JPH08132204A - Continuous casting method - Google Patents
Continuous casting methodInfo
- Publication number
- JPH08132204A JPH08132204A JP27640894A JP27640894A JPH08132204A JP H08132204 A JPH08132204 A JP H08132204A JP 27640894 A JP27640894 A JP 27640894A JP 27640894 A JP27640894 A JP 27640894A JP H08132204 A JPH08132204 A JP H08132204A
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- reduction
- slab
- solid
- segregation
- continuous casting
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Landscapes
- Continuous Casting (AREA)
Abstract
(57)【要約】
【目的】鋳造条件の変化、鋳片内部の凝固の進展とかか
わりなく、所定の条件で圧下を施し、しかも中心偏析の
原因となる収縮流動を効果的に防止することができる連
続鋳造方法を提供する。
【構成】連続鋳造鋳片の末期凝固部で軽圧下を加える連
続鋳造方法において、圧下開始点を 0.0≦fs≦0.2 の範
囲とし、圧下終了点を 0.8≦fs≦1.0 とし、その間にお
いて連続圧下を行い、かつ、流動限界固相率を基準と
した固液界面における圧下量の総和を 0.6〜1.4mm 以下
とするか、または、流動限界固相率を基準とした固液
界面における圧下速度を0.15〜0.3mm/min 以下とするこ
とを特徴とする連続鋳造方法。
(57) [Summary] [Purpose] Irrespective of changes in casting conditions and progress of solidification inside the slab, it is possible to carry out reduction under specified conditions and to effectively prevent shrinkage flow that causes center segregation. A continuous casting method capable of performing the above is provided. [Constitution] In the continuous casting method in which light reduction is applied at the final solidification part of the continuously cast slab, the reduction start point is within the range of 0.0 ≦ fs ≦ 0.2 and the reduction end point is within 0.8 ≦ fs ≦ 1.0. And the total amount of reduction at the solid-liquid interface based on the flow limit solid fraction is set to 0.6 to 1.4 mm or less, or the reduction rate at the solid-liquid interface based on the flow limit solid fraction is set to 0.15 mm. ~ 0.3mm / min or less continuous casting method.
Description
【0001】[0001]
【産業上の利用分野】本発明は、鋼の連続鋳造におい
て、完全に凝固する前の鋳片に軽圧下を加えて鋳片の中
心偏析を防止する連続鋳造方法に関する。BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a continuous casting method in continuous casting of steel in which center segregation of a slab is prevented by applying a light reduction to the slab before completely solidifying.
【0002】[0002]
【従来の技術】連続鋳造法で鋳片を製造する場合には、
しばしば、中心偏析と呼ばれる内部欠陥が問題となる。
この中心偏析は、鋳片の厚み中心部(最終凝固部)で
C、S、P、Si、Mnなどの溶鋼成分が正偏析する現象で
ある。中心偏析は、靱性の低下や水素誘起割れの原因と
なるので、特に厚板用素材においては深刻な問題を惹起
する。2. Description of the Related Art When a slab is manufactured by a continuous casting method,
Often an internal defect called central segregation is a problem.
This center segregation is a phenomenon in which the molten steel components such as C, S, P, Si and Mn are positively segregated in the thickness center portion (final solidified portion) of the cast slab. The center segregation causes a decrease in toughness and hydrogen-induced cracking, and thus causes a serious problem especially in a material for thick plates.
【0003】中心偏析は、凝固末期におけるデンドライ
トの樹間に残る溶鋼がバルジングあるいは凝固収縮等の
原因により、マクロ的に移動することと、前記の成分が
濃化した溶鋼が局部的に集積するために生じることがわ
かっている。この中心偏析の防止対策としては、凝固先
端部付近を何らかの方法で圧下することにより、末期凝
固部の凝固収縮分を補償して濃化溶鋼の流動を抑制する
方法が有効とされ、種々の思想に基づく方法が提案され
てきた。The central segregation is caused by the fact that the molten steel left between dendrite trees at the end of solidification moves macroscopically due to bulging or solidification shrinkage, and that the molten steel enriched with the above components is locally accumulated. It is known to occur in As a measure to prevent this center segregation, it is effective to reduce the flow of the concentrated molten steel by compensating for the solidification shrinkage in the final solidification part by reducing the vicinity of the solidification tip part by some method. A method based on has been proposed.
【0004】上記の圧下による中心偏析の改善程度と、
単位時間あるいは単位鋳造方向長さ当たりの圧下量(以
下、単に「圧下量」と記す)および圧下時期との間には
明確な相関があり、圧下量と圧下時期に関する定量的な
検討もなされている。[0004] The degree of improvement of the center segregation by the above reduction,
There is a clear correlation between the amount of reduction per unit time or length in the casting direction (hereinafter simply referred to as "reduction amount") and the reduction timing, and quantitative studies on the reduction amount and the reduction timing have also been made. There is.
【0005】例えば、特公昭59−39225 号公報には、タ
ンディッシュ内の溶鋼過熱度を30〜70℃に調整し、か
つ、クレーターエンド(未凝固部の先端)近傍で 0.5〜
2.0mm/m の圧下を加える連続鋳造方法が示されている。For example, Japanese Examined Patent Publication (Kokoku) No. 59-39225 discloses that the degree of superheat of molten steel in a tundish is adjusted to 30 to 70 ° C., and 0.5 to 0.5 near the crater end (the tip of the unsolidified portion).
A continuous casting method with a reduction of 2.0 mm / m is shown.
【0006】また、特公平5−30548 号公報には、鋳片
の中心部が液相線温度となる時点から、流動限界固相率
になるまでの時期とそれ以後の凝固時期の圧下量を調整
する方法が提案されている。Further, in Japanese Patent Publication No. 30548/1993, the amount of reduction from the time when the center of the slab reaches the liquidus temperature to the time when it reaches the fluidity limit solid fraction and the solidification time thereafter is described. A method of adjusting is proposed.
【0007】しかし、これらの方法においては、クレー
ターエンド近傍あるいは鋳片の中心部が流動限界固相率
となるまでの時期の圧下量が一定であるから、圧下不足
や過圧下を生じやすいという欠点がある。それは以下の
理由による。However, in these methods, the amount of reduction is constant in the vicinity of the crater end or in the center of the slab until the fluidity limit solid fraction is reached, so that insufficient reduction or overpressure reduction easily occurs. There is. The reason is as follows.
【0008】後に詳しく説明するように、設定圧下量が
固液界面に伝わる割合 (以下、「圧下効率(α)」と記
す) は、鋳造下流側に向かって小さくなる。従って、同
じ圧下量を表面から加えても、固液界面に伝わる圧下量
は凝固時期で変わってくる。As will be described later in detail, the rate at which the set amount of reduction is transmitted to the solid-liquid interface (hereinafter referred to as "rolling efficiency (α)") decreases toward the casting downstream side. Therefore, even if the same amount of reduction is applied from the surface, the amount of reduction transmitted to the solid-liquid interface changes depending on the solidification timing.
【0009】即ち、任意位置の凝固収縮分を基準にした
場合、それより上流側では過圧下になり、それより下流
側では圧下不足になる。前記の公報等に開示される方法
における如く、長い範囲にわたって一定の圧下量で圧下
を加えると、トータルで過圧下や圧下不足を誘発しやす
いのである。圧下不足では当然に中心偏析防止の効果が
小さく、一方、過圧下になると逆V偏析が生じる。That is, when the amount of coagulation contraction at an arbitrary position is used as a reference, the upstream side is overpressure-reduced and the downstream side is under-reduced. As in the methods disclosed in the above-mentioned publications and the like, when a reduction amount is applied at a constant reduction amount over a long range, it is easy to induce a total reduction amount or an insufficient reduction amount. If the reduction is insufficient, the effect of preventing center segregation is naturally small, while if the pressure is excessive, inverse V segregation occurs.
【0010】上記のような問題点に対して、特開平3−
90263 号公報、特公平5−73506 号公報および特公平5
−73507 号公報には、鋳造下流側に向かうほど圧下速度
を大きくしていく連続鋳造方法が示されている。しか
し、これらの方法にも未だ次のような問題点が残る。即
ち、特開平3−90263 号公報に開示されている方法は、
圧下速度の増加条件の範囲が圧下不足となる条件から過
圧下となる条件まで包含しており、中心偏析の改善効果
が安定して得られないと考えられる。With respect to the above problems, Japanese Patent Laid-Open No.
90263, Japanese Patent Publication No. 5-73506, and Japanese Patent Publication No. 5
No. 73507 discloses a continuous casting method in which the rolling speed is increased toward the downstream side of casting. However, these methods still have the following problems. That is, the method disclosed in JP-A-3-90263 is
The range of conditions for increasing the rolling speed includes conditions from insufficient rolling to over rolling, and it is considered that the effect of improving center segregation cannot be stably obtained.
【0011】特公平5−73506 号公報に開示される方法
では、中心偏析の改善を安定して達成するための圧下量
に関する具体的な条件が明らかでない。In the method disclosed in Japanese Examined Patent Publication No. 73506/1993, a specific condition regarding the amount of reduction for stably achieving the improvement of center segregation is not clear.
【0012】特公平5−73507 号公報の方法では、ロー
ル反力による数値限定がなされているが、ロール反力と
適正圧下量との関係が記述されておらず、凝固収縮によ
る流動防止のための考え方が明らかにされていない。さ
らに、上記の3つの公報に示される方法では、鋳片温度
分布の圧下条件に及ぼす影響が考慮されていないという
に共通の問題点がある。In the method disclosed in Japanese Patent Publication No. 73507/1993, the roll reaction force limits the numerical value, but the relationship between the roll reaction force and the appropriate amount of reduction is not described. The way of thinking has not been clarified. Further, the methods disclosed in the above three publications have a common problem that the influence of the temperature distribution of the slab on the rolling reduction condition is not taken into consideration.
【0013】[0013]
【発明が解決しようとする課題】凝固末期における軽圧
下が連続鋳造鋳片の中心偏析の軽減に有効であることは
知られているが、従来の方法では適切な圧下量の選定が
困難で圧下不足あるいは過圧下により中心偏析の改善が
充分でないか、むしろ中心偏析が増加することさえあっ
た。It is known that a light reduction at the final stage of solidification is effective for reducing the center segregation of continuously cast slabs, but it is difficult to select an appropriate reduction amount by the conventional method, and the reduction is performed. Due to insufficient pressure or overpressure, the improvement of the center segregation was not sufficient, or even the center segregation sometimes increased.
【0014】本発明の目的は、鋳造速度や二次冷却条件
(鋳片表面温度、ひいては鋳片断面の温度勾配)等の鋳
造条件の変化および鋳片内部の凝固の進展(未凝固厚み
の変化)とかかわりなく、所定の条件で圧下を施し、し
かも中心偏析の原因となる収縮流動を従来方法以上に効
果的に防止することができる連続鋳造方法を提供するこ
とにある。The object of the present invention is to change the casting conditions such as the casting speed and the secondary cooling conditions (the surface temperature of the slab, and hence the temperature gradient of the cross section of the slab) and the progress of solidification inside the slab (the change in the unsolidified thickness). ) Regardless of the above), it is an object of the present invention to provide a continuous casting method capable of performing reduction under a predetermined condition and more effectively preventing shrinkage flow causing center segregation more than the conventional method.
【0015】[0015]
【課題を解決するための手段】本発明は、下記(1) およ
び(2) の連続鋳造方法を要旨とする。The gist of the present invention is the following continuous casting methods (1) and (2).
【0016】(1) 連続鋳造鋳片の末期凝固部で軽圧下を
加える連続鋳造方法において、圧下開始点を 0.0≦fs≦
0.2 の範囲とし、圧下終了点を 0.8≦fs≦1.0 とし、そ
の間において連続圧下を行い、かつ、流動限界固相率を
基準とした固液界面における圧下量の総和を 0.6〜1.4m
m 以下とすることを特徴とする連続鋳造方法。(1) In the continuous casting method in which a light reduction is applied at the final solidification portion of the continuously cast slab, the reduction start point is 0.0 ≦ fs ≦
The range is 0.2, the rolling end point is 0.8 ≤ fs ≤ 1.0, continuous rolling is performed during that period, and the total rolling reduction at the solid-liquid interface based on the flow limit solid fraction is 0.6 to 1.4 m.
A continuous casting method characterized in that the length is m or less.
【0017】(2) 連続鋳造鋳片の末期凝固部で軽圧下を
加える連続鋳造方法において、圧下開始点を 0.0≦fs≦
0.2 の範囲とし、圧下終了点を 0.8≦fs≦1.0 とし、そ
の間において連続圧下を行い、かつ、流動限界固相率を
基準とした固液界面における圧下速度を0.15〜0.3mm/mi
n 以下とすることを特徴とする連続鋳造方法。(2) In the continuous casting method in which a light reduction is applied at the final solidification part of the continuously cast slab, the reduction start point is 0.0 ≦ fs ≦
The range is 0.2, the rolling end point is 0.8 ≤ fs ≤ 1.0, continuous rolling is performed during that period, and the rolling-down speed at the solid-liquid interface is 0.15 to 0.3 mm / mi based on the flow limit solid fraction.
A continuous casting method characterized in that it is n or less.
【0018】上記(1) および(2) の方法において、fsは
鋳片の厚み中心固相率である。また、上記の「固液界
面」とは流動限界固相率(約 0.7〜0.8 )に達した鋳片
内部の位置を意味する。In the above methods (1) and (2), fs is the thickness center solid fraction of the slab. Further, the above-mentioned "solid-liquid interface" means the position inside the slab that has reached the fluidity limit solid fraction (about 0.7 to 0.8).
【0019】図2は、凝固シェル4の内部に未凝固部3
が存在する鋳片を圧下した場合の固液界面5の圧下速
度、圧下効率等のパラメータの定義を説明するための鋳
片断面模式図である。図示の10の位置でピンチロールに
よる圧下を加えたとき、図示の各記号は次のように定義
される。FIG. 2 shows that the unsolidified portion 3 is formed inside the solidified shell 4.
FIG. 3 is a schematic sectional view of a cast piece for explaining the definition of parameters such as a rolling speed and a rolling efficiency of a solid-liquid interface 5 when a cast piece containing a steel is pressed. When a pinch roll is applied at the 10 position shown in the figure, each symbol shown in the figure is defined as follows.
【0020】 δS :表面圧下量 (mm) L :圧下を受けた距離( m ) δI :固液界面圧下量 (mm) VC :鋳造速度 ( m/min ) ここで、固液界面の圧下速度をRI (mm/min )とすると RI =(δI / L )×VC である。即ち、固液界面の圧下速度RI は、固液界面に
おける単位時間当たりの圧下量として求められる。ま
た、圧下効率αは、 α=(δI /δS ) で表される。なお、δI は、例えば、メニスカスからFe
SやPbのような比重が大きく固液界面に堆積するトレー
サーを添加し、その移動を追跡することによって測定で
きる。Δ S : Surface reduction amount (mm) L: Distance subjected to reduction (m) δ I : Solid-liquid interface reduction amount (mm) V C : Casting speed (m / min) where solid-liquid interface When the reduction speed is R I (mm / min), R I = (δ I / L) × V C. That is, the reduction rate R I at the solid-liquid interface is obtained as the amount of reduction per unit time at the solid-liquid interface. Further, the rolling reduction efficiency α is expressed by α = (δ I / δ S ). Note that δ I can be calculated, for example, from the meniscus to Fe.
It can be measured by adding a tracer, such as S or Pb, which has a large specific gravity and is deposited on the solid-liquid interface, and traces its movement.
【0021】[0021]
【作用】従来から中心偏析の改善のためには最適な軽圧
下量が存在することは知られており、しかも、その圧下
量は、鋳片表面温度(言い換えれば鋳片内部の温度分
布)、凝固の程度によって変動することも経験的にわか
っていた。従って、未凝固部を持つ鋳片の圧下に際して
は鋳片の凝固の程度、2次冷却条件(鋳片内温度勾配)
に応じて圧下条件を変更しなければならないものと考え
られていた。It has been conventionally known that there is an optimum amount of light reduction for improving the center segregation. Moreover, the amount of reduction depends on the surface temperature of the slab (in other words, the temperature distribution inside the slab), It was also empirically known that it varies depending on the degree of coagulation. Therefore, the degree of solidification of the slab when the slab with an unsolidified portion is rolled down, the secondary cooling condition (temperature gradient in the slab)
It was thought that the reduction conditions had to be changed according to
【0022】本発明者は様々な鋳造条件に対応可能であ
る軽圧下条件の指標を提供し、かつ中心偏析改善のため
の凝固末期軽圧下を従来より有効に行うために、固液界
面の圧下挙動に着目して研究をすすめた。The inventor of the present invention provides an index of a light reduction condition that can correspond to various casting conditions, and in order to effectively perform a final solidification light reduction for improving the center segregation, the reduction of the solid-liquid interface is performed. The research was promoted focusing on the behavior.
【0023】図5は鋼の連続鋳造で未凝固部分を含む鋳
片に圧下を加えた場合の鋳片表面圧下速度RS (mm/min)
と中心偏析の関係を調べた結果を示す図である。ここで
は圧下中の鋳片表面温度が 700〜900 ℃の場合と 900〜
1000℃の場合の2つに分けて整理してある。なお、中心
偏析は後述する実施例に示す炭素偏析度 (C/CO )で
評価した。FIG. 5 shows the slab surface reduction rate R S (mm / min) when the slab containing an unsolidified portion is subjected to reduction in continuous casting of steel.
It is a figure which shows the result of having investigated the relationship of a center segregation. Here, when the slab surface temperature during rolling is 700 to 900 ℃ and 900 to 900 ℃,
It is divided into two cases in case of 1000 ℃. The center segregation was evaluated by the carbon segregation degree (C / CO ) shown in the examples described later.
【0024】図5に示すように鋳片表面温度が高くなる
ほど、偏析度 (C/CO ) を低くするための表面圧下速
度 (RS ) を大きくする必要がある。As shown in FIG. 5, the higher the surface temperature of the slab, the higher the surface rolling reduction rate (R S ) for lowering the segregation degree (C / C O ).
【0025】図6(b)は同(a)に示すような3種の
圧下パターンで軽圧下を行ったときの中心偏析発生状況
の調査結果である。図6(a)に示すパターン1、即
ち、凝固の進行と共に圧下勾配を大きくしていく圧下形
態の時に最も中心偏析の改善程度が大きい。これらの結
果は、鋳片内部の温度分布、凝固の進行程度に応じた圧
下量を選定する必要があることを意味する。FIG. 6B shows the results of investigation of the occurrence of central segregation when light reduction is performed with three types of reduction patterns as shown in FIG. In the pattern 1 shown in FIG. 6A, that is, in the rolling mode in which the rolling gradient is increased with the progress of solidification, the degree of improvement of the central segregation is greatest. These results mean that it is necessary to select the amount of reduction according to the temperature distribution inside the slab and the degree of solidification.
【0026】図5および図6のような結果が生じる理由
は以下のように考えられる。The reason why the results shown in FIGS. 5 and 6 occur is considered as follows.
【0027】鋳片をロールにより圧下する場合、表面か
ら加えた圧下量はそのまま固液界面に伝播するわけでは
なく、表面圧下量と固液界面に伝わる圧下量の比(前記
の圧下効率α)は 1.0以下である。これは、鋳片未凝固
部の変形抵抗、流動抵抗等のために、表面圧下量が鋳片
の幅拡がりと先進等に消費されるからである。When the slab is rolled by a roll, the amount of reduction applied from the surface does not directly propagate to the solid-liquid interface, but the ratio of the amount of surface reduction and the amount of reduction transmitted to the solid-liquid interface (the above-mentioned reduction efficiency α). Is less than 1.0. This is because the amount of surface reduction is consumed by the spread of the slab and the advancement due to the deformation resistance, flow resistance, etc. of the unsolidified portion of the slab.
【0028】図7にメニスカスからの距離、即ち、鋳造
進行方向の距離と圧下効率αの関係の一例を示す。α
は、先に説明したように図2に示す方法で求めた。FIG. 7 shows an example of the relationship between the distance from the meniscus, that is, the distance in the casting progress direction and the rolling reduction efficiency α. α
Was determined by the method shown in FIG. 2 as described above.
【0029】本発明者は、この実験データか、有限要素
法による応力解析モデルを構築し、様々な条件での固液
界面の圧下挙動を推算した。The present inventor constructed a stress analysis model by the finite element method from this experimental data, and estimated the rolling behavior of the solid-liquid interface under various conditions.
【0030】凝固の進行と共に、未凝固部の抵抗が固液
界面に及ぼす影響が大きくなるため、αは小さくなる。
また、鋳片温度が高くなるほど(即ち、鋳片内部の温度
勾配が小さいほど)、凝固シェル剛性は小さく、表面圧
下量が鋳片の幅拡がりと先進に消費されやすくなるため
にαは小さくなる。従って、仮に一定の圧下勾配で鋳片
を圧下しても、図8に示すように凝固時期(メニスカス
からの距離)および鋳片内温度勾配(鋳片表面温度)に
より固液界面に伝播する圧下量が異なることになる。As the solidification progresses, the influence of the resistance of the unsolidified portion on the solid-liquid interface increases, so that α decreases.
Further, the higher the slab temperature (that is, the smaller the temperature gradient inside the slab), the smaller the solidification shell rigidity, and the smaller the surface reduction amount, the wider the slab and the more easily it will be consumed in the advanced process, so α will be smaller. . Therefore, even if the slab is rolled down with a constant rolling down gradient, the rolling down that propagates to the solid-liquid interface due to the solidification timing (distance from the meniscus) and the temperature gradient inside the slab (slab surface temperature) as shown in FIG. The amount will be different.
【0031】このような結果から本発明者らは、凝固の
程度、鋳片内温度分布が異なっても普遍的な整理ができ
るようなパラメーターを追求すべく、独自に、固液界面
における圧下挙動と中心偏析程度の相関を調査したとこ
ろ、以下に記述する現象を見い出し、本発明を完成し
た。From these results, the inventors of the present invention uniquely pursued the rolling-down behavior at the solid-liquid interface in order to pursue parameters that can be universally organized even if the degree of solidification and the temperature distribution in the slab are different. As a result of investigating the correlation between and the degree of center segregation, the following phenomenon was found and the present invention was completed.
【0032】図3は流動限界固相率を基準とした固液界
面に伝播する圧下量の総和ΣδI と炭素偏析度 (C/C
O ) で評価した中心偏析との関係を示したものである。
なお、この図は鋳片表面温度が 750〜1100℃までの広範
囲にわたってのデータを示したものである。FIG. 3 shows the total sum Σδ I of the amount of reduction propagating to the solid-liquid interface and the carbon segregation degree (C / C) based on the fluidity limit solid fraction.
It shows the relationship with the center segregation evaluated by O ).
This figure shows data over a wide range of slab surface temperatures from 750 to 1100 ° C.
【0033】図3には圧下時期を次の4種類に変更した
場合について示した。FIG. 3 shows the case where the rolling-down timing is changed to the following four types.
【0034】鋳片の厚み中心固相率 (前記のfs) が
0.0を超えたところから 0.8となるまで連続圧下した場
合(図3の○) 0.2<fs<0.8 の範囲を連続圧下した場合(図3の
△) 0<fsのところからfs=0.5 のところまで連続圧下し
た場合(図3の□) 0<fsのところからfs=1.0 のところまで連続圧下し
た場合(図3の●) なお、図3では固液界面を形成する固相率を流動限界固
相率としている。The thickness center solid fraction of the cast slab (fs above) is
Continuous reduction from 0.0 to 0.8 (○ in Fig. 3) Continuous reduction in the range of 0.2 <fs <0.8 (△ in Fig. 3) From 0 <fs to fs = 0.5 Continuous reduction (□ in Fig. 3) Continuous reduction from 0 <fs to fs = 1.0 (● in Fig. 3) In Fig. 3, the solid phase ratio forming the solid-liquid interface is set to the flow limit solid. It is taken as a phase ratio.
【0035】図3から明らかなように、鋳片表面温度に
関わらず、ΣδI を 0.6〜1.4 mmの範囲に制御すること
により、中心偏析の大きな改善が得られている。As is clear from FIG. 3, a large improvement in center segregation is obtained by controlling Σδ I within the range of 0.6 to 1.4 mm regardless of the surface temperature of the slab.
【0036】上記の結果から、表面温度が広範囲にわた
って異なる多数の鋳片についても、ΣδI という一つの
ファクターで中心偏析を減少させる範囲が確定できるこ
とが明らかであり、このΣδI を用いる本発明の方法
は、従来の鋳片表面における圧下量制御法よりも普遍性
を有することがわかる。[0036] From the above results, for the number of slab surface temperature is different over a wide range, it is clear that you can determine the range to reduce the center segregation in a factor called Sigma] [Delta] I, the present invention using the Sigma] [Delta] I It can be seen that the method is more universal than the conventional method for controlling the amount of reduction on the surface of the cast slab.
【0037】ΣδI は圧下区間中、ほぼ等しい界面圧下
速度RI (mm/min)に配分されることが望ましい。但し、
±20〜30%のバラツキの範囲内で配分されていてもその
区間が連続圧下されていればΣδI の適正制御により中
心偏析の大きな改善が得られる。すなわち、局所的にみ
れば適正範囲からずれていても、圧下範囲トータルでみ
て圧下不足になるか過圧下になるかの判定をすればよい
ということになる。It is desirable that Σδ I be distributed to the substantially same interfacial reduction rate R I (mm / min) during the reduction section. However,
Even if it is distributed within the range of ± 20 to 30%, if the section is continuously rolled down, the central segregation can be greatly improved by proper control of Σδ I. That is, even if it deviates from the proper range locally, it is sufficient to judge whether the total reduction range is insufficient or excessive.
【0038】次に、図3を圧下を加える時期(鋳片厚み
中心の固相率fsの範囲)という観点からみて、同一量の
ΣδI で中心偏析を比較した場合、0<fsからfs=0.8
までの範囲を連続圧下した場合 (前記、図3の○印)
と0<fsからfs=1.0 の範囲を連続圧下した場合 (前記
、図3●印) が最も中心偏析が減少している。以下、
0.2<fs<0.8 の範囲を連続圧下した場合 (前記、図
3の△) 、0<fsのところからfs=0.5 のところまで連
続圧下した場合 (前記、図3の□) の順に偏析が大き
くなっている。Next, from the viewpoint of the time when the reduction is applied (the range of the solid fraction fs at the thickness center of the slab) in FIG. 3, when the center segregation is compared with the same amount of Σδ I , 0 <fs to fs = 0.8
When the range up to is continuously rolled down (circle mark in Fig. 3 above)
In the case of continuous rolling down in the range of 0 <fs to fs = 1.0 (marked with ● in Fig. 3), the center segregation is reduced most. Less than,
Segregation increases in the order of continuous reduction in the range of 0.2 <fs <0.8 (△ in Fig. 3 above) and continuous reduction from 0 <fs to fs = 0.5 (□ in Fig. 3 above). Has become.
【0039】このことは、中心偏析を形成する凝固時期
が固相率fsが0を超え、0.8 となるまでの範囲であるこ
とを意味し、この範囲を確実に適正な界面圧下量で連続
圧下することが重要であることを示している。This means that the solidification time for forming the central segregation is in the range from the solid fraction fs exceeds 0 to 0.8, and this range is surely reduced by the appropriate interfacial reduction. It shows that it is important to do.
【0040】但し、圧下時期を 0.2<fs<0.8 とした
の場合でも、に比べてかなり偏析の改善効果は見られ
ており、圧下が必要な最低限の範囲はこの範囲であると
考えられる。However, even when the rolling-down time is set to 0.2 <fs <0.8, the effect of improving the segregation is seen as compared with, and it is considered that the minimum range of rolling-down is this range.
【0041】以上の知見に基づいてなされたのが前記
(1) の発明、すなわち、「圧下開始点を鋳片の厚み中心
固相率が0〜0.2 の範囲とし、圧下終了点を 0.8〜1.0
の範囲とし、その全域において連続圧下を行い、固液界
面における圧下量の総和を 0.6〜1.4 mmとすることを特
徴とする連続鋳造方法」の発明である。The above was made based on the above findings.
The invention of (1), that is, "the reduction start point is within the range of the thickness center solid fraction of the slab is 0 to 0.2, and the reduction end point is 0.8 to 1.0.
The continuous casting method is performed in that range, and the total amount of reduction at the solid-liquid interface is set to 0.6 to 1.4 mm.
【0042】次に、前記(2) の発明、即ち、「圧下開始
点を鋳片の厚み中心固相率が0〜0.2 の範囲とし、圧下
終了点を 0.8〜1.0 の範囲とし、その全域において固液
界面における圧下速度が0.15〜0.30mm/minとなる連続圧
下を行うことを特徴とする連続鋳造方法の発明」につい
て説明する。Next, the invention of (2) above, that is, "the reduction start point is in the range of 0 to 0.2 in the thickness center solid fraction of the slab, and the reduction end point is in the range of 0.8 to 1.0. The invention of a continuous casting method characterized by performing continuous reduction at a reduction rate of 0.15 to 0.30 mm / min at the solid-liquid interface "will be described.
【0043】図4は流動限界固相率を基準とした固液界
面に伝播する単位時間当たりの圧下量、即ち前述の界面
圧下速度RI と中心偏析(前記の炭素偏析度、C/
CO )の関係についても調査した結果である。FIG. 4 shows the amount of reduction per unit time that propagates to the solid-liquid interface based on the critical flow solid fraction, that is, the interface reduction rate R I and the center segregation (the carbon segregation degree, C /
It is the result of the investigation on the relationship of C O ).
【0044】圧下時期は、図3から確定した中心偏析改
善のための最適圧下時期である0<fsのところからfs=
0.8 のところまでの場合について示してある。図4から
明らかなように、固液界面の圧下速度RI にも中心偏析
の改善のための適正範囲が存在する。すなわち、RI が
0.15〜0.30mm/minの範囲にあるとき中心偏析の大きな改
善が得られる。From the point of 0 <fs, which is the optimum rolling time for improving the center segregation determined from FIG. 3, fs =
The case up to 0.8 is shown. As is apparent from FIG. 4, there is an appropriate range for improving the center segregation in the rolling speed R I at the solid-liquid interface. That is, R I
A large improvement in center segregation is obtained when it is in the range of 0.15 to 0.30 mm / min.
【0045】RI の最適範囲は、鋳片の単位時間当たり
の収縮量と同等から2倍程度までである。すなわち、鋳
片の体積収縮により溶鋼流動とバランスするようなRI
を選定することが重要である。体積収縮量に比較して2
倍程度の過圧下気味の条件でも中心偏析が改善されるの
は、体積収縮以外にもロール間バルジング等、溶鋼流動
の原因となる現象があるため、これを相殺するだけの圧
下を行う必要があるからである。The optimum range of R I is from the same as the contraction amount per unit time of the slab to about twice. That is, R I that balances the molten steel flow due to the volume contraction of the slab
It is important to select 2 compared to volume shrinkage
The reason why the center segregation is improved even under the condition of about double overpressure is that there is a phenomenon that causes molten steel flow such as bulging between rolls in addition to volume contraction, so it is necessary to perform a reduction to offset this. Because there is.
【0046】RI が最適範囲より小さい場合は圧下不足
により中心偏析が増大し、一方、最適範囲より大きい場
合は過圧下により(逆v偏析が生じて)やはり中心偏析
が増える。When R I is smaller than the optimum range, the center segregation increases due to insufficient reduction, while when R I is larger than the optimum range, the center segregation also increases due to overpressure (reverse v segregation occurs).
【0047】前記(1) の発明の条件と (2)の発明の条件
は両立させることが望ましい。即ち「鋳片の厚み中心の
固相率が0より大きく 0.8以下である範囲の全域におい
て固液界面における圧下速度が0.15〜0.30mm/minとなる
ように、しかも固液界面における圧下量の総和が 0.6〜
1.4mm となるように連続圧下する」のが最も望ましい。It is desirable that the conditions of the invention (1) and the conditions of the invention (2) are compatible with each other. That is, "The reduction rate at the solid-liquid interface is 0.15 to 0.30 mm / min over the entire range where the solid fraction at the thickness center of the slab is greater than 0 and 0.8 or less, and the total amount of reduction at the solid-liquid interface is Is 0.6 ~
It is most desirable to carry out continuous rolling down to 1.4 mm.
【0048】本発明方法はスラブ、ブルーム、ビレット
等の各種形状の鋳片の鋳造に適用可能であり、スラブの
ような偏平比の大きい鋳片においては幅方向のどの位置
にも適用できる。The method of the present invention can be applied to casting slabs of various shapes such as slabs, blooms and billets, and can be applied to any position in the width direction of a slab having a large flatness ratio.
【0049】[0049]
【実施例1】図1に概略構造を示す連続鋳造機を使用し
て、鋼スラブの連続鋳造を行った。Example 1 A steel slab was continuously cast using a continuous casting machine whose schematic structure is shown in FIG.
【0050】この連鋳機は湾曲半径 12.5mのS型連鋳機
であり、圧下ゾーンの長さは5mである。This continuous casting machine is an S-type continuous casting machine having a bending radius of 12.5 m, and the length of the reduction zone is 5 m.
【0051】図1において、浸漬ノズル2から鋳型1に
鋳込まれた溶鋼3はサポートロール群6、圧下ロール群
7、そしてピンチロール8を経て凝固し、引き出され
る。圧下ロール群は複数の圧下ロールで構成され、ロー
ルに与える油圧を制御することにより、圧下量(圧下速
度)の調整ができる。表1に鋳造条件(圧下条件以外)
を、表2および表3に圧下条件を示す。In FIG. 1, the molten steel 3 cast into the mold 1 from the dipping nozzle 2 is solidified through the support roll group 6, the reduction roll group 7, and the pinch roll 8 and then drawn. The reduction roll group is composed of a plurality of reduction rolls, and the amount of reduction (the reduction speed) can be adjusted by controlling the hydraulic pressure applied to the rolls. Casting conditions in Table 1 (other than reduction conditions)
Table 2 and Table 3 show the rolling reduction conditions.
【0052】実施例1〜4は本発明(1) の実施例であ
り、鋳片の幅中央部の厚み中心固相率fsが 0.0〜0.8 の
範囲の全域で連続圧下を加え、その間で固液界面で受け
た総圧下量ΣδI が 0.6〜1.4 mmとなるように設定圧下
量を調整した場合である。但し、界面圧下速度RI は必
ずしも、本発明(2) の範囲内には入っていない。Examples 1 to 4 are examples of the present invention (1), in which continuous rolling is applied over the entire range of the thickness center solid fraction fs of the width center portion of the cast piece in the range of 0.0 to 0.8, and solidification is applied between them. This is the case when the set reduction amount is adjusted so that the total reduction amount Σδ I received at the liquid interface is 0.6 to 1.4 mm. However, the interfacial rolling speed R I is not necessarily within the range of the present invention (2).
【0053】実施例5〜8は本発明(2) の実施例であ
り、鋳片の幅中央部の厚み中心固相率fsが 0.0〜0.8 ま
での全域で連続圧下を加え、且つ、各固相率区間におけ
る界面圧下速度RI が0.15〜0.30mm/minとなるように設
定圧下量を調整した場合である。Examples 5 to 8 are examples of the present invention (2), in which continuous reduction is applied in the entire region of the thickness center solid fraction fs of the width center portion of the slab to 0.0 to 0.8, and This is a case where the set reduction amount is adjusted so that the interface reduction velocity R I in the phase ratio section is 0.15 to 0.30 mm / min.
【0054】一方、比較例1〜4は従来例として、鋳片
表面の圧下速度RS を制御した場合、比較例5は界面圧
下速度RI がほぼ適正値に制御されているが、圧下時期
が鋳片の厚み中心固相率fsが 0.1〜0.7 の範囲であった
場合、比較例6は界面総圧下量ΣδI が適正値に制御さ
れているが、圧下したのが鋳片の厚み中心固相率fsが0.
3〜0.7 の範囲であった場合である。On the other hand, Comparative Examples 1 to 4 are conventional examples, and when the reduction rate R S of the surface of the slab is controlled, in Comparative Example 5, the interfacial reduction rate R I is controlled to an almost appropriate value. When the solid center fs of the slab is in the range of 0.1 to 0.7, Comparative Example 6 controls the total interface reduction amount Σδ I to an appropriate value. Solid fraction fs is 0.
The case is in the range of 3 to 0.7.
【0055】[0055]
【表1】 [Table 1]
【0056】[0056]
【表2】 [Table 2]
【0057】[0057]
【表3】 [Table 3]
【0058】表4に実施例および比較例における中心偏
析の調査結果を示す。中心偏析の程度を示す炭素偏析度
は、鋳片幅中央部の中心偏析部の炭素濃度 (C) を発光
分析法で10点測定し、その中のピーク値と鋼の平均濃度
(CO ) との比(C/CO )として評価した。Table 4 shows the results of investigation of center segregation in Examples and Comparative Examples. The carbon segregation degree, which indicates the degree of center segregation, was measured by measuring the carbon concentration (C) at the center segregation part at the center of the slab width by optical emission spectrometry at 10 points. The peak value and the average concentration of steel
It was evaluated as (C O) and a ratio of (C / C O).
【0059】更に、鋳片の圧下状態を推定するために、
鋳片幅中央部の偏析形態を調査した。V偏析は圧下不足
の状態に, 逆V偏析は過圧下の状態に対応すると考えら
れる。従って、偏析形態はV偏析でも逆V偏析でもない
のが好ましい。Further, in order to estimate the rolled state of the slab,
The segregation morphology at the center of the width of the slab was investigated. It is considered that V segregation corresponds to the state of insufficient reduction and reverse V segregation corresponds to the state of overpressure. Therefore, the segregation morphology is preferably neither V segregation nor inverse V segregation.
【0060】実施例1〜4は様々な鋳片表面温度(Tsu)
の範囲で界面総圧下量ΣδI を適正値に制御したもので
あるが、この場合も炭素偏析度(C/CO ) は1.10以下
と非常に低位であり、鋳片縦断面にはV偏析も逆V偏析
も観察されなかった。Examples 1 to 4 are various slab surface temperatures (Tsu)
In this range, the total reduction amount of the interface Σδ I was controlled to an appropriate value. In this case as well, the carbon segregation degree (C / C O ) was extremely low at 1.10 or less, and V segregation was observed on the longitudinal section of the slab. Neither reverse V segregation was observed.
【0061】実施例5〜8は、様々な圧下ゾーン入側の
鋳片表面温度(Tsu) の範囲で界面圧下速度RI を適正値
に制御したものであるが、いずれの場合も炭素偏析度
(C/CO ) は1.10以下と低位の偏析程度を示してい
た。また、鋳片縦断面にはV偏析も逆V偏析も観察され
ず、圧下不足でも過圧下でもない良好な圧下状態になっ
ていることが推察された。In each of Examples 5 to 8, the interfacial reduction rate R I was controlled to an appropriate value within a range of the slab surface temperature (Tsu) on the entry side of various reduction zones. In all cases, the degree of carbon segregation was controlled. (C / C O ) showed a low segregation degree of 1.10 or less. Further, neither V segregation nor inverse V segregation was observed in the longitudinal section of the slab, and it was inferred that the steel was in a good reduction state with neither reduction insufficiency nor overpressure.
【0062】実施例1〜8において、広い鋳片表面温度
範囲にわたって低位の中心偏析程度が得られたのは、固
液界面圧下速度、または固液界面圧下量の総計が適正範
囲になるように表面圧下速度を設定したからである。In Examples 1 to 8, a low degree of center segregation was obtained over a wide slab surface temperature range so that the solid-liquid interfacial reduction rate or the total amount of solid-liquid interfacial reduction was in the proper range. This is because the surface rolling speed is set.
【0063】一方、比較例1〜2は、鋳片表面からの圧
下速度RS を一定値にしたものであるが、いずれも炭素
偏析度は実施例と比較して高位であった。比較例1は、
fsが0.4 以上の位置での界面圧下速度RI が適正値より
小さく、界面総圧下量ΣδIも適正値より小さかったた
め、圧下不足でV偏析が生じ中心偏析が悪化した。On the other hand, in Comparative Examples 1 and 2, the reduction rate R S from the surface of the slab was set to a constant value, but the carbon segregation degree was higher than those of the Examples. Comparative Example 1
At the position where fs was 0.4 or more, the interfacial reduction rate R I was smaller than the proper value, and the total interfacial reduction amount Σδ I was also smaller than the proper value. Therefore, V segregation was caused due to insufficient reduction and the center segregation was deteriorated.
【0064】比較例2はfs= 0.0〜0.7 の範囲の界面圧
下速度RI が大きく、界面総圧下量ΣδI も適正値より
大きかったため、過圧下により中心偏析が悪化した。こ
のように、fs= 0.0〜0.8 の範囲の圧下を、RS 一定の
条件で行うと圧下不足や過圧下を生じ易く、中心偏析の
改善は得られない。In Comparative Example 2, the interfacial reduction rate R I in the range of fs = 0.0 to 0.7 was large, and the total interfacial reduction amount Σδ I was also larger than the appropriate value, so the center segregation deteriorated due to overpressure. As described above, if the rolling reduction in the range of fs = 0.0 to 0.8 is performed under the condition that R S is constant, insufficient rolling reduction or overpressure reduction is likely to occur, and improvement of the center segregation cannot be obtained.
【0065】比較例3〜4は、鋳片表面からの圧下効率
が鋳造下流側になるに従って小さくなることを意識し
て、表面圧下速度RS を鋳造下流側にいくにつれて大き
くしたものであるが、炭素偏析度は実施例と比較して高
位であった。In Comparative Examples 3 to 4, the surface reduction rate R S was increased toward the casting downstream side in consideration of the fact that the reduction efficiency from the surface of the slab becomes smaller toward the casting downstream side. The carbon segregation degree was higher than that in the examples.
【0066】比較例3は、圧下範囲全域にわったて界面
圧下速度RI が適正値に入らず、界面総圧下量ΣδI も
適正値より小さかったため、圧下不足(V偏析)で中心
偏析が悪化した。In Comparative Example 3, since the interfacial reduction rate R I did not reach the proper value over the entire reduction range and the total interface reduction amount Σδ I was smaller than the proper value, the center segregation was caused by insufficient reduction (V segregation). It got worse.
【0067】比較例4は、fsが 0.4以上の位置での界面
圧下速度RI が適正値よりも大きく、界面総圧下量Σδ
I も適正値より大きかったために、過圧下により中心偏
析が悪化した。このように、鋳造下流側になるほど表面
圧下速度RS を大きくしても、界面圧下速度RI あるい
は界面総圧下量ΣδI が適正な値になるように圧下量を
設定しないと、中心偏析の改善は得られない。In Comparative Example 4, the interface reduction rate R I at the position where fs is 0.4 or more is larger than the proper value, and the total interface reduction amount Σδ.
Since I was also larger than the appropriate value, central segregation deteriorated due to overpressure. Thus, even if the surface reduction rate R S is increased toward the downstream side of casting, unless the reduction amount is set so that the interface reduction rate R I or the interface total reduction amount Σδ I becomes an appropriate value, the center segregation There is no improvement.
【0068】比較例5では、fs= 0.1〜0.7 の範囲の界
面圧下速度RI を適正値に制御したがfs= 0.0〜0.1 、
fs= 0.7〜0.8 の範囲が圧下されていないため、炭素偏
析度は実施例と比較して高く、縦断面の偏析形態も圧下
不足を示すV偏析であった。In Comparative Example 5, the interfacial rolling velocity R I in the range of fs = 0.1 to 0.7 was controlled to an appropriate value, but fs = 0.0 to 0.1,
Since the range of fs = 0.7 to 0.8 was not reduced, the degree of carbon segregation was higher than that of the examples, and the segregation morphology of the longitudinal section was V segregation showing insufficient reduction.
【0069】比較例6は fs= 0.3〜0.7 の範囲でのみ
圧下し, 界面総圧下量ΣδI を適正値に制御したもので
あるが、fs= 0.0〜0.30、fs= 0.7〜0.8 の範囲を圧下
していないために、fs= 0.3〜0.7 の界面圧下速度が大
きくなってしまい、この範囲で過圧下になったため、炭
素偏析度は高かった。比較例5、6の結果から、fs=0.
0〜0.8 の範囲の全域において適切に連続圧下しないと
中心偏析の改善は得られないことがわかる。In Comparative Example 6, the total reduction amount of the interface Σδ I was controlled to an appropriate value by rolling down only in the range of fs = 0.3 to 0.7, but in the range of fs = 0.0 to 0.30 and fs = 0.7 to 0.8. Since no reduction was performed, the interfacial reduction rate at fs = 0.3 to 0.7 became large, and over-compression occurred in this range, so the carbon segregation degree was high. From the results of Comparative Examples 5 and 6, fs = 0.
It can be seen that improvement of center segregation cannot be obtained unless proper continuous reduction is performed in the entire range of 0 to 0.8.
【0070】以上の結果から、本発明の連続鋳造方法
は、従来の方法に比較して中心偏析の低減に威力を発揮
することが明らである。From the above results, it is clear that the continuous casting method of the present invention is more effective in reducing center segregation than the conventional method.
【0071】[0071]
【表4】 [Table 4]
【0072】[0072]
【発明の効果】本発明方法によれば、鋳造条件に関係な
く、鋳片の凝固の進展状況のみを応じて圧下制御を行え
ばよい。しかも、それによって圧下不足も過圧下もない
理想的な圧下を行うことができ、鋳片の中心偏析の軽減
に大きな効果が得られる。According to the method of the present invention, the reduction control may be performed only in accordance with the progress of solidification of the slab regardless of the casting conditions. In addition, it is possible to perform ideal reduction without insufficient reduction or over-pressure reduction, and it is possible to obtain a great effect in reducing center segregation of the slab.
【図1】本発明方法を実施する連鋳機の概略構造図であ
る。FIG. 1 is a schematic structural diagram of a continuous casting machine for carrying out the method of the present invention.
【図2】各種のパラメータの定義を説明する鋳片断面の
模式図である。FIG. 2 is a schematic view of a slab cross section for explaining the definition of various parameters.
【図3】固液界面の総圧下量ΣδI と炭素偏析度との関
係の一例を示す図である。FIG. 3 is a diagram showing an example of the relationship between the total reduction amount Σδ I at the solid-liquid interface and the carbon segregation degree.
【図4】固液界面圧下速度RI と炭素偏析度との関係の
一例を示す図である。FIG. 4 is a diagram showing an example of the relationship between the solid-liquid interface reduction rate R I and the carbon segregation degree.
【図5】表面圧下速度RS と炭素偏析度との関係の一例
を示す図である。FIG. 5 is a diagram showing an example of a relationship between a surface rolling speed R S and a carbon segregation degree.
【図6】圧下パターンと中心偏析との関係の一例を示す
図である。FIG. 6 is a diagram showing an example of a relationship between a reduction pattern and center segregation.
【図7】圧下効率の鋳造方向推移の一例を示す図であ
る。FIG. 7 is a diagram showing an example of transition of rolling efficiency in a casting direction.
【図8】界面圧下速度RI の鋳造方向推移の一例を示す
図である。FIG. 8 is a diagram showing an example of transition of the interfacial reduction rate R I in the casting direction.
1:水冷銅鋳型、2:浸漬ノズル、3:溶鋼、4:凝固
シェル、5:固液界面 6:サポートロール群、7:圧下ロ ル群、8:ピンチ
ロール、9:非圧下部 10:圧下部1: Water-cooled copper mold, 2: Immersion nozzle, 3: Molten steel, 4: Solidified shell, 5: Solid-liquid interface 6: Support roll group, 7: Rolling roll group, 8: Pinch roll, 9: Non-pressing portion 10: Rolling down
Claims (2)
る連続鋳造方法において、圧下開始点を 0.0≦fs≦0.2
の範囲とし、圧下終了点を 0.8≦fs≦1.0 とし、その間
において連続圧下を行い、かつ、流動限界固相率を基準
とした固液界面における圧下量の総和を 0.6〜1.4mm 以
下とすることを特徴とする連続鋳造方法。ただし、fsは
鋳片の厚み中心固相率である。1. A continuous casting method in which a light reduction is applied at the final solidification portion of a continuously cast slab, where the reduction start point is 0.0 ≦ fs ≦ 0.2.
, The end point of the rolling reduction is 0.8 ≤ fs ≤ 1.0, continuous rolling is performed between them, and the total rolling reduction at the solid-liquid interface based on the solid limit of flow limit is 0.6 to 1.4 mm or less. A continuous casting method characterized by: However, fs is the thickness center solid fraction of the slab.
る連続鋳造方法において、圧下開始点を 0.0≦fs≦0.2
の範囲とし、圧下終了点を 0.8≦fs≦1.0 とし、その間
において連続圧下を行い、かつ、流動限界固相率を基準
とした固液界面における圧下速度を0.15〜0.30mm/min以
下とすることを特徴とする連続鋳造方法。ただし、fsは
鋳片の厚み中心固相率である。2. A continuous casting method in which a light reduction is applied at the final solidification portion of a continuously cast slab, where the reduction start point is 0.0 ≦ fs ≦ 0.2.
The end point of the reduction is 0.8 ≤ fs ≤ 1.0, continuous reduction is performed during that period, and the reduction rate at the solid-liquid interface is 0.15 to 0.30 mm / min or less based on the critical solid fraction for flow. A continuous casting method characterized by: However, fs is the thickness center solid fraction of the slab.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP27640894A JP2964888B2 (en) | 1994-11-10 | 1994-11-10 | Continuous casting method |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP27640894A JP2964888B2 (en) | 1994-11-10 | 1994-11-10 | Continuous casting method |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JPH08132204A true JPH08132204A (en) | 1996-05-28 |
| JP2964888B2 JP2964888B2 (en) | 1999-10-18 |
Family
ID=17568995
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP27640894A Expired - Lifetime JP2964888B2 (en) | 1994-11-10 | 1994-11-10 | Continuous casting method |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JP2964888B2 (en) |
Cited By (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP2008207201A (en) * | 2007-02-26 | 2008-09-11 | Jfe Steel Kk | Manufacturing method of continuous cast slab |
| JP2011224583A (en) * | 2010-04-16 | 2011-11-10 | Jfe Steel Corp | Method for determining centerline segregation of continuously cast slab |
| CN107377919A (en) * | 2017-07-20 | 2017-11-24 | 东北大学 | A kind of method for improving bearing steel strand central dense degree |
| CN114669723A (en) * | 2022-03-21 | 2022-06-28 | 江阴兴澄特种钢铁有限公司 | Control method for effective reduction interval of casting blank |
| WO2025258259A1 (en) * | 2024-06-11 | 2025-12-18 | Jfeスチール株式会社 | Stainless steel seamless pipe and method for producing same |
-
1994
- 1994-11-10 JP JP27640894A patent/JP2964888B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Cited By (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP2008207201A (en) * | 2007-02-26 | 2008-09-11 | Jfe Steel Kk | Manufacturing method of continuous cast slab |
| JP2011224583A (en) * | 2010-04-16 | 2011-11-10 | Jfe Steel Corp | Method for determining centerline segregation of continuously cast slab |
| CN107377919A (en) * | 2017-07-20 | 2017-11-24 | 东北大学 | A kind of method for improving bearing steel strand central dense degree |
| CN114669723A (en) * | 2022-03-21 | 2022-06-28 | 江阴兴澄特种钢铁有限公司 | Control method for effective reduction interval of casting blank |
| CN114669723B (en) * | 2022-03-21 | 2024-05-17 | 江阴兴澄特种钢铁有限公司 | Control method for effective rolling interval of casting blank |
| WO2025258259A1 (en) * | 2024-06-11 | 2025-12-18 | Jfeスチール株式会社 | Stainless steel seamless pipe and method for producing same |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JP2964888B2 (en) | 1999-10-18 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| JP3064832B2 (en) | Continuous casting method | |
| US4519439A (en) | Method of preventing formation of segregations during continuous casting | |
| JP3427794B2 (en) | Continuous casting method | |
| JPH08132204A (en) | Continuous casting method | |
| JPH08238550A (en) | Continuous casting method for steel | |
| US4678719A (en) | Method and apparatus for continuous casting of crystalline strip | |
| CA1241178A (en) | Method and apparatus for continuous casting of crystalline strip | |
| EP0174767B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for direct casting of crystalline strip by radiantly cooling | |
| JP3994848B2 (en) | Continuous casting method of steel | |
| EP0174766B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for direct casting of crystalline strip in non-oxidizing atmosphere | |
| JP7273307B2 (en) | Steel continuous casting method | |
| JP5476959B2 (en) | Continuous casting method under light pressure | |
| JPH0390263A (en) | Continuous casting method | |
| JP3283746B2 (en) | Continuous casting mold | |
| JPH0436776B2 (en) | ||
| JP7768079B2 (en) | Continuous casting mold and method of manufacturing continuous casting mold | |
| JP3394730B2 (en) | Continuous casting method of steel slab | |
| JP4717357B2 (en) | High-speed continuous casting method for carbon steel | |
| JPH0390261A (en) | Continuous casting method | |
| JP7727178B2 (en) | Method for controlling pressure load of chill roll and method for manufacturing thin-walled cast slab | |
| JPH0819843A (en) | Cooling method of slab in continuous casting | |
| JPH11192539A (en) | Continuous casting method of chromium-containing molten steel with excellent internal defect resistance | |
| JP3342774B2 (en) | Mold powder for continuous casting | |
| JP3114679B2 (en) | Continuous casting method | |
| JP3498586B2 (en) | Continuous casting method |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (prs date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20070813 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (prs date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20080813 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (prs date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20080813 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (prs date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20090813 Year of fee payment: 10 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (prs date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20090813 Year of fee payment: 10 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (prs date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20100813 Year of fee payment: 11 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (prs date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20110813 Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (prs date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20110813 Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (prs date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20120813 Year of fee payment: 13 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (prs date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20120813 Year of fee payment: 13 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (prs date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130813 Year of fee payment: 14 |
|
| S111 | Request for change of ownership or part of ownership |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313111 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (prs date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130813 Year of fee payment: 14 |
|
| R371 | Transfer withdrawn |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R371 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (prs date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130813 Year of fee payment: 14 |
|
| S111 | Request for change of ownership or part of ownership |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313111 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (prs date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130813 Year of fee payment: 14 |
|
| R350 | Written notification of registration of transfer |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350 |
|
| EXPY | Cancellation because of completion of term |