[go: up one dir, main page]

TW201111784A - Test material for use in high pressure water-jet rust removing device and impact capacity assessment method of high pressure water-jet rust removing device - Google Patents

Test material for use in high pressure water-jet rust removing device and impact capacity assessment method of high pressure water-jet rust removing device Download PDF

Info

Publication number
TW201111784A
TW201111784A TW98131821A TW98131821A TW201111784A TW 201111784 A TW201111784 A TW 201111784A TW 98131821 A TW98131821 A TW 98131821A TW 98131821 A TW98131821 A TW 98131821A TW 201111784 A TW201111784 A TW 201111784A
Authority
TW
Taiwan
Prior art keywords
groove
metal plate
pressure water
grooves
spray material
Prior art date
Application number
TW98131821A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
TWI420108B (en
Inventor
Chao-Qi Huang
Jun-Chao Shi
Zhong-Ping Ru
Bi-Kun Zheng
Kun-Cheng Dong
Original Assignee
China Steel Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by China Steel Corp filed Critical China Steel Corp
Priority to TW098131821A priority Critical patent/TWI420108B/en
Publication of TW201111784A publication Critical patent/TW201111784A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of TWI420108B publication Critical patent/TWI420108B/en

Links

Landscapes

  • Testing Resistance To Weather, Investigating Materials By Mechanical Methods (AREA)

Abstract

The present invention relates to a kind of test material for use in high pressure water-jet rust removing device and the impact capacity assessment method of the high pressure water-jet rust removing device. The test material includes at least one erosion-prone metal plate for receiving the watering impact of the high pressure water-jet rust removing device so as to from a rust-removal pattern on surface of the erosion-prone metal plate, then the impact capacity of the high pressure water-jet rust removing device is assessed according to the rust-removal pattern. As the water-jet marks of the rust-removal pattern has a 3D shape, the user may assess the impact capacity of the high pressure water-jet rust removing device according to rust-removal pattern.

Description

201111784 六、發明說明: 【發明所屬之技術領域】 本發明係關於一種用於高壓喑k ^ „ 门£贺水除銹器之試喷材及高壓 噴水除銹器之衝擊能力之評估方法, / T 乃沄,_ §之,係關於一種 包含一易衝餘金屬板之試噴材及 Λ何及利用该易衝蝕金屬板評估 該高壓噴水除銹器之衝擊能力之方法。 【先前技術】201111784 VI. Description of the Invention: [Technical Field] The present invention relates to an evaluation method for the impact capability of a test spray material and a high pressure water spray rust remover for a high pressure 喑k ^ „ T 沄 沄, _ §, relates to a test spray material comprising an easy-to-shrink metal plate and a method for evaluating the impact capability of the high-pressure water spray rust remover by using the easy-to-etch metal plate.

>考圖1及圖2 77別顯*胃知高壓噴水除錄器之前視及 側視示意圖。該高壓噴水除錄器i為熱乳工場的重要設 備,其負責去除各階段中熱乳鋼帶2之表面上之錄皮。該 高壓喷水除錢^包括複數個並排之喷仙,該等喷嘴u 係用以嗔出扇形高壓水刀12於該熱乾鋼帶2之表面。 參考圖3,顯示習知高壓噴水除錄器於試噴板上所形成 之除錄圖形之俯視示意圖。習知評估該高廢喷水除錄器】 之方法為除銹圖形檢測方4,其係將所謂的試喷板3,也 就是一塊表面具有塗漆層32的鋼板31,推送到該高壓喷水 除錄器1内,並開啟該等喷嘴u以喷出複數個高麼水刀12 而喷除邛刀塗漆層32,之後將該試喷板3退回。如圖所 不’該試噴板3中被該等高愿水刀12衝擊的區域,其表面 的塗漆層32會被喷除,而形成一除錄圖形。由於該除錄圖 形之排列方式與圖1中之該等喷嘴11之幾何參數有關,因 此使用者可檢視該除銹圖形以瞭解該等喷嘴11安裝的角度 疋否正確、5亥等喷嘴11是否有堵塞或該等喷嘴11是否已經 毀損等項目。 I41l90.doc 201111784 此種檢測方法之缺點如下。由於該試噴板3上僅有一層 薄薄的塗漆層32,因此其所犯士、十^ μ 、化成之除銹圖形係為2D圖形, 而無顯示與衝擊能力相關的資訊,因而無法評估該等高墨 水刀12之衝擊能力,亦即盔法 子估該兩壓喷水除銹器丨之 :擊“。此外,在實際應用時’為了將該塗漆 掉,通常會設定較長的喷除時間,亦即會設定該試喷板3 之^留時間較長,以增加該等高廢水们2衝擊該試喷板3 之時間。如此設定方式與實際喷除作業不符 結果並不準確。 口此共檢测 因此,有必要提供—種用於高㈣水_器 高壓噴水除銹器之衝擊能力 《喷材及 題。 f估方法,以解決上述問 【發明内容】 本發明提供一種用於高壓喷水除錄器之 至少一易衝蝕金屬板,用以接受 、° 紙姆 亥阿屋噴水除銹器之喑氽 衝擊’使得該易衝飯金屬板之一表 而根據該除錄圖形評估該高堡 ,成-除錄圖形, Λ不除銹器之衝墼 本發明另外提供-種高星喷水除 方法,其包括以下步驟:⑷提供之衝擊此力之評估 至少-易賊金屬板;_,^材’輯喷材包括 錄器内,且完成定位;—喷水除 試喷材之易衝#金屬板進行f X除^ ’以對該 表面上形成一除錄圓形;及(d)根據^該易衝餘金屬板之 之除錄圖形評估該高壓喷水^ ^金屬板表面上 乃盗之衝擊能力。 141190.doc 201111784 任丰發明中’由於該除銹圖形 在本發明中,>Test Figure 1 and Figure 2 77 show the front view and side view of the high pressure water jet recorder. The high-pressure water jet recorder i is an important device of the hot milk plant, and is responsible for removing the skin on the surface of the hot milk steel strip 2 in each stage. The high-pressure water spray removing money includes a plurality of side-by-side spray nozzles for picking up the fan-shaped high-pressure water jet 12 on the surface of the hot dry steel strip 2. Referring to Figure 3, there is shown a top plan view of a conventional high pressure water jet recorder on a test jet. The method for evaluating the high waste water jet recorder is a rust pattern detecting method 4, which pushes a so-called test spray plate 3, that is, a steel plate 31 having a paint layer 32 on its surface, to the high pressure spray. The water ejector 1 is opened, and the nozzles u are opened to eject a plurality of high water knives 12 to eject the trowel paint layer 32, and then the test blasting plate 3 is retracted. In the region of the test spray plate 3 which is impacted by the contour water jet 12, the paint layer 32 on the surface thereof is sprayed off to form a record pattern. Since the arrangement of the uninterrupted patterns is related to the geometric parameters of the nozzles 11 in FIG. 1, the user can view the descaling pattern to know whether the angle of the nozzles 11 is correctly installed, and whether the nozzles 11 such as 5 There are items such as blockage or whether the nozzles 11 have been damaged. I41l90.doc 201111784 The disadvantages of this test method are as follows. Since the test spray plate 3 has only a thin paint layer 32 on the test strip 3, the rust-removing pattern of the smashed, ten^μ, and the formed rusting pattern is a 2D figure, and no information related to the impact capability is displayed, and thus Evaluating the impact capability of the high-injection knife 12, that is, the helmet method estimates the two-pressure water jet rust remover: ". In addition, in actual application, in order to paint the paint, it is usually set to be longer. The ejection time, that is, the retention time of the test spray plate 3 is set to be long, so as to increase the time when the high-temperature waste water 2 impacts the test spray plate 3. The setting method is inaccurate with the actual spray operation, and the result is not accurate. Therefore, it is necessary to provide a kind of impact capability for high (four) water_high pressure water spray rust remover "spraying material and problem. F estimation method to solve the above problem" [invention] The present invention provides a At least one easily eroded metal plate for the high-pressure water jet recorder for receiving, ° 纸 姆 姆 姆 阿 屋 屋 喷 ' ' ' ' ' 该 该 该 该 该 该 该 该 该 之一Record the picture to evaluate the high castle, into - except the recorded graphics, Λ not rust The present invention further provides a high-star spray water removal method comprising the following steps: (4) providing an impact of the impact of the evaluation of at least the thief metal plate; _, ^ material's spray material including the recorder, And complete the positioning; - spray water in addition to the test spray material easy to punch # metal plate for f X division ^ 'to form a demarcation circle on the surface; and (d) according to ^ the easy to flush metal plate The recorded figure evaluates the impact capability of the high-pressure water jet on the surface of the metal plate. 141190.doc 201111784 Ren Feng invention in the 'because the descaling pattern is in the present invention,

資訊’因而可以達到線 上(On Line)量測評估之目的。 【實施方式】 參考圖4,顯示本發明之高壓喷水除銹器之衝擊能力之 評估方法之流程示意圖。首先,步驟S41係提供一試喷材 5。請同時參考圖5及圖6,分別顯示本發明中試喷材之俯 視及側視不意圖。參考圖7,顯示本發明中試喷材之分解 示意圖。在本實施例中,該試噴材5包括一底材51及至少 一易衝蝕金屬板52。該易衝蝕金屬板52係為容易被該高壓 水刀12(圖1)衝蝕而於表面上形成水刀痕之材質,較佳地其 係為鋁、鋅、銅或鉛,更佳地其係為鋁。該底材5丨之材質 係為鋼。 該底材51具有一第一表面5U、一第二表面5 12及至少一 溝槽513,該第一表面511係相對於該第二表面512。以溝 槽5 13為例說明’該溝槽513係位於該第一表面5U,該至 少一易衝蝕金屬板52係固設於該溝槽513内,且較佳地, 該易衝蝕金屬板52之形狀與體積係與該溝槽5 13相符,使 得於固設後該易衝蝕金屬板52之表面係與該底材51之第一 表面511齊平。在本實施例中,該易衝蝕金屬板52係可拆 卸式地固設於該溝槽513内,使得在後續步驟中,該易衝 141190.doc 201111784 蝕金屬板52可以從該底材51取下或分離開。較佳地,該易 衝蝕金屬板52係利用螺絲鎖固於該溝槽5丨3内。 在本實施例中,該溝槽513之數目係為四個,其中二個 溝槽513係位於該第一表面511 ’其餘二個溝槽513係位於 該第二表面512。該易衝蝕金屬板”之數目亦為四個,其 分別位於該等溝槽513内。然而,在其他應用中’該溝槽 5"之數目係為二個,其皆位於該第一表面5ιι。該易衝餘 金屬板52之數目亦為二個,其分別位於該等溝槽513内。 然而可以理解的是,在本發明中亦可不使用該底材Μ,亦 即一片該易衝蚀金屬板52本身即可作為該試喷材5。 在本實施例中’該底材51係為鋼板。然而,在其他應用 中’该底材51可以是條鋼,其更具有一第三表面及一第四 表面(圖中未示)’該第三表面係相對於該第四表面。該溝 槽5U之數目係為四個,分別係位於該 二表面I該第三表面及該第四表面,且該易㈣I: 板52之數目係為四個’其分別位於該等溝槽川内。 該條鋼之四個外圍表面皆有該易衝蝕金屬板& 接著’參考圖4及圖8 ’步驟S42係腺 將該试喷材5傳送至該 ^㈣除錄器1内’ J'完成定位’以確保在接續之步驟 喷嘴U所喷出之高麼水刀12皆可以衝擊到該易_ 金屬板52。在本實财,係先將該試料 上,並將裝有該易衝钱金屬板…、乳線 ^ ^ 細得送至該高壓喷水 除銹器〗内,以輥輪吋動的方式完成定位。 接著,步驟⑷係啟動該高虔噴水除錄器卜以對該試噴 141I90.doc 201111784 材5之易衝蝕金屬板52進行喷除,而於該易衝蝕金屬板52 之表面上形成一除銹圖形,如圖9所示。該除銹圖形包括 複數個水刀痕6,每一水刀痕6係為一凹槽,且每一凹槽中 不同位置具有不同深度,而形成3D外型。 接著,退回該試喷材5且將該易衝蝕金屬板52從該底材 51取下或分離。 最後,步驟S44係根據該易衝蝕金屬板52表面上之除銹 圖形評估該高壓喷水除銹器丨之衝擊能力。根據該等水刀 痕6之深度、寬度及分佈情形除了可以瞭解該等喷嘴丨ι(圖 1)安裝的角度是否正確、該等喷嘴n是否有堵塞或該等喷 嘴11是否已經毀損等項目之外,由於每個水刀痕6的深度 與寬度不同,易於分辨該等高壓水刀12相互干擾所造成之 弱化區A,因此可藉該等水刀痕6來評估該高壓喷水除銹器 1之衝擊能力。 在本發明中,由於該等水刀痕6係為3D外型,因此,使 用者可以利用目測或觸摸等方式立即初步得知該等水刀痕 6之深度分佈情形。或者,<吏用者也可以利用量測工具或 照相工具將該等水刀痕6之資訊量化,再辅以其他數學分 析方法或演算方法以取得所需之資訊,因而可以達到線上 (On Line)量測評估之目的。 惟上述實施例僅為說明本發明之原理及其功效,而非用 以限制本發明。因此’習於此技術之人士對上述實施例進 行修改及變化仍不脫本發明之精神。本發明之權利範圍應 如後述之申請專利範圍所列。 141190.doc 201111784 【圖式簡單說明】 圖1顯示習知高壓喷水除銹器之前視示意圖; 圖2顯示習知高壓喷水除鱗器之側視示意圖; 圖3 .、、’員不s知冋壓喷水除銹器於試喷板上所形成之除銹 圖形之俯視示意圖; 圖4顯不本發明之向壓噴水除銹器之衝擊能力之評估方 法之流程示意圖; 圖5顯示本發明中試嗔材之俯視示意圖; 圖6顯示本發明中試噴材之側視示意圖; 圖7顯示本發明中試噴材之分解示意圖; 圖8顯不本發明中該試噴材定位於該高壓噴水除錢器内 之示意圖;及 圖9顯不本發明中降# r陈銹圖形之水刀痕之立體示意圖。 【主要元件符號說明】 1 高壓噴水除銹器 2 熱軋鋼帶 3 習知試噴板 5 本發明之試嘴材 6 水刀痕 11 噴嘴 12 高壓水刀 31 鋼板 32 塗漆層 51 底材 141190.doc 201111784 52 易衝触金屬板 511 底材之第- -表面 512 底材之第 二表面 513 溝槽 141190.doc -9-Information can thus be used for on-line measurement assessment purposes. [Embodiment] Referring to Fig. 4, there is shown a flow chart showing a method for evaluating the impact capability of the high-pressure water spray rust remover of the present invention. First, step S41 provides a test spray material 5. Referring to Fig. 5 and Fig. 6, the top view and the side view of the test spray material of the present invention are respectively shown. Referring to Figure 7, there is shown a schematic exploded view of the test spray material of the present invention. In the present embodiment, the test spray material 5 includes a substrate 51 and at least one easily erosive metal plate 52. The erosive metal plate 52 is a material which is easily eroded by the high pressure waterjet 12 (FIG. 1) to form a water knife mark on the surface, preferably aluminum, zinc, copper or lead, more preferably It is made of aluminum. The material of the substrate 5 is made of steel. The substrate 51 has a first surface 5U, a second surface 512, and at least one groove 513, the first surface 511 being opposite the second surface 512. Taking the trench 5 13 as an example, the trench 513 is located on the first surface 5U, and the at least one easily-erodible metal plate 52 is fixed in the trench 513, and preferably, the easy-etching metal The shape and volume of the plate 52 coincide with the groove 513 such that the surface of the erosive metal plate 52 is flush with the first surface 511 of the substrate 51 after being secured. In the present embodiment, the erosive metal plate 52 is detachably fixed in the groove 513, so that in the subsequent step, the escaping 141190.doc 201111784 etched metal plate 52 can be from the substrate 51. Remove or separate. Preferably, the erosive metal plate 52 is screwed into the groove 5丨3. In the present embodiment, the number of the grooves 513 is four, and the two grooves 513 are located on the first surface 511'. The remaining two grooves 513 are located on the second surface 512. The number of the erodible metal plates is also four, which are respectively located in the grooves 513. However, in other applications, the number of the grooves 5" is two, which are located on the first surface. 5 ι. The number of the easy-to-flush metal plates 52 is also two, which are respectively located in the grooves 513. However, it can be understood that the substrate 亦可, that is, one piece of the ram, may not be used in the present invention. The etched metal plate 52 itself can be used as the test spray material 5. In the present embodiment, the substrate 51 is a steel plate. However, in other applications, the substrate 51 may be a strip of steel, which has a third a surface and a fourth surface (not shown) 'the third surface is opposite to the fourth surface. The number of the grooves 5U is four, respectively located on the second surface I and the third surface Four surfaces, and the number of the easy (four) I: plates 52 is four 'they are located in the grooves. The four outer peripheral surfaces of the strip have the easy-to-erod metal plate & Figure 8 'Step S42 is the gland to transfer the test spray material 5 to the ^ (4) recorder 1 'J' to complete the positioning' In the continuation step, the high water knife 12 sprayed by the nozzle U can impact the easy _ metal plate 52. In this real money, the sample is first loaded, and the easy-to-make metal plate is installed... The milk line ^ ^ is sent to the high-pressure water spray rust remover, and the positioning is completed by the roller swaying method. Next, the step (4) is to start the sorghum water spray logger to test the test spray 141I90. Doc 201111784 The erosive metal plate 52 of the material 5 is sprayed, and a rust-removing pattern is formed on the surface of the erosive metal plate 52, as shown in Fig. 9. The rust-removing pattern includes a plurality of water-jet marks 6 Each water knife mark 6 is a groove, and each groove has a different depth at different positions to form a 3D shape. Next, the test material 5 is returned and the easy-to-etch metal plate 52 is removed from the The substrate 51 is removed or separated. Finally, step S44 evaluates the impact capability of the high-pressure water jet rust remover according to the rust-removing pattern on the surface of the easy-to-corrosion metal plate 52. According to the depth of the water knife mark 6, In addition to the width and distribution, it is possible to know whether the angles of the nozzles (Fig. 1) are correct, and the nozzles n are In addition to items such as blockage or whether the nozzles 11 have been damaged or not, since the depth and width of each of the waterjet marks 6 are different, it is easy to distinguish the weakened zone A caused by the mutual interference of the high-pressure waterjets 12, so that it is possible to borrow such The water knife mark 6 is used to evaluate the impact capability of the high-pressure water spray rust remover 1. In the present invention, since the water knife marks 6 are 3D-shaped, the user can immediately obtain a preliminary visual or touch method. Knowing the depth distribution of the waterjet marks 6. Alternatively, the user can also quantify the information of the waterjet marks 6 by using a measuring tool or a photographic tool, and supplemented by other mathematical analysis methods or calculation methods. Get the information you need to achieve the online (On Line) measurement assessment. However, the above-described embodiments are merely illustrative of the principles of the invention and its effects, and are not intended to limit the invention. Therefore, those skilled in the art will be able to modify and change the above-described embodiments without departing from the spirit of the invention. The scope of the invention should be as set forth in the appended claims. 141190.doc 201111784 [Simplified illustration of the drawings] Figure 1 shows a schematic front view of a conventional high-pressure water jet rust remover; Figure 2 shows a side view of a conventional high-pressure water spray descaler; Figure 3, '' FIG. 4 is a schematic plan view showing the method for evaluating the impact capability of the water jet water rust remover according to the present invention; FIG. FIG. 6 is a schematic side view of the test spray material of the present invention; FIG. 7 is a schematic view showing the decomposition of the test spray material of the present invention; FIG. 8 shows that the test spray material is positioned in the present invention. Schematic diagram of the high pressure water spray remover; and Fig. 9 shows a three-dimensional schematic diagram of the water knife mark of the #r rust pattern in the present invention. [Main component symbol description] 1 High-pressure water jet rust remover 2 Hot-rolled steel strip 3 Conventional test spray plate 5 Test nozzle of the invention 6 Water knife mark 11 Nozzle 12 High-pressure water jet 31 Steel plate 32 Paint layer 51 Substrate 141190. Doc 201111784 52 Easy-to-touch metal plate 511 Substrate - - Surface 512 Substrate second surface 513 Groove 141190.doc -9-

Claims (1)

201111784 七、申請專利範圍: k 一 = N㈣水除鱗器之試喷材,包括: 喷:易衝蝕金屬板,用以接受該高壓喷水除錄器之 ’使得該易衝蝕金屬板之-表面上形成一除 :二而根據該除錄圖形評估該高壓喷水除錄器之二 鋁、:項1之武噴材’其中該易衝蝕金屬板之材質係為 姑鋅、鋼或鉛。 3.如請求項1 $ 4 h 4噴材,更包括一底材,具有一 面、一笙-主工 ^ 第一 及至少一溝槽,該第二表面係相對於該 面,該至少—溝槽係位於該第一表面,該至少一 衝蝕金屬板係固設於該至少一溝槽内。 4·如=求項3之試喷材,其中該底材之材質係為鋼。 、項3之式喷材,其中該易衝蝕金屬板之該表面係 興该底材之第一表面齊平。 6 ·如請求項3夕4 _丄, 皆位於之试噴材,其中該溝槽之數目係為二個,其 ;該第一表面,該易衝蝕金屬板之數目係為二個, 八分別位於該等溝槽内。 7·如凊求項3之試喷材,其中該溝槽之數目係為四個,二 表^槽係位於該第-表面,其餘二個溝槽係位於該第二 :’邊易衝蝕金屬板之數目係為四個,其分別位於該 寻溝槽内。 項3之試噴材,其中該底材更具有-第三表面及 表面,邊溝槽之數目係為四個,分別係位於該第 141190.doc 201111784 表面、該第二表面、該第三表面及該第四表面,且該 易衝蚀金屬板之數目係為四個,其分別位於該等溝样 内0 9 9. 如請求項3之試嗜从 4 α X赁材,其中該易衝蝕金屬板係可拆 地固設於該溝槽内β " 10. 如明求項9之試噴材’其中該易衝蝕金屬板 鎖固於該溝槽内。 用螺4 以下 11· 一種高壓噴水除銹器 τ乃亞夂衡擊能力之評估方法,包括 步驟: 易衝蝕金屬 (a)提供一試噴材,該試喷材包括至少一 板; ㈨將該試喷材傳送至該高輯水除錄器内,且完成定 位; ⑷啟動該高壓噴水除錄器’以對該試喷材之易衝蝕金 屬板進行噴除,而於該易衝蝕金屬板之表面上形成 一除銹圖形;及 (d)根據該易衝蝕金屬板表面上 陆场圖形評估該高壓 喷水除銹器之衝擊能力。 12. 如請求項11之評估方法,其 想上 3步驟(a)中,該易衝飯金 屬板之材質係為銘、鋅、銅或錯。 13. 如請求項丨丨之評估方法,其 ^ , ,驟(a)中,該試喷材更 包括一底材,該底材具有一第一表 罘表面、一第二表面及至 >'一溝槽,該至少一溝槽係位於哕笛 亥第—表面,該至少一 易衝蝕金屬板係固設於該至少一溝槽内 14U90.doc 201111784 14. 15. 其中該底材之材質係為鋼。 其中該易衝蝕金屬板之表面係 如請求項13之評估方法, 如明求項1 3之評估方法, 與該底材之第一表面齊平 16.如請求項13之評估方法, * , 其中該溝槽之數目係為二個, ,、白位於該第一表面, β易衝姓金屬板之數目传鼻-個,其分別位於該等溝槽内。 係為一 1 7.如清求項13之評估方沐,甘.. … 方去其中該溝槽之數目係為四個, 一個溝槽係位於該第一表面,盆201111784 VII. Patent application scope: k 1 = N (four) water descaler test spray material, including: spray: easy to eroded metal plate, to accept the high pressure water jet recorder's 'making the easy erosion metal plate Forming a division on the surface: according to the unrecorded pattern, evaluating the aluminum alloy of the high-pressure water jet recorder, the item 1 of the blasting material, wherein the material of the erosive metal sheet is guar zinc, steel or lead. 3. The object of claim 1 1 4 4 4, further comprising a substrate having a side, a 笙-main work ^ first and at least one groove, the second surface being opposite to the face, the at least groove The groove is located on the first surface, and the at least one erosion metal plate is fixed in the at least one groove. 4. The test spray material of claim 3, wherein the material of the substrate is steel. The spray material of item 3, wherein the surface of the easily eroded metal plate is such that the first surface of the substrate is flush. 6 · If the request item 3 4 4 丄, is located in the test spray material, wherein the number of the grooves is two, the first surface, the number of the easy-to-etch metal plates is two, eight Located in the grooves respectively. 7. The test spray material of claim 3, wherein the number of the grooves is four, the two grooves are located on the first surface, and the other two grooves are located at the second: The number of metal plates is four, which are respectively located in the groove. The test spray material of item 3, wherein the substrate further has a third surface and a surface, and the number of the side grooves is four, which are respectively located on the surface of the 141190.doc 201111784, the second surface, and the third surface. And the fourth surface, and the number of the erodible metal plates is four, which are respectively located in the groove samples. 0 9. According to claim 3, the test is from 4 α X, wherein the easy punch The etched metal plate is detachably fixed in the groove. [10] 10. The test spray material of claim 9 wherein the erosive metal plate is locked in the groove. Using a screw 4 below 11 · A high-pressure water spray rust remover τ is a method for evaluating the weighing ability of the arsenic, including the steps: the easy-erosion metal (a) provides a test spray material, the test spray material comprising at least one plate; The test spray material is transferred to the high-frequency water remover and the positioning is completed; (4) the high-pressure water spray remover is activated to spray the easy-erosion metal plate of the test spray material, and the easy-erosion metal is sprayed Forming a descaling pattern on the surface of the panel; and (d) evaluating the impact capability of the high pressure water jet descaler based on the land pattern on the surface of the erodible metal sheet. 12. In the evaluation method of claim 11, it is considered that in 3 steps (a), the material of the Yijin metal plate is Ming, Zinc, Copper or Wrong. 13. The method of claim ,, in (a), the test spray material further comprises a substrate having a first surface, a second surface, and to > a groove, the at least one groove is located on the surface of the whirlpool, and the at least one easily erosive metal plate is fixed in the at least one groove. 14U90.doc 201111784 14. 15. The material of the substrate It is made of steel. Wherein the surface of the easily erosive metal sheet is evaluated according to claim 13, as assessed by the method of claim 13, which is flush with the first surface of the substrate. 16. The evaluation method of claim 13 is *, The number of the grooves is two, and the white is located on the first surface, and the number of the metal plates of the β-positive name is transmitted to the first groove, and the plurality of metal plates are respectively located in the grooves. The system is a 1 7. As for the evaluation of the item 13, the method of the square, the number of the grooves is four, and a groove is located on the first surface, the basin /、餘一個溝槽係位於該第 二表面’該易衝蝕金屬板之數 該等溝槽内。 目係為四個’其分別位於 18. 如請求項1 3之評估方法,其 及一第四表面,該溝槽之數 第一表面、該第二表面、該 該易衝钱金屬板之數目係為 内。 中該底材更具有一第三表面 目係為四個,分別係位於該 第二表面及該第四表面,且 四個,其分別位於該等溝槽/, the remaining groove is located in the second surface of the impervious metal plate. The items are four's respectively located at 18. The evaluation method of claim 1 3, and a fourth surface, the number of the first surface of the groove, the second surface, and the number of the money-saving metal sheets The system is internal. The substrate further has a third surface system of four, respectively located on the second surface and the fourth surface, and four, respectively located in the grooves 19.如清求項13之評估方法 式地固設於該溝槽内。 20·如請求項19之評估方法 絲鎖固於該溝槽内。 其中該易衝蝕金屬板係可拆卸 其中該易衝蝕金屬板係利用螺 21. 如請,項13之評估方法,其中該步驟⑷之後更包括-3 回該試喷材且將該易衝#金屬板從該底材取下之步驟。 22. 如請求項"之評估方法,其中該步驟⑷中,該除錄圖升 包括複數個水刀痕,該步驟⑷係根據該等水刀痕之, 度、寬度及分佈情形以評估該高壓喷水除錄器之衝擊貪I 力。 141190.doc19. The evaluation method of claim 13 is fixed in the trench. 20. The evaluation method of claim 19 is that the wire is locked in the groove. Wherein the erosive metal plate is detachable, wherein the erosive metal plate is utilised by the snail 21. The evaluation method of Item 13, wherein the step (4) further comprises -3 returning the test spray material and the rushing #The step of removing the metal plate from the substrate. 22. The evaluation method of claim item, wherein in the step (4), the de-recording map comprises a plurality of waterjet marks, and the step (4) is based on the degree, width and distribution of the waterjet marks to evaluate the The impact of the high-pressure water jet recorder is greedy. 141190.doc
TW098131821A 2009-09-21 2009-09-21 Evaluation Method for Impact Capacity of High Pressure Water Sprayer and Sprayer TWI420108B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
TW098131821A TWI420108B (en) 2009-09-21 2009-09-21 Evaluation Method for Impact Capacity of High Pressure Water Sprayer and Sprayer

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
TW098131821A TWI420108B (en) 2009-09-21 2009-09-21 Evaluation Method for Impact Capacity of High Pressure Water Sprayer and Sprayer

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
TW201111784A true TW201111784A (en) 2011-04-01
TWI420108B TWI420108B (en) 2013-12-21

Family

ID=44909006

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
TW098131821A TWI420108B (en) 2009-09-21 2009-09-21 Evaluation Method for Impact Capacity of High Pressure Water Sprayer and Sprayer

Country Status (1)

Country Link
TW (1) TWI420108B (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
TWI568515B (en) * 2013-07-05 2017-02-01 China Steel Corp Detection Method of Shock Capability of High Pressure Water Sprinkler

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH0780772A (en) * 1993-09-16 1995-03-28 Nippon Steel Corp Method and apparatus for surface treatment of steel
US6021682A (en) * 1998-08-31 2000-02-08 Ingersoll-Rand Company Automatic machinability measuring and machining methods and apparatus therefor
DE10110324A1 (en) * 2001-03-03 2002-09-05 Sms Demag Ag Process for descaling tapes
CN201266138Y (en) * 2008-06-30 2009-07-01 鞍钢股份有限公司 A device for testing the effect of high pressure water descaler

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
TWI568515B (en) * 2013-07-05 2017-02-01 China Steel Corp Detection Method of Shock Capability of High Pressure Water Sprinkler

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
TWI420108B (en) 2013-12-21

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Huang et al. Mechanisms of damage initiation in a titanium alloy subjected to water droplet impact during ultra-high pressure plain waterjet erosion
Liao et al. Dual-processing by abrasive waterjet machining—a method for machining and surface modification of nickel-based superalloy
Ahmed et al. Identification of surface features on cold-rolled stainless steel strip
Lugovtsova et al. Damage quantification in an aluminium-CFRP composite structure using guided wave wavenumber mapping: Comparison of instantaneous and local wavenumber analyses
CN103909102B (en) The technology arrangement of a kind of jet flow cleaning and control method
CN104483330A (en) Concrete surface crack real-time monitoring system and cracking risk dynamic assessment method
Fujisawa et al. Influence of surface roughness on liquid droplet impingement erosion
CN202057480U (en) High pressure water descaling nozzle performance testing device
KR102229477B1 (en) Repair and reinforcement system of fire-damaged buildings
TW201111784A (en) Test material for use in high pressure water-jet rust removing device and impact capacity assessment method of high pressure water-jet rust removing device
Fujisawa et al. Time-resolved observations of pit formation and cloud behavior in cavitating jet
Nguyen et al. Measurement and prediction of scour volume around a cubic artificial reef under steady flow conditions using stereo vision
JP2001071022A (en) Descaling device for metal strip of continuous casting
CN105180886A (en) Method for measuring strain distribution of cold rolled sheet steel
CN201755586U (en) A kind of multi-functional slab for hot-rolled strip steel production site
CN101832870A (en) An equipment point inspection method for a high-pressure water descaling device
CN202661277U (en) Detection apparatus for high pressure water descaling effect
CN104511487A (en) Detection method for length of wave-shaped steel plate
JP4855920B2 (en) Residual stress evaluation method for water jet peening surface
TWI568515B (en) Detection Method of Shock Capability of High Pressure Water Sprinkler
Johnston et al. Comparison of impact forces measured by different instrumentation systems on the CCGS Terry Fox during the Bergy Bit Trials
CN101206195A (en) Method of Ultrasonic Detection of Buried Depth of Near-surface Defects
Sadowski et al. The metrology of ground concrete surfaces morphology with 3D laser scanner
TWI420069B (en) Method of measurement of derusting device configuration
TW201248155A (en) Method for analyzing striking power of water jet

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
MM4A Annulment or lapse of patent due to non-payment of fees