JP2018000714A - Biological index evaluation apparatus, biological index evaluation method, biological index evaluation program, and biological index evaluation system - Google Patents

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To enable evaluation of a biometric index according to a schedule of practice or a game, and to immediately feed back the evaluation of the biometric index. A biometric index evaluation device 1 acquires measurement data acquisition unit 31 that acquires measurement data including a measured biometric index and a measurement date of the biometric index, and activity activity information indicating an activity activity on the measurement date. The activity activity information acquisition unit 32, the storage processing unit 33 that stores the measurement date and the biometric index included in the measurement data and the activity activity information in the storage device 50, and the activity activity information based on the evaluation target date. The evaluation standard creation unit 34 that creates an evaluation standard using the biometric index stored in the storage device 50 according to the progress of the above, and the evaluation unit 35 that evaluates the biometric index on the evaluation target date based on the evaluation standard. To be equipped. [Selection diagram] Fig. 2

Description

  The present invention relates to a biological index evaluation apparatus, a biological index evaluation method, a biological index evaluation program, and a biological index evaluation system that evaluate a biological index (weight, etc.) of a measurement subject.

  2. Description of the Related Art Conventionally, there has been proposed an apparatus that manages changes in body weight and displays the tendency of body weight changes with an image or the like (for example, Patent Document 1). However, in sports practice sites, it is important not only to evaluate changes in weight but also to evaluate and manage weight according to practice and matches. For this reason, for example, a method is adopted in which the person whose weight is to be measured enters the weight measurement value on a sheet, and the person or manager analyzes the amount of change in weight from the previous day according to practice or a match. .

WO2006 / 070827

However, the method of filling in the measured values on the paper has the problems that it is difficult to maintain the reliability of the measured values to be entered and that the analysis of the measured values is a manual operation, so that the amount of change in weight cannot be immediately fed back. . Moreover, in the method of patent document 1, since the evaluation of the weight according to the practice and game in which damage to a body differs is not performed, the subject that it is connected with a poor physical condition and injury of an athlete without being evaluated effectively. there were.
In view of the above circumstances, the present invention is capable of evaluating a biometric index in accordance with a practice or game schedule, and capable of immediately feeding back the biometric index evaluation, a biometric index evaluation method, It is an object to provide a biological index evaluation program and a biological index evaluation system.

One aspect of the biological index evaluation apparatus of the present invention is a measurement data acquisition unit that acquires measurement data including a measured biological index and a measurement date of the biological index, and activity activity information indicating an activity activity on the measurement date An activity action information acquisition unit that acquires the measurement date, the storage date that is included in the measurement data, the biometric index, and the activity action information that are stored in a storage device in association with each other, and the evaluation target date As an evaluation criterion creating unit that creates an evaluation criterion using the biological index stored in the storage device according to the progress of the activity action information, and the biological body on the evaluation target date based on the evaluation criterion An evaluation unit that evaluates the index.
In this specification, the “biological index” means an index for judging and evaluating the physical condition of a human. For example, body weight, body water content, and BMI (Body Mass Index) are included.
In this specification, the “activity action” means an activity that the measured person makes conscious with a specific intention or purpose among the activities of the measured person. For example, playing sports matches, practicing for matches, or resting in preparation for a match.
In this specification, “activity action information” means information indicating an activity action. For example, character information such as “game date”, “practice date”, or “holiday” used when managing the schedule of activity actions is included.
In this specification, “progress of activity information” means how the activity information changes over time. For example, there is a transition method in which the activity action information corresponding to each of the different measurement dates transitions in the order of “practice date”, “holiday”, and “match date”.

  According to one aspect of the biological index evaluation apparatus, the measurement data acquisition unit acquires measurement data including the measured biological index and the measurement date of the biological index, and the activity action information acquisition unit acquires the measurement date. Acquire activity activity information indicating activity activity in. The storage processing unit causes the storage device to store the measurement date and the biometric index included in the measurement data and the activity action information in association with each other. The evaluation criterion creation unit evaluates using the biometric index stored in the storage device according to how the activity action information stored in the storage device has elapsed with respect to the evaluation date. Create a standard. The evaluation unit evaluates the biological index on the evaluation target date based on the created evaluation criterion. It is conceivable that the appropriate range of the biometric index differs depending on what type of activity the activity before the measurement date of the biometric was, that is, how the activity changed. In the one aspect, the evaluation criterion for the biometric index is created according to how the activity action information indicating the activity action has elapsed based on the evaluation target date, and the evaluation of the biometric index on the evaluation target date is Based on evaluation criteria. Therefore, according to the one aspect, the evaluation of the biometric index on the evaluation target date is performed in accordance with the transition of the activity action up to the evaluation target date. Further, in the above aspect, since the measurement date, the biometric index, and the activity action information are associated with each other and stored in the storage device, the evaluation standard creation unit obtains the biometric index and the activity action information necessary for creating the evaluation standard. It can be read immediately. Furthermore, the creation of the evaluation criteria is executed by the evaluation criteria creation unit, and the evaluation of the biometric index is executed by the evaluation unit. Therefore, it is possible to immediately feed back the evaluation result of the biometric index to the person to be measured as compared with the case where the biometric index is analyzed manually.

  In a preferred aspect of the present invention, the evaluation criterion creating unit extracts and extracts the biometric index from the storage device in accordance with a pattern of progress of the activity action information in a predetermined period that goes back from the evaluation target date. The evaluation standard is created using the biometric index. In this preferred aspect, for example, among the biometric indices stored in the storage device, the biometric index extracted by the evaluation criterion creating unit is such that the pattern of the activity action information associated with the biometric index is the predetermined period. It becomes a biometric index in the case of corresponding to any of the progress patterns of the activity action information. Therefore, since an evaluation standard is created using a biometric index related to activity action information that passes in a specific pattern, the evaluation standard is an evaluation standard that is highly correlated with the transition of the activity action. Since the evaluation of the biometric index on the evaluation target date is performed based on such an evaluation criterion, the evaluation conforming to the transition of the activity action up to the price target date is performed.

  In a preferred aspect of the present invention, the storage processing unit causes the storage device to store the evaluation result of the biometric index on the evaluation target date in association with the biometric index and the activity action information on the evaluation target date. . In this preferred embodiment, the result of the evaluation of the biometric index on the evaluation target date is stored in the storage device in association with the biometric index and the activity action information on the measurement date corresponding to the evaluation target date. Therefore, the history of the evaluation results can be immediately fed back to the person being measured.

  In a preferred aspect of the present invention, the measurement data includes identification information of a person to be measured of a biometric index, and the identification information is associated with the measurement date, the biometric index, and the activity action information. The evaluation criterion creating unit creates the evaluation criterion based on the biometric index for each identification information and the activity action information, and the evaluation unit is based on the evaluation criterion for each identification information. To evaluate the biological index. According to this preferred aspect, since the biometric index is evaluated for each person to be measured, it becomes possible to manage and instruct the physical condition suitable for each person to be measured.

  One aspect of the biological index evaluation apparatus of the present invention is a biological index measurement unit that measures a biological index, an activity action information acquisition unit that acquires activity action information indicating an activity action on the measurement date of the biological index, and the measurement A storage processing unit that associates and stores the date, the biometric index, and the activity action information with each other in the storage device, and the storage device stores the activity action information based on the evaluation target date as a reference. An evaluation standard creating unit that creates an evaluation standard using a biometric index, and an evaluation unit that evaluates the biometric index on the evaluation target date based on the evaluation standard.

  According to the one aspect, the biological index measurement unit measures the biological index. The activity activity information acquisition unit acquires activity activity information indicating activity activity on the measurement date of the biometric index. The storage processing unit causes the storage device to store the measurement date, the biological index, and the activity action information in association with each other. The evaluation criterion creation unit evaluates using the biometric index stored in the storage device according to how the activity action information stored in the storage device has elapsed with respect to the evaluation date. Create a standard. The evaluation unit evaluates the biological index on the evaluation target date based on the created evaluation criterion. Therefore, the evaluation criteria for the biometric index are created according to how the activity action information indicating the activity activity has elapsed with respect to the evaluation target date, and the evaluation of the biometric index on the evaluation target date is based on the evaluation criteria. Based on. As a result, the evaluation of the biometric index on the evaluation target date is performed in accordance with the transition of the activity action up to the evaluation target date. Further, in the above aspect, since the measurement date, the biometric index, and the activity action information are associated with each other and stored in the storage device, the evaluation standard creation unit obtains the biometric index and the activity action information necessary for creating the evaluation standard. It can be read immediately. Furthermore, the creation of the evaluation criteria is executed by the evaluation criteria creation unit, and the evaluation of the biometric index is executed by the evaluation unit. Therefore, it is possible to immediately feed back the evaluation result of the biometric index to the person to be measured as compared with the case where the biometric index is analyzed manually.

  One aspect of the biometric index evaluation method of the present invention is to acquire measurement data including the measured biometric index and the measurement date of the biometric index, acquire activity action information indicating an activity action on the measurement date, The measurement date and the biological index included in the measurement data and the activity action information are stored in association with each other, and the stored organism is stored according to the progress of the activity action information on the basis of the evaluation target date. An evaluation standard is created using the index, and the biological index on the evaluation target date is evaluated based on the evaluation standard.

  According to one aspect of the biometric index evaluation method, the biometric index evaluation criterion is created according to how the activity action information indicating the activity action has elapsed with reference to the evaluation target date, The biometric index is evaluated based on the evaluation criteria. As a result, the evaluation of the biometric index on the evaluation target date is performed in accordance with the transition of the activity action up to the evaluation target date. In the aspect, the measurement date, the biometric index, and the activity action information are stored in association with each other, so that the biometric index and the activity action information necessary for creating the evaluation standard can be read immediately. Therefore, it is possible to immediately feed back the evaluation result of the biometric index to the person to be measured as compared with the case where the biometric index is analyzed manually.

  One aspect of the biometric index evaluation method of the present invention is to measure a biometric index, acquire activity action information indicating an activity action on the measurement date of the biometric index, and obtain the measurement date, the biometric index, and the activity action information. Based on the evaluation criterion, the evaluation criterion is stored in the storage device in association with each other, and based on the evaluation target date, using the biological index stored in the storage device according to the progress of the activity action information. Then, the biological index on the evaluation target date is evaluated.

  According to one aspect of the biometric index evaluation method, the biometric index evaluation criterion is created according to how the activity action information indicating the activity action has elapsed with reference to the evaluation target date, The biometric index is evaluated based on the evaluation criteria. As a result, the evaluation of the biometric index on the evaluation target date is performed in accordance with the transition of the activity action up to the evaluation target date. In the aspect, the measurement date, the biometric index, and the activity action information are stored in association with each other, so that the biometric index and the activity action information necessary for creating the evaluation standard can be read immediately. Therefore, it is possible to immediately feed back the evaluation result of the biometric index to the person to be measured as compared with the case where the biometric index is analyzed manually.

  One aspect of the biometric index evaluation program of the present invention includes a biometric index evaluation apparatus, a measurement data acquisition unit that acquires measurement data including a measured biometric index and a measurement date of the biometric index, and the measurement date An activity activity information acquisition unit that acquires activity activity information indicating an activity activity, a storage processing unit that stores the measurement date and the biometric index included in the measurement data, and the activity activity information in a storage device in association with each other And, based on the evaluation target date, according to the progress of the activity action information, based on the evaluation criterion, an evaluation criterion creating unit that creates an evaluation criterion using the biological index stored in the storage device, It functions as an evaluation unit that evaluates the biological index on the evaluation target date.

  According to one aspect of the biometric index evaluation program, by causing the biometric index evaluation apparatus to execute the program, the measurement data acquisition unit includes a measured biometric index and a measurement date of the biometric index. Get the data. The activity action information acquisition unit acquires activity action information indicating the activity action on the measurement date. The storage processing unit causes the storage device to store the measurement date and the biometric index included in the measurement data and the activity action information in association with each other. The evaluation criterion creation unit evaluates using the biometric index stored in the storage device according to how the activity action information stored in the storage device has elapsed with respect to the evaluation date. Create a standard. The evaluation unit evaluates the biological index on the evaluation target date based on the created evaluation criterion. Therefore, the evaluation criteria for the biometric index are created according to how the activity action information indicating the activity activity has elapsed with respect to the evaluation target date, and the evaluation of the biometric index on the evaluation target date is based on the evaluation criteria. Based on. As a result, the evaluation of the biometric index on the evaluation target date is performed in accordance with the transition of the activity action up to the evaluation target date. Further, in the above aspect, since the measurement date, the biometric index, and the activity action information are associated with each other and stored in the storage device, the evaluation standard creation unit obtains the biometric index and the activity action information necessary for creating the evaluation standard. It can be read immediately. Furthermore, the creation of the evaluation criteria is executed by the evaluation criteria creation unit, and the evaluation of the biometric index is executed by the evaluation unit. Therefore, it is possible to immediately feed back the evaluation result of the biometric index to the person to be measured as compared with the case where the biometric index is analyzed manually.

  One aspect of the biomarker evaluation system of the present invention is a biomarker evaluation system including a biomarker measurement device and a biomarker evaluation device that can communicate with the biomarker measurement device. A biometric index measuring unit for measuring an index, wherein the biometric index evaluation device is a measurement data acquiring unit that acquires measurement data including the biometric index measured by the biometric index measuring device and the measurement date of the biometric index; , An activity information acquisition unit that acquires activity activity information indicating activity activity on the measurement date, the measurement date and the biometric index included in the measurement data, and the activity activity information in association with each other in the storage device A storage processing unit to be stored, and an evaluation criterion using the biological index stored in the storage device according to the progress of the activity action information, based on the evaluation target date. And evaluation criteria creation unit for forming, based on the evaluation criteria, and a evaluation unit for evaluating the biological indicators in the evaluation date.

  According to one aspect of the biomarker evaluation system, in the biomarker measurement apparatus, the biomarker measurement unit measures a biomarker. In the biological index evaluation device, the measurement data acquisition unit acquires measurement data including the measured biological index and the measurement date of the biological index, and the activity action information acquisition unit indicates the activity action on the measurement date Acquire activity activity information. The storage processing unit causes the storage device to store the measurement date and the biometric index included in the measurement data and the activity action information in association with each other. The evaluation criterion creation unit evaluates using the biometric index stored in the storage device according to how the activity action information stored in the storage device has elapsed with respect to the evaluation date. Create a standard. The evaluation unit evaluates the biological index on the evaluation target date based on the created evaluation criterion. Therefore, the evaluation criteria for the biometric index are created according to how the activity action information indicating the activity activity has elapsed with respect to the evaluation target date, and the evaluation of the biometric index on the evaluation target date is based on the evaluation criteria. Based on. As a result, according to the one aspect, the evaluation of the biological index on the evaluation target date is performed in accordance with the transition of the activity action up to the evaluation target date. In the aspect, the measurement date, the biometric index, and the activity action information are associated with each other and stored in the storage device. Therefore, the evaluation standard creating unit of the biometric index evaluation apparatus needs the biometric index necessary for creating the evaluation standard. In addition, it is possible to read out activity action information immediately. Furthermore, the creation of the evaluation criteria is executed by the evaluation criteria creation unit, and the evaluation of the biometric index is executed by the evaluation unit. Therefore, it is possible to immediately feed back the evaluation result of the biometric index to the person to be measured as compared with the case where the biometric index is analyzed manually.

It is a figure which shows the external appearance of the biometric index evaluation system which concerns on the 1st Embodiment of this invention. It is a block diagram for demonstrating the function of a biological index evaluation system. It is a flowchart which shows the measurement process of the biomarker of a biomarker measuring device. It is a flowchart which shows the communication process of a biometric index measuring apparatus. It is a flowchart which shows the measurement data acquisition process of the biometric index evaluation apparatus, and the acquisition process of activity action information. 5 is a flowchart showing a biomarker evaluation process in the biomarker evaluation apparatus 1. 5 is a flowchart showing a biomarker evaluation process in the biomarker evaluation apparatus 1. 5 is a flowchart showing a biomarker evaluation process in the biomarker evaluation apparatus 1. It is a figure which shows an example of the table of the recording data at the time of measuring a body weight as a biometric parameter | index. It is a figure which shows an example of the biometric index and alert display screen in a display part. It is the figure which represented the measurement history of the body weight in the graph format. It is a figure which shows an example of transition of the change rate with respect to the body weight on the day before a measurement day. It is a figure which shows an example of transition of the change rate with respect to the body weight on the day before the measurement day. It is a figure which shows an example of the change rate transition display screen which shows transition of the change rate of the body weight on the day after the game day in 2nd Embodiment of this invention. It is a figure which shows an example of the list display screen in 3rd Embodiment of this invention. It is a figure which shows the external appearance of the biometric index evaluation apparatus in 4th Embodiment of this invention. It is a block diagram for demonstrating the function of a biometric index evaluation apparatus. It is a flowchart which shows the measurement process of the biological index in a biological index evaluation apparatus. It is a flowchart which shows the acquisition process of the activity action information in a biometric index evaluation apparatus.

<First Embodiment>
FIG. 1 is a diagram showing an appearance of a biomarker evaluation system 100 according to the first embodiment of the present invention. As shown in FIG. 1, the biomarker evaluation system 100 includes a biomarker evaluation apparatus 1 and a biomarker measurement apparatus 2. As shown in FIG. 1, the biological index measuring device 2 is a device that measures a biological index such as the weight of a person to be measured on a flat measuring table 10. The biometric index evaluation apparatus 1 is an apparatus that acquires a biometric index measured from the biometric index measurement apparatus 2 and evaluates the biometric index.

  The biometric index evaluation apparatus 1 includes, for example, a personal computer, a tablet terminal, a mobile terminal such as a mobile phone, and the like. The biometric index evaluation apparatus 1 receives measurement data, which will be described later, from the biometric index measurement apparatus 2 through wireless communication such as Wi-Fi (registered trademark) or wired communication using a LAN cable or a USB cable. The biometric index evaluation apparatus 1 includes a display unit 62 as shown in FIG. 1, evaluates the biometric index based on the received measurement data, and displays the evaluation result on the display unit 62.

The biometric index measuring device 2 includes a flat measurement table 10 and a flat operation panel 20. On the flat measurement table 10, each current supply electrode 11 and each voltage measurement electrode 12 are installed so as to contact the right foot and the left foot of the measurement subject.
The operation panel 20 includes an operation unit 21 and a display unit 22. The operation unit 21 is an input device that receives instructions from the measurement subject, and includes, for example, function buttons such as a power button for turning the power on and off and a display switching button for switching the display of the display unit 22. . The operation unit 21 includes an ID number as identification information of the measurement subject, and setting buttons for performing various settings such as the name, age, sex, and height of the measurement subject. In FIG. 1, the illustration of all buttons is omitted. The buttons provided on the operation unit 21 are not limited to these, and a touch panel configured integrally with the display unit 22 can be used as the operation unit 21. The display unit 22 is configured by a liquid crystal panel, for example, and displays, for example, a measurement result of a biological index such as the body weight of the measurement subject.

  FIG. 2 is a block diagram for explaining the function of the biological index evaluation system 100. First, the function of the biological index measuring device 2 will be described with reference to FIG. As shown in FIG. 2, the biological index measurement device 2 includes an operation unit 21, a display unit 22, a communication unit 23, a biological index measurement unit 40, a calculation control unit 230, and a storage device 250. . The operation unit 21 and the display unit 22 correspond to the operation unit 21 and the display unit 22 described with reference to FIG.

The communication unit 23 includes a wireless communication interface such as Wi-Fi (registered trademark) or a wired communication interface, and communicates with the biological index evaluation apparatus 1.
The arithmetic control unit 230 includes an information processing apparatus such as a microprocessor. The calculation control unit 230 functions as a communication control unit 231, a display control unit 232, and a biological index calculation unit 233 by executing a program stored in the program storage unit 251 of the storage device 250.
The communication control unit 231 transmits the measurement data measured by the biological index measurement unit 40 to the biological index evaluation device 1 when a request for transmission of measurement data is made from the biological index evaluation device 1 via the communication unit 23. The communication unit 23 is controlled.
The display control unit 232 performs control to display the measurement result of the biological index such as the body weight on the display unit 22. The display control unit 232 controls the display unit 22 to display a message requesting input of the ID number of the measurement subject. Details of the display specific columns will be described later.

The biometric index measuring unit 40 measures the biometric index of the measurement subject. The biological index measurement unit 40 includes a body composition measurement unit 41 and a weight measurement unit 42. The body composition measuring unit 41 measures the body composition of the measurement subject. As shown in FIG. 2, the body composition measurement unit 41 includes a current supply unit 14, a voltage measurement unit 15, a pair of current supply electrodes 11, a pair of voltage measurement electrodes 12, and a biological index calculation of the calculation control unit 230. Part 233.
The current supply unit 14 supplies a measurement current between the pair of current supply electrodes 11. The measurement current is an alternating current having a predetermined frequency (for example, 5 kHz to 250 kHz) that flows between the current supply electrodes 11 via the body of the measurement subject.
The voltage measurement unit 15 generates a measurement signal corresponding to the voltage between the pair of voltage measurement electrodes 12. This measurement signal is a signal corresponding to the measurement subject's bioimpedance, and is converted into a digital signal by an A / D converter (not shown) and then input to the biometric index calculation unit 233.
The biometric index calculation unit 233 calculates a body composition as a biometric index by calculation based on a measurement signal corresponding to the bioelectrical impedance. In addition, the biometric index calculation unit 233 calculates the body composition (body fat percentage, fat mass, lean mass, muscle mass, body water content, etc.) as a biometric index obtained by the calculation, the ID number of the person being measured, and the measurement date And stored in the storage device 250 as measurement data. The biological index measuring device 2 includes a real time clock (RTC) IC (not shown). The biological index calculation unit 233 can recognize the measurement date by reading data such as year, month, and day from the real-time clock IC.

  The body weight measurement unit 42 measures body weight according to a load acting on the measurement table 10. As shown in FIG. 2, the body weight measurement unit 42 includes the weight sensor 16, the amplification conversion unit 17, and the biological index calculation unit 233 of the calculation control unit 230. The weight sensor 16 generates a voltage corresponding to the load acting on the measurement table 10. Specifically, a strain gauge that generates a voltage corresponding to the deformation of the strain generating body disposed below the measurement table 10 (that is, a voltage corresponding to the body weight of the person on the measurement table 10) is a weight sensor. 16 can be used. The amplification conversion unit 17 amplifies the voltage generated by the weight sensor 16 and generates a measurement signal. This measurement signal is converted into a digital signal by an A / D converter (not shown) and then input to the biological index calculation unit 233. The biometric index calculation unit 233 calculates the weight as a biometric index by calculation based on the measurement signal corresponding to the weight. In addition, the biological index calculation unit 233 stores the weight as the biological index obtained by the calculation in the storage device 250 as measurement data in association with the ID number of the person to be measured and the measurement date.

The storage device 250 is configured by, for example, a nonvolatile memory, an HDD (hard disk drive), or the like, and includes a program storage unit 251 and a measurement data storage unit 252. The program storage unit 251 stores various data such as a program executed by the calculation control unit 230 and a table used by the calculation control unit 230.
In the measurement data storage unit 252, the biological index measured by the biological index measurement unit 40, the measurement date, and the ID number of the measurement subject are stored as measurement data.
The storage device 250 may be a non-volatile memory that can be connected to the biometric index measuring device 2, an external HDD, or a USB memory, or an external server or an HDD connected to an external server. May be.

  The biometric index measuring apparatus 2 of the present embodiment can measure body weight, body fat percentage, fat mass, lean mass, muscle mass, body water content, BMI (Body Mass Index), etc. as the biometric index of the measurement subject. It is. In the following description, when a specific example is shown, a case in which weight measurement is performed by paying attention to a body weight related to physical condition and being used for managing a body at a sports practice site is extracted and shown.

  Next, the function of the biological index evaluation apparatus 1 will be described with reference to FIG. As shown in FIG. 2, the biological index evaluation apparatus 1 includes a calculation control unit 30, a storage device 50, an operation unit 61, a display unit 62, and a communication unit 63. The biological index evaluation apparatus 1 can be used by the person to be measured himself / herself, but in the following description, as an example, an administrator (hereinafter referred to as a person who manages the body of the person to be measured at a sporting site). A case where it is used by an administrator) will be described.

  The operation unit 61 is an input device that receives an instruction from an administrator, and includes, for example, a power button for turning on / off the power. In this embodiment, as an example, a touch panel configured integrally with the display unit 62 is used as the operation unit 61. In the present embodiment, the operation unit 61 includes a button for selecting an evaluation mode for evaluating a biological index and a button for selecting a data acquisition mode for acquiring measurement data and activity action information. Further, the operation unit 61 includes a screen keyboard for inputting the ID number of the person to be measured, an evaluation date and activity action information to be described later, a button for switching the display screen on the display unit 62, and the like. In FIG. 2, the illustration of all buttons is omitted.

The display unit 62 is configured by, for example, a liquid crystal panel or the like, and displays, for example, a biological index such as the body weight of the measurement subject and an evaluation result of the biological index. It is also possible to display a history of the change rate of the biometric index.
The communication unit 63 includes a wireless communication interface such as Wi-Fi (registered trademark) or a wired communication interface, and performs communication with the biological index measurement device 2.

  The arithmetic control unit 30 includes an information processing device such as a microprocessor, for example. The calculation control unit 30 executes the program stored in the program storage unit 51 of the storage device 50, thereby causing the measurement data acquisition unit 31, the activity action information acquisition unit 32, the storage processing unit 33, the evaluation criterion creation unit 34, and the evaluation. Functions as the unit 35 and the display control unit 36.

  When a button for selecting a data acquisition mode for acquiring measurement data and activity action information is clicked, the measurement data acquisition unit 31 controls the communication unit 63 to request the biomarker measurement apparatus 2 to transmit measurement data. Send. In addition, when the measurement data is transmitted from the biological index measurement device 2, the measurement data acquisition unit 31 controls the communication unit 63 to acquire the measurement data.

  The activity action information acquisition unit 32 acquires the activity action information of the measurement subject based on the input by the operation unit 61. The activity action information means information indicating an activity action. For example, it is information relating to the act of activities such as practicing on a weight measurement day, taking a break, or playing a game. In the present embodiment, as an example, a “practice date” indicating that the measurement date is a date of practice, a “holiday” indicating that the measurement date is off, and a game was performed on the measurement date Three types of information indicating “game day” are used as activity action information.

  The storage processing unit 33 uses the measurement data acquired by the measurement data acquisition unit 31, the activity action information acquired by the activity action information acquisition unit 32, and the evaluation result by the evaluation unit 35 described below as recorded data in the storage device 50. The recorded data is stored in the recording data storage unit 52.

The evaluation reference creation unit 34 extracts the record data from the record data storage unit 52 of the storage device 50 according to the pattern of the progress of the activity action information in a predetermined period retroactive from the evaluation target date of the biometric index. The evaluation target date is input in the operation unit 61, and an arbitrary measurement date of the biological index can be designated as the evaluation target date.
The progress pattern of the activity action information includes, for example, a first pattern in which the day before and the day before the evaluation target day were “practice day” or “holiday”. Further, the progress pattern of the activity action information includes a second pattern in which the day before the evaluation target date was “match day”. Further, the progress pattern of the activity action information includes a third pattern in which the day before the evaluation target day is a “practice day” or a “holiday” and the day before is a “game day”. The evaluation criterion creation unit 34 extracts recording data used for creating the evaluation criterion from the recording data stored in the recording data storage unit 52 of the storage device 50 according to these patterns. Details will be described later.

  Further, the evaluation criterion creating unit 34 creates an evaluation criterion using the recording data extracted as described above. For example, the evaluation criteria include an appropriate range based on the average value and standard deviation of the body weight, and an appropriate range based on the average value of the change rate of the body weight. Details will be described later.

Based on the evaluation criteria created by the evaluation criteria creation unit 33, the evaluation unit 35 evaluates the biometric index on the evaluation target date according to the progress pattern of the activity action information. The evaluation includes, for example, a decrease or increase in body weight, a magnitude of the weight decrease rate, or whether or not the body is recovering. Details will be described later.
Note that the biological index evaluation apparatus 1 according to the present embodiment can evaluate body weight, body water content, body mass index (BMI), and the like as the biological index of the measurement subject. In the following description, when a specific example is shown, a case in which weight is evaluated by paying attention to a weight related to physical condition and used in managing a body at a sports practice site is extracted and shown as a representative case.

  The display control unit 36 performs control for causing the display unit 62 to display a biological index such as body weight, a change rate of the biological index, and a result of evaluation of the biological index included in the acquired measurement data. In addition, the display control unit 36 performs control for causing the display unit 62 to display a message for requesting input of the ID number, measurement date, evaluation target date, and activity action information of the person to be measured. Further, the display control unit 36 performs control for causing the display unit 62 to display a message indicating that recording data to be described later is insufficient. Details of the display specific columns will be described later.

The storage device 50 is configured by, for example, a nonvolatile memory, an HDD (hard disk drive), or the like, and includes a program storage unit 51 and a recording data storage unit 52. The program storage unit 51 stores various data such as a biological index evaluation program executed by the calculation control unit 30 and a table used by the calculation control unit 30.
In the recording data storage unit 52, the acquired measurement data, the acquired activity action information, and the evaluation result of the biometric index are associated with each other and stored as recording data for each ID number of the measurement subject. A specific example of the recording data will be described later.
The storage device 50 may be a non-volatile memory that can be connected to the biometric index evaluation apparatus 1, an external HDD, or a USB memory, or an external server or an HDD connected to an external server. May be.

Next, the overall operation of the biological index evaluation system 100 of this embodiment will be described with reference to the flowcharts of FIGS.
FIG. 3 is a flowchart showing the measurement process of the biometric index of the biomarker measurement apparatus 2. The biological index measuring device 2 starts to operate when the power is turned on. The biological index measuring apparatus 2 can operate in various operation modes other than the operation mode for measuring the biological index. However, in the description of the present embodiment, the operation mode is the measurement of the biological index. It is assumed that the operation mode to be performed is set.

The display control unit 232 of the arithmetic control unit 230 causes the display unit 22 to display a display for prompting input of an ID number as identification information of the measurement subject. For example, the display control unit 232 displays a message such as “Please enter ID number” on the display unit 22 (FIG. 3; S1).
When the ID number is input according to the message, the biological index calculation unit 233 acquires the input ID number and temporarily stores it in the storage device 250 (FIG. 3; S2).

  When the acquisition of the ID number is completed, the biological index calculation unit 233 performs measurement of the biological index (FIG. 3; S3). When measuring the body weight as the biometric index, the biometric index calculation unit 233 inputs a measurement signal according to the body weight of the measurement subject output from the amplification conversion unit 17 of the weight measurement unit 42, and obtains the weight by calculation. The biometric index calculation unit 233 temporarily stores the weight in the storage device 250.

  The display control unit 232 displays the biological index measured this time on the display unit 22 (FIG. 3; S4). As a display method, the numerical value of the biological index itself may be displayed, or may be displayed in the form of a graph as will be described later. When measuring body weight as a biometric index, numerical values of body weight are displayed in a numerical display format or a graph format.

When the display of the biometric index is completed, the biometric index calculation unit 233 stores the measurement date and the biometric index in association with each other for each ID number of the measurement subject and stores the measurement data in the measurement data storage unit 252 (FIG. 3; S5). . When measuring the body weight as the biometric index, the measurement date and the body weight are associated with each other for each ID number of the measurement subject and stored in the measurement data storage unit 252 as measurement data.
Note that the date obtained by referring to a real-time clock IC (not shown) is used as the measurement date. However, the measurement date may be input by the operation unit 21.
This completes the biometric index measurement process.

Next, communication processing of the biological index measurement device 2 will be described. FIG. 4 is a flowchart showing communication processing of the biological index measuring apparatus 2. The communication control unit 231 of the biological index measuring device 2 executes the communication process at predetermined time intervals in parallel with the above-described measurement process of the biological index.
The communication control unit 231 determines whether or not there is a transmission request for measurement data from the biological index evaluation device 1 in the communication unit 23 (FIG. 4; S10). When the communication control unit 231 determines that there is no request for transmission of measurement data from the biological index evaluation device 1 (FIG. 4; S10: NO), the communication process ends.
On the other hand, when the communication control unit 231 determines that there is a request for transmission of measurement data from the biological index evaluation device 1 (FIG. 4; S10: YES), the measurement data storage unit 252 of the storage device 250 determines the ID of the person being measured. The number, the measurement date, and the biometric index are read out and transmitted to the biometric index evaluation apparatus 1 as measurement data (FIG. 4; S11). When measuring body weight as a biometric index, the ID number, measurement date, and weight of the person to be measured are transmitted to the biometric index evaluation apparatus 1 as measurement data.
The biometric index evaluation apparatus 1 can transmit a transmission request for measurement data at any time. However, in the present embodiment, as an example, when the measurement subject measures a biometric index, the administrator uses the biometric index evaluation apparatus 1. It is assumed that the wireless communication connection with the biological index measuring device 2 is in a standby state in a state where a wireless communication connection or a wired communication connection is established. Then, the administrator confirms that the person to be measured has measured the biometric index, and transmits a measurement data transmission request from the biometric index evaluation apparatus 1 to the biomarker measurement apparatus 2. Therefore, in this embodiment, every time the measurement subject measures the biometric index, the measurement data is transmitted from the biometric index measurement device 2 to the biometric index evaluation device 1.

Next, measurement data acquisition processing and activity action information acquisition processing of the biological index evaluation apparatus 1 will be described. FIG. 5 is a flowchart showing measurement data acquisition processing and activity action information acquisition processing of the biometric index evaluation apparatus 1.
The administrator first activates a biometric index program that is installed in advance in the biometric index evaluation apparatus 1 and stored in the program storage unit 51 of the storage device 50. When the biometric index program is activated, the measurement data acquisition unit 31 attempts to establish a connection between the biometric index evaluation apparatus 1 and the biometric index measurement apparatus 2. When the connection is established, the display unit 62 of the biometric index evaluation apparatus 1 has a button for selecting an evaluation mode for evaluating the biometric index and a data acquisition mode for acquiring measurement data and activity action information. Is displayed.

When the administrator clicks the button and selects the data acquisition mode, the display control unit 36 of the calculation control unit 30 causes the display unit 62 to display a display prompting the user to input the ID number of the measurement subject. For example, the display control unit 36 displays a message such as “Please input ID number” on the display unit 62 (FIG. 5; S20).
When the ID number is input according to the message, the display control unit 36 causes the display unit 62 to display a display for prompting the input of the measurement date of the measurement data to be acquired. For example, the display control unit 36 displays a message such as “Please input the measurement date” on the display unit 62 (FIG. 5; S20).

The measurement data acquisition unit 31 acquires the ID number and measurement date input by the operation unit 61, and temporarily stores them in the storage device 50 (FIG. 5; S21). Next, the measurement data acquisition unit 31 controls the communication unit 63 to transmit a transmission request for measurement data including the acquired ID number and measurement date to the biological index measurement device 2 (FIG. 5; S22).
The measurement data acquisition unit 31 transmits measurement data including an ID number, a measurement date, and a biological index from the biological index measurement device 2, acquires measurement data received via the communication unit 63, and stores the measurement data in the storage device 50. Temporary storage is performed (FIG. 5; S23). When measuring body weight as a biometric index, the ID number, measurement date, and weight are acquired as measurement data and temporarily stored in the storage device 50.

When the measurement data acquisition is completed, the display control unit 36 displays a message such as “Please input today's schedule execution result” and selection items of “practice day”, “holiday”, and “match day”. It is displayed on the display unit 62 (FIG. 5; S24).
When any selection item of “practice day”, “holiday”, or “match date” is selected as the schedule execution result (activity action information), the activity action information acquisition unit 32 selects the selected option item as the selected action item. The corresponding activity action information is acquired and temporarily stored in the storage device 50 (FIG. 5; S25).

When the acquisition of the activity action information is completed, the storage processing unit 33 records the ID number, measurement date, biometric index, and activity action information temporarily stored in the storage device 50 as described above in association with each other. The data is stored in the recording data storage unit 52 of the storage device 50 (FIG. 5; S26). When measuring body weight as a biometric index, the ID number, measurement date, weight, and activity action information are associated with each other and stored in the storage device 50 as recorded data.
Although various modes can be considered for storing the recording data, in this embodiment, as an example, the recording date, the biometric index, and the activity action information are stored in the recording data storage unit 52 as a record of the recording data table TBL1. The recording data table TBL1 is managed for each ID number. FIG. 9 is a diagram illustrating an example of a record data table TBL1 when body weight is measured as a biological index. In the example shown in FIG. 9, “0001” is stored in the record R1 of the ID number in the table TBL1. This indicates that the recording data stored in the following recording data record is the recording data of the measurement subject having the ID number “0001”. For example, when the measurement date is July 3, the weight is 73.7 (kg), the activity action information is “practice date”, and this recorded data is the first recorded data, Of these, the record data is stored in the first record R2 as follows. “7/3” is stored in the measurement date field, “73.7” in the weight field, and “practice date” in the activity action information field in the record R2. In the table TBL1 shown in FIG. 9, there are fields of change rate 1 and change rate 2 and an evaluation field, but calculation and evaluation of change rate 1 and change rate 2 are not performed at this stage. Therefore, “-” is stored in these fields.
When the above storage process ends, the measurement data acquisition process and the activity action information acquisition process end.

Next, a biomarker evaluation process in the biomarker evaluation apparatus 1 will be described. 6 to 8 are flowcharts showing the biometric index evaluation process in the biometric index evaluation apparatus 1. The evaluation process varies depending on the progress pattern of the activity action information. In this embodiment, as an example, the pattern of progress of activity information is classified into the following three types of patterns.
(1) First pattern: a pattern in which the activity action information two days before the evaluation target date is “practice day” or “holiday” and the previous day's activity action information is “practice day” or “holiday”.
(2) Second pattern: a pattern in which the activity action information on the day before the evaluation target date is “match day”.
(3) Third pattern: The activity action information on the day before the evaluation target date is “practice day” or “holiday”, and the activity action information on the day before the evaluation target day corresponds to “game day”. pattern.
In the present embodiment, different evaluation processes are performed depending on which of the three types of patterns is the progress pattern of the activity action information up to the evaluation target date.
First, the evaluation process in the first pattern will be described.

(First pattern)
When the administrator clicks a button for selecting an evaluation mode for evaluating a biological index displayed on the display unit 62 of the biological index evaluation apparatus 1, the evaluation process shown in FIGS. 6 to 8 is started.
When the evaluation process is started, the display control unit 36 causes the display unit 62 to display a display prompting input of the ID number of the measurement subject. For example, the display control unit 36 displays a message such as “Please enter ID number” on the display unit 62 (FIG. 6; S30).
When the ID number is input according to the message, the display control unit 36 causes the display unit 62 to display a display prompting the user to input the evaluation target date. For example, the display control unit 36 displays a message such as “Please enter the evaluation date” on the display unit 62 (FIG. 6; S30).

The evaluation reference creation unit 34 acquires the input ID number and evaluation target date, and temporarily stores them in the storage device 50 (FIG. 6; S31, S32). Next, the evaluation criterion creation unit 34 determines which pattern the progress of the activity action information up to the evaluation target date is (FIG. 6; S40). The determination of the progress pattern of the activity action information is performed with reference to the recording data table TBL1.
The evaluation criterion creation unit 34 refers to the temporarily stored ID number, identifies the record of the corresponding table TBL1 from the recording data storage unit 52, and refers to the record of the identified table TBL1 to evaluate The progress pattern of the activity action information in a predetermined period retroactive from the day is determined (FIG. 6; S40).
For example, if the ID number of the measurement subject to be evaluated is “0001” and the current evaluation target date is July 5, the evaluation reference creation unit 34 will obtain an ID number as shown in FIG. The record of the record data corresponding to “0001” is specified. Among the records, in record R2 in which July 3 which is the day before the evaluation target date is stored in the measurement date field, “practice date” is stored in the activity action information field. In the record R3 in which July 4th, which is the day before the evaluation target date, is stored in the measurement date field, “practice date” is stored in the activity action information field. Therefore, the evaluation criterion creating unit 34 determines that the pattern of the activity action information progress based on the evaluation target date of July 5 is the first pattern (FIG. 6; S40: first pattern). .

  After determining that the progress pattern of the activity action information is the first pattern, the evaluation reference creation unit 34 determines whether or not the reference record of the first pattern is set (FIG. 6; S50). The reference record of the first pattern is a record that is set when the number of records necessary for calculating the average value of the biometric index reaches a predetermined set value. In the present embodiment, the record of the newest measurement date in the record group that has reached the set value is set as the reference record of the first pattern. When the reference record of the first pattern is set, the average value of the biological index is calculated based on the record group for the set value including the reference record. In addition, when the record of the measurement date newer than the reference record is accumulated and the number of records counted from the next day of the reference record reaches the set value, the reference record is reset and the reset is performed. The average value of the biometric index is calculated based on the record group for the set value including the reference record.

  If the evaluation reference creation unit 34 determines that the reference record of the first pattern has not yet been set (FIG. 6; S50: NO), the previous day and the previous day of the evaluation target date among the records of the specified table TBL1 The previous record, which is a target for calculating the average value of the biometric index, is extracted (FIG. 6; S60).

  In the present embodiment, the record for which the average value is calculated in the first pattern is a record in which the day before the evaluation target date is stored in the measurement date field, and the activity activity information progress pattern Is a record determined to be the first pattern. Therefore, the record in which the activity action information progress pattern is determined to be the second pattern or the third pattern is excluded from the record for which the average value is calculated in the first pattern. In other words, when there is a record in which “game date” is stored in the activity action information field, the record corresponding to the next day and the next day of the record is excluded from the target record.

In the example shown in FIG. 9, when the evaluation target date is July 5, there are two records, R2 and R3, for which the average value is calculated. The evaluation reference creation unit 34 counts the number of records that are targets of average value calculation, and determines whether the number of records has reached the set value N1 for the first pattern (FIG. 6; S70). In the present embodiment, the setting value N1 for the first pattern is set to 10 as an example. However, the set value N1 can be changed as appropriate. In the example in FIG. 9 where the evaluation target date is July 5th, the number of records for which the average value is calculated is 2, and the evaluation reference creation unit 34 has reached the set value N1 (= 10). It is determined that it is not present (FIG. 6; S70: NO).
If it is determined that the number of records has not reached the set value N1 (= 10), the display control unit 35 displays a message indicating that the recording data is insufficient on the display unit 62 (FIG. 6; S150). . Next, the display control unit 36 displays the biometric index measured this time on the display unit 62 (FIG. 6; S180). In the example of measuring the body weight as the biometric index, the weight measured this time is displayed on the display unit 62. As a display method, the numerical value of the biological index itself may be displayed, or may be displayed in the form of a graph as will be described later.

  When the biometric index display ends, the storage processing unit 33 stores the evaluation result in the table TBL1 of the recording data storage unit 52 (FIG. 6; S190). In the example in which the evaluation target date is July 5 in FIG. 9, the evaluation is not performed because the number of records for which the average value is calculated has not reached the set value N1. In this case, there is no change in the stored contents of the table TBL1. When the evaluation is not performed, the process of step S190 may be omitted.

Next, the measurement subject repeats measurement of the biometric index in the biometric index measuring apparatus 2, and the number of records of the record data stored in the table TBL1 in the biometric index evaluation apparatus 1 is the average of the biometric indices in the first pattern. A case where the number necessary for value calculation is reached will be described.
The evaluation criterion creation unit 34 determines that the pattern of progress of the activity action information based on the evaluation target date is the first pattern (FIG. 6; S40: first pattern), and the reference record is still set. Suppose that it is judged that it is not (FIG. 6; S50: NO). The evaluation reference creation unit 34 extracts records that are the previous day of the evaluation target date and the records before the previous day from the specified table TBL1 and that are targets for calculating the average value of the biometric index (FIG. 6). S60). For example, in the example illustrated in FIG. 9, when the evaluation target date is July 13, the records in which the measurement date before July 13 is stored in the measurement date field are the records R2 to R11. Up to 10 records. Since these records are all records for which the average value of the biometric index in the first pattern is calculated, the evaluation reference creating unit 34 determines that the number of records necessary for calculating the average value has reached the set value N1. (FIG. 6; S70: YES).

  The evaluation reference creation unit 34 sets the record of the newest measurement date in the record group that has reached the set value N1 as the reference record of the first pattern (FIG. 6; S80), and stores the reference record in the storage device 50. Remember me temporarily. In FIG. 9, when the evaluation target date is July 13, the measurement date is July, which is the record of the newest measurement date in the record group from the record R2 to the record R11 that has reached the set value N1. The record R11 on the 12th is set as the reference record of the first pattern.

  Next, the evaluation reference creation unit 34 sets a record group for the set value N1 including the reference record as a target record group that is a target for calculating the average value of the biometric index (FIG. 6; S90), and the target record group Is temporarily stored in the storage device 50. As information indicating the target record group, a record number or the like not shown in FIG. 9 can be considered. In FIG. 9, when the evaluation target date is July 13, the evaluation reference creation unit 34 selects a record group for the set value N1 including the reference record, that is, a record group from the record R2 to the record R11. Set as the target record group.

The evaluation reference creation unit 34 calculates the average value and standard deviation of the biometric index based on the target record group (FIG. 6; S140). In addition, the evaluation criterion creation unit 34 creates an evaluation criterion based on the average value and standard deviation of the biometric index (FIG. 6; S141), and temporarily stores it in the storage device 50.
In the present embodiment, the evaluation criterion creating unit 34 calculates the average value ave1 and standard deviation SD1 of the biometric index for 10 days. In addition, the evaluation criterion creation unit 34 first determines that the biological index of the evaluation target date is equal to or greater than a value obtained by subtracting the standard deviation SD1 from the average value ave1 and equal to or less than a value obtained by adding the standard deviation SD1 to the average value ave1. Created as an evaluation standard for patterns.
If the evaluation target date is July 13 in the example of FIG. 9, the evaluation reference creation unit 34 reads the weight from the target record group from the record R2 to the record R11, and the average value ave1 of the weight for 10 days A standard deviation SD1 is calculated. In the example of FIG. 9, the average value ave1 of the body weight is 74.3 kg, and the standard deviation SD1 is 0.6. Therefore, the evaluation standard is 73.7 kg or more and 74.9 kg or less.

Next, the evaluation unit 35 determines whether or not the biological index of the evaluation target date satisfies the evaluation criterion (FIG. 6; S160). When the evaluation unit 35 determines that the biological index of the evaluation target day satisfies the evaluation standard (FIG. 6; S160: YES), the display control unit 36 displays the biological index measured this time on the display unit 62. (FIG. 6; S180). The display of the biometric index may be a numerical value of the biometric index displayed on the display unit 62, or a mode in which changes in the biometric index are displayed in a graph. However, when the evaluation unit 35 determines that the biometric index measured this time does not satisfy the evaluation standard (FIG. 6; S160: NO), the display control unit 36 performs an alert display on the display unit 62 and measures this time. The display of the biometric index is executed (FIG. 6; S170).
If the evaluation date is July 13 in the example of FIG. 9, the weight on July 13 of the evaluation date is 73.1 kg, which satisfies the evaluation criteria of 73.7 kg to 74.9 kg. Absent. Therefore, the evaluation unit 35 determines that the weight on the evaluation target day does not satisfy the evaluation standard (FIG. 6; S160: NO). When the display control unit 36 determines that the weight on the evaluation target day does not satisfy the evaluation criteria (FIG. 6; S160: NO), the display control unit 36 displays an alert display indicating weight loss attention and the weight measured this time. Display is performed (FIG. 6; S170).
FIG. 10 is a diagram illustrating an example of a biometric index and alert display screen on the display unit 62. As shown in FIG. 10, on the biometric index and alert display screen, the ID number of the person to be measured is displayed at the top of the screen, the weight is displayed on the vertical axis, and the measurement date is displayed on the horizontal axis. On the alert display screen, if the weight meets the evaluation criteria, the weight value is displayed with a black circle, but if the weight does not meet the evaluation criteria, an alert mark for weight loss attention or weight An alert mark of increased attention is displayed. In the example shown in FIG. 10, on the measurement date of July 13, an alert mark indicating weight loss is displayed together with a weight value of 73.1 kg. Further, in the example shown in FIG. 10, a line graph connecting the body weight values is displayed so that the change in the body weight value can be easily grasped.

  When the display of the biometric index (FIG. 6; S180) or the alert display and the display of the biometric index (FIG. 6; S170) is completed, the storage processing unit 33 stores the evaluation result as the record data in the table TBL1 of the record data storage unit 52. (FIG. 6; S190). For example, if the evaluation target date is July 13 in the example of FIG. 9, “weight loss” is stored in the evaluation field of the record R12. Thus, the evaluation process ends.

  Next, the reference record and target record group resetting process in the first pattern will be described. If the evaluation reference creation unit 34 determines that a reference record has been set (FIG. 6; S50: YES), the average value calculation target among the records from the previous day of the evaluation target day to the next day of the reference record is determined. Is extracted (FIG. 8; S100). Then, the evaluation criterion creating unit 34 determines whether or not the number of extracted records has reached the set value N1 (FIG. 6; S110).

  For example, in the example shown in FIG. 9, it is assumed that the reference record is set in the record R11 and the evaluation target date is July 16. In this case, the evaluation criterion creation unit 34 records from the record R14 whose measurement date is July 15 which is the day before July 16 to the record R13 which is the record of the next day of the record R12 which is the reference record. Among the records, a record for which an average value is calculated is extracted. As described above, in the evaluation process for the first pattern, records corresponding to the second pattern and the third pattern are excluded from the records for which the average value is calculated. The record R13 corresponds to the second pattern in which the activity action information of the record R12 of the previous day is “match date”. The record R14 corresponds to the third pattern in which the activity action information of the record R12 of the day before last is “game day”. Accordingly, the record R13 and the record R14 are excluded from the records for which the average value is calculated in the first pattern. As a result, the record for which the average value is calculated is only the record R12 that is the record of the next day after the reference record.

  In this case, the evaluation criterion creating unit 34 determines that the number of records necessary for calculating the average value is 1, and has not reached the set value N1 (FIG. 6; S110: NO), and the reference record and the target record group Do not perform reconfiguration processing. Therefore, the evaluation unit 35 evaluates the biological index on the evaluation target date based on the already created evaluation criteria (FIG. 6; S160). In the example shown in FIG. 9, if the evaluation target date is July 16, the evaluation standard created based on the average value and the standard deviation in the record group from record R2 to record R11 is the July evaluation date. It is determined whether or not the 16th day biometric index is satisfied.

  FIG. 11 is a graph showing the measurement history of the weight of the person A to be measured (ID number = 0001) in a graph format. The measurement date and weight shown in FIG. 11 correspond to the measurement date and weight described in the table TBL1 shown in FIG. In FIG. 11, the game day is indicated by a black square mark, and the practice date or holiday is indicated by a black circle mark. As shown in FIG. 11, when the evaluation target date is July 16, the weight of the previous day of July 16 and the weight before the previous day, which is the target for calculating the average value of the first pattern, is The stored record is only the record in which the weight of July 13 shown by (1) in FIG. 11 is stored. Therefore, in this case, according to the evaluation standard created based on the average value and the standard deviation of the weight in the records from July 3 to July 12, the evaluation of the weight on July 16 as the evaluation target day Is done. In FIG. 11, the range in which the evaluation criterion is created is indicated as “reference A”.

  However, it is assumed that the measurement has progressed and the number of records for which the average value is calculated in the first pattern has reached the set value N1. In this case, the evaluation criterion creation unit 34 determines that the number of records for which the average value is to be calculated has reached the set value N1 (FIG. 6; S110: YES), and the evaluation criterion creation unit 34 determines that the reference record Is reset (FIG. 6; S120) and the target record group is reset (FIG. 6; S130).

  In the example shown in FIG. 11, 18 measurements were performed from July 13 to July 30, but the previous day was the game day as the pattern of the progress of the activity action information. 2 patterns and a third pattern in which the day before was a game day are included. Specifically, the measurement dates indicated by (a1), (a2), (a3), and (a4) in FIG. 11 are the second pattern, and (b1), (b2), (b3), (b4 The measurement date indicated by) is the third pattern. These records on the measurement date are excluded from the records for which the average value is calculated in the first pattern. The records for which the average value is calculated in the first pattern are the records on the measurement date indicated by (1) to (10) in FIG.

For example, it is assumed that July 31 is the evaluation target date. Of the records from the record on July 30 which is the day before the evaluation target day to the record on July 13 which is the record the next day of the reference record, the records for which the average value of the first pattern is calculated are shown in FIG. (1) to (10) are measurement date records. In this case, the evaluation criterion creation unit 34 determines that the number of records that are the target of average value calculation has reached the set value N1 (FIG. 6; S110: YES).
The evaluation reference creation unit 34 is a record of the newest measurement date in the record group of measurement dates indicated by (1) to (10) in FIG. 11 that has reached the set value N1, and is indicated by (10) in FIG. The record of the measurement date is reset as a reference record (FIG. 6; S120). The record of the measurement date indicated by (10) in FIG. 11 corresponds to the record R29 in which July 30 is the measurement date in FIG. The evaluation reference creation unit 34 resets the record R29 as a reference record and temporarily stores it in the storage device 50.
Further, the evaluation criterion creating unit 34 resets the record group for the set value N1 including the reference record as a target record group that is a target for calculating the average value of the biometric index (FIG. 6; S130). The record group for the set value N1 including the reference record is a record group including the measurement date records indicated by (1) to (10) in FIG. 11 correspond to the records R12, R15, R16, R19, R20, R21, R24, R25, R28, and R29 in FIG. 9, respectively. The evaluation criterion creation unit 34 resets a record group including these records R12, R15, R16, R19, R20, R21, R24, R25, R28, and R29 as a target record group, and temporarily stores it in the storage device 50. Let

  The evaluation reference creation unit 34 calculates the average value and standard deviation of the biometric index based on the reset target record group (FIG. 6; S140). In addition, the evaluation criterion creation unit 34 creates an evaluation criterion based on the average value and standard deviation of the biometric index (FIG. 6; S141), and temporarily stores it in the storage device 50. The evaluation reference creation unit 34 calculates the average value ave1 and standard deviation SD1 of the weight stored in the reset target record group. In addition, the evaluation criterion creation unit 34 determines that the weight of the evaluation target day is equal to or more than a value obtained by subtracting the standard deviation SD1 from the average value ave1 and equal to or less than a value obtained by adding the standard deviation SD1 to the average value ave1. Created as a new evaluation standard in the pattern.

On July 31st and the day after July 31st, evaluation will be performed using this new evaluation standard. In FIG. 11, the range in which this new evaluation criterion is created is indicated as “reference B”.
In the same manner, among the records from the record on the previous day of the evaluation target day to the record on the next day of the reference record, the number of records for which the average value of the first pattern is calculated is the set value N1 (= 10). Each time the value reaches, the reference record and the target record group are reset. Further, a new evaluation standard is created based on the reset standard record and the target record group, and the evaluation is performed using the new evaluation standard.

  When the day before and the day before the measurement date is a practice day or a holiday, if the weight of the person to be measured on the measurement day greatly increases with respect to the evaluation standard, excess energy is suspected. Moreover, when the body weight of the person to be measured is greatly reduced with respect to the evaluation standard, energy shortage and a decrease in body water content are suspected. Therefore, if the evaluation result of this embodiment is used, advice suitable for the situation that the day before and the day before the measurement day is a practice day or a holiday can be given to the measurement subject. As described above, according to the present embodiment, it is possible to evaluate an appropriate biometric index according to a practice day or a holiday schedule.

(Second pattern)
Next, an example of a second pattern in which the day before the evaluation date is a game day will be described as a pattern of progress of the activity action information.

  After the acquisition of the ID number of the measurement subject and the acquisition of the evaluation target date, the evaluation reference creation unit 34 determines which pattern the activity action information has progressed (FIG. 6; S40). For example, assuming that the evaluation target date is July 14 shown in FIG. 9, in the record R12 in which July 13 which is the previous day of the evaluation target date is stored in the measurement date field, the activity action information field “Game day” is stored in Therefore, the evaluation criterion creating unit 34 determines that the pattern of the progress of the activity action information based on the evaluation target date of July 14 is the second pattern (FIG. 6; S40: second pattern). .

  FIG. 7 is a flowchart showing a process specific to the second pattern in the evaluation process of the present embodiment. After determining that it is the second pattern, the evaluation reference creation unit 34 calculates the rate of change of the biometric index on the date of evaluation as the rate of change 1 based on the record of the date of evaluation and the record of the day before the date of evaluation. (FIG. 7; S41). In the present embodiment, two types of rate of change, change rate 1 and rate of change 2, are used as the rate of change of the biometric index. The rate of change of the biometric index. The rate of change 2 is the rate of change of the biometric index on the evaluation target day relative to the biometric index on the game day that is the day before the evaluation target date. In the second pattern, a change rate of 1 is used.

  When the weight is given as an example of the biometric index, generally, the weight is often reduced the day after the game day. However, if the body weight is greatly reduced, poor physical condition, glycogen unrecovered, and dehydration are suspected. Therefore, in the second pattern, in the second pattern, the change rate of the biometric index on the next day of the game day as viewed from the game date is calculated as the change rate 1, and this change rate 1 is calculated for the set value N2 (= 3). Then, the average value ave2 is calculated, and when the measured body weight is less than the average value ave2, a warning is given that the weight loss rate is large.

The change rate 1 in the second pattern is calculated by the following equation.
Change rate 1 [%] = (Biometric index on the day after the game day−Biometric index on the game day) / Biometric index on the game day * 100 (Equation 1)

  In the example shown in FIG. 9, when the evaluation target date is July 14, the record R13 is a record of the evaluation target date (the day after the match date). Further, the record R12 becomes a record of the day before the evaluation target day (game day). The evaluation reference creation unit 34 reads 72.9 [kg] stored in the body weight field as the biometric index of the record R13, and stores 73.1 [kg] stored in the body weight field as the biometric index of the record R12. kg]. The evaluation criterion creating unit 34 applies these body weights to Equation 1 and calculates the rate of change 1 as −0.3 [%]. The storage processing unit 33 stores the calculated change rate 1 in the field of the change rate 1 of the evaluation target day record as the change rate 1 of the evaluation target day (FIG. 7; S42). In the example shown in FIG. 9, when the evaluation target date is July 14, -0.3 [%] is stored in the field of change rate 1 in record R13. If the change rate 1 of the biometric index on the evaluation target date has already been calculated and the change rate 1 has already been stored in the biometric field in the record of the evaluation target date, step S41 shown in FIG. The process of step S42 may be omitted.

  When the storage process of the change rate 1 is completed, the evaluation reference creation unit 34 determines whether a reference record of the second pattern is set (FIG. 7; S51). The reference record of the second pattern is a record that is set when the number of records necessary for calculating the average value of the change rate 1 reaches a predetermined set value N2 (= 3). In the present embodiment, the record of the newest measurement date in the record group that has reached the set value N2 is set as the reference record of the second pattern. When the reference record of the second pattern is set, the average value of the change rate 1 is calculated based on the record group for the set value from the day before the evaluation target date to the next day of the reference pattern. In addition, a record with a measurement date that is newer than the reference record is accumulated, and when the number of records from the day before the evaluation target date to the next day of the reference record reaches the set value N2, the reference record is reset. Then, the average value of the rate of change 1 is calculated based on the record group of the set value N2 from the day before the evaluation target date to the next day of the reset reference record.

  If the evaluation reference creation unit 34 determines that the reference record for the second pattern has not yet been set (FIG. 7; S51: NO), from the previous day and the previous day of the evaluation target date among the records of the specified table TBL1 The previous record, which is a target for calculating the average value of the change rate 1 of the biometric index, is extracted (FIG. 7; S61).

  In the present embodiment, the record that is the target for calculating the average value of the change rate 1 of the biological index in the second pattern is a record in which the day before the evaluation target date is stored in the measurement date field, It is a record in which the progress pattern of the activity action information is determined as the second pattern. Accordingly, the record in which the activity action information progress pattern is determined to be the first pattern or the third pattern is excluded from the record for which the average value of the change rate 1 of the biometric index is calculated in the second pattern. The In other words, when there is a record in which “game date” is stored in the activity action information field, records other than the record corresponding to the next day of the record are excluded from the target record.

  In the example illustrated in FIG. 9, when the evaluation target date is July 14, the record that is the target of calculating the average value of the change rate 1 of the biometric index does not exist before the evaluation target date. The evaluation reference creation unit 34 counts the number of records that are targets for calculating the average value of the change rate 2 of the biometric index, and determines whether the number of records has reached the set value N2 for the second pattern ( FIG. 7; S71). In the present embodiment, the setting value N2 for the second pattern is set to 3 as an example. However, the set value N2 can be changed as appropriate. In the example in which the evaluation target date is July 14 in FIG. 9, the number of records that are targets for calculating the average value of the change rate 1 of the biometric index is 0, and the evaluation criterion creation unit 34 sets the number of records to the set value. It is determined that N2 (= 3) has not been reached (FIG. 7; S71: NO).

  If it is determined that the number of records has not reached the set value N2 (= 3), the display control unit 36 displays a message indicating that the recording data is insufficient on the display unit 62 (FIG. 6; S150). . Next, the display control unit 36 causes the display unit 62 to display the biological index of the evaluation target date (FIG. 6; S180). In the example of measuring the body weight as the biometric index, the weight measured this time is displayed on the display unit 62. As the display method, the numerical value of the biological index itself may be displayed, or may be displayed in the form of a graph as shown in FIG.

  When the biometric index display ends, the storage processing unit 33 stores the evaluation result in the table TBL1 of the recording data storage unit 52 (FIG. 6; S190). In the example in FIG. 9 where the evaluation target date is July 14, the evaluation is not performed because the number of records that are targets for calculating the average value of the change rate 1 of the biometric index has not reached the set value N2. In this case, there is no change in the stored contents of the table TBL1. When the evaluation is not performed, the process of step S190 may be omitted.

  Next, the measurement subject repeatedly performs measurement of the biometric index in the biometric index measurement apparatus 2, and the number of records of the record data stored in the table TBL1 in the biometric index evaluation apparatus 1 changes the biometric index in the second pattern. A case where the number necessary for calculating the average value of rate 1 is reached will be described.

  The evaluation criterion creation unit 34 determines that the pattern of progress of the activity action information based on the evaluation target date is the second pattern (FIG. 6; S40: second pattern), Assume that the rate of change 1 of the biometric index on the evaluation target date is calculated based on the record on the day before the evaluation target date (FIG. 7; S41). Further, it is assumed that the storage processing unit 33 stores the calculated change rate 1 in the field of the change rate 1 of the evaluation date record (FIG. 7; S42). Then, it is assumed that the evaluation reference creation unit 34 determines that the reference record of the second pattern has not yet been set (FIG. 7; S51: NO).

  Next, the evaluation criterion creation unit 34 is a record before the evaluation target date and a record before the previous day among the records of the identified table TBL1, and is a target for calculating an average value of the change rate 1 of the biometric index. Records are extracted (FIG. 7; S61).

  For example, assume that the evaluation target date is July 27 in the example shown in FIG. In this case, the record of the measurement date before July 27, and the record in which the progress pattern of the activity action information is determined as the second pattern is the three records R13, R17, and R22. Become. Since these records are all records for calculating the average value of the change rate 1 in the second pattern, the evaluation reference creating unit 34 sets the number of records necessary for calculating the average value of the change rate 1 to the set value N2. It is determined that it has been reached (FIG. 7; S71: YES).

  The evaluation reference creation unit 34 sets the record of the newest measurement date in the record group that has reached the set value N2 as the reference record of the second pattern (FIG. 7; S81), and stores the reference record in the storage device 50. Remember me temporarily. In FIG. 9, when the evaluation target date is July 27, the measurement date is July, which is the record of the newest measurement date in the record group of the records R13, R17, R22 that has reached the set value N2. The record R22 on the 23rd is set as the reference record of the second pattern.

  Next, the evaluation reference creation unit 34 sets a record group for the set value N2 including the reference record as a target record group that is a target for calculating the average value of the change rate 1 of the biometric index (FIG. 7; S91). The information indicating the target record group is temporarily stored in the storage device 50. As information indicating the target record group, a record number or the like not shown in FIG. 9 can be considered. In FIG. 9, when the evaluation target date is July 27, the evaluation criterion creation unit 34 records a set of records including the reference record for the set value N2, that is, records R13, R17, and R22. Is set as the target record group.

  The evaluation reference creation unit 34 calculates an average value of the change rate 1 of the biometric index based on the target record group (FIG. 7; S142). Further, the evaluation criterion creating unit 34 creates an evaluation criterion based on the average value of the change rate 1 of the biometric index (FIG. 7; S143) and temporarily stores it in the storage device 50. In the present embodiment, the evaluation reference creation unit 34 calculates the average value ave2 of the change rate 1 of the biological index for three days. Further, the evaluation criterion creating unit 34 creates an evaluation criterion that the rate of change 1 of the evaluation target date is equal to or greater than the average value ave2.

  In FIG. 9, when the evaluation target date is July 27, the evaluation reference creation unit 34 calculates −0.3 from the field of the change rate 1 of each of the records R13, R17, and R22 that are the target record group. Read [%], 1.2 [%], and -0.1 [%]. Then, the evaluation criterion creating unit 34 calculates the average value ave2. In this example, the average value ave2 is 0.27%. Therefore, the evaluation standard is 0.27 [%] or more.

  Next, the evaluation unit 35 determines whether or not the biological index of the evaluation target date satisfies the evaluation criterion (FIG. 6; S160). When the evaluation unit 35 determines that the biological index of the evaluation target day satisfies the evaluation standard (FIG. 6; S160: YES), the display control unit 36 displays the biological index of the evaluation target date on the display unit 62. It is displayed (FIG. 6; S180). The display of the biometric index may be a numerical value of the biometric index displayed on the display unit 62, or a mode in which changes in the biometric index are displayed in a graph as shown in FIG. However, when the evaluation unit 35 determines that the biological index of the evaluation target date does not satisfy the evaluation standard (FIG. 6; S160: NO), the display control unit 36 displays an alert on the display unit 62 and the evaluation target. The display of the biometric index of the day is executed (FIG. 6; S170).

  If the evaluation date is July 27 in the example of FIG. 9, the rate of change 1 on July 27 of the evaluation date is -1.2 [%], which is 0.27 [%], which is the evaluation criterion. The above is not satisfied. Therefore, the evaluation unit 35 determines that the change rate 1 of the evaluation target date does not satisfy the evaluation standard (FIG. 6; S160: NO). When the display control unit 36 determines that the rate of change 1 of the evaluation target day does not satisfy the evaluation criteria (FIG. 6; S160: NO), the display control unit 36 displays an alert indicating the large weight loss rate and the evaluation target. The weight of the day is displayed (FIG. 6; S170).

  FIG. 10 is a diagram illustrating an example of a biometric index and alert display screen on the display unit 62. As shown in FIG. 10, on the biometric index and alert display screen, the ID number of the person to be measured is displayed at the top of the screen, the weight is displayed on the vertical axis, and the measurement date is displayed on the horizontal axis. In the alert display screen, when the rate of change 1 on the evaluation target day satisfies the evaluation criteria, the weight value is displayed together with a black circle, but when the rate of change 1 on the evaluation target date does not meet the evaluation criteria. Displays an alert mark indicating that the weight loss rate is large. In the example shown in FIG. 10, on the measurement date of July 27, an alert mark indicating that the weight loss rate is large is displayed together with a weight value of 74.7 kg.

  When the display of the biometric index (FIG. 6; S180) or the alert display and the display of the biometric index (FIG. 6; S170) is completed, the storage processing unit 37 stores the evaluation result as the record data in the table TBL1 of the record data storage unit 52. (FIG. 6; S190). For example, if the evaluation target date is July 27 in the example of FIG. 9, “large weight loss rate” is stored in the evaluation field of the record R26. Thus, the evaluation process ends.

  FIG. 12 is a diagram illustrating an example of the change rate of the change in the body weight of the day before the measurement day for the person A to be measured (ID number = 0001). In FIG. 12, the rate of change surrounded by a dotted rectangle indicates the rate of change 1. In the example shown in FIG. 12, it can be seen that the rate of change 1 on July 27 is larger in the negative direction than the rate of change 1 on July 14, July 18, and July 23.

  On the next day of the game day, in general, the body weight often decreases. However, when the rate of change 1 is significantly lower than the evaluation standard, poor physical condition, glycogen unrecovered, and dehydration are suspected. Therefore, if the evaluation result of this embodiment is used, advice suitable for the situation that it was the next day of the game day can be given to the measurement subject.

  Next, the reference record and target record group resetting process in the second pattern will be described. If the evaluation reference creation unit 34 determines that the reference record is set (FIG. 7; S51: YES), the average value of the rate of change 1 among the records from the day before the evaluation target day to the next day of the reference record Records to be calculated are extracted (FIG. 7; S101). Then, the evaluation criterion creating unit 34 determines whether or not the number of extracted records has reached the set value N2 (FIG. 7; S111).

  For example, in the example shown in FIG. 9, it is assumed that the reference record is set in the record R22, and the evaluation target date is August 1, which is not shown in FIG. In this case, the evaluation reference creation unit 34 is a record of the next day of the record R22 which is a reference record from a record (not shown) whose measurement date is July 31 which is the day before August 1. Of the records up to the record R23, a record that is a target for calculating the average value of the change rate 1 is extracted. As described above, in the evaluation process for the second pattern, records corresponding to the first pattern and the third pattern are excluded from the records for which the average value of the change rate 1 is calculated. As a result, the record for which the average value of the change rate 1 is calculated is only the record R26.

  In this case, the evaluation criterion creation unit 34 determines that the number of records necessary for calculating the average value of the change rate 1 is 1, and has not reached the set value N2 (FIG. 7; S111: NO), The target record group is not reset. Therefore, the evaluation unit 35 evaluates the change rate 1 of the biological index on the evaluation target date based on the already created evaluation criteria (FIG. 6; S160). If the evaluation target date is August 1, the evaluation standard created based on the average value of the rate of change 1 in the record group up to records R13, R17, and R22 is the biological body on August 1 of the evaluation target date. It is determined whether the rate of change of the indicator is satisfied.

  However, it is assumed that the measurement has progressed and the number of records that are the target of calculating the average value of the change rate 1 in the second pattern has reached the set value N2. In this case, the evaluation criterion creation unit 34 determines that the number of records for which the average value of the rate of change 1 is calculated has reached the set value N2 (FIG. 7; S111: YES), and the evaluation criterion creation unit 34 Resets the reference record (FIG. 7; S121) and resets the target record group (FIG. 7; S131).

  The evaluation reference creation unit 34 calculates the average value of the change rate 1 of the biometric index based on the reset target record group (FIG. 7; S142). Further, the evaluation criterion creating unit 34 creates an evaluation criterion based on the average value of the change rate 1 of the biometric index (FIG. 7; S143) and temporarily stores it in the storage device 50. The evaluation reference creation unit 34 calculates an average value ave2 of the change rate 1 of the biometric index stored in the reset target record group. In addition, the evaluation criterion creating unit 34 creates that the change rate 1 of the biological index on the evaluation target date is equal to or higher than the average value ave2 as a new evaluation criterion in the second pattern. When a new evaluation standard is created, when the date after the reset standard record is set as the evaluation target date, the evaluation is performed using the new evaluation standard.

  In the same manner, among the records from the record on the previous day of the evaluation target day to the record on the next day of the reference record, the number of records to be subjected to the average value calculation of the second pattern change rate 1 is the set value N2. Each time (= 3) is reached, the reference record and the target record group are reset. Further, a new evaluation standard is created based on the reset standard record and the target record group, and the evaluation is performed using the new evaluation standard.

  When weight is given as an example of a biometric index, the weight is generally decreased on the next day of the game day. However, if the weight on the evaluation target day is greatly reduced relative to the evaluation standard, poor physical condition, glycogen unrecovered, and dehydration are suspected. Therefore, if the evaluation result of this embodiment is used, advice suitable for the situation that it was the next day of the game day can be given to the measurement subject. As described above, according to the present embodiment, it is possible to evaluate an appropriate weight in accordance with a game day schedule.

(Third pattern)
Next, an example of a third pattern in which the day before the evaluation target day is a game day will be described as a pattern of the activity action information.

  After the acquisition of the ID number of the measurement subject and the acquisition of the evaluation target date, the evaluation reference creation unit 34 determines which pattern the activity action information has progressed (FIG. 6; S40). For example, it is assumed that the evaluation target date is July 15 shown in FIG. In this case, in the record R12 in which July 13th, which is the day before the evaluation target date, is stored in the measurement date field, “game date” is stored in the activity action information field. Therefore, the evaluation criterion creation unit 34 determines that the pattern of the progress of the activity action information based on the evaluation target date of July 15 is the third pattern (FIG. 6; S40: third pattern). .

  FIG. 8 is a flowchart showing a process specific to the third pattern in the evaluation process of the present embodiment. After determining that it is the third pattern, the evaluation reference creation unit 34 calculates the rate of change 2 of the biological index on the evaluation target date based on the record on the evaluation target date and the record two days before the evaluation target date. (FIG. 8; S43). In the present embodiment, two types of rate of change, change rate 1 and rate of change 2, are used as the rate of change of the biometric index, and the rate of change 1 is the evaluation target date for the biometric index on the game day that is the day before the evaluation target date. The rate of change of the biometric index. The rate of change 2 is the rate of change of the biometric index on the evaluation target day relative to the biometric index on the game day that is the day before the evaluation target date. In the third pattern, a change rate of 2 is used.

  Taking weight as an example of a biometric index, generally, the weight lost after the game day is often recovered, and if not recovered here, poor physical condition, glycogen unrecovered, dehydration is suspected. Is called. Therefore, in the third pattern, in the third pattern, the rate of change of the biometric index two days after the match date as seen from the match date is calculated as the rate of change 2, and this rate of change 2 is totaled for the set value N3 (= 3). Then, the average value ave3 is calculated, and when the measured body weight is less than the average value ave3, the user is warned that the body weight has not recovered.

The change rate 2 in the third pattern is calculated by the following equation.
Rate of change 2 [%] = (Biometric index two days after game day−Biometric index of game day) / Biometric index of game day * 100 (Equation 2)

  In the example shown in FIG. 9, when the evaluation date is July 15, the record R14 is a record of the evaluation date (the day after the game day). Further, the record R12 becomes a record of the day before the evaluation target day (game day). The evaluation reference creation unit 34 reads 73.7 [kg] stored in the body weight field as the biometric index of the record R14, and stores 73.1 [kg] stored in the body weight field as the biometric index of the record R12. kg]. The evaluation criterion creating unit 34 applies these weights to the equation 2 and calculates the rate of change 2 as 0.8 [%]. The storage processing unit 33 stores the calculated change rate 2 in the field of the change rate 2 of the record of the evaluation target date as the change rate 2 of the evaluation target day (FIG. 8; S44). In the example shown in FIG. 9, when the evaluation target date is July 15, 0.8 [%] is stored in the field of change rate 2 of record R14. If the rate of change 2 of the biometric index on the evaluation target date has already been calculated and the rate of change 2 has already been stored in the field of the biometric index in the record of the date of evaluation, step S43 shown in FIG. The process of step S44 may be omitted.

  When the storage process of the change rate 2 is completed, the evaluation reference creation unit 34 determines whether a reference record of the third pattern is set (FIG. 8; S52). The reference record of the third pattern is a record that is set when the number of records necessary for calculating the average value of the change rate 2 reaches a predetermined set value N3 (= 3). In the present embodiment, the record of the newest measurement date in the record group that has reached the set value N3 is set as the reference record of the third pattern. When the reference record of the third pattern is set, the average value of the change rate 2 is calculated based on the record group for the set value from the day before the evaluation target date to the next day of the reference pattern. In addition, a record with a measurement date that is newer than the reference record is accumulated, and when the number of records from the day before the evaluation target date to the next day of the reference record reaches the set value N3, the reference record is reset. Then, the average value of the change rate 2 is calculated based on the record group of the set value N3 from the day before the evaluation target date to the next day of the reset reference record.

  If the evaluation reference creation unit 34 determines that the reference record of the third pattern has not yet been set (FIG. 8; S52: NO), the previous day and the previous day of the evaluation target date among the records of the identified table TBL1 The previous record, which is a target for calculating the average value of the change rate 2 of the biometric index, is extracted (FIG. 8; S62).

  In the present embodiment, the record that is the target for calculating the average value of the biological index change rate 2 in the third pattern is a record in which the day before the evaluation target date is stored in the measurement date field, It is a record in which the progress pattern of the activity action information is determined as the third pattern. Therefore, the record in which the activity action information progress pattern is determined to be the first pattern or the second pattern is excluded from the record for which the average value of the biometric index change rate 2 is calculated in the third pattern. The In other words, when there is a record in which “game date” is stored in the activity action information field, the day corresponding to the second day after the measurement date stored in the measurement date field of the record is displayed in the measurement date field. The records other than the stored records are excluded from the target records.

  In the example shown in FIG. 9, when the evaluation target date is July 15, the record for which the average value of the change rate 2 of the biological index is calculated does not exist before the evaluation target date. The evaluation reference creation unit 34 counts the number of records that are targets for calculating the average value of the change rate 2 of the biometric index, and determines whether the number of records has reached the set value N3 for the third pattern ( FIG. 8; S72). In the present embodiment, the setting value N3 for the third pattern is set to 3 as an example. However, the set value N3 can be changed as appropriate. In the example in FIG. 9 where the evaluation target date is July 15th, the number of records to be subjected to the calculation of the average value of the change rate 2 of the biometric index is 0, and the evaluation reference creation unit 34 sets the number of records to the set value. It is determined that N3 (= 3) has not been reached (FIG. 8; S72: NO).

  When it is determined that the number of records has not reached the set value N3 (= 3), the display control unit 35 displays a message indicating that the recording data is insufficient on the display unit 62 (FIG. 6; S150). . Next, the display control unit 36 displays the biometric index measured this time on the display unit 62 (FIG. 6; S180). In the example of measuring the body weight as the biometric index, the weight measured this time is displayed on the display unit 62. As the display method, the numerical value of the biological index itself may be displayed, or may be displayed in the form of a graph as shown in FIG.

  When the biometric index display ends, the storage processing unit 33 stores the evaluation result in the table TBL1 of the recording data storage unit 52 (FIG. 6; S190). In the example in FIG. 9 where the evaluation target date is July 15, the number of records that are targets for calculating the average value of the change rate 2 of the biometric index has not reached the set value N3, so that the evaluation is not performed. In this case, there is no change in the stored contents of the table TBL1. When the evaluation is not performed, the process of step S190 may be omitted.

  Next, the measurement subject repeats measurement of the biometric index in the biometric index measuring apparatus 2, and the number of records of the record data stored in the table TBL1 in the biometric index evaluation apparatus 1 changes the biometric index in the third pattern. A case where the number necessary for calculating the average value of rate 2 is reached will be described.

  The evaluation standard creation unit 34 determines that the pattern of the progress of the activity action information based on the evaluation target date is the third pattern (FIG. 6; S40: third pattern), It is assumed that the rate of change 2 of the biometric index on the evaluation target day is calculated based on the record two days before the evaluation target day (FIG. 8; S43). Further, it is assumed that the storage processing unit 33 stores the calculated change rate 2 in the field of change rate 2 of the record of the evaluation target date (FIG. 8; S44). Then, it is assumed that the evaluation reference creation unit 34 determines that the reference record of the third pattern has not yet been set (FIG. 8; S52: NO).

  Next, the evaluation criterion creating unit 34 is a record before the evaluation target date and a record before the previous day among the records of the specified table TBL1, and is a target for calculating an average value of the change rate 2 of the biometric index. Records are extracted (FIG. 8; S62).

  For example, assume that the evaluation target date is July 28 in the example illustrated in FIG. 9. In this case, the record of the measurement date before July 28, and the record of determining the progress pattern of the activity action information as the third pattern is the three records R14, R18, and R23. Become. Since these records are all records for calculating the average value of the change rate 2 in the third pattern, the evaluation reference creation unit 34 sets the number of records necessary for calculating the average value of the change rate 2 to the set value N3. It is determined that it has been reached (FIG. 8; S72: YES).

  The evaluation reference creation unit 34 sets the record of the newest measurement date in the record group that has reached the set value N3 as the reference record of the third pattern (FIG. 8; S82), and stores the reference record in the storage device 50. Remember me temporarily. In FIG. 9, when the evaluation target date is July 28, the measurement date is July, which is the record of the newest measurement date in the record group of the records R14, R18, R23 that has reached the set value N3. The record R23 on the 24th is set as the reference record of the third pattern.

  Next, the evaluation reference creation unit 34 sets a record group for the set value N3 including the reference record as a target record group that is a target for calculating the average value of the change rate 2 of the biometric index (FIG. 8; S92). The information indicating the target record group is temporarily stored in the storage device 50. As information indicating the target record group, a record number or the like not shown in FIG. 9 can be considered. In FIG. 9, when the evaluation target date is July 28, the evaluation reference creation unit 34 records a set of records including the reference record for the set value N3, that is, records up to records R14, R18, and R23. Is set as the target record group.

  The evaluation reference creation unit 34 calculates an average value of the change rate 2 of the biometric index based on the target record group (FIG. 8; S144). Further, the evaluation criterion creating unit 34 creates an evaluation criterion based on the average value of the change rate 2 of the biometric index (FIG. 8; S145) and temporarily stores it in the storage device 50. In this embodiment, the evaluation reference creation unit 34 calculates an average value ave3 of the biological index change rate 2 for three days. Further, the evaluation criterion creating unit 34 creates an evaluation criterion that the rate of change 2 of the evaluation target date is equal to or greater than the average value ave3.

  In FIG. 9, when the evaluation target date is July 28, the evaluation reference creation unit 34 calculates 0.8 [from the field of the change rate 2 of each of the records R14, R18, and R23 that are the target record group. %], 0.8 [%], and 1.2 [%] are read. Then, the evaluation criterion creating unit 34 calculates the average value ave3. In this example, the average value ave3 is 0.93%. Therefore, the evaluation standard is 0.93 [%] or more.

  Next, the evaluation unit 35 determines whether or not the biological index of the evaluation target date satisfies the evaluation criterion (FIG. 6; S160). When the evaluation unit 35 determines that the biological index of the evaluation target day satisfies the evaluation standard (FIG. 6; S160: YES), the display control unit 36 displays the biological index of the evaluation target date on the display unit 62. It is displayed (FIG. 6; S180). The display of the biometric index may be a numerical value of the biometric index displayed on the display unit 62, or a mode in which changes in the biometric index are displayed in a graph as shown in FIG. However, when the evaluation unit 35 determines that the biological index of the evaluation target date does not satisfy the evaluation standard (FIG. 6; S160: NO), the display control unit 36 displays an alert on the display unit 62 and the evaluation target. The display of the biometric index of the day is executed (FIG. 6; S170).

  If the evaluation date is July 28 in the example of FIG. 9, the rate of change 2 on July 28 of the evaluation date is −0.9 [%], which is an evaluation criterion of 0.93 [% The above is not satisfied. Therefore, the evaluation unit 35 determines that the rate of change 2 of the evaluation target date does not satisfy the evaluation standard (FIG. 6; S160: NO). When the display control unit 36 determines that the rate of change 2 of the evaluation target date does not satisfy the evaluation standard (FIG. 6; S160: NO), the alert display indicating that the recovery is not completed on the display unit 62; The weight of the evaluation target day is displayed (FIG. 6; S170).

  FIG. 10 is a diagram illustrating an example of a biometric index and alert display screen on the display unit 62. As shown in FIG. 10, on the biometric index and alert display screen, the ID number of the person to be measured is displayed at the top of the screen, the weight is displayed on the vertical axis, and the measurement date is displayed on the horizontal axis. In the alert display screen, when the rate of change 2 on the evaluation target day satisfies the evaluation criteria, the weight value is displayed together with a black circle, but when the rate of change 2 on the evaluation target date does not meet the evaluation criteria. Displays an alert mark indicating that the recovery has not been completed. In the example shown in FIG. 10, on the measurement date of July 28, an alert mark indicating that the recovery is not completed is displayed together with a weight value of 74.9 kg.

  When the display of the biometric index (FIG. 6; S180) or the alert display and the display of the biometric index (FIG. 6; S170) is completed, the storage processing unit 37 stores the evaluation result as the record data in the table TBL1 of the record data storage unit 52. (FIG. 6; S190). For example, when the evaluation target date is July 28 in the example of FIG. 9, “not recovered” is stored in the evaluation field of the record R27. Thus, the evaluation process ends.

  FIG. 13 is a diagram illustrating an example of transition of the change rate with respect to the body weight two days before the measurement date for the person A to be measured (ID number = 0001). In FIG. 13, the rate of change surrounded by a dotted square indicates the rate of change 2. In the example shown in FIG. 13, it can be seen that the rate of change 2 on July 28 is larger in the negative direction than the rate of change 2 on July 15, July 19, and July 24.

  In general, the weight lost after the game day often recovers, and when the rate of change 2 is significantly lower than the evaluation standard, poor physical condition, glycogen not recovered, and dehydration are suspected. Therefore, if the evaluation result of this embodiment is used, advice suitable for the situation that it was the day after the game day can be given to the measurement subject.

  Next, the reference record and target record group resetting process in the third pattern will be described. If the evaluation reference creation unit 34 determines that the reference record is set (FIG. 8; S52: YES), the average value of the rate of change 2 among the records from the day before the evaluation target day to the next day of the reference record Records to be calculated are extracted (FIG. 8; S102). Then, the evaluation criterion creating unit 34 determines whether or not the number of extracted records has reached the set value N3 (FIG. 8; S112).

  For example, in the example shown in FIG. 9, it is assumed that the reference record is set in the record R23, and the evaluation target date is August 2, which is not shown in FIG. In this case, the evaluation reference creation unit 34 is a record on the next day of the record R23 that is a reference record from a record (not shown) in which August 1 which is the day before August 2 is the measurement date. Of the records up to the record R24, a record for which the average value of the change rate 2 is calculated is extracted. As described above, in the evaluation process for the third pattern, records corresponding to the first pattern and the second pattern are excluded from the records for which the average value of the change rate 2 is calculated. As a result, the record for which the average value of the change rate 2 is calculated is only the record R27.

  In this case, the evaluation criterion creation unit 34 determines that the number of records necessary for calculating the average value of the change rate 2 is 1, and has not reached the set value N3 (FIG. 8; S112: NO), The target record group is not reset. Therefore, the evaluation unit 35 evaluates the change rate 2 of the biological index on the evaluation target date based on the already created evaluation criteria (FIG. 6; S160). If the evaluation target date is August 2, the evaluation standard created based on the average value of the rate of change 2 in the record group up to records R14, R18, R23 is the biometric of August 2 of the evaluation target date. It is determined whether the rate of change of the indicator is satisfied.

  However, it is assumed that the measurement has progressed and the number of records that are the target of calculating the average value of the change rate 2 in the third pattern has reached the set value N3. In this case, the evaluation criterion creating unit 34 determines that the number of records that are targets of calculating the average value of the change rate 2 has reached the set value N3 (FIG. 8; S112: YES), and the evaluation criterion creating unit 34 Resets the reference record (FIG. 8; S122) and resets the target record group (FIG. 8; S132).

  The evaluation reference creation unit 34 calculates the average value of the change rate 2 of the biometric index based on the reset target record group (FIG. 8; S144). Further, the evaluation criterion creating unit 34 creates an evaluation criterion based on the average value of the change rate 2 of the biometric index (FIG. 8; S145) and temporarily stores it in the storage device 50. The evaluation reference creation unit 34 calculates the average value ave3 of the change rate 2 of the biometric index stored in the reset target record group. In addition, the evaluation criterion creating unit 34 creates a new evaluation criterion in the third pattern that the change rate 2 of the biological index on the evaluation target date is equal to or higher than the average value ave3. When a new evaluation standard is created, when the date after the reset standard record is set as the evaluation target date, the evaluation is performed using the new evaluation standard.

  In the same manner, among the records from the record on the previous day of the evaluation target day to the record on the next day of the reference record, the number of records for which the average value of the change rate 2 of the third pattern is calculated is the set value N3. Each time (= 3) is reached, the reference record and the target record group are reset. Further, a new evaluation standard is created based on the reset standard record and the target record group, and the evaluation is performed using the new evaluation standard.

  Taking weight as an example of a biometric index, in general, the decreased weight is often recovered the day after the game day, but if the weight the day after the game day does not meet the evaluation criteria, poor physical condition, Glycogen unrecovered, dehydration is suspected. Therefore, if the evaluation result of this embodiment is used, advice suitable for the situation that it was the day after the game day can be given to the measurement subject. As described above, according to the present embodiment, it is possible to evaluate an appropriate weight according to the game schedule.

As described above, according to the present embodiment, the evaluation of the biometric index is performed using different evaluation criteria according to the schedule of the practice day or the holiday and the game day, so that effective physical condition management for the game day is performed. Can do. Moreover, when the recovery state after a game day is judged appropriately and recovery is not enough, an appropriate countermeasure can be taken.
In addition, since different evaluation criteria are used based on the measurement history of each person to be measured instead of the same evaluation, individual physical condition management suitable for each person to be measured can be performed.
Furthermore, when measurement histories are obtained for a large number of persons to be measured, it is possible to pattern the trend of changes in the biometric index after the game date and the recovery tendency after the game date based on the measurement history. Conceivable. Therefore, even when physical condition management guidance is given to a group such as a soccer team, guidance to group members can be accurately and concisely performed based on the pattern.
The evaluation of the biometric index according to the present invention eliminates the need to fill in the measurement values on the form and manually analyze it, so that it is possible to provide immediate feedback to the measured person and the management of the physical condition of the measured person by the administrator. Simplification can be realized. For the person being measured, an appropriate evaluation can be obtained without performing complicated work, leading to improvement in the self-management ability of the person being measured.

Second Embodiment
Next, a second embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to FIG. In the first embodiment, the aspect in which the daily weight measurement value and the alert when applicable are displayed on the display unit 62 has been described. However, in the present embodiment, only the necessary recording data is extracted and the display unit 62 is extracted. The display is different from the first embodiment.

  An example of necessary recording data is the rate of change of the biometric index on the next day of the game day. Taking weight as an example of a biometric index, it is generally said that suppressing weight loss on the next day of a game day is necessary for recovery from fatigue after the game day. Therefore, it is important to display a list of the rate of change in weight on the next day of the game day in order to allow the subject to perform proper physical condition management on a daily basis. In view of this, in this embodiment, a change rate transition display mode is provided that indicates the transition of the change rate of the weight on the next day of the game day. By pressing the input button (not shown) of the operation unit 61 to input the ID number of the person to be measured and pressing the mode switching button (not shown), the evaluation reference creation unit 34 of the calculation control unit 30 changes. The rate transition display mode process is executed.

  The evaluation criterion creation unit 34 refers to the table TBL1 associated with the input ID number and corresponds to the measurement day corresponding to the game day and the day after the game day relative to the weight of the measurement day corresponding to the game day. A change rate 1 which is a change rate of the body weight on the measurement date is extracted. The display control unit 36 causes the display unit 62 to display a change rate transition display screen as shown in FIG. 14 based on the measurement date corresponding to the extracted game date and the change rate 1.

  FIG. 14 is a diagram illustrating an example of a change rate transition display screen showing a transition of the change rate 1 that is the change rate of the weight on the next day of the game day in the present embodiment. As shown in FIG. 14, on the change rate transition display screen, the ID number of the measurement subject is displayed on the upper right of the screen. On the vertical axis, the weight change rate 1 [%] is displayed, and the weight change rate 1 on the measurement day corresponding to the next day of the game day is displayed in a bar graph format. The horizontal axis displays the date of the match date, not the date of the match next day. Below the date of the match date, the weight change rate 1 on the measurement date corresponding to the next day of the match date is displayed as a numerical value.

  The administrator can display such a change rate transition display screen and show the measured person to the measured person so that the measured person can recognize the change rate 1 of the weight on the next day of the game day and can instruct the measured person. it can. In the example shown in FIG. 14, as a result of the guidance, it can be seen that the measurement subject's awareness of weight recovery increases and the weight change rate 1 (decrease rate) gradually decreases. Thus, the biological index evaluation apparatus 1 of the present invention can be used as an educational tool.

  In the above example, only the weight change rate 1 on the next day of the game day is extracted, but the present invention is not limited to such a configuration, and other recorded data can be extracted and displayed. is there. For example, only the change rate 2 of the weight on the day after the game day may be extracted and displayed. Alternatively, the weight change rate 1 on the next day of the game day and the weight change rate 2 on the next day of the game day may be extracted and displayed.

<Third Embodiment>
Next, a third embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to FIG. In 1st Embodiment and 2nd Embodiment, although the measured value etc. which a measured person displayed on the display part 62 can confirm was demonstrated, in this embodiment, the measured value etc. which are displayed on the display part 62 Is different from the first embodiment and the second embodiment in that only the administrator can confirm the above.

  In order for one manager to grasp the physical condition of a large number of measured persons such as members of a soccer team, it is preferable that the physical condition of each measured person can be listed. Therefore, in this embodiment, an administrator mode is provided in which only an administrator can check a list of measured values of each person to be measured. When the administrator presses an input button (not shown) of the operation unit 61 to input the administrator's ID number and presses a mode switching button (not shown), the evaluation reference creation unit 34 of the arithmetic control unit 30 is Execute the administrator mode process.

Various modes can be considered for the display in the administrator mode. As an example, a mode in which the weight on the evaluation target day, the rate of change of the weight from the previous day, and the schedule of the previous day are displayed as a list will be described.
The evaluation target date is input by an input button (not shown) of the operation unit 61. The evaluation reference creation 34 refers to the table TBL1 of each measured person, the ID number of each measured person, the weight of the measurement date corresponding to the input evaluation target date, and the rate of change of the weight from the previous day. The activity action information on the previous day of the input evaluation target date is extracted. When the rate of change in weight from the previous day is not stored in the table TBL1, the rate of change in weight from the previous day is calculated. The display control unit 36 causes the display unit 62 to display a list display screen as shown in FIG. 15 based on the extracted ID number, the activity action information of the previous day, the weight, and the rate of change of the weight from the previous day.

  FIG. 15 is a diagram illustrating an example of a list display screen in the present embodiment. As shown in FIG. 15, the list display screen displays the ID number, name, previous day schedule, weight, and rate of change. The “name” can be displayed by providing a table in which, for example, an ID number and the name of the person to be measured are linked, and referring to the table. The “previous day schedule” is displayed based on the activity activity information of the previous day extracted as described above. When the activity action information on the previous day is “match date”, “match” is displayed on the list display screen of FIG. When the activity action information on the previous day is “practice date”, “practice” is displayed on the list display screen of FIG. The “change rate” is a change rate of the body weight on the measurement day corresponding to the evaluation date with respect to the weight on the previous day of the measurement date corresponding to the evaluation date input as described above. As described in the first embodiment, such a change rate is stored in the table TBL1 only when the measurement date corresponding to the evaluation target date corresponds to the second pattern. Therefore, when the activity action information on the day before the measurement date corresponding to the evaluation date is “practice date”, the rate of change is not stored in the table TBL1. In this case, the evaluation reference creation unit 34 may calculate the change rate of the weight on the measurement day corresponding to the evaluation target date with respect to the weight on the previous day of the measurement date corresponding to the evaluation target date.

  In addition, the evaluation criterion creating unit 34 creates an evaluation criterion for the list display screen, and performs grouping of persons to be measured based on the evaluation criterion. For example, the evaluation criterion creating unit 34 creates an evaluation criterion that the change rate is −0.2 [%] or more and 0.2% [%] or less. Then, the evaluation standard creation unit 34 divides the change rate into a group that exceeds the evaluation standard, a group within the evaluation standard, and a group that falls below the evaluation standard. The display control unit 35 displays a group whose rate of change is below the evaluation standard in a column displayed as “* Caution required * reduction”, and displays a group within the evaluation standard in a column displayed as “within range”. . In addition, the display control unit 35 displays a group in which the rate of change exceeds the evaluation standard in a column that displays “* Caution required * Increase”.

  By using such a list display screen, the administrator can easily grasp the physical condition according to the schedule of each person being measured. For example, among the measured persons displayed in the “* Attention * Reduced” column, those who have a “game” on the previous day's schedule are suspected of poor physical condition, unrecovered glycogen, and dehydration. Among the subjects displayed in the “* Attention * Reduction” column, those whose schedule is “Practice” on the previous day are suspected of lack of energy and decreased body water content. Excessive energy is suspected for the subject displayed in the “* Attention * Increase” column. Therefore, if the list display screen of the present embodiment is used, appropriate advice can be given to the subject in accordance with the physical condition according to the schedule of each subject.

  In the above example, the change rate from the previous day of the weight on the measurement date corresponding to the evaluation date is displayed on the list display screen, but the present invention is not limited to such a configuration, and other information is displayed. It is also possible to display on the list display screen. For example, the rate of change of the weight on the measurement date corresponding to the evaluation date from the previous day may be displayed on the list display screen. Alternatively, the change rate from the previous day of the weight on the measurement date corresponding to the evaluation date and the change rate from the previous day of the weight on the measurement date corresponding to the evaluation date may be displayed on the list display screen. Good.

<Fourth embodiment>
Next, a fourth embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to FIGS. In the first to third embodiments, the aspect in which the present invention is embodied by the biological index evaluation system 100 including the biological index measurement device 2 and the biological index evaluation device 1 has been described. However, in the present embodiment, a mode in which the present invention is embodied using a single biological index evaluation apparatus 1A having functions of the biological index measurement apparatus 2 and the biological index evaluation apparatus 1 will be described.

  FIG. 16 is a diagram illustrating an appearance of the biological index evaluation apparatus 1A according to the present embodiment. As shown in FIG. 16, the biological index evaluation apparatus 1 </ b> A is an apparatus that measures a biological index such as the body weight of the measurement subject on the flat measurement table 10 and evaluates the biological index.

As shown in FIG. 16, the biological index evaluation apparatus 1 </ b> A includes a flat measurement table 10 and a flat operation panel 20, similarly to the biological index measurement apparatus 2 described in the first embodiment. On the flat measurement table 10, each current supply electrode 11 and each voltage measurement electrode 12 are installed so as to contact the right foot and the left foot of the measurement subject.
The operation panel 20 includes an operation unit 21 and a display unit 22. The operation unit 21 has both the function of the operation unit 21 of the biological index measuring device 2 described in the first embodiment and the function of the operation unit 61 in the biological index evaluation device 1 described in the first embodiment and the like. The operation unit 21 is an input device that receives instructions from the measurement subject and the administrator. For example, function buttons such as a power button for turning on / off the power and a display switching button for switching the display of the display unit 22. Is provided. In addition, the operation unit 21 performs various settings such as an ID number as a measurement subject identification information, an administrator ID number, an evaluation target date, activity action information, a measurement subject name, age, sex, and height. For example, a setting button is provided. Further, the operation unit 21 includes a button for selecting an evaluation mode for evaluating a biological index, and a button for selecting a data acquisition mode for acquiring measurement data and activity action information. The operation unit 21 includes a button for inputting an evaluation target date, activity action information, and the like, a button for switching a display screen on the display unit 62, and the like. The buttons provided on the operation unit 21 are not limited to these, and a touch panel configured integrally with the display unit 22 can be used as the operation unit 21. Note that illustration of any buttons is omitted in FIG.

  The display unit 22 has both the function of the display unit 22 of the biological index measuring device 2 described in the first embodiment and the function of the display unit 62 of the biological index evaluation device 1 described in the first embodiment and the like. The display unit 22 is configured by a liquid crystal panel, for example, and displays, for example, a measurement result of a biological index such as a body weight of the measurement subject, an evaluation result of the biological index, a change rate of the biological index, and the like.

  FIG. 17 is a block diagram for explaining functions of the biological index evaluation apparatus 1A. As illustrated in FIG. 17, the biological index evaluation apparatus 1 </ b> A includes an operation unit 21, a display unit 22, a calculation control unit 230, a biological index measurement unit 40, and a storage device 250.

  The biological index measurement unit 40 in the biological index evaluation device 1A has the same function as the biological index measurement unit 40 in the biological index measurement device 2 described in the first embodiment and the like. The biometric index measuring unit 40 measures the biometric index of the measurement subject. The biological index measurement unit 40 includes a body composition measurement unit 41 and a weight measurement unit 42. The functions of the body composition measuring unit 41 and the body weight measuring unit 42 are the same as the functions described in the first embodiment and the like, and thus description thereof is omitted.

The calculation control unit 230 of the biological index evaluation apparatus 1A includes the function of the calculation control unit 230 of the biological index measurement apparatus 2 described in the first embodiment and the calculation control unit of the biological index evaluation apparatus 1 described in the first embodiment. It has 30 functions. The arithmetic control unit 230 includes an information processing apparatus such as a microprocessor. The calculation control unit 230 executes the program stored in the program storage unit 251 of the storage device 250, thereby causing the display control unit 232, the biological index calculation unit 233, the activity action information acquisition unit 235, the storage processing unit 236, the evaluation criteria. It functions as a creation unit 237 and an evaluation unit 238. In the present embodiment, since it is not necessary to acquire measurement data, the arithmetic control unit 230 does not function as a measurement data acquisition unit.
The biometric index evaluation apparatus 1A corresponds to the communication unit 23 of the biomarker measurement apparatus 2 described in the first embodiment and the communication unit 63 of the biomarker evaluation apparatus 1 described in the first embodiment and the like. There is no communication unit. Further, the calculation control unit 230 of the biological index evaluation apparatus 1A does not function as the communication control unit 231 in the calculation control unit 230 of the biological index measurement apparatus 2 described in the first embodiment. Therefore, in the biological index evaluation apparatus 1A, the communication processing control shown in FIG. 4 described in the first embodiment is not performed.

  The display control unit 232 of the biological index evaluation apparatus 1A includes the function of the display control unit 232 of the biological index measurement apparatus 2 described in the first embodiment and the display control of the biological index evaluation apparatus 1 described in the first embodiment and the like. It also has the function of the part 36. The display control unit 232 displays a message for requesting input of the ID numbers of the subject and the administrator, a message for requesting input of the evaluation target date and activity action information, and a message indicating that the recording data is insufficient. Control to display on the screen. In addition, the display control unit 232 performs control for causing the display unit 22 to display the measurement result of the biological index such as the body weight, the change rate of the biological index, and the evaluation result of the biological index.

  The biological index calculation unit 233 of the biological index evaluation device 1A has the same function as the biological index calculation unit 233 of the biological index measurement device 2 described in the first embodiment and the like. The biometric index calculation unit 233 determines the body composition (body fat percentage, fat mass, fat free mass) as a biometric index based on the measurement signal corresponding to the measurement subject's bioimpedance and the measurement signal corresponding to the measurement subject's weight. , Muscle mass, body water content, etc.) and body weight are calculated.

  The activity action information acquisition unit 235 of the biological index evaluation apparatus 1A has the same function as the activity action information acquisition unit 32 of the biological index evaluation apparatus 1 described in the first embodiment and the like. The activity action information acquisition unit 235 acquires the activity action information of the measurement subject based on the input by the operation unit 21. The activity action information is the same as the activity action information described in the above embodiments.

  The storage processing unit 236 of the biological index evaluation apparatus 1A has the same function as the storage processing unit 33 of the biological index evaluation apparatus 1 described in the first embodiment and the like. The storage processing unit 236 stores the biometric index obtained by the biometric index calculation unit 233 and the measurement date obtained by referring to the real-time clock IC (not shown) in the recording data storage unit 253 in association with the ID number. The recorded table TBL1 is stored as recording data. In addition, the storage processing unit 236 stores the activity action information acquired by the activity action information acquisition unit 236 and the evaluation result by the evaluation unit 238 in the table TBL1 stored in the recording data storage unit 253 as recording data.

  The evaluation criterion creation unit 237 of the biological index evaluation apparatus 1A has the same function as the evaluation criterion creation unit 34 of the biological index evaluation device 1 described in the first embodiment and the like. The evaluation criterion creation unit 237 is used to create an evaluation criterion from the recorded data stored in the recording data storage unit 253 of the storage device 250 in accordance with the progress pattern of the activity action information. Extract recorded data. The evaluation standard creation unit 237 creates an evaluation standard using the extracted record data.

  The evaluation unit 238 of the biological index evaluation apparatus 1A has the same function as the evaluation unit 35 of the biological index evaluation apparatus 1 described in the first embodiment and the like. Based on the evaluation criteria created by the evaluation criteria creation unit 237, the evaluation unit 238 performs evaluation of the biometric index on the evaluation target date according to the progress pattern of the activity action information.

The storage device 250 of the biological index evaluation apparatus 1A includes the functions of the storage device 250 of the biological index measurement apparatus 2 described in the first embodiment and the storage device 50 of the biological index evaluation apparatus 1 described in the first embodiment and the like. Combines functionality. The storage device 250 includes, for example, a non-volatile memory or an HDD (hard disk drive), and includes a program storage unit 251 and a recording data storage unit 253. In the present embodiment, since it is not necessary to acquire measurement data, the storage device 250 does not include a measurement data storage unit. The program storage unit 251 stores various data such as a biological index measurement program executed by the calculation control unit 230, a biological index evaluation program, and a table used by the calculation control unit 230. In the recording data storage unit 253, the biometric index, the activity action information, and the evaluation result of the biometric index are associated with each other and stored as recording data for each ID number of the measurement subject.
The storage device 250 may be a non-volatile memory that can be connected to the biometric index evaluation apparatus 1A, an external HDD, or a USB memory, or an HDD connected to an external server or an external server. May be.

Next, the overall operation of the biological index evaluation apparatus 1A of this embodiment will be described. Regarding the biometric index measurement process, a different part from the biometric index measurement process described with reference to FIG. 3 in the first embodiment will be described.
FIG. 18 is a flowchart showing a measurement process of the biometric index of the biometric index evaluation apparatus 1A according to the present embodiment. In the first embodiment, as shown in FIG. 3, the biometric index calculation unit 233 associates the measurement date and the biometric index with each other for each ID number of the measurement subject, and stores them in the measurement data storage unit 252 as measurement data. (FIG. 3; S5). However, in the present embodiment, the biological index calculation unit 233 refers to the ID number of the person to be measured, and identifies the corresponding record in the table TBL1 from the recording data storage unit 253. Next, the storage processing unit 236 refers to a real-time clock IC (not shown) and stores the current year, month, and day as the measurement date in the measurement date field of the specified record. And the memory | storage process part 236 memorize | stores the measured biometric parameter | index in the field of the biometric parameter | index of the said record (FIG. 18; S6).

The measurement data acquisition process and activity action information acquisition process of the biological index evaluation apparatus 1 will be described. FIG. 19 is a flowchart showing an activity action information acquisition process in the biological index evaluation apparatus 1A.
First, the administrator activates the biometric index program stored in the program storage unit 251 of the storage device 250 in the biometric index evaluation apparatus 1A. The biometric index program is started by clicking a button for selecting a data acquisition mode for acquiring activity action information in the operation unit 21.

  When the administrator clicks the button and selects the data acquisition mode, the display control unit 232 of the calculation control unit 230 causes the display unit 22 to display a display prompting input of the ID number of the measurement subject. For example, the display control unit 232 displays a message such as “Please enter ID number” on the display unit 22 (FIG. 19; S200).

The storage processing unit 236 temporarily stores the input ID number in the storage device 250. When the input of the ID number is completed, the display control unit 232 displays a message such as “Please input today's schedule execution result” and selection items of “practice date”, “holiday”, and “match date”. It is displayed on the display unit 22 (FIG. 19; S201).
When any selection item of “practice day”, “holiday”, or “match day” is selected as the schedule execution result, the activity action information acquisition unit 235 selects the activity action information corresponding to the selected selection item. Is temporarily stored in the storage device 250 (FIG. 19; S202).

When the acquisition of the activity action information is completed, the storage processing unit 236 identifies the record of the corresponding table TBL1 from the recording data storage unit 253 with reference to the ID number temporarily stored in the storage device 250 as described above. To do. Next, the storage processing unit 236 specifies a record of measurement date obtained by referring to a real time clock IC (not shown). Next, the storage processing unit 236 stores the activity action information temporarily stored in the storage device 250 as record data in the activity action information field of the identified record (FIG. 19; S203). When measuring body weight as a biometric index, the ID number, measurement date, weight, and activity action information are associated with each other and stored in the table TBL1 stored in the recording data storage unit 253 as recording data.
Various forms of recording data can be considered. In this embodiment, as in the first embodiment, the measurement date, the biometric index, and the activity action information are recorded as a record in the record data table TBL1 shown in FIG. The recorded data is stored in the recording data storage unit 253. The recording data table TBL1 is managed for each ID number.
When the above storage process ends, the activity action information acquisition process ends.

  Next, the biometric index evaluation process in the biometric index evaluation apparatus 1A will be described. The biometric index evaluation process in the present embodiment is the same as the biometric index evaluation process described with reference to FIGS. 6 to 8 in the first embodiment. The biometric index evaluation processing according to the present embodiment is executed by the display control unit 232, the storage processing unit 236, the evaluation reference creation unit 237, and the evaluation unit 238. Although detailed description is omitted, also in the present embodiment, recording data is extracted from the recording data storage unit 253 in accordance with the progress pattern of the activity action information, and an evaluation criterion is created based on the extracted recording data. . Then, the biological index is evaluated on the evaluation target date based on the evaluation criteria. The biometric index and the evaluation result are displayed on the display unit 22 as a biometric index and an alert display screen, as described with reference to FIG. 10 in the first embodiment.

Therefore, also in this embodiment, since the biometric index is evaluated using different evaluation criteria according to the schedule of practice days, holidays, and game days, effective physical condition management for game days can be performed. Moreover, when the recovery state after a game day is judged appropriately and recovery is not enough, an appropriate countermeasure can be taken.
In addition, since different evaluation criteria are used based on the measurement history of each person to be measured instead of the same evaluation, individual physical condition management suitable for each person to be measured can be performed.
Furthermore, when measurement histories are obtained for a large number of persons to be measured, it is possible to pattern the trend of changes in the biometric index after the game date and the recovery tendency after the game date based on the measurement history. Conceivable. Therefore, even when physical condition management guidance is given to a group such as a soccer team, guidance to group members can be accurately and concisely performed based on the pattern.
Further, in the present embodiment, the evaluation of the biometric index does not require the entry of the measurement value on the paper or the manual analysis, so that immediate feedback to the measured person is possible and the measured by the administrator. Simplification of a person's physical condition management can be realized. For the person being measured, an appropriate evaluation can be obtained without performing complicated work, leading to improvement in the self-management ability of the person being measured.

  In the biological index evaluation apparatus 1A of the present embodiment, it is possible to extract only the necessary recording data described with reference to FIG. 14 in the second embodiment and display it on the display unit 22. The administrator uses the biological index evaluation apparatus 1A to display a change rate transition display screen as shown in FIG. 14 and shows the measured person the weight change rate on the next day of the game day. And can instruct the person being measured. Therefore, the biological index evaluation apparatus 1A can be used as an educational tool.

In the biological index evaluation apparatus 1A of the present embodiment, it is also possible to display on the display unit 22 a list display screen such as measurement values of the measurer that can be confirmed only by the administrator described in the third embodiment with reference to FIG. It is. For example, also in the biological index evaluation apparatus 1A of the present embodiment, the ID number, the activity information on the previous day, the body weight, and the rate of change of the body weight from the previous day are measured based on the evaluation criteria as shown in FIG. Are displayed on the display unit 22. Therefore, also in this embodiment, the administrator can easily grasp the physical condition according to the schedule of each person to be measured by using such a list display screen. Also in this embodiment, appropriate advice can be given to the subject according to the physical condition according to the schedule of each subject.
In the fourth embodiment, the biometric index is directly stored as record data in the table TBL1. However, the present invention is not limited to such a mode. The table stored in the recording data storage unit 253 after the measurement data storage unit is provided in the storage device 250 and the biological index is stored in the measurement data storage unit. You may memorize | store as recording data in TBL1. Alternatively, the storage processing unit 236 may store the biometric index in the table TBL1 when the biometric index is calculated or when the biometric index is stored in the measurement data storage unit.

<Modification>
The above embodiment can be variously modified. Specific modifications are exemplified below. Two or more aspects arbitrarily selected from the following examples can be appropriately combined as long as they do not contradict each other.

(1) Modification 1
In the above embodiment, the example using the body weight as the biometric index has been described, but the present invention is not limited to such a configuration. For example, it may be used for managing a body at a sports practice site such as body water content, BMI (Body Mass Index), etc. as a biometric index.

(2) Modification 2
In the above embodiment, three types of patterns from the first pattern to the third pattern were used as the progress pattern of the activity action information. However, the present invention is not limited to such a configuration. It is possible to increase the types of patterns as appropriate. For example, a pattern in which a game day lasts for two days or a pattern in which a game day is played every other day may be added. Further, the evaluation of the biometric index on the next day of the game day when the game days are continued may be performed with priority on the second pattern.

(3) Modification 3
In the above embodiment, the example in which the storage device 50 is built in the biological index evaluation device 1 has been described. However, the present invention is not limited to such a configuration, and the storage device 50 is installed in an external server or the like. You may do it. Moreover, although the above embodiment demonstrated the example which incorporates the memory | storage device 250 in the biomarker measurement apparatus 2 and the biomarker evaluation apparatus 1A, this invention is not necessarily limited to such a structure, The memory | storage device 250 May be installed in an external server or the like.

(4) Modification 4
In the above embodiment, when the activity action information progress pattern is the first pattern, the standard deviation is used when calculating the evaluation reference value, but any variation scale may be employed. For example, the variance of measured values or the coefficient of variation of level values (value obtained by dividing the standard deviation by the average value of the group) can be adopted as the variation measure.

(5) Modification 5
In the first to third embodiments, the mode in which the measurement data is transmitted from the biological index measuring device 2 to the biological index evaluating device 1 has been described. However, the present invention is not limited to such an embodiment, and the measurement data may be transferred from the biological index measurement device 2 to the biological index evaluation device 1 using a storage medium such as a USB memory.

(6) Modification 6
In the first to third embodiments, the mode in which activity action information is input in the biological index evaluation apparatus 1 has been described. However, the present invention is not limited to such a mode, and the activity action information is input by the biological index measuring device 2 and the activity index information is input by the biological index evaluation device 1 using a storage medium such as communication or USB memory. May be obtained.

(7) Modification 7
In the first to third embodiments, the aspect in which the biological index change rate is calculated in the biological index evaluation apparatus 1 has been described. However, the present invention is not limited to such an embodiment. The change rate of the biometric index is calculated by the biometric index measurement device 2, and the biometric index evaluation device 1 uses a storage medium such as communication or a USB memory. You may make it acquire the change rate of an parameter | index.

(8) Modification 8
In the above embodiment, the aspect in which the activity action information is acquired by the administrator selecting a button or the like has been described. However, the present invention is not limited to such an embodiment. A schedule table in which a measurement date and activity activity information are associated with each other is prepared in advance, and the activity activity information is obtained by referring to the schedule table. You may get it.

(9) Modification 9
In the first to third embodiments, the aspect has been described in which the measurement data is acquired from the biological index measurement device 2 in the biological index evaluation device 1 every time the measurement subject measures the biological index. In the fourth embodiment, the mode in which the administrator executes the measurement data acquisition process every time the measurement subject measures the biological index has been described. However, the present invention is not limited to such an embodiment, and the measurement data may be acquired collectively. For example, the measurement data of all the persons to be measured may be acquired collectively every day, or the measurement data of all the persons to be measured may be acquired collectively every predetermined period. When acquiring measurement data collectively, the measurement data measurement process and activity action information acquisition process described with reference to FIG. 5 may be executed as many times as necessary.

(10) Modification 10
In the above embodiment, the aspect which memorize | stores the biological index evaluation program in the program storage part 51 of the memory | storage device 50 in the biological index evaluation apparatus 1 or the program storage part 251 of the memory | storage part 250 in 1 A of biological index evaluation apparatuses was demonstrated. However, the present invention is not limited to such an embodiment. The biological index evaluation program may be stored in, for example, a non-transitory recording medium. As such a recording medium, a semiconductor recording medium such as a RAM (Random Access Memory) or a ROM (Read Only Memory) is suitable, but a known arbitrary type of recording medium such as an optical recording medium or a magnetic recording medium. Can be included. “Non-transitory” recording media includes all computer-readable recording media except transient and propagating signals, and does not exclude volatile recording media.

DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1,1A ... Biological parameter | index evaluation apparatus, 2 ... Biological parameter | index measuring apparatus, 10 ... Measurement stand, 11 ... Current supply electrode, 12 ... Voltage measurement electrode, 14 ... Current supply part, 15 ... Voltage measurement part, 16 ... Weight sensor, DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 17 ... Amplification conversion part, 21 ... Operation part, 22 ... Display part, 23 ... Communication part, 30 ... Calculation control part, 31 ... Measurement data acquisition part, 32 ... Activity action information acquisition part, 33 ... Recording process selection part, 34 ... Evaluation criteria creation unit, 35 ... Evaluation unit, 36 ... Display control unit, 40 ... Biometric index measurement unit, 41 ... Body composition detection unit, 42 ... Weight detection unit, 50 ... Storage device, 51 ... Program storage unit, 52 ... Recording data storage unit, 61 ... operation unit, 62 ... display unit, 63 ... communication unit, 100 ... biological index evaluation system, 230 ... calculation control unit, 231 ... communication control unit, 232 ... display control unit, 233 ... biological index calculation Part, 235 ... activity action information acquisition part 236 ... recording process selecting section, 237 ... Based creating unit, 238 ... evaluation unit, 250 ... storage device, 251 ... program storage unit, 252 ... measurement data storage section, 253 ... recording data storage unit, TBL1 ... table.

Claims (9)

A measurement data acquisition unit for acquiring measurement data including the measured biological index and the measurement date of the biological index;
An activity action information acquisition unit that acquires activity action information indicating an activity action on the measurement date;
A storage processing unit that stores the measurement date and the biometric index included in the measurement data, and the activity action information in a storage device in association with each other;
An evaluation criterion creation unit that creates an evaluation criterion using the biological index stored in the storage device according to the progress of the activity action information, with the evaluation target date as a reference,
Based on the evaluation criteria, an evaluation unit that evaluates the biological index on the evaluation target date;
A biological index evaluation apparatus comprising: The evaluation criterion creating unit extracts the biometric index from the storage device according to a pattern of progress of the activity action information in a predetermined period retroactive from the evaluation target date, and uses the extracted biometric index to perform the evaluation Create standards,
The biological index evaluation apparatus according to claim 1. The storage processing unit causes the storage device to store the evaluation result of the biometric index on the evaluation target date in association with the biometric index and the activity action information on the evaluation target date.
The biological index evaluation apparatus according to claim 1 or 2. The measurement data includes identification information of the measurement subject of the biometric index,
The identification information is associated with the measurement date, the biological index, and the activity action information,
The evaluation criterion creating unit creates the evaluation criterion based on the biometric index and the activity action information for each identification information,
The evaluation unit evaluates the biological index based on the evaluation criteria for each identification information.
The biological index evaluation apparatus according to any one of claims 1 to 3. A biometric index measurement unit for measuring a biometric index;
An activity information acquisition unit for acquiring activity activity information indicating an activity activity on the measurement date of the biometric index;
A storage processing unit for storing the measurement date, the biometric index, and the activity action information in a storage device in association with each other;
An evaluation criterion creation unit that creates an evaluation criterion using the biological index stored in the storage device according to the progress of the activity action information, with the evaluation target date as a reference,
Based on the evaluation criteria, an evaluation unit that evaluates the biological index on the evaluation target date;
A biological index evaluation apparatus comprising: Obtaining measurement data including the measured biometric index and the measurement date of the biometric index;
Acquire activity activity information indicating activity activity on the measurement date,
Storing the measurement date and the biometric index included in the measurement data, and the activity action information in association with each other;
Based on the evaluation target date, according to the progress of the activity action information, create an evaluation criterion using the stored biometric index,
Based on the evaluation criteria, evaluate the biological index on the evaluation target date,
Biometric index evaluation method. Measure biometric indicators,
Acquiring activity activity information indicating activity activity on the measurement date of the biometric index,
Storing the measurement date, the biological index, and the activity action information in association with each other in a storage device;
Based on the evaluation target date, according to the progress of the activity action information, create an evaluation criterion using the biometric index stored in the storage device,
Based on the evaluation criteria, evaluate the biological index on the evaluation target date,
Biometric index evaluation method. Biometric evaluation device
A measurement data acquisition unit for acquiring measurement data including the measured biological index and the measurement date of the biological index;
An activity action information acquisition unit that acquires activity action information indicating an activity action on the measurement date;
A storage processing unit that stores the measurement date and the biometric index included in the measurement data, and the activity action information in a storage device in association with each other;
An evaluation criterion creation unit that creates an evaluation criterion using the biological index stored in the storage device according to the progress of the activity action information, with the evaluation target date as a reference,
Based on the evaluation criteria, function as an evaluation unit for evaluating the biological index on the evaluation target date,
Bioindicator evaluation program. A biomarker evaluation system comprising a biomarker measurement device and a biomarker evaluation device capable of communicating with the biomarker measurement device,
The biological index measuring device is:
A biometric index measuring unit for measuring the biometric index,
The biological index evaluation apparatus is
A measurement data acquisition unit for acquiring measurement data including the biological index measured by the biological index measurement device and the measurement date of the biological index;
An activity action information acquisition unit that acquires activity action information indicating an activity action on the measurement date;
A storage processing unit that stores the measurement date and the biometric index included in the measurement data, and the activity action information in a storage device in association with each other;
An evaluation criterion creation unit that creates an evaluation criterion using the biological index stored in the storage device according to the progress of the activity action information, with the evaluation target date as a reference,
An evaluation unit that evaluates the biological index on the evaluation target date based on the evaluation criteria,
Biometric index evaluation system.

Images