[go: up one dir, main page]

JPH1122004A - Construction of a simple calculation system using steel braces for the proper placement of load-bearing walls in a wooden frame conventional construction building - Google Patents

Construction of a simple calculation system using steel braces for the proper placement of load-bearing walls in a wooden frame conventional construction building

Info

Publication number
JPH1122004A
JPH1122004A JP20824197A JP20824197A JPH1122004A JP H1122004 A JPH1122004 A JP H1122004A JP 20824197 A JP20824197 A JP 20824197A JP 20824197 A JP20824197 A JP 20824197A JP H1122004 A JPH1122004 A JP H1122004A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
frame
building
construction
wall
floor
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
JP20824197A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP3343646B2 (en
Inventor
Kazuo Okada
和夫 岡田
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
OKADA KENCHIKU DESIGN LE-MU KK
Original Assignee
OKADA KENCHIKU DESIGN LE-MU KK
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by OKADA KENCHIKU DESIGN LE-MU KK filed Critical OKADA KENCHIKU DESIGN LE-MU KK
Priority to JP20824197A priority Critical patent/JP3343646B2/en
Publication of JPH1122004A publication Critical patent/JPH1122004A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP3343646B2 publication Critical patent/JP3343646B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Load-Bearing And Curtain Walls (AREA)
  • Buildings Adapted To Withstand Abnormal External Influences (AREA)

Abstract

(57)【要約】 【課題】 本発明は、木造軸組在来構法建物における
耐震性能について、その耐力の基本としての木軸筋かい
を頼りとした従来の工法のみでは、記録的な大地震には
充分対応できない諸点の再認識を基に、鋼製筋かいとい
う徹底した品質管理を前提とした製品の高耐力と、施工
の簡便さ更に加えて建物全体の中での製品の適正な配置
を平易にチェックできる簡易計算システムまでを総合的
に確立し、生命の尊厳と併せ「木の文化」としての構法
の新たなる伝承を課題とする。 【解決手段】 本発明の課題を解決する具体的な手段
は、前述の諸項目を網羅した実務を基に、フレームの工
場製作工程における製品精度及び品質管理の徹底をはじ
めとして、現場施工管理についても大工職方を含む担当
技術者各人が工法の簡便さと耐力があるが故にその他の
壁の木軸筋かいの留め付け手段に粗略に陥ることなく、
工程手順のマニュアルも充分に咀嚼せしめ、建設大臣認
定の重みに見合う発明の課題の持つ理念の周知の徹底こ
そ肝要であり、発明者・出願人共に本発明の秘める高い
社会性の意義への自覚こそ基本であると考える。
(57) [Summary] [PROBLEMS] The present invention relates to a seismic performance of a wooden framed conventional building using only a conventional construction method that relies on a wooden shaft bracing as a basis of its strength. Based on the re-recognition of various points that cannot be adequately handled, the high strength of the products based on the thorough quality control of steel bracing and the simplicity of construction, as well as the proper placement of the products in the entire building Comprehensively establish a simple calculation system that can check easily, and, together with the dignity of life, make a new tradition of the construction method as "tree culture". SOLUTION: The concrete means for solving the problems of the present invention is based on the practice covering the above-mentioned various items, and includes the thoroughness of product accuracy and quality control in a frame manufacturing process, and on-site construction management. Because the engineers in charge, including carpenters, have the simplicity and strength of the construction method, they do not fall into rough ways to fasten the wooden shaft braces on other walls.
It is important to thoroughly understand the manual of the process procedure and to thoroughly disseminate the philosophy of the invention that matches the weight of the Minister of Construction's recognition, and both the inventor and the applicant are aware of the high social significance of the invention. I think that is fundamental.

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

【0001】[0001]

【発明の属する技術分野】本発明は、木造軸組在来構法
建物の耐震性能について、設計段階における初期チェッ
クとそれに続く性能向上のための数値を根拠とした修正
検討を、施工に携わる棟梁工務店においてでも一般的に
平易な壁量算出程度の簡単な計算方法をもって達成でき
ることとし、同構法の特徴である自由間取りの結果とし
て起こり得る耐力壁の偏りがちの弱点を、高耐力のOK
フレームの組み込みにより、建物全体としてバランス良
い耐力の配分を効率よく実現できる手段を創出すること
にある。
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION The present invention relates to a construction work for a timber-building construction company, which conducts an initial check at the design stage and a subsequent correction study based on numerical values for improving the performance of seismic performance of a conventional wooden framed building. Even in a store, it can be achieved by a simple calculation method that is generally simple enough to calculate the amount of wall, and the weak point of bias of the load-bearing wall that can occur as a result of free layout, which is a feature of the same construction method, is considered as a high strength OK.
An object of the present invention is to create a means for efficiently realizing a well-balanced distribution of proof strength by incorporating a frame.

【0002】[0002]

【従来の技術】従来、建築基準法施行令第46条に規定
される木造建築物の耐力上必要な軸組壁量の計算は、桁
行き方向及び梁間方向共にその方向に向いて配置される
耐力壁の壁量の合計数値をもって合否の判定をなされて
きていたもので、公庫融資や一定規模以上又は特定構造
で構造計算審査の義務付け対象となるもの以外の一般木
造住宅などにおいては、設計者や大工棟梁による建築確
認申請図上の経験的配慮に委ねられていたのであり、通
例的な平面プランとしてみても南側に縁側やリビングル
ームを配置して大きな開口窓を取るためにその脇方向で
は必然的に小幅の耐力壁しか取り得なくなり、明らかに
耐震的にも偏りとみなされるにもかかわらず、北側寄り
の押入や洗面所・便所などの付属室まわりの壁密度が高
いため合計壁量として規定数値を満たしていれば良しと
されてきたので、技術面においてもそれに沿った慣行的
レベルを超える努力は在来構法全体としても阪神大震災
の警鐘が鳴らされたとは言えどもなおそれらの盲点を補
って余りある理念を持った汎用的な説得力のある工法が
未だ躍り出ては来ないのである。
2. Description of the Related Art Conventionally, the calculation of the amount of framing wall necessary for the proof strength of a wooden building prescribed in Article 46 of the Enforcement Order of the Building Standards Law is performed in such a manner that both the girder direction and the beam-to-beam direction are arranged in that direction. Pass / fail judgments have been made based on the total value of the amount of load-bearing walls.In the case of public housing loans or ordinary wooden houses other than those of a certain size or of a specific structure that are subject to structural calculation review, the It was left to the empirical considerations on the construction confirmation application drawing by the carpenter's ridge beam, and even if it is seen as a customary plan, in order to arrange the rim side and living room on the south side and take a large opening window, Inevitably, only a small bearing wall can be obtained, and although it is apparently considered to be seismically biased, the wall density around the ancillary rooms such as the push-in on the north side and toilets and toilets is high, so the total wall amount It has been considered good to meet the prescribed numerical values, so efforts in the technical aspect that exceed the conventional level in line with the conventional Hanshin Great Earthquake even though the conventional construction method as a whole sounded a warning bell A general-purpose and persuasive construction method with a philosophy that is too compensating has not yet emerged.

【0003】[0003]

【発明が解決しようとする課題】木造軸組在来構法にお
いて、その構造耐力の要めは筋かいに総てを負っている
と言わねばならず、更にその先を突き詰めると一本ごと
の筋かいの両先端の留め付け手段の結果が耐震性能を左
右しているのであるが、そこにはまた命としての先端留
め付け部分における引っ張り力に対する割り裂けという
逃れることのできない木軸材としての宿命も克服せねば
ならず、そのような繊細な施工管理が求められる耐力壁
の力学上も合理的な配置についても強い指導力を裏付け
とした法規 るのであり、震災による大破壊の結果を見てからその施
工上の非を唱えることは簡単であろうが設計段階から被
害を未然に防ぐことが可能となる工法の具体的な提案こ
そが建築技術者が負うべき責務と考えねばならず、本発
明者及び出願人によって取得した建設大臣認定のOKフ
レームを簡便な手法と工程で取り付けが出来、更にその
適切な配置方法も高度な構造専門技術者を煩わすことも
なく簡易な加減乗除計算の範囲で所期の回答を求め得る
ことを可能とする、つまり形態の伴なった高耐力の耐震
フレームとその適切な配置理論とを併用することによっ
て発揮できる技術的効果が本発明の主たる課題である。
In the conventional wooden frame construction method, it must be said that the structural strength of the frame is borne entirely by the braces. The result of the fastening means at both ends of the paddle determines the seismic performance, but there is also a fate as an irreversible wooden shaft, splitting against the tensile force at the tip fastening part as a life Regulations that support such delicate construction management require strong leadership in both dynamics and rational arrangement of load-bearing walls. Therefore, it would be easy to advocate the construction after seeing the results of the catastrophic destruction caused by the earthquake, but the concrete proposal of a construction method that can prevent damage from the design stage is the only thing. It must be considered as the responsibility of the building engineer, and the OK frame approved by the inventor and the applicant can be installed by a simple method and process. It is possible to obtain the expected answer within the range of simple addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division calculations without the need for a technician, that is, to use a high-strength seismic frame with a form and its appropriate placement theory together The technical effect that can be exerted is the main problem of the present invention.

【0004】[0004]

【課題を解決するための手段】上記課題を解決する手段
として、形あるOKフレームの製造から現場取付けに至
る実施工程と、フレームの適切な配置を理論づける計算
式の構成の二点に分けてみることが出来る。先ず一点の
形態を持つフレームについては、本発明者及び出願人と
同一名義による平成8年3月21日付実用新案登録第3
024994号によってその形状から実施例にいたるま
で詳細に亙って公報記録にもすでに収められており(後
述の図面の一部は同登録出願図面と類似点もあるが、耐
力上最も負担を負う下枠のボルト位置に厚さ10mmの
鉄板補強プレートを工場溶接して標準製品とした点が本
願の決定的特徴である)、更にその後の平成9年3月2
1日付で「建設省玉住指発第12号」として建設大臣よ
り固有の耐力有りとして建築基準法施行令に定める上限
の壁倍率「5.0」の認定を取得し、全国いづこの行政
においても建築確認申請提出時にはOKフレーム適用の
承認が得られることになったのである。
Means for Solving the Problems As means for solving the above-mentioned problems, there are divided into two points: an implementation process from the production of a shapely OK frame to installation on a site, and a calculation formula for theoretically arranging an appropriate arrangement of the frame. You can see. First, regarding a frame having one form, a utility model registration dated March 21, 1996, No. 3 under the same name as the present inventor and the applicant.
No. 024994 already describes in detail in the official gazette record from its shape to the embodiment. (Some of the drawings described below have similarities to the drawings of the same registered application, but bear the most burden on the bearing capacity. It is a decisive feature of the present invention that an iron plate reinforcing plate with a thickness of 10 mm is factory-welded at the bolt position of the lower frame to make it a standard product.) Further, on March 2, 1997
On the 1st, "Ministry of Construction Tamazushi No. 12" was approved by the Minister of Construction as having inherent strength and the upper limit of wall magnification "5.0" stipulated in the Ordinance for Enforcement of the Building Standards Law was obtained. Also, when submitting an application for building confirmation, approval for the application of the OK frame was obtained.

【0005】次いで二点めの簡易計算システムの構成に
ついて述べる。木造軸組在来構法における耐震壁の耐力
は、筋かい取付けの施工精度に総て委ねられているので
あるが、更に一棟の建物内での適切な壁配置こそ重要な
ポイントであり、法規制のやや盲点的な曖昧さの中で如
何に実効性の高い計算理論を確立できるかに使命がかか
っていることになる。しかもその計算理論について構造
解析技術者だけがマスター出来、同構法の融通ある多様
性を日常業務とする大概の棟梁工務店において難問とし
て敬遠されてしまっては、木の文化としての伝統構法の
近い将来での凋落の道しかなく、そこにこそ本発明によ
る簡易計算システムの画期性があると自負するものであ
る。
Next, the configuration of a second simple calculation system will be described. The strength of the earthquake-resistant wall in the conventional wooden frame construction method is entirely left to the construction accuracy of braced installation, but proper wall arrangement within one building is also an important point. The mission depends on how effective a theory of computation can be established in the somewhat blind ambiguity of regulation. Moreover, only the structural analysis engineer can master the theory of computation, and if most of the building construction companies that use the versatility of the construction method as daily work are avoided as a difficult problem, the traditional construction method as a wooden culture is close There is only a road of decline in the future, and I am proud that the simple calculation system according to the present invention is revolutionary.

【0006】即ち、建物全体の荷重の中心を表す重心
と、耐力壁で囲まれる区画ごとの連結展開としての剛性
の中心とのずれ=偏心率が大きければ大きいほど地震時
での捻れ倒壊の危険性も大きくなり、在来構法の魅力と
しての外観上の変化ある段違い形状や大きな開口を設け
たいが故に必然的に偏心も避けられないのであるが、こ
の際、耐力壁の配置が最も手薄で3尺など小幅しか設置
できない場合にその小幅壁中に木軸筋かいに替えて高耐
力のOKフレームを挿入することにより大臣認定の壁倍
率「5.0」として大幅壁にも勝る実効を発揮できるの
であり、その根拠となる数値成績の組み立て方法は、フ
レーム採用以前の間取り平面図において、桁行き方向及
び梁間方向共に筋かいの入る「耐力壁を有する軸線上の
壁量を、その軸線の長さで除した数値」を各軸線ごとに
算出して比較してみる、つまり軸線1m当たりにどれだ
けの壁の力が配分されているかを比較できることにな
り、最も弱い軸線は平面図においてもすでに歴然として
いるはずであるのでフレームの高倍率に置き換えて再び
アップした壁量を軸線長さで除して比較し、1ヵ所で不
足なら2ヵ所でフレーム挿入を設定してみながら軸線ご
との数値差を縮小してゆく言い換えれば偏心率を小さく
してゆく試算を重ね、終局としてその差位が0.3以内
程度に調整できればコンピュータ解析においても桁行き
方向・梁間方向共に偏心率「0」の判定結果が得られる
ことは本発明者において実証確認済みであり、後続のモ
デル平図面・計算式の説明の項でも述べる。
That is, the difference between the center of gravity representing the center of the load of the entire building and the center of rigidity as a joint development for each section surrounded by the load-bearing wall = The greater the eccentricity, the greater the risk of torsion and collapse during an earthquake. The eccentricity is inevitably inevitable because we want to provide a stepped shape with a change in appearance and a large opening as an attractiveness of the conventional construction method, but in this case, the arrangement of the load-bearing wall is the thinnest When only a small width such as 3 shaku can be installed, insert a high-strength OK frame in the narrow wall in place of a wooden shaft brace to achieve an effect that greatly exceeds the wall as a minister-approved wall magnification of "5.0" The method of assembling the numerical results, which is the basis, is based on the plan of the floor plan before adoption of the frame. The numerical value divided by the value is calculated for each axis and compared. In other words, it is possible to compare how much wall force is distributed per meter of axis, and the weakest axis is already in the plan view. It should be obvious, so replace it with the high magnification of the frame and divide the amount of wall that has been raised again by the axis length and compare. If one is not enough, try setting the frame insertion at two places and read the value for each axis In order to reduce the difference, in other words, repeat the trial calculation to reduce the eccentricity, and if the difference can be adjusted to within about 0.3 as a final result, even in the computer analysis, the eccentricity "0" in both the digit direction and the beam-to-beam direction can be obtained. The inventor has verified and confirmed that the determination result can be obtained, and will be described in the following description of the model plan and calculation formula.

【0007】なお建物が2階建の場合は、上記条件調整
済みの1階での耐力壁位置と上下に連続している壁配置
が構造耐震上も好ましいことは明白であるが、そのヵ所
数は4〜5としてしかも拡散配置された2階間取りプラ
ンを立案すべきである。
When the building is a two-story building, it is clear that the wall arrangement on the first floor, which has been adjusted for the conditions described above, and the vertically continuous wall arrangement is preferable for structural seismic resistance. Should be planned as 4 to 5 and a floor plan with two floors spread widely.

【0008】[0008]

【発明の実施の形態】発明の実施の形態について、先ず
前提条件となる基本概念を述べる。わが国の歴史と風土
とそして先人達の珠玉の手法によって永く培われてきた
木造軸組在来構法について、机上の設定値をはるかに超
える巨大地震に対処しようとするとき、その構造耐力の
根源となるべき天然木軸材としての筋かいそのものに留
め付け部分での揺れ抵抗時に起こる割り裂け現象は、植
物的限界と見極めるべきであり、従ってそれえの確実な
物理的耐震材及び一般平易な工法として鋼材によるOK
フレームこそが素朴な原点であると確信するものであ
る。
BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION First, a basic concept which is a prerequisite for an embodiment of the present invention will be described. Regarding the traditional construction method of wooden frame cultivated for a long time by the history and climate of Japan and the gem of the predecessors, when trying to cope with a huge earthquake far exceeding the set value on the desk, the root of its structural strength The splitting phenomena that occur during the resistance to shaking at the part of the bracing itself as the natural wood shaft should be identified as a plant limit, and therefore a reliable physical seismic material and a generally simple construction method OK as steel
I am convinced that frames are the simplest starting point.

【0009】かかる概念をもって公的試験機関である
(財)日本住宅・木材技術センターにおいて平成8年2
月28日に1体、同年5月14日に1体、そして同年9
月25日には建設大臣認定を前提としたJIS規定に従
って連続4体の実体試験を行ない、耐力としての平均壁
倍率7.3倍の実績記録を達成し、その成績をもってわ
が国唯一の権威である(財)日本建築センターの評定審
査を平成9年1月20日付で完結し、更にその評定結果
をもって同年3月21日付でフレーム単独の耐力を建築
基準法上限の壁倍率「5.0」として、しかも余裕耐力
も評価の上で1階より2〜3階まで上下に壁体が連続す
る3階建にも使用可能工法として大臣認定を取得したの
である。
With this concept, at the Japan Housing and Wood Technology Center, a public testing organization,
One on May 28, one on May 14 of the same year, and nine on the same year
On March 25, a continuous body test was conducted in accordance with the JIS regulations premised on the approval of the Minister of Construction, and a record of 7.3 times the average wall magnification was achieved as a proof stress, and the results are the only authority in Japan. The assessment of the Building Center of Japan was completed on January 20, 1997, and based on the assessment results, the strength of the frame alone was set as the maximum wall magnification of the Building Standards Law "5.0" on March 21, 1997. In addition, after evaluating the marginal strength, the ministry was approved as a construction method that can be used in three-story buildings where the walls are continuous up and down from the first floor to the second to third floors.

【0010】なお特筆すべきは、上述のセンター評定の
審査(早稲田大学の神山幸弘教授を委員長に東京大学・
日本大学などの先生方と建設省関係者を含む14人構成
の木質系構造専門委員会)途上において、本発明の二大
骨子であるフレーム本体の耐力実績と、建物内部におけ
る合理的かつ適切な配置バランスの設定方法についての
簡易計算システムも本発明者より詳細な報告がなされ、
棟梁工務店レベルにおいても平易にフレームの配分チェ
ックが可能であることの容認も併せて大臣認定へと進展
できたことである。
[0010] It should be noted that the above-mentioned evaluation of the center was evaluated by Professor Yukihiro Kamiyama of Waseda University, chaired by the University of Tokyo.
On the way, a 14-member wood-based structural expert committee including teachers from Nihon University and others from the Ministry of Construction) A simple calculation system on the setting method of the arrangement balance is also reported in more detail by the present inventor,
At the level of the building contractor, the fact that it is possible to easily check the distribution of frames has been accepted, and it has been possible to progress to the Minister's accreditation.

【0011】[0011]

【実施例】以下、添付図面に従って一実施例を説明す
る。図1は、フレーム本体の正面・平断面・側断面を表
しており、製作は品質管理の徹底した特定工場(大臣認
定書にも申請どおり明記されている)において行なうこ
ととし、母材としての等辺山形鋼を所定寸法に切断した
後それぞれの接点を電気溶接して正確な形状を作り寸法
検査合格後、溶融亜鉛メッキどぶ漬けを施して長期の防
錆に配慮した標準製品である。なお製品の中帯枠には
「建設大臣認定番号証」及び製造順番号刻印入りの「製
造検査済証」がそれぞれアルミプレート製としてかしめ
付けすることとし、長期に亙る品質管理の責任明示法と
して大臣認定書中にも明記されている。
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS An embodiment will be described below with reference to the accompanying drawings. Figure 1 shows the front, flat, and side cross sections of the frame body. Production is to be performed at a specific factory where quality control is thoroughly performed (specified in the Minister's Certificate as specified). It is a standard product that cuts an equilateral angle iron into a predetermined size, then electrically welds each contact to form an accurate shape, passes dimensional inspection, and then dipped in hot-dip galvanized steel to prevent long-term rust. In addition, the "Minister of Construction Certification Number" and "Manufacturing Inspection Certificate" engraved with the manufacturing order number shall be caulked on the middle frame of the product as aluminum plates, respectively. It is also specified in the Minister's certificate.

【0012】特定工場において製作されたフレームを木
造柱の眞々間隔910mm・通称3尺間に挿入した標準
タイプの場合の緊結ボルトの位置概要及び1・2階で上
下に連続して取付ける部分も含め図2に示す。
[0012] In the case of a standard type in which a frame manufactured at a specific factory is inserted between wooden pillars at a distance of 910 mm and a so-called three-foot length, an outline of the positions of binding bolts and a part for vertically attaching the first and second floors are also provided. 2 is shown in FIG.

【0013】標準タイプの1階での各取合部分及び新築
現場における施工手順を符号順としても明快に理解する
ため斜視図として図3に示すが、先ず布型基礎のコンク
リート打込みに際し、図5及び図6と図11に従う所定
寸法位置に正確にアンカーボルトを埋め込み、コンクリ
ートの凝固養生後に土台を取付け、軸組の建方日には最
初にクレーンをもって耐震製品のフレームをアンカーボ
ルト位置にゆっくり吊り下げて穴合わせの上土台上に定
着させてナットを仮締めし、上枠より安全のためのロー
プを二方向へ張ってフレームを自立させておく。
FIG. 3 is a perspective view of the standard type on the first floor for each joint and the construction procedure at the new construction site in order to clearly understand the order of the codes, but FIG. In addition, anchor bolts are accurately embedded in predetermined dimensions according to FIGS. 6 and 11, and the foundation is attached after solidification and curing of concrete. On the date of construction of the frame, first the frame of the seismic product is slowly suspended at the anchor bolt position by using a crane. Lower it, fix it on the base of the hole, temporarily tighten the nuts, and tension the rope in two directions from the upper frame to make the frame self-supporting.

【0014】フレームが複数体あっても同様で、次いで
柱を順次に建て込み、2階梁を組み、フレームの取りつ
くか所の梁下に納める所定寸法の高さ調整枕材と共に梁
上より貫通ボルトを落しこんでナットを仮締めする。次
に2階柱も順次建て込んでから小屋梁を掛け全軸組の建
方を完了する。但し2階(又は3階)において1階のフ
レームと上下に連続取付けとなる場合は、貫通ボルトは
梁を挟んでそれぞれフレーム2体ごと締めることとす
る。(図2参照)
The same applies to the case where there are a plurality of frames. Next, the columns are sequentially built, and the second floor beams are assembled. Drop the through bolt and temporarily tighten the nut. Next, the second floor pillars are also erected one after another, and the hut beams are hung to complete the construction of all the frames. However, in the case where the second floor (or the third floor) is to be continuously attached to the frame on the first floor and the upper and lower sides, the through bolts are tightened together with the two frames with the beam interposed therebetween. (See Fig. 2)

【0015】全軸組の建方が完了したら直ちに隅柱周辺
ごとに下げ振り修正を行ない、仮筋かいをきめ細かく取
付けてから軸組用各種の接合金物をはじめフレーム用ボ
ルトも本締めをなし、竪枠からのラグスクリューも締め
込んで特別な技術や時間を労することもなくフレーム工
程の一切を簡便に終了する。
Immediately after the construction of all the frames is completed, the swing-back correction is made around each corner post, and the temporary braces are attached finely, and then the various bolts for the frames and the frame bolts are fully tightened. The lag screw from the vertical frame is also tightened to complete the entire frame process without any special technique or time.

【0016】3階建における上下連続取付けの場合の軸
組詳細図として図4に示す。
FIG. 4 shows a detailed view of the frame assembly in the case of vertically mounting in a three-story building.

【0017】上階からの揺れをフレームが受け、更にそ
れを地盤へ確実に受け伝える大きな役目を持つ鉄筋入り
布型基礎コンクリートの断面形状及びフレームを固定す
るアンカーボルトの高精度取付けの方法を部分的な斜視
図として図5に示す。
The cross-sectional shape of the reinforced cloth-type foundation concrete having a large role of receiving the shaking from the upper floor and further reliably transmitting the shaking to the ground, and the method of mounting the anchor bolts for fixing the frame with high precision are described. FIG. 5 is a schematic perspective view.

【0018】フレームの下枠と土台を貫通するアンカー
ボルトの詳細を図6に示す。
FIG. 6 shows details of the anchor bolts penetrating the lower frame and the base of the frame.

【0019】フレームの上枠と2階(又は3階)梁及び
フレームが2階(又は3階)でも連続取付けとなる場合
の下枠との貫通ボルトの詳細を、建物個々の寸法差異を
簡易に処理出来る「高さ調整枕材」の納まりも含めた詳
細として図7に示す。
The details of the through bolts between the upper frame of the frame, the second floor (or the third floor) beams, and the lower frame when the frame is continuously mounted even on the second floor (or the third floor), and the dimensional difference of each building can be simplified. FIG. 7 shows details including the “height adjustment pillow material” that can be processed in the above manner.

【0020】フレーム上枠が上部梁と貫通ボルトにより
取付く詳細を図8に示す。
FIG. 8 shows details in which the upper frame of the frame is attached by the upper beam and the through bolt.

【0021】フレームを片面和室の眞壁面でも取付け位
置の眞振りにより正確に納まることの詳細を図9に示
す。
FIG. 9 shows the details of accurately placing the frame even on the true wall of the one-sided Japanese room by swinging the mounting position.

【0022】建物の間口方向の寸法が長く、縁側や連続
主室の横並びのある間取りの場合には強い地震の揺さ振
りに合うと間口中央あたりで内側へ又は外側へ撓み折れ
の現象が考えられるので、長い軸線上のフレームとT字
状にフレーム同士を抵抗体の理想的形状として接続配置
する納まりを平面及び断面図として図10に示す。
In the case of a layout with a long frontage direction of the building and a side-by-side or continuous main room, the phenomenon of bending inward or outward around the center of the frontage may be considered to be suitable for strong earthquake shaking. FIG. 10 is a plan view and a cross-sectional view showing a fitting in which a frame on a long axis and a frame are connected and arranged in a T-shape as an ideal shape of a resistor.

【0023】柱眞々間隔910mm(通称3尺間)の壁
中に挿入するフレームの上下ボルト穴眞位置を示す平面
詳細を、左右2本の柱についてそれぞれ断面寸法の異な
る条件を設定してみた場合の検討と共に図11に示す。
The details of the plane showing the positions of the upper and lower bolt holes of the frame to be inserted into the wall with the columns having a pitch of 910 mm (commonly called three-square) were set for the two columns on the left and right with different cross-sectional dimensions. FIG. 11 shows a case study.

【0024】フレーム配置の適正さを試算するためのモ
デル平面プランを、数値の根拠を示す計算式そのものが
本願の命題である都合上中心線及びそれぞれの間隔寸法
も明記して図12に示す。
FIG. 12 shows a model plane plan for estimating the appropriateness of the frame arrangement, with the center line and each interval dimension clearly specified for the sake of convenience because the calculation formula itself showing the basis of the numerical values is a proposition of the present application.

【0025】なお当平面図は、試算にあたり発明者の有
利勝手な間取りではとの批判にも応えるためオリジナル
作品を避け、(財)日本住宅・木材技術センターが平成
7年11月四国の多度津工学試験場において阪神大震災
と同規模の震動実大実験を行ない、その詳細が公的資料
の意味をもって広く公開されている「記録テキスト・B
棟仕様」をモデルとさせていただいたもので、前述のセ
ンター評定審査資料としても注釈付きで作成提出した内
容と同一のものである。
In addition, in order to respond to the criticism of the inventor's advantageous layout in the estimation, the original plan was avoided from the original work, and the Japan Housing and Wood Technology Center was established in November 1995 by Tadotsu Engineering in Shikoku. At the test site, a full-scale shaking experiment of the same scale as the Great Hanshin Earthquake was conducted, and the details are widely disclosed with the meaning of public data.
The building specification was used as a model, and it is the same as the center evaluation review material described above, which was created and submitted with annotations.

【0026】[0026]

【発明の効果】本発明は、上述のとおり構成されている
ので次に記載する効果が得られる。
Since the present invention is constructed as described above, the following effects can be obtained.

【0027】木造軸組在来構法建物の特徴としての自由
間取りと、大きな開口を持つ解放感は、他の木造構法で
は果たせない独特の住空間を可能とするものであるが、
一面では融通性のあまり構造耐力に偏りのあるまま実施
されてしまう危険性も併せ持つので、それへの対処とし
て先ず設計段階において脆弱な部分をフレームの挿入に
より合理的に補足しながら、かつ建物全体での適正な耐
力バランスの実現が、本発明による簡易計算システムに
より可能となる。
[0027] The free layout and the sense of openness with a large opening, which are the characteristics of a wooden frame traditional construction method, make it possible to create a unique living space that cannot be fulfilled by other wooden construction methods.
On the one hand, there is also the danger that the construction will be carried out with a bias in the structural strength due to the lack of flexibility, so as a countermeasure, at first in the design stage, fragile parts are rationally supplemented by inserting frames and the whole building A simple calculation system according to the present invention makes it possible to realize an appropriate proof stress balance.

【0028】更に、机上の設定値をはるかに超えること
が想定される大地震に備え、建物全体として現行の法規
定の2倍に近い壁倍率及び壁量をフレームの多数挿入に
より計る場合も、一部分の耐力のみ突出する逆のアンバ
ランスとならぬよう本簡易計算システムにより無理なく
配分することも容易に可能となる。
Further, in preparation for a large earthquake that is expected to far exceed the set value on the desk, the wall magnification and the wall amount close to twice the current legal provisions of the entire building may be measured by inserting a large number of frames. With this simple calculation system, the distribution can be easily performed without difficulty so that the reverse imbalance in which only a part of the proof stress protrudes does not occur.

【0029】一部につき前述した(財)日本住宅・木材
技術センターにより実施された多度津工学試験場での震
動実大実験の記録ビデオはすでに有料頒布されており、
その内容においては、建築基準法規定と同等耐力と設定
された木造軸組在来構法建物といえども耐力源としての
木軸筋かいの留め付けをきちんと施工すれば阪神大震災
クラスの地震でも倒壊しないとの結論づけの強調が見受
けられ、そこには現行法規擁護の公的立場も否めないで
はないが、しかしその画像の中では震動開始2秒で1階
床上に配置されていたサイドボードが激しく転倒してし
まったのであり、もしその面前に家人が居たならば逃げ
る間もなく下敷きになったことは間違いなく、あの大震
災においても死者と完全倒壊を含む建物の被害はあらゆ
るマスコミにおいて詳報されたが、死者の数倍はあった
はずの家財転倒による怪我人数の実態は殆ど報道されな
かったのであり、実験ビデオのもたらした教訓は、現行
法規定の2倍の耐力構造にしておけば単略に考えても揺
れは半分近くになり、従って転倒による怪我人数も半分
程度に防げた筈であり、マスコミにおいて市販の家具転
倒留め金物の推奨をする建築識者にいたっては、建築に
携わる技術者としての恥と心得るべしと本発明者は叫ぶ
ものであり、本発明効果の究極は当該構法建物の地震揺
れを半分にすることだとの信念は固いのである。
A part of the recorded video of the full-scale vibration experiment at the Tadotsu engineering test site conducted by the Japan Housing and Wood Technology Center has already been distributed for a fee.
In terms of its contents, even if it is a wooden frame traditional construction building set to the same strength as the Building Standard Law provisions, it will not collapse even if the Hanshin Great Earthquake class earthquake is installed if the wooden shaft braces are properly fastened as a source of strength It is undeniable that the official position of adhering to the current laws and regulations is undeniable, but in the image, the sideboard placed on the first floor at 2 seconds after the quake falls violently It was clear that if a family member was in front of him, he would have been laid down immediately without escaping, and even in the great earthquake disaster the damage to the building including dead and completely collapsed was reported in all media, Few lessons were reported about the number of injuries caused by the fall of household goods, which should have been several times the number of deaths, and the lesson learned from the experimental video was that it was twice as resistant to current legal provisions. If it were simply structured, the shaking would be almost half even if considered simply, so the number of injuries caused by falling should have been reduced to about half, and even architects recommending commercial furniture fall fasteners in the media. The present inventor shouts, "Be shameful as a technician involved in construction," and shouts out, and he firmly believes that the ultimate effect of the present invention is to halve the earthquake shaking of the building.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief description of the drawings]

【図1】フレーム本体の標準型正面図・平断面・側断面
図である。
FIG. 1 is a standard front view, flat cross-section, and side cross-sectional view of a frame main body.

【図2】木造軸組内に納まるフレーム正面図である。FIG. 2 is a front view of a frame housed in a wooden frame.

【図3】フレームが木造軸組内に納まる斜視図である。FIG. 3 is a perspective view in which a frame is accommodated in a wooden frame.

【図4】3階建に上下連続してフレームを取付ける場合
の軸組図である。
FIG. 4 is a frame diagram in a case where a frame is continuously mounted vertically on a three-story building.

【図5】布型基礎コンクリートの断面とアンカーボルト
位置の高精度取付け方法図。
FIG. 5 is a cross-sectional view of a cloth-type foundation concrete and a high-precision mounting method of anchor bolt positions.

【図6】フレーム下枠と土台を貫通するアンカーボルト
の詳細図である。
FIG. 6 is a detailed view of an anchor bolt penetrating a frame lower frame and a base.

【図7】2階(又は3階)梁及び高さ調整枕材を挟んで
納まる上下連続フレームと貫通ボルトの詳細図ある。
FIG. 7 is a detailed view of an upper and lower continuous frame and a through bolt that are sandwiched between a second floor (or third floor) beam and a height adjusting pillow material.

【図8】小屋梁と高さ調整枕材とフレーム上枠との納ま
り詳細図である。
FIG. 8 is a detailed view showing how a hut beam, a height-adjusting pillow material, and a frame upper frame fit.

【図9】室内壁の片面が和室である場合のフレーム納め
方を示す詳細図である。
FIG. 9 is a detailed view showing how to fit the frame when one surface of the indoor wall is a Japanese-style room.

【図10】フレーム同士をT字状に取付ける場合の詳細
図である。
FIG. 10 is a detailed view of a case where frames are attached in a T-shape.

【図11】フレームの上下枠のボルト穴眞位置を示す詳
細図である。
FIG. 11 is a detailed view showing the positions of the bolt holes in the upper and lower frames of the frame.

【図12】フレーム配置における簡易計算システム構成
のためのモデル平面図である。
FIG. 12 is a model plan view for a simple calculation system configuration in a frame arrangement.

【符号の説明】[Explanation of symbols]

1. フレーム専用アンカーボルト φ16mm L6
00mm 亜鉛メッキ 2. 布型基礎コンクリート 鉄筋入り 3. 土台 5. 柱 6. 柱 7. 高さ調整枕材(梁材と同質) 8. 丸かすがい・亜鉛メッキ φ6mm L120
mm(左右両面4本) 9. 2(3)階梁 10. 貫通ボルト(2か所) φ16mm L現場
合わせ・亜鉛メッキ 11. ラグスクリュー φ12mm L 7
0mm ・亜鉛メッキ 12. 貫通ボルト(枕材成90mm以上の場合中央で
1本追加取付け) 13. 間柱 (上下切り分けフレームヘビス留
め) 14. 補強プレート(工場溶接亜鉛メッキ)130m
m×65mm×10mm 15. 天端均しモルタル 16. 中帯枠 (主枠と一体工場溶接加工・亜鉛
メッキどぶ漬け) 17. 筋かい枠 ( 同上 ・ 同上 ) 18. 「建設大臣認定番号証」 (アルミプレー
ト・かしめ留め) 19. 「製造検査済証」 ( 同
上 ) 20. 添柱 21. 京壁 22. ラスボード (塗り壁下地) 23. 石膏ボード (クロス下地) 24. ラグスクリュー φ9mm L 60
mm ・亜鉛メッキ 25. 下地桟 26. 壁ぬき 27. 畳寄せ 28. 畳 29. 巾木 30. フローリング 31. 床板 32. 根太 33. 根太受け
1. Frame dedicated anchor bolt φ16mm L6
00mm galvanized 2. 2. Cloth-type foundation concrete with steel reinforcement Foundation 5. Pillar 6. Pillar 7. 7. Height-adjustable pillow (same quality as beam) Round cap, galvanized φ6mm L120
mm (4 on both sides) 9. 2 (3) floor beams 10. 10. Penetration bolt (2 places) φ16mm L-placed / galvanized Lug screw φ12mm L7
0mm ・ Zinc plating 12. 12. Penetration bolt (In the case of pillow material 90mm or more, one additional bolt is attached at the center) 13. Stud (up and down separation frame with a screw) Reinforcement plate (factory weld galvanized) 130m
m × 65 mm × 10 mm 15. Top end leveling mortar 16. Medium belt frame (welded with main frame at factory and galvanized) Bracing frame (same as above) "Ministry of Construction Certification Number Certificate" (aluminum plate, caulking) “Production inspection certificate”
Top) 20. Pillar 21. Kyoto wall 22. Lath board (painted wall base) 23. Gypsum board (cloth base) 24. Lug screw φ9mm L 60
mm ・ Zinc plating 25. Shimojibashi 26. Without walls 27. Tatami mat 28. Tatami 29. Baseboard 30. Flooring 31. Floorboard 32. Joist 33. Receiving joist

フロントページの続き (51)Int.Cl.6 識別記号 FI E04B 2/56 622 E04B 2/56 622B 622H 632 632B 632C 632D 632H 651 651A 651L 652 652K E04H 9/02 311 E04H 9/02 311 Front Page continued (51) Int.Cl. 6 identifications FI E04B 2/56 622 E04B 2/56 622B 622H 632 632B 632C 632D 632H 651 651A 651L 652 652K E04H 9/02 311 E04H 9/02 311

Claims (3)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims] 【請求項1】 木造軸組在来構法建物の新築設計に際
し、耐震上最も重要な耐力壁を建物全体に釣り合い良く
配置しようとする場合、間取りの都合や南面部分で大き
な開口を得たいために小幅の耐力壁しか設置できないの
が現実であるが、その小幅(通称3尺)壁の内部に高耐
力の鋼製筋かい(本発明者及び出願人による建設大臣認
定取得済み工法で以下同認定承認に倣いOKフレーム又
はフレームと呼称する)を挿入して大幅の耐力壁に充分
相当する壁量の確保を可能とした上で、その適正壁量数
値確認の手段として、建物の間口・桁行方向及び奥行・
梁間方向共に、「それぞれ耐力壁を有する軸線上の壁量
を、その軸線の長さで除した数値」つまり軸線の1m当
りに幾らの壁量が働いているかを各軸線ごとに比較し
て、差異が0.1〜0.3程度と小さければ小さいほど
1棟の構造体としての偏心が少なく、また差異が0.5
を大巾に超える場合は不足している軸線上の壁中へOK
フレームの追加挿入を試み、再び増加した壁量をその軸
線の長さで除してみて差異の縮小確認を繰り返し試算し
てみることにより、高度のコンピュータ解析に頼らずと
も平易な加減乗除計算で偏心がもたらす地震時における
建物の捻れ倒壊現象を事前に調整できることを可能とす
る簡易計算システムの構成。
(1) In the case of a new construction design of a wooden frame conventional construction method, when the most important load-bearing wall for seismic resistance is to be arranged in a balanced manner over the entire building, it is necessary to obtain a large opening in the southern part due to the layout. It is a reality that only small-width bearing walls can be installed. However, high-strength steel braces are installed inside the small-width (commonly known as 3 shaku) walls. (Referred to as “OK frame” or “frame” in accordance with the approval) to secure a sufficient amount of wall for a large load-bearing wall. And depth
In the direction between the beams, "the numerical value obtained by dividing the amount of the wall on the axis having the load bearing wall by the length of the axis", that is, how much the amount of the wall works per meter of the axis is compared for each axis. The smaller the difference is, about 0.1 to 0.3, the less the eccentricity of one building is, and the difference is 0.5
If it exceeds the width, OK into the wall on the missing axis
Attempting to insert additional frames, dividing the increased wall volume by the length of its axis again, and repeatedly calculating the reduction of the difference, a simple addition / subtraction multiplication / division calculation without relying on sophisticated computer analysis. Configuration of a simple calculation system that enables to adjust in advance the torsion and collapse phenomenon of a building during an earthquake caused by eccentricity.
【請求項2】OKフレームのごとき建築基準法にすでに
定められている形状や耐力が違った形で規定数値を上回
るとされ、それを建設大臣認定に及びたいとする場合に
は前提条件としての事前審査過程に(財)日本建築セン
ターの評定があり、更に評定を受ける前提条件に公的機
関の性格及び権威をもつ(財)日本住宅・木材技術セン
ターによる4体連続の試験成績書の提示が義務付けられ
ているのであるが、本フレームにおいては4体に先立ち
1体づつ2度にわたって同試験場で実体テストを受け、
フレーム上部に横からの大きな水平力が加わったとき、
フレーム全体変形に抵抗する最大ポイントである下枠を
繋ぎ留めているアンカーボルト位置において真っ先に起
こる部分変形の秒単位の実態を目前体験した結果とし
て、ボルト位置を竪枠外面より70mmと決め、かつ下
枠にボルト位置補強として厚さ10mmの鉄板プレート
をフレーム製作工程で事前溶接して標準製品となす構
成。
2. It is assumed that the shape and strength already specified in the Building Standard Law such as an OK frame exceed the specified values in a different form, and if it is desired to be approved by the Minister of Construction, In the preliminary screening process, the Japan Building Center was rated, and the prerequisite for receiving the rating was the character and authority of a public institution. The Japan Housing and Wood Technology Center presented four consecutive test reports. However, in this frame, before the four bodies, each body undergoes a body test twice, one body at a time,
When a large horizontal force is applied to the top of the frame from the side,
As a result of immediately experiencing the actual state in seconds of the partial deformation that occurs first at the anchor bolt position that holds the lower frame, which is the maximum point that resists the entire frame deformation, the bolt position is determined to be 70 mm from the outer surface of the vertical frame, and A 10mm thick iron plate is pre-welded to the lower frame as a standard product in the frame manufacturing process to reinforce the bolt position.
【請求項3】上記請求項1及び2を内容とした実施に際
し、その耐力と合理的な簡易計算システムの併用の成果
をもって前記センター評定と大臣認定共に容認となった
1階より2階更に3階まで上下に連続してフレームを挿
入する耐震工法の構成。但し3階建に適用させる場合
は、最も耐力負担の大きい1階フレームの下枠と竪枠隅
に厚さ6mmの補強3角プレートの事前溶接を標準製品
とし、更に安全対応としてフレーム両脇柱の元部に一般
3階建規格品のホールダウン金物も併用させることが付
帯条件となる。
3. In the implementation of the above claims 1 and 2, with the result of the combined use of the proof stress and the rational simple calculation system, the center rating and the minister's approval are both accepted from the first floor to the second floor and three more. A seismic construction method in which frames are inserted continuously up and down to the floor. However, when applied to a three-story building, a 6 mm thick reinforced triangular plate is pre-welded to the lower and vertical corners of the first-floor frame, which has the greatest load bearing capacity, as a standard product. It is an additional condition that hall down hardware of a general three-story standard product is also used in the base of the building.
JP20824197A 1997-06-30 1997-06-30 Simplified calculation method using steel braces for proper placement of load-bearing walls in traditional timber framed buildings Expired - Fee Related JP3343646B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP20824197A JP3343646B2 (en) 1997-06-30 1997-06-30 Simplified calculation method using steel braces for proper placement of load-bearing walls in traditional timber framed buildings

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP20824197A JP3343646B2 (en) 1997-06-30 1997-06-30 Simplified calculation method using steel braces for proper placement of load-bearing walls in traditional timber framed buildings

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPH1122004A true JPH1122004A (en) 1999-01-26
JP3343646B2 JP3343646B2 (en) 2002-11-11

Family

ID=16553002

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP20824197A Expired - Fee Related JP3343646B2 (en) 1997-06-30 1997-06-30 Simplified calculation method using steel braces for proper placement of load-bearing walls in traditional timber framed buildings

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP3343646B2 (en)

Cited By (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2003016147A (en) * 2001-06-29 2003-01-17 Nippon Steel Corp Structure production information processing apparatus, structure production system, structure production method, and storage medium and program therefor
JP2006249799A (en) * 2005-03-11 2006-09-21 Kenzo Iwata Aseismatic reinforcing member for wooden building
JP2007077601A (en) * 2005-09-12 2007-03-29 Misawa Homes Co Ltd Vibration control panel installation structure
JP2011144543A (en) * 2010-01-14 2011-07-28 Uesho:Kk Method for seismically strengthening room of wooden building, and earthquake-resistant shelter
KR101681084B1 (en) * 2015-09-02 2016-12-01 한양대학교 산학협력단 Apparatus for preventing masonry-infilled wall from falling sideward by out-of-plane force on wall using tendon
JP2018003351A (en) * 2016-06-29 2018-01-11 泰久 志築 Reinforcement structure for building
CN114150912A (en) * 2021-12-06 2022-03-08 北京建筑大学 A support plate type integral connection node suitable for steel frame support system
JP2023020780A (en) * 2021-07-29 2023-02-09 株式会社高橋監理 Hold down for four stories
CN116220192A (en) * 2022-12-02 2023-06-06 悉地国际设计顾问(深圳)有限公司 A Conversion System Between Diagonal Bracing and Core Tube

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP5802455B2 (en) * 2011-07-05 2015-10-28 株式会社アクト Wooden frame construction method and wooden frame construction method

Cited By (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2003016147A (en) * 2001-06-29 2003-01-17 Nippon Steel Corp Structure production information processing apparatus, structure production system, structure production method, and storage medium and program therefor
JP2006249799A (en) * 2005-03-11 2006-09-21 Kenzo Iwata Aseismatic reinforcing member for wooden building
JP2007077601A (en) * 2005-09-12 2007-03-29 Misawa Homes Co Ltd Vibration control panel installation structure
JP2011144543A (en) * 2010-01-14 2011-07-28 Uesho:Kk Method for seismically strengthening room of wooden building, and earthquake-resistant shelter
KR101681084B1 (en) * 2015-09-02 2016-12-01 한양대학교 산학협력단 Apparatus for preventing masonry-infilled wall from falling sideward by out-of-plane force on wall using tendon
JP2018003351A (en) * 2016-06-29 2018-01-11 泰久 志築 Reinforcement structure for building
JP2023020780A (en) * 2021-07-29 2023-02-09 株式会社高橋監理 Hold down for four stories
CN114150912A (en) * 2021-12-06 2022-03-08 北京建筑大学 A support plate type integral connection node suitable for steel frame support system
CN116220192A (en) * 2022-12-02 2023-06-06 悉地国际设计顾问(深圳)有限公司 A Conversion System Between Diagonal Bracing and Core Tube

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP3343646B2 (en) 2002-11-11

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP1337720B1 (en) Connector
US5249404A (en) Holdown connection
US20100166497A1 (en) Multipurpose holdown
RU2483170C2 (en) Wall design using bearing wall panel for wooden building and method of its manufacturing
US7941984B2 (en) Wind force resistant structure
US20020059756A1 (en) Modular units, modular structures having modular units, and method for constructing modular structures
Ceccotti et al. Seismic behaviour of multi-storey XLam buildings
JP3343646B2 (en) Simplified calculation method using steel braces for proper placement of load-bearing walls in traditional timber framed buildings
US11155977B2 (en) Portal frame with lap joint for moment resistance
JP3343647B2 (en) An existing building with a wooden frame conventional construction method, which is reinforced by a steel beam and a steel bracing frame from the outside.
JP2001164645A (en) Structural calculation method for wooden house and wooden house built using the same
Maison et al. Dynamic analysis of a forty-four story building
JP3149343U (en) A concrete block foundation with wooden pedestal brackets with brace fittings.
JP4039987B2 (en) Building using precast concrete frame and its construction method
US20230083082A1 (en) Connection structure for glued laminated timber
JPH08277587A (en) Framework bearing wall and frame work construction method based on its application
JP3823269B2 (en) Seismic structure of wooden structure
JP3024994U (en) Frame of steel seismic resistant frame in conventional wooden frame construction method
JP3039716U (en) Earthquake-resistant equipment for wooden buildings
JP3124752B2 (en) Reinforcement structure of wooden frame
JP2002155589A (en) Bearing wall and its construction method
JP7356695B2 (en) wooden building structure
JPH07145639A (en) Three-story unit building
JP2001152544A (en) Building, structural analysis method and production method thereof, and structural analysis method of unit building
JPS6221634Y2 (en)

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees