KR900006351B1 - Precipitate quantitative measurement - Google Patents
Precipitate quantitative measurement Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- KR900006351B1 KR900006351B1 KR1019860011556A KR860011556A KR900006351B1 KR 900006351 B1 KR900006351 B1 KR 900006351B1 KR 1019860011556 A KR1019860011556 A KR 1019860011556A KR 860011556 A KR860011556 A KR 860011556A KR 900006351 B1 KR900006351 B1 KR 900006351B1
- Authority
- KR
- South Korea
- Prior art keywords
- precipitates
- specimen
- precipitate
- corroded
- measuring
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N31/00—Investigating or analysing non-biological materials by the use of the chemical methods specified in the subgroup; Apparatus specially adapted for such methods
- G01N31/20—Investigating or analysing non-biological materials by the use of the chemical methods specified in the subgroup; Apparatus specially adapted for such methods using microanalysis, e.g. drop reaction
Landscapes
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
- Molecular Biology (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
- Biochemistry (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Immunology (AREA)
- Pathology (AREA)
- Sampling And Sample Adjustment (AREA)
- Investigating And Analyzing Materials By Characteristic Methods (AREA)
Abstract
내용 없음.No content.
Description
첨부된 도면은 본 발명에 따라 석출물의 양을 측정함에 있어서 부식깊이를 측정하기 위하여 주사 전자현미경에 의해 확대 관찰된 시편을 나타내는 참고 사시도.The accompanying drawings are perspective views showing specimens magnified and observed by a scanning electron microscope to measure the depth of corrosion in measuring the amount of precipitate in accordance with the present invention.
* 도면의 주요부분에 대한 설명* Description of the main parts of the drawings
1 : 시편 11 : 부식된 부분1 Psalm 11 Corroded Part
12 : 벗긴부분 13 : 경계면12: stripped portion 13: the interface
14 : 긁힌 자국선14: Scratches
본 발명은 저합금 고장력강(HSLA-Steel)에서 Nb,V,Ti 등에 의해 형성되는 미세석출물의 량을 투과전자현미경(TEM)에서 탄소복제법(carbon Replica)에 의해 정확히 측정하려는 석출물 정량 측정법에 관한 것이다.The present invention relates to a quantitative measurement method of precipitates to accurately measure the amount of fine precipitates formed by Nb, V, Ti, etc. in a low alloy high tensile steel (HSLA-Steel) by a carbon replica in a transmission electron microscope (TEM). will be.
강중에 존재하는 석출물의 양을 투과 전자현미경에서 탄소복제법에 의해 측정하는 종래의 방법으로는 강의 시편표면을 연마하고 부식액으로 상기 연마표면을 부식시킨 다음, 탄소복제물에 의해 부식된 시편표면에 존재하는 석출물을 추출하여 단위 면적당 석출물 수(ns) 및 평균직경(ds)을 측정하고, 단위면적당 석출물수 (ns) 를Conventional methods for measuring the amount of precipitates present in steel by carbon cloning in transmission electron microscopy include polishing the surface of steel specimens, corroding the polishing surface with a corrosion solution, and then present on the surface of the specimen corroded by carbon cloning. Extract the precipitates to measure the number of precipitates per unit area (ns) and average diameter (ds), and determine the number of precipitates per unit area (ns)
식expression
......................................................(1) ........................................ ....(One)
에 의해 체적분율로 환산하여, 석출물의 양을 측정하는 방법이 알려져 있다.A method of measuring the amount of precipitates in terms of volume fraction in terms of is known.
(상기 식(1)에서, fv : 석출물의 체적분율, ns : 단위면적당 측정된 석출물 수, ds : 측정된 석출물의 평균직경, σs : 측정된 석출물의 직경과 평균직경과의 표준 편차) 여기서, 석출물이 추출되는 시편의 부피(부식깊이)는 평균석출물 직경(ds)으로 항상 일정하다고 가정하여 측정된 것인데 실제로 시편으로부터 석출물을 탄소복제물에 추출하기 위해 부식시키는 경우 부식되는 시편의 깊이가 강의 조성과 열처리 조건에 따라 다음(표 1)과 같이 변화됨을 알 수 있다.(In formula (1), fv: volume fraction of precipitates, ns: number of measured precipitates per unit area, ds: average diameter of measured precipitates, ss: standard deviation of the measured precipitate diameter and the average diameter), The volume (corrosion depth) of the specimen from which the precipitates are extracted is measured on the assumption that the average precipitate diameter (ds) is always constant. In practice, when the precipitates are corroded to extract carbon from the specimens, the depth of the specimens that are corroded is determined by It can be seen that it is changed as shown in Table 1 according to the heat treatment conditions.
[표 1]TABLE 1
ds-표면으로부터 측정된 석출물의 평균입경.Average particle size of precipitates measured from the ds-surface.
nv-단위체적당 계산된 석출물nv-calculated precipitates per unit volume
te-시편의 부식된 깊이Corroded Depth of te Specimen
그러나, 상기 종래방법에서는 석출물이 추출되는 시편의 부식깊이의 측정이 불가능하여, 추출되는 적출물의 평균직경으로 가정하고 있으나 이러한 방법은 강의 조성과 일처리 변화조건에 관계없이 항상 부식되는 깊이를 일정하다고 생각하였기 때문에 측정상의 정화성 결여가 문제되었던 것이었다.However, in the conventional method, it is impossible to measure the corrosion depth of the specimen from which the precipitates are extracted, but it is assumed that the average diameter of the extracted extracts is constant. Because of this, lack of measurable determinism was a problem.
상기 측정상의 정확성 결여는 결과적으로 석출물량과 분포가 기계적 성질과 조직변화에 큰 요인이 되며, 이는 고장력강의 품질 설계와 재질예측 및 강도 예측모델설정에 중대한 오차를 발생시키는 원인이 된다.As a result, the lack of measurement accuracy results in a significant factor in the amount and distribution of the precipitates in mechanical properties and structure changes, which causes significant errors in the quality design of the high tensile steel, the material prediction, and the strength prediction model.
따라서, Nb,V 및 Ti를 함유한 저합금 고장력강의 기계적 성질과, 냉각시의 변태조직을 조업조건에 따라 예측하기 위한 모델과, 강도 예측모델설정을 위해서 정확한 석출물량측정이 요구되어 왔다.Therefore, accurate precipitation measurement has been required for the mechanical properties of the low alloy high tensile strength steel containing Nb, V and Ti, the model for predicting the transformation structure during cooling according to the operating conditions, and the strength prediction model.
따라서,본 발명은 상기 종래방법에서는 석출물량을 정확하게 측정할 수 없었던 것을, 강의조성와 열처리변화조건에 따라 부식되는 시편의 깊이변화를 측정하는 수단에 의해 석출물량의 정확한 측정방법을 제공하고자 하는데 그 목적이 있다.Accordingly, the present invention is to provide a method for accurately measuring the amount of precipitate by means of measuring the change in the depth of the specimen corroded according to the composition of the steel and the heat treatment change conditions that the amount of precipitate could not be accurately measured in the conventional method. There is this.
본 발명의 또 다른 목적은 상기와 같은 본 발명의 방법으로 인해 Nb,V,Ti를 함유한 저합금 고장력강의 기계적 성질과, 냉각시 변태조직등을 조업조건에 따라 예측하려는 모델이나 강도예측 모델의 설정을 용이하고 양호하게 이물수 있도록 한것이다.Another object of the present invention is to provide a model or strength prediction model for predicting the mechanical properties of Nb, V, Ti-containing low alloy high tensile strength steel and the transformation structure during cooling according to the operating conditions. It is to make setting easy and good.
이하, 본 발명을 설명한다.Hereinafter, the present invention will be described.
본 발명은 석출물의 양을 투과 전자현미경에서 탄소복제법에 의해 측정하는 석출물 정량측정법에 있어서, 3μm 정도의 다이아몬드 분말로 강의시편 표면을 미세연마하는 단계 , 미세 연마된 시편표면의 1/2 정도를 라코미트(Lacomit)페인트로 도포시킨 다음, 시편표면을 부식액 바람직하게는, 나이탈 용액으로 부식시키는 단계 , 탄소복제물에 의해 부식된 시편표면에 존재하는 석출물을 추출하여 단위면적당 석출물 수(ns) 및 석출물의 평균입경(ds)을 측정하는 단계 , 상기 도포된 페인트를 벗긴후, 부식된 부분과 페인트가 벗겨진 부분의 경계 면상에 존재하는 연마시 긁힌 자국선을 주사 전자현미경으로 확대관찰하여 부식깊이(te)를 측정하는 단계 ; 및 상기 단위 면적당 석출물 수(ns)를In the present invention, in the quantitative measurement of precipitates by measuring the amount of precipitates by a carbon cloning method in a transmission electron microscope, the step of finely polishing the surface of the steel specimen with a diamond powder of about 3μm, about half of the surface of the finely ground specimen After coating with Lacomit paint, the surface of the specimen is corroded with a corrosive solution, preferably a nital solution, the precipitates present on the surface of the corroded specimen by the carbon replica are extracted and the number of precipitates per unit area (ns) and Determination of the average particle diameter (ds) of the precipitate, peeling off the applied paint, and then observed by the scanning electron microscope the scratch marks on the boundary surface of the corroded portion and the peeled off portion with a scanning electron microscope to determine the corrosion depth ( measuring te); And the number of precipitates per unit area (ns)
식.................................................(2)expression ......................... 2)
에 의해 체적 분율로 환산하는 단계를 포함하여 석출물의 양을 측정하는 방법에 관한 것이다.It relates to a method for measuring the amount of precipitate, including the step of converting to a volume fraction by.
상기 식(2)에서, fv' : 석출물의 체적 분율, ns : 단위면적당 석출물 수, ds : 측정된 적출뮬의 평균직경, σs : 측정한 석출물의 직경과 평균직경과의 표준편차.In formula (2), fv 'is the volume fraction of precipitates, ns is the number of precipitates per unit area, ds is the average diameter of the measured mules, ss is the standard deviation between the diameter and the average diameter of the measured precipitates.
이하, 도면을 통하여 본 발명을 상세히 설명한다.Hereinafter, the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the drawings.
도면에 나타난 바와같이, 본 발명의 첫번째 단계에서는 통상적으로 연마된 강 시편 표면(1)을 3μm 정도의 다이아몬드 분말로 미세 연마하고 시편표면의 1/2 정도(s)를 라코미트(Lacomit)페인트 (2)로 도포한 후 부식액으로 일정시간 부식시킨다.As shown in the figure, in the first step of the present invention, the polished steel specimen surface 1 is finely ground with a diamond powder of about 3 μm, and about half (s) of the specimen surface is coated with Lacomit paint ( After coating with 2), corrode with corrosion solution for a certain time.
다음에, 부식된 시편표면에 존재하는 석출물을 탄소복제물에 의해 추출하여 단위면적당 석출물 수(ns) 및 석출물의 평균직경(ds)를 측정한다.Next, the precipitates present on the corroded specimen surface are extracted with a carbon replica to measure the number of precipitates per unit area (ns) and the average diameter of the precipitates (ds).
다음에, 상기 페인트(2)를 벗기고, 이 벗긴 부분(12)과 부식된 부분(11)과, 경계면(13)과 접하는 연마시 긁힌 자국선(14)부분을 주사전자 현미경으로 확대관찰하여 통상의 기하학적인 방법으로 부식깊이(te)를 측정한다.Next, the paint 2 is peeled off, and the
즉, 도면에서, 부식깊이(te)는 "C"에 해당되는 것으로써,에 의해서 계산될 수 있다.That is, in the drawing, the corrosion depth te corresponds to "C", Can be calculated by
다음에, 단위면적당 적출물 수(ns)를Next, the number of extracts per unit area (ns)
식.........................................................(2)expression ........................................ .......(2)
에 의해 체적 분율로 환산하므로서 본 발명에 부합되는 석출물 정량측정방법은 완료된다.The quantitative measurement method for precipitates in accordance with the present invention is completed by converting to volume fraction by.
상기 부식액으로는 통상의 다양한 종류의 부식액이 사용될 수 있으나, 2%의 나이탈 용액을 사용하는 것이 바람직하다.As the corrosion solution, various kinds of conventional corrosion solutions may be used, but it is preferable to use a 2% nital solution.
도면에 제시된 시편표면상의 긁힌 자국선(14)은 주사 전자현미경으로 확대 관찰된 이상적인(ideal)인 경우를 나타낸 것이며, 실제로는 그 긁힌 자국선(14)은 도면에 제시된 수보다 횔씬 많은 수가 형성되며, 또한, 모두 서로 평형관계를 갖고 형성되지 않을 뿐만 아니라 그 깊이에 있어서도 서로 다르게 형성된다.The scratch marks 14 on the surface of the specimen shown in the figure represent an ideal case magnified by scanning electron microscopy, and in reality, the
그러나, 본 발명에 따라 실제 부식깊이를 측정함에 있어서는 아무런 지장이 없는데, 그 이유는 여러 긁힌자국선(14)중 부식부분(11)과 페인트(2)가 벗겨진 부분(12)과의 경계면(13)과 접하고, 소정깊이를 갖는 긁힌 자국선(l4)를 선택하여 부식깊이(te)를 측정할 수 있기 때문이다.However, there is no problem in measuring the actual corrosion depth according to the present invention, because the
이하, 본 발명을 실시예를 통하여 좀더 구체적으로 설명한다.Hereinafter, the present invention will be described in more detail with reference to Examples.
[실시예]EXAMPLE
[표 2]TABLE 2
상기 표 2와 같은 성분으로 조성되는 강 시편을 900℃에서 2분간 열처리한 다음, 하기 표 3과 같은 조건으로 부식시켰다.Steel specimens composed of the components shown in Table 2 were heat-treated at 900 ° C. for 2 minutes, and then corroded under the conditions shown in Table 3 below.
상기와 같이 부식된 시편을 주사 전자현미경에 의해 확대 관찰하여 석출물양과 부식된 시편의 깊이(te)와의 관계를 관찰하고 그 결과를 하기 표 3에 나타내었다.As described above, the corroded specimen was observed by a scanning electron microscope to observe the relationship between the amount of precipitates and the depth (te) of the corroded specimen, and the results are shown in Table 3 below.
또한, 상기 시편에 대하여 탄소복제물에 의해 추출된 석출물의 수등을 투과 전자현미경으로 관찰하여 측정하고 그 결과를 하기 표 3에 나타내었다.In addition, the number and the like of the precipitate extracted by the carbon replica for the specimen was observed by measuring with a transmission electron microscope and the results are shown in Table 3 below.
[표 3]TABLE 3
* ds,dv : 표면적 및 체적분포로부터 얻어진 평균석출물의 직경* ds, dv: diameter of average precipitate obtained from surface area and volume distribution
fv : 석출물의 체적분율fv: volume fraction of precipitate
ns,nv : 각각 단위표면적 및 체적당 존재하는 석출물의 수ns, nv: number of precipitates present per unit surface area and volume, respectively
상기 표 3에 나타난 바와같이, 시편의 부식깊이(te)는 부식조건에 따라 변화됨을 알 수 있으며, 이는 부식깊이(te)를 강의 열처리조건 및 부식시간에 관계없이 항상 일정하다고 하는 종래의 방법으로는 석출물의 양을 정확하게 측정할 수 없다는 것을 의미하는 것이다.As shown in Table 3, it can be seen that the corrosion depth (te) of the specimen is changed according to the corrosion conditions, which is a conventional method that the corrosion depth (te) is always constant regardless of the heat treatment conditions and the corrosion time of the steel Means that the amount of precipitate cannot be measured accurately.
상기 실시예1의 표 2와 같은 조성을 갖는 강종을 하기 표 4와 같은 온도 및 시간으로 열처리한 다음, 1%나이탈 용액으로 20초동안 부식시킨 시편에 대하여 용해도적식, 종래방법 및 본 발명에 의해 석출물의 체척분율값을 측정하고 그 결과를 하기 표 4에 나타내었다.The steel grade having the composition shown in Table 2 of Example 1 was heat-treated at the temperature and time as shown in Table 4, and then subjected to the solubility formula, the conventional method, and the present invention for the specimen corroded for 20 seconds with 1% nital solution The sediment fraction values of the precipitates were measured and the results are shown in Table 4 below.
[표 4]TABLE 4
상기 표 4에 표시된 이론치 값(fv)은 용해도적식(Solubility Limit Equation)log[Nb][C+N]=1.56에 의해서 계산된 값이다.The theoretical value fv shown in Table 4 is the solubility limit equation log [Nb] [C + N] = It is calculated by 1.56.
상기 표 4에 나타난 바와같이, 종래방법의 결과치는 이론치보다 약 5-10배 정도 많은 양이 측정됨을 알수 있으며, 이는 종래방법이 석출물량의 측정에 있어서 부정확하다는 것을 의미한다.As shown in Table 4, it can be seen that the result of the conventional method is about 5-10 times more than the theoretical value, which means that the conventional method is inaccurate in measuring the amount of precipitates.
상술한 바와같이, 본 발명은 미세석출물(특히 저합금고장력강의 석출물)의 량을 탄소복제법에 의해 측정하는 경우 석출물이 추출되는 시편의 부식깊이를 주사 전자현미경으로 측정하여 이 방법에 의해 강의조성과 열처리 변화조건에 따른 석출물의 추출깊이의 변화를 고려하여 시편의 단위부피당 석출물의 수를 정확하게 측정할 수 있는 수단을 부여할 수 있는 효과가 있는 것이다.As described above, in the present invention, when the amount of fine precipitates (particularly, precipitates of low alloy high tensile steel) is measured by carbon cloning, the corrosion depth of the specimen from which the precipitates are extracted is measured by scanning electron microscopy. Considering the change in the extraction depth of the precipitate according to the change of the heat treatment conditions, it is possible to give a means for accurately measuring the number of precipitates per unit volume of the specimen.
Claims (1)
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| KR1019860011556A KR900006351B1 (en) | 1986-12-30 | 1986-12-30 | Precipitate quantitative measurement |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| KR1019860011556A KR900006351B1 (en) | 1986-12-30 | 1986-12-30 | Precipitate quantitative measurement |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| KR880008024A KR880008024A (en) | 1988-08-30 |
| KR900006351B1 true KR900006351B1 (en) | 1990-08-28 |
Family
ID=19254551
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| KR1019860011556A Expired KR900006351B1 (en) | 1986-12-30 | 1986-12-30 | Precipitate quantitative measurement |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| KR (1) | KR900006351B1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KR100941270B1 (en) * | 2007-06-19 | 2010-02-11 | 현대자동차주식회사 | Apparatus and method for corrosion test of exhaust system parts |
-
1986
- 1986-12-30 KR KR1019860011556A patent/KR900006351B1/en not_active Expired
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| KR880008024A (en) | 1988-08-30 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US3950642A (en) | Method of inspecting shot peened surfaces for extent of coverage | |
| US3618374A (en) | Method for measuring surface cleanliness | |
| DE3443675A1 (en) | SAMPLE FOR TESTING THROUGH ULTRASOUND | |
| KR900006351B1 (en) | Precipitate quantitative measurement | |
| Doménech-Carbó et al. | Detection of archaeological forgeries of Iberian lead plates using nanoelectrochemical techniques. The lot of fake plates from Bugarra (Spain) | |
| Smith et al. | Investigation of the effect of impingement angle on tribocorrosion using single impacts | |
| JPH05346387A (en) | Method of judging cleanliness of metal materials | |
| Privezentsev et al. | Analysis of the microhardness of metals using digital metallographic images | |
| CN114002250B (en) | Method for removing analysis peak interference of electronic probe line and application thereof | |
| JP2744704B2 (en) | Method for estimating thermal aging embrittlement of duplex stainless steel | |
| Young et al. | Evaluation of correction methods for determining load-independent Knoop microhardness | |
| JPH0313861A (en) | Method for detecting damage in metal | |
| JPH10206355A (en) | Evaluation method of fatigue damage degree of metal | |
| Eggli | Anodic stripping coulometry at a thin-film mercury electrode | |
| Scott et al. | Principles and Practice of Metallography | |
| King et al. | AN ANALYSIS OF SOME THIRD‐CENTURY ROMAN COINS FOR SURFACE SILVERING AND SILVER PERCENTAGE OF THEIR ALLOY CONTENT | |
| JPS6095354A (en) | Automatic analysis method of coal structure | |
| RU1817013C (en) | Method of determination of service life of protective coatings on metals in corrosive media | |
| US20070209429A1 (en) | Direct method and apparatus for testing anticorrosion performance of aqueous protective fluids with wire beam electrode sensors | |
| JP2004333389A (en) | Non-destructive creep damage evaluation method for CrMoV steel | |
| CN114324297A (en) | Method for analyzing grain characteristics | |
| SU1364956A1 (en) | Method of determining destruction toughness of materials | |
| Thondiraj et al. | A microprocessor based stripping thickness meter. | |
| Pitschner | A Proposed Method for Accurately Evaluating Results of Corrosion Tests of Ferrous Metals | |
| JPS63290948A (en) | Method of quantitatively analyzing phase containing light element by mean atomic number by using scanning microscope and picture analyzer |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| A201 | Request for examination | ||
| PA0109 | Patent application |
St.27 status event code: A-0-1-A10-A12-nap-PA0109 |
|
| PA0201 | Request for examination |
St.27 status event code: A-1-2-D10-D11-exm-PA0201 |
|
| R17-X000 | Change to representative recorded |
St.27 status event code: A-3-3-R10-R17-oth-X000 |
|
| PG1501 | Laying open of application |
St.27 status event code: A-1-1-Q10-Q12-nap-PG1501 |
|
| E902 | Notification of reason for refusal | ||
| PE0902 | Notice of grounds for rejection |
St.27 status event code: A-1-2-D10-D21-exm-PE0902 |
|
| T11-X000 | Administrative time limit extension requested |
St.27 status event code: U-3-3-T10-T11-oth-X000 |
|
| T11-X000 | Administrative time limit extension requested |
St.27 status event code: U-3-3-T10-T11-oth-X000 |
|
| T11-X000 | Administrative time limit extension requested |
St.27 status event code: U-3-3-T10-T11-oth-X000 |
|
| P11-X000 | Amendment of application requested |
St.27 status event code: A-2-2-P10-P11-nap-X000 |
|
| P13-X000 | Application amended |
St.27 status event code: A-2-2-P10-P13-nap-X000 |
|
| G160 | Decision to publish patent application | ||
| PG1605 | Publication of application before grant of patent |
St.27 status event code: A-2-2-Q10-Q13-nap-PG1605 |
|
| E701 | Decision to grant or registration of patent right | ||
| PE0701 | Decision of registration |
St.27 status event code: A-1-2-D10-D22-exm-PE0701 |
|
| GRNT | Written decision to grant | ||
| PR0701 | Registration of establishment |
St.27 status event code: A-2-4-F10-F11-exm-PR0701 |
|
| PR1002 | Payment of registration fee |
St.27 status event code: A-2-2-U10-U11-oth-PR1002 Fee payment year number: 1 |
|
| PR1001 | Payment of annual fee |
St.27 status event code: A-4-4-U10-U11-oth-PR1001 Fee payment year number: 4 |
|
| PR1001 | Payment of annual fee |
St.27 status event code: A-4-4-U10-U11-oth-PR1001 Fee payment year number: 5 |
|
| PR1001 | Payment of annual fee |
St.27 status event code: A-4-4-U10-U11-oth-PR1001 Fee payment year number: 6 |
|
| FPAY | Annual fee payment |
Payment date: 19960704 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
| PR1001 | Payment of annual fee |
St.27 status event code: A-4-4-U10-U11-oth-PR1001 Fee payment year number: 7 |
|
| LAPS | Lapse due to unpaid annual fee | ||
| PC1903 | Unpaid annual fee |
St.27 status event code: A-4-4-U10-U13-oth-PC1903 Not in force date: 19970829 Payment event data comment text: Termination Category : DEFAULT_OF_REGISTRATION_FEE |
|
| PC1903 | Unpaid annual fee |
St.27 status event code: N-4-6-H10-H13-oth-PC1903 Ip right cessation event data comment text: Termination Category : DEFAULT_OF_REGISTRATION_FEE Not in force date: 19970829 |
|
| PN2301 | Change of applicant |
St.27 status event code: A-5-5-R10-R13-asn-PN2301 St.27 status event code: A-5-5-R10-R11-asn-PN2301 |
|
| R18-X000 | Changes to party contact information recorded |
St.27 status event code: A-5-5-R10-R18-oth-X000 |
|
| R18-X000 | Changes to party contact information recorded |
St.27 status event code: A-5-5-R10-R18-oth-X000 |
|
| P22-X000 | Classification modified |
St.27 status event code: A-4-4-P10-P22-nap-X000 |
|
| R18-X000 | Changes to party contact information recorded |
St.27 status event code: A-5-5-R10-R18-oth-X000 |
|
| R18-X000 | Changes to party contact information recorded |
St.27 status event code: A-5-5-R10-R18-oth-X000 |
|
| R18-X000 | Changes to party contact information recorded |
St.27 status event code: A-5-5-R10-R18-oth-X000 |
|
| R18-X000 | Changes to party contact information recorded |
St.27 status event code: A-5-5-R10-R18-oth-X000 |
|
| R18-X000 | Changes to party contact information recorded |
St.27 status event code: A-5-5-R10-R18-oth-X000 |
|
| R18-X000 | Changes to party contact information recorded |
St.27 status event code: A-5-5-R10-R18-oth-X000 |