[go: up one dir, main page]

JP2010054292A - Method of measuring internal defect - Google Patents

Method of measuring internal defect Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP2010054292A
JP2010054292A JP2008218423A JP2008218423A JP2010054292A JP 2010054292 A JP2010054292 A JP 2010054292A JP 2008218423 A JP2008218423 A JP 2008218423A JP 2008218423 A JP2008218423 A JP 2008218423A JP 2010054292 A JP2010054292 A JP 2010054292A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
defect
detection
diameter
detection data
thickness
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
JP2008218423A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP5169626B2 (en
Inventor
Yasuo Yokoyama
康雄 横山
Wataru Maeda
亘 前田
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
JFE Steel Corp
Original Assignee
JFE Steel Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by JFE Steel Corp filed Critical JFE Steel Corp
Priority to JP2008218423A priority Critical patent/JP5169626B2/en
Publication of JP2010054292A publication Critical patent/JP2010054292A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP5169626B2 publication Critical patent/JP5169626B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Investigating Or Analyzing Materials By The Use Of Magnetic Means (AREA)

Abstract

【課題】構造体の内部欠陥を定量的かつ高精度に測定および評価し得る内部欠陥測定方法を提供する。
【解決手段】この内部欠陥測定方法は、強磁性体製の構造体外面を、複数のチャンネルをもつ磁束検出手段を有する検出センサで走査して、検出データを収集する検出データ収集工程と(S10)、その収集した検出データに基準となる信号を乗算後にフィルタリング処理を行う位相検波処理工程(S20)と、得られた信号に対してベクトル座標の座標変換を行う座標変換工程(S30)と、その座標変換された信号から構造体の減肉部を検出する減肉部検出工程(S40)と、検出センサの各ch間の減衰の仕方から構造体の欠陥径を推定する欠陥径推定工程(S50)と、その求めた欠陥径、および所定の関係式から構造体の残肉厚を算出する残肉厚算出工程(S60)とを含む。
【選択図】図2
An internal defect measurement method capable of measuring and evaluating an internal defect of a structure quantitatively and with high accuracy is provided.
This internal defect measurement method includes a detection data collection step of collecting detection data by scanning the outer surface of a structure made of a ferromagnetic material with a detection sensor having magnetic flux detection means having a plurality of channels (S10). ), A phase detection processing step (S20) for performing filtering processing after multiplying the collected detection data by a reference signal, and a coordinate conversion step (S30) for performing coordinate conversion of vector coordinates on the obtained signal, A thinning portion detection step (S40) for detecting a thinning portion of the structure from the coordinate-transformed signal, and a defect diameter estimation step (S40) for estimating the defect diameter of the structure from the way of attenuation between each channel of the detection sensor ( S50) and a remaining thickness calculation step (S60) for calculating the remaining thickness of the structure from the obtained defect diameter and a predetermined relational expression.
[Selection] Figure 2

Description

本発明は、強磁性体で作られたプレート状、ボックス状またはパイプ状等の形状を有する構造体の内部欠陥の大きさと深さを、電磁誘導法によって構造体の外面から測定し、評価する内部欠陥測定方法に関する。   The present invention measures and evaluates the size and depth of internal defects of a structure having a plate shape, box shape, pipe shape, or the like made of a ferromagnetic material from the outer surface of the structure by an electromagnetic induction method. The present invention relates to an internal defect measurement method.

強磁性体で作られた構造体の内部欠陥を検出し、これを評価しようとすると、直接構造体の内部を測定することが難しい場合や、また、測定できるとしても多大な手間や費用がかかる場合が多い。そこで、構造体の外面からの測定によって、構造体の内部欠陥を検出し、これを評価する方法として、超音波探傷法が一般的には用いられている。超音波探傷法としては、例えば特許文献1に記載の技術がある。この技術は、鋼材の内部や表面に存在する欠陥を、超音波探触子を複数個並設してマルチチャネルで超音波探傷を行うものである。   Detecting internal defects in structures made of ferromagnetic materials and trying to evaluate them can be difficult or costly even if it is difficult to directly measure the inside of the structure. There are many cases. Therefore, an ultrasonic flaw detection method is generally used as a method for detecting and evaluating an internal defect of a structure by measurement from the outer surface of the structure. As an ultrasonic flaw detection method, for example, there is a technique described in Patent Document 1. In this technique, a plurality of ultrasonic probes are juxtaposed to detect defects existing in or on the surface of a steel material and multi-channel ultrasonic flaw detection is performed.

しかしながら、特許文献1で示すような超音波探傷法には、構造体の外面に探触子をあてる必要があるため、探触子をあてる面の錆や、ごみなどの異物、場合によっては塗膜を除去するという下地処理が必要である。そのため、測定にあたって手間がかかるという問題がある。また、測定対象となる構造体との間に接触媒質を必要とし、さらに、測定個所がピンポイントになる(なお、特許文献1では、超音波探触子を複数個並設することによって、この欠点に対処している)などの問題点がある。   However, in the ultrasonic flaw detection method shown in Patent Document 1, it is necessary to apply a probe to the outer surface of the structure. Therefore, rust on the surface to which the probe is applied, foreign matter such as dust, and coating depending on circumstances. A ground treatment for removing the film is necessary. Therefore, there is a problem that it takes a lot of time for measurement. Further, a contact medium is required between the structure to be measured and the measurement location is pinpointed (in Patent Document 1, this is achieved by arranging a plurality of ultrasonic probes in parallel. There are problems such as dealing with shortcomings).

これに対し、電磁誘導法を用いた構造体の内部欠陥検出技術が提案されている。この種の内部欠陥検出技術としては、例えば特許文献2の開示がある。同文献に記載の技術は、離して設けた2つの励磁手段によって、測定対象となる鋼材を、その内部に向きが反対で透過磁束密度の同じ磁束が透過するように励磁する。そして、この2つの励磁手段の中間位置で前記鋼材から漏れる磁束密度を漏れ磁束密度検出手段で検出するようにして、鋼材の腐食または亀裂等を検出する方法である。
特許3228132号公報 特開平11−44674号公報
On the other hand, an internal defect detection technique for a structure using an electromagnetic induction method has been proposed. As this type of internal defect detection technology, for example, there is a disclosure of Patent Document 2. The technique described in this document excites a steel material to be measured by two excitation means provided apart so that magnetic fluxes having opposite transmission directions and the same transmission magnetic flux density can pass through the steel material. The magnetic flux density leaking from the steel material at an intermediate position between the two excitation means is detected by the leakage magnetic flux density detection means to detect corrosion or cracking of the steel material.
Japanese Patent No. 3228132 Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 11-44674

しかしながら、特許文献2に示される方法は、特許文献1で示すような超音波探傷法のように、探触子をあてる面の錆や、ごみなどの異物、または塗膜を除去する必要はないものの、鋼材の腐食または亀裂等を検出するのみである。すなわち、構造体の内部欠陥の大きさと深さを定量的に測定し、これを評価できるものでなく、構造体の健全性を評価する上では不十分である。
そこで、本発明は上記事情に鑑みてなされたもので、強磁性体で作られた構造体の外部から、探触子をあてる面の錆やごみなどの異物、または塗膜を除去することなく、構造体の内部欠陥の大きさとその深さを定量的かつ高精度に測定し、これを評価できる内部欠陥測定方法を提供することにある。
However, the method disclosed in Patent Document 2 does not need to remove foreign matter such as rust on the surface to which the probe is applied, dust, or a coating film, unlike the ultrasonic flaw detection method illustrated in Patent Document 1. However, it only detects corrosion or cracks in the steel material. That is, the size and depth of the internal defect of the structure cannot be quantitatively measured and evaluated, which is insufficient for evaluating the soundness of the structure.
Therefore, the present invention has been made in view of the above circumstances, without removing foreign matter such as rust and dust on the surface to which the probe is applied, or the coating film from the outside of the structure made of a ferromagnetic material. An object of the present invention is to provide an internal defect measurement method capable of quantitatively and accurately measuring the size and depth of an internal defect of a structure and evaluating it.

上記課題を解決するために、本発明のうち第一の発明は、強磁性体でつくられた構造体の内部欠陥を、低周波電磁誘導法を用いて測定する内部欠陥測定方法であって、前記構造体の外面を、励磁装置および複数のチャンネルをもつ磁束検出手段を有する検出センサで走査して検出データを収集する検出データ収集工程と、その収集した検出データに対して、基準となる信号および基準となる信号の位相を90°ずらせた信号をそれぞれ別個に乗算した後に、フィルタリング処理を行う位相検波処理工程と、その位相検波処理工程で得られた信号を描かせるベクトル座標のゼロ点を任意の位置に移動させるとともに、その描かせた信号軌跡の長楕円の長径および短径方向に座標軸を回転させる座標変換工程と、その座標変換された検出データに基づいて前記構造体の内部欠陥の欠陥径を推定する欠陥径推定工程と、前記構造体の残肉厚を算出する残肉厚算出工程とを含み、前記残肉厚算出工程は、前記欠陥径推定工程で求めた欠陥径、および、その求めた欠陥径に対応する疑似欠陥部を形成した被測定物を用いた実験によって予め得られている欠陥径毎の(元厚×長楕円長さ)と(残肉厚/元厚)との関係式に基づいて、前記構造体の残肉厚を算出することを特徴としている。   In order to solve the above problems, a first invention of the present invention is an internal defect measurement method for measuring internal defects of a structure made of a ferromagnetic material using a low-frequency electromagnetic induction method, A detection data collection step of collecting detection data by scanning the outer surface of the structure with a detection sensor having an excitation device and a magnetic flux detection means having a plurality of channels, and a signal serving as a reference for the collected detection data And a phase detection processing step for performing a filtering process after separately multiplying signals each having a phase of a reference signal shifted by 90 °, and a zero point of a vector coordinate for drawing a signal obtained in the phase detection processing step. The coordinate conversion step of moving the coordinate axis in the major axis and minor axis direction of the ellipse of the drawn signal trajectory and moving the coordinate axis in the drawn signal locus, and the coordinate-converted detection data A defect diameter estimating step of estimating a defect diameter of an internal defect of the structure, and a remaining thickness calculating step of calculating a remaining thickness of the structure, the remaining thickness calculating step including the defect diameter For each defect diameter obtained in advance by an experiment using the defect diameter obtained in the estimation step and the object to be measured in which the pseudo defect portion corresponding to the obtained defect diameter is formed (original thickness × ellipse length) And the remaining thickness of the structure is calculated based on the relational expression of (remaining thickness / original thickness).

また、本発明のうち第二の発明は、強磁性体でつくられた構造体の内部欠陥を、低周波電磁誘導法を用いて測定する内部欠陥測定方法であって、前記構造体の外面を、励磁装置および複数のチャンネルをもつ磁束検出手段を有する検出センサで走査して検出データを収集する検出データ収集工程と、その収集した検出データに対して、基準となる信号および基準となる信号の位相を90°ずらせた信号をそれぞれ別個に乗算した後に、フィルタリング処理を行う位相検波処理工程と、その位相検波処理工程で得られた信号を描かせるベクトル座標のゼロ点を任意の位置に移動させるとともに、その描かせた信号軌跡の長楕円の長径および短径方向に座標軸を回転させる座標変換工程と、その座標変換された信号の急峻な立ち上がり部分を検出することにより欠陥部の有無を判定する欠陥部検出工程と、前記構造体の残肉厚を算出する残肉厚算出工程とを含み、前記残肉厚算出工程は、前記欠陥径推定工程で求めた欠陥径、および、その求めた欠陥径に対応する疑似欠陥部を形成した被測定物を用いた実験によって予め得られている欠陥径毎の(元厚×長楕円長さ)と(残肉厚/元厚)との関係式に基づいて、前記構造体の残肉厚を算出することを特徴としている。   The second invention of the present invention is an internal defect measuring method for measuring an internal defect of a structure made of a ferromagnetic material by using a low frequency electromagnetic induction method, wherein the external surface of the structure is measured. , A detection data collection step of collecting detection data by scanning with a detection sensor having an excitation device and a magnetic flux detection means having a plurality of channels, and a reference signal and a reference signal for the collected detection data After individually multiplying the signals whose phases are shifted by 90 °, the phase detection processing step for performing the filtering process, and the zero point of the vector coordinates for drawing the signal obtained in the phase detection processing step are moved to an arbitrary position. At the same time, a coordinate transformation process that rotates the coordinate axis in the major axis and minor axis direction of the ellipse of the drawn signal trajectory, and a steep rising portion of the coordinate-converted signal are detected. A defective portion detecting step for determining the presence or absence of a defective portion, and a remaining thickness calculating step for calculating a remaining thickness of the structure, wherein the remaining thickness calculating step is obtained in the defect diameter estimating step. (Original thickness × long ellipse length) and (remaining meat) for each defect diameter obtained in advance by an experiment using a measured object in which a pseudo defect portion corresponding to the obtained defect diameter was formed. The remaining thickness of the structure is calculated on the basis of the relational expression (thickness / original thickness).

本発明に係る内部欠陥測定方法によれば、上記一連の工程を含む所定の処理を実行することによって、検出信号中にランダムな信号軌跡を描くようなノイズがあったり、長楕円に近い軌跡を描いたりしたとしても、欠陥と関係ない方向に振れる外乱(例えば、検出センサと被測定物とのリフトオフ変化など)の影響を排除可能である。したがって、構造体の内部欠陥の大きさ(欠陥径)とその深さ(残肉厚)を定量的かつ高精度に測定し、これを評価することができる。
ここで、本発明に係る内部欠陥測定方法において、前記欠陥径推定工程は、前記センサの各チャンネル間の検出データまたは前記センサの走査方向の検出データの減衰量の傾きから欠陥の大きさを求めることは好ましい。このような構成であれば、欠陥の大きさを定量的かつ高精度に推定する上で好適である。
According to the internal defect measuring method according to the present invention, by performing a predetermined process including the above-described series of steps, there is noise that draws a random signal locus in the detection signal, or a locus close to an ellipse is obtained. Even if it is drawn, it is possible to eliminate the influence of a disturbance (for example, a lift-off change between the detection sensor and the object to be measured) that swings in a direction unrelated to the defect. Therefore, the size of the internal defect (defect diameter) and the depth (remaining thickness) of the structure can be measured quantitatively and with high accuracy and evaluated.
Here, in the internal defect measurement method according to the present invention, the defect diameter estimation step obtains the size of the defect from the inclination of the attenuation amount of the detection data between the channels of the sensor or the detection data of the sensor in the scanning direction. It is preferable. Such a configuration is suitable for estimating the size of the defect quantitatively and with high accuracy.

上述したように、本発明に係る内部欠陥測定方法によれば、強磁性体で作られた構造体の外部から、探触子をあてる面の錆やごみなどの異物、または塗膜を除去することなく、構造体の内部欠陥の大きさ(欠陥径)とその深さ(残肉厚)を定量的かつ高精度に測定し、これを評価することができる。   As described above, according to the internal defect measuring method of the present invention, foreign matter such as rust and dust on the surface to which the probe is applied or the coating film is removed from the outside of the structure made of a ferromagnetic material. Therefore, the size (defect diameter) and depth (remaining thickness) of the internal defect of the structure can be measured quantitatively and with high accuracy, and this can be evaluated.

まず、本発明に係る内部欠陥測定方法で用いる低周波電磁誘導法およびこれを行うための電磁誘導装置について説明する。図1は、その低周波電磁誘導法を行うための電磁誘導装置の一構成例を示す図であり、同図中、符号10は検出センサ、また、Sは被測定物(構造体)、Kは欠陥部をそれぞれ示している。
同図に示すように、この電磁誘導装置の検出センサ10は、磁束を検出するための磁束検出手段である検出コイル3と、励磁コイル2を巻き付けたコの字型の強磁性体コア4を有する励磁装置(磁化器)1とを備えている。この検出センサ10には、以下不図示のエンコーダと、検出センサ10と被測定物Sとの間のリフトオフを一定に保持するために、軸受を内蔵した転動輪と、個別に高さ調整のできるスクリュー式調整機構とを設けている。そして、この電磁誘導装置は、検出センサ1の強磁性体コア4を、強磁性体製の構造体である被測定物Sに対向させて配置し、励磁コイル2に励磁信号を印加して強磁性体コア4内に磁束を発生させ、これにより被測定物Sの欠陥部Kに発生する漏洩磁束を、検出コイル3で検出するようになっている。なお、この検出コイル3は、欠陥部Kに発生する漏洩磁束の測定能率を向上させるために、16個のコイルを一定ピッチで並べている。なおまた、磁束検出手段には、上記例示した検出コイル3の他に、例えば感磁素子などを用いることができる。
First, the low-frequency electromagnetic induction method used in the internal defect measurement method according to the present invention and the electromagnetic induction device for performing the method will be described. FIG. 1 is a diagram showing a configuration example of an electromagnetic induction device for performing the low-frequency electromagnetic induction method. In the figure, reference numeral 10 denotes a detection sensor, S denotes an object to be measured (structure), K Indicates a defective part.
As shown in the figure, a detection sensor 10 of this electromagnetic induction device includes a detection coil 3 that is a magnetic flux detection means for detecting magnetic flux, and a U-shaped ferromagnetic core 4 around which an excitation coil 2 is wound. And an exciting device (magnetizer) 1. The detection sensor 10 includes an encoder (not shown) below, and a rolling wheel with a built-in bearing and a height adjustment that can be individually adjusted to maintain a constant lift-off between the detection sensor 10 and the object S to be measured. And a screw type adjusting mechanism. In this electromagnetic induction device, the ferromagnetic core 4 of the detection sensor 1 is disposed so as to face the object to be measured S, which is a ferromagnetic structure, and an excitation signal is applied to the excitation coil 2 to strengthen the electromagnetic sensor. Magnetic flux is generated in the magnetic core 4, and thereby leakage magnetic flux generated in the defective portion K of the object S to be measured is detected by the detection coil 3. In addition, in order to improve the measurement efficiency of the leakage magnetic flux which generate | occur | produces in the defect part K, this detection coil 3 has arranged 16 coils in a fixed pitch. In addition to the detection coil 3 exemplified above, for example, a magnetic sensing element can be used as the magnetic flux detection means.

ここで、一般的な電磁誘導法と低周波電磁誘導法の最も大きな違いは、印加する励磁信号の周波数である。つまり、一般的な電磁誘導法では、数百kHz〜数MHzの高周波の励磁信号によって磁束を被測定物Sの表層部に集中させる。これに対し、低周波電磁誘導法では、印加する励磁信号の周波数を数百Hz以下程度の低周波にすることによって、磁束の分布を測定対象となる被測定物Sの板厚方向に広げ、これにより、被測定物Sの厚さ方向での感度を向上させるようにしている。   Here, the biggest difference between the general electromagnetic induction method and the low frequency electromagnetic induction method is the frequency of the excitation signal to be applied. That is, in a general electromagnetic induction method, the magnetic flux is concentrated on the surface layer portion of the object S to be measured by a high frequency excitation signal of several hundred kHz to several MHz. On the other hand, in the low frequency electromagnetic induction method, the frequency of the excitation signal to be applied is set to a low frequency of about several hundred Hz or less, thereby spreading the magnetic flux distribution in the plate thickness direction of the object S to be measured, Thereby, the sensitivity in the thickness direction of the measurement object S is improved.

以下、上記電磁誘導装置を用いて、本発明に係る内部欠陥測定方法により、被測定物S(強磁性体でつくられた構造体)の内部欠陥(例えば腐食減肉部)の検出およびその部分での残肉厚を算出する処理手順を説明する。なお、図2は、本発明に係る内部欠陥測定方法の処理フローの一例を示す図である。
図2に示すように、この内部欠陥測定方法は、検出データ収集工程(ステップS10)、位相検波処理工程(ステップS20)、座標変換工程(ステップS30)、欠陥部検出工程(ステップS40)、欠陥径推定工程(ステップS50)、および残肉厚算出工程(ステップS60)をこの順に実行するものである。
Hereinafter, by using the above-described electromagnetic induction device, the internal defect measurement method according to the present invention detects the internal defect (for example, the corrosion thinning portion) of the measured object S (the structure made of a ferromagnetic material) and the portion thereof. A processing procedure for calculating the remaining thickness in FIG. FIG. 2 is a diagram showing an example of a processing flow of the internal defect measuring method according to the present invention.
As shown in FIG. 2, this internal defect measuring method includes a detection data collection step (step S10), a phase detection processing step (step S20), a coordinate conversion step (step S30), a defect portion detection step (step S40), a defect The diameter estimation step (step S50) and the remaining thickness calculation step (step S60) are executed in this order.

ここで、本実施形態では、検出データの収集およびその解析装置には、汎用ノート型PCとAD変換器を用いた。この汎用ノート型PCは、上記ステップS10〜S60を含む一連の自動解析の処理プログラムを搭載しており、その搭載したプログラムによって、被測定物Sの残肉厚と欠陥部Kの直径を自動的に瞬時に算出し、その結果を汎用ノート型PCの画面上に表示可能である。また、被測定物Sのその他の任意の部位(例えば欠陥部Kを有しない部分)についても、測定・解析者の判断により、汎用ノート型PCの画面上の任意の位置をマウスでクリックすれば、前記同様に、その位置での被測定物Sの残肉厚と直径を算出し、これを表示することができるものである。   Here, in the present embodiment, a general-purpose notebook PC and an AD converter are used as the detection data collection and analysis device. This general-purpose notebook PC is equipped with a series of automatic analysis processing programs including steps S10 to S60, and the thickness of the measured object S and the diameter of the defect portion K are automatically determined by the installed programs. Can be instantaneously calculated and the result can be displayed on the screen of a general-purpose notebook PC. In addition, for any other part of the object to be measured S (for example, a part not having the defect portion K), if the measurement / analyzer judges, an arbitrary position on the screen of the general-purpose notebook PC is clicked with the mouse. In the same manner as described above, the remaining thickness and diameter of the measurement object S at that position can be calculated and displayed.

また、本実施形態では、強磁性体製の構造体として、板厚6〜19mmの複数の鋼板を試験片として用意した。そして、各鋼板に対して、直径φ10mm、φ20mmおよびφ30mmで且つ残肉厚2mm(被測定物Sの元厚−2mm)から種々の深さの平底円孔を疑似欠陥部Kとして試験片の長手方向に適宜離間して設けた。そして、これら試験片を被測定物Sとし、この鋼板の欠陥部Kを上記検出センサ10で順次にセンシングし、検出コイル3からの検出信号を用いて本発明に係る内部欠陥測定方法による測定精度を評価した。   Moreover, in this embodiment, the several steel plate with a plate thickness of 6-19 mm was prepared as a test piece as a ferromagnetic structure. Then, for each steel plate, the length of the test piece is a flat bottom circular hole having a diameter of φ10 mm, φ20 mm and φ30 mm and having a remaining thickness of 2 mm (original thickness of the object to be measured S-2 mm) as a pseudo defect K. They were provided appropriately spaced in the direction. Then, these test pieces are used as the object to be measured S, and the defect portion K of the steel plate is sequentially sensed by the detection sensor 10, and the measurement accuracy by the internal defect measurement method according to the present invention using the detection signal from the detection coil 3. Evaluated.

詳しくは、上記検出データ収集工程(ステップS10)では、上述した、図1に示す検出センサ1を用い、その検出コイル3によって上記被測定物Sの外面を走査して検出データの収集を行った。なお、この際の検出データの収集は、検出データ毎に以下のステップS20〜S60の一連の処理手順を行っても良いし、また、検出データを一旦記憶媒体に記憶しておいてから以下の一連の処理手順を行うようにしても良い。   Specifically, in the detection data collection step (step S10), the detection sensor 1 shown in FIG. 1 described above is used, and the detection coil 3 scans the outer surface of the object S to collect the detection data. . The collection of the detection data at this time may be performed by performing a series of processing steps of the following steps S20 to S60 for each detection data, or once the detection data is temporarily stored in a storage medium. A series of processing procedures may be performed.

次に、位相検波処理工程(ステップS20)では所定の位相検波処理を行った。図3は、その位相検波処理を説明する図である。
この位相検波処理では、図3に示すように、上記検出コイル3からの検出信号に対して基準となる基準信号(励磁信号を用いる場合が多い)を乗算した後、ノイズ除去など通常行われるフィルタリング処理(例えば、ローパスフィルタリング)を行った信号(「Y信号」とよぶ)を取得するとともに、同様にして、上記検出コイル3からの検出信号に対して基準となる基準信号の位相を90°遅らせた上で乗算した信号(「X信号」とよぶ)を取得する。図4(a)に、この位相検波処理で得られたY信号およびX信号を、縦軸をY、横軸をXとするベクトル座標上にプロットしたイメージを示す。
Next, in the phase detection processing step (step S20), predetermined phase detection processing was performed. FIG. 3 is a diagram for explaining the phase detection processing.
In this phase detection process, as shown in FIG. 3, after the detection signal from the detection coil 3 is multiplied by a reference signal (in many cases, an excitation signal is used) as a reference, filtering that is normally performed such as noise removal is performed. A signal (referred to as “Y signal”) that has undergone processing (for example, low-pass filtering) is acquired, and similarly, the phase of the reference signal serving as a reference is delayed by 90 ° with respect to the detection signal from the detection coil 3. A signal obtained by multiplication (referred to as “X signal”) is acquired. FIG. 4A shows an image obtained by plotting the Y signal and the X signal obtained by this phase detection processing on vector coordinates in which the vertical axis represents Y and the horizontal axis represents X.

ここで、本発明者らは、強磁性体でつくられた構造体の内部欠陥を、低周波電磁誘導法を用いて測定するために、種々の寸法とした平底円孔状の疑似欠陥部Kを形成した被測定物Sを用いた実験を繰返した結果、以下のような知見を得た。
つまり、図4(a)に示すように、被測定物Sの欠陥部位での検出信号のベクトル座標中の信号軌跡は長楕円形となる(知見1)。そして、この図4(a)に示す信号軌跡の長楕円の傾き角度は、対象とする被測定物Sが板であれば、その板の厚さ(元厚)の違いによって変化するものの、対象が同じ(元厚が同じ)であれば、この長楕円の傾きの角度はほぼ一定であり、欠陥部Kの有無によっては変化しない(知見2)。さらに、欠陥部K(腐食減肉部等)の大小(欠陥径ないしその深さ)が変わることによって、この長楕円の長さが一定の相関をもって変化するという知見を得た(知見3)。
Here, in order to measure the internal defect of a structure made of a ferromagnetic material using a low-frequency electromagnetic induction method, the present inventors have a flat-bottom hole-like pseudo-defect portion K having various dimensions. As a result of repeating the experiment using the object S to be measured, the following knowledge was obtained.
That is, as shown in FIG. 4A, the signal trajectory in the vector coordinates of the detection signal at the defective portion of the object S to be measured has an elliptical shape (Knowledge 1). If the object to be measured S is a plate, the inclination angle of the ellipse of the signal locus shown in FIG. 4A changes depending on the thickness (original thickness) of the plate. Are the same (the original thickness is the same), the inclination angle of the ellipse is substantially constant and does not change depending on the presence or absence of the defect K (Knowledge 2). Furthermore, the knowledge that the length of this ellipse changes with a certain correlation by the magnitude (defect diameter or its depth) of the defect part K (corrosion thinning part etc.) changed was acquired (knowledge 3).

そこで、本発明における被測定物Sの欠陥部Kの検出およびその部分での残肉厚を算出する処理手順においては、これら知見1〜3に基づいた所定の処理を実行することによって、検出信号中にランダムな信号軌跡を描くようなノイズがあったり、長楕円に近い軌跡を描いたりしたとしても、欠陥と関係ない方向に振れる外乱(検出センサ10と被測定物Sとのリフトオフ変化など)の影響を排除可能とした。   Therefore, in the processing procedure for detecting the defective portion K of the object to be measured S and calculating the remaining thickness at the portion in the present invention, the detection signal is obtained by executing a predetermined processing based on these findings 1 to 3. Even if there is noise that draws a random signal trajectory inside or a trajectory close to an ellipse, a disturbance that swings in a direction not related to a defect (lift-off change between the detection sensor 10 and the object S to be measured, etc.) The influence of can be eliminated.

すなわち、続く座標変換工程(ステップS30)では、上記ベクトル座標のゼロ点を任意の位置に移動させ(図4(b)参照)、さらに、被測定物Sの板の厚さ(元厚)が同じであれば、上述の長楕円形の角度がほぼ一定であるという知見を利用し、上記長楕円形の長径および短径方向に、先に求めたベクトル座標の座標変換、つまり座標軸の回転を行うものである。図4(b)に、当該座標変換工程において、同図(a)での、ゼロ点の移動および回転をしたベクトル座標(同図(a)でのY’軸)上での信号軌跡をプロットしたイメージを示す。なお、以下、ゼロ点の移動および回転をしたY軸およびX軸を、それぞれY’軸およびX’軸とする。   That is, in the subsequent coordinate conversion step (step S30), the zero point of the vector coordinates is moved to an arbitrary position (see FIG. 4B), and the thickness (original thickness) of the object S to be measured is further increased. If they are the same, the knowledge that the angle of the ellipse is almost constant is used, and the coordinate transformation of the vector coordinates obtained earlier, that is, the rotation of the coordinate axis, is performed in the major axis and minor axis directions of the ellipse. Is what you do. FIG. 4B plots the signal trajectory on the vector coordinates (Y ′ axis in FIG. 4A) obtained by moving and rotating the zero point in FIG. The image is shown. Hereinafter, the Y axis and the X axis that have moved and rotated the zero point are referred to as a Y ′ axis and an X ′ axis, respectively.

次に、欠陥部検出工程(ステップS40)では、欠陥部K(減肉部)において、上記ベクトル座標において長楕円の信号軌跡を描いたとき、長楕円の角度は被測定物Sの元厚が同じであれば一定であることに着目し、以下の(式1)の条件を満たす部位を欠陥部Kとし、「腐食減肉あり」と判定するものである。これは、図4(b)に示す、ΔY'の急峻な立ち上がり部分での検出コイル3の最大電圧(以下、「ピーク値」という)を検出するものであり、(式1)の定数は被測定物Sの対象材料や検出しようとする欠陥部等により予め設定される。
|ΔY'/ΔX'|≧定数 ・・・・・(式1)
Next, in the defect detection step (step S40), when a signal path of a long ellipse is drawn in the vector coordinates in the defect part K (thinning part), the angle of the long ellipse is the original thickness of the object S to be measured. Focusing on the fact that they are constant if they are the same, a part satisfying the following (Equation 1) is defined as a defective portion K, and “corrosion thinning” is determined. This is to detect the maximum voltage (hereinafter referred to as “peak value”) of the detection coil 3 at the steep rising portion of ΔY ′ shown in FIG. It is set in advance depending on the target material of the measuring object S, a defective portion to be detected, and the like.
| ΔY ′ / ΔX ′ | ≧ constant (Equation 1)

そして、続く欠陥径推定工程(ステップS50)では、複数のチャンネル(16個のコイル)をもつ検出コイル3の、各ch間の信号の減衰量の傾きから、上記欠陥部検出工程で「腐食減肉あり」と判定された欠陥部Kの欠陥径の大きさを求める。
つまり、上記検出コイル3の16個のコイルのうち、欠陥部Kの中心に最も近く、ピーク値の大きいコイルを0チャンネル(ch)とし、それに隣接するコイルから順に1ch、2ch、・・・とよぶとき、それぞれのコイルにて検出されるピーク値は0chから順に減衰していく。それをグラフ上にプロットすると図5に例示するようになる。なお、同図に示す例は、種々の寸法とした平底円孔状の疑似欠陥部Kを形成した被測定物Sのうち、直径がφ10mm、φ20mm、φ30mmの疑似欠陥部を形成した被測定物Sの例であって、縦軸が上記ピーク値の減衰比(各コイルのピーク値/0chのコイルのピーク値)であり、同図では、0chのコイルのピーク値を1とする)で表わしており、また、横軸が各コイルのチャンネル(ch)数を示している。
Then, in the subsequent defect diameter estimation step (step S50), from the inclination of the attenuation amount of the signal between the channels of the detection coil 3 having a plurality of channels (16 coils), the “defect reduction” is performed in the defect portion detection step. The size of the defect diameter of the defect portion K determined to be “thick” is obtained.
That is, among the 16 coils of the detection coil 3, the coil that is closest to the center of the defect portion K and has a large peak value is set to 0 channel (ch), and the 1 channel, 2 ch,. When called, the peak value detected by each coil attenuates in order from 0ch. When it is plotted on the graph, it becomes as illustrated in FIG. The example shown in the figure is an object to be measured in which a pseudo-defect portion having a diameter of φ10 mm, φ20 mm, or φ30 mm is formed out of the object to be measured S having a flat-bottom hole-like pseudo defect portion K having various dimensions. In the example of S, the vertical axis represents the attenuation ratio of the peak value (the peak value of each coil / the peak value of the coil of 0ch), and in FIG. The horizontal axis indicates the number of channels (ch) of each coil.

図5に示すように、各ch間のピーク値の減衰の割合(同図のグラフの傾き)は、欠陥部Kの欠陥径(同図の例では、疑似欠陥部の直径φ10mm、φ20mm、φ30mm)に応じてそれぞれ異なっていることが分かる。したがって、各ch間のピーク値の減衰の仕方(つまり、「グラフの傾き」)から欠陥部Kの欠陥径を推定することが可能である。
なお、本実施形態では、検出コイル3を多チャンネル(16個のコイル)設け、各ch間の信号の減衰量の傾きから欠陥部Kの欠陥径の大きさを求める例を説明したが、これに限らず、例えば、検出センサ10(検出コイル3)の走査方向の時分割信号について同様の処理を行うことによっても、欠陥の大きさを定量的かつ高精度に推定可能である。
As shown in FIG. 5, the rate of attenuation of the peak value between each channel (the slope of the graph in FIG. 5) indicates the defect diameter of the defect portion K (in the example of FIG. 5, the diameter of the pseudo defect portion is φ10 mm, φ20 mm, φ30 mm). ) According to each. Therefore, it is possible to estimate the defect diameter of the defect portion K from the way of attenuation of the peak value between each channel (that is, “the slope of the graph”).
In the present embodiment, the detection coil 3 is provided with multiple channels (16 coils), and the example in which the size of the defect diameter of the defect portion K is obtained from the slope of the attenuation of the signal between the channels has been described. For example, the size of the defect can be estimated quantitatively and with high accuracy by performing the same processing on the time-division signal in the scanning direction of the detection sensor 10 (detection coil 3).

そして、続く残肉厚算出工程(ステップS60)は、上記欠陥径推定工程(ステップS50)で求めた欠陥部Kの欠陥径、および、その求めた欠陥径に対応する疑似欠陥部を形成した被測定物Sを用いた実験によって予め得られている欠陥径毎の(被測定物Sの元厚×長楕円長さ(Y'のピーク値))と(残肉厚/元厚)との関係式に基づいて、被測定物Sの残肉厚を算出するものである。   In the subsequent remaining thickness calculation step (step S60), the defect diameter of the defect portion K obtained in the defect diameter estimation step (step S50) and the object on which the pseudo defect portion corresponding to the obtained defect diameter is formed. Relationship between (original thickness of measured object S × long ellipse length (peak value of Y ′)) and (residual thickness / original thickness) for each defect diameter obtained in advance by an experiment using measured object S Based on the equation, the remaining thickness of the measurement object S is calculated.

ここで、本実施形態の残肉厚算出工程(ステップS60)における残肉厚の算出は、以下の知見に基づく。つまり、上記長楕円長さ(Y'のピーク値)は、残肉厚が少ないほど高くなることから、明らかに肉厚との相関がみられる(知見4)。また、残肉厚比が同じであっても元厚が厚いほど長楕円長さ(Y'のピーク値)は低くなる(知見5)。したがって、この関係を加味した補正をすることによって、一層好適な近似式が得られる。   Here, the calculation of the remaining thickness in the remaining thickness calculation step (step S60) of the present embodiment is based on the following knowledge. That is, since the length of the ellipse (the peak value of Y ′) becomes higher as the remaining thickness becomes smaller, there is clearly a correlation with the thickness (Knowledge 4). Moreover, even if the remaining thickness ratio is the same, the longer the original thickness, the lower the ellipse length (the peak value of Y ′) becomes (Knowledge 5). Therefore, a more preferable approximate expression can be obtained by performing correction in consideration of this relationship.

この知見に係る結果の一部を以下の表1に示す。なお、同表においては、疑似欠陥部を形成した被測定物Sの各欠陥径(直径φ10mm、φ20mm、φ30mm)それぞれについての、元厚(真値)、欠陥径の深さ(真値)、残肉厚(真値)、残肉厚比(残肉厚/元厚)、長楕円長さ(Y'のピーク値)および(被測定物Sの元厚×長楕円長さ(Y'のピーク値))を示した。   A part of the results relating to this finding is shown in Table 1 below. In the table, for each defect diameter (diameter φ10 mm, φ20 mm, φ30 mm) of the measurement object S in which the pseudo defect portion is formed, the original thickness (true value), the depth of the defect diameter (true value), Remaining thickness (true value), remaining thickness ratio (remaining thickness / original thickness), long ellipse length (peak value of Y ′) and (original thickness of measured object S × long elliptical length (Y ′ Peak value)).

Figure 2010054292
Figure 2010054292

さらに、図6に、上述の関係を加味した補正を考慮した図、つまり、「被測定物Sの元厚×長楕円長さ(Y'のピーク値)」と「残肉厚/元厚」との関係を示す。なお、同図(a)〜(c)は、各欠陥径(直径φ10mm、φ20mm、φ30mm)をパラメータにして、欠陥径毎に3種類のグラフがあり、各グラフは、縦軸に「被測定物Sの元厚×長楕円長さ(Y'のピーク値)」を、また、横軸に「残肉厚/元厚」をそれぞれとり、表1の測定結果をプロットした結果の一例である。   Further, FIG. 6 is a diagram that considers the correction in consideration of the above-described relationship, that is, “original thickness of measured object S × long ellipse length (peak value of Y ′)” and “remaining thickness / original thickness”. Shows the relationship. In addition, the same figure (a)-(c) makes each defect diameter (diameter φ10mm, φ20mm, φ30mm) a parameter, and there are three types of graphs for each defect diameter. It is an example of the results obtained by plotting the measurement results in Table 1 with “original thickness of the object S × long ellipse length (peak value of Y ′)” and “horizontal thickness / original thickness” on the horizontal axis. .

また、図7(a)〜(c)は、長楕円長さ(Y'のピーク値)と無次元量(欠陥径/残肉厚)との関係を示した比較のための図である。図7も図6同様に、欠陥径(直径φ10mm、φ20mm、φ30mm)をパラメータにして、縦軸に「長楕円長さ(Y'のピーク値)」、横軸に「残肉厚/元厚」をそれぞれとり、測定結果をプロットした。なお、この図7に示す比較例は、本出願人による従前の出願(特開2006−208312号公報)に開示した内部欠陥測定方法によるものである。   FIGS. 7A to 7C are diagrams for comparison showing the relationship between the ellipse length (peak value of Y ′) and the dimensionless amount (defect diameter / remaining thickness). As in FIG. 6, FIG. 7 uses the defect diameter (diameter φ10 mm, φ20 mm, φ30 mm) as a parameter, and the vertical axis indicates “long ellipse length (Y ′ peak value)” and the horizontal axis indicates “remaining thickness / original thickness”. ”And the measurement results were plotted. The comparative example shown in FIG. 7 is based on the internal defect measurement method disclosed in a previous application (Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 2006-208312) by the present applicant.

ここで、図6(a)〜(c)および図7(a)〜(c)に示すいずれの結果についても、各図に示す一次近似直線に高い相関を示していることが分かるが、図6および図7相互のR(相関係数の2乗値)を比較すると、図6(a)〜(c)に示す一次近似直線(つまり、縦軸に「被測定物Sの元厚×長楕円長さ(Y'のピーク値)」を採った場合の一次近似直線)の方が、図7(a)〜(c)に示す一次近似直線(つまり、縦軸に「長楕円長さ(Y'のピーク値)」を採った場合の一次近似直線)よりも測定値が真値に対してより近似していることが判る(なお、「R」は、0と1の間の値をとり、この値が1に近いほど真値に対して一次近似直線がより近似していることを示す。)。 Here, it can be seen that any of the results shown in FIGS. 6A to 6C and FIGS. 7A to 7C show a high correlation with the linear approximation line shown in each figure. 6 and FIG. 7 are compared with each other, R 2 (the square value of the correlation coefficient) is compared, and a linear approximation line shown in FIGS. 6A to 6C (that is, “the original thickness of the measured object S × The primary approximate line in the case of adopting “long ellipse length (peak value of Y ′)” is the primary approximate line shown in FIGS. 7A to 7C (that is, “long ellipse length on the vertical axis”). It can be seen that the measured value is more approximate to the true value than the (primary approximate line when “(peak value of Y ′)” is taken) (“R 2 ” is between 0 and 1). The value is taken, and the closer this value is to 1, the closer the linear approximation line is to the true value.)

これにより、本願においては、残肉厚算出工程(ステップS60)での残肉厚の算出に際し、図6の一次近似直線を採用しており、先の欠陥径推定工程にて推定されている「欠陥径」から、図6のうちのいずれかの一次近似直線を選定し、この一次近似直線から「残肉厚/元厚」を得ることによって、真値に対して一層近似した「残肉厚」の値を取得している。   Thereby, in this application, when calculating the remaining thickness in the remaining thickness calculation step (step S60), the first-order approximate straight line of FIG. 6 is adopted, which is estimated in the previous defect diameter estimation step. From the “defect diameter”, select one of the primary approximate lines in FIG. 6, and obtain “remaining thickness / original thickness” from this first approximate line, thereby further approximating the “remaining thickness” to the true value. ”Is being acquired.

つまり、推定されている「欠陥径」に応答する図6の一次近似直線において、仮に図6(a)が選定されたとき、同図において応答する「長楕円長さ(Y'のピーク値)×元厚」をAとすれば、同図の一次近似直線から「残肉厚/元厚」Bが得られる。そして、求める「残肉厚」は、「B×元厚」によって算出することができる。なお、図6のうちのいずれかの一次近似直線を選定するに際しては、推定されている「欠陥径」の値を四捨五入して疑似欠陥部を形成した被測定物Sの各欠陥径(直径φ10mm、φ20mm、φ30mm)の一次近似直線を応答させる。   That is, in the first-order approximate straight line of FIG. 6 that responds to the estimated “defect diameter”, when FIG. 6A is selected, the “long ellipse length (the peak value of Y ′) that responds in FIG. Assuming that “x original thickness” is A, “remaining thickness / original thickness” B is obtained from the primary approximate line of FIG. Then, the “remaining thickness” to be calculated can be calculated by “B × original thickness”. Note that when selecting any of the first-order approximate straight lines in FIG. 6, each defect diameter (diameter φ10 mm) of the measurement object S in which the estimated “defect diameter” value is rounded to form a pseudo defect portion. , Φ20 mm, φ30 mm) is made to respond.

本発明に係る内部欠陥測定方法において、真値に対して近似した「残肉厚」の値に対し、総合した検出誤差を評価した結果を図8に示す。なお、同図(a)が上述した本発明に係る内部欠陥測定方法において図6の一次近似直線を採用した結果であり、また、同図(b)が、比較例として、図7の一次近似直線を採用した結果である。同図からわかるように、図8(a)および(b)相互のR(相関係数の2乗値)を比較すると、改善式を採用した図8(a)のR値の方が、従前の図8(b)のR値よりも良い結果であった。なお、本発明に係る内部欠陥測定方法において、総合した検出誤差としては、残肉厚±20%であり、自動欠陥検出が確実に可能な範囲は、板厚が24mm以下であり、また、欠陥径は、その直径が10mm以上且つ板厚の30%深さ以上のものであった。 In the internal defect measuring method according to the present invention, FIG. 8 shows the result of evaluating the total detection error with respect to the “remaining thickness” value approximated to the true value. 6A shows the result of adopting the primary approximation line of FIG. 6 in the internal defect measuring method according to the present invention described above, and FIG. 7B shows the primary approximation of FIG. 7 as a comparative example. This is a result of adopting a straight line. As can be seen from FIG. 8, when comparing R 2 (correlation coefficient square value) between FIGS. 8A and 8B, the R 2 value of FIG. The result was better than the R 2 value of FIG. In the internal defect measurement method according to the present invention, the total detection error is a remaining thickness of ± 20%, and the range in which automatic defect detection can be reliably performed is a plate thickness of 24 mm or less, The diameter was 10 mm or more and 30% depth or more of the plate thickness.

本発明に係る内部欠陥測定方法で用いる低周波電磁誘導法を行うための電磁誘導装置の一構成例を示す図である。It is a figure which shows one structural example of the electromagnetic induction apparatus for performing the low frequency electromagnetic induction method used with the internal defect measuring method which concerns on this invention. 本発明に係る内部欠陥測定方法の処理フローの一例を示す図である。It is a figure which shows an example of the processing flow of the internal defect measuring method which concerns on this invention. 図2の処理フローでの位相検波処理を説明する図である。It is a figure explaining the phase detection process in the processing flow of FIG. 同図(a)は、位相検波処理後の信号をベクトル座標上にプロットした図である。また、同図(b)は、同図(a)での、ゼロ点の移動および回転をしたベクトル座標上での信号軌跡をプロットしたイメージを示す図である。FIG. 6A is a diagram in which signals after phase detection processing are plotted on vector coordinates. FIG. 5B is a diagram showing an image in which signal trajectories on the vector coordinates obtained by moving and rotating the zero point in FIG. 検出コイルの各ch間でのピーク値の減衰の仕方の一例を表す図である。It is a figure showing an example of the method of attenuation of the peak value between each channel of a detection coil. 本発明に係る内部欠陥測定方法での、「長楕円長さ(Y'のピーク値)×元厚」と「(残肉厚/元厚)」との関係を示した図((a)〜(c))である。The figure which showed the relationship between "long ellipse length (peak value of Y ') x original thickness" and "(residual thickness / original thickness)" in the internal defect measuring method which concerns on this invention ((a)- (C)). 図6の比較例であって、「長楕円長さ(Y'のピーク値)」と「(残肉厚/元厚)」との関係を示した図((a)〜(c))である。6 is a comparative example of FIG. 6 and is a diagram ((a) to (c)) showing a relationship between “long ellipse length (peak value of Y ′)” and “(remaining wall thickness / original thickness)”. is there. 実際の残肉厚と算出した残肉厚との関係を示した図であり、同図(a)は、図6に示す本発明に係る内部欠陥測定方法での結果、また、同図(b)は図7に示す比較例の方法での結果をそれぞれ示している。It is the figure which showed the relationship between the actual remaining thickness and the calculated remaining thickness, The figure (a) shows the result by the internal defect measuring method which concerns on this invention shown in FIG. ) Shows the results of the method of the comparative example shown in FIG.

符号の説明Explanation of symbols

1 励磁装置
2 励磁コイル
3 磁束検出手段
4 強磁性体コア
10 検出センサ
S 被測定物
K 欠陥部
DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 Excitation apparatus 2 Excitation coil 3 Magnetic flux detection means 4 Ferromagnetic core 10 Detection sensor S Measured object K Defect part

Claims (3)

強磁性体でつくられた構造体の内部欠陥を、低周波電磁誘導法を用いて測定する内部欠陥測定方法であって、
前記構造体の外面を、励磁装置および複数のチャンネルをもつ磁束検出手段を有する検出センサで走査して検出データを収集する検出データ収集工程と、その収集した検出データに対して、基準となる信号および基準となる信号の位相を90°ずらせた信号をそれぞれ別個に乗算した後に、フィルタリング処理を行う位相検波処理工程と、その位相検波処理工程で得られた信号を描かせるベクトル座標のゼロ点を任意の位置に移動させるとともに、その描かせた信号軌跡の長楕円の長径および短径方向に座標軸を回転させる座標変換工程と、その座標変換された検出データに基づいて前記構造体の内部欠陥の欠陥径を推定する欠陥径推定工程と、前記構造体の残肉厚を算出する残肉厚算出工程とを含み、
前記残肉厚算出工程は、前記欠陥径推定工程で求めた欠陥径、および、その求めた欠陥径に対応する疑似欠陥部を形成した被測定物を用いた実験によって予め得られている欠陥径毎の(元厚×長楕円長さ)と(残肉厚/元厚)との関係式に基づいて、前記構造体の残肉厚を算出することを特徴とする内部欠陥測定方法。
An internal defect measurement method for measuring internal defects of a structure made of a ferromagnetic material using a low frequency electromagnetic induction method,
A detection data collection step of collecting detection data by scanning the outer surface of the structure with a detection sensor having an excitation device and a magnetic flux detection means having a plurality of channels, and a signal serving as a reference for the collected detection data And a phase detection processing step for performing a filtering process after separately multiplying signals each having a phase of a reference signal shifted by 90 °, and a zero point of a vector coordinate for drawing a signal obtained in the phase detection processing step. A coordinate conversion step of rotating the coordinate axis in the major axis and minor axis direction of the ellipse of the drawn signal trajectory and moving it to an arbitrary position, and the internal defect of the structure based on the coordinate-converted detection data A defect diameter estimating step for estimating a defect diameter, and a remaining thickness calculation step for calculating a remaining thickness of the structure,
In the remaining thickness calculation step, the defect diameter obtained in the defect diameter estimation step, and the defect diameter obtained in advance by an experiment using a measurement object in which a pseudo defect portion corresponding to the obtained defect diameter is formed. An internal defect measuring method, comprising: calculating a remaining thickness of the structure based on a relational expression between (original thickness × long elliptical length) and (remaining thickness / original thickness).
強磁性体でつくられた構造体の内部欠陥を、低周波電磁誘導法を用いて測定する内部欠陥測定方法であって、
前記構造体の外面を、励磁装置および複数のチャンネルをもつ磁束検出手段を有する検出センサで走査して検出データを収集する検出データ収集工程と、その収集した検出データに対して、基準となる信号および基準となる信号の位相を90°ずらせた信号をそれぞれ別個に乗算した後に、フィルタリング処理を行う位相検波処理工程と、その位相検波処理工程で得られた信号を描かせるベクトル座標のゼロ点を任意の位置に移動させるとともに、その描かせた信号軌跡の長楕円の長径および短径方向に座標軸を回転させる座標変換工程と、その座標変換された信号の急峻な立ち上がり部分を検出することにより欠陥部の有無を判定する欠陥部検出工程と、その検出された欠陥部における検出データに基づいて前記構造体の内部欠陥の欠陥径を推定する欠陥径推定工程と、前記構造体の残肉厚を算出する残肉厚算出工程とを含み、
前記残肉厚算出工程は、前記欠陥径推定工程で求めた欠陥径、および、その求めた欠陥径に対応する疑似欠陥部を形成した被測定物を用いた実験によって予め得られている欠陥径毎の(元厚×長楕円長さ)と(残肉厚/元厚)との関係式に基づいて、前記構造体の残肉厚を算出することを特徴とする内部欠陥測定方法。
An internal defect measurement method for measuring internal defects of a structure made of a ferromagnetic material using a low frequency electromagnetic induction method,
A detection data collection step of collecting detection data by scanning the outer surface of the structure with a detection sensor having an excitation device and a magnetic flux detection means having a plurality of channels, and a signal serving as a reference for the collected detection data And a phase detection processing step for performing a filtering process after separately multiplying signals each having a phase of a reference signal shifted by 90 °, and a zero point of a vector coordinate for drawing a signal obtained in the phase detection processing step. A defect is detected by moving to an arbitrary position and detecting a steep rising portion of the coordinate-converted signal and a coordinate conversion step of rotating the coordinate axis in the major axis and minor axis direction of the ellipse of the drawn signal locus. The defect diameter of the internal defect of the structure based on the defect detection process for determining the presence / absence of the defect and the detection data in the detected defect Includes a defect size estimation step of estimating, the remaining wall thickness calculating step of calculating a remaining wall thickness of the structure,
In the remaining thickness calculation step, the defect diameter obtained in the defect diameter estimation step, and the defect diameter obtained in advance by an experiment using a measurement object in which a pseudo defect portion corresponding to the obtained defect diameter is formed. An internal defect measuring method, comprising: calculating a remaining thickness of the structure based on a relational expression between (original thickness × long elliptical length) and (remaining thickness / original thickness).
請求項1または請求項2に記載の内部欠陥測定方法において、
前記欠陥径推定工程は、前記検出センサの有する各チャンネル間の検出データまたは前記検出センサの走査方向の検出データの減衰量の傾きから前記構造体の内部欠陥の欠陥径を推定することを特徴とする内部欠陥測定方法。
In the internal defect measuring method according to claim 1 or 2,
In the defect diameter estimating step, the defect diameter of the internal defect of the structure is estimated from the inclination of the attenuation amount of the detection data between the channels of the detection sensor or the detection data in the scanning direction of the detection sensor. Internal defect measurement method.
JP2008218423A 2008-08-27 2008-08-27 Internal defect measurement method Active JP5169626B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2008218423A JP5169626B2 (en) 2008-08-27 2008-08-27 Internal defect measurement method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2008218423A JP5169626B2 (en) 2008-08-27 2008-08-27 Internal defect measurement method

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2010054292A true JP2010054292A (en) 2010-03-11
JP5169626B2 JP5169626B2 (en) 2013-03-27

Family

ID=42070390

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2008218423A Active JP5169626B2 (en) 2008-08-27 2008-08-27 Internal defect measurement method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP5169626B2 (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN112819746A (en) * 2019-10-31 2021-05-18 合肥美亚光电技术股份有限公司 Nut kernel worm-eating defect detection method and device
CN112819745A (en) * 2019-10-31 2021-05-18 合肥美亚光电技术股份有限公司 Nut kernel center worm-eating defect detection method and device

Citations (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH0560731A (en) * 1991-09-02 1993-03-12 Nkk Corp Magnetization force control method for magnetic flaw detector
JPH05264512A (en) * 1992-03-18 1993-10-12 Osaka Gas Co Ltd Method and device for inspecting piping
JPH06281627A (en) * 1993-03-30 1994-10-07 Osaka Gas Co Ltd Method and device for inspecting tubular body
JPH1144674A (en) * 1997-07-25 1999-02-16 Asahi Electric Works Ltd Method and device for detecting corrosion, crack, etc., of steel material
JP3228132B2 (en) * 1996-07-08 2001-11-12 日本鋼管株式会社 Ultrasonic flaw detection method
JP2002350406A (en) * 2001-05-28 2002-12-04 Kawasaki Steel Corp Eddy current flaw detector
JP2004239866A (en) * 2003-02-10 2004-08-26 Jfe Steel Kk Method and apparatus for detecting magnetic flux leakage
JP2004294353A (en) * 2003-03-28 2004-10-21 Tokyo Electric Power Co Inc:The Thickness detection device for hollow metal body
JP2006208312A (en) * 2005-01-31 2006-08-10 Jfe Steel Kk Internal defect measurement method and apparatus

Patent Citations (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH0560731A (en) * 1991-09-02 1993-03-12 Nkk Corp Magnetization force control method for magnetic flaw detector
JPH05264512A (en) * 1992-03-18 1993-10-12 Osaka Gas Co Ltd Method and device for inspecting piping
JPH06281627A (en) * 1993-03-30 1994-10-07 Osaka Gas Co Ltd Method and device for inspecting tubular body
JP3228132B2 (en) * 1996-07-08 2001-11-12 日本鋼管株式会社 Ultrasonic flaw detection method
JPH1144674A (en) * 1997-07-25 1999-02-16 Asahi Electric Works Ltd Method and device for detecting corrosion, crack, etc., of steel material
JP2002350406A (en) * 2001-05-28 2002-12-04 Kawasaki Steel Corp Eddy current flaw detector
JP2004239866A (en) * 2003-02-10 2004-08-26 Jfe Steel Kk Method and apparatus for detecting magnetic flux leakage
JP2004294353A (en) * 2003-03-28 2004-10-21 Tokyo Electric Power Co Inc:The Thickness detection device for hollow metal body
JP2006208312A (en) * 2005-01-31 2006-08-10 Jfe Steel Kk Internal defect measurement method and apparatus

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN112819746A (en) * 2019-10-31 2021-05-18 合肥美亚光电技术股份有限公司 Nut kernel worm-eating defect detection method and device
CN112819745A (en) * 2019-10-31 2021-05-18 合肥美亚光电技术股份有限公司 Nut kernel center worm-eating defect detection method and device
CN112819746B (en) * 2019-10-31 2024-04-23 合肥美亚光电技术股份有限公司 Nut kernel worm erosion defect detection method and device

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP5169626B2 (en) 2013-03-27

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
RU2644026C1 (en) Method and device for testing using scattering flows
JP4829883B2 (en) Method and apparatus for non-destructive inspection of tubes
US7206706B2 (en) Inspection method and system using multifrequency phase analysis
JP5383597B2 (en) Eddy current inspection apparatus and inspection method
JP5607868B2 (en) Inspection system and operation method
WO2017008621A1 (en) Micro-magnetic detection method and device
CN103399083B (en) A kind of suppressing method of Pulsed eddy current testing Lift-off effect
EP2482067A1 (en) A non-destructive test method for automatic fastener inspection
KR100696991B1 (en) Apparatus and method for detecting eddy current of steam generator tube using permeability measurement method
JP4742600B2 (en) Internal defect measurement method and apparatus
CN101300482B (en) Method for measuring S/N ratio in eddy current scratch on inner surface of tube
JP5169626B2 (en) Internal defect measurement method
US20200049661A1 (en) Eddy current inspection device for nondestructive testing
JP5614752B2 (en) Quenching state inspection device and quenching state inspection method
US10775347B2 (en) Material inspection using eddy currents
JP2016161562A (en) Eddy current inspection device and eddy current inspection method
JP2015094588A (en) Ultrasonic flaw detection inspection method for measured material
Pearson et al. A study of MFL signals from a spectrum of defect geometries
JP2005164516A (en) Method for detecting defect
JP2003043015A (en) Defect depth estimation method
JP6058436B2 (en) Eddy current flaw detector and eddy current flaw detection method
KR101309885B1 (en) Defect detecting apparatus of steel pipe coated with paint using magnetic leakage flux method and operating method thereof
JP5857904B2 (en) Thinning depth estimation method and apparatus
JP2005164298A (en) Eddy current flaw detection method and apparatus
JP2023111411A (en) Pipe defect determination device

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20110128

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20120822

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20120911

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20121108

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20121204

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20121217

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 5169626

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250