TWI607422B - Interactive teaching question distribution system and using method thereof - Google Patents

Description

Interactive system for teaching question allocation problem and its use method

The present invention relates to a teaching interaction system and a method of using the same, and in particular to an interactive system for teaching mutual teaching through a student and a method of using the same.

With the development of science and technology, the application of computers or equivalent electronic products as teaching aids is becoming more and more extensive. From the early computer classroom practice, the computer screen of the students is controlled by the teacher's computer, and the teacher presents the pictures to the students. The teacher recorded the teaching content into a digital image file, which was watched by the students at the far end, and recently replaced the traditional textbooks and other paper products through the computer to achieve complete paperless teaching.

The teaching method based on computer or equivalent electronic products has many advantages, which reduces the cost of paper, which is equivalent to indirectly improving environmental protection. In addition, there are good editing ability and dynamic teaching. Further evaluation after examination can be Quickly learned that the traditional practice of a large number of people has been eliminated.

In response to this, the current teaching methods should also follow the development of science and technology, make corresponding changes, and make the overall teaching effect better. Here is an example to illustrate that the current teaching is supplemented by computers. In the first paragraph, the teacher usually asks the students if they have any questions. Usually, the students will stay in silent or unanswered manners. This way, the way of interrogation is not ideal, and the teacher can't know the current class's learning status. In one case, there may be one student asking questions, but the vast majority of students are aware of the content of the teaching, so the teacher may repeat the teaching for the student. For most students and teachers, the overall teaching will be slowed down. schedule.

In this regard, how to effectively use the advantages brought by the computer or equivalent electronic products, and the corresponding improvement of teaching methods, is the technical focus of the present invention.

The purpose of the present invention is to propose an interactive system for teaching question distribution problems and a method for using the same, based on an application computer or an equivalent electronic product, providing an interactive system and a method for using the mutual help among students to improve teaching quality.

In order to achieve the above object, the present invention proposes an interactive system for teaching question distribution problems and a method for using the same, and the structure of the interactive system includes:

A questioning interface module is used to generate questions for the students to evaluate, and the student answers the questions generated by the questioning interface module;

An assessment report module, after the student answers the question, the right or wrong is returned to the lecturer through the evaluation report module, and the evaluation report module is different according to the answering question, and the correct answer is given to the student. a state, giving the student the second state of the wrong answer;

In the case of a adoption problem module, the student in the second state issues a state of help through the adoption problem module, and the student in the first state issues a adoption status through the adoption problem module;

a record allocation problem module, which pairs the above-mentioned adoption status and the help-seeking state to each other, records them, and generates an allocation status information;

A summary problem module is summarized according to the allocation status information of the record distribution problem module and generates a summary information, and the lecturer decides to enter the re-teaching or enter the next chapter according to the content of the summary information.

In an embodiment of the invention, the interactive system cooperates with a teaching system, the teaching system comprising a course database, the course database containing at least one course material content.

In an embodiment of the invention, a limit module is further included, which has a set value for limiting the upper limit of the number of students who can adopt the second state by the student in the first state.

Continuing the above, the parameter of the set value is greater than one.

The method of using the method of the present invention comprises the steps of:

(a) evaluate the participants through the question interface module;

(b) Reward each student's assessment status through the assessment and return module, and distinguish between the correct student and the wrong student;

(c) Through the adoption module, the correct student will answer the wrong student's adoption of the teaching;

(d) record the results of adoption through a record allocation module;

(e) Confirm the status of the pairing by summarizing the problem module. The instructor decides to re-learn or enter the next chapter according to the status of the pairing.

Continuing the above, which further includes the step (b) comprising:

(b1) giving the correct answer to the first student;

(b2) giving the student who answered the error a second state;

(b3) Reward each student's separation in the first state or the second state and count them.

Continuing the above, which further includes the step (c) comprising:

(c1) The student in the second state proposes a state of help;

(c2) The student in the first state proposes a status of adoption;

(c3) Pair the help state and the adoption status.

Continuing the above, which further includes the step (d) comprising:

(d1) confirm the number of students who have submitted a state of help;

(d2) confirm the number of students who have submitted their adoption status;

(d3) Record the pairing results to generate allocation status information.

Continuing the above, in the pairing result mentioned in the step (d3), the student who proposes the adoption status can set a set value through a restriction module, and adjust the quantity that the student of the adoption state can adopt.

Continuing the above, which further includes the step (e) comprising:

(e1) Check the allocation status information and confirm the value of the number of students who are currently in the state of seeking assistance and the number of students who have submitted the status of adoption;

(e2) If the value of the subtraction mentioned in step (e1) is greater than zero, the instructor will decide to teach again;

(e3) If the value of the subtraction mentioned in step (e1) is less than or equal to zero, the instructor will decide to proceed to the next chapter.

Through the above technical means, the instructor can conduct simple tests in each paragraph to determine the learning situation of each student, and then assist in learning through mutual help, so that the overall learning effect is better, to achieve the advantages of improving teaching quality. .

The above and other objects, features and advantages of the present invention will become more <RTIgt;

In the following embodiments, the same or similar component symbols represent the same or similar components. In addition, the directional terms mentioned in the following embodiments, for example, up, down, left, right, front or back, etc., refer only to the direction of the additional drawing, and therefore, the directional term used is used for explanation, and It is not intended to limit the invention.

Please refer to "Figure 1", which is a block diagram of the interactive system of the present invention. It can be clearly seen that two large blocks are the interactive system 1 and the teaching system 2, and the teaching system 2 includes the course. The database 21 and the course material content 22 are substantially the same as the current common architecture, and therefore will not be described again, and the interactive system 1 is divided into modules with different functions, and the following ones are explained:

Question interface module 11: mainly used to generate questions for the students to evaluate, the content of the questions will be in line with the content of the course material content 22, corresponding to the problem to test the student's current learning situation.

The evaluation return module 12 is mainly used to deliver the results of the student test evaluation to the lecturer. In order to facilitate the subsequent operation, the students will be sent back and forth according to the different questions and answers. ,Let

The adoption problem module 13 is mainly for pairing the students in different states, and the student in the second state issues a help state through the adoption problem module 13, and the student in the first state issues a adoption through the adoption problem module 13 The status, adoption problem module 13 will match the adoption status and the help status of the students, and apply to the subsequent modules. In the case of the lecturer's approval, the matching ratio of the adoption status and the help status can be changed. Details will be explained below.

The record allocation problem module 14 is configured to record the situation after the above allocation, record the result, and generate an allocation status information according to the result.

Summary problem module 15: assign status information to summarize and generate a summary information, the lecturer determines the current learning situation in the classroom according to the content of the summary information, to judge the overall learning situation of the current student, specifically After comparing the number of students who propose the state of help with the number of students who are in the state of adoption, the instructor will be able to understand whether the current learning effect is good or not, and decide to enter the re-education or enter the next chapter.

Restriction module 16: The above-mentioned ratio of the adoption status and the assistance status, specifically, a student in the adoption state teaches a student who is in a state of help, such a teacher ratio can be understood as 1:1, and Limiting the set value in the module 16 is to adjust the parameters of the teacher ratio. Under reasonable circumstances, the teacher has a good teaching effect under the condition of 1:2. Based on such a starting condition, the restriction module 16 The set value can be adjusted and changed according to the lecturer's consideration, so that the record distribution problem module 14 and the summary problem module 15 can work more smoothly.

Please refer to "Fig. 2", which is a flow chart of the method for using the interactive system of the present invention, and the method of use is carried out in conjunction with the above structure. Each step will be described below:

(a) Evaluate the participants through the Question Interface Module: the students are assessed for problems.

(b) Reward each student's assessment status through the assessment and return module, and distinguish between the correct student and the wrong student: according to the results of the assessment, give each student a status and answer the correct student. The first state gives the student the second state of the wrong answer.

(c) Through the adoption question module, the correct student will answer the wrong student's adoption of the teaching: the student in the first state will be paired with the student in the second state according to the status of each student.

(d) Record the results of the adoption through the record allocation module: record the results of the pairings completed above for subsequent use.

(e) Confirm the status of the pairing by summarizing the problem module. The lecturer decides to re-learn or enter the next chapter according to the status of the pairing: mainly to confirm whether each student who has not yet learned has a learned student can teach. The instructor then plans the overall teaching progress based on the status of the pairing.

Please refer to "FIG. 3", which is a detailed flow chart of step (b) of the present invention. Specifically, step (b) can also be subdivided into steps (b1) to (b3), which are described as follows:

(b1) Give the correct student a first status: assign the correct student (student number) to a first state.

(b2) The student who answered the error is given a second state: the student who has answered the mistake (student number) is given a second state.

(b3) Reward each student's respective status in the first state or the second state, and count the statistics: the status of each student is counted and used by the subsequent modules.

Please refer to "Fig. 4", which is a detailed flow chart of step (c) of the present invention. Specifically, step (c) can also be subdivided into steps (c1) to (c3), which are described as follows:

(c1) The second state of the student proposes a state of help: the student who has not yet learned will seek help through the adoption problem module.

(c2) The first state of the student proposes a status of adoption: the learned student assists through the adoption problem module.

(c3) Pairing the state of help and the status of adoption: Pairing the students in different states, the significance of which is that after the lecturer's class is over, the students can agree on the time to conduct interactive learning exchanges.

Please refer to "figure 5", which is a detailed flow chart of step (d) of the present invention. Specifically, step (d) can also be subdivided into steps (d1) to (d3), which are described as follows:

(d1) Confirm the number of students who have submitted a status of help: Confirm the number of students who are in the state of help, usually referring to the students who failed to correctly answer the questions generated by the question interface module.

(d2) Confirm the number of students who are in the state of adoption: Confirm the number of students in the assisted state, usually refer to the students who can correctly answer the questions generated by the question interface module and are willing to provide assistance.

(d3) Record the pairing result to generate allocation status information: record the above result and generate an allocation status information, and provide it to the subsequent module for application.

Please refer to "Fig. 6", which is a detailed flowchart of the step (e) of the present invention. Specifically, the step (e) can also be subdivided into steps (d1) to (d3), which includes a judgment, which is explained as follows :

(e1) Checking the distribution status information and confirming the value of the number of students who are currently in the state of seeking assistance and the number of students who are in the state of adoption: to determine the number of students in different states, to obtain a value by subtraction, according to It is worthwhile to decide the course of the instructor's teaching.

(e2) If the value of the subtraction mentioned in step (e1) is greater than zero, the instructor will decide to teach again: specifically, the overall effect of the student in this paragraph is not good, there are many possible reasons, such as answer There are too few correct people, too many wrong people, insufficient willingness to learn from each other, or the teaching methods of the lecturers are not easy to be understood. In this case, it is recommended to teach again.

(e3) If the value of the subtraction mentioned in step (e1) is less than or equal to zero, the instructor will decide to proceed to the next chapter: specifically, the student of this paragraph has a good overall effect and can be matched by the students. To achieve the purpose of interactive mutual learning.

The core concept of this architecture is to achieve a mutual learning outcome through interactive means to enhance the quality of teaching and teaching speed.

Although the present invention has been disclosed in the above preferred embodiments, it is not intended to limit the present invention, and those skilled in the art can make some modifications and refinements without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. The scope of protection is subject to the definition of the scope of the attached patent application.

1‧‧‧Interactive system

11‧‧‧Question interface module

12‧‧‧Evaluation Reward Module

13‧‧‧ Adoption problem module

14‧‧‧ Record Allocation Problem Module

15‧‧‧Summary problem module

16‧‧‧Restriction module

2‧‧‧ teaching system

21‧‧‧ course database

22‧‧‧ Course material content

1 is a block diagram of an interactive system of the present invention; FIG. 2 is a flow chart of a method for using the interactive system of the present invention; FIG. 3 is a detailed flow chart of step (b) of the present invention; Step (c) is a detailed flow chart; Figure 5 is a detailed flow chart of step (d) of the present invention; and Figure 6 is a detailed flow chart of step (e) of the present invention.

1‧‧‧Interactive system

11‧‧‧Question interface module

12‧‧‧Evaluation Reward Module

13‧‧‧ Adoption problem module

14‧‧‧ Record Allocation Problem Module

15‧‧‧Summary problem module

16‧‧‧Restriction module

2‧‧‧ teaching system

21‧‧‧ course database

22‧‧‧ Course material content

Claims (10)

An interactive system for teaching question distribution problems is applied to teaching activities. The interactive system includes: a question interface module for generating questions for the students to evaluate, and the student answers the questions generated by the question interface module. The evaluation reward module, the student's right or wrong after answering the question, is returned to the lecturer through the evaluation reward module, and the evaluation reward module is different according to the answering question, and the correct answer is given to the student. The first state, the second state of the student who answered the mistake; the adoption question module, the student of the second state sends a help state through the adoption question module, and the student in the first state sends a question through the adoption question module a status of adoption; and a record distribution problem module, the above-mentioned adoption status and the help status are paired with each other, recorded, and an allocation status information is generated; and a summary problem module is configured according to the record distribution problem model The group's allocation status information is summed up and a summary information is generated. The lecturer decides to proceed according to the content of the summary information. Teaching or go to the next chapter again. For example, the interactive system for teaching question distribution problems described in claim 1 of the patent scope, wherein the interactive system cooperates with a teaching system, the teaching system includes a course database, and the course database contains at least one course material content. The interactive system for teaching question allocation problem according to claim 1, wherein the method further includes a limit module having a set value for limiting the student in the first state to adopt the second state. The maximum number. An interactive system for teaching question allocation problems as described in claim 3, wherein the parameter of the set value is greater than one. A method for using an interactive system for assigning teaching questions as described in claim 1 of the patent application, the method steps comprising: (a) evaluating a student through a questioning interface module; (b) evaluating the feedback model The group returns the assessment status of each student and distinguishes between the correct student and the student who answered the mistake; (c) through the adoption question module, the correct student will answer the wrong student's adoption of teaching; (d) The record allocation problem module records the results of the adoption; and (e) confirms the status of the pairing by summarizing the problem module, and the instructor decides to re-learn or proceed to the next chapter according to the state of the pairing. The method for using the interactive system for teaching question allocation according to claim 5, wherein the step (b) further comprises: (b1) giving the first student the correct answer; (b2) answering the wrong question. The student is given a second state; and (b3) returns each student's respective in a first state or a second state and is counted. The method for using the interactive system for teaching question allocation according to claim 6 of the patent application, further comprising the step (c) comprising: (c1) the second state student proposes a help state; (c2) the first state The student proposes a status of adoption; and (c3) pairs the status of help and the status of adoption. The method for using the interactive system for teaching question allocation according to claim 7 of the patent application scope, wherein the step (d) further comprises: (d1) confirming the number of students who propose the state of assistance; and (d2) confirming the student who is in the state of adoption. Quantity; and (d3) record the pairing results to generate allocation status information. For example, in the method of using the interactive system of the teaching question allocation problem described in claim 8 of the patent application, wherein the pairing result mentioned in the step (d3), the student who proposes the adoption status can set a setting through a restriction module. Value, the number of students who can adopt the status of adoption. For example, the method for using the interactive system for teaching question allocation according to item 8 of the patent application scope includes, in addition, step (e) includes: (e1) checking the allocation status information, and confirming the number of students currently requesting help status and raising the number of students. The value of the number of students in the state is subtracted; (e2) if the value of the subtraction mentioned in step (e1) is greater than zero, the instructor will decide to teach again; and (e3) the subtraction as mentioned in step (e1) If the value is less than or equal to zero, the instructor will decide to proceed to the next chapter.