JP7330093B2 - Solar power generation facility management system and solar power generation facility management method - Google Patents
Solar power generation facility management system and solar power generation facility management method Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- JP7330093B2 JP7330093B2 JP2019234799A JP2019234799A JP7330093B2 JP 7330093 B2 JP7330093 B2 JP 7330093B2 JP 2019234799 A JP2019234799 A JP 2019234799A JP 2019234799 A JP2019234799 A JP 2019234799A JP 7330093 B2 JP7330093 B2 JP 7330093B2
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- power generation
- photovoltaic power
- control device
- determination
- abnormality
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
- 238000010248 power generation Methods 0.000 title claims description 220
- 238000007726 management method Methods 0.000 title claims description 44
- 230000005856 abnormality Effects 0.000 claims description 66
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 45
- 238000009795 derivation Methods 0.000 claims description 17
- 230000002159 abnormal effect Effects 0.000 claims description 12
- 230000002596 correlated effect Effects 0.000 claims description 7
- 230000000630 rising effect Effects 0.000 claims description 7
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 9
- 101150003196 PCS1 gene Proteins 0.000 description 8
- 101100493726 Phalaenopsis sp. BIBSY212 gene Proteins 0.000 description 8
- 101100030895 Saccharomyces cerevisiae (strain ATCC 204508 / S288c) RPT4 gene Proteins 0.000 description 8
- 238000009434 installation Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000002776 aggregation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000004220 aggregation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000002265 prevention Effects 0.000 description 2
- 229910021417 amorphous silicon Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 150000001875 compounds Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000004973 liquid crystal related substance Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910021421 monocrystalline silicon Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 229910021420 polycrystalline silicon Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000004065 semiconductor Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000001629 suppression Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000010409 thin film Substances 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02E—REDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
- Y02E10/00—Energy generation through renewable energy sources
- Y02E10/50—Photovoltaic [PV] energy
- Y02E10/56—Power conversion systems, e.g. maximum power point trackers
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02E—REDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
- Y02E40/00—Technologies for an efficient electrical power generation, transmission or distribution
- Y02E40/70—Smart grids as climate change mitigation technology in the energy generation sector
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y04—INFORMATION OR COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES HAVING AN IMPACT ON OTHER TECHNOLOGY AREAS
- Y04S—SYSTEMS INTEGRATING TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO POWER NETWORK OPERATION, COMMUNICATION OR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES FOR IMPROVING THE ELECTRICAL POWER GENERATION, TRANSMISSION, DISTRIBUTION, MANAGEMENT OR USAGE, i.e. SMART GRIDS
- Y04S10/00—Systems supporting electrical power generation, transmission or distribution
- Y04S10/12—Monitoring or controlling equipment for energy generation units, e.g. distributed energy generation [DER] or load-side generation
- Y04S10/123—Monitoring or controlling equipment for energy generation units, e.g. distributed energy generation [DER] or load-side generation the energy generation units being or involving renewable energy sources
Landscapes
- Remote Monitoring And Control Of Power-Distribution Networks (AREA)
- Supply And Distribution Of Alternating Current (AREA)
- Photovoltaic Devices (AREA)
Description
本発明は、広域に分散配置される複数の太陽光発電設備が正常か否かを判定する太陽光発電設備の管理システム、及び太陽光発電設備の管理方法に関する。 The present invention relates to a photovoltaic power generation facility management system and a photovoltaic power generation facility management method for determining whether or not a plurality of photovoltaic power generation facilities distributed over a wide area are normal.
これまで、太陽光発電設備の管理システムとして、広域に分散配置される複数の太陽光発電設備の発電データを収集し、当該発電データに基づいて夫々の太陽光発電設備が正常か否かを判定するものが知られている(特許文献1を参照)。
より詳細には、当該管理システムは、例えば、特定の地域に存在する特定の太陽光発電設備が正常か否かを判定するのに際し、特定の地域における日照時間データや太陽高度データ等に基づいて、特定の地域の標準発電量を算出し、当該標準電力量から、特定の太陽光発電設備の発電電力量が大きく乖離している場合に、特定の太陽光発電設備が正常でないと判断する。
Until now, as a management system for photovoltaic power generation facilities, power generation data from multiple photovoltaic power generation facilities distributed over a wide area is collected, and based on the power generation data, it is determined whether each photovoltaic power generation facility is normal. It is known to do so (see Patent Literature 1).
More specifically, for example, when determining whether a specific photovoltaic power generation facility existing in a specific area is normal, the management system is based on sunshine hours data, solar altitude data, etc. in a specific area , the standard power generation amount in a specific area is calculated, and if the power generation amount of a specific solar power generation facility deviates greatly from the standard power generation amount, it is determined that the specific solar power generation facility is not normal.
上記特許文献1に開示の技術は、特定の太陽光発電設備が正常か否かの判定を、特定の太陽光発電設備の所定時間における発電電力量に基づいて判定するものであるから、当該所定時間における気象変化に伴う日照時間の変化等による発電電力量の変動が、正常か異常かの判定に大きく影響を及ぼす虞があり、新たな技術の開発が望まれていた。 The technology disclosed in Patent Document 1 determines whether or not a specific photovoltaic power generation facility is normal based on the amount of power generated by the specific photovoltaic power generation facility at a predetermined time. There is a risk that fluctuations in the amount of power generated due to changes in sunshine hours due to changes in weather over time can greatly affect the determination of normality or abnormality, and development of new technology has been desired.
本発明は、上述の課題に鑑みてなされたものであり、その目的は、気象変動に伴う日照時間の変化等がある場合であっても、判定対象の太陽光発電設備が正常か否かを比較的精度良く判定できる太陽光発電設備の管理システム、及び太陽光発電設備の管理方法を提供することにある。 The present invention has been made in view of the above-mentioned problems, and its object is to determine whether or not the photovoltaic power generation equipment to be determined is normal even when there is a change in sunshine hours due to weather changes. It is an object of the present invention to provide a management system for a photovoltaic power generation facility and a method for managing the photovoltaic power generation facility capable of relatively accurate determination.
上記目的を達成するための太陽光発電設備の管理システムは、
広域に分散配置される複数の太陽光発電設備が正常か否かを判定する管理システムであって、その特徴構成は、
複数の前記太陽光発電設備のうちの判定対象の前記太陽光発電設備の所定期間における複数の時刻での特定時間幅の発電電力量と、前記判定対象を除く複数の前記太陽光発電設備のうちで相関導出対象の前記太陽光発電設備の前記所定期間における前記複数の時刻での前記特定時間幅の発電電力量とから相関係数を導出し、当該相関係数を直接用いて判定対象の前記太陽光発電設備の異常を判定する制御装置を備え、
前記制御装置は、現時点よりも前の過去の時点において前記相関係数が予め定められる異常判定閾値以上で、且つ現時点において前記相関係数が前記異常判定閾値未満である場合に、前記判定対象の前記太陽光発電設備が異常の可能性があると判定する第1判定処理を実行する点にある。
The management system for photovoltaic power generation facilities to achieve the above objectives is
A management system for determining whether or not a plurality of photovoltaic power generation facilities distributed over a wide area is normal, the characteristic configuration of which is as follows:
A power generation amount of the solar power generation facility to be determined among the plurality of solar power generation facilities in a specific time span at a plurality of times in a predetermined period, and among the plurality of solar power generation facilities excluding the determination target deriving a correlation coefficient from the amount of power generated in the specific time span at the plurality of times in the predetermined period of the solar power generation facility to be correlated, and directly using the correlation coefficient to determine the Equipped with a control device that determines abnormalities in the photovoltaic power generation equipment ,
When the correlation coefficient is equal to or greater than a predetermined abnormality determination threshold value at a past time point before the current time point and the correlation coefficient is less than the abnormality determination threshold value at the current time point, the control device determines whether the determination target is The point is that the first determination process is executed to determine that the photovoltaic power generation facility may be abnormal .
上記目的を達成するための太陽光発電設備の管理方法は、
広域に分散配置される複数の太陽光発電設備が正常か否かを判定する管理方法であって、その特徴構成は、
複数の前記太陽光発電設備のうちの判定対象の前記太陽光発電設備の所定期間における複数の時刻での特定時間幅の発電電力量と、前記判定対象を除く複数の前記太陽光発電設備のうちで相関導出対象の前記太陽光発電設備の前記所定期間における前記複数の時刻での前記特定時間幅の発電電力量とから相関係数を導出し、当該相関係数を直接用いて判定対象の前記太陽光発電設備の異常を判定し、
現時点よりも前の過去の時点において前記相関係数が予め定められる異常判定閾値以上で、且つ現時点において前記相関係数が前記異常判定閾値未満である場合に、前記判定対象の前記太陽光発電設備が異常の可能性があると判定する第1判定処理を実行する点にある。
The management method of the photovoltaic power generation facility to achieve the above purpose is
A management method for determining whether or not a plurality of photovoltaic power generation facilities distributed over a wide area is normal, the characteristic configuration of which is as follows:
A power generation amount of the solar power generation facility to be determined among the plurality of solar power generation facilities in a specific time span at a plurality of times in a predetermined period, and among the plurality of solar power generation facilities excluding the determination target deriving a correlation coefficient from the amount of power generated in the specific time span at the plurality of times in the predetermined period of the solar power generation facility to be correlated, and directly using the correlation coefficient to determine the Judge the abnormality of the photovoltaic power generation equipment ,
When the correlation coefficient is equal to or greater than a predetermined abnormality determination threshold value at a past time point before the current time point, and the correlation coefficient is less than the abnormality determination threshold value at the current time point, the solar power generation facility to be determined. is to execute a first determination process for determining that there is a possibility that there is an abnormality .
上記特徴構成によれば、判定対象の太陽光発電設備の所定期間における複数の時刻での特定時間幅の発電電力量と、相関導出対象の太陽光発電設備の所定期間における複数の時刻での特定時間幅の発電電力量とから導出される相関係数を直接用いて判定対象の太陽光発電設備の異常を判定するから、例えば、所定期間のある特定時間幅において広域で発生する気象変化があり、所定期間のある特定時間幅での発電電力量が変化する場合であっても、判定対象の太陽光発電設備の発電電力量と相関導出対象の太陽光発電設備の発電電力量の双方に略同傾向の変化が発生するため、当該広域で発生する気象変化が相関係数に与える影響は十分に小さいものとなる。
これにより、これまで説明してきた相関係数を直接用いた太陽光発電設備の異常の判定によれば、特定時間幅での発電電力量を直接用いて太陽光発電設備の正常か否かの判定を行う場合に比べ、広域で発生する気象変化の影響を良好に排除した判定を実現できる。
また、上記特徴構成によれば、相関係数を直接用いることで判定対象の太陽光発電設備の異常を判定するから、所定期間における複数の時刻での特定時間幅の発電電力量の夫々の相関度合いを反映した値(相関係数)に基づいて異常を判定することができ、例えば、所定期間の発電電力量の移動平均等を比較して異常の判定を行う場合に比べて、より精度の高い異常の判定を実行できる。
尚、太陽光発電設備のソーラーパネルは、可動部がないシステムであることから、故障の少ない安定した発電システムとして知られている。このことから、本発明では、複数の太陽光発電設備のうち、2つ以上の太陽光発電設備が、同じタイミングで故障することがないという前提で異常の判定を行っている。
According to the above characteristic configuration, the amount of power generated in a specific time period at a plurality of times in a predetermined period of the solar power generation facility to be determined, and the identification of the solar power generation facility to be correlated at a plurality of times in the predetermined period Since the abnormality of the solar power generation facility to be determined is determined by directly using the correlation coefficient derived from the amount of power generated in the time span, for example, there is a weather change that occurs over a wide area in a certain time span of a predetermined period. , even if the amount of power generation changes in a specific time span of a predetermined period, the amount of power generated by the solar power generation facility to be determined and the power generation amount of the solar power generation facility to be correlated derivation are approximately Since changes with the same tendency occur, the influence of weather changes occurring in the wide area on the correlation coefficient is sufficiently small.
As a result, according to the determination of the abnormality of the photovoltaic power generation equipment directly using the correlation coefficient described so far, it is possible to determine whether the photovoltaic power generation equipment is normal by directly using the amount of power generated in a specific time period. In comparison with the case of performing
In addition, according to the above characteristic configuration, since the abnormality of the photovoltaic power generation facility to be determined is determined by directly using the correlation coefficient, each correlation of the generated power amount of the specific time width at a plurality of times in the predetermined period Abnormality can be determined based on a value (correlation coefficient) that reflects the degree of failure. High anomaly judgment can be performed.
Since the solar panel of the photovoltaic power generation facility is a system without moving parts, it is known as a stable power generation system with few failures. Therefore, in the present invention, abnormality determination is performed on the premise that two or more of the plurality of photovoltaic power generation facilities do not fail at the same timing.
太陽光発電設備の発電電力量は日照状態に応じて変化するため、設置箇所(例えば、経度や緯度)や設置方向や設置角度等が異なる太陽光発電設備同士の相関係数は、予め低い場合がある。一例を挙げると、南東向きに設置された太陽光発電設備と南西向きに設置された太陽光発電設備では、1日のうちで日照状態になる時間帯がずれるため、両者が正常な状態である場合であっても、相関係数は低くなる場合がある。
上記特徴構成によれば、制御装置が、第1判定処理において、現時点よりも前の過去の時点において相関係数が予め定められる異常判定閾値以上で、且つ現時点において相関係数が異常判定閾値未満である場合に、判定対象の太陽光発電設備が異常の可能性があると判定することで、過去の時点において相関係数の低い太陽光発電設備の現時点での相関係数を、判定対象から除外することができ、判定の精度をより向上させることができる。
因みに、過去の時点の相関係数としては、昨年同月同時刻での特定時間幅における相関係数の平均、前月同時刻での特定時間幅における相関係数の平均、前日同時刻での特定時間幅における相関係数等を用いることができる。
Since the amount of power generated by photovoltaic power generation facilities changes according to the amount of sunlight, the correlation coefficient between photovoltaic power generation facilities with different installation locations (e.g., longitude and latitude), installation directions, installation angles, etc. is low in advance. There is For example, a solar power generation facility installed facing southeast and a solar power generation facility facing southwest are in normal conditions because the hours of the day when they become sunny differ. Even then, the correlation coefficient may be low.
According to the above characteristic configuration, in the first determination process, the control device causes the correlation coefficient to be equal to or greater than a predetermined abnormality determination threshold value at a past time point before the current time point, and the correlation coefficient at the current time point to be less than the abnormality determination threshold value. , the current correlation coefficient of the solar power generation facility with a low correlation coefficient in the past is determined from the determination target by determining that there is a possibility that there is an abnormality in the solar power generation facility to be determined. It can be excluded, and the accuracy of determination can be further improved.
By the way, the correlation coefficient at the past point in time is the average of the correlation coefficient in the specific time span at the same time in the same month last year, the average of the correlation coefficient in the specific time span at the same time in the previous month, and the specific time in the previous day at the same time. A correlation coefficient or the like in width can be used.
太陽光発電設備の管理システムの更なる特徴構成は、
前記制御装置は、前記第1判定処理を複数の前記判定対象の前記太陽光発電設備に対して実行するものであり、
少なくとも3つ以上の前記判定対象の前記太陽光発電設備に異常の可能性があるという停止条件が満たされる場合、異常の判定を停止する停止処理を実行する点にある。
A further characteristic configuration of the management system for photovoltaic power generation facilities is:
The control device executes the first determination process for a plurality of the solar power generation facilities to be determined,
When a stop condition that at least three or more of the photovoltaic power generation facilities to be determined are likely to be abnormal is satisfied, a stop process is executed to stop determination of abnormality.
上述したように、太陽光発電設備は、システムの安定性が高い等の理由により複数が同時に異常と判定される可能性は十分に低いと考えられている。
上記特徴構成の如く、第1判定処理において、少なくとも3つ以上の前記判定対象の前記太陽光発電設備の異常の可能性があるという停止条件が満たされる判定した場合、天候異常の可能性があると判断し、異常判定の停止処理を実行することで、判定精度の向上を図ることができる。
As described above, it is considered that the possibility that a plurality of photovoltaic power generation facilities are determined to be abnormal at the same time is sufficiently low due to reasons such as high system stability.
As in the above characteristic configuration, when it is determined in the first determination process that the stop condition that at least three or more of the photovoltaic power generation facilities subject to determination are likely to be abnormal is satisfied, there is a possibility of weather abnormality. By determining that and executing the stop processing of the abnormality determination, it is possible to improve the determination accuracy.
太陽光発電設備の管理システムの更なる特徴構成は、
前記制御装置は、前記広域内の天候情報を外部から取得可能に構成され、
前記天候情報に前記広域内で天候異常を含むという停止条件が満たされる場合、異常の判定を停止する停止処理を実行する点にある。
A further characteristic configuration of the management system for photovoltaic power generation facilities is:
The control device is configured to be able to acquire weather information within the wide area from the outside,
When the weather information satisfies a stop condition that the weather information includes an abnormal weather within the wide area, a stop process is executed to stop determination of the abnormality.
広域内で天候異常がある場合には、導出された相関係数が、判定対象の太陽光発電設備が正常であるにも関わらず、低い値となることがある。
上記特徴構成によれば、天候情報に広域内で天候異常を含むという停止条件が満たされる場合には、異常の判定を停止する停止処理を実行することで、判定対象の太陽光発電設備が正常であるにも関わらず異常であると判定されることを防止できる。
When there is weather anomaly in a wide area, the derived correlation coefficient may be a low value even though the photovoltaic power generation facility to be determined is normal.
According to the above characteristic configuration, when the stop condition that the weather information includes a weather abnormality in a wide area is satisfied, by executing the stop processing for stopping the abnormality determination, the solar power generation equipment to be determined is normal. Therefore, it is possible to prevent the determination that there is an abnormality in spite of the above.
太陽光発電設備の管理システムの更なる特徴構成は、
前記制御装置は、系統が停電状態にあるか否かを判定可能に構成され、
前記系統が前記停電状態であるという停止条件が満たされる場合、異常の判定を停止する停止処理を実行する点にある。
A further characteristic configuration of the management system for photovoltaic power generation facilities is:
The control device is configured to be able to determine whether the system is in a power failure state,
The point is that, when the stop condition that the system is in the power failure state is satisfied, a stop process for stopping the determination of abnormality is executed.
落雷等の自然災害により系統が停電状態にある場合、太陽光発電設備は系統から切り離されるので、通常、発電電力量は0となる。また、太陽光発電設備のうち自立して重要負荷へ電力供給するものについては、発電及び電力供給を継続することになるが、自立時は系統連系時と異なり、無効電力も太陽光発電設備から供給されることになるので、供給できる有効電力は一般的に減少する。
上記特徴構成によれば、系統が停電状態であるという停止条件が満たされる場合、異常の判定を停止する停止処理を実行することで、停電時で通常時とは発電電力量が大きくことなる場合に、妥当でない異常の判定が実行されることを防止できる。
When the system is in a blackout state due to a natural disaster such as a lightning strike, the photovoltaic power generation equipment is disconnected from the system, so normally the amount of power generated is zero. In addition, among photovoltaic power generation facilities that are self-sustaining and supply power to important loads, power generation and power supply will continue. Therefore, the active power that can be supplied is generally reduced.
According to the above characteristic configuration, when the stop condition that the system is in a power failure state is satisfied, by executing the stop processing for stopping the abnormality determination, the amount of power generated during the power failure may differ greatly from that during normal times. In addition, it is possible to prevent execution of inappropriate abnormality determination.
太陽光発電設備の管理システムの更なる特徴構成は、
前記制御装置は、系統電圧が所定閾値以上である系統電圧上昇状態であるか否かに係る系統電圧情報を保持可能に構成され、
前記制御装置が、前記系統電圧情報から前記系統電圧が前記系統電圧上昇状態であるという停止条件が満たされる場合、異常の判定を停止する停止処理を実行する点にある。
A further characteristic configuration of the management system for photovoltaic power generation facilities is:
The control device is configured to be able to hold system voltage information regarding whether or not the system voltage is in a rising state in which the system voltage is equal to or higher than a predetermined threshold,
The control device is characterized in that, when a stop condition that the system voltage is in the system voltage rising state from the system voltage information is satisfied, the control device executes a stop process of stopping the abnormality determination.
例えば、多くの発電電力を供給可能な太陽光発電設備が過密に系統連系している箇所においては、太陽光発電設備からの逆潮流により、系統電圧が法定で定められる上限値よりも高くなる場合があり、このような場合には、太陽光発電設備のパワーコンディショナの系統電圧上昇抑制機能が働き、太陽光発電設備の有効電力制御により発電電力量が抑制されるため、このような場合に本発明に係る異常判定を実行すると、太陽光発電設備の現状を適正に反映しない判定がなされる虞がある。
上記特徴構成によれば、制御装置は、系統電圧情報から系統電圧が系統電圧上昇状態であるという停止条件が満たされる場合、異常の判定を停止する停止処理を実行するから、太陽光発電設備の現状を適切に反映しない判定が行われることを防止できる。
For example, in locations where photovoltaic power generation facilities capable of supplying a large amount of generated power are interconnected to the grid, reverse power flow from the photovoltaic power generation facilities causes the system voltage to rise above the legal upper limit. In such cases, the system voltage rise suppression function of the power conditioner of the photovoltaic power generation facility works, and the amount of power generated is suppressed by the active power control of the photovoltaic power generation facility. If the abnormality determination according to the present invention is executed in the second stage, there is a risk that the determination will not properly reflect the current state of the photovoltaic power generation facility.
According to the above characteristic configuration, when the system voltage information satisfies the condition that the system voltage is in a rising system voltage state, the control device executes the stop process for stopping the abnormality determination. It is possible to prevent a judgment that does not appropriately reflect the current situation from being made.
太陽光発電設備の管理システムの更なる特徴構成は、
前記制御装置は、広域に分散配置する複数の前記太陽光発電設備の前記所定期間における前記複数の時刻での前記特定時間幅の発電電力量を経時的に記憶する記憶部を有し、
前記停止処理を実行しているときの前記記憶部に記憶された発電電力量は、前記相関係数の導出から除外する点にある。
A further characteristic configuration of the management system for photovoltaic power generation facilities is:
The control device has a storage unit that stores over time the power generation amount of the specific time width at the plurality of times in the predetermined period of the plurality of solar power generation facilities distributed over a wide area,
The power generation amount stored in the storage unit while the stop processing is being executed is excluded from the derivation of the correlation coefficient.
上記特徴構成によれば、停止処理が発生したときの発電電力量のデータを、異常の判定を行う基礎とするデータから除外するから、特に、現時点よりも過去の時点の発電電力量を用いて太陽光発電設備の異常の判定を行う場合において、その判定精度を向上できる。 According to the above characteristic configuration, the data of the generated power amount at the time when the stop process occurred is excluded from the data used as the basis for determining the abnormality, so that the generated power amount at the point in time past the present time is used. It is possible to improve the accuracy of judgment when judging abnormality of photovoltaic power generation equipment.
太陽光発電設備の管理システムの更なる特徴構成は、
前記制御装置は、一の前記判定対象の前記太陽光発電設備の異常の判定に際し、異なる2以上の前記相関導出対象の前記太陽光発電設備との間で導出される前記相関係数に基づいて、前記第1判定処理を実行し、前記第1判定処理の判定結果の複数において異常の可能性があると判定された場合に、前記判定対象の前記太陽光発電設備の異常の可能性が高いと判定する第2判定処理を実行する点にある。
A further characteristic configuration of the management system for photovoltaic power generation facilities is:
The control device, when determining an abnormality in one of the determination target solar power generation facilities, based on the correlation coefficient derived between two or more different correlation derivation target solar power generation facilities , the first determination process is executed, and when it is determined that there is a possibility of abnormality in a plurality of determination results of the first determination process, the possibility of abnormality in the solar power generation facility to be determined is high. The point is that a second determination process is executed to determine that
上記特徴構成の如く、異なる2つ以上の相関導出対象の太陽光発電設備との間で実行される複数の第1判定処理の判定結果により「異常の可能性がある」と判定された場合、その判定結果の確度が高いとして、「異常の可能性が高い」と判定することで、判定結果に信頼度を付与して提示することができる。 As in the above characteristic configuration, when it is determined that "there is a possibility of abnormality" according to the determination results of a plurality of first determination processes performed between two or more different correlation derivation target solar power generation facilities, By judging that the probability of the judgment result is high and that "the possibility of abnormality is high", the judgment result can be given reliability and presented.
太陽光発電設備の管理システムの更なる特徴構成は、
前記制御装置は、複数の太陽光発電設備の少なくとも一つとして設けられている点にある。
A further characteristic configuration of the management system for photovoltaic power generation facilities is:
The control device is provided as at least one of a plurality of photovoltaic power generation facilities.
上記特徴構成によれば、例えば、ネットワーク回線に接続された太陽光発電設備のパワーコンディショナとして上述の制御装置を備えることにより、当該パワーコンディショナとしての制御装置が、例えば、近傍の太陽光発電設備からの発電電力量を定期的に受信し、自身の太陽光発電設備の発電電力量との相関係数を導出し、自身が設けられる太陽光発電設備が正常か否かの判定を、別途管理サーバ等を設けることなく良好に行うことができる。 According to the above-described characteristic configuration, for example, by providing the above-described control device as a power conditioner of a photovoltaic power generation facility connected to a network line, the control device as the power conditioner can control, for example, a nearby photovoltaic power generation It periodically receives the amount of power generated from the facility, derives the correlation coefficient with the amount of power generated by its own solar power generation facility, and determines whether the solar power generation facility installed by itself is normal or not. It can be performed satisfactorily without providing a management server or the like.
太陽光発電設備の管理システムの更なる特徴構成として、前記制御装置は、前記太陽光発電設備とは別に設けられ、且つ通信回線を介して前記太陽光発電設備の前記発電電力量を受信可能に構成されていても構わない。 As a further characteristic configuration of the management system for photovoltaic power generation equipment, the control device is provided separately from the photovoltaic power generation equipment, and is capable of receiving the amount of power generated by the photovoltaic power generation equipment via a communication line. It does not matter if it is configured.
本発明の実施形態に係る太陽光発電設備PVの管理システム100、及びその管理方法は、気候変動に伴う日照時間の変化がある場合であっても、判定対象の太陽光発電設備が正常か否かを比較的精度良く判定できるものに関する。
以下、図面に基づいて実施形態に係る太陽光発電設備PVの管理システム100、及びその管理方法を説明する。
The
A
図1に示すように、当該実施形態に係る管理システム100では、広域に分散配置される複数(当該実施形態では、n個)の太陽光発電設備PV1~PVn(nは2以上の整数)の夫々の発電電力量WPV1~WPVnを電気通信回線Nを介して受信可能な制御装置Sを備えており、当該制御装置Sが、受信した発電電力量WPV1~WPVnに基づいて、判定対象の太陽光発電設備PVm(mは、n以下の任意の整数:図示省略)が正常か否かを判定するものである。制御装置Sは、一般に知られるハードウェアとソフトウェアの協働により実現されるサーバとして設けられる。
尚、判定対象の太陽光発電設備PVmは、固定されたものではなく、制御装置Sが、複数の太陽光発電設備PV1~PVnの中から選択できるものである。
As shown in FIG. 1, in the
The photovoltaic power generation facility PVm to be determined is not fixed, but can be selected by the control device S from among the plurality of photovoltaic power generation facilities PV1 to PVn.
太陽光発電設備PV1~PVnは、実質的に同一の構成を有しているので、以下では、太陽光発電設備PV1を例として説明する。
太陽光発電設備PV1は、複数のソーラーパネルSPを直列に接続したストリングST1a、ST1bを複数(当該実施形態では2つ)備えており、ストリングST1aは逆流防止ダイオードD1aを介して接続箱CB1に接続されており、ストリングST1bは逆流防止ダイオードD1bを介して接続箱CB1に接続されている。
尚、図示は省略するが、ソーラーパネルSPの夫々には、バイパスダイオードが設けられている。これにより、ストリングST1a、ST1bは、何れかのソーラーパネルSPが日照条件の変化等により発電していない状態でも、他のソーラーパネルSPが発電している場合には、他のソーラーパネルSPの出力の合計がストリングの出力となる。
接続箱CB1にてまとめられた電力線は、直流を交流に変換する機能等を有するパワーコンディショナPCS1に接続され、当該パワーコンディショナPCS1は、電力線を介して所定の電力負荷PL1及び系統Kへ接続され、電力負荷PL1及び系統Kへ発電電力が供給可能に構成されている。
Since the photovoltaic power generation facilities PV1 to PVn have substantially the same configuration, the photovoltaic power generation facility PV1 will be described below as an example.
The photovoltaic power generation facility PV1 includes a plurality of (two in this embodiment) strings ST1a and ST1b in which a plurality of solar panels SP are connected in series, and the string ST1a is connected to a junction box CB1 via a backflow prevention diode D1a. , and the string ST1b is connected to the connection box CB1 via the backflow prevention diode D1b.
Although not shown, each solar panel SP is provided with a bypass diode. As a result, even if one of the solar panels SP is not generating power due to a change in sunshine conditions or the like, the strings ST1a and ST1b are able to maintain the output of the other solar panel SP if the other solar panel SP is generating power. is the output string.
The power lines connected by the junction box CB1 are connected to a power conditioner PCS1 having a function such as converting direct current to alternating current, and the power conditioner PCS1 is connected to a predetermined electric power load PL1 and the system K via the power line. , and is configured to be able to supply the generated power to the power load PL1 and the system K.
因みに、複数の太陽光発電設備PV1~PVnの夫々の定格出力は、異なっていても良く、複数の太陽光発電設備PV1~PVnの夫々に設けられるソーラーパネルSPの発電性能及び枚数は、異なっていても構わない。 Incidentally, the rated output of each of the plurality of photovoltaic power generation facilities PV1 to PVn may be different, and the power generation performance and the number of solar panels SP provided in each of the plurality of photovoltaic power generation facilities PV1 to PVn are different. I don't mind.
パワーコンディショナPCS1~PCSnの夫々は、自身に接続される太陽光発電設備PV1~PVnのソーラーパネルSPの総発電電力(単位時間(例えば1時間)当たりの発電電力量)を計測可能に構成されており、当該総発電電力を自身に設けられている記憶部(図示せず)に、逐次経時的に記憶する。
制御装置Sは、電気通信回線Nを通じて、パワーコンディショナPCS1~PCSnに接続されており、パワーコンディショナPCS1~PCSnの記憶部に記憶される経時的な発電電力を、逐次受信可能に構成されている。制御装置Sは、受信した発電電力を、自身の記憶部Dにおいて、パワーコンディショナPCS1~PCSn毎に経時的に記憶する。
Each of the power conditioners PCS1 to PCSn is configured to be able to measure the total power generated by the solar panels SP of the photovoltaic power generation facilities PV1 to PVn connected thereto (the amount of power generated per unit time (for example, one hour)). The total generated power is sequentially stored in a storage unit (not shown) provided therein over time.
The control device S is connected to the power conditioners PCS1 to PCSn through a telecommunication line N, and is configured to be able to sequentially receive the power generated over time stored in the storage units of the power conditioners PCS1 to PCSn. there is The control device S stores the received generated power in its own storage unit D with time for each of the power conditioners PCS1 to PCSn.
ここで、判定対象の太陽光発電設備PVmが「正常」であることについて説明を加える。
一般に、太陽光発電設備PVを構成するソーラーパネルSPの発電電力量は、その材質が単結晶シリコン、多結晶シリコン、薄膜アモルファスシリコン及びCISやCIGS等の化合物半導体の何れにおいても、10年で数%以上の出力が低下し、多い場合には10%程度低下することが知られている。
このため、太陽光発電設備PVが「正常」であることの判定を行うには、予め定めた固定の判定閾値と発電電力量との比較により判定することができないという事情がある。
そこで、制御装置Sでは、以下に示す方法にて、判定対象の太陽光発電設備PVmが正常か否かの判定を行っている。
Here, an explanation will be added about whether the photovoltaic power generation facility PVm to be determined is "normal".
In general, the amount of power generated by a solar panel SP that constitutes a photovoltaic power generation facility PV is several times in 10 years regardless of whether the material is monocrystalline silicon, polycrystalline silicon, thin film amorphous silicon, or a compound semiconductor such as CIS or CIGS. It is known that the output drops by 10% or more, and in many cases, it drops by about 10%.
For this reason, in order to determine whether the photovoltaic power generation facility PV is "normal", there is a situation that it cannot be determined by comparing the predetermined fixed determination threshold value and the generated power amount.
Therefore, in the control device S, the following method is used to determine whether or not the photovoltaic power generation facility PVm to be determined is normal.
制御装置Sは、気象サーバ(図示せず)から電気通信回線Nを介して受信した天候情報と、複数の太陽光発電設備PV1~PVnの経時的に変化する発電電力量と、複数の太陽光発電設備PV1~PVnが接続される系統の停電情報及び系統電圧情報と、異常の判定に用いる処理条件(判定閾値等)とを少なくとも記憶する記憶部Dを備えると共に、判定対象の太陽光発電設備PV1~PVnの異常を判定する第1判定処理部S4a及び第2判定処理部S4bと、第1~4停止条件を満たす場合に停止処理を実行する停止処理部S4cとを有する演算部S4を備えている。
更に、制御装置Sには、演算部S4にて演算される演算結果を表示する液晶ディスプレイ等から成る表示部S3が接続されると共に、演算部S4の処理条件(判定閾値等)の更新等を行うためのキーボードやマウス等の操作部S2が接続されている。
制御装置Sは、複数の太陽光発電設備PV1~PVnのうち判定対象の太陽光発電設備PVmの所定期間(例えば、6時間以上9時間以内の期間:一日の主な日照時間)における複数時刻での特定時間幅(例えば、単位時間としての1時間:雲等の影響による一時的な変動が平準化できる時間)の発電電力量と、判定対象を除く複数の太陽光発電設備PVnのうちで相関導出対象の太陽光発電設備PVk(kは、n以下の任意の整数:図示せず)の所定期間における複数の時刻での特定時間幅の発電電力量とから相関係数Rab(以下の〔表3〕を参照)を導出し、当該相関係数Rabを直接用いて判定対象の太陽光発電設備PVmの異常を判定する。
因みに、判定対象の太陽光発電設備PVm及び相関導出対象の太陽光発電設備PVkは、図2に示す制御フローに従って、制御装置Sにより複数の太陽光発電設備PV1~PVnの中から適宜選択可能に構成される。
The control device S receives weather information from a weather server (not shown) via an electric communication line N, the amount of power generated by the plurality of photovoltaic power generation facilities PV1 to PVn that changes over time, and a plurality of sunlight A storage unit D that stores at least power failure information and system voltage information of the system to which the power generation facilities PV1 to PVn are connected, and processing conditions (determination threshold value, etc.) used for abnormality determination, and a solar power generation facility to be determined. A calculation unit S4 having a first determination processing unit S4a and a second determination processing unit S4b that determine abnormality of PV1 to PVn, and a stop processing unit S4c that executes stop processing when the first to fourth stop conditions are satisfied. ing.
Further, the control device S is connected to a display unit S3 such as a liquid crystal display for displaying the calculation result calculated by the calculation unit S4, and updates the processing conditions (determination threshold value, etc.) of the calculation unit S4. An operation unit S2 such as a keyboard and a mouse is connected to perform the operation.
The control device S controls the determination target photovoltaic power generation facility PVm among the plurality of photovoltaic power generation facilities PV1 to PVn for a predetermined period (for example, a period of 6 hours or more and 9 hours or less: main sunshine hours in a day) at a plurality of times. The amount of power generated in a specific time period (for example, 1 hour as a unit time: the time during which temporary fluctuations due to the influence of clouds, etc. can be leveled), and among the multiple photovoltaic power generation facilities PVn excluding the judgment target Correlation coefficient Rab (below [ Table 3]) is derived, and the abnormality of the photovoltaic power generation facility PVm to be determined is determined by directly using the correlation coefficient Rab.
Incidentally, the photovoltaic power generation facility PVm to be determined and the photovoltaic power generation facility PVk to be correlated derivation target can be appropriately selected from a plurality of photovoltaic power generation facilities PV1 to PVn by the control device S according to the control flow shown in FIG. Configured.
ここで、太陽光発電設備PVnの時刻(Ti:i=1~N:Nは2以上の任意の整数)毎の単位時間(例えば、1時間)当たりの発電電力量を〔表1〕に示すものとし、複数の太陽光発電設備PV1~PVnの発電電力量の相関係数Rab(a、bは、n以下の任意の整数)を〔表2〕に示すものとする場合、相関係数Rabを導出するための数式は、以下の〔数1〕で表される。 Here, the amount of power generated per unit time (for example, one hour) for each time (Ti: i = 1 to N: N is an arbitrary integer of 2 or more) of the photovoltaic power generation facility PVn is shown in [Table 1]. Assuming that the correlation coefficient Rab (a and b are arbitrary integers less than or equal to n) of the generated power amounts of the plurality of photovoltaic power generation facilities PV1 to PVn is shown in [Table 2], the correlation coefficient Rab A formula for deriving is represented by the following [Equation 1].
以下、制御装置Sが実行する太陽光発電設備PV1~PVnの異常判定制御を、図2の制御フローに基づいて説明する。
制御装置Sは、複数の太陽光発電設備PV1~PVnが配設される広域の天候情報を図示しない気象サーバから電気通信回線Nを介して受信して、記憶部Dに記憶する。
また、制御装置Sは、複数の太陽光発電設備PV1~PVnの夫々に設けられるパワーコンディショナPCS1~PCSnから、複数の太陽光発電設備PV1~PVnの経時的に変化する発電電力量を電気通信回線Nを介して受信すると共に、複数の太陽光発電設備PV1~PVnの夫々が接続される系統Kの停電情報及び系統電圧情報を電気通信回線Nを介して受信し、受信した各種情報を、太陽光発電設備PV1~PVn毎に記憶部Dに記憶する(#01)。
Abnormality determination control of the photovoltaic power generation facilities PV1 to PVn executed by the controller S will be described below based on the control flow of FIG.
The control device S receives weather information for a wide area where a plurality of photovoltaic power generation facilities PV1 to PVn are arranged from a weather server (not shown) via an electric communication line N, and stores the information in a storage unit D.
In addition, the control device S communicates the amount of power generated by the plurality of photovoltaic power generation facilities PV1 to PVn, which changes over time, from the power conditioners PCS1 to PCSn provided in the plurality of photovoltaic power generation facilities PV1 to PVn, respectively. While receiving through the line N, the power failure information and the system voltage information of the system K to which each of the plurality of photovoltaic power generation facilities PV1 to PVn are connected are received through the telecommunication line N, and the received various information is Stored in the storage unit D for each of the photovoltaic power generation facilities PV1 to PVn (#01).
停止処理部S4cは、記憶部Dに記憶される天候情報に広域内で天候異常を含むという第2停止条件が満たされる場合(#02でYES)、以降の異常の判定を実行せず(異常の判定を停止)、表示部S3に「天候異常のため異常の判定不可」と表示する。一方、第2停止条件を満たさない場合、#03のステップへ移行する。 If the weather information stored in the storage unit D satisfies the second stop condition that the weather information stored in the storage unit D includes a weather abnormality in a wide area (YES in #02), the stop processing unit S4c does not execute subsequent abnormality determination (abnormality is stopped), and the display section S3 displays "Unable to determine abnormality due to abnormal weather". On the other hand, if the second stop condition is not satisfied, the process proceeds to step #03.
制御装置Sは、複数の太陽光発電設備PV1~PVnから判定対象の太陽光発電設備PVmを選択して登録する(#03)。 The controller S selects and registers the photovoltaic power generation facility PVm to be judged from the plurality of photovoltaic power generation facilities PV1 to PVn (#03).
停止処理部S4cは、判定対象の太陽光発電設備PVmの系統への接続箇所において、系統が停電状態であるという第3停止条件が満たされる場合、又は系統が電圧上昇状態(例えば、系統電圧が予め定められた所定閾値以上である系統電圧上昇状態)であるという第4停止条件が満たされる場合(#04でYES)、選択されている判定対象の太陽光発電設備PVmをその後の異常判定処理において判定対象及び相関導出対象として用いない非演算対象の太陽光発電設備として記憶部Dへ登録する(#05)。その後、制御装置Sは、新たに判定対象の太陽光発電設備PVmを更新する(#03)。尚、当該選択の更新は、複数の太陽光発電設備PV1~PVnの中から重複することなく順次選ばれて実行される。
一方、第3停止条件及び第4停止条件が満たされない場合(#04でNO)、#06のステップへ移行する。
The stop processing unit S4c performs the operation when the third stop condition that the system is in a power failure state is satisfied at the connection point of the determination target photovoltaic power generation facility PVm to the system, or when the system is in a voltage rising state (for example, when the system voltage is If the fourth stop condition is satisfied (YES in #04), the selected determination target photovoltaic power generation facility PVm is subjected to subsequent abnormality determination processing. is registered in the storage unit D as a non-calculation target photovoltaic power generation facility that is not used as a determination target and a correlation derivation target (#05). After that, the control device S newly updates the determination target photovoltaic power generation facility PVm (#03). Note that the update of the selection is performed by sequentially selecting from among the plurality of photovoltaic power generation facilities PV1 to PVn without duplication.
On the other hand, if the third stop condition and the fourth stop condition are not satisfied (NO in #04), the process proceeds to step #06.
制御装置Sは、複数の太陽光発電設備PV1~PVnから相関導出対象の太陽光発電設備PVkを選択して登録する(#06)。 The control device S selects and registers the photovoltaic power generation facility PVk for correlation derivation from the plurality of photovoltaic power generation facilities PV1 to PVn (#06).
停止処理部S4cは、相関導出対象の太陽光発電設備PVkの系統への接続箇所において、系統が停電状態であるという第3停止条件が満たされる場合、又は系統が電圧上昇状態であるという第4停止条件が満たされる場合(#07でYES)、選択されている相関導出対象の太陽光発電設備PVkをその後の異常判定処理において判定対象及び相関導出対象として用いない非演算対象の太陽光発電設備として記憶部Dへ登録する(#08)。その後、制御装置Sは、新たに判定対象の太陽光発電設備PVkを更新する(#06)。尚、当該選択の更新は、複数の太陽光発電設備PV1~PVnの中から重複することなく順次選ばれて実行される。
一方、第3停止条件及び第4停止条件が満たされない場合(#07でNO)、#09のステップへ移行する。
The stop processing unit S4c performs a third stop condition that the system is in a power outage state or a fourth stop condition that the system is in a voltage rising state at a connection point of the photovoltaic power generation facility PVk for which the correlation is to be derived to the system. If the stop condition is satisfied (YES in #07), the selected correlation derivation target photovoltaic power generation facility PVk is not used as a determination target and a correlation derivation target in the subsequent abnormality determination process. is registered in the storage unit D as (#08). After that, the control device S newly updates the determination target photovoltaic power generation facility PVk (#06). Note that the update of the selection is performed by sequentially selecting from among the plurality of photovoltaic power generation facilities PV1 to PVn without duplication.
On the other hand, if the third stop condition and the fourth stop condition are not satisfied (NO in #07), the process proceeds to step #09.
第1判定処理部S4aは、選択された判定対象の太陽光発電設備PVmの所定期間における複数の時刻での特定時間幅の発電電力量と、選択された相関導出対象の太陽光発電設備PVkの所定期間における複数の時刻での特定時間幅の発電電力量とから相関係数Rmkを導出し、当該相関係数Rmkを直接用いて判定対象の太陽光発電設備PVmの異常を判定する第1判定処理を実行する(#09)。
例えば、第1判定処理部S4aは、導出した相関係数Rmkが予め選択された異常判定閾値(例えば、0.3)未満であれば、判定対象の太陽光発電設備PVmが異常の可能性があると判定する。
尚、第1判定処理部S4aは、判定精度を高める場合、判定対象の太陽光発電設備PVmと相関導出対象の太陽光発電設備PVkとに関し、記憶部Dに記憶される現時点よりも前の過去の時点における相関係数Rmkが異常判定閾値以上で、且つ現時点において相関係数Rmkが異常判定閾値未満である場合に、判定対象の太陽光発電設備が異常の可能性があると判定しても構わない。
因みに、過去の時点の相関係数としては、昨年同月同時刻での特定時間幅における相関係数の平均、前月同時刻での特定時間幅における相関係数の平均、前日同時刻での特定時間幅における相関係数等を用いることができる。
尚、記憶部Dに経時的に記憶される太陽光発電設備PV1~PVnの過去の発電電力量は、第1~第4停止条件が満たされた場合の発電電力量が除外されており、これらの値に基づいた第1判定処理は実行されないようになっている。
The first determination processing unit S4a determines the amount of power generated by the selected determination target photovoltaic power generation facility PVm at a plurality of times in a predetermined period, and the selected determination target photovoltaic power generation facility PVk. Deriving a correlation coefficient Rmk from the amount of power generated in a specific time span at a plurality of times in a predetermined period, and directly using the correlation coefficient Rmk to determine an abnormality in the photovoltaic power generation facility PVm to be determined First determination Processing is executed (#09).
For example, if the derived correlation coefficient Rmk is less than a preselected abnormality determination threshold value (for example, 0.3), the first determination processing unit S4a determines that there is a possibility that the solar power generation facility PVm to be determined is abnormal. Determine that there is.
In addition, when the determination accuracy is increased, the first determination processing unit S4a performs a past operation prior to the present time stored in the storage unit D with respect to the determination target photovoltaic power generation facility PVm and the correlation derivation target photovoltaic power generation facility PVk. When the correlation coefficient Rmk at the time point is equal to or greater than the abnormality determination threshold value and the correlation coefficient Rmk is less than the abnormality determination threshold value at the present time, even if it is determined that there is a possibility that the solar power generation facility to be determined is abnormal I do not care.
By the way, the correlation coefficient at the past point in time is the average of the correlation coefficient in the specific time span at the same time in the same month last year, the average of the correlation coefficient in the specific time span at the same time in the previous month, and the specific time in the previous day at the same time. A correlation coefficient or the like in width can be used.
The past power generation amounts of the photovoltaic power generation facilities PV1 to PVn stored over time in the storage unit D exclude the power generation amounts when the first to fourth stop conditions are satisfied. The first determination process based on the value of is not executed.
制御装置Sは、選択されている判定対象の太陽光発電設備PVmに関し、非演算対象以外の相関導出対象の太陽光発電設備PVkすべてについて第1判定処理を実行した場合(#10でYES)、#11のステップへ移行し、非演算対象以外の相関導出対象の太陽光発電設備PVkすべての第1判定処理の実行が完了していない場合(#10でNO)、#06のステップに戻って、相関導出対象の太陽光発電設備PVkを更新する。
When the control device S has executed the first determination process for all of the correlation derivation target photovoltaic power generation facilities PVk other than the non-calculation target photovoltaic power generation facilities PVm that have been selected (YES in #10), Move to step #11, and if execution of the first determination process for all the correlation derivation target photovoltaic power generation facilities PVk other than non-calculation targets has not been completed (NO in #10), return to
#10のステップでYESの場合、第2判定処理部S4bは、判定対象の太陽光発電設備PVmが、異なる2以上の相関導出対象の太陽光発電設備PVkとの間で導出される相関係数に基づいて実行された第1判定処理の判定結果の複数(当該実施形態では2つ)において、異常の可能性があると判定されている場合、判定対象の太陽光発電設備PVmの異常の可能性が高いと判定する第2判定処理を実行する。
If YES in
更に、制御装置Sは、これまでに少なくとも異なる3つ以上の判定対象の太陽光発電設備PVmの第1判定処理が実行され、且つ少なくとも3つ以上の判定対象の太陽光発電設備PVmに異常の可能性があるという第1停止条件が満たされるか否かを判定し、第1停止条件が満たされる場合(#13でYES)、天候異常として記憶部Dに登録し(#12)、第1停止条件が満たされない場合(#13でNo)、#14のステップを実行する。
Further, the control device S determines that the first determination process has been executed for at least three or more different determination target photovoltaic power generation facilities PVm so far, and that at least three or more determination target photovoltaic power generation facilities PVm are abnormal. It is determined whether or not the first stop condition that there is a possibility is satisfied, and if the first stop condition is satisfied (YES in #13), it is registered in the storage unit D as a weather abnormality (#12), and the first If the stop condition is not satisfied (No in #13),
#13のステップでYESの場合、制御装置Sは、すべての判定対象の太陽光発電設備PVmに関し、非演算対象以外の相関導出対象の太陽光発電設備PVkすべてについて第1判定処理及び第2判定処理を実行したか否かを判定し、実行した場合(#14でYES)、#15のステップへ移行し、非演算対象以外の相関導出対象の太陽光発電設備PVkすべてについて第1判定処理及び第2判定処理の実行が完了していない場合(#14でNO)、#03のステップに戻って、判定対象の太陽光発電設備PVmを更新する。
In the case of YES in
制御装置Sは、最後に第1判定処理、第2判定処理、非演算対象として登録された太陽光発電設備及び天候異常であったか否かにつき、表示部S3に表示して、異常判定制御を終了する。 Finally, the control device S displays the first determination process, the second determination process, the photovoltaic power generation facility registered as a non-calculation target, and whether or not there was a weather abnormality on the display unit S3, and terminates the abnormality determination control. do.
〔別実施形態〕
(1)上記実施形態では、第1停止条件~第4停止条件に基づいて、停止処理を実行する構成例を示したが、当該停止処理は実行しなくても構わないし、すべてを実行せずに何れか一つ以上を実行する構成であっても構わない。
[Another embodiment]
(1) In the above embodiment, a configuration example is shown in which the stop processing is executed based on the first to fourth stop conditions. may be configured to execute any one or more.
(2)上記実施形態では、比較的規模の大きい太陽光発電設備PV1~PVnに関する管理システム100について説明してきた。
しかしながら、本発明の管理システムは、小規模の太陽光発電設備PV1~PVnに対しても適用可能である。
例えば、太陽光発電設備PV1~PVnの夫々を単体のソーラーパネルとし、当該ソーラーパネルの複数の出力を個別に識別可能なパワーコンディショナPCSをこれまで説明してきた制御装置Sとして働かせる構成をとっても構わない。
当該構成により、夫々のソーラーパネル自体が、正常か否かを個別に判定できる。
(2) In the above embodiment, the
However, the management system of the present invention can also be applied to small-scale photovoltaic power generation facilities PV1 to PVn.
For example, each of the photovoltaic power generation facilities PV1 to PVn may be a single solar panel, and a power conditioner PCS capable of individually identifying a plurality of outputs of the solar panel may be configured to work as the control device S described so far. do not have.
With this configuration, it is possible to individually determine whether or not each solar panel itself is normal.
(3)制御装置Sは、複数の太陽光発電設備PV1~PVnに設けられるパワーコンディショナPCS1~PCSnから、夫々の発電電力量を逐次受信可能に構成されている例を示した。
しかしながら、制御装置Sは、所定時間間隔(例えば、ローカルで集計するなら0.5秒間隔、ネットワーク回線を介した遠隔で集計するなら1分間隔)で、発電電力量を受信する構成を採用しても構わない。
(3) An example has been shown in which the control device S is configured to be able to sequentially receive the amounts of generated power from the power conditioners PCS1 to PCSn provided in the plurality of photovoltaic power generation facilities PV1 to PVn.
However, the control device S adopts a configuration that receives the power generation amount at predetermined time intervals (for example, 0.5 second intervals for local aggregation, and 1 minute intervals for remote aggregation via a network line). I don't mind.
(4)上記実施形態では、制御装置Sは、複数の太陽光発電設備PV1~PVnに対して電気通信回線Nを介して電気的に接続されるサーバとして設けられる構成例を示した。
しかしながら、当該制御装置Sは、複数の太陽光発電設備PV1~PVnの少なくとも一つを構成する機器(例えば、パワーコンディショナ)として設けても構わない。
(4) In the above embodiment, the configuration example in which the control device S is provided as a server electrically connected to the plurality of photovoltaic power generation facilities PV1 to PVn via the electric communication line N is shown.
However, the control device S may be provided as a device (for example, a power conditioner) that constitutes at least one of the plurality of photovoltaic power generation facilities PV1 to PVn.
尚、上記実施形態(別実施形態を含む、以下同じ)で開示される構成は、矛盾が生じない限り、他の実施形態で開示される構成と組み合わせて適用することが可能であり、また、本明細書において開示された実施形態は例示であって、本発明の実施形態はこれに限定されず、本発明の目的を逸脱しない範囲内で適宜改変することが可能である。 It should be noted that the configurations disclosed in the above embodiments (including other embodiments, the same shall apply hereinafter) can be applied in combination with configurations disclosed in other embodiments as long as there is no contradiction. The embodiments disclosed in this specification are exemplifications, and the embodiments of the present invention are not limited thereto, and can be modified as appropriate without departing from the object of the present invention.
本発明の太陽光発電設備の管理システム、及び太陽光発電設備の管理方法は、気象変動に伴う日照時間の変化等がある場合であっても、対象の太陽光発電設備の正常か否かを比較的精度良く判定できる太陽光発電設備の管理システム、及び太陽光発電設備の管理方法として、有効に利用可能である。 The management system of the solar power generation facility and the management method of the solar power generation facility of the present invention can determine whether the target solar power generation facility is normal even if there is a change in the sunshine hours due to weather changes. The present invention can be effectively used as a management system for photovoltaic power generation equipment and a method for managing photovoltaic power generation equipment that can make determinations with relatively high accuracy.
100 :管理システム
K :系統
N :電気通信回線
PVk :相関導出対象の太陽光発電設備
PVm :判定対象の太陽光発電設備
Rab :相関係数
S :制御装置
S4a :第1判定処理部
S4b :第2判定処理部
S4c :停止処理部
WPV :発電電力量
100: Management system K: System N: Telecommunications line PVk: Photovoltaic power generation equipment PVm for correlation derivation: Photovoltaic power generation equipment Rab for determination: Correlation coefficient S: Control device S4a: First determination processing unit S4b: Second 2 determination processing unit S4c: stop processing unit WPV: power generation amount
Claims (10)
複数の前記太陽光発電設備のうちの判定対象の前記太陽光発電設備の所定期間における複数の時刻での特定時間幅の発電電力量と、前記判定対象を除く複数の前記太陽光発電設備のうちで相関導出対象の前記太陽光発電設備の前記所定期間における前記複数の時刻での前記特定時間幅の発電電力量とから相関係数を導出し、当該相関係数を直接用いて判定対象の前記太陽光発電設備の異常を判定する制御装置を備え、
前記制御装置は、現時点よりも前の過去の時点において前記相関係数が予め定められる異常判定閾値以上で、且つ現時点において前記相関係数が前記異常判定閾値未満である場合に、前記判定対象の前記太陽光発電設備が異常の可能性があると判定する第1判定処理を実行する太陽光発電設備の管理システム。 A management system for photovoltaic power generation equipment that determines whether or not a plurality of photovoltaic power generation equipment distributed over a wide area is normal,
A power generation amount of the solar power generation facility to be determined among the plurality of solar power generation facilities in a specific time span at a plurality of times in a predetermined period, and among the plurality of solar power generation facilities excluding the determination target deriving a correlation coefficient from the amount of power generated in the specific time span at the plurality of times in the predetermined period of the solar power generation facility to be correlated, and directly using the correlation coefficient to determine the Equipped with a control device that determines abnormalities in the photovoltaic power generation equipment ,
When the correlation coefficient is equal to or greater than a predetermined abnormality determination threshold value at a past time point before the current time point and the correlation coefficient is less than the abnormality determination threshold value at the current time point, the control device determines whether the determination target is A management system for a photovoltaic power generation facility that executes a first determination process for determining that the photovoltaic power generation facility may be abnormal .
前記第1判定処理を複数の前記判定対象の前記太陽光発電設備に対して実行するものであり、 The first determination process is executed for a plurality of the determination target photovoltaic power generation facilities,
少なくとも3つ以上の前記判定対象の前記太陽光発電設備に異常の可能性があるという停止条件が満たされる場合、異常の判定を停止する停止処理を実行する請求項1に記載の太陽光発電設備の管理システム。 The photovoltaic power generation facility according to claim 1, wherein, when a stop condition that at least three or more of the photovoltaic power generation facilities to be determined are likely to be abnormal is satisfied, a stop process is performed to stop determination of abnormality. management system.
前記天候情報に前記広域内で天候異常を含むという停止条件が満たされる場合、異常の判定を停止する停止処理を実行する請求項1又は2に記載の太陽光発電設備の管理システム。 The control device is configured to be able to acquire weather information within the wide area from the outside,
3. The management system for photovoltaic power generation facilities according to claim 1 or 2, wherein, when a stop condition that said weather information includes a weather anomaly within said wide area is satisfied, a stop process for stopping judgment of anomaly is executed.
前記系統が前記停電状態であるという停止条件が満たされる場合、異常の判定を停止する停止処理を実行する請求項1~3の何れか一項に記載の太陽光発電設備の管理システム。 4. The management system for photovoltaic power generation equipment according to claim 1, wherein, when a stop condition that said system is in said blackout state is satisfied, a stop process for stopping abnormality determination is executed.
前記制御装置が、前記系統電圧情報から前記系統電圧が前記系統電圧上昇状態であるという停止条件が満たされる場合、異常の判定を停止する停止処理を実行する請求項1~4の何れか一項に記載の太陽光発電設備の管理システム。 The control device is configured to be able to hold system voltage information regarding whether or not the system voltage is in a rising state in which the system voltage is equal to or higher than a predetermined threshold,
5. The control device according to any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein, when the system voltage information satisfies a stop condition that the system voltage is in the system voltage rising state, the control device executes a stop process for stopping the abnormality determination. Management system of photovoltaic power generation equipment according to .
前記停止処理を実行しているときの前記記憶部に記憶された発電電力量は、前記相関係数の導出から除外する請求項2~5の何れか一項に記載の太陽光発電設備の管理システム。 The control device has a storage unit that stores over time the power generation amount of the specific time width at the plurality of times in the predetermined period of the plurality of solar power generation facilities distributed over a wide area,
The management of the photovoltaic power generation facility according to any one of claims 2 to 5, wherein the power generation amount stored in the storage unit when the stop process is being executed is excluded from derivation of the correlation coefficient. system.
一の前記判定対象の前記太陽光発電設備の異常の判定に際し、異なる2以上の前記相関導出対象の前記太陽光発電設備との間で導出される前記相関係数に基づいて、前記第1判定処理を実行し、前記第1判定処理の判定結果の複数において異常の可能性があると判定された場合に、前記判定対象の前記太陽光発電設備の異常の可能性が高いと判定する第2判定処理を実行する請求項1又は2に記載の太陽光発電設備の管理システム。 The control device is
When determining abnormality of one of the determination target photovoltaic power generation facilities, the first determination is performed based on the correlation coefficient derived between the two or more different correlation derivation target photovoltaic power generation facilities A second step of determining that there is a high possibility of abnormality in the photovoltaic power generation equipment to be determined when it is determined that there is a possibility of abnormality in a plurality of determination results of the first determination process. 3. The management system for photovoltaic power generation equipment according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the determination process is executed .
複数の前記太陽光発電設備のうちの判定対象の前記太陽光発電設備の所定期間における複数の時刻での特定時間幅の発電電力量と、前記判定対象を除く複数の前記太陽光発電設備のうちで相関導出対象の前記太陽光発電設備の前記所定期間における前記複数の時刻での前記特定時間幅の発電電力量とから相関係数を導出し、当該相関係数を直接用いて判定対象の前記太陽光発電設備の異常を判定し、 A power generation amount of the solar power generation facility to be determined among the plurality of solar power generation facilities in a specific time span at a plurality of times in a predetermined period, and among the plurality of solar power generation facilities excluding the determination target deriving a correlation coefficient from the amount of power generated in the specific time span at the plurality of times in the predetermined period of the solar power generation facility to be correlated, and directly using the correlation coefficient to determine the Judge the abnormality of the photovoltaic power generation equipment,
現時点よりも前の過去の時点において前記相関係数が予め定められる異常判定閾値以上で、且つ現時点において前記相関係数が前記異常判定閾値未満である場合に、前記判定対象の前記太陽光発電設備が異常の可能性があると判定する第1判定処理を実行する管理方法。 When the correlation coefficient is equal to or greater than a predetermined abnormality determination threshold value at a past time point before the current time point, and the correlation coefficient is less than the abnormality determination threshold value at the current time point, the solar power generation facility to be determined. is likely to be abnormal.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2019234799A JP7330093B2 (en) | 2019-12-25 | 2019-12-25 | Solar power generation facility management system and solar power generation facility management method |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2019234799A JP7330093B2 (en) | 2019-12-25 | 2019-12-25 | Solar power generation facility management system and solar power generation facility management method |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JP2021103926A JP2021103926A (en) | 2021-07-15 |
| JP7330093B2 true JP7330093B2 (en) | 2023-08-21 |
Family
ID=76755386
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2019234799A Active JP7330093B2 (en) | 2019-12-25 | 2019-12-25 | Solar power generation facility management system and solar power generation facility management method |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JP7330093B2 (en) |
Citations (11)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP2005275491A (en) | 2004-03-23 | 2005-10-06 | Sanyo Electric Co Ltd | System for compensation for generated output of photovoltaic generation |
| JP2006174609A (en) | 2004-12-16 | 2006-06-29 | Ken Tsuzuki | Power generation data managing method in solar power generation |
| JP2006278712A (en) | 2005-03-29 | 2006-10-12 | Kyocera Corp | Solar power system |
| WO2011092882A1 (en) | 2010-01-26 | 2011-08-04 | 株式会社日立製作所 | System for predicting output from solar electric generating facility ,weather predicting system, and method for predicting output from solar electric generating facility |
| US20120310427A1 (en) | 2011-05-31 | 2012-12-06 | Williams B Jeffery | Automatic Monitoring and Adjustment of a Solar Panel Array |
| JP2014154728A (en) | 2013-02-08 | 2014-08-25 | Hitachi Advanced Digital Inc | Solar cell panel monitoring program, solar cell panel monitoring device and solar cell panel monitoring method |
| CN104485889A (en) | 2015-01-08 | 2015-04-01 | 江苏蓝天光伏科技有限公司 | Failure detection method for photovoltaic power generation units with multiple same mounting dip angles |
| JP2016127763A (en) | 2015-01-08 | 2016-07-11 | 株式会社コンテック | Abnormality detection method of photovoltaic power generation string and abnormality detection program of photovoltaic power generation string |
| JP2017162252A (en) | 2016-03-10 | 2017-09-14 | 横河電機株式会社 | Process monitoring apparatus, process monitoring system, process monitoring method, process monitoring program, and recording medium. |
| JP2018046727A (en) | 2016-09-17 | 2018-03-22 | 未来工業株式会社 | Power generation facility network |
| JP2018201282A (en) | 2017-05-26 | 2018-12-20 | 東芝ライテック株式会社 | Communication device and communication system |
-
2019
- 2019-12-25 JP JP2019234799A patent/JP7330093B2/en active Active
Patent Citations (11)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP2005275491A (en) | 2004-03-23 | 2005-10-06 | Sanyo Electric Co Ltd | System for compensation for generated output of photovoltaic generation |
| JP2006174609A (en) | 2004-12-16 | 2006-06-29 | Ken Tsuzuki | Power generation data managing method in solar power generation |
| JP2006278712A (en) | 2005-03-29 | 2006-10-12 | Kyocera Corp | Solar power system |
| WO2011092882A1 (en) | 2010-01-26 | 2011-08-04 | 株式会社日立製作所 | System for predicting output from solar electric generating facility ,weather predicting system, and method for predicting output from solar electric generating facility |
| US20120310427A1 (en) | 2011-05-31 | 2012-12-06 | Williams B Jeffery | Automatic Monitoring and Adjustment of a Solar Panel Array |
| JP2014154728A (en) | 2013-02-08 | 2014-08-25 | Hitachi Advanced Digital Inc | Solar cell panel monitoring program, solar cell panel monitoring device and solar cell panel monitoring method |
| CN104485889A (en) | 2015-01-08 | 2015-04-01 | 江苏蓝天光伏科技有限公司 | Failure detection method for photovoltaic power generation units with multiple same mounting dip angles |
| JP2016127763A (en) | 2015-01-08 | 2016-07-11 | 株式会社コンテック | Abnormality detection method of photovoltaic power generation string and abnormality detection program of photovoltaic power generation string |
| JP2017162252A (en) | 2016-03-10 | 2017-09-14 | 横河電機株式会社 | Process monitoring apparatus, process monitoring system, process monitoring method, process monitoring program, and recording medium. |
| JP2018046727A (en) | 2016-09-17 | 2018-03-22 | 未来工業株式会社 | Power generation facility network |
| JP2018201282A (en) | 2017-05-26 | 2018-12-20 | 東芝ライテック株式会社 | Communication device and communication system |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JP2021103926A (en) | 2021-07-15 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US11387778B2 (en) | Photovoltaic system failure and alerting | |
| US10740512B2 (en) | System for tuning a photovoltaic power generation plant forecast with the aid of a digital computer | |
| CN102362360B (en) | For the fault detection method of solar power system | |
| JP7289995B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for recognizing operating state of photovoltaic string and storage medium | |
| CN102638197B (en) | Solar photovoltaic component, method for tracking maximum power point thereof and method for monitoring fault thereof | |
| JP6087200B2 (en) | Abnormality detection device for solar power generation system, abnormality detection method, and solar power generation system | |
| JP5335151B2 (en) | Solar power system | |
| US20210063975A1 (en) | Adaptive system monitoring using incremental regression model development | |
| JP6597425B2 (en) | FACTOR ESTIMATION DEVICE, FACTOR ESTIMATION DEVICE CONTROL METHOD, CONTROL PROGRAM, AND RECORDING MEDIUM | |
| JP2017184472A (en) | Power generation diagnosis method and power generation diagnosis apparatus for solar power generation system | |
| WO2016166991A1 (en) | Diagnostic system for photovoltaic power generation equipment, and program | |
| JPWO2016098200A1 (en) | Solar power plant control system | |
| WO2025000963A1 (en) | Photovoltaic fault ride-through control method and apparatus, storage medium, and computer device | |
| CN107852132A (en) | The method of the absolute point of the peak power conveyed for determination by a string of photovoltaic panels and the equipment for being configured to execution this method | |
| JP7330093B2 (en) | Solar power generation facility management system and solar power generation facility management method | |
| JP2018166370A (en) | Power generation state determination device | |
| US20170018930A1 (en) | Power system management device and program | |
| JP7435073B2 (en) | Anomaly detection device, anomaly detection method, and anomaly detection program | |
| JP2016144244A (en) | Power generation situation diagnosis method for photovoltaic power generation system, and device therefor | |
| JP6833303B1 (en) | Power generation forecaster | |
| CN117294247B (en) | Inefficient power plant diagnosis method, device, computer equipment and storage medium | |
| JP2022134663A (en) | Operating state estimating device, control method and program for operating state estimating device | |
| KR20220039990A (en) | Management system of solar power plant | |
| CN111401689A (en) | Method, device and equipment for determining snowfall date of photovoltaic station and storage medium | |
| JP2016054632A (en) | Management device for solar battery, photovoltaic power generation system and program |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| A621 | Written request for application examination |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621 Effective date: 20220518 |
|
| A977 | Report on retrieval |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007 Effective date: 20230215 |
|
| A131 | Notification of reasons for refusal |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131 Effective date: 20230404 |
|
| A521 | Request for written amendment filed |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523 Effective date: 20230602 |
|
| TRDD | Decision of grant or rejection written | ||
| A01 | Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01 Effective date: 20230711 |
|
| A61 | First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61 Effective date: 20230808 |
|
| R150 | Certificate of patent or registration of utility model |
Ref document number: 7330093 Country of ref document: JP Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150 |