JP2009197700A - Vertical wind mill blade - Google Patents
Vertical wind mill blade Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- JP2009197700A JP2009197700A JP2008040829A JP2008040829A JP2009197700A JP 2009197700 A JP2009197700 A JP 2009197700A JP 2008040829 A JP2008040829 A JP 2008040829A JP 2008040829 A JP2008040829 A JP 2008040829A JP 2009197700 A JP2009197700 A JP 2009197700A
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- blade
- wind
- wing
- split
- lift
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 230000001141 propulsive effect Effects 0.000 abstract description 6
- 238000005452 bending Methods 0.000 abstract description 3
- 230000002093 peripheral effect Effects 0.000 description 21
- 230000000630 rising effect Effects 0.000 description 7
- 230000007423 decrease Effects 0.000 description 5
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 125000006850 spacer group Chemical group 0.000 description 3
- 239000012530 fluid Substances 0.000 description 2
- UJCHIZDEQZMODR-BYPYZUCNSA-N (2r)-2-acetamido-3-sulfanylpropanamide Chemical compound CC(=O)N[C@@H](CS)C(N)=O UJCHIZDEQZMODR-BYPYZUCNSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 241001669680 Dormitator maculatus Species 0.000 description 1
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 150000001875 compounds Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 230000006866 deterioration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001771 impaired effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012423 maintenance Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010248 power generation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000011218 segmentation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02E—REDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
- Y02E10/00—Energy generation through renewable energy sources
- Y02E10/70—Wind energy
- Y02E10/74—Wind turbines with rotation axis perpendicular to the wind direction
Landscapes
- Wind Motors (AREA)
Abstract
Description
本発明は風力発電などに使われる垂直軸風車の翼に関し、回り始める最低風速であるカットイン風速を下げると共に、素早い立ち上がりを実現しながら揚力翼としての出力パワーを概ね維持できる風車翼に関する。 The present invention relates to a blade of a vertical axis wind turbine used for wind power generation and the like, and more particularly to a wind turbine blade that can reduce the cut-in wind speed, which is the lowest wind speed that starts to rotate, and can generally maintain the output power as a lift blade while realizing a quick rise.
ジャイロミル型などの垂直軸風車では飛行機翼に似た揚力翼が使われている。一般に揚力は翼と空気など流体の相対速度の二乗に比例することが知られている通り、数m/s以上の中・高風速域ではパドル型やサポニウス型などの抗力型の風車に比べて、総合能率である風パワーに対する出力パワーで表されるパワー係数が高い反面、低速回転時の揚力が極端に小さいため、カットイン風速が高いことや立ち上がりにくく、立ち上がっても風速に見合う回転速度まで上がるのに時間がかかった。 In vertical axis wind turbines such as the gyromill type, lift wings similar to airplane wings are used. As is generally known, lift is proportional to the square of the relative velocity of fluid such as airfoil and air, as compared to drag type wind turbines such as paddle type and Saponius type in the middle and high wind speed range of several m / s or higher. Although the power coefficient expressed by the output power relative to the wind power, which is the overall efficiency, is high, the lift at low speed rotation is extremely small, so the cut-in wind speed is high and it is difficult to start up, even if it rises up to the rotation speed that matches the wind speed It took time to go up.
立ち上がりの遅い原因が風車の慣性モーメントに起因しているのであれば、エネルギーとして蓄積されるので問題は少ないが、回転速度が上がらない内は揚力が小さいことに起因していたのでは、エネルギーへの変換そのものが遅れるため、平均の出力は大幅に低下してしまう
このため、やむをえずモータを接続したり、発電機をモータとして使ったりして無風や微風時でも電池など外部電源を使って回転を止めないでおくものや、風速を検出してモータで起動するなど、余計な電力を消費する手段を講じているものもあるが、これとて低速回転からの立ち上がりの悪さはカバーできない。
If the cause of the slow start is due to the moment of inertia of the windmill, it will be accumulated as energy, so there are few problems.However, if the rotational speed does not increase, the lift is small, Therefore, the average output is greatly reduced due to the delay in the conversion of this.Therefore, it is unavoidable to connect a motor or use a generator as a motor to rotate using an external power source such as a battery even when there is no wind or light wind. Some devices do not stop the operation, and others take measures to consume extra power, such as starting with a motor by detecting the wind speed, but this does not cover the poor rise from low-speed rotation.
このように揚力翼だけでは市街地など比較的平均風速が低い上、吹いたり止んだり風速の変化の大きい地域では実用になりにくく、モニュメントに留まる例も多い。
ここれを改善しようとして、小さな抗力型風車との複合風車とするとか、翼の下面の一部を開けて抗力を得ようとするもの(特許文献1)などの提案もあり、それなりの立ち上がりの改善効果があるものの、基本的に小さな抗力型風車翼を付加したような効果であり、大きな抗力は得られないばかりか、抵抗が増えるためか揚力翼としての性能が損なわれてしまう。
In order to improve this, there are proposals such as a compound wind turbine with a small drag type wind turbine, or a method of obtaining a drag force by opening a part of the lower surface of the wing (Patent Document 1). Although there is an improvement effect, it is basically an effect of adding a small drag type wind turbine blade, and not only a large drag cannot be obtained, but also the performance as a lift blade is impaired due to increased resistance.
停止時や低速回転時でも風速に応じた推進力を得て素早く立ち上がり、従ってモータなどによる起動動作を不要とし、高風速時も揚力翼としての出力パワーを概ね維持できる垂直軸風車用の翼を得る。 A blade for a vertical axis wind turbine that can quickly stand up with a propulsive force according to the wind speed even when stopped or rotated at low speeds, and therefore does not require a starting operation by a motor, etc., and can generally maintain the output power as a lift blade even at high wind speeds. obtain.
本発明は垂直軸風車の翼であって、揚力翼の翼弦に沿った翼形を表す断面で、基本形とする翼(1)の前縁から概ね翼弦長の1/6から1/2の間で切断した後方が空洞の先行部(3)と、ほぼ前記切断位置で翼厚のほぼ中央を起点とし、基本形とする翼の翼厚以内の厚みで後縁まで伸びる後行部(4)とに分割した分割翼とした。 The present invention is a blade of a vertical axis windmill, and is a cross section representing an airfoil shape along a chord of a lift wing, and is approximately 1/6 to 1/2 of the chord length from the leading edge of the basic wing (1). The leading part (3) of the cavity cut between the trailing part (3) and the trailing part (4) starting from substantially the center of the blade thickness at the cutting position and extending to the trailing edge with a thickness within the blade thickness of the basic blade. ) And divided blades.
停止時でも分割翼の切断位置の一方から入る風によって、先行部(3)は内側から翼の進行方向に押され、他方に排出される風で進行方向に推進力を発生し、モータなどによる起動の助けを借りることなく素早い立ち上がりを実現すると共に、周速比1を超えてもこの動作が残るため、高速回転時には基本形の揚力翼に比べてやや低い回転速度となるものの、トルクが増大するため基本形と比べて遜色のない出力パワーが得られる。 Even when stopped, the leading part (3) is pushed in the moving direction of the blades from the inside by the wind entering from one of the cutting positions of the divided blades, and the driving force is generated in the moving direction by the wind discharged to the other side. Achieving a quick start-up without the help of start-up, and this operation remains even if the peripheral speed ratio exceeds 1, so that the rotational speed is slightly lower than that of the basic lift wing during high-speed rotation, but the torque increases. Therefore, output power comparable to that of the basic type can be obtained.
揚力翼はそれぞれの特性の違いなどから、数多くの翼形が提案されており、データが公表されているものも多いが、本発明はこれらを含め、どのような揚力翼にも適用することができる。また請求項では先行部(3)の長さ(Lf)の範囲を、立ち上り特性の大幅な改善効果が認められ、出力パワーのあまり低下しない範囲として翼弦長の1/6から1/2としたが、最良の形態としては、一般的に揚力翼の最大翼厚を与える位置である前縁から1/3付近の位置にするのが、立ち上がり特性の大幅改善と出力パワーの維持を両立させる形態と推定される。
また、後行部(4)を薄くすると低風速時の立ち上がり特性や出力パワーがより優れたものになるが、無負荷周速比は低下する傾向にあるので、仕様や製作の都合に応じて適宜選択する余地がある。
A number of airfoils have been proposed for lift wings due to differences in their characteristics, and many of the data have been published, but the present invention can be applied to any lift wing including these. it can. Further, in the claims, the range of the length (Lf) of the leading portion (3) is recognized as a range in which the rise characteristic is significantly improved and the output power is not significantly reduced, from 1/6 to 1/2 of the chord length. However, as the best mode, it is generally set to a position near 1/3 from the leading edge, which is the position that gives the maximum blade thickness of the lift wing, to achieve both a significant improvement in rising characteristics and maintenance of output power. Estimated form.
Also, if the trailing part (4) is made thinner, the rise characteristics and output power at low wind speeds will become better, but the no-load peripheral speed ratio tends to decrease, so depending on the specifications and the convenience of production There is room to choose as appropriate.
本発明はジャイロミル風車として一般的な垂直直線翼に適用できる。翼の上下両端の処置は、実験では上下の長さである翼長を短くしたこともあり、それぞれ基本形の翼形をした板で塞いだが実用風車では端部で発生しやすい渦流の軽減処置など一般的な両端処置も適用できる。
また、翼を分割したため新たな支持・固定方法が必要になるが、例えば図14に示すスペーサ(5,6)を垂直長手方向に適宜挿入してネジなどの締結部品(7)で固定し、これらにステーを接続したり、必要に応じてバンドで巻いて補強したりする方法もある。
The present invention can be applied to a vertical straight blade generally used as a gyromill wind turbine. In the experiment, the upper and lower ends of the wing were shortened in the experiment, and the wing length, which is the upper and lower length, was shortened. General both-end treatment can also be applied.
Further, since the blades are divided, a new support / fixing method is required. For example, the spacers (5, 6) shown in FIG. 14 are appropriately inserted in the vertical longitudinal direction and fixed with fastening parts (7) such as screws, There are also methods to connect stays to these, or to wrap them with bands as needed.
以下実施例について図面を参照して説明する。なお、以下で示すデータは下記の実験風車で取得したものであり、データで、例えば無負荷の周速比が2以下など常識的な値より低いのは翼の垂直方向の長さを極端に短くしたため、翼を支えるステーの風圧抵抗が無視できないとか、翼の上下に逃げる風が無視できないとか、上下翼端で発生する渦流の影響が大きいなど、実用風車とはやや異なる部分もあるが、各種形態の翼の能力比較用としては十分と考える。
実験風車
最外周半径(翼の最外周):110mm(全ての実験翼で統一)
翼数 :3
各翼の占有角度 :45度(全ての実験翼で統一)
翼長さ(垂直直線翼) :64mm(全ての実験翼で統一)
最大翼厚(2種類に統一):W=15mm,20mm
簡易風洞仕様(広風速域は自動車走行による)
風速3段切り替え :L=1.5m/s,M=2.7m/s,H=3.5m/s
Embodiments will be described below with reference to the drawings. The data shown below was obtained with the following experimental wind turbine. In the data, for example, the no-load peripheral speed ratio is lower than a common value such as 2 or less. Because it has been shortened, the wind pressure resistance of the stay that supports the wing cannot be ignored, the wind escaping up and down the wing can not be ignored, and the influence of the vortex generated at the upper and lower wing tips is large, but there are some differences from the practical wind turbine, It is considered sufficient for comparing the performance of various types of wings.
Experimental windmill outermost radius (outermost circumference of wing): 110mm (unified for all experimental wings)
Number of wings: 3
Occupation angle of each wing: 45 degrees (unified for all experimental wings)
Blade length (vertical straight blade): 64mm (unified for all experimental blades)
Maximum blade thickness (unified in two types): W = 15mm, 20mm
Simple wind tunnel specifications (wide wind speed range depends on driving)
Three-stage wind speed switching: L = 1.5m / s, M = 2.7m / s, H = 3.5m / s
図1は本発明の分割翼の基本的な動作を示す1実施例の翼断面図である。基となった基本形の翼は同図で一部が点線のようにつながっている直線対称翼であるが、これを太い実線のように基本形の途中の位置(Lf)の例えば最大翼厚の位置で切断した後方が空洞の先行部(3)と、切断位置から後ろの切断面を翼厚の中央に寄せて閉じたような、切断位置を起点とする後行部(4)に分割し、翼弦に沿った翼の途中で、風が曲がりながら翼厚みを通り抜けできるような通路を設けている。後行部は同図に太い点線で示すように膨らみを薄くして風が入りやすいようにしても良い。 FIG. 1 is a blade cross-sectional view of one embodiment showing the basic operation of the divided blade of the present invention. The wing of the basic shape that is the basis is a straight symmetric wing that is partially connected as shown by the dotted line in the figure, but this is the position of the maximum blade thickness, for example, at the position (Lf) in the middle of the basic shape as shown by the thick solid line. The rear part cut in the step is divided into a leading part (3) of the cavity and a trailing part (4) starting from the cutting position, such that the cutting surface behind the cutting position is closed to the center of the blade thickness, In the middle of the wing along the chord, there is a passage that allows the wind to pass through the wing thickness while turning. As shown by the thick dotted line in the figure, the trailing portion may be thinned so that the wind can easily enter.
図1では図の上方の圧力が高く、風が上方から入り先行部を内側から押すと共に下後方に排出される流れを矢印で示しているが、下方の圧力が高い場合は逆の流れとなる。入った風で先行部が内側から押される力はパドル型風車の抗力のようだが、例えば図の真上から曲がりながら入った風は直交方向に翼を押し、更に下側の斜め後方に排出されて直交方向に推進力となる動作は揚力の定義にも該当するので、以後どちらとは特定せず単に推進力と呼ぶ。
また、本発明の分割翼は揚力翼をベースとしており、当然、翼に働く有効な力は一般に説明されている揚力と、前記推進力との合成力であるが以下では煩雑を避けるため、この推進力に的を絞って説明する。
In FIG. 1, the upper pressure in the figure is high, and the flow of wind entering from the upper side and pushing the leading part from the inside and discharged downward and rearward is indicated by arrows. However, when the lower pressure is high, the flow is reversed. . The force that the leading part is pushed from the inside by the wind that entered seems to be the drag of the paddle type windmill, but for example, the wind that entered while turning from the top of the figure pushes the wing in the orthogonal direction, and is further discharged diagonally backward on the lower side Therefore, since the operation that becomes the propulsive force in the orthogonal direction also corresponds to the definition of lift, it will be simply referred to as the propulsive force without specifying either.
The split wing of the present invention is based on a lift wing. Naturally, the effective force acting on the wing is a combined force of the lift force generally described and the propulsion force. Explain with a focus on propulsion.
このように動作する分割翼(1)の回転各位置における変化を、図8に停止または低速回転時の様子を、図9に風速に対する翼の最外周での回転運動による速度との比である周速比が1の状態での様子をそれぞれ示す。
図8では風向に対して315度付近から左廻りに225度付近まで、翼上面と下面とで圧力差のなくなる270度付近を除いてほぼ全周で図1で説明した推進力が発生する。
周速比1の場合の図9では風と翼の回転運動が合成され、各位置の翼に対する風向は同図で示すように翼の前方側に傾く。しかしこの場合でも同図に示すようにわずかの圧力差で切断位置に風の一部が流れ込む。
FIG. 8 shows the change at each rotational position of the split blade (1) operating in this way, FIG. 8 shows the state at the time of stop or low speed rotation, and FIG. 9 shows the ratio of the rotational speed at the outermost periphery of the blade to the wind speed. A state in a state where the peripheral speed ratio is 1 is shown.
In FIG. 8, the propulsive force described in FIG. 1 is generated on almost the entire circumference except for the vicinity of 270 degrees where there is no pressure difference between the upper surface and the lower surface of the blade from about 315 degrees to about 225 degrees counterclockwise with respect to the wind direction.
In FIG. 9 in the case of the
一般にこの切断位置のような流体中の不連続領域では渦流が発生し、速度が上がるほど大きな抵抗力になるはずである。しかし、回転速度が上がると切断位置付近にある空気は遠心力を受けて回転円の外側に押し出されるため、中高風速域では内側から外側への流れが多くなり、渦流による抵抗や分割したことによる揚力の低下を、この流れによる推進力で補っているようにも考えられる。 In general, a vortex is generated in a discontinuous region in the fluid such as the cutting position, and the resistance should be increased as the speed increases. However, as the rotational speed increases, the air near the cutting position receives centrifugal force and is pushed out of the rotating circle, so the flow from the inside to the outside increases in the middle and high wind speed range, which is due to resistance and division by vortex flow. It can be considered that the decrease in lift is compensated by the propulsive force generated by this flow.
図3は湾曲翼に本発明を実施した1実施例である。様々な翼形状があることは既に記したが、本実施例では図2に示すように垂直軸風車専用の翼として回転軸を中心とした円弧に沿って翼弦を湾曲させた湾曲翼(1b)を使った例である。この翼の最外周半径と最大翼厚Wおよび占有角度を同図のように定義する。 FIG. 3 shows an embodiment in which the present invention is applied to a curved wing. Although it has already been described that there are various blade shapes, in this embodiment, as shown in FIG. 2, as a blade dedicated to a vertical axis wind turbine, a curved blade (1b) whose blade chord is curved along an arc centered on the rotation axis. ). The outermost peripheral radius, the maximum blade thickness W, and the occupation angle are defined as shown in FIG.
図3は湾曲翼(1b)に本発明を実施し、先行部(3b)の長さ(Lf)を翼弦長の1/3(A),1/4(B)および1/2(C)の位置で切断し、後行部(4b)はそれぞれ先行部のほぼ前記切断位置で、翼厚のほぼ中央を起点に翼弦に沿って緩やかに膨らみ、後行部のほぼ中央で最大の厚みとなり、以後は徐々に薄くなり、後縁で閉じる形状とし、いずれの部分でも基本形以下の厚みとしている例である。 FIG. 3 shows that the present invention is applied to the curved wing (1b), and the length (Lf) of the leading portion (3b) is set to 1/3 (A), 1/4 (B) and 1/2 (C ), And the trailing part (4b) swells gently along the chord starting from the approximate center of the blade thickness at the cutting position of the leading part, and is the largest at the approximate center of the trailing part. This is an example in which the thickness becomes a thickness that gradually decreases thereafter and closes at the trailing edge, and any portion has a thickness equal to or less than the basic shape.
このようにした分割翼(2b)で最大翼厚Wを20mm,占有角度45度の翼を使用して無負荷での立ち上がり特性を調べた。立ち上がりの測定は風速L(1.5m/s),M(2.7m/s),H(3.5m/s)の各設定風速の中で回転を拘束しておき、拘束解除後の時間と回転速度から時間と周速比に変換して比較した。なお、設定風速の中でどのような回転位置でも立ち上がらない場合は強制起動してから以後の値を測定し、翼の位置によっては立ち上がる場合は、その位置で拘束を解除した。本例では基本形だけが、風速Lではどの位置でも立ち上らず風速Mでは立ち上がらない位置があった。 Using the blade having the split blade (2b) having the maximum blade thickness W of 20 mm and the occupation angle of 45 degrees, the rising characteristics under no load were examined. Rise is measured by constraining rotation at each of the set wind speeds of wind speed L (1.5 m / s), M (2.7 m / s), and H (3.5 m / s), and the time after the restraint is released And compared with the rotation speed from time to peripheral speed ratio. In addition, when it did not stand up at any rotational position within the set wind speed, the subsequent values were measured after the forced start, and when it stood up depending on the blade position, the restraint was released at that position. In this example, only the basic shape has a position where the wind speed L does not stand up at any position and the wind speed M does not stand up.
測定結果を風速L,M,Hについて図10に示す。これらの図から、基本形の立ち上がりはいずれの風速でも大幅に遅く、特性が湾曲していることから、発生トルクは回転速度に依存することがわかり、分割翼の場合はいずれも周速比0から直線的に立ち上がっていることから、回転速度にあまり依存せず風速に応じたほぼ一定のトルクと風車自体の慣性モーメントに依存する立ち上がり特性になったと見ることができる。 The measurement results for wind speeds L, M, and H are shown in FIG. From these figures, it can be seen that the rise of the basic form is significantly slower at any wind speed and the characteristics are curved, so that the generated torque depends on the rotational speed. Since it rises linearly, it can be seen that it has risen characteristics that do not depend much on the rotational speed but depend on the almost constant torque according to the wind speed and the moment of inertia of the windmill itself.
しかしながら、到達する周速比は基本形が一番高く、いずれの分割翼もやや低下しており、図14の広風速域での無負荷周速比の図で(W20基本形)と(W20 1/3分割翼)のグラフに示すように高風速域でも同様に約8%低下する傾向となっているが極端な劣化は見られない。
However, the peripheral speed ratio to be reached is the highest in the basic form, and all the divided blades are slightly lowered. In the diagram of the no-load peripheral speed ratio in the wide wind speed region of FIG. 14, (W20 basic form) and (
分割翼で実際に取り出せる出力パワーはどうなるか、実験風車にはマイクロモータしか接続していないので、下記の様にしてパワー係数の相対値であるパワー係数比で比較した。
(AA)一般に回転機のパワーがトルクと角速度の積で表せ、モータをブレーキとして使った場合、制動トルクはモータ電流に比例することを利用する。
(BB)最大出力は無負荷時の周速比を100%としたとき、これを70%に低下させる負荷とした時に得られるとの説に従い、風速L,M,Hでそれぞれ無負荷時の周速比が70%に低下するように外部電源からモータに電流ブレーキをかけ、この電流値と角速度の積をブレーキパワーとして算出する。
(CC)実験風車の最外周直径と上下翼長の積を受風面積として、各風速の3乗に比例する風パワーを算出し、前記(BB)で求めたブレーキパワーを除して擬似パワー係数を求める。
(DD)図2に示す基本形で最大翼厚W=20mm,占有角45度としたものが、風速Hの中にある時の前記擬似パワー係数を1として各種翼の擬似パワー系数を基準化し、相対値であるパワー係数比とする。
Since only the micromotor is connected to the experimental wind turbine, the output power that can actually be extracted with the split blades was compared with the power coefficient ratio, which is the relative value of the power coefficient, as follows.
(AA) Generally, the power of a rotating machine can be expressed by the product of torque and angular velocity. When a motor is used as a brake, the fact that the braking torque is proportional to the motor current is used.
(BB) According to the theory that the maximum output can be obtained when the peripheral speed ratio at no load is 100% and the load is reduced to 70%, the wind speeds L, M, and H are respectively at no load. A current brake is applied from the external power source to the motor so that the peripheral speed ratio is reduced to 70%, and the product of the current value and the angular velocity is calculated as the brake power.
(CC) Using the product of the outermost peripheral diameter of the experimental wind turbine and the upper and lower blade length as the wind receiving area, calculate the wind power proportional to the cube of each wind speed, and remove the brake power obtained in (BB) above to simulate the pseudo power Find the coefficient.
(DD) In the basic form shown in FIG. 2, the maximum blade thickness W = 20 mm and the occupancy angle of 45 degrees is obtained by standardizing the pseudo power coefficient of various blades with the pseudo power coefficient being 1 when the wind speed H is in the wind speed H, The power coefficient ratio is a relative value.
この結果分割翼(2b)では基本形(1b)よりトルクが増えていることが判明し、図11のパワー係数のグラフに示すように、風速Lでは全ての分割翼が確実に基本形を上回っており、風速M,Hでは1/4および1/2分割翼では基本形よりやや下がっているものの、1/3分割翼では基本翼とほぼ同等のパワーが得られることがわかる。 As a result, it has been found that the split blade (2b) has an increased torque compared to the basic shape (1b), and as shown in the power coefficient graph of FIG. In the wind speeds M and H, although the 1/4 and 1/2 split blades are slightly lower than the basic shape, it can be seen that the 1/3 split blade can obtain almost the same power as the basic blade.
なお、本実施例で使用した基本となる対称翼は、飛行機翼として形状等のデータが公開されているNACA2412翼形の、翼弦より下を削除し上側を折り返して図1に示す形状の直線対称翼としたものを、直交座標上のX軸を占有角度で示す角度に、Y軸を中心軸からの半径とする極座標に変換して湾曲させたものである。この方法は対象翼に限らずほかの飛行機翼などを任意の半径で湾曲させる手法として便利である。 The basic symmetrical wing used in this example is a straight line of the shape shown in FIG. 1 by removing the lower part of the NACA 2412 airfoil whose shape and other data are disclosed as airplane wings and turning the upper part back. A symmetric wing is converted into a polar coordinate having the X axis on the orthogonal coordinates as an occupied angle and the Y axis as a radius from the central axis, and is curved. This method is convenient as a method of bending not only the target wing but also other airplane wings with an arbitrary radius.
図5に飛行機翼を基本形とした1実施例を示す。垂直軸風車翼として飛行機翼がそのまま使われる例も多い。図4に実施例3の基本形(1a)とした飛行機翼を示す。同図は約3度の仰え角を付けた飛行機用の直線翼の断面図である。迎え角については、図1に示す直線対称翼(1)やこれを湾曲させた図2に示す湾曲対称翼(1b)の場合には迎え角はほぼ不要であるが、通常翼弦より上の厚みが大きい飛行機翼では仰え角を付けた方が、無負荷周速比やパワー係数比においてやや成績が良い。なお、対称翼の場合は仰え角をつけてもほとんど差はないが、マイナスの迎え角である俯角をつけると性能が劣化する傾向がある。 FIG. 5 shows an embodiment based on an airplane wing. There are many cases where airplane wings are used as they are as vertical axis windmill wings. FIG. 4 shows an airplane wing of the basic form (1a) of the third embodiment. This figure is a cross-sectional view of a straight wing for an airplane with an elevation angle of about 3 degrees. As for the angle of attack, in the case of the linearly symmetric wing (1) shown in FIG. 1 or the curved symmetric wing (1b) shown in FIG. For airplane wings with a large thickness, it is better to give an angle of elevation with a no-load peripheral speed ratio and a power coefficient ratio. In the case of a symmetric wing, there is almost no difference even if an elevation angle is added, but if a depression angle that is a negative angle of attack is added, the performance tends to deteriorate.
図5は図4の基本形を前縁からの長さLfで切断した先行部(3a)と、翼厚に対する翼弦の位置に関係なく、切断位置での翼厚のほぼ中央を起点として緩やかに膨らみ、後行部のほぼ半分位置で最大の膨らみとし、後縁で閉じる後行部(4a)とによる分割翼(2a)としたものである。 FIG. 5 shows the leading part (3a) obtained by cutting the basic shape of FIG. 4 by the length Lf from the leading edge and gently starting from the approximate center of the blade thickness at the cutting position regardless of the position of the chord relative to the blade thickness. The bulge is the largest bulge at the almost half position of the trailing part, and the split wing (2a) is formed by the trailing part (4a) closed at the trailing edge.
図5では飛行機翼の慣例に合わせて直交座標上で先行部の寸法を取ったが、これを垂直軸風車に使うと先行部(3a)の切断位置が極座標で切断した実施例1の図3とは上面・下面の切断位置で少し異なるが、翼の性能にはほとんど影響しない。重要なのは後行部が上面・下面の切断位置を結んだ切断面のほぼ中央を起点としていることである。これは切断位置を通り抜ける風が曲がらなければならないことと、できるだけ多くの風が通り抜けられることとを両立させるためである。 In FIG. 5, the dimensions of the leading portion on the orthogonal coordinates are taken in accordance with the convention of airplane wings. However, when this is used for a vertical axis wind turbine, the cutting position of the leading portion (3a) is cut at polar coordinates. Is slightly different depending on the cutting position on the upper and lower surfaces, but has little effect on the blade performance. What is important is that the trailing part starts from approximately the center of the cut surface connecting the cutting positions of the upper surface and the lower surface. This is in order to achieve both the fact that the wind passing through the cutting position has to bend and that as much wind as possible can pass through.
すなわち風の入り口と出口をほぼ同じ寸法とし、曲がらずに素通りする風を防ぎ、かつ最短の通路を作るためであり、例えば後行部の起点を先行部の内側に入りこむようにずらすと、素通りは確実に防げるが通路が長くなり、逆に起点を後ろにずらして切断面との間に隙間ができると素通りする風が増え、いずれも分割翼の性能を劣化させてしまう。この傾向はそれほど敏感ではないが、いずれの翼形状の場合でも切断位置における翼厚寸法の±10%以内のずれに抑えることが望ましい。 In other words, the size of the wind inlet and outlet is almost the same size, to prevent the wind that passes without bending, and to make the shortest passage, for example, if the starting point of the trailing part is shifted so as to enter the inside of the preceding part However, if the starting point is shifted backward to create a gap between the cut surface and the gap between the cut surface increases, the flow of wind increases, and the performance of the divided blades deteriorates. Although this tendency is not so sensitive, it is desirable to suppress the deviation within ± 10% of the blade thickness dimension at the cutting position in any blade shape.
具体的な例として、形状などのデータが公開され、飛行機や風車に使われているNACA4412翼形に、最大翼厚W=15mmと占有角度45度を適用して、翼弦長の比率をやや縮めた翼に本発明を実施し、分割位置(Lf)を翼弦長の1/3とした分割翼(2a)を実験風車に取り付けて調べた。 As a specific example, the NACA4412 airfoil used for airplanes and windmills with data such as shapes is applied to a maximum blade thickness W = 15 mm and an occupation angle of 45 degrees, and the ratio of the chord length is slightly The present invention was carried out on the shrunken blade, and the split blade (2a) with the split position (Lf) being 1/3 of the chord length was attached to the experimental wind turbine and examined.
図12に風速Lにおける立ち上がり特性を(W15 基本形)と(W15 1/3分割翼)に示す。この試験で基本形はどのような回転位置においても立ち上らないため、時間0においてかなり回っているように起動したので時間を比べることはできないが、同図に示すように分割翼の場合はは直線的に立ち上っており大幅に改善されていることがわかる。また到達する周速比は図10の(W20 1/3分割翼)とほぼ同様に基本形に比べてやや低下しており、図14の広風速域の無負荷周速比では(W15 1/3分割翼)はおよそ風速3m/sまでは緩やかに低下しこれ以上では(W20 1/3分割翼)とほぼ同じ特性となっているが、(W15 基本形)からは約10%低下している。
FIG. 12 shows the rising characteristics at the wind speed L in (W15 basic type) and (
図13の(W15基本形)と(W15 1/3分割翼)に示すパワー係数比ではW20翼と同様に風速Lでは基本形を上回り、風速M,Hでは基本形とほば同じかやや高いパワーが得られることがわかる。W20翼に比べて翼が薄くなったため、パワー係数比が相対的に低下しているが、W15翼が悪いということではなく、W15翼を使う場合は占有角度を広げるとか、翼の数を増やすなどの余地があることを示しているにすぎない。
The power coefficient ratio shown in (W15 basic type) and (
図6および図7に後行部の膨らみを無くした1実施例を示す。実施例1の図1の分割翼では後行部(4)の膨らみを薄くできることを記したが、これを推し進めると図6の(4d)に示すように湾曲した平板としたり、(4c)に示すように直線的な平板としたりすることができる。以後、後行部として膨らみのない平板を使った分割翼を分割平翼と呼ぶ。後行部(4c)は先行部(3b)の切断位置(Lf)で翼厚のほぼ中央の起点と、後縁を直線で結んだ平板としたもので、パワー係数比において(4d)を使った分割平翼よりやや優れているようなので、最大翼厚W=20mm,占有角度45度の分割平翼(2d)として調べた。 6 and 7 show an embodiment in which the bulge of the trailing portion is eliminated. In the split wing of FIG. 1 of Example 1, it has been described that the bulge of the trailing part (4) can be thinned. However, when this is pushed forward, a curved flat plate as shown in (4d) of FIG. As shown, it can be a straight flat plate. Hereinafter, a split wing using a flat plate that does not bulge as a trailing portion is referred to as a split flat wing. The trailing part (4c) is a flat plate in which the starting point at the center of the blade thickness and the trailing edge are connected by a straight line at the cutting position (Lf) of the leading part (3b), and the power coefficient ratio is (4d). Since it seems to be slightly better than the divided flat blade, it was examined as a divided flat blade (2d) having a maximum blade thickness W = 20 mm and an occupation angle of 45 degrees.
この翼の立ち上がり特性を図10の(W20 1/3分割平翼)のグラフに示す。同図から明らかなように分割平翼は到達する無負荷周速比は他の分割翼にくらべてやや低下しており、図13に示す広風速域の無負荷周速比では風速5m/s程度まで緩やかに低下し、以後は基本形に対し約18%低下したまま推移している。しかし分割平翼は切断位置にに風が入りやすいためか、立ち上り特性はいずれの風速でも最も早いことがわかる。また図11に示すW20翼のパワー係数比では、(1/3分割平翼)は風速M,Hで(基本形)や(1/3先行翼)と同等としても、風速Lではこれらを大きく上回っていることがわかる。
The rising characteristics of this blade are shown in the graph of (
別の例として図7は基本形として実施例2でも使用した飛行機翼を使った分割平翼(2c)の例である。ここでは最大翼厚w=15mm,占有角度=45度とし、同図で先行部の長さLを翼弦長の1/6,1/3および2/3と大きく変化させた場合を調べた。図6との違いは翼厚のほかにW15翼は湾曲翼ではなく、図7に示すように翼弦が直線のままの飛行機翼であることにより、平板(4c)の角度が小さくなっていることである。またこの分割平翼は図4の基本形で説明した約3度の迎え角を付けて測定した。 As another example, FIG. 7 shows an example of a split flat wing (2c) using an airplane wing used in the second embodiment as a basic form. Here, the maximum blade thickness w = 15 mm, the occupation angle = 45 degrees, and the case where the length L of the leading portion was greatly changed to 1/6, 1/3 and 2/3 of the chord length in FIG. . The difference from FIG. 6 is that, in addition to the blade thickness, the W15 wing is not a curved wing, and as shown in FIG. 7, the angle of the flat plate (4c) is small because the wing chord is a straight wing. That is. The split flat blade was measured with the angle of attack of about 3 degrees as described in the basic form of FIG.
この例の立ち上がり特性は、図12で重なってしまったが(W15 1/3分割平翼)と(W15 1/6分割平翼)が共に最も早く、(W15 2/3分割平翼)は基本形よりは優れているが、どの回転位置でも立ち上らず、不十分な結果であった。また到達する無負荷周速比も基本形より低く、図14の広風速域の無負荷周速比の(W15 1/3分割平翼)に示すように、風速5m/s付近から上はなぜか(W20 1/3分割平翼)とほぼ同じ特性で、基本形からはほぼ20%低下する結果となった。図13のパワー係数比では(1/3分割平翼)がいずれの風速でも最も優れ、風速Lでは(1/6分割平翼)が基本形を大きく超えているが(2/3分割平翼)ではは基本形に近い結果となった。
これらと実施例2の結果から、分割翼としては分割位置を翼弦長の1/6から1/2の間とするのが良く、以上の実験からは1/3付近が最も良い結果であった。
The rise characteristics of this example overlapped in FIG. 12, but (
From these and the results of Example 2, it is better to set the split position between 1/6 and 1/2 of the chord length for the split blade, and from the above experiments, the vicinity of 1/3 is the best result. It was.
1:基本形とする揚力翼
1a:直線翼
1b:湾曲翼
2:分割翼
2a:直線翼を基本形とした分割翼
2b:湾曲用を基本形とした分割翼
2c:後行部の翼厚を薄くした直線分割翼
2d:後行部の翼厚を薄くした湾曲分割翼
3:先行部
3a:直線翼の先行部
3b:湾曲翼の先行部
4:後行部
4a:直線翼の後行部
4b:湾曲翼の後行部
4c:厚みを薄くした直線後行部
4d:厚みを薄くした湾曲後行部
5:先行部と後行部の間隔を維持するスペーサ
6:後行部に内装するスペーサ
7:締結部品
1: Lifting blade as
Claims (1)
It is a blade of a vertical axis windmill, and is a cross section representing an airfoil shape along a chord of a lift wing, and is approximately 1/6 to 1/2 of the chord length from the leading edge of the basic wing (1). The cut back is the leading part (3) of the cavity and the trailing part (4) extending from the substantially center of the blade thickness at the cutting position to the trailing edge with a thickness within the blade thickness of the basic blade. A split wing (2) characterized by being split.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2008040829A JP2009197700A (en) | 2008-02-22 | 2008-02-22 | Vertical wind mill blade |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2008040829A JP2009197700A (en) | 2008-02-22 | 2008-02-22 | Vertical wind mill blade |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JP2009197700A true JP2009197700A (en) | 2009-09-03 |
Family
ID=41141475
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2008040829A Pending JP2009197700A (en) | 2008-02-22 | 2008-02-22 | Vertical wind mill blade |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JP2009197700A (en) |
Cited By (7)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GB2477509A (en) * | 2010-02-04 | 2011-08-10 | Rolls Royce Plc | A vertical axis turbine foil structure with surface fluid transfer openings |
| US20120134815A1 (en) * | 2011-11-21 | 2012-05-31 | General Electric Company | Blade extension for rotor blade in wind turbine |
| US20120134836A1 (en) * | 2011-11-21 | 2012-05-31 | General Electric Company | Blade extension for rotor blade in wind turbine |
| KR101437543B1 (en) * | 2013-02-06 | 2014-09-04 | 주식회사 웨스텍 | Vertical axis windpower generation equipped with lift and drag type blade |
| KR101437539B1 (en) * | 2013-01-22 | 2014-09-04 | 주식회사 웨스텍 | Vertical axis windpower generation of stack rotor |
| WO2017097229A1 (en) * | 2015-12-10 | 2017-06-15 | 李亦博 | Blade capable of efficiently utilizing low velocity fluid, and application of blade |
| CN108700025A (en) * | 2015-12-10 | 2018-10-23 | 李亦博 | Efficiently utilize the blade of low velocity fluid and its application |
-
2008
- 2008-02-22 JP JP2008040829A patent/JP2009197700A/en active Pending
Cited By (10)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GB2477509A (en) * | 2010-02-04 | 2011-08-10 | Rolls Royce Plc | A vertical axis turbine foil structure with surface fluid transfer openings |
| US20120134815A1 (en) * | 2011-11-21 | 2012-05-31 | General Electric Company | Blade extension for rotor blade in wind turbine |
| US20120134836A1 (en) * | 2011-11-21 | 2012-05-31 | General Electric Company | Blade extension for rotor blade in wind turbine |
| US8376703B2 (en) * | 2011-11-21 | 2013-02-19 | General Electric Company | Blade extension for rotor blade in wind turbine |
| US8430633B2 (en) * | 2011-11-21 | 2013-04-30 | General Electric Company | Blade extension for rotor blade in wind turbine |
| KR101437539B1 (en) * | 2013-01-22 | 2014-09-04 | 주식회사 웨스텍 | Vertical axis windpower generation of stack rotor |
| KR101437543B1 (en) * | 2013-02-06 | 2014-09-04 | 주식회사 웨스텍 | Vertical axis windpower generation equipped with lift and drag type blade |
| WO2017097229A1 (en) * | 2015-12-10 | 2017-06-15 | 李亦博 | Blade capable of efficiently utilizing low velocity fluid, and application of blade |
| CN108700025A (en) * | 2015-12-10 | 2018-10-23 | 李亦博 | Efficiently utilize the blade of low velocity fluid and its application |
| US10808678B2 (en) | 2015-12-10 | 2020-10-20 | Yibo Li | Blade capable of efficiently utilizing low-velocity fluid and application thereof |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US7914259B2 (en) | Wind turbine blades with vortex generators | |
| CN101371007B (en) | Turbine cascade end wall | |
| KR101787294B1 (en) | Rotor blade of a wind turbine and wind turbine | |
| JP2009197700A (en) | Vertical wind mill blade | |
| JP5479388B2 (en) | Wind turbine blade and wind power generator equipped with the same | |
| CN104246215B (en) | Rotor blades for wind energy installations | |
| US20130323098A1 (en) | Axial flow blower | |
| US8936435B2 (en) | System and method for root loss reduction in wind turbine blades | |
| JP2009293622A5 (en) | ||
| CN102454633B (en) | Axial compressor | |
| JP5813807B2 (en) | Axial flow compressor | |
| JP2009074447A (en) | Vertical axis windmill | |
| EP2867524A1 (en) | A wind turbine blade | |
| US11300096B2 (en) | Method for determining arrangement position of vortex generator on wind turbine blade, method for producing wind turbine blade assembly, and wind turbine blade assembly | |
| CN104736844A (en) | Wind turbine | |
| CN109690072B (en) | Wind turbine rotor blade | |
| JP2019078191A5 (en) | ||
| DK202370542A1 (en) | Wind turbine blades and wind turbine systems that include a co-flow jet | |
| JP2004084522A (en) | Blade and wind power generator with it | |
| CN112689710B (en) | Wind turbine rotor blade components for noise reduction | |
| CN116157597A (en) | Wind turbine | |
| JP2009191744A (en) | Vertical axis windmill | |
| US11867145B2 (en) | Rotor blade for a wind power installation, wind power installation, and method for designing a rotor blade | |
| CN105604611A (en) | Variable-geometry turbine with strake wing structure of moving blade | |
| CN101952585A (en) | Aerodynamic profile for the root of a wind turbine blade having a double leading edge |