US12119880B2 - Rapid polarization tracking in an optical channel - Google Patents
Rapid polarization tracking in an optical channel Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US12119880B2 US12119880B2 US16/988,874 US202016988874A US12119880B2 US 12119880 B2 US12119880 B2 US 12119880B2 US 202016988874 A US202016988874 A US 202016988874A US 12119880 B2 US12119880 B2 US 12119880B2
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- optical
- signal
- optical data
- intensity
- polarization
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 title claims abstract description 212
- 230000010287 polarization Effects 0.000 title claims abstract description 59
- 238000005070 sampling Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 20
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 claims description 32
- 239000013598 vector Substances 0.000 claims description 24
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 claims description 14
- 238000001228 spectrum Methods 0.000 claims description 12
- 230000003044 adaptive effect Effects 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000011084 recovery Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000001427 coherent effect Effects 0.000 abstract description 8
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 description 8
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 8
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 7
- 239000000835 fiber Substances 0.000 description 7
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 6
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 description 6
- 230000036962 time dependent Effects 0.000 description 6
- 238000012937 correction Methods 0.000 description 5
- 239000013307 optical fiber Substances 0.000 description 4
- 230000010363 phase shift Effects 0.000 description 4
- 102100040862 Dual specificity protein kinase CLK1 Human genes 0.000 description 3
- 101000749294 Homo sapiens Dual specificity protein kinase CLK1 Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000010561 standard procedure Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000012935 Averaging Methods 0.000 description 2
- 102100040844 Dual specificity protein kinase CLK2 Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 101000749291 Homo sapiens Dual specificity protein kinase CLK2 Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 230000003321 amplification Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000000969 carrier Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000008878 coupling Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000010168 coupling process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000005859 coupling reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000003199 nucleic acid amplification method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000010521 absorption reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000853 adhesive Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000001070 adhesive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000011230 binding agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000001413 cellular effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000021615 conjugation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000006735 deficit Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000006185 dispersion Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007689 inspection Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000002372 labelling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000013178 mathematical model Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010606 normalization Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001902 propagating effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000011664 signaling Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007704 transition Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04B—TRANSMISSION
- H04B10/00—Transmission systems employing electromagnetic waves other than radio-waves, e.g. infrared, visible or ultraviolet light, or employing corpuscular radiation, e.g. quantum communication
- H04B10/60—Receivers
- H04B10/61—Coherent receivers
- H04B10/614—Coherent receivers comprising one or more polarization beam splitters, e.g. polarization multiplexed [PolMux] X-PSK coherent receivers, polarization diversity heterodyne coherent receivers
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04B—TRANSMISSION
- H04B10/00—Transmission systems employing electromagnetic waves other than radio-waves, e.g. infrared, visible or ultraviolet light, or employing corpuscular radiation, e.g. quantum communication
- H04B10/07—Arrangements for monitoring or testing transmission systems; Arrangements for fault measurement of transmission systems
- H04B10/075—Arrangements for monitoring or testing transmission systems; Arrangements for fault measurement of transmission systems using an in-service signal
- H04B10/077—Arrangements for monitoring or testing transmission systems; Arrangements for fault measurement of transmission systems using an in-service signal using a supervisory or additional signal
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04B—TRANSMISSION
- H04B10/00—Transmission systems employing electromagnetic waves other than radio-waves, e.g. infrared, visible or ultraviolet light, or employing corpuscular radiation, e.g. quantum communication
- H04B10/07—Arrangements for monitoring or testing transmission systems; Arrangements for fault measurement of transmission systems
- H04B10/075—Arrangements for monitoring or testing transmission systems; Arrangements for fault measurement of transmission systems using an in-service signal
- H04B10/079—Arrangements for monitoring or testing transmission systems; Arrangements for fault measurement of transmission systems using an in-service signal using measurements of the data signal
- H04B10/0795—Performance monitoring; Measurement of transmission parameters
- H04B10/07951—Monitoring or measuring chromatic dispersion or PMD
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04B—TRANSMISSION
- H04B10/00—Transmission systems employing electromagnetic waves other than radio-waves, e.g. infrared, visible or ultraviolet light, or employing corpuscular radiation, e.g. quantum communication
- H04B10/25—Arrangements specific to fibre transmission
- H04B10/2507—Arrangements specific to fibre transmission for the reduction or elimination of distortion or dispersion
- H04B10/2569—Arrangements specific to fibre transmission for the reduction or elimination of distortion or dispersion due to polarisation mode dispersion [PMD]
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04B—TRANSMISSION
- H04B10/00—Transmission systems employing electromagnetic waves other than radio-waves, e.g. infrared, visible or ultraviolet light, or employing corpuscular radiation, e.g. quantum communication
- H04B10/50—Transmitters
- H04B10/516—Details of coding or modulation
- H04B10/54—Intensity modulation
- H04B10/541—Digital intensity or amplitude modulation
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04B—TRANSMISSION
- H04B10/00—Transmission systems employing electromagnetic waves other than radio-waves, e.g. infrared, visible or ultraviolet light, or employing corpuscular radiation, e.g. quantum communication
- H04B10/60—Receivers
- H04B10/61—Coherent receivers
- H04B10/616—Details of the electronic signal processing in coherent optical receivers
- H04B10/6164—Estimation or correction of the frequency offset between the received optical signal and the optical local oscillator
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04B—TRANSMISSION
- H04B10/00—Transmission systems employing electromagnetic waves other than radio-waves, e.g. infrared, visible or ultraviolet light, or employing corpuscular radiation, e.g. quantum communication
- H04B10/60—Receivers
- H04B10/61—Coherent receivers
- H04B10/616—Details of the electronic signal processing in coherent optical receivers
- H04B10/6166—Polarisation demultiplexing, tracking or alignment of orthogonal polarisation components
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04J—MULTIPLEX COMMUNICATION
- H04J14/00—Optical multiplex systems
- H04J14/06—Polarisation multiplex systems
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04B—TRANSMISSION
- H04B10/00—Transmission systems employing electromagnetic waves other than radio-waves, e.g. infrared, visible or ultraviolet light, or employing corpuscular radiation, e.g. quantum communication
- H04B10/50—Transmitters
- H04B10/501—Structural aspects
- H04B10/503—Laser transmitters
Definitions
- Various example embodiments relate to optical communication equipment and, more specifically but not exclusively, to state of polarization (SOP) measurements.
- SOP state of polarization
- a standard single-mode fiber typically supports two modes of propagation distinguished by their polarization. Due to optical birefringence in the fiber, the polarization modes may travel with different group velocities, and random changes in the birefringence along the fiber length typically result in random coupling between the modes. The resulting SOP rotation and polarization-mode-dispersion (PMD) phenomena may lead to signal impairments that can severely limit the transmission capacity of the fiber. Some ambient events, such as lightning or strong mechanical vibration, may even cause the fiber to rotate the SOP at speeds of several Mrad/s, which can trigger an optical-link outage.
- PMD polarization-mode-dispersion
- an optical receiver e.g., for an Optical Supervisory Channel (OSC), whose optical front end comprises a polarization-diversity coherent optical receiver configured to receive a conventional intensity-modulated (e.g., OSC) signal.
- OSC Optical Supervisory Channel
- four quadrature components of the received OSC signal detected by the polarization-diversity coherent optical receiver are sampled at a relatively high sampling rate and are used to calculate the Stokes parameters of the OSC signal.
- the Stokes parameters can be updated at the high sampling rate, which can be suitably selected to enable polarization tracking with a relatively high time resolution and/or at relatively high SOP-rotation speeds.
- the four detected quadrature components are appropriately combined in the receiver DSP to determine the intensity of the received OSC signal, which is then used in a conventional manner to recover the OSC data encoded therein.
- Some embodiments may advantageously be used to implement rapid polarization tracking for any slow optical channel employing intensity modulation without the use of polarization division multiplexing (PDM).
- PDM polarization division multiplexing
- the digital signal processor is further configured to recover data carried by the intensity-modulated optical data signal from a combination of the first, second, third, and fourth streams of digitalizations.
- FIG. 2 shows a block diagram of an optical communication and/or monitoring system, with a polarization tracking apparatus at the optical data receiver thereof, according to an embodiment
- FIG. 3 shows a block diagram of a digital circuit that can be used in the optical data receiver shown in FIG. 2 according to an embodiment
- FIGS. 4 A- 4 C graphically illustrate an example of polarization-tracking data that can be obtained in the optical communication and/or monitoring system of FIG. 2 according to an embodiment.
- E x r E y r J ⁇ ( ⁇ , ⁇ ) ⁇ [ E x t E y t ] ( 1 )
- E x t and E y t are the x and y components, respectively, of the Jones vector of the input light
- E x r and E y r are the x and y components, respectively, of the Jones vector of the output light
- J( ⁇ , ⁇ ) is the Jones matrix of the optical element given by Eq. (2):
- J ⁇ ( ⁇ , ⁇ ) [ cos ⁇ ⁇ ( ⁇ ) - e j ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ sin ⁇ ( ⁇ ) e j ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ sin ⁇ ⁇ ( ⁇ ) cos ⁇ ⁇ ( ⁇ ) ] ( 2 )
- 2 ⁇ and ⁇ are the elevation and azimuth polarization rotation angles, respectively, the values of which can be used to define the SOP.
- the above example of a Jones matrix does not include effects of optical attenuation and/or amplification.
- the unity-radius Poincare sphere can be obtained by normalizing the Stokes parameters with respect to the optical power P.
- the angles ⁇ and ⁇ are related to the normalized Stokes parameters S 1 ′, S 2 ′, and S 3 ′ as follows:
- polarization tracking refers to time-resolved measurements of the SOP of an optical signal.
- such polarization tracking may include determination, as a function of time, of the angles ⁇ and ⁇ .
- An Optical Supervisory Channel uses an out-of-band wavelength (e.g., 1510 nm, 1620 nm, 1310 nm, or some proprietary wavelength) that is outside the link's amplification band, e.g., the Erbium-doped fiber amplifier (EDFA) band.
- the OSC signal is typically used to carry control information about the corresponding in-band wavelength-division-multiplexed (WDM) optical signal and/or conditions at the remote optical terminal or amplifier. It may also be used for remote software updates or upgrades and some network-management operations.
- WDM wavelength-division-multiplexed
- the term “in-band” refers to one or more optical carriers from a WDM set used for user (e.g., network-customer, payload) data transport through the corresponding fiber-optic link. Subcarriers or dither tones that are spectrally located within the bandwidth allocated to the optical carrier are considered to be in-band.
- the term “out-of-band” should be construed as indicating the use of communications means that do not rely on or utilize any of the optical carriers from the WDM set or any of their subcarriers.
- An example of such out-of-band communications means is the Internet Protocol (IP) implemented over a wireline, wireless, or OSC connection.
- IP Internet Protocol
- Some in-band optical channels may be configured to use polarization division multiplexing (PDM), which is based on transmitting independently modulated data signals over orthogonal polarizations of the same optical carrier.
- PDM polarization division multiplexing
- QPSK Quadrature Phase Shift Keying
- QAM Quadrature Amplitude Modulation
- PDM and WDM can be used concurrently for at least some groups of in-band optical channels.
- An optical PDM receiver may employ an adaptive digital filter, e.g., a multiple-input/multiple-output (MIMO) equalizer, for electronic polarization demultiplexing.
- MIMO multiple-input/multiple-output
- a constant-modulus algorithm (CMA) or a multi-modulus algorithm (MMA) may be employed by the filter controller to adaptively update the filter-tap coefficients.
- An error signal used by the filter controller to drive the updates is typically produced by averaging slicing decisions over multiple signaling intervals (symbol time slots). As such, the speed with which the adaptive filter can react to SOP changes is inherently limited by the performed averaging and by the symbol rate of the PDM signal.
- An example embodiment may be based on an OSC receiver whose optical front end is modified to include a polarization-diversity coherent optical receiver connected to receive a conventional intensity-modulated OSC signal.
- Four quadrature components of the received OSC signal detected by the polarization-diversity coherent optical receiver are sampled at a relatively high sampling rate (e.g., at a rate that is higher than the symbol rate of the OSC signal) and then used to calculate the Stokes parameters of the OSC signal.
- the Stokes parameters can be updated at the high sampling rate, which can be suitably selected to enable polarization tracking at relatively high SOP-rotation speeds, e.g., of several Mrad/s or even higher.
- the four detected quadrature components are appropriately combined in the receiver DSP to determine the intensity of the received OSC signal, which can then be used in a conventional manner to recover the OSC data encoded therein.
- FIG. 2 shows a block diagram of an optical communication and/or monitoring system 200 according to an embodiment.
- system 200 is described below in reference to an Optical Supervisory Channel (OSC).
- OSC Optical Supervisory Channel
- alternative embodiments in which system 200 is used for a different (from OSC) application are also possible.
- system 200 comprises an optical data transmitter 210 and an optical data receiver 230 optically connected via an optical-fiber-communication link 220 .
- link 220 comprises one or more spans of optical fiber or fiber-optic cable, e.g., one or more spans of standard single-mode optical fiber.
- link 220 may include one or more optional optical amplifiers (not explicitly shown in FIG. 2 ), each connected between two corresponding fiber spans.
- link 220 may include other optical elements, e.g., one or more optical filters, splitters, switches, etc.
- some portions of link 220 may be implemented using planar optical waveguides and/or free-space optical connections.
- Optical data transmitter 210 comprises a laser source 202 , an optical modulator 206 , and an electrical drive circuit 212 connected as indicated in FIG. 2 .
- laser source 202 generates an optical carrier 204 having a carrier frequency f c .
- Optical modulator 206 then operates to modulate optical carrier 204 in response to an electrical drive signal 208 .
- a resulting modulated optical signal 218 is then applied to optical link 220 .
- optical modulator 206 can be an optical intensity modulator, e.g., an electro-absorption modulator (EAM), or an optical amplitude modulator, e.g., an appropriately configured Mach-Zehnder modulator (MZM).
- Drive circuit 212 is configured to generate electrical drive signal 208 for optical modulator 206 , e.g., as known in the pertinent art, in response to an electrical data signal 214 and a clock signal CLK 1 .
- Clock signal CLK 1 determines the symbol rate, R 1 , at which optical signal 218 is modulated.
- electrical data signal 214 may be an OSC data signal.
- electrical data signal 214 may be an amplitude-modulated electrical data signal.
- optical signal 218 is not a PDM signal and is generated to carry a single optical-symbol stream corresponding to data signal 214 .
- optical signal 218 may be linearly polarized, e.g., have a fixed linear polarization.
- optical signal 218 ′ After propagating through link 220 , optical signal 218 becomes optical signal 218 ′, which is applied to optical data receiver 230 .
- Optical signal 218 ′ may differ somewhat from optical signal 218 because link 220 typically imposes certain signal distortions, e.g., time-varying distortions well known to those skilled in the pertinent art.
- link 220 may cause the SOP of optical signal 218 ′ to differ from the SOP of optical signal 218 , e.g., due to the above-mentioned time-dependent SOP rotation in the optical fiber.
- a front-end circuit of optical receiver 230 comprises a polarization-diversity optical hybrid 60 , light detectors 62 1 - 62 4 , transimpedance amplifiers (TIAs) 64 1 - 64 4 , analog-to-digital converters (ADCs) 66 1 - 66 4 , and an optical local-oscillator (OLO) source (e.g., laser) 56 .
- Optical hybrid 60 has (i) two input ports labeled S and R and (ii) four output ports labeled 1 through 4 .
- Input port S receives optical signal 218 ′ from link 220 .
- Input port R receives an OLO signal 58 generated by OLO source 56 .
- OLO signal 58 has a fixed linear polarization and further has an optical-carrier frequency that is sufficiently close to the frequency f c of optical carrier 204 to enable coherent (e.g., homodyne or intradyne) detection of optical signal 218 ′.
- OLO source 56 can be implemented using a relatively stable tunable laser whose output wavelength (optical frequency) can be controllably tuned, e.g., using a control signal 54 .
- optical hybrid 60 operates to mix optical signal 218 ′ and OLO signal 58 to generate different mixed (e.g., by interference) optical signals (not explicitly shown in FIG. 2 ), the mixed optical signals being mixtures with different relative phase shifts and different polarization components of the optical signal 218 ′.
- Light detectors 62 1 - 62 4 then convert the mixed optical signals into four electrical signals 63 1 - 63 4 that are indicative of the quadratures of optical signal 218 ′.
- light detectors 62 1 - 62 4 may be balanced light detectors, e.g., each including a respective pair of photodiodes electrically connected in a differential configuration.
- electrical signals 63 1 and 63 2 may be an analog I signal and an analog Q signal, respectively, corresponding to a first (e.g., horizontal, X) polarization component of signal 218 ′.
- These I and Q signals provide measurements of two quadratures (e.g., the in-phase and quadrature components, often referred to as the I and Q quadratures or components) of the first polarization of signal 218 ′.
- Electrical signals 63 3 and 63 4 may similarly be an analog I signal and an analog Q signal, respectively, corresponding to a second (e.g., vertical, Y) polarization component of signal 218 ′.
- These I and Q signals may provide measurements of the I and Q quadratures of the second polarization of signal 218 ′.
- optical mixers that produce signal components relatively phase-shifted by a phase shift different from 90 degrees may also be used.
- the relative phase shift can be from the range between 45 and 135 degrees.
- Each of electrical signals 63 1 - 63 4 is amplified using a respective one of TIAs 64 1 - 64 4 , and the corresponding amplified electrical signals are converted into digital form using ADCs 66 1 - 66 4 .
- Each of the resulting digital signals 68 1 - 68 4 produced by ADCs 66 1 - 66 4 carries a stream of digital samples of the corresponding analog waveform, with the digital samples being produced by the corresponding ADC 68 at the sampling rate, R 2 , determined by a clock signal CLK 2 applied to the ADCs 66 1 - 66 4 .
- the sampling rate R 2 is greater than the symbol rate R 1 .
- the sampling rate R 2 may be greater than the symbol rate R 1 by a factor of four or by a factor of ten or more.
- Digital signals 68 1 - 68 4 are processed by a digital signal processor (DSP) 70 to: (i) recover the data signal 214 and (ii) perform time-resolved measurements of the SOP of optical signal 218 ′.
- the maximum time resolution for the SOP measurements that can be achieved based on digital signals 68 1 - 68 4 is the reciprocal sampling rate of those digital signals, i.e., 1/R 2 .
- the sampling rate R 2 can be approximately 10 9 samples/second or even higher.
- the sampling rate R 2 can be selected to enable proper polarization tracking at relatively high SOP-rotation speeds, e.g., of several Mrad/s or even higher.
- DSP 70 comprises a carrier-frequency-offset (CFO) circuit 250 connected to receive digital signals 68 1 - 68 4 .
- optical data receiver 230 may have an optional feedback path 240 that connects CFO circuit 250 and a wavelength controller 52 of OLO source 56 as indicated in FIG. 2 .
- CFO circuit 250 operates to: (i) perform estimation of the frequency difference ⁇ f between the carrier frequency of the OLO signal 58 and the frequency f c of the optical carrier 204 , and (ii) apply frequency-offset correction to digital signals 68 1 - 68 4 .
- the resulting frequency-offset-corrected digital signals 268 1 - 268 4 generated by CFO circuit 250 are directed further downstream in the chain of signal processing of DSP 70 .
- CFO circuit 250 also operates to generate a control signal 42 , which may be appropriately processed in the feedback path and is delivered to controller 52 to cause the controller to generate an appropriate wavelength-tuning control signal 54 for OLO source 56 .
- Example embodiments of CFO circuit 250 are described in more detail below in reference to FIG. 3 .
- DSP 70 further comprises low-pass filters (LPFs) 270 1 - 270 4 , squaring circuits 274 1 - 274 4 , an adder 278 , a carrier and data recovery (CDR) circuit 282 , a Stokes-parameter circuit 290 , and an SOP circuit 294 .
- LPFs low-pass filters
- CDR carrier and data recovery
- LPFs 270 1 - 270 4 operate to reduce high-frequency noise that might be present in digital signals 268 1 - 268 4 .
- Two copies of each of the resulting filtered digital signals 272 1 - 272 4 generated by LPFs 270 1 - 270 4 are applied to the squaring circuits 274 1 - 274 4 and to the Stokes-parameter circuit 290 , respectively.
- Each of squaring circuits 274 1 - 274 4 operates to compute a square of each received digital value, and the adder 278 sums up the computed squares for each sampling time, thereby generating a digital signal 280 .
- digital signal 280 carries a stream of digital values proportional to the optical power P of optical signal 218 ′.
- Two copies of digital signal 280 are applied to CDR circuit 282 and SOP circuit 294 , respectively.
- CDR circuit 282 operates in a conventional manner to: (i) recover the clock signal CLK 1 from digital signal 280 ; and (ii) use the recovered clock signal to slice digital signal 280 at appropriate times, thereby substantially reconstructing the corresponding electrical data signal 214 used to drive optical modulator 206 at the optical data transmitter 210 .
- Stokes-parameter circuit 290 uses the received copy of digital signals 272 1 - 272 4 to compute three streams of digital values, which are labeled in FIG. 2 as S 1 , S 2 , and S 3 , respectively. Each of these digital values is proportional to the corresponding one of the Stokes parameters S 1 , S 2 , and S 3 of optical signal 218 ′. In an example embodiment, this computation can be performed in accordance with Eqs. (6) and (9), e.g., as explained in more detail below.
- SOP circuit 294 receives the streams S 1 , S 2 , and S 3 computed by the Stokes-parameter circuit 290 .
- digital signal 280 and the streams S 1 , S 2 , and S 3 are each clocked at the rate of the clock signal CLK 2 .
- a sequence of the composed Stokes vectors S may be time-stamped and stored in a non-volatile memory of the SOP circuit 294 to form a data set that represents the corresponding time-dependent Stokes vector S(t).
- SOP circuit 294 may be configured to further process the data set representing the time-dependent Stokes vector S(t). For example, the values of the Stokes parameter S 0 of the Stokes vector S(t) may be used to compute the time-dependent normalized Stokes vector S′(t). The time-dependent normalized Stokes vector S′(t) can then be used to compute the corresponding time-resolved values of the angles ⁇ and ⁇ (see, e.g., Eqs. (4a)-(4c)).
- the computed angles ⁇ (t) and ⁇ (t) and/or various components of the Stokes vectors S′(t) and S(t) can be exported via an output port 296 from DSP 70 , e.g., for plotting and convenient viewing on a graphical display by the network operator and/or for further analysis by an appropriate network-management entity.
- DSP 70 receives the computed angles ⁇ (t) and ⁇ (t) and/or various components of the Stokes vectors S′(t) and S(t) via an output port 296 from DSP 70 , e.g., for plotting and convenient viewing on a graphical display by the network operator and/or for further analysis by an appropriate network-management entity.
- FIGS. 4 A- 4 C A non-limiting example of the graphical SOP data that may be generated in this manner is shown in FIGS. 4 A- 4 C .
- DSP 70 may be programmed based on the following simplified mathematical model of the optical channel of system 200 .
- Optical signal 218 generated by optical data transmitter 210 has a fixed linear polarization, which can be assumed to be an X polarization.
- the Jones vector of optical signal 218 can be expressed as (E x t 0) T .
- E x t , E x r , and E y r are generally complex valued.
- 2 (6a) S 1
- phase noise ⁇ (t) and carrier frequency offset ⁇ f theoretically have no impact on the measured SOPs in a properly implemented optical data receiver 230 .
- special care still needs to be taken to ensure that the relative detuning of laser 202 and OLO source 56 does not become so large as to place some relevant signal components outside the bandwidth of the pertinent circuits of optical data receiver 230 during the polarization-tracking runtime.
- the corresponding feature of optical data receiver 230 can be implemented, e.g., using feedback path 240 as described further below in reference to FIG. 3 and continued reference to FIG. 2 .
- SOP circuit 294 can then be programmed to form the data set that represents the corresponding time-dependent Stokes vector S(t) using (i) the streams S 1 , S 2 , and S 3 computed in this manner by Stokes-parameter circuit 290 and (ii) the corresponding stream of digital values provided by digital signal 280 .
- FIG. 3 shows a block diagram of CFO circuit 250 according to an embodiment.
- Digital signals 68 1 - 68 4 and 268 1 - 268 4 and control signal 42 are also shown in FIG. 3 to better indicate the relationship between the circuits shown in FIGS. 2 and 3 .
- CFO circuit 250 comprises a spectrum analyzer 310 configured to compute and analyze a power spectrum of the down-converted signal resulting from the coherent detection of optical signal 218 ′ in the front end of optical data receiver 230 .
- spectrum analyzer 310 comprises fast-Fourier-transform (FFT) circuits 312 1 - 312 4 , squaring circuits 316 1 - 316 4 , and an adder 320 connected as indicated in FIG. 3 and is configured to compute in a conventional manner a power spectrum 322 .
- FFT fast-Fourier-transform
- An analyzer circuit 324 then operates to analyze the power spectrum 322 to determine: (i) the value of the carrier frequency offset ⁇ f, and (ii) the peak-to-average power ratio (PAPR) of the power spectrum.
- the determined value of ⁇ f is then outputted via an output signal 326 .
- the determined PAPR is outputted via an output signal 328 .
- the amplitude A 0 is then used to calculate the spectrum's PAPR, which in this case can be relatively large.
- the amplitude A 0 may be relatively small, which causes the PAPR to be small as well.
- CFO circuit 250 further comprises a comparator 330 and a CFO-correction circuit 340 .
- Comparator 330 is connected to receive the PAPR outputted by spectrum analyzer 310 via signal 328 . Comparator 330 operates to generate control signal 42 by comparing the received PAPR with a fixed threshold value. For example, comparator 330 may be configured to: (i) set the control signal 42 to binary one if the received PAPR is smaller than the fixed threshold value; and (ii) set the control signal 42 to binary zero if the received PAPR is greater than the fixed threshold value. The control signal 42 generated in this manner is applied to feedback path 240 (also see FIG. 2 ).
- CFO-correction circuit 340 is connected to receive the value of f 0 outputted by spectrum analyzer 310 via signal 326 .
- CFO-correction circuit 340 is configured to perform CFO correction in accordance with Eqs. (10a)-(10d):
- I x ′ I x cos(2 ⁇ f 0 t )+ Q x sin(2 ⁇ f 0 t ) (10a)
- Q x ′ ⁇ I x sin(2 ⁇ f 0 t )+ Q x cos(2 ⁇ f 0 t ) (10b)
- I y ′ I y cos(2 ⁇ f 0 t )+ Q y sin(2 ⁇ f 0 t ) (10c)
- Q y ′ ⁇ I y sin(2 ⁇ f 0 t )+ Q y cos(2 ⁇ f 0 t ) (10d)
- wavelength controller 52 when control signal 42 is at binary zero, wavelength controller 52 lets OLO source 56 run in its current configuration, i.e., no controlled wavelength tuning is performed thereby. However, when control signal 42 is at binary one, wavelength controller 52 generates an appropriate control signal 54 to cause OLO source 56 to change the carrier frequency f c , e.g., until control signal 42 resets back to binary zero.
- wavelength controller 52 may include a phase-lock-loop (PLL) circuit, a thermo-electric cooler, and/or other suitable circuitry conventionally used to implement wavelength tuning.
- PLL phase-lock-loop
- FIGS. 4 A- 4 C graphically show an example of polarization-tracking data that can be obtained in system 200 according to an embodiment. More specifically, FIGS. 4 A- 4 C graphically show the normalized Stokes parameters S 1 ′, S 2 ′, and S 3 ′, respectively, as a function of time over a 32- ⁇ s-long time interval.
- the traces labeled as “true” represent the simulated link conditions under which the mean SOP-rotation speed is 20 Mrad/s.
- the traces labeled as “tracked” represent estimated polarization-tracking data that may be obtained under these link conditions using an embodiment of optical data receiver 230 in which the ADCs 66 1 - 66 4 are clocked at 4 ⁇ 10 9 samples/s. Excellent agreement between the “true” and “tracked” traces can be easily noted in each of FIGS. 4 A- 4 C .
- Some embodiments of the disclosed polarization tracking methods and apparatus can be used, e.g., to detect and/or identify some specific (e.g., undesirable) events along the optical fiber line 220 ( FIG. 2 ).
- Such events may include but are not limited to lightning, strong mechanical vibrations (e.g., due to construction work or movement of heavy machinery), etc.
- an apparatus comprising: an optical data receiver (e.g., 230 , FIG. 2 ) for an intensity-modulated optical data signal (e.g., 218 ′, FIG. 2 ), the optical data receiver comprising: an optical hybrid (e.g., 60 , FIG. 2 ) configured to mix the intensity-modulated optical data signal and an optical local-oscillator signal (e.g., 58 , FIG.
- first and second pluralities of mixed optical signals to generate first and second pluralities of mixed optical signals, the first plurality corresponding to a first polarization of the optical data signal, the second plurality corresponding to a different second polarization of the optical data signal; a first plurality of light detectors (e.g., 62 1 - 62 2 , FIG. 2 ) connected to generate first and second streams of digitalizations (e.g., 68 1 - 68 2 , FIG.
- a second plurality of light detectors e.g., 62 3 - 62 4 , FIG. 2
- third and fourth streams of digitalizations e.g., 68 3 - 68 4 , FIG. 2
- a digital signal processor e.g., 70 , FIG. 2
- SOP state of polarization
- the digital signal processor is further configured to recover data (e.g., 214 , FIG. 2 ) carried by the intensity-modulated optical data signal from a combination (e.g., 280 , FIG. 2 ) of the first, second, third, and fourth streams of digitalizations.
- the digital signal processor is configured to generate said combination to be proportional to optical power of the intensity-modulated optical data signal.
- the first and second polarizations are mutually orthogonal.
- the first and second polarizations are linearly independent polarizations of the intensity-modulated optical data signal.
- the intensity-modulated optical data signal is intensity-modulated at a symbol rate (e.g., R 1 ); and wherein the digital signal processor is configured to obtain the time-resolved measurements of the SOP with a finer time resolution than one over the symbol rate (e.g., ⁇ 1/R 1 ).
- the intensity-modulated optical data signal is intensity-modulated at a symbol rate (e.g., R 1 ); and wherein the sampling rate is greater than the symbol rate by a factor of two or more (e.g., R 2 >2R 1 ).
- the time-resolved measurements of the SOP comprise time-resolved measurements of two or more Stokes parameters (e.g., shown in FIGS. 4 A- 4 C ) of the intensity-modulated optical data signal.
- the time-resolved measurements of the SOP comprise time-resolved measurements of at least one of an elevation polarization-rotation angle (e.g., ⁇ , Eq. (2)) and an azimuth polarization-rotation angle (e.g., ⁇ , Eq. (2)).
- an elevation polarization-rotation angle e.g., ⁇ , Eq. (2)
- an azimuth polarization-rotation angle e.g., ⁇ , Eq. (2)
- the intensity-modulated optical data signal is an Optical-Supervisory-Channel signal.
- the optical data receiver further comprises a laser source (e.g., 56 , FIG. 2 ) to generate the optical local-oscillator signal and a feedback path (e.g., 240 , FIG. 2 ) from the digital signal processor to the laser source to control relative detuning of carrier frequency of the optical local-oscillator signal.
- a laser source e.g., 56 , FIG. 2
- a feedback path e.g., 240 , FIG. 2
- the digital signal processor comprises a spectrum analyzer (e.g., 310 , FIG. 3 ) configured to send a control signal (e.g., 42 , FIGS. 2 , 3 ) through the feedback path to a laser-source controller (e.g., 52 , FIG. 2 ).
- a spectrum analyzer e.g., 310 , FIG. 3
- a control signal e.g., 42 , FIGS. 2 , 3
- a laser-source controller e.g., 52 , FIG. 2 .
- the digital signal processor comprises a digital circuit (e.g., 250 , FIGS. 2 , 3 ) configured to compensate for a difference between optical carrier frequencies of the optical local-oscillator signal and the intensity-modulated optical data signal.
- a digital circuit e.g., 250 , FIGS. 2 , 3
- the optical data receiver further comprises: a memory (e.g., 294 , FIG. 2 ) to store a data set representing a plurality of time-stamped Stokes vectors of the intensity-modulated optical data signal obtained using the time-resolved measurements of the SOP; and an output port (e.g., 296 , FIG. 2 ) to export the data set from the optical data receiver.
- a memory e.g., 294 , FIG. 2
- an output port e.g., 296 , FIG. 2
- the digital signal processor does not include an adaptive digital filter capable of performing electronic polarization demultiplexing.
- the apparatus further comprises an Optical-Supervisory-Channel transmitter (e.g., 210 , FIG. 2 ) fiber-connected to the optical data receiver and configured to use intensity modulation to generate the intensity-modulated optical data signal.
- an Optical-Supervisory-Channel transmitter e.g., 210 , FIG. 2
- the apparatus further comprises an Optical-Supervisory-Channel transmitter (e.g., 210 , FIG. 2 ) fiber-connected to the optical data receiver and configured to use intensity modulation to generate the intensity-modulated optical data signal.
- an apparatus comprising: an optical data receiver (e.g., 230 , FIG. 2 ) that comprises: a polarization-diversity optical hybrid (e.g., 60 , FIG. 2 ) configured to mix an optical data signal (e.g., 218 ′, FIG. 2 ) and an optical local-oscillator signal (e.g., 58 , FIG.
- an optical data receiver e.g., 230 , FIG. 2
- a polarization-diversity optical hybrid e.g., 60 , FIG. 2
- an optical local-oscillator signal e.g., 58 , FIG.
- first and second pluralities of mixed optical signals to generate first and second pluralities of mixed optical signals, the first plurality corresponding to a first polarization of the optical data signal, the second plurality corresponding to a second polarization of the optical data signal, the first and second polarizations being mutually orthogonal; a first plurality of light detectors (e.g., 62 1 - 62 2 , FIG. 2 ) connected to generate first and second streams of digitalizations (e.g., 68 1 - 68 2 , FIG.
- a second plurality of light detectors e.g., 62 3 - 62 4 , FIG. 2
- third and fourth streams of digitalizations e.g., 68 3 - 68 4 , FIG. 2
- a digital signal processor e.g., 70 , FIG.
- SOP state of polarization
- figure numbers and/or figure reference labels in the claims is intended to identify one or more possible embodiments of the claimed subject matter in order to facilitate the interpretation of the claims. Such use is not to be construed as necessarily limiting the scope of those claims to the embodiments shown in the corresponding figures.
- the conjunction “if” may also or alternatively be construed to mean “when” or “upon” or “in response to determining” or “in response to detecting,” which construal may depend on the corresponding specific context.
- the phrase “if it is determined” or “if [a stated condition] is detected” may be construed to mean “upon determining” or “in response to determining” or “upon detecting [the stated condition or event]” or “in response to detecting [the stated condition or event].”
- the terms “couple,” “coupling,” “coupled,” “connect,” “connecting,” or “connected” refer to any manner known in the art or later developed in which energy is allowed to be transferred between two or more elements, and the interposition of one or more additional elements is contemplated, although not required. Conversely, the terms “directly coupled,” “directly connected,” etc., imply the absence of such additional elements. The same type of distinction applies to the use of terms “attached” and “directly attached,” as applied to a description of a physical structure. For example, a relatively thin layer of adhesive or other suitable binder can be used to implement such “direct attachment” of the two corresponding components in such physical structure.
- processors may be provided through the use of dedicated hardware as well as hardware capable of executing software in association with appropriate software.
- the functions may be provided by a single dedicated processor, by a single shared processor, or by a plurality of individual processors, some of which may be shared.
- processor or “controller” should not be construed to refer exclusively to hardware capable of executing software, and may implicitly include, without limitation, digital signal processor (DSP) hardware, network processor, application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), field programmable gate array (FPGA), read only memory (ROM) for storing software, random access memory (RAM), and non volatile storage.
- DSP digital signal processor
- ASIC application specific integrated circuit
- FPGA field programmable gate array
- ROM read only memory
- RAM random access memory
- non volatile storage Other hardware, conventional and/or custom, may also be included.
- any switches shown in the figures are conceptual only. Their function may be carried out through the operation of program logic, through dedicated logic, through the interaction of program control and dedicated logic, or even manually, the particular technique being selectable by the implementer as more specifically understood from the context.
- circuitry may refer to one or more or all of the following: (a) hardware-only circuit implementations (such as implementations in only analog and/or digital circuitry); (b) combinations of hardware circuits and software, such as (as applicable): (i) a combination of analog and/or digital hardware circuit(s) with software/firmware and (ii) any portions of hardware processor(s) with software (including digital signal processor(s)), software, and memory(ies) that work together to cause an apparatus, such as a mobile phone or server, to perform various functions); and (c) hardware circuit(s) and or processor(s), such as a microprocessor(s) or a portion of a microprocessor(s), that requires software (e.g., firmware) for operation, but the software may not be present when it is not needed for operation.”
- This definition of circuitry applies to all uses of this term in this application, including in any claims.
- circuitry also covers an implementation of merely a hardware circuit or processor (or multiple processors) or portion of a hardware circuit or processor and its (or their) accompanying software and/or firmware.
- circuitry also covers, for example and if applicable to the particular claim element, a baseband integrated circuit or processor integrated circuit for a mobile device or a similar integrated circuit in server, a cellular network device, or other computing or network device.
- any block diagrams herein represent conceptual views of illustrative circuitry embodying the principles of the disclosure.
- any flow charts, flow diagrams, state transition diagrams, pseudo code, and the like represent various processes which may be substantially represented in computer readable medium and so executed by a computer or processor, whether or not such computer or processor is explicitly shown.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- Signal Processing (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Electromagnetism (AREA)
- Optical Communication System (AREA)
Abstract
Description
where Ex t and Ey t are the x and y components, respectively, of the Jones vector of the input light; Ex r and Ey r are the x and y components, respectively, of the Jones vector of the output light; and J(θ,ϕ) is the Jones matrix of the optical element given by Eq. (2):
where 2θ and ϕ are the elevation and azimuth polarization rotation angles, respectively, the values of which can be used to define the SOP. For clarity, the above example of a Jones matrix does not include effects of optical attenuation and/or amplification.
P=√{square root over (S 1 2 +S 2 2 +S 3 2)} (3)
For a given optical power P, different SOPs can be mapped to different respective points on the surface of the Poincare sphere. For example, the vector S shown in
E x r=cos(θ)·E x t (5a)
E y r =e jϕ sin(θ)·E x t (5b)
Herein, the values of Ex t, Ex r, and Ey r are generally complex valued.
S 0 =|E x r|2 +|E y r|2 (6a)
S 1 =|E x r|2 −|E y r|2 (6b)
S 2=2 Re(E x r·(E y r)*) (6c)
S 3=−2 Im(E x r ·E y r)*) (6d)
where the “*” symbol in the superscript denotes complex conjugation.
E x r=cos(θ)·E x t ·e jφ(t) e 2πj(Δf)t (7a)
E y r =e jφ sin(θ)·E x t ·e jφ(t) e 2πj(Δf)t (7b)
By substituting Eqs. (7a)-(7b) into Eqs. (6a)-(6d), one obtains the following set of equations:
S 0 =|E x t|2 (8a)
S 1 =|E x t|2 cos(2θ) (8b)
S 2 =|E x t|2 sin(2θ)cos(ϕ) (8c)
S 3 =|E x t|2 sin(2θ)sin(ϕ) (8d)
After normalization by |Ex t|2, Eqs. (8b)-(8d) are identical to Eqs. (4a)-(4c), which confirms that measurements of the Stokes vector S=(S0 S1 S2 S3)T of
E x r(n)=d 1(n)+jd 2(n) (9a)
E y r(n)=d 3(n)+jd 4(n) (9b)
where d1(n), d2(n), d3(n), and d1(n) denote the digital streams carried by digital signals 272 1-272 4, respectively; and n is the time-slot index.
I x ′=I x cos(2πf 0 t)+Q x sin(2πf 0 t) (10a)
Q x ′=−I x sin(2πf 0 t)+Q x cos(2πf 0 t) (10b)
I y ′=I y cos(2πf 0 t)+Q y sin(2πf 0 t) (10c)
Q y ′=−I y sin(2πf 0 t)+Q y cos(2πf 0 t) (10d)
where Ix, Qx, Iy, and Qy, are the digital values provided by signals 68 1-68 4, respectively, at time t; and Ix′, Qx′, Iy′, and Qy′ are the corresponding digital values computed for signals 268 1-268 4, respectively.
Claims (14)
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US16/988,874 US12119880B2 (en) | 2020-08-10 | 2020-08-10 | Rapid polarization tracking in an optical channel |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US16/988,874 US12119880B2 (en) | 2020-08-10 | 2020-08-10 | Rapid polarization tracking in an optical channel |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| US20220045766A1 US20220045766A1 (en) | 2022-02-10 |
| US12119880B2 true US12119880B2 (en) | 2024-10-15 |
Family
ID=80114303
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| US16/988,874 Active US12119880B2 (en) | 2020-08-10 | 2020-08-10 | Rapid polarization tracking in an optical channel |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US12119880B2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (7)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP6693592B1 (en) * | 2019-05-22 | 2020-05-13 | Nttエレクトロニクス株式会社 | Optical transmission characteristic compensation method and optical transmission characteristic compensation system |
| US11650340B2 (en) * | 2020-12-01 | 2023-05-16 | Nokia Solutions And Networks Oy | Detection of seismic disturbances using optical fibers |
| US12184333B2 (en) | 2021-09-24 | 2024-12-31 | Aloe Semiconductor Inc. | Optical multiple-input-multiple-output (MIMO) demultiplexers |
| CN117061003A (en) * | 2022-05-06 | 2023-11-14 | 华为技术有限公司 | Optical signal status information detection method and photoelectric device running the detection method |
| US12119881B2 (en) * | 2022-06-03 | 2024-10-15 | Aloe Semiconductor Inc. | Optical multiple-input-multiple-output (MIMO) receiver using stokes vector measurements |
| US20230396351A1 (en) * | 2022-06-03 | 2023-12-07 | Aloe Semiconductor, Inc. | Optical multi-wavelength dual-polarization transceivers |
| US12316378B2 (en) | 2023-01-13 | 2025-05-27 | The Boeing Company | Optical high-power amplifier circuit with switchable polarized output state |
Citations (70)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US6587190B2 (en) | 2000-09-21 | 2003-07-01 | Kwangju Institute Of Science & Technology | System and method for measuring chromatic dispersion in optical fiber |
| US6621947B1 (en) | 1998-12-18 | 2003-09-16 | Future Fibre Technologies Pty Ltd | Apparatus and method for monitoring a structure using a counter-propagating signal method for locating events |
| US20050196176A1 (en) * | 2004-03-08 | 2005-09-08 | Han Sun | Equalization strategy for dual-polarization optical transport system |
| US20060126993A1 (en) | 2004-11-24 | 2006-06-15 | Sioptical, Inc. | SOI-based optical interconnect arrangement |
| US20060163457A1 (en) | 2005-01-11 | 2006-07-27 | Future Fibre Technologies Pty Ltd | Apparatus and method for using a counter-propagating signal method for locating events |
| US7142736B2 (en) | 2004-01-05 | 2006-11-28 | Optellios, Inc. | Distributed fiber sensor with interference detection and polarization state management |
| US7209670B2 (en) | 2003-04-29 | 2007-04-24 | Nortel Networks Limited | Polarization diversity receiver for optical transmission system |
| US20080152363A1 (en) * | 2006-12-22 | 2008-06-26 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Polarization tracking and signal equalization for optical receivers configured for on-off keying or pulse amplitude modulation signaling |
| US20080232795A1 (en) | 2007-03-21 | 2008-09-25 | Adva Ag Optical Networking | Method And System For Localizing An Attenuation Change Location In An Optical Waveguide |
| US20080239448A1 (en) * | 2007-03-29 | 2008-10-02 | Fujitsu Limited | Optical modulation device and optical modulation method |
| US20090148164A1 (en) * | 2007-12-05 | 2009-06-11 | Nortel Networks Limited | Signal equalizer in a coherent optical receiver |
| US7555227B2 (en) * | 2005-10-21 | 2009-06-30 | Nortel Networks Limited | Polarization compensation in a coherent optical receiver |
| US20100189445A1 (en) * | 2009-01-29 | 2010-07-29 | Fujitsu Limited | Optical communication system and optical receiver |
| US7769305B1 (en) * | 2005-10-21 | 2010-08-03 | Nortel Networks Limited | High-speed digital signal processing in a coherent optical receiver |
| US20100239254A1 (en) * | 2009-03-20 | 2010-09-23 | University Of Central Florida Research Foundation, Inc. | Compensation of Transmission Impairments in Polarization Multiplexed Systems |
| US20100329677A1 (en) * | 2009-06-29 | 2010-12-30 | Noriaki Kaneda | Symbol Timing Recovery in Polarization Division Multiplexed Coherent Optical Transmission System |
| US7885539B2 (en) | 2005-12-08 | 2011-02-08 | Deutsche Telekom Ag | Method for detecting and localizing faults in an optical transmission path, and optical transmission system |
| US7940389B2 (en) | 2004-05-25 | 2011-05-10 | Fotech Solutions Limited | Method and apparatus for detecting pressure distribution in fluids |
| US7961331B2 (en) | 2006-02-24 | 2011-06-14 | British Telecommunications Public Limited Company | Sensing a disturbance along an optical path |
| US20110255870A1 (en) * | 2010-01-21 | 2011-10-20 | Grigoryan Vladimir S | Optical transceivers for use in fiber optic communication networks |
| US20120230629A1 (en) | 2009-11-13 | 2012-09-13 | Optasense Holdings Limited | Fibre Optic Distributed Sensing |
| US20120315043A1 (en) * | 2010-02-04 | 2012-12-13 | Nippon Telegraph And Telephone Corporation | Transmission method, reception method, transmitter apparatus, and receiver device |
| US20130181757A1 (en) * | 2010-09-24 | 2013-07-18 | Nokia Siemens Networks | Method and Device for Clock Recovery |
| US20130336654A1 (en) * | 2011-03-02 | 2013-12-19 | Nec Corporation | Optical receiver, polarization demultiplexer, and optical receiving method |
| US20140079390A1 (en) * | 2012-09-14 | 2014-03-20 | Fujitsu Limited | In-band supervisory data modulation using complementary power modulation |
| US8682159B2 (en) | 2008-07-09 | 2014-03-25 | Tyco Electronics Subsea Communications Llc | Optical communication system supporting detection and communication networks |
| US20140133844A1 (en) | 2012-11-14 | 2014-05-15 | Stefan Dahlfort | Sequence-based link fault localization |
| US20140260638A1 (en) | 2013-03-12 | 2014-09-18 | Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) | Automated fault localization in pipelines and electrical power transmission lines |
| US20140328588A1 (en) * | 2013-05-01 | 2014-11-06 | Fujitsu Optical Components Limited | Optical communication system, optical transmitter, and optical receiver |
| US20150030331A1 (en) * | 2012-04-13 | 2015-01-29 | Alcatel Lucent | Nonlinear cross-polarization mitigation algorithm |
| US20150043907A1 (en) * | 2011-11-09 | 2015-02-12 | Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson, (Publ) | Optical supervisory channel |
| US20150131988A1 (en) | 2013-11-14 | 2015-05-14 | Adva Optical Networking Se | Method and apparatus for monitoring mechanical fiber stress of optical fiber spans |
| US20150280856A1 (en) * | 2014-03-26 | 2015-10-01 | Fujitsu Limited | Polarization state detector, optical transmitter, and optical receiver |
| US9337934B1 (en) * | 2012-11-29 | 2016-05-10 | Clariphy Communications, Inc. | Coherent transceiver architecture |
| US20160182182A1 (en) * | 2014-12-23 | 2016-06-23 | Infinera Corporation | Polarization tracking using signal tone information while keeping least mean squares frequency domain equalization |
| US20160218813A1 (en) * | 2015-01-28 | 2016-07-28 | Ciena Corporation | Polarization mode dispersion (pmd) tolerant optical signaling |
| US20170054513A1 (en) * | 2015-08-20 | 2017-02-23 | Futurewei Technologies, Inc. | Estimation and Compensation of Local Oscillator Frequency Offset and Chromatic Dispersion Using Pilot Tones in Spectral-Shaping Subcarrier Modulation |
| US20170126312A1 (en) | 2015-11-03 | 2017-05-04 | Ciena Corporation | In-service optical fault isolation systems and methods |
| US9712232B2 (en) | 2015-03-16 | 2017-07-18 | Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. | Apparatus and method for OTDR transmitter noise compensation |
| US20170356805A1 (en) * | 2016-06-09 | 2017-12-14 | Ciena Corporation | Integrated polarimeter in an optical line system |
| US9906308B1 (en) * | 2016-08-23 | 2018-02-27 | Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories, Inc. | Methods for compensation of cross-polarization modulation (XPolM) impairments in coherent optical communications |
| US20180198547A1 (en) * | 2017-01-10 | 2018-07-12 | Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. | Systems and methods for network signaling |
| US10038504B2 (en) * | 2015-12-29 | 2018-07-31 | Nokia Of America Corporation | Optical network span sensing |
| WO2018156132A1 (en) | 2017-02-23 | 2018-08-30 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Distributed acoustic sensing system with a polarization control device for improving signal-to-noise ratio |
| US20180269985A1 (en) * | 2017-03-17 | 2018-09-20 | Alcatel-Lucent Usa Inc. | Feedforward decision-free pilot-aided phase noise estimation for coherent optical m-qam systems |
| EP3404855A1 (en) | 2017-05-17 | 2018-11-21 | Nokia Solutions and Networks Oy | Use of band-pass filters in supervisory signal paths of an optical transport system |
| EP3404852A1 (en) | 2017-05-17 | 2018-11-21 | Alcatel Submarine Networks | Supervisory signal paths for an optical transport system |
| US20190052393A1 (en) | 2009-12-08 | 2019-02-14 | Snell Holdings, Llc | Subchannel photonic routing, switching and protection with simplified upgrades of wdm optical networks |
| US20190074908A1 (en) * | 2017-09-06 | 2019-03-07 | Nokia Solutions And Networks Oy | Coherent optical receiver for medium- and short-reach links |
| US20190181950A1 (en) * | 2016-09-27 | 2019-06-13 | Kddi Corporation | Polarization tracking device, optical receiving device, and polarization tracking method |
| US10324002B2 (en) | 2013-06-10 | 2019-06-18 | General Photonics Corporation | Devices and methods for characterization of distributed fiber bend and stress |
| US20190260493A1 (en) * | 2018-02-22 | 2019-08-22 | Nokia Solutions And Networks Oy | Protection of channel connections in an optical network |
| US10404400B2 (en) * | 2017-04-07 | 2019-09-03 | Nokia Of America Corporation | Optical transport system employing direct-detection self-coherent receivers and compatible transmitters |
| US20190379462A1 (en) * | 2018-06-08 | 2019-12-12 | Maxim Integrated Products, Inc. | Systems and methods for polarization control using blind source separation |
| US20190393964A1 (en) * | 2018-06-25 | 2019-12-26 | Infinera Corporation | Clock recovery for subcarrier based coherent optical systems |
| WO2020026007A1 (en) | 2018-08-03 | 2020-02-06 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) | Optimum three-dimensional constellations for optical interconnects employing stokes vector receivers |
| US20200044734A1 (en) | 2017-02-01 | 2020-02-06 | British Telecommunications Public Limited Company | Optical fiber event location |
| US20200052786A1 (en) | 2014-03-10 | 2020-02-13 | Aeponyx Inc. | Methods and systems relating to optical networks |
| US20200076508A1 (en) * | 2017-11-21 | 2020-03-05 | Cable Television Laboratories, Inc | Systems and methods for full duplex coherent optics |
| US20200106521A1 (en) * | 2018-09-28 | 2020-04-02 | Fujitsu Limited | Apparatus and method for monitoring change of polarization state resulted from optical link and optical receiver |
| US20200195354A1 (en) * | 2017-05-15 | 2020-06-18 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Dsp-free coherent receiver |
| US20200235842A1 (en) * | 2019-01-09 | 2020-07-23 | Cable Television Laboratories, Inc | Systems and methods for carrier phase recovery |
| US20200266887A1 (en) * | 2019-02-15 | 2020-08-20 | Viavi Solutions Inc. | Mitigating polarization dependent loss (pdl) by transforming frequency components to a ball |
| US20200328806A1 (en) | 2019-04-12 | 2020-10-15 | Fujitsu Limited | Measurement device, transmission device, and network system |
| US20200328818A1 (en) * | 2018-05-08 | 2020-10-15 | Maxim Integrated Products, Inc. | Systems and methods for analog electronic polarization control for coherent optical receivers |
| US20210013962A1 (en) | 2019-07-09 | 2021-01-14 | Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. | Method and apparatus for detecting operational conditions of an optical link in an optical network |
| US20210099234A1 (en) | 2019-09-26 | 2021-04-01 | Raytheon Company | Methods and apparatus for reception of low photon density optical signals |
| WO2021168033A1 (en) | 2020-02-19 | 2021-08-26 | Google Llc | Systems and methods for detecting mechanical disturbances using underwater optical cables |
| US20210376926A1 (en) | 2020-06-02 | 2021-12-02 | Nokia Solutions And Networks Oy | Direct-detection optical receiver capable of signal-to-signal beat interference cancellation |
| US20220171081A1 (en) | 2020-12-01 | 2022-06-02 | Nokia Solutions And Networks Oy | Detection of seismic disturbances using optical fibers |
-
2020
- 2020-08-10 US US16/988,874 patent/US12119880B2/en active Active
Patent Citations (75)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US6621947B1 (en) | 1998-12-18 | 2003-09-16 | Future Fibre Technologies Pty Ltd | Apparatus and method for monitoring a structure using a counter-propagating signal method for locating events |
| US6587190B2 (en) | 2000-09-21 | 2003-07-01 | Kwangju Institute Of Science & Technology | System and method for measuring chromatic dispersion in optical fiber |
| US7209670B2 (en) | 2003-04-29 | 2007-04-24 | Nortel Networks Limited | Polarization diversity receiver for optical transmission system |
| US7142736B2 (en) | 2004-01-05 | 2006-11-28 | Optellios, Inc. | Distributed fiber sensor with interference detection and polarization state management |
| US20050196176A1 (en) * | 2004-03-08 | 2005-09-08 | Han Sun | Equalization strategy for dual-polarization optical transport system |
| EP2796847A2 (en) | 2004-05-25 | 2014-10-29 | Fotech Solutions Limited | Method and apparatus for detecting pressure distribution in fluids |
| US7940389B2 (en) | 2004-05-25 | 2011-05-10 | Fotech Solutions Limited | Method and apparatus for detecting pressure distribution in fluids |
| US20060126993A1 (en) | 2004-11-24 | 2006-06-15 | Sioptical, Inc. | SOI-based optical interconnect arrangement |
| US20060163457A1 (en) | 2005-01-11 | 2006-07-27 | Future Fibre Technologies Pty Ltd | Apparatus and method for using a counter-propagating signal method for locating events |
| US7555227B2 (en) * | 2005-10-21 | 2009-06-30 | Nortel Networks Limited | Polarization compensation in a coherent optical receiver |
| US7769305B1 (en) * | 2005-10-21 | 2010-08-03 | Nortel Networks Limited | High-speed digital signal processing in a coherent optical receiver |
| US7885539B2 (en) | 2005-12-08 | 2011-02-08 | Deutsche Telekom Ag | Method for detecting and localizing faults in an optical transmission path, and optical transmission system |
| US7961331B2 (en) | 2006-02-24 | 2011-06-14 | British Telecommunications Public Limited Company | Sensing a disturbance along an optical path |
| US20080152363A1 (en) * | 2006-12-22 | 2008-06-26 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Polarization tracking and signal equalization for optical receivers configured for on-off keying or pulse amplitude modulation signaling |
| US20080232795A1 (en) | 2007-03-21 | 2008-09-25 | Adva Ag Optical Networking | Method And System For Localizing An Attenuation Change Location In An Optical Waveguide |
| US20080239448A1 (en) * | 2007-03-29 | 2008-10-02 | Fujitsu Limited | Optical modulation device and optical modulation method |
| US20090148164A1 (en) * | 2007-12-05 | 2009-06-11 | Nortel Networks Limited | Signal equalizer in a coherent optical receiver |
| US8682159B2 (en) | 2008-07-09 | 2014-03-25 | Tyco Electronics Subsea Communications Llc | Optical communication system supporting detection and communication networks |
| US20100189445A1 (en) * | 2009-01-29 | 2010-07-29 | Fujitsu Limited | Optical communication system and optical receiver |
| US20100239254A1 (en) * | 2009-03-20 | 2010-09-23 | University Of Central Florida Research Foundation, Inc. | Compensation of Transmission Impairments in Polarization Multiplexed Systems |
| US20100329677A1 (en) * | 2009-06-29 | 2010-12-30 | Noriaki Kaneda | Symbol Timing Recovery in Polarization Division Multiplexed Coherent Optical Transmission System |
| US20120230629A1 (en) | 2009-11-13 | 2012-09-13 | Optasense Holdings Limited | Fibre Optic Distributed Sensing |
| US20190052393A1 (en) | 2009-12-08 | 2019-02-14 | Snell Holdings, Llc | Subchannel photonic routing, switching and protection with simplified upgrades of wdm optical networks |
| US20110255870A1 (en) * | 2010-01-21 | 2011-10-20 | Grigoryan Vladimir S | Optical transceivers for use in fiber optic communication networks |
| US20120315043A1 (en) * | 2010-02-04 | 2012-12-13 | Nippon Telegraph And Telephone Corporation | Transmission method, reception method, transmitter apparatus, and receiver device |
| US20130181757A1 (en) * | 2010-09-24 | 2013-07-18 | Nokia Siemens Networks | Method and Device for Clock Recovery |
| US20130336654A1 (en) * | 2011-03-02 | 2013-12-19 | Nec Corporation | Optical receiver, polarization demultiplexer, and optical receiving method |
| US20150043907A1 (en) * | 2011-11-09 | 2015-02-12 | Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson, (Publ) | Optical supervisory channel |
| US20150030331A1 (en) * | 2012-04-13 | 2015-01-29 | Alcatel Lucent | Nonlinear cross-polarization mitigation algorithm |
| US20140079390A1 (en) * | 2012-09-14 | 2014-03-20 | Fujitsu Limited | In-band supervisory data modulation using complementary power modulation |
| US20140133844A1 (en) | 2012-11-14 | 2014-05-15 | Stefan Dahlfort | Sequence-based link fault localization |
| US9337934B1 (en) * | 2012-11-29 | 2016-05-10 | Clariphy Communications, Inc. | Coherent transceiver architecture |
| US20140260638A1 (en) | 2013-03-12 | 2014-09-18 | Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) | Automated fault localization in pipelines and electrical power transmission lines |
| US20140328588A1 (en) * | 2013-05-01 | 2014-11-06 | Fujitsu Optical Components Limited | Optical communication system, optical transmitter, and optical receiver |
| US10324002B2 (en) | 2013-06-10 | 2019-06-18 | General Photonics Corporation | Devices and methods for characterization of distributed fiber bend and stress |
| US20150131988A1 (en) | 2013-11-14 | 2015-05-14 | Adva Optical Networking Se | Method and apparatus for monitoring mechanical fiber stress of optical fiber spans |
| US20200052786A1 (en) | 2014-03-10 | 2020-02-13 | Aeponyx Inc. | Methods and systems relating to optical networks |
| US20150280856A1 (en) * | 2014-03-26 | 2015-10-01 | Fujitsu Limited | Polarization state detector, optical transmitter, and optical receiver |
| US20160182182A1 (en) * | 2014-12-23 | 2016-06-23 | Infinera Corporation | Polarization tracking using signal tone information while keeping least mean squares frequency domain equalization |
| US20160218813A1 (en) * | 2015-01-28 | 2016-07-28 | Ciena Corporation | Polarization mode dispersion (pmd) tolerant optical signaling |
| US9712232B2 (en) | 2015-03-16 | 2017-07-18 | Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. | Apparatus and method for OTDR transmitter noise compensation |
| US20170054513A1 (en) * | 2015-08-20 | 2017-02-23 | Futurewei Technologies, Inc. | Estimation and Compensation of Local Oscillator Frequency Offset and Chromatic Dispersion Using Pilot Tones in Spectral-Shaping Subcarrier Modulation |
| US20170126312A1 (en) | 2015-11-03 | 2017-05-04 | Ciena Corporation | In-service optical fault isolation systems and methods |
| US10038504B2 (en) * | 2015-12-29 | 2018-07-31 | Nokia Of America Corporation | Optical network span sensing |
| US10161798B2 (en) | 2016-06-09 | 2018-12-25 | Ciena Corporation | Integrated polarimeter in an optical line system |
| US20170356805A1 (en) * | 2016-06-09 | 2017-12-14 | Ciena Corporation | Integrated polarimeter in an optical line system |
| US20190101447A1 (en) | 2016-06-09 | 2019-04-04 | Ciena Corporation | Integrated polarimeter in an optical line system |
| US9906308B1 (en) * | 2016-08-23 | 2018-02-27 | Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories, Inc. | Methods for compensation of cross-polarization modulation (XPolM) impairments in coherent optical communications |
| US20190181950A1 (en) * | 2016-09-27 | 2019-06-13 | Kddi Corporation | Polarization tracking device, optical receiving device, and polarization tracking method |
| US20180198547A1 (en) * | 2017-01-10 | 2018-07-12 | Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. | Systems and methods for network signaling |
| US20200044734A1 (en) | 2017-02-01 | 2020-02-06 | British Telecommunications Public Limited Company | Optical fiber event location |
| WO2018156132A1 (en) | 2017-02-23 | 2018-08-30 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Distributed acoustic sensing system with a polarization control device for improving signal-to-noise ratio |
| US20180269985A1 (en) * | 2017-03-17 | 2018-09-20 | Alcatel-Lucent Usa Inc. | Feedforward decision-free pilot-aided phase noise estimation for coherent optical m-qam systems |
| US10284303B2 (en) * | 2017-03-17 | 2019-05-07 | Nokia Of America Corporation | Feedforward decision-free pilot-aided phase noise estimation for coherent optical M-QAM systems |
| US10404400B2 (en) * | 2017-04-07 | 2019-09-03 | Nokia Of America Corporation | Optical transport system employing direct-detection self-coherent receivers and compatible transmitters |
| US20200195354A1 (en) * | 2017-05-15 | 2020-06-18 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Dsp-free coherent receiver |
| EP3404852A1 (en) | 2017-05-17 | 2018-11-21 | Alcatel Submarine Networks | Supervisory signal paths for an optical transport system |
| EP3404855A1 (en) | 2017-05-17 | 2018-11-21 | Nokia Solutions and Networks Oy | Use of band-pass filters in supervisory signal paths of an optical transport system |
| US20190074908A1 (en) * | 2017-09-06 | 2019-03-07 | Nokia Solutions And Networks Oy | Coherent optical receiver for medium- and short-reach links |
| US20200076508A1 (en) * | 2017-11-21 | 2020-03-05 | Cable Television Laboratories, Inc | Systems and methods for full duplex coherent optics |
| US20190260493A1 (en) * | 2018-02-22 | 2019-08-22 | Nokia Solutions And Networks Oy | Protection of channel connections in an optical network |
| US20200328818A1 (en) * | 2018-05-08 | 2020-10-15 | Maxim Integrated Products, Inc. | Systems and methods for analog electronic polarization control for coherent optical receivers |
| US20190379462A1 (en) * | 2018-06-08 | 2019-12-12 | Maxim Integrated Products, Inc. | Systems and methods for polarization control using blind source separation |
| US20190393964A1 (en) * | 2018-06-25 | 2019-12-26 | Infinera Corporation | Clock recovery for subcarrier based coherent optical systems |
| WO2020026007A1 (en) | 2018-08-03 | 2020-02-06 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) | Optimum three-dimensional constellations for optical interconnects employing stokes vector receivers |
| US20200106521A1 (en) * | 2018-09-28 | 2020-04-02 | Fujitsu Limited | Apparatus and method for monitoring change of polarization state resulted from optical link and optical receiver |
| US20200235842A1 (en) * | 2019-01-09 | 2020-07-23 | Cable Television Laboratories, Inc | Systems and methods for carrier phase recovery |
| US20200266887A1 (en) * | 2019-02-15 | 2020-08-20 | Viavi Solutions Inc. | Mitigating polarization dependent loss (pdl) by transforming frequency components to a ball |
| US20200328806A1 (en) | 2019-04-12 | 2020-10-15 | Fujitsu Limited | Measurement device, transmission device, and network system |
| US20210013962A1 (en) | 2019-07-09 | 2021-01-14 | Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. | Method and apparatus for detecting operational conditions of an optical link in an optical network |
| US20210099234A1 (en) | 2019-09-26 | 2021-04-01 | Raytheon Company | Methods and apparatus for reception of low photon density optical signals |
| WO2021168033A1 (en) | 2020-02-19 | 2021-08-26 | Google Llc | Systems and methods for detecting mechanical disturbances using underwater optical cables |
| US20210376926A1 (en) | 2020-06-02 | 2021-12-02 | Nokia Solutions And Networks Oy | Direct-detection optical receiver capable of signal-to-signal beat interference cancellation |
| US11309959B2 (en) | 2020-06-02 | 2022-04-19 | Nokia Solutions And Networks Oy | Direct-detection optical receiver capable of signal-to-signal beat interference cancellation |
| US20220171081A1 (en) | 2020-12-01 | 2022-06-02 | Nokia Solutions And Networks Oy | Detection of seismic disturbances using optical fibers |
Non-Patent Citations (24)
| Title |
|---|
| "Fiber Doctor (FD)", www.huawei.com, 2020 [retrieved on Jun. 9, 2020] Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: https://info.support.huawei.com/network/ptmngsys/Web/WDMkg/en/39_fd.html> (4 pages). |
| "Optical Supervisory Channel (OSC) SFP Transceiver with Integrated Micro-OTDR Now Available from Optical Zonu (OZC)", www.pr.com, 2014 [retrieved on Jun. 8, 2020] Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: https://www.pr.com/press-release/548495> (2 pages). |
| "OSN 8800—Huawei", www.huawei.com, 2016 [retrieved on Jun. 9, 2020] Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: https://carrier.huawei.com/en/products/fixed-network/transmission/wdm-otn/osn8800> (4 pages). |
| "What's shaking? Earthquake detection with submarine cables", www.google.com, 2020 [retrieved on Oct. 29, 2020] Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/infrastructure/using-subsea-cables-to-detect-earthquakes> (7 pages). |
| Boitier, F., et al. "Proactive Fiber Damage Detection in Real-time Coherent Receiver." European Conference on Optical Communication (ECOC), Sep. 17-21, 2017. Gothenburg, Sweden (2017): 1-3. |
| Che, Di, "Coherent Optical Short-Reach Communications", Doctoral Dissertation, University of Melbourne (2016): 135 pages. |
| Ciaramella, Ernesto, "Polarization-Independent Receivers for Low-Cost Coherent OOK Systems." IEEE Photonics Technology Letters 26.6 (2014): 548-551. |
| Dorize, Christian, et al., "Enhancing the performance of coherent OTDR systems with polarization diversity complementary codes." Optics Express 26.10 (2018): 12878-12890. |
| Gordon, J. P., et al., "PMD fundamentals: Polarization mode dispersion in optical fibers." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 97.9 (2000): 4541-4550. |
| ITU-T, "Spectral grids for WDM applications: DWDM frequency grid." Recommendation G.694.1 (Oct. 2020): 1-7. |
| Jignesh, Jokhakar, et al. "Polarization independent optical injection locking for carrier recovery in optical communication systems." Optics Express 25.18 (2017): 21216-21228. |
| Krummrich, Peter M., et al. "Demanding response time requirements on coherent receivers due to fast polarization rotations caused by lightning events." Optics Express 24.11 (2016): 12442-12457. |
| Li, Jie, et al. "Real-time Fast Polarization Tracking Based on Polarization Phase Locking Least Mean Square Algorithm." Optics Express 27.16 (2019): 22116-22126. |
| Lindsey, Nathaniel J., et al. "Illuminating seafloor faults and ocean dynamics with dark fiber distributed acoustic sensing." Science 366.6469 (2019): 1103-1107. |
| Marra, Giuseppe, et al. "Ultrastable laser interferometry for earthquake detection with terrestrial and submarine cables." Science 361.6401 (2018): 486-490. |
| Mazur, Michael, et al. "Detection of Ambient Disturbances Using Dispersive Delays in Optical Fibers." U.S. Appl. No. 17/580,202, filed Jan. 20, 2022; (33 pages). |
| Mazur, Mikael, et al. "Correlation Metric for Polarization Changes." IEEE Photonics Technology Letters 30.17 (2018): 1575-1578. |
| Roudas, Ioannis "Chapter 10: Coherent Optical Communication Systems." WDM Systems and Networks. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1093-5_10 (2012): 373-417. |
| Šlapák, Martin, et al. "Polarization Changes as Early Warning System in Optical Fiber Networks." 42nd International Conference on Telecommunications and Signal Processing (TSP). Budapest, Hungary. IEEE (2019): 597-600. |
| Wikipedia: Stokes parameters, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stokes_parameters (Year: 2021). * |
| Williams, Ethan F., et al. "Distributed sensing of microseisms and teleseisms with submarine dark fibers." Nature Communications 10, Article 5778 (2019): 1-11. |
| Yan, Yaxi, et al. "Distributed vibration sensing based on forward transmission and coherent detection." arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.07675 (2019): 1-8. |
| Zhan, Zhongwen. "Distributed Acoustic Sensing Turns Fiber-Optic Cables into Sensitive Seismic Antennas." Seismological Research Letters 91.1 (2019): 1-15. |
| Zhang, Jiao, et al. "200 Gbit/s/λ PDM-PAM-4 PON system based on intensity modulation and coherent detection." Journal of Optical Communications and Networking 12.1 (Jan. 2020): A1-A8. |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| US20220045766A1 (en) | 2022-02-10 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US12119880B2 (en) | Rapid polarization tracking in an optical channel | |
| US8761600B2 (en) | In-band supervisory data modulation | |
| US8989571B2 (en) | In-band supervisory data modulation using complementary power modulation | |
| JP5034770B2 (en) | Coherent optical receiver and optical communication system | |
| Kikuchi | Phase-diversity homodyne detection of multilevel optical modulation with digital carrier phase estimation | |
| US20090214224A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for coherent analog rf photonic transmission | |
| US9755759B2 (en) | Polarisation-independent coherent optical receiver | |
| Pascual et al. | Photonic integrated gain switched optical frequency comb for spectrally efficient optical transmission systems | |
| US9692521B1 (en) | Polarization pre-compensation technique for polarization-division-multiplexed direct-detection optical communication systems | |
| Kakati et al. | Performance of grey‐coded IQM‐based optical modulation formats on high‐speed long‐haul optical communication link | |
| Adles et al. | Blind optical modulation format identification from physical layer characteristics | |
| Takushima et al. | Measurement of differential phasor diagram of multilevel dpsk signals by using an adjustment-free delay interferometer composed of a 3$\,\times\, $3 optical coupler | |
| Roudas | Coherent optical communication systems | |
| Zibar et al. | Radio-frequency transparent demodulation for broadband hybrid wireless-optical links | |
| EP3570462B1 (en) | Coherent optical communication with constellations having electric field coordinates on circles | |
| Cabrera et al. | Universal bias controller testbed for dp-iq modulators in coherent optical links | |
| GB2492068A (en) | Carrier regeneration for optical receivers by frequency shifting a pump signal by a frequency divided beating signal | |
| Schmogrow | Real-time digital signal processing for software-defined optical transmitters and receivers | |
| Mustika et al. | Evaluation of Aperture Diameter Variation on OFDM Inter–Satellite Optical Wireless Communication (Is–OWC) | |
| KR102514806B1 (en) | Balanced-detection based receiver for polarization-division multiplexed optical transmission systems, and operating method of the same | |
| CN104363051A (en) | Optical fiber wireless integrated system | |
| AGALLIU | Comparison of Modulation Formats in Fiber-Optic Transmission Systems | |
| Seimetz | Phase diversity receivers for homodyne detection of optical DQPSK signals | |
| Urick et al. | High Dynamic Range, 100 km Digital Radio-over-Fiber Links | |
| Kawanishi | Integrated mach–zehnder interferometer-based modulators for advanced modulation formats |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: ENTITY STATUS SET TO UNDISCOUNTED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: BIG.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
| AS | Assignment |
Owner name: NOKIA SOLUTIONS AND NETWORKS OY, FINLAND Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:LE, THAI SON;REEL/FRAME:053481/0041 Effective date: 20200622 |
|
| STCV | Information on status: appeal procedure |
Free format text: NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED |
|
| STCV | Information on status: appeal procedure |
Free format text: APPEAL BRIEF (OR SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF) ENTERED AND FORWARDED TO EXAMINER |
|
| STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED |
|
| STCV | Information on status: appeal procedure |
Free format text: NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED |
|
| STCV | Information on status: appeal procedure |
Free format text: APPEAL BRIEF (OR SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF) ENTERED AND FORWARDED TO EXAMINER |
|
| STCV | Information on status: appeal procedure |
Free format text: EXAMINER'S ANSWER TO APPEAL BRIEF MAILED |
|
| STCV | Information on status: appeal procedure |
Free format text: ON APPEAL -- AWAITING DECISION BY THE BOARD OF APPEALS |
|
| STCV | Information on status: appeal procedure |
Free format text: BOARD OF APPEALS DECISION RENDERED |
|
| STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- AFTER EXAMINER'S ANSWER OR BOARD OF APPEALS DECISION |
|
| STCC | Information on status: application revival |
Free format text: WITHDRAWN ABANDONMENT, AWAITING EXAMINER ACTION |
|
| STCV | Information on status: appeal procedure |
Free format text: BOARD OF APPEALS DECISION RENDERED |
|
| STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE MAILED -- APPLICATION RECEIVED IN OFFICE OF PUBLICATIONS |
|
| ZAAB | Notice of allowance mailed |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: MN/=. |
|
| STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: PUBLICATIONS -- ISSUE FEE PAYMENT VERIFIED |
|
| STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |