JPH08303699A - Method and apparatus for detecting abnormality in fluid transportation piping system - Google Patents
Method and apparatus for detecting abnormality in fluid transportation piping systemInfo
- Publication number
- JPH08303699A JPH08303699A JP7105798A JP10579895A JPH08303699A JP H08303699 A JPH08303699 A JP H08303699A JP 7105798 A JP7105798 A JP 7105798A JP 10579895 A JP10579895 A JP 10579895A JP H08303699 A JPH08303699 A JP H08303699A
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- flow rate
- ratio
- pipe
- piping system
- fluid
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Landscapes
- Examining Or Testing Airtightness (AREA)
- Pipeline Systems (AREA)
Abstract
Description
【0001】[0001]
【産業状の利用分野】本発明は、流体輸送配管系の異常
検出方法および装置に関する。BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a method and apparatus for detecting abnormality in a fluid transportation piping system.
【0002】[0002]
【従来の技術】一般に、気体や液体等の流体を輸送する
配管系においては、流体を受け入れる流入管やこれに連
通して流体を送り出す流出管等の輸送管系の各点に流量
計を取り付けて、流量の計測、監視あるいは制御等を行
っている。これらの流量計の精度管理は、保守点検要員
によって行われる定期的な目盛検査などの精度チェック
によって確認されるのが一般的であるが、流体輸送配管
系が多岐にわたるなど複雑で、多数の流量計が設けられ
ている場合は、その保全負荷の増大や保守点検要員の増
加を招いていた。また、流量計の精度チェックの際はそ
の流量計からの流量信号が発信できないため、プラント
等の操業に支障を来していた。2. Description of the Related Art Generally, in a piping system for transporting a fluid such as gas or liquid, a flow meter is attached to each point of a transportation pipe system such as an inflow pipe for receiving the fluid and an outflow pipe for communicating the fluid with the inflow pipe. The flow rate is measured, monitored or controlled. The quality control of these flowmeters is generally confirmed by a precision check such as periodic scale inspections performed by maintenance personnel, but it is complicated due to the wide variety of fluid transportation piping systems, and many flowrates are involved. If a meter is provided, it causes an increase in maintenance load and an increase in maintenance and inspection personnel. Further, when checking the accuracy of the flow meter, the flow rate signal from the flow meter cannot be transmitted, which hinders the operation of the plant or the like.
【0003】一方、配管の破損や亀裂による流体の漏洩
の検出方法については、流入管側における流量の合計値
ΣFI と流出管側における流量の合計値ΣFO とを比較
して、流入側流量合計値ΣFI が流出側流量合計値ΣF
O より大きくなったときに漏洩発生と判断する方法が数
多く提案されている(例えば、実開昭54− 70492号、特
開昭56− 52700号、特開平4−363638号公報参照)。On the other hand, regarding the method of detecting fluid leakage due to pipe breakage or cracks, the total flow rate ΣF I on the inflow pipe side and the total flow rate ΣF O on the outflow pipe side are compared and the inflow side flow rate is compared. Total value ΣF I is outflow side total flow value ΣF
Method of determining a leakage occurs when it becomes larger than O have been proposed (e.g., Japanese Utility Model 54-70492, JP 56 - 52700 No., see JP Hei 4-363638).
【0004】[0004]
【発明が解決しようとする課題】しかしながら、前記の
ような流入管側と流出管側の流量差に基く流体の漏洩の
検出方法では、以下に示すような問題がある。 (1) 通常の誤差範囲の流量測定誤差が生じても流体の漏
洩が発生したと誤って判断してしまい、過剰な対応を余
儀なくされる恐れがあること。 (2) 配管からの漏洩量や流量計の測定スパンのずれによ
る誤差も、流量の増減に比例して変化するため、異常と
判断できる流量差分も変化するため異常検出の信頼度に
問題があること。 (3) 流量計の異常や故障に比べて配管漏洩事故の発生確
率が一般的に小さいと判断されるが、一方、対処の緊急
性については配管漏洩事故の方が流量計の異常や故障に
比べて高いと考えられる。しかし、従来の方法では、通
常の範囲の流量計の誤差が考慮されておらず、また、流
量計の異常や故障と配管漏洩事故が区別されておらず、
常に緊急の対応が必要となる。このため、保全負荷が大
きくなり、多くの保守点検要員が必要になること。However, the above-described method for detecting fluid leakage based on the flow rate difference between the inflow pipe side and the outflow pipe side has the following problems. (1) Even if a flow rate measurement error within the normal error range occurs, it may be mistakenly determined that fluid leakage has occurred, and it may be necessary to take excessive measures. (2) The error due to the amount of leakage from the pipe and the deviation of the measurement span of the flow meter also changes in proportion to the increase / decrease in the flow rate. thing. (3) It is judged that the probability of occurrence of a pipe leakage accident is generally lower than that of an abnormality or failure of the flowmeter, but regarding the urgency of countermeasures, a pipe leakage accident is more likely to cause an abnormality or failure of the flowmeter. It is considered to be expensive. However, in the conventional method, the error of the flow meter in the normal range is not taken into consideration, and the abnormality or failure of the flow meter and the pipe leakage accident are not distinguished,
An urgent response is always needed. As a result, the maintenance load increases and many maintenance personnel are required.
【0005】本発明は、上記のような従来技術の課題を
解決すべくなされたものであって、流量計の通常の誤差
を考慮して、このような誤差と、流量計の異常や故障と
配管漏洩事故とを区別して検出し、流量計の保全負荷を
軽減しつつ、配管漏洩事故に対しては確実に対処できる
ようなうな流体輸送配管系の異常検出方法および装置を
提供することを目的とする。The present invention has been made in order to solve the above-mentioned problems of the prior art. In consideration of a normal error of a flow meter, such an error and an abnormality or failure of the flow meter are considered. An object of the present invention is to provide a method and an apparatus for detecting an abnormality in a fluid transportation piping system, which can detect a piping leakage accident separately and reduce the maintenance load of the flowmeter, and can surely cope with the piping leakage accident. And
【0006】[0006]
【課題解決のための手段】本発明は、1または2以上の
流体を流入し、1または2以上の流体を流出する流体輸
送配管系の流入側および流出側に取り付けた流量計を介
して流量がそれぞれ測定される流体輸送配管系の異常検
出方法において、流入側において測定される流量合計値
に対する流出側における流量合計値の比Fr を求め、該
流量比Frが下記(1) 式もしくは(2) 式を満たす時には
流量計の異常と判断し、前記流量比Fr が下記(3) 式を
満たす時には流体輸送配管系の管破損による漏洩と判断
することを特徴とする流体輸送配管系の異常検出方法で
ある。DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION The present invention provides a flow rate through a flow meter attached to the inflow side and the outflow side of a fluid transportation piping system for inflowing one or more fluids and outflowing one or more fluids. In the method for detecting an abnormality in a fluid transportation piping system in which each of the above is measured, the ratio F r of the total flow rate on the outflow side to the total flow rate measured on the inflow side is obtained, and the flow rate ratio F r is calculated by the following equation (1) or When the equation (2) is satisfied, it is judged that the flowmeter is abnormal, and when the flow rate ratio Fr satisfies the following equation (3), it is judged that the leakage is caused by the pipe breakage of the fluid transportation piping system. This is the abnormality detection method.
【0007】 Fr >1+ε ………………(1) 1−ε>Fr ≧1−λ ………………(2) Fr <1−λ ………………(3) ここで、ε;流体の特性、配管径、流量検出器の種類や
特性等から決まる誤差比であって、経験的に決められる
1より小さい定数。F r > 1 + ε ………… (1) 1-ε> F r ≧ 1-λ ………… (2) F r <1-λ ………… (3) Here, ε is an error ratio determined by the characteristics of the fluid, the pipe diameter, the type and characteristics of the flow rate detector, etc., and is a constant smaller than 1 which is empirically determined.
【0008】λ;配管から漏洩があっても緊急対処をし
ない限度の漏洩量の流入側合計流量値に対する比であっ
て、経験的に決められるεより大きく1より小さい定
数。 なお、前記誤差比εを0.2 とし、前記漏洩量比λを0.5
とするのがよい。また、本発明は、1または2以上の流
体の流入管および1または2以上の流体の流出管が接続
される流体輸送配管系において、前記流入管および流出
管に取り付けられた流量計によってそれぞれの流量が測
定される流体輸送配管系の異常検出装置であって、前記
流入管において測定される流量合計値に対する前記流出
管において測定される流量合計値の比Fr を求める流量
比演算手段と、該流量比演算手段で求められた流量比F
r を入力して、予め設定された誤差比εと漏洩量比λと
を用いて比較演算して、前記流量比Fr が下記(1) 式も
しくは(2) 式を満たしたときには流量計異常警報を発
し、前記流量比Fr が下記(3) 式を満たしたときには配
管破損漏洩警報を発する比較・警報手段と、を設けたこ
とを特徴とする流体輸送配管系の異常検出装置である。Λ: a ratio of a leakage amount to a limit at which emergency measures are not taken even if there is a leak from a pipe, and a constant greater than ε and less than 1 which is empirically determined. The error ratio ε is 0.2 and the leakage amount ratio λ is 0.5.
It is good to do. Further, in the present invention, in a fluid transportation piping system to which one or more fluid inflow pipes and one or more fluid outflow pipes are connected, the flowmeters attached to the inflow pipe and the outflow pipe respectively An abnormality detection device for a fluid transportation piping system for measuring a flow rate, comprising: a flow rate ratio calculating means for obtaining a ratio F r of a total flow rate value measured in the outflow pipe to a total flow rate value measured in the inflow pipe, Flow rate ratio F obtained by the flow rate ratio calculating means
When r is input and a comparison calculation is performed using a preset error ratio ε and a leakage amount ratio λ, when the flow rate ratio F r satisfies the following equation (1) or equation (2), the flowmeter is abnormal. An abnormality detecting device for a fluid transportation piping system, comprising: an alarm and comparing / warning means for issuing a pipe breakage leakage alarm when the flow rate ratio F r satisfies the following expression (3).
【0009】 Fr >1+ε ………………(1) 1−ε>Fr ≧1−λ ………………(2) Fr <1−λ ………………(3) ここに、ε;流体の特性、配管径、流量検出器の種類や
特性等から決まる誤差比であって、経験的に決められる
1より小さい定数。F r > 1 + ε ………… (1) 1-ε> F r ≧ 1-λ ………… (2) F r <1-λ ………… (3) Where ε is an error ratio determined by the characteristics of the fluid, the pipe diameter, the type and characteristics of the flow rate detector, etc., and is a constant smaller than 1 which is empirically determined.
【0010】λ;配管から漏洩があっても緊急対処をし
ない限度の漏洩量の流入側合計流量値に対する比であっ
て、経験的に決められるεより大きく1より小さい定
数。 なお、前記誤差比εを0.2 とし、前記漏洩量比λを0.5
とするのがよい。Λ: A ratio of the leakage amount of the limit at which emergency measures are not taken even if there is a leak from the pipe to the total flow rate on the inflow side, which is a constant greater than ε and less than 1 which is empirically determined. The error ratio ε is 0.2 and the leakage amount ratio λ is 0.5.
It is good to do.
【0011】[0011]
【作用】一般に流量計の測定精度は、流体の温度、圧
力、粘度等の特性や配管径、流量計の種類、その測定ス
パン等の特性によって変化する。流体の温度や圧力は測
定が容易であるので、部位によって温度や圧力が変化す
るような流体輸送配管系においては、流量とともに温度
や圧力も測定して、ある一定の温度、圧力の条件下での
流量値に補正した値が用いられる。In general, the measurement accuracy of the flowmeter changes depending on the characteristics such as the temperature, pressure and viscosity of the fluid, the pipe diameter, the type of the flowmeter and the measurement span thereof. Since it is easy to measure the temperature and pressure of a fluid, in a fluid transport piping system where the temperature and pressure change depending on the location, measure the temperature and pressure together with the flow rate, and under certain temperature and pressure conditions. The value corrected to the flow rate value of is used.
【0012】このような温度・圧力補正を行った場合で
も、他の要因によって流量測定誤差が生じるので、粒体
輸送配管系における流量測定値を用いて流量計の故障や
配管の破損による流体の漏洩を異常として検知する場合
には、このような通常あり得る範囲の流量測定誤差を考
慮しないと、誤検出の確率が非常に高くなる。また、配
管からの漏洩量や流量計の検出スパンのずれによる誤差
も、流量の増減に比例して変化するため、このような流
量増減による影響をも考慮しないと、異常検出の信頼度
に問題が生じる。Even when such temperature / pressure correction is performed, a flow rate measurement error occurs due to other factors. Therefore, the flow rate measurement value in the granular transport piping system is used to detect the fluid flow due to the failure of the flow meter or the damage to the piping. In the case of detecting the leakage as an abnormality, the probability of false detection becomes very high unless the flow measurement error in such a normal range is taken into consideration. In addition, the error due to the amount of leakage from the pipe and the deviation of the detection span of the flow meter also changes in proportion to the increase / decrease in the flow rate. Occurs.
【0013】それゆえ、本発明では、流入側における流
量測定値の合計値に対する流出側における流量測定値の
合計値の比Fr を求めて無次元化することによって、上
記した流量増減による影響を無くすことができる。さら
に、上記流量比Fr に対して許容される、流体の特性、
配管径、流量検出器の種類や特性によって決まる通常の
範囲の誤差比をε(ただし、εは1より小さい定数)と
すると、流量計の故障や異常(通常の誤差を異常としな
い)や配管の破損による漏洩がない場合には、下記(4)
式が成り立つ。Therefore, in the present invention, the ratio F r of the total value of the flow rate measurement values on the outflow side to the total value of the flow rate measurement values on the inflow side is obtained and made dimensionless, so that the above-mentioned influence of the increase or decrease of the flow rate can be reduced. It can be lost. Furthermore, the characteristics of the fluid allowed for the flow rate ratio F r ,
If the error ratio in the normal range determined by the pipe diameter and the type and characteristics of the flow rate detector is ε (however, ε is a constant smaller than 1), the flowmeter will fail or be abnormal (normal errors will not be abnormal) or piping. If there is no leakage due to damage to the
The formula holds.
【0014】 1−ε≦Fr ≦1+ε ………………(4) つぎに、流量計の故障や異常が生じたとすると、下記
(5) 式もしくは(6) 式が成り立つことになる。 Fr >1+ε ………………(5) 1−ε>Fr ………………(6) ここで、(5) 式が成り立つ場合は、流出側の流量合計値
が流入側の流量合計値より大きいわけであるから、配管
の破損による漏洩があり得ず、流量計の故障や異常と判
断してもよい。1-ε ≦ F r ≦ 1 + ε (4) Next, if a failure or abnormality of the flow meter occurs,
Equation (5) or equation (6) holds. F r > 1 + ε ………… (5) 1-ε> F r ………… (6) Here, if the equation (5) holds, the total flow rate on the outflow side is Since it is larger than the total flow rate, there is no leakage due to pipe damage, and it may be determined that the flowmeter is faulty or abnormal.
【0015】一方、(6) 式が成り立つ場合は、流出側の
流量合計値が流入側の流量合計値より小さいわけである
から、流量計の故障や異常の他に配管の破損による漏洩
があり得る。そこで、仮に配管の破損による漏洩があっ
たとしてもそれを無視し、流量計の異常とみなして緊急
対応を行わない限度の漏洩量の流入側流量合計値に対す
る比を経験的に決めて漏洩量比λ(ただし、λはεより
大きく1より小さい定数)とすると、流量比Fr が下記
(7) 式を満たすときには、まず1次的には流量計の故障
や異常と判断することになる。On the other hand, when the equation (6) is satisfied, the total flow rate on the outflow side is smaller than the total flow rate on the inflow side. Therefore, in addition to the failure or abnormality of the flowmeter, there is leakage due to pipe damage. obtain. Therefore, even if there is a leak due to pipe breakage, it is ignored, and the leak amount is empirically determined by deciding the ratio of the limit leak amount to the total flow rate on the inflow side, which is regarded as an abnormality of the flowmeter and emergency response is not performed. If the ratio is λ (where λ is a constant larger than ε and smaller than 1), the flow rate ratio F r is
When the formula (7) is satisfied, firstly, it is judged that the flowmeter is faulty or abnormal.
【0016】 1−ε>Fr ≧1−λ ………………(7) したがって、流量比Fr が下記(8) 式を満たすときは、
配管破損による漏洩と判断して、緊急処置をとるように
すればよい。 1−λ>Fr ………………(8) このように、本発明によれば、流量計の通常の誤差の範
囲にある場合と、流量計の故障や異常の場合と、配管破
損による漏洩大の場合とを区別して、後2者の場合に、
それぞれの警報を発信するようにしたので、例えば、流
量計の通常の誤差範囲にある場合は、流量計の保全を省
略することが可能となり、保全負荷の軽減、保守点検要
員の省人化を図ることが可能となる。また、実際には配
管破損によってある程度の漏洩が生じている場合で、流
量比Fr の大きさからは流量計異常の範囲に入って流量
計異常警報が出る場合もあるが、この場合は、流量計異
常箇所の確認点検を行えば、配管破損による漏洩が発見
される可能性が大きいので実際上は問題ない。1-ε> F r ≧ 1-λ (7) Therefore, when the flow rate ratio F r satisfies the following equation (8),
It may be determined that the leak is due to pipe damage, and emergency measures should be taken. 1-λ> F r (8) As described above, according to the present invention, when the flowmeter is within the normal error range, when the flowmeter is out of order, or when there is an abnormality, the pipe is damaged. In the case of the latter two,
Since each alarm is sent out, for example, when the flowmeter is within the normal error range, it is possible to omit maintenance of the flowmeter, reduce maintenance load, and reduce the number of maintenance personnel. It is possible to plan. In addition, in the case where a certain amount of leakage has actually occurred due to pipe breakage, and depending on the magnitude of the flow rate ratio F r , there may be cases where a flow meter abnormality alarm is issued due to a flow meter abnormality range. In this case, There is a high possibility that a leak due to pipe damage will be found if the flowmeter is checked and checked for abnormal points, so there is no practical problem.
【0017】次に、通常の製鉄プラント等における工業
用水、副生ガス(例えば高炉ガスやコークス炉ガス等)
の流体輸送用配管系に本発明を適用する場合に、前記誤
差比εを0.2 程度とするのがよい。これは、過去の経験
に基くもので、プラントのオペレータから保守点検要員
へ流量計の故障修理の要請を行う判断基準として、従
来、誤差20%以上が一つの目安として長年用いられてき
ていることによるもので、これによって特に問題が生じ
たことはない。Next, industrial water and by-product gas (for example, blast furnace gas, coke oven gas, etc.) in an ordinary steelmaking plant, etc.
When the present invention is applied to the fluid transportation piping system, the error ratio ε is preferably set to about 0.2. This is based on past experience, and an error of 20% or more has been used as a standard for many years as a criterion for requesting maintenance and inspection personnel from plant operators to repair and repair flowmeters. This has not caused any particular problems.
【0018】また、上記の流体輸送用配管系に本発明を
適用する場合に、前記漏洩量比λを0.5 程度とするのが
よい。これは、流量計の通常の誤差比εを上記のように
0.2程度とした場合、流量計の故障や異常によっては、
例えば、流入側の流量計に誤差がないと仮定して、流出
側の流量計が実際の半分以下を突然指示するとか、ある
いは逆に、流出側の流量計に誤差がないと仮定して、流
入側の流量計が実際の倍以上を突然指示するなどの突発
的異常現象は起こらないという経験的事実に基くもので
ある。Further, when the present invention is applied to the above-mentioned fluid transportation piping system, it is preferable that the leakage amount ratio λ is about 0.5. This is the normal error ratio ε of the flowmeter as above.
When set to about 0.2, depending on the malfunction or abnormality of the flow meter,
For example, assuming that the flowmeter on the inflow side has no error, the flowmeter on the outflow side suddenly indicates less than half of the actual value, or conversely, assuming that the flowmeter on the outflow side has no error, It is based on the empirical fact that a sudden abnormal phenomenon such as sudden indication of the flowmeter on the inflow side that is more than the actual value does not occur.
【0019】[0019]
【実施例】以下に、本発明の実施例について図面を参照
して説明する。図1は、本発明を製鉄プラントの高炉ガ
ス輸送配管系に適用した一実施例の構成を示すブロック
図である。この図において、1,2は高炉ガスを発生す
る高炉で、高炉ガス輸送管路Pで接続されている。3〜
7は高炉ガス消費設備で、3は高炉ガス放散塔、4は熱
風炉、5はガスタービン発電設備、6は鋼片加熱炉、7
はその他の高炉ガス消費設備であり、いずれも高炉ガス
輸送管路Pに接続されている。なお、高炉ガス放散塔3
の先端部にはガス放散弁8が取り付けられている。Embodiments of the present invention will be described below with reference to the drawings. FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing a configuration of an embodiment in which the present invention is applied to a blast furnace gas transportation piping system of an iron manufacturing plant. In this figure, reference numerals 1 and 2 denote blast furnaces that generate blast furnace gas, which are connected by a blast furnace gas transport line P. 3-
7 is a blast furnace gas consumption facility, 3 is a blast furnace gas diffusion tower, 4 is a hot blast stove, 5 is a gas turbine power generation facility, 6 is a billet heating furnace, 7
Are other blast furnace gas consuming facilities, all of which are connected to the blast furnace gas transportation pipeline P. Blast furnace gas diffusion tower 3
A gas diffusion valve 8 is attached to the tip of the.
【0020】また、9は高炉ガス輸送管路Pに接続され
る高炉ガスを貯蔵するガスホルダで、高炉1,2と高炉
ガス消費設備である高炉ガス放散塔3や熱風炉4、ガス
タービン発電設備5、鋼片加熱炉6、その他の高炉ガス
消費設備7などとの間のバッファとされ、その時に応じ
て高炉ガス消費設備と高炉ガス発生設備の両方の役割を
果たす。すなわち、ガスホルダ9内で高炉ガスの貯蔵量
が増加中は高炉ガス消費設備となり、高炉ガスの貯蔵量
が減少中は高炉ガス発生設備となる。Reference numeral 9 is a gas holder connected to the blast furnace gas transportation pipeline P for storing blast furnace gas. The blast furnaces 1 and 2 and the blast furnace gas diffusion tower 3 which is a blast furnace gas consuming facility, the hot blast stove 4, and the gas turbine power generation equipment. 5, it serves as a buffer between the billet heating furnace 6 and other blast furnace gas consuming equipment 7, and plays a role of both the blast furnace gas consuming equipment and the blast furnace gas generating equipment depending on the time. That is, the blast furnace gas consumption facility is used while the blast furnace gas storage amount is increasing in the gas holder 9, and the blast furnace gas generation facility is used when the blast furnace gas storage amount is decreasing.
【0021】11,12は高炉ガス輸送管路Pへの流入管p
1 ,p2 に取り付けられる発生側流量計で、13〜17は高
炉ガス輸送管路Pからの流出管p3 〜p7 に取り付けら
れる消費側流量計である。なお、測定される高炉ガスは
矢印で示す方向へ流れる。18はガスホルダ9に取り付け
られるレベル計である。19はガスホルダ出入流量演算器
であり、レベル計18のレベル信号の時間変化とガスホル
ダ9のホルダ断面積とから、ガスホルダ9に流出入管p
8 を介して流出入する高炉ガス流量を演算する。Reference numerals 11 and 12 denote inflow pipes p to the blast furnace gas transport pipe line P.
1 and p 2 are flowmeters on the generating side, and 13 to 17 are flowmeters on the consuming side, which are installed on the outflow pipes p 3 to p 7 from the blast furnace gas transport pipeline P. The measured blast furnace gas flows in the direction indicated by the arrow. Reference numeral 18 is a level meter attached to the gas holder 9. Reference numeral 19 denotes a gas holder inlet / outlet flow rate calculating unit, which calculates the flow-in / out pipe p to / from the gas holder 9 from the time change of the level signal of the level meter 18 and the holder cross-sectional area of the gas holder 9.
Calculate the blast furnace gas flow in and out via 8 .
【0022】20は、高炉ガスの発生側流量計11, 12の流
量測定値F1 、F2 を入力して、下記(9) 式により発生
側流量合計値ΣFI を演算する発生側流量演算器であ
る。 ΣFI =F1 +F2 ………………(9) 21は、高炉ガスの消費側流量計13〜17からの流量測定値
F3 〜F7 およびガスホルダ出入流量演算器18からの出
入流量値F8 を入力して消費側流量合計値ΣF O を下記
(10)式で演算する消費側流量演算器である。Reference numeral 20 denotes the flow of the blast furnace gas generation side flow meters 11 and 12.
Quantity measurement value F1, F2Enter and generate by the following formula (9)
Side total flow ΣFIIs a source side flow rate calculator that calculates
It ΣFI= F1+ F2 ……………… (9) 21 is the flow rate measurement value from the blast furnace gas consumption side flowmeters 13 to 17.
F3~ F7And gas holder in / out flow rate calculator 18
Input flow rate F8Enter the total flow rate on the consumption side ΣF OBelow
This is a consumption-side flow rate calculator that calculates using equation (10).
【0023】 ΣFO =F3 +F4 +F5 +F6 +F7 +F8 ………………(10) なお、出入流量値F8 は高炉ガス輸送管路Pからの流出
時、つまりガスホルダ9のレベル上昇時には“+”(プ
ラス)の符号、高炉ガス輸送管路Pへの流入時、つまり
ガスホルダ9のレベル降下時には“−”(マイナス)の
符号を持つとして定義される。ΣF O = F 3 + F 4 + F 5 + F 6 + F 7 + F 8 (10) Note that the inlet / outlet flow rate value F 8 is at the time of outflow from the blast furnace gas transport pipe P, that is, in the gas holder 9. It is defined as having a "+" (plus) sign when the level rises, and a "-" (minus) sign when the gas holder 9 flows down, that is, when the level of the gas holder 9 falls.
【0024】22は発生側流量演算器20および消費側流量
演算器21からの発生側流量合計値ΣFI および消費側流
量合計値ΣFO とを入力して流量比Fr を下記(11)式で
求める流量比演算器である。 Fr =ΣFO /ΣFI =(F3 +F4 +F5 +F6 +F7 +F8 )/(F1 +F2 ) ………………(11) 23は比較演算器で、流量比演算器22と、誤差比εを設定
する定数設定器24と、漏洩量比λを設定する定数設定器
25がそれぞれ接続されており、流量比演算器22から入力
される流量比Fr と、定数設定器24, 25から与えられる
誤差比εおよび漏洩量比λとを用いて比較演算を行い、
流量比Fr が(12)もしくは(13)を満たしたときには警報
器26を介して流量計故障・異常の警報を発し、また流量
比Fr が(14)を満たしたときには同様に配管破損漏洩発
生の警報を発する。22 is the input of the total flow rate ΣF I of the generating side and the total flow rate ΣF O of the generating side from the flow rate calculating unit 20 of the generating side and the flow rate calculating unit of the consuming side 21, and the flow rate ratio F r is expressed by the following equation (11). This is a flow rate ratio calculator obtained by F r = ΣF O / ΣF I = (F 3 + F 4 + F 5 + F 6 + F 7 + F 8 ) / (F 1 + F 2 ) ……………… (11) 23 is a comparison calculator and a flow ratio calculator 22, a constant setter 24 that sets the error ratio ε, and a constant setter that sets the leakage amount ratio λ
25 are connected to each other, and comparison calculation is performed using the flow rate ratio F r input from the flow rate ratio calculator 22 and the error ratio ε and the leakage amount ratio λ given from the constant setters 24 and 25.
When the flow rate ratio F r satisfies (12) or (13), a flow meter failure / abnormality alarm is issued via the alarm device 26, and when the flow rate ratio F r satisfies (14), the pipe breakage leaks as well. Generate an alarm for the occurrence.
【0025】 Fr >1+ε ………………(12) 1−ε>Fr ≧1−λ ………………(13) Fr <1−λ ………………(14) なお、本実施例においては、高炉ガス輸送管路Pの部位
における温度や圧力の変化は殆どないとの前提条件にし
ているので、測定される流量値に対する温度および圧力
の補正は行っていない。F r > 1 + ε ………… (12) 1-ε> F r ≧ 1-λ ………… (13) F r <1-λ ………… (14) In this embodiment, since it is premised that the temperature and pressure hardly change at the site of the blast furnace gas transportation pipeline P, the temperature and pressure are not corrected for the measured flow rate value.
【0026】また、ガスホルダ9での流出入量を表す出
入流量値F8 は、ガスホルダ9のレベル上昇時には
“+”の符号、ガスホルダ9のレベル降下時には“−”
の符号を持つように定義するとして説明したが、高炉ガ
ス輸送管路Pからの流出側すなわち高炉ガスの消費側で
“+”の符号を持つように定義すれば、下記(15)〜(17)
式のようにしても同様に流量比Fr を求めることができ
る。The inflow / outflow flow rate value F 8 representing the inflow / outflow amount at the gas holder 9 is a “+” sign when the level of the gas holder 9 rises, and a “−” when the level of the gas holder 9 drops.
Although it is described as having the sign of “+”, if it is defined so as to have the sign of “+” on the outflow side from the blast furnace gas transportation pipeline P, that is, the blast furnace gas consumption side, the following (15) to (17) )
The flow rate ratio F r can be calculated in the same manner using the equation.
【0027】 ΣFI =F1 +F2 −F8 ………………(15) ΣFO =F3 +F4 +F5 +F6 +F7 ………………(16) Fr =ΣFO /ΣFI =(F3 +F4 +F5 +F6 +F7 )/(F1 +F2 −F8 ) ………………(17) なお、この出入流量値F8 を、高炉ガス輸送管路Pから
の流出時のガスホルダレベル上昇時には“−”の符号
を、高炉ガス輸送管路Pへの流入時のガスホルダレベル
降下時にはの“+”の符号を付けるように定義すれば、 ΣFI =F1 +F2 +F8 ………………(18) ΣFO =F3 +F4 +F5 +F6 +F7 ………………(19) Fr =ΣFO /ΣFI =(F3 +F4 +F5 +F6 +F7 )/(F1 +F2 +F8 ) ………………(20) としてもよいし、あるいは、 ΣFI =F1 +F2 ………………(18a) ΣFO =F3 +F4 +F5 +F6 +F7 −F8 ………………(19a) Fr =ΣFO /ΣFI =(F3 +F4 +F5 +F6 +F7 −F8 )/(F1 +F2 ) ………………(20a) としてもよい。ΣF I = F 1 + F 2 −F 8 ………… (15) ΣF O = F 3 + F 4 + F 5 + F 6 + F 7 ………… (16) F r = ΣF O / ΣF I = (F 3 + F 4 + F 5 + F 6 + F 7 ) / (F 1 + F 2 −F 8 ) ……………… (17) In addition, this inlet / outlet flow rate value F 8 is used as the blast furnace gas transportation pipeline P When the gas holder level is increased when the gas holder level rises when the gas flows out from the fuel cell, and when the gas holder level is lowered when the gas holder level drops when the gas flows into the blast furnace gas transport pipeline P, ΣF I = F 1 + F 2 + F 8 ………… (18) ΣF O = F 3 + F 4 + F 5 + F 6 + F 7 ………… (19) F r = ΣF O / ΣF I = (F 3 + F 4 + F 5 + F 6 + F 7 ) / (F 1 + F 2 + F 8 ) ……………… (20), or ΣF I = F 1 + F 2 ………… (18a) ΣF O = F 3 + F 4 + F 5 + F 6 + F 7 F 8 .................. (19a) F r = ΣF O / ΣF I = (F 3 + F 4 + F 5 + F 6 + F 7 -F 8) / (F 1 + F 2) .................. (20a ).
【0028】また、前記実施例では、出入流量値F8 は
レベル計18によるレベル検出値の時間変化とホルダ断面
積とから求めるとしたが、これに代わって、両方向測定
型の流量計を用いてもよいし、片方向測定型の流量計を
互いに向きを変えて2つ設けるようにしてもよい。この
場合にも、前記実施例と同様、ある一方向の流れに
“+”の符号を、それとは反対の方向の流れには“−”
の符号を付けるように定義すれば、考え方は前記と同様
で、(9) 〜(11)式、(15)〜(17)式、(18)〜(20)式、(18
a) 〜(20a) 式のいずれかの組の式を用いて計算すれば
よい。Further, in the above-mentioned embodiment, the inlet / outlet flow rate value F 8 is calculated from the time change of the level detection value by the level meter 18 and the holder cross-sectional area. Instead of this, a bidirectional measurement type flow meter is used. Alternatively, two unidirectional flowmeters may be provided with their directions turned to each other. Also in this case, as in the case of the above-described embodiment, the sign of "+" is given to the flow in one direction, and the sign of "-" is given to the flow in the opposite direction.
If the definition is given with the sign of, the concept is the same as the above, and the expressions (9) to (11), (15) to (17), (18) to (20), and (18
It may be calculated using any one of the formulas a) to (20a).
【0029】前出図1に示した構成と同じ製鉄プラント
を対象にして、発生側流量演算器20および消費側流量演
算器21および流量比演算器22の演算式に前記(9) 〜(11)
式を用い、また比較演算器23に用いる比較演算式である
(12)〜(14)式の定数をそれぞれε=0.2 、λ=0.5 と
し、1年間にわたって高炉ガス輸送管路Pの異常検出の
実験を行った。Targeting a steelmaking plant having the same construction as shown in FIG. 1, the formulas (9) to (11) are added to the formulas of the generator side flow rate calculator 20, the consumer side flow rate calculator 21 and the flow rate ratio calculator 22. )
It is a comparison operation expression using an expression and used in the comparison operation unit 23.
The constants of the equations (12) to (14) were set to ε = 0.2 and λ = 0.5, respectively, and an experiment for detecting an abnormality in the blast furnace gas transport pipeline P was conducted for one year.
【0030】この間において、流量計の異常(故障)警
報は全部で3回発信されたが、その都度保守点検要員に
よって流量計を点検した結果、いずれの場合も流量計に
故障が発生したことが判明した。そして、故障修理の処
置をとった後は警報の発信が無くなった。また、配管破
損による漏洩警報は一度も発生しなかった。また、高炉
ガス放散塔3に取り付けた流量計13の回りに、図2に示
すように、バイパス管pB を接続し、前後バルブVI ,
VO およびバイパスバルブVB を取り付け、前後バルブ
VI ,VO を閉じてバイパスバルブVB を開け、先端部
のガス放散弁8を全開にし、流量計13を迂回させてバイ
パス管pB から最大限のガス放散を行う実験を行った。
その結果、流量比Fr が0.4 まで低下した。このときの
漏洩量比λの設定値は0.5 であることから、 Fr =0.4 <1−λ=0.5 となって前出(14)式を満足する状態が発生し、模擬的で
はあるが配管破裂による漏洩が検出することができた。During this period, the abnormality (failure) alarm of the flowmeter was transmitted three times in total, and as a result of the maintenance personnel inspecting the flowmeter each time, a failure of the flowmeter occurred in any case. found. Then, after taking action for repairing the trouble, the alarm was no longer issued. Moreover, no leak warning was issued due to pipe damage. Further, as shown in FIG. 2, a bypass pipe p B is connected around the flow meter 13 attached to the blast furnace gas diffusion tower 3, and front and rear valves V I ,
V O and bypass valve V B are attached, front and rear valves V I and V O are closed, bypass valve V B is opened, gas diffusion valve 8 at the tip is fully opened, and flow meter 13 is bypassed to bypass pipe p B. Experiments were conducted to maximize gas emissions.
As a result, the flow rate ratio F r dropped to 0.4. Since the set value of the leakage ratio λ at this time is 0.5, Fr = 0.4 <1-λ = 0.5 and the condition that satisfies the above equation (14) occurs, and the piping Leakage due to rupture could be detected.
【0031】以上、本発明の実施例について説明した
が、本発明は上記した実施例に限るものではなく、本発
明の構成の要旨を逸脱しない範囲内で種々の変形例を含
むものであることはいうまでもない。Although the embodiments of the present invention have been described above, the present invention is not limited to the above-mentioned embodiments, and it is understood that various modifications are included within the scope of the gist of the constitution of the present invention. There is no end.
【0032】[0032]
【発明の効果】以上説明したように、本発明によれば、
流体の輸送配管系における異常を流量計の故障や異常が
発生した場合と配管破損による漏洩大の場合とに区別し
て検出するようにしたので、流量計のメンテナンスを流
量計異常警報が出たときのみ限ることができ、保全負荷
の軽減、保守点検要員の削減が可能となる。また、配管
破損による漏洩もタイムリーに検出できるから、迅速な
対応や処置が可能となり、設備の安全性に寄与する。As described above, according to the present invention,
When the flowmeter abnormality alarm is issued, maintenance of the flowmeter is detected by distinguishing the abnormality in the fluid transportation piping system from the failure or abnormality of the flowmeter and the case of large leakage due to pipe damage. It is possible to reduce the maintenance load and the number of maintenance and inspection personnel. In addition, leaks due to pipe breakage can be detected in a timely manner, which enables swift response and treatment and contributes to the safety of the equipment.
【図1】本発明を製鉄所の高炉ガス輸送配管系に適用し
た一実施例の構成を示すブロック図である。FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing a configuration of an embodiment in which the present invention is applied to a blast furnace gas transportation piping system of an iron mill.
【図2】本発明の実験に用いた装置の説明図である。FIG. 2 is an explanatory diagram of an apparatus used in an experiment of the present invention.
1,2 高炉 3 高炉ガス放散塔 4 熱風炉 5 ガスタービン発電設備 6 鋼片加熱炉 7 その他の高炉ガス消費設備 8 ガス放散弁 9 ガスホルダ 11,12 発生側流量計(流量計) 13〜17 消費側流量計(流量計) 18 レベル計 19 ガスホルダ出入流量演算器 20 発生側流量演算器 21 消費側流量演算器 22 流量比演算器(流量比演算手段) 23 比較演算器(比較・警報手段) 24, 25 定数設定器 26 警報器(比較・警報手段) P 高炉ガス輸送管路(流体輸送用配管系) p1 ,p2 流入管 p3 〜p7 流出管 p8 流出入管 pB バイパス管 VI 前バルブ VO 後バルブ VB バイパスバルブ1, blast furnace 3 blast furnace gas diffusion tower 4 hot blast stove 5 gas turbine power generation equipment 6 steel slab heating furnace 7 other blast furnace gas consumption equipment 8 gas diffusion valve 9 gas holder 11, 12 generation side flow meter (flow meter) 13 to 17 consumption Side flow meter (flow meter) 18 Level meter 19 Gas holder inlet / outlet flow rate calculator 20 Source side flow rate calculator 21 Consumption side flow rate calculator 22 Flow rate ratio calculator (flow ratio calculator) 23 Comparison calculator (comparison / alarm means) 24 , 25 constant setting device 26 alarms (comparing and warning means) P blast furnace gas pipeline (fluid transport pipe system) p 1, p 2 inlet tube p 3 ~p 7 outflow pipe p 8 outflow pipe p B bypass pipe V I Front valve V O Rear valve V B Bypass valve
Claims (4)
は2以上の流体を流出する流体輸送配管系の流入側およ
び流出側に取り付けた流量計を介して流量がそれぞれ測
定される流体輸送配管系の異常検出方法において、 流入側において測定される流量合計値に対する流出側に
おける流量合計値の比Fr を求め、該流量比Fr が下記
(1) 式もしくは(2) 式を満たす時には流量計の異常と判
断し、前記流量比Fr が下記(3) 式を満たす時には流体
輸送配管系の管破損による漏洩と判断することを特徴と
する流体輸送配管系の異常検出方法。 Fr >1+ε ………………(1) 1−ε>Fr ≧1−λ ………………(2) Fr <1−λ ………………(3) ここで、ε;流体の特性、配管径、流量検出器の種類や
特性等から決まる誤差比であって、経験的に決められる
1より小さい定数。 λ;配管から漏洩があっても緊急対処をしない限度の漏
洩量の流入側合計流量値に対する比であって、経験的に
決められるεより大きく1より小さい定数。1. Fluid transportation in which one or more fluids flow in and one or more fluids flow out, and the flow rate of which is measured via a flow meter attached to the inflow side and the outflow side of a fluid transportation piping system, respectively. in the abnormality detection method of the piping system, to determine the specific F r of the total flow rate value at the outlet side to the flow rate sum measured at the inlet side, the flow rate ratio F r is the following
When the formula (1) or the formula (2) is satisfied, it is judged that the flow meter is abnormal, and when the flow rate ratio Fr satisfies the following formula (3), it is judged that the leakage is caused by the breakage of the fluid transportation piping system. Method for detecting abnormality in fluid transportation piping system. F r > 1 + ε ………… (1) 1-ε> F r ≧ 1-λ ………… (2) F r <1-λ ………… (3) where ε: An error ratio determined by the characteristics of the fluid, the diameter of the pipe, the type and characteristics of the flow rate detector, etc., which is an empirically determined constant smaller than 1. λ: A ratio of the leakage amount at the limit where emergency measures are not taken even if there is a leak from the pipe to the total flow rate value on the inflow side, which is a constant larger than ε which is empirically determined and smaller than 1.
比λが0.5 である請求項1に記載の流体輸送配管系の異
常検出方法。2. The abnormality detection method for a fluid transportation piping system according to claim 1, wherein the error ratio ε is 0.2 and the leakage amount ratio λ is 0.5.
または2以上の流体の流出管が接続される流体輸送配管
系において、前記流入管および流出管に取り付けられた
流量計によってそれぞれの流量が測定される流体輸送配
管系の異常検出装置であって、 前記流入管において測定される流量合計値に対する前記
流出管において測定される流量合計値の比Fr を求める
流量比演算手段と、該流量比演算手段で求められた流量
比Fr を入力して、予め設定された誤差比εと漏洩量比
λとを用いて比較演算して、前記流量比Fr が下記(1)
式もしくは(2) 式を満たしたときには流量計異常警報を
発し、前記流量比Fr が下記(3) 式を満たしたときには
配管破損漏洩警報を発する比較・警報手段と、を設けた
ことを特徴とする流体輸送配管系の異常検出装置。 Fr >1+ε ………………(1) 1−ε>Fr ≧1−λ ………………(2) Fr <1−λ ………………(3) ここに、ε;流体の特性、配管径、流量検出器の種類や
特性等から決まる誤差比であって、経験的に決められる
1より小さい定数。 λ;配管から漏洩があっても緊急対処をしない限度の漏
洩量の流入側合計流量値に対する比であって、経験的に
決められるεより大きく1より小さい定数。3. An inflow pipe for one or more fluids and 1
Or, in a fluid transportation piping system to which two or more fluid outflow pipes are connected, an abnormality detection device for a fluid transportation piping system, wherein respective flow rates are measured by flowmeters attached to the inflow pipe and the outflow pipe, The flow rate ratio calculating means for obtaining the ratio F r of the total flow rate value measured in the outflow pipe to the total flow rate value measured in the inflow pipe and the flow rate ratio F r obtained by the flow rate ratio calculating means are input. , A comparison is made using a preset error ratio ε and a leakage amount ratio λ, and the flow rate ratio F r is as follows (1)
A comparison / warning means is provided, which issues a flowmeter abnormality alarm when the formula (2) is satisfied, and a pipe breakage leak alarm when the flow rate ratio Fr satisfies the following formula (3). An abnormality detection device for fluid transportation piping system. F r > 1 + ε ………… (1) 1-ε> F r ≧ 1-λ ………… (2) F r <1-λ ………… (3) where ε: An error ratio determined by the characteristics of the fluid, the diameter of the pipe, the type and characteristics of the flow rate detector, etc., which is an empirically determined constant smaller than 1. λ: A ratio of the leakage amount at the limit where emergency measures are not taken even if there is a leak from the pipe to the total flow rate value on the inflow side, which is a constant larger than ε which is empirically determined and smaller than 1.
比λが0.5 である請求項3記載の流体輸送配管系の異常
検出装置。4. The abnormality detecting device for a fluid transportation piping system according to claim 3, wherein the error ratio ε is 0.2 and the leakage amount ratio λ is 0.5.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP7105798A JPH08303699A (en) | 1995-04-28 | 1995-04-28 | Method and apparatus for detecting abnormality in fluid transportation piping system |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP7105798A JPH08303699A (en) | 1995-04-28 | 1995-04-28 | Method and apparatus for detecting abnormality in fluid transportation piping system |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JPH08303699A true JPH08303699A (en) | 1996-11-22 |
Family
ID=14417147
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP7105798A Pending JPH08303699A (en) | 1995-04-28 | 1995-04-28 | Method and apparatus for detecting abnormality in fluid transportation piping system |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JPH08303699A (en) |
Cited By (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KR20010104861A (en) * | 2000-05-16 | 2001-11-28 | 이계안 | device for perceiving time of repairing in pneumatic pipe arrangement and method thereof |
| JP2007240200A (en) * | 2006-03-06 | 2007-09-20 | Jfe Steel Kk | Gas leak detection method |
| CN113435727A (en) * | 2021-06-22 | 2021-09-24 | 安徽泽众安全科技有限公司 | Method for acquiring gas diffusion range under single-point alarm of communication pipeline |
| CN116081557A (en) * | 2022-12-28 | 2023-05-09 | 武汉三江航天远方科技有限公司 | A multiple calibration device and control method based on a closed-loop online monitoring system |
| JP2023130856A (en) * | 2022-03-08 | 2023-09-21 | 栗田工業株式会社 | Abnormality diagnosis method and device for water treatment system |
-
1995
- 1995-04-28 JP JP7105798A patent/JPH08303699A/en active Pending
Cited By (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KR20010104861A (en) * | 2000-05-16 | 2001-11-28 | 이계안 | device for perceiving time of repairing in pneumatic pipe arrangement and method thereof |
| JP2007240200A (en) * | 2006-03-06 | 2007-09-20 | Jfe Steel Kk | Gas leak detection method |
| CN113435727A (en) * | 2021-06-22 | 2021-09-24 | 安徽泽众安全科技有限公司 | Method for acquiring gas diffusion range under single-point alarm of communication pipeline |
| CN113435727B (en) * | 2021-06-22 | 2022-10-25 | 安徽泽众安全科技有限公司 | Method for acquiring gas diffusion range under single-point alarm of communication pipeline |
| JP2023130856A (en) * | 2022-03-08 | 2023-09-21 | 栗田工業株式会社 | Abnormality diagnosis method and device for water treatment system |
| CN116081557A (en) * | 2022-12-28 | 2023-05-09 | 武汉三江航天远方科技有限公司 | A multiple calibration device and control method based on a closed-loop online monitoring system |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN109253870B (en) | The assessment device and method in biomass fuel boiler heat-exchange tube service life | |
| JP3579976B2 (en) | Piping leak monitoring device | |
| US10663162B2 (en) | Fluid utilization facility management method and fluid utilization facility management system | |
| CN112284897B (en) | Treatment method for fretting wear damage of heat transfer tube of steam generator of nuclear power unit | |
| CN109813400A (en) | Online verification and test system of boiler main steam flowmeter based on Internet of Things technology | |
| KR940009575A (en) | Gas supply equipment abnormality detection device and detection method | |
| CN118840226B (en) | Emergency management system of gas station | |
| JP2019144667A (en) | Valve device abnormality detection system and valve device abnormality detection method | |
| JPH08303699A (en) | Method and apparatus for detecting abnormality in fluid transportation piping system | |
| JP2002168400A (en) | Adjustment pressure self-diagnosis method and gas leak detection device | |
| JP3538989B2 (en) | Piping leak monitoring device | |
| CN206627243U (en) | Pressure transmitter sampling system and differential pressure transmitter sampling system | |
| JP3901159B2 (en) | Gas pipe leak monitoring device | |
| CN107858467A (en) | A kind of blast-furnace cooled water leak hunting method and system | |
| US20250164082A1 (en) | Qmin system for calculating latent gases in pressure reducing stations | |
| JPH0843247A (en) | Gas leakage monitoring device | |
| CN111811623B (en) | Auxiliary judgment method for measuring flow of high-pressure gas supply | |
| JP3042248B2 (en) | Gas supply equipment abnormality monitoring device | |
| JP2010139360A (en) | Gas supply security apparatus and gas meter | |
| JPH1017911A (en) | Tuyere damage diagnosis method | |
| JPH05119848A (en) | Self-inspecting device for pressure regulator | |
| JP2001004105A (en) | Method of deciding abnormality of temperature control valve | |
| CN115218677A (en) | Intermediate frequency furnace water circulation monitoring device | |
| JP2026010807A (en) | Sintering machine ignition furnace abnormality diagnosis method and sintering machine ignition furnace abnormality diagnosis device | |
| CN121089076A (en) | Method, device, equipment and medium for evaluating blocking degree of oxide scale in boiler tube |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| A02 | Decision of refusal |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A02 Effective date: 20040120 |