JP2592894B2 - Driving training simulator - Google Patents

Description

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION [Object of the Invention] (Industrial application field) The present invention relates to a driving training simulator.

(Prior Art) Driving training simulators are currently being developed and introduced in all departments. As is well known, the operation training simulator has been developed to effectively foster plant operation and maintenance personnel. The dynamic characteristics of the plant, for example, in the thermal power generation field, the main engine and auxiliary equipment such as boilers, turbines, generators, etc. Simulates the pressurized oil system of the machine and the electric system at the same time as the actual machine, and displays it on the monitor panel / operation panel or CRT similar to the actual machine.
In addition, since the instructor can operate in a state that is difficult to implement or an abnormal state with a low frequency of occurrence, not only normal operation but also maintenance and accident response can be trained.

In addition, at the start of training, an initial state setting function that can set a plant state that suits the purpose, a backtrack function that returns the current simulation state to the simulation state at any time in the past, and a current simulation state at any time in the past And a replay function for restoring the operation state from that point to the current point in time.

FIG. 5 is a configuration diagram of a conventional driving training simulator, in which an instructor, a driving training simulator, and a trainee proceed together to perform training.

First, as an example of the operation of the driving training simulator, a starting operation from a stopped state of the main engine will be described.

Using the dialogue unit 1, the instructor sends a plant state setting change request “a” for setting the main engine stop state to the plant state setting change unit 2. The plant state setting change means 2 sets the plant state setting change information “b” for stopping the main engine in the plant characteristic simulation section 3.

The plant state c in the stopped state of the main engine simulated by the mathematical formula of the plant characteristic simulation unit 3 or the simulated high-rise building or the like is a monitoring panel similar to the actual board or a plant state display unit 4 such as a CRT.
And provided to the trainer.

Based on the state of the plant state display unit 4, the trainee uses the plant operation unit 5 such as the SW of the operation panel or the CRT,
Perform the plant startup operation. The plant operation section 5 notifies the trainee operation information d to the plant characteristic simulation section 3. As a result, the plant characteristics simulation for the plant start operation of the trainee is performed.

Next, the behavior of the occurrence of an accident / failure will be described. The instructor issues a valve lock plant state setting change request a to the plant state setting change means 2 by using the dialogue unit 1 to cause a valve lock failure during the above-described starting operation, for example.
The plant state setting change means 2 sets the plant state setting change information b, which is information on valve lock, in the plant characteristic simulation section 3 to lock the valve. The effect of the valve lock is simulated by the plant characteristic simulating unit 3, and the affected plant state c is displayed on the plant state display unit 4. The trainee notices the abnormal state of the plant and investigates the cause.
After investigating the cause, the trainee operates a valve of another system, and takes a countermeasure such as preventing a plant trip or the like.
This is performed using

The plant operation unit 5 notifies the trainee operation information d, which is the corresponding action, to the plant characteristic simulation unit 3. As a result, a plant characteristic simulation for the countermeasure for the valve lock accident is performed.

Next, the backtracking and replaying operations will be described.

In the operation training as described above, the plant state setting change information b from the instructor, the plant state c from the plant characteristic simulator 3, and the trainee operation information d from the trainee
Instructor-required, trainee-operated 2 is trainee-result storage unit 6 sequentially at regular intervals, for example, training-result information 201 in FIG.
As described above, and used as reproduction data for the backtrack replay function.

For the backtrack replay request from the instructor, a plant state reproduction request i is issued to the training result storage unit 6 as a simulation state reproduction request 10 minutes before the current simulation state, for example, using the communication unit 1. The training result storage unit 6 sets the plant state 10 minutes before the present time as the plant state reproduction information j in the plant characteristic simulation unit 3. Thereby, the plant state c 10 minutes before the present time is displayed on the plant state display section 4.
This is the function of the backtrack. In addition, the replay function is performed when the plant state setting change information and the training operation information of the instructor from the simulation time returned 10 minutes ago by the backtrack function to the current time are directed to the current time from the training result storage unit 6. The parameters are set in the plant characteristic simulation section 3 in the order of the series. As a result, the plant state c from the last 10 minutes to the present is simulated by the plant characteristic simulation section 3 and reproduced and displayed on the plant state display section 4.

As the operation training simulator with the above features has become the mainstream of full automation of the plant, many trainers with various levels can perform operation training that can not be experienced with actual equipment safely and effectively, Training under the instruction.

(Problems to be solved by the invention) However, what manages the training results of trainers having many different levels is only the paper management by the instructor, for example, the trainee management sheet. The selection of the review item of the training is determined by the instructor from the training management sheet, and the instructor has a burden during training and a loss of training efficiency.

[Configuration of the invention]

(Means for Solving the Problems) The configuration of the present invention for explaining the purpose will be described with reference to FIG.

In the present invention, in order to manage the training result of the trainee as a medical chart, a training result processing unit 7 for determining whether or not the training result is correct and creating a trainer chart in a conventional configuration, and a trainer storing the trainer chart A medical chart storage unit 8 and a normal training result storage unit 9 for storing a normal training result are provided.
It should be noted that information for creating a trainee's chart is obtained from the training result storage unit 6 that stores training results for the backtracking and replay functions.

(Operation) Therefore, in the present invention, the training result of the trainee is managed by the driving training simulator, and the judgment of the training result is performed, and the characteristics, analysis, and statistics of the trainee are performed using the driving training simulator. To be changed.

(Embodiment) First, management of a trainee chart is a configuration diagram of the present invention. This will be described with reference to FIG.

Since the instructor saves the training result stored in the training result storage unit 6 as a medical chart, a training result processing request e for creating a trainee medical chart is issued to the training result processing unit 7 using the interactive unit 1. The training result processing means 7 retrieves the training result information f from the training result storage unit 6, and from the normal training result storage unit 9 in which the correct training result for the training item is stored, to determine the training result, accidents and failure number, take out the normal training result information f ₁ the operation mode of the start / stop or the like as a key.

Here, we describe a normal training result information f ₁ stored in the normal exercise result storage unit 9.

Normal training results for the training items are stored in the normal training result storage unit 9. When the simulator is introduced, normal training is performed using the driving training simulator of the present invention and registered in the normal training result storage unit 9. In the registration method, a normal operation corresponding to the training item is performed, and the training result storage unit 6 stores the normal operation.

Further, the normal training result storage request h is
And outputs the training result storage unit 6, the normal training result information f ₁ the initial state number, accidents and failures number as a key operation modes such as start / stop, and registers the normal exercise result storage unit 9.

Depending on the training, there is no problem in the sequence even if the operation order of the operation SW is reversed, or the operation SW and the operation
There is a timer between the SWs, and some must be operated within the specified time. In order to provide such a logic condition and time element of the operation SW to the normal training result information f ₁ in the normal training result storage unit 9, the instructor performs a training result process for extracting the normal training result information f ₁ from the dialogue unit 1. A key such as a request e, for example, a training item, an initial state number, etc., is sent to the training result processing means 7. The training result processing means 7 stores normal training result information f ₁ for operation mode keys such as an initial state number, an accident / failure number, and start / stop from the normal training result storage unit 9.
Is taken out and displayed on the dialogue unit 1. Instructor performs additional correction of the logic conditions and time element displayed on the dialogue unit 1 normal training result information f _1. Normal training result information f ₁ the logic conditions and time element is added as described above, through the training result processing unit 7, it is stored in the normal exercise result storage unit 9.

Next, the training result processing unit 7 determines the train's wrong operation from the training result information f and normal training result information f ₁ for the training items, to create a medical record of the trainee. The created chart is used as the trainer chart information g. For example, the trainee chart information g stored in the trainer chart storage unit 8 as the trainee name, the training date and time, the training item, the training result right or wrong, the content of an erroneous operation, etc. Can be extracted using the dialogue unit 1 as follows, for example.

The instructor uses the dialogue unit 1 to request the training result processing means 7 for a training result processing request e such as a trainee name and a take-out condition. The training result processing means 7 extracts the trainee chart information g corresponding to the request content of the training result processing request e from the trainee chart storage unit 8 and displays it on the dialogue unit 1. As described above, the driving training simulator of the present invention creates, stores, displays, and manages a trainee chart.

Here, an embodiment of the format of the trainee chart and the determination of the correctness of the training result according to the present invention will be described.

FIG. 2 is an example of a trainee chart created using the driving training simulator of the present invention. The trainee chart is a training program that classifies the trainee's personal information 101, such as the trainee's name, gender, age, and business name, and the trainee's training results for each initial state, and determines whether the trainee is correct or not. The result history information 102 is, for example, the date of training, the name of the initial state setting performed at the beginning of training,
If an accident / failure occurs,
These are the results of the judgment on the correctness of the plant operation and the failure handling operation during the training, the operation data during the training, and the like.

FIG. 3 is an example of a method for determining whether the training result is correct or not using the driving training simulator of the present invention. Whether the training result is correct or not is determined by classifying the training result information 201 for each initial state setting and each accident / failure, and comparing it with the normal training result information of the corresponding classification in the normal training result information 202. In FIG. 3, the trainee operation information after setting the initial state A in the training result information 201 and the initial state A in the normal training result information 202
And the operation of the trainee in the training result information 201 and the corresponding operation of the accident / fault A in the normal training result information 202. It is performed every time, and an operation error or insufficient operation of the trainee is determined, and the result is reflected in the trainee chart.

The fourth example is an embodiment of a normal training result information correction screen diagram for giving the operating condition of the operation SW and the timer condition to the normal training result information from the instructor. The normal training result information is information that stores a time-series state change of the operation SW1 as shown in the operation list of FIG. Here, if the order of the operations of the operation SW1 and the operation SW2 does not matter in sequence in either case, the condition list indicates that there is no order condition, for example, NS (NOT
Sequential).

If there is a specified time of 3 minutes between the operation of the operation SW4 and the operation of the operation SW5, the timer is expressed as 3 minutes.

As described above, since the normal training result information can be modified by adding the condition and the timer information by the instructor, the applicability to the correctness of the training result, for example, the operation performed by the trainee A and the operation performed by the trainee B are different. However, it is possible to determine that both are correct.

Now, a series of training curriculum has been completed, and the training result of the trainee is stored in the training result storage unit 6. The instructor uses the dialogue unit 1 to create a training result of the trainee as a trainee chart, and sends a training result processing request e for creating a chart to the training result processing unit 7.

Training result processing unit 7, exercise result storage unit 6 from the single item training ie taken out training result information f from the initial state set to the next initial setting, normal normal training result information f ₁ corresponding to the initial state Take it out from the training result storage unit 9. Then training result processing unit 7, comparison of the training results the normal training information f result information f ₁ for example, plant operations trainee performs such operation sequence timer condition of the operation SW errors and the plant operation such as insufficient first Check as shown in Figure 3.

The checked result is created as one of the training result history information 102 of the trainee chart shown in FIG. As described above, the training result is created as a trainee chart and stored in the trainee chart storage unit 8. The dialogue unit 1 requests the trainee processing means 7 to provide a trainee name and a trainee chart retrieval condition, for example, a list of whether the training result of the accident response training is correct or not, as a trainee chart processing request e. The training result processing means 7 lists the training results of the accident response training from the trainee chart storage unit 8 in accordance with the trainee chart retrieval condition, and displays the instructor as the trainee chart information g in the dialogue unit 1. Looking at the training result list of the accident response training displayed on the dialogue section 1, the trainee learns the weak point of the trainee, for example, the weakness in responding to the electrical accident response, and gives advice or review for the weak point.

As described above, the instructor can manage and analyze the training results using the driving training simulator in parallel with the training. When the training item is operated as a certification test for driving training, the trainee chart is the result of the driving training test.
Each training item is assigned a score in advance, and after the training is completed, a score is given to the trainee chart according to the score, and the score is output to a typewriter or the like.

Thereby, the management of the certification test using the driving training simulator can be performed.

〔The invention's effect〕

As described above, according to the present invention, since the training result of the trainee is managed by the driving training simulator, the paper management of the instructor is not required. In addition, whether the training result is correct or not can be automatically determined and saved as a trainee's chart, so that the training result analysis and statistics of the trainee can be performed using a driving training simulator.

As a result, the management of the training result for the trainer of the instructor has been substantially automated, and labor saving of the instructor can be achieved.

In addition, since the trainee can view his / her own training results as a medical chart, he / she can utilize the results after training as self-diagnosis and train-on-the-desk.

[Brief description of the drawings]

FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a driving training simulator of the present invention, and FIG.
FIG. 3 is an explanatory view of an embodiment of the trainer chart of the present invention, FIG. 3 is an explanatory view of an embodiment of a method for judging correctness of training result information from normal training result information of the present invention, and FIG. FIG. 5 is an explanatory diagram of an embodiment of a normal training result information correction screen, and FIG. 5 is a configuration diagram of a conventional driving training simulator. DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 ... Dialogue part 2 ... Plant state change means 3 ... Plant characteristic simulation part 4 ... Plant state display part 5 ... Plant operation part 6 ... Training result storage part 7 ... Training result processing means 8 ... trainee medical record storage unit 9 ... normal training result storage unit

Claims (1)

(57) [Claims] An operation training simulator for simulating a plant state and allowing a trainee to learn a correct operation method of a plant, a dialogue unit for receiving a request from an instructor and providing information to the instructor, A plant state changing means for changing a state setting;
A plant characteristic simulation unit that faithfully simulates the characteristics of the plant, a plant state display unit that displays a plant state to a trainee, and a plant operation unit that receives an operation from the trainee,
A training result storage unit that stores training results, a normal training result storage unit that stores normal training results, a training result processing unit that determines whether a training result is correct or not, and processes the training result as a trainee chart, and stores the trainer chart. It consists of a trainee chart record storage unit that determines whether the trainee's training result is a normal training result or not, manages the result as a chart, and can analyze the trainee's training result and statistics Driving training simulator.