[go: up one dir, main page]

JP2011012928A - Method of diagnosing combustion abnormality of heat treatment furnace - Google Patents

Method of diagnosing combustion abnormality of heat treatment furnace Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP2011012928A
JP2011012928A JP2009159234A JP2009159234A JP2011012928A JP 2011012928 A JP2011012928 A JP 2011012928A JP 2009159234 A JP2009159234 A JP 2009159234A JP 2009159234 A JP2009159234 A JP 2009159234A JP 2011012928 A JP2011012928 A JP 2011012928A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
combustion
exhaust gas
reference range
determined
zone
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
JP2009159234A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP5428593B2 (en
Inventor
Shinichi Toyoshima
慎一 豊島
Toru Kuroda
亨 黒田
Tomonori Nakanishi
知典 中西
Munetoshi Kaise
宗利 貝瀬
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Nippon Steel Corp
Original Assignee
Sumitomo Metal Industries Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Sumitomo Metal Industries Ltd filed Critical Sumitomo Metal Industries Ltd
Priority to JP2009159234A priority Critical patent/JP5428593B2/en
Publication of JP2011012928A publication Critical patent/JP2011012928A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP5428593B2 publication Critical patent/JP5428593B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02EREDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
    • Y02E20/00Combustion technologies with mitigation potential
    • Y02E20/34Indirect CO2mitigation, i.e. by acting on non CO2directly related matters of the process, e.g. pre-heating or heat recovery

Landscapes

  • Combustion Of Fluid Fuel (AREA)
  • Regulation And Control Of Combustion (AREA)
  • Control Of Combustion (AREA)
  • Air Supply (AREA)
  • Feeding And Controlling Fuel (AREA)

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To determine not only an abnormality in a combustion system but also an abnormal portion and an abnormal form in a combustion facility.SOLUTION: In a combustion furnace having a plurality of combustion zones of a large number of burners 2 including air preheaters 4 for combustion air controlling a fuel system and a combustion air system by one system, such as a radiant tube furnace 1, temperatures of preheated air and exhaust gas of each of a large number of radiant tubes are detected. By comparing the detection values with a detection average value of the zone, presence/absence of an abnormality, an abnormal portion and an abnormal form of the combustion system are determined. Since the determination of presence/absence of the abnormality, the abnormal portion and the abnormal form of the combustion system in the furnace is permitted, deterioration is prevented, and necessary countermeasures are taken during operation. Maintenance plans are prepared beforehand. Thus, productivity, quality and energy efficiency in the combustion furnace are maintained by the minimum maintenance work at the minimum cost.

Description

本発明は、燃焼空気を予熱する空気予熱器を付帯する多数本のバーナの、燃料系及び燃焼空気系をそれぞれ一系統で制御する燃焼ゾーン(以下、単にゾーンという。)を複数有する熱処理炉の、燃焼異常を診断する方法に関するものである。   The present invention provides a heat treatment furnace having a plurality of combustion zones (hereinafter simply referred to as zones), each of which controls a fuel system and a combustion air system in a single system, of a plurality of burners attached with an air preheater for preheating combustion air. The present invention relates to a method for diagnosing combustion abnormality.

例えばラジアントチューブ炉では、複数のゾーン20を各々適正な温度に均一加熱するため、図6に示すように、小容量のバーナ21が、各ゾーン20に50〜300本設置されている。なお、図6中の22は燃焼空気配管、23は燃料配管、24は燃焼空気配管22及び燃料配管23に設けた流量調整弁25a,25bの開度を制御する制御器、26は排ガスを吸引するファンを示す。   For example, in a radiant tube furnace, in order to uniformly heat each of the plurality of zones 20 to an appropriate temperature, 50 to 300 small capacity burners 21 are installed in each zone 20 as shown in FIG. In FIG. 6, 22 is a combustion air pipe, 23 is a fuel pipe, 24 is a controller that controls the opening degree of the flow rate adjusting valves 25a and 25b provided in the combustion air pipe 22 and the fuel pipe 23, and 26 is an exhaust gas suction unit. Indicates a fan to play.

これら各ゾーンに設置された多数本のバーナは、主に経済的な制約から、その燃料流量及び燃焼空気流量をそれぞれ一系統で制御しているのが一般的である。   A large number of burners installed in each of these zones generally control their fuel flow rate and combustion air flow rate in a single system mainly due to economic constraints.

ところで、ラジアントチューブは、一般的には、図7に示すように、前記バーナ21と、チューブ27及び自己排ガスの排熱を回収する空気予熱器28の3つの部品から構成されている。   By the way, as shown in FIG. 7, the radiant tube is generally composed of three parts: the burner 21, a tube 27, and an air preheater 28 for recovering exhaust heat of the self-exhaust gas.

そして、ラジアントチューブを構成する前記バーナ、チューブ、及び空気予熱器の異常発生モードとしては、バーナの場合は閉塞・溶損等、チューブの場合は亀裂・穴あき等、空気予熱器の場合は溶損・リーク等を挙げることができる。   The abnormal modes of the burner, tube, and air preheater constituting the radiant tube are as follows: clogging / melting damage for the burner, crack / perforation for the tube, etc. for the air preheater. Loss and leak.

ラジアントチューブを構成する前記3つの部品の異常発生部位を早期に特定できれば、異常が発生した部品を交換することで、ラジアントチューブの健全性を維持することができる。   If the abnormality occurrence part of the three parts constituting the radiant tube can be identified at an early stage, the soundness of the radiant tube can be maintained by replacing the part in which the abnormality has occurred.

しかしながら、前記3つの構成部品の異常を特定できずに放置すれば、異常燃焼が続く結果、異常が発生した構成部品だけでなく、ラジアントチューブ全体に損傷が及ぶ ことになる。   However, if the abnormalities of the three components are left unidentified, the abnormal combustion continues, resulting in damage not only to the component in which the abnormality has occurred but also to the entire radiant tube.

各ゾーンに配置された多数本のラジアントチューブを、燃焼空気、燃料それぞれを一系統で制御している中で、ラジアントチューブの1本が損傷すると、ゾーン内の他のラジアントチューブへの燃焼空気と燃料のバランスが崩れ、正常燃焼からズレが生じる。   While a large number of radiant tubes arranged in each zone are controlling combustion air and fuel in a single system, if one of the radiant tubes is damaged, the combustion air to the other radiant tubes in the zone The balance of the fuel is lost, and a deviation occurs from normal combustion.

その結果、エネルギーロスが発生するだけでなく、他のラジアントチューブの損傷も連鎖的に進行していくというトラブルが発生し、生産能率低下や製品品質不良といった大きな問題を引き起こすことになり、復旧のための保守費用も莫大なものとなる。   As a result, not only does energy loss occur, but damage to other radiant tubes progresses in a chained fashion, causing major problems such as reduced production efficiency and poor product quality. Therefore, the maintenance cost is also enormous.

このような熱処理炉におけるバーナの燃焼が異常かどうかの判定を、多数本のバーナの、各々の予熱空気の温度を検出することによって行う方法が、特許文献1に開示されている。この特許文献1で開示された方法は、空気比の変化により予熱空気温度のパターンが変化することに着目したものである。   Patent Document 1 discloses a method for determining whether or not burner combustion in such a heat treatment furnace is abnormal by detecting the temperature of each preheated air of a number of burners. The method disclosed in Patent Document 1 focuses on the fact that the preheated air temperature pattern changes due to a change in the air ratio.

しかしながら、特許文献1で開示された方法は、予熱空気の温度のみに基づいて判定を行うので、バーナ等の燃焼系の限られた内容の異常しか判定することができず、空気予熱器の穴開き等の異常についての判定はできない。また、この方法は、同一空燃比であっても、燃料流量・ゾーンの炉温によって燃焼空気温度が変化することについての考慮がなされていないので、異常の特定精度が低いという問題がある。   However, since the method disclosed in Patent Document 1 makes a determination based only on the temperature of the preheated air, it can only determine the abnormality of limited contents of the combustion system such as a burner, and the hole of the air preheater Judgment about abnormalities such as opening cannot be made. In addition, this method has a problem that the accuracy of specifying an abnormality is low because no consideration is given to the fact that the combustion air temperature varies depending on the fuel flow rate and the furnace temperature of the zone even at the same air-fuel ratio.

また、多数本のバーナの前圧力を検出することにより、バーナの異常燃焼を判定する方法が特許文献2に開示されている。この特許文献2で開示された方法は、予め測定された正常動作時の圧力範囲と測定した前圧力を比較することで燃焼が異常か否かを判断するものである。   Further, Patent Document 2 discloses a method for determining abnormal combustion of a burner by detecting the pre-pressure of a large number of burners. The method disclosed in Patent Document 2 determines whether or not combustion is abnormal by comparing a pre-measured pressure range during normal operation with a measured pre-pressure.

しかしながら、特許文献2で開示された方法も、バーナの前圧力のみに基づいて判定を行うので、バーナ等の燃焼系の限られた内容の異常しか判定することができず、チューブや空気予熱器の穴開き等の異常についての判定はできない。   However, since the method disclosed in Patent Document 2 also makes a determination based only on the pre-pressure of the burner, it can only determine abnormality of limited contents of the combustion system such as the burner, and the tube or air preheater. It is not possible to judge abnormalities such as hole opening.

また、これら特許文献1、2は、燃焼設備の異常部位や異常形態の判定に関しては、全く考慮されていない。    In addition, these Patent Documents 1 and 2 do not consider at all regarding the determination of an abnormal part or an abnormal form of a combustion facility.

特開平5−312318号公報JP-A-5-312318 特開平8−13040号公報Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 8-13040

本発明が解決しようとする問題点は、従来の熱処理炉の燃焼異常診断方法は、バーナ等の燃焼系の限られた内容の燃焼異常の有無しか判定することができないという点である。   The problem to be solved by the present invention is that the conventional method for diagnosing combustion abnormality in a heat treatment furnace can only determine the presence or absence of combustion abnormality of a limited content in a combustion system such as a burner.

本発明の燃焼炉の燃焼異常診断方法は、
バーナ等の燃焼系の異常に限らず、チューブや空気予熱器の穴開き等の燃焼設備の異常部位や異常形態の判定をも行うことを可能にするために、
燃焼空気の空気予熱器を付帯する多数本のラジアントチューブの、燃料系及び燃焼空気系をそれぞれ一系統で制御する燃焼ゾーンを、複数備えた燃焼炉において、
前記多数本のラジアントチューブの、
1) 各々の予熱空気及び排ガスの温度を検出し、
或いは、
2) 各々のバーナ前圧力と、予熱空気及び排ガスの温度を検出し、
これら検出値を当該ゾーンの検出平均値と比較することにより、燃焼系の異常の有無と異常部位・異常形態を判断することを最も主要な特徴としている。
The combustion abnormality diagnosis method for a combustion furnace according to the present invention includes:
In order to be able to determine not only abnormalities in combustion systems such as burners, but also abnormal parts and abnormal forms of combustion equipment such as tubes and holes in air preheaters,
In a combustion furnace provided with a plurality of combustion zones, each of which controls a fuel system and a combustion air system in a single system, of a large number of radiant tubes attached to an air preheater of combustion air,
Of the multiple radiant tubes,
1) Detect the temperature of each preheated air and exhaust gas,
Or
2) Detect the pre-burner pressure, preheated air and exhaust gas temperature,
By comparing these detection values with the detection average value of the zone, the main feature is to determine the presence / absence of abnormality in the combustion system and the abnormal part / abnormal form.

より具体的には、各々の予熱空気及び排ガスの温度を検出する場合は、
当該ゾーンの検出平均値に対して、予熱空気温度、排ガス温度の何れもが、基準範囲以上低い場合には、バーナあるいはバーナに燃料を供給する配管に詰まり又は閉塞が生じたと判定する。
More specifically, when detecting the temperature of each preheated air and exhaust gas,
When both the preheated air temperature and the exhaust gas temperature are lower than the reference range with respect to the detected average value of the zone, it is determined that the burner or the pipe supplying fuel to the burner is clogged or blocked.

また、当該ゾーンの検出平均値に対して、予熱空気温度、排ガス温度の何れもが、基準範囲以上高い場合には、チューブに穴開き又は亀裂が生じたと判定する。   Further, when both the preheated air temperature and the exhaust gas temperature are higher than the reference range with respect to the detected average value of the zone, it is determined that the tube has a hole or a crack.

また、当該ゾーンの検出平均値に対して、予熱空気温度は基準範囲以上低く、排ガス温度は基準範囲以上高い場合には、空気予熱器に溶損又は穴開きが生じたと判定する。   When the preheated air temperature is lower than the reference range and the exhaust gas temperature is higher than the reference range with respect to the detected average value of the zone, it is determined that the air preheater has melted or perforated.

一方、各々のバーナ前圧力と、予熱空気及び排ガスの温度を検出する場合は、
当該ゾーンの検出平均値に対して、バーナ前圧力、予熱空気温度、排ガス温度の何れもが、基準範囲以上低い場合には、バーナ前圧力測定位置より供給側の燃料配管で詰まりあるいは閉塞が生じたと判定する。
On the other hand, when detecting the pre-burner pressure and the temperature of preheated air and exhaust gas,
If any of the pre-burner pressure, preheated air temperature, and exhaust gas temperature is lower than the reference range with respect to the detected average value of the zone, the fuel piping on the supply side is clogged or blocked from the pre-burner pressure measurement position. It is determined that

また、当該ゾーンの検出平均値に対して、基準範囲以上に、バーナ前圧力が高く、予熱空気温度と排ガス温度が低い場合には、バーナ部の詰まりあるいは閉塞が生じたと判定する。   Further, when the pre-burner pressure is higher than the reference range and the preheated air temperature and the exhaust gas temperature are lower than the detected average value of the zone, it is determined that the burner portion is clogged or blocked.

また、当該ゾーンの検出平均値に対して、バーナ前圧力が基準範囲以上高く、予熱空気温度と排ガス温度は基準範囲内にある場合には、チューブに変形を生じたと判定する。   Further, when the pre-burner pressure is higher than the reference range with respect to the detected average value of the zone and the preheated air temperature and the exhaust gas temperature are within the reference range, it is determined that the tube has been deformed.

また、当該ゾーンの検出平均値に対して、予熱空気温度と排ガス温度は基準範囲以上高く、バーナ前圧力は基準範囲内にある場合には、チューブには穴開き又は亀裂を生じたと判定する。   Further, when the preheated air temperature and the exhaust gas temperature are higher than the reference range and the pre-burner pressure is within the reference range with respect to the detected average value of the zone, it is determined that the tube has a hole or a crack.

また、当該ゾーンの検出平均値に対して、基準範囲以上に、予熱空気温度が低く、排ガス温度が高く、バーナ前圧力は基準範囲内にある場合には、空気予熱器に溶損又は穴開きを生じたと判定する。   Also, if the preheated air temperature is lower than the reference range, the exhaust gas temperature is higher, and the pre-burner pressure is within the reference range, the air preheater will be melted or perforated. Is determined to have occurred.

前記本発明においては、前記ゾーンの検出平均値を、炉温と燃料の流量が一定の範囲のデータを抽出して得るものとすれば、より判定精度が向上する。   In the present invention, if the detection average value of the zone is obtained by extracting data in a range where the furnace temperature and the fuel flow rate are constant, the determination accuracy is further improved.

本発明により、燃焼炉における燃焼系の異常の有無、異常の部位、及び異常の形態を判定することが可能となる。また、警告値の設定や傾向管理を行うようにすれば、明らかな異常をきたす前に異常の部位や異常の形態を把握することも可能となる。   According to the present invention, it is possible to determine the presence / absence of an abnormality in a combustion system in a combustion furnace, an abnormal part, and an abnormality form. Moreover, if warning values are set and trend management is performed, it is possible to grasp an abnormal part and an abnormal form before an obvious abnormality occurs.

以上の効果により、操業中には悪化の未然防止あるいは必要な措置を、また事前の保全計画立案が可能となり、燃焼炉における生産性、品質、エネルギー効率を、最小の保全作業、コストで維持することが可能となる。   As a result of the above, it is possible to prevent deterioration or take necessary measures during operation and to plan maintenance in advance, and maintain productivity, quality, and energy efficiency in the combustion furnace with minimum maintenance work and cost. It becomes possible.

ラジアントチューブ炉について、予熱空気温度及び排ガス温度を検出することによる本発明の燃焼異常診断方法の第1の例を実施する装置を示した図である。It is the figure which showed the apparatus which implements the 1st example of the combustion abnormality diagnosis method of this invention by detecting the preheating air temperature and waste gas temperature about a radiant tube furnace. (a)はゾーンの炉温が700℃〜750℃の範囲と、850℃〜900℃の範囲のゾーン燃料流量に対する1個のラジアントチューブの予熱空気温度の関係を示した図、(b)は同じく排ガス温度との関係を示した図である。(A) is the figure which showed the relationship of the zone furnace temperature of the zone 700 to 750 degreeC, and the preheating air temperature of one radiant tube with respect to the zone fuel flow rate of the range of 850 to 900 degreeC, (b) It is the figure which showed the relationship with exhaust gas temperature similarly. 各ラジアントチューブの排ガス温度及び予熱空気温度を抽出し、その平均値を示した図で、(a)はNo.1ゾーン、(b)はNo.2ゾーンを示した図である。The exhaust gas temperature and the preheated air temperature of each radiant tube are extracted, and the average values thereof are shown. 1 zone, (b) is No. It is the figure which showed 2 zones. ラジアントチューブ炉について、バーナ前圧力、予熱空気温度及び排ガス温度を検出することによる本発明の燃焼異常診断方法の第2の例を実施する装置を示した図である。It is the figure which showed the apparatus which implements the 2nd example of the combustion abnormality diagnostic method of this invention by detecting a pre-burner pressure, preheating air temperature, and exhaust gas temperature about a radiant tube furnace. (a)〜(c)は、本発明の燃焼異常診断の第2の例の測定例を説明する図である。(A)-(c) is a figure explaining the example of a measurement of the 2nd example of the combustion abnormality diagnosis of this invention. ラジアントチューブ炉における燃焼ゾーンの概略図である。It is the schematic of the combustion zone in a radiant tube furnace. ラジアントチューブの構造を説明する図である。It is a figure explaining the structure of a radiant tube.

本発明では、燃焼系の異常に限らず、燃焼設備の異常部位や異常形態の判定をも可能とするという目的を、各々の予熱空気及び排ガスの温度、或いは更に各々のバーナ前圧力をも検出し、これら検出値を当該ゾーンの検出平均値と比較することによって実現した。   In the present invention, not only the abnormality of the combustion system, but also the purpose of making it possible to determine the abnormal part and form of the combustion facility, the temperature of each preheated air and exhaust gas, or each pre-burner pressure is also detected. These detection values were realized by comparing with the detection average value of the zone.

ラジアントチューブ炉に備えられた多数本のバーナの、各バーナの燃焼系に異常が発生すれば、各々の特性(各部の圧力・温度、排ガスの成分等)に異常が見られることは当然である。   If abnormalities occur in the combustion system of each burner of the multiple burners provided in the radiant tube furnace, it is natural that abnormalities are observed in each characteristic (pressure / temperature of each part, exhaust gas components, etc.). .

しかしながら、これらの特性値を常時計測することは、経済面・保守面を考えると合理的ではない。従って、生産能率や燃料原単位の明確な悪化時、あるいは定期的な開放点検等による異常発見時に、事後的に保全するのが一般的である。   However, it is not reasonable to always measure these characteristic values in view of economics and maintenance. Therefore, it is common to maintain after the event when the production efficiency and the fuel consumption rate are clearly deteriorated or when an abnormality is detected by periodic open inspection.

一方で、従来技術のように計測対象を1つ(例えば燃焼空気温度)に絞れば、経済面・保守面の負担を小さくして、ある程度の種類の燃焼異常について異常の「有無」を判定することができる。この場合、操業中(燃焼調整・バーナ閉止等)や点検時(保全対象の絞込み)の措置に一定の効果を得ることができる。   On the other hand, if the number of measurement objects is limited to one (for example, combustion air temperature) as in the prior art, the burden on the economy and maintenance is reduced, and the “presence / absence” of abnormality is determined for a certain type of combustion abnormality. be able to. In this case, a certain effect can be obtained for measures during operation (combustion adjustment, burner closing, etc.) and during inspection (restriction of maintenance targets).

しかしながら、従来技術の場合、判定が可能な燃焼異常の内容が限られる上、燃焼系のどの部位で、どのような形態で異常が発生したのかを判定することができない。従って、最終的には開放点検時でないと異常部位や異常形態の判定は不可能であり、異常に対応する内容も限られる。   However, in the case of the prior art, the contents of combustion abnormality that can be determined are limited, and it is impossible to determine in which part of the combustion system and in what form the abnormality has occurred. Therefore, it is impossible to finally determine the abnormal part and the abnormal form unless it is during open inspection, and the content corresponding to the abnormality is limited.

発明者らは、ラジアントチューブ炉おける燃焼装置の開放点検時に見つかった異常部位及び異常形態と、各種燃焼特性の計測値の比較調査を行った結果、ラジアントチューブ炉の燃焼異常の有無とその部位・形態の判定が可能であることを見出した。   The inventors conducted a comparative investigation of the abnormal part and abnormal form found during the open inspection of the combustion device in the radiant tube furnace and the measured values of various combustion characteristics. It was found that the form can be determined.

すなわち、発明者らは、各バーナの予熱空気温度及び排ガス温度、或いは更に各々のバーナ前圧力を常時計測すれば、燃焼異常バーナの検出とともにその異常部位・異常形態を判定でき、適切な操業時及び点検時の措置をとることが可能であることを見出した。   In other words, the inventors can measure the preheated air temperature and exhaust gas temperature of each burner, or further each pre-burner pressure, and determine the abnormal part / abnormal form as well as the detection of the abnormal combustion burner. And it was found that it is possible to take measures at the time of inspection.

本発明の燃焼炉の燃焼異常診断方法は、前記発明者らの知見に基づいてなされたものであり、以下、ラジアントチューブ炉について本発明の燃焼異常診断方法を適用する場合について説明する。   The combustion abnormality diagnosis method for a combustion furnace according to the present invention has been made based on the knowledge of the inventors. Hereinafter, a case where the combustion abnormality diagnosis method according to the present invention is applied to a radiant tube furnace will be described.

[実施例1]
図1は、ラジアントチューブ炉について、予熱空気温度及び排ガス温度を検出することによる本発明の燃焼異常診断方法の第1の例を適用する場合の構成例を示す。
1はラジアントチューブ炉のゾーンで、ゾーン加熱を行うために、各ゾーン1に複数のバーナ2が設けられている。ゾーン1内の各バーナ2には、燃料及び燃焼空気がそれぞれ一系統で供給され、それぞれの流量がゾーン制御される。
[Example 1]
FIG. 1 shows a configuration example when a first example of the combustion abnormality diagnosis method of the present invention is applied to a radiant tube furnace by detecting a preheating air temperature and an exhaust gas temperature.
Reference numeral 1 denotes a zone of a radiant tube furnace, and a plurality of burners 2 are provided in each zone 1 in order to perform zone heating. Each burner 2 in the zone 1 is supplied with fuel and combustion air in one system, and the respective flow rates are zone-controlled.

燃焼空気は空気予熱器4で排ガスと熱交換した後、バーナ2に導かれ、燃料と混合してチューブ3内で燃焼して対象物を間接的に加熱する。なお、図1中の5は燃料配管、6は燃焼空気配管、7は排ガス配管、14a,14bは燃料配管5、燃焼空気配管6に設けられた流量調整弁、15は排ガス配管7に設けられた排ガス吸引用のファンを示す。   After the combustion air exchanges heat with the exhaust gas in the air preheater 4, the combustion air is led to the burner 2, mixed with the fuel and burned in the tube 3 to indirectly heat the object. 1, 5 is a fuel pipe, 6 is a combustion air pipe, 7 is an exhaust gas pipe, 14a and 14b are flow control valves provided in the fuel pipe 5 and the combustion air pipe 6, and 15 is provided in the exhaust gas pipe 7. The exhaust gas suction fan is shown.

本発明方法を実施する場合、上記構成のラジアントチューブ炉における各バーナ2の、空気予熱器4の下流側の燃焼空気配管6に予熱空気温度測定器9を、排ガス配管7に排ガス温度測定器10をそれぞれ設置する。   When carrying out the method of the present invention, the preheated air temperature measuring device 9 is provided in the combustion air piping 6 on the downstream side of the air preheater 4 and the exhaust gas temperature measuring device 10 is provided in the exhaust gas piping 7 of each burner 2 in the radiant tube furnace configured as described above. Is installed.

そして、前記予熱空気温度測定器9、排ガス温度測定器10で測定した各測定データを、データ収集装置11、データ蓄積部12を介してデータ処理装置13に送る。データ処理装置13は、前記2種のデータ測定値に基づき、以下のようにして、燃焼系の異常の有無と、異常部位・異常形態を判定する。なお、データ蓄積部12とデータ処理装置13を分割せず、一体に構成した装置を使用しても良い。   Then, each measurement data measured by the preheating air temperature measuring device 9 and the exhaust gas temperature measuring device 10 is sent to the data processing device 13 via the data collecting device 11 and the data storage unit 12. Based on the two types of data measurement values, the data processing device 13 determines the presence / absence of abnormality in the combustion system and the abnormal part / abnormal form as follows. The data storage unit 12 and the data processing device 13 may not be divided, and an integrally configured device may be used.

下記表1に、ラジアントチューブ炉における燃焼装置の開放点検時に見つかった異常部位及び異常形態と、各種燃焼特性の計測値とを比較調査して見出した、異常部位・異常形態と、前記2種のデータの測定値と当該ゾーンの検出平均値との差との関係を示す。   In Table 1 below, the abnormal part and abnormal form found during the open inspection of the combustion device in the radiant tube furnace and the measured values of various combustion characteristics were found and compared with the abnormal part and abnormal form. The relationship between the measured value of data and the difference between the detected average value of the zone is shown.

Figure 2011012928
Figure 2011012928

表1に示すように、予熱空気温度、排ガス温度を各ラジアントチューブについて測定し、これら検出値を当該ゾーンの検出平均値と比較すれば、燃焼系の異常の有無だけでなく、異常部位及び異常形態をも判定することが可能になることが分かる。   As shown in Table 1, if the preheated air temperature and exhaust gas temperature are measured for each radiant tube and these detected values are compared with the detected average value of the zone, not only the presence or absence of abnormality in the combustion system, It can be seen that the form can also be determined.

すなわち、予熱空気温度が低く、排ガス温度も低い場合は、バーナあるいはバーナに燃料を供給する配管に詰まり又は閉塞が発生していると判定する。これは、バーナあるいは燃料配管が詰まる又は閉塞すると、燃料が十分に供給されていない状態になって、排ガス温度が低くなり、結果的に予熱空気温度も低下するためである。   That is, when the preheated air temperature is low and the exhaust gas temperature is low, it is determined that the burner or the pipe that supplies fuel to the burner is clogged or blocked. This is because when the burner or the fuel pipe is clogged or blocked, the fuel is not sufficiently supplied, the exhaust gas temperature is lowered, and as a result, the preheated air temperature is also lowered.

また、予熱空気温度が低く、排ガス温度が高い場合は、空気予熱器が溶損等していると判定する。これは、空気予熱器の溶損等で自己排ガスの熱回収が十分に行われない場合は、予熱空気温度が下がり、排ガス温度は上がるためである。   Further, when the preheating air temperature is low and the exhaust gas temperature is high, it is determined that the air preheater is melted. This is because when the heat recovery of the self-exhaust gas is not sufficiently performed due to melting of the air preheater or the like, the preheating air temperature decreases and the exhaust gas temperature increases.

また、予熱空気温度が高く、排ガス温度が高い場合は、チューブに穴開きや亀裂が発生していると判定する。これは、チューブに穴開きや亀裂が発生している場合は、加熱炉内の高温の雰囲気ガスが、チューブの穴開きや亀裂からチューブ内に引き込まれ、その熱エネルギー分排ガス温度が上昇する結果、予熱空気温度も上昇するためである。   Further, when the preheated air temperature is high and the exhaust gas temperature is high, it is determined that a hole or a crack has occurred in the tube. This is because when the tube has holes or cracks, the high-temperature atmosphere gas in the furnace is drawn into the tube from the holes or cracks in the tube, and the exhaust gas temperature rises due to the heat energy. This is because the preheating air temperature also rises.

従って、データ処理装置に、各測定値と当該ゾーンの検出平均値との差に応じた異常パターンを予め設定しておき、各ラジアントチューブについて測定した予熱空気温度、排ガス温度を当該ゾーンの検出平均値と比較すれば、異常の有無だけでなく異常部位・異常形態をも判定できるようになる。   Therefore, an abnormal pattern corresponding to the difference between each measured value and the detected average value of the zone is set in advance in the data processing device, and the preheated air temperature and exhaust gas temperature measured for each radiant tube are detected average of the zone. By comparing with the value, it is possible to determine not only the presence / absence of abnormality but also the abnormal part / abnormal form.

その際、予熱空気温度と排ガス温度の正常範囲は、炉やラジアントチューブの形式によって異なるので、事前調査を行った後に設定しておくことが望ましい。しかしながら、大多数の正常バーナに比較して、異常が発生しているバーナには、温度のズレが生じるため、ズレが生じたバーナを点検して異常が発生していれば、異常の範囲として設定すれば良い。   At this time, the normal ranges of the preheated air temperature and the exhaust gas temperature vary depending on the type of the furnace and the radiant tube, and therefore it is desirable to set them after conducting a preliminary survey. However, compared with the majority of normal burners, the burner in which an abnormality has occurred has a temperature deviation. Set it.

また、データ処理装置に、予め異常あるいは警告を表示すべき値と、異常パターンを設定しておき、異常時には警報とともに異常パターンを表示するようにすることが望ましい。   Further, it is desirable to set a value and an abnormal pattern for displaying an abnormality or warning in advance in the data processing apparatus, and to display the abnormal pattern together with an alarm when an abnormality occurs.

なお、異常あるいは警告を表示すべき値は、一律に決まるものではなく、ラジアントチューブ炉及びそれを構成する機器の形式、あるいは保全の考え方によって適宜決定するものである。   In addition, the value which should display abnormality or a warning is not decided uniformly, but is suitably determined by the type of a radiant tube furnace and the apparatus which comprises it, or the view of maintenance.

さらには、各測定値の傾向管理を行うようにすれば、異常の進行を防止する手段を採ることも可能になる。   Furthermore, if trend management of each measurement value is performed, it is possible to take means for preventing the progress of abnormality.

図2にゾーンの炉温が700℃〜750℃の範囲と、850℃〜900℃の範囲のゾーン燃料(Cガス)流量に対する1個のラジアントチューブの予熱空気温度と排ガス温度の関係を示す。   FIG. 2 shows the relationship between the preheated air temperature of one radiant tube and the exhaust gas temperature with respect to the zone fuel (C gas) flow rate in the range where the zone furnace temperature is 700 ° C. to 750 ° C. and in the range of 850 ° C. to 900 ° C.

図2より、予熱空気温度と排ガス温度は、ゾーンの燃料流量のみならず、ゾーンの炉温の影響も受けることが明らかであるため、単純にサンプリングデータの平均値を取った場合は判定精度が低下する。   From FIG. 2, it is clear that the preheated air temperature and exhaust gas temperature are affected not only by the fuel flow rate of the zone but also by the furnace temperature of the zone. descend.

従って、前記分析精度を向上させるためには、予熱空気温度と排ガス温度を一定期間、一定周期でサンプリングして蓄積した後、ゾーンの炉温と燃料流量が一定範囲の区間のデータを抽出し、平均値を取ることが望ましい。   Therefore, in order to improve the analysis accuracy, the preheated air temperature and the exhaust gas temperature are sampled and accumulated in a certain period and a certain period, and then the data of the zone in which the zone furnace temperature and the fuel flow rate are in a certain range are extracted, It is desirable to take an average value.

溶融亜鉛めっき鋼板製造ラインのラジアントチューブ炉の、燃焼空気配管と排ガス配管のサンプリング孔に、前記予熱空気温度測定器及び排ガス温度測定器としてシース熱電対を設置し、以下のデータ抽出範囲において、各ラジアントチューブの排ガス温度及び予熱空気温度を検出した。   In the sampling hole of the combustion air piping and exhaust gas piping of the radiant tube furnace of the hot dip galvanized steel sheet production line, a sheath thermocouple is installed as the preheating air temperature measuring device and exhaust gas temperature measuring device, and in each of the following data extraction ranges, The exhaust gas temperature and preheated air temperature of the radiant tube were detected.

(データ抽出範囲)
炉温:850℃以上、900℃以下
燃料:
種類:Cガス(4600kcal/Nm3
流量:180Nm3/H以上、200Nm3/H以下
(Data extraction range)
Furnace temperature: 850 ° C or higher and 900 ° C or lower Fuel:
Type: C gas (4600kcal / Nm 3 )
Flow rate: 180Nm 3 / H or more, 200Nm 3 / H below

データ蓄積部12では、その時のゾーンの炉内温度、ゾーン燃料流量を1分間隔で3日間サンプリングし、データ処理装置13では、一定炉温範囲、燃料流量範囲の各ラジアントチューブの排ガス温度及び予熱空気温度を抽出し、その平均値をとった。   The data storage unit 12 samples the furnace temperature and zone fuel flow rate of the zone at that time for 3 days at an interval of 1 minute, and the data processing unit 13 exhausts the exhaust gas temperature and preheating of each radiant tube in the constant furnace temperature range and fuel flow rate range. The air temperature was extracted and the average value was taken.

図3にデータ処理装置13の出力を示す。図3(a)はNo.1ゾーンの出力、(b)はNo.2ゾーンの出力を示したものである。   FIG. 3 shows the output of the data processing device 13. FIG. 1 zone output, (b) No. The output of 2 zones is shown.

図3(a)に示すNo.1ゾーンでは、3番のラジアントチューブの予熱空気温度と排ガス温度が共に低く、バーナ異常と判定した。また、9番のラジアントチューブの予熱空気温度が低く、排ガス温度が高いので、空気予熱器異常と判定した。   No. shown in FIG. In one zone, the preheated air temperature and exhaust gas temperature of the No. 3 radiant tube were both low, and burner abnormality was determined. Moreover, since the preheating air temperature of the No. 9 radiant tube was low and the exhaust gas temperature was high, it was determined that the air preheater was abnormal.

図3(b)に示すNo.2ゾーンでは、5番のラジアントチューブの予熱空気温度と排ガス温度が共に高く、チューブ異常と判定した。   No. shown in FIG. In zone 2, the preheated air temperature and exhaust gas temperature of the No. 5 radiant tube were both high, and the tube was judged abnormal.

そして、前記判定は、その後の定期修理のラジアントチューブ点検の結果、妥当であることが判明した。   And the said determination became clear as a result of the radiant tube inspection of a subsequent periodic repair.

[実施例2]
図4にラジアントチューブ炉について本発明の燃焼異常診断方法の第2の例を適用する場合の構成例を示す。図4中、図1と同一符号は同一部品或いは相当部品を示し、詳細な説明を省略する。
[Example 2]
FIG. 4 shows a configuration example in the case where the second example of the combustion abnormality diagnosis method of the present invention is applied to a radiant tube furnace. 4, the same reference numerals as those in FIG. 1 denote the same parts or corresponding parts, and detailed description thereof is omitted.

本発明方法の第2の例を実施する場合、図1に示した第1の例の構成に加えて、各バーナ2の、燃料配管5にバーナ前圧力測定器8をさらに設置する。   When the second example of the method of the present invention is implemented, in addition to the configuration of the first example shown in FIG. 1, a pre-burner pressure measuring device 8 is further installed in the fuel pipe 5 of each burner 2.

そして、前記バーナ前圧力測定器8、予熱空気温度測定器9、排ガス温度測定器10で測定された各測定データは、データ収集装置11、データ蓄積部12を介してデータ処理装置13に送る。   Each measurement data measured by the pre-burner pressure measuring device 8, the preheating air temperature measuring device 9, and the exhaust gas temperature measuring device 10 is sent to the data processing device 13 via the data collecting device 11 and the data storage unit 12.

データ処理装置13は、前記3種のデータ測定値に基づき、以下のようにして、燃焼系の異常の有無と、異常部位・異常形態を判定する。   Based on the three types of data measurement values, the data processing device 13 determines whether there is an abnormality in the combustion system and the abnormal part / abnormal form as follows.

下記表2に、ラジアントチューブ炉における燃焼装置の開放点検時に見つかった異常部位及び異常形態と、各種燃焼特性の計測値とを比較調査して見出した、異常部位・異常形態と、前記3種のデータの測定値と当該ゾーンの検出平均値との差との関係を示す。   In Table 2 below, the abnormal part and abnormal form found during the open inspection of the combustion device in the radiant tube furnace and the measurement values of various combustion characteristics were found, and the abnormal part and abnormal form were found. The relationship between the measured value of data and the difference between the detected average value of the zone is shown.

Figure 2011012928
Figure 2011012928

表2に示すように、バーナ前圧力、予熱空気温度、排ガス温度を各バーナについて測定し、これら検出値を当該ゾーンの検出平均値と比較すれば、燃焼系の異常の有無だけでなく、異常部位及び異常形態をも判定することが可能になることが分かる。   As shown in Table 2, if the pre-burner pressure, preheated air temperature, and exhaust gas temperature are measured for each burner and these detected values are compared with the detected average value of the zone, It turns out that it becomes possible to determine a site | part and an abnormal form.

従って、データ処理装置に、各測定値と当該ゾーンの検出平均値との差に応じた異常パターンを予め設定しておき、各バーナについて測定したバーナ前圧力、予熱空気温度、排ガス温度を当該ゾーンの検出平均値と比較すれば、異常の有無だけでなく異常部位・異常形態をも判定できるようになる。   Therefore, an abnormal pattern corresponding to the difference between each measured value and the detected average value of the zone is preset in the data processing device, and the pre-burner pressure, preheated air temperature, and exhaust gas temperature measured for each burner are set in the zone. Compared with the detected average value, it is possible to determine not only the presence / absence of abnormality but also the abnormal part / abnormal form.

図5に本発明による測定結果の一例を示す。
この測定結果によると、No.2のバーナは、予熱空気温度は低い方で、排ガス温度は高い方で異常判定値を超えており、表2の異常パターンEと一致しているので、No.2のバーナついては、空気予熱器の溶損あるいは穴開きと判定できる。従って、消火の措置をとり、次の保全日までに空気予熱器の予備を用意した上で交換した。
FIG. 5 shows an example of measurement results according to the present invention.
According to this measurement result, no. The burner No. 2 has a lower preheated air temperature and a higher exhaust gas temperature, which exceeds the abnormality determination value, which is consistent with the abnormality pattern E in Table 2. For the burner No. 2, it can be determined that the air preheater is melted or perforated. Therefore, fire extinguishing measures were taken, and a spare air preheater was prepared and replaced by the next maintenance date.

また、No.5のバーナは、バーナ前圧力が高い方で、予熱空気温度と排ガス温度は低い方で、それぞれ警告値を超えており、表2の異常パターンBと一致しているので、No.5のバーナについては、バーナ部で、詰まりあるいは閉塞が生じたと判定できる。従って、燃焼空気配管のバルブにより空気比を最適に調整した上で操業し、次回保全日でバーナの清掃を行った。   No. The burner No. 5 has a higher pre-burner pressure, a lower preheated air temperature and a lower exhaust gas temperature, each exceeding a warning value, and is consistent with the abnormal pattern B in Table 2. Regarding the burner No. 5, it can be determined that clogging or blockage has occurred at the burner portion. Therefore, the operation was performed after the air ratio was optimally adjusted by the valve of the combustion air piping, and the burner was cleaned on the next maintenance day.

一方、従来技術の場合、先に述べたように燃焼系の異常を、いわゆる「診断」することは出来ず、異常の検出のみを行うことになる。例えば特許文献1で開示された予熱空気温度を指標とした検出方法では、表1のA、B、D、Eの異常パターンによる異常は検出できるものの、Cの異常パターンは検出できないうえ、異常がどういう形態で発生しているかは判定できない。   On the other hand, in the case of the prior art, as described above, the abnormality of the combustion system cannot be so-called “diagnosed”, and only the abnormality is detected. For example, in the detection method using the preheated air temperature as an index disclosed in Patent Document 1, an abnormality due to the abnormal patterns A, B, D, and E in Table 1 can be detected, but an abnormal pattern of C cannot be detected. It cannot be determined in what form it occurs.

本発明は上記の例に限らず、各請求項に記載された技術的思想の範疇であれば、適宜実施の形態を変更しても良いことは言うまでもない。   The present invention is not limited to the above example, and it goes without saying that the embodiments may be changed as appropriate within the scope of the technical idea described in each claim.

例えば、図1の実施例ではU字型の、また図4の実施例ではW字型のラジアントチューブを使用したが、シングルエンド型のラジアントチューブを使用した場合でも適用できる。また、ばらつきの影響を考慮しないのであれば、データを蓄積せず、同一の炉温、同一の燃料流量時の瞬時値で評価しても良い。さらに、溶融亜鉛めっきラインのみでなく、ラジアントチューブを使用する燃焼炉であればどのような燃焼炉でも適用可能である。   For example, although the U-shaped radiant tube is used in the embodiment of FIG. 1 and the W-shaped radiant tube is used in the embodiment of FIG. 4, the present invention can be applied even when a single-ended radiant tube is used. Further, if the influence of variation is not taken into consideration, the data may not be accumulated and the evaluation may be performed using instantaneous values at the same furnace temperature and the same fuel flow rate. Furthermore, not only a hot dip galvanizing line but any combustion furnace that uses a radiant tube is applicable.

以上の本発明は、燃焼空気の空気予熱器を付帯する多数本のバーナの、燃料系及び燃焼空気系を一系統で制御する燃焼ゾーンを複数有する熱処理炉であれば、ラジアントチューブ炉の燃焼異常診断に限らず、その他の燃焼炉の燃焼異常診断にも有効である。   If the present invention described above is a heat treatment furnace having a plurality of combustion zones in which a fuel system and a combustion air system are controlled in a single system, a combustion abnormality of a radiant tube furnace, if there are a plurality of burners attached with an air preheater for combustion air. It is effective not only for diagnosis but also for combustion abnormality diagnosis of other combustion furnaces.

1 ゾーン
2 バーナ
3 チューブ
4 空気予熱器
5 燃料配管
6 燃焼空気配管
7 排ガス配管
8 バーナ前圧力測定器
9 予熱空気温度測定器
10 排ガス温度測定器
11 データ収集装置
12 データ蓄積部
13 データ処理装置
DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 Zone 2 Burner 3 Tube 4 Air preheater 5 Fuel piping 6 Combustion air piping 7 Exhaust gas piping 8 Burner pre-pressure measuring device 9 Preheating air temperature measuring device 10 Exhaust gas temperature measuring device 11 Data collection device 12 Data storage part 13 Data processing device

Claims (13)

燃焼空気の空気予熱器を付帯する多数本のラジアントチューブの、燃料系及び燃焼空気系をそれぞれ一系統で制御する燃焼ゾーンを、複数備えた燃焼炉において、
前記多数本のラジアントチューブの、各々の予熱空気及び排ガスの温度を検出し、
これら検出値を当該ゾーンの検出平均値と比較することにより燃焼系の異常の有無と異常部位・異常形態を判断することを特徴とする燃焼炉の燃焼異常診断方法。
In a combustion furnace provided with a plurality of combustion zones each controlling a fuel system and a combustion air system in a single system of a plurality of radiant tubes attached with an air preheater of combustion air,
Detecting the temperature of each preheated air and exhaust gas of the multiple radiant tubes;
A method for diagnosing combustion abnormality in a combustion furnace, wherein the presence or absence of abnormality of the combustion system and the abnormal part / abnormal form are determined by comparing these detected values with the detected average value of the zone.
当該ゾーンの検出平均値に対して、
予熱空気温度、排ガス温度の何れもが、基準範囲以上低い場合には、
バーナあるいはバーナに燃料を供給する配管に詰まり又は閉塞が生じたと判定することを特徴とする請求項1に記載の燃焼炉の燃焼異常診断方法。
For the detection average value of the zone,
If both the preheated air temperature and exhaust gas temperature are lower than the reference range,
2. The combustion abnormality diagnosis method for a combustion furnace according to claim 1, wherein it is determined that the burner or a pipe for supplying fuel to the burner is clogged or blocked.
当該ゾーンの検出平均値に対して、
予熱空気温度、排ガス温度の何れもが、基準範囲以上高い場合には、
チューブに穴開き又は亀裂が生じたと判定することを特徴とする請求項1に記載の燃焼炉の燃焼異常診断方法。
For the detection average value of the zone,
If both the preheated air temperature and exhaust gas temperature are higher than the reference range,
The combustion abnormality diagnosis method for a combustion furnace according to claim 1, wherein it is determined that a hole or a crack has occurred in the tube.
当該ゾーンの検出平均値に対して、
予熱空気温度は基準範囲以上低く、排ガス温度は基準範囲以上高い場合には、
空気予熱器に溶損又は穴開きが生じたと判定することを特徴とする請求項1に記載の燃焼炉の燃焼異常診断方法。
For the detection average value of the zone,
If the preheating air temperature is lower than the reference range and the exhaust gas temperature is higher than the reference range,
2. The combustion abnormality diagnosis method for a combustion furnace according to claim 1, wherein the air preheater is determined to have melted or perforated.
当該ゾーンの検出平均値に対して、
予熱空気温度、排ガス温度の何れもが、基準範囲以上低い場合には、バーナあるいはバーナに燃料を供給する配管に詰まり又は閉塞が生じたと判定し、
予熱空気温度、排ガス温度の何れもが、基準範囲以上高い場合には、チューブに穴開き又は亀裂が生じたと判定し、
予熱空気温度は基準範囲以上低く、排ガス温度は基準範囲以上高い場合には、空気予熱器に溶損又は穴開きが生じたと判定することを特徴とする請求項1に記載の燃焼炉の燃焼異常診断方法。
For the detection average value of the zone,
When both the preheating air temperature and the exhaust gas temperature are lower than the reference range, it is determined that the burner or the piping that supplies fuel to the burner is clogged or clogged.
If both the preheated air temperature and the exhaust gas temperature are higher than the reference range, it is determined that a hole or crack has occurred in the tube.
The combustion abnormality in a combustion furnace according to claim 1, wherein when the preheating air temperature is lower than the reference range and the exhaust gas temperature is higher than the reference range, it is determined that the air preheater has melted or perforated. Diagnosis method.
請求項1に記載の燃焼異常診断方法において、
前記多数本のラジアントチューブの、各々のバーナ前圧力を更に検出し、
これら検出値を当該ゾーンの検出平均値と比較することにより燃焼系の異常の有無と異常部位・異常形態を判断することを特徴とする燃焼炉の燃焼異常診断方法。
In the combustion abnormality diagnostic method according to claim 1,
Further detecting the pre-burner pressure of each of the multiple radiant tubes;
A method for diagnosing combustion abnormality in a combustion furnace, wherein the presence or absence of abnormality of the combustion system and the abnormal part / abnormal form are determined by comparing these detected values with the detected average value of the zone.
当該ゾーンの検出平均値に対して、
バーナ前圧力、予熱空気温度、排ガス温度の何れもが、基準範囲以上低い場合には、
バーナ前圧力測定位置より供給側の燃料配管で、詰まりあるいは閉塞が生じたと判定することを特徴とする請求項6に記載の燃焼炉の燃焼異常診断方法。
For the detection average value of the zone,
If any of the pre-burner pressure, preheating air temperature, and exhaust gas temperature is lower than the reference range,
The combustion abnormality diagnosis method for a combustion furnace according to claim 6, wherein it is determined that clogging or blockage has occurred in the fuel pipe on the supply side from the pre-burner pressure measurement position.
当該ゾーンの検出平均値に対して、
基準範囲以上に、バーナ前圧力が高く、予熱空気温度と排ガス温度が低い場合には、
バーナ部で、詰まりあるいは閉塞が生じたと判定することを特徴とする請求項6に記載の燃焼炉の燃焼異常診断方法。
For the detection average value of the zone,
If the pre-burner pressure is high and the preheating air temperature and exhaust gas temperature are low above the reference range,
7. The combustion abnormality diagnosis method for a combustion furnace according to claim 6, wherein it is determined that the burner portion is clogged or blocked.
当該ゾーンの検出平均値に対して、
バーナ前圧力が基準範囲以上高く、予熱空気温度と排ガス温度は基準範囲内にある場合には、
チューブに変形を生じたと判定することを特徴とする請求項6に記載の燃焼炉の燃焼異常診断方法。
For the detection average value of the zone,
If the pre-burner pressure is higher than the reference range and the preheated air temperature and exhaust gas temperature are within the reference range,
The combustion abnormality diagnosis method for a combustion furnace according to claim 6, wherein it is determined that deformation has occurred in the tube.
当該ゾーンの検出平均値に対して、
予熱空気温度と排ガス温度は基準範囲以上高く、バーナ前圧力は基準範囲内にある場合には、
チューブに穴開き又は亀裂を生じたと判定することを特徴とする請求項6に記載の燃焼炉の燃焼異常診断方法。
For the detection average value of the zone,
If the preheated air temperature and exhaust gas temperature are higher than the reference range and the pre-burner pressure is within the reference range,
7. The combustion abnormality diagnosis method for a combustion furnace according to claim 6, wherein it is determined that a hole or a crack has occurred in the tube.
当該ゾーンの検出平均値に対して、
基準範囲以上に、予熱空気温度が低く、排ガス温度が高く、バーナ前圧力は基準範囲内にある場合には、
空気予熱器に溶損又は穴開きを生じたと判定することを特徴とする請求項6に記載の燃焼炉の燃焼異常診断方法。
For the detection average value of the zone,
If the preheated air temperature is lower than the reference range, the exhaust gas temperature is high, and the pre-burner pressure is within the reference range,
The combustion abnormality diagnosis method for a combustion furnace according to claim 6, wherein it is determined that the air preheater has melted or perforated.
当該ゾーンの検出平均値に対して、
バーナ前圧力、予熱空気温度、排ガス温度の何れもが、基準範囲以上低い場合には、バーナ前圧力測定位置より供給側の燃料配管で詰まりあるいは閉塞が生じたと判定し、
基準範囲以上に、バーナ前圧力が高く、予熱空気温度と排ガス温度が低い場合には、バーナ部の詰まりあるいは閉塞が生じたと判定し、
バーナ前圧力が基準範囲以上高く、予熱空気温度と排ガス温度は基準範囲内にある場合には、チューブに変形を生じたと判定し、
予熱空気温度と排ガス温度は基準範囲以上高く、バーナ前圧力は基準範囲内にある場合には、チューブに穴開き又は亀裂を生じたと判定し、
基準範囲以上に、予熱空気温度が低く、排ガス温度が高く、バーナ前圧力は基準範囲内にある場合には、空気予熱器に溶損又は穴開きを生じたと判定することを特徴とする請求項6に記載の燃焼異常診断方法。
For the detection average value of the zone,
If all of the pre-burner pressure, preheated air temperature, and exhaust gas temperature are lower than the reference range, it is determined that the fuel pipe on the supply side is clogged or blocked from the pre-burner pressure measurement position.
If the pre-burner pressure is higher than the reference range, and the preheating air temperature and exhaust gas temperature are low, it is determined that the burner section is clogged or clogged,
If the pre-burner pressure is higher than the reference range and the preheated air temperature and exhaust gas temperature are within the reference range, it is determined that the tube has been deformed,
If the preheated air temperature and exhaust gas temperature are higher than the reference range and the pre-burner pressure is within the reference range, it is determined that the tube has perforated or cracked,
When the preheating air temperature is lower than the reference range, the exhaust gas temperature is high, and the pre-burner pressure is within the reference range, it is determined that the air preheater has melted or perforated. 6. The combustion abnormality diagnosis method according to 6.
前記ゾーンの検出平均値は、炉温と燃料の流量が一定の範囲のデータを抽出して得たものであることを特徴とする請求項1〜12の何れかに記載の燃焼異常診断方法。   The combustion abnormality diagnosis method according to any one of claims 1 to 12, wherein the detected average value of the zone is obtained by extracting data in a range in which the furnace temperature and the fuel flow rate are in a certain range.
JP2009159234A 2009-07-03 2009-07-03 Combustion abnormality diagnosis method for combustion furnace Active JP5428593B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2009159234A JP5428593B2 (en) 2009-07-03 2009-07-03 Combustion abnormality diagnosis method for combustion furnace

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2009159234A JP5428593B2 (en) 2009-07-03 2009-07-03 Combustion abnormality diagnosis method for combustion furnace

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2011012928A true JP2011012928A (en) 2011-01-20
JP5428593B2 JP5428593B2 (en) 2014-02-26

Family

ID=43592011

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2009159234A Active JP5428593B2 (en) 2009-07-03 2009-07-03 Combustion abnormality diagnosis method for combustion furnace

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP5428593B2 (en)

Cited By (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR101344503B1 (en) 2012-09-27 2013-12-24 현대제철 주식회사 Radiation pipe burner
CN105043952A (en) * 2015-05-27 2015-11-11 上海理工大学 Comprehensive test apparatus for coal or biomass combustion flue gas pollutants, and method thereof
JP2016109420A (en) * 2014-12-03 2016-06-20 Jfeスチール株式会社 Combustion management system of heat treatment facility
CN108120310A (en) * 2017-11-22 2018-06-05 南京钢铁股份有限公司 A kind of roller bottom stove self preheating burner abnormal examination and processing method
KR102139993B1 (en) 2019-04-02 2020-07-31 주식회사 포스코 Appartus for detecting deformation of radiant tube for annealing furnace
CN116045658A (en) * 2023-03-07 2023-05-02 海南医学院 A multi-temperature zone tube furnace capable of real-time detection of abnormal gases
CN118246907A (en) * 2024-05-28 2024-06-25 西安四腾环境科技有限公司 A consumables management system and method for waste gas treatment
TWI875097B (en) * 2023-07-25 2025-03-01 中國鋼鐵股份有限公司 Burner monitoring system and burner monitoring method

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH01181013A (en) * 1988-01-13 1989-07-19 Babcock Hitachi Kk Air preheater performance diagnostic method
JPH05312318A (en) * 1992-05-01 1993-11-22 Sumitomo Metal Ind Ltd Method for sensing abnormal state of burner
JPH0813040A (en) * 1994-07-04 1996-01-16 Nippon Steel Corp Direct-fire reduction heating apparatus for steel strip and combustion method thereof
JPH0960867A (en) * 1995-08-28 1997-03-04 Sumitomo Metal Ind Ltd Abnormal burner detection method
JP2003004229A (en) * 2001-06-25 2003-01-08 Nippon Steel Corp Radiant tube burner combustion failure detection method and apparatus

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH01181013A (en) * 1988-01-13 1989-07-19 Babcock Hitachi Kk Air preheater performance diagnostic method
JPH05312318A (en) * 1992-05-01 1993-11-22 Sumitomo Metal Ind Ltd Method for sensing abnormal state of burner
JPH0813040A (en) * 1994-07-04 1996-01-16 Nippon Steel Corp Direct-fire reduction heating apparatus for steel strip and combustion method thereof
JPH0960867A (en) * 1995-08-28 1997-03-04 Sumitomo Metal Ind Ltd Abnormal burner detection method
JP2003004229A (en) * 2001-06-25 2003-01-08 Nippon Steel Corp Radiant tube burner combustion failure detection method and apparatus

Cited By (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR101344503B1 (en) 2012-09-27 2013-12-24 현대제철 주식회사 Radiation pipe burner
JP2016109420A (en) * 2014-12-03 2016-06-20 Jfeスチール株式会社 Combustion management system of heat treatment facility
CN105043952A (en) * 2015-05-27 2015-11-11 上海理工大学 Comprehensive test apparatus for coal or biomass combustion flue gas pollutants, and method thereof
CN108120310A (en) * 2017-11-22 2018-06-05 南京钢铁股份有限公司 A kind of roller bottom stove self preheating burner abnormal examination and processing method
KR102139993B1 (en) 2019-04-02 2020-07-31 주식회사 포스코 Appartus for detecting deformation of radiant tube for annealing furnace
CN116045658A (en) * 2023-03-07 2023-05-02 海南医学院 A multi-temperature zone tube furnace capable of real-time detection of abnormal gases
TWI875097B (en) * 2023-07-25 2025-03-01 中國鋼鐵股份有限公司 Burner monitoring system and burner monitoring method
CN118246907A (en) * 2024-05-28 2024-06-25 西安四腾环境科技有限公司 A consumables management system and method for waste gas treatment

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP5428593B2 (en) 2014-02-26

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP5428593B2 (en) Combustion abnormality diagnosis method for combustion furnace
CN101858591B (en) Diagnosis and prevention system and method of high temperature corrosion state of boiler water cooled wall
CN109992825A (en) A kind of real-time lifetime estimation method of four main tubes of boiler for considering wall thickness reduction and crossing heat affecting
CN102338471A (en) Optimal Operation Monitoring Method of Heating Furnace
CN103267684B (en) A kind of station boiler pressure restraining element life consumption acquisition methods and system
CN115755717B (en) Kiln equipment operation detecting system based on thing networking
KR100964904B1 (en) Heater for Annealing Furnace
CN110738328A (en) Boiler receives anti-explosion preventive maintenance system of face abrasionproof
JP7142545B2 (en) Boiler tube leak diagnostic system and boiler tube leak diagnostic method
CN106439775B (en) A kind of boiler tube foreign matters from being blocked on-line monitoring method based on temperature profile parameter
JP5838522B2 (en) Damage diagnosis method for radiant tube recuperator
CN119045562B (en) Automatic measurement and automatic adjustment control system for temperature of coke oven head
JP7155988B2 (en) Method for detecting defective combustion of radiant tube burner
CN217173633U (en) Device for cleaning gas system on line
JP6822435B2 (en) Elucidation device and elucidation method of the cause of deterioration of fuel intensity in the heating furnace
KR101289139B1 (en) Fuel pre-heating apparatus
CN117371246A (en) Screen type superheater thermal deviation identification method based on wall temperature
CN103088191B (en) The method for early warning of vertical continuous annealing furnace radiation pipe burner tip and interchanger thereof
US12504232B2 (en) Furnace and method for operating a furnace
KR100715418B1 (en) Heat exchange abnormality detection device and BF paper preheating device having same
US20230400254A1 (en) Furnace and method for operating a furnace
CN103063806B (en) Method for detecting abnormity of remaining oxygen in thermal treatment furnace
JP4159028B2 (en) Burner abnormality detection method for continuous annealing furnace
KR102112549B1 (en) Apparatus for detecting hole of tube of the channel type recuperator
CN115712292A (en) Online energy efficiency diagnosis and evaluation method for steel rolling heating furnace

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20110825

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20121011

A711 Notification of change in applicant

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A712

Effective date: 20121011

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20130214

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20130226

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20130425

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20131105

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20131118

R151 Written notification of patent or utility model registration

Ref document number: 5428593

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R151

S533 Written request for registration of change of name

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313533

R350 Written notification of registration of transfer

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350