown by arrow 42 .
- detecting aircraft traveling towards the runway now is of little value, while detecting aircraft traveling away from the runway, as depicted by arrow 40 , is critical.
- this change in critical direction can be readily accommodated by resetting the microwave transceiver 12 B to detect only outgoing traffic, i.e., only traffic moving in the direction 40 .
- this change in sensing direction is accomplished by resetting an internal switch in the transceiver.
- Microwave transceivers suitable for use with the system of the present invention are known in the art and are available from Microwave Sensors, Inc., of Ann Arbor, Michigan, among others.
- FIG. 4 there is shown an arrangement of microwave transceivers in which two transceivers may be used to determine the direction in which an aircraft or vehicle is traveling on a runway or taxiway.
- a transceiver 12 C is located on one side of the runway and is set to detect outgoing traffic.
- Another transceiver 12 D is located on the opposite side of the runway and is set to detect incoming traffic.
- airport personal can determine the direction of travel of any vehicle on the runway or taxiway depending on whether the incoming or outgoing transceiver is triggered.
- the transceivers may also be situated side by side as shown by transceivers 12 C and 12 D′. It is required that one transceiver be set to detect incoming traffic and that the other be set to detect outgoing traffic.
- the signal 34 generated by the microwave transceiver 12 upon detecting an aircraft or vehicle, is transmitted to the annunciator 24 .
- the annunciator upon receiving the signal plays a prerecorded warning.
- the annunciator is capable of responding to 64 input channels with a unique prerecorded voice message for each channel. Therefore, an airport may deploy multiple transceiver's where each transceiver is associated with a unique voice and/or warning message. This feature is highly advantageous, in that by using a different voice to indicate a runway intrusion at each critical area, tower personnel will be able to immediately recognize where the intrusion has occurred without waiting to hear the complete warning.
- annunciators with more or less capability than that of the exemplary embodiment may be used with the present invention warning system.
- annunciators may be tailored to have more or less input channels. In small airports, with only a few critical runway/taxiway or other intersections, only a few channels may be needed.
- Annunciators are known in the art.
- the annunciator used in the exemplary embodiment of the present invention warning system may be obtained from RACO Manufacturing and Engineering Company of Emeryville, Calif.
- the timing relay 22 it may be desirable to include the timing relay 22 .
- a particular transceiver is triggered only momentarily. For example, an animal may run across a monitored intersection. The transceiver will transmit a warning signal only so long as the triggering object is within the transceiver's dispersion area. In the case of an animal running across a monitored intersection, this time period may be less than the time required to play the recorded warning message. This may result in an abrupt termination of the message or other annunciator error.
- This problem may be readily solved by including a timing relay with each transceiver.
- the timing relay maintains transmission of the warning signal for a predetermined period of time whenever the transceiver is triggered. Typically, this period will be long enough to allow the annunciator to fully play the warning message.
- the timing relay may be replaced with a signal strength meter and filtering circuitry, in which the meter discriminates between weak and strong transceiver signals and the filter only allows strong signals indicative of a ground vehicle or aircraft to be transmitted to the annunciator.
- FIG. 2 a particularly preferred embodiment of the runway incursion system 10 , where the system is integrated with a typical breakaway runway or taxiway lamp 44 , is shown.
- a ground traffic control system utilize the existing power delivery infrastructure to the extent practicable. Since runway lamps are spaced at predetermined intervals along the runways of most U.S. airports, and such lamps are naturally located at the critical runway/taxiway intersections of a particular airport. It is desirable to integrate the warning system of the present invention with such lamps and to utilize the power lines for those lamps to supply power to the microwave transceivers.
- the power used by the lamp must be converted to a form suitable for use by the transceiver.
- Runway and taxiway lamps typically operate from constant current 120 volt AC power sources.
- the microwave transceivers typically require a constant voltage 24 volt AC power source. Therefore, the power adapter 18 (FIG. 1) is required to convert the runway or taxiway lamp power to a form suitable for use by the microwave transceivers.
- the power adapter is a step-down transformer. It is also desirable to include the fuse 20 in the electrical connection to the power adapter to the protect the warning system 10 from possible voltage surges in the runway or taxiway lamp power system.
- the present invention runway incursion system may be deployed with its own independent power network 19 (FIG. 1) and that the system may be readily adapted to operate from powers sources other than runway or taxiway lighting circuits.
- microwave transceivers suitable for use in the system of the present invention are available that utilize either AC or DC power and which utilize other operating voltages. Therefore, the system of the present invention may be adapted to operate from a wide array of existing airport power sources, which include, but are not limited to runway and taxiway lamps.
- the transceiver 12 may be connected to the structure of the breakaway lamp 44 by means of an angle bracket 48 or by any other suitable means.
- the step-down transformer 18 , the fuse 20 , and the optional timing relay 22 , as well as associated wiring, are conveniently housed in a junction box 46 , which may be any suitable enclosure.
- the junction box is attached to the runway or taxiway lamp by means of brackets 50 , or any other suitable attachment means.
- the transceiver warning signal is transmitted to the annunciator 24 via a communications cable such as a telephone cable.
- the warning signal may be transmitted to the annunciator by radio frequency or other means. Such techniques are known to those skilled in the art.
- the present invention provides a low cost, effective, runway incursion detection and warning system which may be deployed at most U.S. airports, and at those of many other countries.
- the system may be integrated with a typical breakaway runway or taxiway lamp which allows for easy installation at critical runway/taxiway and other intersections.
- the system may use existing runway or taxiway light power systems for a power source.
- the microwave radar transceiver used in the present invention can effectively detect aircraft and ground vehicles in inclement weather such rain, snow, and fog.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Aviation & Aerospace Engineering (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Traffic Control Systems (AREA)
- Radar Systems Or Details Thereof (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- This invention relates to the field of airport ground traffic control systems and more particularly to a system for determining aircraft position on an airport surface and for providing warnings of potential collisions.
- Unauthorized incursions of aircraft and ground vehicles onto runways and taxiways can often have catastrophic results. The number of aircraft accidents that occur on the ground is nearly three times the number of aircraft accidents that occur in the air.
- In poor visual conditions the problem becomes even worse since the ground controller is often reliant on non-visual information such as voice communications from the cockpit crew, reporting an aircraft's current position on the airport surface, or on display information from a ground traffic control radar system. Unfortunately, due to their prohibitive cost, only some of the largest airports in the United States have ground traffic control radar systems to aid the controller. The remainder of U.S. airports depend solely on the visual observations of flight controllers and on position reports from pilots. Of the airports which have ground traffic control radar, some of these systems are modern systems such as the ASDE-3 systems. However, many existing ground traffic control radars are over twenty years old, are difficult to maintain, and may provide inadequate information in poor weather because rain, snow, and fog tend to interfere with the radar signals. Thus, in a large number of airports, during poor weather conditions, the flight controllers are often literally reduced to asking air crews “where are you?” to locate aircraft on the airport surface. Fortunately, for any particular airport there are generally only a few taxiway/runway intersections that are critical intersections, i.e., those intersections that have a history of an excessive number of runway incursions.
- What is needed therefore is a reliable yet low cost system that provides a warning of unauthorized runway incursions to the flight controllers. Ideally, such a system will provide an audible warning to flight controllers since the controllers are typically continually watching their air traffic control screens and may not notice a purely visual warning of a runway incursion. In addition, such a system should be free from the poor weather operational problems associated with conventional radar warning systems.
- The present invention is a simple, low cost, but effective, runway incursion warning system for monitoring the critical runway/taxiway intersections of an airport and for communicating data indicative of a possible runway incursion to flight controllers or other airport personnel. The system uses off-the-shelf microwave radar motion detectors for detecting the approach of aircraft, ground vehicles, or people. A microwave radar system has important advantages over a conventional radar system. Most notably, due to the comparatively short wavelengths of microwaves, such systems are not as affected by rain, snow, or fog, as are conventional radar systems.
- In the system of the present invention, microwave radar transceivers or motion detectors are located at predetermined installation sites adjacent to selected runways and/or taxiways of the airport. The motion detectors include a transmitter unit and a receiver unit. The detectors operate by transmitting microwaves in a cone shaped dispersion pattern. When an aircraft or a ground vehicle enters the dispersion pattern some of the microwaves are reflected back to the motion detector and are detected by the receiver unit. Commonly available motion detectors may be configured to detect motion in one direction only, thus the system of the present invention may be configured to selectively detect either incoming or outgoing traffic. The detectors may also be arranged in pairs to detect the direction of travel of an aircraft or vehicle.
- In the system of the present invention, when the detectors detect the approach of an aircraft or ground vehicle, a signal is transmitted to an annunciator located in the tower. The annunciator provides a verbal warning to tower personnel of a potential runway intrusion. Preferably, the annunciator is programable so that different voices will provide warnings depending upon, for example, where the runway intrusion is occurring. This feature is highly advantageous, in that by using a different voice to indicate a runway intrusion at each critical area, tower personnel will be able to immediately recognize where the intrusion has occurred without waiting to hear the complete warning. A further advantage of the present invention system is that it operates at low power and may utilize the existing cabling normally provided for runway lights. In one particularly preferred embodiment, the motion detector and associated hardware are integrated with a typical runway lamp. These and other features of the invention will become more apparent from the following detailed description of the invention, when taken in conjunction with the accompanying exemplary drawings.
- FIG. 1 is a schematic illustration of the system of the present invention.
- FIG. 2 is a schematic illustration of an embodiment of the present invention where the motion detector and associated hardware are integrated with a runway light.
- FIG. 3 is a schematic illustration of a motion detector in accordance with the present invention disposed adjacent to a runway.
- FIG. 4 is a schematic illustration of two motion detectors in accordance with the present invention disposed adjacent to a runway in such a manner that the direction of travel of an aircraft or ground vehicle may be determined.
- An exemplary system embodying the present invention shown in FIG. 1 comprises a
microwave radar transceiver 12, which is commonly referred to as a motion detector, apower adapter 18, a fuse 20, a timing relay 22, and aprogramable annunciator 24. - Referring now to FIGS. 1 and 3, the
microwave transceiver 12 includes atransmitter unit 14 and areceiver unit 16. In this exemplary embodiment, the transmitter broadcastsmicrowaves 25, in a cone shapeddispersion pattern 26, across a taxiway orrunway 28. When a moving object such as anaircraft 30, or aground vehicle 32, enters the dispersion pattern some of the microwaves are reflected back to the receiver unit which detects the reflected microwave radiation and generates a signal 34 indicative of the aircraft or ground vehicle present in the dispersion pattern. The microwave transceiver operates using Doppler effect principles, which are known to those skilled in the art. One of the features of Doppler effect microwave transceivers of the type used in the present invention is that the transceiver may selectively detect either incoming or outgoing traffic. This feature is particularly important in that often it is desirable to detect only those aircraft or ground vehicles that are entering a runway or taxiway from the wrong direction. - Referring now to FIG. 3, if aircraft landing on the
runway 28, in thedirection 36, are directed to exit the runway on a particular “exit”taxiway 38, generating a warning when any aircraft enters the exit taxiway is of little value in that most of aircraft entering the exit taxiway are aircraft which have just landed and are leaving the runway, in the correct direction as indicated by arrow 40. However, if the microwave transceiver 12B is set to detect only incoming traffic, all exiting aircraft are ignored and only aircraft or ground vehicles traveling in an incorrect direction, i.e., towards the runway, as indicated by arrow 42, are detected. - The ability to selectively detect only incoming or outgoing traffic is further advantageous in that often airports change the direction in which aircraft takeoff or land on a particular runway. Thus, with continued reference to FIG. 3, if the airport directed aircraft to takeoff in a direction opposite to that shown by
arrow 36,taxiway 38 would then become the runway “approach” taxiway and the correct direction of travel would then be towards the runway, as shown by arrow 42. Thus, detecting aircraft traveling towards the runway now is of little value, while detecting aircraft traveling away from the runway, as depicted by arrow 40, is critical. However, this change in critical direction can be readily accommodated by resetting the microwave transceiver 12B to detect only outgoing traffic, i.e., only traffic moving in the direction 40. In the transceivers of the exemplary embodiment, this change in sensing direction is accomplished by resetting an internal switch in the transceiver. Microwave transceivers suitable for use with the system of the present invention are known in the art and are available from Microwave Sensors, Inc., of Ann Arbor, Michigan, among others. - Referring now to FIG. 4, there is shown an arrangement of microwave transceivers in which two transceivers may be used to determine the direction in which an aircraft or vehicle is traveling on a runway or taxiway. As shown in FIG. 4, a transceiver 12C is located on one side of the runway and is set to detect outgoing traffic. Another
transceiver 12D is located on the opposite side of the runway and is set to detect incoming traffic. When set up in this manner, airport personal can determine the direction of travel of any vehicle on the runway or taxiway depending on whether the incoming or outgoing transceiver is triggered. The transceivers may also be situated side by side as shown bytransceivers 12C and 12D′. It is required that one transceiver be set to detect incoming traffic and that the other be set to detect outgoing traffic. - Referring again to FIG. 1, the signal 34 generated by the
microwave transceiver 12, upon detecting an aircraft or vehicle, is transmitted to theannunciator 24. The annunciator upon receiving the signal plays a prerecorded warning. In the exemplary embodiment, the annunciator is capable of responding to 64 input channels with a unique prerecorded voice message for each channel. Therefore, an airport may deploy multiple transceiver's where each transceiver is associated with a unique voice and/or warning message. This feature is highly advantageous, in that by using a different voice to indicate a runway intrusion at each critical area, tower personnel will be able to immediately recognize where the intrusion has occurred without waiting to hear the complete warning. Those skilled in the art will understand that annunciators with more or less capability than that of the exemplary embodiment may be used with the present invention warning system. For example, annunciators may be tailored to have more or less input channels. In small airports, with only a few critical runway/taxiway or other intersections, only a few channels may be needed. Annunciators are known in the art. The annunciator used in the exemplary embodiment of the present invention warning system may be obtained from RACO Manufacturing and Engineering Company of Emeryville, Calif. - With continued reference to FIG. 1, in some embodiments of the runway incursion warning system, it may be desirable to include the timing relay 22. Occasionally, situations may occur where a particular transceiver is triggered only momentarily. For example, an animal may run across a monitored intersection. The transceiver will transmit a warning signal only so long as the triggering object is within the transceiver's dispersion area. In the case of an animal running across a monitored intersection, this time period may be less than the time required to play the recorded warning message. This may result in an abrupt termination of the message or other annunciator error. This problem may be readily solved by including a timing relay with each transceiver. The timing relay maintains transmission of the warning signal for a predetermined period of time whenever the transceiver is triggered. Typically, this period will be long enough to allow the annunciator to fully play the warning message. In more sophisticated embodiments, the timing relay may be replaced with a signal strength meter and filtering circuitry, in which the meter discriminates between weak and strong transceiver signals and the filter only allows strong signals indicative of a ground vehicle or aircraft to be transmitted to the annunciator.
- Referring now to FIG. 2, a particularly preferred embodiment of the
runway incursion system 10, where the system is integrated with a typical breakaway runway ortaxiway lamp 44, is shown. Due to the need to control costs at small and medium sized airports, it is desirable that a ground traffic control system utilize the existing power delivery infrastructure to the extent practicable. Since runway lamps are spaced at predetermined intervals along the runways of most U.S. airports, and such lamps are naturally located at the critical runway/taxiway intersections of a particular airport. It is desirable to integrate the warning system of the present invention with such lamps and to utilize the power lines for those lamps to supply power to the microwave transceivers. - In order to integrate the
exemplary microwave transceiver 12 with the runway ortaxiway lamp 44, the power used by the lamp must be converted to a form suitable for use by the transceiver. Runway and taxiway lamps typically operate from constant current 120 volt AC power sources. The microwave transceivers typically require aconstant voltage 24 volt AC power source. Therefore, the power adapter 18 (FIG. 1) is required to convert the runway or taxiway lamp power to a form suitable for use by the microwave transceivers. In the exemplary embodiment, the power adapter is a step-down transformer. It is also desirable to include the fuse 20 in the electrical connection to the power adapter to the protect thewarning system 10 from possible voltage surges in the runway or taxiway lamp power system. Those skilled in the art will understand that the present invention runway incursion system may be deployed with its own independent power network 19 (FIG. 1) and that the system may be readily adapted to operate from powers sources other than runway or taxiway lighting circuits. In addition, microwave transceivers suitable for use in the system of the present invention are available that utilize either AC or DC power and which utilize other operating voltages. Therefore, the system of the present invention may be adapted to operate from a wide array of existing airport power sources, which include, but are not limited to runway and taxiway lamps. - The
transceiver 12 may be connected to the structure of thebreakaway lamp 44 by means of an angle bracket 48 or by any other suitable means. The step-downtransformer 18, the fuse 20, and the optional timing relay 22, as well as associated wiring, are conveniently housed in ajunction box 46, which may be any suitable enclosure. The junction box is attached to the runway or taxiway lamp by means ofbrackets 50, or any other suitable attachment means. In the exemplary embodiment, the transceiver warning signal is transmitted to theannunciator 24 via a communications cable such as a telephone cable. However, in other embodiments, the warning signal may be transmitted to the annunciator by radio frequency or other means. Such techniques are known to those skilled in the art. - The present invention provides a low cost, effective, runway incursion detection and warning system which may be deployed at most U.S. airports, and at those of many other countries. The system may be integrated with a typical breakaway runway or taxiway lamp which allows for easy installation at critical runway/taxiway and other intersections. The system may use existing runway or taxiway light power systems for a power source. Furthermore, unlike long wave-length radar systems, the microwave radar transceiver used in the present invention can effectively detect aircraft and ground vehicles in inclement weather such rain, snow, and fog. While only the presently preferred embodiments have been described in detail, as will be apparent to those skilled in the art, modifications and improvements may be made to the system and method disclosed herein without departing from the scope of the invention. Accordingly, it is not intended that the invention be limited except by the appended claims.
Claims (22)
Priority Applications (4)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US09/848,106 US6486825B1 (en) | 2001-05-02 | 2001-05-02 | Runway incursion detection and warning system |
| EP02734118A EP1405283A4 (en) | 2001-05-02 | 2002-05-01 | TRACK INTRUSION DETECTION AND WARNING SYSTEM |
| AU2002305307A AU2002305307A1 (en) | 2001-05-02 | 2002-05-01 | Runway incursion detection and warning system |
| PCT/US2002/013755 WO2002089088A2 (en) | 2001-05-02 | 2002-05-01 | Runway incursion detection and warning system |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US09/848,106 US6486825B1 (en) | 2001-05-02 | 2001-05-02 | Runway incursion detection and warning system |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| US20020163461A1 true US20020163461A1 (en) | 2002-11-07 |
| US6486825B1 US6486825B1 (en) | 2002-11-26 |
Family
ID=25302358
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| US09/848,106 Expired - Lifetime US6486825B1 (en) | 2001-05-02 | 2001-05-02 | Runway incursion detection and warning system |
Country Status (4)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US6486825B1 (en) |
| EP (1) | EP1405283A4 (en) |
| AU (1) | AU2002305307A1 (en) |
| WO (1) | WO2002089088A2 (en) |
Cited By (20)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US6850185B1 (en) * | 2003-07-31 | 2005-02-01 | Rockwell Collins | Runway obstacle detection system and method |
| US20050140540A1 (en) * | 2003-12-29 | 2005-06-30 | Itt Manufacturing Enterprises, Inc. | Airfield surface target detection and tracking using distributed multilateration sensors and W-band radar sensors |
| US20070008185A1 (en) * | 2002-10-28 | 2007-01-11 | Xsight Systems Ltd. | Foreign object detection system and method |
| US20080186221A1 (en) * | 2007-02-07 | 2008-08-07 | Honeywell International Inc. | Surface vehicle transponder |
| US7576680B1 (en) | 2006-08-09 | 2009-08-18 | Rockwell Collins, Inc. | Pulse pattern for weather phenomenon and incursion detection system and method |
| US20090243881A1 (en) * | 2008-03-31 | 2009-10-01 | Xsight Systems Ltd. | System and method for ascription of foreign object debris detected on airport travel surfaces to foreign object sources |
| US20100023191A1 (en) * | 2008-07-22 | 2010-01-28 | Arinc Incorporated | Method and apparatus for wireless runway incursion detection |
| US7702461B2 (en) * | 2001-03-06 | 2010-04-20 | Honeywell International Inc. | Ground operations and imminent landing runway selection |
| US7783427B1 (en) | 2006-07-14 | 2010-08-24 | Rockwell Collins, Inc. | Combined runway obstacle detection system and method |
| US7890248B2 (en) | 2001-03-06 | 2011-02-15 | Honeywell International Inc. | Ground operations and advanced runway awareness and advisory system |
| US7932853B1 (en) | 2008-09-12 | 2011-04-26 | Rockwell Collins, Inc. | System and method for identifying incursion threat levels |
| US20110187580A1 (en) * | 2007-10-09 | 2011-08-04 | Guy Laenen | Device for detecting a vehicle on an airport runway |
| US8019529B1 (en) | 2007-08-17 | 2011-09-13 | Rockwell Collins, Inc. | Runway and airport incursion alerting system and method |
| US8145367B2 (en) | 2001-03-06 | 2012-03-27 | Honeywell International Inc. | Closed airport surface alerting system |
| US20130342367A1 (en) * | 2003-12-18 | 2013-12-26 | George Vickas | Incursion Collision Avoidance System For Vehicle Traffic Control |
| US9135830B2 (en) | 2010-02-18 | 2015-09-15 | Xsight Systems Ltd. | Airport travel surface edge lighting and foreign object detection system and method |
| US20150323661A1 (en) * | 2014-05-06 | 2015-11-12 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Method and device for monitoring an immobile space region |
| CN109385939A (en) * | 2018-10-18 | 2019-02-26 | 北京首都国际机场股份有限公司 | Multiple entry runway is anti-to scratch system |
| AU2018202640B2 (en) * | 2014-06-27 | 2019-08-22 | Rite-Hite Holding Corporation | Pedestrian-vehicle safety systems for loading docks |
| CN114360181A (en) * | 2021-12-29 | 2022-04-15 | 北京中铁建建筑科技有限公司 | Boundary guardrail that possesses multiple monitoring facilities |
Families Citing this family (17)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US7148815B2 (en) * | 2000-12-22 | 2006-12-12 | Byron Scott Derringer | Apparatus and method for detecting objects located on an airport runway |
| US7450004B2 (en) * | 2004-10-29 | 2008-11-11 | The Boeing Company | Systems and methods for handling information from wireless nodes, including nodes for communication with aircraft |
| US7765037B2 (en) * | 2005-08-19 | 2010-07-27 | Rockwell Collins, Inc. | Runway incursion detection system and method for displaying a runway incursion |
| DE102006007644B4 (en) * | 2006-02-18 | 2008-01-31 | Heinz Wipf | Method and system for preventing intrusion of a mobile object into a section of a traffic route |
| US8812223B2 (en) * | 2007-01-23 | 2014-08-19 | Honeywell International Inc. | Systems and methods for alerting aircraft crew members of a runway assignment for an aircraft takeoff sequence |
| US20110221624A1 (en) * | 2007-12-05 | 2011-09-15 | Sensys Networks, Inc | Apparatus and Method Using a Radar in a Wireless and/or Wireline Sensor Node and Operating Radar In the Ground to Detect and Count Vehicles in Roadway, Parking Lot and Airport Applications |
| ITBO20080274A1 (en) * | 2008-04-30 | 2009-11-01 | Ocem Spa | SYSTEM FOR DETECTION OF THE POSITION OF AIRCRAFT AND / OR VEHICLES ALONG THE TRACKS AND AIRPORTS |
| GB2460954B (en) | 2008-06-20 | 2011-03-02 | David Zammit-Mangion | A method and system for resolving traffic conflicts in take-off and landing |
| US8232909B2 (en) | 2008-09-30 | 2012-07-31 | Cooper Technologies Company | Doppler radar motion detector for an outdoor light fixture |
| RU2492495C2 (en) * | 2011-07-21 | 2013-09-10 | Виктор Леонидович Семенов | Methods of determining sign and value of deviation of aircraft from heading and glide path at final landing phase on aerodrome and apparatus for realising said methods |
| RU2485537C2 (en) * | 2011-07-21 | 2013-06-20 | Виктор Леонидович Семенов | Method of aircraft landing with course or glideslope approach onto aerodrome and devices for its realisation, radar to detect sign of target deviation from equisignal direction |
| EP2769235B1 (en) | 2011-10-19 | 2023-11-29 | Balu Subramanya | Directional speed and distance sensor |
| US8264401B1 (en) | 2011-12-29 | 2012-09-11 | Sensys Networks, Inc. | Micro-radar, micro-radar sensor nodes, networks and systems |
| US9554444B2 (en) | 2012-12-17 | 2017-01-24 | OV20 Systems | Device and method for retrofitting or converting or adapting series circuits |
| US11004337B2 (en) | 2012-12-28 | 2021-05-11 | Balu Subramanya | Advanced parking management system |
| SE537675C2 (en) * | 2013-09-19 | 2015-09-29 | Scania Cv Ab | Procedure and system for road safety when driving a vehicle in a safety-critical area |
| US9589472B2 (en) * | 2014-09-23 | 2017-03-07 | Raytheon Company | Runway incursion detection and indication using an electronic flight strip system |
Family Cites Families (30)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US2514436A (en) | 1948-06-18 | 1950-07-11 | Luis W Alvarez | Airway monitoring and control system |
| US3152315A (en) | 1961-01-27 | 1964-10-06 | Lab For Electronics Inc | Aircraft tracking and indicating system |
| US3855571A (en) | 1972-04-13 | 1974-12-17 | Dynamics Corp Massa Div | Aircraft ground traffic control system |
| US3872474A (en) | 1973-01-02 | 1975-03-18 | Itt | Airport ground surveillance system |
| US4360795A (en) | 1980-10-03 | 1982-11-23 | Honeywell, Inc. | Detection means |
| US4481516A (en) * | 1980-10-27 | 1984-11-06 | Michelotti Paul E | Low visibility runway monitor |
| US4516125A (en) | 1982-09-20 | 1985-05-07 | General Signal Corporation | Method and apparatus for monitoring vehicle ground movement in the vicinity of an airport |
| IT1223930B (en) | 1988-11-23 | 1990-09-29 | Elkron Spa | DEVICE FOR DETECTING RELATIVE MOVEMENTS BETWEEN VEHICLES MAINLY IN ANTI-COLLISION FUNCTION |
| US5170162A (en) | 1989-08-16 | 1992-12-08 | Whelen Technologies, Inc. | Motion direction detection |
| NL9001599A (en) | 1990-07-13 | 1992-02-03 | Frans Herman De Haan | DEVICE FOR LOCATING AND IDENTIFYING ANSWERS. |
| US5574648A (en) | 1990-10-09 | 1996-11-12 | Pilley; Harold R. | Airport control/management system using GNSS-based methods and equipment for the control of surface and airborne traffic |
| US5448243A (en) | 1991-12-30 | 1995-09-05 | Deutsche Forschungsanstalt Fur Luft- Und Raumfahrt E.V. | System for locating a plurality of objects and obstructions and for detecting and determining the rolling status of moving objects, such as aircraft, ground vehicles, and the like |
| JP2987716B2 (en) * | 1992-03-19 | 1999-12-06 | 日本信号株式会社 | Aircraft detection device |
| US5268698A (en) | 1992-07-31 | 1993-12-07 | Smith Sr Louis P | Target acquisition, locating and tracking system |
| US5530440A (en) * | 1992-12-15 | 1996-06-25 | Westinghouse Norden Systems, Inc | Airport surface aircraft locator |
| US5300933A (en) | 1993-02-24 | 1994-04-05 | Daniel H. Wagner Associates, Inc. | Stick figure radar tracking process |
| CA2114755A1 (en) * | 1993-02-26 | 1994-08-27 | Peter L. Hoover | Airport surveillance system |
| US5334982A (en) | 1993-05-27 | 1994-08-02 | Norden Systems, Inc. | Airport surface vehicle identification |
| US5374932A (en) | 1993-08-02 | 1994-12-20 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Airport surface surveillance system |
| US5400031A (en) | 1994-03-07 | 1995-03-21 | Norden Systems, Inc. | Airport surface vehicle identification system and method |
| US5629691A (en) * | 1995-05-26 | 1997-05-13 | Hughes Electronics | Airport surface monitoring and runway incursion warning system |
| US5557278A (en) * | 1995-06-23 | 1996-09-17 | Northrop Grumman Corporation | Airport integrated hazard response apparatus |
| US5724040A (en) * | 1995-06-23 | 1998-03-03 | Northrop Grumman Corporation | Aircraft wake vortex hazard warning apparatus |
| IT1290406B1 (en) * | 1996-01-22 | 1998-12-03 | Oerlikon Contraves S P A | SYSTEM FOR THE SURVEILLANCE OF TRAFFIC ON THE AIRPORT SURFACE BASED ON A NETWORK OF SMALL RADARS |
| DE19619015B4 (en) | 1996-05-10 | 2006-11-02 | Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e.V. | Method and arrangement for traffic monitoring |
| US5933099A (en) | 1997-02-19 | 1999-08-03 | Mahon; James | Collision avoidance system |
| US5933098A (en) | 1997-03-21 | 1999-08-03 | Haxton; Phil | Aircraft security system and method |
| DE19723685C1 (en) | 1997-06-05 | 1999-04-08 | Deutsch Zentr Luft & Raumfahrt | Process for generating an image of moving objects in the microwave range using inverse synthetic aperture radar |
| DE10011000B9 (en) * | 2000-03-07 | 2005-06-23 | Karl Neugebauer | Security system for airports |
| DE10104950A1 (en) * | 2000-03-11 | 2001-10-04 | Apm Gmbh Airport Equipment | Device for directing traffic at airports or on ships uses groups of sensors to identify vehicles or aircraft and/or to monitor a runway status and assess traffic movements. |
-
2001
- 2001-05-02 US US09/848,106 patent/US6486825B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
2002
- 2002-05-01 EP EP02734118A patent/EP1405283A4/en not_active Ceased
- 2002-05-01 WO PCT/US2002/013755 patent/WO2002089088A2/en not_active Ceased
- 2002-05-01 AU AU2002305307A patent/AU2002305307A1/en not_active Abandoned
Cited By (30)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US8145367B2 (en) | 2001-03-06 | 2012-03-27 | Honeywell International Inc. | Closed airport surface alerting system |
| US7890248B2 (en) | 2001-03-06 | 2011-02-15 | Honeywell International Inc. | Ground operations and advanced runway awareness and advisory system |
| US7702461B2 (en) * | 2001-03-06 | 2010-04-20 | Honeywell International Inc. | Ground operations and imminent landing runway selection |
| US7663507B2 (en) | 2002-10-28 | 2010-02-16 | Xsight Systems Ltd. | Foreign object detection system and method |
| US20070008185A1 (en) * | 2002-10-28 | 2007-01-11 | Xsight Systems Ltd. | Foreign object detection system and method |
| US7253748B2 (en) * | 2002-10-28 | 2007-08-07 | Xsight Systems Ltd | Foreign object detection system and method |
| US20070296611A1 (en) * | 2002-10-28 | 2007-12-27 | Xsight Systems Ltd. | Foreign object detection system and method |
| US20100109913A1 (en) * | 2002-10-28 | 2010-05-06 | Xsight Systems Ltd. | Foreign object detection system and method |
| US6850185B1 (en) * | 2003-07-31 | 2005-02-01 | Rockwell Collins | Runway obstacle detection system and method |
| US20130342367A1 (en) * | 2003-12-18 | 2013-12-26 | George Vickas | Incursion Collision Avoidance System For Vehicle Traffic Control |
| US7495600B2 (en) * | 2003-12-29 | 2009-02-24 | Itt Manufacturing Enterprise, Inc. | Airfield surface target detection and tracking using distributed multilateration sensors and W-band radar sensors |
| US20050140540A1 (en) * | 2003-12-29 | 2005-06-30 | Itt Manufacturing Enterprises, Inc. | Airfield surface target detection and tracking using distributed multilateration sensors and W-band radar sensors |
| US7783427B1 (en) | 2006-07-14 | 2010-08-24 | Rockwell Collins, Inc. | Combined runway obstacle detection system and method |
| US8072368B1 (en) | 2006-08-09 | 2011-12-06 | Rockwell Collins, Inc. | Pulse pattern for weather phenomenon and incursion detection system and method |
| US7576680B1 (en) | 2006-08-09 | 2009-08-18 | Rockwell Collins, Inc. | Pulse pattern for weather phenomenon and incursion detection system and method |
| US7479919B2 (en) * | 2007-02-07 | 2009-01-20 | Honeywell International Inc. | Surface vehicle transponder |
| US20080186221A1 (en) * | 2007-02-07 | 2008-08-07 | Honeywell International Inc. | Surface vehicle transponder |
| US8019529B1 (en) | 2007-08-17 | 2011-09-13 | Rockwell Collins, Inc. | Runway and airport incursion alerting system and method |
| US20110187580A1 (en) * | 2007-10-09 | 2011-08-04 | Guy Laenen | Device for detecting a vehicle on an airport runway |
| US20120194358A1 (en) * | 2008-03-31 | 2012-08-02 | Xsight Systems Ltd. | System and method for ascription of objects detected on airport surfaces to object sources |
| US8022841B2 (en) * | 2008-03-31 | 2011-09-20 | Xsight Systems Ltd. | System and method for ascription of foreign object debris detected on airport travel surfaces to foreign object sources |
| US20090243881A1 (en) * | 2008-03-31 | 2009-10-01 | Xsight Systems Ltd. | System and method for ascription of foreign object debris detected on airport travel surfaces to foreign object sources |
| US20100023191A1 (en) * | 2008-07-22 | 2010-01-28 | Arinc Incorporated | Method and apparatus for wireless runway incursion detection |
| US7932853B1 (en) | 2008-09-12 | 2011-04-26 | Rockwell Collins, Inc. | System and method for identifying incursion threat levels |
| US9135830B2 (en) | 2010-02-18 | 2015-09-15 | Xsight Systems Ltd. | Airport travel surface edge lighting and foreign object detection system and method |
| US20150323661A1 (en) * | 2014-05-06 | 2015-11-12 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Method and device for monitoring an immobile space region |
| AU2018202640B2 (en) * | 2014-06-27 | 2019-08-22 | Rite-Hite Holding Corporation | Pedestrian-vehicle safety systems for loading docks |
| US10934113B2 (en) * | 2014-06-27 | 2021-03-02 | Rite-Hite Holding Corporation | Pedestrian-vehicle safety systems for loading docks |
| CN109385939A (en) * | 2018-10-18 | 2019-02-26 | 北京首都国际机场股份有限公司 | Multiple entry runway is anti-to scratch system |
| CN114360181A (en) * | 2021-12-29 | 2022-04-15 | 北京中铁建建筑科技有限公司 | Boundary guardrail that possesses multiple monitoring facilities |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| WO2002089088A2 (en) | 2002-11-07 |
| WO2002089088A3 (en) | 2003-08-21 |
| AU2002305307A1 (en) | 2002-11-11 |
| US6486825B1 (en) | 2002-11-26 |
| EP1405283A4 (en) | 2004-12-08 |
| EP1405283A2 (en) | 2004-04-07 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US6486825B1 (en) | Runway incursion detection and warning system | |
| US8466804B2 (en) | Incursion collision avoidance system for vehicle traffic control | |
| US7535404B2 (en) | Airport safety system | |
| US4481516A (en) | Low visibility runway monitor | |
| US20090021397A1 (en) | Method and System for Preventing the Intrusion of a Displaceable Object into a Section of a Traffic Route | |
| CA2444144C (en) | Variable speed limit system | |
| US7835827B2 (en) | Methods, systems and computer program products for communicating auditory alert to aircraft | |
| EP3330736B1 (en) | Data communication between airport surveillance radar and onboard airborne weather radar | |
| CA2542873A1 (en) | Implantable sling having bladder support | |
| CN102332214A (en) | Enhanced airport scene monitoring system | |
| CN111445727A (en) | System and method for monitoring airport runway incursion | |
| AU2019250256A1 (en) | An emergency vehicle proximity alert system | |
| EP1234293B1 (en) | Aircraft location system for airports | |
| CN113129620A (en) | Vehicle signal lamp system at intersection of aircraft taxiway and service lane based on radar | |
| US7908079B1 (en) | Portable runway intersection display and monitoring system | |
| US7450029B2 (en) | Incursion collision avoidance system for vehicle traffic control | |
| CN112346060A (en) | A method and system for detecting the entry and exit of airport ground targets into and out of runways | |
| CN211375799U (en) | Traffic warning system based on database | |
| Dy et al. | An affordable approach to runway incursion prevention | |
| US20250342771A1 (en) | Integrated runway safety alerting | |
| Norris Jr | Autonomous UV-enhanced-vision system that prevents runway incursions at medium-size airports | |
| SU1709366A1 (en) | System for monitoring runway traffic | |
| CA2543873A1 (en) | An incursion collision avoidance system for vehicle traffic control | |
| JP2026023006A (en) | Threat detection device, threat detection method, and program | |
| Thompson et al. | An operational concept for the smart landing facility (SLF) |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| AS | Assignment |
Owner name: OMAHA AIRPORT AUTHORITY, NEBRASKA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:SMITHEY, DONALD L.;REEL/FRAME:012004/0868 Effective date: 20010502 |
|
| FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: PAYER NUMBER DE-ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: RMPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
| STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
| CC | Certificate of correction | ||
| FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
| FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
| FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 12 |