JP2010248452A - Detergent composition and cleaning tool - Google Patents

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a detergent composition excellent in detergent properties and stability, and able to exhibit odor eliminating effect caused by the masking function after the cleaning by the means of sugar cane extracts, and to provide a detergent composition and a cleaning tool which can be suitably used not only for application tools for water periphery or infant but also for a cleaner for interior surfaces etc. of automobiles. <P>SOLUTION: Basically, a surfactant, a sugar cane extract, and water are combined. If needed, alcohols, an alkaline component or an acid component as a detergent auxiliary agent, essential oil, and the like are further combined thereto. The sugar cane extracts mainly function as an odor eliminating component. The sugar cane extracts can provide a human with high odor eliminating effect caused by the masking effect even though malodorous substance cannot be completely eliminated. The cleaning tool can be obtained by immersing a sheet like cloth with the detergent composition. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2011,JPO&INPIT

Description

  The present invention is approved as a food additive for all of the components of the composition, particularly a cleaning composition used for removing stains on water-contained areas such as kitchens and washrooms in the home, and interior surfaces of automobiles. In addition to improving safety by adopting the components that are used, masking the odor components adhering to the object while removing dirt adhering to the object (object to be cleaned / surface to be cleaned) It is related with the cleaning composition which improves a deodorizing effect | action by doing and is also excellent also in the microbe elimination effect | action. The present invention also relates to a cleaning tool comprising a sheet-like cloth impregnated with the cleaning composition.

  If you try to wipe off dirt such as food and dishes in the kitchen such as a range or refrigerator, baby chairs, baby beds, baby tables, child seats, etc. It is conceivable that the components in the cleaning composition impregnated or adhered to the cleaning agent adhere to the food or remain on the object after being wiped up. In such cases, infants may lick foods with residual ingredients and ingest them directly, or infants may touch the hands and feet and indirectly ingest residual ingredients. The remaining components remain attached to the skin, causing skin problems and dermatitis.

  Therefore, conventionally, the object was wiped up only with water without using the cleaning composition, or the object wiped up with the cleaning composition was wiped up again with water.

  However, there is a limit to the cleanability just by wiping the target object with only water wiping without using the cleaning composition, and there may remain anxiety about whether the dirt adhering to the target object has been wiped off cleanly. Many. In particular, odor components and bacteria adhering to an object cannot often be removed and sterilized only by wiping with water.

  On the other hand, studies have been conducted on liquid cleaning compositions for kitchens that use food additives as cleaning components and have been provided with safety, cleaning power, sterilization power, and the like (see, for example, Patent Document 1). The liquid cleaning composition for kitchens proposed by Patent Document 1 has a sucrose fatty acid ester having an HLB value of 14 to 20 to 1 to 15% by weight, and a polyglycerin fatty acid ester having an HLB value of 12 to 17 to 0. 5 to 10 wt%, monoglycerin fatty acid ester 0.3 to 3 wt%, phosphate represented by a specific chemical formula 0.1 to 3 wt%, the total amount of the above three is 5 to 20 wt% The weight ratio of the phosphate to the three is defined as 1/20 to 1/5.

  The cleaning composition proposed by the above Patent Document 1 uses a surfactant (polyglycerin fatty acid ester, monoglycerin fatty acid ester) designated as a food additive by the Food Sanitation Law in order to improve safety. ing.

JP 2003-261898 A

  However, although the cleaning composition proposed by Patent Document 1 is a liquid cleaning composition, it can be said that the cleaning composition is suitable for cleaning dishes and kitchenware. It is unsuitable as a composition. Even if it can be used for removing dirt from the interior surface of an automobile, it is not satisfactory because it has a weaker cleaning power than a commercially available automobile cleaner, and the cleaning composition itself is expensive. Therefore, there is a problem that the cost for removing the dirt is too high as compared with a commercially available car cleaner.

  The present invention has been made in view of the above situation. That is, the present invention is not only excellent in cleanability and safety with respect to water-use places such as kitchens in general households where hygiene management is important, and appliances used for infants (for example, baby bottles, tableware, etc.), as well as cleaning. An object of the present invention is to provide a cleaning composition and a cleaning tool that exhibit an excellent deodorizing action later and are also useful for deodorizing food waste and rancidity of edible oil, and excrement and vomiting of infants.

  In addition, the present invention provides a cleaning composition and a cleaning tool that can be suitably used not only for the above-mentioned water-spotted parts and appliances used for infants but also for removing dirt from automobile interior surfaces and the like. The purpose is to do.

  The cleaning composition according to the present invention is basically composed of a combination of a surfactant, a sugar cane extract, and water, and if necessary, an alcohol, an alkaline component as a cleaning aid, or It is constituted by further combining an acid component, essential oil and the like. Moreover, the cleaning tool which concerns on this invention impregnates the said cleaning composition in the sheet-like cloth.

  Specific examples of the surfactant include glycerin fatty acid ester, sorbitan fatty acid ester, sucrose fatty acid ester, and polyoxyethylene sorbitan fatty acid ester.

  The sugarcane extract exhibits an effect of chemically neutralizing or decomposing malodorous substances, and an effect of making the malodor less noticeable by a sugarcane-derived aroma component. Specifically, even if the malodorous substance is not completely erased, the masking action for the malodorous substance can be exhibited to make a person feel a high deodorizing effect. In addition, since there is no selectivity for specific odor components, it is effective only for acidic odors and alkaline odors only, and it has no deodorizing effect for other odor components. It exhibits a deodorizing effect evenly. In addition, sugarcane extract is originally sugar, so it has a good flavor and does not feel bitter or darker than other natural extracts. Don't make it happen. Therefore, it has the advantage that the cleaner performance (cleaning performance) of the cleaning composition is not disturbed. Furthermore, compared with other deodorant components, it is excellent in compatibility with detergent components such as surfactants and liquid stability, and some of the components (such as inorganic alkali components) can be left standing for a long time. There is no inconvenience of precipitation.

  The cleaning composition according to the present invention is based on the combination of the surfactant, sugarcane extract and water described above, and this structure can achieve both a cleaning effect and a deodorizing effect.

  However, sufficient cleaning properties may not be obtained with the above-described surfactant alone. In particular, for oil stains in the kitchen, etc., it is considered that the oil and fat solubility in the above-mentioned surfactant is lacking, so that it is advantageous to add alcohols in view of this point.

  Since the cleaning composition according to the present invention is an aqueous formulation, the antiseptic action is also improved. In order to enhance the antiseptic action, it may be possible to add a preservative that can be used as a food additive, but it is desirable that such a preservative is not used as much as possible in view of side effects and the like.

  In addition, there are some stains that cannot be easily removed, such as water stains and plastic surfaces. For this type of soil, it is beneficial to add an acid component or an alkali component. In particular, baking soda (sodium hydrogen carbonate), which is an alkali component, not only improves the pH of the cleaning composition and enhances the cleaning effect, but also when the water contained in the cleaning composition evaporates, Since the fine particles are precipitated and work as abrasive particles, it helps to improve the cleaner property.

  The aqueous solvent is useful for improving the solubility of the aqueous stain.

  Furthermore, if essential oil is added, a fragrance | flavor effect | action improves and the detergency with respect to oil stains also improves.

  In the cleaning composition according to the present invention, the surfactant is selected from glycerin fatty acid ester, sorbitan fatty acid ester, sucrose fatty acid ester, and polyoxyethylene sorbitan fatty acid ester, and is used in one or a combination of two or more. . Surfactants are necessary to provide detergency. These surfactants are also said to exert a bacteriostatic effect that suppresses the activity of bacteria. A compounding quantity is 0.5-10.0 wt%, Preferably it is 1.0-6.0 wt%. If the amount is less than 0.5 wt%, the cleaning properties are insufficient, and if it exceeds 10.0 wt%, there is no problem with the cleaning properties, but the amount remaining on the object is increased and the finish is unfavorable. When it is 0.5 to 10.0 wt%, it is possible to satisfy both the cleaning property and the finishing property. The effect appears remarkably if the blending amount is 1.0 to 6.0 wt%.

  As alcohols, ethanol, propanol, isopropanol, butanol, isobutanol, benzyl alcohol and the like can be used. Alcohols exhibit sterilization and antiseptic effects, and also improve the solubility of oil stains and the like. The compounding quantity of alcohol is 5.0-35.0 wt%, Preferably it is 10.0-30.0 wt%. If it is less than 5.0 wt%, the solubility of the soil is insufficient, and sufficient antiseptic action cannot be expected. If it exceeds 35.0 wt%, the solubility of some water-soluble components will be poor and will precipitate, so the liquid stability will not be good. If it is 5.0-35.0 wt%, the solubility of stain | pollution | contamination and sufficient antiseptic | preservative effect will be exhibited, precipitation will not arise, and liquid stability is also favorable. In particular, this effect is prominent when the blending amount is 10.0 to 30.0 wt%.

  Acid components or alkaline components as cleaning aids include sodium nitrite, ammonia, hydrochloric acid, oxalic acid, tartaric acid, sodium hydroxide, glacial acetic acid, hydrogen peroxide, citric acid, succinic acid, gluconic acid, sodium bicarbonate, There are sodium carbonate, lactic acid, sodium polyphosphate, sodium sulfate, magnesium sulfate, malic acid, disodium hydrogen phosphate, sodium dihydrogen phosphate, etc., and the most suitable one is selected according to the type of dirt. For example, it is appropriate to select an acid component for oil stains and soils such as alkali components and scales. A compounding quantity is 0.05-6.0 wt%, Preferably it is 0.1-4.0 wt%. If the amount is less than 0.05 wt%, the improvement in cleaning properties due to addition cannot be obtained, and if it exceeds 6.0 wt%, it remains as a residue on the object, resulting in poor finish. When it is 0.05 to 6.0 wt%, the cleaning property is improved and no residue remains. This effect is prominent when the blending amount is 0.1 to 4.0 wt%.

  Examples of the aqueous solvent include glycerin and propylene glycol. By blending these, the detergency of water-based dirt is improved, and it is useful for improving workability. A compounding quantity is 0.5-5.0 wt%, Preferably it is 1.0-3.0 wt%. If the amount is less than 0.5 wt%, improvement in cleaning properties due to the addition cannot be obtained, and if it exceeds 5.0 wt%, drying of the liquid agent becomes worse and workability is impaired. When the content is 0.5 to 5.0 wt%, the cleaning property is improved, the liquid agent dries quickly, and the workability does not deteriorate. In particular, when the blending amount is 1.0 to 3.0 wt%, the improvement of the cleaning property and the quick drying property of the liquid agent appear remarkably.

  The essential oil includes orange oil (limonene) which is a terpene hydrocarbon extracted from trees and fruits, citronellal 1,8-cineole l-menthol and the like. Depending on the type, there are effects such as improved cleaning properties and improved antibacterial properties. A compounding quantity is 0.05-2.0 wt%, Preferably it is 0.1-1.0 wt%. If it is less than 0.05 wt%, it is difficult to obtain the effect of addition (fragrance / cleaning properties, etc.), and if it exceeds 2.0 wt%, it becomes cloudy and a transparent liquid cannot be obtained, resulting in poor fragrance. Moreover, since the influence with respect to a base material becomes large and the coating of the surface of a target object melt | dissolves, it is not preferable. When it is 0.05 to 2.0 wt%, it has abundant fragrance and cleanability and has little influence on the substrate. In particular, when the blending amount is 0.1 to 1.0 wt%, the effect is remarkable.

  Sugarcane extract functions mainly as a deodorant component. Conventionally used safe deodorants (green tea extract, perilla extract, mushroom extract, etc.) not only have problems such as bitterness, strong odor, and unique dark color, but they also eliminate odor components. Since the selectivity of the odor effect is high, there is a problem that a large deodorizing action can be obtained only for a specific odor component. On the other hand, sugarcane extract chemically neutralizes and decomposes malodorous substances and has the effect of making odorous substances inconspicuous by aroma components derived from sugarcane, and masking effect even if the malodorous substances are not completely eliminated It exhibits an excellent effect of allowing a person to feel a higher deodorizing effect.

  The compounding quantity of sugarcane extract is 0.1-3.0 wt%, Preferably it is 0.5-2.0 wt%. If it is less than 0.1 wt%, the deodorizing effect is weak, and if it exceeds 3.0 wt%, a sufficient deodorizing effect is obtained, so that no further addition is necessary. Moreover, since the amount remaining on the object increases, the finish becomes worse. When it is 0.1 to 3.0 wt%, a sufficient deodorizing effect is obtained and the finish is not deteriorated. In particular, when the blending amount is 0.5 to 2.0 wt%, the effect is remarkable.

  Water exhibits both the action of a solvent and the action of dissolving aqueous dirt. The amount used is the balance excluding surfactants, alcohols, cleaning aids, aqueous solvents, essential oils and sugarcane extracts.

  The cleaning composition according to the present invention can be suitably used to remove not only water around ordinary households such as kitchens and washrooms, but also the interior surface of automobiles. In particular, since the ingredients approved as food additives are adopted for all the constituents of the composition, it is excellent in hygiene safety, deodorization and sterilization. In particular, since the deodorizing effect is enhanced by masking the odor component adhering to the object, the effect of allowing the person to feel a high deodorizing effect due to the masking effect is exhibited. Since the cleaning tool according to the present invention is obtained by impregnating the above-mentioned cleaning composition into a sheet-like cloth, the same effects as described above are exhibited by its use.

  The cleaning composition according to the present invention can be used by impregnating a sheet-like cloth made of woven fabric or non-woven fabric. In addition, it can be used in the form of a spray like a spray or in the form of a liquid. However, when this spray form is adopted, after the cleaning composition is sprayed on the object, the object is crossed. It will wipe up things.

  There are no particular restrictions on the type of cloth to be impregnated with the cleaning composition, but for example, natural fiber cloth, synthetic fiber cloth, mixed fiber cloth in which natural fiber cloth and synthetic fiber cloth are mixed, etc. Is mentioned.

  Examples of the natural fiber cloth include a cotton cloth, a silk cloth, a hemp cloth, a wool cloth, and a tencel cloth. These natural fiber cloths may be used alone or in combination of two or more.

  Examples of synthetic fiber cloth include rayon cloth, polynosic cloth, cupra cloth, polyethylene cloth, polypropylene cloth, polybutene cloth, acetate cloth, promix cloth, vinylon cloth, nylon cloth, Examples include triacetate cloth, polychlore cloth, acrylic cloth, polyurethane cloth, polyethylene terephthalate cloth, polyester cloth, fluorine cloth, vinylidene cloth, and polyvinyl chloride cloth. These synthetic fiber cloths may be used alone or in combination of two or more.

  Examples of the mixed fiber cloth include those obtained by mixing the above-described natural fiber cloth and the above-described synthetic fiber cloth at an arbitrary mixing ratio.

  Among these, the cloth is preferably a cotton cloth, a rayon cloth, a nylon cloth, an acrylic cloth, a polyester cloth, and a mixed fiber cloth thereof, more preferably a cotton cloth. Can be mentioned. Moreover, it is preferable that the cloth has a twist and has a hollow cross-sectional structure. By using the cloth having such a structure, dust on the surface to which dirt is attached can be efficiently removed.

  Further, the cloth has a tensile strength in the longitudinal or transverse direction of 15 N / 5 cm or more, preferably 20 to 500 N / 5 cm, more preferably 30 to 300 N / 5 cm. If the tensile strength in the longitudinal direction or the transverse direction of the cloth is less than 15 N / 5 cm, the cloth strength is insufficient, so that the cloth may be broken during work.

  The cloth has a wet / wet strength ratio of 80% or more, preferably 100 to 120%, more preferably 105 to 115%. If the dry / wet strength ratio of the cloth is less than 80%, the strength of the cloth in the wet state is lowered. In particular, when the basis weight is low, the woven yarn may fall off or the cloth may be broken.

Also, cloth, basis weight 40 g / ^{m 2} or more, preferably, 40~200g / ^{m 2,} more preferably 50 to 100 g / ^{m 2.} If the weight of the cloth is less than 40 g / m ² , the total amount of the impregnating liquid at the optimum weight ratio of the impregnating liquid with respect to the weight of the cloth is reduced, so that the cleaning efficiency is reduced and the strength of the cloth itself is also reduced. There is a case.

  Further, the cloth has an official moisture content of 1 or more, preferably 1 to 15, and more preferably 8 to 12. If the official moisture content of the cloth is less than 1, the water absorption of the cloth is reduced, and in use in an environment where the temperature is high, the retention of the impregnating liquid is reduced, and the cloth may dry quickly. is there.

  There are no particular restrictions on impregnating the cloth with the impregnating solution. For example, dip roll coater method, gravure roll coater method, spray coating method, reverse roll coater method, direct roll coater method, kiss roll coater method, inverse knife coater method Well-known methods such as an air knife coater method, an opposite knife coater method, and a brush coating method can be used. Moreover, it can also be made to impregnate by the shower method which applies an impregnating liquid like a shower form from the upper direction of cloth.

  The impregnating liquid impregnated into the cloth is 1.5 to 4.0 times by weight, preferably 1.5 to 3.5 times by weight, more preferably 2.0 to 3.3 times the weight of the cloth. It is preferable to impregnate 0 times by weight. When the impregnation amount of the impregnating liquid impregnated into the cloth is less than 1.5 times the weight of the cloth, the cleaner effect is reduced. When the impregnating liquid exceeds 4.0 weight times, the impregnating liquid is excessive on the surface of the object. May remain and cannot be wiped off.

  The cloth can be used for removing stains such as a water kitchen location such as a home kitchen or a washroom, and an interior surface of an automobile.

A sample was obtained by sequentially dissolving polyoxyethylene sorbitan monolaurate or lower and sugar cane extract in 95.0 wt% of water.
Polyoxyethylene sorbitan monolaurate 2.0wt%
Sucrose laurate 2.0wt%
Sugar cane extract 1.0wt%
Water 95.0wt%
100.0wt%

A sample was obtained by dissolving polyoxyethylene sorbitan monolaurate or less and ethanol successively in 72.5 wt% of water.
Polyoxyethylene sorbitan monolaurate 2.0wt%
Polyglycerin oleate 3.0wt%
Sucrose oleate 1.0wt%
Sugar cane extract 1.5wt%
Ethanol 20.0wt%
Water 72.5wt%
100.0wt%

A sample was obtained by sequentially dissolving polyoxyethylene sorbitan monooleate or less and ethanol in 71.5 wt% of water.
Polyoxyethylene sorbitan monooleate 3.0wt%
Polyglycerin oleate 3.0wt%
Sugar cane extract 1.5wt%
Sodium bicarbonate 1.0wt%
Ethanol 20.0wt%
Water 71.5wt%
100.0wt%

A sample was obtained by sequentially dissolving polyoxyethylene sorbitan monostearate and ethanol up to 68.5 wt% of water.
Polyoxyethylene sorbitan monostearate 1.0wt%
Polyglycerin laurate 3.0wt%
Sucrose oleate 1.0wt%
Sugar cane extract 1.5wt%
Citric acid 1.0wt%
Glycerin 2.0wt%
Benzyl alcohol 2.0wt%
Ethanol 20.0wt%
Water 68.5wt%
100.0wt%

A sample was obtained by sequentially dissolving polyoxyethylene sorbitan monooleate or less and ethanol in 69.2 wt% of water.
Polyoxyethylene sorbitan monolaurate 2.0wt%
Polyglycerin oleate 3.0wt%
Sucrose oleate 1.0wt%
Orange oil 0.3wt%
Sugar cane extract 1.5wt%
Sodium sulfate 0.5wt%
Sodium bicarbonate 0.5wt%
Propylene glycol 2.0wt%
Ethanol 20.0wt%
Water 69.2wt%
100.0wt%

  Examples where the detergent composition according to the present invention is used by impregnating a sheet-like cloth made of woven fabric or nonwoven fabric are shown as Example 6 and Example 7.

Nonwoven fabric composed of 100% acrylic fiber cut to 20 × 30 cm (sample weight: 60 g / m ²⁾ official moisture content: 2.0, tensile strength: 70 N / 5 cm, dry and wet A sample was obtained by uniformly impregnating an impregnation liquid (10.8 g) corresponding to 3.0 times the weight of the nonwoven fabric (3.6 g) into a strength ratio of 90%.

Nonwoven fabric composed of 100% cotton fiber, cut into 20 × 30 cm from the sample solution prepared in Example 4 (weight per unit area: 60 g / m ² official moisture content: 8.5, tensile strength: 100 N / 5 cm, wet and dry A sample in a wet state was obtained by uniformly impregnating an impregnating solution (10.8 g) corresponding to 3.0 times the weight of the nonwoven fabric (3.6 g) into a strength ratio (115%).

Comparative Example 1

A sample was obtained by dissolving sucrose laurate in 94.0 wt% of water.
Sucrose laurate 6.0 wt%
94.0 wt% of water
100.0wt%

Comparative Example 2

Laurylamine oxide and ralyl glucoside were sequentially dissolved in 95.0 wt% of water to obtain a sample.
Laurylamine oxide 2.0wt%
Lauryl glucoside 3.0wt%
Water 95.0wt%
100.0wt%

Comparative Example 3

A sample was obtained by sequentially dissolving sugar cane extract and below and ethanol in 76.0 wt% of water.
Sugar cane extract 2.0wt%
Sodium bicarbonate 2.0wt%
Ethanol 20.0wt%
Water 76.0wt%
100.0wt%

Comparative Example 4

Samples were obtained by sequentially dissolving ralyl glucoside and green tea extract in 93.0 wt% of water.
Lauryl glucoside 5.0wt%
Sodium bicarbonate 1.0wt%
Green tea extract 1.0wt%
Water 93.0wt%
100.0wt%

  An example in which the cloth of the comparative example is impregnated into a cloth is shown as Comparative Example 5 below.

Comparative Example 5

Nonwoven fabric composed of 100% rayon fiber cut to 20 × 30 cm (sample weight: 60 g / m ²⁾ official moisture content: 11.0, tensile strength: 30 N / 5 cm, dry and wet A strength sample of 60%) was uniformly impregnated with an impregnating solution (10.8 g) corresponding to 3.0 times the weight of the nonwoven fabric (3.6 g) to obtain a wet sample.

<Performance evaluation test>
The performance evaluation of the prepared sample solution was performed. The method for evaluating the performance of the sample liquid is as follows.

-Detergency Fats and oils mixed with beef tallow and salad oil in a weight ratio of 2: 1 are colored with oil-soluble red pigment, 0.8 g is applied to a 7 cm x 15 cm stainless steel plate, dried at 25 ° C for 24 hours, and contaminated with oil A board was prepared.
0.2 g of the sample solution was applied to an oily and fat-contaminated plate, and spread and wiped evenly with a dry towel. Thereafter, it was rinsed with water, and the soil removal property was visually observed and evaluated according to the following criteria.
In Example 6, Example 7, and Comparative Example 5, the sample cloth obtained in each Example was used instead of the dry towel.
◎: Fats and oils are not left and clean ○: Oils and fats are hardly left and clean △: Fats and oils are left a little and dirty ×: Oils and fats are hardly removed and dirty

-Deodorizing property A deodorizing evaluation test was conducted on ammonia and acetic acid, which are common bad odors. First, 3.0 g of a 1.0% aqueous solution of ammonia (or acetic acid) that is offensive odor was uniformly immersed in a mat of 100% polyester of 3 × 8 × 0.5 cm. Spray 1.0 g of sample solution on a mat with a bad odor, wipe it 10 times with a dry cotton towel, place it in a 1000 ml Erlenmeyer flask, cover the mouth with parafilm, and leave it at 25 ° C. I put it. The odor after 30 minutes was examined. Evaluation was carried out by comparing a blank with 1.0 g of water sprayed on a mat with a bad odor soaked. The sensory test was performed by 10 professional panelists based on the following criteria and averaged. In Example 6 and Example 7 and Comparative Example 5, after wiping the mat place soaked in bad odor with the wet sample cloth obtained in each Example 10 times, put it in a 1000 ml Erlenmeyer flask, The mouth was covered with parafilm and allowed to stand at 25 ° C. The odor after 30 minutes was examined. Evaluation was performed in the same manner as described above.
◎: The odor disappeared completely compared to the blank ○: The odor disappeared considerably compared to the blank △: The odor disappeared slightly compared to the blank ×: Not deodorized compared to the blank

Liquid stability The prepared composition was allowed to stand at 1 ° C. and 50 ° C. for 1 month, and the transparency of the liquid, separation and precipitation were visually observed and evaluated according to the following criteria.
◎: Transparency is maintained and it is in a uniform state without separation / precipitation ○: It is opaque but it is in a uniform state without separation / precipitation △: Transparency is maintained, but separation or precipitation occurs State x: Opaque and in a state where separation or precipitation occurs <Performance evaluation>

Claims (6)

A combination of one or more surfactants selected from glycerin fatty acid ester, sorbitan fatty acid ester, sucrose fatty acid ester, polyoxyethylene sorbitan fatty acid ester, sugarcane extract, and water,
A detergent composition comprising 0.5 to 10.0 wt% of the surfactant, 0.1 to 3.0 wt% of sugar cane extract, and the balance being water. A combination of one or more surfactants selected from glycerin fatty acid ester, sorbitan fatty acid ester, sucrose fatty acid ester, polyoxyethylene sorbitan fatty acid ester, alcohols, sugarcane extract, and water,
The surfactant is contained in an amount of 0.5 to 10.0 wt%, the alcohol is contained in an amount of 5.0 to 35.0 wt%, the sugarcane extract is contained in an amount of 0.1 to 3.0 wt%, and the balance is water. A cleaning composition characterized by the above. One or more surfactants selected from glycerin fatty acid ester, sorbitan fatty acid ester, sucrose fatty acid ester, polyoxyethylene sorbitan fatty acid ester, alcohols, and an alkali component or acid component as a cleaning aid, It consists of a combination of sugarcane extract and water,
The above surfactant is contained in an amount of 0.5 to 10.0 wt%, the alcohol is contained in an amount of 5.0 to 35.0 wt%, the alkali component or the acid component is contained in an amount of 0.05 to 6.0 wt%, and the sugar cane extract Is contained in an amount of 0.1 to 3.0 wt%, and the balance is water. One or more surfactants selected from glycerin fatty acid ester, sorbitan fatty acid ester, sucrose fatty acid ester, polyoxyethylene sorbitan fatty acid ester, alcohols, and an alkali component or acid component as a cleaning aid, It consists of a combination of sugarcane extract, aqueous solvent and water,
The above surfactant is contained in an amount of 0.5 to 10.0 wt%, the alcohol is contained in an amount of 5.0 to 35.0 wt%, the alkali component or the acid component is contained in an amount of 0.05 to 6.0 wt%, and the sugar cane extract Is contained in an amount of 0.1 to 3.0 wt%, an aqueous solvent is contained in an amount of 0.5 to 5.0 wt%, and the balance is water. One or more surfactants selected from glycerin fatty acid ester, sorbitan fatty acid ester, sucrose fatty acid ester, polyoxyethylene sorbitan fatty acid ester, alcohols, and an alkali component or acid component as a cleaning aid, It consists of a combination of sugarcane extract, aqueous solvent, essential oil and water,
The above surfactant is contained in an amount of 0.5 to 10.0 wt%, the alcohol is contained in an amount of 5.0 to 35.0 wt%, the alkali component or the acid component is contained in an amount of 0.05 to 6.0 wt%, and the sugar cane extract Of 0.1 to 3.0 wt%, 0.5 to 5.0 wt% of an aqueous solvent, 0.05 to 2.0 wt% of essential oil, and the balance being water Agent composition.   A cleaning tool comprising a sheet-like cloth impregnated with the cleaning composition according to any one of claims 1 to 5.