[go: up one dir, main page]

TW201314479A - Method for gathering opinions and surveying data - Google Patents

Method for gathering opinions and surveying data Download PDF

Info

Publication number
TW201314479A
TW201314479A TW100134935A TW100134935A TW201314479A TW 201314479 A TW201314479 A TW 201314479A TW 100134935 A TW100134935 A TW 100134935A TW 100134935 A TW100134935 A TW 100134935A TW 201314479 A TW201314479 A TW 201314479A
Authority
TW
Taiwan
Prior art keywords
opinion
opinions
system website
voting
website
Prior art date
Application number
TW100134935A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
TWI457773B (en
Inventor
pei-sheng Yang
Shan-He Yang
Dong-Yu Yang
Original Assignee
pei-sheng Yang
Shan-He Yang
Dong-Yu Yang
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by pei-sheng Yang, Shan-He Yang, Dong-Yu Yang filed Critical pei-sheng Yang
Priority to TW100134935A priority Critical patent/TW201314479A/en
Publication of TW201314479A publication Critical patent/TW201314479A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of TWI457773B publication Critical patent/TWI457773B/zh

Links

Landscapes

  • Information Transfer Between Computers (AREA)

Abstract

The present invention relates to a method for gathering opinions and surveying data. The steps include: (A) a questioner in a system website puts forward an opinion with real name and provides information relevant to the opinion; (B-1) the content of the opinion is filtered by a keyword filter in the system website for instant confirmation and notification of the questioner whether it can be published in the system website; (B-2) users browse all opinions in the system website and select from them, and the selected opinions are replied and put to vote with real name, wherein relevant information can also be provided by any one of the respondents, voters and opinion buyers with real name; (C) the reply opinions and the voting opinions in step (B-2) are converted through a compiler of the system website into the background data and statistical data, which are gathered for storage in the database of the system website and integrated into the survey data for used by the service providers to quickly and comprehensively gather public opinions for application.

Description

彙集意見及調查資料之方法Method of bringing together opinions and survey data

本發明係有關於一種彙集意見及調查資料之方法,係透過網站以彙集眾人意見,並進行意見調查以供統計與分析運用。The present invention relates to a method of collecting opinions and investigating materials through a website to gather opinions of various people and conduct opinion surveys for statistical and analytical use.

一般社群網路服務(Social Network Services,簡稱SNS)網站中,均會提供一種在線討論(Online discussion)的程序,係以網路論壇(如討論區、留言版)之形式呈現於網站之網頁上,以供社群或非社群成員參加各式各樣的討論議題,使得人人皆可在透過網路發聲。In the general social network service (SNS) website, an online discussion program is provided, which is displayed on the website in the form of a web forum (such as a discussion forum, a message board). In order to allow members of the community or non-community members to participate in a variety of discussion topics, so that everyone can speak through the Internet.

然而,所述網路論壇之形式卻具有以下問題點:However, the form of the web forum has the following problems:

[1]在目前現有之網站中,並沒有在提問時同步進行意見調查之功能或服務,一般人若想獲取眾人之意見,通常會藉由提出問題來觀察其他人回覆意見,但是答案往往僅由少數人士回覆,且易被投機取巧者重覆利用,易淪為少數個人意見而難以代表大眾之意見。[1] In the existing websites, there is no function or service for conducting opinion surveys simultaneously when asking questions. If ordinary people want to get opinions from everyone, they usually observe other people's responses by asking questions, but the answers are often only A small number of people responded and were easily used by opportunistics. Yi Yi was a minority opinion and difficult to represent the public.

[2]由於網路論壇中常會存有許多相似標題之文章及言論,且分散於不同之網路論壇中,若該網站管理者未定時檢閱並予以篩選或合併時,過多重疊之資訊容易造成瀏覽者之困擾,並佔用網站之資料庫空間,雖會整理出常見問答集以應對,卻會受管理者之態度影響而不易彙整出客觀之思緒脈絡。[2] Since there are many articles and remarks with similar titles in the online forums, and they are scattered in different online forums, if the website administrators do not regularly review and filter or merge, too much overlapping information is likely to cause The troubles of the viewers and occupying the database space of the website, although sorting out the common question and answer set to deal with, will be affected by the attitude of the manager and not easy to integrate the objective thoughts.

[3]而在一般網路論壇中,遭遇爭議問題時,容易出現眾說紛紜之意見,若要投票表決,亦會有造假之嫌疑,且管理者通常都難以有效統合及整理歸類該些意見,甚至沒有追踪記錄,往往待事件過後即以刪除處理,易使爭議問題重覆發生。[3] In the general online forums, when controversial issues are encountered, it is easy to have different opinions. If you want to vote, there will be suspicions of fraud, and it is often difficult for managers to effectively integrate and sort out the opinions. Even if there is no tracking record, it is often treated as a deletion after the event, which makes the dispute problem repeat.

有鑑於此,本發明人乃潛心研思、設計組製,其能提供一種彙集意見及調查資料之方法,係具有同步彙集意見、並進行意見調查之功效,即為本發明所欲研創之創作動機者。In view of this, the present inventors have devoted themselves to research and design, which can provide a method for collecting opinions and investigating materials, and has the effect of simultaneously collecting opinions and conducting opinion surveys, that is, creating creations for the present invention. Motivator.

本創作之主要目的,在於提供一種彙集意見及調查資料之方法,係具有同步彙集意見、並進行意見調查之功效。The main purpose of this creation is to provide a method for collecting opinions and investigating materials, which has the effect of simultaneously collecting opinions and conducting opinion surveys.

為達上述目的,本創作之方法的步驟包括:步驟A,提問者於該系統網站中以實名方式提出意見,並提供涉及該意見之相關資訊;步驟B-1,該意見之內容敘述,係經由該系統網站之關鍵字篩選器過濾,以即時確認並通知提問者是否能夠發表於該系統網站中;如是,該意見即可發表於該系統網站中;如否,該系統網站會即時通知提問者修正該意見之內容敘述;步驟B-2,使用者瀏覽該系統網站中之眾人意見、並從中挑選,而選定之意見以實名方式來回覆意見、參與表決意見,該相關資訊還能由回覆者、表決者及意見購買者的其中之一以實名方式提供;以及步驟C,係將步驟B-2之回覆意見與表決意見,經由該系統網站之編譯器轉換成背景資料及統計數據,彙集於該系統網站之資料庫中儲存,並整合成調查資料,以供業者迅速且週全地彙集眾人意見與運用。In order to achieve the above purposes, the steps of the method of the present invention include: Step A, the questioner submits an opinion in real name on the website of the system, and provides relevant information related to the opinion; Step B-1, the content description of the opinion, is Filtered by the keyword filter of the system website to instantly confirm and inform the questioner whether it can be published on the system website; if yes, the opinion can be published on the system website; if not, the system website will immediately notify the question The content of the comment is revised. In step B-2, the user browses the opinions of the people on the system website and selects them. The selected opinions are returned by the real name and participate in the voting opinions. The relevant information can also be replyed. One of the parties, the voter and the purchaser of the opinion is provided by real name; and step C is to convert the reply and voting opinions of step B-2 into background information and statistical data through the compiler of the system website, and collect It is stored in the database of the system website and integrated into survey data, so that the operators can quickly and comprehensively gather opinions and applications.

據此,本發明之方法,係透過在伸張意見之過程中,同步彙集意見並進行意見調查,除了能快速彙整眾人意見並補足使用者之基本資料,避免陷入討論之爭議中,又能透過小組投票機制、代理投票機制以及核對機制等機制,確實綜合眾人意見,以客觀分析出眾人之意見趨向,俾利供長期意見調查使用,再藉由增設付款機制以提升每一意見之價值。Accordingly, the method of the present invention, through the process of presenting opinions, simultaneously synthesizes opinions and conducts opinion surveys, in addition to quickly collecting opinions of the opinions and supplementing the basic information of the users, avoiding being caught in the dispute of the discussion, and Mechanisms such as voting mechanism, proxy voting mechanism and verification mechanism do integrate the opinions of the public, objectively analyze the tendency of the public to make a profit, and use it for long-term opinion surveys, and then increase the value of each opinion by adding a payment mechanism.

為了能夠更進一步瞭解本發明之特徵、特點和技術內容,請參閱以下有關本發明之詳細說明與附圖,惟所附圖式僅提供參考與說明用,非用以限制本發明。For a fuller understanding of the features, features and aspects of the present invention, reference should be made to the accompanying drawings.

請參閱第1圖及第2圖所示,本發明係為一種彙集意見及調查資料之方法,即業者(如網站業者)透過架設一系統網站100做為平台,該系統網站100具有社群網路服務並提供在線討論功能,讓任何使用者200經由網路300登入該系統網站100且成為會員後,能於該系統網站100中伸張意見(包含提出意見、回覆意見及表決意見);每一會員係以實際姓名及身份證字號登錄,並具有一投票權,以針對具有爭議之問題及意見進行投票表決,避免發生虛報不實之情形,並防止做為網路犯罪之工具;前述使用者包含提問者、回覆者及表決者和意見購買者(即:購買意見之任何人);前述該系統網站100係架設於伺服器中且包含有處理單元101及與該處理單元101連結之資料庫104,又該處理單元101中分別設有與該網路300及資料庫104連結的關鍵字篩選器102(Keyword Filter)及編譯器103(Compiler)。另在本發明中,使用者所發表於該系統網站中之內容敘述均為意見700,因此該意見包含有提問之問題、該問題之回覆以及任何看法。Referring to FIG. 1 and FIG. 2, the present invention is a method for collecting opinions and survey data, that is, an operator (such as a website operator) uses a system website 100 as a platform, and the system website 100 has a social network. The online service provides an online discussion function, so that any user 200 can log in to the system website 100 via the network 300 and become a member, and can present opinions (including comments, replies, and voting opinions) on the system website 100; Members are registered with the actual name and ID number, and have a voting right to vote on disputed issues and opinions, to avoid false reporting, and to prevent cybercrime as a tool; Include the questioner, the responder, and the voter and the opinion purchaser (ie, anyone who purchases the opinion); the system website 100 is installed in the server and includes the processing unit 101 and the database connected to the processing unit 101. 104. The processing unit 101 further includes a keyword filter 102 (Keyword Filter) and a compiler 103 (Compiler) connected to the network 300 and the database 104. In addition, in the present invention, the content descriptions published by the user on the website of the system are opinions 700, and therefore the opinions include questions of the questions, responses to the questions, and any opinions.

本發明方法之各步驟說明如下:The steps of the method of the invention are illustrated as follows:

步驟A,提問者於該系統網站中以實名方式提出意見700,並提供涉及該意見之相關資訊702;該意見之相關資訊還能由回覆者、表決者或該系統網站提供,而所提供之相關資訊係選自新聞、評論、論文、書籍及其它網站(例如博客網站、微博網站、維基百科網站);該相關資訊之呈現方式係能以文字敘述、圖照或影音檔呈現。In step A, the questioner submits an opinion 700 on the system website in real name and provides relevant information 702 related to the opinion; the related information of the opinion can also be provided by the responder, the voter or the system website, and the provided information Relevant information is selected from news, reviews, essays, books, and other websites (such as blog sites, Weibo sites, Wikipedia sites); the presentation of such information can be presented in textual, pictorial or audiovisual files.

步驟B-1,該意見之內容敘述,係經由該系統網站之關鍵字篩選器過濾,以即時確認並通知提問者是否能夠發表於該系統網站中;如是,該意見係符合該關鍵字篩選器之篩選條件,即可發表於該系統網站中;如否,該系統網站會即時通知提問者修正該意見之內容敘述;在實施例中,係採以負面關鍵字做為篩選條件。Step B-1, the content description of the opinion is filtered by a keyword filter of the system website to instantly confirm and notify the questioner whether it can be published on the system website; if yes, the opinion conforms to the keyword filter The screening conditions can be published on the system website; if not, the system website will immediately notify the questioner to correct the content description of the opinion; in the embodiment, the negative keyword is used as the screening condition.

步驟B-2,使用者瀏覽該系統網站中之眾人意見、並從中挑選,而選定之意見以實名方式來回覆意見、參與表決意見,該相關資訊還能由回覆者、表決者及意見購買者的其中之一以實名方式提供。In step B-2, the user browses and selects the opinions of the people in the system website, and the selected opinions are followed by the real name to vote and participate in the voting opinions, and the related information can also be returned by the respondent, the voter and the opinion purchaser. One of them is provided by real name.

步驟C,係將步驟B-2之回覆意見與表決意見,經由該系統網站之編譯器轉換成背景資料及統計數據,彙集於該系統網站之資料庫中儲存,並整合成意見調查資料,以供業者迅速且週全地彙集眾人意見與運用(例如賣給提問者)。Step C, the feedback and voting opinions of step B-2 are converted into background information and statistical data by the compiler of the system website, collected in the database of the system website, and integrated into the opinion survey data, Suppliers quickly and comprehensively gather opinions and applications (such as selling to questioners).

上述步驟中,每一意見700係搭配有複數具有對應關係之子問題701,該些子問題之產生方式,係由提問者於提出問題時建立,或是由該系統網站預先內建於該資料庫中,而所有子問題經由該編譯器彙整並連結彼此之間的對應關係,於使用者每次伸張意見之過程中,複數子問題係以隨機方式彈出視窗,或是將該些子問題以配對方式連續彈出視窗,迫使使用者先行回覆該些子問題後,才能接續回覆所挑選之意見,以助該系統網站進行意見調查。In the above steps, each opinion 700 is matched with a plurality of sub-questions 701 having a corresponding relationship, and the sub-questions are generated by the questioner when the question is raised, or are pre-built in the database by the system website. In the middle, all sub-problems are merged and linked to each other via the compiler. During each user's opinion, the plurality of sub-problems pop up the window in a random manner, or pair the sub-questions The method continuously pops up the window, forcing the user to reply to the sub-questions first, in order to continue to reply to the selected opinions, so as to assist the system website to conduct opinion surveys.

該子問題701之出現時機,如第1圖所示,係能在步驟B-2中於每次回覆意見前或是回覆意見後出現,但不限於此,亦能在步驟B-1中於提問者修正該意見之內容敘述前或後出現,藉由將複數子問題分散於不同步驟中,藉以陸續各別彙集提問者及回覆者之意見,使並增加使用者與該系統網站之間的互動關係。The timing of the occurrence of the sub-question 701, as shown in FIG. 1 , can appear in step B-2 before each reply or after replying to the comment, but is not limited thereto, and can also be performed in step B-1. The questioner corrects the content of the opinion before or after the narrative, by dispersing the plural sub-questions in different steps, so as to gradually collect the opinions of the questioner and the replyer, and increase the relationship between the user and the system website. interaction.

該子問題之內容敘述,係選自該使用者登錄之會員資料中、或是所挑選意見的內容敘述及相關資訊中;而該子問題採以網頁或視窗形式呈現。藉由不同子問題以陸續補足該使用者之會員資料,並透過衍生之子問題以促進使用者回覆並提供更詳細資料,俾利於同步進行意見調查。The content of the sub-question is selected from the member information registered by the user, or the content description and related information of the selected opinions; and the sub-question is presented in the form of a webpage or a window. By supplementing the membership information of the user with different sub-questions and promoting the user's reply and providing more detailed information through the derivative sub-question, it is beneficial to conduct simultaneous opinion surveys.

每一意見經過回覆後,若任何使用者認為該回覆意見之內容敘述不足或是不認同該回覆意見,除了提出投票以進行表決外,亦可參考原提問者之提出意見的內容敘述,另行提出修改後之意見以重覆上述步驟流程,或是另行回覆意見,因此在本發明中,單一意見會有不同的內容敘述及回覆,藉由彙整、分析後,就能獲得較為深入核心內涵之意見,又能將彙集之意見分成正相關、負相關、中立持平及具創新性等類型。After replying to each of the comments, if any user thinks that the content of the reply is insufficient or does not agree with the reply, in addition to making a vote to vote, it may also refer to the content of the original questioner's comments. The revised comments will repeat the above steps or reply to the comments. Therefore, in the present invention, a single opinion will have different content narratives and replies. After consolidation and analysis, you can obtain more in-depth core connotations. It can also divide the opinions of the collection into positive correlation, negative correlation, neutrality and innovation.

所述之意見與子問題係經由程式設計而呈現出不同形式,能選自單一題、是非題、二選一題、多選一題、複選題、隨機問題搭配衍生問題、子母題、排序題、長期提問題、限期提問題的其中之一,藉以讓提問者能迅速輕鬆建立提問,並方便資料庫統計。The opinions and sub-problems are presented in different forms through programming, and can be selected from a single question, a yes-no question, a second-choice question, a multiple-choice question, a multiple-choice question, a random question pairing problem, a sub-mother, One of the questions of sorting questions, long-term questions, and deadlines, so that the questioner can quickly and easily establish questions and facilitate database statistics.

在檢索及瀏覽意見時,當發現一意見之內容敘述與另一意見之內容敘述近似時,任何使用者係能通知網站管理者彙整(人工處理),或是提供意見編號,讓該系統網站依該二意見之人氣指標,自動將低人氣指標之問題直接併入高人氣指標之問題中(自動處理),也能由眾人投票之方式合併,例如在該二意見旁設有意見選擇鍵,並予以限定投票時間。When searching and browsing opinions, when it is found that the content description of one opinion is similar to the content description of another opinion, any user can notify the website manager to collect (manual processing) or provide an opinion number to let the system website The popularity index of the two opinions automatically merges the problem of low popularity index into the problem of high popularity index (automatic processing), and can also be merged by everyone, for example, there is an opinion selection button next to the second opinion, and Limit the voting time.

每一意見與子問題之回覆必須在該系統網站所設定之時間內完成;而對於具有爭議之意見及子問題,亦必須在該系統網站所設定之時間內完成投票。The reply to each comment and sub-question must be completed within the time set by the system's website; for controversial opinions and sub-questions, the vote must be completed within the time set by the system's website.

為了提升每一意見之價值,本發明之系統網站設有一付款機制,係綜合每一意見之內容敘述、調查資料以及反應程度,劃分出數級付款價格,每一級付款價格係具有對應等級之檢閱權限;所述之檢閱權限係包含有可供檢閱之人數、次數、地區、對象限制及時間期限;而所述之反應程度係能選自於該意見之關鍵字排序、該意見設於網頁中之位置、該意見被檢閱之瀏覽數或是該意見之競價熱度。前述付款機制係能以網路電子交易(如信用卡)付款,請參閱第3圖所示,在網路終端之使用者200與該系統網站100之間,係透過認證中心401、發卡銀行402、收單銀行403及付款轉接站400等機構運作,以達成網路電子交易之功效。In order to enhance the value of each opinion, the system website of the present invention has a payment mechanism, which integrates the content narrative, survey data and reaction degree of each opinion, and divides the price of several levels of payment, and each level of payment price has a corresponding level of review. Permission; the review permission includes the number of people, the number of times, the region, the object limit, and the time limit; and the degree of response can be selected from the keyword ranking of the opinion, and the opinion is set in the webpage. The location, the number of views that the comment was reviewed, or the auction price of the comment. The payment mechanism can be paid by a network electronic transaction (such as a credit card). Referring to FIG. 3, between the user 200 of the network terminal and the system website 100, the authentication center 401 and the issuing bank 402 are used. Institutions such as the acquiring bank 403 and the payment transfer station 400 operate to achieve the effect of online electronic transactions.

提問者欲透過該系統網站提出特定意見(如具有爭議之意見)進行意見調查、獲得該調查資料之對應等級的檢閱權限(即意見調查之統計結果及該調查資料之分析)、以及建立授權他人檢閱之設定條件的其中之一事項,須經由該系統網站審定,審定為必須付款時,則提問者須於付款後才得以實施該事項或任多數事項,但該意見或意見購買者用於公益或慈善用途時,則不需付費即可使用;而所述之設定條件係為僅限提問者自己檢閱、限於被授權者檢閱、同意被該系統網站公開以供眾人檢閱、該特定意見搭配企業廣告行銷公開以供人檢閱、或是該特定意見經長時間調查後公開供人檢閱(如收視率之統計分析資料)。The questioner would like to make a specific opinion (such as a disputed opinion) through the system's website to conduct an opinion survey, obtain the corresponding level of review authority of the survey data (ie, the statistical result of the opinion survey and the analysis of the survey data), and establish an authorized person. One of the conditions for reviewing the conditions must be verified by the system website. If it is determined to be a payment, the questioner must implement the matter or most of the matters after payment, but the opinion or opinion purchaser is used for public welfare. For charitable purposes, it can be used without payment; the set conditions are only for the questioner to review, limited to the authorized person to review, agree to be publicized by the system website for review by everyone, the specific opinion matching company Advertising marketing is publicly available for review, or the specific opinion is publicly available for review after a long period of investigation (such as statistical analysis of ratings).

在檢閱權限方面,每一意見之回覆者及表決者,僅能簡單地檢閱該意見之調查資料(例如該意見之他人回覆意見),其他使用者欲檢閱該意見時,於付款後,才具有對應等級之檢閱權限;任一使用者係能透過給付該系統網站之設定價格,或是競標方式,購得所挑選意見之回覆意見及調查資料的檢閱權限,而在該使用者購得該檢閱權限後,亦能授權給他人閱覽。Regarding the review authority, each respondent and voter of the opinion can only simply review the survey information of the opinion (for example, the reply of the person who comments on the opinion). When other users want to review the opinion, they have the payment after they have The review authority of the corresponding level; any user can purchase the reply opinion of the selected opinion and the review authority of the survey data by paying the set price of the system website or the bidding method, and the user can purchase the review After the permission, it can also be authorized for reading.

為了廣納眾意且避免陷入討論之爭議中,通常遭遇具有爭議之意見500時,如第4圖及第5圖所示,該系統網站設有一小組投票機制600,係由三位以上之奇數會員組成一投票小組(奇數的目的:避免該投票小組內發生票數平均之情形),以針對該系統網站中之任一意見進行投票表決,每一投票小組係由組成成員中推舉一人做為小組長6001,在該投票小組之眾人意見一致時,由小組長為代理人來代表該投票小組進行投票,並附送該組成員之實名資料以供核對;而該意見之提問者係能設定該投票小組之組成條件,該組成條件包含人數、族群、年齡及屬性。In order to gain public opinion and avoid falling into the discussion disputes, it is common to encounter controversial opinions 500. As shown in Figures 4 and 5, the system website has a small group of voting mechanisms 600, which are composed of three or more odd numbers. Members form a voting group (the purpose of the odd number: to avoid the average number of votes in the voting group), to vote on any of the opinions on the system's website, each voting group is elected by the members of the group as The group leader 6001, when the voting group's opinions are the same, the group leader will act as the agent to vote on behalf of the voting group, and the real name information of the group members will be attached for verification; and the questioner of the opinion can set the The composition of the voting group, the composition conditions include the number of people, ethnic groups, age and attributes.

舉例而言,提問者在提出意見時,可預先設定該意見之投票小組之組成成員人數,而該投票小組最多不超過9人(含小組長)為佳,其中在進行小組投票時,該小組長及其他8名成員以實名方式,且必須附送身分證字號,以供核對,避免發生重覆投票之情形,而該投票小組之人數可以增加或減少。For example, when a questioner makes an opinion, the number of members of the voting group of the opinion can be pre-set, and the voting group is preferably no more than 9 people (including the group leader), and in the group voting, the small The leader and the other 8 members are in real-name manner and must be accompanied by an identity card number for verification to avoid repeated voting. The number of voting groups can be increased or decreased.

其次,由於提問者會依特定目地(例如電視台之收視率、競選比賽之候選人支持度),提出不同之意見,因而在該投票小組之成員的族群、年齡及屬性方面會有不同需求,例如提問者提出欲了解16至35歲之網路族的意見,則該投票小組之成員限於16歲至35歲之間,而符合此組成條件之小組長就必須去找符合相同資格成員;反之,不符合資格之小組長及組成成員均不能投票。Secondly, because the questioner will make different opinions depending on the specific purpose (such as the ratings of the TV station and the candidate support of the competition), there will be different needs in terms of the ethnicity, age and attributes of the members of the voting group, for example. If the questioner proposes to understand the opinions of the Internet family between the ages of 16 and 35, the members of the voting group are limited to between the ages of 16 and 35, and the team leader who meets the composition requirements must go to the same qualified member; Non-qualified team leaders and constituent members cannot vote.

在針對意見進行投票時,會列出該投票小組之成員姓名,當該投票小組之成員中,若有人意見不合,在雙方同意之情況下,不同意見之成員可脫離投票小組獨自投票。在小組投票機制中,每一投票小組之投票數有所限制,且該小組長不能兼任其它投票小組之小組長。本發明不限於以該投票小組實施,亦由複數投票小組組成一投票中組實施,進而再結合其它投票中組以組成一投票大組實施。When voting on opinions, the names of the members of the voting group will be listed. If there is any disagreement among the members of the voting group, members of different opinions may vote alone from the voting group if the parties agree. In the group voting mechanism, the number of votes for each voting group is limited, and the group leader cannot serve as the group leader of other voting groups. The present invention is not limited to being implemented by the voting group, and is also composed of a voting group formed by a plurality of voting groups, and then combined with other voting groups to form a voting group.

另外,為了便於幫助不會使用網路、身心障礙及身體肢障者,如第4圖及第5圖所示,該系統網站係設有一代理投票機制601,係由一會員徵得他人之同意及獲得他人之身份證字號時,該會員即能成為代理人6011,來代理他人於該系統網站100中之任一意見進行投票表決。在代理投票機制601中,每一具代理資格之會員能同時代理之投票數不限,且對於不會使用網路之使用者可採以電話聯絡,藉此可避免侷限投票者之年齡層及族群,又能縮減冗長之投票時間,以達到快速表決之功效。而當上述投票小組內產生不同意見而無法一致時,由於該投票小組無法成立時,即可以該代理投票機制替代實施。因此在本發明中,所有表決意見可透過個人代理投票實現、也可以透過小組代理投票實現,亦或是該二種投票之機制並行實施。In addition, in order to facilitate the use of the Internet, physical and mental disabilities and physical disabilities, as shown in Figures 4 and 5, the system website has a proxy voting mechanism 601, which is approved by a member. And when obtaining the identity number of another person, the member can become an agent 6011 to vote for any of the opinions of the system on the system 100. In the proxy voting mechanism 601, the number of votes that can be represented by each member of the agent is not limited, and the user who does not use the network can be contacted by telephone, thereby avoiding the age level of the restricted voter and The ethnic group can also reduce the lengthy voting time to achieve the effect of a quick vote. When the above-mentioned voting group has different opinions and cannot be consistent, since the voting group cannot be established, the proxy voting mechanism can be used instead. Therefore, in the present invention, all voting opinions can be realized through individual proxy voting, or through group proxy voting, or the two voting mechanisms can be implemented in parallel.

如第4圖所示,該系統網站係設有一核對機制502,係透過被代理人親領贈品、被代理人親用贈品以及獲取被代理人之語音頻率的其中一方式進行驗證核對,再次確認代理人與被代理人符合會員資格以及彼此之間的委任關係,並覆核該投票小組之其他成員或被代理人投票之意見確實一致;所述贈品包含有禮品、等價點數及折價卷;而所述語音頻率係透過一音頻即時鑑定器105(請參閱第2圖)來驗證核對,因此可透過通話以鑑定被代理人之聲音頻率,當該系統網站中之音頻即時鑑定器105測得相同之音頻後,即通過核對機制502,接續步驟即該系統網站會認可投票成立503,之後步驟即待投票結果產生504As shown in Figure 4, the system website has a verification mechanism 502, which is verified by one of the means by which the agent receives the gift, the agent's personal gift, and the voice frequency of the agent. The agent and the agent are in compliance with the membership and the appointing relationship between them, and the opinions of the other members of the voting group or the voting by the agent are identical; the gifts include gifts, equivalent points and discount rolls And the voice frequency is verified by an audio instant evaluator 105 (see Figure 2), so the voice frequency of the agent can be authenticated by the call, when the audio instant evaluator 105 in the system website measures After the same audio is obtained, the verification mechanism 502 is passed, and the subsequent step is that the system website will approve the voting to be established 503, and then the step is to wait for the voting result to generate 504.

如第6圖所示,使用者係透過桌上型電腦、電視遊樂器、網路電話、家用電話、手機、智慧型手機、筆記型電腦及平板電腦的其中之一裝置204,經由網路300登入該系統網站100中伸張意見。該裝置204不限於行動裝置或是其它非行動裝置實施。而伸張意見之方式除了透過網路登入該系統網站中,也能透過傳遞手機簡訊之方式實施。As shown in FIG. 6, the user is through the network 300 through one of the devices 204 of the desktop computer, the video game instrument, the network phone, the home phone, the mobile phone, the smart phone, the notebook computer, and the tablet computer. Log in to the system website 100 for an opinion. The device 204 is not limited to a mobile device or other non-mobile device implementation. In addition to accessing the system's website through the Internet, the way to express opinions can also be implemented by transmitting mobile phone newsletters.

以上所述僅為本發明之較佳可行實施例,非因此即侷限本發明之專利範圍,舉凡運用本發明說明書及圖式內容所為之等效結構變化,均理同包含於本發明之範圍內,合予陳明。The above description is only a preferred embodiment of the present invention, and is not intended to limit the scope of the present invention. The equivalent structural changes of the present invention and the contents of the drawings are all included in the scope of the present invention. , combined with Chen Ming.

A...步驟AA. . . Step A

B-1...步驟B-1B-1. . . Step B-1

B-2...步驟B-2B-2. . . Step B-2

C...步驟CC. . . Step C

100...系統網站100. . . System website

101...處理單元101. . . Processing unit

102...關鍵字篩選器102. . . Keyword filter

103...編譯器103. . . translater

104...資料庫104. . . database

105...音頻即時鑑定器105. . . Audio instant evaluator

200...使用者200. . . user

201...提問者201. . . questioner

202...回覆者202. . . Replyer

203...表決者203. . . Voter

204...裝置204. . . Device

300...網路300. . . network

400...付款轉接站400. . . Payment transfer station

401...認證中心401. . . Certification Center

402...發卡銀行402. . . Issuing bank

403...收單銀行403. . . Acquiring bank

500...具有爭議之意見500. . . Controversial opinion

600...小組投票機制600. . . Group voting mechanism

6001...小組長6001. . . Group leader

601...代理人機制601. . . Agent mechanism

6011...代理人6011. . . agent

602...核對機制602. . . Check mechanism

603...認可投票成立603. . . Approved voting

604...投票結果產生604. . . Voting results

700...意見700. . . opinion

701...子問題701. . . Sub problem

702...相關資訊702. . . relevant information

第1圖係為本發明彙集意見及調查資料之方法的步驟流程圖。Figure 1 is a flow chart showing the steps of the method for collecting opinions and survey data of the present invention.

第2圖係為提問者、回覆者及表決者與系統網站的關係示意圖。Figure 2 is a diagram showing the relationship between the questioner, the responder, and the voter and the system website.

第3圖係為本發明系統網站、網路終端之使用者與認證中心、發卡銀行、收單銀行及付款轉接站之間的關係示意圖。Figure 3 is a schematic diagram showing the relationship between the system website, the user of the network terminal, the authentication center, the issuing bank, the acquiring bank, and the payment transfer station.

第4圖係為本發明小組投票機制以及代理投票機制之步驟流程圖。Figure 4 is a flow chart showing the steps of the group voting mechanism and the proxy voting mechanism of the present invention.

第5圖係為本發明系統網站、投票小組及投票之代理人與被代理人的關係示意圖。Figure 5 is a schematic diagram showing the relationship between the agent website and the agent of the system website, voting group and voting of the present invention.

第6圖係為本發明之系統網站透過網路與桌上型電腦、電視遊樂器、網路電話、家用電話、手機、智慧型手機、筆記型電腦及平板電腦等裝置的關係示意圖。Figure 6 is a diagram showing the relationship between the system website of the present invention and a device such as a desktop computer, a video game instrument, a network phone, a home phone, a mobile phone, a smart phone, a notebook computer, and a tablet computer.

A...步驟AA. . . Step A

B-1...步驟B-1B-1. . . Step B-1

B-2...步驟B-2B-2. . . Step B-2

C...步驟CC. . . Step C

500...具有爭議之意見500. . . Controversial opinion

600...小組投票機制600. . . Group voting mechanism

601...代理人機制601. . . Agent mechanism

701...子問題701. . . Sub problem

Claims (12)

一種彙集意見及調查資料之方法,即業者透過架設一系統網站,並提供社群網路服務及在線討論功能,讓任何使用者經由網路登入該系統網站且成為會員後,能於該系統網站中伸張意見;前述使用者包含提問者、回覆者及表決者和意見購買者;而該方法之步驟包括:步驟A,提問者於該系統網站中以實名方式提出意見,並提供涉及該意見之相關資訊;步驟B-1,該意見之內容敘述,係經由該系統網站之關鍵字篩選器過濾,以即時確認並通知提問者是否能夠發表於該系統網站中;如是,該意見即可發表於該系統網站中;如否,該系統網站會即時通知提問者修正該意見之內容敘述;步驟B-2,使用者瀏覽該系統網站中之眾人意見、並從中挑選,而選定之意見以實名方式來回覆意見、參與表決意見,該相關資訊還能由回覆者、表決者及意見購買者的其中之一以實名方式提供;以及步驟C,係將步驟B-2之回覆意見與表決意見,經由該系統網站之編譯器轉換成背景資料及統計數據,彙集於該系統網站之資料庫中儲存,並整合成調查資料,以供業者迅速且週全地彙集眾人意見與運用。A method of bringing together opinions and survey data, that is, by setting up a system website and providing social networking services and online discussion functions, any user can log in to the system website and become a member via the Internet. The above-mentioned users include the questioner, the responder, and the voter and the opinion purchaser; and the steps of the method include: Step A, the questioner submits the opinion in real name on the system website, and provides the opinion related thereto. Related information; Step B-1, the content description of the opinion is filtered by the keyword filter of the system website to instantly confirm and notify the questioner whether it can be published on the system website; if yes, the opinion can be published on In the system website; if not, the system website will immediately notify the questioner to correct the content description of the opinion; in step B-2, the user browses the opinions of the people in the system website and selects them, and the selected opinions are in real name. Respond to opinions and participate in voting opinions. The relevant information can also be used by one of the respondents, voters and opinion purchasers. Provided by the real name method; and step C, the feedback and voting opinions of step B-2 are converted into background information and statistical data through the compiler of the system website, collected in the database of the system website, and integrated into The survey data is used by the supplier to quickly and comprehensively gather opinions and applications. 如申請專利範圍第1項所述彙集意見及調查資料之方法,其中,每一意見係搭配有複數具有對應關係之子問題,該些子問題係由提問者於提出問題時建立以及由該系統網站預先內建於該資料庫中之其一方式產生,而所有子問題經由該編譯器彙整並連結彼此之間的對應關係,於使用者每次伸張意見之過程中,該些子問題係以隨機方式彈出視窗及以配對方式連續彈出視窗之其中一方式,迫使使用者先行回覆該些子問題後,才能接續回覆所挑選之意見,以助該系統網站進行意見調查。For example, in the method of claiming the opinions and survey data mentioned in Item 1 of the patent application, each opinion is matched with a plurality of sub-questions having corresponding relationships, which are established by the questioner at the time of the question and by the website of the system. One of the methods pre-built in the database is generated, and all the sub-problems are merged and connected to each other via the compiler, and the sub-questions are randomized each time the user makes an opinion. One way of pop-up window and continuous pop-up window in pairing mode is to force the user to reply to the sub-questions before they can reply to the selected opinions to help the system website to conduct opinion survey. 如申請專利範圍第2項所述彙集意見及調查資料之方法,其中,該意見與子問題係經由程式設計而呈現出不同形式,能選自單一題、是非題、二選一題、多選一題、複選題、隨機問題搭配衍生問題、子母題、排序題、長期提問題、限期提問題的其中之一。For example, the method for collecting opinions and survey data mentioned in the second paragraph of the patent application, wherein the opinions and sub-questions are presented in different forms through programming, and can be selected from a single question, a yes-no question, a second-choice question, and multiple choices. One of the questions, the multiple-choice questions, the random problem collocation problem, the sub-mother, the sorting problem, the long-term question, and the deadline. 如申請專利範圍第1項所述彙集意見及調查資料之方法,其中,當一意見之內容敘述與另一意見之內容敘述近似時,係透過該系統網站自動處理、使用者提報並經該系統網站人工處理、以及由眾人投票之其一方式合併。The method for collecting opinions and survey data as described in item 1 of the patent application, wherein when the content description of one opinion is similar to the content description of another opinion, it is automatically processed by the system website, the user reports and passes the The system website is manually processed and merged by one of the methods of voting. 如申請專利範圍第1項所述彙集意見及調查資料之方法,其中,該系統網站設有一付款機制,係綜合每一意見之內容敘述、調查資料以及反應程度,劃分出數級付款價格,每一級付款價格係具有對應等級之檢閱權限;所述之檢閱權限係包含有可供檢閱之人數、次數、地區、對象限制及時間期限;而所述之反應程度係能選自於該意見之關鍵字排序、該意見設於網頁中之位置、該意見被檢閱之瀏覽數或是該意見之競價熱度。For example, the method for collecting opinions and survey data mentioned in the first paragraph of the patent application, wherein the system website has a payment mechanism, which integrates the content narrative, survey data and reaction level of each opinion, and divides the price of the several levels. The first-level payment price has the review authority of the corresponding level; the review permission includes the number of people, the number of times, the region, the object limit and the time limit for review; and the degree of reaction described can be selected from the key of the opinion. The word sort, the location of the comment on the web page, the number of views that the comment was reviewed, or the bidding heat of the comment. 如申請專利範圍第5項所述彙集意見及調查資料之方法,其中,提問者欲透過該系統網站提出特定意見進行意見調查、獲得該調查資料之對應等級的檢閱權限、以及建立授權他人檢閱之設定條件的其中之一事項,須經由該系統網站審定,審定為必須付款時,則提問者須於付款後才得以實施所述事項;而所述之設定條件係為僅限提問者自己檢閱、限於被授權者檢閱、同意被該系統網站公開以供眾人檢閱、該特定意見搭配企業廣告行銷公開以供人檢閱、以及該特定意見經長時間調查後公開供人檢閱的其中之一。The method for collecting opinions and survey data as described in item 5 of the patent application, wherein the questioner wants to make a specific opinion through the system website to conduct an opinion survey, obtain the corresponding level of review authority of the survey data, and establish an authorized person to review it. One of the conditions for setting conditions shall be verified by the system website. If it is determined that payment is necessary, the questioner shall implement the said matter after payment; and the set conditions are only for the questioner to review, It is limited to one of the authorized persons to review and agree to be publicized by the system website for review by the public, the specific opinion is matched with the corporate advertisement marketing for human review, and the specific opinion is publicly available for review after a long investigation. 如申請專利範圍第6項所述彙集意見及調查資料之方法,其中,而每一意見之回覆者及表決者,僅能簡單地檢閱該意見之調查資料,其他使用者欲檢閱該意見時,於付款後,才具有對應等級之檢閱權限;任一使用者係能透過給付該系統網站之設定價格以及競標方式的其中之一,購得所挑選意見之回覆意見及調查資料的檢閱權限,而在該使用者購得該檢閱權限後,亦能授權給他人閱覽。If the method of collecting opinions and survey information is mentioned in the application for the scope of patent application, the respondent and the voter of each opinion can only simply review the survey information of the opinion. When other users wish to review the opinion, After the payment, the review authority of the corresponding level is available; any user can purchase the reply opinion of the selected opinion and the review authority of the survey data by paying one of the set price of the system website and the bidding method. After the user purchases the review permission, the user can also authorize the user to view it. 如申請專利範圍第1項所述彙集意見及調查資料之方法,其中,該系統網站設有一小組投票機制,係由三位以上之奇數會員組成一投票小組,以針對該系統網站中之任一意見進行投票,每一投票小組係由組成成員中推舉一人做為小組長,在該投票小組之眾人意見一致時,由小組長為代理人來代表該投票小組進行投票,並附送該組成員之實名資料以供核對;而該意見之提問者係能設定該投票小組之組成條件,該組成條件包含人數、族群、年齡及屬性。For example, the method for collecting opinions and survey data mentioned in the first paragraph of the patent application, wherein the system website has a group voting mechanism, which consists of three or more odd members forming a voting group to target any of the system websites. The opinion is voted. Each voting group is elected by the constituent members as the group leader. When the voting group has the same opinion, the group leader acts as the agent to vote on behalf of the voting group and attaches the members of the group. The real-name information is used for verification; and the questioner of the opinion can set the composition conditions of the voting group, including the number, ethnicity, age and attributes. 如申請專利範圍第8項所述彙集意見及調查資料之方法,其中,該系統網站係設有一核對機制,係透過被代理人親領贈品、被代理人親用贈品以及獲取被代理人之語音頻率的其中一方式進行驗證核對,再次確認代理人與被代理人之符合會員資格以及彼此之間的委任關係,並覆核該投票小組之其他成員或被代理人投票之意見確實一致;所述贈品包含有禮品、等價點數及折價卷;而所述語音頻率係透過一音頻即時鑑定器來驗證核對。For example, the method for collecting opinions and survey data mentioned in the scope of patent application is as follows: wherein the system website has a check-up mechanism, which is through the agent’s personal gift, the agent’s personal gift, and the voice of the agent. One of the methods of frequency verification, reconfirming the membership and the accommodating relationship between the agent and the agent, and reviewing the other members of the voting group or the opinions voted by the agent is indeed consistent; The gift includes a gift, an equivalent point, and a discount volume; and the voice frequency is verified by an audio instant authenticator. 如申請專利範圍第1項所述彙集意見及調查資料之方法,其中,該系統網站係設有一代理投票機制,係由一會員徵得他人之同意及獲得他人之身份證字號後,該會員即能成為代理人,來代理他人於該系統網站中之任一意見進行投票表決。For example, the method for collecting opinions and survey data mentioned in the first paragraph of the patent application, wherein the system website has a proxy voting mechanism, after a member obtains the consent of another person and obtains the ID number of another person, the member is Be able to become an agent and act as a proxy to vote on any of the opinions on the system's website. 如申請專利範圍第10項所述彙集意見及調查資料之方法,其中,該系統網站係設有一核對機制,係透過被代理人親領贈品、被代理人親用贈品以及獲取被代理人之語音頻率的其中一方式進行驗證核對,再次確認代理人與被代理人之符合會員資格以及彼此之間的委任關係,並覆核該投票小組之其他成員或被代理人投票之意見確實一致;所述贈品包含有禮品、等價點數及折價卷;而所述語音頻率係透過一音頻即時鑑定器來驗證核對。For example, the method for collecting opinions and survey data mentioned in the application scope of Patent No. 10, wherein the system website has a check-up mechanism, which is to receive gifts through the agent, to use the gifts by the agent, and to obtain the voice of the agent. One of the methods of frequency verification, reconfirming the membership and the accommodating relationship between the agent and the agent, and reviewing the other members of the voting group or the opinions voted by the agent is indeed consistent; The gift includes a gift, an equivalent point, and a discount volume; and the voice frequency is verified by an audio instant authenticator. 如申請專利範圍第1項所述彙集意見及調查資料之方法,其中,使用者係透過桌上型電腦、電視遊樂器、網路電話、家用電話、手機、智慧型手機、筆記型電腦及平板電腦的其中之一裝置,經由網路登入該系統網站中伸張意見。For example, the method for collecting opinions and survey data as described in the first paragraph of the patent application, wherein the user is through a desktop computer, a video game, an internet phone, a home phone, a mobile phone, a smart phone, a notebook computer, and a tablet. One of the computers is installed on the system's website via the Internet.
TW100134935A 2011-09-28 2011-09-28 Method for gathering opinions and surveying data TW201314479A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
TW100134935A TW201314479A (en) 2011-09-28 2011-09-28 Method for gathering opinions and surveying data

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
TW100134935A TW201314479A (en) 2011-09-28 2011-09-28 Method for gathering opinions and surveying data

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
TW201314479A true TW201314479A (en) 2013-04-01
TWI457773B TWI457773B (en) 2014-10-21

Family

ID=48802518

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
TW100134935A TW201314479A (en) 2011-09-28 2011-09-28 Method for gathering opinions and surveying data

Country Status (1)

Country Link
TW (1) TW201314479A (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN110678896A (en) * 2017-06-08 2020-01-10 尹圣旻 Collective intelligence collection system and method

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20030101166A1 (en) * 2001-11-26 2003-05-29 Fujitsu Limited Information analyzing method and system
US7814043B2 (en) * 2001-11-26 2010-10-12 Fujitsu Limited Content information analyzing method and apparatus
TW200945225A (en) * 2008-04-30 2009-11-01 Chunghwa Telecom Co Ltd Customer service reporting management system

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN110678896A (en) * 2017-06-08 2020-01-10 尹圣旻 Collective intelligence collection system and method

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
TWI457773B (en) 2014-10-21

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Aguinis et al. MTurk research: Review and recommendations
Ko Social desire or commercial desire? The factors driving social sharing and shopping intentions on social commerce platforms
Clemons et al. Global differences in online shopping behavior: Understanding factors leading to trust
Casaló et al. Do online hotel rating schemes influence booking behaviors?
Tsao et al. eWOM persuasiveness: do eWOM platforms and product type matter?
Yang Effects of restaurant satisfaction and knowledge sharing motivation on eWOM intentions: the moderating role of technology acceptance factors
Dijkmans et al. Online conversation and corporate reputation: A two-wave longitudinal study on the effects of exposure to the social media activities of a highly interactive company
Racherla et al. Perceived ‘usefulness’ of online consumer reviews: An exploratory investigation across three services categories
Kim Understanding antecedents of continuance intention in social-networking services
Fichman A comparative assessment of answer quality on four question answering sites
Rong et al. Social information disclosure of friends in common in an e‐commerce platform ecosystem: An online experiment
Wei et al. Network size and content generation on social media platforms
US20190026782A1 (en) Computer system or method for coordinating and collaborating remote online identities of influencers on social media networks
Wirtz et al. Antecedents and consequences of public administration’s social media website attractiveness
Leonard et al. Ethical awareness of seller’s behavior in consumer-to-consumer electronic commerce: Applying the multidimensional ethics scale
Chu et al. What motivates consumer to engage in microblogs? The roles of brand post characteristics and brand prestige: X. Chu et al.
Papaioannou et al. Investigating customer satisfaction dimensions with service quality of online auctions: an empirical investigation of e-Bay
US20130110660A1 (en) Method of collecting opinions and surveying data
Tseng et al. Applying an AHP technique for developing a website model of third-party booking system
Thompson et al. Thematic discrepancy analysis: a method to gain insights into lurkers and test for non-response bias
D’Assergio et al. The race for data: Utilizing informative or persuasive cues to gain opt-in?
Siuda et al. “Similar to legal companies”: Vendor brands and other aspects of marketing communication in the darknet drug trade
TW201314479A (en) Method for gathering opinions and surveying data
TWI528321B (en) Information supply and need system
Ansari et al. Do customers perceive reviews as manipulated? A warranting theory perspective

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
GD4A Issue of patent certificate for granted invention patent
MM4A Annulment or lapse of patent due to non-payment of fees