[go: up one dir, main page]

JP2008292288A - Bearing diagnostic device for reduction gear - Google Patents

Bearing diagnostic device for reduction gear Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP2008292288A
JP2008292288A JP2007137912A JP2007137912A JP2008292288A JP 2008292288 A JP2008292288 A JP 2008292288A JP 2007137912 A JP2007137912 A JP 2007137912A JP 2007137912 A JP2007137912 A JP 2007137912A JP 2008292288 A JP2008292288 A JP 2008292288A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
bearing
frequency
unit
vibration
amplitude
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
JP2007137912A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
Hiroyuki Nishida
博幸 西田
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Mitsubishi Electric Engineering Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Mitsubishi Electric Engineering Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Mitsubishi Electric Engineering Co Ltd filed Critical Mitsubishi Electric Engineering Co Ltd
Priority to JP2007137912A priority Critical patent/JP2008292288A/en
Publication of JP2008292288A publication Critical patent/JP2008292288A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Measurement Of Mechanical Vibrations Or Ultrasonic Waves (AREA)
  • Testing Of Devices, Machine Parts, Or Other Structures Thereof (AREA)

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a bearing diagnostic device which quantitatively diagnoses abnormalities caused at each bearing with sufficient accuracy in reduction gear which consists of two or more bearings, like an elevator winding machine. <P>SOLUTION: The bearing diagnostic device comprises a filter processing section which extracts signal waveforms of a plurality of frequencies from diagnostic signal waveforms which shows the temporal variations of amplitude values representing an extent of vibration that is generated from a bearing to be diagnosed; an exponentiating processing section which exponentiates the amplitude values of the signal waveforms of a plurality of frequencies; a frequency analyzing section which applies Fourier transformation on exponentiated waveforms which shows temporal variations of the exponentiated amplitude values for finding frequency spectra, while it also calculates the amplitude values for every frequency which are resulting from the structure and revolution speed of the bearing; a criterion storing section which stores criteria values for every frequency that are resulting from the structure and revolution speed of the bearing; a comparison operation section which compares the amplitude values calculated in frequency analyzing section for every frequency with the criteria value stored in the criterion storing section; and a result display section which displays the result of decision, based on the result of comparison in the comparison operation section. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2009,JPO&INPIT

Description

この発明は、エレベータ巻上機などの減速機に使用されている軸受の異常を定量且つ精度良く検出する軸受診断装置に関するものである。   The present invention relates to a bearing diagnostic apparatus for quantitatively and accurately detecting an abnormality of a bearing used in a reduction gear such as an elevator hoisting machine.

従来、エレベータ巻上機などの減速機に使用されている軸受の異常判断は、現場の点検作業者の官能評価を頼りに判断することが多かった。官能評価による判断は特別な計測器や診断装置を必要とせず手軽に行える利点はあるが、作業者によって判断にばらつきが生じる他、適確な判断を行うには経験を積む必要がある。このため、経験の浅い作業者では適確な判断が行えず、軸受の異常が進行してから異常が発見される場合があり、短納期での修繕対応が必要になることがある。また、官能評価は作業者の五官に判断が委ねられるため定量的な判断が難しく、定期的に点検を実施している場合にも前回の点検時との差を明確に判断することができなかった。   Conventionally, an abnormality judgment of a bearing used in a reduction gear such as an elevator hoisting machine is often judged by relying on a sensory evaluation of an on-site inspection operator. Judgment by sensory evaluation has the advantage that it can be easily performed without the need for a special measuring instrument or diagnostic device. However, the judgment varies depending on the operator, and it is necessary to gain experience to make an accurate judgment. For this reason, an inexperienced worker cannot make an accurate judgment, and the abnormality may be discovered after the abnormality of the bearing has progressed, and repairing with a short delivery time may be required. In addition, it is difficult to make a quantitative judgment because sensory evaluation is entrusted to the five officials of the worker, and even when periodic inspections are carried out, the difference from the previous inspection cannot be clearly determined. It was.

従来の軸受診断装置においては、診断対象とする軸受から発生する音や振動などを各種センサで検出し、検出した信号から必要な周波数帯域のみ各種フィルタで抽出し、抽出後の信号をエンベローブ処理し、FFT処理を行って周波数スペクトルを算出し、軸受の回転数と寸法諸元から求まる周期性と比較する装置が種々知られている。   In a conventional bearing diagnostic device, sounds and vibrations generated from the bearing to be diagnosed are detected by various sensors, only the necessary frequency band is extracted from the detected signal by various filters, and the extracted signal is envelope processed. Various devices are known that perform FFT processing to calculate a frequency spectrum and compare it with the periodicity obtained from the rotational speed and dimensions of the bearing.

従来の軸受診断装置の一例では、異常診断対象部材から発生する音または振動を検出し、異常診断対象部材の異常に起因する周波数の基本周波数の大きさと、その自然数倍の周波数成分の大きさと比較し、その比較結果を異常の判定基準として用いる判定手段を具備して構成されている。この診断装置では、過去の測定データを用いることがなく基準値の設定が行え、診断処理が複雑にならずに診断が行える利点がある(例えば、特許文献1参照)。   In an example of a conventional bearing diagnosis device, sound or vibration generated from a member to be diagnosed for abnormality is detected, and the magnitude of the fundamental frequency of the frequency resulting from the abnormality of the member to be diagnosed for abnormality and the magnitude of the frequency component that is a natural number multiple thereof. It comprises a judging means for comparing and using the comparison result as a judgment criterion for abnormality. This diagnostic apparatus has an advantage that a reference value can be set without using past measurement data, and diagnosis can be performed without complicating diagnostic processing (see, for example, Patent Document 1).

また、従来の軸受診断装置の他の例では、回転部品または静止部材にセンサを固定しセンサにより検出された信号の波形から回転部品と静止部材とセンサのいずれかの固有振動数に対応した特定周波数帯域を抽出するフィルタ部と、フィルタ処理後の波形の絶対値検波をするエンベローブ処理部と、エンベローブ処理された波形の周波数を分析する周波数分析部と、診断対象回転部品の損傷に起因した周波数と実測データに基づく周波数とを比較する比較照合部と、比較結果に基づき、異常の有無や異常の部位を特定する異常判定部とを具備している。この診断断置によれば、回転部品が組込まれている装置を分解することなく実稼動の状態で複数の部品の欠陥と損傷の程度を同時に検査でき、また機械部品の固有振動数に対応した周波数帯域を抽出するため、高感度で高SN比の測定が可能になる利点がある(例えば、特許文献2参照)。   In another example of a conventional bearing diagnosis apparatus, a sensor is fixed to a rotating component or a stationary member, and the identification corresponding to the natural frequency of any of the rotating component, the stationary member, and the sensor is performed from the waveform of the signal detected by the sensor. A filter unit that extracts the frequency band, an envelope processing unit that detects the absolute value of the filtered waveform, a frequency analysis unit that analyzes the frequency of the envelope-processed waveform, and a frequency resulting from damage to the rotating component to be diagnosed And a comparison / collation unit that compares the frequency based on the actual measurement data, and an abnormality determination unit that identifies the presence / absence of an abnormality and an abnormal part based on the comparison result. According to this diagnostic disconnection, it is possible to inspect the degree of defects and damage of multiple parts at the same time in actual operation without disassembling the device in which the rotating parts are incorporated, and also correspond to the natural frequency of the machine parts. Since the frequency band is extracted, there is an advantage that measurement with high sensitivity and high S / N ratio is possible (for example, refer to Patent Document 2).

特開2003−232674号公報JP 2003-232674 A 特開2005−62154号公報JP 2005-62154 A

しかし、特許文献1に開示されている診断装置では、診断においては検出した信号から診断に必要な周波数帯域の信号を取り出し処理を行っているが、エレベータ巻上機のような複数個の軸受や歯車などから構成される減速機では、振動に様々な周波数を含むため診断に必要な周波数帯域の決定は、診断の対象となる軸受や歯車などの構成により異なるため一意に決定できない。
また、過去の測定データを用いることなく基準の設定が可能となることが利点となっている診断装置であることから、測定データに基づいて診断に必要な周波数帯域を得ることもできない。このため軸受異常の初期段階での診断において精度をよくすることができない。
However, in the diagnostic device disclosed in Patent Document 1, in the diagnosis, a signal in a frequency band necessary for the diagnosis is extracted from the detected signal and processed, but there are a plurality of bearings such as an elevator hoist. In a reduction gear composed of gears and the like, since the vibration includes various frequencies, the determination of the frequency band necessary for the diagnosis cannot be uniquely determined because it differs depending on the configuration of the bearing or gear to be diagnosed.
In addition, since the diagnostic apparatus is advantageous in that it is possible to set a reference without using past measurement data, a frequency band necessary for diagnosis cannot be obtained based on the measurement data. For this reason, accuracy cannot be improved in the diagnosis at the initial stage of bearing abnormality.

また、特許文献2に開示されている診断装置では、フィルタ部にて機械部品の固有振動数に対応した複数の周波数帯域を抽出するが、この固有振動数は回転部品である複列円錐ころ軸受、歯車および車輪、静止部材である軸受箱、異常検出用センサの何れかを被測定物として打撃法により加振して、被測定物に取り付けた振動検出器または打撃により発生した音響を周波数分析することにより求めるが、エレベータ巻上機のように現場に設備が設置されて分解が簡単に行えない複数の軸受により構成される減速機では、内部構成品である軸受や歯車に対して打撃法により加振して固有動数を求める方法は時間と手間がかかり現実的でなく、また構成品を組合せた場合には検出した振動の周波数帯域は必ずしも各構成品の固有振動数とはならないため、適切な周波数帯域が得られない。   In the diagnostic device disclosed in Patent Document 2, a filter unit extracts a plurality of frequency bands corresponding to the natural frequency of a machine part. The natural frequency is a double row tapered roller bearing that is a rotating part. Any of the gears and wheels, the bearing box, which is a stationary member, and an abnormality detection sensor, is vibrated by the striking method as the object to be measured, and the frequency detector analyzes the sound generated by the vibration detector attached to the object to be measured. However, in the case of a reducer composed of multiple bearings that cannot be easily disassembled because the equipment is installed on site, such as an elevator hoisting machine, the impact method is applied to bearings and gears that are internal components. The method of obtaining the natural frequency by applying vibration is not time-consuming and time-consuming, and when the components are combined, the detected vibration frequency band is not necessarily the natural frequency of each component. Therefore, no proper frequency band is obtained.

この発明の目的は、エレベータ巻上機のような複数の軸受から構成される減速機に対して、官能検査で生じた判定基準のばらつきを解消し、作業者の経験に基づく判断に頼ることなく、各軸受で発生した異常を定量的に精度良く診断する軸受診断装置を提供することである。   The object of the present invention is to eliminate variations in judgment criteria caused by sensory inspection for a reduction gear composed of a plurality of bearings such as an elevator hoisting machine, without relying on judgment based on the experience of the operator. An object of the present invention is to provide a bearing diagnostic apparatus that quantitatively and accurately diagnoses an abnormality occurring in each bearing.

この発明に係る軸受診断装置は、軸受の異常を診断する軸受診断装置であって、診断する軸受から発生する振動の大きさを表す振幅値の時間軸上の変化を示す診断対象信号波形から複数の周波数の信号波形を抽出するフィルタ処理部と、上記複数の周波数の信号波形の振幅値を累乗する累乗処理部と、上記累乗された振幅値の時間軸上の変化を示す累乗波形にフーリエ変換を施して周波数スペクトルを求めるとともに、軸受の構造と回転数とに起因する周波数毎の振幅値を算出する周波数分析部と、軸受の構造と回転数とに起因する周波数毎の判定基準値を格納する判定基準格納部と、周波数毎に上記周波数分析部で算出した振幅値と上記判定基準格納部に格納した判定基準値とを比較する比較演算部と、上記比較演算部での比較結果に基づく判定結果を表示する判定結果表示部と、を備える。   A bearing diagnostic apparatus according to the present invention is a bearing diagnostic apparatus for diagnosing a bearing abnormality, and includes a plurality of diagnostic target signal waveforms indicating changes on the time axis of amplitude values indicating the magnitude of vibration generated from a bearing to be diagnosed. A filter processing unit that extracts a signal waveform of a plurality of frequencies, a power processing unit that raises the amplitude values of the signal waveforms of the plurality of frequencies, and a Fourier transform to a power waveform that indicates changes on the time axis of the raised amplitude values To obtain the frequency spectrum, and to store the frequency analysis unit that calculates the amplitude value for each frequency attributed to the bearing structure and the rotational speed, and the judgment reference value for each frequency attributed to the bearing structure and the rotational speed Based on the comparison result in the comparison calculation unit, the comparison calculation unit that compares the amplitude value calculated in the frequency analysis unit for each frequency with the determination reference value stored in the determination reference storage unit. Z It includes a determination result display unit for displaying the determination result.

この発明に係る軸受診断装置の効果は、エレベータ巻上機のような複数の軸受から構成される減速機に対して、官能検査で生じた判定基準のばらつきを解消し、作業者の経験に基づく判断に頼ることなく、各軸受で発生した異常を定量的に且つ精度良く診断することができることである。   The effect of the bearing diagnostic device according to the present invention is based on the experience of the operator by eliminating the variation in the judgment criteria caused by the sensory test for the reduction gear composed of a plurality of bearings such as an elevator hoisting machine. An abnormality occurring in each bearing can be diagnosed quantitatively and accurately without depending on the judgment.

実施の形態1.
図1は、この発明に係る実施の形態1による軸受診断装置の機能ブロック図である。
この発明に係る実施の形態1による軸受診断装置を図1を参照して説明する。尚、この説明では診断対象の減速機としてエレベータの巻上機1を例にして説明する。
この発明に係る実施の形態1による軸受診断装置は、エレベータ巻上機1に発生する振動を検出しアナログの電気信号を出力する振動センサ2、振動センサ2から出力される電気信号を増幅する増幅部3、増幅されたアナログの電気信号をデジタルの電気信号に変換するA/D変換部4、デジタルの電気信号にウェーブレット変換を施し複数の周波数の信号波形を抽出し、各周波数の信号波形の実部と虚部を二乗平均処理するウェーブレット変換処理部5、ウェーブレット変換処理部5で算出した複数の信号波形の振幅値を累乗する累乗処理部6、累乗処理部6から出力される振幅値に累乗処理を行った信号波形に対してフーリエ変換を施して周波数スペクトルを求め、且つ周波数スペクトルから軸受の構造と回転数とに起因する特定周波数での振幅値を算出する周波数分析部7、軸受の構造と回転数とに起因する特定周波数毎の判定基準値を格納する判定基準格納部8、周波数分析部7で算出した振幅値と判定基準格納部8に格納された判定基準値とを比較し軸受の異常を判断する比較演算部9、比較演算部9での比較演算結果に基づいて判定結果を表示する判定結果表示部10を有する。
Embodiment 1 FIG.
1 is a functional block diagram of a bearing diagnostic apparatus according to Embodiment 1 of the present invention.
A bearing diagnostic apparatus according to Embodiment 1 of the present invention will be described with reference to FIG. In this description, the elevator hoist 1 will be described as an example of the reduction gear to be diagnosed.
The bearing diagnosis apparatus according to the first embodiment of the present invention detects a vibration generated in the elevator hoist 1 and outputs an analog electric signal, and an amplification that amplifies the electric signal output from the vibration sensor 2 Unit 3, an A / D converter 4 that converts the amplified analog electrical signal into a digital electrical signal, wavelet transform is performed on the digital electrical signal, and a signal waveform of a plurality of frequencies is extracted. A wavelet transform processing unit 5 that performs mean-square processing of the real part and imaginary part, a power processing unit 6 that raises the amplitude values of a plurality of signal waveforms calculated by the wavelet transform processing unit 5, and an amplitude value output from the power processing unit 6 A frequency spectrum is obtained by performing Fourier transform on the signal waveform that has been subjected to the power process, and the specific frequency resulting from the structure and rotation speed of the bearing from the frequency spectrum Frequency analysis unit 7 for calculating the amplitude value of the bearing, determination criterion storage unit 8 for storing the determination reference value for each specific frequency resulting from the structure and rotation speed of the bearing, and the amplitude value and determination criterion storage calculated by the frequency analysis unit 7 The comparison operation unit 9 compares the determination reference value stored in the unit 8 to determine a bearing abnormality, and the determination result display unit 10 displays the determination result based on the comparison operation result in the comparison operation unit 9.

次に、この発明に係る実施の形態1による軸受診断装置の動作について説明する。
複数の軸受により構成されているエレベータ巻上機1の軸受上部の箇所に振動センサ2をマグネットアタッチメントなどにより固定する。
機械振動は振動センサ2によりアナログの電気信号に変換されて出力され、増幅部3で増幅され、A/D変換部4でデジタルの電気信号に変換される。デジタルの電気信号の振幅値が振動の大きさを表す診断対象振動波形を得る。このようにして計測した健全時の診断対象振動波形(A)と異常時の診断対象振動波形(B)の例を図2に示す。この状態の診断対象振動波形では健全時に比較して異常時に顕著な特徴は見られない。
Next, the operation of the bearing diagnostic apparatus according to Embodiment 1 of the present invention will be described.
The vibration sensor 2 is fixed by a magnet attachment or the like at a position above the bearing of the elevator hoisting machine 1 constituted by a plurality of bearings.
The mechanical vibration is converted into an analog electric signal by the vibration sensor 2 and output, amplified by the amplifying unit 3, and converted into a digital electric signal by the A / D conversion unit 4. A diagnosis target vibration waveform is obtained in which the amplitude value of the digital electric signal indicates the magnitude of vibration. FIG. 2 shows examples of the diagnosis target vibration waveform (A) at the time of health and the diagnosis target vibration waveform (B) at the time of abnormality measured in this way. In the vibration waveform to be diagnosed in this state, no remarkable feature is observed when there is an abnormality compared to when it is healthy.

この診断対象振動波形に対してウェーブレット変換処理部5で時間−周波数解析の一種であるウェーブレット変換を行い、様々な周波数成分を含む診断対象振動波形から、周波数帯毎の時間軸波形を抽出する。ここで抽出する周波数帯は、事前に同型式の巻上機の軸受に異常が生じた際に計測した実データにおいて軸受の損傷箇所によって軸受の構造と回転数とから定まる周期性が振幅の変化に現れる周波数帯とする。周期性が振幅の変化に現れる周波数帯が複数ある場合には複数の時間軸波形を抽出する。
ウェーブレット変換による各周波数帯の演算結果から実部と虚部を2乗して加算し平方根を求め、各周波数帯の時間軸波形を得る。先に示した健全時の診断対象振動波形(A)および異常時の診断対象振動波形(B)について、以上の手順で抽出した指定の周波数帯での時間軸波形(健全時が(A1)、異常時が(B1))を図3に示す。この結果から異常時の時間軸波形には、診断対象軸受の損傷箇所によって発生する周期性に一致する8.5回/秒の周期性が現れていることがわかる。逆に健全な軸受ではこの周期性の特徴は見られない。
The wavelet transform processing unit 5 performs wavelet transform, which is a kind of time-frequency analysis, on the diagnosis target vibration waveform, and extracts a time axis waveform for each frequency band from the diagnosis target vibration waveform including various frequency components. The frequency band extracted here is the periodicity determined by the bearing structure and the number of rotations depending on the damaged part of the bearing in the actual data measured when an abnormality occurred in the bearing of the same type hoisting machine in advance. The frequency band that appears in. When there are a plurality of frequency bands in which the periodicity appears in the amplitude change, a plurality of time axis waveforms are extracted.
From the calculation result of each frequency band by wavelet transform, the real part and the imaginary part are squared and added to obtain a square root to obtain a time-axis waveform of each frequency band. About the diagnosis target vibration waveform (A) at the time of health and the diagnosis target vibration waveform (B) at the time of abnormality shown above, the time axis waveform in the specified frequency band extracted by the above procedure (when the sound time is healthy (A1), FIG. 3 shows an abnormal time (B1). From this result, it can be seen that a periodicity of 8.5 times / second appears in the time axis waveform at the time of abnormality, which coincides with the periodicity generated by the damaged portion of the bearing to be diagnosed. Conversely, a healthy bearing does not show this periodicity feature.

次に、ウェーブレット変換処理部5で算出した時間軸波形に対して累乗処理部6で振幅値を累乗する処理を実施し、複数の周波数帯毎の累乗処理した時間軸波形を得る。先に示した特定の周波数帯での時間軸波形(A1、B1)に対し、時間軸波形の振幅値を2乗した時間軸波形(健全時が(A2)、異常時が(B2))を図4に、3乗した時間軸波形(健全時が(A3)、異常時が(B3))を図5に示す。異常時には振幅に周期的な特徴があり健全時にはないことから、振幅値の累乗処理により異常時に現れる周期的な振幅の特徴がさらに顕著になることがわかる。   Next, the time-axis waveform calculated by the wavelet transform processing unit 5 is subjected to a process of raising the amplitude value by the power-processing unit 6 to obtain a time-axis waveform obtained by performing the power process for each of a plurality of frequency bands. Compared to the time axis waveform (A1, B1) in the specific frequency band shown above, a time axis waveform obtained by squaring the amplitude value of the time axis waveform (when healthy (A2), when abnormal (B2)) FIG. 4 shows a time-axis waveform that is raised to the third power (when healthy (A3), when abnormal (B3)). Since the amplitude has a periodic characteristic at the time of abnormality and not at the time of soundness, it can be seen that the characteristic of the periodic amplitude that appears at the time of abnormality becomes more prominent by the power process of the amplitude value.

次に、周波数分析部7では累乗処理部6で周波数帯毎に振幅値を累乗処理した時間軸波形に対して個別にフーリエ変換を施して周波数スペクトルを出力する。この周波数スペクトルから軸受の構造と回転数とに起因して発生する周期性に相当する周波数での振幅値を算出する。
先に図4に示した2乗処理した時間軸波形(健全時が(A2)、異常時が(B2))の周波数スペクトル(健全時が(A2’)、異常時が(B2’))を図6に、図5に示した3乗処理した時間軸波形(健全時が(A3)、異常時が(B3))の周波数スペクトル(健全時が(A3’)、異常時が(B3’))を図7に示す。
また、参考のために波形に累乗処理を行わなかった場合の図3の時間軸波形(健全時が(A1)、異常時が(B1))の周波数スペクトル(健全時が(A1’)、異常時が(B1’))を図8に示す。
Next, the frequency analysis unit 7 individually performs a Fourier transform on the time axis waveform obtained by performing the power process on the amplitude value for each frequency band by the power processing unit 6 and outputs a frequency spectrum. From this frequency spectrum, an amplitude value at a frequency corresponding to the periodicity generated due to the structure of the bearing and the rotational speed is calculated.
The frequency spectrum (the healthy time is (A2 ′) and the abnormal time is (B2 ′)) of the time axis waveform (healthy time is (A2), abnormal time is (B2)) shown in FIG. FIG. 6 shows the frequency spectrum of the time-axis waveform (healthy condition is (A3), abnormal condition is (B3)) shown in FIG. 5 (healthy condition is (A3 ′), abnormal condition is (B3 ′). ) Is shown in FIG.
For reference, the frequency spectrum of the time axis waveform (when healthy (A1) and abnormal (B1)) (when healthy is (A1 ') when the power process is not performed on the waveform is abnormal. FIG. 8 shows the time (B1 ′).

図8に示す累乗処理を行わなかった周波数スペクトル(健全時が(A1’)、異常時が(B1’))、図6に示す2乗処理を行った周波数スペクトル(健全時が(A2’)、異常時が(B2’)および図7に示す3乗処理を行った周波数スペクトル(健全時が(A3’)、異常時が(B3’))から異常データに含まれる損傷箇所により発生する周期性に相当する周波数8.5Hzでの振幅を算出した結果を表1に示す。   The frequency spectrum in which the power process shown in FIG. 8 was not performed (health is (A1 ′) and abnormal is (B1 ′)), and the frequency spectrum in which the square process shown in FIG. 6 is performed (health is (A2 ′)). The frequency generated by the damaged portion included in the abnormal data from the abnormal spectrum (B2 ′) and the frequency spectrum subjected to the cube process shown in FIG. 7 (healthy (A3 ′), abnormal (B3 ′)) Table 1 shows the result of calculating the amplitude at a frequency of 8.5 Hz corresponding to the sex.

Figure 2008292288
Figure 2008292288

この結果、累乗処理を行うことにより、健全時と異常時の数値差が大きくなるため、異常判断の精度が高まることがわかる。異常時に発生する特徴が顕著になるため異常の初期段階において周期的に現れる振幅の値が小さな場合にも、異常の特徴を顕著にして検出することができる。   As a result, by performing the power process, the numerical value difference between the normal state and the abnormal state is increased, so that it is understood that the accuracy of the abnormality determination is increased. Since the feature that occurs at the time of abnormality becomes remarkable, even when the value of the amplitude that periodically appears in the initial stage of the abnormality is small, the feature of the abnormality can be detected prominently.

次に、周波数分析部7で周波数スペクトルより算出した軸受の構造と回転数に起因する周波数での振幅値を比較演算部9に出力する。
また、判定基準格納部8に診断対象の軸受の構造と回転数毎に予め格納している軸受の構造と回転数に起因する特定周波数毎の判定基準値を比較演算部9に出力する。
Next, an amplitude value at a frequency resulting from the structure and rotation speed of the bearing calculated from the frequency spectrum by the frequency analysis unit 7 is output to the comparison calculation unit 9.
In addition, the determination reference value for each specific frequency caused by the bearing structure and the rotation speed stored in advance in the determination reference storage section 8 for each bearing structure and rotation speed is output to the comparison calculation section 9.

判定基準格納部8に格納している判定基準値は、複数の健全な巻上機を対象に事前に計測した振動の実データを基にばらつきを勘案して算出する。予め、複数の健全な巻上機を対象に事前に検出した振動の実データより、軸受の構造と回転数から定まる各周期性での周波数分析部7で得られる振幅値を算出する。
次に、算出した振幅値を対象に、振幅値の平均と標準偏差を算出し、平均に標準偏差を整数倍して加算した値を判定基準値として設定する。判定基準値は診断対象の状態に応じて任意に設定変更可能であるが、エレベータ巻上機1の場合には平均に標準偏差の5倍の値を設定しても精度が得られる。
同型の機種のばらつきを勘案して判定基準値を設定するため、初めて振動を計測する現場での同型の機種の軸受においても精度よく診断を行うことができる。
The determination reference value stored in the determination reference storage unit 8 is calculated in consideration of variations based on actual vibration data measured in advance for a plurality of healthy hoisting machines. From the actual vibration data detected in advance for a plurality of healthy hoisting machines, the amplitude value obtained by the frequency analysis unit 7 at each periodicity determined from the bearing structure and the rotational speed is calculated.
Next, the average of the amplitude value and the standard deviation are calculated for the calculated amplitude value, and a value obtained by multiplying the average by multiplying the standard deviation by an integer is set as a determination reference value. The determination reference value can be arbitrarily set according to the state of the diagnosis target. However, in the case of the elevator hoist 1, accuracy can be obtained even if a value that is five times the standard deviation is set as an average.
Since the determination reference value is set in consideration of the variation of the same type of model, it is possible to accurately diagnose the bearing of the same type in the field where vibration is measured for the first time.

次に、比較演算部9では、周波数分析部7から出力した振幅値(x)と、判定基準格納部8から出力した判定基準値値(y)を比較する。比較演算は、軸受の構造と回転数に起因する特定周波数毎に、判定基準値(y)と振幅値(x)の比較を行う。各特定周波数において、判定基準値(y)に比べて振幅値(x)が大きい場合には異常、判定基準値(y)に比べて振幅値(x)が小さい場合には健全と判定する。   Next, the comparison operation unit 9 compares the amplitude value (x) output from the frequency analysis unit 7 with the determination reference value (y) output from the determination reference storage unit 8. In the comparison operation, the determination reference value (y) and the amplitude value (x) are compared for each specific frequency resulting from the bearing structure and the rotational speed. At each specific frequency, when the amplitude value (x) is larger than the determination reference value (y), it is determined abnormal, and when the amplitude value (x) is smaller than the determination reference value (y), it is determined sound.

次に、判定結果表示部10に比較演算部9での演算結果を出力する。出力内容は、各周波数での判定基準値(y)、振幅値(x)、判定結果である。各周波数での判定結果に1つでも異常の判定があれば判定結果表示部10に異常と表示する。また、全て健全と判定した揚合には判定結果表示部10に健全と表示する。
また、各周波数の振幅値(x)を判定基準値(y)で除算した商(z)を表示する。各周波数は軸受の構造と回転数に起因するので、商(z)により異常の要因となった軸受の損傷箇所を把握することができ、健全と判断した揚合にも判定基準に対する健全のレベルを把握することができる。
Next, the calculation result in the comparison calculation unit 9 is output to the determination result display unit 10. The output contents are a determination reference value (y), an amplitude value (x), and a determination result at each frequency. If there is even one abnormality determination result at each frequency, the determination result display unit 10 displays the abnormality. In addition, the determination result display unit 10 displays that it is healthy when it is determined that all are healthy.
Further, the quotient (z) obtained by dividing the amplitude value (x) of each frequency by the determination reference value (y) is displayed. Since each frequency depends on the bearing structure and the number of rotations, the quotient (z) can be used to identify the damaged part of the bearing that caused the anomaly. Can be grasped.

実施の形態2.
なお、実施の形態1による軸受診断装置では、エレベータ巻上機1を例に説明したが、エレベータは利用者の操作によって動作するため動作が不規則である。また、動作の始動時は加速状態となり、一定速度で稼動後、停止時には減速状態となり、稼動中の速度も不規則である。振動により軸受の診断を行う場合には、停止時には診断に有効なデータを計測できず、加速減速時も振動の状態が一定でないため、振動の状態が安定する一定速度時での振動データを計測する必要がある。振動計測は作業者が手動で行う場合には、不規則に動作するエレベータの動作状態を作業者が確認しながら計測しなければならず作業が容易ではない。
Embodiment 2. FIG.
In the bearing diagnostic device according to the first embodiment, the elevator hoist 1 is described as an example. However, the elevator operates in an irregular manner because the elevator operates according to a user's operation. In addition, the acceleration state is set when the operation is started, the operation is performed at a constant speed, the deceleration state is set when the operation is stopped, and the operating speed is irregular. When diagnosing bearings by vibration, data effective for diagnosis cannot be measured at the time of stopping, and the vibration state is not constant even during acceleration and deceleration, so vibration data at a constant speed at which the vibration state is stable is measured. There is a need to. When the operator performs vibration measurement manually, the operator must perform measurement while confirming the operating state of the elevator that operates irregularly, and the operation is not easy.

図9は、この発明に係る実施の形態2による軸受診断装置の機能ブロック図である。図10は、この発明に係る実施の形態2による自動計測処理部の機能ブロック図である。
この発明に係る実施の形態2による軸受診断装置は、実施の形態1による軸受診断装置に自動計測処理部11を追加したことが異なっており、それ以外は同様であるので同様な部分に同じ符号を付記し説明は省略する。
自動計測処理部11は、振動レベル検出により振動の計測を開始するトリガーレベル検出部12、計測した振動波形の実効値を算出する実効値演算部13、実効値演算結果から振動波形の有効性を判断する有効データ判断部14を有する。
FIG. 9 is a functional block diagram of a bearing diagnostic apparatus according to Embodiment 2 of the present invention. FIG. 10 is a functional block diagram of an automatic measurement processing unit according to Embodiment 2 of the present invention.
The bearing diagnostic apparatus according to the second embodiment of the present invention is different from the bearing diagnostic apparatus according to the first embodiment in that an automatic measurement processing unit 11 is added. The description is omitted.
The automatic measurement processing unit 11 includes a trigger level detection unit 12 that starts measurement of vibration by vibration level detection, an effective value calculation unit 13 that calculates an effective value of the measured vibration waveform, and the effectiveness of the vibration waveform from the effective value calculation result. It has a valid data judgment unit 14 for judgment.

次に、この発明に係る実施の形態2による軸受診断装置での動作について説明する。
エレベータ巻上機1の軸受上部の箇所に振動センサ2をマグネットアタッチメントなどにより固定する。振動センサ2は振動を検出して電気信号として出力する。増幅部3は、電気信号を増幅し、A/D変換部4は、アナログ信号である電気信号をデジタル信号に変換する。
デジタル信号として振動の大きさを振幅値にとった振動波形を得て、自動計測処理部11に振動波形を出力する。振動波形は自動計測処理部11のトリガーレベル検出部12に入力され、トリガーレベル検出部12は、振動波形の振幅値と予め設定されたトリガーレベルと比較し、振動波形の振幅値がトリガーレベルより大きいと、振動波形の計測を開始する。
Next, the operation of the bearing diagnostic apparatus according to Embodiment 2 of the present invention will be described.
The vibration sensor 2 is fixed to a location above the bearing of the elevator hoisting machine 1 with a magnet attachment or the like. The vibration sensor 2 detects vibration and outputs it as an electrical signal. The amplification unit 3 amplifies the electrical signal, and the A / D conversion unit 4 converts the electrical signal that is an analog signal into a digital signal.
A vibration waveform having the amplitude of vibration as an amplitude value is obtained as a digital signal, and the vibration waveform is output to the automatic measurement processing unit 11. The vibration waveform is input to the trigger level detection unit 12 of the automatic measurement processing unit 11, and the trigger level detection unit 12 compares the amplitude value of the vibration waveform with a preset trigger level, and the amplitude value of the vibration waveform is greater than the trigger level. If it is larger, vibration waveform measurement starts.

トリガーレベルはエレベータ始動時の電磁ブレーキ開放時に発生する振動レベルを基に設定する。エレベータ始動時の電磁ブレーキを開放時には、エレベータ稼動中に発生する振動より大きな振動が巻上機上の振動センサ固定箇所に発生する。この電磁ブレーキ開放時に巻上機に発生する振動のレベルを予め把握しておく。トリガー信号を制御盤などの外部から取らず、巻上機本体に発生する振動を使用するため、制御装置の改造等が必要無く、容易にトリガー信号を得ることができる。   The trigger level is set based on the vibration level generated when the electromagnetic brake is released when the elevator starts. When the electromagnetic brake at the time of starting the elevator is released, a vibration larger than the vibration generated during the operation of the elevator is generated at the vibration sensor fixing portion on the hoisting machine. The level of vibration generated in the hoisting machine when the electromagnetic brake is released is grasped in advance. Since the trigger signal is not taken from outside such as a control panel and vibration generated in the hoisting machine main body is used, the trigger signal can be easily obtained without requiring modification of the control device.

トリガーレベル検出により振動波形の計測を開始し、予め設定した所定の時間の振動波形を計測後、実効値演算部13に振動波形を出力する。
実効値演算部13では、ブレーキ開放後、エレベータが一定速度になる所定の時間帯の振幅の実効値(a)と、その直前の時間帯の振幅の実効値(b)および直後の時間帯の振幅の実効値(c)を算出し、有効データ判断部14に出力する。
The measurement of the vibration waveform is started by detecting the trigger level, the vibration waveform for a predetermined time set in advance is measured, and then the vibration waveform is output to the effective value calculation unit 13.
In the effective value calculation unit 13, after the brake is released, the effective value (a) of the amplitude in a predetermined time zone in which the elevator is at a constant speed, the effective value (b) of the amplitude in the immediately preceding time zone, and the immediately following time zone. The effective value (c) of the amplitude is calculated and output to the valid data determination unit 14.

有効データ判断部14では、2種類の判断基準によりデータの有効性を判断する。1種類目の判断基準は予め計測した健全な振動データから算出したエレベータがー定速度になる所定の振幅の実効値を基準値として、実効値(a)を比較して一定速度時に発生する振動が発生しているか確認する。実効値(a)が基準値より小さい場合には、エレベータが一定速度状態でなく、停止または減速している可能性が高い。この場合は、再度トリガー待機状態となる。   The valid data judgment unit 14 judges the validity of data based on two kinds of judgment criteria. The first criterion is the vibration generated at a constant speed by comparing the effective value (a) with the effective value of a predetermined amplitude at which the elevator becomes a constant speed calculated from sound vibration data measured in advance as a reference value. Make sure that is occurring. When the effective value (a) is smaller than the reference value, there is a high possibility that the elevator is not in a constant speed state and is stopped or decelerated. In this case, the trigger standby state is entered again.

実効値(a)が基準値より大きな場合には、2種類目の判断基準により有効性を判断する。実効値(b)を実効値(c)で除算した商(d)を判断に使用する。
エレベータが一定速度の場合には、振動の振幅値は多少の変動はあるが同じであるため、商(d)は1前後となる。また、商(d)は加速状態では小さく、減速状態では大きくなる。従って、例えば、振幅値のばらつきを勘案して商(d)が0.9より大きく、1.1より小さい場合には診断に有効なデータとして判断する。ここで無効と判断された場合には加速状態または減速状態の可能性があるためデータを廃棄し、再度トリガー待機状態となる。
このように実施の形態2による軸受診断装置により、現場での計測時の作業性を大幅に改善することができる。
When the effective value (a) is larger than the reference value, the effectiveness is determined according to the second determination criterion. The quotient (d) obtained by dividing the effective value (b) by the effective value (c) is used for the determination.
When the elevator is at a constant speed, the amplitude value of the vibration is the same with some fluctuations, so the quotient (d) is around 1. The quotient (d) is small in the acceleration state and large in the deceleration state. Therefore, for example, when the quotient (d) is larger than 0.9 and smaller than 1.1 in consideration of the variation of the amplitude value, it is determined as effective data for diagnosis. If it is determined to be invalid, there is a possibility of an acceleration state or a deceleration state, so the data is discarded and the trigger standby state is entered again.
As described above, the bearing diagnostic apparatus according to the second embodiment can greatly improve the workability at the time of measurement in the field.

尚、上述の実施の形態1、2による軸受診断装置を構成する部分のうち、振動センサ2、増幅部3、A/D変換部4以外の部分はコンピュータで処理することができる。ノート型コンピュータなどを含む携帯型コンピュータを使用すれば、現場を訪問する点検作業員が携帯することができ、軸受の異常を現場で即座に判断することができる。   Of the parts constituting the bearing diagnostic apparatus according to the first and second embodiments described above, parts other than the vibration sensor 2, the amplifying unit 3, and the A / D converting unit 4 can be processed by a computer. If a portable computer including a notebook computer or the like is used, it can be carried by an inspection worker who visits the site, and a bearing abnormality can be immediately judged on site.

また、判定結果を伝送する判定結果伝送部を備えれば、現場に軸受診断装置を設置して、判定結果を伝送することにより、監視事務所等で軸受の異常を判断することができる。現場を訪問する点検作業員の負荷を軽減するとともに、現場訪問のインターバル間に異常が発生した場合にも素早く異常を判断することができる。   Further, if a determination result transmission unit for transmitting the determination result is provided, a bearing diagnosis apparatus can be installed at the site, and the determination result can be transmitted to determine a bearing abnormality at a monitoring office or the like. It is possible to reduce the load on the inspection worker who visits the site and to quickly determine the abnormality even when an abnormality occurs between the site visit intervals.

この発明に係る実施の形態1による軸受診断装置の機能ブロック図である。It is a functional block diagram of the bearing diagnostic apparatus by Embodiment 1 which concerns on this invention. エレベータ巻上機の振動の大きさを振幅値として表した診断対象振動波形である。It is a diagnostic object vibration waveform which expressed the magnitude of vibration of an elevator hoist as an amplitude value. 図2の診断対象振動波形から抽出された特定の周波数帯の振動の振幅の時間軸上での変化を表した波形である。It is a waveform showing the change on the time-axis of the amplitude of the vibration of the specific frequency band extracted from the diagnostic object vibration waveform of FIG. 図3の特定の周波数帯の振動の振幅を2乗処理した波形である。It is the waveform which carried out the square process of the amplitude of the vibration of the specific frequency band of FIG. 図3の特定の周波数帯の振動の振幅を3乗処理した波形である。It is the waveform which carried out the cube process of the amplitude of the vibration of the specific frequency band of FIG. 図4の波形の周波数スペクトルである。It is a frequency spectrum of the waveform of FIG. 図5の波形の周波数スペクトルである。It is a frequency spectrum of the waveform of FIG. 図3の波形の周波数スペクトルである。It is a frequency spectrum of the waveform of FIG. この発明に係る実施の形態2による軸受診断装置の機能ブロック図である。It is a functional block diagram of the bearing diagnostic apparatus by Embodiment 2 which concerns on this invention. この発明に係る実施の形態2による自動計測処理部の機能ブロック図である。It is a functional block diagram of the automatic measurement process part by Embodiment 2 which concerns on this invention.

符号の説明Explanation of symbols

1 エレベータ巻上機、2 振動センサ、3 増幅部、4 A/D変換部、5 ウェーブレット変換処理部、6 累乗処理部、7 周波数分析部、8 判定基準格納部、9 比較演算部、10 判定結果表示部、11 自動計測処理部、12 トリガーレベル検出部、13 実効値演算部、14 有効データ判断部。   DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 Elevator winding machine, 2 Vibration sensor, 3 Amplification part, 4 A / D conversion part, 5 Wavelet conversion process part, 6 Power process part, 7 Frequency analysis part, 8 Judgment reference | standard storage part, 9 Comparison calculation part, 10 determination Result display unit, 11 Automatic measurement processing unit, 12 Trigger level detection unit, 13 RMS value calculation unit, 14 Valid data determination unit.

Claims (7)

減速機の軸受の異常を診断する軸受診断装置であって、
診断する軸受から発生する振動の大きさを表す振幅値の時間軸上の変化を示す診断対象信号波形から複数の周波数の信号波形を抽出するフィルタ処理部と、
上記複数の周波数の信号波形の振幅値を累乗する累乗処理部と、
上記累乗された振幅値の時間軸上の変化を示す累乗波形にフーリエ変換を施して周波数スペクトルを求めるとともに、軸受の構造と回転数とに起因する特定周波数毎の振幅値を算出する周波数分析部と、
上記特定周波数毎の判定基準値を格納する判定基準格納部と、
上記特定周波数毎に上記周波数分析部で算出した振幅値と上記判定基準格納部に格納した判定基準値とを比較する比較演算部と、
上記比較演算部での比較結果に基づく判定結果を表示する判定結果表示部と、
を備えることを特徴とする軸受診断装置。
A bearing diagnostic device for diagnosing an abnormality in a reduction gear bearing,
A filter processing unit for extracting a signal waveform of a plurality of frequencies from a diagnosis target signal waveform indicating a change in amplitude on the time axis of an amplitude value indicating a magnitude of vibration generated from a bearing to be diagnosed;
A power processor that raises the amplitude values of the signal waveforms of the plurality of frequencies,
A frequency analysis unit that calculates a frequency spectrum by performing Fourier transform on a power waveform that represents a change in time of the raised amplitude value on the time axis, and calculates an amplitude value for each specific frequency caused by the structure and rotation speed of the bearing When,
A criterion storage unit for storing the criterion value for each specific frequency;
A comparison operation unit that compares the amplitude value calculated by the frequency analysis unit for each specific frequency with the determination reference value stored in the determination reference storage unit;
A determination result display unit for displaying a determination result based on the comparison result in the comparison operation unit;
A bearing diagnosis apparatus comprising:
上記フィルタ処理部は、上記診断対象信号波形にウェーブレット変換を施して複数の周波数帯の信号波形を抽出し、実部と虚部の二乗平均処理により信号波形を算出することを特徴とする請求項1に記載の軸受診断装置。   The filter processing unit performs wavelet transformation on the diagnosis target signal waveform to extract signal waveforms in a plurality of frequency bands, and calculates a signal waveform by a mean square process of a real part and an imaginary part. The bearing diagnostic apparatus according to 1. 上記判定基準値は、複数の健全な同型式の減速機から検出した振幅値の平均に、上記検出した振幅値の標準偏差を所定数倍した値を加算した値であることを特徴とする請求項1に記載の軸受診断装置。   The determination reference value is a value obtained by adding a value obtained by multiplying a standard deviation of the detected amplitude value by a predetermined number to an average of amplitude values detected from a plurality of healthy same-type reduction gears. Item 6. The bearing diagnostic device according to Item 1. 振動の計測を開始するトリガー信号として減速機の電磁ブレーキ開放時に発生する振動を用いることを特徴とする請求項1乃至3のいずれか一項に記載の軸受診断装置。   The bearing diagnostic apparatus according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein vibration generated when the electromagnetic brake of the speed reducer is released is used as a trigger signal for starting measurement of vibration. 上記トリガー信号に従って開始された計測により得られた診断対象信号波形の状態から診断に有効な診断対象信号波形を判断する有効データ判断部を備えることを特徴とする請求項4に記載の軸受診断装置。   The bearing diagnosis apparatus according to claim 4, further comprising an effective data determination unit that determines a diagnosis target signal waveform effective for diagnosis from a state of the diagnosis target signal waveform obtained by measurement started according to the trigger signal. . 上記フィルタ処理部、上記累乗処理部、上記周波数分析部、上記判定基準格納部、上記比較演算部および上記判定結果表示部は、コンピュータから構成されることを特徴する請求項1、2、3、5のいずれか一項に記載の軸受診断装置。   The filter processing unit, the power processing unit, the frequency analysis unit, the determination criterion storage unit, the comparison operation unit, and the determination result display unit are configured by a computer. The bearing diagnostic apparatus according to claim 5. 上記比較演算部による判定結果を伝送する判定結果伝送部を備えることを特徴とする請求項6に記載の軸受診断装置。   The bearing diagnosis apparatus according to claim 6, further comprising a determination result transmission unit that transmits a determination result by the comparison operation unit.
JP2007137912A 2007-05-24 2007-05-24 Bearing diagnostic device for reduction gear Pending JP2008292288A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2007137912A JP2008292288A (en) 2007-05-24 2007-05-24 Bearing diagnostic device for reduction gear

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2007137912A JP2008292288A (en) 2007-05-24 2007-05-24 Bearing diagnostic device for reduction gear

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2008292288A true JP2008292288A (en) 2008-12-04

Family

ID=40167167

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2007137912A Pending JP2008292288A (en) 2007-05-24 2007-05-24 Bearing diagnostic device for reduction gear

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP2008292288A (en)

Cited By (23)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2011252753A (en) * 2010-06-01 2011-12-15 Mitsubishi Electric Engineering Co Ltd Diagnostic device for bearings
CN102364320A (en) * 2011-11-09 2012-02-29 安徽巨一自动化装备有限公司 Double side support bearing housing installation structure
JP2012058107A (en) * 2010-09-09 2012-03-22 Nittetsu Elex Co Ltd Rotary machine abnormality diagnosis method
CN102721537A (en) * 2012-06-01 2012-10-10 西安交通大学 Mechanical impact type fault diagnosis method based on variable space-scale frame
CN102879195A (en) * 2012-09-25 2013-01-16 西安交通大学 Multi-wavelet self-adaptive block threshold noise-reducing time domain diagnosis method for damage of gearbox
CN102879196A (en) * 2012-09-25 2013-01-16 西安交通大学 Compound fault diagnosing method for planetary gearbox by using matrix wavelet transformation
CN103196672A (en) * 2013-03-01 2013-07-10 北京中科科仪股份有限公司 Magnetic levitation molecular pump radical protective bearing detection method
CN103837345A (en) * 2014-03-25 2014-06-04 上海电机学院 Gearbox fault diagnosis method and device
CN104215446A (en) * 2014-09-02 2014-12-17 申龙电梯股份有限公司 Elevator landing door lock detector
CN104807639A (en) * 2015-04-23 2015-07-29 广西大学 Fault diagnosis method and device for rolling bearing of running gear of locomotive
CN105445022A (en) * 2015-11-17 2016-03-30 中国矿业大学 Planetary gear fault diagnosis method based on dual-tree complex wavelet transform-entropy feature fusion
CN105841961A (en) * 2016-03-29 2016-08-10 中国石油大学(华东) Bearing fault diagnosis method based on Morlet wavelet transformation and convolutional neural network
CN106124205A (en) * 2016-08-29 2016-11-16 孟玲 A kind of decelerator health analysis system
CN107631877A (en) * 2017-08-11 2018-01-26 南京航空航天大学 A kind of rolling bearing fault collaborative diagnosis method for casing vibration signal
WO2019061006A1 (en) * 2017-09-26 2019-04-04 Schaeffler Technologies AG & Co. KG Bearing failure diagnosis method and device, readable storage medium, and electronic device
WO2019234788A1 (en) * 2018-06-04 2019-12-12 日産自動車株式会社 Abnormality detection device and abnormality detection method
WO2020089508A1 (en) * 2018-11-02 2020-05-07 Kone Corporation Arrangement for detecting bearing failures in elevator
CN113048220A (en) * 2021-03-12 2021-06-29 中煤科工集团重庆研究院有限公司 Mining elevator gear box hidden danger identification method and monitoring device
EP3896309A2 (en) 2020-04-17 2021-10-20 Nabtesco Corporation Status monitoring device for speed reducer, and speed reducing device
EP3916999A1 (en) * 2020-05-27 2021-12-01 Kabushiki Kaisha Yaskawa Denki Waveform controller to operate machine
KR20230005672A (en) * 2021-07-01 2023-01-10 한국항공대학교산학협력단 Linear motion guide health evaluation system and method thereof
KR20240178371A (en) * 2023-06-22 2024-12-31 한국자동차연구원 Apparatus and method for diagnosing fault of motor reducer
WO2025150956A1 (en) * 2024-01-12 2025-07-17 한양대학교 산학협력단 Bearing defect diagnosis method

Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH0399234A (en) * 1989-09-13 1991-04-24 Ube Ind Ltd Diagnosing method for abnormality of rotary machine
JPH08211925A (en) * 1995-02-08 1996-08-20 Takaoka Electric Mfg Co Ltd CRT monitoring device
JP2001027585A (en) * 1999-07-14 2001-01-30 Hitachi Ltd Method and apparatus for monitoring vibration of rotating body
JP2002022617A (en) * 2000-07-05 2002-01-23 Mitsubishi Electric Corp Bearing diagnostic device
JP2002098585A (en) * 2000-09-25 2002-04-05 Takasago Thermal Eng Co Ltd Method and apparatus for detecting abnormality in rotating equipment
JP2004020193A (en) * 2002-06-12 2004-01-22 Takayoshi Yamamoto Method for diagnosing object facility, computer program, and device for diagnosing subject facility
JP2005062154A (en) * 2003-07-29 2005-03-10 Nsk Ltd Abnormality diagnosis device and rolling bearing device having the same
JP2006047265A (en) * 2004-02-09 2006-02-16 National Institute Of Advanced Industrial & Technology Unsteady wave analysis system

Patent Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH0399234A (en) * 1989-09-13 1991-04-24 Ube Ind Ltd Diagnosing method for abnormality of rotary machine
JPH08211925A (en) * 1995-02-08 1996-08-20 Takaoka Electric Mfg Co Ltd CRT monitoring device
JP2001027585A (en) * 1999-07-14 2001-01-30 Hitachi Ltd Method and apparatus for monitoring vibration of rotating body
JP2002022617A (en) * 2000-07-05 2002-01-23 Mitsubishi Electric Corp Bearing diagnostic device
JP2002098585A (en) * 2000-09-25 2002-04-05 Takasago Thermal Eng Co Ltd Method and apparatus for detecting abnormality in rotating equipment
JP2004020193A (en) * 2002-06-12 2004-01-22 Takayoshi Yamamoto Method for diagnosing object facility, computer program, and device for diagnosing subject facility
JP2005062154A (en) * 2003-07-29 2005-03-10 Nsk Ltd Abnormality diagnosis device and rolling bearing device having the same
JP2006047265A (en) * 2004-02-09 2006-02-16 National Institute Of Advanced Industrial & Technology Unsteady wave analysis system

Cited By (38)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2011252753A (en) * 2010-06-01 2011-12-15 Mitsubishi Electric Engineering Co Ltd Diagnostic device for bearings
JP2012058107A (en) * 2010-09-09 2012-03-22 Nittetsu Elex Co Ltd Rotary machine abnormality diagnosis method
CN102364320A (en) * 2011-11-09 2012-02-29 安徽巨一自动化装备有限公司 Double side support bearing housing installation structure
CN102721537A (en) * 2012-06-01 2012-10-10 西安交通大学 Mechanical impact type fault diagnosis method based on variable space-scale frame
CN102879195B (en) * 2012-09-25 2014-03-12 西安交通大学 Multi-wavelet self-adaptive block threshold noise-reducing time domain diagnosis method for damage of gearbox
CN102879196A (en) * 2012-09-25 2013-01-16 西安交通大学 Compound fault diagnosing method for planetary gearbox by using matrix wavelet transformation
CN102879196B (en) * 2012-09-25 2014-03-12 西安交通大学 Compound fault diagnosing method for planetary gearbox by using matrix wavelet transformation
CN102879195A (en) * 2012-09-25 2013-01-16 西安交通大学 Multi-wavelet self-adaptive block threshold noise-reducing time domain diagnosis method for damage of gearbox
CN103196672A (en) * 2013-03-01 2013-07-10 北京中科科仪股份有限公司 Magnetic levitation molecular pump radical protective bearing detection method
CN103837345A (en) * 2014-03-25 2014-06-04 上海电机学院 Gearbox fault diagnosis method and device
CN104215446A (en) * 2014-09-02 2014-12-17 申龙电梯股份有限公司 Elevator landing door lock detector
CN104807639A (en) * 2015-04-23 2015-07-29 广西大学 Fault diagnosis method and device for rolling bearing of running gear of locomotive
CN105445022A (en) * 2015-11-17 2016-03-30 中国矿业大学 Planetary gear fault diagnosis method based on dual-tree complex wavelet transform-entropy feature fusion
CN105841961A (en) * 2016-03-29 2016-08-10 中国石油大学(华东) Bearing fault diagnosis method based on Morlet wavelet transformation and convolutional neural network
CN106124205A (en) * 2016-08-29 2016-11-16 孟玲 A kind of decelerator health analysis system
CN107631877A (en) * 2017-08-11 2018-01-26 南京航空航天大学 A kind of rolling bearing fault collaborative diagnosis method for casing vibration signal
CN111094927A (en) * 2017-09-26 2020-05-01 舍弗勒技术股份两合公司 Bearing fault diagnosis method and device, readable storage medium and electronic equipment
WO2019061006A1 (en) * 2017-09-26 2019-04-04 Schaeffler Technologies AG & Co. KG Bearing failure diagnosis method and device, readable storage medium, and electronic device
WO2019234788A1 (en) * 2018-06-04 2019-12-12 日産自動車株式会社 Abnormality detection device and abnormality detection method
CN112236662A (en) * 2018-06-04 2021-01-15 日产自动车株式会社 Abnormality detection device and abnormality detection method
JPWO2019234788A1 (en) * 2018-06-04 2021-06-24 日産自動車株式会社 Anomaly detection device and abnormality detection method
US11827222B2 (en) 2018-06-04 2023-11-28 Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. Abnormality detection apparatus and abnormality detection method
JP7010374B2 (en) 2018-06-04 2022-01-26 日産自動車株式会社 Anomaly detection device and abnormality detection method
WO2020089508A1 (en) * 2018-11-02 2020-05-07 Kone Corporation Arrangement for detecting bearing failures in elevator
CN112955395A (en) * 2018-11-02 2021-06-11 通力股份公司 Device for detecting elevator bearing fault
US12479698B2 (en) * 2018-11-02 2025-11-25 Kone Corporation Arrangement for detecting bearing failures in elevator
US20210229953A1 (en) * 2018-11-02 2021-07-29 Kone Corporation Arrangement for detecting bearing failures in elevator
EP3896309A3 (en) * 2020-04-17 2021-12-29 Nabtesco Corporation Status monitoring device for speed reducer, and speed reducing device
US11773797B2 (en) 2020-04-17 2023-10-03 Nabtesco Corporation Status monitoring device for speed reducer, and speed reducing device
EP3896309A2 (en) 2020-04-17 2021-10-20 Nabtesco Corporation Status monitoring device for speed reducer, and speed reducing device
EP3916999A1 (en) * 2020-05-27 2021-12-01 Kabushiki Kaisha Yaskawa Denki Waveform controller to operate machine
CN113048220B (en) * 2021-03-12 2022-11-08 中煤科工集团重庆研究院有限公司 Mining elevator gear box hidden danger identification method and monitoring device
CN113048220A (en) * 2021-03-12 2021-06-29 中煤科工集团重庆研究院有限公司 Mining elevator gear box hidden danger identification method and monitoring device
KR20230005672A (en) * 2021-07-01 2023-01-10 한국항공대학교산학협력단 Linear motion guide health evaluation system and method thereof
KR102594205B1 (en) 2021-07-01 2023-10-25 한국항공대학교산학협력단 Linear motion guide health evaluation system and method thereof
KR20240178371A (en) * 2023-06-22 2024-12-31 한국자동차연구원 Apparatus and method for diagnosing fault of motor reducer
KR102836449B1 (en) * 2023-06-22 2025-07-18 한국자동차연구원 Apparatus and method for diagnosing fault of motor reducer
WO2025150956A1 (en) * 2024-01-12 2025-07-17 한양대학교 산학협력단 Bearing defect diagnosis method

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP2008292288A (en) Bearing diagnostic device for reduction gear
JP5067979B2 (en) Bearing diagnostic device
JP5146008B2 (en) Abnormality diagnosis apparatus and abnormality diagnosis method
JP4120099B2 (en) Bearing abnormality diagnosis method and abnormality diagnosis device
JP2018179735A (en) Method and apparatus for diagnosing abnormality of rotating parts
JP6714806B2 (en) Status monitoring device and status monitoring method
JP6508017B2 (en) Evaluation method of machinery and equipment
JP2017219469A (en) State monitoring device and state monitoring method
CN203432784U (en) State monitoring device used for rotary mechanical components
JP5293300B2 (en) Vibration monitoring device and vibration monitoring method for rotating machine
EP2434266A2 (en) Sideband Energy Ratio Method For Gear Mesh Fault Detection
JP6835265B2 (en) Measurement and diagnostic equipment and measurement and diagnosis method
CN113092114B (en) Bearing fault diagnosis method, device and storage medium
JP2013221877A (en) Abnormality inspection method and abnormality inspection device
WO2008117765A1 (en) Abnormality diagnostic method and device of extremely low speed rotary machine
CN101464212A (en) Method and apparatus for vibration-based automatic condition monitoring of a wind turbine
WO2006030786A1 (en) Abnormality diagnosis device and abnormality diagnosis method
JP6728808B2 (en) Measuring and diagnosing device and measuring and diagnosing method
EP3842780B1 (en) Method and device for diagnosing abnormality in rolling bearing
JP2018155494A (en) Bearing abnormality diagnosis system and bearing abnormality diagnosis method
JP2009103525A (en) Method for diagnosing abnormality of tooth plane of gear and apparatus using same
JP3871054B2 (en) Machine equipment condition monitoring method and apparatus
EP4336164A1 (en) Vibration diagnosis device
JPWO2020157818A1 (en) Diagnostic device and equipment equipped with it and diagnostic method
JP3020349B2 (en) Error detection method and device

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20100112

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20111004

A02 Decision of refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A02

Effective date: 20120221