[go: up one dir, main page]

JP2009089072A - Control device for electromagnetic load device - Google Patents

Control device for electromagnetic load device Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP2009089072A
JP2009089072A JP2007256653A JP2007256653A JP2009089072A JP 2009089072 A JP2009089072 A JP 2009089072A JP 2007256653 A JP2007256653 A JP 2007256653A JP 2007256653 A JP2007256653 A JP 2007256653A JP 2009089072 A JP2009089072 A JP 2009089072A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
current value
value
load device
electromagnetic load
target current
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
JP2007256653A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
Kazuya Hoshino
一也 星野
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Hitachi Ltd
Original Assignee
Hitachi Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Hitachi Ltd filed Critical Hitachi Ltd
Priority to JP2007256653A priority Critical patent/JP2009089072A/en
Publication of JP2009089072A publication Critical patent/JP2009089072A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Control Of Voltage And Current In General (AREA)
  • Electronic Switches (AREA)

Abstract

【課題】電磁負荷装置の異常(断線又は短絡)を高精度に検出できる電磁負荷装置の制御装置を提供する。
【解決手段】電磁負荷装置(リニアソレノイド1)を駆動する電気回路(駆動回路108)と、該電気回路に流す目標電流値を設定する手段(目標電流値設定部101)と、該電気回路を流れる電流値をモニタする手段(電流モニタ回路4)と、前記モニタされる電流値と目標電流値との差分を算出する手段(電流偏差演算部102)と、該差分に基づいて、該モニタされる電流値が目標電流値と一致するように、前記電磁負荷装置への出力電流値を制御する制御手段と、前記モニタされる電流値と、前記目標電流値又は出力電流値と、の差分を所定時間積算する積算手段(電流偏差積算部104)と、該差分の積算値を閾値と比較することで、前記電磁負荷装置の異常を判定する異常判定手段(異常判定部105)と、を含んで構成した。
【選択図】図2
A control device for an electromagnetic load device capable of detecting an abnormality (disconnection or short circuit) of the electromagnetic load device with high accuracy.
An electric circuit (driving circuit 108) for driving an electromagnetic load device (linear solenoid 1), means for setting a target current value to be passed through the electric circuit (target current value setting unit 101), and the electric circuit A means for monitoring the flowing current value (current monitor circuit 4), a means for calculating the difference between the monitored current value and the target current value (current deviation calculation unit 102), and the monitoring based on the difference. The control means for controlling the output current value to the electromagnetic load device, and the difference between the monitored current value and the target current value or the output current value so that the current value to be matched with the target current value An integration unit (current deviation integration unit 104) that integrates for a predetermined time, and an abnormality determination unit (abnormality determination unit 105) that determines an abnormality of the electromagnetic load device by comparing the integrated value of the difference with a threshold value. Consists of.
[Selection] Figure 2

Description

本発明は、電磁負荷装置(例えば、車両に搭載されている電子制御式自動変速機の作動油圧制御システムにおいて、作動油圧を制御するリニアソレノイドなど)の制御装置に関し、特に、電磁負荷装置の異常(断線と短絡の少なくとも一方)を高精度に検出する技術に関する。   The present invention relates to a control device for an electromagnetic load device (for example, a linear solenoid for controlling the hydraulic pressure in an operating hydraulic pressure control system for an electronically controlled automatic transmission mounted on a vehicle), and more particularly, an abnormality in the electromagnetic load device. The present invention relates to a technique for detecting (at least one of disconnection and short circuit) with high accuracy.

リニアソレノイドなど電磁負荷装置に流れる電流値は、温度や電源電圧など外乱要素の影響によって変動するため、該電流の測定値(モニタ電流値)と目標電流値との偏差に基づき、モニタ電流値が目標電流値と一致するように、電磁負荷装置を駆動する電気回路への出力電流値を補正するフィードバック制御が行われている。
ところで、電磁負荷装置に異常(断線又は短絡)が発生すると、電磁負荷装置の駆動を適切に制御できなくなり、関連機器の動作性能が低下する。
The value of the current flowing through an electromagnetic load device such as a linear solenoid fluctuates due to the influence of disturbance factors such as temperature and power supply voltage. Therefore, the monitor current value is calculated based on the deviation between the measured value of the current (monitor current value) and the target current value. Feedback control for correcting the output current value to the electric circuit that drives the electromagnetic load device is performed so as to coincide with the target current value.
By the way, when an abnormality (disconnection or short circuit) occurs in the electromagnetic load device, the drive of the electromagnetic load device cannot be appropriately controlled, and the operation performance of the related equipment is degraded.

そこで、このような異常発生時に電磁負荷装置の駆動制御を異常時用の制御に切り換えることができるように、特許文献1に記載のものでは、リニアソレノイドのモニタ電流値と、目標電流値と、の差が閾値を超えるのを検出することで、該リニアソレノイドの異常を検出している。
特開平7−194175号公報
Therefore, in order to be able to switch the drive control of the electromagnetic load device to control for an abnormality when such an abnormality occurs, the one described in Patent Document 1 uses a monitor current value of a linear solenoid, a target current value, By detecting that the difference between the two exceeds a threshold value, the abnormality of the linear solenoid is detected.
Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 7-194175

しかしながら、特許文献1に記載のものでは、目標電流値が0に近い程度に小さいとき、実際の断線時に、モニタ電流値が0となることで、モニタ電流値と目標電流値との差が小さくなって正常範囲に収まってしまうため、断線を検出するのが困難となる。
また、目標電流値がモニタ電流値の測定限界値に近い程度に大きいときも、モニタ電流値が測定限界値で飽和することで、モニタ電流値と目標電流値との差が小さくなって正常範囲に収まってしまうため、短絡を検出できない。
However, in the device described in Patent Document 1, when the target current value is small enough to be close to 0, the monitor current value becomes 0 at the actual disconnection, so that the difference between the monitor current value and the target current value is small. Since it falls within the normal range, it is difficult to detect disconnection.
In addition, even when the target current value is large enough to be close to the measurement limit value of the monitor current value, the monitor current value is saturated at the measurement limit value, so that the difference between the monitor current value and the target current value is reduced, so The short circuit cannot be detected.

さらに、実際にリニアソレノイド及びその駆動装置内に異常がない正常時でも、目標電流値が変動したとき、その応答時にモニタ電流値のピークが過渡的に目標電流値を大きく上回ることで、短絡と誤判定しやすい。
本発明は、以上のような従来の問題点に鑑みてなされたものであり、電磁負荷装置の異常(断線と短絡の少なくとも一方)を高精度に検出できる電磁負荷装置の制御装置を提供することを目的とする。
In addition, even when the linear solenoid and its drive device are normal and normal, when the target current value fluctuates, the peak of the monitor current value transiently greatly exceeds the target current value during the response. Easily misjudged.
The present invention has been made in view of the conventional problems as described above, and provides an electromagnetic load device control device capable of detecting an abnormality (at least one of disconnection and short circuit) of the electromagnetic load device with high accuracy. With the goal.

このため、請求項1に係る発明は、
電磁負荷装置を駆動する電気回路と、
該電気回路に流す目標電流値を設定する手段と、
該電気回路を流れる電流値をモニタする手段と、
前記モニタされる電流値と目標電流値との差分を算出する手段と、
該差分に基づいて、該モニタされる電流値が目標電流値と一致するように、前記電磁負荷装置への出力電流値を制御する制御手段と、
前記モニタされる電流値と、前記目標電流値又は出力電流値と、の差分を所定時間積算する積算手段と、
該差分の積算値を閾値と比較することで、前記電磁負荷装置の異常を判定する異常判定手段と、
を含んで構成したことを特徴とする。
For this reason, the invention according to claim 1
An electric circuit for driving the electromagnetic load device;
Means for setting a target current value to flow through the electric circuit;
Means for monitoring the value of current flowing through the electrical circuit;
Means for calculating a difference between the monitored current value and the target current value;
Control means for controlling an output current value to the electromagnetic load device based on the difference so that the monitored current value matches a target current value;
Integration means for integrating the difference between the monitored current value and the target current value or output current value for a predetermined time;
An abnormality determining means for determining an abnormality of the electromagnetic load device by comparing the integrated value of the difference with a threshold;
It is characterized by including.

請求項2に係る発明は、
前記所定時間は、前記異常判定の要求時を基点として、過去へ遡る方向へ設定されることを特徴とする。
請求項3に係る発明は、
前記閾値として、正の閾値と負の閾値とを有し、
前記差分を、前記モニタされる電流値から目標電流値又は出力電流値を差し引いて算出する場合、前記異常判定手段は、前記積算値が正の閾値を上回ったとき、前記電磁負荷装置の短絡による異常と判定し、前記積算値が負の閾値を下回ったとき、前記電磁負荷装置の断線による異常と判定し、
前記差分を、前記目標電流値又は出力電流値からモニタされる電流値を差し引いて算出する場合、前記異常判定手段は、前記積算値が正の閾値を上回ったとき、前記電磁負荷装置の断線による異常と判定し、前記積算値が負の閾値を下回ったとき、前記電磁負荷装置の短絡による異常と判定することを特徴とする。
The invention according to claim 2
The predetermined time is set in a direction going back to the past, starting from the time when the abnormality determination is requested.
The invention according to claim 3
The threshold has a positive threshold and a negative threshold,
When the difference is calculated by subtracting the target current value or the output current value from the monitored current value, the abnormality determination means is caused by a short circuit of the electromagnetic load device when the integrated value exceeds a positive threshold value. When it is determined as abnormal, and the integrated value falls below a negative threshold, it is determined as abnormal due to disconnection of the electromagnetic load device,
When the difference is calculated by subtracting the monitored current value from the target current value or the output current value, the abnormality determination means is caused by disconnection of the electromagnetic load device when the integrated value exceeds a positive threshold value. When it is determined as abnormal and the integrated value falls below a negative threshold, it is determined as abnormal due to a short circuit of the electromagnetic load device.

請求項4に係る発明は、
前記閾値は、前記目標電流値又は出力電流値に応じて変更されることを特徴とする。
請求項5に係る発明は、
前記異常判定手段によって前記電磁負荷装置の異常と判定されたとき、該電磁負荷装置に対し、異常時用のフェールセーフ制御を行うことを特徴とする。
The invention according to claim 4
The threshold value is changed according to the target current value or the output current value.
The invention according to claim 5
When it is determined by the abnormality determining means that the electromagnetic load device is abnormal, fail safe control for an abnormality is performed on the electromagnetic load device.

請求項6に係る発明は、
前記電磁負荷装置の断線による異常と判定されたときは、該電磁負荷装置により制御される機器の不適切な動作を回避するフェールセーフ制御を行い、
前記電磁負荷装置の短絡による異常と判定されたときは、前記電気回路を電源から切断し、該電気回路の過電流を回避するフェールセーフ制御を行うことを特徴とする。
The invention according to claim 6
When it is determined that there is an abnormality due to disconnection of the electromagnetic load device, fail safe control is performed to avoid inappropriate operation of the equipment controlled by the electromagnetic load device,
When it is determined that there is an abnormality due to a short circuit of the electromagnetic load device, fail-safe control is performed to disconnect the electric circuit from a power source and avoid an overcurrent of the electric circuit.

請求項7に係る発明は、
前記積算手段は、
前記目標電流値の変動後定常状態に至るまでの期間に算出された前記差分の積算を禁止することを特徴とする。
請求項8に係る発明は、
前記目標電流値が、第1の所定値より大きいとき、
又は、
前記目標電流値が、前記第1の所定値より小さい第2の所定値より小さいとき、
前記異常判定手段による判定を行うことを特徴とする。
The invention according to claim 7 provides:
The integrating means includes
The integration of the difference calculated during the period from the change of the target current value to the steady state is prohibited.
The invention according to claim 8 provides:
When the target current value is greater than a first predetermined value,
Or
When the target current value is smaller than a second predetermined value smaller than the first predetermined value,
The determination by the abnormality determination means is performed.

請求項1に係る発明によれば、前記制御手段が、モニタされる電流値と目標電流値との差分に基づいて、該モニタされる電流値が目標電流値と一致するように、前記電磁負荷装置への出力電流値を制御する。このとき、前記積算手段が、モニタされる電流値と、目標電流値又は出力電流値と、の差分を所定時間積算し、前記異常判定手段が、該差分の積算値を閾値と比較することで、前記電磁負荷装置の異常を判定する。   According to the first aspect of the present invention, the electromagnetic load is controlled so that the control unit matches the monitored current value with the target current value based on the difference between the monitored current value and the target current value. Controls the output current value to the device. At this time, the integrating means integrates the difference between the monitored current value and the target current value or the output current value for a predetermined time, and the abnormality determining means compares the integrated value of the difference with a threshold value. The abnormality of the electromagnetic load device is determined.

請求項2に係る発明によれば、前記積算手段が、異常判定の要求時を基点として過去へ遡る方向へ設定された所定時間の間に算出された前記差分を、積算する。
請求項3に係る発明によれば、前記異常判定手段は、積算値が正の閾値を上回ったとき又は負の閾値を下回ったとき、前記電磁負荷装置の異常と判定する。
請求項4に係る発明によれば、前記閾値が、目標電流値又は出力電流値に応じて変更される。
According to the second aspect of the present invention, the integration means integrates the difference calculated during a predetermined time set in a direction going back to the past from the time when the abnormality determination is requested.
According to the invention of claim 3, the abnormality determining means determines that the electromagnetic load device is abnormal when the integrated value exceeds a positive threshold or falls below a negative threshold.
According to the invention which concerns on Claim 4, the said threshold value is changed according to a target electric current value or an output electric current value.

請求項5に係る発明によれば、前記異常判定手段によって電磁負荷装置の異常と判定されたとき、該電磁負荷装置に対し、異常時用のフェールセーフ制御を行うことができる。
請求項6に係る発明によれば、前記電磁負荷装置の断線による異常時及び短絡による異常時において、夫々、所定のフェールセーフ制御を行うことができる。
請求項7に係る発明によれば、前記目標電流値の変動後定常状態に至るまでの期間に算出された前記差分(前記モニタされる電流値と、前記目標電流値又は出力電流値と、の差分)は、前記積算値に反映されなくなる。
According to the fifth aspect of the present invention, when the abnormality determining means determines that the electromagnetic load device is abnormal, fail safe control for an abnormality can be performed on the electromagnetic load device.
According to the invention which concerns on Claim 6, predetermined fail safe control can be performed at the time of abnormality by the disconnection of the said electromagnetic load apparatus, and the time of abnormality by a short circuit, respectively.
According to the invention of claim 7, the difference (the monitored current value and the target current value or the output current value) calculated in a period until the steady state is reached after the target current value changes. (Difference) is not reflected in the integrated value.

請求項8に係る発明によれば、前記目標電流値が第1の所定値より大きいとき、又は、目標電流値が第2の所定値より小さいとき、前記異常判定手段による判定が行われる。   According to the eighth aspect of the present invention, when the target current value is larger than the first predetermined value or when the target current value is smaller than the second predetermined value, the determination by the abnormality determination unit is performed.

以下に、本発明の実施形態について説明する。
図1は、本発明に係る電磁負荷装置の制御装置を、車両に搭載されている電子制御式自動変速機の油圧制御システムのリニアソレノイドに対して適用した形態のシステム構成図である。
図1において、例えば、自動変速機の油圧制御システムにおけるリニアソレノイド(電磁負荷装置)の駆動制御装置は、リニアソレノイド1に駆動電流を供給する電気回路2、この電気回路2からリニアソレノイド1に供給される駆動電流を監視する際に使用される電流モニタ抵抗3、リニアソレノイド1に供給される駆動電流を監視する電流モニタ回路4、ならびに制御中枢のCPU5を備えて構成されている。
Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described.
FIG. 1 is a system configuration diagram in which a control device for an electromagnetic load device according to the present invention is applied to a linear solenoid of a hydraulic control system for an electronically controlled automatic transmission mounted on a vehicle.
In FIG. 1, for example, a drive controller for a linear solenoid (electromagnetic load device) in a hydraulic control system for an automatic transmission supplies an electric circuit 2 for supplying a drive current to a linear solenoid 1, and supplies the linear solenoid 1 from the electric circuit 2. A current monitor resistor 3 used for monitoring the drive current to be monitored, a current monitor circuit 4 for monitoring the drive current supplied to the linear solenoid 1, and a CPU 5 serving as a control center.

なお、本発明に係る電磁負荷装置の制御装置は、図1の形態に限らず、電磁負荷装置を有する他の様々な形態にも適用可能である。
図1のリニアソレノイド1は、駆動電流がリニアソレノイド1に出力されるソレノイド出力端子6とグランドとの間に接続され、駆動電流量に応じてオン/オフの間を連続的に変化させてリニア制御され、電気回路2から供給される駆動電流に基づいて駆動制御される。リニアソレノイド1は、オフ(駆動電流が停止)した時にソレノイドのインダクタンス成分により発生する電流が、パワーグラウンド端子7から環流用ダイオード8を介して電流モニタ抵抗3、ソレノイド出力端子6を経てリニアソレノイド1に環流される。
In addition, the control apparatus of the electromagnetic load apparatus which concerns on this invention is applicable not only to the form of FIG. 1, but to various other forms which have an electromagnetic load apparatus.
The linear solenoid 1 shown in FIG. 1 is connected between a solenoid output terminal 6 that outputs a drive current to the linear solenoid 1 and a ground, and is continuously changed between on and off according to the amount of drive current. The drive is controlled based on the drive current supplied from the electric circuit 2. When the linear solenoid 1 is turned off (driving current is stopped), the current generated by the inductance component of the solenoid passes through the current monitoring resistor 3 and the solenoid output terminal 6 from the power ground terminal 7 through the recirculation diode 8, and the linear solenoid 1 Perfused.

電気回路2は、リニアソレノイド1に供給しようとする駆動電流(目標電流値)を指示する駆動信号(パルス信号)をCPU5から受けて、この駆動信号のデューティ比に基づいて駆動電流を生成し、生成した駆動電流を電流モニタ抵抗3、ソレノイド出力端子6を介してリニアソレノイド1に供給する。
電流モニタ抵抗3は、電気回路2とソレノイド出力端子6との間に接続され、リニアソレノイド1に供給される駆動電流を抵抗の電圧降下を利用してモニタする。
The electric circuit 2 receives a drive signal (pulse signal) indicating a drive current (target current value) to be supplied to the linear solenoid 1 from the CPU 5 and generates a drive current based on the duty ratio of the drive signal. The generated drive current is supplied to the linear solenoid 1 via the current monitor resistor 3 and the solenoid output terminal 6.
The current monitor resistor 3 is connected between the electric circuit 2 and the solenoid output terminal 6 and monitors the drive current supplied to the linear solenoid 1 using the voltage drop of the resistor.

電流モニタ回路4は、電流モニタ抵抗3の両端の電圧を入力し、入力された電圧に基づいて、内蔵する積分回路等の機能によりリニアソレノイド1に供給される駆動電流に対応した電流モニタ信号(モニタ電流値)をCPU5に与える。
CPU5は、リニアソレノイド1のフィードバック駆動制御、ならびにリニアソレノイド1の異常(断線及び短絡の両方)を検出制御する制御中枢となる。CPU5は、内部に記憶されたプログラムに基づいて、上記駆動制御ならびに検出制御を行う。
The current monitor circuit 4 inputs a voltage across the current monitor resistor 3, and based on the input voltage, a current monitor signal (corresponding to a drive current supplied to the linear solenoid 1 by a function of an internal integration circuit or the like) (Monitor current value) is given to the CPU 5.
The CPU 5 serves as a control center for detecting and controlling feedback drive control of the linear solenoid 1 and abnormality (both disconnection and short circuit) of the linear solenoid 1. The CPU 5 performs the drive control and the detection control based on a program stored therein.

なお、本実施形態ではリニアソレノイド1の断線及び短絡の両方を検出しているが、本発明には断線又は短絡の一方のみを検出するものも含まれる。
図2は、前記リニアソレノイドの通電制御回路を示す。
図2において、目標電流値設定部101では、前記リニアソレノイド1の目標電流値を設定する。
In this embodiment, both the disconnection and the short circuit of the linear solenoid 1 are detected. However, the present invention includes one that detects only one of the disconnection or the short circuit.
FIG. 2 shows an energization control circuit of the linear solenoid.
In FIG. 2, a target current value setting unit 101 sets a target current value of the linear solenoid 1.

電流偏差演算部102では、前記目標電流値設定部101で設定される目標電流値と、電流モニタ回路4で検出される電流値(モニタ電流値)と、の電流偏差(モニタ電流値から目標電流値を差し引いた値)を演算する。
前記電流偏差演算部102で演算された電流偏差は、電流補正項算出部103及び電流偏差積算部104に出力される。
In the current deviation calculation unit 102, the current deviation between the target current value set by the target current value setting unit 101 and the current value (monitor current value) detected by the current monitor circuit 4 (from the monitor current value to the target current). The value obtained by subtracting the value is calculated.
The current deviation calculated by the current deviation calculation unit 102 is output to the current correction term calculation unit 103 and the current deviation integration unit 104.

前記電流補正項算出部103では、前記電流偏差演算部102で演算された電流偏差に基づいて、モニタ電流値を目標電流値へ一致させるようにフィードバック制御するための電流補正項を算出する。
また、電流偏差積算部104では、前記電流偏差演算部102で算出された電流偏差のうち、所定時間内に算出された電流偏差を積算することで、前記電流偏差の積算値を更新演算する。
The current correction term calculation unit 103 calculates a current correction term for feedback control so that the monitor current value matches the target current value based on the current deviation calculated by the current deviation calculation unit 102.
Further, the current deviation integrating unit 104 updates the integrated value of the current deviation by integrating the current deviations calculated within a predetermined time among the current deviations calculated by the current deviation calculating unit 102.

ここで、上記所定時間は、異常判定の要求時を基点として、過去へ遡る方向へ設定される。即ち、異常判定の要求時より該一定時間だけ過去へ遡った時と、異常判定の要求時と、の間に算出された電流偏差(該異常判定の要求時に算出された電流偏差を含む)を積算する。
前記電流偏差積算部104で算出される前記電流偏差の積算値は、異常判定部105に出力される。
Here, the predetermined time is set in a direction that goes back to the past, starting from the time when the abnormality determination is requested. That is, the current deviation (including the current deviation calculated at the time of the abnormality determination request) calculated between the time when the abnormality determination is requested and the predetermined time has been traced back to the past. Accumulate.
The integrated value of the current deviation calculated by the current deviation integrating unit 104 is output to the abnormality determining unit 105.

前記電流補正項算出部103の出力(電流補正項)は、補正項加算部106において前記目標電流値設定部101で設定される目標電流値に加算され、デューティ変換部107では、前記補正項加算部106の加算結果をデューティ(スイッチングのON時間割合)に変換し、最終的な出力デューティが設定される。
前記デューティ変換部107の出力である出力デューティは電気回路2に出力され、電気回路2では、前記出力デューティに基づいて、前記リニアソレノイド1の電源をPWM制御する。
The output (current correction term) of the current correction term calculation unit 103 is added to the target current value set by the target current value setting unit 101 in the correction term addition unit 106, and the correction term addition is performed in the duty conversion unit 107. The addition result of the unit 106 is converted into a duty (switching ON time ratio), and a final output duty is set.
The output duty, which is the output of the duty converter 107, is output to the electric circuit 2, and the electric circuit 2 performs PWM control of the power supply of the linear solenoid 1 based on the output duty.

電流モニタ回路4では、前記リニアソレノイド1に流れる電流を、電流モニタ抵抗3の端子間電圧として検出し、前記電流偏差演算部102に出力する。
異常判定部105では、前記目標電流値設定部101で設定された目標電流値に応じて、後述する断線判定閾値及び短絡判定閾値を設定する。そして、これら断線判定閾値又は短絡判定閾値と、前記電流偏差積算部104で算出される前記電流偏差の積算値と、を比較することで、リニアソレノイド1の異常を判定する。
In the current monitor circuit 4, the current flowing through the linear solenoid 1 is detected as a voltage across the terminals of the current monitor resistor 3 and is output to the current deviation calculation unit 102.
The abnormality determination unit 105 sets a disconnection determination threshold value and a short circuit determination threshold value, which will be described later, according to the target current value set by the target current value setting unit 101. Then, the disconnection determination threshold value or the short circuit determination threshold value is compared with the integrated value of the current deviation calculated by the current deviation integrating unit 104 to determine abnormality of the linear solenoid 1.

ここで、上述のように、電流偏差積算部104では、前記リニアソレノイド1の異常判定の要求時より以前の所定時間に算出された前記差分を積算しているため、このような異常判定の要求があったとき、即座に前記差分の積算値を算出することができ、異常判定部105において迅速かつ効果的に該異常を判定することができる。
上記リニアソレノイド1の異常検出について、以下詳述する。
Here, as described above, since the current deviation integrating unit 104 integrates the difference calculated at a predetermined time before the time when the abnormality determination of the linear solenoid 1 is requested, such an abnormality determination request. Therefore, the integrated value of the difference can be immediately calculated, and the abnormality determination unit 105 can quickly and effectively determine the abnormality.
The abnormality detection of the linear solenoid 1 will be described in detail below.

図3は、リニアソレノイド1及び電気回路2のいずれにも断線,短絡がないとき(以下、正常時とする)、リニアソレノイド1の断線時,短絡時(以下、断線時,短絡時とする)、における時間とモニタ電流値との関係の例を示す。
図3に示すように、正常時には、目標電流値が一定でありモニタ電流値が定常状態(目標電流値に収束)であるが、断線時には、モニタ電流値が目標電流値よりも低下して0となっており、短絡時には、モニタ電流値が目標電流値よりも増加している。
3 shows that neither the linear solenoid 1 nor the electric circuit 2 is disconnected or short-circuited (hereinafter referred to as normal), the linear solenoid 1 is disconnected or short-circuited (hereinafter referred to as disconnected or short-circuited). The example of the relationship between time and monitor current value in is shown.
As shown in FIG. 3, when normal, the target current value is constant and the monitor current value is in a steady state (converged to the target current value), but when disconnected, the monitor current value drops below the target current value and becomes zero. When the short circuit occurs, the monitor current value increases from the target current value.

本実施形態では、図3の電流偏差(モニタ電流値から目標電流値を差し引いた値)を積算するが、該積算値と時間との関係は、例えば図4のようになる。
図4において、正常時には、電流偏差が略0となるようにフィードバック制御が行われているため、電流偏差の積算値は略0に収束する。なお、図4において目標電流値は定常状態であるが、目標電流値の変動があっても、定常状態に至るまでの間に、電流偏差が正の状態と、負の状態と、が交互に現れるように応答するため、正負の電流偏差が相殺し合って、電流偏差の積算値は、絶対値の増大が抑制されて0に近い値へ収束する。
In this embodiment, the current deviation in FIG. 3 (a value obtained by subtracting the target current value from the monitor current value) is integrated, and the relationship between the integrated value and time is as shown in FIG.
In FIG. 4, since feedback control is performed so that the current deviation becomes substantially zero at the normal time, the integrated value of the current deviation converges to substantially zero. In FIG. 4, the target current value is in a steady state, but even if the target current value fluctuates, the positive and negative current deviations alternate between reaching the steady state. In order to respond so as to appear, the positive and negative current deviations cancel each other, and the integrated value of the current deviations converges to a value close to 0 while the increase in absolute value is suppressed.

一方、断線時には、図3に示すように電流偏差が負の状態が継続することで、負の電流偏差が繰り返し積算され、電流偏差の積算値が負の方向へ増加する。
また、短絡時には、図3に示すように電流偏差が正の状態が継続することで、正の電流偏差が繰り返し積算され、電流偏差の積算値が正の方向へ増加する。
そして、図2の異常判定部105において、電流偏差の積算値が所定の断線判定閾値を負の方向へ超えるのを検出したとき、リニアソレノイド1が断線していると判定し、該積算値が所定の短絡判定閾値を正の方向へ超えるのを検出したとき、リニアソレノイド1が短絡していると判定する。
On the other hand, at the time of disconnection, as shown in FIG. 3, the negative current deviation continues, so that the negative current deviation is repeatedly integrated, and the integrated value of the current deviation increases in the negative direction.
Further, when the short circuit occurs, the positive current deviation continues as shown in FIG. 3, so that the positive current deviation is repeatedly integrated, and the integrated value of the current deviation increases in the positive direction.
2 detects that the integrated value of the current deviation exceeds a predetermined disconnection determination threshold value in the negative direction, it is determined that the linear solenoid 1 is disconnected, and the integrated value is When it is detected that the predetermined short-circuit determination threshold is exceeded in the positive direction, it is determined that the linear solenoid 1 is short-circuited.

なお、これら断線判定閾値及び短絡判定閾値は、正常時において電流偏差の積算値が到達するのを確実に防止できる程度の値に設定される。
異常判定部105においてリニアソレノイド1の断線と判定したときは、リニアソレノイド1が制御不能なために自動変速機など関連機器が不適切な動作を起こさないように、フェールセーフ制御を行う。
Note that the disconnection determination threshold and the short-circuit determination threshold are set to values that can reliably prevent the integrated value of the current deviation from reaching the normal value.
When the abnormality determining unit 105 determines that the linear solenoid 1 is disconnected, fail safe control is performed so that the linear solenoid 1 is not controllable and related devices such as an automatic transmission do not perform inappropriate operations.

一方、異常判定部105においてリニアソレノイド1の短絡と判定したときは、例えば、電気回路2を電源から切断し、電気回路2の過電流による性能低下を防止するようなフェールセーフ制御を行う。
以下、本実施形態の奏する効果について、従来の構成と比較して説明する。
従来の構成(例えば特許文献1に記載のもの)では、リニアソレノイドの電流偏差の絶対値(モニタ電流値と目標電流値との差)が閾値を超えたのを検出したとき、リニアソレノイド又はこれを駆動する駆動装置の異常(断線又は短絡)と判定している。したがって、目標電流値が0に近い程度に小さいときは、図5に示すように、実際の断線時に、モニタ電流値が0となることで、電流偏差の絶対値が小さくなって正常範囲に収まってしまうため、断線を検出するのが困難である。
On the other hand, when the abnormality determination unit 105 determines that the linear solenoid 1 is short-circuited, for example, fail-safe control is performed such that the electric circuit 2 is disconnected from the power source and performance degradation due to overcurrent of the electric circuit 2 is prevented.
Hereinafter, the effects produced by the present embodiment will be described in comparison with a conventional configuration.
In the conventional configuration (for example, described in Patent Document 1), when it is detected that the absolute value of the current deviation of the linear solenoid (the difference between the monitor current value and the target current value) exceeds the threshold, Is determined to be abnormal (disconnected or short-circuited). Therefore, when the target current value is small enough to be close to 0, as shown in FIG. 5, the absolute value of the current deviation becomes small and falls within the normal range because the monitor current value becomes 0 when the actual disconnection occurs. Therefore, it is difficult to detect disconnection.

これに対し、本実施形態では、図4に示すように、正常時には電流偏差の積算値が略0に収束するのに対して、実際の断線時には、絶対値の小さな電流偏差であってもこれが積算されて該積算値が負の方向へ増大するため、正常時と断線時とで電流偏差の積算値の差が明確に現れる。そして、電流偏差の積算値が断線判定閾値を負の方向へ超えるのを検出することで、断線を確実に検出することができる。   On the other hand, in the present embodiment, as shown in FIG. 4, the integrated value of the current deviation converges to approximately 0 in the normal state, whereas this is even if the current deviation has a small absolute value in the actual disconnection. Since the integrated value increases in the negative direction, a difference in the integrated value of the current deviation clearly appears between the normal time and the disconnection. The disconnection can be reliably detected by detecting that the integrated value of the current deviation exceeds the disconnection determination threshold value in the negative direction.

また、上記従来の構成では、リニアソレノイドの目標電流値がモニタ電流値の測定限界値に近い程度に大きいとき(図6の領域E1)は、実際の短絡時に、実際の電流値が測定限界値を超過していても、モニタ電流値が測定限界値で飽和することで、やはり電流偏差の絶対値が小さくなって正常範囲に収まってしまうため、短絡を検出するのが困難である。   Further, in the above-described conventional configuration, when the target current value of the linear solenoid is large enough to be close to the measurement limit value of the monitor current value (area E1 in FIG. 6), the actual current value is the measurement limit value at the time of the actual short circuit. Even if the value exceeds the value, the monitor current value saturates at the measurement limit value, so that the absolute value of the current deviation also decreases and falls within the normal range, so that it is difficult to detect a short circuit.

これに対し、本実施形態では、正常時には電流偏差の積算値が略0に収束するのに対して、実際の短絡時には、絶対値の小さな電流偏差であってもこれが積算されて該積算値が正の方向へ増大するため、正常時と短絡時とで電流偏差の積算値の差が明確に現れる。そして、電流偏差の積算値が短絡判定閾値を正の方向へ超えるのを検出することで、短絡を確実に検出することができる。   On the other hand, in the present embodiment, the integrated value of the current deviation converges to approximately 0 in the normal state, whereas in the actual short circuit, even if the current deviation has a small absolute value, the integrated value is integrated. Since it increases in the positive direction, the difference in the integrated value of the current deviation clearly appears between the normal time and the short circuit. And a short circuit is reliably detectable by detecting that the integrated value of an electric current deviation exceeds a short circuit determination threshold value to a positive direction.

なお、目標電流値が特に小さい領域では、実際の断線時、電流偏差の絶対値が極めて小さくなるため、電流偏差の積算値が負の方向へ増大する速度が低下し、断線発生から前記積算値が断線判定閾値を超えるまでの時間が長くなることで、断線検出が遅れる懸念がある。したがって、例えば図7に示すように、目標電流値が特に小さい領域(目標電流値がb1未満の領域)において、断線判定閾値を0に近づけることで、断線検出の迅速性を確保してもよい。   In the region where the target current value is particularly small, the absolute value of the current deviation becomes extremely small at the time of actual disconnection, so the speed at which the integrated value of current deviation increases in the negative direction decreases, and the integrated value from the occurrence of disconnection decreases. There is a concern that disconnection detection may be delayed due to the length of time until the disconnection determination threshold is exceeded. Therefore, for example, as illustrated in FIG. 7, in a region where the target current value is particularly small (a region where the target current value is less than b1), the disconnection determination threshold value may be brought close to 0 to ensure the speed of disconnection detection. .

同様に、目標電流値が特に前記測定限界値に近い領域でも、実際の短絡時、電流偏差の絶対値が極めて小さくなるため、電流偏差の積算値が正の方向へ増大する速度が低下し、短絡発生から前記積算値が短絡判定閾値を超えるまでの時間が長くなることで、短絡検出が遅れる懸念がある。したがって、例えば図7に示すように、目標電流値が特に前記測定限界値に近い領域(目標電流値がb2より大きい領域)において、短絡判定閾値を0に近づけることで、短絡検出の迅速性を確保してもよい。   Similarly, even in the region where the target current value is particularly close to the measurement limit value, the absolute value of the current deviation becomes extremely small at the time of actual short circuit, so the speed at which the integrated value of the current deviation increases in the positive direction decreases, There is a concern that detection of a short circuit may be delayed due to the length of time from the occurrence of a short circuit until the integrated value exceeds the short circuit determination threshold. Therefore, for example, as shown in FIG. 7, in a region where the target current value is particularly close to the measurement limit value (a region where the target current value is larger than b2), the short-circuit determination threshold is brought close to 0, thereby improving the speed of short-circuit detection. It may be secured.

図7において、目標電流値がb1以上の領域における断線判定閾値はa1であり、目標電流値がb2以下の領域における短絡判定閾値はa2であるが、このa1,a2は、正常時に目標電流値の変動によってモニタ電流値のオーバーシュートが規定サイクル発生しても、夫々断線,短絡であるとの誤判定が生じないように設定する。したがって、予め、発生し得るモニタ電流値のオーバーシュート量を、計測等によって求めておくのがよい。   In FIG. 7, the disconnection determination threshold value in the region where the target current value is b1 or more is a1, and the short circuit determination threshold value in the region where the target current value is b2 or less is a2, but these a1 and a2 are the target current values in the normal state. Even if a monitor current value overshoot occurs due to fluctuations in the number of cycles, it is set so that erroneous determination of disconnection or short circuit does not occur. Therefore, it is preferable to obtain the overshoot amount of the monitor current value that can be generated in advance by measurement or the like.

ここで、図7の目標電流値がb1未満の領域では、該領域へ目標電流値が低下するように変動したとき、実際の電流値のオーバーシュート量が、正常時の制御領域の下限値(図6参照)からモニタ電流値の測定限界値(ここでは0)を減じた値、を超えるようになっている。そこで、実際の電流値のうちオーバーシュート時に0未満(負)の値を示せなかった分を補償すべく、目標電流値がb1未満の領域において断線判定閾値を0に近づけ、これにより断線の検出精度を確保している。   Here, in the region where the target current value in FIG. 7 is less than b1, when the target current value fluctuates into the region, the actual current value overshoot amount is the lower limit value ( The value obtained by subtracting the measurement limit value (here, 0) of the monitor current value from the monitor current value is exceeded. Therefore, in order to compensate for the actual current value that could not show a value less than 0 (negative) at the time of overshoot, the disconnection determination threshold is brought close to 0 in the region where the target current value is less than b1, thereby detecting the disconnection. Ensures accuracy.

また、図7の目標電流値がb2より大きい領域では、該領域へ目標電流値が増加するように変動したとき、実際の電流値のオーバーシュート量が、モニタ電流値の測定限界値から正常時の制御領域の上限値(図6参照)を減じた値、を超えるようになっている。そこで、実際の電流値のうちオーバーシュート時にモニタ電流値の測定限界値を超過した分を補償すべく、目標電流値がb2より大きい領域において短絡判定閾値を0に近づけ、これにより短絡の検出精度を確保している。   Further, in the region where the target current value in FIG. 7 is larger than b2, when the target current value fluctuates so as to increase to the region, the actual overshoot amount of the current value is normal from the measurement limit value of the monitor current value. The value obtained by subtracting the upper limit value of the control area (see FIG. 6) is exceeded. Therefore, in order to compensate for the portion of the actual current value that exceeds the measurement limit value of the monitor current value at the time of overshoot, the short-circuit determination threshold is brought close to 0 in the region where the target current value is larger than b2, thereby detecting the short-circuit detection accuracy. Is secured.

図7の目標電流値がb1未満の領域における断線判定閾値の目標電流値に対する変化率、及び、目標電流値がb2より大きい領域における短絡判定閾値の目標電流値に対する変化率は、チューニング等によって適切に設定するとよい。
また、上記従来の構成では、図8に示すように、目標電流値が小さい領域ほど、モニタ電流値の短絡判定閾値も小さく設定され、該短絡判定閾値と目標電流値との差が小さくなっている。したがって、実際に正常時であっても、目標電流値が特に小さい領域(図6の領域E2)へ低下するように変動したときは、応答時にモニタ電流値のピークが該短絡判定閾値を超えやすく、短絡と誤判定しやすい。
The change rate with respect to the target current value of the disconnection determination threshold value in the region where the target current value is less than b1 in FIG. 7 and the change rate with respect to the target current value of the short circuit determination threshold value in the region where the target current value is greater than b2 are appropriate by tuning or the like. It is good to set to.
In the conventional configuration, as shown in FIG. 8, the smaller the target current value is, the smaller the short-circuit determination threshold value of the monitor current value is set, and the difference between the short-circuit determination threshold value and the target current value becomes smaller. Yes. Therefore, even if it is actually normal, if the target current value fluctuates so as to decrease to a particularly small region (region E2 in FIG. 6), the peak of the monitor current value tends to exceed the short-circuit determination threshold during response. Easily misjudged as a short circuit.

これに対し、本実施形態では、リニアソレノイド1を流れる電流値のフィードバック制御により、定常状態に至るまでの間に、電流偏差が正の状態と、負の状態と、が交互に現れるように応答し、正負の電流偏差が相殺し合うため、電流偏差の積算値は、図9に示すように、絶対値の増大が抑制されて短絡判定閾値を超えない範囲で減衰し、0に近い値へ収束する。このように、電流偏差を積算することで、実際の正常時に短絡と誤判定されるのを確実に防止し、短絡の検出精度を向上させることができる。   On the other hand, in the present embodiment, the feedback control of the current value flowing through the linear solenoid 1 makes a response so that a positive current deviation and a negative state appear alternately until the steady state is reached. Then, since the positive and negative current deviations cancel each other, as shown in FIG. 9, the integrated value of the current deviation attenuates within a range in which the increase in absolute value is suppressed and does not exceed the short circuit determination threshold, and approaches a value close to zero. Converge. In this way, by accumulating the current deviation, it is possible to reliably prevent erroneous determination as a short circuit during actual normality and improve the detection accuracy of the short circuit.

なお、目標電流値の大きな変動後モニタ電流値が定常状態に至るまでの期間は、電流偏差の絶対値が一時的に大きくなり、該期間に算出された電流偏差を積算すると、積算値に大きな影響を及ぼしてリニアソレノイド1の異常と誤判定する懸念があるため、該期間に算出された電流偏差は、積算を禁止することで積算値に反映させないようにしてもよい。これにより、リニアソレノイド1の異常判定の正確性を確保できる。この場合、前記所定時間は、該積算禁止期間分を補償すべく、延長してもよい。   It should be noted that the absolute value of the current deviation temporarily increases during the period until the monitored current value after the large fluctuation of the target current value reaches the steady state, and if the current deviation calculated during this period is integrated, the integrated value becomes large. Since there is a concern that it may be erroneously determined that the linear solenoid 1 is abnormal, the current deviation calculated during the period may not be reflected in the integrated value by prohibiting the integration. Thereby, the accuracy of the abnormality determination of the linear solenoid 1 can be ensured. In this case, the predetermined time may be extended to compensate for the integration prohibition period.

さらに、上記従来の構成では、リニアソレノイドの目標電流値がモニタ電流値の測定限界値に近い程度に大きい領域(図6の領域E1)では、モニタ電流値の短絡判定閾値が該測定限界値で飽和してしまい、図10に示すように、該短絡判定閾値と目標電流値との差が小さくなる。したがって、実際に正常時であっても、目標電流値が該測定限界値に近い領域(図6の領域E1)へ増加するように変動したときは、応答時にモニタ電流値のピークが該短絡判定閾値を超えやすく、やはり短絡と誤判定しやすい。   Further, in the conventional configuration, in a region where the target current value of the linear solenoid is large enough to be close to the measurement limit value of the monitor current value (region E1 in FIG. 6), the short-circuit determination threshold value of the monitor current value is the measurement limit value. As shown in FIG. 10, the difference between the short-circuit determination threshold value and the target current value becomes small. Therefore, even if the actual value is normal, when the target current value fluctuates so as to increase to a region close to the measurement limit value (region E1 in FIG. 6), the peak of the monitor current value at the time of response is determined as the short circuit determination. It is easy to exceed the threshold value, and it is easy to mistakenly determine that it is a short circuit.

これに対し、本実施形態では、リニアソレノイド1を流れる電流値のフィードバック制御により、定常状態に至るまでの間に、電流偏差が正の状態と、負の状態と、が交互に現れるように応答し、正負の電流偏差が相殺し合うため、電流偏差の積算値は、図11に示すように、絶対値の増大が抑制されて短絡判定閾値を超えない範囲で減衰し、0に近い値へ収束する。このように、電流偏差を積算することで、実際の正常時に短絡と誤判定されるのを確実に防止し、短絡の検出精度を向上させることができる。   On the other hand, in the present embodiment, the feedback control of the current value flowing through the linear solenoid 1 makes a response so that a positive current deviation and a negative state appear alternately until the steady state is reached. Then, since the positive and negative current deviations cancel each other, as shown in FIG. 11, the integrated value of the current deviation attenuates within a range in which the increase in absolute value is suppressed and does not exceed the short circuit determination threshold, and approaches a value close to zero. Converge. In this way, by accumulating the current deviation, it is possible to reliably prevent erroneous determination as a short circuit during actual normality and improve the detection accuracy of the short circuit.

また、電流偏差の絶対値を閾値と比較することによって異常判定を行う上記従来の構成では、上述のように、目標電流値がモニタ電流値の測定限界値に近い程度に大きい領域(目標電流値が第1の所定値より大きい図6の領域E1)と、目標電流値が特に小さい領域(目標電流値が第2の所定値より小さい図6の領域E2)と、において、リニアソレノイド1の異常と誤判定したり、リニアソレノイド1の異常を検出できなかったりする。したがって、このような誤判定や異常未検出を生じやすい目標電流値領域でのみ、前記電流偏差の積算値に基づく高精度な異常判定を行い、一方、該領域外の目標電流値のときは、上記従来の構成のように、前記電流偏差の絶対値を閾値と比較することによる簡易な異常判定を行ってもよい。   Further, in the above-described conventional configuration in which abnormality determination is performed by comparing the absolute value of the current deviation with a threshold value, as described above, the target current value is large enough to be close to the measurement limit value of the monitor current value (target current value). 6 is larger than the first predetermined value, and the region where the target current value is particularly small (region E2 in FIG. 6 where the target current value is smaller than the second predetermined value) is abnormal. Or the abnormality of the linear solenoid 1 cannot be detected. Therefore, only in the target current value region that is likely to cause such misjudgment or abnormality undetected, highly accurate abnormality determination based on the integrated value of the current deviation is performed, while on the other hand, when the target current value outside the region, As in the above-described conventional configuration, simple abnormality determination may be performed by comparing the absolute value of the current deviation with a threshold value.

上記説明では、目標電流値とモニタ電流値との差分(電流偏差)を積算することで、電流偏差の積算値を求めたが、本発明はこれに限られず、出力電流値(前記電流補正項と目標電流値とを加算して得られる電流値)とモニタ電流値との差分を積算するようにしてもよい。この場合、図7の横軸の目標電流値を出力電流値と読み替え、出力電流値に応じて断線判定閾値及び短絡判定閾値を変更するなどしてもよい。   In the above description, the integrated value of the current deviation is obtained by integrating the difference (current deviation) between the target current value and the monitor current value. However, the present invention is not limited to this, and the output current value (the current correction term) And the current value obtained by adding the target current value) and the monitor current value may be integrated. In this case, the target current value on the horizontal axis in FIG. 7 may be read as the output current value, and the disconnection determination threshold value and the short circuit determination threshold value may be changed according to the output current value.

本発明の実施形態のシステム構成図System configuration diagram of an embodiment of the present invention 本発明の実施形態の通電制御回路を示す図The figure which shows the electricity supply control circuit of embodiment of this invention 本発明の実施形態に係る時間とモニタ電流値との関係の例を示す図The figure which shows the example of the relationship between time and monitor current value which concerns on embodiment of this invention 本発明の実施形態に係る時間と電流偏差の積算値との関係の例を示す図The figure which shows the example of the relationship between the time which concerns on embodiment of this invention, and the integrated value of an electric current deviation 従来の構成に係る断線時における時間とモニタ電流値との関係の例を示す図The figure which shows the example of the relationship between the time at the time of the disconnection which concerns on the conventional structure, and a monitor electric current value 従来の構成における目標電流値とモニタ電流値との関係の例を示す図The figure which shows the example of the relationship between the target electric current value and monitor current value in the conventional structure 本発明の実施形態に係る目標電流値と、断線判定閾値又は短絡判定閾値と、の関係の例を示す図The figure which shows the example of the relationship between the target electric current value which concerns on embodiment of this invention, and a disconnection determination threshold value or a short circuit determination threshold value 従来の構成に係る正常時に目標電流値が変動したときにおける時間とモニタ電流値との関係の例を示す図The figure which shows the example of the relationship between time and monitor electric current value when the target electric current value fluctuates at the normal time which concerns on the conventional structure 本発明の実施形態に係る正常時に目標電流値が変動したときにおける時間と電流偏差の積算値との関係の例を示す図The figure which shows the example of the relationship between time and the integrated value of an electric current deviation when the target electric current value fluctuates at the normal time which concerns on embodiment of this invention 従来の構成に係る正常時に目標電流値が変動したときにおける時間とモニタ電流値との関係の例を示す図The figure which shows the example of the relationship between time and monitor electric current value when the target electric current value fluctuates at the normal time which concerns on the conventional structure 本発明の実施形態に係る正常時に目標電流値が変動したときにおける時間と電流偏差の積算値との関係の例を示す図The figure which shows the example of the relationship between time and the integrated value of an electric current deviation when the target electric current value fluctuates at the normal time which concerns on embodiment of this invention

符号の説明Explanation of symbols

1 リニアソレノイド
2 電気回路
3 電流モニタ抵抗
4 電流モニタ回路
5 CPU
1 Linear Solenoid 2 Electrical Circuit 3 Current Monitor Resistor 4 Current Monitor Circuit 5 CPU

Claims (8)

電磁負荷装置を駆動する電気回路と、
該電気回路に流す目標電流値を設定する手段と、
該電気回路を流れる電流値をモニタする手段と、
前記モニタされる電流値と目標電流値との差分を算出する手段と、
該差分に基づいて、該モニタされる電流値が目標電流値と一致するように、前記電磁負荷装置への出力電流値を制御する制御手段と、
前記モニタされる電流値と、前記目標電流値又は出力電流値と、の差分を所定時間積算する積算手段と、
該差分の積算値を閾値と比較することで、前記電磁負荷装置の異常を判定する異常判定手段と、
を含んで構成したことを特徴とする電磁負荷装置の制御装置。
An electric circuit for driving the electromagnetic load device;
Means for setting a target current value to flow through the electric circuit;
Means for monitoring the value of current flowing through the electrical circuit;
Means for calculating a difference between the monitored current value and the target current value;
Control means for controlling an output current value to the electromagnetic load device based on the difference so that the monitored current value matches a target current value;
Integration means for integrating the difference between the monitored current value and the target current value or output current value for a predetermined time;
An abnormality determining means for determining an abnormality of the electromagnetic load device by comparing the integrated value of the difference with a threshold;
A control device for an electromagnetic load device, comprising:
前記所定時間は、前記異常判定の要求時を基点として、過去へ遡る方向へ設定されることを特徴とする請求項1に記載の電磁負荷装置の制御装置。   2. The control device for an electromagnetic load device according to claim 1, wherein the predetermined time is set in a direction going back to the past, with the abnormality determination request as a base point. 前記閾値として、正の閾値と負の閾値とを有し、
前記差分を、前記モニタされる電流値から目標電流値又は出力電流値を差し引いて算出する場合、前記異常判定手段は、前記積算値が正の閾値を上回ったとき、前記電磁負荷装置の短絡による異常と判定し、前記積算値が負の閾値を下回ったとき、前記電磁負荷装置の断線による異常と判定し、
前記差分を、前記目標電流値又は出力電流値からモニタされる電流値を差し引いて算出する場合、前記異常判定手段は、前記積算値が正の閾値を上回ったとき、前記電磁負荷装置の断線による異常と判定し、前記積算値が負の閾値を下回ったとき、前記電磁負荷装置の短絡による異常と判定することを特徴とする請求項1または請求項2に記載の電磁負荷装置の制御装置。
The threshold has a positive threshold and a negative threshold,
When the difference is calculated by subtracting the target current value or the output current value from the monitored current value, the abnormality determination means is caused by a short circuit of the electromagnetic load device when the integrated value exceeds a positive threshold value. When it is determined as abnormal, and the integrated value falls below a negative threshold, it is determined as abnormal due to disconnection of the electromagnetic load device,
When the difference is calculated by subtracting the monitored current value from the target current value or the output current value, the abnormality determination means is caused by disconnection of the electromagnetic load device when the integrated value exceeds a positive threshold value. 3. The control device for an electromagnetic load device according to claim 1, wherein when the integrated value is determined to be abnormal and the integrated value falls below a negative threshold value, it is determined that the electromagnetic load device is abnormal due to a short circuit. 4.
前記閾値は、前記目標電流値又は出力電流値に応じて変更されることを特徴とする請求項1〜請求項3のいずれか1つに記載の電磁負荷装置の制御装置。   The control device for an electromagnetic load device according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein the threshold value is changed according to the target current value or the output current value. 前記異常判定手段によって前記電磁負荷装置の異常と判定されたとき、該電磁負荷装置に対し、異常時用のフェールセーフ制御を行うことを特徴とする請求項1〜請求項4のいずれか1つに記載の電磁負荷装置の制御装置。   5. The fail-safe control for an abnormal time is performed on the electromagnetic load device when the abnormality determination unit determines that the electromagnetic load device is abnormal. 5. The control device of the electromagnetic load device described in 1. 前記電磁負荷装置の断線による異常と判定されたときは、該電磁負荷装置により制御される機器の不適切な動作を回避するフェールセーフ制御を行い、
前記電磁負荷装置の短絡による異常と判定されたときは、前記電気回路を電源から切断し、該電気回路の過電流を回避するフェールセーフ制御を行うことを特徴とする請求項5に記載の電磁負荷装置の制御装置。
When it is determined that there is an abnormality due to disconnection of the electromagnetic load device, fail safe control is performed to avoid inappropriate operation of the equipment controlled by the electromagnetic load device,
6. The electromagnetic wave according to claim 5, wherein when it is determined that there is an abnormality due to a short circuit of the electromagnetic load device, fail-safe control is performed to disconnect the electric circuit from a power source and avoid an overcurrent of the electric circuit. Control device for load device.
前記積算手段は、
前記目標電流値の変動後定常状態に至るまでの期間に算出された前記差分の積算を禁止することを特徴とする請求項1〜請求項6のいずれか1つに記載の電磁負荷装置の制御装置。
The integrating means includes
The control of the electromagnetic load device according to any one of claims 1 to 6, wherein integration of the difference calculated in a period from the change of the target current value to a steady state is prohibited. apparatus.
前記目標電流値が、第1の所定値より大きいとき、
又は、
前記目標電流値が、前記第1の所定値より小さい第2の所定値より小さいとき、
前記異常判定手段による判定を行うことを特徴とする請求項1〜請求項7のいずれか1つに記載の電磁負荷装置の制御装置。
When the target current value is greater than a first predetermined value,
Or
When the target current value is smaller than a second predetermined value smaller than the first predetermined value,
The control device for an electromagnetic load device according to claim 1, wherein the determination by the abnormality determination unit is performed.
JP2007256653A 2007-09-28 2007-09-28 Control device for electromagnetic load device Pending JP2009089072A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2007256653A JP2009089072A (en) 2007-09-28 2007-09-28 Control device for electromagnetic load device

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2007256653A JP2009089072A (en) 2007-09-28 2007-09-28 Control device for electromagnetic load device

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2009089072A true JP2009089072A (en) 2009-04-23

Family

ID=40661871

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2007256653A Pending JP2009089072A (en) 2007-09-28 2007-09-28 Control device for electromagnetic load device

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP2009089072A (en)

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2011187033A (en) * 2010-03-11 2011-09-22 Fuji Electric Co Ltd Current output device
WO2018047553A1 (en) * 2016-09-12 2018-03-15 ボッシュ株式会社 Control device
WO2022254929A1 (en) * 2021-06-01 2022-12-08 オムロン株式会社 Actuator drive device
US12451281B2 (en) 2021-04-12 2025-10-21 Hitachi Astemo, Ltd. Load drive device and method for controlling electronic control device

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH05217737A (en) * 1992-02-05 1993-08-27 Nippondenso Co Ltd Driving device for linear solenoid

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH05217737A (en) * 1992-02-05 1993-08-27 Nippondenso Co Ltd Driving device for linear solenoid

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2011187033A (en) * 2010-03-11 2011-09-22 Fuji Electric Co Ltd Current output device
WO2018047553A1 (en) * 2016-09-12 2018-03-15 ボッシュ株式会社 Control device
JPWO2018047553A1 (en) * 2016-09-12 2019-06-24 ボッシュ株式会社 Control device
US12451281B2 (en) 2021-04-12 2025-10-21 Hitachi Astemo, Ltd. Load drive device and method for controlling electronic control device
WO2022254929A1 (en) * 2021-06-01 2022-12-08 オムロン株式会社 Actuator drive device
JP7663026B2 (en) 2021-06-01 2025-04-16 オムロン株式会社 Actuator drive device, solenoid valve device, electromagnetic contactor, and electromagnetic brake device

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP6400610B2 (en) Load drive circuit
US7301312B2 (en) Switching power supply unit for generating an output voltage stepped up from an input voltage
US9035658B2 (en) Method for detecting a breakdown in a switching current source and corresponding power source
JPWO2018110134A1 (en) In-vehicle controller
JP2009089072A (en) Control device for electromagnetic load device
US10768241B2 (en) Power supply circuit and sound equipment
JP6023341B2 (en) Drive circuit for at least two contactors and method for driving at least two contactors
US20130187447A1 (en) Control and diagnostics of multiple electrical generating machines using an external voltage regulator
US10770886B2 (en) Electromagnetic load drive device and in-vehicle control system
JP2016181071A (en) Power supply
US12447914B2 (en) Vehicle-mounted control device
JP2013041713A (en) Lighting device, headlamp lighting device, headlamp device, and vehicle
US12451281B2 (en) Load drive device and method for controlling electronic control device
US9647530B2 (en) Switching power supply with preventive maintenance function
CN115875147A (en) High pressure fuel pump circuit
JP5033401B2 (en) Solenoid drive
US11824528B2 (en) Load drive device and control method of load drive device
JP2011202530A (en) Fuel pump control device
JP4840377B2 (en) Power supply circuit and control method thereof
JP6908366B2 (en) Power circuit and power control method
JP2006349527A (en) Solenoid abnormality detection device
JP2005236101A (en) Solenoid abnormality detection device
CN119582585B (en) Power supply device and medical system
JP2006317334A (en) Solenoid abnormality detection device
JP2009231409A (en) Linear solenoid driving device

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A711 Notification of change in applicant

Effective date: 20090925

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A712

RD03 Notification of appointment of power of attorney

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A7423

Effective date: 20090925

A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20091209

A977 Report on retrieval

Effective date: 20111130

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Effective date: 20120207

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

A02 Decision of refusal

Effective date: 20120612

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A02