JP2019060026A - Magnesium-based alloy extension material and manufacturing method therefor - Google Patents
Magnesium-based alloy extension material and manufacturing method therefor Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- JP2019060026A JP2019060026A JP2018233016A JP2018233016A JP2019060026A JP 2019060026 A JP2019060026 A JP 2019060026A JP 2018233016 A JP2018233016 A JP 2018233016A JP 2018233016 A JP2018233016 A JP 2018233016A JP 2019060026 A JP2019060026 A JP 2019060026A
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- less
- based alloy
- mass
- stress
- alloy
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Landscapes
- Extrusion Of Metal (AREA)
Abstract
【課題】 比較的安価な元素であるMnのみを添加したMg基合金素材を、温度と減面比を制御した熱間及び温間加工を施すことにより、優れた室温加工性を有するMg基合金伸展材を提供すること。【解決手段】 本発明のMg基合金伸展材は、0.07mass%以上、2mass%以下のMnを含み、残部がMgと不可避的成分からなる基合金伸展材であって、母材の平均結晶粒径が5μm以下、かつ、前記伸展材を、JIS規格に基づき、1×10−5/s以上1×10−3/s以下の範囲のひずみ速度で引張試験を行った場合に得られる応力−ひずみ曲線図において、最大負荷応力(σmax)と破断時応力(σbk)の関係、(σmax—σbk)/σmaxが0.3以上であり、棒状の形状を有する。【選択図】 図7PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a Mg-based alloy material having excellent room-temperature workability by subjecting a Mg-based alloy material to which only Mn, which is a relatively inexpensive element, is added, to hot and warm working by controlling the temperature and the area reduction ratio. Provide extension material. SOLUTION: The Mg-based alloy stretched material of the present invention is a base alloy stretched material containing 0.07 mass% or more and 2 mass% or less of Mn, with the balance being Mg and an unavoidable component, and the average crystal of the base material. The stress obtained when a tensile test is performed on the stretched material having a particle size of 5 μm or less and a strain rate of 1 × 10 −5 / s or more and 1 × 10 −3 / s or less based on JIS standards. In the strain curve diagram, the relationship between the maximum load stress (σmax) and the stress at break (σbk), (σmax−σbk) / σmax is 0.3 or more, and has a rod-like shape. [Selection diagram] FIG.
Description
本発明は、室温延性に優れたマンガン(Mn)が添加された微細結晶粒のマグネシウム(Mg)基合金伸展材及びその製造方法に関する。 The present invention relates to a fine grained magnesium (Mg) -based alloy extension material to which manganese (Mn) excellent in room temperature ductility is added, and a method for producing the same.
Mg合金は、次世代の軽量金属材料として注目されている。しかし、その結晶構造が六方晶であるため、底面すべりと柱面に代表される非底面すべりの臨界分断せん断応力(CRSS)の差が、室温付近では極めて大きい。そのため、アルミニウム(Al)や鉄(Fe)などの他の金属材料と比較して、延性は乏しく、室温二次成形や加工が難しい。 Mg alloys are attracting attention as next-generation lightweight metal materials. However, since the crystal structure is a hexagonal crystal, the difference between the critical fracture shear stress (CRSS) of the non-bottom surface slide represented by the base surface slide and the cylindrical surface is extremely large around room temperature. Therefore, compared with other metal materials such as aluminum (Al) and iron (Fe), ductility is poor, and room temperature secondary forming and processing are difficult.
これらの問題を解決すべく、希土類元素添加による合金化が良く用いられている。例えば、特許文献1、2では、イットリウム(Y)やセリウム(Ce)、ランタン(La)をはじめとする希土類元素を添加し、塑性変形能の改善が図られている。希土類元素には、非底面のCRSSを低下させる、すなわち、底面と非底面のCRSSの差を縮め、非底面の転位すべり運動をしやすくする働きがあるためである。一方、希土類元素を使用することから、素材価格の高騰が懸念され、経済的観点から、安価な汎用元素の添加による延性や成形性の改善が求められている。 In order to solve these problems, alloying by addition of rare earth elements is often used. For example, in Patent Documents 1 and 2, rare earth elements such as yttrium (Y), cerium (Ce), and lanthanum (La) are added to improve the plastic deformability. It is because the rare earth elements have a function to lower the non-bottom CRSS, that is, to reduce the difference between the bottom and non-bottom CRSS and to facilitate non-bottom dislocation sliding motion. On the other hand, since rare earth elements are used, there is a concern that the price of the material will rise, and from an economic point of view, improvement of ductility and formability by the addition of inexpensive general purpose elements is required.
一方、Mgの結晶粒界近傍では、粒界コンパティビリティー応力が作用し、非底面すべりが活動することも指摘されている(非特許文献1)。そのため、大量の結晶粒界を導入(結晶粒微細化)することは、延性改善に有効であると考えられる。 On the other hand, it has also been pointed out that grain boundary compatibility stress acts in the vicinity of Mg grain boundaries, and non-bottom sliding is activated (Non-Patent Document 1). Therefore, introducing a large amount of grain boundaries (grain refinement) is considered to be effective for ductility improvement.
特許文献3では、希土類元素又は汎用元素を微量に含有させ、強度特性に優れた微細結晶粒Mg合金が開示されている。この合金の高強度化は、これらの溶質元素が結晶粒界に偏析することが主要因とされている。他方、微細結晶粒Mg合金は、粒界コンパティビリティー応力の作用による非底面の転位すべり運動が活性化する。しかし、塑性変形を補完する働きのある粒界すべりに関して、これらの合金では、いずれの添加元素も粒界すべりの発現を抑制する働きがあるため、粒界すべりが変形に殆ど寄与しない。そのため、これらの合金の延性は、従来からのMg合金と同等レベルで、更なる延性の改善が求められている。すなわち、粒界コンパティビリティーが作用する微細組織構造を維持しながら、粒界すべりの発現を抑制しない溶質元素の探索が必要である。 Patent Document 3 discloses a fine grained Mg alloy which contains a small amount of a rare earth element or a general-purpose element and is excellent in strength characteristics. The strengthening of this alloy is mainly attributed to the segregation of these solute elements at grain boundaries. On the other hand, in the case of a fine grained Mg alloy, nondislocation dislocation sliding motion is activated by the action of grain boundary compatibility stress. However, with regard to grain boundary sliding which has a function of complementing plastic deformation, in these alloys, any added element has the function of suppressing the occurrence of grain boundary sliding, so grain boundary sliding hardly contributes to deformation. Therefore, the ductility of these alloys is required to be further improved in ductility at the same level as that of conventional Mg alloys. That is, it is necessary to search for solute elements that do not suppress the occurrence of grain boundary sliding while maintaining the microstructure structure on which grain boundary compatibility works.
一方、MgへのMnの添加は、Mg合金の耐食性を劣化するFeやニッケル(Ni)などの重元素との反応により金属間化合物を生成させ、これら重元素による合金の材質劣化を低減する効果があるとされている(非特許文献2)が、MnのMg合金伸展材の結晶粒微細化に対する影響に関しては記載されていない。 On the other hand, the addition of Mn to Mg produces an intermetallic compound by reaction with heavy elements such as Fe and nickel (Ni) which degrades the corrosion resistance of the Mg alloy, and an effect of reducing material deterioration of the alloy by these heavy elements However, the effect of Mn on the grain refining of Mg alloy extension material is not described.
特許文献4では、0.03〜1mass%のMn添加は、ボロン(B)と共存することで、鋳造時のMg母相の結晶粒サイズを微細にする働きがあることが開示されている。しかしながら、この特許文献におけるMg合金では、鋳造組織の結晶粒サイズが100μmから数十μm程度までの微細化効果であり、延性を改善するためには、更なる結晶粒サイズの微細化が必要である。 Patent Document 4 discloses that the addition of 0.03 to 1% by mass of Mn has the function of reducing the crystal grain size of the Mg matrix at the time of casting by coexisting with boron (B). However, in the Mg alloy in this patent document, the grain size of the cast structure is a refinement effect from 100 μm to several tens of μm, and further refinement of the grain size is necessary to improve the ductility. is there.
特許文献5では、0.2〜3mass%のMnが含有し、平均結晶粒径が20〜100μmとなる所定の条件で焼鈍(圧延前焼鈍)した上で、温間圧延加工により、底面の集積度合い(集合組織)をランダム化させた、成形性に富み、制振性に優れたMg合金材が開示されている。しかし、優れた制振特性を維持するためには、大量の結晶粒界を導入することは望ましくなく、Mg母相の結晶粒サイズが50μm以下の再結晶組織を有することとある。また、成形性と制振性の向上を両立させるためには、非底面すべりの転位運動が必要であり、底面の集合組織をランダムにすることが、必須の組織制御である。また、成形性は、エリクセン試験によって評価を行っている。 In patent document 5, after 0.2-3 mass% of Mn containing and annealing (pre-rolling annealing) on predetermined conditions used as average grain size becoming 20-100 micrometers, accumulation of the bottom is carried out by warm rolling processing. There is disclosed a Mg alloy material which is rich in formability and excellent in vibration damping properties, in which the degree (texture) is randomized. However, in order to maintain excellent damping properties, it is not desirable to introduce a large amount of grain boundaries, and it is said that the grain size of the Mg matrix has a recrystallized structure of 50 μm or less. In addition, in order to achieve both the formability and the improvement of the damping property, nondisplacement dislocation movement is required, and it is an essential structure control to make the texture of the bottom surface random. Also, the formability is evaluated by the Erichsen test.
特許文献6では、0.01〜20mass%のMnを含有し、強度特性に優れ、加工性に富むMg合金圧延材が開示されている。しかしながら、特許文献6では、250MPa以上、350MPa以下の降伏応力を有することが開示されているものの、これらの機械的特性は、Mnのみの添加では達成できず(例えば、本明細書、図7の機械的特性と比較)、複数の溶質元素が添加されていることが容易に推測できる。 Patent Document 6 discloses a rolled Mg alloy material that contains 0.01 to 20 mass% of Mn, is excellent in strength characteristics, and is rich in workability. However, although Patent Document 6 discloses that it has a yield stress of 250 MPa or more and 350 MPa or less, these mechanical properties can not be achieved by the addition of Mn alone (for example, in the present specification, FIG. 7) It can easily be inferred that multiple solute elements are added (compared to mechanical properties).
本発明は、比較的安価な元素であるMnのみを添加したMg基合金素材を、温度と減面比を制御した熱間及び温間加工を施すことにより、優れた室温加工性を有するMg基合金伸展材を提供することを課題としている。これに加え、Mg基合金伸展材の延性や成形性を評価する新しい指標を導入することで、優れた室温加工性を定義付けることも課題としている。 The present invention is an Mg-based alloy having excellent room temperature processability by subjecting a Mg-based alloy material to which only relatively inexpensive elements, only Mn, are added to hot and warm processing with controlled temperature and reduction ratio. It is an issue to provide an alloy extension material. In addition to this, it is also an issue to define excellent room temperature processability by introducing a new index for evaluating the ductility and formability of the Mg-based alloy extension material.
本発明による延性に優れたMg基合金伸展材は、0.07mass%以上、2mass%以下のMnを含み、残部がMgと不可避的成分からなる基合金伸展材であって、母材の平均結晶粒径が5μm以下、かつ、前記伸展材を、JIS規格に基づき、1×10−5/s以上1×10−3/s以下の範囲のひずみ速度で引張試験を行った場合に得られる応力−ひずみ曲線図において、最大負荷応力(σmax)と破断時応力(σbk)の関係、(σmax―σbk)/σmaxが0.3以上であり、棒状の形状を有することを特徴とする。 The Mg-based alloy extension material excellent in ductility according to the present invention is a base alloy extension material containing 0.07 mass% or more and 2 mass% or less of Mn, with the balance being Mg and unavoidable components, and the average crystal of the base material Stress obtained when the particle diameter is 5 μm or less, and the extension material is subjected to a tensile test at a strain rate in the range of 1 × 10 −5 / s or more and 1 × 10 −3 / s or less based on the JIS standard In the strain curve diagram, the relationship between the maximum applied stress (σmax) and the stress at break (σbk), (σmax−σbk) / σmax is 0.3 or more, and has a rod-like shape.
前記母材の平均結晶粒径は3μm未満であってもよい。 The average grain size of the base material may be less than 3 μm.
Mnを0.11mass%以上1.40mass%以下を含んでもよい。 The Mn content may be 0.11 mass% to 1.40 mass%.
本発明によるMg基合金伸展材を製造する方法は、0.07mass%以上、2mass%以下のMnを含み、残部がMgと不可避的成分からなるMg基合金鋳造材を400℃以上650℃以下の温度で溶体化処理した後、100℃以上550℃以下の温度で総断面減少率70%以上となるまで、押出加工、引抜加工、溝ロール圧延のいずれかの加工法により熱間ひずみ付与を行うことを特徴とする。 The method for producing the Mg-based alloy extension material according to the present invention comprises the cast material of Mg-based alloy containing 0.07 mass% or more and 2 mass% or less of Mn and the balance being Mg and unavoidable components is 400 ° C. or more and 650 ° C. or less After solution treatment at a temperature, hot straining is performed by any of the processing methods of extrusion processing, drawing processing, and grooved roll rolling until the total cross-section reduction rate becomes 70% or more at a temperature of 100 ° C to 550 ° C. It is characterized by
前記熱間ひずみ付与を繰り返してもよい。 The hot straining may be repeated.
前記熱間ひずみ付与は、押出加工または溝ロール圧延の加工法であってもよい。 The hot straining may be a process of extrusion or grooved roll rolling.
前記熱間ひずみ付与を総断面減少率90%以上となるまで行ってもよい。 The hot straining may be performed until the total cross-sectional reduction rate becomes 90% or more.
本発明の効果を得るためのMg基合金素材のMnの含有量は、0.07mass%以上、2mass%以下である。Mnの含有量が0.07mass%(=0.03mol%)とは、溶質元素であるMnが、変形挙動に影響を及ぼす最小添加量である。すなわち、含有量が0.07mass%の場合、固溶しているMn原子は、19.5×10−10mの間隔でMg結晶中に存在すると見積もることができる。この距離は、Mgのバーガースベクトルの3倍程度の大きさに相当し、転位などの格子欠陥が原子結合論的に相互作用を及ぼす限界の値であることを意味する。一方、Mn含有量が2mass%以上の場合、Mg結晶中のMnの最大固溶量を超過するため、Mg−Mnからなる粗大な金属間化合物が、結晶粒内及び結晶粒界に分散する。これらの粗大な金属間化合物粒子の分散は、塑性変形中に破壊の起点となり、延性の向上の観点から好ましいとは言えない。ここで、Mg−Mn金属間化合物粒子の大きさは、好ましくは、500nm以下、より好ましくは250nm以下、さらに好ましくは100nm以下である。 The content of Mn in the Mg-based alloy material for obtaining the effects of the present invention is 0.07 mass% or more and 2 mass% or less. The content of Mn of 0.07 mass% (= 0.03 mol%) is the minimum addition amount of Mn which is a solute element to affect the deformation behavior. That is, when the content is 0.07 mass%, it can be estimated that the solid solution Mn atoms are present in the Mg crystal at an interval of 19.5 × 10 −10 m. This distance corresponds to about three times the size of the Burgers vector of Mg, which means that it is the limit value at which lattice defects such as dislocation cause atomic bonding interactions. On the other hand, when the Mn content is 2 mass% or more, the maximum solid solution amount of Mn in Mg crystal is exceeded, so a coarse intermetallic compound consisting of Mg-Mn is dispersed in crystal grains and in crystal grain boundaries. Dispersion of these coarse intermetallic compound particles becomes a starting point of fracture during plastic deformation, and is not preferable from the viewpoint of improvement of ductility. Here, the size of the Mg—Mn intermetallic compound particles is preferably 500 nm or less, more preferably 250 nm or less, and still more preferably 100 nm or less.
熱間加工後のMg母相の結晶粒サイズは10μm以下であることが好ましいが、さらに好ましくは7μm以下がよく、さらに好ましくは5μm以下がよい。結晶粒サイズが10μmより粗大な場合、結晶粒界で生じる粒界コンパティビリティー応力は、結晶粒内全域に影響を及ぼさない。すなわち、非底面転位すべりが結晶粒内全域で活動することが難しく、延性の向上が望めない。もちろん、結晶粒サイズが10μm以下であれば、Mg結晶粒内及び結晶粒界に500nm以下のMg−Mn金属間化合物が分散していてもかまわない。また、平均結晶粒サイズを10μm以下に維持できるのであれば、熱間加工後に、ひずみ取り焼鈍などの熱処理を行ってもかまわない。 The crystal grain size of the Mg matrix after hot working is preferably 10 μm or less, more preferably 7 μm or less, and still more preferably 5 μm or less. When the grain size is larger than 10 μm, the grain boundary compatibility stress generated at the grain boundary does not affect the entire area within the grain. That is, it is difficult for non-bottom dislocation sliding to be active in the entire region of the crystal grain, and improvement in ductility can not be expected. Of course, if the crystal grain size is 10 μm or less, an Mg—Mn intermetallic compound of 500 nm or less may be dispersed in the Mg crystal grains and in the crystal grain boundaries. In addition, heat treatment such as strain relief annealing may be performed after hot working as long as the average grain size can be maintained at 10 μm or less.
次に微細組織を得るための製造方法を説明する。溶製したMg−Mn合金鋳造材を、400℃以上、650℃以下の温度で溶体化処理を行う。ここで、溶体化処理温度が400℃未満の場合、Mnを均質に固溶させるためには長時間の温度保持が必要となり、工業的観点から好ましくない。一方、650℃を超えると、固相温度以上であるため、局所溶解が始まり、作業上危険である。もちろん、鋳造法は、重力鋳造、砂型鋳造、ダイキャストなど、本発明のMg基合金鋳造材を作製できる手法であればいずれの方法も採用できる。 Next, a manufacturing method for obtaining a fine structure will be described. The molten Mg—Mn alloy cast material is subjected to solution treatment at a temperature of 400 ° C. or more and 650 ° C. or less. Here, when the solution treatment temperature is less than 400 ° C., it is necessary to maintain the temperature for a long time to form a solid solution of Mn, which is not preferable from an industrial viewpoint. On the other hand, if the temperature exceeds 650 ° C., local melting starts because the temperature is above the solid phase temperature, which is dangerous for operation. Of course, as the casting method, any method such as gravity casting, sand casting, die casting and the like can be adopted as long as it can produce the Mg-based alloy cast material of the present invention.
溶体化処理後、熱間ひずみ付与を行う。熱間加工の温度は、100℃以上550℃以下が好ましい。加工温度が100℃未満の場合、加工温度が低いため動的再結晶が起こりにくく、健全な伸展材を作製することができない。加工温度が550℃を超える場合、加工中に再結晶化が進行して結晶粒微細化が阻害され、更に、押出加工の金型寿命の低下の原因となる。なお、各種温度の測定は最低でも上下10℃の誤差を見込む必要があり、これらのことから20℃を温度ゾーンとして各種温度を表示するのがその実態に即したものである。 After the solution treatment, hot straining is performed. The temperature for hot working is preferably 100 ° C. or more and 550 ° C. or less. If the processing temperature is less than 100 ° C., the processing temperature is low, so dynamic recrystallization is unlikely to occur, and a healthy extension material can not be produced. If the processing temperature exceeds 550 ° C., recrystallization proceeds during processing to inhibit grain refinement, which further causes a decrease in die life of extrusion processing. In addition, it is necessary to allow at least an error of 10 ° C. at the minimum for measurement of various temperatures, and from these facts, displaying various temperatures with 20 ° C. as a temperature zone is in line with the actual situation.
熱間加工時のひずみ付与は、総断面減少率が70%以上、好ましくは80%以上、より好ましくは90%以上とする。総断面減少率が70%未満の場合、ひずみ付与が不十分であるため、結晶粒サイズの微細化ができない。更に、ひずみ付与前、すなわち、所定温度に昇温した炉内又はコンテナ内に保持中に、Mg−Mnからなる金属間化合物が母相及び結晶粒界に生成することが考えられる。この様な場合、十分なひずみを付与しなければ、これらの金属間化合物を微細に分散させることが難しい。熱間加工方法は、押出、鍛造、圧延、引抜などが代表的であるが、ひずみを付与できる塑性加工法であればいずれの加工法でも採用できる。ただし、熱間加工を実行せず、鋳造材に溶体化処理したのみでは、Mg母相の結晶粒サイズが粗大であるため、本発明の効果が得られない。 The straining at the time of hot working is performed such that the total cross-section reduction rate is 70% or more, preferably 80% or more, and more preferably 90% or more. If the total cross-section reduction rate is less than 70%, the straining is insufficient, and thus the grain size can not be reduced. Furthermore, it is conceivable that intermetallic compounds consisting of Mg—Mn are formed in the matrix and grain boundaries before strain application, that is, during holding in a furnace or container heated to a predetermined temperature. In such a case, it is difficult to finely disperse these intermetallic compounds unless sufficient strain is applied. The hot working method is typically extrusion, forging, rolling, drawing or the like, but any working method may be adopted as long as it is a plastic working method that can impart strain. However, the effect of the present invention can not be obtained because the crystal grain size of the Mg matrix is coarse only by solution treatment of the cast material without executing hot working.
Mg基合金伸展材の延性や成形性を評価する新しい指標、すなわち、応力低下度とひずみ速度感受性指数(m値)について説明する。図1の公称応力と公称ひずみ曲線から、一様伸び、全伸びなどが測定され、これらの値が素材の成形性の指標となっている。しかし、一様伸びは、均一変形までの伸びであるため、一軸変形を意味する。一方、実際の成形では、一軸変形ではなく、多軸状態が多いため、成形性に優れるか否かは、材料の塑性変形の限界を知ることが重要である。ここで、塑性変形限界とは、材料の延性破壊の発生から破壊に至る過程に対応づけられ、微視的欠陥(ボイド)の発生から成長・全体破壊までの変形尤度(=応力低下度)によって決定される。すなわち、図1の両矢印で示す変形低下度が大きい程、くびれが生じやすく、多軸状態にて変形に優れると言える。他方、変形低下度が小さい場合、応力集中が生じ、せん断破壊を起こす。優れた成形性を得るためには、式(1)の応力低下度の値が、
(σmax−σbk)/σmax ・・・(1)
0.3以上であることが好ましい。
A new index for evaluating the ductility and formability of Mg-based alloy extensions, that is, the stress reduction and strain rate sensitivity index (m value) will be described. From the nominal stress and the nominal strain curve in FIG. 1, uniform elongation, total elongation, etc. are measured, and these values are indicators of the formability of the material. However, uniform elongation means uniaxial deformation since it is elongation to uniform deformation. On the other hand, it is important to know the limit of plastic deformation of the material whether or not it is excellent in formability, because in actual forming, there are many uniaxial states instead of uniaxial deformation. Here, the plastic deformation limit corresponds to the process from the occurrence of ductile fracture of a material to the fracture, and the likelihood of deformation from the occurrence of microscopic defects (voids) to growth / total fracture (= the degree of stress reduction) Determined by That is, as the degree of deformation reduction indicated by the double arrow in FIG. 1 is larger, it is more likely that a necking occurs, and the deformation is excellent in a multiaxial state. On the other hand, when the degree of deformation reduction is small, stress concentration occurs and shear failure occurs. In order to obtain excellent formability, the value of the degree of stress reduction of equation (1) is
(Σmax−σbk) / σmax (1)
It is preferable that it is 0.3 or more.
また、粒界すべりの発現の有無は、m値を用いることで予測することができる。式(2)のm値は、
市販の純Mn(99.9%)と市販の純Mg(99.96%)を、鉄製るつぼを用いて、Ar雰囲気にて完全に溶解し、溶解温度800℃にて120分間以上保持した後、鉄製鋳型に鋳込み、Mg−Mn母合金(Mn=4.8mass%)を作製した。その後、Mn目標含有量が、0.1mass%、0.25mass%、0.7mass%、1.35mass%となるようにMg−Mn母合金とMgを調整し、鉄製るつぼを用いて4種類のMg−Mn合金鋳造材を溶製した。なお、溶解温度は700℃、溶解保持時間を5分とし、直径90mm、高さ200mmの鉄製鋳型を用いて鋳造した。鋳造材を500℃、2時間にて溶体化処理した後、Mnやその他の元素組成濃度をICP発光分光分析法により分析評価した。組成分析の結果を表1に示す。 After completely dissolving commercially available pure Mn (99.9%) and commercially available pure Mg (99.96%) in an Ar atmosphere using an iron crucible, and maintaining the solution temperature at 800 ° C. for 120 minutes or more The cast iron was cast in a mold made of iron to prepare a Mg-Mn master alloy (Mn = 4.8 mass%). After that, the Mg-Mn mother alloy and Mg are adjusted so that the target Mn content becomes 0.1 mass%, 0.25 mass%, 0.7 mass%, and 1.35 mass%, and four types of iron crucibles are used. The Mg-Mn alloy casting material was melted. The melting temperature was 700 ° C., and the melting and holding time was 5 minutes, and casting was performed using an iron mold having a diameter of 90 mm and a height of 200 mm. After the cast material was subjected to solution treatment at 500 ° C. for 2 hours, the concentrations of elemental compositions of Mn and other elements were analyzed and evaluated by ICP emission spectrometry. The results of composition analysis are shown in Table 1.
溶体化処理後の鋳造材1〜4を、機械加工により、直径90mm、長さ80mmの円柱押出ビレットに加工した。加工後のビレットを300〜400℃に設定したコンテナ内で30分間保持した後、押出比5:1にて押出による熱間ひずみ付与加工を行い、直径40mmで長さ300mm以上の形状の一段押出材を作製した。(以下、1st押出材と称す。)この1st押出材を40mmの長さに切断した後、表2に示す押出温度に設定したコンテナ内で30分間保持し、押出比25:1(=減面率:94%)にて、2回目の熱間ひずみ付与加工を行った。(以下、2nd押出材と称す。) Casting materials 1 to 4 after solution treatment were machined into cylindrical extruded billets of 90 mm in diameter and 80 mm in length. After holding the processed billet for 30 minutes in a container set at 300 to 400 ° C., hot strain application processing by extrusion is performed at an extrusion ratio of 5: 1, and one-step extrusion with a diameter of 40 mm and a length of 300 mm or more The material was made. After cutting this 1st extruded material to a length of 40 mm, it is held for 30 minutes in a container set to the extrusion temperature shown in Table 2 and an extrusion ratio of 25: 1 (= surface reduction) The second hot straining process was performed at a rate of 94%. (Hereafter, it is called 2nd extrusion material.)
次に、溝ロール材圧延工程について説明する。Mg−Mn合金の溝ロール材は、次の手順で製作した。1st押出材(直径40mm)を、長さ80mmの円柱ビレットを切り出した。溝ロール圧延用円柱ビレットを、表2に示す加工温度に設定したマッフル炉内で60分間保持し、溝ロール圧延を施した。ここで、ロール表面温度は、室温とし、溝ロール圧延による断面積減を1パスあたり18%とし、総減面率が92%となるように15回繰返し圧延を実施した。 Next, the grooved roll material rolling process will be described. A grooved roll material of Mg-Mn alloy was manufactured in the following procedure. From the 1st extruded material (diameter 40 mm), a cylindrical billet having a length of 80 mm was cut out. The grooved roll rolling cylindrical billet was held for 60 minutes in a muffle furnace set to the processing temperature shown in Table 2, and grooved roll rolling was performed. Here, the roll surface temperature was room temperature, the cross-sectional area reduction due to grooved roll rolling was 18% per pass, and rolling was repeated 15 times such that the total reduction in area was 92%.
なお、1st押出は、直径40mmからなる円柱ビレットへの形状付与を目的としている。2nd押出及び溝ロール圧延は、ひずみ付与加工中の動的再結晶を利用した結晶粒微細化を主たる目的としている。 In addition, 1st extrusion aims at shape provision to the cylindrical billet which consists of diameter 40 mm. The 2nd extrusion and grooved roll rolling mainly aim at grain refinement using dynamic recrystallization during straining processing.
光学顕微鏡及び走査型電子顕微鏡/電子線後方散乱回折装置を用いて、作製したMg−Mn合金の微細組織観察を行った。図2〜5に典型的な観察例を示す。図中、黒色線で囲まれた領域が、ひとつの結晶粒である。図2は、異なる加工温度で作製したMg−0.25mass%Mn合金押出材の微細組織観察例である。加工温度の低温化にともない、結晶粒サイズは微細化する。また、図3〜5の微細組織観察から、いずれのMg−Mn合金も、結晶粒サイズが5μm以下であることが分かる。なお、各Mg−Mn合金の平均結晶粒サイズは、切片法で求め、表2にまとめている。ここで、本発明の効果を得るためには、熱間加工後のMg−Mn合金の平均結晶粒サイズが、10μm以下であることが重要である。そのため、10μmを超える平均結晶粒サイズを有するMg−Mn合金は、比較例としている。 The microstructure of the prepared Mg-Mn alloy was observed using an optical microscope and a scanning electron microscope / electron beam backscattering diffractometer. Typical observation examples are shown in FIGS. In the figure, a region surrounded by a black line is one crystal grain. FIG. 2 is an example of observing the microstructure of an extruded material of Mg-0.25 mass% Mn alloy manufactured at different processing temperatures. As the processing temperature decreases, the grain size becomes finer. Further, from the microstructure observation in FIGS. 3 to 5, it is understood that the crystal grain size is 5 μm or less in any of the Mg—Mn alloys. In addition, the average grain size of each Mg-Mn alloy is calculated | required by the segment method, and is put together in Table 2. Here, in order to obtain the effects of the present invention, it is important that the average grain size of the Mg-Mn alloy after hot working is 10 μm or less. Therefore, Mg-Mn alloys having an average grain size of more than 10 μm are used as comparative examples.
図6に、走査型電子顕微鏡/電子線後方散乱回折から得られた結晶方位分布図を示す。各線が等高線を表し、(0001)面すなわち底面に結晶方位が集合し、その最大集積度は3.0以上である。一方で、一般的に、ランダムな集合組織を有する場合、等高線が均等に分布、もしくは、等高線が存在しないことを特徴とする。そのため、実施例に示すMg−Mn合金は、底面集合組織を有することが分かる。 FIG. 6 shows a crystal orientation distribution map obtained from scanning electron microscope / electron backscattering diffraction. Each line represents a contour line, and crystal orientations gather on the (0001) plane, ie, the bottom, and the maximum integration degree is 3.0 or more. On the other hand, generally, in the case of having a random texture, it is characterized in that contour lines are evenly distributed or contour lines do not exist. Therefore, it turns out that Mg-Mn alloy shown in an example has bottom face texture.
2nd押出材及び溝ロール圧延から採取した試験片について、初期ひずみ速度1×10−3s−1と1×10−5s−1で室温引張試験を行った。引張試験は、JIS規格に基づき、平行部長さ15mm、平行部直径3mmからなる丸棒試験片を用いた。全ての試験片は、押出方向又は圧延方向に対して、平行方向から採取した。図7と図8に室温の引張試験により得られた公称応力−公称ひずみ曲線を示す。実施例のMg−Mn合金(図7)は、優れた延性を示すことが確認できる。一方、平均結晶粒サイズが10μm以上の比較例の場合(図8)、実施例と比べて、延性は低下することが分かる。ここで、応力が20%以上低下した場合を「破断」したと定義(図中ではBKと表示)し、その時の公称ひずみを、破断伸びとして表2にまとめている。 A room temperature tensile test was performed on test pieces collected from the 2nd extruded material and grooved roll rolling at an initial strain rate of 1 × 10 −3 s −1 and 1 × 10 −5 s −1 . The tension test used the round bar test piece which consists of parallel part length 15 mm and parallel part diameter 3 mm based on JIS specification. All test pieces were taken from the parallel direction to the extrusion direction or the rolling direction. 7 and 8 show nominal stress-nominal strain curves obtained by room temperature tensile tests. It can be confirmed that the Mg-Mn alloy of the example (FIG. 7) exhibits excellent ductility. On the other hand, in the case of the comparative example having an average crystal grain size of 10 μm or more (FIG. 8), it is understood that the ductility is reduced as compared with the example. Here, the case where the stress is reduced by 20% or more is defined as "broken" (indicated as BK in the figure), and the nominal strain at that time is summarized in Table 2 as a breaking elongation.
また、図7に示す実施例の公称応力と公称ひずみ曲線は、最大負荷応力後、大きな応力低下度を示していることが分かる。例えば、実施例7の(σmax―σbk)/σmaxの値は0.7を示すことから、本発明合金の塑性変形限界が大きく、成形性に優れることを示唆している。図9に、実施例7の室温引張試験後の外観写真を示す。図中、矢印で示す破断部近傍では、局部収縮の大きい高絞り型となり、成形性に優れていることを裏付けている。また、他の実施例も同様の傾向を示すことも確認している。 Also, it can be seen that the nominal stress and nominal strain curves of the embodiment shown in FIG. 7 show a large degree of stress drop after the maximum applied stress. For example, the value of (σmax−σbk) / σmax in Example 7 is 0.7, which indicates that the plastic deformation limit of the alloy of the present invention is large, and the formability is excellent. The external appearance photograph after the room temperature tension test of Example 7 is shown in FIG. In the figure, in the vicinity of the broken part shown by the arrow, it becomes a high drawing type with a large local contraction, and it supports that it is excellent in moldability. It is also confirmed that the other examples show the same tendency.
各引張試験の結果をもとに、公称ひずみ0.05の時の、公称応力の値を流動応力とし、図10に流動応力とひずみ速度の関係を示す。図中、直線の傾きがm値に相当し、平均二乗法によって求まった値を表2に示す。実施例にあるMg−Mn合金のm値は、0.1以上を示し、粒界すべりの発現により、高延性化をもたらしている。一方、比較例のMg−Mn合金のm値は小さく、本発明の効果を得るためには、結晶粒サイズが微細であることが不可欠である。 Based on the results of each tensile test, the nominal stress value at a nominal strain of 0.05 is taken as the flow stress, and the relationship between the flow stress and the strain rate is shown in FIG. In the figure, the slope of the straight line corresponds to the m value, and the value obtained by the mean square method is shown in Table 2. The m value of the Mg-Mn alloy in the examples is 0.1 or more, and the occurrence of grain boundary sliding brings about high ductility. On the other hand, the m value of the Mg-Mn alloy of the comparative example is small, and in order to obtain the effect of the present invention, it is essential that the grain size is fine.
なお、本発明の実施例では、第1段塑性ひずみ付与方法として押出加工、第2段塑性ひずみ付与方法として押出加工と溝圧延ロール加工の例を示したが、第1段及び第2段塑性ひずみ付与方法として押出加工、鍛造加工、圧延加工、引抜加工のうちのいずれか1種類の加工方法の組合せを採用しても構わない。もちろん、適性の範囲の断面減少率をとることができれば、第2段塑性ひずみ付与方法を省略することもできるし、断面減少率が所定の値より少ない場合には、更に、第3段以上の塑性ひずみ付与を行うこともできる。 In the embodiment of the present invention, although an example of extrusion processing as the first stage plastic strain application method and extrusion and groove rolling roll processing as the second stage plastic strain application method is shown, the first stage and second stage plasticity are described. A combination of any one processing method among extrusion, forging, rolling and drawing may be adopted as a strain application method. Of course, the second stage plastic strain application method can be omitted if the section reduction rate within the appropriate range can be obtained, and if the section reduction rate is smaller than a predetermined value, the third stage or more Plastic strain can also be applied.
本発明のMg−Mn合金は、優れた延性を示すことから、二次加工性に富み、板形状をはじめとする複雑形状への成形が容易である。また、大きなひずみを付与しても破断が起こらないことから、自動車などをはじめとする衝撃吸収材や構造材としての適応が可能と言える。また、粒界すべりが発現することから、内部摩擦特性に優れ、振動やノイズを課題とする部位への適応が考えられる。更に、希土類元素を用いていないため、従来の希土類添加Mg合金と比較して素材の価格を低減することが可能である。 Since the Mg-Mn alloy of the present invention exhibits excellent ductility, it is rich in secondary workability and can be easily formed into a complex shape including a plate shape. In addition, since breakage does not occur even if a large strain is applied, it can be said that it can be applied as an impact absorbing material or structural material including automobiles and the like. In addition, since grain boundary sliding appears, it is considered that the internal friction characteristics are excellent, and adaptation to a portion where vibration or noise is a problem is considered. Furthermore, since the rare earth element is not used, it is possible to reduce the cost of the material compared to the conventional rare earth-doped Mg alloy.
σmax 最大負荷応力
σbk 破断時応力
BK 応力が20%以上低下した公称ひずみの値
FS 公称ひずみ0.05の時の公称応力の値、別称:流動応力
m ひずみ速度感受性指数
ED 押出加工に対して平行方向
RD 圧延加工に対して平行方向
TD 押出又は圧延加工に対して垂直方向
σmax Maximum load stress σbk Stress at break 20% or more of nominal strain value at which stress is reduced by 20% or more FS nominal stress value at nominal strain 0.05, alias: flow stress m strain rate sensitivity index ED parallel to extrusion Direction RD parallel to the rolling process TD perpendicular to the extrusion or rolling process
Claims (7)
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2018233016A JP6648894B2 (en) | 2018-12-13 | 2018-12-13 | Magnesium-based alloy stretch material and method of manufacturing the same |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2018233016A JP6648894B2 (en) | 2018-12-13 | 2018-12-13 | Magnesium-based alloy stretch material and method of manufacturing the same |
Related Parent Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2014138560A Division JP2016017183A (en) | 2014-07-04 | 2014-07-04 | Magnesium-based alloy malleable material and manufacturing method therefor |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JP2019060026A true JP2019060026A (en) | 2019-04-18 |
| JP6648894B2 JP6648894B2 (en) | 2020-02-14 |
Family
ID=66176323
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2018233016A Active JP6648894B2 (en) | 2018-12-13 | 2018-12-13 | Magnesium-based alloy stretch material and method of manufacturing the same |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JP6648894B2 (en) |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN112030048A (en) * | 2020-08-26 | 2020-12-04 | 中南大学 | High-strength high-heat-conductivity magnesium alloy and preparation method thereof |
Families Citing this family (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN112048650A (en) * | 2020-07-22 | 2020-12-08 | 东华大学 | High-strength magnesium alloy with high electromagnetic shielding and thermal conductivity and preparation method thereof |
Citations (7)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP2002373526A (en) * | 2001-06-14 | 2002-12-26 | Fujikura Ltd | Overhead wire |
| CN101698917A (en) * | 2009-11-11 | 2010-04-28 | 重庆大学 | High strength high plasticity magnesium alloy |
| JP2010121165A (en) * | 2008-11-19 | 2010-06-03 | Mitsubishi Alum Co Ltd | Magnesium alloy sheet and method for producing the same |
| CN102312144A (en) * | 2010-07-07 | 2012-01-11 | 乐普(北京)医疗器械股份有限公司 | Ultrafine-grain medical magnesium alloy and preparation method thereof |
| JP2013129914A (en) * | 2011-11-22 | 2013-07-04 | National Institute Of Advanced Industrial Science & Technology | Method for producing magnesium alloy sheet material, magnesium alloy sheet material, and press molding using the same |
| JP2013170299A (en) * | 2012-02-21 | 2013-09-02 | Sumitomo Electric Ind Ltd | Method for manufacturing metal coil material and metal coil material |
| CN103882273A (en) * | 2014-04-18 | 2014-06-25 | 重庆大学 | Mg-Mn wrought magnesium alloy and preparation method thereof |
-
2018
- 2018-12-13 JP JP2018233016A patent/JP6648894B2/en active Active
Patent Citations (7)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP2002373526A (en) * | 2001-06-14 | 2002-12-26 | Fujikura Ltd | Overhead wire |
| JP2010121165A (en) * | 2008-11-19 | 2010-06-03 | Mitsubishi Alum Co Ltd | Magnesium alloy sheet and method for producing the same |
| CN101698917A (en) * | 2009-11-11 | 2010-04-28 | 重庆大学 | High strength high plasticity magnesium alloy |
| CN102312144A (en) * | 2010-07-07 | 2012-01-11 | 乐普(北京)医疗器械股份有限公司 | Ultrafine-grain medical magnesium alloy and preparation method thereof |
| JP2013129914A (en) * | 2011-11-22 | 2013-07-04 | National Institute Of Advanced Industrial Science & Technology | Method for producing magnesium alloy sheet material, magnesium alloy sheet material, and press molding using the same |
| JP2013170299A (en) * | 2012-02-21 | 2013-09-02 | Sumitomo Electric Ind Ltd | Method for manufacturing metal coil material and metal coil material |
| CN103882273A (en) * | 2014-04-18 | 2014-06-25 | 重庆大学 | Mg-Mn wrought magnesium alloy and preparation method thereof |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN112030048A (en) * | 2020-08-26 | 2020-12-04 | 中南大学 | High-strength high-heat-conductivity magnesium alloy and preparation method thereof |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JP6648894B2 (en) | 2020-02-14 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| JP6860235B2 (en) | Magnesium-based alloy wrought material and its manufacturing method | |
| JP6860236B2 (en) | Magnesium-based alloy wrought material and its manufacturing method | |
| JP6893354B2 (en) | Magnesium-based alloy extender | |
| US11060173B2 (en) | Wrought processed magnesium-based alloy and method for producing same | |
| KR101258470B1 (en) | High-Strength High-Ductility Ignition-Proof Magnesium Alloy | |
| JP6489576B2 (en) | Method for producing a magnesium-based alloy extension material | |
| JP6432344B2 (en) | Magnesium alloy and manufacturing method thereof | |
| JP4189687B2 (en) | Magnesium alloy material | |
| WO2008117890A1 (en) | Magnesium alloys and process for producing the same | |
| EP2835437B1 (en) | Magnesium alloy, magnesium alloy member and method for manufacturing same, and method for using magnesium alloy | |
| JP2016017183A (en) | Magnesium-based alloy malleable material and manufacturing method therefor | |
| JP2016169427A (en) | Mg ALLOY AND PRODUCTION METHOD THEREFOR | |
| JP4929000B2 (en) | Magnesium alloy for plastic working and magnesium alloy plastic working member | |
| JP6648894B2 (en) | Magnesium-based alloy stretch material and method of manufacturing the same | |
| KR101007856B1 (en) | High strength high ductility magnesium alloy | |
| JP5419061B2 (en) | Magnesium alloy | |
| JP6120380B6 (en) | Magnesium alloy, magnesium alloy member and method for producing the same, and method of using magnesium alloy | |
| JP6774787B2 (en) | Magnesium alloy manufacturing method | |
| POPELA et al. | High-temperature behaviour of Ti-Al-Nb-Ta intermetallics |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| A621 | Written request for application examination |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621 Effective date: 20181213 |
|
| A977 | Report on retrieval |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007 Effective date: 20191211 |
|
| A131 | Notification of reasons for refusal |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131 Effective date: 20191217 |
|
| A521 | Request for written amendment filed |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523 Effective date: 20191218 |
|
| TRDD | Decision of grant or rejection written | ||
| A01 | Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01 Effective date: 20200107 |
|
| A61 | First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61 Effective date: 20200108 |
|
| R150 | Certificate of patent or registration of utility model |
Ref document number: 6648894 Country of ref document: JP Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150 |
|
| R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
| R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
| R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |