JP2019049507A - Method and apparatus for detecting defects - Google Patents
Method and apparatus for detecting defects Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- JP2019049507A JP2019049507A JP2017174722A JP2017174722A JP2019049507A JP 2019049507 A JP2019049507 A JP 2019049507A JP 2017174722 A JP2017174722 A JP 2017174722A JP 2017174722 A JP2017174722 A JP 2017174722A JP 2019049507 A JP2019049507 A JP 2019049507A
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- contour
- defect
- outline
- approximation line
- detection method
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Landscapes
- Investigating Materials By The Use Of Optical Means Adapted For Particular Applications (AREA)
- Image Analysis (AREA)
Abstract
【課題】複雑形状の検査対象物についてもマスキングによる多大の手間を要することなく欠陥の検出を確実に行うことが可能な欠陥検出方法を提供する。
【解決手段】検査対象物1の輪郭を検出し、当該輪郭に最も近い輪郭近似線L1と前記輪郭上の各輪郭点との差分値が所定値Th以上となった輪郭部分を欠陥11として検出する。欠陥11はタービンブレードの翼縁に生じた凸欠陥である。
【選択図】 図2An object of the present invention is to provide a defect detection method capable of reliably detecting a defect of a complex-shaped inspection object without requiring much labor by masking.
An outline of an inspection object 1 is detected, and an outline portion in which a difference value between an outline approximation line L1 closest to the outline and each outline point on the outline becomes a predetermined value Th or more is detected as a defect 11. Do. The defect 11 is a convex defect generated on the blade edge of the turbine blade.
[Selected figure] Figure 2
Description
本発明は検査対象物の凸欠陥や打痕等の欠陥の検出に適した欠陥検出方法および欠陥検出装置に関するものである。 The present invention relates to a defect detection method and a defect detection apparatus suitable for detecting a defect such as a convex defect or a dent of an inspection object.
例えば精密鋳造品のタービンブレードのような複雑な形状の検査対象物では、複雑な陰影により各部の輝度に大きな差を生じるため、輝度の不均一な領域をマスキングで除去することを繰り返して検査領域を区画生成する必要があって多大な手間を要するとともにマスキングによる未検査領域が生じるという問題があった。なお、マスキングによる欠陥検出領域の区画生成については例えば特許文献1に記載されている。 For example, in the case of a complex-shaped inspection object such as a turbine blade of a precision casting product, the complex shading causes a large difference in the luminance of each part, so repeated removal of non-uniform areas of luminance by masking is performed. There is a problem that it is necessary to create a section, which requires a lot of time and that an uninspected area is generated by masking. In addition, about the production | generation of the division of the defect detection area | region by masking, it describes in patent document 1, for example.
本発明はこのような課題を解決するもので、複雑形状の検査対象物についてもマスキングによる多大の手間を要することなく欠陥の検出を確実に行うことが可能な欠陥検出方法および欠陥検出装置を提供することを目的とする。 The present invention solves such a problem, and provides a defect detection method and a defect detection apparatus capable of reliably detecting a defect on an inspection object having a complicated shape without requiring much labor by masking. The purpose is to
本発明の欠陥検出方法では、検査対象物(1)の輪郭を検出し、当該輪郭に最も近い輪郭近似線(L1)と前記輪郭上の各輪郭点との差分値が所定値(Th)以上となった輪郭部分を欠陥(11)として検出する。 In the defect detection method of the present invention, the contour of the inspection object (1) is detected, and the difference value between the contour approximation line (L1) closest to the contour and each contour point on the contour is a predetermined value (Th) or more The contour portion that has become is detected as a defect (11).
本発明の欠陥検出方法によれば、検査対象物の輪郭上の各輪郭点と輪郭近似線の差分値が所定値以上となった部分を欠陥として検出しているから、従来のようなマスキングによる領域除去のような煩雑な手間を要することなく欠陥の検出を確実に行うことができる。
前記輪郭から最も近い輪郭近似線を、直線近似線ないし曲線近似線から選択するようにできる。
前記検出された輪郭のうち直線部と曲線部についてそれぞれ検査範囲を設定し、これら検査範囲でそれぞれ直線近似線ないし曲線近似線を選択するようにできる。
前記差分値が所定の閾値Thを超えた場合に当該輪郭部分を欠陥として検出するようにできる。
上記閾値は例えば1.5%〜3.5%である。
According to the defect detection method of the present invention, a portion where the difference value between each contour point on the contour of the inspection object and the contour approximation line is equal to or more than a predetermined value is detected as a defect. Defects can be detected reliably without the need for complicated work such as area removal.
The contour approximation closest to the contour may be selected from a linear approximation or a curve approximation.
It is possible to set an inspection range for each of the straight line portion and the curve portion among the detected contours, and to select a linear approximation line or a curve approximation line in these inspection ranges.
When the difference value exceeds a predetermined threshold Th, the contour portion can be detected as a defect.
The threshold is, for example, 1.5% to 3.5%.
本発明の欠陥検出装置では、検査対象物(1)の輪郭を検出する手段(ステップ101,102)と、前記輪郭に最も近い輪郭近似線(L1)を設定する手段(ステップ103)と、前記輪郭近似線と前記輪郭上の各輪郭点との差分値を算出する手段(ステップ104)と、前記差分値が所定値(Th)以上となった輪郭部分を欠陥(11)として検出する手段(ステップ105,106)とを具備する。本発明の欠陥検出装置によっても上記欠陥検出方法と同様の効果が得られる。 In the defect detection apparatus of the present invention, a means (step 101, 102) for detecting the contour of the inspection object (1), and a means (step 103) for setting a contour approximation line (L1) closest to the contour; A means (step 104) for calculating a difference value between the contour approximation line and each of the contour points on the contour, and a means for detecting as a defect (11) a contour portion where the difference value is equal to or greater than a predetermined value (Th) Step 105, 106). The same effects as the above-described defect detection method can be obtained by the defect detection device of the present invention.
なお、前記輪郭近似線(L1)を、無欠陥の前記検査対象物(1)の輪郭から得るようにしても良い。また、前記欠陥(11)は例えばタービンブレードの翼縁に生じた凸欠陥ないし凹欠陥である。 The contour approximation line (L1) may be obtained from the contour of the non-defective inspection object (1). Further, the defect (11) is, for example, a convex defect or a concave defect generated on a blade edge of a turbine blade.
上記カッコ内の符号は、後述する実施形態に記載の具体的手段との対応関係を参考的に示すものである。 The reference numerals in the parentheses indicate the correspondence with the specific means described in the embodiments to be described later.
以上のように、本発明によれば、複雑形状の検査対象物についてもマスキングによる多大の手間を要することなく欠陥の検出を確実に行うことができる。 As described above, according to the present invention, it is possible to reliably detect a defect on an inspection object having a complicated shape without requiring much labor by masking.
なお、以下に説明する実施形態はあくまで一例であり、本発明の要旨を逸脱しない範囲で当業者が行う種々の設計的改良も本発明の範囲に含まれる。なお、以下で説明する図6、図7のフローチャートの各ステップは画像を取り込んだコンピュータ内で実行されるものである。 The embodiments described below are merely examples, and various design improvements made by those skilled in the art without departing from the scope of the present invention are also included in the scope of the present invention. Note that each step of the flowcharts of FIG. 6 and FIG. 7 described below is executed in a computer that has captured an image.
(第1実施形態)
図1には一例として検査対象物であるタービンブレード1の画像の一部を示す。本実施形態では最初に公知の撮像手段によってタービンブレード1を撮像し(図6のステップ101)、その画像中で、直線状の輪郭線(輪郭点の集合)を対象として設定された検査範囲X1、曲線状の輪郭線を対象として設定された検査範囲X2毎にタービンブレード1の翼縁に輪郭近似線L1,L2を設定する(図6のステップ103、図1(b))。上記輪郭近似線L1,L2は、各検査範囲X1,X2内においてタービンブレード1の翼縁の輪郭に最も近い近似線を、直線近似線ないし曲線近似線から選択したものである。ここでは一例として、輪郭近似線L1として直線近似線を選択し、輪郭近似線L2として曲線近似線を選択している。なお、検査範囲X1,X2はタービンブレード1の輪郭のうちの直線部と曲線部毎に区分されてそれぞれ設定されている。
First Embodiment
A part of the image of the turbine blade 1 which is a test object is shown as an example in FIG. In the present embodiment, first, the turbine blade 1 is imaged by a known imaging unit (step 101 in FIG. 6), and in the image, an inspection range X1 set for a linear outline (set of outline points) Contour approximation lines L1 and L2 are set on the blade edge of the turbine blade 1 for each inspection range X2 set for a curved contour (step 103 in FIG. 6, FIG. 1 (b)). The contour approximation lines L1 and L2 are obtained by selecting an approximation line closest to the contour of the blade edge of the turbine blade 1 in each inspection range X1 and X2 from a linear approximation line or a curve approximation line. Here, as an example, a straight line approximation line is selected as the contour approximation line L1, and a curve approximation line is selected as the contour approximation line L2. The inspection ranges X1 and X2 are respectively divided into a linear portion and a curved portion of the contour of the turbine blade 1 and set.
一方、検査対象物であるタービンブレード1の輪郭線を撮像画像から算出して(図6のステップ102)その画像中の各検査範囲X1,X2毎に、翼縁の各輪郭線と当該検査範囲X1,X2に予め設定されている上記輪郭近似線L1,L2の差分値(%)を算出する(図6のステップ104)。そして上記差分値が所定の閾値Thを超えた時に欠陥有りとする(図6のステップ105,106)。差分値が閾値Thを超えない場合は欠陥無しとする(図6のステップ105,107)。ここで差分値は、図3に示すように、基準線PLから輪郭近似線Lまでの距離hと基準線PLから輪郭線Pまでの距離h´より、下式(1)又は(2)を選択的に使用して算出される。
h´>hの場合 差分値(%)=(h´−h)/h×100…(1)
h>h´の場合 差分値(%)=(h−h´)/h×100…(2)
On the other hand, the outline of the turbine blade 1 which is the inspection object is calculated from the captured image (step 102 in FIG. 6), and each outline of the blade edge and the inspection area for each inspection area X1 and X2 in the image The difference value (%) of the contour approximation lines L1 and L2 preset in X1 and X2 is calculated (step 104 in FIG. 6). When the difference value exceeds a predetermined threshold Th, it is determined that there is a defect (steps 105 and 106 in FIG. 6). If the difference value does not exceed the threshold Th, no defect is made (steps 105 and 107 in FIG. 6). Here, as shown in FIG. 3, the difference value is expressed by the following equation (1) or (2) from the distance h from the reference line PL to the contour approximation line L and the distance h ′ from the reference line PL to the contour line P: Calculated using selective use.
In the case of h '> h, difference value (%) = (h'-h) / h × 100 (1)
In the case of h> h 'difference value (%) = (h−h ′) / h × 100 (2)
ここで、基準線PLは以下のように決定される。すなわち撮像画像上で横方向をX軸(位置)、縦方向をY軸(距離)とし(図8(c))、画像上の検査対象物のY軸方向の全体の大きさ(距離)がWであったときの、その半分W/2の位置を基準とする(図8(a))。そして、輪郭近似線L1上のプロット点Sに対し、距離W/2の例えば90%の距離にあるプロット点Sに近い点を基準点Pとして選択する。このようにして、検査範囲X1において、X軸(位置)方向で複数の基準点(P1,P2,P3)を得て、これらを連結したものを基準線PLとする(図8(b)、(c))。なお、基準点Pは、距離W/2の80%〜90%の間で適宜決定できる。また、検査範囲X1,X2(図1)はあくまで一例であり、実際には必要個所にさらに数多く設定される。 Here, the reference line PL is determined as follows. That is, in the captured image, the horizontal direction is the X axis (position), and the vertical direction is the Y axis (distance) (FIG. 8C), and the overall size (distance) of the inspection object on the image in the Y axis direction is The position of the half W / 2 when it is W is used as a reference (FIG. 8 (a)). Then, for the plot point S on the contour approximate line L1, a point near the plot point S at a distance of, for example, 90% of the distance W / 2 is selected as the reference point P. In this manner, in the inspection range X1, a plurality of reference points (P1, P2, P3) are obtained in the X axis (position) direction, and a combination of these is set as a reference line PL (FIG. 8 (b), (C)). The reference point P can be appropriately determined between 80% and 90% of the distance W / 2. Further, the inspection ranges X1 and X2 (FIG. 1) are merely examples, and in practice, many more are set at necessary places.
ここで例えば、図1のA領域および図2に示すように検査範囲X1の翼縁に凹欠陥11が生じていると、式(2)が選択される。この凹欠陥11部分では輪郭点と輪郭近似線L1の差分値が局所的に閾値Thを超えて大きくなる。例えば閾値Thを2.5%としたとき、図1のA領域の欠陥11部分では差分値が5.0%になり、この部分に欠陥11があることが検出される(図6のステップ106)。なお、本発明における検査対象物の凸欠陥や打痕等の欠陥は差分値で2.5%前後の値で顕著に検出されるという実験結果に基づいて、閾値Thを2.5%としている。なお、適した閾値Thは1.5%〜3.5%である。 Here, for example, as shown in the A region of FIG. 1 and FIG. 2, when the concave defect 11 is generated at the blade edge of the inspection range X1, the equation (2) is selected. In the concave defect portion 11, the difference value between the contour point and the contour approximate line L1 locally becomes larger than the threshold value Th. For example, when the threshold value Th is 2.5%, the difference value becomes 5.0% in the defect 11 portion of the A region in FIG. 1, and it is detected that the defect 11 is present in this portion (step 106 in FIG. 6). ). In the present invention, the threshold Th is set to 2.5% based on the experimental result that defects such as convex defects and dents of the inspection object in the present invention are significantly detected with a difference value of around 2.5%. . A suitable threshold Th is 1.5% to 3.5%.
他の一例として、図4のB領域および図5に示すように、検査対象であるタービンブレード1の画像中の検査範囲X1,X2において、厚み方向で上記と反対側の翼縁に輪郭近似線L3,L4を設定しておけば、検査範囲X2で翼縁に打痕による凸欠陥12が生じていると、この凸欠陥12部分で輪郭点と輪郭近似線L4の差分値が所定値Thを超えて局所的に大きくなるから、この部分に欠陥12があることが検出される。例えば閾値Thを2.5%としたとき、図4のA領域の欠陥12部分では差分値が5.5%になり、この部分に欠陥12があることが検出される As another example, as shown in area B of FIG. 4 and FIG. 5, in the inspection ranges X1 and X2 in the image of the turbine blade 1 to be inspected, a contour approximation line is drawn to the blade edge on the opposite side in the thickness direction. If L3 and L4 are set, if a convex defect 12 due to a dent is generated at the blade edge in the inspection range X2, the difference between the contour point and the contour approximate line L4 at this convex defect 12 portion is a predetermined value Th Since it locally grows beyond it, it is detected that there is a defect 12 in this part. For example, when the threshold value Th is 2.5%, the difference value becomes 5.5% at the defect 12 portion in the A region of FIG. 4 and it is detected that the defect 12 is present in this portion
(第2実施形態)
上記第1実施形態では検査対象のタービンブレードを撮像してこれから輪郭近似線を設定したが、本実施形態では、図7のステップ201〜203で示すように、無欠陥のタービンブレードを撮像し、これから輪郭線を算出して輪郭近似線の設定を行う。ステップ204〜209は、第1実施形態における図6のステップ101,102,104〜107と同一である。このような手順によれば、欠陥検出精度をより向上させることができる。
Second Embodiment
In the first embodiment, the turbine blade to be inspected is imaged and the contour approximation line is set from this, but in the present embodiment, as shown in steps 201 to 203 of FIG. From this, the outline is calculated and the outline approximation is set. Steps 204-209 are the same as steps 101, 102, 104-107 of FIG. 6 in the first embodiment. According to such a procedure, the defect detection accuracy can be further improved.
1…タービンブレード(検査対象物)、11,12…欠陥、L1,L2,L3,L4…輪郭近似線。 1 Turbine blade (object to be inspected) 11, 12 Defect, L1, L2, L3, L4 Contour approximate line.
Claims (8)
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2017174722A JP6943100B2 (en) | 2017-09-12 | 2017-09-12 | Defect detection method |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2017174722A JP6943100B2 (en) | 2017-09-12 | 2017-09-12 | Defect detection method |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JP2019049507A true JP2019049507A (en) | 2019-03-28 |
| JP6943100B2 JP6943100B2 (en) | 2021-09-29 |
Family
ID=65905548
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2017174722A Active JP6943100B2 (en) | 2017-09-12 | 2017-09-12 | Defect detection method |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JP6943100B2 (en) |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN112085708A (en) * | 2020-08-19 | 2020-12-15 | 浙江华睿科技有限公司 | Method and equipment for detecting defects of straight line edge in product outer contour |
Citations (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JPH09281055A (en) * | 1996-04-09 | 1997-10-31 | Hitachi Metals Ltd | Inspection method for chip |
| JP2005204724A (en) * | 2004-01-20 | 2005-08-04 | Olympus Corp | Endoscope apparatus for measurement |
| JP2008002848A (en) * | 2006-06-20 | 2008-01-10 | Tateyama Machine Kk | Defect inspection device and defect inspection method for rod-shaped rotary tool |
| US20090202135A1 (en) * | 2008-02-07 | 2009-08-13 | Keyence Corporation | Defect Detection Apparatus, Defect Detection Method and Computer Program |
-
2017
- 2017-09-12 JP JP2017174722A patent/JP6943100B2/en active Active
Patent Citations (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JPH09281055A (en) * | 1996-04-09 | 1997-10-31 | Hitachi Metals Ltd | Inspection method for chip |
| JP2005204724A (en) * | 2004-01-20 | 2005-08-04 | Olympus Corp | Endoscope apparatus for measurement |
| JP2008002848A (en) * | 2006-06-20 | 2008-01-10 | Tateyama Machine Kk | Defect inspection device and defect inspection method for rod-shaped rotary tool |
| US20090202135A1 (en) * | 2008-02-07 | 2009-08-13 | Keyence Corporation | Defect Detection Apparatus, Defect Detection Method and Computer Program |
| JP2009186338A (en) * | 2008-02-07 | 2009-08-20 | Keyence Corp | Flaw detector, flaw detection method and computer program |
Cited By (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN112085708A (en) * | 2020-08-19 | 2020-12-15 | 浙江华睿科技有限公司 | Method and equipment for detecting defects of straight line edge in product outer contour |
| CN112085708B (en) * | 2020-08-19 | 2023-07-07 | 浙江华睿科技股份有限公司 | Method and equipment for detecting defects of straight line edges in outer contour of product |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JP6943100B2 (en) | 2021-09-29 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US8452072B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for inspecting tire shape | |
| JP5791475B2 (en) | Image processing apparatus, image processing method, and image processing program | |
| KR20170119901A (en) | Weld bead detecting apparatus | |
| JP2020123042A5 (en) | ||
| JP2020519017A5 (en) | ||
| Sung et al. | Effect of tool nose profile tolerance on surface roughness in finish turning | |
| JP3913517B2 (en) | Defect detection method | |
| JP2007064728A (en) | Strain evaluation apparatus and strain evaluation method | |
| JP2019049507A (en) | Method and apparatus for detecting defects | |
| CN117830230A (en) | Pipeline girth weld defect detection method and system based on AI feature recognition | |
| JP6599698B2 (en) | Image measuring apparatus and control program therefor | |
| JP2012053060A (en) | Ultrasonic flaw detection data processing method, flaw detection data processing program and ultrasonic flaw detection | |
| TW201923923A (en) | Determining the critical size variation of the pattern | |
| JP2004185019A5 (en) | ||
| US10317203B2 (en) | Dimension measuring apparatus and computer readable medium | |
| JP2018036203A (en) | Hole internal inspection device and hole internal inspection method | |
| JP2009236550A (en) | Flaw detection method | |
| JP2007256225A (en) | Pattern matching method and computer program for performing pattern matching | |
| JP2016192923A5 (en) | ||
| JP2018044873A (en) | Surface inspection apparatus, surface inspection method, and database | |
| JP2016121875A (en) | X-ray inspection device | |
| JP2007294739A (en) | Pattern shape evaluation method, program, and semiconductor device manufacturing method | |
| JP6602096B2 (en) | Defect detection device | |
| JP2008058090A (en) | Pattern evaluation method and program | |
| JP5091461B2 (en) | Ultrasonic flaw detector, method and program thereof |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| A621 | Written request for application examination |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621 Effective date: 20200721 |
|
| A977 | Report on retrieval |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007 Effective date: 20210520 |
|
| A131 | Notification of reasons for refusal |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131 Effective date: 20210601 |
|
| A521 | Request for written amendment filed |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523 Effective date: 20210727 |
|
| TRDD | Decision of grant or rejection written | ||
| A01 | Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01 Effective date: 20210810 |
|
| A61 | First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61 Effective date: 20210823 |
|
| R150 | Certificate of patent or registration of utility model |
Ref document number: 6943100 Country of ref document: JP Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150 |