JPH06128109A - Herbicide for turf and method for weeding lawn - Google Patents
Herbicide for turf and method for weeding lawnInfo
- Publication number
- JPH06128109A JPH06128109A JP27592492A JP27592492A JPH06128109A JP H06128109 A JPH06128109 A JP H06128109A JP 27592492 A JP27592492 A JP 27592492A JP 27592492 A JP27592492 A JP 27592492A JP H06128109 A JPH06128109 A JP H06128109A
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- herbicide
- turf
- coumarin
- plant
- hurghaya
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 230000002363 herbicidal effect Effects 0.000 title claims abstract description 28
- 239000004009 herbicide Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 26
- CRQQGFGUEAVUIL-UHFFFAOYSA-N chlorothalonil Chemical compound ClC1=C(Cl)C(C#N)=C(Cl)C(C#N)=C1Cl CRQQGFGUEAVUIL-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 title claims abstract 8
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims description 12
- 238000009333 weeding Methods 0.000 title claims description 5
- ZYGHJZDHTFUPRJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N coumarin Chemical compound C1=CC=C2OC(=O)C=CC2=C1 ZYGHJZDHTFUPRJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 50
- 229960000956 coumarin Drugs 0.000 claims abstract description 25
- 235000001671 coumarin Nutrition 0.000 claims abstract description 25
- 239000000284 extract Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 10
- 239000000843 powder Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 7
- 238000001035 drying Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 3
- 239000002904 solvent Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 3
- 239000004480 active ingredient Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000005507 spraying Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 241000196324 Embryophyta Species 0.000 abstract description 36
- 240000004178 Anthoxanthum odoratum Species 0.000 abstract 4
- 235000011595 sweet vernalgrass Nutrition 0.000 abstract 4
- 230000001629 suppression Effects 0.000 abstract 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 14
- 230000002401 inhibitory effect Effects 0.000 description 12
- 244000025254 Cannabis sativa Species 0.000 description 11
- 244000042324 Trifolium repens Species 0.000 description 9
- 235000013540 Trifolium repens var repens Nutrition 0.000 description 9
- RODXRVNMMDRFIK-UHFFFAOYSA-N scopoletin Chemical compound C1=CC(=O)OC2=C1C=C(OC)C(O)=C2 RODXRVNMMDRFIK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 8
- 241000208822 Lactuca Species 0.000 description 7
- 235000003228 Lactuca sativa Nutrition 0.000 description 7
- 238000000605 extraction Methods 0.000 description 6
- 229920001817 Agar Polymers 0.000 description 4
- XEHFSYYAGCUKEN-UHFFFAOYSA-N Dihydroscopoletin Natural products C1CC(=O)OC2=C1C=C(OC)C(O)=C2 XEHFSYYAGCUKEN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 239000008272 agar Substances 0.000 description 4
- FWYIBGHGBOVPNL-UHFFFAOYSA-N scopoletin Natural products COC=1C=C2C=CC(OC2=C(C1)O)=O FWYIBGHGBOVPNL-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 3
- 241000209504 Poaceae Species 0.000 description 2
- 230000002411 adverse Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000002542 deteriorative effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000001914 filtration Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000000575 pesticide Substances 0.000 description 2
- GOLORTLGFDVFDW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 3-(1h-benzimidazol-2-yl)-7-(diethylamino)chromen-2-one Chemical compound C1=CC=C2NC(C3=CC4=CC=C(C=C4OC3=O)N(CC)CC)=NC2=C1 GOLORTLGFDVFDW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 208000035859 Drug effect increased Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 241000257465 Echinoidea Species 0.000 description 1
- 244000299452 Gouania lupuloides Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000000292 Gouania lupuloides Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 241000219793 Trifolium Species 0.000 description 1
- 238000009835 boiling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000003814 drug Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229940079593 drug Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000419 plant extract Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000008213 purified water Substances 0.000 description 1
- ODCWYMIRDDJXKW-UHFFFAOYSA-N simazine Chemical compound CCNC1=NC(Cl)=NC(NCC)=N1 ODCWYMIRDDJXKW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000008399 tap water Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000020679 tap water Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Chemical compound O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
Landscapes
- Agricultural Chemicals And Associated Chemicals (AREA)
Abstract
Description
【0001】[0001]
【産業上の利用分野】本発明は、芝用除草剤及び芝生の
除草方法に関するものである。BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a lawn herbicide and a lawn weeding method.
【0002】[0002]
【従来の技術】最近、ゴルフ場の芝生には、シマジン、
プロザミド等の除草剤を多量に散布しており、それが近
隣の水道水中に検出される等、環境への悪影響が問題と
なっている。2. Description of the Related Art Recently, simazine,
A large amount of herbicides such as prozamide is sprayed, and it is detected in nearby tap water, which has a problem of adverse effects on the environment.
【0003】そこで、従来では、環境への悪影響を避け
るために、雨水と共に流出したものを回収して処理する
等の対応策が取られている。[0003] Therefore, conventionally, in order to avoid adverse effects on the environment, measures have been taken such as collecting and treating the outflow with rainwater.
【0004】[0004]
【発明が解決しようとする課題】処が、この対応策では
多量に流出する除草剤を回収することができず、十分な
対応とは成り得なかった。However, with this countermeasure, it is not possible to collect a large amount of herbicide, and it is not possible to take a sufficient countermeasure.
【0005】そこで、従来の除草剤に代わる除草剤又は
除草方法が待望されている。尚、除草剤に代わるものと
して、雑草に対する除草活性を有する植物成分を利用し
た除草剤が提案されている(例えば、特開昭61−20
0901号公報等)が、芝に関する除草効果について何
ら開示されていない。Therefore, a herbicide or a herbicidal method, which replaces the conventional herbicide, is desired. As an alternative to the herbicide, a herbicide using a plant component having herbicidal activity against weeds has been proposed (for example, JP-A-61-20).
No. 0901) does not disclose any herbicidal effect on grass.
【0006】そこで、本発明者は、芝地に生える雑草を
アレロパシー作用によってその成育を抑制する植物とし
て芝類と芝類に近いハルガヤ,チガヤについて種々研究
の結果、ハルガヤが最も芝地に生える雑草に対する阻害
作用が強いことを知得し、本発明を完成するに至った。[0006] Therefore, the present inventor has conducted various studies on turfgrass and Hargaya and Chigaya, which are close to turfgrass, as weeds that suppress the growth of weeds that grow on turfgrass. It was found that the inhibitory effect on the
【0007】本発明は斯かる知見に基づいてなされたも
ので、その目的は、芝地中の雑草の成育を抑制すること
を利用して、環境を悪化させない芝の育成を可能にする
芝用除草剤及び芝生の除草方法を提供することにある。The present invention has been made on the basis of such findings, and its purpose is to suppress the growth of weeds in the grass, and to grow grass without deteriorating the environment. To provide a herbicide and a lawn weeding method.
【0008】[0008]
【課題を解決するための手段】請求項1に係る除草剤
は、クマリンを主成分とするものである。請求項2に係
る除草剤は、ハルガヤ中のクマリンを主成分とするもの
である。The herbicide according to claim 1 is mainly composed of coumarin. The herbicide according to claim 2 is mainly composed of coumarin in Hargaya.
【0009】請求項3に係る除草剤は、ハルガヤの植物
体を乾燥,粉砕した粉体から成るものである。請求項4
に係る除草剤は、ハルガヤの植物体を溶媒により成分抽
出して成る成分抽出物を有効成分とするものである。The herbicide according to claim 3 is composed of powder obtained by drying and crushing a plant of Hurghaya. Claim 4
The herbicide according to (1) has an active ingredient as a component extract obtained by extracting a component of a Hargaya plant with a solvent.
【0010】請求項5に係る除草剤は、ハルガヤの生体
を粉砕した粉体から成るものである。請求項6に係る芝
生の除草方法は、芝地にハルガヤの植物体を散布するも
のである。The herbicide according to claim 5 is composed of a powder obtained by crushing the living body of Hurghaya. The lawn weeding method according to claim 6 is a method of spraying Hurghaya plants on grass.
【0011】[0011]
【作用】クマリンは、芝地に生える雑草に対するアレロ
パシー作用が強く、雑草の成育を阻害する。[Action] Coumarin has a strong allelopathic effect on weeds growing on grass and inhibits the growth of weeds.
【0012】ハルガヤ中のクマリンは、生体、乾燥物或
いは抽出物であっても、芝地に生える雑草に対するアレ
ロパシー作用が強く、雑草の成育を阻害する。[0012] Coumarin in Hurghaya has a strong allelopathic action against weeds growing on turf and inhibits the growth of weeds, whether it is a living body, a dried product or an extract.
【0013】[0013]
【実施例】以下、本発明を実施例に基づいて説明する。
芝類にアレロパシー作用があるか否かを確認した処、顕
著な阻害作用を有するものはなく、目的とする除草剤と
することは困難であった。EXAMPLES The present invention will be described below based on examples.
When it was confirmed whether or not the turf had an allelopathic effect, there was no substance having a remarkable inhibitory effect, and it was difficult to make it a desired herbicide.
【0014】そこで、芝類に近いイネ科植物のうち、ハ
ルガヤとチガヤについて実験した。先ず、アレロパシー
作用を持つ物質としては、ハルガヤから検出されるクマ
リン(Coumarin)、チガヤから検出されるスコポレチン(S
copoletion) と考えられる。Then, among the grasses close to grasses, experiments were carried out on Hargaya and Chigaya. First, as substances having an allelopathic effect, there are coumarin (Coumarin) detected in Hargaya and scopoletin (S
copoletion).
【0015】そこで、クマリンとスコポレチンの溶液
を、検定植物に添加して、検定植物の成長に及ぼす影響
について実験した。尚、検定植物としては、成長が均一
で、多くの研究に用いられているレタスを用いた。Therefore, a solution of coumarin and scopoletin was added to the test plants to test the effect on the growth of the test plants. As the test plant, lettuce, which has a uniform growth and is used in many studies, was used.
【0016】実験の結果を図1に示す。図1は、縦軸に
レタスの地上部長のコントロール比、横軸にクマリンと
スコポレチンの濃度を表す。クマリンは、図1に示すよ
うに、0.1ppm程度の微量濃度でも阻害作用が発現し、1
ppm の近傍から急激に阻害作用が増大し、100ppmではレ
タス地上部が殆ど成育しなくなった。The results of the experiment are shown in FIG. In FIG. 1, the vertical axis represents the control ratio of the aboveground length of lettuce, and the horizontal axis represents the concentrations of coumarin and scopoletin. As shown in Fig. 1, coumarin exerts an inhibitory action even at a trace concentration of about 0.1 ppm.
The inhibitory effect increased sharply from the vicinity of ppm, and at 100 ppm, the above-ground lettuce part hardly grew.
【0017】このことから、クマリンには、検定植物に
対する阻害作用があることが確認された。一方、スコポ
レチンでは、濃度を10ppm 以上にした場合に、僅かに検
定植物に対する阻害作用が発揮されることが確認され
た。From this, it was confirmed that coumarin has an inhibitory effect on the test plant. On the other hand, it was confirmed that scopoletin exhibited a slight inhibitory effect on the test plant when the concentration was 10 ppm or more.
【0018】次に、ハルガヤ,チガヤが、芝地に生える
検定植物(シロクローバ)に及ぼす影響について実験し
た。ハルガヤ,チガヤの乾燥葉の加熱抽出液を、芝生に
生える雑草の一つであるシロクローバ幼根に添加して、
シロクローバ幼根の成長に及ぼす影響について実験し
た。Next, an experiment was conducted on the effect of Hargaya and Chigaya on a test plant (white clover) growing on turf. Heated extract of dried leaves of Hurghaya and Chigaya was added to white clover radicle, which is one of the weeds growing on the lawn,
The effects on the growth of white clover radicles were studied.
【0019】各植物体からの成分の抽出方法は、次の通
りである。先ず、各植物体の乾燥葉に精製水を加えて加
熱し、沸騰開始から10分後に火を止める。The method for extracting the components from each plant is as follows. First, purified water is added to the dried leaves of each plant and heated, and the heat is turned off 10 minutes after the start of boiling.
【0020】次に、30分間放置する。その後、東洋ろ
紙 No.1で濾過する(粗い目の濾過)。更に、0.8 μm
の目のフィルタで再度濾過する(細かい目の濾過)。そ
の結果を図2に示す。図2は、縦軸にシロクローバ幼根
長のコントロール比、横軸に抽出濃度を表す。Then, it is left for 30 minutes. Then, filter with Toyo filter paper No. 1 (coarse grain filtration). Furthermore, 0.8 μm
Filter again with a double eye filter (fine eye filtration). The result is shown in FIG. In FIG. 2, the vertical axis represents the control ratio of white clover radicle length, and the horizontal axis represents the extraction concentration.
【0021】図2に示すように、ハルガヤでは、抽出濃
度が0.1g/lでも約60%のコントロール比があり、抽出濃
度が増加するにつれて確実に阻害作用が増加している。
これに対し、チガヤでは、抽出濃度が1g/l 以上でない
と、ハルガヤの抽出濃度0.1g/lと同等の阻害作用が得ら
れなかった。As shown in FIG. 2, in Hurghaya, there is a control ratio of about 60% even when the extraction concentration is 0.1 g / l, and the inhibitory action surely increases as the extraction concentration increases.
On the other hand, when the extract concentration was not less than 1 g / l, the inhibitory effect equivalent to the extract concentration of 0.1 g / l of Hargaya could not be obtained in Tigaya.
【0022】又、チガヤでは、抽出濃度が約5g/l の場
合に、ハルガヤの抽出濃度1g/l と同等の阻害作用が得
られた。換言すると、シロクローバ幼根長のコントロー
ル比を50%とする場合、ハルガヤの抽出濃度は0.25g/l
であるが、チガヤの抽出濃度は1g/l であった。In addition, when the extract concentration was about 5 g / l, the inhibitory effect on the extract was about 1 g / l of Hargaya. In other words, when the control ratio of white clover radicle length is 50%, the extract concentration of Hurghaya is 0.25 g / l.
However, the extraction concentration of the sea urchin was 1 g / l.
【0023】又、シロクローバ幼根長のコントロール比
を25%とする場合、ハルガヤの抽出濃度は1g/l である
が、チガヤの抽出濃度は5g/l であった。以上のよう
に、ハルガヤとチガヤとを対比すると、ハルガヤの阻害
作用と同等の効果をチガヤに求めると、5〜10倍の高
濃度とする必要があり、好ましくないことが判明した。Further, when the control ratio of white clover radicle length was set to 25%, the extraction concentration of Hargaya was 1 g / l, but the extraction concentration of Chigaya was 5 g / l. As described above, when Hargaya was compared with Chigaya, it was found that it is necessary to have a high concentration of 5 to 10 times when it is desired to obtain an effect equivalent to the inhibitory effect of Hargaya, which is not preferable.
【0024】図1及び図2の結果から明らかなように、
ハルガヤ生体根から抽出されたクマリン及び薬品として
のクマリンは、芝地に生える雑草であるシロクローバに
対して、その成育を阻害する作用があり、充分に除草剤
として機能することが確認できた。As is apparent from the results shown in FIGS. 1 and 2,
It was confirmed that coumarin extracted from the roots of Hurghaya and coumarin as a drug have an action of inhibiting the growth of white clover, which is a weed growing on turf, and sufficiently function as a herbicide.
【0025】又、ハルガヤとクマリンの作用を比較した
結果、ハルガヤの根(乾燥重量)1mgが、クマリン5.4
μg に相当した。次に、プラントボックス法によるハル
ガヤ生体根とクマリンの作用を比較した。Further, as a result of comparing the effects of Hurghaya and coumarin, 1 mg of Hurghaya root (dry weight) was found to have coumarin 5.4.
Equivalent to μg. Next, the effects of coumarin and roots of Hurghaya by the plant box method were compared.
【0026】その装置を図3及び図4に示す。図3及び
図4に示すように、6cm×6cm×10cmの培養容器1の隅
部に、網材で形成された内径24mmの円筒2が配され、こ
の円筒2内にハルガヤ生体根又は濃度10ppm のクマリン
を含む寒天培地が入れられている。The device is shown in FIGS. As shown in FIG. 3 and FIG. 4, a cylinder 2 having an inner diameter of 24 mm formed of a net material is arranged at the corner of a culture vessel 1 of 6 cm × 6 cm × 10 cm, and inside this cylinder 2, a root of Hargaya or a concentration of 10 ppm The agar medium containing the coumarin of is contained.
【0027】そして、培養容器1内を寒天培地3とし、
この寒天培地3には21個のレタスの種子4が植えてあ
る。円筒2内に入れられたハルガヤ生体根又は培地中の
クマリンは、網目から寒天培地3中に溶け出し、レタス
の種子4にアレロパシー作用を及ぼす。Then, the inside of the culture vessel 1 is set to an agar medium 3,
On this agar medium 3, 21 lettuce seeds 4 are planted. The coumarin in the roots of Hurghaya or the medium placed in the cylinder 2 dissolves into the agar medium 3 through the mesh and exerts an allelopathic action on the lettuce seeds 4.
【0028】そのアレロパシー作用を及ぼす際の、ハル
ガヤ生体根又は濃度10ppm のクマリンの入った円筒2の
外縁2aから各種子4までの距離と、レタス幼根長との
関係を確認した。When the allelopathic effect was exerted, the relationship between the root length of lettuce radicles and the distance from the outer edge 2a of the cylinder 2 containing the living roots of Hargaya or coumarin having a concentration of 10 ppm to each offspring 4 was confirmed.
【0029】その結果を、図5に示す。図5から明らか
なように、ハルガヤ生体根とクマリンとは、ほぼ近似し
た結果を示しており、ハルガヤ生体根による阻害効果
は、主としてクマリンによるものであることが実証され
た。The results are shown in FIG. As is clear from FIG. 5, the results obtained from the roots of Hurghaya and coumarin show similar results, demonstrating that the inhibitory effect of the roots of Hargaya is mainly due to coumarin.
【0030】この結果に基づいて、ハルガヤの生体根を
粉砕し、その粉体を芝地に散布した処、シロクローバ等
の雑草の成育が抑えられた。又、ハルガヤの生体葉につ
いても同様の結果を得た。On the basis of these results, when the living roots of Hargaya were crushed and the powder was applied to the grass, the growth of weeds such as white clover was suppressed. Similar results were obtained for living leaves of Hurghaya.
【0031】更に、ハルガヤの生体を、芝地に散布した
場合も、同様の結果を得た。尚、上記実施例では、芝地
に生える雑草としてシロクローバについて説明したが、
その他の雑草にも有効である。Further, similar results were obtained when Hargaya organisms were sprayed on the grass. In the above example, white clover was explained as a weed that grows on grass,
It is also effective for other weeds.
【0032】又、本発明の適用分野としては、ゴルフ場
の芝生の育成、公園,緑地の芝生の育成がある。The field of application of the present invention is to grow lawns on golf courses, parks, and green areas.
【0033】[0033]
【発明の効果】以上のように、請求項1乃至6によれ
ば、芝地に散布すると、クマリンが芝地に生える雑草に
対するアレロパシー作用を発現し、雑草の成育が抑える
ことができる。As described above, according to claims 1 to 6, when sprayed on grass, coumarin exerts an allelopathic action on the weeds growing on the grass, and the growth of the weeds can be suppressed.
【0034】その結果、従来の農薬系統の除草剤に代わ
って使用することが可能となる。而も、植物由来の除草
剤であるから、環境を悪化させることなく、芝の育成を
行うことができる。As a result, it becomes possible to use the herbicide of the conventional pesticide system instead. Moreover, since it is a herbicide derived from plants, it is possible to grow grass without deteriorating the environment.
【0035】又、一度散布した農薬を回収,除去する方
法と比較して、コストも低く抑えることができる。Further, the cost can be kept low as compared with the method of collecting and removing the pesticide once sprayed.
【図1】アレロパシー作用候補物質がレタス地上部長に
及ぼす影響を示すグラフである。FIG. 1 is a graph showing the influence of an allelopathic action candidate substance on the lettuce aerial length.
【図2】植物体加熱抽出液がシロクローバ幼根長に及ぼ
す影響を示すグラフである。FIG. 2 is a graph showing the effect of a heated plant extract on white root clover radicle length.
【図3】プラントボックス法によるハルガヤ生体根とク
マリンの作用を比較するための装置の概略説明図であ
る。FIG. 3 is a schematic explanatory view of an apparatus for comparing the actions of the roots of Hagaya by the plant box method and coumarin.
【図4】図3の平面図である。FIG. 4 is a plan view of FIG.
【図5】プラントボックス法によるハルガヤ生体根とク
マリンの作用を比較するためのグラフである。FIG. 5 is a graph for comparing the effects of coumarin with roots of Hagaya by the plant box method.
Claims (6)
る芝用除草剤。1. A herbicide for turf, which comprises coumarin as a main component.
とを特徴とする芝用除草剤。2. A herbicide for turf, which is mainly composed of coumarin in Hurghaya.
から成ることを特徴とする芝用除草剤。3. A herbicide for turf, which comprises a powder obtained by drying and crushing a plant of Hurghaya.
して成る成分抽出物を有効成分とすることを特徴とする
芝用除草剤。4. A herbicide for turf, which comprises a component extract obtained by extracting components of a plant of Hurghaya with a solvent as an active ingredient.
ことを特徴とする芝用除草剤。5. A herbicide for turf, which comprises a powder obtained by crushing a living body of Hurghaya.
を特徴とする芝生の除草方法。6. A method of weeding a lawn, which comprises spraying a plant of Hurghaya on a lawn.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP27592492A JP2971268B2 (en) | 1992-10-14 | 1992-10-14 | Lawn herbicide and lawn weeding method |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP27592492A JP2971268B2 (en) | 1992-10-14 | 1992-10-14 | Lawn herbicide and lawn weeding method |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JPH06128109A true JPH06128109A (en) | 1994-05-10 |
| JP2971268B2 JP2971268B2 (en) | 1999-11-02 |
Family
ID=17562325
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP27592492A Expired - Fee Related JP2971268B2 (en) | 1992-10-14 | 1992-10-14 | Lawn herbicide and lawn weeding method |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JP2971268B2 (en) |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WO2011083363A2 (en) | 2009-12-24 | 2011-07-14 | El Pertiguero, S.A. | Broad spectrum herbicide and plant regulator compositions |
-
1992
- 1992-10-14 JP JP27592492A patent/JP2971268B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WO2011083363A2 (en) | 2009-12-24 | 2011-07-14 | El Pertiguero, S.A. | Broad spectrum herbicide and plant regulator compositions |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JP2971268B2 (en) | 1999-11-02 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Roe et al. | Municipal solid waste compost suppresses weeds in vegetable crop alleys | |
| Abo-Elwfa et al. | Potential molluscicidal activity of the aqueous extracts of some plants and their powders against terrestrial snail Monacha obstructa (L. Pfeiffer, 1842) under laboratory and field conditions | |
| Nielsen et al. | Mechanical and chemical control of Heracleum mantegazzianum and H. sosnowskyi. | |
| KR20200064462A (en) | Environment-friendly herbicide and method of manufacturing the same | |
| JPH06128109A (en) | Herbicide for turf and method for weeding lawn | |
| Rushing et al. | Drying temperature and developmental stage at harvest influence the parthenolide content of feverfew leaves and stems | |
| Ibrahim et al. | Effect of rainfall in the control of onion thrips, Thrips tabaci Lindeman (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) in Sokoto, Nigeria | |
| KR20220072636A (en) | Composition for controlling pest comprising Neem seed extract, Cinnamomum cassia extract and Citronella oil as effective component and uses thereof | |
| JP2863221B2 (en) | Shellfish pesticide based on tea tannin | |
| JPH06121615A (en) | Lawn | |
| Allen | The ability of paraquat, dalapon and amitrole‐T to kill an Agrostis/Lolium pasture in July, October and April | |
| Chin et al. | Weed management in direct-seeded rice in South Vietnam | |
| Singh et al. | Allelopathic potential of parthenium hysterophorus L. | |
| Amor | Non-chemical weed control in Victorian dryland crops-the dream and the reality. | |
| Medina-Urrutia et al. | Organic mango production: a review Campo Experimental Tecomán, Mexico | |
| Thompson Jr et al. | Action and fate of 2, 4-D and dicamba in trumpetcreeper | |
| Webster et al. | Effects of Ethephon on Abscission of Vegetative and Reproductive Structures of Phaseolus vulgaris L. 1 | |
| Imeokparia | Performance of a new selective rice herbicide in a lowland rice field in Nigeria | |
| Wallis | Herbicides in Kenya coffee IV | |
| RU2073975C1 (en) | Method of struggle against potato phytophthora infection (variants) | |
| Shimoda | Conservation and management of rice field biodiversity | |
| Samuel et al. | Effect on crop due to coffee white stem borer infestation. | |
| Foott et al. | Walnut branch wilt: Reduction of disease in four-year experiment in Tulare County orchard | |
| CN120130280A (en) | A chemical weed control method for flue-cured tobacco fields adapted to the climate characteristics of Yunnan | |
| Sherwood | Wild onion and wild garlic control |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (prs date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20080827 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (prs date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20080827 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (prs date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20090827 Year of fee payment: 10 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (prs date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20090827 Year of fee payment: 10 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (prs date is renewal date of database) |
Year of fee payment: 11 Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20100827 |
|
| LAPS | Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees |