JPH06101498B2 - Semiconductor device failure analysis method - Google Patents
Semiconductor device failure analysis methodInfo
- Publication number
- JPH06101498B2 JPH06101498B2 JP62276388A JP27638887A JPH06101498B2 JP H06101498 B2 JPH06101498 B2 JP H06101498B2 JP 62276388 A JP62276388 A JP 62276388A JP 27638887 A JP27638887 A JP 27638887A JP H06101498 B2 JPH06101498 B2 JP H06101498B2
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- failure analysis
- layer
- insulating film
- conductor wiring
- analysis method
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Landscapes
- Testing Of Individual Semiconductor Devices (AREA)
- Tests Of Electronic Circuits (AREA)
- Testing Or Measuring Of Semiconductors Or The Like (AREA)
Description
【発明の詳細な説明】 〔産業上の利用分野〕 本発明は半導体装置の故障解析方法に関し、特に容易に
電子ビームテスターによる半導体装置故障解析が可能な
方法に関する。Description: TECHNICAL FIELD The present invention relates to a semiconductor device failure analysis method, and more particularly to a method capable of easily performing a semiconductor device failure analysis by an electron beam tester.
従来、この種の半導体集積回路の故障解析は、第1の方
法として、パッシベーション膜8および導体配線7の層
間の絶縁膜II8を全く除去せずに電子ビームテスター
(もしくはストロボSEM)を用いて電位コントラストお
よび波形を観察している。Conventionally, the failure analysis of this kind of semiconductor integrated circuit is, as a first method, a potential using an electron beam tester (or strobe SEM) without removing the passivation film 8 and the insulating film II8 between the conductor wirings 7 at all. Observing contrast and waveform.
また、第2の方法としては、第2図(a)および(b)
に示すように、前記絶縁膜II8をエンッチングにより除
去し同様の観察を行っている。The second method is shown in FIGS. 2 (a) and 2 (b).
As shown in, the insulating film II8 is removed by etching and the same observation is performed.
上述した従来の半導体集積回路の故障解析方法の場合、
まず、第1の方法では、電子ビームテスターで観測した
い電位の絶対値が小さいときには電位コントラストの判
別ができないという欠点がある。また、第2の方法で
は、絶縁膜がシリコン窒化膜のようなときには、等方性
のプラズマエンッチング等を用いているが、第2図
(b)のように、下層の導体配線と上層の導体配線との
間のシリコン窒化膜が除去されて下層の導体配線と上層
の導体配線とがショートしてしまうという欠点がある。In the case of the conventional semiconductor integrated circuit failure analysis method described above,
First, the first method has a drawback that the potential contrast cannot be determined when the absolute value of the potential to be observed by the electron beam tester is small. Further, in the second method, when the insulating film is a silicon nitride film, isotropic plasma etching or the like is used. However, as shown in FIG. 2B, the lower conductor wiring and the upper layer are used. There is a drawback that the silicon nitride film between the first and second conductor wirings is removed and the lower conductor wiring and the upper conductor wiring are short-circuited.
本発明の半導体装置の故障解析方法は、一主面上に半導
体素子等の拡散領域および多層導体配線を有する半導体
集積回路において、前記半導体集積回路上のパッシベー
ション用絶縁膜および多層導体配線の層間の絶縁膜を反
応性イオンエンッチングにより除去する第1の工程と、
前記第1の工程により表面に露出された各層の導体配線
の表面に残された絶縁膜のみをフォーカスド・イオン・
ビームを用いたエンッチングにより完全に除去する第2
の工程と、前記第2の工程により完全に前記絶縁膜を除
去された前記各層の導体配線表面をストロボSEMを用い
た電子ビームテスターにより故障解析をする第3の工程
とを含む。A failure analysis method for a semiconductor device according to the present invention is a semiconductor integrated circuit having a diffusion region such as a semiconductor element and a multilayer conductor wiring on one main surface. A first step of removing the insulating film by reactive ion etching;
Only the insulating film left on the surface of the conductor wiring of each layer exposed on the surface in the first step is subjected to focused ion
Complete removal by beam etching 2nd
And the third step of performing failure analysis on the surface of the conductor wiring of each layer from which the insulating film has been completely removed by the second step by an electron beam tester using a strobe SEM.
次に、本発明について図面を参照して詳細に説明する。 Next, the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the drawings.
第1図(a)〜(e)は本発明の一実施例を工程順に示
す断面図であり、2層配線を有するシリコン半導体集積
回路を電子ビームテスターにより故障解析する方法に適
用した実施例である。1 (a) to 1 (e) are cross-sectional views showing an embodiment of the present invention in the order of steps, showing an embodiment applied to a method of failure analysis of a silicon semiconductor integrated circuit having two-layer wiring by an electron beam tester. is there.
まず、同図(a)のように、n型シリコン基板1上にシ
リコン酸化膜2が形成され、アルミニウム3の2層配線
が層間およびパッシベーション膜としてシリコン窒化膜
4を用いて形成されている半導体集積回路を解析する場
合、同図(b)のように、まず、RIE(反応性イオンエ
ンッチング)を用いてシリコン窒化膜4が異方的にエン
ッチングされて同図(c)に示すようになる。第1層の
アルミニウム配線3上および第2層のアルミニウム配線
3上にはシリコン窒化膜4が残っている。さらに、同図
(d)に示すように、FIB(フォーカスド・イオン・ビ
ーム)エンッチングを用いて第1層のアルミニウム配線
3上および第2層のアルミニウム配線3上に残されたシ
リコン窒化膜4のみが除去される。そして、同図(e)
に示すように、電子ビームが第1層および第2層のアル
ミニウム配線上に照射され、同時に、このシリコン集積
回路がLSIテスター等を用いて開始され、ストロボ走査
型電子顕微鏡1(SEM)の原理を用いて電位コントラス
トおよび内部の電位波形が観察される。電位差としては
0.5Vないし0.25V以下の電位が観察できる。First, as shown in FIG. 2A, a semiconductor in which a silicon oxide film 2 is formed on an n-type silicon substrate 1 and two-layer wiring of aluminum 3 is formed between layers and a silicon nitride film 4 as a passivation film. When analyzing an integrated circuit, first, as shown in FIG. 2B, the silicon nitride film 4 is anisotropically etched by using RIE (reactive ion etching), and as shown in FIG. become. The silicon nitride film 4 remains on the first-layer aluminum wiring 3 and the second-layer aluminum wiring 3. Further, as shown in FIG. 3D, the silicon nitride film 4 left on the aluminum wiring 3 of the first layer and the aluminum wiring 3 of the second layer by using FIB (focused ion beam) etching. Only is removed. And the same figure (e)
As shown in, the electron beam is irradiated on the first and second layers of aluminum wiring, and at the same time, this silicon integrated circuit is started by using an LSI tester or the like, and the principle of the strobe scanning electron microscope 1 (SEM) is shown. To observe the potential contrast and the internal potential waveform. As the potential difference
The potential below 0.5V to 0.25V can be observed.
このようにして、電子ビームテスターにより不良解析が
行われる。In this way, the electron beam tester performs the failure analysis.
以上説明したように本発明は、多層配線を有する半導体
集積回路のパッシベーション用絶縁膜および多層導体配
線の層間の絶縁膜を反応性イオンエンッチング(RIE)
により除去し、かつ、前記多層導体配線の表面に少し残
った絶縁膜のみをフォーカスド・イオン・ビーム(FI
B)エッチングにより完全に除去することにより、前記
各層の導体配線の表面をストロボSEMを用いた電子ビー
ムテスターにより電位コントラスト法および波形法によ
り非常に小さな電位差、例えば、0.25Vもしくは0.5Vの
電位差を容易に故障解析することができるという効果が
ある。As described above, according to the present invention, the reactive ion etching (RIE) is performed on the insulating film for passivation of the semiconductor integrated circuit having the multilayer wiring and the insulating film between the layers of the multilayer conductive wiring.
The focused ion beam (FI
B) By completely removing it by etching, the surface of the conductor wiring of each layer is subjected to a very small potential difference, for example, a potential difference of 0.25V or 0.5V by the potential contrast method and the waveform method by the electron beam tester using strobe SEM. This has the effect that failure analysis can be performed easily.
第1図(a)〜(e)は本発明の一実施例の断面図およ
び第2図(a)〜(b)は従来の方法における問題点を
説明するための断面図である。 1……n型シリコン基板、2……シリコン酸化膜、3…
…アルミニウム配線、4……シリコン窒化膜、5……半
導体基板、6……絶縁膜I、7……導体配線、8……絶
縁膜II。1 (a) to 1 (e) are cross-sectional views of an embodiment of the present invention, and FIGS. 2 (a) to 2 (b) are cross-sectional views for explaining problems in the conventional method. 1 ... n-type silicon substrate, 2 ... silicon oxide film, 3 ...
... Aluminum wiring, 4 ... Silicon nitride film, 5 ... Semiconductor substrate, 6 ... Insulating film I, 7 ... Conductor wiring, 8 ... Insulating film II.
Claims (1)
多層導体配線を有する半導体集積回路の故障解析方法に
おいて、前記半導体集積回路上のパッシベーション用絶
縁膜および前記多層導体配線の層間の絶縁膜を反応性イ
オンエンッチングにより除去する第1の工程と、前記第
1の工程により表面に露出された各層の導体配線の表面
に残された絶縁膜のみをフォーカスド・イオン・ビーム
を用いたエンッチングにより完全に除去する第2の工程
と、前記第2の工程により完全に前記絶縁膜を除去され
た前記各層の導体配線表面をストロボ走査型電子顕微鏡
を用いた電子ビームテスターにより故障解析する第3の
工程とを含むことを特徴とする半導体装置の故障解析方
法。1. A failure analysis method for a semiconductor integrated circuit having a diffusion region such as a semiconductor element and a multi-layer conductor wiring on one main surface, wherein an insulation film for passivation on the semiconductor integrated circuit and insulation between layers of the multi-layer conductor wiring are provided. The focused ion beam is used only for the first step of removing the film by reactive ion etching and the insulating film left on the surface of the conductor wiring of each layer exposed on the surface by the first step. The second step of completely removing the insulating film by the etching, and the failure analysis of the surface of the conductor wiring of each layer in which the insulating film is completely removed by the second step by an electron beam tester using a strobe scanning electron microscope. A failure analysis method for a semiconductor device, comprising: a third step.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP62276388A JPH06101498B2 (en) | 1987-10-30 | 1987-10-30 | Semiconductor device failure analysis method |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP62276388A JPH06101498B2 (en) | 1987-10-30 | 1987-10-30 | Semiconductor device failure analysis method |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JPH01119037A JPH01119037A (en) | 1989-05-11 |
| JPH06101498B2 true JPH06101498B2 (en) | 1994-12-12 |
Family
ID=17568718
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP62276388A Expired - Lifetime JPH06101498B2 (en) | 1987-10-30 | 1987-10-30 | Semiconductor device failure analysis method |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JPH06101498B2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (8)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US5976980A (en) * | 1994-11-23 | 1999-11-02 | Intel Corporation | Method and apparatus providing a mechanical probe structure in an integrated circuit die |
| US6020746A (en) * | 1994-11-23 | 2000-02-01 | Intel Corporation | Method and apparatus for probing an integrated circuit through the back side of an integrated circuit die |
| US5952247A (en) * | 1994-11-23 | 1999-09-14 | Intel Corporation | Method of accessing the circuitry on a semiconductor substrate from the bottom of the semiconductor substrate |
| US6153891A (en) * | 1994-11-23 | 2000-11-28 | Intel Corporation | Method and apparatus providing a circuit edit structure through the back side of an integrated circuit die |
| US6309897B1 (en) | 1997-09-30 | 2001-10-30 | Intel Corporation | Method and apparatus providing a circuit edit structure through the back side of an integrated circuit die |
| US5904486A (en) * | 1997-09-30 | 1999-05-18 | Intel Corporation | Method for performing a circuit edit through the back side of an integrated circuit die |
| US6159754A (en) * | 1998-05-07 | 2000-12-12 | Intel Corporation | Method of making a circuit edit interconnect structure through the backside of an integrated circuit die |
| US6692995B2 (en) | 2002-04-05 | 2004-02-17 | Intel Corporation | Physically deposited layer to electrically connect circuit edit connection targets |
-
1987
- 1987-10-30 JP JP62276388A patent/JPH06101498B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JPH01119037A (en) | 1989-05-11 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US5470793A (en) | Method of via formation for the multilevel interconnect integrated circuits | |
| JPH06101498B2 (en) | Semiconductor device failure analysis method | |
| US6168960B1 (en) | Backside device deprocessing of a flip-chip multi-layer integrated circuit | |
| JP2699663B2 (en) | Failure analysis method for semiconductor device | |
| KR100261826B1 (en) | Semiconductor device and manufacturing method thereof | |
| JPH0758724B2 (en) | Semiconductor device failure analysis method | |
| US5933704A (en) | Method to reveal the architecture of multilayer interconnectors in integrated circuits | |
| JPH0574890A (en) | Failure analytical method of semiconductor devices | |
| JP2949830B2 (en) | Failure analysis method for semiconductor device | |
| JPH04239146A (en) | Analysis method for trouble in semiconductor device | |
| US6563221B1 (en) | Connection structures for integrated circuits and processes for their formation | |
| JP2643583B2 (en) | Failure analysis method for semiconductor device | |
| JP2745556B2 (en) | Failure analysis method for semiconductor device | |
| JP2659285B2 (en) | Method for manufacturing semiconductor device | |
| JP2003068854A (en) | Wiring connection method, wiring connection member, and manufacturing method thereof | |
| JPS6057225B2 (en) | Testing method for semiconductor devices | |
| JP2758765B2 (en) | Method for manufacturing semiconductor device | |
| JPH01241845A (en) | Manufacture of semiconductor device | |
| JP2000133620A (en) | Observed device processing method | |
| JPH0917870A (en) | Electrical Characteristics of Semiconductor Devices with Redundant Fuse Overcoat Removal Method for Breakdown | |
| JP2001338961A (en) | Failure analysis method of semiconductor device | |
| JPS62166547A (en) | Formation of multilayer interconnection structure | |
| JPH06177255A (en) | Manufacture of semiconductor integrated circuit device | |
| JPS60180143A (en) | Semiconductor device | |
| JPH0677227A (en) | Semiconductor integrated circuit |