JP2011221773A - Patrol plan creation support system - Google Patents

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a patrol plan creation support system capable of creating an efficient patrol plan by utilizing patrol experience of a patrolman while taking a health state into consideration.SOLUTION: The patrol plan creating support system includes: a database 8 in which patrol records expressing the time and equipment which patrolmen patrolled in the past are recorded; patrolman registering means 5 for registering patrolman information in the database 8 on the basis of a health state of the patrolmen; patrol plan parameter inputting means 6 for inputting patrolman information, equipment information about patrol object equipment, and schedule information about date and time for executing patrol; and patrol plan creating means 7 for calculating a patrol execution date on the basis of the schedule information and the patrolman information, calculating the patrol experience of each patrolman with reference to the patrol records, and creating a patrol plan that is composed of the patrolmen, the patrol execution dates and equipment information by making patrolmen having high patrol experience and patrolmen having low patrol experience patrolmen who execute patrol.

Description

  The present invention relates to a patrol plan creation support system, and is particularly useful when applied to the creation of an efficient patrol plan considering the patrol person based on the patrol experience.

  An electric power company has a large number of power plants and substations, and patrolmen regularly visit these facilities to perform predetermined inspection work. Normally, since a single patrol visits multiple power stations and substations, a patrol plan that allows each patrol person to schedule and efficiently visit each power station and substation. Need to create.

  As the number of patrolmen, power plants, and substations increases, the burden of creating a patrol plan increases, and therefore various technologies that support the creation of a patrol plan have been disclosed (for example, see Patent Document 1).

  In the technique disclosed in Patent Document 1, one is selected from a plurality of patrol plans registered in advance, and a patrol person patrols the site based on the patrol plan.

JP-A-6-004539

  However, the technique according to Patent Document 1 has a problem that patrol can be performed only within a range of a plurality of patrol plans registered in advance, and efficient patrol cannot be performed by utilizing patrol experiences of patrolers. In addition, some patrol people are healthy and others are not. Even if a patrol plan is created without taking such circumstances into consideration, it may be difficult to perform.

  Such a problem is not limited to patrols of power plants and substations, but generally exists when patrols a plurality of facilities.

  In view of such circumstances, an object of the present invention is to provide a patrol plan creation support system capable of creating an efficient patrol plan while making use of the patrol experience of patrolers and taking into consideration the health condition. To do.

  A first aspect of the present invention that solves the above problem is a patrol plan creation support system that supports the creation of a patrol plan that defines the order in which a patrol patrols a plurality of facilities, and when the patrol is in the past, A database that records the patrol records indicating which equipment was patroled, and a question about the health condition of the patrol person are displayed on the display means, and an answer to the question is obtained from the input means, and the answer and a predetermined judgment are obtained. Based on the criteria, it is determined whether or not it is appropriate as a patrol person, and if it is appropriate, patrol person registration means for registering patrol person information related to the person who made the answer in the database, and patrol concerning the patrol person performing the patrol. Based on the inspection schedule parameter input means for inputting the facility information, the facility information regarding the facility to be inspected, the schedule information regarding the date and time of performing the inspection, and the schedule information and the information of the inspector In addition to calculating the inspection date for performing the inspection and referring to the inspection record, the inspection experience is calculated based on the frequency of inspection by each inspection person, and the inspection person having a high inspection experience and the low inspection person. And a patrol plan creation means for creating a patrol plan comprising the patrol person, the inspection date and the facility information. .

  In the first aspect, the patrol pattern of the individual patrol person is reflected in the new patrol plan, and the creation of the patrol plan suitable for the needs of the patrol person can be supported. In other words, it is possible to create a patrol plan by discriminating between those with abundant patrol experiences and those who are not, so that the knowledge of patrols possessed by experienced persons can be given to those with little experience, and the entire organization as a whole Can share know-how related to patrols. Furthermore, since the health status of the person is confirmed when registering as a patrol person to be patroled, it is possible to avoid performing the patrol for a person who is not suitable for patrol.

  According to a second aspect of the present invention, in the inspection plan creation support system described in the first aspect, the inspection plan preparation means refers to the inspection record and is necessary when each inspection person inspects each facility. The inspection plan creation support system is characterized in that the inspection plan is created as the time required for patroling a plurality of facilities with the shortest required time.

  In the second aspect, since a new inspection plan is created using the time required for the inspection performed in the past by the inspector, it is possible to support the efficient preparation of the inspection plan using experience.

  According to a third aspect of the present invention, in the inspection plan creation support system described in the first or second aspect, the inspection plan creation means is common to a patrol person who inputs a schedule of each patrol person and executes the patrol. Thus, the inspection plan creation support system is characterized in that the date and time when no schedule is registered is set as the inspection candidate date, and the inspection execution date is calculated from the execution candidate date and the schedule information.

  In the third aspect, it is possible to determine the inspection date in consideration of the patrol person's schedule.

  According to a fourth aspect of the present invention, in the inspection plan creation support system described in any one of the first to third aspects, the inspection plan creation means includes the number of patrolmen who perform the inspection and the inspection target. The inspection plan creation support system is characterized by calculating the excess or deficiency of the number of patrolmen and the excess or deficiency of the number of facilities by comparing with the number of facilities.

  In the fourth aspect, it is possible to support the creation of a patrol plan that considers whether the number of patrol target facilities is appropriate for the number of patrolmen.

  According to a fifth aspect of the present invention, in the inspection plan creation support system described in any one of the first to fourth aspects, the inspection plan creation means is implemented in the facility with reference to the inspection record. The inspection plan creation support system is characterized in that the number of executions of inspection items as operations is calculated, and the operations are arranged and output in descending order of the number of executions.

  In the fifth aspect, the order of inspection items performed in each facility is determined based on past inspection records.

  ADVANTAGE OF THE INVENTION According to this invention, the inspection plan creation assistance system which can create an efficient inspection plan, making use of a patrol person's inspection experience and considering health condition is provided.

It is a conceptual diagram when a patrol person patrols a power station and a substation based on a patrol plan. It is a schematic block diagram which shows the structure of the inspection plan preparation assistance system which concerns on embodiment. It is a figure which shows the flow of a patrol person registration process. It is a figure which shows the process performed by the inspection plan parameter input means. It is a figure which shows the process which calculates the patrol experience of a patrol person. It is a figure which shows the process which determines the inspection implementation date. It is a figure which shows the process regarding the restriction | limiting of the number of facilities. It is a figure which shows the process which determines whether the number of inspection object facilities is suitable with respect to the number of patrol persons.

  Hereinafter, a mode for carrying out the present invention will be described in the case where a patrol person creates a patrol plan for patroling a power plant or a substation.

  FIG. 1 is a conceptual diagram when a patrol person patrols a power plant and a substation based on a patrol plan. A patrol plan is information indicating which patrol person patrols which power station or substation in what order, and the work (patient items) to be performed at each power station / substation. As shown in the figure, the inspection plan creation support system 1 outputs the inspection plan, and the inspector X and the inspector Y specify the power plant A, the substation B, the substation C, and the substation D based on the inspection plan. Patrol and perform predetermined work at each facility.

  At this time, the patrol person X or the patrol person Y transmits information on the performed work to the patrol plan creation support system 1. For example, the work content is input to the portable terminal 2 or the like having wireless communication means, and the work content is transmitted to the inspection plan creation support system 1. As an item to be input, for example, the weather at that time, information indicating whether the object to be inspected is one of the power plant A and the substations B to D, and who has performed the inspection are indicated. This is information on the information, the inspection item that has been implemented, and the date and time of the start / end of inspection. The inspection plan creation support system 1 that has received such information records the information in a database. The inspection plan creation support system 1 calculates the time required for each inspection item, which is the difference between the start time and end time of each inspection item, and records the time in the database. Such information related to the inspection performed by the inspectors X and Y is referred to as inspection recording. Although details will be described later, the inspection record is treated as the experience of each of the inspectors X and Y, and is used to create a new inspection plan.

  FIG. 2 is a schematic configuration diagram showing a configuration of the inspection plan creation support system. The inspection plan creation support system 1 includes a device having a general information processing function and a program executed by the device. The device configuration includes an input unit 4 such as a keyboard and a mouse and a display unit 3 such as a display, and although not particularly illustrated, a communication unit for communicating with a storage unit such as a CPU, a RAM or a hard disk drive, a portable terminal 2 or the like. It has.

  Further, the program executed by the apparatus causes the apparatus to function as the patrol person registration means 5, the inspection plan parameter input means 6, and the inspection plan creation means 7. The function of each means 5-7 will be described later. Further, the apparatus is provided with a database 8, and the above-mentioned patrol record and the like are recorded in the database 8, and each means can refer to the patrol record and record information on the patrol person, the power plant, the substation, and the like. It is like that.

  The patrol person registration means 5 determines whether a candidate who can be a patrol person is a person who can perform patrol work, and realizes a function of registering as a patrol person if qualified.

  Specifically, a question regarding the health condition is displayed on the display means 3, an answer to the question is obtained from the input means 4, and whether or not it is appropriate as a patrol person based on the answer and a predetermined criterion If it is appropriate, the patrol person information relating to the person who made the answer is registered in the database 8.

  Based on FIG. 3, the process performed by the patrol person registration means 5 will be described. As shown in the figure, the question about the health condition is displayed on the display means 3 (step S1). For example, items to be taken into consideration when performing patrol such as “strong”, “ordinary”, and “anxiety about legs” are displayed on the display means 3 and selected.

  A candidate who can be a patrolman answers such a question using the input means 4. The patrol person registration means 5 classifies the health state as shown in steps S2 to S4 based on the inputted answer. For example, if an answer is received that corresponds to one of “strong”, “normal”, and “no problem with walking for a long time”, the health status of the candidate is “Category A” (Step S2). Similarly, when an answer indicating that the subject falls under “easy to get tired” or the like is given, the candidate's health status is set as “Category B” (step S3), and an answer that the candidate falls under “sick” Is obtained, “Category C” is set (step S4).

  Then, these classifications are compared with the determination criteria (step S5). The determination criterion is information that associates a classification with whether or not registration as a patrol person is possible. For example, if the health condition is only category A or category B, registration as a patrol person is allowed. If the health condition falls into Category A and Category B, it is possible to register as a patrol person. In addition, when the health condition corresponds to Category B and Category C, and only corresponds to Category A and Category C, and Category C, it is determined as non-conforming as a patrol person.

  If the patrol person can be registered (step S6: Yes), the candidate is registered in the database 8 as a patrol person (step S7). If the patrol person registration is impossible (step S6: No), the fact that the patrol person is incompatible is displayed on the display means 3 (step S8), and the process is terminated.

  Thus, when registering as a patrol person to be patroled, the health condition of the person is confirmed, so that it is possible to avoid performing patrol for a person who is not suitable for patrol.

  Returning to FIG. 2, the inspection plan parameter input means 6 realizes a function of inputting information as a basis for creating the inspection plan.

  Specifically, the patrol person information related to the patrol person performing the patrol, the facility information related to the inspection target equipment, and the schedule information related to the date and time when the patrol is performed are input.

  The patrol person information is information related to the patrol person who can patrol and is recorded in the database 8. Specifically, it is composed of information indicating the name and affiliation. The inspection plan parameter input means 6 is provided with information for designating who is to be inspected among the patrol person information in the database 8.

  The facility information is information related to the inspection target facility and is recorded in the database 8. Specifically, it is composed of information indicating the name and location of the equipment. The inspection plan parameter input means 6 is provided with information for designating where inspection is to be performed among the facility information in the database 8.

  The schedule information is information related to the date and time when the inspection is performed. In the present embodiment, the inspection month indicating the inspection month, the inspection course indicating how many hours of the day are allocated for inspection, and the inspection division indicating when the inspection is performed in one month are examples of the schedule information. .

  Based on FIG. 4, the process performed by the inspection plan parameter input means 6 will be described. As shown in the figure, options for “patrolling section”, “patrol course”, and “patrol month”, which are examples of schedule information, are displayed on the display means 3 (steps S11 to S13). For example, for the inspection section, “intermediate inspection”, “end-of-month inspection”, and “temporary inspection” are displayed on the display means 3, and any one is selected. Similarly, regarding the inspection course, the time allocated for inspection, such as “one day”, “am”, “afternoon”, “time (any hour from 1 hour to 8 hours)”, is displayed on the display means 3 and selected. Further, regarding the inspection month, the month for performing the inspection from “January to December” is displayed on the display means 3 and selected.

  Moreover, the facility information of the database 8 is displayed on the display means 3, and the inspection object is selected from them (step S14). The figure shows that “power plant A” and “substations B to D” are selected.

  Moreover, the patrol person information of the database 8 is displayed on the display means 3, and the person who performs patrol is selected from them (step S15). In the figure, it is shown that “Mr. X (patient X)” and “Mr. Y (patient Y)” are selected.

  In these steps S11 to S15, it is confirmed that the schedule information, the facility information, and the patrol person information are respectively input (step S16). If they are input (step S16: Yes), the process is terminated, and some of them are not yet processed. If there is a selection (step S16: No), that effect is displayed (step S17), and S11 to S15 are re-executed.

  Returning to FIG. 2, the inspection plan creation means 7 calculates the inspection implementation date based on the schedule information, the facility information, and the inspector information described above, and further refers to the inspection records of each inspector stored in the database 8. The function to create an appropriate inspection plan is realized. Hereinafter, the process for creating the inspection plan will be described in detail.

  First, as shown in FIG. 5, a patrol experience is calculated for the patrolmen X and Y (see FIG. 4, step S15) designated as those who perform patrols. The patrol experience is calculated based on the frequency with which each patrol person patrols the power plant A and the substations B to D with reference to the patrol record recorded in the database 8. FIG. 5 is a diagram illustrating a process of calculating the inspection experience. As shown in the figure, the number of times the intermediate patrol (see FIG. 4) was performed in the past for each of the patrol person X and the patrol person Y is acquired from the patrol record of the database 8 (steps S21 and S22). For example, it is assumed that the patrol person X has performed an intermediate patrol four times in the past, and the patrol person Y has performed an intermediate patrol twice.

  Next, the total number of implementations is divided by the number of patrolmen assigned to the inspection (step S23), and the quotient is set as the reference number (step S24). In this case, the reference number is 3.

  Next, this reference number is compared with the number of inspections of each patrol person X, Y (steps S25, S26). If the number of inspections is greater than the reference number (steps S25, S26: Yes), “There is experience”. (Steps S27 and S28), and if it is small (Steps S25 and S26: No), it is determined that “experience is insufficient” (Step S29).

  In this case, the inspector X is “experienced”, and the inspector Y is “inexperienced”. In addition, you may determine in steps, such as not having only experience existence but having experienced, some experience, average, inexperience, inexperience.

  Thus, since it is possible to determine who has experience and who has no experience, it is possible to create a patrol plan that allows these persons to perform one patrol. As a result, tacit knowledge such as know-how is inherited from an experienced person to an inexperienced person, and the inspection efficiency of the entire organization can be improved.

  Next, the date and time for performing the inspection (the inspection execution date) is determined. In determining the inspection date, the inspection plan creation means 7 reads the schedules of the inspection persons X and Y. The schedule of the patrolmen X and Y is information representing a schedule for each patroler, and is registered in advance in the database 8 or the like.

  Then, as shown in FIG. 6, the inspection plan creation means 7 searches the read schedules of the inspectors X and Y for dates and times that have no schedule in common with both. Specifically, for each of the patrolmen X and Y, an unscheduled free day is searched from the schedule of “January” designated by the patrol month (see step S13 in FIG. 4) (step S31-A, B), excluding weekends and holidays (steps S32-A, B), searching for available free days (steps S33-A, B), which are common free days for patrolers X, Y All candidate dates are searched (step S34).

  Next, a process of assigning priorities based on the inspection division is performed on a common free day. First, it is determined whether the common free day is “10th to 15th” which is the range of the date of the intermediate inspection (step S35). If it is within the range (step S35: Yes), the common free days are ranked according to a predetermined standard (step S38).

  If the common free day is outside the range of the intermediate inspection date (step S35: No), it is determined whether the common free day is “26th to 31st” which is the range of the month end inspection date ( Step S36). If it is within the range (step S36: Yes), the common free days are ranked according to a predetermined standard (step S39). If it is out of the range (step S36: No), the common free day is excluded as not the date for inspection (step S37). The inspection implementation date is determined from the prioritized dates.

  Next, the inspection plan creation means 7 performs a process of limiting the number of facilities such as a power plant to be inspected according to the inspection course. For example, based on the inspection course, the number of facilities to be inspected is limited as shown in Table 1.

  As shown in Table 1, when “one day” is selected as the inspection course (see step S12 in FIG. 4), 3 to 4 facilities are inspected, and when “am” or “afternoon” is selected, inspection is performed. 1 to 2 facilities to be used. Further, when the number of facilities to be patrol is five or more, the patrol course is divided into “day” and “morning” and “afternoon” on another day and patrols.

  FIG. 7 shows processing related to the limitation on the number of facilities. When the number of power plants and substations selected in step S14 in FIG. 4 is 2 or less (step S41), and the inspection course selected in step S12 in FIG. 4 is “AM” or “PM” ( (Step S42: Yes) Since the restrictions shown in Table 1 are met, the inspection course is determined as “AM” or “PM” (Step S43). When the inspection course is neither “morning” nor “afternoon” (step S42: No), the inspection course is not selected, and the inspection course is selected again (step S12, see FIG. 4).

  When the number a of power plants and substations selected in step S14 in FIG. 4 is greater than 2 and less than or equal to 4 (step S41), and the inspection course selected in step S12 in FIG. (Step S44: Yes) Since it matches the restrictions shown in Table 1, it is determined as the inspection course “one day” (Step S45). If the inspection course is not “one day” (step S44: No), the inspection course is not selected and the inspection course is selected again (step S12, see FIG. 4).

  The number a of power stations and substations selected in step S14 in FIG. 4 is greater than 4 (step S41), and the inspection course selected in step S12 in FIG. 4 is “AM” or “PM” and “DAY”. If it is selected (step S46: Yes, step S47: Yes), it conforms to the restrictions shown in Table 1, so that the inspection course is “one day”, “one day” and another day “am” or Confirmed as “afternoon” (step S47). If neither “morning” nor “afternoon” is selected as the inspection course (step S46: No), or if “one day” is not selected (step S46: No), the restrictions in Table 1 are not met. Then, the inspection course is selected again (see step S12, FIG. 4).

  In this way, it is possible to limit the number of facilities that can be patroled reasonably in the selected patrol course.

  Next, the inspection plan creation means 7 performs a process of determining whether the number of inspection target facilities is appropriate for the number of inspection persons.

  As shown in FIG. 8, the number of patrolmen (see step S15, see FIG. 4) is C, and it is determined whether or not C is 2 or more (step S51). If it is less than 2 (one patrol person) (step S51: No), the fact that the number of persons is insufficient for patrol is displayed (step S52), and the number of patrolmen is urged (step S15, FIG. 4). reference). If C is 2 or more (step S51: Yes), it is determined whether or not C is divisible by 2 (step S53). If not divisible (step S53: No), steps S52 and S15 are performed. If it is divisible (step S53: Yes), it is determined that the restriction of two people per facility to be inspected conforms to the restriction, and the process proceeds to the next process.

  Next, when two people are grouped, the number a of the power plant or substation to be inspected is divided by the number of groups (step S54). If it is not divisible (step S54: No), the fact that the number of the power plant or substation to be inspected is increased or decreased by one is displayed (step S55), and the increase or decrease of the number of facilities is prompted (step S14, see FIG. 4). If it is divisible (step S54: Yes), the processing is terminated (step S56), assuming that the number of facilities that one group patrols is appropriate.

  In the present embodiment, two people, patrol persons X and Y, patrol as a group (step S53: Yes), and patrol four power stations A and substations B to D (step S56). .

  Next, the inspection plan creation means 7 refers to the inspection record recorded in the database 8, calculates the number of inspection items to be implemented in the facility, and arranges and outputs the operations in descending order of the number of executions. . Table 2 exemplifies data related to the intermediate patrol performed by the patrol person X in the past.

  As shown in Table 2, in the database 8, past inspection items and required time of the inspection station X at the power plant A are recorded as inspection records. Note that such recording is based on data input using the mobile terminal 2 every time the patrol person X performs work, as described in FIG.

  For example, in the inspection on January 10, the inspection items a to i are sequentially performed, and it is shown that a time of 5 minutes is required between the inspection items a and b.

  The inspection plan creation means 7 aggregates the inspection records shown in Table 2 for each inspection item, and sets the inspection item most frequently performed in the past as the first inspection order. For example, if the inspection item a is executed most frequently, the inspection item a is first. Thereafter, the inspection items are arranged in descending order of the number of implementations.

  In this way, the order of inspection items to be performed at the power plant A and the substations B to D is determined based on past inspection records.

  Next, the inspection plan creation means 7 calculates the order of inspection of the power plant A and the substations B to D, the time required for movement, and the time required for each facility.

  Such time calculation is performed based on data of power plants and substations registered in the database 8 in advance. Tables 3 to 6 show examples of power plant and substation data.

  Table 3 exemplifies the time (minutes) required to move from the establishment where the patrolmen X and Y are located to the power plant A and the substations B to D. Table 4 shows the time (minutes) required for the movement between the power plant A and the substations B to D. Table 5 exemplifies the required time (minutes) required for the patrol work at the power station A and the substations B to D for each intermediate patrol and end-of-month patrol. Table 6 illustrates course 1 and course 2, which are patterns of the order of patrol through power plant A and substations B to D.

  As a general rule, the inspection plan creation means 7 selects the course described in Table 6 and calculates the travel time from the establishment to each power station A and substations B to D based on the data in Table 3 and Table 4. Based on the data in Table 5, the working time at each power plant A and substations B to D is calculated.

  However, the inspection plan creation means 7 corrects the required time by making use of the past experiences of the inspector X and the inspector Y. Specifically, the inspection is performed with reference to the inspection record recorded in the database 8. For example, as shown in Table 7, when a patrol person X and a patrol person Y patrol in the past, the patrol time required at each power plant A and substations B to D is recorded in the database 8. Suppose that

  As shown in Table 7, Patroler X had 50 minutes, 30 minutes, 35 minutes, and 30 minutes at each power station A and substations B to D when performing an intermediate patrol in the past January. All that was needed was recorded.

  Since the patrol person X and the patrol person Y patrol as a group, it is considered that the patrol work is completed in a shorter patrol time. Therefore, as shown in Table 7, the inspection plan creation means 7 estimates the required time at each power plant A and substations B to D in accordance with the shorter time.

  As a result, the inspection plan to be formulated is exemplified in Table 8.

  As shown in Table 8, at each power plant A and substations B to D, based on the past experience of the patrol person X and the patrol person Y, a patrol plan is formulated with the shorter one as the required time. ing. The departure time of the office was “9:00”, and the arrival time at the office was “16:30” at the latest. These times are input by the person who formulates the inspection plan, and the inspection plan is created so as to keep these input times.

  As described above, in the inspection plan creation support system according to the present embodiment, the past inspection experience of the inspector is recorded as the inspection record in the database 8, and the inspection plan is formulated with reference to the inspection record. As a result, the patrol pattern of the individual patrol person is reflected in the new patrol plan, and the creation of the patrol plan that meets the needs of the patrol person can be supported.

  In addition, it is possible to distinguish between those who have a lot of patrol experience and those who do not, and to create a patrol plan that allows them to perform patrols, so that knowledge of patrols possessed by experienced people should be given to those with little experience It is possible to share the know-how about patrols as a whole organization.

  Furthermore, since a new inspection plan is created using the time required for the inspection performed in the past by the inspection person, it is possible to support the creation of an efficient inspection plan utilizing the experience.

  In the inspection plan creation support system according to the present embodiment, the inspection target is a power plant or a substation. However, the inspection plan creation support system according to the present invention is not limited to this, and the inspection plan preparation support system according to the present invention performs inspection for any facility. Can be applied.

  INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY The present invention has a plurality of facilities and can be used in a field where a patrol person performs a task of patroling these facilities.

A Power plant B to D Substation X, Y Patrol person 1 Patrol plan creation support system 2 Mobile terminal 3 Display means 4 Input means 5 Patrol member registration means 6 Patrol plan parameter input means 7 Patrol plan creation means 8 Database

Claims (5)

A patrol plan creation support system that supports the creation of a patrol plan that defines the order in which patrols patrol multiple facilities,
A database in which a patrol record is recorded that indicates when and what equipment the patrolman has patroled in the past;
Display the question on the health condition of the patrol person on the display means, obtain the answer to the question from the input means, determine whether it is appropriate as a patrol person based on the answer and a predetermined criterion, If appropriate, a patrol person registration means for registering patrol person information about the person who made the answer in the database,
Patrol plan parameter input means for inputting patrol person information related to a patrol person performing the patrol, facility information related to the inspection target equipment, and schedule information related to the date and time for performing the patrol;
While calculating the inspection implementation date for performing the inspection based on the schedule information and the patrol person information, referring to the inspection record, calculating the inspection experience based on the frequency that each inspection person patrols the facility, A patrol plan creating means for creating a patrol plan including the patrol person, the patrol implementation date, and the facility information. A patrol plan creation support system. In the inspection plan creation support system according to claim 1,
The inspection plan creation means refers to the inspection record and patrols the shortest required time required for each patroler to patrol each facility as the required time required when patroling a plurality of facilities. A patrol plan creation support system characterized by creating a plan. In the inspection plan creation support system according to claim 1 or claim 2,
The inspection plan creation means inputs the schedule of each patrol person, and sets the date when the schedule is not registered in common to the patrol person performing the inspection as the inspection candidate date, and the execution candidate date and the schedule information A patrol plan creation support system that calculates the inspection date from In the inspection plan creation support system according to any one of claims 1 to 3,
The inspection plan creation means calculates the excess or deficiency of the number of patrols and the number of facilities by comparing the number of patrols performing the patrol and the number of facilities to be inspected. Patrol plan creation support system. In the inspection plan creation support system according to any one of claims 1 to 4,
The inspection plan creation means refers to the inspection record, calculates the number of executions of inspection items that are operations performed in the facility, and arranges and outputs the operations in descending order of the number of executions. Creation support system.

Images