JP2008108109A - Reusable furniture manufacturing method and reuse furniture manufacturing management system - Google Patents

Abstract

An object of the present invention is to appropriately and easily determine whether or not each piece of furniture can be reused.
A furniture is manufactured by combining a plurality of replaceable furniture parts. Whether or not each furniture part is managed in association with the usage status, and when used furniture is collected, whether or not each furniture component becomes a reuse candidate based on the usage status associated with each furniture component. The furniture is reused using each furniture part that is a candidate for reuse.
[Selection] Figure 3

Description

  The present invention relates to a technique for reusing furniture.

  Conventionally, used furniture is generally discarded or sold as used furniture.

  In addition, as a prior art relevant to this invention, there exists a thing of patent document 1, for example.

JP 2004-337813 A

  However, conventionally, the used furniture is judged as a whole, and if there is a part that is not suitable for reuse, the entire furniture is discarded.

  Moreover, since it is necessary to determine whether reuse is possible only by observing the external appearance of used furniture visually, the determination was difficult.

  Therefore, an object of the present invention is to make it possible to appropriately and easily determine whether or not each piece of furniture can be reused.

  In order to solve the above problems, a reuse furniture manufacturing method according to the present invention is a reuse furniture manufacturing method for reusing furniture manufactured by combining a plurality of replaceable furniture parts, and each of the furniture items described above. Whether to be a reuse candidate for each furniture component based on the step of managing the usage status in association with the component, the step of collecting used furniture, and the usage status associated with each furniture component And a step of providing reuse furniture using each of the furniture parts that are candidates for reuse.

  In this case, in the step of determining whether or not each furniture part is a reuse candidate, a durability diagnostic test is performed on each furniture part, and it is determined to be rejected based on the inspection result. You may make it exclude a thing from a reuse candidate.

  In addition, another reuse furniture manufacturing method of the present invention is a reuse furniture manufacturing method for reusing furniture manufactured by combining a plurality of replaceable furniture parts, and is provided to each of the furniture parts. Storing the usage status information in which the usage status is associated with the identification information in the storage unit; and inputting the identification information given to each furniture part of the collected furniture into the computer device through the input unit; The computer device extracts a usage status corresponding to the input identification code from usage status information stored in the storage unit, and becomes a reuse candidate for each furniture part based on the extracted usage status And a step of determining whether or not.

  Further, another reuse furniture manufacturing method according to the present invention is a reuse furniture manufacturing method for reusing furniture manufactured by combining a plurality of replaceable furniture parts, wherein A step of storing the use status in a storage unit of the tag device to be attached; and the computer device reads the use status stored in the storage unit of the tag device, and the respective furniture parts based on the read use status And a step of determining whether or not to become a reuse candidate every time.

  In these cases, the usage status may include information on a usage period.

  The usage status includes at least one of information on usage environment and information on usage frequency in addition to information on usage period, and at least one of information on usage environment and information on usage frequency is included in the usage period. In consideration of the above, it is preferable to determine a substantial use equivalent period and determine whether or not each furniture part is a reuse candidate based on the substantial use equivalent period.

  The reuse furniture manufacturing management system according to the present invention is a reuse furniture manufacturing management system for reusing furniture manufactured by combining a plurality of replaceable furniture parts, and is provided to each furniture part. Stored in the storage unit, the storage unit that stores the usage status information in which the usage status is associated with the identified identification information, the input unit that can input the identification information given to each furniture part of the collected furniture, and the storage unit A reuse candidate determining unit that extracts a usage situation according to the input identification code from the usage situation information, and determines whether or not each furniture part is a reuse candidate based on the extracted usage situation; , And.

  In addition, another reuse furniture manufacturing management system according to the present invention is a reuse furniture manufacturing management system for reusing furniture manufactured by combining a plurality of replaceable furniture parts, and each of the furniture parts described above. A tag device having a storage unit for storing the usage status, a reading unit for reading the usage status stored in the storage means of the tag device, and each of the above-mentioned each based on the usage status read through the reading unit And a reuse candidate determination computer device having a reuse candidate determination unit that determines whether or not each furniture part is a reuse candidate.

  According to the reuse furniture manufacturing method according to the present invention, the step of managing the use status in association with each furniture component, the step of collecting the used furniture, and the use status associated with each furniture component. On the basis of determining whether or not to become a reuse candidate for each of the furniture parts, and providing the reuse furniture using the furniture parts that have become the reuse candidates, It is possible to appropriately and easily determine whether or not each piece of furniture can be reused based on the usage situation associated with each piece of furniture.

  Further, in the step of determining whether or not to become a reuse candidate for each furniture part, a durability diagnosis test is performed on each furniture part, and a piece that is determined to be rejected based on the inspection result is determined. When excluded from reuse candidates, it is possible to manufacture more appropriate reuse furniture by individually eliminating the inappropriate furniture target parts by individually performing the durability diagnosis inspection on each furniture target part.

  According to another reuse furniture manufacturing method of the present invention, the step of storing in the storage unit the usage status information in which the usage status is associated with the identification information given to each furniture component, and the recovered furniture The step of inputting the identification information given to each furniture part to the computer device through the input unit, and the computer device uses the usage status according to the input identification code from the usage status information stored in the storage unit Extracting and determining whether or not to become a reuse candidate for each furniture part based on the extracted usage situation, and based on the usage situation associated with each furniture part Thus, it is possible to appropriately and easily determine whether each piece of furniture can be reused.

  According to yet another reuse furniture manufacturing method of the present invention, the step of storing the use status in the storage unit of the tag device attached to each furniture part, and the computer device in the storage unit of the tag device Reading the stored usage status, and determining whether or not each furniture component is a reuse candidate based on the read usage status, and is associated with each furniture component. It is possible to appropriately and easily determine whether or not each piece of furniture can be reused based on the usage status.

  Moreover, when the information regarding a use period is included as the said use condition, it can be determined appropriately and easily whether each furniture can be reused according to the said use period.

  The usage status includes at least one of information on usage environment and information on usage frequency in addition to information on usage period, and at least one of information on usage environment and information on usage frequency is included in the usage period. In consideration of the above, the substantial use equivalent period is obtained, and based on the substantial use equivalent period, whether or not each furniture part is a reuse candidate is determined according to the use environment and the use frequency. It is possible to determine whether or not to become a reuse candidate appropriately.

  Further, according to the reuse furniture manufacturing management system according to the present invention, the storage unit for storing the usage status information in which the usage status is associated with the identification information given to each furniture component, and each furniture of the collected furniture An input unit capable of inputting the identification information given to the component, and a usage status corresponding to the input identification code is extracted from the usage status information stored in the storage unit, and based on the extracted usage status A reuse candidate determination unit that determines whether or not each furniture part is a reuse candidate, so whether or not each furniture can be reused based on a usage situation associated with each furniture part Judgment can be made appropriately and easily.

  According to another reuse furniture manufacturing management system of the present invention, a tag device having a storage unit attached to each furniture part and storing the use status thereof, and a use status stored in a storage means of the tag device A reuse candidate determination computer device comprising: a reading unit that reads: a reuse candidate determination unit that determines whether or not each furniture part is a reuse candidate based on a usage situation read through the reading unit; Therefore, it is possible to appropriately and easily determine whether or not each piece of furniture can be reused based on the usage status associated with each piece of furniture.

  A reuse furniture manufacturing method and a reuse furniture manufacturing management system according to embodiments will be described below.

<1. Furniture to be managed>
First, a description will be given of furniture that is a target of a reuse furniture manufacturing method and a reuse furniture manufacturing management system. FIG. 1 is a perspective view showing a desk which is an example of furniture, and FIG. 2 is a perspective view showing a chair which is an example of furniture.

  The target furniture is a tool that is documented for work, clothing, food and living in an office, a house, or the like, such as a desk or chair. Furniture can include other bookshelves, lockers, partitions, and the like.

  The target furniture is manufactured by combining a plurality of replaceable furniture parts.

  The desk 10 as furniture shown in FIG. 1 will be described as an example. The desk 10 includes a top plate 12, a pair of legs 14 provided at the left and right lower portions of the top plate 12, and the front of the top plate 12. And a curtain plate 16 provided between the pair of legs 14. The top plate portion 12, the pair of leg portions 14, and the curtain plate portion 16 are combined by screwing, bolt tightening, a fitting structure, or the like, and can be disassembled and replaced with each other. That is, in this desk 10, these top plate part 12, a pair of leg parts 14, and curtain board part 16 are exchangeable furniture parts.

  Further, the chair 20 as an example of furniture shown in FIG. 2 will be described as an example. The chair 20 includes a leg portion 21 having five support portions, a support pipe portion 22 erected on the leg portion 21, and a support. An elevating gas cylinder unit 23 incorporated in the pipe unit 22; a chair posture changing mechanism unit 24 mounted on the elevating gas cylinder unit 23; a seat unit 25 mounted on the mechanism unit 24; It has a back portion 26 erected at the rear end portion of the seat portion 25 and elbow rest portions 27 provided on the left and right sides of the seat portion 25. And these each parts 22-27 are combined by screwing, bolting, a fitting structure, etc., and can be disassembled and exchanged with others. That is, each leg part 21, support pipe part 22, raising and lowering gas cylinder part 23, mechanism part 24, seat part 25, back part 26 and elbow rest part 27 provided on the left and right of the seat part 25 are replaced. It is a possible furniture part.

  In addition, the above is an example and each furniture part mentioned above may be comprised by the part which can be replaced | exchanged further finely. For example, a decorative plate that covers the surface of the top plate portion 12 is replaceably attached, a cloth that covers the back portion 26 and the seat portion 25 is replaceably attached, and a resin cover that covers the leg portion 21 and the mechanism portion 24 May be mounted interchangeably. Moreover, it is not necessary for all of the furniture parts listed above to be managed in association with the usage status in the reuse furniture manufacturing method and the reuse furniture manufacturing management system. It is sufficient that at least two or more furniture components are managed in association with the usage status in each furniture.

<2. Manufacturing method of reuse furniture>
FIG. 3 is a diagram showing the overall flow of the reuse furniture manufacturing method. This reuse furniture manufacturing method is a reuse furniture manufacturing method for reusing furniture manufactured by combining a plurality of replaceable furniture parts, as shown in step S1, and the usage status for each furniture part. Step S2 for managing furniture, Step S3 for collecting furniture, Step S4 for determining whether or not each furniture part is a reuse candidate, and providing reuse furniture using the furniture part that has become a reuse candidate Step S5. Each of these steps S1 to S5 is performed by the supply manager side. Supply managers include furniture manufacturers, furniture distributors, or furniture renters (including those in lease and rental forms). Note that the steps S1 to S5 need not be performed by the same subject. Moreover, the furniture sold or rented is used by the user (see step S11).

  In step S1, as illustrated in FIGS. 1 and 2, furniture is manufactured by combining a plurality of replaceable furniture parts. The manufactured furniture is provided to the user directly from the manufacturer or indirectly through other distributors or renters.

  The user provided with the furniture uses the furniture in step S11.

  In step S2, the use status is associated with each furniture part and managed. That is, each furniture part is assigned a unique identification code. This identification code may be given at the manufacturing stage, may be given at the provision stage to the user, or may be given at an intermediate stage between them. Good.

  This identification code is held by each furniture component itself. The configuration in which each furniture part holds the identification code is a configuration in which the identification code is stored in a tag device (IC tag or the like) that can hold information by electrical means or the like and is attached to each furniture part, or according to the identification code A configuration in which an identification display (bar code or the like) is attached directly or via a sticker sheet or the like may be employed.

  On the supply manager side, information on the usage status of the furniture is acquired from the user, and the usage status is associated with each furniture component and managed. Here, the usage status includes information on the usage environment and information on the usage frequency in addition to information on the usage period.

  Specifically, information on the period of use includes the date when the furniture part was manufactured, the date when the furniture was manufactured, the date when the furniture was provided to the user, and the user who provided the furniture actually used the furniture. The date of commencement. Among these, the date of manufacture of furniture parts, the date of manufacture of furniture, and the date of supply of furniture to users are information that can be acquired by the supply manager. And based on these date information, a use period can be calculated | required at the time of determining the reuse candidate mentioned later.

  The information on the usage environment is specifically information such as general office use, laboratory use, factory use, outdoor use, and general home use. That is, the degree of deterioration for each furniture part differs depending on the usage environment. For example, each furniture part is easily deteriorated by chemical components in the laboratory, and relatively easily deteriorated by dust, oil components, light, etc. in the factory and outdoors, and is used in general offices and homes. In some cases, it is difficult to deteriorate so much. Therefore, the reuse candidates to be described later are determined in consideration of these usage environments.

  Specifically, the information on the usage frequency is information such as a normal usage frequency in daytime work or the like, and an all-day three-change usage frequency. In other words, the actual use time differs between the case where it is mainly used only for daytime work and the case where it is used three times throughout the day, and the degree of deterioration of each furniture part is different. Therefore, the reuse candidate is determined in consideration of the frequency of use.

  In step S3, the used furniture is collected. That is, when the user determines that the furniture is unnecessary, or when the lease contract ends, the supply manager collects the furniture from the user.

  In step S4, it is determined whether or not each furniture part is a reuse candidate based on the usage status associated with each furniture part.

  In other words, the usage status associated with the furniture part includes information on the usage environment and information on the usage frequency in addition to information on the usage period. Therefore, the substantial usage equivalent period is obtained by adding information on the usage environment and information on the usage frequency to the usage period.

  To explain a specific example, a coefficient a that is empirically, experimentally, or reasonably determined according to the use environment during a period of use, and a coefficient b that is empirically, experimentally, or reasonably determined according to the use frequency. Multiply by to find the substantial usage equivalent period. For example, in the coefficient relating to the usage environment, a coefficient larger than 1 (for example, the value “2”) is set in advance as the coefficient a for use in a factory or outdoors, and the coefficient for use in an office or home. The value “1” is set in advance as a. In addition, for example, the value “1” is set in advance as the coefficient b in the case of normal use frequency, and the value “3” is set in advance as the coefficient b in the case of three-day use frequency. Then, the substantial use equivalent period is obtained by multiplying the use period by the coefficient a and the coefficient b corresponding to the use environment and use frequency.

  On the other hand, the service life is predetermined for each furniture component. This lifetime is also determined empirically, experimentally and speculatively.

  Then, it is determined whether or not to be a reuse candidate by comparing the substantial use equivalent period with the useful life. More specifically, when the substantial use equivalent period of the target furniture part is shorter than the durable period, or shorter than or less than the period obtained by subtracting a predetermined margin period from the durable period The furniture is a candidate for reuse.

  Note that it may be determined whether or not to make a reuse candidate by combining other conditions. For example, resin parts used in a laboratory can be assumed to be severely deteriorated by chemicals and the like, and may be disposed of regardless of the period of use.

  Note that reuse candidates may be determined based on only information relating to the usage period, excluding those determined to have been used for a predetermined period or longer. Further, in addition to the information about the usage period, only one of the information about the usage environment and the information about the usage frequency may be considered to determine the reuse candidate. In addition, reuse candidates may be determined in consideration of information on other usage conditions, for example, occupation types used and uses (shared desk or dedicated desk).

  In addition, after determining the reuse candidate based on the use situation as described above, a durability diagnosis inspection is performed on each candidate furniture part, and those determined to be rejected based on the inspection result Exclude from reuse candidates.

  Durability diagnostic tests include visual inspections such as dirt and tears, deformation state and color, load tests by applying loads to the extent that they do not break and deform, non-destructive tests using ultrasonic waves, radiation, sound, etc. Is called.

  Note that all or part of the durability diagnostic test may be omitted, or may be performed before the reuse candidate is determined based on the usage status.

  In step S5, each furniture part that has become a reuse candidate is used to provide reuse furniture by remodeling furniture or exchanging parts. That is, reuse furniture is manufactured by appropriately combining the furniture parts that are candidates for reuse, or reuse furniture is manufactured by combining each furniture part that is a candidate for reuse with new furniture parts. And these furniture is provided to a user as reuse furniture.

  When the furniture is used after this provision, the use status is managed for each furniture part again as in step S2. Then, after being reused (step S11) and recollected (step S3), in step S4, it is determined whether or not there is a reuse candidate for each furniture part, as described above. At this time, for each furniture part, based on the previous use situation, that is, the first use situation and the second use situation (for example, the second substantial use equivalent period in the first substantial use equivalent period). And then comparing this with the useful life) to determine whether it is a reuse candidate. At this time, since the usage situation is managed for each furniture part, even when multiple furniture parts are combined at the time of providing the first reuse furniture, an appropriate reuse candidate for each furniture part Judgment is made.

<3. Reuse furniture manufacturing management system>
Here, two configuration examples of the reuse furniture manufacturing management system will be described. The first is a system that unifies and manages usage status information, and the second is a system that stores and manages usage status individually on each furniture component side.

<3-1. First system configuration example>
FIG. 4 is a block diagram showing a first reuse furniture production management system used in carrying out the reuse furniture production method.

  The reuse furniture manufacturing management system includes a management computer device 30, an input unit 38, and a display unit 39.

  The input unit 38 is a device for inputting, to the management computer device 30, usage status information and an identification code in which the usage status of furniture parts is associated with the identification code. The input unit 38 may be a keyboard or the like directly connected to the management computer device 30, or may be a terminal device or the like connected via a communication network.

  The display unit 39 is a device that displays predetermined information based on the display output from the management computer device 30.

  The management computer device 30 is a general computer that includes a CPU, RAM, ROM, hard disk device, and the like, and executes various processes described below using a program stored in advance. The management computer device 30 includes a storage unit 32 that manages the usage status, and also functions as a registration management unit 34 and a reuse candidate determination unit 36.

  The storage unit 32 is configured by a hard disk device or the like, and here, is configured to be able to store usage status information.

  The registration management unit 34 stores the information input via the input unit 38 in the storage unit 32 as usage status information. In addition, when an identification code is input via the input unit 38, the reuse candidate determination unit 36 extracts a usage status corresponding to the input identification code from the usage status information stored in the storage unit 32. Then, based on the extracted usage status, it is determined whether or not each furniture part is a reuse candidate. Then, the determination result is displayed on the display unit 39. It should be noted that each function described above may be processed by different devices, such as the function as the reuse candidate determining unit 36 being executed by another computer device.

  FIG. 5 is a diagram illustrating an example of usage status information stored in the storage unit, and FIG. 6 is a diagram illustrating an example of a reuse candidate determination result.

  In the example shown in FIG. 5, for example, for the identification code (0000001), the use start date is “January 1, 2006”, the use frequency is “normal”, and the use environment is registered as “office work”. ing. In addition, for those having an identification code (ID) “0000002” or less, similarly, the use start date, use frequency (“normal”, “3 shifts”, etc.), use environment (“office work”, “factory”, "Laboratory", "Outdoor", etc.) are registered respectively. That is, the usage status information is stored in the storage unit 32 by inputting such information through the input unit 38.

  When the furniture part identification code (ID) is input via the input unit 38, the reuse candidate determination unit 36 uses the usage period during the usage period as described above based on the stored usage status information. Taking into account the information about the environment and the information about the usage frequency, whether or not to become each reuse candidate is determined and displayed on the display unit 39.

  For example, in the example shown in FIG. 6, identification codes (ID) “0000001”, “0000002”, and “0000005” are reuse candidates, and identification codes (0000003) and “0000004” are inappropriate as reuse candidates. It is displayed.

  Looking at this display, the worker or the like continues the process of step S5.

<3-2. Second system configuration example>
FIG. 5 is a block diagram showing a second reuse furniture production management system used in carrying out the reuse furniture production method.

  The reuse furniture manufacturing management system includes a reuse candidate determination computer device 40 and a tag device 46.

  The reuse candidate determination computer device 40 is a general computer including a CPU, a RAM, a ROM, a hard disk device, and the like, and executes various processes described below using a program stored in advance. The reuse candidate determination computer device 40 includes a reading processing unit 41 that writes and reads information to and from the tag device 46 and a function as a reuse candidate determination unit 42. The reuse candidate determination computer device 40 is connected to an input unit 43 such as a keyboard and a display unit 44.

  The tag device 46 includes a storage unit 47 and a control unit 48 that performs reading control of the storage unit 47. The storage unit 47 is a nonvolatile memory that stores information in a rewritable manner.

  The tag device 46 is configured to be detachably connectable to the reuse candidate determination computer device 40 via a wired or wireless input / output interface, and in a state where the tag device 46 is connected to the reuse candidate determination computer device 40, Information can be written and read by the reuse candidate determination computer device 40. Further, the tag device 46 has a small shape that can be attached to each furniture part so as to be inconspicuous, and is attached to each furniture part using an adhesive, screwing, an engagement structure, or the like.

  Then, when the usage status regarding the predetermined furniture part is input through the input unit 43, the usage status is written in the storage unit 47 of the tag device 46. Note that the usage status may be written to the tag device 46 by another dedicated writing device. In the tag device 46, furniture is provided, used, recovered, reused, and the like in a state of being integrated with a corresponding furniture component.

  When the furniture is collected, the usage status of the corresponding tag device 46 is read through the reading processing unit 41 for each furniture part. Then, when this usage status is given to the reuse candidate determination unit 42, the reuse candidate determination unit 42 performs information similar to the above-described information on the usage environment based on the stored usage status based on the stored usage status. In addition, it is determined whether or not to become a reuse candidate in consideration of information on the usage frequency, and is displayed on the display unit 44.

  Looking at this display, the worker or the like continues the process of step S5.

  According to the reuse furniture manufacturing method and the reuse furniture manufacturing management system configured as described above, the usage status is managed in association with each furniture component, and when the used furniture is collected, it is associated with each furniture component. Based on the usage status, it is decided whether or not to become a reuse candidate for each furniture part, and reuse furniture is provided using each furniture part that has become a reuse candidate. It is possible to appropriately and easily determine whether or not furniture can be reused for each furniture part based on the attached usage status.

  And, for example, by determining whether or not furniture can be reused for each furniture part, detailed parts and surface parts (for example, a member that covers the top plate part and the surface of the desk, a cloth material that covers the surface of the chair, etc.) ) Can be used over a long period of time for furniture parts (parts that become the framework of desks and chairs), which are the basic components of furniture.

  In addition, in this way, by determining whether furniture can be reused for each furniture part and using it for reuse for each furniture part, each furniture part can be used for a long time according to the usage situation It is possible to reduce the environmental load by suppressing the generation of waste, and to contribute to the formation of a recycling-oriented society, thereby contributing to the reduction of the environmental load and being friendly to the natural environment.

  In addition, in such a reuse furniture manufacturing method and reuse furniture manufacturing management system, it is assumed that it is determined whether or not it can be reused based on physical properties based on the usage situation associated with each furniture component. It has become. For example, it is premised on the determination based on the physical property that if the period of use is long, the deterioration is likely to occur, the frequency of use is high, and the degree of deterioration is different depending on the use environment. Therefore, it can be understood as a technical idea utilizing the laws of nature.

  In addition, when deciding whether or not to become a reuse candidate for each furniture part, a durability diagnosis inspection is performed on each furniture part, and the reuse candidate is determined to be rejected based on the inspection result Therefore, it is possible to manufacture more appropriate reuse furniture by individually judging the degree of deterioration of each furniture part and excluding inappropriate furniture individually.

  In addition, by including information on the usage period as the usage status that is the basis for determining whether or not to be a reuse candidate, it is possible to appropriately and easily determine whether or not each furniture part can be reused according to the usage period. be able to.

  Furthermore, as the usage status, in addition to information on the usage period, including at least one of information on usage environment and information on usage frequency, more appropriate judgment can be made in consideration of the usage environment and usage frequency. It can be carried out.

It is a perspective view which shows the desk which is an example of object furniture. It is a perspective view which shows the chair which is an example of object furniture. It is a figure which shows the flow of the whole manufacturing method of reuse furniture. It is a block diagram which shows the manufacturing management system of reuse furniture. It is a figure which shows an example of the usage condition information memorize | stored in a memory | storage part. It is a figure which shows an example of the reuse candidate determination result. It is a block diagram which shows the manufacturing management system of other reuse furniture.

Explanation of symbols

DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 10 Desk 12 Top plate part 14 Leg part 16 Curtain board part 20 Chair 30 Management computer apparatus 32 Storage part 34 Registration management part 36 Reuse candidate determination part 38 Input part 39 Display part 40 Reuse candidate determination computer apparatus 41 Reading processing part 42 Reuse candidate Determination unit 43 Input unit 44 Display unit 46 Tag device 47 Storage unit

Claims (8)

A reuse furniture manufacturing method for reusing furniture manufactured by combining a plurality of interchangeable furniture parts,
Managing each furniture part in association with the usage status;
Collecting used furniture; and
Determining whether or not to be a reuse candidate for each furniture part based on the usage situation associated with each furniture part;
Providing reuse furniture by using each of the furniture parts that are candidates for reuse;
A method for producing reused furniture. It is a manufacturing method of the reuse furniture of Claim 1, Comprising:
In the step of determining whether to become a reuse candidate for each furniture part,
A method for manufacturing reuse furniture, wherein a durability diagnosis test is performed on each of the furniture parts, and those determined to be unacceptable based on the inspection result are excluded from reuse candidates. A reuse furniture manufacturing method for reusing furniture manufactured by combining a plurality of interchangeable furniture parts,
Storing the usage status information in which the usage status is associated with the identification information given to each furniture part in the storage unit;
Inputting identification information given to each furniture part of the collected furniture into a computer device through an input unit;
The computer device extracts a usage status corresponding to the input identification code from usage status information stored in the storage unit, and becomes a reuse candidate for each furniture part based on the extracted usage status Determining whether or not,
A method for producing reused furniture. A reuse furniture manufacturing method for reusing furniture manufactured by combining a plurality of interchangeable furniture parts,
Storing the use status in the storage unit of the tag device attached to each furniture part;
The computer device reads the usage status stored in the storage unit of the tag device, and determines whether or not to become a reuse candidate for each furniture part based on the read usage status;
A method for producing reused furniture. It is a manufacturing method of the reuse furniture in any one of Claims 1-4,
The manufacturing method of reuse furniture including the information regarding a use period as said use condition. It is a manufacturing method of the reuse furniture in any one of Claims 1-4,
In addition to the information on the usage period, the usage status includes at least one of information on the usage environment and information on the usage frequency,
In consideration of at least one of information on use environment and information on use frequency in the use period, a substantial use equivalent period is obtained, and based on the substantial use equivalent period, a reuse candidate is determined for each furniture part. Reusable furniture manufacturing method that determines whether or not. A reuse furniture manufacturing management system for reusing furniture manufactured by combining a plurality of replaceable furniture parts,
A storage unit for storing usage status information in which the usage status is associated with the identification information given to each furniture part;
An input unit capable of inputting identification information given to each furniture part of the collected furniture;
The usage status corresponding to the input identification code is extracted from the usage status information stored in the storage unit, and it is determined whether or not each furniture part is a reuse candidate based on the extracted usage status A reuse candidate determination unit to
Reuse furniture manufacturing management system with. A reuse furniture manufacturing management system for reusing furniture manufactured by combining a plurality of replaceable furniture parts,
A tag device that is attached to each furniture part and has a storage unit that stores its use status;
A reading unit that reads the usage status stored in the storage unit of the tag device, and a reuse candidate determination unit that determines whether or not each furniture part is a reuse candidate based on the usage status read through the reading unit A reuse candidate determination computer device comprising:
Reuse furniture manufacturing management system with.

Images