JPH0452198A - Apparatus for evaluating price of land - Google Patents
Apparatus for evaluating price of landInfo
- Publication number
- JPH0452198A JPH0452198A JP16251990A JP16251990A JPH0452198A JP H0452198 A JPH0452198 A JP H0452198A JP 16251990 A JP16251990 A JP 16251990A JP 16251990 A JP16251990 A JP 16251990A JP H0452198 A JPH0452198 A JP H0452198A
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- data
- price
- information
- land
- tax
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 21
- 238000011835 investigation Methods 0.000 abstract 3
- 230000000052 comparative effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012937 correction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000005611 electricity Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001105 regulatory effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000029305 taxis Effects 0.000 description 1
Landscapes
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
Description
【発明の詳細な説明】
〔産業上の利用分野〕
本発明は地価、即ち、土地の評価をより理想に近く、時
代の変遷に適合させて合理的に判断、策定することがで
きる評価方式に関する。[Detailed Description of the Invention] [Field of Industrial Application] The present invention relates to land prices, that is, an evaluation method that can rationally judge and formulate land evaluation closer to the ideal and adapted to the changes of the times. .
一般的に、土地の価格は実際の取引き価格の外に税金の
対象とされる公共機関設定の価格(公示価格)が存在し
ている。実際の取引き価格は需要の関係で大きく変動す
るが、公示価格は税の公平ざ等の見地から地方税法等で
その上昇率が規制されているもので、取引き価格とはか
なり差があるのが現状である。In general, land prices include, in addition to the actual transaction price, a price set by public institutions (published price) that is subject to tax. Actual transaction prices fluctuate greatly depending on demand, but the rate of increase in published prices is regulated by local tax laws from the perspective of tax equity, and there is a considerable difference from transaction prices. is the current situation.
公示価格は一つの市町村ごとに基準地、及び標準地を決
め、その比較バランスにより策定、決定される。基準地
は項目別に一番高価格な個所である一個所であり、標準
地は数個所選定された地点である。The published price is established and determined by determining the standard land and standard land for each municipality and comparing and balancing them. The standard location is the single location with the highest price for each item, and the standard locations are several locations selected.
しかしながら、この従来の評価方丈にあっては明確な基
準がなく、特に国税庁による相続税やまた固定資産税の
税金面について不平感が生じてしまうものであり、逆に
国税庁サイドとしても明確な基準がないため増額する資
料にもこと欠いていたのが実情である。However, this conventional evaluation method does not have clear standards, which can lead to dissatisfaction, especially regarding the tax aspect of inheritance tax and property tax by the National Tax Agency.On the contrary, the National Tax Agency does not have clear standards. The reality is that there was a lack of materials to increase the amount due to the lack of such materials.
そこで、本発明は必要とする調査地点ごとに地価を形成
するだめの要因の明細を明確に表示し比較によるバラン
スを把握し、3年ごとに行なわれる評価のサンプル価格
を表出することもでき、特に税額の不公平移置を是正し
、税額決定側にも有力な資料を得られるようにした地価
の評価方式を提供することを目的としている。Therefore, the present invention can clearly display the details of the factors that form land prices at each required survey point, grasp the balance through comparison, and display sample prices for evaluations conducted every three years. In particular, the aim is to correct unfair shifts in tax amounts and to provide a land price evaluation method that allows tax amount determination parties to obtain useful data.
この目的を達成するために、本発明に係る地価の評価方
式は、基準地、標準地、任意調査地点ごとに、道路情報
、交通情報、商業情報、公共施設のプラス及びマイナス
情報、地域要因のプラス及びマイナス情報を調べて、そ
の内容により予め設定されたランクによって点数を与え
、それに公示価格情報、相続税情報、固定資産税情報、
不動産鑑定価格情報を加味し、一覧できる調査票にまと
めることを特徴としている。In order to achieve this objective, the land price evaluation method according to the present invention includes road information, traffic information, commercial information, positive and negative information on public facilities, and regional factors for each reference site, standard site, and arbitrary survey point. Examine the positive and negative information and give points according to preset ranks based on the content, and then calculate the published price information, inheritance tax information, fixed asset tax information, etc.
It is characterized by taking into account real estate appraisal price information and compiling it into a survey form that can be viewed at a glance.
ト記した構成としたことにより、任意地点における地価
形成要因が明確に表記され、比較バランスを正確に把握
することが可能となって、特に税金に関して納得のいく
評価を実現することができる。By adopting the structure described above, the land price formation factors at any point are clearly indicated, making it possible to accurately grasp the comparative balance, and realizing a satisfactory evaluation, especially regarding taxes.
次シこ、本発明の実施の一例を説明する。 Next, an example of implementation of the present invention will be described.
本発明にあって、任意地点の地価評価を客観的に把握す
るためには、基準地及び標準地と比較してバランスを見
ることになる。即ち、調査地点(基準地、標準地、任意
調査地点)ごとに地価を形成する要因を調査し、その情
報は内容によりランク分けして点数を付点していく。こ
の情報には大別して5種類存在する。第一は道路情報で
あり、近辺道路の種類(国道、県道等)、その幅員、舗
装の有無、歩道、側溝等の有無及び連続性等によりポイ
ントが加点されていく。第二は交通情報であり、駅、/
へス停等の有無、距離、本数等により加点される。また
第三は商業情報であり、生活に電着する大型店舗商店街
等の有無とそこまでの距離により加点される。第四は公
共施設情報であり、都市公園、役所、学校、病院、図書
館等の有無及びその距離によりプラス加点されていくが
、ゴミ処理場等の場合はその距離も加味してマイナス加
点される。最後は地域要因情報であり下水道、ガス、電
気等の有無に加え、区画整理の有無等によりプラス加点
されるが、地質の悪さや浸水、騒音等はマイナス加点さ
れていく。これらを明細に表出して総得点を出す訳だが
、諸々の事情を加味しての補正が最終的に加えられ、任
意地点のポイントがはじき出される。In the present invention, in order to objectively grasp the land price evaluation of an arbitrary point, the balance is compared with a standard place and a standard place. That is, the factors that form land prices are investigated for each survey point (standard site, standard site, optional survey site), and the information is ranked and assigned points based on the content. There are five types of this information. The first is road information, and points are added based on the type of nearby roads (national highways, prefectural roads, etc.), their width, whether they are paved or not, the presence or absence of sidewalks, gutters, etc., and their continuity. The second is traffic information, including stations, /
Points are added based on the presence or absence of bus stops, distance, number of stops, etc. The third category is commercial information, and points are added based on the presence or absence of large-scale shopping malls in one's daily life and the distance to them. The fourth is public facility information, and points are added based on the presence and distance of city parks, government offices, schools, hospitals, libraries, etc., but in the case of garbage disposal sites, points are added minus points based on the distance. . The last piece of information is regional factor information, and in addition to the presence or absence of sewerage, gas, electricity, etc., positive points are added depending on the presence or absence of land readjustment, etc., but negative points are added for poor geology, flooding, noise, etc. These are detailed and the total score is calculated, but in the end, corrections are made to take into account various circumstances, and points are calculated from arbitrary points.
また、このポイント明細を評価するために、基準地、標
準地(平均)と比較してバランスを見ると、その任意点
の評価が大概的に明らかになってぐる。さらに、これに
加えて、国土庁の公示価格情報、国税庁の相続税情報、
固定資産税情報(過去のものとの比較)、及び民間にお
ける不動産鑑定価格情報も同時に表出することにより、
当該地の評価がより一層明確化されてくる。In addition, in order to evaluate the point details, if you look at the balance by comparing it with the standard place and the standard place (average), the evaluation of that arbitrary point will become clear for the most part. Furthermore, in addition to this, the National Land Agency's published price information, the National Tax Agency's inheritance tax information,
By displaying fixed asset tax information (comparison with past information) and private real estate appraisal value information at the same time,
The evaluation of the area in question will become even clearer.
上記したように、本実施例に係る地価の評価方式による
と、地価評価を形成する要因の明細が明確となって基準
地や標準地との比較バランスを明確に把握することがで
き、過去の評価からの比較率により、分析が容易となり
、次期評価のサンプル価格を算出することができ、それ
にIll員の決定した評価額を加味しての決定調書を作
成できる。As mentioned above, according to the land price evaluation method according to this example, the details of the factors that form the land price evaluation are clear, and the comparative balance with reference land and standard land can be clearly understood, and the past The comparison rate from the evaluation facilitates the analysis, allows the calculation of the sample price for the next evaluation, and creates a decision report by adding the evaluation amount determined by the Ill.
さらに、出来上がった調査票を基に、各種の一覧表やグ
ラフ等が容易に作成できるようになっている。Furthermore, various lists, graphs, etc. can be easily created based on the completed questionnaire.
上述したように、本発明に係る地価の評価方式によると
、地価の評価がより客観的に、明確に比較して表出され
るために、その把握が容易となり、特に各種税額におい
て理想に近い算定がなされる。また、各地点においても
、認識が具体的となって不公平感が是正されていくこと
も期待できるものとなっている。As described above, according to the land price evaluation method according to the present invention, land price evaluation is expressed more objectively and clearly in comparison, making it easier to understand and, in particular, achieving calculations that are close to ideal for various tax amounts. will be done. It is also hoped that awareness will become more concrete in each region and that the sense of unfairness will be rectified.
Claims (1)
、交通情報、商業情報、公共施設のプラス及びマイナス
情報、地域要因のプラス及びマイナス情報を調べて、そ
の内容により予め設定されたランクによって点数を与え
、それに公示価格情報、相続税情報、固定資産税情報、
不動産鑑定価格情報を加味し、一覧できる調査票にまと
めることを特徴とする地価の評価方式。(1) Check the road information, traffic information, commercial information, positive and negative information of public facilities, and positive and negative information of regional factors for each standard site, standard site, and arbitrary survey point, and set it in advance based on the content. Points are given based on rank, and public price information, inheritance tax information, fixed asset tax information,
A land price evaluation method that takes into account real estate appraisal price information and compiles it into a survey form that can be viewed at a glance.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP16251990A JPH0452198A (en) | 1990-06-20 | 1990-06-20 | Apparatus for evaluating price of land |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP16251990A JPH0452198A (en) | 1990-06-20 | 1990-06-20 | Apparatus for evaluating price of land |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JPH0452198A true JPH0452198A (en) | 1992-02-20 |
Family
ID=15756165
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP16251990A Pending JPH0452198A (en) | 1990-06-20 | 1990-06-20 | Apparatus for evaluating price of land |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JPH0452198A (en) |
Cited By (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP2002109011A (en) * | 2000-09-28 | 2002-04-12 | Asahi Kasei Corp | Real estate evaluation support system |
| US7289965B1 (en) * | 2001-08-10 | 2007-10-30 | Freddie Mac | Systems and methods for home value scoring |
| US7451095B1 (en) | 2002-10-30 | 2008-11-11 | Freddie Mac | Systems and methods for income scoring |
| US7711574B1 (en) * | 2001-08-10 | 2010-05-04 | Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac) | System and method for providing automated value estimates of properties as of a specified previous time period |
| US7797166B1 (en) | 2002-10-30 | 2010-09-14 | Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac) | Systems and methods for generating a model for income scoring |
| US7835919B1 (en) | 2001-08-10 | 2010-11-16 | Freddie Mac | Systems and methods for home value scoring |
-
1990
- 1990-06-20 JP JP16251990A patent/JPH0452198A/en active Pending
Cited By (10)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP2002109011A (en) * | 2000-09-28 | 2002-04-12 | Asahi Kasei Corp | Real estate evaluation support system |
| US7289965B1 (en) * | 2001-08-10 | 2007-10-30 | Freddie Mac | Systems and methods for home value scoring |
| US7711574B1 (en) * | 2001-08-10 | 2010-05-04 | Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac) | System and method for providing automated value estimates of properties as of a specified previous time period |
| US7835919B1 (en) | 2001-08-10 | 2010-11-16 | Freddie Mac | Systems and methods for home value scoring |
| US7974854B1 (en) | 2001-08-10 | 2011-07-05 | Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac) | Systems and methods for retrospective home value scoring |
| US8682682B1 (en) | 2001-08-10 | 2014-03-25 | Freddie Mac | Systems and methods for generating a model for home value scoring |
| US7451095B1 (en) | 2002-10-30 | 2008-11-11 | Freddie Mac | Systems and methods for income scoring |
| US7797166B1 (en) | 2002-10-30 | 2010-09-14 | Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac) | Systems and methods for generating a model for income scoring |
| US8401868B1 (en) | 2002-10-30 | 2013-03-19 | Freddie Mac | System and method for providing an income score of an applicant based on an income score model |
| US11244386B1 (en) | 2002-10-30 | 2022-02-08 | Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac) | Systems and methods for generating a model for income scoring |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Clifton et al. | The development and testing of an audit for the pedestrian environment | |
| Parks et al. | Characterizing neighborhood pedestrian environments with secondary data | |
| Mikelbank | Spatial analysis of the relationship between housing values and investments in transportation infrastructure | |
| US20180211350A1 (en) | Urban road network asset valuation method, apparatus and system | |
| Jones et al. | Seamless travel: Measuring bicycle and pedestrian activity in San Diego County and its relationship to land use, transportation, safety, and facility type | |
| Cruise et al. | A comparison of road-and footpath-based walkability indices and their associations with active travel | |
| Davidson et al. | Urban projects manual | |
| Daley et al. | Foot-based microscale audit of light rail network in Montreal Canada | |
| Ussery et al. | Sampling methodology and reliability of a representative walkability audit | |
| JPH0452198A (en) | Apparatus for evaluating price of land | |
| Perkins et al. | Mapping urban revitalization: using GIS spatial analysis to evaluate a new housing policy | |
| Carey | Impact of highways on property values: Case study of the Superstition Freeway Corridor | |
| Jimi-Oni et al. | Impact of Road Rehabilitation on Property Value: A Case of Lasu-Isheri Road, Igando, Lagos State | |
| Maddock et al. | A statewide observational assessment of the pedestrian and bicycling environment in Hawaii, 2010 | |
| Buffington et al. | Non-user impacts of different highway designs as measured by land use and land value changes | |
| DiMento et al. | Local government land use policy responses to the Century Freeway/Transitway | |
| Vinay et al. | Study on Access Roads in Select Locations in Western Pune City | |
| Sedaghat | Evaluation of audit tools for age-friendly active transportation planning in New Brunswick | |
| Potsiou et al. | Mass-valuation in Greece: Monitoring Tax and Market Values | |
| Khan et al. | A Methodological Framework for Prioritizing and Enhancing Built Environment Attributes Affecting Pedestrian Walkability in Indian Markets | |
| Kinuthia | The effect of road infrastructural improvement on performance of the matatu industry in Kenya. A case study of Thika super-highway | |
| Adirinekso et al. | The Influence of Amenities Contribution on Wages and Rents Differentials in Indonesia | |
| Tithi et al. | Development of a Practical Methodology for Evaluating the Conditions of Sidewalks in Dhaka City | |
| TITĂ et al. | IMPACT OF PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT INDICATORS IN LOCAL PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION | |
| Horrell et al. | What are the effects of a'shared space'scheme on different users? |