US20020134201A1 - Dust control - Google Patents
Dust control Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20020134201A1 US20020134201A1 US09/899,354 US89935401A US2002134201A1 US 20020134201 A1 US20020134201 A1 US 20020134201A1 US 89935401 A US89935401 A US 89935401A US 2002134201 A1 US2002134201 A1 US 2002134201A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- ore
- ppm
- alkyl
- metal
- alkyl polyglucoside
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 239000000428 dust Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 43
- 125000000217 alkyl group Chemical group 0.000 claims abstract description 60
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 43
- 125000004432 carbon atom Chemical group C* 0.000 claims abstract description 23
- 238000006116 polymerization reaction Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 14
- 239000007864 aqueous solution Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 10
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 claims description 34
- XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N Iron Chemical compound [Fe] XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 29
- 239000010949 copper Substances 0.000 claims description 27
- 239000000243 solution Substances 0.000 claims description 24
- RYGMFSIKBFXOCR-UHFFFAOYSA-N Copper Chemical compound [Cu] RYGMFSIKBFXOCR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 20
- 229910052802 copper Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 20
- 229910052751 metal Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 20
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 claims description 20
- 241000894006 Bacteria Species 0.000 claims description 16
- UCKMPCXJQFINFW-UHFFFAOYSA-N Sulphide Chemical compound [S-2] UCKMPCXJQFINFW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 11
- 229910052742 iron Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 11
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 claims description 7
- 150000002739 metals Chemical class 0.000 claims description 7
- 230000001590 oxidative effect Effects 0.000 claims description 7
- NINIDFKCEFEMDL-UHFFFAOYSA-N Sulfur Chemical compound [S] NINIDFKCEFEMDL-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 5
- 239000011230 binding agent Substances 0.000 claims description 5
- OMZSGWSJDCOLKM-UHFFFAOYSA-N copper(II) sulfide Chemical compound [S-2].[Cu+2] OMZSGWSJDCOLKM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 5
- 229910052717 sulfur Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 5
- 239000011593 sulfur Substances 0.000 claims description 5
- 125000002791 glucosyl group Chemical group C1([C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@H](O1)CO)* 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000009736 wetting Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- QPLDLSVMHZLSFG-UHFFFAOYSA-N Copper oxide Chemical compound [Cu]=O QPLDLSVMHZLSFG-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000005751 Copper oxide Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 229910000431 copper oxide Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000003960 organic solvent Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 150000002923 oximes Chemical class 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000002253 acid Substances 0.000 claims 5
- 239000004094 surface-active agent Substances 0.000 description 23
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 17
- 238000005191 phase separation Methods 0.000 description 10
- 238000000605 extraction Methods 0.000 description 9
- 238000000638 solvent extraction Methods 0.000 description 9
- 239000003795 chemical substances by application Substances 0.000 description 8
- 238000002386 leaching Methods 0.000 description 8
- 238000005065 mining Methods 0.000 description 8
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 8
- 239000012074 organic phase Substances 0.000 description 6
- 239000012071 phase Substances 0.000 description 6
- 239000008346 aqueous phase Substances 0.000 description 5
- 238000005187 foaming Methods 0.000 description 5
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 description 5
- 239000011668 ascorbic acid Substances 0.000 description 4
- 239000008367 deionised water Substances 0.000 description 4
- 229910021641 deionized water Inorganic materials 0.000 description 4
- 239000000839 emulsion Substances 0.000 description 4
- 238000001704 evaporation Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000008020 evaporation Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000003801 milling Methods 0.000 description 4
- 239000002689 soil Substances 0.000 description 4
- 239000011343 solid material Substances 0.000 description 4
- 231100000331 toxic Toxicity 0.000 description 4
- 230000002588 toxic effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 229910052947 chalcocite Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 239000006260 foam Substances 0.000 description 3
- 229910052500 inorganic mineral Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 239000011707 mineral Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000011084 recovery Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000007921 spray Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 3
- QAOWNCQODCNURD-UHFFFAOYSA-N Sulfuric acid Chemical compound OS(O)(=O)=O QAOWNCQODCNURD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 239000011260 aqueous acid Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000003153 chemical reaction reagent Substances 0.000 description 2
- 231100000053 low toxicity Toxicity 0.000 description 2
- 229910052976 metal sulfide Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 244000005700 microbiome Species 0.000 description 2
- 238000011056 performance test Methods 0.000 description 2
- 150000003839 salts Chemical class 0.000 description 2
- 238000005507 spraying Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000001629 suppression Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 231100000419 toxicity Toxicity 0.000 description 2
- 230000001988 toxicity Effects 0.000 description 2
- UNJGEWYTCXNJEE-UHFFFAOYSA-N 3-butyl-1-hydroxyimino-1-phenylheptan-2-ol Chemical compound CCCCC(CCCC)C(O)C(=NO)C1=CC=CC=C1 UNJGEWYTCXNJEE-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 241000726121 Acidianus Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000605222 Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000605272 Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000203069 Archaea Species 0.000 description 1
- OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N Carbon Chemical compound [C] OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000004215 Carbon black (E152) Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000008733 Citrus aurantifolia Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- JPVYNHNXODAKFH-UHFFFAOYSA-N Cu2+ Chemical compound [Cu+2] JPVYNHNXODAKFH-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- LFQSCWFLJHTTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ethanol Chemical compound CCO LFQSCWFLJHTTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- CWYNVVGOOAEACU-UHFFFAOYSA-N Fe2+ Chemical compound [Fe+2] CWYNVVGOOAEACU-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- VTLYFUHAOXGGBS-UHFFFAOYSA-N Fe3+ Chemical compound [Fe+3] VTLYFUHAOXGGBS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 241000589921 Leptospirillum ferrooxidans Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000134732 Metallosphaera Species 0.000 description 1
- 241001134777 Sulfobacillus Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000205101 Sulfolobus Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000011941 Tilia x europaea Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- NIXOWILDQLNWCW-UHFFFAOYSA-N acrylic acid group Chemical group C(C=C)(=O)O NIXOWILDQLNWCW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000013019 agitation Methods 0.000 description 1
- -1 alkylbenzene sulfonates Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 239000010828 animal waste Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000012298 atmosphere Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229910052799 carbon Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 210000004027 cell Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000004927 clay Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000002817 coal dust Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910001431 copper ion Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004090 dissolution Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005363 electrowinning Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000003995 emulsifying agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000001804 emulsifying effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007613 environmental effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 231100000584 environmental toxicity Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002349 favourable effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000835 fiber Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000012530 fluid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000010881 fly ash Substances 0.000 description 1
- 210000000497 foam cell Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 238000009472 formulation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000003517 fume Substances 0.000 description 1
- 150000004676 glycans Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 229910001385 heavy metal Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000003864 humus Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229930195733 hydrocarbon Natural products 0.000 description 1
- 150000002430 hydrocarbons Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 239000004615 ingredient Substances 0.000 description 1
- 150000002500 ions Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- JEIPFZHSYJVQDO-UHFFFAOYSA-N iron(III) oxide Inorganic materials O=[Fe]O[Fe]=O JEIPFZHSYJVQDO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000004816 latex Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920000126 latex Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000004571 lime Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920000847 nonoxynol Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000011368 organic material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000005416 organic matter Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000004033 plastic Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920001282 polysaccharide Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000005017 polysaccharide Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000000979 retarding effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000002002 slurry Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000725 suspension Substances 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C09—DYES; PAINTS; POLISHES; NATURAL RESINS; ADHESIVES; COMPOSITIONS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; APPLICATIONS OF MATERIALS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- C09K—MATERIALS FOR MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATIONS, NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
- C09K3/00—Materials not provided for elsewhere
- C09K3/22—Materials not provided for elsewhere for dust-laying or dust-absorbing
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
- C22B—PRODUCTION AND REFINING OF METALS; PRETREATMENT OF RAW MATERIALS
- C22B1/00—Preliminary treatment of ores or scrap
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
- C22B—PRODUCTION AND REFINING OF METALS; PRETREATMENT OF RAW MATERIALS
- C22B3/00—Extraction of metal compounds from ores or concentrates by wet processes
- C22B3/04—Extraction of metal compounds from ores or concentrates by wet processes by leaching
- C22B3/06—Extraction of metal compounds from ores or concentrates by wet processes by leaching in inorganic acid solutions, e.g. with acids generated in situ; in inorganic salt solutions other than ammonium salt solutions
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
- C22B—PRODUCTION AND REFINING OF METALS; PRETREATMENT OF RAW MATERIALS
- C22B3/00—Extraction of metal compounds from ores or concentrates by wet processes
- C22B3/20—Treatment or purification of solutions, e.g. obtained by leaching
- C22B3/26—Treatment or purification of solutions, e.g. obtained by leaching by liquid-liquid extraction using organic compounds
- C22B3/30—Oximes
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02P—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
- Y02P10/00—Technologies related to metal processing
- Y02P10/20—Recycling
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10S—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10S423/00—Chemistry of inorganic compounds
- Y10S423/09—Reaction techniques
- Y10S423/17—Microbiological reactions
Definitions
- This invention relates to a method for the control of dust during mining operations.
- compositions and methods are, however, often not satisfactory for use on ore at transfer points where the ore is dumped from one conveyor belt onto another or dumped from a conveyor belt onto a heap, since such dust suppressant compositions can interfere with further processing of the ore such as leaching and solvent extraction steps. This is a particular problem where bacteria are involved in heap leaching the ore.
- Dust control agents based on formulations containing conventional surfactants such as nonylphenol ethoxylates, alkylbenzene sulfonates, alcohol ethoxylates, etc., are toxic to these bacteria or are toxic to the bacteria when the quantities of the dust control agents are not closely monitored and controlled.
- aqueous dust suppressing compositions dust control agents
- certain alkyl polyglucosides which exhibit fast wetting times and weak emulsifying properties result in minimal interference with the phase separation step of the solvent extraction process for the recovery of heavy metals from their ores such as the recovery of copper from copper ore using heap, dump, or vat leaching in combination with solvent extraction and electrowinning, and in addition exhibit very low toxicity to the bacteria responsible for leaching copper and other metals from sulfide ores.
- the aqueous dust suppressing compositions of the invention can be applied directly to ore crushing, milling and transport, especially on conveyor belts, preferably at conveyor belt transfer points, as highly effective dust control agents.
- the alkyl polyglucosides used in the aqueous compositions of the invention have alkyl groups that contain an average of from 8 to 12 carbon atoms and a degree of polymerization of from 1.4 to 1.6.
- Such alkyl polyglucosides rapidly wet the solid material such as the ore and dust, etc., onto which they are applied, retard the rate of water evaporation from the applied solids, exhibit acceptable foaming levels and are environmentally acceptable in that they are readily biodegradable and exhibit low toxicity and favorable aquatic and eco-toxicity.
- the present invention accordingly relates to a process for suppressing dust on conveyor belts or at conveyor belt transfer points which comprises contacting the conveyor belt contents with a dust suppressing effective amount of an aqueous solution of an alkyl polyglucoside or alkyl polyglucoside mixture of the formula I
- R 1 is a monovalent alkyl radical having on average from 8 to 12 carbon atoms; Z is a glucose residue; a is a number having a value from 1.4 to 1.6.
- the above alkyl polyglucosides and mixtures thereof also provide rapid phase disengagement, clean interface after phase separation, rapid kinetics of metal extraction, good selectivity for metals such as copper over iron extraction, low tendency for foaming, and low viscosity for ease of handling.
- Prior methods and compositions for dust suppression are not all satisfactory for use in open pit copper oxide ore mining operations using solvent extraction for metal recovery because many of those surfactants used in the spray solutions interfere with the phase separation step.
- the copper is recovered from the ore by leaching with aqueous acid.
- the leaching is accomplished by trickling aqueous acid, such as dilute sulfuric acid, over and through pieces of ore having a relatively large surface area.
- the leach solution dissolves salts of copper and other metals as it trickles through the ore, to provide an aqueous solution of the mixture of metal values.
- the aqueous solution is mixed in tanks with an extraction reagent which is dissolved in an organic solvent, e.g., a hydrocarbon fraction. This is commonly referred to as the organic phase.
- the reagent includes an extractant chemical which selectively forms metal-extractant complex with the copper ions in preference to ions of other metals.
- the step of forming the complex is called the extraction or loading stage of the solvent extraction process.
- the organic phase is transferred to a large settling tank, where the organic solvent, now containing the copper-extractant complex in solution, is separated from the depleted aqueous solution (aqueous phase). This part of the process is called phase separation.
- phase separation does not occur cleanly when the leach solution is mixed with the organic phase during the solvent extraction process. That is, the surfactant acts as an emulsifier, causing the organic and aqueous phases to become suspended in each other thereby retarding the rate of phase separation and increasing entrainment values, thus adding cost to the entire process.
- compositions of the present invention cause minimal interference with the phase separation step, and this is true for sulfide ores as well as for oxidic ores and ores of other chemical composition.
- the sulfide ores are typically bioleached with iron and sulfur oxidizing bacteria, such as Thiobacillus ferrooxidans, Leptospirillum ferrooxidans, Thiobacillus thiooxidans, Sulfobacillus species (which naturally develop within bioheaps when the temperature rises above 40° C.), and other microorganisms such as the extremely thermophilic Archaea microorganisms that include Sulfolobus, Acidianus, and Metallosphaera species. In general, some or all of these bacteria are endemic in the ore.
- iron oxidizing bacteria oxidize ferrous iron to ferric iron which in turn oxidizes the sulfide ion to sulfur, resulting in liberation of the copper from the insoluble sulfide. It has now been discovered that the application of effective quantities of the aqueous dust suppressing compositions of the invention to the sulfide ores during crushing, milling or conveying, preferably at conveyor belt transfer points, does not result in toxic effects on the bacteria during the bioleaching step. In addition, close control over the quantities applied is generally not necessary since toxicity to the bacteria has not been found to be a serious problem.
- the term “conveyor belt transfer points” includes the transfer of ore from one conveyor belt onto another, and the dumping of ore from a conveyor belt into a heap.
- the term “dust” used herein means any particulate solid material that is susceptible to suspension in air or other atmospheric environment. Accordingly, the term dust includes particles having an average diameter of up to 1 mm (though typically only up to about 300 micron) and down into the fume range (e.g. typically as low as 0.001 micrometers).
- the particulate friable solid will be in a substantially dry, non-fluid environment, e.g. the solid will be comprised of less than about 15% by weight water.
- the friable solids can have a varying chemical composition.
- Examples include stones, ore particles, organic materials e.g. sawdust, grain dust, fiber dust, or animal waste, and mineral particles, especial silicic or carbonaceous minerals, e.g. coal dust, soil dust (humus and/or subsoil), gravel dust, fine clay, lime dust, fly ash, and the like.
- organic materials e.g. sawdust, grain dust, fiber dust, or animal waste
- mineral particles especial silicic or carbonaceous minerals, e.g. coal dust, soil dust (humus and/or subsoil), gravel dust, fine clay, lime dust, fly ash, and the like.
- alkyl polyglucosides or mixtures thereof that are useful in the process according to the invention are those of the formula I
- R 1 is a monovalent organic radical having an average of from 8 to 12 carbon atoms; Z is a glucose residue; a is a number having a value from 1.4 to 1.6.
- alkyl polyglucosides are commercially available, for example, as APG®, GLUCOPON®, PLANTAREN® or AGRIMUL® surfactants from Cognis Corporation, Ambler, Pa., 19002. Examples of such surfactants include but are not limited to:
- GLUCOPON® 220 Surfactant—an alkyl polyglucoside in which the alkyl group contains 8 to 10 carbon atoms, an average alkyl group size of about 9.1 carbon atoms, and having an average degree of polymerization of 1.5.
- APG® 325 Surfactant—an alkyl polyglucoside in which the alkyl group contains 9 to 11 carbon atoms and having an average degree of polymerization of 1.6.
- GLUCOPON® 425 Surfactant—an alkyl polyglucoside in which the alkyl group contains 8 to 16 carbon atoms, an average alkyl group size of about 10.3 carbon atoms, and having an average degree of polymerization of 1.45.
- the GLUCOPON® 425N surfactant is identical to GLUCOPON® 425 except that it has been neutralized.
- GLUCOPON® 225 Surfactant—an alkyl polyglucoside in which the alkyl group contains 8 to 10 carbon atoms, an average alkyl group size of about 9.1 carbon atoms, and, having an average degree of polymerization of 1.7.
- GLUCOPON® 625 Surfactant—an alkyl polyglucoside in which the alkyl group contains 12 to 16 carbon atoms, an average alkyl group size of about 12.8 carbon atoms, and having an average degree of polymerization of 1.6.
- aqueous solutions can be placed in contact with the friable solid material in any manner effective to suppress the generation of dust therefrom, such as by spraying.
- the amount of the alkyl polyglucoside in the spray solution is an effective amount which is any amount effective to suppress the generation of dust from the friable solid onto which the solution is applied. Typically, the amount will be from about 5 ppm to about 1000 ppm of alkyl polyglucoside in water with the preferred amount being from about 10 ppm to about 100 ppm.
- these aqueous solutions can also contain a hydrophilic binder material, such as an acrylic latex or a polysaccharide.
- GLUCOPON® 625 is not according to the invention because it's average alkyl group size is 12.8 carbons.
- DUSTCON® is not according to the invention because it is does not contain an alkyl polyglucoside.
- GLUCOPON® 625 is undesirable for two reasons. (1) It contributes to the formation of “rag” at the organic/aqueous interface after phase separation.
- Rag is a relatively stable network of organic film that is suspended from the interface in the aqueous phase.
- Solvent extraction is normally conducted in continuous mixer-settlers, so that emulsion from the mixer must continuously and rapidly coalesce in the settler. If organic matter, such as “rag”, builds up excessively, it will be swept out of the settler with the aqueous phase and be lost from the solvent extraction unit.
- the rate of phase separation is too slow (see DUSTCON®), the emulsion itself will be swept out of the settler; this is known as “flooding:, and constitutes an emergency situation that is dealt with by shutdown of the solvent extraction unit or by much slower flow rates.
- the viscosity of undiluted material is very high. It would need to be diluted several times with water to be practical to handle in a mining situation.
- the surfactant is diluted as the application reservoirs are filled with water. This takes place in a very short time, and the turbulence when filling the container provides the agitation to mix and dilute the surfactant from a high concentration (25%-50%) to the application concentration (typically 10-100 ppm).
- a very high viscosity material would not only be difficult to pump, it would be slow to disperse to a uniform concentration.
- DUSTCON® is also undesirable for three reasons. (1) Its heavy rag level will promote substantial entrainment of organic phase. (2) The slow phase disengagement rate will tend to cause flooding, limiting the rate at which liquids can be passed through a mixer-settler. (3) The higher tendency for foaming means greater problems when handling solutions.
- 1-DUSTCON® is a commercial dust suppressant which is a trademark product of Nalco, Inc.
- E60 is the copper extraction point at 60 seconds.
- E300 is the copper extraction point at 300 seconds.
- Fe300 is the amount of iron extracted at 300 seconds.
- GLUCOPON® 425N Reached 850 ml in 3 min, then decreased to 600 ml.
- GLUCOPON® 220UP Remained between 200-250 ml foam.
- GLUCOPON® 220UP Reached 400 ml in 1.5 min, then retreated to 200 ml.
- GLUCOPON® 220UP Reached 450 ml in 2.5 min, then retreated to 300 ml.
- the time to reach 47 g is: Surfactant-ppm active 1 st Set 2 nd Set Water 2.0 hr 2.1 hr DUSTCON ® 50 ppm 2.3 hr 2.4 hr GLUCOPON ® 425 N-50 ppm 2.7 hr 2.5 hr
- dust control agents of the invention were aqueous (deionized water) solutions of an alkyl polyglucoside in which the alkyl groups contains 8 to 16 carbon atoms, an average alkyl group size of about 10.3 carbon atoms, and the polyglucoside has an average degree of polymerization of 1.45 (GLUCOPON® 425 Surfactant).
- a typical low grade ore primarily chalcocite, was obtained from a mining operation in the Southwestern US and was pulverized to minus 100 mesh.
- Two 200 gram portions of the dry ore were placed in thin layers in the bottoms of plastic pans (10′′ ⁇ 15′′) and sprayed with either 5 ml of deionized water as a control or 5 ml of 20 ppm GLUCOPON® 425 Surfactant.
- Each sample of treated ore was then dried at room temperature. 100 grams of each sample was added to 400 ml of Kelly medium (MKM) mineral salts in 1000 ml Erlenmeyer flasks.
- MKM Kelly medium
- Each flask was inoculated with 10 ml of a 1:1 by weight mix of a leach solution obtained from a copper mining operation in the Southwestern US which is actively leaching chalcocite ore. This leach solution was collected in sterile bottles and contained bacteria active in the bioleaching of chalcocite ore.
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Materials Engineering (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Geochemistry & Mineralogy (AREA)
- Geology (AREA)
- Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Metallurgy (AREA)
- Inorganic Chemistry (AREA)
- Manufacture And Refinement Of Metals (AREA)
- Extraction Or Liquid Replacement (AREA)
Abstract
Process for the control of dust on ore handling points comprising applying to the ore an aqueous solution of an alkyl polyglucoside having an average of from 8 to 12 carbon atoms and a degree of polymerization of from 1.4 to 1.6.
Description
- This application claims the benefit of copending provisional application serial No. 60/222,843, filed on Aug. 4, 2000, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
- This invention relates to a method for the control of dust during mining operations.
- In the mining and processing of ores, ore handling points such as milling, crushing, stockpiling, dump pockets and conveyor belt transfer points give rise to significant airborne dust pollution problems. This is a particular problem with ores such as copper ores since many copper mines are located in arid regions of the world. There are increasing pressures to control dust for environmental reasons as well as for protecting the health of mine workers. Conventional mine dust suppression methods typically comprise spraying a solution of a dust suppressant composition onto surfaces that normally generate dust such as haul roads, etc. These compositions and methods are, however, often not satisfactory for use on ore at transfer points where the ore is dumped from one conveyor belt onto another or dumped from a conveyor belt onto a heap, since such dust suppressant compositions can interfere with further processing of the ore such as leaching and solvent extraction steps. This is a particular problem where bacteria are involved in heap leaching the ore. Dust control agents based on formulations containing conventional surfactants such as nonylphenol ethoxylates, alkylbenzene sulfonates, alcohol ethoxylates, etc., are toxic to these bacteria or are toxic to the bacteria when the quantities of the dust control agents are not closely monitored and controlled.
- There is a strong need for dust control agents that can be freely used on ores during crushing, milling, conveying and stockpiling, i.e. dust control agents that do not interfere with the further processing of the ores, including the bioleaching of sulfide ores.
- It has now been discovered that aqueous dust suppressing compositions (dust control agents) containing certain alkyl polyglucosides which exhibit fast wetting times and weak emulsifying properties result in minimal interference with the phase separation step of the solvent extraction process for the recovery of heavy metals from their ores such as the recovery of copper from copper ore using heap, dump, or vat leaching in combination with solvent extraction and electrowinning, and in addition exhibit very low toxicity to the bacteria responsible for leaching copper and other metals from sulfide ores. Hence, the aqueous dust suppressing compositions of the invention can be applied directly to ore crushing, milling and transport, especially on conveyor belts, preferably at conveyor belt transfer points, as highly effective dust control agents.
- The alkyl polyglucosides used in the aqueous compositions of the invention have alkyl groups that contain an average of from 8 to 12 carbon atoms and a degree of polymerization of from 1.4 to 1.6. Such alkyl polyglucosides rapidly wet the solid material such as the ore and dust, etc., onto which they are applied, retard the rate of water evaporation from the applied solids, exhibit acceptable foaming levels and are environmentally acceptable in that they are readily biodegradable and exhibit low toxicity and favorable aquatic and eco-toxicity. The present invention accordingly relates to a process for suppressing dust on conveyor belts or at conveyor belt transfer points which comprises contacting the conveyor belt contents with a dust suppressing effective amount of an aqueous solution of an alkyl polyglucoside or alkyl polyglucoside mixture of the formula I
- R1O(Z)a I
- wherein R 1 is a monovalent alkyl radical having on average from 8 to 12 carbon atoms; Z is a glucose residue; a is a number having a value from 1.4 to 1.6.
- The above alkyl polyglucosides and mixtures thereof also provide rapid phase disengagement, clean interface after phase separation, rapid kinetics of metal extraction, good selectivity for metals such as copper over iron extraction, low tendency for foaming, and low viscosity for ease of handling.
- Other than in the operating examples, or where other indicated, all numbers expressing quantities of ingredients or reaction conditions used herein are to be understood as modified in all instances by the term “about”.
- While the present methods and compositions can be used with metal ores including metal sulfide ores other than copper ores, the following description will be directed to copper ores for which the invention will most likely have the greatest applicability.
- Prior methods and compositions for dust suppression, as discussed above, are not all satisfactory for use in open pit copper oxide ore mining operations using solvent extraction for metal recovery because many of those surfactants used in the spray solutions interfere with the phase separation step. More specifically, in open pit copper mining operations wherein the ore is referred to as oxide ore, the copper is recovered from the ore by leaching with aqueous acid. The leaching is accomplished by trickling aqueous acid, such as dilute sulfuric acid, over and through pieces of ore having a relatively large surface area. The leach solution dissolves salts of copper and other metals as it trickles through the ore, to provide an aqueous solution of the mixture of metal values. The aqueous solution is mixed in tanks with an extraction reagent which is dissolved in an organic solvent, e.g., a hydrocarbon fraction. This is commonly referred to as the organic phase.
- The reagent includes an extractant chemical which selectively forms metal-extractant complex with the copper ions in preference to ions of other metals.
- The step of forming the complex is called the extraction or loading stage of the solvent extraction process. The organic phase is transferred to a large settling tank, where the organic solvent, now containing the copper-extractant complex in solution, is separated from the depleted aqueous solution (aqueous phase). This part of the process is called phase separation.
- Usually, the process of extraction is repeated through two or more mixer/settler stages, in order to more completely extract the desired metal.
- The process is described in detail in U.S. Pat. No. 4,582,689, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
- If the ore that is used is coated with conventional surfactants used for dust control and these surfactants enter the leach solution during the leaching step, phase separation does not occur cleanly when the leach solution is mixed with the organic phase during the solvent extraction process. That is, the surfactant acts as an emulsifier, causing the organic and aqueous phases to become suspended in each other thereby retarding the rate of phase separation and increasing entrainment values, thus adding cost to the entire process.
- The compositions of the present invention cause minimal interference with the phase separation step, and this is true for sulfide ores as well as for oxidic ores and ores of other chemical composition.
- With specific reference to copper sulfide ores and other metal sulfide ores, the sulfide ores are typically bioleached with iron and sulfur oxidizing bacteria, such as Thiobacillus ferrooxidans, Leptospirillum ferrooxidans, Thiobacillus thiooxidans, Sulfobacillus species (which naturally develop within bioheaps when the temperature rises above 40° C.), and other microorganisms such as the extremely thermophilic Archaea microorganisms that include Sulfolobus, Acidianus, and Metallosphaera species. In general, some or all of these bacteria are endemic in the ore. In the bioleaching step, iron oxidizing bacteria oxidize ferrous iron to ferric iron which in turn oxidizes the sulfide ion to sulfur, resulting in liberation of the copper from the insoluble sulfide. It has now been discovered that the application of effective quantities of the aqueous dust suppressing compositions of the invention to the sulfide ores during crushing, milling or conveying, preferably at conveyor belt transfer points, does not result in toxic effects on the bacteria during the bioleaching step. In addition, close control over the quantities applied is generally not necessary since toxicity to the bacteria has not been found to be a serious problem.
- The term “conveyor belt transfer points” includes the transfer of ore from one conveyor belt onto another, and the dumping of ore from a conveyor belt into a heap. The term “dust” used herein means any particulate solid material that is susceptible to suspension in air or other atmospheric environment. Accordingly, the term dust includes particles having an average diameter of up to 1 mm (though typically only up to about 300 micron) and down into the fume range (e.g. typically as low as 0.001 micrometers). The particulate friable solid will be in a substantially dry, non-fluid environment, e.g. the solid will be comprised of less than about 15% by weight water. The friable solids can have a varying chemical composition. Examples include stones, ore particles, organic materials e.g. sawdust, grain dust, fiber dust, or animal waste, and mineral particles, especial silicic or carbonaceous minerals, e.g. coal dust, soil dust (humus and/or subsoil), gravel dust, fine clay, lime dust, fly ash, and the like.
- As discussed above, the alkyl polyglucosides or mixtures thereof that are useful in the process according to the invention are those of the formula I
- R1O(z)a I
- wherein R 1 is a monovalent organic radical having an average of from 8 to 12 carbon atoms; Z is a glucose residue; a is a number having a value from 1.4 to 1.6. Such alkyl polyglucosides are commercially available, for example, as APG®, GLUCOPON®, PLANTAREN® or AGRIMUL® surfactants from Cognis Corporation, Ambler, Pa., 19002. Examples of such surfactants include but are not limited to:
- 1. GLUCOPON® 220 Surfactant—an alkyl polyglucoside in which the alkyl group contains 8 to 10 carbon atoms, an average alkyl group size of about 9.1 carbon atoms, and having an average degree of polymerization of 1.5.
- 2. APG® 325 Surfactant—an alkyl polyglucoside in which the alkyl group contains 9 to 11 carbon atoms and having an average degree of polymerization of 1.6.
- 3. GLUCOPON® 425 Surfactant—an alkyl polyglucoside in which the alkyl group contains 8 to 16 carbon atoms, an average alkyl group size of about 10.3 carbon atoms, and having an average degree of polymerization of 1.45. The GLUCOPON® 425N surfactant is identical to GLUCOPON® 425 except that it has been neutralized.
- Related Cognis surfactants that are however, outside the scope of the invention, include the following:
- 1. GLUCOPON® 225 Surfactant—an alkyl polyglucoside in which the alkyl group contains 8 to 10 carbon atoms, an average alkyl group size of about 9.1 carbon atoms, and, having an average degree of polymerization of 1.7.
- 2. GLUCOPON® 625 Surfactant—an alkyl polyglucoside in which the alkyl group contains 12 to 16 carbon atoms, an average alkyl group size of about 12.8 carbon atoms, and having an average degree of polymerization of 1.6.
- Solutions of the alkyl polyglucosides are applied to the solid materials on the conveyor belts or at conveyor belt transfer points as described above.
- These aqueous solutions can be placed in contact with the friable solid material in any manner effective to suppress the generation of dust therefrom, such as by spraying.
- The amount of the alkyl polyglucoside in the spray solution is an effective amount which is any amount effective to suppress the generation of dust from the friable solid onto which the solution is applied. Typically, the amount will be from about 5 ppm to about 1000 ppm of alkyl polyglucoside in water with the preferred amount being from about 10 ppm to about 100 ppm.
- In addition to the above alkyl polyglucosides, these aqueous solutions can also contain a hydrophilic binder material, such as an acrylic latex or a polysaccharide.
- The invention will be illustrated but not limited by the following examples.
- The following dust suppressants were tested by a standard Cognis QC extraction performance test that was conducted using 5w/v % 5-nonyl-2-hydroxyacetopheneone oxime with Cu/Fe aqueous feed spiked with surfactant at the indicated level of active component. The results are set forth in Table 1 below:
TABLE 1 50 ppm active, surfactant Undiluted Ave. C's in Degree of Phase Sep, Viscosity, Surfactant the alkyl Polym'n sec Interface Foaming Rate cps GLUCOPON ® 9.1 1.5 96 clean 225 ml max 2800 220 GLUCOPON ® 10.3 1.6 95 clean 850 ml max 550 425 GLUCOPON ® 12.8 1.4 48 Some rag ND 21,500 625a DUSTCON ®a NR NR 200 Heavy rag 1200 ml in 3.5 ND min - Discussion
- GLUCOPON® 625 is not according to the invention because it's average alkyl group size is 12.8 carbons. DUSTCON® is not according to the invention because it is does not contain an alkyl polyglucoside.
- GLUCOPON® 625 is undesirable for two reasons. (1) It contributes to the formation of “rag” at the organic/aqueous interface after phase separation.
- This is believed due to the higher average carbon length of the alkyl chain, causing a greater tendency to stabilize emulsions. Rag is a relatively stable network of organic film that is suspended from the interface in the aqueous phase. Solvent extraction is normally conducted in continuous mixer-settlers, so that emulsion from the mixer must continuously and rapidly coalesce in the settler. If organic matter, such as “rag”, builds up excessively, it will be swept out of the settler with the aqueous phase and be lost from the solvent extraction unit. If the rate of phase separation is too slow (see DUSTCON®), the emulsion itself will be swept out of the settler; this is known as “flooding:, and constitutes an emergency situation that is dealt with by shutdown of the solvent extraction unit or by much slower flow rates. (2) The viscosity of undiluted material is very high. It would need to be diluted several times with water to be practical to handle in a mining situation. Typically, the surfactant is diluted as the application reservoirs are filled with water. This takes place in a very short time, and the turbulence when filling the container provides the agitation to mix and dilute the surfactant from a high concentration (25%-50%) to the application concentration (typically 10-100 ppm). A very high viscosity material would not only be difficult to pump, it would be slow to disperse to a uniform concentration. DUSTCON® is also undesirable for three reasons. (1) Its heavy rag level will promote substantial entrainment of organic phase. (2) The slow phase disengagement rate will tend to cause flooding, limiting the rate at which liquids can be passed through a mixer-settler. (3) The higher tendency for foaming means greater problems when handling solutions.
- 1. Performance Data
- a. Batch SX Data
- The standard Cognis QC extraction performance test was conducted using 5 w/v % 5-nonyl-2-hydroxyacetophenone oxime with Cu/Fe aqueous feed spiked with surfactant at the indicated level of active component. The following abbreviations are used in all the tables below.
- 1-DUSTCON® is a commercial dust suppressant which is a trademark product of Nalco, Inc.
- 2—E60 is the copper extraction point at 60 seconds.
- 3—E300 is the copper extraction point at 300 seconds.
- 4—Fe300 is the amount of iron extracted at 300 seconds.
- 5—Cu/Fe is the copper/iron ratio.
- 6—Kinetics refers to the amount of copper extracted at 60 seconds as a % of the amount at 300 seconds.
- 7—Phase Separation is the time required for the emulsion to separate completely into distinct organic and aqueous phases.
Series 1 Surfactant None DUSTCON ®1 ppm Active Blank 50 ppm E60, g/l2 3.92, 3.90 3.91, 3.99 E300, g/l3 4.17, 3.99 4.09, 4.06 Fe3004, mg/l 1.2, 1.1 3.9, 3.9 Cu/Fe5 3433, 3627 1048, 1041 Kinetics6 94, 98% 96, 98% Phase Sep, sec. 65, 75 s 233, 177 s clean heavy rag -
Series 2 1:1 GLUCO- GLUCO- GLUCO- PON ® PON ® PON ® Surfactant Blank 625 220 625:220 ppm Active none 50 ppm 50 ppm 25:25 ppm E60, g/l 3.84, 3.93 3.27, 3.27 3.79, 3.81 3.56, 3.55 E300, g/l 3.99, 3.99 3.91, 3.96 4.09, 4.11 4.06, 3.99 Fe300, mg/l 1.48, 1.48 2.42, 2.38 1.63, 1.63 1.95, 2.01 Cu/Fe 2696, 2696 1616, 1664 2509, 2521 2082, 1985 Kinetics 96, 98% 84, 83% 93, 93% 88, 89% Phase Sep 106, 109 s 47, 48 s 97, 94 s 81, 76 s sec. clean rag clean sl. rag -
Series 3 GLUCOPON ® GLUCOPON ® GLUCOPON ® Surfactant Blank DUSTCON ® 220 4257 425 ppm none 200 ppm 200 ppm 200 ppm 50 ppm Active E60, g/l 3.84, 3.96 3.82, 3.89 2.61, 2.81 2.47, 2.52 3.51, 3.53 E300, g/l 4.05, 4.12 3.85, 3.91 3.66, 3.70 3.47, 3.58 4.09, 4.02 Fe60, mg/l 2.06, 2.07 6.53, 6.36 3.27, 3.24 4.42, 4.05 3.72, 3.90 Cu/Fe 1864, 1913 590, 611 798, 827 785, 622 1099, 905 Kinetics 95, 96% 99, 99% 71, 76% 71, 70% 86, 88 Phase 108, 105 124, 122 —, 106 105, 109s —, 95 Sep sec. clean heavy rag rag some rag clean - c. Foaming Data
- Dynamic foam cell evaluations were conducted in which the foam level in a 2 L graduated cylinder is measured while circulating the solution and injecting onto the top at 4 L/min. The following data was obtained using 115 ppm hardness water, which corresponds to the water from a commercial mining operation. Times given are those required to reach 1200 ml foam volume, or descriptive results if 1200 ml wasn't reached.
- 50 ppm Active:
- DUSTCON®: 3.5 min.
- GLUCOPON® 425N: Reached 850 ml in 3 min, then decreased to 600 ml.
- GLUCOPON® 220UP: Remained between 200-250 ml foam.
- 75 ppm Active:
- DUSTCON®: 2.5 min.
- GLUCOPON® 425N: 4 min.
- GLUCOPON® 220UP: Reached 400 ml in 1.5 min, then retreated to 200 ml.
- 100 ppm Active:
- DUSTCON®: 2.3 min.
- GLUCOPON® 425N: 2.7 min.
- GLUCOPON® 220UP: Reached 450 ml in 2.5 min, then retreated to 300 ml.
- d. Evaporation Rate Data
- The table below gives data from two sets of evaporation rate studies. Both were done with haul road soil (with which the metal ores can be contaminated), screened to 30 mesh. Soil in a pan was spray wetted to 15% moisture using aqueous solutions of surfactants at the indicated ppm actives level. Pans were allowed to dry in 43% relative humidity atmosphere, and were weighed each hour. In the first set, five different conditions were scouted. In the second set, DUSTCON® and GLUCOPON® 425N were compared at 50 ppm active in duplicate tests. As a measure of evaporation rate, the percent of total water loss (equilibrium) which is gone in two hours is given in the following table.
% of Total Water Loss Observed in Two Hours Surfactant-ppm active 1st Set 2nd Set* DI water 75.9% 76.1% DUSTCON ®-50 ppm 70.7% 72.1% GLUCOPON ® 425 N-50 ppm 65.4% 68.1% GLUCOPON ® 425 N-200 ppm 67.1% GLUCOPON ® 220-50 ppm 66.5% -
Total Water Loss as % of Initial Weight Surfactant-ppm active 1st Set 2nd Set* DI water 13.9% 13.1% DUSTCON ®-50 ppm 13.5% 13.1% GLUCOPON ® 425 N-50 ppm 12.8% 13.2% GLUCOPON ® 425 N-200 ppm 12.9% GLUCOPON ® 220-50 ppm 13.3% - The time to reach 47 g (roughly equivalent to about 3% moisture remaining in the soil) is:
Surfactant-ppm active 1st Set 2nd Set Water 2.0 hr 2.1 hr DUSTCON ® 50 ppm 2.3 hr 2.4 hr GLUCOPON ® 425 N-50 ppm 2.7 hr 2.5 hr - Ore slurry tests were performed on dust control agents of the invention to determine their toxicity to iron oxidizing bacteria used in the bioleaching of sulfide ores. The dust control agents of the invention were aqueous (deionized water) solutions of an alkyl polyglucoside in which the alkyl groups contains 8 to 16 carbon atoms, an average alkyl group size of about 10.3 carbon atoms, and the polyglucoside has an average degree of polymerization of 1.45 (GLUCOPON® 425 Surfactant).
- A typical low grade ore, primarily chalcocite, was obtained from a mining operation in the Southwestern US and was pulverized to minus 100 mesh. Two 200 gram portions of the dry ore were placed in thin layers in the bottoms of plastic pans (10″×15″) and sprayed with either 5 ml of deionized water as a control or 5 ml of 20 ppm GLUCOPON® 425 Surfactant. Each sample of treated ore was then dried at room temperature. 100 grams of each sample was added to 400 ml of Kelly medium (MKM) mineral salts in 1000 ml Erlenmeyer flasks. Each flask was inoculated with 10 ml of a 1:1 by weight mix of a leach solution obtained from a copper mining operation in the Southwestern US which is actively leaching chalcocite ore. This leach solution was collected in sterile bottles and contained bacteria active in the bioleaching of chalcocite ore.
- Biooxidation began as rapidly in the flask containing the ore treated with the solution of GLUCOPON® 425 Surfactant as it did in the flask containing the ore treated with the deionized water. The dissolution of iron and copper proceeded at substantially the same rate and to essentially the same extent in each flask.
- The results obtained are set forth in TABLE 2 below:
TABLE 2 ml 10 ORP, Dissolved NH2SO4 mV (1) Dissolved Metals Cu, Bacteria Day pH added SHE Metals Fe, ppm ppm cells/ml CONTROL: UNSPRAYED ORE, UNINOCULATED FLASK 0 (1 hr) 1.77 0 582 236 336 2 2.65 1.0 564 — — 4 1.96 0 564 257 1487 6 2.06 0 571 292 1597 <106 8 2.07 0 574 225 1638 10 2.10 0.3 575 306 1694 1 × 106 13 1.96 0 577 182 1424 15 2.00 0 606 180 1572 CONTROL: ORE SPRAYED WITH DEIONIZED WATER AND INOCULATED 0 (1 hr) 1.98 0 538 310 323 2 3.64 1.0 554 — — 4 2.30 0.5 565 297 1431 6 2.24 0.5 666 310 1676 5 × 106 8 2.05 0 757 305 1805 10 2.09 0.3 775 446 2095 3 × 107 13 1.94 0 787 671 2480 15 1.95 0 784 788 2493 ORE SPRAYED WITH SOLUTION OF GLUCOPON ® 425 SURFACTANT & INOCULATED 0 (1 hr) 1.98 0 534 314 317 2 3.68 1.0 552 — — 4 2.32 0.5 564 295 1449 6 2.29 0.5 694 270 1673 5 × 106 8 2.06 0 760 315 1831 10 2.09 0.3 783 430 2075 3 × 107 13 1.94 0 793 676 2463 15 1.95 0 787 740 2512 - (1) Redox Potential
- The above results show that the dust suppressing compositions of the on in dust suppressing quantities do not inhibit and are not toxic to iron oxidizing bacteria when sprayed on sulfide ores.
Claims (28)
1. A method of suppressing dust at an ore handling point comprising wetting the ore and the dust with an aqueous composition comprising at least one alkyl polyglucoside in which the alkyl group contains an average of from 8 to 12 carbon atoms and the alkyl polyglucoside has degree of polymerization of from 1.4 to 1.6.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein the at least one alkyl polyglucoside has the formula
R1O(Z)a
wherein R1 is a monovalent alkyl radical having an average from 8 to 12 carbon atoms, Z is a glucose residue, and a is a number of from 1.4 to 1.6.
3. The method of claim 1 wherein the aqueous composition contains from about 5 ppm to about 1000 ppm of alkyl polyglucoside.
4. The method of claim 3 wherein the aqueous composition contains from about 10 ppm to about 100 ppm of alkyl polyglucoside.
5. The method of claim 2 wherein the alkyl polyglucoside is a mixture in which the alkyl group contains from 8 to 16 carbon atoms.
6. The method of claim 5 wherein the mixture of alkyl polyglucosides has an average degree of polymerization of about 1.45.
7. The method of claim 1 wherein the ore is a copper oxide ore.
8. The method of claim 1 wherein the aqueous composition also contains a hydrophilic binder material.
9. The method of claim 2 wherein the aqueous composition contains from about 5 ppm to about 1000 ppm of alkyl polyglucoside.
10. The method of claim 9 wherein the aqueous composition contains from about 10 ppm to about 100 ppm of alkyl polyglucoside.
11. The method of claim 2 wherein the ore is a copper oxide ore.
12. The method of claim 2 wherein the aqueous composition also contains a hydrophilic binder material.
13. A method of suppressing dust at a sulfide ore handling point comprising wetting the dust and the ore with an aqueous composition comprising at least one alkyl polyglucoside in which the alkyl groups contain an average of from 8 to 12 carbon atoms and the alkyl polyglucoside has a degree of polymerization of from 1.4 to 1.6.
14. The method of claim 13 wherein the aqueous solution contains from about 5 ppm to about 1000 ppm of alkyl polyglucosides.
15. The method of claim 13 wherein the aqueous solution contains from about 10 ppm to about 100 ppm of alkyl polyglucosides.
16. The method of claim 13 wherein the alkyl polyglucoside has a degree of polymerization of about 1.45, and an average alkyl group size of about 10.3 carbon atoms.
17. The method of claim 13 wherein the at least one alkyl polyglucoside has the formula
R1O(Z)a
wherein R1 is a monovalent alkyl radical having an average from 8 to 12 carbon atoms, Z is a glucose residue, and a is a number of from 1.4 to 1.6.
18. The method of claim 17 wherein the alkyl polyglucoside is a mixture in which the alkyl group contains from 8 to 16 carbon atoms.
19. The method of claim 18 wherein the mixture of alkyl polyglucosides has an average degree of polymerization of about 1.45.
20. The method of claim 13 wherein the ore is a copper sulfide ore.
21. The method of claim 13 wherein the aqueous composition also contains a hydrophilic binder material.
22. The method of claim 17 wherein the ore is a copper sulfide ore.
23. The method of claim 17 wherein the aqueous composition also contains a hydrophilic binder material.
24. The method of claim 13 wherein the sulfide ore is subsequently bioleached with iron and sulfur oxidizing bacteria.
25. The method of claim 20 wherein the copper sulfide ore is subsequently bio-leached with iron and sulfur oxidizing bacteria.
26. A process for extracting metals from metal ores comprising the steps of
A) wetting the metal ore and associated dust at one or more ore handling points with an aqueous composition comprising at least one alkyl polyglucoside in which the alkyl group contains an average of from 8 to 12 carbon atoms and the alkyl polyglucoside has degree of polymerization of from 1.4 to 1.6;
B) forming a metal-pregnant acid leach solution by contacting an aqueous strong acid with the metal ore to produce a metal-pregnant acid leach solution;
C) contacting the resulting metal-pregnant acid leach solution with an oxime extractant in a water-immiscible organic solvent;
D) separating the resulting metal-depleted acid leach solution from the resulting metal-pregnant organic solution;
E) stripping the metal from the metal-pregnant organic solution with an aqueous strip solution; and
F) obtaining the metal values from the aqueous strip solution.
27. The process of claim 26 wherein the metal ore is a copper ore.
28. The process of claim 27 wherein the copper ore is a copper sulfide ore which following step A) and prior to step B) is bioleached with iron and sulfur oxidizing bacteria.
Priority Applications (4)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US09/899,354 US6432166B1 (en) | 2000-08-04 | 2001-07-05 | Dust control |
| PCT/US2001/022047 WO2002012574A1 (en) | 2000-08-04 | 2001-07-12 | Dust control |
| AU2001275904A AU2001275904A1 (en) | 2000-08-04 | 2001-07-12 | Dust control |
| PE2001000729A PE20020491A1 (en) | 2000-08-04 | 2001-07-18 | PROCESS TO EXTRACT METALS FROM MINES THAT CONTAIN THEM |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US22284300P | 2000-08-04 | 2000-08-04 | |
| US09/899,354 US6432166B1 (en) | 2000-08-04 | 2001-07-05 | Dust control |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| US6432166B1 US6432166B1 (en) | 2002-08-13 |
| US20020134201A1 true US20020134201A1 (en) | 2002-09-26 |
Family
ID=26917202
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| US09/899,354 Expired - Fee Related US6432166B1 (en) | 2000-08-04 | 2001-07-05 | Dust control |
Country Status (4)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US6432166B1 (en) |
| AU (1) | AU2001275904A1 (en) |
| PE (1) | PE20020491A1 (en) |
| WO (1) | WO2002012574A1 (en) |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20040191401A1 (en) * | 2003-02-19 | 2004-09-30 | Bytnar Stephen C. | Methods and compositions for dust and erosion control |
Families Citing this family (10)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20050085407A1 (en) * | 2003-10-17 | 2005-04-21 | Colgate-Palmolive Company | Dust control composition |
| US7005005B2 (en) * | 2003-11-26 | 2006-02-28 | Sequoia Pacific Research Company, Llc | Soil bind and revegetation compositions and methods of making and using such compositions |
| US6881008B1 (en) | 2003-11-26 | 2005-04-19 | Sequoia Pacific Research Company, Ltd. | Particle binding compositions and methods of making and using such compositions |
| US7021864B2 (en) * | 2003-11-26 | 2006-04-04 | Sequoia Pacific Research Company, Llc | Soil binding and revegetation compositions and methods of making and using such compositions |
| CN101035728B (en) * | 2004-10-08 | 2012-02-22 | 纳幕尔杜邦公司 | Methods of Suppressing Dust |
| US20070004811A1 (en) * | 2005-06-29 | 2007-01-04 | Georgia-Pacific Resins, Inc. | Polymerized oil for use as a dust control agent |
| US8298439B2 (en) | 2011-03-30 | 2012-10-30 | Nalco Company | Chemical binder for coating payload in open top hopper cars, trucks, piles, and similar storage/shipping containers |
| US8465667B2 (en) | 2011-03-30 | 2013-06-18 | Nalco Company | Chemical additives to inhibit the air oxidation and spontaneous combustion of coal |
| US9623454B2 (en) | 2014-02-15 | 2017-04-18 | Ecolab Usa Inc. | Method and composition for dust control |
| US9505965B2 (en) | 2014-06-18 | 2016-11-29 | Ecolab Usa Inc. | Composition for dust control and improved material handling |
Family Cites Families (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US4582689A (en) | 1982-02-22 | 1986-04-15 | Henkel Corporation | Solvent extraction process |
| US5143645A (en) * | 1987-04-24 | 1992-09-01 | Betz Laboratories | Method for suppressing process dust emissions using a salt of a fatty acid as a foaming agent |
| US5223165A (en) * | 1988-05-31 | 1993-06-29 | Henkel Kommanditgesellschaft Auf Aktien | Use of alkyl glycosides for dust suppression |
-
2001
- 2001-07-05 US US09/899,354 patent/US6432166B1/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2001-07-12 WO PCT/US2001/022047 patent/WO2002012574A1/en not_active Ceased
- 2001-07-12 AU AU2001275904A patent/AU2001275904A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2001-07-18 PE PE2001000729A patent/PE20020491A1/en not_active Application Discontinuation
Cited By (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20040191401A1 (en) * | 2003-02-19 | 2004-09-30 | Bytnar Stephen C. | Methods and compositions for dust and erosion control |
| US7157021B2 (en) | 2003-02-19 | 2007-01-02 | Archer-Daniels-Midland Company | Methods and compositions for dust and erosion control |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| PE20020491A1 (en) | 2002-07-09 |
| US6432166B1 (en) | 2002-08-13 |
| AU2001275904A1 (en) | 2002-02-18 |
| WO2002012574A1 (en) | 2002-02-14 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US5834294A (en) | Biooxidation process for recovery of metal values from sulfur-containing ore materials | |
| US5246486A (en) | Biooxidation process for recovery of gold from heaps of low-grade sulfidic and carbonaceous sulfidic ore materials | |
| US6410304B2 (en) | Method of biotreatment for solid materials in a nonstirred surface bioreactor | |
| US6432166B1 (en) | Dust control | |
| US20240295006A1 (en) | Extracting base metals using a wetting agent and a thiocarbonyl functional group reagent | |
| US5196052A (en) | Bacterial-assisted heap leaching of ores | |
| US8021870B2 (en) | Method of biotreating a solid material comprising an organic compound | |
| EA038541B1 (en) | Leaching aids and methods of using leaching aids | |
| EP3042969B1 (en) | Method of leaching of minerals concentrates | |
| US6099615A (en) | Method for improved percolation through ore heaps by agglomerating ore with a surfactant and polymer mixture | |
| US6383458B1 (en) | Biooxidation process for recovery of metal values from sulfur-containing ore materials | |
| AU749366B2 (en) | Silver catalysed leaching of chalcopyrite ore | |
| US6083730A (en) | Nonstirred bioreactor for processing refractory sulfide concentrates and method for operating same | |
| AU716911B2 (en) | Method of biotreatment for solid materials in a nonstirred surface bioreactor | |
| US20020037245A1 (en) | Method for segregating metals and minerals from one another by leaching | |
| MXPA01009578A (en) | A method of suppressing dust in a mine using an alkyl polyglucoside composition. | |
| DE4112933C2 (en) | Process for the prevention and blocking of microbial leaching processes of sulfide and metal containing materials | |
| RU2065503C1 (en) | Method for recovery of metals (its versions) and dump | |
| JP3991934B2 (en) | Method of leaching copper from copper sulfide ores containing chalcopyrite | |
| KR100360182B1 (en) | Method of Biotreatment for Solid Materials In A Nonstirred Surface Bioreactor |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| AS | Assignment |
Owner name: COGNIS CORPORATION (COGNIS CORP.), PENNSYLVANIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:OLAFSON, STEPHEN M.;VIRNIG, MICHAEL J;FISHER, G. TIMOTHY;REEL/FRAME:012538/0218;SIGNING DATES FROM 20010927 TO 20011218 |
|
| FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
| REMI | Maintenance fee reminder mailed | ||
| LAPS | Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees | ||
| STCH | Information on status: patent discontinuation |
Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362 |
|
| FP | Lapsed due to failure to pay maintenance fee |
Effective date: 20100813 |