JP2012197350A - Hydrorefining method of heavy oil - Google Patents
Hydrorefining method of heavy oil Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- JP2012197350A JP2012197350A JP2011062245A JP2011062245A JP2012197350A JP 2012197350 A JP2012197350 A JP 2012197350A JP 2011062245 A JP2011062245 A JP 2011062245A JP 2011062245 A JP2011062245 A JP 2011062245A JP 2012197350 A JP2012197350 A JP 2012197350A
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- oil
- catalyst
- hydrorefining
- mass
- sulfur content
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Landscapes
- Production Of Liquid Hydrocarbon Mixture For Refining Petroleum (AREA)
Abstract
【課題】常圧残油および/または減圧軽油とアスファルテンが除去された溶剤脱れき油(DAO)との混合油を原料として水素化精製する場合、水素化精製触媒が劣化するという問題があることから、水素化精製触媒の劣化を抑制し、プロセスの経済性を高めた重質油の水素化精製方法を提供する。
【解決手段】水素化精製触媒が脱メタル触媒と脱硫触媒との組み合わせから成り、脱メタル触媒を通過後の脱メタル処理油中の硫黄分が1.1質量%以上で、かつ金属分が30質量ppm以上45質量ppm以下である脱メタル処理油を得、次いで該脱メタル処理油を脱硫触媒を通過させることにより、水素化精製触媒の劣化を抑制して、硫黄分が0.4質量%以下の水素化精製油を得ることが可能となる。
【選択図】なし[PROBLEMS] To reduce the hydrorefining catalyst when hydrorefining is carried out using a mixed oil of atmospheric residual oil and / or vacuum gas oil and solvent desorbed oil (DAO) from which asphaltenes have been removed. Therefore, the present invention provides a method for hydrorefining heavy oil that suppresses deterioration of the hydrorefining catalyst and improves the economics of the process.
The hydrorefining catalyst comprises a combination of a demetallization catalyst and a desulfurization catalyst, the sulfur content in the demetallized oil after passing through the demetallization catalyst is 1.1% by mass or more, and the metal content is 30%. A demetallized oil having a mass of not less than 45 ppm and not more than 45 ppm by mass is obtained, and then the demetallized oil is passed through a desulfurization catalyst to suppress degradation of the hydrorefining catalyst, so that the sulfur content is 0.4 mass% The following hydrorefined oil can be obtained.
[Selection figure] None
Description
本発明は、水素存在下で重質な炭化水素油中の硫黄分を除去する水素化精製方法に関する。 The present invention relates to a hydrorefining method for removing sulfur content in heavy hydrocarbon oil in the presence of hydrogen.
近年、液体燃料においては、硫黄含有量をより低減させることが要求されている。その要求に対して、燃料油メーカーでは既に様々なクリーン燃料製造法を検討してきた。特にガソリンにおいては硫黄分10質量ppm以下の規制があるため、燃料油メーカーでは触媒の改良や設備の増設等の対応策を採ってきた。
一般に、ガソリンの主基材は流動接触分解装置(FCC)で生成する分解ガソリンである。したがって、ガソリン中の硫黄分を低減するためには、分解ガソリン中の硫黄分を低減することが重要である。
この分解ガソリン中の硫黄分はFCCの原料である重質油(一般的に減圧軽油または常圧蒸留残油)の硫黄分に左右され、FCC原料の硫黄分が高いほど、分解ガソリンの硫黄分が高くなることが知られている。従って、硫黄分が低いクリーンなガソリンを製造するためには、FCCの原料である重質油中の硫黄分をあらかじめ除去する必要がある。
FCCの原料を脱硫するための水素化精製処理(FCCの前処理)では、一般に脱メタル触媒と脱硫触媒の組み合わせから成る水素化精製用触媒を充填した固定床反応塔にて、水素気流中、高温高圧の反応条件で重質油を水素化精製する処理が行なわれる。重質油中の硫黄分は、この水素化精製条件が過酷になればなる程、より低下するのでクリーンなガソリンを製造するには好ましい。しかしながら、意図的に水素化反応条件を過酷にしたり、硫黄分が多い重質油を処理する為、必然的に反応条件が過酷になると、水素化精製触媒の寿命が短くなり、結果として装置を止めて新たに触媒を充填して水素化精製を再開させる必要がある。このような場合、製造されるガソリンのコストが高くなり、経済性に大きな悪影響を及ぼすことになる。
上述したように、重質油の水素化精製処理では脱メタル触媒と脱硫触媒とを積層して使用するのが一般的である。この理由として、脱硫触媒のメタル堆積による失活を防ぐ為に前段に脱メタル触媒が必要であると考えられる。非特許文献1〜3に脱メタル触媒の有効性を示した例が開示されている。
重質油の水素化精製触媒を劣化させる原因として、メタル堆積の他にコーク堆積がある。触媒上に堆積するコークの原因は原料の重質油に含まれるアスファルテン(ヘプタンのようなパラフィン不溶分)であると考えられ、水素化精製前に原料の溶剤脱れき(SDA)処理によりアスファルテンを除去しておくことが触媒寿命延長に有効であることが非特許文献4に開示されている。
In recent years, liquid fuels have been required to further reduce the sulfur content. In response to this demand, fuel oil manufacturers have already considered various clean fuel production methods. In particular, gasoline has restrictions on sulfur content of 10 mass ppm or less, so fuel oil manufacturers have taken countermeasures such as improving the catalyst and adding equipment.
In general, the main base material of gasoline is cracked gasoline produced by a fluid catalytic cracker (FCC). Therefore, in order to reduce the sulfur content in gasoline, it is important to reduce the sulfur content in cracked gasoline.
The sulfur content in the cracked gasoline depends on the sulfur content of the heavy oil (generally vacuum gas oil or atmospheric distillation residue) that is the FCC feedstock. The higher the sulfur content in the FCC feedstock, the higher the sulfur content of the cracked gasoline. Is known to be high. Therefore, in order to produce clean gasoline having a low sulfur content, it is necessary to previously remove the sulfur content in the heavy oil that is the raw material of FCC.
In the hydrorefining treatment (FCC pretreatment) for desulfurizing FCC raw materials, in a fixed bed reaction tower packed with a hydrotreating catalyst generally comprising a combination of a demetallization catalyst and a desulfurization catalyst, A process for hydrorefining heavy oil under high temperature and high pressure reaction conditions is performed. The sulfur content in heavy oil decreases as the hydrorefining conditions become more severe, and is therefore preferable for producing clean gasoline. However, because the hydrogenation reaction conditions are intentionally severe, or heavy oils with a high sulfur content are treated, if the reaction conditions become inevitably severe, the life of the hydrorefining catalyst will be shortened, resulting in the equipment being It is necessary to stop and refill the catalyst and restart hydrorefining. In such a case, the cost of the gasoline to be produced increases, which has a great adverse effect on the economy.
As described above, in the hydrorefining treatment of heavy oil, it is common to use a stack of a demetallization catalyst and a desulfurization catalyst. As a reason for this, it is considered that a demetalization catalyst is necessary in the previous stage in order to prevent deactivation of the desulfurization catalyst due to metal deposition. Non-Patent Documents 1 to 3 disclose examples showing the effectiveness of a demetallation catalyst.
In addition to metal deposition, there is coke deposition as a cause of degrading heavy oil hydrorefining catalysts. The cause of coke depositing on the catalyst is thought to be asphaltenes (paraffin-insoluble matter such as heptane) contained in the heavy oil of the raw material. Asphaltene is removed by solvent removal (SDA) treatment of the raw material before hydrorefining. It is disclosed in Non-Patent Document 4 that removal is effective for extending the catalyst life.
プロパン、ブタン、ペンタンなどの軽質パラフィンを溶剤に用いた重質油のSDA処理では、コーク劣化の原因となるアスファルテンが除去されるので、原料油の一部として溶剤脱れき油(DAO)を用いた場合、水素化精製触媒の寿命が長くなることが期待できると長年信じられてきた。しかしながら、常圧残油および/または減圧軽油とアスファルテンが除去された溶剤脱れき油(DAO)との混合原料において、必ずしも水素化精製触媒の寿命を長くできるとは限らないことが分かった。
本発明の目的は、常圧残油および/または減圧軽油とDAOとの混合原料を水素化精製する際、水素化精製触媒の寿命を延長し、プロセスの経済性を高めた重質油の水素化精製方法を提供することにある。
SDA treatment of heavy oil using light paraffin such as propane, butane, pentane, etc. as solvent removes asphaltenes that cause coke degradation, so use solvent devolatilized oil (DAO) as part of the raw oil It has long been believed that the hydrorefining catalyst can be expected to have a long life. However, it has been found that the life of the hydrorefining catalyst cannot always be extended in a mixed raw material of atmospheric residual oil and / or vacuum gas oil and solvent desorbed oil (DAO) from which asphaltenes have been removed.
The purpose of the present invention is to increase the life of the hydrorefining catalyst and improve the economics of the process when hydrotreating the mixed raw material of atmospheric residual oil and / or vacuum gas oil and DAO. It is to provide a chemical purification method.
本発明者は上記課題について鋭意検討した結果、常圧残油および/または減圧軽油とアスファルテンが除去された溶剤脱れき油(DAO)との混合原料において、脱メタル触媒層を通過した生成油(脱硫触媒に対しては原料となる)が、ある特定の性状を満たす場合のみ、水素化精製触媒の寿命を長くすることができることを見出し、本発明を完成した。
すなわち、本発明は、以下のとおりである。
As a result of intensive investigations on the above problems, the present inventor has found that a mixed oil of atmospheric residual oil and / or vacuum gas oil and solvent debris oil (DAO) from which asphaltenes have been removed has passed through a demetallization catalyst layer ( It has been found that the life of the hydrorefining catalyst can be extended only when it satisfies a certain specific property, which is a raw material for a desulfurization catalyst, and the present invention has been completed.
That is, the present invention is as follows.
[1] 常圧残油および/または減圧軽油と溶剤脱れき油とを混合した原料油を水素化精製する方法であって、水素化精製触媒が脱メタル触媒と脱硫触媒との組み合わせから成り、脱メタル触媒を通過後の脱メタル処理油中の硫黄分が1.1質量%以上で、かつ金属分が30質量ppm以上45質量ppm以下である脱メタル処理油を得、次いで該脱メタル処理油を脱硫触媒を通過させることにより、硫黄分が0.4質量%以下の水素化精製油を得ることを特徴とする重質油の水素化精製方法。 [1] A method of hydrorefining a feedstock obtained by mixing atmospheric residual oil and / or vacuum gas oil and solvent deasphalted oil, wherein the hydrorefining catalyst comprises a combination of a demetallation catalyst and a desulfurization catalyst, A demetallized oil having a sulfur content in the demetallized oil after passing through the demetallized catalyst of 1.1% by mass or more and a metal content of 30 ppm to 45 ppm by mass is obtained, and then the demetallization treatment A method for hydrorefining heavy oil, characterized in that a hydrorefined oil having a sulfur content of 0.4% by mass or less is obtained by passing the oil through a desulfurization catalyst.
[2]常圧残油および/または減圧軽油と溶剤脱れき油とを混合した原料油における溶剤脱れき油の割合が30〜90容量%であることを特徴とする前記記載の重質油の水素化精製方法。
[3]上記水素化精製の反応条件が、液空間速度が0.1〜0.8h−1、水素/油比が3000〜8000scfb、反応圧力が10〜18MPa、反応温度が350〜420℃であることを特徴とする前記記載の重質油の水素化精製方法。
[4]上記溶剤脱れき油が、炭素数3〜6の鎖状飽和炭化水素を少なくとも2種以上を組み合わせた溶剤を用いて得られたことを特徴とする前記記載の重質油の水素化精製方法。
[5]水素化精製触媒全体に対する脱メタル触媒の容積割合が、30〜80%であることを特徴とする前記記載の重質油の水素化精製方法。
[2] The heavy oil according to the above, wherein the ratio of the solvent desorbing oil in the raw oil obtained by mixing the normal pressure residual oil and / or the vacuum gas oil and the solvent desorbing oil is 30 to 90% by volume. Hydrorefining method.
[3] The reaction conditions for the above hydrorefining are: liquid space velocity is 0.1 to 0.8 h −1 , hydrogen / oil ratio is 3000 to 8000 scfb, reaction pressure is 10 to 18 MPa, and reaction temperature is 350 to 420 ° C. The method for hydrorefining heavy oil as described above, characterized in that it exists.
[4] The hydrogenation of heavy oil as described above, wherein the solvent-peeling oil is obtained by using a solvent in which at least two chain saturated hydrocarbons having 3 to 6 carbon atoms are combined. Purification method.
[5] The method for hydrorefining heavy oil as described above, wherein the volume ratio of the demetallization catalyst to the entire hydrorefining catalyst is 30 to 80%.
以下に、本発明を詳細に説明する。
本発明は、常圧残油および/または減圧軽油と溶剤脱れき油(DAO)との混合原料を水素化精製する際、水素化精製触媒の寿命を延長し、プロセスの経済性を高めた重質油の水素化精製方法に関する。
The present invention is described in detail below.
In the present invention, when hydrorefining a mixed raw material of atmospheric residual oil and / or vacuum gas oil and solvent desorbed oil (DAO), the life of the hydrorefining catalyst is extended, and the economical efficiency of the process is increased. The present invention relates to a method for hydrorefining oil.
本発明の水素化精製に用いられる原料となる重質油は、常圧残油および/または減圧軽油と、溶剤脱れき油(DAO)との混合原料である。
常圧残油とは、石油系の原油、オイルサンド由来の合成原油、ビチュメン改質油などを常圧蒸留塔にて蒸留した際のボトム分で、沸点343℃以上の留分を80質量%以上含んだ重質油である。
減圧軽油(VGO)とは、常圧残油を減圧下で蒸留した際の留出分で、沸点343〜550℃の留分を70質量%以上含んだ重質油である。
溶剤脱れき油(DAO)とは常圧残油を減圧下で蒸留した際のボトム分(沸点550℃以上の留分を70質量%以上含んだ重質油)を炭素数3〜6までの鎖状飽和炭化水素を溶剤として抽出した留分である。炭素数3〜6までの鎖状飽和炭化水素としては、プロパン、ノルマルブタン、イソブタン、ノルマルペンタン、イソペンタン、ノルマルヘキサンが挙げられる。特に、これら鎖状飽和炭化水素を少なくとも2種以上組み合わせると、水素化精製触媒の寿命が長くなる傾向にあるので好ましい。
The heavy oil used as the raw material used in the hydrorefining of the present invention is a mixed raw material of atmospheric residual oil and / or vacuum gas oil and solvent desorbed oil (DAO).
The atmospheric residual oil is the bottom fraction when petroleum-based crude oil, synthetic crude oil derived from oil sand, bitumen reformed oil, etc. are distilled in an atmospheric distillation tower, and the fraction having a boiling point of 343 ° C. or higher is 80% by mass. It is a heavy oil containing the above.
The vacuum gas oil (VGO) is a heavy oil containing 70% by mass or more of a fraction having a boiling point of 343 to 550 ° C. when the atmospheric residue is distilled under reduced pressure.
Solvent removal oil (DAO) is a bottom oil (heavy oil containing 70% by mass or more of a fraction having a boiling point of 550 ° C. or higher) obtained by distilling atmospheric residual oil under reduced pressure. A fraction obtained by extracting chain saturated hydrocarbons as a solvent. Examples of the chain saturated hydrocarbon having 3 to 6 carbon atoms include propane, normal butane, isobutane, normal pentane, isopentane, and normal hexane. In particular, it is preferable to combine at least two of these chain saturated hydrocarbons because the life of the hydrorefining catalyst tends to be long.
水素化精製の混合原料全体に対するDAOの割合は、30〜90容量%が好ましく、40〜80容量%が更に好ましい。30容量%未満の場合、水素化精製触媒の寿命への影響がなくなる傾向にあり、本発明の効果が少なくなる傾向にあるので好ましくない。一方、90容量%を超えると水素化精製触媒の寿命が短くなる傾向にあるので好ましくない。 The proportion of DAO with respect to the total hydrorefined mixed raw material is preferably 30 to 90% by volume, more preferably 40 to 80% by volume. If it is less than 30% by volume, the effect on the life of the hydrorefining catalyst tends to be eliminated, and the effect of the present invention tends to be reduced. On the other hand, if it exceeds 90% by volume, the life of the hydrotreating catalyst tends to be short, which is not preferable.
本発明における水素化精製触媒は、脱メタル触媒(前段)と脱硫触媒(後段)とを組み合わせて使用する。
脱メタル触媒は脱メタル機能と脱硫機能とを有し、相対的に脱メタル活性が高い触媒であり、水素化精製条件下で原料油中に含まれるニッケルやバナジウム等の金属分を吸着する機能を主に有する。脱メタル触媒は、例えば、アルミナやシリカアルミナを担体として活性金属にMoを主成分として、Ni、Co、Wなどの金属を組み合わせたものであり、メタル吸着量を大きくするために、平均細孔径が13〜20nm、細孔容積が0.7〜1.4cm3/g、表面積70〜180m2/gであることが好ましい。代表的には、Ni−Mo、およびNi−Co−Mo触媒が挙げられる。
The hydrorefining catalyst in the present invention is used in combination of a demetallization catalyst (front stage) and a desulfurization catalyst (second stage).
A demetallation catalyst has a demetallation function and a desulfurization function, is a catalyst with relatively high demetallation activity, and a function of adsorbing metal components such as nickel and vanadium contained in feedstock oil under hydrorefining conditions It has mainly. The demetallation catalyst is, for example, a combination of active metal and Mo as a main component, and metals such as Ni, Co, and W using alumina or silica alumina as a carrier. Is 13 to 20 nm, the pore volume is 0.7 to 1.4 cm 3 / g, and the surface area is preferably 70 to 180 m 2 / g. Typically, Ni-Mo and Ni-Co-Mo catalysts are mentioned.
脱硫触媒は脱硫機能と脱メタル機能とを有し、相対的に脱硫活性が高い触媒であり、水素化精製条件下で原料油中に含まれる硫黄分および窒素分を除去する機能を主に有する。
脱硫触媒は、例えば、アルミナやシリカアルミナを担体として活性金属にMoを主成分として、Ni、Co、Wなどの金属を組み合わせたものであり、脱メタル触媒に比較して表面積が大きいのが特徴であり、平均細孔径が8〜12nm、細孔容積が0.4〜1.0cm3/g、表面積180〜250m2/gであることが好ましい。代表的には、Ni−Mo、Co−MoおよびNi−Co−Mo触媒が挙げられる。
A desulfurization catalyst has a desulfurization function and a demetallization function, is a catalyst having a relatively high desulfurization activity, and mainly has a function of removing sulfur and nitrogen contained in feedstock under hydrorefining conditions. .
The desulfurization catalyst is, for example, a combination of active metal and Mo as the main component, and metals such as Ni, Co, W, etc. using alumina or silica alumina as a carrier, and has a large surface area compared to the demetallation catalyst. Preferably, the average pore diameter is 8 to 12 nm, the pore volume is 0.4 to 1.0 cm 3 / g, and the surface area is 180 to 250 m 2 / g. Typically, Ni-Mo, Co-Mo and Ni-Co-Mo catalysts are mentioned.
これら水素化精製触媒の形状は角柱上、円柱状、三つ葉型、四つ葉型、球状など、特に限定されること無く種々の形状を用いることが出来る。また、これら触媒の大きさも特に限定されないが、脱メタル触媒の粒径は1〜8mm程度が好適であり、脱硫触媒の粒径は0.8〜3.0mmが好適である。 There are no particular limitations on the shape of these hydrorefining catalysts, such as a prismatic shape, a cylindrical shape, a three-leaf type, a four-leaf type, and a spherical shape, and various shapes can be used. Moreover, although the size of these catalysts is not particularly limited, the particle size of the demetallation catalyst is preferably about 1 to 8 mm, and the particle size of the desulfurization catalyst is preferably 0.8 to 3.0 mm.
水素化精製触媒全体に対する脱メタル触媒の割合は30〜80容積%が好ましく、30〜60容積%が更に好ましい。脱メタル触媒が30容積%未満の場合、脱メタル活性が低くなり、脱硫活性が劣化しやすい傾向になるので好ましくない。また、80容積%を超えると使用する脱硫触媒が少なくなり、脱硫活性が低下し、その結果、生成油中の目的とする硫黄分を得る為に反応温度が上昇し触媒寿命が短くなる傾向にあるので好ましくない。 The ratio of the demetalization catalyst to the entire hydrotreating catalyst is preferably 30 to 80% by volume, more preferably 30 to 60% by volume. If the demetallation catalyst is less than 30% by volume, the demetallation activity tends to be low and the desulfurization activity tends to deteriorate, which is not preferable. Moreover, when it exceeds 80 volume%, the desulfurization catalyst to be used decreases, desulfurization activity falls, As a result, in order to obtain the target sulfur content in produced oil, reaction temperature rises and the catalyst life tends to be shortened. This is not preferable.
脱メタル触媒と脱硫触媒は、同一の反応塔に積層して充填したり、別々の反応塔に充填して使用することが出来る。反応塔に対する原料油の流れに制限はなく、初めに脱メタル触媒層を通過した後、脱硫触媒層を通過すれば、アップフローでもダウンフローでも良い。 The demetallation catalyst and the desulfurization catalyst can be stacked and packed in the same reaction tower, or can be used by packing them in separate reaction towers. There is no limitation on the flow of the raw material oil to the reaction tower, and it may be upflow or downflow as long as it first passes through the demetallation catalyst layer and then passes through the desulfurization catalyst layer.
水素化精製(脱メタルと脱硫)は、充填された触媒を予備硫化した後に行う。予備硫化はこれまでに石油精製で使用されてきた方法、例えば、硫化水素ガスやジメチルヂスルフィドなどの硫化剤を用いた硫化方法を採用することができる。 Hydrorefining (demetallization and desulfurization) is performed after pre-sulfiding the packed catalyst. For the preliminary sulfidation, a method that has been used in petroleum refining so far, for example, a sulfidation method using a sulfiding agent such as hydrogen sulfide gas or dimethyl disulfide can be employed.
水素化精製の液空間速度(LHSV)は0.1〜0.8h−1が好ましく、0.15〜0.60h−1がより好ましく、0.2〜0.5h−1がさらに好ましい。0.1h−1未満では重質油の処理量が低く、プロセスの経済性が低下するので好ましくない。また、0.8h−1を超えると反応温度が高くなり、触媒寿命が短くなる傾向にあるので、結果として経済性が悪化するので好ましくない。 Liquid hourly space velocity of the hydrorefining (LHSV) is preferably from 0.1~0.8h -1, more preferably 0.15~0.60h -1, more preferably 0.2~0.5h -1. Less than 0.1 h −1 is not preferable because the amount of heavy oil treated is low and the economic efficiency of the process is lowered. On the other hand, if it exceeds 0.8 h −1 , the reaction temperature tends to be high and the catalyst life tends to be short.
水素化精製の水素/油比は3000〜8000scfb(1バレルあたりの標準立方フィート)が好ましく、3500〜6000scfbがより好ましく、4000〜5000scfbがさらに好ましい。3000scfb未満の場合、触媒の劣化が進行する傾向にあるので好ましくない。また、8000scfbを超えても触媒劣化への影響がなくなる傾向にあるので、好ましくない。 The hydrogen / oil ratio for hydrorefining is preferably 3000 to 8000 scfb (standard cubic feet per barrel), more preferably 3500 to 6000 scfb, and still more preferably 4000 to 5000 scfb. If it is less than 3000 scfb, the catalyst tends to deteriorate, which is not preferable. Further, even if it exceeds 8000 scfb, there is a tendency that the influence on catalyst deterioration is lost, which is not preferable.
水素化精製の反応圧力は10〜18MPaが好ましく、11〜17MPaがより好ましく、13〜16MPaがさらに好ましい。10MPa未満の場合、脱硫が進行しにくくなり、反応温度の上昇による触媒劣化が起こりやすくなるので好ましくない。一方、18MPaを越えると高価な耐圧性の反応塔が必要になり、かつ水素消費量が増加し、プロセスの経済性が悪化する傾向にあるので好ましくない。 The reaction pressure for hydrorefining is preferably 10 to 18 MPa, more preferably 11 to 17 MPa, and further preferably 13 to 16 MPa. When the pressure is less than 10 MPa, desulfurization is difficult to proceed, and catalyst deterioration due to an increase in reaction temperature is likely to occur. On the other hand, if the pressure exceeds 18 MPa, an expensive pressure-resistant reaction tower is required, and the hydrogen consumption increases, which tends to deteriorate the economics of the process.
水素化精製の反応温度は350〜420℃が好ましく、370〜410℃がより好ましく、380〜400℃がさらに好ましい。350℃未満の場合、目的とする生成油の硫黄分が得られない傾向にあるのでので好ましくない。一方、420℃を越えるとコーキング反応が顕著になり反応塔内の差圧が発生する傾向にあるので好ましくない。 The reaction temperature for hydrorefining is preferably 350 to 420 ° C, more preferably 370 to 410 ° C, and further preferably 380 to 400 ° C. When it is less than 350 ° C., the sulfur content of the target product oil tends not to be obtained, which is not preferable. On the other hand, if the temperature exceeds 420 ° C., the coking reaction becomes prominent and a differential pressure in the reaction tower tends to be generated.
水素化精製は、脱メタル反応と脱硫反応を上述した条件の下、同じ条件で行っても良く、また異なる条件で行うことができる。例えば、同一の反応塔に脱メタル触媒と脱硫触媒を充填する固定床装置の場合には同じ条件で水素化精製が行なわれる。また、反応塔を別々にし、前段の反応塔に脱メタル触媒を、後段の反応塔に脱硫触媒を充填する場合は、各々の反応条件を独立にして行うこともできる。 In the hydrorefining, the demetallation reaction and the desulfurization reaction may be performed under the same conditions as described above, or may be performed under different conditions. For example, in the case of a fixed bed apparatus in which the same reaction tower is filled with a demetallation catalyst and a desulfurization catalyst, hydrorefining is performed under the same conditions. In addition, when the reaction towers are separated and the demetallization catalyst is packed in the former reaction tower and the desulfurization catalyst is filled in the latter reaction tower, the respective reaction conditions can be performed independently.
本発明における脱メタル触媒の役割は重要である。通常は重質原料油からバナジウムやニッケルなどの金属分を除去することで後段の脱硫触媒をメタル失活から防ぐことが主目的なので、脱メタル触媒層で金属分を多く除去した方が好ましい。しかしながら、常圧残油および/または減圧軽油と、溶剤脱れき油とを混合した原料油を用いた場合、脱メタル触媒により原料油から金属分を極力除去するのではなく、脱メタル触媒層を通過した脱メタル油中の金属の含有量を30質量ppm以上45質量ppm以下の範囲に調整することにより、かつ脱メタル油中の硫黄分1.1質量%以上の範囲とすることにより、水素化精製触媒の寿命を長くすることができることを本発明者らにより見出されたものである。
したがって、本発明における常圧残油および/または減圧軽油と、溶剤脱れき油とを含む重質な原料油では、前段の脱メタル触媒層を通過して得られる脱メタル油中の金属分の含有量を30質量ppm以上とすることが必要であり、より好ましくは31質量ppm以上である。脱メタル油中の金属分が30質量ppm未満にまで脱メタルした場合、後段の水素化精製(水素化脱硫)による生成油中の硫黄分を一定にする運転において反応温度が上昇し、結果として触媒寿命が短くなる傾向にあるので好ましくない。一方、上限は45質量ppm以下とすることが必要であり、42質量ppm以下がより好ましい。脱メタル油中の金属分が45質量ppmを超える場合は、後段の水素化精製(水素化脱硫)による生成油中の硫黄分を一定にする運転において反応温度が上昇し、結果として触媒寿命が短くなる傾向にあるので好ましくない。
The role of the demetallation catalyst in the present invention is important. Usually, the main purpose is to remove the metal components such as vanadium and nickel from the heavy feed oil to prevent the subsequent desulfurization catalyst from deactivating the metal. Therefore, it is preferable to remove a large amount of metal in the demetalization catalyst layer. However, in the case of using a feedstock obtained by mixing atmospheric residual oil and / or vacuum gas oil and solvent degreasing oil, the metal removal from the feedstock as much as possible is not performed by the demetallation catalyst. By adjusting the content of metal in the passed demetalized oil to a range of 30 ppm to 45 ppm by mass and making the sulfur content in the demetalized oil 1.1 mass% or more, hydrogen It has been found by the present inventors that the life of the chemical purification catalyst can be extended.
Therefore, in the heavy feedstock oil containing the normal pressure residual oil and / or the vacuum gas oil and the solvent deasphalting oil in the present invention, the metal content in the demetalized oil obtained by passing through the preceding demetallized catalyst layer The content needs to be 30 mass ppm or more, more preferably 31 mass ppm or more. When the metal content in the demetalized oil is demetalized to less than 30 ppm by mass, the reaction temperature rises in the operation in which the sulfur content in the product oil by the subsequent hydrorefining (hydrodesulfurization) is kept constant. This is not preferable because the catalyst life tends to be short. On the other hand, the upper limit needs to be 45 mass ppm or less, and more preferably 42 mass ppm or less. When the metal content in the demetalized oil exceeds 45 mass ppm, the reaction temperature rises in the operation in which the sulfur content in the product oil by the subsequent hydrorefining (hydrodesulfurization) is kept constant, and as a result, the catalyst life is shortened. Since it tends to be shorter, it is not preferable.
また、前段の脱メタル触媒層を通過して得られる脱メタル油中の硫黄分は1.1質量%以上であり、更に1.2質量%以上であることがより好ましい。1.1質量%未満の場合、触媒劣化が進行し、触媒寿命が短くなる傾向にあるので好ましくない。一方、上限は、2.2質量%以下が好ましく、1.8質量%以下がより好ましく、1.6質量%以下がさらに好ましい。脱メタル油の硫黄分が2.2質量%を超える場合は、水素化精製による生成油中の硫黄分を一定にする運転において反応温度が上昇し、結果として触媒寿命が短くなる傾向にあるので好ましくない。
なお、ここで金属分とは蛍光X線分析により求めた値であり、硫黄分とはJIS K2541「原油及び石油製品−硫黄分試験方法」に準拠して求めた値である。
Moreover, the sulfur content in the demetallized oil obtained by passing through the previous demetallization catalyst layer is 1.1% by mass or more, and more preferably 1.2% by mass or more. When the amount is less than 1.1% by mass, the catalyst deterioration is advanced and the catalyst life tends to be shortened. On the other hand, the upper limit is preferably 2.2% by mass or less, more preferably 1.8% by mass or less, and further preferably 1.6% by mass or less. When the sulfur content of the demetalized oil exceeds 2.2% by mass, the reaction temperature increases in the operation in which the sulfur content in the product oil by hydrorefining is kept constant, and as a result, the catalyst life tends to be shortened. It is not preferable.
Here, the metal content is a value obtained by fluorescent X-ray analysis, and the sulfur content is a value obtained in accordance with JIS K2541 “Crude oil and petroleum products—sulfur content test method”.
本発明の重質油の水素化精製方法では、常圧残油および/または減圧軽油と、溶剤脱れき油とを混合した原料油を用いる場合に、脱メタル触媒層を通過した脱メタル油中の金属の含有量を30質量ppm以上45質量ppm以下、硫黄分を1.1質量%以上の範囲に調整することにより、水素化精製触媒の寿命を延長し、硫黄分が十分に除去された生成油を得ることが出来る。脱メタル触媒および脱硫触媒で水素化精製された最終生成物の硫黄分は0.4質量%以下が好ましく、0.3質量%以下が更に好ましい。最終生成油の硫黄分が0.4質量%を超えるとFCCから得られる分解ガソリン中の硫黄分が上昇する傾向にあるので好ましくない。 In the method for hydrorefining heavy oil of the present invention, in the case of using a raw oil in which atmospheric residual oil and / or vacuum gas oil and solvent debris oil are used, in the demetalized oil that has passed through the demetallized catalyst layer By adjusting the content of the metal in the range of 30 mass ppm to 45 mass ppm and the sulfur content in the range of 1.1 mass% or more, the life of the hydrorefining catalyst was extended and the sulfur content was sufficiently removed. The product oil can be obtained. The final product hydrorefined with the demetallation catalyst and the desulfurization catalyst has a sulfur content of preferably 0.4% by mass or less, and more preferably 0.3% by mass or less. If the sulfur content of the final product oil exceeds 0.4% by mass, the sulfur content in cracked gasoline obtained from FCC tends to increase, such being undesirable.
以下、実施例及び比較例により本発明を具体的に説明するが、本発明は下記実施例に限定されるものではない。 EXAMPLES Hereinafter, although an Example and a comparative example demonstrate this invention concretely, this invention is not limited to the following Example.
[予備硫化]
2つの反応塔を有する流通式固定床反応装置に、脱メタル触媒と脱硫触媒とを別々の反応塔に所定量充填し、混合ガス(水素:硫化水素=97:3容量%)を30L/時間の流速で流しながら、全圧15MPaにて反応塔を室温から10℃/分の速度で240℃まで加熱昇温した。次いで、240℃で4時間保持した後、再び340℃まで昇温した。340℃で24時間保持して、予備硫化を終了した。
[Pre-sulfurization]
A flow-type fixed bed reactor having two reaction towers is charged with a predetermined amount of demetallation catalyst and desulfurization catalyst in separate reaction towers, and a mixed gas (hydrogen: hydrogen sulfide = 97: 3% by volume) is 30 L / hour. The reaction tower was heated from room temperature to 240 ° C. at a rate of 10 ° C./min at a total pressure of 15 MPa. Next, after maintaining at 240 ° C. for 4 hours, the temperature was raised to 340 ° C. again. The preliminary sulfidation was completed by maintaining at 340 ° C. for 24 hours.
[触媒の安定化]
予備硫化終了後、340℃のまま中東系原油の常圧残油(沸点355℃+、硫黄分3.7質量%、金属分93質量ppm)を反応塔内に液空間速度0.2h−1で導入した。その後すぐに、反応圧力を12.7MPaまで下げ、反応温度を5℃/hの速度で380℃まで昇温した。380℃のまま水素/油比5000scfbの条件下、30日間通油を継続し、触媒活性を安定化させた。
[Catalyst stabilization]
After completion of the preliminary sulfidation, normal-pressure residual oil (boiling point 355 ° C. +, sulfur content 3.7 mass%, metal content 93 mass ppm) of Middle Eastern crude oil was kept at 340 ° C. in the reaction tower at a liquid space velocity of 0.2 h −1. Introduced in. Immediately thereafter, the reaction pressure was lowered to 12.7 MPa, and the reaction temperature was raised to 380 ° C. at a rate of 5 ° C./h. The oil passage was continued for 30 days under the condition of a hydrogen / oil ratio of 5000 scfb at 380 ° C. to stabilize the catalyst activity.
(実施例1)
Ni−Mo系脱メタル触媒(平均細孔径15nm、表面積118m2/g)35mlとNi−Mo系脱硫触媒(平均細孔径12nm、表面積210m2/g)65mlとを別々の固定床反応塔に充填し、前述した条件にて、予備硫化を行った後、次いで触媒を安定化した。
触媒の安定化後、反応圧力、水素/油比、反応温度、液空間速度(LHSV)をそれぞれ12.7MPa、5000scfb、380℃、0.2h−1に保ったまま、常圧残油とノルマルブタンの溶剤脱れき(SDA)から得られたDAOを30:70(容積比)で混合した原料油(硫黄分4.40質量%、金属分72質量ppm)に切り替えて最終生成油の硫黄分が0.28質量%になるように反応温度を調節しながら、水素化精製を90日間行った。この時の反応温度は、脱メタル触媒層および脱硫触媒層で同一とした。触媒寿命の指標として、この90日間の触媒劣化速度を求めた。その結果を表1に示す。また、脱メタル触媒層を通過した油(第1反応塔出口油)を約30日毎に採取し、その硫黄分および金属分(Ni+V)を測定した。その結果を表1に示す。
Example 1
Ni-Mo-based demetallization catalyst (average pore diameter 15 nm, surface area of 118m 2 / g) packed 35ml and Ni-Mo desulfurization catalyst (average pore size 12 nm, surface area of 210 m 2 / g) and 65ml in separate fixed bed reactor Then, after preliminary sulfidation under the conditions described above, the catalyst was then stabilized.
After stabilization of the catalyst, the normal pressure residual oil and the normal pressure were maintained while maintaining the reaction pressure, hydrogen / oil ratio, reaction temperature, and liquid space velocity (LHSV) at 12.7 MPa, 5000 scfb, 380 ° C., and 0.2 h −1 , respectively. Switch to raw oil (sulfur content 4.40 mass%, metal content 72 mass ppm) mixed with DAO obtained from solvent removal of rubutane (SDA) at 30:70 (volume ratio), sulfur content of final product oil The hydrorefining was carried out for 90 days while adjusting the reaction temperature so as to be 0.28% by mass. The reaction temperature at this time was the same for the demetallation catalyst layer and the desulfurization catalyst layer. The 90-day catalyst deterioration rate was determined as an indicator of catalyst life. The results are shown in Table 1. Moreover, the oil (first reaction tower outlet oil) that passed through the demetallization catalyst layer was collected about every 30 days, and the sulfur content and the metal content (Ni + V) were measured. The results are shown in Table 1.
(比較例1)
水素化精製の原料にDAOを混合しなかったこと以外は、実施例1と同様に予備硫化、触媒の安定化および水素化精製を行った。この時の触媒劣化速度、脱メタル触媒層を通過した油の硫黄分および金属分を表1に示す。
(Comparative Example 1)
Presulfurization, catalyst stabilization, and hydrorefining were performed in the same manner as in Example 1 except that DAO was not mixed with the hydrorefining raw material. Table 1 shows the catalyst deterioration rate and the sulfur content and metal content of the oil that passed through the demetallization catalyst layer.
(比較例2)
水素化精製時に脱メタル触媒層の温度を390℃一定にし、脱硫触媒層の温度のみ変化させたこと以外は、実施例1と同様に予備硫化、触媒の安定化および水素化精製を行った。この時の触媒劣化速度、脱メタル触媒層を通過した油の硫黄分および金属分を表1に示す。
(Comparative Example 2)
Presulfurization, stabilization of the catalyst, and hydrorefining were performed in the same manner as in Example 1 except that the temperature of the demetalization catalyst layer was kept constant at 390 ° C. and only the temperature of the desulfurization catalyst layer was changed during hydrorefining. Table 1 shows the catalyst deterioration rate and the sulfur content and metal content of the oil that passed through the demetallization catalyst layer.
(実施例2)
水素化精製の原料油として、常圧残油の代わりに減圧軽油(VGO、沸点350℃+、硫黄分2.61質量%、金属分1質量ppm)を用い、VGOとDAOを20:80(容積比)で混合した原料油(硫黄分4.30質量%、金属分51質量ppm)を使用したこと以外は実施例1と同様に予備硫化、触媒の安定化および水素化精製を行った。この時の触媒劣化速度、脱メタル触媒層を通過した油の硫黄分および金属分を表1に示す。
(Example 2)
A vacuum gas oil (VGO, boiling point 350 ° C. +, sulfur content 2.61 mass%, metal content 1 mass ppm) is used as a feedstock for hydrorefining instead of atmospheric residue, and VGO and DAO are 20:80 ( Presulfurization, stabilization of the catalyst, and hydrorefining were performed in the same manner as in Example 1 except that the raw material oil (volume ratio: 4.30 mass%, metal content: 51 mass ppm) mixed at a volume ratio) was used. Table 1 shows the catalyst deterioration rate and the sulfur content and metal content of the oil that passed through the demetallization catalyst layer.
(比較例3)
水素化精製時に脱メタル触媒層の温度を385℃一定にしたこと以外は、実施例2と同様に予備硫化、触媒の安定化および水素化精製を行った。この時の触媒劣化速度、脱メタル触媒層を通過した油の硫黄分および金属分を表1に示す。
(Comparative Example 3)
Presulfurization, catalyst stabilization, and hydrorefining were performed in the same manner as in Example 2 except that the temperature of the demetalized catalyst layer was kept constant at 385 ° C. during hydrorefining. Table 1 shows the catalyst deterioration rate and the sulfur content and metal content of the oil that passed through the demetallization catalyst layer.
(実施例3)
水素化精製の原料油として、VGO:DAO=10:90(容積比)で混合した原料油(硫黄分4.50質量%、金属分57質量ppm)を使用し、平均細孔径18nm、表面積106m2/gのNi−Mo系脱メタル触媒を触媒全量の50容積%としたこと以外は、実施例2と同様に予備硫化、触媒の安定化および水素化精製を行った。この時の触媒劣化速度、脱メタル触媒層を通過した油の硫黄分および金属分を表1に示す。
(Example 3)
A raw material oil (sulfur content: 4.50 mass%, metal content: 57 mass ppm) mixed at VGO: DAO = 10: 90 (volume ratio) is used as a hydrorefining raw material oil, with an average pore diameter of 18 nm and a surface area of 106 m. Presulfiding, stabilization of the catalyst, and hydrorefining were performed in the same manner as in Example 2 except that 2 / g of the Ni—Mo-based demetallation catalyst was changed to 50% by volume of the total amount of the catalyst. Table 1 shows the catalyst deterioration rate and the sulfur content and metal content of the oil that passed through the demetallization catalyst layer.
(比較例4)
水素化精製時に脱メタル触媒層の温度を385℃一定にしたこと以外は、実施例3と同様に予備硫化、触媒の安定化および水素化精製を行った。この時の触媒劣化速度、脱メタル触媒層を通過した油の硫黄分および金属分を表1に示す。
(Comparative Example 4)
Presulfurization, catalyst stabilization, and hydrorefining were performed in the same manner as in Example 3 except that the temperature of the demetalized catalyst layer was kept constant at 385 ° C. during hydrorefining. Table 1 shows the catalyst deterioration rate and the sulfur content and metal content of the oil that passed through the demetallization catalyst layer.
(実施例4)
水素化精製時の圧力を15.0MPa、水素/油比を4000scfbにしたこと以外は実施例1と同様に予備硫化、触媒の安定化および水素化精製を行った。この時の原料油性状、触媒劣化速度、脱メタル触媒層を通過した油の硫黄分および金属分を表1に示す。
Example 4
Presulfidation, catalyst stabilization and hydrorefining were performed in the same manner as in Example 1 except that the pressure during hydrorefining was 15.0 MPa and the hydrogen / oil ratio was 4000 scfb. Table 1 shows the properties of the raw material oil, the catalyst deterioration rate, and the sulfur content and metal content of the oil that passed through the demetallization catalyst layer.
(実施例5)
ノルマルブタン、ノルマルペンタン、ノルマルへキサンが40:40:20(容積比)で混合した溶剤による溶剤脱れきから得られたDAOを用いたこと以外は、実施例1と同様に予備硫化、触媒の安定化および水素化精製を行った。この時の触媒劣化速度、脱メタル触媒層を通過した油の硫黄分および金属分を表1に示す。
(Example 5)
Except for using DAO obtained from solvent removal by a solvent in which normal butane, normal pentane, and normal hexane were mixed at a ratio of 40:40:20 (volume ratio), presulfidation, catalyst Stabilization and hydrorefining were performed. Table 1 shows the catalyst deterioration rate and the sulfur content and metal content of the oil that passed through the demetallization catalyst layer.
常圧残油または減圧軽油(VGO)と溶剤脱れき油(VGO)とを混合した原料を脱メタル触媒と脱硫触媒との組み合わせから成る触媒で水素化精製する時、脱メタル触媒層を通過して得られた脱メタル油中の硫黄分が1.1質量%以上であり、かつ金属分が30質量ppm以上45質量ppm以下のときに限り、水素化精製触媒の劣化を抑制し、最終生成油中の硫黄分が0.4質量%以下となる重質油を製造することができる。 When hydrorefining the raw material mixed with atmospheric residual oil or vacuum gas oil (VGO) and solvent degassed oil (VGO) with a catalyst comprising a combination of a demetallation catalyst and a desulfurization catalyst, it passes through the demetallation catalyst layer. Only when the sulfur content in the demetalized oil obtained is 1.1 mass% or more and the metal content is 30 mass ppm or more and 45 mass ppm or less, the degradation of the hydrorefining catalyst is suppressed, and the final production A heavy oil having a sulfur content of 0.4% by mass or less can be produced.
常圧残油および/または減圧軽油とDAOとの混合油を原料として水素化精製するに際しては、本発明の方法を用いることにより、水素化精製触媒の劣化が抑制されるためプロセスの経済性を高めることができる。 When hydrorefining using a normal pressure residual oil and / or a mixed oil of vacuum gas oil and DAO as a raw material, by using the method of the present invention, degradation of the hydrorefining catalyst is suppressed, so the economics of the process are reduced. Can be increased.
Claims (5)
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2011062245A JP5751876B2 (en) | 2011-03-22 | 2011-03-22 | Method for hydrorefining heavy oil |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2011062245A JP5751876B2 (en) | 2011-03-22 | 2011-03-22 | Method for hydrorefining heavy oil |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JP2012197350A true JP2012197350A (en) | 2012-10-18 |
| JP5751876B2 JP5751876B2 (en) | 2015-07-22 |
Family
ID=47179914
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2011062245A Active JP5751876B2 (en) | 2011-03-22 | 2011-03-22 | Method for hydrorefining heavy oil |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JP5751876B2 (en) |
Cited By (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WO2015029618A1 (en) * | 2013-08-30 | 2015-03-05 | Jx日鉱日石エネルギー株式会社 | Hydrocarbon oil production method |
| WO2015029617A1 (en) * | 2013-08-30 | 2015-03-05 | Jx日鉱日石エネルギー株式会社 | Hydrocarbon oil production method |
| JP2017226799A (en) * | 2016-06-24 | 2017-12-28 | コスモ石油株式会社 | Direct desulfurization method and heavy carbohydrate reduced crude oil |
Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JPS63258985A (en) * | 1987-04-16 | 1988-10-26 | Kawasaki Heavy Ind Ltd | Heavy oil hydrotreatment method |
| JPH03273092A (en) * | 1990-03-22 | 1991-12-04 | Nippon Oil Co Ltd | Catalyst for hydrogenation of residual oil |
| WO2002044307A1 (en) * | 2000-11-30 | 2002-06-06 | Jgc Corporation | Method of refining petroleum |
-
2011
- 2011-03-22 JP JP2011062245A patent/JP5751876B2/en active Active
Patent Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JPS63258985A (en) * | 1987-04-16 | 1988-10-26 | Kawasaki Heavy Ind Ltd | Heavy oil hydrotreatment method |
| JPH03273092A (en) * | 1990-03-22 | 1991-12-04 | Nippon Oil Co Ltd | Catalyst for hydrogenation of residual oil |
| WO2002044307A1 (en) * | 2000-11-30 | 2002-06-06 | Jgc Corporation | Method of refining petroleum |
Cited By (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WO2015029618A1 (en) * | 2013-08-30 | 2015-03-05 | Jx日鉱日石エネルギー株式会社 | Hydrocarbon oil production method |
| WO2015029617A1 (en) * | 2013-08-30 | 2015-03-05 | Jx日鉱日石エネルギー株式会社 | Hydrocarbon oil production method |
| JP2015048398A (en) * | 2013-08-30 | 2015-03-16 | Jx日鉱日石エネルギー株式会社 | Method for producing hydrocarbon oil |
| JP2015048397A (en) * | 2013-08-30 | 2015-03-16 | Jx日鉱日石エネルギー株式会社 | Method for producing hydrocarbon oil |
| US9719032B2 (en) | 2013-08-30 | 2017-08-01 | Jx Nippon Oil & Energy Corporation | Hydrocarbon oil production method |
| JP2017226799A (en) * | 2016-06-24 | 2017-12-28 | コスモ石油株式会社 | Direct desulfurization method and heavy carbohydrate reduced crude oil |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JP5751876B2 (en) | 2015-07-22 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US10400184B2 (en) | Hydroprocessing of heavy hydrocarbon feeds using small pore catalysts | |
| US9206363B2 (en) | Hydroprocessing of heavy hydrocarbon feeds | |
| US8741129B2 (en) | Use of low boiling point aromatic solvent in hydroprocessing heavy hydrocarbons | |
| RU2656273C2 (en) | Integration of residue hydrocracking and solvent deasphalting | |
| JPS5850636B2 (en) | Desulfurization treatment method for heavy hydrocarbon oil | |
| RU2663896C2 (en) | Residue hydrocracking processing | |
| WO2010009089A2 (en) | Process for the sequential hydroconversion and hydrodesulfurization of whole crude oil | |
| CA2901390C (en) | Process for partial upgrading of heavy and/or extra-heavy crude oils for its transportation | |
| CN101040032B (en) | Method for Hydrotreating Heavy Hydrocarbon Oil | |
| JP5751876B2 (en) | Method for hydrorefining heavy oil | |
| JP6181378B2 (en) | Hydrotreating method | |
| CA2899196C (en) | Fixed bed hydrovisbreaking of heavy hydrocarbon oils | |
| JP5563491B2 (en) | Method for hydrotreating heavy hydrocarbon oil | |
| EP3844249B1 (en) | Process for producing hazy-free at 0°c heavy base oil | |
| JP4680520B2 (en) | Low sulfur gas oil production method and environmentally friendly gas oil | |
| CA2853924A1 (en) | Pretreatment of fcc naphthas and selective hydrotreating | |
| JP5082138B2 (en) | Operation method of direct desulfurization equipment | |
| JP2004250554A (en) | Hydrodesulfurization of gas oil fraction | |
| JP6548223B2 (en) | Method of producing fuel oil base material | |
| KR20160010576A (en) | Two stage diesel aromatics saturation process using base metal catalyst | |
| JP4766940B2 (en) | Method for producing hydrocarbon oil | |
| JPH11279566A (en) | Method for producing ultra-low sulfur heavy oil | |
| WO2015029617A1 (en) | Hydrocarbon oil production method | |
| JP2008074998A (en) | Manufacturing method of gasoline base material having high octane number | |
| JP2005154538A (en) | Method for producing ultra-low sulfur gas oil base |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| A621 | Written request for application examination |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621 Effective date: 20130626 |
|
| A977 | Report on retrieval |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007 Effective date: 20140306 |
|
| A131 | Notification of reasons for refusal |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131 Effective date: 20140401 |
|
| A02 | Decision of refusal |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A02 Effective date: 20141224 |
|
| A521 | Request for written amendment filed |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523 Effective date: 20150324 |
|
| A521 | Request for written amendment filed |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523 Effective date: 20150414 |
|
| A911 | Transfer to examiner for re-examination before appeal (zenchi) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A911 Effective date: 20150421 |
|
| TRDD | Decision of grant or rejection written | ||
| A01 | Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01 Effective date: 20150519 |
|
| A61 | First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61 Effective date: 20150519 |
|
| R150 | Certificate of patent or registration of utility model |
Ref document number: 5751876 Country of ref document: JP Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150 |
|
| S531 | Written request for registration of change of domicile |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313531 |
|
| S533 | Written request for registration of change of name |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313533 |
|
| R350 | Written notification of registration of transfer |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350 |
|
| S533 | Written request for registration of change of name |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313533 |
|
| R350 | Written notification of registration of transfer |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350 |
|
| R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
| R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
| R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
| S533 | Written request for registration of change of name |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313533 |
|
| R350 | Written notification of registration of transfer |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350 |
|
| R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
| R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
| R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
| R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |